Next Article in Journal
Modeling the Impact of Management Changes on the Infection Dynamics of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in the Broiler Production
Previous Article in Journal
Lignocellulose Fermentation Products Generated by Giant Panda Gut Microbiomes Depend Ultimately on pH Rather than Portion of Bamboo: A Preliminary Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms10050979
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic and Physiological Characterization of Metabacillus flavus sp. nov., a Novel Carotenoid-Producing Bacilli Isolated from Korean Marine Mud

by
Chi Young Hwang
1,
Eui-Sang Cho
1,
Deok Jun Yoon
1,
In-Tae Cha
2,
Dong-Hyun Jung
2,
Young-Do Nam
3,
So-Lim Park
3,
Seong-Il Lim
3,* and
Myung-Ji Seo
1,4,5,*
1
Department of Bioengineering and Nano-Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea
2
Microorganism Resources Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon 22689, Korea
3
Personalized Diet Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea
4
Division of Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea
5
Research Center for Bio Materials & Process Development, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(5), 979; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050979
Submission received: 14 April 2022 / Revised: 4 May 2022 / Accepted: 5 May 2022 / Published: 7 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The newly isolated strain KIGAM252T was found to be facultatively anaerobic, Gram-stain-positive, spore-forming, and rod-shaped. They grew at 10–45 °C, pH 6.0–10.0, and were able to tolerate up to 6% NaCl in the growth medium. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the KIGAM252T strain was related to the genus Metabacillus. The cell membrane fatty acid composition of strain KIGAM252T included C15:0 anteiso and C15:0 iso (25.6%) as the major fatty acids, and menaquinone 7 was the predominant isoprenoid quinone. The major polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylglycerol. The size of the whole genome was 4.30 Mbp, and the G + C content of the DNA was 43.8%. Average nucleotide and amino acid identity and in silico DNA-DNA hybridization values were below the species delineation threshold. Pan-genomic analysis revealed that 15.8% of all genes present in strain KIGAM252T was unique to the strain. The analysis of the secondary biosynthetic pathway predicted the carotenoid synthetic gene cluster in the strain KIGAM252T. Based on these current polyphasic taxonomic data, strain KIGAM252T represents a novel species of the genus Metabacillus that produces carotenoids, for which we propose the name Metabacillus flavus sp. nov. The type of strain was KIGAM252T (=KCTC 43261T = JCM 34406T).

1. Introduction

The genus Metabacillus of the Bacillaceae family was first proposed by Patel and Gupta (2020). Most strains of the genus Metabacillus originally belonged to the genus Bacillus. Based on the overall genetic diversity, phylogenomic, and comparative genomic approaches, Bacillus species were proposed to be reclassified into six novel genera (Peribacillus gen. nov., Cytobacillus gen. nov., Mesobacillus gen. nov., Neobacillus gen. nov., Alkalihalobacillus gen. nov., and Metabacillus gen. nov.) [1]. All previously reported species of the genus Metabacillus are described as rod-shaped, Gram-stain-positive or Gram variable, and grow aerobically [1]. Recently, 14 species (M. fastidiosus, M. indicus, M. herbersteinensis, M. litoralis, M. idriensis, M. niabensis, M. galliciensis, M. halosaccharovorans, M. crassostreae, M. endolithicus, M. malikii, M. mangrovi, M. iocasae, and M. lacus) have been transferred from the genus Bacillus to the genus Metabacillus [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Only two species, M. sediminilitoris and M. elymi isolated from tidal sediments and plants native to the Dokdo Island were initially proposed as novel species of the genus Metabacillus [16,17]. The strain KIGAM252T isolated in our study is a novel species of the genus Metabacillus, which can guide the future research of this genus and add to its taxonomic diversity.
Carotenoids are a large and diverse class of natural compounds comprising up to 700 structures produced by plants, fungi, and bacteria [18]. All carotenoids are derived from a precursor of isoprenoids, such as isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and its isomer dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP), which is a C5 compound based on a carbon backbone, by mean of carotenoid biosynthesis [19]. In most bacteria, IPP and DMAPP participate in elongation reactions leading to the C15 (farnesyl pyrophosphate, FPP) and C20 (geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, GGPP) carotenoid precursors [20]. Thus, microbial sources of carotenoids can produce a diverse range of carotenoids, such as those having C30, C40, and C50 backbones [21]. Among the currently known carotenoid-producing microbial sources, a wide range of colors, such as red, orange, yellow, brown, and black, can be obtained from Bacillus sp. alone [22,23]. The presence of varieties of glycosylated and/or esterified carotenoid derivatives, known as apo-carotenoids, has also been reported [24]. This diversity of pigments obtained from the Bacillus species is commercially attractive and has great potential for the development of microbial carotenoid production. In addition, the C30 carotenoid biosynthesis pathway has been established for M. indicus (originally described as Bacillus indicus) and Cytobacillus firmus (originally described as Bacillus firmus), and their carotenoid products have been identified [24,25,26]. In this study, we confirmed the synthetic pathways for the carotenogenic gene cluster and hypothesized the synthetic carotenoid that could potentially be produced by the strain KIGAM252T.
Marine mud is sediment that is generally found at the bottom of the sea. Since the Challenger expedition (1872–1876), there has been increased interest in the biology of microorganisms in the marine environment [27]. The marine environment has high hydraulic pressure and low temperature. Therefore, microorganisms isolated from marine mud may have particular characteristics that enable them to live in harsh environments. Various types of bacteria characterized as alkaliphiles, thermopiles, psychrophiles, and halophiles have been isolated in the marine environment [28,29]. Consequently, there is growing interest in the industrial use of microbes isolated from marine environments [30,31,32]. During the investigation of the diversity and characteristics of mud samples obtained from marine mud in the Uljin, we isolated a novel strain, which we designated as KIGAM252T, and considered it to belong to the genus Metabacillus. In this study, we performed a polyphasic taxonomy approach for physiological, chemotaxonomic, phylogenetic, and comparative genomic characterization of the isolate and proposed that the strain KIGAM252T should be classified as a novel species of the genus Metabacillus, for which we propose the name Metabacillus flavus sp. nov.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain Isolation and Cultivation

Strain KIGAM252T was isolated from a marine mud sample obtained at a depth below 194 m from the Uljin area (36°42′21.8″ N, 129°35′0.7″ E), Republic of Korea, in March 2020. The obtained mud samples (0.5 g) were suspended in 5 mL of 2% NaCl and vortexed. Using the sample solution (0.5 mL), serial dilution was performed in fresh marine broth 2216 (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). An aliquot (100 µL) of the diluted samples was spread onto marine broth containing 1.5% (w/v) agar. Each plate was incubated at different temperatures of 20 and 30 °C for 2 weeks, respectively, following which colonies with different colors were selected and repeatedly sub-cultured to the new marine agar (MA) at least thrice to obtain pure colonies. Finally, one slightly yellow colony of the species isolated from the MA agar plate was selected and designated as strain KIGAM252T and stored at −80 °C in a 20% (w/v) glycerol stock solution for preservation.

2.2. DNA Extraction and Phylogenetic Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from strain KIGAM252T using the HiYieldTM Genomic DNA Mini Kit (RBC Bioscience, New Taipei City, Taiwan). The partial 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using universal bacterial primers 27F, 337F, 785F, 800R, and 1492R [33]. Then, the PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The purified PCR products were sent to Macrogen Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Korea) for sequence analysis. The sequenced products were assembled using a method described in a previous publication [34] using the SeqManTM II expert sequence analysis software [35]. Based on the EzBioCloud 16S-based ID (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/identify, 11 February 2021), sequences of the type strains closely related to strain KIGAM252T were retrieved. The reference strain, M. mangrovi AK61T, was purchased from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM), and M. indicus LMG 22858T was purchased from the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ) and M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T was purchased from the Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms (KCCM) to evaluate and compare their phenotypic properties and perform comparative analyses.
The taxonomic similarity of the resultant 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain KIGAM252T and the closely related taxa was examined using the EzTaxon-e server (http://www.ezbiocloud.net/eztaxon/, 11 February 2021) [36]. Multiple sequence alignments were conducted using the Clustal W multiple sequence alignment program in the BioEdit 7.2.6.1 software [37,38]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by phylogeny to build the application in MEGA 7.0 [39], based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence of KIGAM252T and closely related taxa. Using the three algorithms, maximum-likelihood (ML), neighbor-joining (NJ), and maximum-parsimony (MP) [40,41,42], the sequence relatedness among strain KIGAM252T and the other related taxa were calculated. The tests for phylogeny were conducted using the bootstrap method, and the bootstrap values were set to 1000 replicates. The Kimura two-parameter model was applied to calculate evolutionary distances [43]. Lysinibacillus boronitolerans 10aT was used as the outgroup taxon.

2.3. Phenotypic Characterization

All experiments were performed on cultures grown at 30 °C in tryptic soy agar (TSA) and tryptic soy broth (TSB) (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The cell morphology of strain KIGAM252T was examined by light microscopy (model CX 23; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (LIBRA 120; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Cell motility tests were performed on 0.5% semi-solid TSB agar test tubes by stabbing inoculation [44]. Gram staining was performed using a Gram stain kit (BioWORLD, Dublin, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To assess the cell growth at various salinities, cells were incubated in TSB media with NaCl concentrations ranging from 0% to 12% (w/v) at increments of 1% for 3 days at 30 °C and 180 rpm. The pH range for growth was assessed by growing the cells for 3 days on TSB media with increments of 1.0 pH unit from pH 4.0 to 12.0 at 30 °C and 180 rpm using the following buffer solutions: 100 mM CH3COOH/CH3COONa buffer (pH 4.0–6.0), 100 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 7.0–8.0), 100 mM NaHCO3/Na2CO3 buffer (pH 9.0–10.0), and 100 mM Na2CO3/NaOH buffer (pH 11.0–12.0). The cells were cultured on TSA plates and incubated at 4, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 37, 40, 45, 50, and 55 °C to determine the range of growth temperature. Tests for hydrolysis of casein, gelatin, starch, and Tween 20, 40, and 80 were performed on TSA plates according to a method described in a previous publication [45]. Catalase and oxidase tests were performed using 3% (v/v) H2O2 and 1% tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine. Anaerobic growth was determined using the GasPakTM EZ anaerobic gas generating pouch system with an indicator (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) on TSA plates incubated for 2 weeks at 30 °C. The methyl red and Voges–Proskauer tests were conducted on MR-VP medium (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) with methyl red solution and 5% α-naphthol solution. H2S formation was monitored on TSB media containing 0.5% (w/v) sodium thiosulfate with lead acetate paper. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted on a TSA plate at 30 °C for 2 weeks using the paper disc method [46]. The antibiotics used were as follows (µg per disc): ampicillin (10 µg), anisomycin (50 µg), cephalothin (30 µg), erythromycin (25 µg), gentamicin (30 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), lincomycin (15 µg), neomycin (30 µg), norfloxacin (20 µg), novobiocin (10 µg), penicillin G (20 UI), streptomycin (50 µg), and tetracycline (30 µg). Other phenotypic and biochemical properties were examined using API 20NE, API® ZYM, and API 50CH test kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France).

2.4. Chemotaxonomic Characterization

Strain KIGAM252T and closely related species (M. mangrovi AK61T, M. indicus LMG 22858T, and M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T) were cultivated on TSA at 30 °C for 2 days to analyze fatty acids. The analysis of cellular fatty acids was carried out by first subjecting the cells to saponification and methylation and then extracting the cellular fatty acids according to a method described in a previous publication using 6890 gas chromatography (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a cross-linked methyl siloxane column (HP-1; A30 m × 0.320 mm × 0.25 µm) [47]. Fatty acids were identified and quantified based on data from the TSBA6 database using the Sherlock MIS Software 6.2 [48]. Cells of strain KIGAM252T were cultivated on TSB at 30 °C for 2 days for isoprenoid quinone and polar lipid profile analyses. The cells were freeze-dried, and the isoprenoid quinones were extracted according to the method described in the previous publication and separated by a YL9100 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Younglin, Anyang, Korea) [49]. The polar lipids were extracted and separated using the method described in a previous publication [50]. Polar lipid profiles were determined by subjecting the cell of strain KIGAM252T to freeze-drying and then performing two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using 10 × 10 cm silica gel 60 F254 (Merck, Branchburg, NJ, USA) and detected using molybdophosphoric acid, Zinzadze’s reagent, and α-naphthol reagent.

2.5. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Verification of Authenticity of the Genome Assembly

Genomic DNA was extracted as described previously. The whole-genome sequence of strain KIGAM252T was obtained and sequenced using a Pacific Biosciences RS II instrument with P6-C4 chemistry. De novo genome assembly was performed using Flye assembler 2.7 software with default parameters in PacBio SMRT Analysis v. 2.3.0 [51].
The authenticity and contamination check of the genome of strain KIGAM252T was conducted according to the proposed minimal standards of using the prokaryote genome database [52]. The authenticity of strain KIGAM252T was checked using 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained based on conventional Sanger sequencing and whole-genome sequencing results as described previously. The GenBank accession numbers of the 16S rRNA gene sequence and whole-genome sequences of strain KIGAM252T were MT804551 and JAGVRK010000000, respectively. To verify the contamination in the genome assembly of strain KIGAM252T, the ContEst16S algorithm was used to assess each sequence (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/contest16s, 11 February 2021) [53].

2.6. Genome Annotation and Phylogenomic and Comparative Genomic Analysis

In silico genome annotation of the strain KIGAM252T was conducted by Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (http://rast.nmpdr.org/, 21 April 2021) with the RASTtk pipeline [54,55]. Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) category analysis was performed by EggNOG v5.0 based on a search of predicted homologous genes [56,57]. Comparative genomic analysis was performed by obtaining full genome sequence data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) genome database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/, 16 September 2021) for all species of the genus Metabacillus, namely M. mangrovi AK61T (WMIB00000000), M. indicus LMG 22858T (JNVC00000000), M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T (WKKF00000000), M. crassostreae DSM 25387T (JAFBDU010000001), M. fastidiosus NBRC 101226T (BCVG01000001), M. halosaccharovorans DSM 25387T (KV917371), M.s iocasae DSM 104297T (JAFBFC010000001), M. lacus AK74T (WKKI01000001), M. litoralis SW-211T (VOQF01000001), M. niabensis 4T19T (CADEPK010000001), and M. sediminilitoris DSL-17T (CP046266). The secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters were identified using antiSMASH 6.0 software with strict detection criteria and by additional features derived using various algorithms, including KnownClusterBlast, ClusterBlast, SubClusterBlast, ActiveSiteFinder, and RREFinder (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/, 21 April 2021) [58]. Ortho-average nucleotide identity (OrthoANI) and average amino acid identity (AAI) values among the strain KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus were calculated using the OAT software and EzAAI tool [59,60] to analyze genomic relatedness, respectively. In silico DNA-DNA hybridization (isDDH) values were calculated using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator program (GGDC 2.1; http://ggdc.dsmz.de/distcalc2.php, 16 September 2021) [61] with recommended formula 2 based on DNA-DNA hybridization between KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus [62]. The intergenomic relatedness was compared to that of the genus Metabacillus using the Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) (http://tygs.dsmz.de/, 16 September 2021). A phylogenomic tree was constructed with branch support via FastME 2.1.4, including SPR post-processing using Genome Blast Distance Phylogeny (GBDP) distances, with the numbers above the branches being pseudo-bootstrap support values of GBDP based on 100 replications [63].

2.7. Pan-Genomic Analysis

Pan-genome was constructed using the Bacterial Pan Genome Analysis (BPGA) software [64]. All genomes of the genus Metabacillus and strain KIGAM252T were defined as core (conserved for all strains), accessory (shared by more than two species but not core), and unique (strain-specific) genes. The pan-genome function and pathway analyses were performed based on data from the Database of COGs (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/cog/, 16 September 2021) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/, 16 September 2021) [65] for representative sequences of all orthologous gene families, and a comparative functional analysis of core, accessory, and unique genes were thus performed. For clustering COG and KEGG pan-genome orthologous groups (POGs), the USEARCH algorithm was used with a 50% sequence identity cut-off value. All the results of the plotting data in this analysis were visualized using gnuplot 4.6.6. Multiple sequence alignment performed by Multiple Sequence Comparison by Log-Expectation (MUSCLE) [52] was used to concatenate core genes to generate a phylogenetic tree using the NJ method with 1000 replications of bootstrap values [41].

2.8. Pigment Extraction and Analysis

A concentrated bacterial cell suspension was sonicated for 5 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000× g. The supernatant was lyophilized and treated with acetone/methanol (7:3, v/v). The collected cells were treated with an equal volume of organic solvent, and the suspension was incubated at 37 °C and 180 rpm for 2 h in dark conditions to sufficiently decolorate. The extracts were centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000× g, and the upper organic layers of the extracts were pooled and evaporated using smart evaporator C1 (BioChromato, San Diego, CA, USA) at 40 °C and re-dissolved in methanol/dichloromethane (5:5, v/v). The obtained extracts were subsequently filtered through a 0.2 μm pore size nylon syringe filter (GVS Korea Ltd., Namyangju, Korea), and finally withdrew the crude carotenoid extracts.
The maximum absorbance spectra of the crude carotenoid extracts were measured using a UV-1280 Shimadzu UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The crude extracted pigments were separated and detected using a YL9100 plus HPLC system equipped with a YL9160 photodiode array (PDA) detector (Youngin Chromass, Anyang, Korea). Injections (20 μL) were made, and separations were performed on a C30 (5 μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d.) reverse phase (RP) column (YMC Inc. Wilmington, DE, USA). The mobile phase was a gradient eluent containing methanol/water (92:8, v/v) with 10 mM ammonium acetate (solvent A) and 100% tert-butyl methyl ether (solvent B). Carotenoid extracts were eluted with a gradient of 90% solvent A and 10% solvent B for 20 min. A linear gradient was then initiated to reach 83% solvent A and 17% solvent B at 29 min. Subsequently, a sharply linear gradient was initiated for the elute to reach 30% solvent A and 70% solvent B at 35 min. Finally, a linear gradient was initiated for the elute to reach 25% solvent A and 75% solvent B at 42 min. The column was equilibrated and returned to the initial conditions for over 30 min. A flow rate of 1 mL min−1 was employed, and the profiles were recorded continuously with a PDA detector at 200–600 nm. Identification was performed based on spectral comparison using previously reported methods [24,66].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Characterization and Discrimination

Cells of the novel strain KIGAM252T were Gram-stain-positive, non-motile, spore-forming, and rod-shaped, having a width of 1.5–1.6 µm and a length of 3.9–4.7 µm (Figure S1). Colonies were pale-yellow in color, circular, and flattened as observed on TSA incubated at 30 °C for 2 days. Growth of strain KIGAM252T occurred at 10–45 °C (optimum, 30 °C) and pH 6.0–10.0 (optimum, pH 7.0). In particular, strain KIGAM252T can grow and survive at NaCl concentrations of up to 6% (w/v) (optimal growth at 3% NaCl). This is a rather high tolerance for NaCl compared to that of other reference strains, maybe because of the strain KIGAM252T being isolated from marine mud. Strain KIGAM252T hydrolyzed casein and gelatin but did not hydrolyze starch or Tween 20, 40, and 80. Positive reactions were detected for catalase and oxidase tests. Strain KIGAM252T was observed to grow under anaerobic conditions. The results of the methyl red and the Voges–Proskauer tests were negative, while the H2S formation showed positive results. Strain KIGAM252T was resistant to ampicillin, anisomycin, cephalothin, lincomycin, and penicillin G. Whereas strain KIGAM252T was susceptible to erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, norfloxacin, novobiocin, neomycin, streptomycin, and tetracycline. The detailed characteristics of strain KIGAM252T and related species in the API 20NE, API® ZYM, and API 50CH tests are shown in Table 1.

3.2. Chemotaxonomic Characterization

The major fatty acid profile of strain KIGAM252T showed C15:0 anteiso (35.7%), C15:0 iso (25.6%), C16:0 iso (9.8%), and C17:0 (8.1%) to be the most prevalent fatty acids. These results were similar to those of closely related type strains of the genus Metabacillus (Table 2). The isoprenoid quinone analysis showed that the strain KIGAM252T had MK-7 as the predominant isoprenoid quinone. In the polar lipid profiling of strain KIGAM252T, diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) were identified as major polar lipids, while phosphatidylglycolipids (PGL), aminophospholipid (APL), glycolipids (GL), phospholipids (PL), and some unidentified lipids (L) were found to have minor distributions (Figure S2).

3.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Verification of Authenticity of the Genome Assembly

The genome sequence of the strain KIGAM252T comprised two complete chromosomes; one is large (4,026,853 bp) and the other is small (5635 bp). The total genome size and G + C content of the DNA were 4,302,488 bp and 43.8%, respectively. Strain KIGAM252T was predicted to harbor 4092 genes, including 3898 coding genes, 128 RNA genes, and 66 pseudo-genes. The numbers of rRNAs, tRNAs, and ncRNAs were 34, 89, and 5, respectively. More detailed general genomic features of KIGAM252T are presented in Table 3.
The comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from whole-genome sequencing and conventional Sanger sequencing showed 100% similarity for sequences of strain KIGAM252T obtained by both methods. The authenticity of the genome of strain KIGAM252T was thus verified, as the genome sequences were not found to be contaminated.

3.4. 16S rRNA Gene Phylogeny

A total of 11 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain KIGAM252T (1539 bp) were obtained by whole-genome sequencing, as mentioned above. In the phylogenetic analysis, strain KIGAM252T and other closely related species showed 98.4% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Table S1). The close phylogenetic relatives with the most similarities were M. mangrovi AK61T (98.4%), M. indicus LMG 22858T (97.6%), and M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T (97.1%). Furthermore, according to the phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, the closest clustered species with strain KIGAM252T was M. mangrovi AK61T (91, 99, and 90 in ML, NJ, and MP trees, respectively). Strain KIGAM252T and M. mangrovi AK61T clustered with M. indicus LMG 22858T and M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T (86, 92, and 80 in ML, NJ, and MP trees, respectively) (Figure 1). According to the phylogenetic analysis, strain KIGAM252T was closely related to the other Metabacillus species mentioned above, but the entire phylogenetic tree also showed that most of the type strains of the genus Metabacillus were distinct from strain KIGAM252T [67]. These results suggest that strain KIGAM252T represents a novel species in the genus Metabacillus.

3.5. Genome-Derived Features and Comparative Genomic Analysis

The COG analysis showed a total of 3656 genes to be present in strain KIGAM252T, and 2268 (62.0%) genes associated with the 18 general COG functional categories were classified as functional genes, excluding those classified as functional unknown (S). The most abundant predicted genes of strain KIGAM252T belonged to the COG categories of amino acid transport and metabolism (E, 284, 7.8%), transcription (K, 228, 6.2%), carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G, 191, 5.2%), energy production and conversion (C, 178, 4.9%), and inorganic ion transport and metabolism (P, 175, 4.8%) (Table S2).
Biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) predicted by antiSMASH showed that the genomes of strain KIGAM252T and other Metabacillus species had 4–10 BGCs responsible for the secondary metabolites, including the genes for terpenes, T3PKS, siderophores, lassopeptides, and other biosynthetic genes (LAP & RiPP-like, NRPS, and lanthiopeptide genes) (Table S3). Strain KIGAM252T possesses six BGCs (two terpene genes, and T3PKS, siderophore, lassopeptide, and LAP & RiPP-like genes). However, only one terpene and BGC and lassopeptide BGC shared 66.0% similarity in two known pathways with the carotenoid BGC from Halobacillus halophilus DSM 2266T (GenBank: FJ040212) [68] and 80.0% similarity with the paeninodin BGC from Paenibacillus dendritiformis C454T (GenBank: AHKH01000064) [69] (Table S4). The other four BGCs in strain KIGAM252T shared no similarity with already known pathways. Although the functions of the four BGCs cannot be predicted accurately, they are likely to produce novel bioactive compounds.
Among the BGCs with predicted similarity was already known pathways in KIGAM252T, the carotenoid-associated terpene BGC was detected in all species of the genus Metabacillus, but all clustering patterns of the genus Metabacillus were not equivalent. In addition, the most known clusters that shared the highest similarity with each terpene BGC of the genus Metabacillus were identified to be different. The biosynthetic pathway for carotenoids in strain KIGAM252T showed that the gene for squalene/phytoene synthase family protein was the core gene, and genes for three phytoene desaturases and acyltransferase were additional genes. According to a previous report on C30 carotenoid gene annotation and functional assignment in the Bacillus species, various crtN genes belonging to the crtI gene family were found in M. indicus HU36 and Cytobacillus firmus GB1 [70]. In addition, glycosyl-transferase, acyltransferase, and carboxyltransferase, which modify carotenoid structures, were found in the two species. A comparison with other species of the genus Metabacillus showed strain KIGAM252T to possess a C30 carotenoid biosynthetic gene cluster similar to that present in M. indicus HU36. The organization of genes associated with the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway in both Metabacillus species is shown by nucleotide-based genetic localization (Figure S3). Each gene has been shown previously to be annotated as diapophytoene synthase (crtM), 4,4′ -diapophytoene desaturase (crtNa), 4,4′ -diapophytoene-ketolase (crtNb), 4,4′ -diapophytoene aldehyde oxidase (crtNc), and acyltransferase (AT), respectively [70]. The sequence identities of each gene between strain KIGAM252T and M. indicus HU36 were 47.7–66.4%, and the amino acid identities were 63.2–69.5%, respectively (Table S5). However, the amino acid identity of AT was significantly lower than that of other genes. Diapophytoene synthase (crtM) is predicted to have evolutionary relationships with bacterial phytoene synthase (crtB) [70]. In addition, 4,4′ -diapophytoene desaturase family genes (crtNa, crtNb, and crtNc) belong to the phytoene desaturase (crtI) family [71]. These four genes are related to the synthesis of the universal bacterial C30 carotenoid skeleton. Therefore, they can be conserved from generation to generation or even with interspecies variations. However, genes for glycosyl-transferase, acyltransferase, and carboxyltransferase are additional modification-associated genes involved in bacterial carotenoid synthesis. Therefore, these additional genes may be strain-specific or show high interspecies variation.
The OrthoANI values computed by a comparison between strain KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus ranged from 67.8% to 75.2% (Figure 2). The highest OrthoANI value obtained by comparisons between strain KIGAM252T and other Metabacillus species was 75.2%, as obtained by comparison with M. mangrovi AK61T, while comparisons with other species showed values under 70%. The AAI values were calculated to be ranging from 65.2% to 80.0% (Figure S4). The isDDH values obtained by comparisons between strain KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus did not exceed 30% (Table S6). According to the suggested cut-off values of OrthoANI, AAI, and isDDH for species delineation (less than 95%, 90%, and 70%, respectively) [40,45,54], the calculated values based on the genomic comparison results proposed that KIGAM252T was distinguished from other previously reported Metabacillus species. In addition, the phylogenomic tree associated with intergenomic relatedness showed that the total 12 species of Metabacillus, including strain KIGAM252T, did not involve equivalent species and subspecies clustering (Figure S5). This result provided more evidence of distinctiveness between KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus.

3.6. Pan-Genomic Analysis of the Genus Metabacillus including Strain KIGAM252T

The pan-genomic analysis showed that strain KIGAM252T and 11 species of the genus Metabacillus had a total 18,494 of POGs: 1123 core POGs, 6984 accessory POGs, and 10,387 unique POGs (Figure S6). The genomes of all Metabacillus species show the core and accessory genes to constitute 24.0–30.3% and 32.9–66.5% of protein-coding genes, respectively (Table 4). In addition, strain KIGAM252T had 622 (15.8%) unique POGs, and other species also had various numbers of strain-specific unique POGs (Figure 3). This observation suggests that all species analyzed by the pan-genome analysis were distinct. According to the COG database, strain KIGAM252T had 221 unique POGs, and most POGs were related to Transcription (K, 11.4%), Carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G, 8.1%), Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (M, 7.1%), and Amino acid transport and metabolism (E, 6.6%) (Figure S7A). Such categorization showed a similar trend for all Metabacillus species (less than 3% difference) (Figure S7C). The categories of Replication, recombination, and repair (L) and Inorganic transport and metabolism (P) were enriched in strain KIGAM252T (14.0% and 11.0%, respectively) compared to those in other Metabacillus species (6.1% and 5.7%, respectively). Strain KIGAM252T had 5.3% POGs in the category of signal transduction mechanisms (T), consequently making this category more depleted than that in all species of Metabacillus (9.4%). According to the KEGG database, 159 POGs were confirmed as KEGG categorizations of unique genes, of which 97 POGs were defined as functional KEGG annotations (Table S7). Enrichment of the KEGG categories of the unique POGs in strain KIGAM252T was predicted to be that of the metabolism (47.4%) and environmental information processing-related pathways (18.6%) (Figure S7B). Similar to the results of the COG categorization, most of the strain KIGAM252T-specific POGs were annotated to genes of carbohydrate metabolism (11.3%), amino acid metabolism (11.3%), and membrane transport (12.4%) subcategories. Various dehydrogenases, transferases, transaminases, kinases, deacetylases, mutases, ligases, and synthases of the carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism subcategories were annotated, and the phosphotransferase system (PTS), bacterial secretion system, and ABC transporters of the membrane transport subcategory were detected. In addition, the phylogenomic tree based on concatenated core POGs showed that the strain KIGAM252T was distinct from the other Metabacillus species, as being clustered with M. mangrovi AK61T, and the two species clustered closely with M. indicus LMG 22858T and M. idriensis SMC4352-2T (Figure S8). The construction of the phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences showed the same tendency, which suggests that strain KIGAM252T and Metabacillus mangrovi AK61T are the closest evolutionary related species. According to the pan-genomic analysis, strain KIGAM252T had more unique POGs and a distribution of unique genes distinguished from other Metabacillus species. Thus, the overall pan-genomic analysis confirmed that strain KIGAM252T is a novel species in the genus Metabacillus.

3.7. Identification of Carotenoid in the Strain KIGAM252T

The yellow carotenoid formed by strain KIGAM252T was extracted and subjected to HPLC-PDA analysis. The chromatographic profiles were obtained at 450 and 286 nm (Figure 4A,B). At 450 nm, the peaks could be categorized into two groups according to their absorbance spectra. Group I had a visible spectral maximum of 448 nm and contained predominant peaks 1–3, eluting between 36.54 and 37.70 min (Figure 4(C-I)). Group II contained predominant peaks 4 and 5, eluting between 38.38 and 38.68 min during which the chromatographic components all had a maximum absorption spectrum of 454 nm (Figure 4(C-II)). Chromatographic peaks 6–8 at 286 nm, eluting from 23.6 to 26.5 min represent group III. These chromatographic components all had a maximum absorption spectrum at 286 nm (Figure 4(C-III)). The major carotenoid products of strain KIGAM252T were predicted to be apo-8′-phytoene, 1-glycosyl-apo-8′-lycopene, and their isomers, based on comparisons of the observed spectral properties with those previously reported for Bacillus carotenoids (Table S8) [24,70]. Although additional analyses will be necessary for accurate identification, the products of carotenoid of strain KIGAM252T were highly similar to those of M. indicus HU36 [24,70]. Based on the results of this study and previous studies on this topic, we confirmed the tendency of carotenoid production in Metabacillus species, which can provide better insights into carotenoid production in microorganisms.

4. Conclusions

This study provides the first genome-based approach, including pan-genome analysis, conducted on the genus Metabacillus, and permits the classification of novel species, whose description is given below. In addition, carotenoid biosynthesis in strain KIGAM252T was investigated using genomic comparison as previously reported. Carotenoid extracted from KIGAM252T cell was confirmed using spectrometric and chromatographic analyses. Overall phenotypic and genome-based analyses have been performed to explore the possibilities of taxonomic distinctions compared with other Metabacillus species previously reported. Based on the results, we propose that strain KIGAM252T represents the type strain of a novel species of the genus Metabacillus that produces carotenoids, for which we propose the name Metabacillus flavus sp. nov.

Description of Metabacillus flavus sp. nov.

Metabacillus flavus (fla’vus. L. masc. adj. flavus, yellow, referring to the color of the colonies).
Cells are Gram-stain-positive, non-motile, spore-forming, rod-shaped cells with 1.5–1.6 µm in width by 3.9–4.7 µm in length. Colonies are pale-yellow color and circular and flatted on TSA incubated at 30 °C for 2 days. Growth occurs in the 10–45 °C (optimum, 30 °C) at 0–6% NaCl (optimum, 3%) at pH 6.0–10.0 (optimum, pH 7.0). The strain hydrolyzes of casein and gelatin but does not hydrolyze starch or Tweens 20, 40, and 80. The catalase and oxidase activities are positive and can grow under anaerobic conditions. The methyl-red and Voges–Proskauer tests are negative and H2S production is positive. In the API 20NE test, β-glucosidase, protease, and β-galactosidase activities are positive, but the reduction of nitrate to nitrite, reduction of nitrite to nitroxide, indole production, glucose fermentation, arginine dihydrolase, and urease activities are negative. In the API® ZYM test, alkaline phosphatase, esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, and α-glucosidase activities are positive, but esterase (C4), lipase (C14), valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, β-glucuronidase, β-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase activities are negative. The following sole carbon and energy sources are used for growth in the API 50CH test, glycerol, D-galactose, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-mannitol, methyl-α-D-mannoside, methyl-α-D-glucoside, amygdalin, arbutin, esculin, salicin, D-cellobiose, D-maltose, sucrose, D-trehalose, D-melezitose, and D-raffinose. Major cellular fatty acids are C15:0 anteiso, C15:0 iso, C16:0 iso, and C17:0. Predominant isoprenoid quinone is MK-7, and the major polar lipids are DPG and PG. The C30 carotenoid 1-glycosyl-apo-8′-lycopene and its isomers are found in cell extracts. The NCBI GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and complete genome are MT804551 and JAGVRK010000000, respectively. The G + C content of the DNA is 43.8% (complete genome sequences). The type strain, KIGAM252T (=KCTC 43261T =JCM 34406T), was isolated from marine mud in the Uljin area, Republic of Korea.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10050979/s1, Figure S1: Transmission electron micrograph of negatively stained strain KIGAM252T. Strain KIGAM252T was cultivated at 30 °C for two days in TSA. Bar, 0.5 µm; Figure S2: Thin-layer chromatograms of the polar lipids of strain KIGAM252T. The 1st-D developing agent, chloroform:methanol:water (65:25:4, v/v/v) and the 2nd-D agent, chloroform:acetic acid:methanol:water (80:15:12:4, v/v/v/v). The major polar lipids are diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG). PGL, phosphatidylglycolipid; APL, aminophospholipid; PL, unidentified phospholipid; GL, unidentified glycolipid; L, unidentified lipid; Figure S3: Carotenoid biosynthetic gene cluster comparison between strain KIGAM252T and M. indicus HU36 based on the nucleotide sequence similarities. The shaded pink areas between linear structures indicate homologous regions. The gene: crtM, 4,4′-diapophytoene synthase; crtNa, 4,4′-diapophytoene desaturase; crtNb, 4,4′-diapophytoene-ketolase; crtNc, 4,4′-diapophytoene aldehyde oxidase; AT, acyltransferase. The genes indicated by gray arrows represent those that have no relationship with carotenoid production.; Figure S4: Heatmap based on AAI values calculated for strainKIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus; M. mangrovi AK61T, M. indicus LMG 22858T, M. idriensis SMC4352-2T, M. lacus AK74T, M. sediminilitoris DSL-17T, M. fastidiosus NBRC 101226T, M. halosaccharovorans DSM 25387T, M. niabensis 4T19T, M. crassostreae DSM 24486T, M. litoralis SW-2211T, and M. iocasae DSM 104297T. High AAI value is indicated in navy, whereas lower value is indicated in sky blue; Figure S5: Phylogenomic tree based on TYGS results showing the relationship between strain KIGAM252T with related type strains in genus Metabacillus. The whole-genome sequence-based tree was inferred with FastME 2.1.6.1 [63] from GBDP distances. Calculated from genome sequences. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d5. The numbers above branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values > 60 % from 100 replications, with average branch support of 98.7 %. Percent of genomic G+C content ranges between 33.8 and 46.6 %; genome size ranges from 3.9 to 5.6 Mb; The number of proteins coded by each genome ranges between 3907 and 5263; Figure S6: Pan-genome and clustering analysis of strain KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus. The boxplots of the pan (purple color) and core genomes (yellow color) are progressively increasing or decreasing by the number of genomes; Figure S7: COG and KEGG categorization of unique genes of strain KIGAM252T. The strain-specific functional unique POG annotation of strain KIGAM252T using COG database (A) and The strain-specific functional unique POG annotation of strain KIGAM252T using the KEGG database (B). Fraction of unique genes associated with different COG categories for strain KIGAM252T and related strains of the genus Metabacillus; M. mangrovi AK61T, M. indicus LMG 22858T, M. idriensis SMC4352-2T, M. lacus AK74T, M. sediminilitoris DSL-17T, M. fastidiosus NBRC 101226T, M. halosaccharovorans DSM 25387T, M. niabensis 4T19T, M. crassostreae DSM 24486T, M. litoralis SW-2211T, and M. iocasae DSM 104297T (C). One-letter abbreviations for the COG categories: J, translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; K, transcription; L, replication, recombination, and repair; B, chromatin structure and dynamics; D, cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; V, defense mechanisms; T, signal transduction mechanisms; M, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; N, cell motility; U, intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; O, post-translational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; C, energy production and conversion; G, carbohydrate transport and metabolism; E, amino acid transport and metabolism; F, nucleotide transport and metabolism; H, coenzyme transport and metabolism; I, lipid transport and metabolism; P, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport; R, general function prediction only, and catabolism; S, function unknown; Figure S8: Phylogenomic tree using concatenated 347 core genes of strain KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus. The tree was constructed using the NJ method with 1000 bootstrap replications; Table S1: 16S rRNA gene similarities between the strain KIGAM252T and related taxa in the genus Metabacillus; Table S2: COG categories of coding proteins in strain KIGAM252T genome; Table S3: The number of predicted secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) and distribution of BGCs of strain KIGAM252T and Metabacillus species.; Table S4: Distribution of BGCs of strain KIGAM252T and similar known pathways with strict detection criteria.; Table S5: Sequence similarities of carotenoid biosynthetic genes between strain KIGAM252T and M. indicus HU36. All sequence identities were calculated by NCBI BLASTn and BLASTp (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/, 27 July 2020) database; Table S6: In silico DDH (isDDH) values and G+C content differences between strain KIGAM252T and closely related species of the genus Metabacillus; Table S7: Strain-specific POGs annotated and classified of strain KIGAM252T using the KEGG database; Table S8: Carotenoid identification based on chromatographic and spectral properties of carotenoids detected in extracts of strain KIGAM252T. Electronic supplementary data are available with the online Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

C.Y.H. performed all the experiments and drafted the manuscript. E.-S.C. contributed to analyzing genome and drafting the manuscript. D.J.Y. contributed to analyzing the genome. I.-T.C. and D.-H.J. contributed to evaluating phenotypic analyses. Y.-D.N. and S.-L.P. screened and isolated the strain. S.-I.L. and M.-J.S. designed all the experiments and supervised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Collaborate Research Program of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) and the Korean Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM). This work was also supported by the Research Assistance Program (2020) of the Incheon National University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets for this study can be found in online repositories. The NCBI GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and complete genome of strain KIGAM252T are MT804551 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT804551, 1 August 2020) and JAGVRK010000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JAGVRK000000000, 11 May 2021), respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patel, S.; Gupta, R.S. A phylogenomic and comparative genomic framework for resolving the polyphyly of the genus Bacillus: Proposal for six new genera of Bacillus species, Peribacillus gen. nov., Cytobacillus gen. nov., Mesobacillus gen. nov., Neobacillus gen. nov., Metabacillus gen. nov. and Alkalihalobacillus gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 406–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Abbas, S.; Ahmed, I.; Kudo, T.; Iqbal, M.; Lee, Y.J.; Fujiwara, T.; Ohkuma, M. A heavy metal tolerant novel bacterium, Bacillus malikii sp. nov., isolated from tannery effluent wastewater. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015, 108, 1319–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Balcázar, J.L.; Pintado, J.; Planas, M. Bacillus galliciensis sp. nov., isolated from faeces of wild seahorses (Hippocampus guttulatus). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 892–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, J.H.; Tian, X.R.; Ruan, Y.; Yang, L.L.; He, Z.Q. Bacillus crassostreae sp. nov., isolated from an oyster (Crassostrea hongkongensis). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 1561–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Dooren, D.; de Jong, L.E. Über Bacillus fastidiosus. Zentrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1929, 2, 334–358. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gupta, V.; Singh, P.K.; Korpole, S.; Tanuku, N.R.S.; Pinnaka, A.K. Bacillus mangrovi sp. nov., isolated from a sediment sample from a mangrove forest. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 2219–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ko, K.S.; Oh, W.S.; Lee, M.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.; Peck, K.R.; Lee, N.Y.; Song, J.H. Bacillus infantis sp. nov. and Bacillus idriensis sp. nov., isolated from a patient with neonatal sepsis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 2541–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kwon, S.W.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, B.Y.; Weon, H.Y.; Kim, J.B.; Go, S.J.; Lee, G.B. Bacillus niabensis sp. nov., isolated from cotton-waste composts for mushroom cultivation. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1909–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mehrshad, M.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Didari, M.; Bagheri, M.; Fazeli, S.A.S.; Schumann, P.; Spröer, C.; Sánchez-Porro, C.; Ventosa, A. Bacillus halosaccharovorans sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium from a hypersaline lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 2776–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parag, B.; Sasikala, C.; Ramana, C.V. Bacillus endolithicus sp. nov., isolated from pebbles. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 4568–4573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singh, H.; Kaur, M.; Kaur, L.; Sharma, S.; Mishra, S.; Tunuku, N.R.S.; Pinnaka, A.K. Bacillus lacus sp. nov., isolated from a water sample of a salt lake in India. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Suresh, K.; Prabagaran, S.R.; Sengupta, S.; Shivaji, S. Bacillus indicus sp. nov., an arsenic-resistant bacterium isolated from an aquifer in West Bengal, India. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1369–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, H.I.; Zhang, J.; Sun, L. Bacillus iocasae sp. nov., isolated from Pacmanus hydrothermal field, Manus Basin. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 3547–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wieser, M.; Worliczek, H.; Kämpfer, P.; Busse, H.J. Bacillus herbersteinensis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 2119–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yoon, J.H.; Oh, T.K. Bacillus litoralis sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat of the Yellow Sea in Korea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1945–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lee, S.Y.; Son, J.S.; Hwang, Y.J.; Shin, J.H.; Ghim, S.Y. Metabacillus elymi sp. nov., isolated from the Rhizosphere of Elymus tsukushiensis, a plant native to the Dokdo Islands, Republic of Korea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2021, 114, 1709–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mao, H.; Wei, Y.; Gao, Y.; Pei, J.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, J. Metabacillus sediminilitoris sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from a tidal sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5211–5216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Britton, G.; Liaaen-Jensen, S.; Pfander, H. Carotenoids: Handbook; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rodriguez-Villalon, A.; Perez-Gil, J.; Rodriguez-Concepcion, M. Carotenoid accumulation in bacteria with enhanced supply of isoprenoid precursors by upregulation of exogenous or endogenous pathways. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 135, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heider, S.A.; Peters-Wendisch, P.; Wendisch, V.F.; Beekwilder, J.; Brautaset, T. Metabolic engineering for the microbial production of carotenoids and related products with a focus on the rare C50 carotenoids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 4355–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, F.; Jiang, J.G.; Chen, Q. Progress on molecular breeding and metabolic engineering of biosynthesis pathways of C30, C35, C40, C45, C50 carotenoids. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Duc, L.H.; Fraser, P.; Cutting, S.M. Carotenoids present in halotolerant Bacillus spore formers. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 255, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Korumilli, T.; Mishra, S. Carotenoid production by Bacillus clausii using rice powder as the sole substrate: Pigment analyses and optimization of key production parameters. J. Biochem. Technol. 2014, 5, 788–794. [Google Scholar]
  24. Perez-Fons, L.; Steiger, S.; Khaneja, R.; Bramley, P.M.; Cutting, S.M.; Sandmann, G.; Fraser, P.D. Identification and the developmental formation of carotenoid pigments in the yellow/orange Bacillus spore-formers. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 2011, 1811, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Osawa, A.; Iki, K.; Sandmann, G.; Shindo, K. Isolation and identification of 4, 4′-diapolycopene-4,4′-dioic acid produced by Bacillus firmus GB1 and its singlet oxygen quenching activity. J. Oleo. Sci. 2013, 62, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Steiger, S.; Perez-Fons, L.; Fraser, P.D.; Sandmann, G. Biosynthesis of a novel C30 carotenoid in Bacillus firmus isolates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jannasch, H.W.; Taylor, C.D. Deep-sea microbiology. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1984, 38, 487–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kato, C.; Sato, T.; Horikoshi, K. Isolation and properties of barophilic and barotolerant bacteria from deep-sea mud samples. Biodivers. Conserv. 1995, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Takami, H.; Kobata, K.; Nagahama, T.; Kobayashi, H.; Inoue, A.; Horikoshi, K. Biodiversity in deep-sea sites located near the south part of Japan. Extremophiles 1999, 3, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cheng, T.H.; Ismail, N.; Kamaruding, N.; Saidin, J.; Danish-Daniel, M. Industrial enzymes-producing marine bacteria from marine resources. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 27, e00482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jahromi, S.T.; Barzkar, N. Future direction in marine bacterial agarases for industrial applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 6847–6863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Porras, M.A.; Witale, C.; Villar, M.A.; Cubitto, M.A. Bioconversion of glycerol to poly (HB-co-HV) copolymer in an inexpensive medium by a Bacillus megaterium strain isolated from marine sediments. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lane, D.J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics; Stackebrandt, E.G., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 115–148. [Google Scholar]
  34. Roh, S.W.; Sung, Y.; Nam, Y.D.; Chang, H.W.; Kim, K.H.; Yoon, J.H.; Jeon, C.O.; Oh, H.M.; Bae, J.W. Arthrobacter soli sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from wastewater reservoir sediment. J. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Thombre, R.S.; Shinde, V.D.; Oke, R.S.; Dhar, S.K.; Shouche, Y.S. Biology and survival of extremely halophilic archaeon Haloarcula marismortui RR12 isolated from Mumbai salterns, India in response to salinity stress. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 1981, 17, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbour-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kluge, A.G.; Farris, J.S. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Biol. 1969, 18, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tittsler, R.P.; Sandholzer, L.A. The use of semi-solid agar for the detection of bacterial motility. J. Bacteriol. 1936, 31, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Benson, H.J. Microbiological Applications: A Laboratory Manual in General Microbiology; McGraw-Hill Company Inc.: Massachusetts, MA, USA, 2002; p. 432. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bauer, A.W.; Kirby, M.M.; Sherris, J.C.; Truck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966, 45, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Miller, L.T. Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1982, 16, 584–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Sasser, M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC Newsl. 1990, 20, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  49. Collins, M.D.; Jones, D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol. Rev. 1981, 45, 316–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Minnikin, D.E.; O’Donnell, A.G.; Goodfellow, M. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J. Microbiol. Methods 1984, 2, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chin, C.S.; Alexander, D.H.; Marks, P.; Klammer, A.A.; Drake, J.; Heiner, C.; Clum, A.; Copeland, A.; Huddleston, J.; Eichler, E.E.; et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lee, I.; Chalita, M.; Ha, S.M.; Na, S.I.; Yoon, S.H.; Chun, J. ContEst16S: An algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 2053–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Brettin, T.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Olsen, G.J.; Olson, R.; Overbeek, R.; Parrello, B.; Pusch, G.D.; et al. RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Forslund, K.; Coelho, L.P.; Szklarczyk, D.; Jensen, L.J.; von Mering, C.; Bork, P. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Szklarczyk, D.; Heller, D.; Hernández-Plaza, A.; Forslund, S.K.; Cook, H.; Mende, D.R.; Letunic, I.; Rattei, T.; Jensen, L.J.; et al. eggNOG 5.0: A hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucl. Acids. Res. 2019, 47, D309–D314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Steinke, K.; Villebro, R.; Ziemert, N.; Lee, S.Y.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 5.0: Updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2009, 47, W81–W87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lee, I.; Kim, Y.O.; Park, S.C.; Chun, J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1100–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, D.; Park, S.; Chun, J. Introducing EzAAI: A pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Auch, A.F.; Klenk, H.P.; Göker, M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Auch, A.F.; von Jan, M.; Klenk, H.P.; Göker, M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand. Genomic. Sci. 2010, 2, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Lefort, V.; Desper, R.; Gascuel, O. FastME 2.0: A comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 2798–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Chaudhari, N.M.; Gupta, V.K.; Dutta, C. BPGA—An ultra-fast pan-genome analysis pipeline. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucl. Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Khaneja, R.; Perez-Fons, L.; Fakhry, S.; Baccigalupi, L.; Steiger, S.; To, E.; Sandmann, G.; Dong, T.C.; Ricca, E.; Fraser, P.D.; et al. Carotenoids found in Bacillus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 108, 1889–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chun, J.; Oren, A.; Ventosa, A.; Christensen, H.; Arahal, D.R.; da Costa, M.S.; Rooney, A.P.; Yi, H.; Xu, X.W.; de Meyer, S.; et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Köcher, S.; Breitenbach, J.; Müller, V.; Sandmann, G. Structure, function and biosynthesis of carotenoids in the moderately halophilic bacterium Halobacillus halophilus. Arch. Microbiol. 2009, 191, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhu, S.; Hegemann, J.D.; Fage, C.D.; Zimmermann, M.; Xie, X.; Linne, U.; Marahiel, M.A. Insights into the unique phosphorylation of the lasso peptide paeninodin. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 13662–13678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Steiger, S.; Perez-Fons, L.; Cutting, S.M.; Fraser, P.D.; Sandmann, G. Annotation and functional assignment of the genes for the C30 carotenoid pathways from the genomes of two bacteria: Bacillus indicus and Bacillus firmus. Microbiology 2015, 161, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Raisig, A.; Sandmann, G. Functional properties of diapophytoene and related desaturases of C-30 and C-40 carotenoid biosynthetic pathways. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1533, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 10 00979 g001 550
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of strain KIGAM252T and related type strains of Metabacillus species based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences. The closed circles represent nodes recovered by both the neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms; the open circles represent nodes recovered by either NJ or MP. The numbers on the nodes indicate the bootstrap values (>70%) calculated using the ML/NJ/MP probabilities. Bar, 0.01 changes per nucleotide.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of strain KIGAM252T and related type strains of Metabacillus species based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences. The closed circles represent nodes recovered by both the neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms; the open circles represent nodes recovered by either NJ or MP. The numbers on the nodes indicate the bootstrap values (>70%) calculated using the ML/NJ/MP probabilities. Bar, 0.01 changes per nucleotide.
Microorganisms 10 00979 g001
Microorganisms 10 00979 g002 550
Figure 2. Heatmap based on OrthoANI values calculated for strain KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus; M. mangrovi AK61T, M. indicus LMG 22858T, M. idriensis SMC4352-2T, M. lacus AK74T, M. sediminilitoris DSL-17T, M. fastidiosus NBRC 101226T, M. halosaccharovorans DSM 25387T, M. niabensis 4T19T, M. crassostreae DSM 24486T, M. litoralis SW-2211T, and M. iocasae DSM 104297T. High OrthoANI value is indicated in red, whereas lower values are indicated in yellow.
Figure 2. Heatmap based on OrthoANI values calculated for strain KIGAM252T and other species of the genus Metabacillus; M. mangrovi AK61T, M. indicus LMG 22858T, M. idriensis SMC4352-2T, M. lacus AK74T, M. sediminilitoris DSL-17T, M. fastidiosus NBRC 101226T, M. halosaccharovorans DSM 25387T, M. niabensis 4T19T, M. crassostreae DSM 24486T, M. litoralis SW-2211T, and M. iocasae DSM 104297T. High OrthoANI value is indicated in red, whereas lower values are indicated in yellow.
Microorganisms 10 00979 g002
Microorganisms 10 00979 g003 550
Figure 3. Flower plot indicating the core and strain-specific POGs of the novel strain KIGAM252T and of other species of the genus Metabacillus; M. mangrovi AK61T, M. indicus LMG 22858T, M. idriensis SMC4352-2T, M. lacus AK74T, M. sediminilitoris DSL-17T, M. fastidiosus NBRC 101226T, M. halosaccharovorans DSM 25387T, M. niabensis 4T19T, M. crassostreae DSM 24486T, M. litoralis SW-2211T, and M. iocasae DSM 104297T.
Figure 3. Flower plot indicating the core and strain-specific POGs of the novel strain KIGAM252T and of other species of the genus Metabacillus; M. mangrovi AK61T, M. indicus LMG 22858T, M. idriensis SMC4352-2T, M. lacus AK74T, M. sediminilitoris DSL-17T, M. fastidiosus NBRC 101226T, M. halosaccharovorans DSM 25387T, M. niabensis 4T19T, M. crassostreae DSM 24486T, M. litoralis SW-2211T, and M. iocasae DSM 104297T.
Microorganisms 10 00979 g003
Microorganisms 10 00979 g004 550
Figure 4. HPLC analysis of extracts from strain KIGAM252T. Chromatogram of carotenoid extracts recorded at 450 nm (A) and at 286 nm (B). UV/Vis spectra (C) grouped (I–III) according to their chromatographic peaks as shown in panels (A,B).
Figure 4. HPLC analysis of extracts from strain KIGAM252T. Chromatogram of carotenoid extracts recorded at 450 nm (A) and at 286 nm (B). UV/Vis spectra (C) grouped (I–III) according to their chromatographic peaks as shown in panels (A,B).
Microorganisms 10 00979 g004
Table
Table 1. Differential characteristics between strain KIGAM252T and the type strains of closely related species in the genus Metabacillus (Taxa: 1, Strain KIGAM252T; 2, M. mangrovi AK61T; 3, M. indicus LMG 22858T; 4, M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T). All of the species were negative for the hydrolysis of Tween 20, 40, and 80 and Voges-Proskauer test. All of the species gave positive results for β-glucosidase, protease, and β-galactosidase, but negative results for reduction of nitrate to nitrite, reduction of nitrite to nitroxide, indole production, glucose fermentation, arginine dihydrolase, and urease in the API 20NE test. All of the species gave positive results for alkaline phosphatase, esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, and α-glucosidase, but negative results for β-glucuronidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase in the API® ZYM test. All of the species gave positive results for glycerol, D-galactose, D-glucose, D-fructose, esculin, D-maltose, and D-raffinose, but negative results for erythritol, D-arabinose, L-arabinose, L-xylose, D-adonitol, methyl-β-D-xyloside, L-sorbose, L-rhamnose, dulcitol, xylitol, D-lyxose, D-tagatose, D-fucose, L-fucose, D-arabitol, L-arabitol, gluconate, and 5-ketogluconate in the API 50CH test.
Table 1. Differential characteristics between strain KIGAM252T and the type strains of closely related species in the genus Metabacillus (Taxa: 1, Strain KIGAM252T; 2, M. mangrovi AK61T; 3, M. indicus LMG 22858T; 4, M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T). All of the species were negative for the hydrolysis of Tween 20, 40, and 80 and Voges-Proskauer test. All of the species gave positive results for β-glucosidase, protease, and β-galactosidase, but negative results for reduction of nitrate to nitrite, reduction of nitrite to nitroxide, indole production, glucose fermentation, arginine dihydrolase, and urease in the API 20NE test. All of the species gave positive results for alkaline phosphatase, esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, and α-glucosidase, but negative results for β-glucuronidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase in the API® ZYM test. All of the species gave positive results for glycerol, D-galactose, D-glucose, D-fructose, esculin, D-maltose, and D-raffinose, but negative results for erythritol, D-arabinose, L-arabinose, L-xylose, D-adonitol, methyl-β-D-xyloside, L-sorbose, L-rhamnose, dulcitol, xylitol, D-lyxose, D-tagatose, D-fucose, L-fucose, D-arabitol, L-arabitol, gluconate, and 5-ketogluconate in the API 50CH test.
Characteristic1234
Temperature range (°C) (optimum)10–35 (30) *15–42 a15–37 b15–45 c
NaCl range (%, w/v) (optimum)0–6 (3) *0–3 a0–2 b0–3 c
pH range for growth (optimum)6.0–10.0 (7.0) *6.0–9.0 a6.0–7.0 b5.5–9.5 c
Catalase *+−+−
Oxidase *+−++
Hydrolysis of *
Casein +−++
Gelatin+−−−
Starch−+++
Methyl red *−−+−
H2S production *+−−−
Esterase (C4)−+++
Lipase (C14)−+−−
Valine arylamidase−+++
Cystine arylamidase−+−−
Trypsin+−−−
α-Chymotrypsin+−++
Acid phosphatase−−−+
β-glucosidase−+−−
D-Ribose+−−+
D-Xylose−−−+
D-Mannose−−++
Inositol−−−+
D-Mannitol++−+
D-Sorbitol−−−+
Methyl-α-D-mannoside+−+−
Methyl-α-D-glucoside+−++
N-acetylglucosamine+−++
Amygdalin+−++
Arbutin+−−+
Salicin+−++
D-Cellobiose+−+−
D-Lactose−−++
D-Melibiose−+++
Sucrose++−+
D-Trehalose++−+
Inulin−++−
D-Melezitose+−−+
Starch−+++
Glycogen−+++
Gentiobiose−−+−
D-Turanose−−++
2-Ketogluconate−−++
* Data from this study. a Data from [6]; b [12]; c [7].
Table
Table 2. Cellular fatty acid contents (>1% of the total fatty acids) of strain KIGAM252T and related species. Taxa: 1, Strain KIGAM252T; 2, M. mangrovi AK61T; 3, M. indicus LMG 22858T; 4, M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T. All data are from this study under the same condition.
Table 2. Cellular fatty acid contents (>1% of the total fatty acids) of strain KIGAM252T and related species. Taxa: 1, Strain KIGAM252T; 2, M. mangrovi AK61T; 3, M. indicus LMG 22858T; 4, M. idriensis SMC 4352-2T. All data are from this study under the same condition.
Saturated1234
C10:0
C12:00.470.100.040.16
C14:00.210.12ND0.15
C16:01.503.000.890.62
C17:08.149.4911.023.55
C18:0NDND0.09ND
Unsaturated
C16:1 ω7c alcoholND2.042.363.78
C16:1 ω11cND5.758.710.73
C18:1 ω9cNDND0.22ND
Branched-chain fatty acid
C11:0 iso ND0.22ND0.09
C13:0 isoND0.12NDND
C14:0 iso7.813.814.046.88
C15:0 iso25.6139.7819.2921.92
C16:0 iso9.786.347.5910.35
C17:0 iso4.674.766.445.54
C17:1 iso ω10cND2.162.410.28
C18:0 isoNDND0.200.32
C19:0 isoNDND0.08ND
C11:0 anteisoND0.18ND0.19
C15:0 anteiso35.6815.4523.7535.35
C17:0 anteiso 5.795.4410.159.09
Summed feature
3; C16:1 ω7c/C16:1 ω6cNDND0.17ND
4; C17:1 iso /C17:1 anteiso BND0.991.480.74
ND, not detected; TR, trace amount (<1%).
Table
Table 3. General characteristics of the genome of strain KIGAM252T.
Table 3. General characteristics of the genome of strain KIGAM252T.
AttributeCharacteristics
Sequencing platformsPacBio
AssemblerFLYE v. 2.7
Genome coverage292.0×
Assembly statusComplete
Assembly size (bp)4,302,488 bp
G + C content (%)43.8
N504,026,853
Total contigs2
Chromosome2
G + C content (%)43.78 (JAGVRK010000001)
52.19
(JAGVRK010000002)
Total genes4092
Total CDS3964
Coding genes3898
Pseudo genes66
RNAs128
-rRNA genes (5S, 16S, 23S)11, 11, 12
-tRNAs89
-ncRNAs5
Table
Table 4. The fraction of core, accessory, and unique genes of strain KIGAM252T and related Metabacillus species.
Table 4. The fraction of core, accessory, and unique genes of strain KIGAM252T and related Metabacillus species.
OrganismGenesCore
(%)		Accessory
(%)		Unique
(%)
Metabacillus sp. KIGAM252T391928.755.515.9
Metabacillus crassostreae DSM 24486T441625.466.48.2
Metabacillus fastidiosus NBRC 101226T416327.038.035.0
Metabacillus halosaccharovorans DSM 25387T478623.558.018.5
Metabacillus idriensis SMC4352-2T459924.454.321.3
Metabacillus indicus LMG 22858T370430.359.210.5
Metabacillus iocasae DSM 104297T383429.332.937.8
Metabacillus lacus AK74T376729.841.129.1
Metabacillus litoralis SW-211T435025.866.57.7
Metabacillus mangrovi AK61T394728.555.615.9
Metabacillus niabensis 4T19T454624.752.422.9
Metabacillus sediminilitoris DSL-17T467024.051.424.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hwang, C.Y.; Cho, E.-S.; Yoon, D.J.; Cha, I.-T.; Jung, D.-H.; Nam, Y.-D.; Park, S.-L.; Lim, S.-I.; Seo, M.-J. Genomic and Physiological Characterization of Metabacillus flavus sp. nov., a Novel Carotenoid-Producing Bacilli Isolated from Korean Marine Mud. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050979

AMA Style

Hwang CY, Cho E-S, Yoon DJ, Cha I-T, Jung D-H, Nam Y-D, Park S-L, Lim S-I, Seo M-J. Genomic and Physiological Characterization of Metabacillus flavus sp. nov., a Novel Carotenoid-Producing Bacilli Isolated from Korean Marine Mud. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(5):979. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050979

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hwang, Chi Young, Eui-Sang Cho, Deok Jun Yoon, In-Tae Cha, Dong-Hyun Jung, Young-Do Nam, So-Lim Park, Seong-Il Lim, and Myung-Ji Seo. 2022. "Genomic and Physiological Characterization of Metabacillus flavus sp. nov., a Novel Carotenoid-Producing Bacilli Isolated from Korean Marine Mud" Microorganisms 10, no. 5: 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050979

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop