Next Article in Journal
Orthohepevirus C: An Expanding Species of Emerging Hepatitis E Virus Variants
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Immunization with Omp25 and L7/L12 Provides Protection against Brucellosis in Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/pathogens9020153
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Different Sources in Algeria

by
Rachid Achek
1,*,
Helmut Hotzel
2,
Ibrahim Nabi
3,
Souad Kechida
3,
Djamila Mami
3,
Nassima Didouh
1,
Herbert Tomaso
2,
Heinrich Neubauer
2,
Ralf Ehricht
4,5,6,
Stefan Monecke
4,5 and
Hosny El-Adawy
2,7,*
1
Faculty of Nature and Life and Earth Sciences, Djilali-Bounaama University, Soufay, Khemis-Miliana 44225, Algeria
2
Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 07743 Jena, Germany
3
Faculty of Sciences, Yahia-Farès University, Urban Pole, 26000 Médéa, Algeria
4
Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), 07745 Jena, Germany
5
InfectoGnostics Research Campus Jena e. V., 07743 Jena, Germany
6
Institute for Physical Chemistry, Friedrich-Schiller-University, 07743 Jena, Germany
7
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheik University, Kafr El-Sheik 35516, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(2), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020153
Submission received: 5 February 2020 / Revised: 18 February 2020 / Accepted: 21 February 2020 / Published: 24 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Pathogens)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic bacterium causing a wide variety of diseases. Biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus is of primary public and animal health concern. The purposes of the present study were to investigate the ability of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from animals, humans, and food samples to form biofilms and to screen for the presence of biofilm-associated and regulatory genes. In total, 55 Staphylococcus aureus isolated from sheep mastitis cases (n = 28), humans (n = 19), and from food matrices (n = 8) were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The ability of Staphylococcus aureus for slime production and biofilm formation was determined quantitatively. A DNA microarray examination was performed to detect adhesion genes (icaACD and biofilm-associated protein gene (bap)), genes encoding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs), regulatory genes (accessory gene regulator (agr) and staphylococcal accessory regulator (sarA)), and the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec elements (SCCmec). Out of 55 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, 39 (71.0%) and 23 (41.8%) were producing slime and biofilm, respectively. All Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from food showed biofilm formation ability. 52.6% of the Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from sheep with mastitis, and 17.9% of isolates from humans, were able to form a biofilm. Microarray analysis typed the Staphylococcus aureus into 15 clonal complexes. Among all Staphylococcus aureus isolates, four of the human isolates (21.1%) harbored the mecA gene (SCCmec type IV) typed into 2 clonal complexes (CC22-MRSA-IV and CC80-MRSA-IV) and were considered as methicillin-resistant, while two of them were slime-producing. None of the isolates from sheep with mastitis harbored the cna gene which is associated with biofilm production. The fnbB gene was found in 100%, 60% and 40% of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food, humans, and sheep with mastitis, respectively. Three agr groups were present and agr group III was predominant with 43.6%, followed by agr group I (38.2%), and agr group II (18.2%). This study revealed the capacity of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to form biofilms and highlighted the genetic background displayed by Staphylococcus aureus isolates from different sources in Algeria.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus (S.) aureus is a bacterium that can cause a wide range of diseases in humans and animals. The capacity of S. aureus to colonize and infect different sites of the body is related to the presence of a variety of virulence factors [1]. Among the virulence factors responsible for the pathogenicity of S. aureus, adhesion proteins and the ability to form biofilms on biotic and abiotic surfaces are of importance [2,3]. In human medicine, large numbers of infections are associated with biofilms produced by staphylococci. The spectrum of clinical presentation comprises osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and other medical device-related infections such as prosthetic joints, endotracheal tubes, skeletal prostheses, vascular catheters, cardiac pacemakers, and heart valves [4,5]. Biofilms formed by S. aureus on food-processing surfaces constitute a critical issue for the food industry and is a dangerous source of contamination of food matrices and human handlers [6]. Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most frequent causes of mastitis in dairy cattle and sheep [7,8,9]. The severity of the disease and the clinical presentation depends on the production of several toxins and adhesion proteins [10].
Two aspects of biofilm play major roles in the pathogenesis of human and animal infections: first, the adhesion of the bacteria to epithelial cells thus facilitates the insertion and the release of different toxins [4,11,12]. Second, decreased diffusion of antimicrobial molecules into the biofilm matrix limits the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy [13,14]. Moreover, in the food industry, biofilms on surfaces increase the resistance to disinfectant agents [15].
A biofilm was defined as a structured community of microbial cells embedded in a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances, which is attached to a surface [16]. The biofilm-building process is divided into distinct phases beginning with attachment of staphylococcal cells on a biomaterial, followed by accumulation and biofilm maturation. The dispersal stage corresponds to the dissemination of bacterial cells that contaminate other surfaces [15,17]. In staphylococcal biofilms, the attachment to biotic or abiotic surfaces is facilitated via microbial surface components that recognize adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) and the biofilm-associated protein (Bap) [18]. The accumulation phase appears to be dependent on polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) encoded by the icaADBC operon [17].
The formation of biofilms is a complex process depending on several factors like nutrient availability, pH value, oxygen level, and surface properties [18]. In addition, biofilm formation in S. aureus is under the control of two genetic loci, sarA (staphylococcal accessory regulator) and agr (accessory gene regulator) quorum-sensing system [19,20].
In Algeria, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance of staphylococci were investigated in clinical and food samples [21,22,23]. However, the biofilm-forming ability of Staphylococcus isolates and their genetic determinants were rarely evaluated in Algeria [24]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the phenotypic biofilm formation of S. aureus isolated from different sample types and to assess the presence of genes that are typically associated with biofilm formation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Isolates

Fifty-five S. aureus isolates were chosen from a previous screening study in Algeria [9,21] to assess their biofilm production ability. The bacterial strains were isolated from food matrices (n = 8), humans (n = 19; 3 with clinical infections and 16 from nasal carriage), and from cases of mastitis in sheep (n = 28). Briefly, a total of 112 food samples were taken from several commercial points and local districts located in Médéa and Ain-defla regions in northern Algeria. Samples were collected from different matrices. For solid food matrices (minced beef meat, sausages, chicken meat, and creamery cake) and liquid food matrix (milk), quantities of 100 g and 100 ml were collected in sterile containers and transferred at 4 °C to the laboratory for microbiological examination. The food samples were processed according to ISO 6888-1/A1 [25] using Baird-Parker medium supplemented with 5% of egg yolk emulsion (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) and 0.5% potassium tellurite.
In total, 71 nasal swabs were collected from volunteer persons who had contact with livestock animals (veterinarians and farmers) to screen the staphylococci nasal carriage. Different clinical samples (wounds, vaginal discharge, and catheter tips) were collected from hospitalized patients in the Médéa and Ain-defla regions. The nasal samples were obtained with a sterile cotton swab and the clinical samples were processed in the same day in the laboratory for microbiology.
In this study, 123 milk samples were aseptically collected from 110 sheep farms in the two provinces of Médéa and Ain-Defla in northern Algeria. Milk samples were collected from sheep presenting clinical symptoms of acute mastitis (fever, edema, anorexia with flock abandonment or suckling refuse, udder pain, consistency or discoloration of udder and bloody secretion). Milk samples were transported in ice-cooled containers to the microbiology laboratory.
The bacteriological analyses of samples from humans and sheep mastitis cases (nasal swabs, clinical samples, and milk) were performed according to conventional methods, as described previously [26,27]. Specimens were transferred to Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth and incubated overnight at 37 °C. One hundred μl of broth culture were streaked out on Columbia agar (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK), supplemented with 5% sheep blood, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 to 48 h. Subsequently, the colonies were picked and subcultured on Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). Single colonies on MSA agar were subjected to Gram staining, catalase, and coagulase tests according to standard microbiological methods [28].

2.2. Ethics Statement

Study protocol was approved by Medical Ethics Research Committee of the Yahia Farès University, Urban Pole, Médéa, Algeria, and from the managers of the hospital in which the study was conducted. Informed written consent was obtained from each participant in the study. Confidentiality and personal privacy was respected in all levels of the study. Collected data will not be used for any other purpose.

2.3. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) Identification

The identification of bacterial species was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) according to the procedure described previously [29]. Briefly, a water suspension of cultured bacteria (300 μl) was precipitated with 900 µL of ethanol (96% vol/vol; Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 × g. The pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of 70% (vol/vol) formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany), followed by adding 50 μl of acetonitrile (Carl Roth GmbH), mixing, and centrifugation for 5 min at 10,000 × g. Then, 1.5 μl of the supernatant were spotted onto a MTP 384 Target Plate Polished Steel TF (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) and air-dried. The dried material was overlaid with 2 μl of a saturated solution of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (in a solution of 50% acetonitrile, 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Steinheim, Germany). Air-drying at room temperature followed. Spectra recording and data analysis were done with an Ultraflex instrument and Biotyper 3.1 software (Bruker Daltonik GmbH) [30].

2.4. Phenotypic Detection of Slime Production Ability on Congo Red Agar

For testing the ability of slime production, the Congo Red Agar (CRA) assay was used as previously described [31]. The isolates were inoculated on CRA plates (BHI agar supplemented with 0.8 g/L Congo Red and 50 g/L of saccharose) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The phenotypic identification of slime-producing colonies was performed according to Arciola et al. [32], where slime-producing isolates form black colonies and non-producing strains develop red colonies. Colonies of variable phenotypes (e.g., red colonies with a black center) were considered as slime-producing as described by Touati et al. [33].

2.5. Assessment of Biofilm Production by Tissue Culture Plate Assay

The ability of S. aureus isolates to form biofilms was investigated quantitatively by applying a Tissue Culture Plate (TCP) assay in 96-well microtiter plates as described previously [34]. In brief, isolated colonies of S. aureus from fresh cultures were inoculated in 5 ml of Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The cultured suspensions were diluted 1:50 with TSB-1% glucose medium and 150 µL of the suspension were filled (in triplicates) into wells of a sterile 96-U-bottom polystyrene plate (PorLab Scientific Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China). TSB-1% glucose served as a negative control. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C, the content of the wells was gently removed, and washed with 200 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 7 mM Na2HPO4, 3 mM NaH2PO4, and 130 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). Adherent bacteria were fixed with methanol (p.a.) and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (150 µL/well) for 15 min. Three gentle washing steps followed to remove the excess of stain and the plate was kept for heat-drying (60 °C for 60 min). The fixed crystal violet was solubilized by adding 150 µL of 96% ethanol, covered, and held without shaking for 30 min. Measurement of the optical density (OD) was performed at 590 nm using a microtiter plate reader MP96 (Safasmonaco, Monaco, France). Interpretation of biofilm production was done as described previously [34]. The optical densities of tested isolates were compared to OD of the negative control (ODc). The biofilm-producing isolates were categorized into four classes as follows: non-producers (OD < ODc), weak (ODc < OD < 2ODc), moderate (2ODc < OD < 4ODc), and strong (OD > 4ODc).

2.6. DNA Microarray Analysis

The detection of biofilm-associated genes (icaACD and bap), genes encoding MSCRAMMs (bbp, clfAB, cna, ebh, ebpS, eno, fib, fnbAB, map, sasG, sdrCD and vwb), and regulatory genes (agrI, II, III, IV and sarA), as well as SCCmec typing were done using the S. aureus specific DNA microarray assay (StaphyType; Abbott (Alere Technologies GmbH), Jena, Germany) according to the procedure described previously [35]. Briefly, purified DNA (after bacterial lysis) was obtained using an automated EZ1 system (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer. DNA samples were subjected to a linear primer elongation using one primer per target. Biotin-16-dUTP was incorporated into the amplicons. Labeled samples hybridized stringently to the probes of the microarray. After washing, horseradish-peroxidase-streptavidin conjugation and staining by precipitation of a dye were performed. The obtained image was analyzed automatically using a reader and software provided by Abbott (Alere Technologies GmbH). Data interpretation was performed as described previously [36,37].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with StatViewTM software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). The differences in the degree of slime production and biofilm formation between groups were examined by Fisher’s exact test that can be done online at https://www.langsrud.com/stat/fisher.htm. Results were considered statistically significant at a p value of < 0.05.

3. Results

In total, 55 S. aureus isolates were recovered. Eight S. aureus were isolated from food (1 creamery cake, 5 raw milk, and 2 minced beef meat), 16 S. aureus isolates were obtained from nasal carriage, 3 from clinical infections of humans, and 28 S. aureus isolates were identified from sheep mastitis cases.
Twenty-three out of 55 S. aureus isolates (41.8%) were found to be biofilm-producing. All food isolates showed biofilm formation ability. Seven (87.5%) strains were firmly adherent, and one (12.5%) was moderately adherent. Most S. aureus isolates from sheep mastitis were identified as non-adherent 23 (82.1%), and only 5 (17.9%) of them were biofilm producers. Ten (52.6% ) S. aureus isolates from humans were adherent (7 isolates were weakly adherent, and 2 were strongly adherent) (Table 1).
In total, 39 (70.9%) of the isolated S. aureus were found to be slime-producing in the Congo Red test. All S. aureus isolated from food were slime-producing, whereas 18 (64.3%) and 13 (68.4%) of sheep and human isolates showed slime production, respectively (Table 1). No significant difference between animal and human isolates was observed in slime production (p > 0.05).
In a cross-analysis of slime and biofilm production ability with two assays (CRA and TCP), all food isolates were simultaneously biofilm and slime producers. Only two isolates (7.1%) from sheep mastitis and 8 (42.1%) from humans were found to be TCP-positive and slime producers.
The results of DNA microarray analysis showed that all isolates from sheep mastitis cases and food samples were identified as methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), while four (21.1%) S. aureus strains isolated from humans were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), harboring the mecA gene (SCCmec type IV). Among the four MRSA isolates (isolated from nasal swabs), two were weakly biofilm-producing with slime production, and the others neither showed biofilm production nor slime production.
Subsequent microarray analysis typed the MSSA into 15 different clonal complexes (CCs) (5 in sheep, 10 in humans, and 4 in food) (Table 2). The ruminant leukocidin genes lukF-P83 and lukM were found in 27 (25 sheep, 1 human, and 1 food) isolates belonging to CC130/521, CC479, CC522, and CC705. Two MSSA isolates (1 from sheep and 1 from human) were not typable. Four MRSA isolated from humans were typed into 2 CC (CC22-MRSA-IV and CC80-MRSA-IV). The Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) gene was detected only in one MRSA isolated from a human.
Isolates were assigned to three agr groups: the predominant agr group was agrIII (43.6%), followed by agrI (38.2%), and agrII (18.2%). The regulatory gene sarA was detected in all isolates (Table 3 and Table 4).
The distributions of biofilm-associated genes, genes encoding MSCRAMMs, and regulatory genes among isolates regarding biofilm and slime formation are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. All isolates harbored icaACD genes but the bap gene was not found.
For MSCRAMMs genes, clfA/B, ebpS, eno, fnbA, map, sdrC, and vwb genes were detected in all isolates, regardless of their origin or ability to form biofilms. In biofilm-producing isolates originating from sheep mastitis, the cna gene was not detected, while the cna gene was found in 50% of biofilm-producing isolates from humans (5/10) and food (4/8). The fnbB gene was identified in all food isolates and moderately detected in 40% (2/5) in sheep mastitis biofilm-producing isolates.
The results revealed that agrI, agrII, and agrIII types were detected in 7 (1 moderate and 6 weak adherent), 6 (4 strong and 2 weak adherent), and 6 (4 strong and 2 moderate adherent) biofilm-producing S. aureus isolates, respectively.
Sixty percent (3/5) of biofilm-producing isolates from sheep mastitis cases and 20% (2/10) of isolates from humans belonged to agrIII. In biofilm-producing S. aureus isolated from humans, agrI was predominantly detected in five isolates (50%), followed by agrII in 3 isolates (30%). In biofilm-producing S. aureus isolated from food samples, agrII and agrIII were equally detected (37.5%), while agrI was found in 2 (25%) isolates.
The cna, fnbB, and sasG genes were occasionally detected in S. aureus isolated from sheep mastitis (21.4%, 17.9%, and 32.1%, respectively), but frequently among human isolates, in either slime producers or non-slime producers.
The cna gene was detected in 8 (61.5%), 4 (50%), and 4 (22.2%) of slime-producing S. aureus originating from humans, food, and sheep mastitis, respectively. The fnbB gene was found in 100%, 61.5%, and 16.7% of slime-producing S. aureus isolated from food isolates (8/8), humans (8/13), and sheep mastitis (3/18), respectively.
The sdrD gene was detected in 42 isolated S. aureus in this study. The sdrD gene was found in 12 (92.3%), 7 (87.5%), and 18 (72.2%) of slime-producing S. aureus originating from humans, food, and sheep mastitis, respectively. Noticeably, the sdrD gene was found more frequently in slime producers than in non-slime producers (p > 0.05).
The results revealed that the agrI, agrII, and agrIII genes were detected in 14 (35.9%), 7 (17.9%), and 18 (46.2%) slime-producing S. aureus, respectively.
Among the slime-producing isolates assigned to agrIII, 66.7% (12/18), 37.5% (3/8), and 23.1% (3/13) were obtained from sheep mastitis, food, and humans, respectively. In slime-producing S. aureus isolated from humans, agrI was detected in 7 isolates (53.8%) followed by agrII and agrIII in 3 isolates (23.1%). In slime-producing S. aureus isolates from food samples, agrII and agrIII were equally often detected (37.5%), while agrI was found in 25% of the isolates.

4. Discussion

Staphylococcus aureus is a zoonotic pathogen capable of causing a wide variety of syndromes in animals and humans. Biofilm-producing S. aureus is considered as a major public and animal health concern. The objectives of this study were to investigate the biofilm-forming ability of S. aureus isolated from different sources and to analyze biofilm-associated and regulatory genes using microarray analysis.
In this study, all isolates from food showed higher biofilm production than those from humans (52.6%) and sheep mastitis cases (17.9%). This result was in concordance with the study of Rodriguez-Lazaro et al. [38]. Most of S. aureus isolates from sheep mastitis did not form biofilms (82.1%), which was in concordance with a previous report on S. aureus isolates from sheep milk [39]. In the present study, 52.6% of human isolates were biofilm-producing S. aureus. Concordantly, it was reported that isolates able to produce biofilm were more often found among clinical isolates from humans than in commensal isolates [40].
The CRA assay showed that slime production occurred frequently (70.1%) and isolates from food are more likely to be slime producers (100%) than isolates from humans (68.4%) or sheep mastitis (64.3%) isolates. The present findings were in concordance with studies of Ammendolia et al. for human clinical isolates (88.9%) [41] and Duran et al. for isolates from nasal samples (58.3%) [42].
The cross-analysis of biofilm-formation and slime production ability using the results of TCP and CRA assays revealed no perfect correlation in S. aureus isolated from humans (52.6% versus 68.4%) and sheep mastitis cases (17.9% versus 64.3%), but matched perfectly in food. This finding corroborates the results of a previous study on S. aureus strains, in which isolates from bovine mastitis were more frequently slime-producing (CRA assay) than biofilm-forming isolates on TCA (91.4% versus 68.6%) [43].
Subsequent microarray analysis showed high genetic diversity among isolated S. aureus from different sources in this study.
In this study, S. aureus isolates were genetically diverse (15 CCs). The ruminant leukocidin genes lukF-P83 and lukM were found in 27 isolates (25 sheep, 1 human, and 1 food). The Panton-Valentine-Leukocidin (PVL) gene, which is mostly associated with community-acquired MRSA infections, was detected only in one MRSA isolated from a human.
Previous investigations showed that the intracellular adhesion (icaACD) gene products are important in the ability of S. aureus biofilm formation [44,45]. The presented data of the DNA microarray analysis revealed that all S. aureus isolates harbored icaACD genes regardless of their origin. These results were in agreement with several findings made in human infections [46], human nasal samples [47], sheep mastitis [48], and isolates from food matrices [6].
Here, not all icaACD gene-carrying isolates had the capacity to produce biofilms and/or slime. It was reported that the correlation between ica carriage and biofilm-forming ability in S. aureus is unpredictable [3], because the expression of biofilm-depending genes and adhesion on surfaces is a complex process of gene regulation dependant on several factors as well as nutrients, pH value, and surface characteristics [15,18,19,49].
In this study, presence of the bap gene was not found in any of the isolates. In general, the bap gene, which promotes inert surfaces and intracellular adhesion, is rarely observed in S. aureus [39,50] and its presence has only been reported in few S. aureus isolates from cases of bovine and sheep mastitis [39,51,52].
On the other hand, few extracellular proteins as well as cell-bound MSCRAMMs are considered essential for the pathogenicity of S. aureus. Indeed, genes like fnb (A and B), clfA, and cna that encode MSCRAMMs are responsible for adhesion to host cells, and may participate in biofilm formation [53]. In S. aureus, fnbAB genes encode for fibronectin-binding proteins, which are functioning as adhesins and invasins to modulate adherence and internalization, and it has also been reported to facilitate biofilm assembly [53,54].
FnBPA and FnBPB proteins are involved in biofilm maturation but not in primary attachment. They are generally involved in the ica-encoded polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA) [54]. This function was confirmed by a report in which a primary attached biofilm was damaged by fnbAB mutation [53]. The findings of this study showed that fnbA and fnbB were detected in 100% and 41.8% of all S. aureus isolates, respectively. In a previous study, fnbA and fnbB genes were detected in 77.8% and 81% of MRSA isolates from patients, respectively [55]. Here, the fnbB gene was rarely detected among non-biofilm-producing isolates but found in all biofilm-producing isolates from food matrices and humans. These findings were in discordance with a previous reports where either the fnbB gene was not detected in biofilm-producing isolates [6] or detected in a low level (29.0%) in MRSA isolated from humans [50]. However, a previous study reported that fnbB occurred frequently (99.5%) in S. aureus isolated from humans [46].
Clumping factors ClfA and ClfB encoded by the genes clfA and clfB are the most important proteins for the binding of S. aureus to fibrinogen and fibrin [56]. In this study, all S. aureus harbored clfAB genes, which is contradictory to reports on sheep mastitis isolates [7] and isolates from human nasal and clinical samples [50].
Our findings showed that 57.1% of biofilm-producing isolates from food carried the cna gene, while in previous studies, it was reported that 80% of the biofilm-forming isolates from food were cna-positive [6] and 73% of the clinical isolates [55]. Contrary to our results, another study showed that only 17% of S. aureus isolated from sheep mastitis possessed the cna gene, suggesting that the cna gene was detected only in some clonal complexes of S. aureus [57].
The sasG gene (surface protein of S. aureus) was shown to promote the formation of biofilms [58]. The present findings revealed that the sasG gene was frequently detected in the biofilm-producing S. aureus independent from the MSCRAMMs genetic performance. Indeed, the product of sasG has the ability to mask other binding components of S. aureus to microbial surface components (MSCRAMMs), including clfB, and limits their promoting to form biofilms [56,59]. Furthermore, sasG promotes strong adhesion affinity, even with masking clfB and independent of the ica-encoded PIA with its masking properties. The sasG biofilm formation was clearly shown to be dependent on the level of sasG expression [59].
In S. aureus, the accessory gene regulator (agr) and the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sarA) are genetic loci that determine the regulation and control of the expression of several virulence determinants [57]. Both sarA and agr play global regulatory roles in the limitation and/or propagation of S. aureus biofilm formation [20,60].
The biofilm-producing S. aureus strains isolated from food in this study carried agrI, II, or III, while other studies found that the majority (60%) of biofilm-producing S. aureus were the carriers of agrIII [6]. In S. aureus isolated from humans in this study, the agrI was more predominant in biofilm producers followed by agrII, which disagreed with a previous study in Palestine that reported biofilm-producing S. aureus isolated from humans mainly possessed agrI and agrIII [50]. It was reported that agr expression can restrict biofilm formation allowing the colonization of a new surface by dispersion of the bacterium from a previously formed biofilm [12,61].
The sarA gene is strongly related to the polysaccharide poly-N-acetylglucosamine (PNAG)- dependent biofilm formation in S. aureus [60,62]. In this study, all isolates carried the sarA gene independent of their ability to form biofilms. The detection of sarA is likely correlated to the detection of icaACD loci, as demonstrated by previous findings [55,60,62] where isolates harboring icaADBC genes were found to be positive for the sarA gene and isolates of the icaADBC-negative genotype did not carry sarA.
The biofilm formation ability of S. aureus isolated from sheep mastitis cases was detected in 17.9% of isolated strains consolidated the fact that pathogenesis of udder infection critically depends on adhesion of S. aureus to the mammary gland parenchyma. In the same tendency, the binding and/or insertion ability of S. aureus to mammary gland epithelium was related to the production of biofilms [13]. In addition, biofilm formation limits antimicrobial agents therapy of mastitis by reducing the diffusion of antibiotics through the biofilm matrix [14,63].
In conclusion, S. aureus as known pathogenic bacteria can induce gene expression of biofilm that has an important role in the pathogenesis of staphylococcal infections and causes bacterial attachment and colonization on tissues or surfaces that may act as a substrate for microbial adhesion. This study revealed the biofilm-forming ability of S. aureus isolated from human, animal, and food samples. It represents an extensive analysis of several potential biofilm-associated-genes in S. aureus isolates. The results of this study proved that MSSA isolates from food origin have significant capacity for forming biofilms, which can play a key role for the successful dissemination of MSSA lineages via food.
Therefore, significant differences in gene carriage between biofilm-forming and non-biofilm-forming isolates were not observed.
To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first of its kind in Algeria to evaluate the biofilm and slime-forming abilities among S. aureus recovered from different origins.

Author Contributions

Data curation, R.A., I.N., S.K, D.M. and N.D.; Methodology, R.A., I.N., H.H., R.E. and S.M.; Investigation, R.A., I.N. and S.K.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.A., I.N., H.H. and H.E.-A.; Writing—review and editing, H.H., H.T., R.E., S.M., H.N. and H.E.-A.; Supervision, H.H. and H.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Byrgit Hofmann and Peggy Methner at the Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Jena, Germany, and Elke Müller and Annett Reißig at Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), Jena, Germany, for their excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tam, K.; Torres, V.J. Staphylococcus aureus secreted toxins and extracellular enzymes. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Costerton, J.W.; Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. O’Neill, E.; Pozzi, C.; Houston, P.; Smyth, D.; Humphreys, H.; Robinson, D.A.; O’Gara, J.P. Association between methicillin susceptibility and biofilm regulation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from device-related infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 1379–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Brady, R.A.; Leid, J.G.; Calhoun, J.H.; Costerton, J.W.; Shirtliff, M.E. Osteomyelitis and the role of biofilms in chronic infection. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 52, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Fitzpatrick, F.; Humphreys, H.; O’Gara, J.P. The genetics of staphylococcal biofilm formation—Will a greater understanding of pathogenesis lead to better management of device-related infection? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2005, 11, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Vergara, A.; Normanno, G.; Di Ciccio, P.; Pedonese, F.; Nuvoloni, R.; Parisi, A.; Santagada, G.; Colagiorgi, A.; Zanardi, E.; Ghidini, S.; et al. Biofilm formation and its relationship with the molecular characteristics of food-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 2364–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Azara, E.; Longheu, C.; Sanna, G.; Tola, S. Biofilm formation and virulence factor analysis of Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from ovine mastitis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Melchior, M.B.; van Osch, M.H.; Lam, T.J.; Vernooij, J.C.; Gaastra, W.; Fink-Gremmels, J. Extended biofilm susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus bovine mastitis isolates: Evidence for association between genetic makeup and biofilm susceptibility. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 5926–5937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Achek, R.; El-Adawy, H.; Hotzel, H.; Tomaso, H.; Ehricht, R.; Hamdi, T.M.; Azzi, O.; Monecke, S. Short communication: Diversity of staphylococci isolated from sheep mastitis in northern Algeria. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Karahan, M.; Acik, M.N.; Cetinkaya, B. Investigation of toxin genes by polymerase chain reaction in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis in Turkey. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 1029–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Archer, N.K.; Mazaitis, M.J.; Costerton, J.W.; Leid, J.G.; Powers, M.E.; Shirtliff, M.E. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: Properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence 2011, 2, 445–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kong, K.F.; Vuong, C.; Otto, M. Staphylococcus quorum sensing in biofilm formation and infection. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Aguilar, B.; Amorena, B.; Iturralde, M. Effect of slime on adherence of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine and ovine mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 2001, 78, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mah, T.F. Biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Abdallah, M.; Benoliel, C.; Drider, D.; Dhulster, P.; Chihib, N.E. Biofilm formation and persistence on abiotic surfaces in the context of food and medical environments. Arch. Microbiol. 2014, 196, 453–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Donlan, R.M.; Costerton, J.W. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 167–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Beenken, K.E.; Dunman, P.M.; McAleese, F.; Macapagal, D.; Murphy, E.; Projan, S.J.; Blevins, J.S.; Smeltzer, M.S. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 4665–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Otto, M. Staphylococcal biofilms. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shenkman, B.; Rubinstein, E.; Cheung, A.L.; Brill, G.E.; Dardik, R.; Tamarin, I.; Savion, N.; Varon, D. Adherence properties of Staphylococcus aureus under static and flow conditions: Roles of agr and sar loci, platelets, and plasma ligands. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 4473–4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Xu, D.; Shi, L.; Cai, R.; Li, C.; Yan, H. Association between agr type, virulence factors, biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from pork production. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Achek, R.; Hotzel, H.; Cantekin, Z.; Nabi, I.; Hamdi, T.M.; Neubauer, H.; El-Adawy, H. Emerging of antimicrobial resistance in staphylococci isolated from clinical and food samples in Algeria. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Antri, K.; Rouzic, N.; Dauwalder, O.; Boubekri, I.; Bes, M.; Lina, G.; Vandenesch, F.; Tazir, M.; Ramdani-Bouguessa, N.; Etienne, J. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone ST80-IV in hospital and community settings in Algiers. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 526–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Chaalal, W.; Chaalal, N.; Bourafa, N.; Kihal, M.; Diene, S.M.; Rolain, J.M. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food products in western Algeria. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zaatout, N.; Ayachi, A.; Kecha, M.; Kadlec, K. Identification of staphylococci causing mastitis in dairy cattle from Algeria and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 29, 14402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. ISO. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Coagulase-Positive Staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and Other Species)—Part 1: Technique Using Baird-Parker Agar Medium; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  26. Denis, F.; Ploy, M.C.; Martin, C.; Bingen, E.; Quentin, R. Bactériologie Médicale: Techniques Usuelles, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Masson SAS: Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  27. Oliver, S.P.; Gonzalez, R.N.; Hogan, J.S.; Jayarao, M.; Owens, W.E. Microbiological Procedures for the Diagnosis of Bovine Udder Infection and Determination of Milk Quality, 4th ed.; Council, N.M., Ed.; National Mastitis Council NMC Inc.: Verona, WI, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Quinn, P.J.; Carter, M.E.; Markey, B.K.; Carter, G.R. (Eds.) Clinical Veterinary Microbiology; Lynton House; Mosby-Year Book Europe Limited: London, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bizzini, A.; Greub, G. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, a revolution in clinical microbial identification. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 1614–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. El-Adawy, H.; Ahmed, M.; Hotzel, H.; Monecke, S.; Schulz, J.; Hartung, J.; Ehricht, R.; Neubauer, H.; Hafez, H.M. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from healthy turkeys and broilers using DNA microarrays. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Freeman, D.J.; Falkiner, F.R.; Keane, C.T. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Pathol. 1989, 42, 872–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Arciola, C.R.; Campoccia, D.; Montanaro, L. Detection of biofilm-forming strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. aureus. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2002, 2, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Touati, A.; Achour, W.; Abbassi, M.S.; Ben Hassen, A. Detection of ica genes and slime production in a collection of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains from catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients. Pathol. Biol. 2007, 55, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stepanovic, S.; Vukovic, D.; Hola, V.; Di Bonaventura, G.; Djukic, S.; Cirkovic, I.; Ruzicka, F. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: Overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 2007, 115, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Monecke, S.; Ehricht, R.; Slickers, P.; Wernery, R.; Johnson, B.; Jose, S.; Wernery, U. Microarray-based genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from camels. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 150, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Monecke, S.; Ehricht, R. Rapid genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates using miniaturised oligonucleotide arrays. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2005, 11, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Monecke, S.; Slickers, P.; Ehricht, R. Assignment of Staphylococcus aureus isolates to clonal complexes based on microarray analysis and pattern recognition. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 53, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Rodriguez-Lazaro, D.; Alonso-Calleja, C.; Oniciuc, E.A.; Capita, R.; Gallego, D.; Gonzalez-Machado, C.; Wagner, M.; Barbu, V.; Eiros-Bouza, J.M.; Nicolau, A.I.; et al. Characterization of biofilms formed by foodborne methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Martins, K.B.; Faccioli-Martins, P.Y.; Riboli, D.F.; Pereira, V.C.; Fernandes, S.; Oliveira, A.A.; Dantas, A.; Zafalon, L.F.; da Cunha Mde, L. Clonal profile, virulence and resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from sheep milk. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015, 46, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Agarwal, A.; Jain, A. Glucose & sodium chloride induced biofilm production & ica operon in clinical isolates of staphylococci. Indian J. Med. Res. 2013, 138, 262–266. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ammendolia, M.G.; Di Rosa, R.; Montanaro, L.; Arciola, C.R.; Baldassarri, L. Slime production and expression of the slime-associated antigen by staphylococcal clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 3235–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Duran, N.; Dogramaci, Y.; Demir, C.; Ozer, B.; Kalaci, A. Detection of slime and methicillin resistance genes in staphylococci isolated from nasal samples of patients with orthopaedic implants. Med. Sci. Monit. 2010, 16, BR271–BR277. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vasudevan, P.; Nair, M.K.; Annamalai, T.; Venkitanarayanan, K.S. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet. Microbiol. 2003, 92, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cramton, S.E.; Gerke, C.; Schnell, N.F.; Nichols, W.W.; Gotz, F. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 5427–5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Maira-Litran, T.; Kropec, A.; Abeygunawardana, C.; Joyce, J.; Mark, G.; Goldmann, D.A.; Pier, G.B. Immunochemical properties of the staphylococcal poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 4433–4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Arciola, C.R.; Campoccia, D.; Gamberini, S.; Baldassarri, L.; Montanaro, L. Prevalence of cna, fnbA and fnbB adhesin genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from orthopedic infections associated to different types of implant. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 246, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Piechota, M.; Kot, B.; Frankowska-Maciejewska, A.; Gruzewska, A.; Wozniak-Kosek, A. Biofilm formation by methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains from hospitalized patients in Poland. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 4657396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Tel, O.Y.; Aslantas, O.; Keskin, O.; Yilmaz, E.S.; Demir, C. Investigation of the antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from gangrenous mastitis of ewes. Acta Vet. Hung. 2012, 60, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Stewart, E.J.; Ganesan, M.; Younger, J.G.; Solomon, M.J. Artificial biofilms establish the role of matrix interactions in staphylococcal biofilm assembly and disassembly. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Azmi, K.; Qrei, W.; Abdeen, Z. Screening of genes encoding adhesion factors and biofilm production in methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Palestinian patients. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Herron, L.L.; Chakravarty, R.; Dwan, C.; Fitzgerald, J.R.; Musser, J.M.; Retzel, E.; Kapur, V. Genome sequence survey identifies unique sequences and key virulence genes with unusual rates of amino acid substitution in bovine Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 3978–3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cucarella, C.; Solano, C.; Valle, J.; Amorena, B.; Lasa, I.; Penades, J.R. Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 2888–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Houston, P.; Rowe, S.E.; Pozzi, C.; Waters, E.M.; O’Gara, J.P. Essential role for the major autolysin in the fibronectin-binding protein-mediated Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotype. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 1153–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. O’Neill, E.; Pozzi, C.; Houston, P.; Humphreys, H.; Robinson, D.A.; Loughman, A.; Foster, T.J.; O’Gara, J.P. A novel Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotype mediated by the fibronectin-binding proteins, FnBPA and FnBPB. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 3835–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gowrishankar, S.; Kamaladevi, A.; Balamurugan, K.; Pandian, S.K. In vitro and in vivo biofilm characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients associated with pharyngitis infection. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1289157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. O’Brien, L.M.; Walsh, E.J.; Massey, R.C.; Peacock, S.J.; Foster, T.J. Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor B (ClfB) promotes adherence to human type I cytokeratin 10: Implications for nasal colonization. Cell. Microbiol. 2002, 4, 759–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Monecke, S.; Luedicke, C.; Slickers, P.; Ehricht, R. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in asymptomatic carriers. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 28, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Geoghegan, J.A.; Corrigan, R.M.; Gruszka, D.T.; Speziale, P.; O’Gara, J.P.; Potts, J.R.; Foster, T.J. Role of surface protein SasG in biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 5663–5673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Corrigan, R.M.; Rigby, D.; Handley, P.; Foster, T.J. The role of Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SasG in adherence and biofilm formation. Microbiology 2007, 153, 2435–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Valle, J.; Toledo-Arana, A.; Berasain, C.; Ghigo, J.M.; Amorena, B.; Penades, J.R.; Lasa, I. SarA and not sigmaB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 48, 1075–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Boles, B.R.; Horswill, A.R. agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, 1000052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Beenken, K.E.; Blevins, J.S.; Smeltzer, M.S. Mutation of sarA in Staphylococcus aureus limits biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 4206–4211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Basanisi, M.G.; La Bella, G.; Nobili, G.; Franconieri, I.; La Salandra, G. Genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from milk and dairy products in South Italy. Food Microbiol. 2017, 62, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Distribution of biofilm and slime-producing S. aureus isolated from sheep, humans, and food samples.
Table 1. Distribution of biofilm and slime-producing S. aureus isolated from sheep, humans, and food samples.
CriteriaSheep (28)
n (%)		Human (19)
n (%)		Food (8)
n (%)
Biofilm-producing
(TCP performance) *		PositiveStrong02 (10.5)7 (87.5)
Moderate2 (7.14)1 (5.3)1 (12.5)
Weak 3 (10.7)7 (36.8)0
Total5 (17.9)10 (52.6)8 (100)
Negative23 (82.1)9 (47.4)0
Slime-producing
(CRA performance) **		SlimePositive14 (50.0)9 (47.4)8 (100)
Variable4 (14.3)4 (21.1)0
Total18 (64.3)13 (68.4)8 (100)
No slime10 (35.7)6 (31.6)0
Biofilm and slime-producing (TCP and CRA)2 (7.1)8 (42.1)8 (100)
* TCP: Tissue Culture Plate; ** CRA: Congo Red Agar
Table
Table 2. Genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
Table 2. Genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
Clonal ComplexSheep (n = 28)Human (n = 19)Food (n = 8)Comments
CC1-MSSA02 (10.5%)3 (37.5%)Common lineage in cattle and in humans
CC5-MSSA01 (5.3%)2 (25.0%)Common lineage in humans and in poultry
CC8-MSSA1 (3.6%)00Common human lineage, no data on sheep
CC15-MSSA01 (5.3%)0Common human lineage
CC22-MSSA04 (21.1%)0Common human lineage
CC22-MRSA-IV (tst 1+)03 (15.8%)0Common MRSA strain in humans from the Middle East and the Mediterranean
CC30-MSSA01 (5.3%)0Common human lineage
CC45-MSSA 2 (10.5%) Common human lineage
CC80-MRSA-IV (PVL+)01 (5.3%)0Common MRSA strain in humans from the Middle East and the Mediterranean
CC97-MSSA1 (3.6%)1 (5.3%)2 (25.0%)Common lineage in cattle and in humans
CC130/521-MSSA18 (64.3%)00Common lineage in sheep/goats
CC398-MSSA01 (5.3%)0Common lineage in poultry and increasingly in humans
CC479-MSSA2 (11.1%)01 (12.5%)Common lineage in cattle
CC522-MSSA4 (14.3%)00Common lineage in sheep/goats
CC705-MSSA1 (3.6%)1 (5.3%)0Common lineage in cattle, unusual in humans, no sufficient data on sheep
Not identified1 (3.6%)1 (5.3%)0
Total CCs detected5104
Table
Table 3. Correlation between biofilm formation ability using TCP assay and distribution of biofilm-associated genes, microbial surface components that recognize adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) genes, and regulatory genes in the tested S. aureus isolates.
Table 3. Correlation between biofilm formation ability using TCP assay and distribution of biofilm-associated genes, microbial surface components that recognize adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) genes, and regulatory genes in the tested S. aureus isolates.
CriteriaSheep Mastitis Isolates (n = 28)Human Isolates (n = 19)Food Isolates (n = 8)
Absence
(23)		Weak
(3)		Moderate
(2)		Strong
(0)		Absence
(9)		Weak
(7)		Moderate
(1)		Strong
(2)		Absence
(0)		Weak
(0)		Moderate
(1)		Strong
(7)
Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin and biofilm associated protein genesicaACD23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
bap000000000000
Genes encoding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs)bbp23 (100%)2 (66.6%)2 (100%)08 (88.8%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)5 (71.4%)
clfA/B23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
cna6 (26%)0008 (88.8%)3 (42.8%)1 (100%)1 (50%)0004 (57.1%)
ebh23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)05 (55.5%)4 (57.1%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
ebpS23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
eno23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
fib23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)01 (11.1%)4 (75.1%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
fnbA23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
fnbB3 (13.0%)2 (66.6%)004 (44.4%)3 (42.8%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
map23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
sasG7 (30.4%)2 (66.6%)005 (55.5%)6 (85.7%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
sdrC23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
sdrD15 (65.2%)2 (66.6%)2 (100%)07 (77.7%)6 (85.7%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)6 (85.7%)
vwb23 (100%))3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
Regulatory genesagrI5 (21.7%)2 (66.6%)007 (77.7%)4 (57.1%)1 (100%)0001 (100%)1 (14.2%)
II3 (13.0%)0001 (11.1%)2 (28.5%)01 (50%)0003 (42.9%)
III15 (65.2%)1 (33.3%)2 (100%)01 (11.1%)1 (14.2%)01 (50%)0003 (42.9%)
IV000000000000
sarA23 (100%)3 (100%)2 (100%)09 (100%)7 (100%)1 (100%)2 (100%)001 (100%)7 (100%)
Table
Table 4. Correlation between slime production ability using CRA assay and distribution of biofilm-associated genes, MSCRAMMs genes, and regulatory genes in S. aureus isolates.
Table 4. Correlation between slime production ability using CRA assay and distribution of biofilm-associated genes, MSCRAMMs genes, and regulatory genes in S. aureus isolates.
CriteriaSheep Mastitis Isolates (n = 28)Human Isolates (n = 19)Food Isolates (n = 8)
Slime Producing (18)No Slime Producing (10)Slime Producing (13)No Slime Producing (6)Slime Producing (8)No Slime Producing (0)
Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin and biofilm-associated protein genesicaACD18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0
bap000000
Genes encoding microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs)bbp17 (94.4%)10 (100%)12 (92.3%)6 (100%)6 (75.0%)0
clfA/B18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0
cna4 (22.2%)2 (20.0%)9 (69.2%)4 (66.6%)4 (50.0%)0
ebh18 (100%)10 (100%)9 (69.2%)3 (50.0%)8 (100%)0
ebpS18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0
eno18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0
fib18 (100%)10 (100%)6 (46.1%92 (33.3%)8 (100%)0
fnbA18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0
fnbB18 (100%)2 (20.0%)8 (61.5%)2 (33.3%)8 (100%)0
map18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0
sasG6 (33.3%)3 (30.0%)10 (76.9%)4 (66.6%)8 (100%)0
sdrC18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0
sdrD13 (72.2%)6 (60.0%)12 (92.3%)4 (66.6%)7 (87.5%)0
vwb18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0
Regulatory genesagrI5 (27.7%)2 (20.0%)7 (53.8%)5 (83.3%)2 (25%)0
II1 (5.5%)2 (20.0%)3 (23.0%)1 (16.6%)3 (37.5%)0
III12 (66.6%)6 (60%)3 (23.0%)03 (37.5%)0
IV000000
sarA18 (100%)10 (100%)13 (100%)6 (100%)8 (100%)0

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Achek, R.; Hotzel, H.; Nabi, I.; Kechida, S.; Mami, D.; Didouh, N.; Tomaso, H.; Neubauer, H.; Ehricht, R.; Monecke, S.; et al. Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Different Sources in Algeria. Pathogens 2020, 9, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020153

AMA Style

Achek R, Hotzel H, Nabi I, Kechida S, Mami D, Didouh N, Tomaso H, Neubauer H, Ehricht R, Monecke S, et al. Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Different Sources in Algeria. Pathogens. 2020; 9(2):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Achek, Rachid, Helmut Hotzel, Ibrahim Nabi, Souad Kechida, Djamila Mami, Nassima Didouh, Herbert Tomaso, Heinrich Neubauer, Ralf Ehricht, Stefan Monecke, and et al. 2020. "Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Different Sources in Algeria" Pathogens 9, no. 2: 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9020153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop