Next Article in Journal
Effect of Tea Saponins on Rumen Microbiota and Rumen Function in Qinchuan Beef Cattle
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy of Soft-Rot Disease Biocontrol Agents in the Inhibition of Production Field Pathogen Isolates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epsilon-Caprolactam- and Nylon Oligomer-Degrading Bacterium Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3: Characterization and Potential Use in Bioremediation

by
Tatiana Z. Esikova
1,
Ekaterina V. Akatova
2 and
Inna P. Solyanikova
3,4,*
1
Laboratory of Plasmid Biology, G.K. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Pushchino Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, prosp. Nauki 5, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
2
Laboratory of Ecological and Medical Biotechnology, Tula State University, Friedrich Engels Street 157, 300012 Tula, Russia
3
Laboratory of Microbial Enzymology, G.K. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Pushchino Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, prosp. Nauki 5, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
4
Regional Microbiological Center, Institute of Pharmacy, Chemistry and Biology, Belgorod National Research University, 308015 Belgorod, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 373; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020373
Submission received: 11 December 2022 / Revised: 16 January 2023 / Accepted: 29 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacterial Pathways for Pollutants Degradation)

Abstract

:
epsilon-Caprolactam (Caprolactam, CAP), a monomer of the synthetic non-degradable polymer nylon-6, is the major wastewater component in the production of caprolactam and nylon-6. Biological treatment of CAP, using microbes could be a potent alternative to the current waste utilization techniques. This work focuses on the characterization and potential use of caprolactam-degrading bacterial strain BS3 isolated from soils polluted by CAP production wastes. The strain was identified as Brevibacterium epidermidis based on the studies of its morphological, physiological, and biochemical properties and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. This study is the first to report the ability of Brevibacterium to utilize CAP. Strain BS3 is an alcalo- and halotolerant organism, that grows within a broad range of CAP concentrations, from 0.5 up to 22.0 g/L, optimally at 1.0–2.0 g/L. A caprolactam biodegradation experiment using gas chromatography showed BS3 to degrade 1.0 g/L CAP over 160 h. In contrast to earlier characterized narrow-specific CAP-degrading bacteria, strain BS3 is also capable of utilizing linear nylon oligomers (oligomers of 6-aminohexanoic acid), CAP polymerization by-products, as sole sources of carbon and energy. The broad range of utilized toxic pollutants, the tolerance for high CAP concentrations, as well as the physiological properties of B. epidermidis BS3, determine the prospects of its use for the biological cleanup of CAP and nylon-6 production wastes that contain CAP, 6-aminohexanoic acid, and low molecular weight oligomer fractions.

1. Introduction

Epsilon-Caprolactam (Caprolactam, CAP, the cyclic amide of 6-aminohexanoic acid) is one of the chemical products that are in high demand on the world market. CAP is used as a raw material to produce polycaprolactam, more known as nylon-6. This polymer is produced by the ring-opening polymerization of caprolactam, in which the monomeric unit, 6-aminohexanoic acid (6-AHA), is linked by amide bonds with a degree of polymerization > 100 [1]. The polymerization products contain the linear and cyclic oligomers of 6-aminohexanoic acid traditionally called nylon oligomers (OLN). Caprolactam, 6-aminohexanoic acid, and nylon oligomers are the major components of wastewater and solid wastes formed in the production of CAP and nylon-6 [2]. At present, the wastewater is incinerated, and the solid wastes are buried, which leads to the polluting soils and ground waters by caprolactam and its by-products. In several works, CAP is shown to cause dermatitis, fever, and seizures in humans, to induce DNA damage and cause chromosomal aberrations in mammals [3,4,5], as well as to inhibit the growth of microorganisms that play important roles in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of soils [6]. Due to its toxic effect on living organisms, this pollutant poses a hazard to the environment and human health.
To date, CAP-degrading bacteria from various taxonomic groups have been described: proteobacteria, actinobacteria, and spore-forming bacteria [7,8,9]. Some of them utilize the xenobiotic as a sole source of carbon and nitrogen; others require additional sources of carbon or nitrogen.
Although the linear nylon oligomers have structures like those of linear peptides found in biological systems and thus could probably be acted upon by proteases/peptidases/amidohydrolases produced by microorganisms, they are harder to degrade by microbes than CAP. Several bacterial strains have been described that are capable of transforming OLN to 6-aminohexanoic acid [2] and, in some cases, of utilizing them completely [1,10]. Earlier, we isolated and characterized CAP-degrading bacteria attributed to the genus Pseudomonas that do not degrade the linear OLN but transform them to corresponding dicarboxylic acids [11]. The diversity of microorganisms oxidizing nylon oligomers, and peculiarities of the biodegradation of these man-made compounds by them remain little investigated. The absence of any systemic research into microbial degraders of CAP and OLN hinders the development of safe and economical technologies for the biological cleanup of their production wastes and the bioremediation of polluted sites.
It is thought that the biodegradation of CAP and OLN in bacteria proceeds via the common biochemical pathway [2,11]. This suggests that caprolactam-degrading strains could use OLN as growth substrates. Still, the possibility of degrading CAP and OLN as sole sources of carbon without any additional growth factors by one bacterial culture has not been described. This work presents the results of investigating the morphological, physiological, and biochemical properties and the taxonomic status of the strain BS3, which possesses a unique capability of utilizing not only caprolactam but also the low molecular weight linear nylon oligomers (as exemplified by the 6-AHA dimer and trimer) as sole sources of carbon and energy. We also aim to assess the degradation potential of this strain and the prospects of its application for the biological cleanup of industrial wastes from the production of caprolactam and CAP-based polymers.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All reagents (Sigma, St.Louis, MO, USA; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany; Amresco, Solon, OH, USA; Honeywell Fluka, Seelze, Germany) were of analytical grade. The linear dimer and trimer of 6-aminohexanoic acid were synthesized according to Kinoshita et al. [12]. The oligomers were assayed by thin-layer chromatography and mass spectrometry.

2.2. Bacterial Strain and Growth Conditions

Bacterial strain BS3 (VKM Ac-2833) has been isolated earlier from soil sampled in a CAP production territory (Shchekino, Tula Region, Russia) [13]. The bacterium was cultivated in a mineral salt medium (MSM) containing (g/L): KH2PO4, 0.2; K2HPO4, 0.6; NaCl, 0.3; NH4Cl, 0.4; CaCl2 × 2H2O, 0.1; MgSO4 × 7H2O, 0.2. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.5; then the medium was sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min. A sterile solution of trace elements in the amount of 1.0 mL containing (g/L): H3BO3, 0.5; CuSO4 × 5H2O, 0.04; FeCl3, 0.2; MnSO4 × H2O, 0.4; (NH4)6Mo7O24 × 4H2O, 0.2; ZnSO4 × 7H2O, 0.4, was introduced into the medium. CAP, 6-AHA, adipinic acid (ADA), and the linear oligomers of 6-AHA (dimer and trimer) at concentrations of 1.0 g/L (w/v) were used as sole sources of carbon and energy. The culture was grown at 28 °C on a shaker (180 rpm) or in Petri dishes containing an agarized medium. For the preparation of agar plates, the medium was supplemented with 2% agar.
The physiological characteristics and optimum growth conditions were studied using a tryptone-soy medium (TSM) of the following composition (g/L): soy extract, 30.0; casein hydrolysate, 5.0; yeast extract, 1.0; aminopeptide, 60 mL L−1; pH 7.5.

2.3. Microscopy

Light microscopy of samples in the phase contrast mode was carried out using a Nikon Eclipse Ci microscope (Nikon, Minato, Japan) equipped with a ProgRes SpeedXT camera (Jenoptic, Jena, Germany). Electron microscopy of thin sections was carried out according to the method described in [14]. To prepare ultrathin sections, double fixation with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetraxide was used followed by embedding the cells in an epoxy resin Epon 812. Sections were viewed through an electron microscope JEM-1400 (JEOL, Akishima, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.

2.4. Characterization of the Physiological and Biochemical Properties

Optimal growth conditions were investigated in a liquid TSM. Growth was examined at different temperatures (4, 10, 18, 25, 30, 37, 40, 42, and 45 °C) and pH values (from 4.0 up to 11.0, in increments of 0.5 pH unit) adjusted with appropriate buffers [15] and various NaCl concentrations (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, 15.0, 17.5, 20.0, 25.0, w/v). Culture growth was monitored at OD590 using a UV Specord spectrophotometer (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Each variant of the experiment was performed in triplicate; the mean values were used for the analysis.
The catalase activity was investigated by assessing bubble production in a 3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide solution. The oxidase activity was determined by the oxidation of tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine [16].
Utilization of various substrates, enzyme activities, and other biochemical properties were tested by using Api 20E, Api 20NE, and Api 50CH strips (BioMerieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Identification of the Strain BS3

2.5.1. 16. S rRNA Gene Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted with a ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA MiniPrepTM Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was performed with the GeneAmp PCR System 9700 with prokaryotic universal 16S rRNA gene primers: 27f (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492r (50-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-30) [17]. The reaction products were separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel. DNA fragments were isolated from agarose and purified using a ZymoClean Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research, USA). Purified PCR products were sequenced on an ABI Prism 373 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The sequence obtained was compared with the sequences in GenBank databases using the BLAST software package [18]. Multiple alignments with sequences of the most closely related bacterial strains and calculations of levels of sequence similarity were carried out using the CLUSTAL X program [19].
The 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence of strain BS3 was deposited in the GenBank under accession number JN787123.

2.5.2. G + C Analysis and DNA-DNA Hybridization

The G + C content of the genomic DNA for strain BS3 was determined by the thermal denaturation method using the DNA of Escherichia coli K12 as a standard [20]. DNA-DNA relatedness was studied using the fluorometric micro-well method [21]. Hybridization was performed in five replicates. The highest and lowest values obtained in each sample were excluded, and the means of the remaining three values were quoted as DNA-DNA relatedness values.

2.6. Caprolactam Degradation Experiment

Degradation of caprolactam was carried out by growing the bacterial strain in an MSM (pH 7.5) supplemented with 1.0 g/L substrate. The culture grown on the same medium up to the mid-exponential phase (OD590, 1.0) was used as inoculum. Cells were sedimented by centrifugation (5000 g, 10 min) and poured into flasks up to an OD590 of 0.05. Cultivation was done in 750 mL flasks with 100 mL of the medium for 160 h at 28 °C and 180 rpm. Samples to measure the optical density and the amount of CAP were taken every 20 h. Bacterial growth was assessed by the change of optical density, and the amount of substrate in samples (including control experiments without inoculation) was determined using gas chromatography.

2.7. Caprolactam Tolerance Test

Growth of BS3 at different CAP concentrations was examined in an MSM-containing substrate at 0.4, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, 22.0, or 23.0 g/L. The conditions for the preparation of inoculum and cultivation of cells were the same as in the Caprolactam Degradation Experiment. Bacterial growth was assessed by measuring the optical density at 590 nm. The OD value was converted to dry cell weight (DCW) using a calibration curve. The duration of the lag period and the maximal specific growth rate (µmax) were calculated from the growth curves plotted for each concentration of substrate using Microsoft Office Excel 2007 [22].

2.8. Gas Chromatography Analysis

Samples (1 mL each) were centrifuged (5000 g, 10 min); the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-µm Millipore membrane filter and then analyzed at a Kristal-5000.2 gas chromatograph (Khromatek, Podolsk, Russia) using a flame ionization detector and a BP1 J08 capillary column (60 m × 0.30 mm × 0.53 μm) (SGE Analytical Science, Ringwood, Australia). The conditions for the analysis were as follows: column thermostat temperature, 150 °C; evaporator temperature, 310 °C; detector temperature, 250 °C; carrier gas (helium) flow rate, 5.2 cm3/min.
The amount of CAP was determined by the calibration curve. The curve was plotted using twofold serial dilutions of an aqueous solution of CAP at an initial concentration of 2.0 mg mL−1.

2.9. Statistical Data Processing

All experiments were performed in triplicate and statistical methods such as standard deviation and standard error were employed using [22]. The confidence level at 95% intervals was calculated for each set of samples to determine the margin of error.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology and Ultrastructure of Cells

Cells of strain BS3 are immotile, rod-shaped with spherically rounded ends, and approximately 1.0–1.4 μm long and 0.6–0.8 μm wide. Cells multiply by binary division and do not form spores and prosthecas. Electron microscopy of ultrathin sections revealed the cell wall structure typical of Gram-positive bacteria. The outer surface of the cell wall is bounded by a monolayer contour of unknown nature. The cell cytoplasm has extensive electron-transparent inclusions of up to 200–300 nm in diameter (Figure 1).
After 5–6 days of incubation at 28 °C on an agarized mineral medium supplemented with caprolactam, the bacterium forms small, rounded colonies 2–3 mm in diameter, which is grayish-white, slimy, non-transparent, homogeneous; with a slightly convex profile, smooth edge, and smooth surface.

3.2. Physiological and Biochemical Properties

The physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain BS3 are given in Table 1. The isolate is a chemoorganotrophic, catalase-positive, and oxidase-negative organism. It possesses a respiratory type of metabolism, is capable of nitrate reduction; liquefies gelatin, hydrolyzes casein, and starch. Does not degrade esculin and tweens, and does not form indole. Tests for β-galactosidase, arginin dihydrolase, and urease are negative. As a source of carbon, the strain uses a broad range of organic compounds, including simple and complex carbohydrates, some alcohols, and organic acids.
Strain BS3 grows within the temperature range of 10 up to 37 °C and pH 6.0 up to 10.5, optimally at 25–28 °C and pH 7.5–8.0, which enables attributing it to mesophilic, non-acid-resistant, and alcalotolerant bacteria. The culture is capable of growing at the high salinity of the medium (up to 18%), though the amount of salt for optimal growth is 0.2%. These data indicate that the investigated strain belongs to halotolerant bacteria.

3.3. Identification of the Strain BS3

For the phylogenetic analysis of strain BS3, we determined the 16S rRNA gene sequence of 1283 bp (GenBank accession no. JN787123). Analysis of the sequence showed the isolate to belong to the class Actinobacteria, genus Brevibacterium and to have the highest similarity of 16S rRNA gene to type strain B. epidermidis VKM Ac-2108T (99.8%). The similarity between 16S rRNA genes of strain BS3 and the type strains of other most closely related species of this genus—B. iodinum DSM 2062T and B. permense VKM Ac-2280T—was lower, 98.8%. The mean DNA–DNA relatedness value between strain BS3 and B. epidermidis VKM Ac-2108T was 71%. The G + C content in the DNA of strain BS3 was 62.6 mol. %, which is typical of B. epidermidis bacteria. Based on the data obtained, strain BS3 was attributed to the species Brevibacterium epidermidis. The phenotypic characteristics of strain BS3 (Table 1) also confirm its phylogenetic identification as a representative of Brevibacterium epidermidis [23].

3.4. Caprolactam Tolerance

As we mentioned above, CAP is a toxic compound and at certain concentrations, it inhibits bacterial growth, including those of degrading bacteria. The rate and degree of caprolactam degradation in wastewater, first, depends on the amount of this compound, hence the tolerance of the microorganisms-destructors to high concentrations of caprolactam can be critical in practical use. To determine the caprolactam tolerance of BS3, we compared the growth parameters of the culture (duration of the lag phase, maximal specific growth rate, OD590, dry weight of cells) during its cultivation in an MSM containing from 0.1 up to 25.0 g/L substrate. The results obtained are presented in Table 2 and Figure 2.
In the experiments, BS3 was found not to grow at a substrate concentration lower than 0.5 g/L (Table 2). The lag phase at a CAP concentration of 0.5 g/L was minimal as compared with other variants of the experiment; the culture began to grow almost immediately after the inoculum was introduced (Table 2 and Figure 2). The stationary growth phase was rapidly reached, but the optical density was not high (0.81), which, most likely, indicates that the substrate was depleted, and cells ceased to grow. At a CAP concentration of 1.0 and 2.0 g/L the culture had the maximal values of optical density (1.57 and 1.50, respectively), dry weight of cells (0.98 and 0.92, respectively), and specific growth rate (0.236 and 0.224 h−1, respectively) (Table 2). Though the bacterial growth began after a small lag period (6 and 7 h, respectively), we believe these concentrations of the substrate to be optimal. A further increase in the amount of CAP in the medium was accompanied by a proportional increase in the lag period, a decrease in the specific growth rate, as well as a reduction of the optical density. At a substrate concentration of 10.0 g/L and higher, the value of μmax was observed to decrease dramatically; however, the culture did not cease to grow completely. A critical amount of CAP in the medium, at which bacterial growth was still observed, was 22.0 g/L. The duration of the lag phase, in that case, was more than 60 h, and the values of OD and μmax were minimal (0.15 and 0.022 h−1, respectively) (Table 2 and Figure 2). At higher concentrations of the xenobiotic, as well as in controls (without the addition of substrate and/or inoculum), there was no culture growth.

3.5. Caprolactam Degradation

Based on the results of the previous experiment, the CAP degradation dynamics by strain BS3 were investigated at an optimal concentration of substrate, 1.0 g/L. Cell growth was monitored by the change of optical density, and the content of substrate in samples was assessed by gas chromatography. As shown in Figure 3, the investigated strain totally utilized this amount of CAP over 160 h. The substrate was mainly consumed during the active growth phase (40–120 h), its content in the medium over this time decreased by 91.8%; the maximal value of optical density was 1.58. An insignificant consumption of CAP also continued in the stationary growth phase (120–160 h) to make about 5.2%. In the control experiment without adding the inoculum, the concentration of caprolactam did not change, which indicates the absence of bacterial growth (Figure 3, curve 3).
Each value is a mean of three replicates with error bars indicating the standard deviation from the mean.

3.6. Growth of Strain BS3 on Caprolactam Intermediates and Nylon Oligomers

It is known that caprolactam degradation starts with a caprolactam ring opening to form 6-aminohexanoic acid, followed by the deamination to 6-oxohexanoate and subsequent oxidation to yield adipic acid, which is then converted via β-oxidation reactions of the fatty acid metabolic pathway [10,24]. It is important to note that 6-AHA is also a product of the hydrolysis of nylon oligomers (6-AHA oligomers) [1,2,10,25]. Thus, the degradation of OLN can theoretically proceed via the CAP catabolic pathway (Figure 4).
For this reason, we studied the growth of strain BS3 in an MSM containing OLN, 6-AHA, or ADA as sole sources of carbon and energy. The concentrations of substrates were 1.0 g/L. Especially for this experiment, we synthesized the 6-AHA linear dimer and trimer. The results obtained showed that BS3 was able to grow on all substrates tested (Figure 5). This implies that the investigated strain can utilize the linear nylon oligomers as a sole source of carbon and energy. Additionally, degradation of CAP and OLN most likely occurs in BS3 via the common biochemical pathway, the formation of 6-AHA and ADA. The lack of information about genes encoding the key enzymes of CAP catabolism did not enable a strict molecular genetic proof of this assumption. It should be noted that the growth rate, as the optical density of the culture in a medium supplemented with OLN, was lower than on 6-AHA and/or ADA. Bacterial growth on OLN began after a lengthier lag phase than on other substrates, which led to an increase in the total culture growth time.
Each value is a mean of three replicates with error bars indicating the standard deviation from the mean.

4. Discussion

Interest in research into various aspects of microbial degradation of caprolactam and nylon-6 has considerably grown in recent years. This is because the volume of production of CAP and polymers on its basis constantly increases, and toxic production wastes enter the environment. Initially, the ability to degrade CAP was found in Pseudomonas bacteria, which are known to possess metabolic plasticity and can utilize a broad range of organic compounds, including toxic pollutants [26]. In the opinion of Iizuka et al. [27], this is due to a lactamase activity, which pseudomonads possess, and which rarely occurs in other microorganisms. We have shown that the ability of Pseudomonas bacteria to utilize CAP is determined by plasmids (CAP plasmids), which carry genetic information required for the complete mineralization of the xenobiotic [11,28]. Later works described caprolactam-utilizing bacteria of the genera Alcaligenes, Corynebacterium, Acinetobacter, Achromobacter, Arthrobacter, Microbacterium, Bacillus, and others [6,8,9,10,29]. A phylogenetic study of CAP degraders isolated from nylon-6 production wastes attributed them to three phyla: Proteobacteria (Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria), Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes [7]. The plasmid or chromosomal localization of CAP catabolism genes in degraders representing these taxonomic groups remains an open issue.
It is interesting that while several decades ago CAP degraders have been isolated only from soils polluted by CAP and nylon-6 production wastes, in recent years they have been also found in soils with nonspecific pollutants [30]. The emergence of the ability to degrade CAP in bacteria can be contributed to the pollution of the environment by CAP polymerization products (car and aircraft tire treads, fishing nets, cloths, etc.) and the adaptation of bacteria to them owing to the extension of enzymes’ substrate specificities, as well as the spreading of CAP plasmids in bacterial communities.
The present study focused on the characterization of gram-positive caprolactam-degrading bacterium BS3 with the view of investigating its potential for the biological treatment of caprolactam and nylon-6 production wastes. This microbe was isolated from soil samples taken in a CAP production territory (Russia). Based on the detailed investigation of its morphological, physiological, and biochemical properties, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and data of DNA–DNA hybridization with closely related type strain B. epidermidis VKM Ac-2108T, BS3 was identified as belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria, species Brevibacterium epidermidis. Though actinobacteria are known to be capable of degrading a broad range of natural and man-made organic compounds, CAP degraders of the genus Brevibacterium are described here for the first time. According to the literature data, B. epidermidis bacteria are typical representatives of human skin microbiota [31].
Strain B. epidermidis BS3 grew within a broad range of concentrations of the xenobiotic, from 0.5 up to 22.0 g/L. An optimal concentration of CAP was 1.0 g/L. At a concentration greater than 10.0 g/L, the CAP had a negative effect on the growth of the culture, as evidenced by an increase in the lag period and a decrease in the maximal specific growth rate and optical density of the culture. A study of CAP degradation dynamics by gas chromatography showed the bacterium to degrade completely this amount of substrate over 160 h. Its major amount, about 92%, was consumed by cells in the exponential growth phase. It should be noted that strain BS3 utilized CAP without extra sources of carbon or growth factors, in contrast to bacteria that require additional carbon sources or vitamins to degrade this xenobiotic [32].
Of special interest is that BS3 possesses a unique capability of utilizing not only CAP but also the linear nylon oligomers (dimer and trimer), which distinguishes it from the earlier described narrow-specificity CAP and/or oligomers’ degraders. As we mentioned above, the distinction between CAP and OLN biodegradation processes is the hydrolysis reaction of the amide bond in the substrate molecule, as the result of which a 6-AHA species forms in both cases; it can be further oxidized by CAP or OLN degraders via the common biochemical pathway. Despite this, the earlier described CAP degraders are incapable of utilizing OLN [10,11]. In turn, the bacteria Alcaligenes sp. D-2 and Agromyces sp. KY5R that utilize the oligomers do not degrade CAP [33,34]. A work by Baxi [2] has shown that, at the introduction of caprolactam-degrading strain Alcaligenes faecalis into a non-sterile soil polluted by nylon-6 production wastes, the amounts of CAP and linear oligomers in the soil are observed to decrease. However, no strict proof has been given that these pollutants are degraded by namely A. faecalis. The ability to degrade CAP and some linear and cyclic OLN has been described only for Corynebacterium aurantiacum B2, but this strain utilizes CAP and its derivatives only upon the addition of yeast extract to the medium [35]. In contrast, the isolate investigated in this work had no requirement of yeast extract/growth factors to degrade CAP and linear OLN.
One of the reasons why bacteria are incapable of utilizing simultaneously CAP and OLN is, in our mind, the narrow substrate specificity of 6-aminohexanoate-dimer hydrolase (EC 3.5.1.46), which breaks the amide bond in the molecule of linear OLN. Thus, Kinoshita et al. [36] have shown that in Flavobacterium sp. KI72 6-aminohexanoate-dimer hydrolase is inactive towards 100 various compounds with the amide bond, among them peptides, linear and cyclic amides, CAP including. As for caprolactam hydrolase (EC 3.5.2.-), this enzyme has not been isolated yet and its properties have not been studied. In our view, the ability of strain BS3 to utilize both CAP and OLN can be due to the occurrence of two specific hydrolases, one of which is active toward the oligomers and the other to CAP. At the same time, we cannot completely rule out the existence in this bacterium of one enzyme with a broad substrate specificity, possessing the activities of both 6-aminohexanoate-dimer hydrolase and caprolactam hydrolase. Expansion of substrate specificity in the already available bacterial enzymes is one of the mechanisms for the emergence of enzyme activities to earlier non-degradable synthetic substrates, OLN including. Thus, at a prolonged incubation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO in a mineral medium with the linear dimer as a sole source of carbon, the bacterium adapted to the xenobiotic and acquired an ability to degrade it [37]. For example, Rybkina et al. [38] have described other examples of expanded substrate specificity of enzymes that enable microorganisms to attack not only the target substrate but also its derivatives, which are persistent toxicants. Thus, the bacterial strain studied in this work possesses unique enzyme activities and can utilize CAP, 6-AHA, and low molecular weight linear OLN, which makes it promising for the biological cleanup of CAP and nylon-6 production wastes containing CAP, 6-AHA, and low molecular weight oligomer fractions.
The possibility of using microorganisms for the biological cleanup of production wastes containing CAP and OLN has only started to be investigated. The biological treatment of wastewaters using activated sludge or activated sludge mixed with specific caprolactam-degrading bacteria has been reported [2,39]. Kulkarni and Kanekar have demonstrated the application of Pseudomonas strains for the degradation of caprolactam from nylon-6 effluents [4]. Strain Alcaligenes faecalis also grew in a synthetic medium containing only the components of oligomeric waste as nutrients [2]. However, these experiments were carried out in laboratory conditions. The degradation of caprolactam in CAP and nylon-6 production wastes and the in-situ bioremediation of soil polluted with CAP have not been reported.
The rate and degree of CAP degradation in wastewater have been shown to depend primarily on the concentration of the xenobiotic [40]. According to the available data, the amount of CAP can vary from 1360 up to 3600 mg/L depending on the facility, and the content of CAP in solid wastes can reach 34% (w/v) [39]. On this basis, the tolerance of microbial degraders to high concentrations of the xenobiotic can be of crucial significance for their use in biological cleanup technologies. As a rule, the concentration of CAP optimal for most microbial degraders is 1.0–2.0 g/L [8,41,42]. An increase in the concentration of substrate up to 5.0 g/L led to a significant reduction in the cell growth and harvest rates in Pseudomonas bacteria, and at a concentration of 10.0 g/L, they ceased to grow completely [41]. The maximum tolerance of Achromobacter guttatus KF71 was approximately 5.0 g caprolactam per L and required the supplementation of yeast to the medium [43]. Bacteria Proteus sp. NTS2 and Achromobacter sp. grew at 10.0 and 15.0 g/L CAP, respectively; however, these amounts of substrate were not optimal and inhibited cell growth to a significant degree [6,7]. Strain Acinetobacter calcoaceticus demonstrated poor growth at 19.0 g/L CAP [8]. A critical amount of CAP in a mineral medium, at which the investigated strain continued to grow, was 22.0 g/L, which is higher than in earlier reported caprolactam-degrading bacteria. These results demonstrate that strain BS3 has a great potential for bioremediation of caprolactam from production wastes within a broad range of concentrations of the pollutant.
It is generally recognized that efficient uptake of organic pollutants from water and/or soil by microorganisms is impeded by such factors as pH values, temperature as well as salinity non-optimal for their growth. Therefore, not all microbial degraders are suitable for environmental cleanup technologies. Since wastes from CAP and CAP-based polymer manufacture are alkaline solutions [44], halo- and alcalohalotolerance of strain B. epidermidis BS3—along with its ability to utilize a broad range of toxic pollutants and high CAP tolerance—make it promising for use in technologies of the biological cleanup of CAP and nylon-6 production wastes under conditions distinct from the optimum.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Z.E.; methodology, T.Z.E. and I.P.S.; validation, T.Z.E. and E.V.A.; formal analysis, E.V.A.; investigation, T.Z.E. and E.V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Z.E.; writing—review and editing, T.Z.E. and I.P.S.; visualization, T.Z.E. and I.P.S.; supervision, I.P.S.; project administration, I.P.S.; funding acquisition, I.P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No: 19-54-80003). The APC was paid for by Dr. Y. Delegan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for the help from translator Victor Selivanov. The authors are grateful to N. Suzina for providing phase-contrast and ultrathin section photographs of Brevibacterium epidermidis strain BS3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Negoro, S. Biodegradation of nylon and other synthetic polyamides. Biopolymers 2002, 9, 395–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baxi, N.N. Feasibility studies of in situ bioremediation of nylon-6 oligomer waste contaminated soil. Curr. Res. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 3, 378–383. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sheldon, T. Chromosomal damage induced by caprolactam in human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 1989, 224, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kulkarni, R.S.; Kanekar, P.P. Bioremediation of ε-caprolactam from nylon-6 waste water by use of Pseudomonas aeruginosa MCM B-407. Curr. Microbiol. 1998, 37, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Baxi, N.N.; Shah, A.K. Biological treatment of the components of solid oligomeric waste from a nylon-6 production plant. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 16, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Baxi, N.N. Influence of ε-caprolactam on growth and physiology of environmental bacteria. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 1471–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sanuth, H.A.; Yadav, A.; Fagade, O.E.; Shouche, Y. ε-Caprolactam utilization by Proteus sp. and Bordetella sp. isolated from solid waste dumpsites in Lagos State, Nigeria, first report. Indian J. Microbiol. 2013, 53, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rajoo, S.; Ahn, J.O.; Lee, H.W.; Jung, J.K. Isolation and characterization of a novel ε-caprolactam-degrading microbe, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, from industrial wastewater by chemostat-enrichment. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 2069–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mehta, S.K.; Panchal, P.A.; Butala, B.N.; Sane, S.A. Bacillus cereus mediated ε-caprolactam degradation: An initiative for waste water treatment of nylon-6 production plant. J. Bioremediat. Biodegrad. 2014, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shama, G.; Wase, D.A. The biodegradation of ε-caprolactam and some related compounds. Int. Biodeterior. Bull. 1981, 17, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Esikova, T.Z.; Ponamoreva, O.N.; Baskunov, B.P.; Taran, S.A.; Boronin, A.M. Transformation of low-molecular linear caprolactam oligomers by caprolactam-degrading bacteria. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kinoshita, S.; Kageyama, S.; Iba, K.; Yamada, Y.; Okada, H. Utilization of a cyclic dimer and linear oligomers of ε-aminocaproic acid by Achromobacter guttatus KI 72. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1975, 39, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Esikova, T.Z.; Akatova, E.V.; Taran, S.A. Bacteria that degrade low molecular linear epsilon-caprolactam oligomers. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Belova, S.E.; Suzina, N.E.; Rijpstra, W.I.C.; Damst, J.S.S.; Dedysh, S.N. Edaphobacter lichenicola sp. nov., a member of the family Acidobacteriaceae from lichen-dominated forested tundra. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 1265–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chung, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Kanai, H.; Akiba, T.; Kudo, T. Purification and properties of extracellular amylase from the hyperthermophilic archeon Thermococcus profundus DT5432. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1502–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kovacs, N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956, 178, 703–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lane, D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematic; Stackebrandt, E., Goodfellow, M., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  18. BLAST Software Package. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast (accessed on 1 November 2022).
  19. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position’specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Owen, R.L.; Lapage, S.P. The terminal denaturation of partly purified bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid and its taxonomic application. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1976, 41, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, L.; Li, W.; Huang, Y.; Wang, L.M.; Liu, Z.H.; Lanoot, B.J.; Bancanneyt, M.; Swings, J. Streptomyces jietaisiensis sp. nov., isolated from soil in northern China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1939–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Microsoft Excel 2007 Program. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/ru-ru/microsoft-365/previous-versions/download-office-2007 (accessed on 1 November 2022).
  23. Gruner, E.; Pfyffer, G.E.; Graevenitz, A.V. Characterization of Brevibacterium spp. from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1993, 31, 1408–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Otzen, M.; Palacio, C.; Janssen, D.B. Characterization of the caprolactam degradation pathway in Pseudomonas jessenii using mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 6699–6711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Palacio, C.M.; Roseboom, H.J.; Lanfranchi, E.; Meng, Q.; Otzen, M.; Janssen, D.B. Biochemical properties of a Pseudomonas aminotransferase involved in caprolactam metabolism. FEBS J. 2019, 286, 4086–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Girard, L.; Lood, C.; Höfte, M.; Vandamme, P.; Rokni-Zadeh, H.; van Noort, V.; Lavigne, R.; de Mot, R. The ever-expanding Pseudomonas genus: Description of 43 new species and partition of the Pseudomonas putida group. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Iizuka, H.; Tanabe, I.; Fukumura, T.; Kato, K. Taxonomic study on the ε-caprolactam-utilizing bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1967, 13, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Esikova, T.Z.; Grishchenkov, V.G.; Boronin, A.M. Plasmids that control ε-caprolactam biodegradation. Microbiology 1990, 59, 547–552. [Google Scholar]
  29. Baxi, N.N.; Patel, S.; Hansoti, D. An Arthrobacter citreus strain suitable for degrading ε-caprolactam in polyamide waste and accumulation of glutamic acid. AMB Express 2019, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Panov, A.V.; Volkova, O.V.; Puntus, I.F.; Esikova, T.Z.; Kosheleva, I.A.; Boronin, A.M. scpA, a new salicylate hydroxylase gene localized in salicylate/caprolactam degradation plasmids. Mol. Biol. 2013, 47, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Collins, M.D.; Farrow, J.A.E.; Goodfellow, M.; Minnikin, D.E. Brevibacterium casei sp. nov. and Brevibacterium epidermidis sp. nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1983, 4, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, C.C.; Lee, C.M. Isolation of the ε-caprolactam denitrifying bacteria from a wastewater treatment system manufactured with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resin. J. Hazard Mater. 2007, 145, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fukumura, T.; Takeuchi, M.; Bann, I. Stepwise loss of metabolism of ε-aminocaproic acid cyclic dimer in Alcaligenes species D-2. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982, 14, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yasura, K.; Uedo, Y.; Takeo, M.; Kato, D.; Negoro, S. Genetic organization of nylon-oligomer-degrading enzymes from alcalophilic bacterium, Agromyces sp. KY5R. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2007, 104, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fukumura, T. Bacterial breakdown of ε-caprolactam and its cyclic oligomers. Plant Cell Physiol. 1966, 7, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kinoshita, S.; Terada, T.; Taniguchi, T.; Taken, Y.; Masuda, S.; Matsunaga, N.; Okada, H. Purification and characterization of 6-aminohexanoic-acid-oligomer hydrolase of Flavobacterium sp. KI72. Eur. J. Biochem. 1981, 116, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prijambada, I.; Negoro, S.; Yomo, T.; Urabe, I. Emergence of nylon oligomer degradation enzymes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO through experimental evolution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 2020–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rybkina, D.O.; Plotnikova, E.G.; Dorofeeva, L.V.; Mironenko, Y.; Demakov, V.A. A new aerobic gram-positive bacterium with a unique ability to degrade ortho- and para-clorinated biphenyls. Microbiology 2003, 72, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baxi, N.N.; Shah, A.K. ε-Caprolactam-degradation by Alcaligenes faecalis for bioremediation of wastewater of a nylon-6 production plant. Biotechnol. Lett. 2002, 24, 1177–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fortmann, L.; Rosenberg, A. Fate of ε-caprolactam in the aquatic environment. Chemosphere 1984, 13, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boronin, A.M.; Naumova, R.P.; Grishchenkov, V.G.; Ilijinskaya, O.N. Plasmids specifying ε-caprolactam degradation in Pseudomonas strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1984, 22, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kulkarnik, R.S.; Kanekar, P.P. Effect of some curing agents on phenotypic stability in Pseudomonas putida degrading ε-caprolactam. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 14, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kinoshita, S.; Kobayashi, E.; Okada, H. Degradation of e-caprolactam by Achromobacter guttatus KF71. J. Ferment. Technol. 1973, 51, 719–725. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sokolov, A.B.; Pechatnikov, M.G.; Krizhanovskii, A.S.; Petrov, G.G. Kombinirovanie khimicheskikh i biologicheskikh sposobov ochistki kaprolaktamisoderzhashchikh stokov [Combining chemical and biological methods for cleaning caprolactam-containing wastes]. Ross. Khim. Zh. 2006, 50, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Morphology of strain BS3 cells: (a) phase contrast; scale bar, 10 μm; (b) ultrathin section; scale bar, 1 μm. Designations: CW, cell wall; C, capsule; I, electron-transparent inclusion.
Figure 1. Morphology of strain BS3 cells: (a) phase contrast; scale bar, 10 μm; (b) ultrathin section; scale bar, 1 μm. Designations: CW, cell wall; C, capsule; I, electron-transparent inclusion.
Microorganisms 11 00373 g001
Figure 2. Growth dynamics of Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3 in a mineral medium at different concentrations of caprolactam (g/L) as a sole carbon and energy source. Each value is a mean of three replicates with error bars indicating the standard deviation from the mean.
Figure 2. Growth dynamics of Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3 in a mineral medium at different concentrations of caprolactam (g/L) as a sole carbon and energy source. Each value is a mean of three replicates with error bars indicating the standard deviation from the mean.
Microorganisms 11 00373 g002
Figure 3. Growth (1) and utilization dynamics (2,3) of Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3 in a mineral medium supplemented with caprolactam (1.0 g/L) as a sole carbon and energy source. 3—the control variant without adding the inoculum.
Figure 3. Growth (1) and utilization dynamics (2,3) of Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3 in a mineral medium supplemented with caprolactam (1.0 g/L) as a sole carbon and energy source. 3—the control variant without adding the inoculum.
Microorganisms 11 00373 g003
Figure 4. Scheme for the biodegradation of caprolactam and linear nylon oligomers (as exemplified by the dimer).
Figure 4. Scheme for the biodegradation of caprolactam and linear nylon oligomers (as exemplified by the dimer).
Microorganisms 11 00373 g004
Figure 5. Growth dynamics of Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3 in a mineral medium supplemented with linear nylon oligomers and caprolactam intermediates as sole sources of carbon and energy (concentration of substrates, 1.0 g/L).
Figure 5. Growth dynamics of Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3 in a mineral medium supplemented with linear nylon oligomers and caprolactam intermediates as sole sources of carbon and energy (concentration of substrates, 1.0 g/L).
Microorganisms 11 00373 g005
Table 1. Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of strain BS3.
Table 1. Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of strain BS3.
Characteristics
Cell form/sizeRound-ended short rods, 1.0–1.4 × 0.6–0.8 μm
Gram stainPositive
MotilityNegative
Relation to oxygenAerobic
OxidaseNegative
CatalasePositive
Nitrate reductionPositive
UreaseNegative
Esculin hydrolysisNegative
Starch hydrolysisNegative
Casein hydrolysisPositive
Gelatin liquefactionPositive
β-Galactosidase, arginine dihydrolaseNegative
Indole productionNegative
Hydrolysis of TweensNegative
Growth temperature (optimum), °C10–37 (25–28)
Growth pH range (optimum)6.0–10.5 (7.5–8.0)
NaCl tolerance, % (optimum)0–18.0 (0.2)
DNA G + C content, mol. %62.6
Assimilation of substrates
Fructose, cellobiose, galactose, glucose, ribose, sucrosePositive
Xylose, arabinose, maltose, rhamnose, fucose, lactoseNegative
Dulcitol, inositol, adonitol, arobitol, sorbitolNegative
Mannitol, glycerolPositive
Malate, phenylacetate, sodium citrate, potassium gluconate, capric acid, succinatePositive
Formation of acid from
InositolNegative
MannitolPositive
RhamnoseNegative
SalicylateNegative
SorbitolNegative
Table 2. Growth values of Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3 vs. caprolactam concentrations in a mineral medium.
Table 2. Growth values of Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3 vs. caprolactam concentrations in a mineral medium.
CAP Concentration,
g/L
Lag Phase, hµmax, h−1OD590Dry Cell Weight, g/mL
0.4000.030
0.51.00.1430.810.48 ± 0.03
1.06.00.2361.570.98 ± 0.09
2.07.00.2241.500.92± 0.07
5.0150.1461.050.64 ± 0.05
10.0270.0800.580.31 ± 0.02
15.0400.05430.390.24 ± 0.02
20.0500.0410.290.176 ± 0.01
22.0600.0220.150.08 ± 0.001
23.0 00.030
The table shows the mean values ± standard deviations. The results were obtained from three independent experiments. The maximum values of optical density at the beginning of the stationary phase of growth are given. The weight of dry cells was determined at the point of maximum optical density according to the calibration curve.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Esikova, T.Z.; Akatova, E.V.; Solyanikova, I.P. Epsilon-Caprolactam- and Nylon Oligomer-Degrading Bacterium Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3: Characterization and Potential Use in Bioremediation. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020373

AMA Style

Esikova TZ, Akatova EV, Solyanikova IP. Epsilon-Caprolactam- and Nylon Oligomer-Degrading Bacterium Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3: Characterization and Potential Use in Bioremediation. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2):373. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020373

Chicago/Turabian Style

Esikova, Tatiana Z., Ekaterina V. Akatova, and Inna P. Solyanikova. 2023. "Epsilon-Caprolactam- and Nylon Oligomer-Degrading Bacterium Brevibacterium epidermidis BS3: Characterization and Potential Use in Bioremediation" Microorganisms 11, no. 2: 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020373

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop