Next Article in Journal
The Effects of DNA Extraction Kits and Primers on Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Microbial Community in Freshwater Sediments
Next Article in Special Issue
Soil Metabolomics Predict Microbial Taxa as Biomarkers of Moisture Status in Soils from a Tidal Wetland
Previous Article in Journal
Occurrence and Characteristics of ESBL- and Carbapenemase- Producing Escherichia coli from Wild and Feral Birds in Greece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Landscape Composition and Soil Physical–Chemical Properties Drive the Assemblages of Bacteria and Fungi in Conventional Vegetable Fields
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Functional Biogeography of eDNA Metacommunities in the Post-Fire Landscape of the Angeles National Forest

1
Department of Agriculture Sciences, Los Angeles Pierce College, 6201 Winnetka Avenue, PMB 553, Woodland Hills, CA 91304, USA
2
Environmental Sciences Graduate Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
3
Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
4
Department of Wood Science & Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
5
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
6
DNA Learning Center, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
7
Department of Biology, Center for Genome & Metagenome Studies, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(6), 1218; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061218
Submission received: 27 April 2022 / Revised: 29 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 14 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Soil Microbiome)

Abstract

:
Wildfires have continued to increase in frequency and severity in Southern California due in part to climate change. To gain a further understanding of microbial soil communities’ response to fire and functions that may enhance post-wildfire resilience, soil fungal and bacterial microbiomes were studied from different wildfire areas in the Gold Creek Preserve within the Angeles National Forest using 16S, FITS, 18S, 12S, PITS, and COI amplicon sequencing. Sequencing datasets from December 2020 and June 2021 samplings were analyzed using QIIME2, ranacapa, stats, vcd, EZBioCloud, and mixomics. Significant differences were found among bacterial and fungal taxa associated with different fire areas in the Gold Creek Preserve. There was evidence of seasonal shifts in the alpha diversity of the bacterial communities. In the sparse partial least squares analysis, there were strong associations (r > 0.8) between longitude, elevation, and a defined cluster of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs). The Chi-square test revealed differences in fungi–bacteria (F:B) proportions between different trails (p = 2 × 10−16). sPLS results focused on a cluster of Green Trail samples with high elevation and longitude. Analysis revealed the cluster included the post-fire pioneer fungi Pyronema and Tremella. Chlorellales algae and possibly pathogenic Fusarium sequences were elevated. Bacterivorous Corallococcus, which secretes antimicrobials, and bacterivorous flagellate Spumella were associated with the cluster. There was functional redundancy in clusters that were differently composed but shared similar ecological functions. These results implied a set of traits for post-fire resiliency. These included photo-autotrophy, mineralization of pyrolyzed organic matter and aromatic/oily compounds, potential pathogenicity and parasitism, antimicrobials, and N-metabolism.

1. Introduction

Wildfires have continued to increase in frequency and severity in Southern California due in part to climate change; furthermore, the size and intensity of fires has increased since 1950 [1]. To gain a further understanding of microbial soil communities’ response to fire and functions that may enhance post-wildfire resilience, soil fungal and bacterial microbiomes were studied from different wildfire areas in the Gold Creek Preserve within the Angeles National Forest using 16S, FITS, 18S, 12S, PITS, and COI (Cytochrome Oxidase I) amplicon sequencing.
Dispersal is a factor in the evolution of metacommunities [2]; in the setting of the study site, Canyon relief, creek flow, and wind erosion in the Gold Creek Preserve aid in dispersal of microbes. Wind erodibility is a part of soil classification [3]. Habitat isolation, distance from the forest edge, or remoteness is also a factor that shapes community structure in the biogeographical context [2].
Metacommunity ecology has focused on species attributes, including eukaryotic host distributions, and landscape ecology focuses on site attributes [2]. This study attempts to integrate both sets of attributes into a joined model for the assemblages of organisms that are present in high relative abundance at various spatial coordinates. Antibiotic resistance represents a rapid evolutionary process which dons novel ecological functions to bacteria and modifies the competitive hierarchy [2]. Coexistence networks or clustered image maps [4,5] may shed light on the evolution of groups of microorganisms in the context of the study location and extent.
Heat from an intense wildfire would be expected to sterilize soil [6,7] and favor taxa that metabolize pyrolyzed organic matter, such as Pyronema fungi [6]. Wetter soil would be expected to increase the impact of heat on soil, along with fire intensity and duration [7]. Microbial biomass is characteristically lowered following a wildfire [8,9], and recovery of soil communities may span decades [9]. Microbial diversity would be expected to decline with the number of fires, as noted by Bowd et al. [10]. However, soil erodibility is enhanced post-fire [11], which would aid in the dispersal of organisms. Additionally, low intensity fires may not significantly decrease mycorrhizal populations, fire effects are expected to be less in xeric environments, and microbes in the substratum are more resistant to burns [7]. Oliver et al. [8] reported no shifts in soil physical properties following low-intensity burns, although fungal taxa did shift in composition.
Fungi can be readily identified in soil samples with fungi internal transcribed spacers (FITS) markers. Vegetation communities have been strong predictors of bacterial and fungal community responses to fires in boreal forests in Canada [9]. Plant environmental DNA (eDNA) in the soil can be identified with PITS (plant internal transcribed spacers) markers, although visual inspection of the site may be similarly informative. Typically, bacteria are identified with the 16S marker.
Although bacteria and fungi were of primary interest, other microorganisms such as algae and protists were also detectable with this assay, as well as nematodes and arthropods. Protists have received little attention in studies of microbial communities [12]; this emphasizes the importance of including markers such as 18S and COI for identification of eukaryotes in metabarcoding datasets. Predators control the size of populations, are interdependent with microbes, play a role in designing the community structure, and influence spatial heterogeneity through grazing [2]. These eukaryotic organisms may also have symbiotic associations that help to shape the persistence of symbionts even when the association no longer benefits both parties [2]. Furthermore, rapid establishment of photosynthetic organisms is common after fire, and a decrease in the F:B ratio is common after fire [7].
This study will contribute to the resolution of the important ecological inquiry questioning the limits to which microbial metacommunity diversity and functions are resistant to short and long-term perturbations, how much functional redundancy is present in microbial communities, and how major shifts in environmental conditions may affect co-occurring groups of microorganisms [13].
We hypothesized that the Blue Trail, which is a wildlife corridor and was only burned in one recent fire, would have the highest alpha diversity of fungi and the highest fungi–bacteria (F:B) ratio. We hypothesized that trails would have a differential abundance of taxa associated with their fire histories. We hypothesized that the Blue Trail would have the highest alpha diversity of fungal taxa when contrasted with the other trails, which had different fire histories. The Red Trail was burned in the 2009 Station Fire combined with the Creek Fire, and the Creek Fire and 2016 Sand Fire affected the Green Trail.

2. Materials and Methods

Data was generated from two rounds of soil sampling. Gold Creek Round 1 (20 samples) were taken in December 2020, and Round 2 (18 samples) were taken in June 2021. Data available from Round 1 includes 16S, 18S, 12S, FITS, COI and PITS. The paper will focus on soil microbes. December 2020 and June 2021 data were analyzed using DNA Subway Purple Line [14], ranacapa [15], stats, vcd, and mixomics [5,16]. Ranacapa was used for multivariate ANOVA and alpha diversity. R stats was used for Chi-square test of proportions. Mixomics was used to conduct sparse partial least squares analysis (sPLS). Samples were gathered from the Blue Trail wildlife corridor which was burned in the 2017 Creek fire. The Red Trail burned in the 2009 Station Fire combined with the Creek Fire, and the Creek Fire and 2016 Sand Fire affected the Green Trail. The information for each of the fires is given in Table 1.
There are two sets of soil conditions present between the sites, based on USDA historical data [3]. Both of the soil classifications in the sampling area had low organic matter (OM) from 0 to 10 cm. The Trigo-Modesto-San Andreas classification encompassed the southern half of the Preserve, including the Blue Trail and the Red Trail. The Caperton-Trigo classification was mainly located the Green Trail and is represented by Map unit 54. The sites differ in their range of slope, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), texture, and capacity for capillary water, as shown in Table 2. Since the Caperton-Trigo classification was coarser, it had less capacity for available water, and was well-drained. The Caperton-Trigo area also had a slightly acidic pH based on historical data, and a higher cation exchange capacity, which one would expect to be favorable to plants despite the diminished water availability. Furthermore, the samples associated with the Caperton-Trigo complex corresponded to a lower soil wind erodibility index (48 T/ac/year) regardless of its higher maximum slope percentage, when compared with the Trigo-Modesto-San Andreas complex (56 T/ac/year) [3].
Soil samples were taken from plant rootzones of Quercus agrifolia, Eriodictyon crassifolium, Dendromecon rigida, and Arctostaphylos glauca. The Q. agrifolia had burned in different combinations of fires, and the thickleaf Yerba Santa and Tree Poppy, which require scarification to germinate, established large stands at the sampling sites after the 2017 Creek Fire and 2016 Sand Fire, respectively. The manzanita trees resprouted from trees that had been established after the Station Fire and regenerated following the 2017 Creek Fire. These plants were of interest since they produce secondary metabolites, such as tannins, coumarins, protopine, and essential oils. Coumarins and terpenes influence the composition of microbial communities in the rootzone [18]; microbes regulate plant secondary metabolite production by enhancing gene expression or through horizontal gene transfer [19].
For Round 1, three samples were retrieved within a 1-foot radius of one another, and the DNA was pooled prior to library construction for each marker. Three samples were taken from three individuals of the same plant species in proximity of each marker for Round 2. The soil sampling maps for winter and summer are displayed in Figure 1. Sample metadata for summer 2021 and winter 2020 has been provided in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. There were two rounds of sampling, during winter and during summer (38 samples total) with 16S, FITS, 18S, 12S, PITS, and COI amplicons. The samples were collected in sterile cryotubes. For Round 1 samples, the DNA was extracted at University of California, Los Angeles and sequenced by University of California, Santa Cruz Genomics Institute [20]. For Round 1, six molecular markers were amplified and sequenced with Illumina barcode adapters at 35,000 paired reads each. Quality control was performed in QIIME2; Cutadapt was used to remove Illumina adaptor sequences; DADA2 was used for quality score trimming and identification of unique ASVs. Taxonomies were assigned to Amplicon Sequence Variants with an 95% likelihood cutoff from the CRUX database. A GreenGenes classifier was used. Each marker dataset was outputted into an ASV (Amplicon Sequence Variant) table for downstream analysis using the Anacapa toolkit [21].
Round 2 Data consists of 16S amplicons only. For Round 2, DNA was extracted with the Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) Power Soil DNA kit and sent to James Madison University for 16S amplification, library preparation [22,23], and pooled 16S amplicon NGS on the Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) MiniSeq platform. The V4 region of the bacterial 16s rRNA gene was amplified and barcoded for each sample using the primers developed by Kozich et al. (2013). Samples were screened for successful amplification on an agarose gel and pooled. A double-sided bead cleanup was carried out to remove primer-dimers and a low amount of off-target larger PCR products. Quality and concentration of the pooled library was checked using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and NEB’s Library Quant Kit for Illumina. The library was then sequenced on a MiniSeq using a mid-output reagent cartridge. Before loading, the library was combined with Ilumina’s PhiX control (30:70 16s:PhiX) to ensure a high-quality run despite the low diversity of the 16s library. A dual indexing strategy was used with these primers which used Kozich et al.’s approach and the Schloss primers: Forward: GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA. Reverse: GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT [24,25]. DNA Subway was used; the Purple Line analysis implemented DADA2 [26] and QIIME2 [27,28] for quality control, alpha rarefaction, and to output the ASV table for taxonomic diversity analyses.
The methods used to identify the most important features employ a similar strategy as Dwiyanto et al. [29], which included PERMANOVA, sparse partial least squares, differential abundance analysis; we also considered the functional implications using predicted functions and references to known microbial functions. There were less robust functional databases developed for fungi than bacteria, and protists are primarily characterized by morphology [12] so there was less information available about their function in the literature. Formal hypothesis testing was carried out in DESeq2 and visualized with SystempipeR. The Round 1 and Round 2 16S Fastqs were compared using EZBioCloud Metagenomic Taxonomic Profiling applications.
To examine other factors besides the fire history which may have been associated with the most abundant microbes in the study, partial least squares clustering was performed. sPLS has been used for a range of applications which have included genomic selection in cattle breeding [30], data integration for expression studies and eQTL (expression quantitative trait loci) mapping [31,32], has helped establish relationships between soil fungal diversity and the concentration of chlorinated pollutants [33], and has uncovered differential abundance of microbial WGS shotgun metagenomic sequences [34].
Partial least squares has been considered a quasi-supervised approach. It has been particularly useful for genomics and environmental sampling because it is a solution to the p > n problem. That is to say, there are relatively few samples compared to the number of features in the DNA sequencing dataset. Essentially, successive regressions are carried out via projection onto latent constructs to unveil hidden biological effects [35].
Next, variable selection was carried out to reveal the most important features in a large dataset which can be obscured by an overabundance of features. The optimal number of features is tuned for each of the selected number of components using k-fold cross-validation with the purpose of minimizing the root mean square error of estimation [5,30]. In genomic selection efforts, the predictive error is minimized [30]. The model was further filtered using regression coefficients [5,16,35].
The dataset was merged to reduce the number of necessary steps and was intended to give a more wholistic picture of the microbiome, including which bacteria, archaea, plants, fungi, and protists are associated with one another and their potential interactions. The Round 1 data from 16S, FITS, PITS, 18S, and COI were concatenated, and zero-sum columns were removed with R janitor [36]. The package mixomics was used to conduct sparse partial least squares analysis, which is useful when there are a number of multicollinear features, as in this case.

3. Results

The main results showed significant differences in bacterial and fungal taxa associated with different fire areas in the Gold Creek Preserve. There were changes in fungal taxa associated with soil samples that were affected by the Creek Fire in combination with the 2009 Station Fire, 2016 Sand Fire, or the 2017 Creek Fire alone. The computation of the Abundance-based Coverage Estimator (ACE) index accounted for the number of rare and abundant OTUs [37]. The highest fungal to bacterial ratio was related to the area that had been affected by the two most recent fires, which was the Green Trail. However, there was in fact a trend toward the highest alpha diversity of fungi residing in the Blue Trail wildlife corridor.
Plant species was not a significant factor in determining the alpha or beta diversity of the communities. However, in the sparse partial least squares analysis, there was evidence of moderate associations (r > 0.5) between the type of plant, topography, soil vs. sediment, soil classification, latitude, and a suite of prokaryotic and eukaryotic taxa. There were strong associations (r > 0.8) between longitude, elevation, and a defined cluster of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs).
The results of the permutational ANOVA for the summer bacteria sequences indicated that the Trail variable was associated with differences in beta-diversity between samples (p = 0.04). The largest differences were between the Red Trail and the Blue Trail in the winter samples. In the December samples, there was also a marginally significant result for higher alpha diversity in bacterial communities associated with the Blue Trail when contrasted with the Red Trail, based on a post hoc Tukey Test (p-adjusted = 0.09). The Red Trail Samples were associated with a significantly lower number of observed bacteria species when contrasted with the Green Trail. This evidence suggested that the higher fire intensity of the Station Fire combined with the recent burn of the Creek Fire influenced the abundance of fungal sequences amplified by the FITS marker. The Blue Trail was associated with significant differences in 16S beta diversity when contrasted with the Red Trail, based on the analysis in Ranacapa.
The Blue Trail samples taken as a whole, which had burned in the Creek Fire, were associated with the most observed species for fungi. The salty area at the head of the canyon on the Green Trail exhibited the least species richness for fungi. Overall, however, the Red Trail had the lowest number of observed species, in general, as Figure 2 has revealed. In the summer samples, the Trail variable was a significant factor associated with species richness (p = 0.029). There were significant differences in the observed number of species between the Red Trail and the Green Trail (p-adjusted = 0.022). This was a shift from the winter samples, where differences were detected between the species richness of bacteria between the Red Trail and the Blue Trail. There were significant differences in the summer samples in terms of beta diversity between the Blue Trail and the Green Trail as well (p-adjusted = 0.04), based on PERMANOVA.
Plant rootzone was not significantly associated with alpha/beta diversity of the communities based on PERMANOVA (permutational multivariate analysis of variance) and observed species. However, in sPLS, moderate associations (r > 0.5) showed between plant, topography, soil/sediment, soil classification, latitude, and suites of taxa. Strong associations (r > 0.8) existed between longitude, elevation, and clusters of taxa. The sPLS was useful for selecting relevant features. sPLS visualizations revealed evidence of overdispersion, shown in Figure 3.
In the December samples, the ratio of bacterial to fungal sequences was calculated. A Chi-square test of proportions was carried out. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the proportions of bacteria to fungi between the three Trails. The F:B ratio for the Blue Trail was 2.6, which was between the range for subtropical forest and desert, based on published datasets [38]. The F:B ratio for the Red Trail was 3.18, which was similar to cropland [38]; the ratio for the Green Trail was 3.47, which was similar to shrubland and grassland [38]. The results showed that all three groups differed from one another in terms of their bacteria to fungi ratios (p = 2.2 × 10−16). These results suggested that the effects of repeated burns favor fungi. Interestingly, based on the 18S data from December, sediment samples associated with a higher relative abundance of arthropods, except for the low creek sample. The Rhagidiidae predatory mite was an important taxon according to the sPLS results, as shown in Figure 4. Ascomycota sequences had the highest relative abundance, followed by Basidiomycota. The Mucoromycota sequences were mainly present in the Blue Trail soil samples. In Whitman et al., Mucoromycota increased at sites with higher burn severity [9].
The 16S data also showed a differential abundance of bacteria during the second round of sampling on the Green Trail. Higher alpha diversity was observed in the second round of 16S samples taken during the warm season in June, versus in the first round of samples from the winter. There was no significant difference in beta diversity. It was also be considered that the two sets of samples were processed and sequenced on separated runs, which accounts for some of the variation. Nevertheless, the inspection of the negative controls in both datasets suggested that were was little contamination in the DNA isolates or amplicons.
sPLS was sensitive to outliers; results focused on a cluster of Green Trail samples with high elevation and longitude, shown in the top cluster of Figure 4. Analysis revealed the cluster included the post-fire pioneer fungus Pyronema [6,39], Tremella, and Strobiloscypha, which produce strobiloscyphone antimicrobials [40]. Chlorellales algae, toxic Leptiota, and potentially pathogenic Fusarium sequences were elevated. Bacterivorous Corallococcus, which secretes antimicrobials [41], and bacterivorous flagellate Spumella [42] were associated with the cluster. Plant-associated Rhogostoma, of the Cercozoa amoebae [43], had a moderately positive association with elevation and longitude and was associated with the soil organism grouping rather than the sediment grouping. This makes sense, since they are extremely abundant in terrestrial ecosystems [43].
As evidenced in Figure 4, each cluster also had possible plant pathogens, such as Phoma, Pyrenochaetopsis and Microbotrymycetes, saprophytes such as Penicillium and Tetracladium, mycorrhizal fungi such as Genabea and Sporidesmium, and ammonia oxidizers such as Nitrosarcheum and Planctomyces. Coprophilous fungi, which colonize dung, were also represented. Parasites such as Acanthamoeba were also characterized in each cluster. Mortierella, of the Mucoromycota, which are noted for their production of polyunsaturated fatty acids, were associated with a cluster of taxa that were negatively associated with elevation and latitude. Mucoromycota were also shown to be differentially abundant on the Blue Trail, as noted in Table 5 and Table 6, along with other lipid accumulators Umbelopsidaceae and Umbelopsis sp. Polyketide and antibiotic producers such as Minuisphaera and Neosetophoma were also broadly distributed, which matches up with the results in Table 5 and Table 6 from the DESeq2 [44] analysis, where different Cladorrhinum sp. sequence variants were differentially abundant on each trail. Additionally, shown in Figure 4, each cluster of taxa had autotrophic organisms characterized, such as red, green, golden, or brown algae, or protists which are symbiotic with Cyanobacteria. Gemmatimonadetes autotrophic bacteria were differentially abundant on the Green Trail and Blue Trail, as noted in Table 7 and Table 8. The Red Trail was associated with methanogens and methanotrophs.
There were no highly significant differences in functional diversity between the different trails in the inferred functional analysis in EZBioCloud MTP [52] based on adjusted p-values. The suggested that there is functional redundancy between the separate soil communities, which allowed the soil ecosystem functions to be carried out, but within different soil and fire history environments. There were some interesting trends that are worth pointing out which had significant p-values < 0.05 but did not pass multiple testing with FDR = 0.05.
As shown in Figure 5, Assimilatory nitrate reductase predicted functions were elevated the Green Trail for the Round 1 samples; multidrug/chloramphenicol efflux transport protein predicted functions were also elevated on the Green Trail. Elsewhere on the Blue Trail, the Benzene toluene chlorobenzene dioxygenase ferredoxin component was predicted to be elevated in the metagenome, along with Lichenysin synthetase. Beta-lactamase antibiotic resistance functions were elevated for the Blue Trail, as well as Cu and Ag efflux system and multidrug efflux system outer membrane protein, according to the Kruskal–Wallis functional biomarker test in EZBioCloud. Halo acetate dehalogenase was elevated on the Red Trail, according to the predicted functions; Propanediol dehydratase and Stigmatellin polyketide synthase were also expected to be elevated on the Red Trail in the Round 1 samples. Putrescine ornithine dehydratase was elevated on the Green Trail, based on the predicted functional profile in EZBioCloud.
There were similar trends in the Round 2 samples, such as predictions for elevated CAG pathogenicity island protein 4 sequences on the Green Trail vs. Red Trail; there were also predicted elevated functions of coronafacic acid on the Green Trail when contrasted with the Red Trail. Coronafacic acid mimics jasmonic acid in plants and promotes rhizomes. Furthermore, there were elevated functions of coumaroyl quinate monooxygenase on the Green Trail when contrasted with the Red Trail. Monooxygenases are used by microbes to degrade polyaromatic compounds [6]. Pyronema fungi which occurred in high abundance also share this function [6].
Taxa showed significant differences at different fire areas in the Preserve. The highest fungi–bacteria (F:B) ratio was related to the Green Trail, burned in 2016 and 2017. The Chi-square test revealed differences in F:B proportions between different trails (p = 2 × 10−16). There was evidence of overdispersion in the alpha diversity results from both the Round 1 and Round 2 datasets, which indicated that a negative binomial model may be appropriate for differential abundance analysis; the evidence is displayed in Figure 6. It was evident in the partial least squares results as well, where the effect of outliers has a strong influence on the model, and the results focus on the differences between the Green Trail and other trails. There were no Phytophthora sequences found in the soil samples except with the COI marker. It was not detected with the FITS or 18S marker. There were several other possible plant pathogens detected including Alternaria, which is also a common saprobe.
EZBioCloud Metagenomic Taxonomic Profiles for bacteria associated with the winter versus the summer soil samples is shown in Figure 7. The taxonomies at the phylum level are similar, which was consistent with the beta diversity results for these two groups. The differences between the groups could be accounted for by Cyanobacteria in the winter which were absent in summer. On the other hand, Gemmatimonadetes were present in summer and absent in winter, as shown in Figure 7. These changes appeared to represent a seasonal shift in microbial communities. Furthermore, there was a higher relative abundance of Planctomycetes in winter, a higher relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia in summer, and a higher relative abundance of Chloroflexi which are frequently found in hot springs and hypersaline environments [53], in the winter samples.
Further investigation of the taxonomic composition at the class level revealed that multiple classes of bacteria were detected in winter but not in summer, visualized in Figure 8. These classes were Nitriliruptoria, Flavobacteria, and Clostridia. Meanwhile, during summer there were other classes detected that were absent in the winter samples. These classes were Rubrobacteria, Solibacteres, Oligoflexia, and Acidimicrobia.

4. Discussion

The perilous life of plants in fire disturbed areas of the semi-arid forest was observed to be threatened by many factors. Beyond abiotic factors such as fire damage to vascular tissues and increasing frequency and duration of heat and drought, there was evidence that woody plants were also confronted with many possible plant pathogens and parasites. Some notable potential pathogens from the results were Pythium, Fusarium, Botryosphaeriaceae, Microbotrytomycetes, Xanthamonadales, and Hyphomonas. Pythium and Fusarium are common fungi in bare-root forest nurseries [67]. What was remarkable about the presence of these possible pathogens in the Gold Creek results was the way that the putative pathogens may be controlled by antibiotic-producers that were found in high abundance on the various Trails. There was strong evidence supporting the presence of antibiotic producers such as Cladorrhinum sp. in significant numbers, according to our results.
After fire, cyclic organic compounds have been shown to be released from plant material and soil and hydrophobic films cover soil particles [7]. The ability to tolerate and utilize these compounds is a means to survival and resilience in fire disrupted areas. Different groups of organisms with resiliency traits at different combinations of longitude and elevation in the area studied were revealed.
Based on the DNA sequencing results, it appeared that the support system of the recovering forest involved predatory mites, bacterivores, nitrogen fixing cyanobacteria and protist symbionts, algae, ammonia oxidizing bacteria and archaea, Actinobacteria which reduce nitrogen, mycorrhizae from Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Mucoromycota, and the post-fire pioneers Pyronema and other Pezizales. In Whitman et al., Mucoromycota increased at sites with higher burn severity [9]. Pezizales are known to have increased abundance of sporocarps after a burn [68,69], which would make them poised to colonize when the fire subsides.
Bacterivores such as amoebae were important not only as predators but also due to their role in spreading bacteria. Bacteria which feed on other bacteria were notable for their role in mineralizing the nutrients bound to the body of soil bacteria. Where sugars are scarce, some bacteria and fungi are able to use other energy sources such as amino acids or Nitrogen, while others make their own energy through photosynthesis or facultative photo-autotrophy. Naturally, there were also many soil bacteria in this context that acquire and exhibit antimicrobial drug resistance traits. A few examples of this were the beta-lactamase resistance genes, efflux systems and multidrug resistance.
The high F:B ration on the Green Trail may have been due to the resistant nature of fungal sclerotia [7] which may have had a persistent advantage over bacteria in this setting. Bare soil has also been shown to have a high F:B ratio. Another possible explanation was the winter season of the Creek Fire, combined with the soil classification on the Blue and Red Trail, which would both contribute to the wetness of the soil when the fire took place. Wetter conditions have been shown to contribute to soil sterilization during fires [7]. There would be expected to be a short-lived increase in mobile nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium after a burn [7,11], which could in fact lead to an accumulation of microbial biomass [7]. A flush of CO2 immediately during and after a fire, and an increase in metabolic activity in the microbiome post-fire would be expected to occur, after wetting and rewetting of soil in Mediterranean forests according Munoz-Rojas et al.’s Australian study [70]. Furthermore, there were asymmetric changes in the carbon and nitrogen cycles [70]; Rodriguez et al. found similar results in Quercus ilex [71]. Elevated CO2 has been shown to modify community composition in the wheat rootzone [72]. However, over time leaching, wind, and water erosion leads to a loss of nutrients post-fire [11], and CO2 will disperse.
An unexpected result is that the plant species was not a significant factor in determining the alpha or beta diversity of the communities. This is in contrast to what Mataix-Solera et al. suggested [7]; it was suggested that shifts in plant communities would be the drivers of microbial diversity rather than the effects of fire itself. In Whitman et al. [9], there was a trifecta of plant and microbial fire response strategies including fast growers, heat survivors, and post-fire affinity; burn severity was the most important factor. The dispersal mechanisms noted earlier may explain the small number of differentially abundant taxa that were identified in the DESeq2 analysis.
The moderate associations (r > 0.5) between plant, topography, soil/sediment, soil classification, latitude, and suites of taxa partly agreed with previous research [7] and the results of Whitman et al. [9]. Furthermore, we identified different microbial post-fire responders than Whitman et al.’s Canadian study [9], with the exception of Penicillium. The plant communities help to configure the clusters of taxa in multi-dimensional space. However, in our study, strong associations (r > 0.8) existed between longitude, elevation, and clusters of taxa, in agreement with Wang et al.’s study on lichen-associated fungi [73].
In Abaya et al.’s study [47], Cladorrhinum was demonstrated to be effective against plant pathogens; Pyrenochaeta was one of the pathogens controlled. It is interesting because in our results, Pyrenochaetopsis was an abundant and ubiquitous pathogen, and Cladorrhinum was a differentially abundant fungus associated with the Red Trail and the Green Trail.
As a result of wildfires, aromatic and oily Plant and soil compounds released from fire. Microbial Cyclopropane, benzene, toluene and chloroalkane processing functions are favored. Nitrogen and Phosphorous are liberated from ash. Saprophytic fungi break down organic matter, e.g., lignocellulose. Mushrooms accumulate lipids, gamma linoleic acid, and triacylglyerides. Bacteria produce polyketides such as alkaloids, antimicrobial and anti-insect compounds. Antibiotic resistance and tolerance as a response to selective pressure (Beta lactamase and multidrug resistance). Fungi produce toxins for defense such as amatoxin. Plant pathogen populations are controlled. Plant Pathogens respond to selective pressure by adapting with antibiotic resistance. Nitrogen cycling is carried out by bacteria, archaea, cyanobacteria and their symbionts, and fungi. Nitrogen fixation is key, along with aerobic and anaerobic ammonia oxidizers, saprophytes, and coprophilous fungi which represent the interaction with animal waste and cadavers. These concepts were mapped in Figure 9.
Algae and Cyanobacteria have been known as common post-fire pioneers and may quickly colonize degraded ecosystems [7]. However, nitrate and nitrous oxide, oxidized products of nitrogen fixation, are potential sources of groundwater pollution and nitrification-related features should be monitored [74]. In our results, there were highly abundant Cyanobacteria and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea. In Levy-Booth 2014, the author expressed concern about dissimilative nitrogen metabolism [74]. In dissimilative nitrogen metabolism, the nitrate product is excreted into the environment because more is produced than needed to satisfy organismal needs [75].
The Red Trail Samples were associated with a significantly lower number of observed bacteria species when contrasted with the Green Trail. This evidence suggested that the higher fire intensity of the Station Fire combined with the recent burn of the Creek Fire influenced the abundance of fungal sequences amplified by the FITS marker. As Oliver et al. noted [8], the most important factors in soil microbial response to fire are the burn frequency and intensity.
There was evidence of seasonal shifts in the alpha diversity of the bacterial communities, based on the (ACE) index. That was because there were more OTUs detected in the Summer 16S results than the Winter 16S results. Ma et al. found similar results of seasonal community composition shift in the rootzone of hazelnut [4].

5. Conclusions

There are a high number of significantly abundant microbes that remain unclassified. This represents a major opportunity for discovery. However, caution is suggested due to the large number of possible plant and animal pathogen and parasite sequences that were discovered to be present in large numbers. Further study of the communities of organisms at this site could lead to the discovery of antibiotics and bioinsecticides, derived from the same organisms that are helping plants in the Angeles National Forest to resist infection.
There was functional redundancy between fungi and bacteria, and between different clusters of samples, that emphasizes the most important functions identified in this study and how they are important to recovery from fire. Clusters of taxa were differently composed but shared similar ecological functions. These results implied a set of traits for post-fire resiliency. These included photo-autotrophy, mineralization of pyrolyzed organic matter and aromatic/oily compounds, potential pathogenicity and parasitism, antimicrobials, digestion of microbes, and N-metabolism.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; formal analysis, S.S.; investigation, S.S., J.F., B.J., Y.B., R.A.E., and K.B.B.-K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.; writing—review and editing, S.B., G.P., A.E.T., J.F., B.J., Y.B., R.A.E., and K.B.B.-K.; supervision, S.B., G.P., and A.E.T.; funding acquisition, B.N. and R.A.E.; resources, B.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by training and resources from the National Science Foundation IUSE grant, NSF DUE-1821657 awarded to Bruce Nash and Ray Enke in part to support Community College faculty. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. DBI-0735191, DBI-1265383, and DBI-1743442 which supported iPlant Collaborative and DNA Subway development.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence read archives and metadata are available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information, BioProject ID PRJNA831829: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/831829 (accessed on 29 May 2022).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Shannon Devaney, Norman Senn, and Robert West for technical assistance with soil sampling. Thank you to John Creedon and Jonathan Ebrahimpour for technical writing assistance. The authors would also like to thank Rachel Meyer, Colin Fairbairn, and Miroslava Menguia-Ramos for technical assistance with DNA extraction and DNA sequencing for Round 1 samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. California Air Resources Board. Wildfires & Climate Change. Available online: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/wildfires-climate-change (accessed on 18 April 2022).
  2. Mony, C.; Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Bohannan, B.J.M.; Peay, K.; Leibold, M.A. A Landscape of Opportunities for Microbial Ecology Research. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Survey. Available online: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/ (accessed on 14 March 2020).
  4. Ma, W.; Yang, Z.; Liang, L.; Ma, Q.; Wang, G.; Zhao, T. Seasonal Changes in Soil Microbial Community and Co-Occurrence Network of Species of the Genus Corylus. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rohart, F.; Gautier, B.; Singh, A.; Lê Cao, K.-A. mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Fischer, M.S.; Stark, F.G.; Berry, T.D.; Zeba, N.; Whitman, T.; Traxler, M.F. Pyrolyzed Substrates Induce Aromatic Compound Metabolism in the Post-fire Fungus, Pyronema domesticum. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mataix-Solera, J.; Guerrero, C.; García-Orenes, F.; Bárcenas, G.M.; Torres, M.P.; Barcenas, M. Forest Fire Effects on Soil Microbiology. In Fire Effects on Soils and Restoration Strategies; Cerdà, A., Peter, R., Eds.; Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2009; Chapter 5; p. 133. [Google Scholar]
  8. Oliver, A.K.; Callaham, M.A.; Jumpponen, A. Soil fungal communities respond compositionally to recurring frequent prescribed burning in a managed southeastern US forest ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 345, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Whitman, T.; Whitman, E.; Woolet, J.; Flannigan, M.D.; Thompson, D.K.; Parisien, M.-A. Soil bacterial and fungal response to wildfires in the Canadian boreal forest across a burn severity gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2019, 138, 107571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bowd, E.J.; Banks, S.C.; Bissett, A.; May, T.W.; Lindenmayer, D.B. Disturbance alters the forest soil microbiome. Mol. Ecol. 2021, 31, 419–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, C.; Koo, K.; Byun, J.; Jeong, J. Post-fire effects on soil properties in red pine (pinus densiflora) stands. For. Sci. Technol. 2005, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Caron, D.A.; Worden, A.Z.; Countway, P.D.; Demir, E.; Heidelberg, K.B. Protists are microbes too: A perspective. ISME J. 2009, 3, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Antwis, R.E.; Griffiths, S.; Harrison, X.; Bou, P.A.; Arce, A.; Bettridge, A.S.; Brailsford, F.; de Menezes, A.; Devaynes, A.; Forbes, K.M.; et al. Fifty important research questions in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93, fix044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hilgert, U.; McKay, S.; Khalfan, M.; Williams, J.; Ghiban, C.; Micklos, D. DNA Subway. In Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–18 July 2014; Article 70. pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kandlikar, G.S.; Gold, Z.; Cowen, M.C.; Meyer, R.S.; Freise, A.C.; Kraft, N.J.; Moberg-Parker, J.; Sprague, J.; Kushner, D.J.; Curd, E.E. ranacapa: An R package and Shiny web app to explore environmental DNA data with exploratory statistics and interactive visualizations. F1000Research 2018, 7, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Le Cao, K.A.; Rohart, F.; Gonzalez, I.; Dejean, S.; Gautier, B.; Bartolo, F.; Monget, P.; Coquery, J.; Yao, F.; Liquet, B. mixOmics: Omics Data Integration Project. R package version 6.1.1. 2016. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mixOmics (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  17. Los Angeles Almanac. Wildfires in Los Angeles County. Available online: http://www.laalmanac.com/fire/fi07.php (accessed on 20 April 2022).
  18. Jacoby, R.P.; Martyn, A.; Kopriva, S. Exometabolomic Profiling of Bacterial Strains as Cultivated Using Arabidopsis Root Extract as the Sole Carbon Source. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Pang, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, T.; Gao, C.; Li, Z.; Guo, L.; Xu, J.; Cheng, Y. Linking Plant Secondary Metabolites and Plant Microbiomes: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. UC Caledna DNA DATA SERVICE—Caledna. Available online: ucedna.com (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  21. Curd, E.E.; Gold, Z.; Kandlikar, G.S.; Gomer, J.; Ogden, M.; O’Connell, T.; Pipes, L.; Schweizer, T.M.; Rabichow, L.; Lin, M.; et al. Anacapa Toolkit: An environmental DNA toolkit for processing multilocus metabarcode datasets. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2019, 10, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S.M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M.; et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1621–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Lozupone, C.A.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Fierer, N.; Knight, R. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4516–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kozich, J.J.; Westcott, S.L.; Baxter, N.T.; Highlander, S.K.; Schloss, P.D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 5112–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ul-Hasan, S.; Bowers, R.M.; Figueroa-Montiel, A.; Licea-Navarro, A.F.; Beman, J.M.; Woyke, T.; Nobile, C.J. Community ecology across bacteria, archaea and microbial eukaryotes in the sediment and seawater of coastal Puerto Nuevo, Baja California. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Callahan, B.J.; Mcmurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Gonzalez Peña, A.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, Interactive, Scalable and Extensible Microbiome Data Science using QIIME. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dwiyanto, J.; Ayub, Q.; Lee, S.M.; Foo, S.C.; Chong, C.W.; Rahman, S. Geographical separation and ethnic origin influence the human gut microbial composition: A meta-analysis from a Malaysian perspective. Microb. Genom. 2021, 7, 000619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Colombani, C.; Croiseau, P.; Fritz, S.; Guillaume, F.; Legarra, A.; Ducrocq, V.; Robert-Granié, C. A comparison of partial least squares (PLS) and sparse PLS regressions in genomic selection in French dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 2120–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Liquet, B.; de Micheaux, P.L.; Hejblum, B.; Thiébaut, R. Group and sparse group partial least square approaches applied in genomics context. Bioinformatics 2015, 32, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Chun, H.; Keleş, S. Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping With Multivariate Sparse Partial Least Squares Regression. Genetics 2009, 182, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Krohn, C.; Jin, J.; Wood, J.L.; Hayden, H.L.; Kitching, M.; Ryan, J.; Fabijański, P.; Franks, A.E.; Tang, C. Highly decomposed organic carbon mediates the assembly of soil communities with traits for the biodegradation of chlorinated pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 404, 124077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Libiger, O.; Schork, N.J. Partial Least Squares Regression Can Aid in Detecting Differential Abundance of Multiple Features in Sets of Metagenomic Samples. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mehmood, T.; Liland, K.H.; Snipen, L.; Sæbø, S. A review of variable selection methods in Partial Least Squares Regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012, 118, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Firke, S.; Denney, B.; Haid, C.; Knight, R.; Grosser, M.; Zadra, J. Janitor: Simple Tools for Examining and Cleaning Dirty Data. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/package=janitor (accessed on 31 March 2022).
  37. Kim, B.-R.; Shin, J.; Guevarra, R.B.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, D.W.; Seol, K.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, H.B.; Isaacson, R.E. Deciphering Diversity Indices for a Better Understanding of Microbial Communities. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 2089–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. He, L.; Rodrigues, J.L.M.; Soudzilovskaia, N.A.; Barceló, M.; Olsson, P.A.; Song, C.; Tedersoo, L.; Yuan, F.; Yuan, F.; Lipson, D.A.; et al. Global biogeography of fungal and bacterial biomass carbon in topsoil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 108024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bruns, T.D.; Chung, J.A.; Carver, A.A.; Glassman, S.I. A simple pyrocosm for studying soil microbial response to fire reveals a rapid, massive response by Pyronema species. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0222691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Qu, W.; Wijeratne, E.M.K.; Bashyal, B.P.; Xu, J.; Xu, Y.-M.; Liu, M.X.; Inácio, M.C.; Arnold, A.E.; U’Ren, J.M.; Gunatilaka, A.A.L. Strobiloscyphones A–F, 6-Isopentylsphaeropsidones and Other Metabolites from Strobiloscypha sp. AZ0266, a Leaf-Associated Fungus of Douglas Fir. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 2575–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Livingstone, P.G.; Ingleby, O.; Girdwood, S.; Cookson, A.R.; Morphew, R.M.; Whitworth, D.E. Predatory Organisms with Untapped Biosynthetic Potential: Descriptions of Novel Corallococcus Species C. aberystwythensis sp. nov., C. carmarthensis sp. nov., C. exercitus sp. nov., C. interemptor sp. nov., C. llansteffanensis sp. nov., C. praedator sp. nov., C. sicarius sp. nov., and C. terminator sp. nov. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01931-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jeong, M.; Kim, J.I.; Nam, S.W.; Shin, W. Molecular Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the Genus Spumella (Chrysophyceae) Based on Morphological and Molecular Evidence. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Öztoprak, H.; Walden, S.; Heger, T.; Bonkowski, M.; Dumack, K. What Drives the Diversity of the Most Abundant Terrestrial Cercozoan Family (Rhogostomidae, Cercozoa, Rhizaria)? Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Tauk-Tornisielo, S.M.; Arasato, L.S.; de Almeida, A.F.; Govone, J.S.; Malagutti, E.N. Lipid formation and γ-linolenic acid production by Mucor circinelloides and Rhizopus sp., grown on vegetable oil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2009, 40, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gardeli, C.; Athenaki, M.; Xenopoulos, E.; Mallouchos, A.; Koutinas, A.; Aggelis, G.; Papanikolaou, S. Lipid production and characterization by Mortierella (Umbelopsis) isabellina cultivated on lignocellulosic sugars. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 1461–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abaya, A.; Xue, A.; Hsiang, T. Selection and screening of fungal endophytes against wheat pathogens. Biol. Control 2021, 154, 104511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Carlucci, A.; Raimondo, M.; Santos, J.; Phillips, A. Plectosphaerella species associated with root and collar rots of horticultural crops in southern Italy. Persoonia-Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2012, 28, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Li, P.-L.; Chai, A.-L.; Shi, Y.-X.; Xie, X.-W.; Li, B.-J. First Report of Root Rot Caused by Plectosphaerella cucumerina on Cabbage in China. Mycobiology 2017, 45, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. University of California, Irvine. Dune Stinkhorn, Phallus hadriani. Fungi of Orange County, CA. 2015. Available online: https://nathistoc.bio.uci.edu/Fungi/Phallus%20hadriani/index.html (accessed on 24 April 2022).
  51. EM Lab P & K. Emericellopsis sp. Fungal Library. Available online: https://www.emlab.com/resources/fungal-library/emericellopsis-sp/ (accessed on 24 April 2022).
  52. Yoon, S.-H.; Ha, S.-M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cholorflexus—MicrobeWiki. Available online: https://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/MicrobeWiki (accessed on 24 April 2022).
  54. Mujakić, I.; Piwosz, K.; Koblížek, M. Phylum Gemmatimonadota and Its Role in the Environment. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Figueiredo, G.; Gomes, M.; Covas, C.; Mendo, S.; Caetano, T. The Unexplored Wealth of Microbial Secondary Metabolites: The Sphingobacteriaceae Case Study. Microb. Ecol. 2022, 83, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Houpt, E.; Petri, W. Rickettsial Infections. In Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kwaśna, H.; Szewczyk, W.; Baranowska, M.; Behnke-Borowczyk, J. Bacteria associated with vascular wilt of poplar. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Raes, B.; Horemans, B.; Rentsch, D.; T’Syen, J.; Ghequire, M.G.K.; de Mot, R.; Wattiez, R.; Kohler, H.-P.E.; Springael, D. Aminobacter sp. MSH1 Mineralizes the Groundwater Micropollutant 2,6-Dichlorobenzamide through a Unique Chlorobenzoate Catabolic Pathway. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 10146–10156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yabe, S.; Sakai, Y.; Abe, K.; Yokota, A. Diversity of Ktedonobacteria with Actinomycetes-Like Morphology in Terrestrial Environments. Microbes Environ. 2017, 32, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Boncristiani, H.F.; Criado, M.F.; Arruda, E. Respiratory Viruses. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 128–141. ISBN 9780123739445. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yeager, C.M.; Gallegos-Graves, L.V.; Dunbar, J.; Hesse, C.N.; Daligault, H.; Kuske, C.R. Polysaccharide Degradation Capability of Actinomycetales Soil Isolates from a Semiarid Grassland of the Colorado Plateau. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e03020-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Lau, E.; Iv, E.J.N.; Dillard, Z.W.; Dague, R.D.; Semple, A.L.; Wentzell, W.L. High Throughput Sequencing to Detect Differences in Methanotrophic Methylococcaceae and Methylocystaceae in Surface Peat, Forest Soil, and Sphagnum Moss in Cranesville Swamp Preserve, West Virginia, USA. Microorganisms 2015, 3, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chase, A.B.; Arevalo, P.; Polz, M.F.; Berlemont, R.; Martiny, J. Evidence for Ecological Flexibility in the Cosmopolitan Genus Curtobacterium. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Iino, T.; Tamaki, H.; Tamazawa, S.; Ueno, Y.; Ohkuma, M.; Suzuki, K.-I.; Igarashi, Y.; Haruta, S. Candidatus Methanogranum caenicola: A Novel Methanogen from the Anaerobic Digested Sludge, and Proposal of Methanomassiliicoccaceae fam. nov. and Methanomassiliicoccales ord. nov., for a Methanogenic Lineage of the Class Thermoplasmata. Microbes Environ. 2013, 28, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Kalam, S.; Basu, A.; Ahmad, I.; Sayyed, R.Z.; El-Enshasy, H.A.; Dailin, D.J.; Suriani, N.L. Recent Understanding of Soil Acidobacteria and Their Ecological Significance: A Critical Review. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 580024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ueda, A.; Saneoka, H. Characterization of the Ability to Form Biofilms by Plant-Associated Pseudomonas Species. Curr. Microbiol. 2014, 70, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Marčiulynienė, D.; Marčiulynas, A.; Lynikienė, J.; Vaičiukynė, M.; Gedminas, A.; Menkis, A. DNA-Metabarcoding of Belowground Fungal Communities in Bare-Root Forest Nurseries: Focus on Different Tree Species. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dove, N.; Hart, S.C. Fire Reduces Fungal Species Richness and In Situ Mycorrhizal Colonization: A Meta-Analysis. Fire Ecol. 2017, 13, 37–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hughes, K.W.; Matheny, P.B.; Miller, A.N.; Petersen, R.H.; Iturriaga, T.M.; Johnson, K.D.; Methven, A.S.; Raudabaugh, D.B.; Swenie, R.A.; Bruns, T.D. Pyrophilous fungi detected after wildfires in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park expand known species ranges and biodiversity estimates. Mycologia 2020, 112, 677–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Muñoz-Rojas, M.; Erickson, T.E.; Martini, D.; Dixon, K.W.; Merritt, D.J. Soil physicochemical and microbiological indicators of short, medium and long term post-fire recovery in semi-arid ecosystems. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 63, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rodríguez, A.; Durán, J.; Rey, A.; Boudouris, I.; Valladares, F.; Gallardo, A.; Yuste, J.C. Interactive effects of forest die-off and drying-rewetting cycles on C and N mineralization. Geoderma 2018, 333, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jin, J.; Krohn, C.; Franks, A.E.; Wang, X.; Wood, J.L.; Petrovski, S.; McCaskill, M.; Batinovic, S.; Xie, Z.; Tang, C. Elevated atmospheric CO2 alters the microbial community composition and metabolic potential to mineralize organic phosphorus in the rhizosphere of wheat. Microbiome 2022, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, X.; Wei, X.; Wei, J. Lichen-Associated Fungal Community in Hypogymnia hypotrypa (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) Affected by Geographic Distribution and Altitude. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Levy-Booth, D.J.; Prescott, C.E.; Grayston, S.J. Microbial functional genes involved in nitrogen fixation, nitrification and denitrification in forest ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 75, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Peretó, J. Dissimilative Metabolism; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; p. 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Left to Right: Round 1 soil sampling map (December 2020) and Round 2 soil sampling map (June 2021).
Figure 1. Left to Right: Round 1 soil sampling map (December 2020) and Round 2 soil sampling map (June 2021).
Microorganisms 10 01218 g001
Figure 2. Fungi species richness curves for the three Trail areas of the Gold Creek Preserve.
Figure 2. Fungi species richness curves for the three Trail areas of the Gold Creek Preserve.
Microorganisms 10 01218 g002
Figure 3. Sparse Partial Least Squares PCA plot of the samples in Y-variate space after optimization of the number of components using the root mean square error minimization. A 3D plot of the final sparse partial least squares PCA depicted in XY-variate space.
Figure 3. Sparse Partial Least Squares PCA plot of the samples in Y-variate space after optimization of the number of components using the root mean square error minimization. A 3D plot of the final sparse partial least squares PCA depicted in XY-variate space.
Microorganisms 10 01218 g003
Figure 4. Clustered Image Map. There was a suite of functional traits related to wildfire resiliency that was found to be consistent across clusters of samples in the sPLS results.
Figure 4. Clustered Image Map. There was a suite of functional traits related to wildfire resiliency that was found to be consistent across clusters of samples in the sPLS results.
Microorganisms 10 01218 g004
Figure 5. Functional analysis with the Kruskal–Wallis test: (a) Assimilatory nitrate reductase for the Green Trail vs. Red Trail; (b) Benzene toluene chlorobenzene dioxygenase ferredoxin component for the Green Trail vs. Blue Trail; (c) Beta-lactamase for the Green Trail vs. Blue Trail; (d) Halo acetate dehalogenase for the Blue Trail vs. Red Trail; (e) Propanediol dehydratase for the Green Trail vs. Red Trail; (f) Putrescine ornithine dehydratase for the Green Trail vs. Blue Trail; (g) Stigmatellin polyketide synthase for the Green Trail vs. Red Trail; (h) Lichenysin synthetase for the Green Trail vs. Blue Trail.
Figure 5. Functional analysis with the Kruskal–Wallis test: (a) Assimilatory nitrate reductase for the Green Trail vs. Red Trail; (b) Benzene toluene chlorobenzene dioxygenase ferredoxin component for the Green Trail vs. Blue Trail; (c) Beta-lactamase for the Green Trail vs. Blue Trail; (d) Halo acetate dehalogenase for the Blue Trail vs. Red Trail; (e) Propanediol dehydratase for the Green Trail vs. Red Trail; (f) Putrescine ornithine dehydratase for the Green Trail vs. Blue Trail; (g) Stigmatellin polyketide synthase for the Green Trail vs. Red Trail; (h) Lichenysin synthetase for the Green Trail vs. Blue Trail.
Microorganisms 10 01218 g005
Figure 6. Alpha Diversity Index for the winter versus the summer samples. Note evidence of overdispersion since both groups show outliers.
Figure 6. Alpha Diversity Index for the winter versus the summer samples. Note evidence of overdispersion since both groups show outliers.
Microorganisms 10 01218 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of the taxonomic composition of the winter sequences versus the summer sequences at the phylum level using EZBioCloud MTP.
Figure 7. Comparison of the taxonomic composition of the winter sequences versus the summer sequences at the phylum level using EZBioCloud MTP.
Microorganisms 10 01218 g007
Figure 8. EZBioCloud MTP analysis of the composition of the winter and summer sequences at the class level.
Figure 8. EZBioCloud MTP analysis of the composition of the winter and summer sequences at the class level.
Microorganisms 10 01218 g008
Figure 9. A proposed Soil Food Web of the Gold Creek Preserve, showing the most important redundant functions and known species interactions.
Figure 9. A proposed Soil Food Web of the Gold Creek Preserve, showing the most important redundant functions and known species interactions.
Microorganisms 10 01218 g009
Table 1. Description of the fires that have affected the area of interest [17]. © 1998–2019 Given Place Media, publishing as Los Angeles Almanac. Reprinted with permission.
Table 1. Description of the fires that have affected the area of interest [17]. © 1998–2019 Given Place Media, publishing as Los Angeles Almanac. Reprinted with permission.
Fire NameDate StartedAcres BurnedStructures Destroyed
Station26 August 2009160,577209
Sand22 July 201641,43218
Creek5 December 201715,619123
Table 2. Soil classifications, soil physical and chemical properties are specified for the Gold Creek Preserve according to USDA historical data [3].
Table 2. Soil classifications, soil physical and chemical properties are specified for the Gold Creek Preserve according to USDA historical data [3].
Soil ClassSlopepHCECTexture%OMAvail. H2O/100 cm
Trigo-Modesto-San Andreas (Map unit 48)15–70%79.8Loam111.27 cm
Caperton-Trigo (Map unit 54)50–85%6.511.3Gravelly loam15.94 cm
Table 3. Sample metadata for Round 2 sampling.
Table 3. Sample metadata for Round 2 sampling.
SampleIDLatitudeLongitudeElevationPlant_SpeciesTrailReplicate
Sample2534.322778−118.311672140Charred_OakBlueTrailrep1
Sample2634.322778−118.311672140Charred_OakBlueTrailrep2
Sample2734.322778−118.311672140Charred_OakBlueTrailrep3
Sample2834.321389−118.308892240Charred_OakRedTrailrep1
Sample2934.321389−118.308892240Charred_OakRedTrailrep2
Sample3034.321389−118.308892240Charred_OakRedTrailrep3
Sample3134.321667−118.311112200Manzanita_SWRedTrailrep1
Sample3234.321667−118.311112200Manzanita_SWRedTrailrep2
Sample3334.321667−118.311112200Manzanita_SWRedTrailrep3
Sample3434.3267402−118.309972340Bush_PoppyGreenTrailrep1
Sample3534.3267402−118.309972340Bush_PoppyGreenTrailrep2
Sample3634.3267402−118.309972340Bush_PoppyGreenTrailrep3
Sample3734.3279066−118.310282350Charred_OakGreenTrailrep1
Sample3834.3279066−118.310282350Charred_OakGreenTrailrep2
Sample3934.3279066−118.310282350Charred_OakGreenTrailrep3
Sample4034.324444−118.311672190Yerba_SantaGreenTrailrep1
Sample4134.324444−118.311672190Yerba_SantaGreenTrailrep2
Sample4234.324444−118.311672190Yerba_SantaGreenTrailrep3
Table 4. Sample metadata from Round 1 sampling.
Table 4. Sample metadata from Round 1 sampling.
Sample NameLatLongElevationPlantTrailTypeTopographySoil Class
K0554_M834.3225−118.3132140OakBlue TrailsoilFlatTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0782_B234.32278−118.3132130NoneBlue TrailsedimentCreekTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0782_C334.3225−118.3132140SycamoreBlue TrailsoilFlatTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0787_G534.3225−118.3012090FernBlue TrailsoilFlatTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0788_A134.3225−118.3142090YuccaBlue TrailsoilFlatTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0788_L734.3225−118.3142090Low CreekBlue TrailsedimentCreekTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0782_L734.32389−118.3122210Yerba SantaGreen TrailsoilTerraceTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0783_B234.3251−118.542230ReedGreen TrailsedimentCreekCaperton-Trigo
K0783_G534.32611−118.312330ChemiseGreen TrailsoilTerraceCaperton-Trigo
K0783_K634.32667−118.3092380CeanothusGreen TrailsoilTerraceCaperton-Trigo
K0783_L734.32722−118.3112400Bush PoppyGreen TrailsoilTerraceCaperton-Trigo
K0788_C334.3251−118.542230NoneGreen TrailsedimentCanyonCaperton-Trigo
K0788_G534.32694−118.312350NoneGreen TrailsoilCanyonCaperton-Trigo
K0788_M834.32389−118.3122190Yerba SantaGreen TrailsoilSlopeTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0790_C334.32694−118.312350OakGreen TrailsedimentCreekCaperton-Trigo
K0560_B234.32194−118.3112200ManzanitaRed TrailsoilSlopeTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0782_K634.32139−118.3092240OakRed TrailsoilTerraceTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0783_A134.3225−118.3122160ToyonRed TrailsoilSlopeTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0787_T934.32167−118.3112210ManzanitaRed TrailsoilSlopeTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
K0788_T934.32278−118.3122190BuckwheatRed TrailsoilSlopeTrigo-Modesto-San Andreas
Table 5. DESeq2 results for differentially expressed fungal taxa associated with the Red Trail vs. the Blue trail during winter 2020. Positive log fold change results represent sequences that were differentially abundant on the Red Trail. Negative log fold changes represent sequences that were differentially abundant on the Blue Trail.
Table 5. DESeq2 results for differentially expressed fungal taxa associated with the Red Trail vs. the Blue trail during winter 2020. Positive log fold change results represent sequences that were differentially abundant on the Red Trail. Negative log fold changes represent sequences that were differentially abundant on the Blue Trail.
TaxonBaseMeanlog2FoldChangelfcSEp Valuep adjNotes
OTU667Mucor saturninus11.66055−22.21324.01273.10 × 10−84.01 × 10−6Produces gamma linoleic acid and stores triacyl glycerides [45]
OTU671Umbelopsidaceae (unclassified)10.2148321.9924.0128154.24 × 10−84.40 × 10−6Converts lignocellulosic sugars to lipids [46]
OTU433Cladorrhinum sp.41.6797622.628893.9232358.03 × 10−91.39 × 10−6Wheat endophyte that controls Fusarium [47]
OTU341Plectosphaerella sp.55.81719−24.40684.0120541.18 × 10−93.05 × 10−7Root rot [48,49]
OTU536Phallus hadriani61.05296−24.51814.012049.89 × 10−103.05 × 10−7Dune stinkhorn [50]
Table 6. DESeq results for differentially expressed fungal taxa associated with the Green Trail vs. the Blue Trail (Round 1). Positive fold change values correspond to sequences that were differentially abundant on the Green Trail; taxa with significant negative fold change values are associated with the Blue Trail.
Table 6. DESeq results for differentially expressed fungal taxa associated with the Green Trail vs. the Blue Trail (Round 1). Positive fold change values correspond to sequences that were differentially abundant on the Green Trail; taxa with significant negative fold change values are associated with the Blue Trail.
TaxonBaseMeanlog2FoldChangep Valuep adjNotes
OTU341Plectosphaerella55.81719−25.54721.75 × 10−134.53 × 10−11Root rot [48,49]
OTU672Umbelopsis sp.47.74795−25.3542.65 × 10−134.58 × 10−11Endophyte, Converts lignocellulosic sugars to lipids [46]
OTU536Phallus hadriani61.05296−25.6811.31 × 10−134.53 × 10−11Dune stinkhorn [50]
OTU433Cladorrhinum sp.41.6797622.384167.61 × 10−115.57 × 10−9Produces antibiotics [47]
OTU363Emericellopsis sp.12.82686−23.43181.42 × 10−111.80 × 10−9Halotolerant, sexual state of Acremonium [51]
OTU224Calloria urticae10.1225−22.14031.77 × 10−101.02 × 10−8Pezizalaceae
OTU667Mucor saturninus11.66055−23.33321.73 × 10−111.80 × 10−9Produces gamma linoleic acid and stores triacyl glycerides [45]
OTU434Cladorrhinum flexuosum17.64756−22.51638.61 × 10−115.57 × 10−9Wheat endophyte that controls Fusarium [47]
OTU671Umbelopsidaceae (unclassified)10.21483−22.94323.74 × 10−113.23 × 10−9Converts lignocellulosic sugars to lipids [46]
Table 7. Red Trail vs. Green Trail 16S Round 2 differential abundance analysis (summer). The negative fold change values represent taxa that are elevated on the Green Trail. The positive fold change values represent taxa that were elevated on the Red Trail.
Table 7. Red Trail vs. Green Trail 16S Round 2 differential abundance analysis (summer). The negative fold change values represent taxa that are elevated on the Green Trail. The positive fold change values represent taxa that were elevated on the Red Trail.
TaxonBaseMeanlog2FoldChangep Valuep adjNotes
OTU349Gemmatimonas sp.10.973−6.211521.50 × 10−60.000307Facultative anoxygenic phototroph, requires organic substrates [54]
OTU206Sphingobacteriaceae (unclassified)27.15296−7.841031.53 × 10−89.40 × 10−6Polyketides, Terpenes, non-ribosomal peptides, antibiotics [55]
OTU481Rickettsiales (unclassified)62.316414.6751786.40 × 10−50.009801Related to Typhus, obligate intracellular parasite of animals [56]
OTU454Hyphomonadaceae (unclassified)20.30979−7.40211.44 × 10−60.000307Vascular wilt of poplar [57]
Table 8. Red Trail vs. Blue Trail 16S Round 2 differential abundance analysis. Taxa with negative fold change values were elevated on the Blue Trail. Taxa with positive fold change values were elevated on the Red Trail.
Table 8. Red Trail vs. Blue Trail 16S Round 2 differential abundance analysis. Taxa with negative fold change values were elevated on the Blue Trail. Taxa with positive fold change values were elevated on the Red Trail.
TaxonBaseMeanlog2FoldChangep Valuep adjNotes
OTU206Sphingobacteriaceae (unclassified)27.15296−6.564030.0001280.003176Polyketides, Terpenes, antibiotics [55]
OTU349Gemmatimonas sp.10.973−6.556232.98 × 10−50.000894Autotrophic bacterium [54]
OTU481Rickettsiales (unclassified)62.316417.6594093.13 × 10−50.000894Intracellular parasite [56]
OTU439Aminobacter sp.30.81048.1592973.77 × 10−50.000998Mineralizes Chlorobenzoates [58]
OTU265Ktedonobacteraceae (unclassfied)152.12128.9402757.98 × 10−60.000329Forms branched mycelia, geothermal areas [59]
OTU512Burkholderia sp.69.313989.1895181.67 × 10−67.84 × 10−5Possible plant pathogen and antibiotic resistant, degrades chlorinated pollutants [33]
OTU95Legionellaceae (unclassified)121.84979.922433.03 × 10−95.63 × 10−7Amino acids are preferred energy source [60]
OTU121Pseudonocardiaceae (unclassified)99.1472310.084141.15 × 10−81.43 × 10−6Degradation of polysaccharides and chitin in dryland soils [61]
OTU432Methylocystaceae (unclassified)17.8878518.590221.69 × 10−67.84 × 10−5Methanotrophic bacteria [62]
OTU89Curtobacterium sp.17.3693520.607783.87 × 10−72.87 × 10−5Degradation of polysaccharides, most common in S. CA leaf litter [63]
OTU4Thermoplasmata E2 (unclassified)20.7621520.823793.36 × 10−72.87 × 10−5Uncultured archaea, Methanogen [64]
OTU17Acidobacteriaceae (Unclassified)48.9678621.706341.43 × 10−95.31 × 10−7Plant growth-promoting [65]
OTU602Pseudomonadaceae (unclassified)45.4921822.039548.96 × 10−75.54 × 10−5Plant-associated, motile [66]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Senn, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Presley, G.; Taylor, A.E.; Nash, B.; Enke, R.A.; Barnard-Kubow, K.B.; Ford, J.; Jasinski, B.; Badalova, Y. The Functional Biogeography of eDNA Metacommunities in the Post-Fire Landscape of the Angeles National Forest. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061218

AMA Style

Senn S, Bhattacharyya S, Presley G, Taylor AE, Nash B, Enke RA, Barnard-Kubow KB, Ford J, Jasinski B, Badalova Y. The Functional Biogeography of eDNA Metacommunities in the Post-Fire Landscape of the Angeles National Forest. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(6):1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Senn, Savanah, Sharmodeep Bhattacharyya, Gerald Presley, Anne E. Taylor, Bruce Nash, Ray A. Enke, Karen B. Barnard-Kubow, Jillian Ford, Brandon Jasinski, and Yekaterina Badalova. 2022. "The Functional Biogeography of eDNA Metacommunities in the Post-Fire Landscape of the Angeles National Forest" Microorganisms 10, no. 6: 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061218

APA Style

Senn, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Presley, G., Taylor, A. E., Nash, B., Enke, R. A., Barnard-Kubow, K. B., Ford, J., Jasinski, B., & Badalova, Y. (2022). The Functional Biogeography of eDNA Metacommunities in the Post-Fire Landscape of the Angeles National Forest. Microorganisms, 10(6), 1218. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop