Next Article in Journal
Robust Output Feedback Position Control of Hydraulic Support with Neural Network Compensator
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Smart Materials-Based Instrumentation for Force Measurements in Biomedical Applications: A Methodological Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Technical Note

Robotic Hummingbird Axial Dynamics and Control near Hovering: A Simulation Model

Department of Control Engineering and System Analysis, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), CP. 165-55, 50 Av. F.D. Roosevelt, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
Actuators 2023, 12(7), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/act12070262
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 14 June 2023 / Accepted: 20 June 2023 / Published: 25 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Actuators for Robotics)

Abstract

After a short overview of the COLIBRI project, this paper considers the cycle-averaged flight dynamics of a flapping-wing robot near hovering, taking advantage of the weak coupling between the roll and pitch axes. The system is naturally unstable; it needs to be stabilized actively, which requires an attitude reconstruction. Due to the flapping of the wings, the system is subject to a strong periodic noise at the flapping frequency and its higher harmonics; the resulting axial forces and pitch moments are characterized from experimental data. The flapping noise propagates to the six-axis Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) consisting of three accelerometers and three gyros. The paper is devoted to attitude reconstruction in the presence of flapping noise representative of flight conditions. Two methods are considered: (i) the complementary filter based on the hovering assumption and (ii) a full-state dynamic observer (Kalman filter). Unlike the complementary filter, the full-state dynamic observer allows the reconstruction of the axial velocity, allowing us to control the hovering without any additional sensor. A numerical simulation is conducted to assess the merit of the two methods using experimental noise data obtained with the COLIBRI robot. The paper discusses the trade-off between noise rejection and stability.
Keywords: hummingbird; hovering; IMU; attitude reconstruction; complementary filter; dynamic observer; Kalman filter; flapping noise hummingbird; hovering; IMU; attitude reconstruction; complementary filter; dynamic observer; Kalman filter; flapping noise

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Farid, Y.; Wang, L.; Brancato, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, K.; Preumont, A. Robotic Hummingbird Axial Dynamics and Control near Hovering: A Simulation Model. Actuators 2023, 12, 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/act12070262

AMA Style

Farid Y, Wang L, Brancato L, Wang H, Wang K, Preumont A. Robotic Hummingbird Axial Dynamics and Control near Hovering: A Simulation Model. Actuators. 2023; 12(7):262. https://doi.org/10.3390/act12070262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farid, Yousef, Liang Wang, Lorenzo Brancato, Han Wang, Kainan Wang, and André Preumont. 2023. "Robotic Hummingbird Axial Dynamics and Control near Hovering: A Simulation Model" Actuators 12, no. 7: 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/act12070262

APA Style

Farid, Y., Wang, L., Brancato, L., Wang, H., Wang, K., & Preumont, A. (2023). Robotic Hummingbird Axial Dynamics and Control near Hovering: A Simulation Model. Actuators, 12(7), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/act12070262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop