Next Article in Journal
Nuclear Morphofunctional Organization and Epigenetic Characteristics in Somatic Cells of T. infestans (Klug, 1834)
Previous Article in Journal
Efficiency of Experimental Formulation Containing Duddingtonia flagrans and Pochonia chlamydosporia against Moniezia expansa Eggs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/pathogens12081029
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ecotype Analysis in Cattle from Great Britain

by
Ternenge Thaddaeus Apaa
1,*,
Harriet McFadzean
2,
Sara Gandy
3,
Kayleigh Hansford
3,
Jolyon Medlock
3 and
Nicholas Johnson
1
1
Vector Borne Diseases, Virology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone KT15 3NB, UK
2
Animal and Plant Health Agency, Staplake Mount, Starcross, Exeter EX6 8PE, UK
3
Medical Entomology & Zoonoses, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(8), 1029; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081029
Submission received: 3 July 2023 / Revised: 22 July 2023 / Accepted: 7 August 2023 / Published: 10 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens: And Now What?)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anaplasma phagocytophilum (A. phagocytophilum) is the aetiological agent of tick-borne fever in cattle and sheep, and granulocytic anaplasmosis in human and dogs. Livestock, companion animal and human infections with A. phagocytophilum have been reported globally. Across England and Wales, two isolates (called ecotypes) have been reported in ticks. This study examined A. phagocytophilum isolates present in livestock and wildlife in Great Britain (GB), with a particular focus on cattle. Clinical submissions (EDTA blood) from cattle (n = 21) and sheep (n = 3) were received by APHA for tick-borne disease testing and the animals were confirmed to be infected with A. phagocytophilum using a PCR targeting the Msp2 gene. Further submissions from roe deer (n = 2), red deer (n = 2) and Ixodes ricinus ticks (n = 22) were also shown to be infected with A. phagocytophilum. Subsequent analysis using a nested PCR targeting the groEL gene and sequencing confirmed the presence of ecotype I in cattle, sheep, red deer and Ixodes ricinus, and ecotype II in roe deer and I. ricinus removed from deer carcasses. Despite the presence of two ecotypes, widely distributed in ticks from England and Wales, only ecotype I was detected in cattle in this study.

1. Introduction

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is an obligate intracytoplasmic bacteria classified under the family Anaplasmatacea (formerly Ehrlichia equi and Ehrlichia phagocytophila). It was renamed A. phagocytophilum in 2001 based on a genetic analysis unifying the former species Ehrlichia equi, Ehrlichia phagocytophila and the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis [1,2]. A. phagocytophilum is transmitted by ticks and has been reported in cattle (Bos taurus), sheep (Ovis aries), goat (Capra hircus), horse (Equus caballus), dog (Canis lupus familiaris), red deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), rodents, birds, hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus), wild boar (Sus scrofa), humans, cat (Felis catus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and moose (Alces alces). Ixodes ricinus is the principal vector of A. phagocytophilum in Europe [3,4], although its DNA has also been detected from Dermacentor reticulatus [5], D. marginatus [6], Haemaphysalis punctata [7], H. concinna [5] and other Ixodes species, including I. hexagonus, I. canisuga [8], I. persulcatus and I. trianguliceps [9]. However, the role of these tick species as potential vectors for A. phagocytophilum transmission in Europe is not clearly understood. Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus transmit A. phagocytophilum in North America, where human granulocytic anaplasmosis is regularly reported [10,11,12], although there appears to be few reports of infection in livestock. In Asia and Russia, I. persulcatus and Dermacentor silvarum are known vectors of A. phagocytophilum [13]. Transmission from mother to child immediately before or after birth has been documented in humans [14]; transmission to the foetus via placenta has also been reported in cattle [15]. Cases of canine, ovine, equine, bovine and human anaplasmosis have been reported globally and the infection of questing ticks, ruminants and wildlife has been reported in Europe over the past decade [16,17,18,19,20].
Human infection with A. phagocytophilum is considered an emerging zoonotic disease. It was first recorded as a febrile illness and named human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) in North America in 1994 [21]. Case rates have dramatically increased since, and the disease poses an increasingly important public health threat. The first European cases were documented in Slovenia [22,23,24,25], with further cases reported in other European countries, including Spain [4,26], France [27] and Italy [28]. However, overall disease rates remain substantially lower in Europe than in the United States. The rarity of human infection with A. phagocytophilum in GB has been considered to be due to the absence of zoonotic isolates, also described as ecotypes [18]. Recent studies have documented A. phagocytophilum presence in GB, including a prevalence survey of questing ticks in Wales (12.1%), Northern England (4.7%), Southern England (1.8%) and central England (0.5%) [17]. Ecotype I has been recorded in GB sheep (O. aries) [18] associated with specific areas and is considered more likely to infect humans [17]. Gandy et al. [17] and Bianchessi et al. [18] examined questing ticks and sheep, respectively. However, cases of bovine anaplasmosis [29,30] and co-infection with Babesia and A. phagocytophilum resulting in severe disease have been recorded in GB and Europe [16,31,32]. Bovine anaplasmosis is a transient and mild infection characterized by clinical signs such as fever, anorexia, weakness and secondary infection due to immunosuppression [33]. High morbidity associated with abortion and a drop in milk production, resulting in economic losses, have also been reported in dairy cattle diagnosed with bovine anaplasmosis [32,33,34]. However, information regarding the potential role of A. phagocytophilum in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of abortions and stillbirth in cattle is not clearly known [34].
To establish the evolutionary relationship of Anaplasma species, a selection of appropriate molecular gene marker is essential. PCR assays designed to amplify 16S rRNA [13], highly conserved major surface protein-2 (Msp2 or p44), citrate synthase (gltA) [35,36], ankA [37] and heat shock protein (groEL) [17,18] genes have all proven to be useful. In addition, PCR and sequencing assays designed to target multiple genes (multilocus sequence genotyping) have been used effectively for A. phagocytophilum genotyping [37,38]. However, the groEL gene has demonstrated to be a valuable and useful genetic marker to identify and establish distinct genetic clades of A. phagocytophilum in the absence of multilocus sequence genotyping [18,39,40]. Information on A. phagocytophilum ecotypes present in GB cattle is currently unavailable. The aim of this study was to investigate A. phagocytophilum isolates present in GB cattle from samples (initially tested using Msp2 gene qPCR) obtained from Southern England, Wales and Scotland. Additional samples obtained from sheep, deer and I. ricinus were also examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Sequencing

Whole engorged ticks (collected from cattle and roe deer only) and EDTA blood samples collected from cattle (Bos taurus), sheep (O. aries) and both roe (Capreolus capreolus), and red (Cervus elaphus) deer submitted from nine locations (for tick-borne pathogen testing) in Great Britain, including England (Devon, Cornwall, Norfolk, Cumbria, Somerset, and Dorset), Scotland and Wales (Pembrokeshire and Powys), were examined. Samples were tested for A. phagocytophilum following DNA extraction using QIAamp DNeasy kit (QIAgen, Manchester, UK). Msp2 gene-specific TaqMan qPCR assay [41] was used to initially screen samples for the presence of A. phagocytophilum DNA. Where this was detected, a partial groEL gene heminested PCR assay was applied [39]. PCR products obtained were separated on agarose gel (1.5%) prepared with SYBR safe nucleic acid staining dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) and run at 100 volts for 60 min. PCR controls consisted of A. phagocytophilum DNA (positive) [16] and nuclease-free water (negative). The groEL gene PCR products were sequenced using primers Ephpl groEL (569) and Eph groEL (1142). Morphological identification and molecular barcoding of tick samples were carried out, following published methods [42]. Details of all PCR primers, master mix reaction volumes and thermal cycling conditions are provided in the Supplementary file (Supplementary Materials Table S4).

2.2. Sequence Editing, Assembly and Phylogenetic Analysis

Quality assessment, removal of primer sequence, editing, alignment and generation of consensus sequence from Sanger sequence obtained was carried out using SeqMan Pro in DNAStar Lasergene v15, followed by NCBI online BLASTn search. A. phagocytophilum groEL gene DNA sequences generated were deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession number OQ436965-OQ437012. A total of 328 A. phagocytophilum groEL gene nucleotide sequences, including sequences generated from this study, downloaded from GenBank database and published in the recent literature [18,43,44], were used for phylogenetic analysis. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed in IQ-TREE v2.0.7 [45], using 10,000 bootstrap approximations and implementation of UFBoot2 within IQ-TREE to evaluate nodes [46]. IQ-TREE v2.0.7 automatically selected the best nucleotide substitution model (HKY+F+R2) [47] with the lowest Bayesian information criterion (BIC) [48]. The precision of the phylogenetic tree generated was improved by the inclusion of the ModelFinder option in command-line for the selection of the best fitting nucleotide substitution model [48]. The tree constructed was visualized and annotated in FigTree v1.4.4. to produce a radial phylogram for simple presentation.

3. Results

A total of fifty samples that previously tested positive for the presence of A. phagocytophilum via the Msp2 gene qPCR assay were assessed for A. phagocytophilum genotyping, following groEL gene PCR assay. All tick samples assessed (n = 22; female: 20; nymphs: 2) were identified as I. ricinus. A. phagocytophilum groEL gene sequence was obtained for 48 of 50 samples tested, including 20/22 I. ricinus, 21/21 Bos taurus, 3/3 O. aries, 2/2 Capreolus capreolus and 2/2 Cervus elaphus samples (Table 1). Nucleotide sequences (530 bp) were assembled from confirmed positive samples (48/48). NCBI online custom BLASTn search demonstrated 95–100% a similarity between sequences generated by this study and A. phagocytophilum sequences submitted from the British Isles and Europe (Supplementary Materials Table S2). Although all nucleotide sequences obtained were >90% identical to other A. phagocytophilum sequences available in the GenBank database, 17/48 of sequences obtained were >99% identical to sequences (accession numbers: KJ832487, KJ832484) originating from Bos taurus (France) and O. aries (AF548385) from Norway. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that 45/48 sequences generated in this study clustered with A. phagocytophilum sequences identified as ecotype I, while the remaining three (3/48) clustered with ecotype II (Figure 1, Supplementary Materials Figure S1 [18]. This set of three A. phagocytophilum sequences were generated from C. capreolus blood/tick samples and showed a greater identity (NCBI online BLASTn search) to A. phagocytophilum sequences (accession number KM215256, JN005745, DQ779568 and AF383226) detected from C. capreolus from Poland and Switzerland, classified as ecotype II in the recent literature [43]. In addition, phylogenetic tree demonstrated a geographical clustering of A. phagocytophilum ecotype I reported in this study (from sheep (1/3), cattle (8/21) and I. ricinus (8/20)) with previously reported European ecotype I from cattle, humans (e.g., AF033101: Austria; AF033101: Slovenia), horses, hedgehog, brown bear, polecat, sheep, roe deer, dogs, wild goat, fox and dogs. Similarly, the remaining ecotype I sequence obtained from Great Britain, cattle (n = 13), sheep (n = 2) and ticks (n = 10), in this study, clustered with previously reported European ecotype I from wild ruminants, cattle, sheep, horse and dog. However, the American ecotype I reference sequences reported from domestic and wild animals (horses, rodents, rabbits, dogs and cats) and humans (zoonotic ecotype I) clustered within a distinct geographical subclade (Supplementary Materials Figure S1).

4. Discussion

Following the renaming of A. phagocytophilum [1], genotypes with a diverse host range have emerged. The emergence of multiple genotypes has created complexity in the understanding of pathogenicity and clinical disease manifestation in various animal hosts and potential for zoonotic transmission in humans. Bovine anaplasmosis caused by A. phagocytophilum is associated with a severe clinical disease in cattle globally, and risk factors such as the season of the year, the presence of tick vectors, latitude and farm hygiene practice have been associated with disease [49]. However, this study aimed at establishing A. phagocytophilum ecotypes using a small number of samples confirmed to be positive via the Msp2 qPCR. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the presence of ecotype I in cattle and red deer in GB. Bovine anaplasmosis and co-infection with B. divergens and A. phagocytophilum characterized by severe disease and mortality has been reported in GB [16,32] and other parts of mainland Europe [29,30,31]. Although this study did not test for Babesia species, B. divergens is known to share the same vector (I. ricinus) as A. phagocytophilum and co-infection can increase the severity of disease [16]. I. ricinus is a three-host tick, both larval and nymphal stages of I. ricinus feed on small to medium-sized animals while adults prefer larger animals, including cattle. The presence of A. phagocytophilum (ecotype I) in all engorged ticks collected from cattle is likely to originate from a previous blood meal (during larval/nymphal lifecycle stages from other animal hosts) or present in the blood meal obtained from infested cattle. This report supports previous findings that infected animals can play a significant role in the enzootic transmission of A. phagocytophilum [50]. Additional studies are required to provide a clear understanding of the pathogenicity and clinical manifestation of A. phagocytophilum in cattle, and assist clinicians in diagnosis, treatment and control. The presence of ecotype I in sheep and both ecotypes (I and II) in I. ricinus further supports recent studies reporting A. phagocytophilum in sheep [18] and questing ticks collected from GB recreational areas [17], while the report of ecotype II from roe deer in this study supports previous reports from Central Europe [51,52]. Cervids (red and roe deer) are wildlife reservoir hosts for various genotypes of A. phagocytophilum known to be transmitted by I. ricinus [53,54,55]. Although roe deer have been demonstrated to be co-infected with multiple A. phagocytophilum variants, these variants are not considered pathogenic to domestic animals and humans. However, genotypes reported from red deer are pathogenic to domestic animals [51]. The presence of ecotype I in red deer from this study suggest further investigations are needed to understand the role of red deer in A. phagocytophilum transmission in GB. In addition, the geographical clustering of ecotype I sequences reported in this study partly supports previous findings in Europe [56]. Ecotype I reported in this study clustered within the same geographical subclade with European wild and domestic animals, equine and human zoonotic ecotypes I sequences, suggesting zoonotic risk and the likelihood of human infection as previously described. The separate geographical clustering of the American human, domestic and wild animal ecotype I may likely suggest differences in potentials for zoonotic infections between the European and American ecotype I as recently described [18]. This report provides additional information on the A. phagocytophilum isolates infecting cattle in GB.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study reports that only A. phagocytophilum ecotype I has been detected in GB cattle and provides further evidence for the presence of ecotypes I and II in red and roe deer, respectively. The presence of ecotype I in cattle and I. ricinus infesting cattle corroborates such reports in previous studies. These findings constitute the first report of A. phagocytophilum ecotype I in GB cattle, despite the presence of ecotypes I and II in the indigenous tick population [17]. However, this report should be interpreted with caution owing to the smaller sample size assessed in this study. The presence of A. phagocytophilum ecotype I in sheep was also confirmed in this study as previously reported in GB [18]. The epidemiology and clinical disease manifestation of the A. phagocytophilum genotypes in GB cattle require further investigation as A. phagocytophilum and/or co-infection with B. divergens in cattle is routinely reported and likely to result in severe disease and potential mortality. While the full zoonotic potentials of ecotype I is not well understood, it has been associated with human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Preventive measures, including public education on tick control and limiting the exposure of animal and humans to tick bites, are suggested measures in the absence of adequate information on A. phagocytophilum disease pathogenicity and epidemiology in GB cattle.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12081029/s1. Figure S1: A full polar cladogram displayed, following maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed at 10,000 bootstrap approximations using A. phagocytophilum groEL gene nucleotide sequences (48) generated from this study and representative ecotypes (328) reported in the previous literature; Table S1: GenBank accession number and list of A. phagocytophilum nucleotide sequences obtained from GB livestock, I. ricinus and deer species; Table S2: A summary of NCBI online custom BLASTn search containing a list of GB nucleotide sequences obtained from GB livestock, I. ricinus and deer species, GenBank accession numbers and percentage identity, established ecotypes based on the recent literature, host and country of origin; Table S3: List of GenBank nucleotide accession numbers used for NCBI online BLASTn search; Table S4: List of published nested PCR primers (A), reaction volumes and thermal cycling conditions (B) used for the amplification of the A. phagocytophilum groEL gene in this study. Available online: https://zenodo.org/record/8174242 (accessed on 15 July 2023).

Author Contributions

Project administration and funding acquisition N.J.; conceptualization, methodology and formal data analysis N.J. and T.T.A.; writing original draft T.T.A., H.M., S.G., K.H., J.M. and N.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was carried out as part of the Ticks and Tick-borne Disease Surveillance programme, funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Scottish and Welsh Governments, under grant number SE0566.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived based on the type of samples analysed and anonymous results generated.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Nucleotide sequences obtained from this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank under accession number OQ436965-OQ437012 (Supplementary Materials Table S1).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dumler, J.S.; Barbet, A.F.; Bekker, C.; Dasch, G.A.; Palmer, G.H.; Ray, S.C.; Rikihisa, Y.; Rurangirwa, F.R. Reorganization of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: Unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, descriptions of six new species combinations and designation of Ehrlichia equi and ‘HGE agent’ as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophila. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 2145–2165. [Google Scholar]
  2. Woldehiwet, Z. The natural history of Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 167, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Beugnet, F.; Marié, J.-L. Emerging arthropod-borne diseases of companion animals in Europe. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 163, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Blanco, J.R.; Oteo, J.A. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2002, 8, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Tomanovic, S.; Chochlakis, D.; Radulovic, Z.; Milutinovic, M.; Cakic, S.; Mihaljica, D.; Tselentis, Y.; Psaroulaki, A. Analysis of pathogen co-occurrence in host-seeking adult hard ticks from Serbia. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2013, 59, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bonnet, S.; de la Fuente, J.; Nicollet, P.; Liu, X.; Madani, N.; Blanchard, B.; Maingourd, C.; Alongi, A.; Torina, A.; Fernandez de Mera, I.G.; et al. Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in adult Dermacentor spp. ticks from nine collection sites in France. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palomar, A.; Portillo, A.; Santibáñez, P.; Mazuelas, D.; Roncero, L.; García-Álvarez, L.; Santibáñez, S.; Gutiérrez, Ó.; Oteo, J. Detection of tick-borne Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma centrale in Spain. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2015, 29, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Keyte, S.; Abdullah, S.; James, K.; Newbury, H.; Helps, C.; Tasker, S.; Wall, R. Prevalence and distribution of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in ticks collected from dogs in the United Kingdom. Vet. Rec. 2021, 188, e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rar, V.A.; Epikhina, T.I.; Yakimenko, V.V.; Malkova, M.G.; Tancev, A.K.; Bondarenko, E.I.; Ivanov, M.K.; Tikunova, N.V. Genetic variability of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in ticks and voles from Ixodes persulcatus/Ixodes trianguliceps sympatric areas from Western Siberia, Russia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 854–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kohn, B.; Galke, D.; Beelitz, P.; Pfister, K. Clinical features of canine granulocytic anaplasmosis in 18 naturally infected dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2008, 22, 1289–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bakken, J.S.; Dumler, J.S. Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 31, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Granquist, E.G.; Aleksandersen, M.; Bergström, K.; Dumler, S.J.; Torsteinbø, W.O.; Stuen, S. A morphological and molecular study of Anaplasma phagocytophilum transmission events at the time of Ixodes ricinus tick bite. Acta Vet. Scand. 2010, 52, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rar, V.A.; Livanova, N.N.; Panov, V.V.; Doroschenko, E.K.; Pukhovskaya, N.M.; Vysochina, N.P.; Ivanov, L.I. Genetic diversity of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia in the Asian part of Russia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2010, 1, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Horowitz, H.W.; Kilchevsky, E.; Haber, S.; Aguero-Rosenfeld, M.; Kranwinkel, R.; James, E.K.; Wong, S.J.; Chu, F.; Liveris, D.; Schwartz, I. Perinatal transmission of the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pusterla, N.; Braun, U.; Wolfensberger, C.; Lutz, H. Intrauterine infection with Ehrlichia phagocytophila in a cow. Vet. Rec. 1997, 141, 101–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Johnson, N.; Paul Phipps, L.; McFadzean, H.; Barlow, A.M. An outbreak of bovine babesiosis in February, 2019, triggered by above average winter temperatures in southern England and co-infection with Babesia divergens and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gandy, S.; Hansford, K.; McGinley, L.; Cull, B.; Smith, R.; Semper, A.; Brooks, T.; Fonville, M.; Sprong, H.; Phipps, P.; et al. Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing Ixodes ricinus nymphs across twenty recreational areas in England and Wales. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022, 13, 101965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bianchessi, L.; Rocchi, M.S.; Maley, M.; Allen, K.; Ballingall, K.; Turin, L. Presence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ecotype I in UK Ruminants and Associated Zoonotic Risk. Pathogens 2023, 12, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Flattery, A.; McKiernan, F.; Browne, J.; Gray, J.; Zaid, T.; O’Connor, J.; Zintl, A. The prevalence and distribution of Anaplasma phagocytophilum genotypes in Ixodes ricinus nymphs collected from farm- and woodland sites in Ireland. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022, 13, 101928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hoepler, W.; Markowicz, M.; Schoetta, A.-M.; Zoufaly, A.; Stanek, G.; Wenisch, C. Molecular diagnosis of autochthonous human anaplasmosis in Austria—An infectious diseases case report. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bakken, J.S.; Dumler, J.S.; Chen, S.-M.; Eckman, M.R.; Van Etta, L.L.; Walker, D.H. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in the upper Midwest United States: A new species emerging? JAMA 1994, 272, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Petrovec, M.; Lotric Furlan, S.; Zupanc, T.A.; Strle, F.; Brouqui, P.; Roux, V.; Dumler, J.S. Human disease in Europe caused by a granulocytic Ehrlichia species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 1556–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Weber, R.; Pusterla, N.; Loy, M.; Lutz, H. Fever, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia in a patient with acute Lyme borreliosis were due to human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998, 26, 253–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lotrič-Furlan, S.; Petrovec, M.; Zupanc, T.A.; Nicholson, W.L.; Sumner, J.W.; Childs, J.E.; Strle, F. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Europe: Clinical and laboratory findings for four patients from Slovenia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998, 27, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Laferl, H.; Hogrefe, W.; Köck, T.; Pichler, H. A further case of acute human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Slovenia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1999, 18, 385–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Oteo, J.A.; Blanco, J.R.; Martínez de Artola, V.; Ibarra, V. First report of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis from southern Europe (Spain). Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2000, 6, 430–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Remy, V.; Hansmann, Y.; De Martino, S.; Christmann, D.; Brouqui, P. Human Anaplasmosis Presenting as Atypical Pneumonitis in France. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 846–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ruscio, M.; Cinco, M. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Italy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 990, 350–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aktas, M.; Ozubek, S. Bovine anaplasmosis in Turkey: First laboratory confirmed clinical cases caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Vet. Microbiol. 2015, 178, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Matsumoto, K.; Joncour, G.; Davoust, B.; PITEL, P.H.; Chauzy, A.; Collin, E.; Morvan, H.; Vassallo, N.; Brouqui, P. Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in cattle in France. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1078, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andersson, M.O.; Vichova, B.; Tolf, C.; Krzyzanowska, S.; Waldenstrom, J.; Karlsson, M.E. Co-infection with Babesia divergens and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in cattle (Bos taurus), Sweden. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017, 8, 933–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. McFadzean, H.; Johnson, N.; Phipps, L.P.; Hobbs, R.L. High morbidity associated with an outbreak of tick-borne disease in a dairy herd, Cornwall. Vet. Rec. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Woldehiwet, Z. Anaplasma phagocytophilum in ruminants in Europe. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1078, 446–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Loo, H.; Pascottini, O.B.; Hooyberghs, J.; De Bleecker, K.; Ribbens, S.; Opsomer, G.; Pardon, B. Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in fetal and placental tissue of bovine abortions and perinatal mortalities. Vet. Rec. 2023, e2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. LEE, C.; Lin, Y.; Tsang, C.; Chung, Y. A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for rapid detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in dogs. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2012, 36, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kawahara, M.; Rikihisa, Y.; Lin, Q.; Isogai, E.; Tahara, K.; Itagaki, A.; Hiramitsu, Y.; Tajima, T. Novel genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma centrale, and a novel Ehrlichia sp. in wild deer and ticks on two major islands in Japan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Scharf, W.; Schauer, S.; Freyburger, F.; Petrovec, M.; Schaarschmidt-Kiener, D.; Liebisch, G.; Runge, M.; Ganter, M.; Kehl, A.; Dumler, J.S.; et al. Distinct Host Species Correlate with Anaplasma phagocytophilum ankA Gene Clusters. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 790–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chastagner, A.; Dugat, T.; Vourc’h, G.; Verheyden, H.; Legrand, L.; Bachy, V.; Chabanne, L.; Joncour, G.; Maillard, R.; Boulouis, H.J.; et al. Multilocus sequence analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum reveals three distinct lineages with different host ranges in clinically ill French cattle. Vet. Res. 2014, 45, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alberti, A.; Addis, M.F.; Sparagano, O.; Zobba, R.; Chessa, B.; Cubeddu, T.; Parpaglia, M.L.P.; Ardu, M.; Pittau, M. Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Sardinia, Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chisu, V.; Zobba, R.; Lecis, R.; Sotgiu, F.; Masala, G.; Foxi, C.; Pisu, D.; Alberti, A. GroEL typing and phylogeny of Anaplasma species in ticks from domestic and wild vertebrates. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Courtney, J.W.; Kostelnik, L.M.; Zeidner, N.S.; Massung, R.F. Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3164–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. de Marco, M.; Hernandez-Triana, L.M.; Phipps, L.P.; Hansford, K.; Mitchell, E.S.; Cull, B.; Swainsbury, C.S.; Fooks, A.R.; Medlock, J.M.; Johnson, N. Emergence of Babesia canis in southern England. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Jahfari, S.; Coipan, E.C.; Fonville, M.; Van Leeuwen, A.D.; Hengeveld, P.; Heylen, D.; Heyman, P.; Van Maanen, C.; Butler, C.M.; Földvári, G. Circulation of four Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotypes in Europe. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Grassi, L.; Franzo, G.; Martini, M.; Mondin, A.; Cassini, R.; Drigo, M.; Pasotto, D.; Vidorin, E.; Menandro, M.L. Ecotyping of Anaplasma phagocytophilum from Wild Ungulates and Ticks Shows Circulation of Zoonotic Strains in Northeastern Italy. Animals 2021, 11, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; Von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hasegawa, M.; Kishino, H.; Yano, T.-A. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 1985, 22, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Noaman, V. Epidemiological study on Anaplasma phagocytophilum in cattle: Molecular prevalence and risk factors assessment in different ecological zones in Iran. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 183, 105118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jahfari, S.; Ruyts, S.C.; Frazer-Mendelewska, E.; Jaarsma, R.; Verheyen, K.; Sprong, H. Melting pot of tick-borne zoonoses: The European hedgehog contributes to the maintenance of various tick-borne diseases in natural cycles urban and suburban areas. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hamsikova, Z.; Silaghi, C.; Takumi, K.; Rudolf, I.; Gunar, K.; Sprong, H.; Kazimirova, M. Presence of Roe Deer Affects the Occurrence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ecotypes in Questing Ixodes ricinus in Different Habitat Types of Central Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Razanske, I.; Rosef, O.; Radzijevskaja, J.; Bratchikov, M.; Griciuviene, L.; Paulauskas, A. Prevalence and co-infection with tick-borne Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia spp. in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Southern Norway. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 8, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Stuen, S.; Pettersen, K.S.; Granquist, E.G.; Bergstrom, K.; Bown, K.J.; Birtles, R.J. Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants in sympatric red deer (Cervus elaphus) and sheep in southern Norway. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013, 4, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dugat, T.; Zanella, G.; Veran, L.; Lesage, C.; Girault, G.; Durand, B.; Lagree, A.C.; Boulouis, H.J.; Haddad, N. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis potentially reveals the existence of two groups of Anaplasma phagocytophilum circulating in cattle in France with different wild reservoirs. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Huhn, C.; Winter, C.; Wolfsperger, T.; Wuppenhorst, N.; Strasek Smrdel, K.; Skuballa, J.; Pfaffle, M.; Petney, T.; Silaghi, C.; Dyachenko, V.; et al. Analysis of the population structure of Anaplasma phagocytophilum using multilocus sequence typing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Rar, V.; Tkachev, S.; Tikunova, N. Genetic diversity of Anaplasma bacteria: Twenty years later. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 91, 104833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 12 01029 g001
Figure 1. A simplified radial phylogram displayed following a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed with 10,000 bootstrap approximation using A. phagocytophilum groEL gene sequences generated from this study (n = 48) and representative ecotypes (n = 328) from previous studies [18,43]. Clades, branches and branch tips in black represents ecotype I, red represents ecotype II, green represents ecotype III and blue represents ecotype IV, while taxa in magenta under ecotypes I and II represent nucleotide sequences reported from this study. Branch tips highlighted in grey under ecotype I clade represents A. phagocytophilum ecotype I sequences reported from Great Britain cattle. Roman numerals I, II, III and IV represents ecotypes. The phylogeny is rooted at midpoint and drawn to display circular node shapes at bootstrap support values ≥ 90.
Figure 1. A simplified radial phylogram displayed following a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed with 10,000 bootstrap approximation using A. phagocytophilum groEL gene sequences generated from this study (n = 48) and representative ecotypes (n = 328) from previous studies [18,43]. Clades, branches and branch tips in black represents ecotype I, red represents ecotype II, green represents ecotype III and blue represents ecotype IV, while taxa in magenta under ecotypes I and II represent nucleotide sequences reported from this study. Branch tips highlighted in grey under ecotype I clade represents A. phagocytophilum ecotype I sequences reported from Great Britain cattle. Roman numerals I, II, III and IV represents ecotypes. The phylogeny is rooted at midpoint and drawn to display circular node shapes at bootstrap support values ≥ 90.
Pathogens 12 01029 g001
Table 1. Distribution of A. phagocytophilum ecotypes among GB cattle, sheep, roe/red deer and ticks in Great Britain.
Table 1. Distribution of A. phagocytophilum ecotypes among GB cattle, sheep, roe/red deer and ticks in Great Britain.
LocationEcotypeSequence Variants (n)HostTick SpeciesNegative (n)Positive (n)Total
Devon18B. taurus −88
113vegetationI. ricinus *213 15
Cornwall12 I. ricinus *−22
15B. taurus −55
Norfolk12C. elaphus (red deer) −22
Cumbria11 I. ricinus *−11
21C. capreolus (roe deer) −11
Pembrokeshire12 I. ricinus *−22
Dorset11O. aries −11
11B. taurus −11
Somerset12B. taurus −22
11C. capreolus (roe deer) −11
Powys11B. taurus −11
Scotland11O. aries −11
Unknown22 I. ricinus **−22
15B. taurus −44
11O. aries −12
Total 48 24850
(*) Ticks collected from cattle; (**) ticks collected from roe deer carcass. NB: Only engorged ticks were examined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Apaa, T.T.; McFadzean, H.; Gandy, S.; Hansford, K.; Medlock, J.; Johnson, N. Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ecotype Analysis in Cattle from Great Britain. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1029. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081029

AMA Style

Apaa TT, McFadzean H, Gandy S, Hansford K, Medlock J, Johnson N. Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ecotype Analysis in Cattle from Great Britain. Pathogens. 2023; 12(8):1029. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Apaa, Ternenge Thaddaeus, Harriet McFadzean, Sara Gandy, Kayleigh Hansford, Jolyon Medlock, and Nicholas Johnson. 2023. "Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ecotype Analysis in Cattle from Great Britain" Pathogens 12, no. 8: 1029. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12081029

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop