Next Article in Journal
From Infection to Death: An Overview of the Pathogenesis of Visceral Leishmaniasis
Previous Article in Journal
Exposure to Biological Fluids in Dental Practice—Narrative Review on Appropriate Risk Assessment to Guide Post-Exposure Management
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/pathogens12070970
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Identification and Characterization of Fusarium Associated with Walnut Branch Blight Disease in China

by
Ting Ma
,
Chengde Yang
*,
Fengfeng Cai
and
Richard Osei
Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(7), 970; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070970
Submission received: 19 June 2023 / Revised: 12 July 2023 / Accepted: 12 July 2023 / Published: 24 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Fungal Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In October 2020, samples of walnut branch blight were collected from Longnan. Pathogens were isolated and identified based on morphological and molecular features, and their characteristics were analyzed by pathogenicity. Pathogenicity testing revealed that seven strains (LN-1, LN-3, LN-6, LN-19, LN-27, QY3-1, and QY9-1) induced symptoms of walnut branch blight that were consistent with those observed in the field after inoculation. Furthermore, some Fusarium-type conidia and spherical chlamydospores were visible indicating that they were Fusarium spp. A molecular characterization including sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the ITS, TEF-1α, βTUB, Fu, and LSU gene regions revealed that LN-1 and LN-19 belonged to F. avenaceum, LN-3 and LN-6 to F. acuminatum, LN-27 to F. sporotrichioides, and QY3-1 and QY9-1 to F. tricinctum. This is the first time that F. acuminatum-, F. sporotrichioides-, and F. tricinctum-caused walnut branch blight has been reported in China.

1. Introduction

The walnut (Juglans regia L.) is a valuable economic tree due to its nuts and wood. The walnut kernel, a rich source of several beneficial chemicals, contributes to more than 40% of the weight of the nuts [1,2]. Walnut plantations can provide significant economic and environmental benefits [3]. The walnut is presently grown commercially in Southern Europe, Northern Africa, Eastern Asia, the United States, Western South America, and China. China is the world’s greatest producer of walnuts [4], accounting for approximately 48% of global production [5]. Walnut, on the other hand, is commonly affected with a variety of diseases such as cankers, blights, anthracnose, dieback, and kernel decay [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Walnut branch blight (disease incidence of 3%) is widely documented to be a rising concern for walnut farmers in Gansu, Xinjiang, Henan, and other Chinese provinces, hurting fruit quality and output [6]. Walnut branch blight offers a possible danger to the further development of the walnut industry in China, although there is little precise information regarding the incidence of walnut branch blight and the pathogen diversity in China.
At least 10 species of pathogens are known to cause diseases in walnut worldwide, including Colletotrichum godetiae [7], Botryosphaeriaceae and Diaporthaceae species [8,9,10], Cytospora atrocirrhata, Colletotrichum chrysosperma, Colletotrichum gigalocus, Colletotrichum nivea, Colletotrichum sacculus [11,12], Boeremia exigua [13], Fusarium solani [14], Fusarium incarnatum [15], and Fusarium semitectum [16]. However, Fusarium is rarely reported on walnut branch blight. Fusarium, a soilborne fungal genus with a large host range and significant economic relevance as a plant pathogen, comprises a large number of morphologically and phylogenetically different, widely distributed fungal species [17,18]. Traditionally, Fusarium species were recognized based on colony morphology, conidial morphology such as macro- and microconidia size and shape, and other phenotypic characteristics such as the presence and placement of chlamydospores (intercalary or terminal) [17,19]. Fusarium species established using phylogenetic procedures are also exceedingly difficult to identify using solely traditional morphological criteria. For detecting and discriminating closely related Fusarium species, molecular-based techniques have proven particularly effective [20]. Sequences from the nuclear ribosomal DNA’s internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region are commonly employed in phylogenetic investigations of numerous fungi. The ITS region has not been commonly employed in phylogenetic analyses of Fusarium and allied fungi since the revelation that species in the Fusarium fujikuroi and Fusarium oxysporum species complexes contain non-orthologous copies of the ITS2, which can lead to inaccurate phylogenetic results [21]. The β-tubulin (βTUB) [21,22] and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1-α) nuclear genes [23,24] have been effectively employed to differentiate a variety of species within the Fusarium genus.
Studies on etiology are essential for a good disease diagnosis to develop future research on the epidemiology and control of the disease. Therefore, this study used a polyphasic strategy that incorporated morphological features and multi-gene phylogenetic analysis to identify pathogens causing walnut branch blight in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of Fungal Cultures

Walnut branch blight, which develops in 1–2-year-old shoots, was identified in 2020 in Longnan City, Gansu Province. Symptoms of the disease were fusiform or oval black lesions that gradually developed and extended on the branches, blight and dieback of branches, reddish-brown dead branch bark with plenty of yellow tiny dots (sporodochium), and defoliation. In October 2020, 30 branches with typical symptoms (Figure 1) were collected from the LinYuan family farm walnut orchard in Longnan City, Gansu Province, China. A stereomicroscope was used to investigate the fungal structures on the lesions with the bark layer.
To isolate the pathogen, walnut branches were washed with tap water and dried. Branch segments (3 × 3 mm) were removed and surface-sterilized for 45 s with 75% ethanol, encompassing the margin of a lesion and nearby asymptomatic tissues. After three washes with sterile distilled water, samples were plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) and cultured at 25 °C for 5 days.

2.2. Morphological Identification

Single hyphal tips from Fusarium species colonies with typical growth characteristics were transferred to fresh PDA and cultured to obtain pure cultures. The strains were cultured for 5 days at 25 °C on PDA, and the texture, border, color, and other properties of the colonies were noted. After 15 days, the size of the conidia was measured. Using a No.333 light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Suzhou, China), 50 conidia and 50 chlamydospores were photographed and measured. Structures were measured using light microscopy with 40× and 100× objective lenses.

2.3. Pathogenicity Tests

The representative strains from all identified Fusarium species were tested for pathogenicity on walnut branches (approximately 15 cm long and 1 cm in diameter). First, in vitro pathogenicity tests were performed on healthy 1-year-old branches of walnut “QingXiang” in the field. Walnut branches were surface-disinfected with 70% ethanol before being punctured gently with a sterilized insect needle (No. 5) to generate a wound (about 1 mm). The strains were planted on PDA plates and cultured for 5 days at 25 °C before spraying 300 μL of their spore suspensions (1.0 × 106 CFU/mL) over the wounded plant tissue [25]. As a negative control, sterile water was used. To retain moisture, all treated branches were placed in transparent plastic boxes with lids containing wet sterile filter paper. The same method described above was used to perform in vivo pathogenicity tests on 2-year-old tree-detached branches. They were also kept in an artificial climate chamber (25 ± 1 °C and humidity 100%). The symptoms were examined and photographed using a digital camera (SONY DSC-T20, Tokyo, Japan) regularly. To confirm Koch’s postulates, the strains were re-isolated from inoculated branches and pathogenicity tests were performed on healthy branches. Each test was performed in triplicate.

2.4. DNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification, and DNA Sequencing

Using the E.Z.N.A.TM HP Fungal DNA Kit (Omega, Shanghai, China), genomic DNA was extracted from strains of hyphae scraped from PDA cultures (5 days old) and stored at −20 °C.
The internal transcribed spacer (ITS), translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF-1α), β-tubulin (βTUB), Fu (a pair of genus-specific primer Fu3/Fu4 for Fusarium was designed, based on 18S rDNA and internal transcribed spacer ITS2 sequence), and large subunit rDNA (LSU) genes were amplified using ITS1/ITS4 primers [26], TEF1αF/TEF1αR primers [20], btαa/btαb primers [27], Fu3/Fu4 [28], and LR0R/LR5 [29], respectively. PCR was performed on a thermal cycler (Model A37028; Shanghai, China) in a 25 μL volume including 1 μL of DNA template, 1 μL of each primer, 12.5 μL of 2× Easy TaqPCR Super Mix, and 9.5 μL of ddH2O (Qingke Biotech, Xi’an, China). However, five different genes were amplified under different conditions. The amplified condition for the ITS was 30 s initial denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final elongation step of 2 min at 72 °C; and the condition for the other genes were similar to that of the ITS except for annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and cycling of 35 times of the TEF-1α, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s and cycling of 34 times of the βTUB, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s and cycling of 33 times of the Fu, and annealing at 48 °C for 30 s and cycling of 35 times of the LSU, respectively. Qingke Biotech (Shaanxi, China) visualised the PCR amplification results on 1% agarose gels and sequenced the amplicons three times. The sequences were entered into the GenBank database.

2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

The sequences were BLASTed against Genbank database by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; Accessed on 20 June 2021) nucleotide database. The gene sequences were aligned with homologous sequences from GenBank using the multiple sequence alignment programme (ClustalX 2.0). Ambiguously aligned characters and gaps were removed using default settings. Sequences of closely related Fusarium spp. strains were obtained from GenBank to construct datasets for phylogenetic analysis.
GenBank sequences were added to the sequences obtained, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with multi-gene phylogenetic analysis using MEGA11.0 and the maximum likelihood analysis with 1000 bootstrap replications. Values greater than 50% are displayed.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation of Fungi

A total of 30 fungal colonies were isolated from the infected branches based on the colony characteristics that formed on PDA plates 5 days after inoculation. These included eight strains of Boeremia spp., six strains of Alternaria alternata, fourteen strains of Fusarium, and two strains of Melanconium oblongum, and the isolation frequency was 26.7%, 20%, 46.7%, and 6.7% each, respectively. The morphological and cultural characteristics of the strains on PDA plates, with curved conidia and single chlamydospores, which were similar to the morphology of strains isolated directly from typical symptoms of branch blight, led to the initial identification of seven fungal strains as Fusarium spp. in this current study. As a result, the strains were given the names LN-1, LN-3, LN-6, LN-19, LN-27, QY3-1, and QY9-1, and were used for further study.
This is a preliminary study and further investigation is required to determine if these Fusarium species are found in other parts of the Gansu province.

3.2. Morphological and Cultural Characteristics

Seven strains are maintained as culture collections in the laboratory of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria and Bacterial Diversity, College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University. On PDA, fungal colonies grew up to 80 mm in diameter within 7 days at 25°C. LN-1 and LN-19 developed rich white colonies that were densely packed with hyphae. LN-3 and LN-6 colonies grew quickly and changed from white to orange. LN-27 grew quickly, with white flocculence that finally became yellow. QY3-1 and QY9-1 have yellow-brown centers and pink-to-white edges, with dark red pigments in the agar (Figure 2). After 15 d of incubation on PDA at 25 °C in darkness, conidia were seen under a microscope. Tested strains produced three types of spores: macroconidia (Figure 3a), microconidia (Figure 3b), and chlamydospores (Figure 3c). The macroconidia were sickle-shaped, with three to five septa, the majority of which had three septa, whereas the microconidia were ellipsoid to fusoid, with zero to one septum, the majority of which had one septum (Table 1). The chlamydospores appeared to be spherical, intercalary, and formed in chains with a smooth exine in the cultures. Conidiogenous cells are hyaline and bottle-shaped, with more polyphialide open ends from which conidia are generated while the length of the phialide remains constant (Figure 3d). Based on these morphological characteristics, the strains were identified as Fusarium spp.
Based on morphological similarities with previous descriptions of the colony, conidiogenous cell, conidia, and chlamydospores [30], the strains were provisionally classified as Fusarium spp.

3.3. Pathogenicity Tests

All strains tested were able to induce lesions on the inoculated walnut branches after inoculation in laboratory conditions (Figure 4). The inoculated plants developed branch blight symptoms 3 days later, with dark brown to black and depressed lesions 5 days later. As expected, the symptoms around the wound progressed from dark gray to reddish-brown, with some yellow spots forming on the uneven lesions. The expressed symptoms were typical for walnut branch blight, as described. Non-inoculated branches remained symptomless under identical conditions. The fungus successfully re-isolated from diseased walnut branch tissues and was reidentified as Fusarium spp. based on its morphological and molecular characteristics, confirming Koch’s postulates (Figure S1). The results showed that the seven strains caused the symptoms of walnut branch blight.

3.4. Molecular Identification

In PCR analysis, fragments of 530, 680, 300, 570, and 900 bp from ITS, TEF-1α, βTUB, Fu, and LSU genes were amplified in all tested strains. To identify fungal species in these strains, PCR products were sequenced, and the sequences were then deposited in the NCBI database (Table 2). The ITS, TEF-1α, and βTUB sequences of LN-1 (GenBank accession numbers: MT239572, MT276173, and MT276177) and LN-19 (GenBank accession numbers: MT239575, MT276176, and MT276180) shared a 100%, 99.7%, and 98.73%, and 100%, 99.71%, and 99.68% identity with the corresponding sequences of F. avenaceum (GenBank accession numbers: MN522841, MG670380, and KU852602, and MN186746, MK111429, and KP170733), respectively. A multilocus phylogenetic tree of F. avenaceum was constructed, and the results revealed that the grouping of strains LN-1 and LN-19 were supported by a 100% bootstrap value (Figure 5a). The ITS, TEF-1α, and βTUB sequences of LN-3 (GenBank accession numbers: MT239573, MT276174, and MT276178) and LN-6 (GenBank accession numbers: MT239574, MT276175, and MT276179) had a 100% identity with F. acuminatum (GenBank accession numbers: KR051403, MG826892, and KX880329, and KR047059, JX397865, and MH341246), respectively. A multilocus phylogenetic tree of F. acuminatum was constructed, and the results revealed that the grouping of strains LN-3 and LN-6 were supported by a 97% bootstrap value (Figure 5b). The ITS, TEF-1α, and Fu sequences of LN-27 (GenBank accession numbers: MT921794 and MW517798) had a 99%, 87%, and 90% identity with F. sporotrichioides (GenBank accession numbers: MT921794, MH582265, and MT921794), respectively. A multilocus phylogenetic tree of F. sporotrichioides was constructed, and the results indicated that the grouping of strain LN-27 was supported by a 96% bootstrap value (Figure 5c). Furthermore, the ITS and LSU sequences of QY3-1 (GenBank accession numbers: MZ571930 and MZ572963) and QY9-1 (GenBank accession numbers: MZ571931 and MZ572964) shared a 98.76%, 100%, and 100% identity with F. tricinctum (GeneBank accession numbers: MN856343.1, KT224255.1, and MH868113.1), respectively. A multilocus phylogenetic tree of F. tricinctum was constructed, and the results revealed that the grouping of strains QY3-1 and QY9-1 was supported by a 100% bootstrap value (Figure 5d).

4. Discussion

A variety of fungal diseases affect the walnut tree, severely reducing walnut output. Previous research found that walnut branch blight is caused by a variety of pathogens, the most common of which was Botryosphaeriaceae, Cytospora, and Diaporthe. Botryosphaeriaceae fungi have been identified in major walnut-producing countries such as Southern Spain [6,8], the United States [8,10], China [9], Iran [31], Turkey [32], Chile [33], and the Czech Republic [34]. This research, on the other hand, describes Fusarium pathogens of walnut branch blight in Longnan, China. Many Fusarium species are well-known plant pathogens that may also operate as secondary invaders, and many of these species produced mycotoxins that can contaminate cereal grains [35]. Similarly, Fusarium species, as well as members of newly segregated and closely related genera such as Bisifusarium and Neocosmospora [36], are recognised pathogens of deadly animal and human diseases [18,29]. The morphological flexibility of Fusarium species is widely documented. Thus, for convincing species identification, consistent culture media and methods, as well as multi-locus molecular data, are now required [37]. The shape and development of chlamydospores, the presence or absence of sporodochia, and the type of macro- and microconidia are all relevant morphological characteristics [17]. Fusarium species have traditionally been recognized using morphological characteristics and pathogenicity tests [17]. Many studies have also shown that the morphological characteristics of Fusarium strains are rarely stable within a species [17]. DNA sequence analysis for species identification has gained popularity since early 2000 [38]. The most commonly used sequences to distinguish Fusarium spp. are portions of genomic sequences encoding translation elongation factor-1α (TEF-1α) [39], β-tubulin (βTUB) [40], calmodulin (CAL) [24], the intergenic spacer region (IGS) [41], DNA-directed RNA polymerase II largest (RPB1), and second-largest subunit (RPB2) [20,38]. PCR can be used to identify Fusarium species, either as an alternative or addition to morphological identification. It has been shown to be effective for identifying Fusarium species [42,43,44]. Species–specific primers have been designed and used for PCR detection and the screening of F. graminearum [45], F. pseudograminearum [46], F. acuminatum [47], F. avenaceum [45], F. crookwellense [48], F. equiseti [49], F. poae [50], and F. tricinctum [51]. Despite the fact that some writers suggest that PCR may be used for the routine detection and identification of Fusarium species without the necessity for isolation and morphological analysis of this fungus [52], others disagree. This study compared and analyzed the sequences in GenBank, reconstructed the phylogenetic tree, defined the species name from the perspective of molecular phylogeny according to the branch unit where the strain is located, and used dual methods to identify walnut branch blight, ensuring accuracy, convenience, and reliability. Combining the results of morphological and molecular evidence, it is possible to infer that strains LN-1 and LN-19 are F. avenaceum, strains LN-3 and LN-6 are F. acuminatum, strain LN-27 is F. sporotrichioides, and strains QY3-1 and QY9-1 are F. tricinctum.
In general, the environment is important in plant pathogen infection [53]. Most studies agree that disease epidemics are influenced by climate, notably, rainfall, humidity, and dew; nevertheless, constant high-humidity conditions might favour the rapid development and spread of walnut branch blight [54]. This life cycle should be used to determine the critical moments with respect to the infection of the pathogens to carry out effective management strategies against the disease. The results of two pathogenicity tests showed that the higher severity of branch blight in the detached leaf assay compared to in vivo clearly indicated that the high humidity and other environmental conditions promoting microbial growth under controlled conditions enhanced blight infection [53]. In addition, our experiment discovered that the symptoms of disease were similar to those of walnut branches under natural conditions, but pathogens were more likely to infect the young shoots of walnuts through wounds than the perennial mature branches, compared to the symptom of the onset and the adult stage of the shoots. Because of walnut trees’ long juvenility period and the complexity of environmental conditions [55], there are differences in the symptoms of walnut branches under natural conditions, which may be related to the differences in the degree of lignification of the branches, the thickness of the cortex, and the growth potential, and more research is needed to determine this. Fusarium is mostly identified using morphological methods; however, its culture characteristics are readily influenced by environmental changes, making morphological identification challenging. By understanding the diversity of Fusarium species associated with the disease, we will be able to pursue studies on biology, epidemiology, and control to establish optimum management strategies to prevent infections. The occurrence of walnut branch blight has reduced the yield and quality of walnut, which has affected the planting area in Longnan. This study provides a theoretical basis for future research into the prevention of the branch blight disease of walnut. To further understand the epidemiology of the branch blight disease, more knowledge on Fusarium spp. biology and interactions with hosts is required. These findings will aid in the diagnosis of walnut branch blight as well as the development of effective management measures in response to the advent of novel diseases.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the fungus Fusarium of a shoot blight disease of walnut was investigated in China. Because the incidence of walnut disease in this area has increased in recent years, the aim of this study was to isolate and identify the causal pathogens of walnut branch blight in China using morphology- and molecular-based methods to provide a consistent diagnosis. F. avenaceum was previously identified as the causative agent of the brown apical necrosis disease of walnut in Hubei, China [56]. This is the first time that F. acuminatum-, F. sporotrichioides-, and F. tricinctum-caused walnut branch blight has been reported in China.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12070970/s1, Figure S1: Cultural characteristic of Fusarium spp. reisolated (left, upper view; right, dorsal view). a: LN-1. b: LN-19. c: LN-3. d: LN-6. e: LN-27, f: QY3-1, g: QY9-1.

Author Contributions

T.M.: methodology, formal analysis, and writing—original draft. C.Y.: resources, validation, and writing—review and editing. F.C.: software and data curation. R.O.: Software. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the colleagues of Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bolling, B.W.; McKay, D.L.; Blumberg, J.B. The phytochemical composition and antioxidant actions of tree nuts. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 19, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gharibzahedi, S.M.T.; Mousavi, S.M.; Hamedi, M.; Khodaiyan, F. Determination and characterization of kernel biochemical composition and functional compounds of Persian walnut oil. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bernard, A.; Lheureux, F.; Dirlewanger, E. Walnut: Past and future of genetic improvement. Tree Genet. Genomes 2018, 14, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Vahdati, K.; Arab, M.M.; Sarikhani, S.; Sadat-Hosseini, M.; Leslie, C.A.; Brown, P.J. Advances in Persian Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Breeding Strategies. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Nut and Beverage Crops; Al-Khayri, J., Jain, S., Johnson, D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shen, D.; Wu, S.; Zheng, Y. Characterization of iron walnut in different regions of China based on phytochemical composition. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 58, 1358–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. López-Moral, A.; Lovera, M.; del Carmen Raya, M.; Cortés-Cosano, N.; Arquero, O.; Trapero, A.; Agustí-Brisach, C. Etiology of Branch Dieback and Shoot Blight of English Walnut Caused by Botryosphaeriaceae and Diaporthe Species in Southern Spain. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 533–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Varjas, V.; Lakatos, T.; Tóth, T.; Kovács, C. First Report of Colletotrichum godetiae Causing Anthracnose and Twig Blight on Persian Walnut in Hungary. Plant Dis. 2020, 105, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, S.F.; Morgan, D.P.; Hasey, J.K.; Anderson, K.; Michailides, T.J. Phylogeny, morphology, distribution, and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae and Diaporthaceae from English walnut in California. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 636–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Li, G.Q.; Liu, F.F.; Li, J.Q.; Liu, Q.L.; Chen, S.F. Characterization of Botryosphaeria dothidea and Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae from English walnut in China. J. Phytopathol. 2015, 164, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Michailides, T.J.; Hasey, J. Botryosphaeria and Phomopsis Cankers of Walnuts in California. Walnut Husk Fly Field Meeting; University of California Cooperative Extension: Half Moon Bay, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fan, X.L.; Hyde, K.D.; Liu, M.; Liang, Y.M.; Tian, C.M. Cytospora species associated with walnut canker disease in China, with description of a new species C. gigalocus. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, S.Z.; Guo, K.F.; He, L.; Yiming, A. First report of Cytospora nivea causing Cytospora canker on walnut (Juglans regia L.) in the Tianshan Mountains Region of Xinjiang, China. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cai, F.F.; Yang, C.D.; Ma, T.; Jin, M.J.; Cui, L.X. First Report of Boeremia exigua var. exigua Causing Branch Blight on Walnut in China. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mulero-Aparicio, A.; Agustí-Brisach, C.; del Carmen Raya, M.; Lovera, M.; Arquero, O.; Trapero, A. First Report of Fusarium solani Causing Stem Canker in English Walnut in Spain. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, B.; Kalha, C.S.; Razdan, V.K.; Verma, V.S. First Report of Walnut Canker Caused by Fusarium incarnatum from India. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Belisario Luongo, L.; Vitale, S.; Santori, A. First Report of Fusarium semitectum as the Agent of Twig Cankers on Persian (English) Walnut in Italy. Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Leslie, J.F.; Summerell, B.A. (Eds.) The Fusarium Laboratory Manual; Blackwell: Ames, IA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aoki, T.; O’Donnell, K.; Geiser, D.M. Systematics of key phytopathogenic Fusarium species: Current status and future challenges. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2014, 80, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nelson, P.E.; Dignani, M.C.; Anaissie, E.J. Taxonomy, biology, and clinical aspects of Fusarium species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 7, 479–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Geiser, D.M.; Jiménez-Gasco, M.D.M.; Kang, S.; Makalowska, L.; Veeraraghava, N.; Ward, T.J. Fusarium-ID v. 1.0: A DNA sequence database for identifying Fusarium. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. O’Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1997, 7, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yli-Mattila, T.; Paavanen-Huhtala, S.; Bulat, S.A.; Alekhina, I.A.; Nirenberg, H.I. Molecular, morphological and phylogenetic analysis of the Fusarium avenaceum/F. arthrosporioides/F. tricinctum species complex—A polyphasic approach. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 655–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Knutsen, A.K.; Torp, M.; Holst-Jensen, A. Phylogenetic analyses of the Fusarium poae, Fusarium sporotrichioides and Fusarium langsethiae species complex based on partial sequences of the translation elongation factor-1 alpha gene. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 95, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. O’Donnell, K.; Nirenberg, H.I.; Aoki, T.; Cigelnik, E. A multigene phylogeny of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex: Detection of additional phylogenetically distinct species. Mycoscience 2000, 41, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, T.; Yang, C.D.; Cai, F.F.; Chen, Z.H. Morpho-cultural, physiological and molecular characterisation of Colletotrichum nymphaeae causing anthracnose disease of walnut in China. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 166, 105537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dubey, S.C.; Priyanka, K.; Singh, V. Phylogenetic relationship between different race representative populations of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris in respect of translation elongation factor-1α, β-tubulin, and internal transcribed spacer region genes. Arch. Microbiol. 2014, 196, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, X.Y.; Liu, X.M. PCR technique for rapid screening of fusarium verticillioides. Chin. J. Food Hyg. 2005, 2, 145–150. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Donnell, K.; Sutton, D.A.; Rinaldi, M.G.; Sarver, B.A.J.; Arunmozhi Balajee, S.; Schroers, H.J.; Summerbell, R.C.; Robert, V.A.R.G.; Crous, P.W.; Zhang, N.; et al. Internet-accessible DNA sequence database for identifying fusaria from human and animal infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 3708–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. O’Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E.; Casper, H.H. Molecular phylogenetic, morphological, and mycotoxin data support reidentification of the Quorn mycoprotein fungus as Fusarium venenatum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 1998, 23, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sohrabi, M.; Mohammadi, H.; León, M.; Armengol, J.; Banihashemi, Z. Fungal pathogens associated with branch and trunk cankers of nut crops in Iran. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 157, 327–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kara, M.; Soylu, E.M.; Soylu, S.; Uysal, A.; Kurt, Ş. First report of Neofusicoccum parvum causing branch dieback on Juglans regia in Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 103, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Díaz, G.A.; Latorre, B.A.; Ferrada, E.; Gutiérrez, M.; Bravo, F.; Lolas, M. First report of Diplodia mutila causing branch dieback of English walnut cv. Chandler in the Maule Region, Chile. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Eichmeier, A.; Pecenka, J.; Spetik, M.; Necas, T.; Ondrasek, I.; Armengol, J.; León, M.; Berlanas, C.; Gramaje, D. Fungal trunk pathogens associated with Juglans regia in the Czech Republic. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bhat, R.; Ravishankar, V.R.; Karim, A.A. Mycotoxins in food and feed: Present status and future concerns. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 57–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sandoval-Denis, M.; Crous, P.W. Removing chaos from confusion: Assigning names to common human and animal pathogens in Neocosmospora. Persoonia 2018, 41, 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. O’Donnell, K.; Sutton, D.A.; Rinaldi, M.G.; Gueidan, C.; Crous, P.W.; Geiser, D.M. Novel multilocus sequence typing scheme reveals high genetic diversity of human pathogenic members of the Fusarium incarnatum-F. equiseti and F. chlamydosporum species complexes within the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 3851–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Visentin, I.; Valentino, D.; Cardinale, F.; Tamietti, G. DNA-based tools for the detection of Fusarium spp. pathogenic on maize. In Molecular Identification of Fungi; Gherbawy, Y., Voigt, K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 107–129. ISBN 978-3-64205-042-8. [Google Scholar]
  39. Divakara, S.T.; Santosh, P.; Aiyaz, M.; Ramana, M.V.; Hariprasad, P.; Nayaka, S.C.; Niranjana, S.R. Molecular identification and characterization of Fusarium spp. associated with sorghum seeds. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 2014, 94, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. O’Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E.; Nirenberg, H.I. Molecular systematic and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 1998, 90, 465–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yli-Mattila, T.; Gagkaeva, T. Molecular chemotyping of Fusarium graminearum, F. culmorum and F. cerealis isolates from Finland and Russia. In Molecular Identification of Fungi; Gherbawy, Y., Voigt, K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; ISBN 978-3-642-05041-1. [Google Scholar]
  42. Demeke, T.; Clear, R.M.; Patrick, S.K.; Gaba, D. Species-specific PCR-based assays for the detection of Fusarium species and a comparison with the whole seed agar plate method and trichothecene analysis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 103, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yli-Mattila, T.; Paavanen-Huhtala, S.; Parikka, P.; Konstantinova, P.; Gagkaeva, T.Y. Molecular and morphological diversity of Fusarium species in Finland and north-western Russia. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rahjoo, V.; Zad, J.; Javan-Nikkhah, M.; Mirzadi Gohari, A.; Okhovvat, S.M.; Bihamta, M.R. Morphological and molecular identification of Fusarium isolated from maize ears in Iran. J. Plant Pathol. 2008, 90, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Waalwijk, C.; Kastelein, P.; Vries, I.D.; Kerenyi, Z.; Lee, T.V.D.; Hasselink, T. Major changes in Fusarium spp. in wheat in the Netherlands. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 109, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aoki, T.; O’Donnell, K. Morphological and molecular characterization of Fusarium pseudograminearum sp. nov., formerly recognized as the Group 1 population of F. graminearum. Mycologia 1999, 91, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Williams, K.J.; Dennis, J.I.; Smyl, C.; Wallwork, H. The application of species-specific assays based on the polymerase chain reaction to analyze Fusarium crown rot of durum wheat. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2002, 31, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yoder, W.T.; Christianson, L.M. Species-specific primers resolve members of Fusarium section Fusarium. Fungal Genet. Biol. 1998, 23, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mishra, P.K.; Fox, R.T.V.; Culham, A. Development of a PCR-based assay for rapid and reliable identification of pathogenic Fusaria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 218, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Parry, D.W.; Nicholson, P. Development of PCR assay to detect Fusarium poae in wheat. Plant Pathol. 1996, 45, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aktaruzzaman, M.; Afroz, T.; Lee, Y.G. Morphological and molecular characterization of Fusarium tricinctum causing post-harvest fruit rot of pumpkin in Korea. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2018, 84, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koncz, Z.; Huszti, K.; Naár, Z.; Kiss, A.; Szécsi, Á. PCR identification of Fusarium graminearum isolated from wheat grain. Cereal Res. Commun. 2008, 36, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Garrett, K.A.; Dendy, S.; Frank, E.; Rouse, M.; Travers, S. Climate change effects on plant disease: Genomes to ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 489–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Belisario, A.; Zoina, A. Occurrence of Persian (English) walnut blight and its control in the nursery. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1995, 25, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiang, S.; Han, S.; He, D. Evaluating Walnut (Juglans spp.) for resistance to walnut blight and comparisons between artificial inoculation assays and field studies. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2019, 48, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Y.X.; Chen, J.Y.; Xu, X.W.; Li, D.W.; Wang, Q.Z. First Report of Brown Apical Necrosis of Walnut Fruit Caused by Fusarium avenaceum in Hubei, China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 12 00970 g001 550
Figure 1. Epidermal symptoms of walnut branch blight: (a) withered and irregularly cracked, (b) dense yellow dots.
Figure 1. Epidermal symptoms of walnut branch blight: (a) withered and irregularly cracked, (b) dense yellow dots.
Pathogens 12 00970 g001
Pathogens 12 00970 g002a 550Pathogens 12 00970 g002b 550
Figure 2. Cultural characteristic of Fusarium spp. growth on PDA plate for 5 days (left, upper view; right, dorsal view): (a): LN-1; (b): LN-19; (c): LN-3; (d): LN-6; (e): LN-27; (f): QY3-1; (g): QY9-1.
Figure 2. Cultural characteristic of Fusarium spp. growth on PDA plate for 5 days (left, upper view; right, dorsal view): (a): LN-1; (b): LN-19; (c): LN-3; (d): LN-6; (e): LN-27; (f): QY3-1; (g): QY9-1.
Pathogens 12 00970 g002aPathogens 12 00970 g002b
Pathogens 12 00970 g003a 550Pathogens 12 00970 g003b 550
Figure 3. The conidia, chlamydospores, and conidiogenous cell of Fusarium species: (1) macroconidia; (2) microconidia; (3) chlamydospores; (4) conidiogenous cell; (a–g): the pathogens LN-1, LN-19, LN-3, LN-6, LN-27, QY3-1, and QY9-1.
Figure 3. The conidia, chlamydospores, and conidiogenous cell of Fusarium species: (1) macroconidia; (2) microconidia; (3) chlamydospores; (4) conidiogenous cell; (a–g): the pathogens LN-1, LN-19, LN-3, LN-6, LN-27, QY3-1, and QY9-1.
Pathogens 12 00970 g003aPathogens 12 00970 g003b
Pathogens 12 00970 g004 550
Figure 4. Pathogenicity test of Fusarium species: (1) in vitro (branch segment on agar); (2) in planta (branch attached to tree); (a1–h1): the vitro pathogenicity of the pathogen LN-1, LN-19, LN-3, LN-6, LN-27, QY3-1, QY9-1, and CK; (a2–h2): the planta pathogenicity of the pathogen LN-1, LN-19, LN-3, LN-6, LN-27, QY3-1, QY9-1, and CK.
Figure 4. Pathogenicity test of Fusarium species: (1) in vitro (branch segment on agar); (2) in planta (branch attached to tree); (a1–h1): the vitro pathogenicity of the pathogen LN-1, LN-19, LN-3, LN-6, LN-27, QY3-1, QY9-1, and CK; (a2–h2): the planta pathogenicity of the pathogen LN-1, LN-19, LN-3, LN-6, LN-27, QY3-1, QY9-1, and CK.
Pathogens 12 00970 g004
Pathogens 12 00970 g005a 550Pathogens 12 00970 g005b 550
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Fusarium based on a combined five-gene data set (ITS, TEF-1α, βTUB, Fu, and LSU) of the MEGA 11.0 program. Values above nodes are bootstrap values obtained from 1000 replicates. Values greater than 50% are displayed. (a) F. avenaceum; (b): F. acuminatum; (c): F. sporotrichioides; (d): F. tricinctum. Combining obtained results of morphological identification and molecular characterization, it can be concluded that all strains belong to F. avenaceum, F. acuminatum, F. sporotrichioides, and F. tricinctum, respectively.
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of Fusarium based on a combined five-gene data set (ITS, TEF-1α, βTUB, Fu, and LSU) of the MEGA 11.0 program. Values above nodes are bootstrap values obtained from 1000 replicates. Values greater than 50% are displayed. (a) F. avenaceum; (b): F. acuminatum; (c): F. sporotrichioides; (d): F. tricinctum. Combining obtained results of morphological identification and molecular characterization, it can be concluded that all strains belong to F. avenaceum, F. acuminatum, F. sporotrichioides, and F. tricinctum, respectively.
Pathogens 12 00970 g005aPathogens 12 00970 g005b
Table
Table 1. The sizes of conidia and chlamydospores of Fusarium.
Table 1. The sizes of conidia and chlamydospores of Fusarium.
Fusarium
Species		F. avenaceumF.acuminatumF. sporotrichioidesF. tricinctum
IsolatesLN-1LN-19LN-3LN-6LN-27QY3-1QY9-1
MacroconidiaSize a (mm)33.3 ~ 83.2 × 7.3 ~ 12.732.6 ~ 67.0 × 7.3 ~ 15.033.5 ~ 54.0 × 8.8 ~ 13.740.2 ~ 61.1 × 8.2 ~ 13.714.9 ~ 28.7 × 3.2 ~ 8.820.1 ~ 37.6 × 2.9 ~ 6.420.2 ~ 31.1 × 3.4 ~ 7.0
n = 50Mean b (mm)48.7 (± 14.3 c) ~ 10.6 (±1.4)54.2 (±8.5) ~ 10.4 (±1.7)42.4 (±6.5) ~ 11.4 (±1.5)47.5 (±5.8) ~ 11.1 (±1.3)22.1 (±3.7) ~ 5.2 (±1.0)27.1 (± 4.1) ~ 4.7 (±0.7)25.5 (±2.9) ~ 5.0 (±0.7)
MicroconidiaSize (mm)7.4 ~ 15.6 × 2.3 ~ 3.67.3 ~ 14.6 × 2.0 ~ 4.36.9 ~ 15.5 × 2.2 ~ 4.97.0 ~ 13.7 × 1.5 ~ 4.36.3 ~ 14.1 × 1.7 ~ 4.95.9 ~ 18.0 × 1.7 ~ 4.910.1 ~ 20.5 × 2.1 ~ 6.8
n = 50Mean (mm)9.9 (±2.1) ~ 2.8 (±0.3)11.3 (±1.9) ~ 3.0 (±0.6)10.0 (±1.8) ~ 2.9 (±0.6)11.0 (±1.8) ~ 3.5 (±0.5)9.7 (±1.8) ~ 3.0 (±0.7)11.9 (±3.0) ~ 3.0 (±0.5)13.8 (±2.5) ~ 3.5 (±0.6)
ChlamydosporesSize (mm)7.3 ~ 17.6 × 6.0 ~ 14.012.1 ~ 20.4 × 7.4 ~ 15.77.0 ~ 17.3 × 5.3 ~ 15.99.0 ~ 20.3 × 5.7 ~ 14.87.0 ~ 16.2 × 5.0 ~ 14.511.9 ~ 27.6 × 8.5 ~ 19.010.6 ~ 24.4 × 7.3 ~ 18.2
n = 50Mean (mm)8.9 (±2.2) ~ 12.7 (±1.9)10.9 (±1.9) ~ 15.9 (±1.9)9.1 (±2.4) ~ 11.8 (±2.2)8.9 (±2.6) ~ 11.9 (±2.4)9.9 (±2.6) ~ 7.3 (±2.3)17.7 (±3.7) ~ 12.5 (±2.7)16.7 (±3.1) ~ 12.9 (±2.4)
a Size is the size range of the spore dimensions; b mean is the average of the spore dimensions; c the values are mean ± standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Fusarium species used in the multilocus phylogenetic analysis and their GenBank accession numbers.
Table 2. Fusarium species used in the multilocus phylogenetic analysis and their GenBank accession numbers.
Fusarium SpeciesIsolatesGenBank Accession Number a
ITSTEF-1αβTUBFuLSU
F. avenaceumLN-1MT239572MT276173MT276177\\
LN-19MT239575MT276176MT276180\\
F.acuminatumLN-3MT239573MT276174MT276178\\
LN-6MT239574MT276175MT276179\\
F. sporotrichioidesLN-27MT921794MW517798\MT921794\
F. tricinctumQY3-1MZ571930\\\MZ572963
QY9-1MZ571931\\\MZ572964
aITS, internal transcribed spacer region; TEF-1α, translation elongation factor 1-α; βTUB, β-tubulin; Fu, a pair of genus-specific primer Fu3/Fu4 for Fusarium was designed, based on 18S rDNA and internal transcribed spacer ITS2 sequence; LSU, large subunit rDNA.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, T.; Yang, C.; Cai, F.; Osei, R. Molecular Identification and Characterization of Fusarium Associated with Walnut Branch Blight Disease in China. Pathogens 2023, 12, 970. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070970

AMA Style

Ma T, Yang C, Cai F, Osei R. Molecular Identification and Characterization of Fusarium Associated with Walnut Branch Blight Disease in China. Pathogens. 2023; 12(7):970. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070970

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Ting, Chengde Yang, Fengfeng Cai, and Richard Osei. 2023. "Molecular Identification and Characterization of Fusarium Associated with Walnut Branch Blight Disease in China" Pathogens 12, no. 7: 970. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070970

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop