Next Article in Journal
Blue and Yellow Light Induce Changes in Biochemical Composition and Ultrastructure of Limnospira fusiformis (Cyanoprokaryota)
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Oil-Rich Food Waste Substrates, Used as an Alternative Carbon Source, on the Cultivation of Microalgae—A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Whole Genome Sequencing of the Novel Probiotic Strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FCa3L
Previous Article in Special Issue
16S-rRNA-Based Metagenomic Profiling of the Bacterial Communities in Traditional Bulgarian Sourdoughs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Screening and Characterization of the Diversity of Food Microorganisms and Their Metabolites

by
João Miguel Rocha
1,2,3,*,
Biljana Kovacevik
4,
Sanja Kostadinović Veličkovska
4,
Mercedes Tamame
5 and
José António Teixeira
6
1
CBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina—Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal
2
LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
3
ALiCE—Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
4
Faculty of Agriculture, University “Goce Delčev”, Krste Misirkov bb, 2000 Štip, North Macedonia
5
Institute of Functional Biology and Genomics (IBFG), CSIC-University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
6
Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(5), 1235; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051235
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Accepted: 4 May 2023 / Published: 8 May 2023

Abstract

:
Food is rarely kept in a sterile environment and the composition of microbial associations found in various foodstuffs is widely varied. Microorganisms in food usually originate from the natural microbiota of raw materials and the surrounding environments. Whether a species prevails depends upon its ability to adapt to intrinsic factors associated with foods, such as nutrient content; pH; water activity; oxidation–reduction potential; and antimicrobial properties, with various extrinsic factors playing a role, including temperature, relative humidity, atmosphere, and ambient pressure. Any change to these parameters may cause changes in the present microbial consortia. Therefore, it is important to identify which microbial consortia will thrive in particular foods and conditions. While active, microorganisms undergo many complex mechanisms that affect food quality and safety. Most beneficial food microorganisms belong to lactic acid bacteria and yeasts. Pathogenic and spoilage bacteria are usually Gram-negative, although there are some Gram-positive ones, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium botulinum, and C. perfringens. Some may merely cause spoilage, while others may be related to foodborne illnesses.

1. Introduction

Food microorganisms can produce valuable compounds, such as organic acids, exopolysaccharides (EPS), peptides (especially bacteriocins), bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS), short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), vitamins, ethanol, aroma compounds, some other low-molecular-weight compounds, etc. [1]. The type of metabolites and their relative ratios depend on the synergistic action between the genomes of microorganisms and the environmental conditions in which they grow [2]. Some compounds possess antimicrobial and antioxidative properties, thus enhancing the safety and stability of foodstuffs, and have also been proven to be suitable for use in the food industry. Lactic acid bacteria naturally dominate the microbiota of many foods and have a major potential for use in food biopreservation; their consumption is safe since they do not have lipopolysaccharides in their cell membrane; thus, anaphylactic shock is avoided when administered in humans [3]. Their use is especially beneficial in fermented food, where they usually are found in consortia with yeasts and acetic acid bacteria (AAB). They can be naturally present or introduced as pure cultures. Their metabolic activities contribute to the natural biopreservation of such foods and the extension of shelf-life [4]. The antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of LABs are particularly important for food engineering since prolonged exposure to chemical preservatives may pose health risks in humans, so the use of such natural antimicrobial preservatives is highly desirable to consumers and are likely to be used in clean-label foodstuffs. The antimicrobial properties of LAB may appear indirectly by lowering the pH, changing the osmotic pressure in the food, or directly producing numerous antimicrobial compounds via complex metabolic pathways. In fact, these processes are not independent of one another; thus, the decrease in pH usually occurs because of microbial metabolisms and the production of mostly organic acids and ethanol.

2. Special Issue on “Screening and Characterization of the Diversity of Food Microorganisms and Their Metabolites”

Beneficial microorganisms, such as lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and yeasts (especially those from the genus Saccharomyces), are highly appreciated in the food and beverage industry alongside home-prepared foodstuffs since they contribute to the processes of fermenting sugars into other valuable substances. The two-stage fermentation of cider and wine—which starts with the alcoholic fermentation of sugars by yeast from the Saccharomyces species and then continues with acetification where ethanol is oxidized to acetic acid, generally involving species from the family of acetic acid bacteria—contributes to vinegar production [5]. Various compounds from vinegar, generated during the Millard reaction, are identified to have antioxidant properties [6]. Therefore, the antioxidant capacity of vinegar will depend on the type of fruit employed to prepare it [7].
The role of LAB and yeasts in bread preparation is invaluable, especially when it is traditionally prepared, such as with sourdough. The spontaneous fermentation of flour and water in the sourdough formation establishes highly diverse microbial communities that are beneficial for human health due to naturally present microorganisms in flour and the surrounding environment. Considering that each sourdough is unique, Lau et al. [8] give an overview of microbial communities isolated from sourdough prepared from different kinds of flours. The investigation showed that most of the microorganisms isolated from sourdough prepared from flour originating from different types of cereals belong to the genus Lactobacillus, with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum found to be the most abundant followed by Levilactibacillus breavis and Lacticaseibacillus casei. Other less present bacterial species found belonged to the genera Weissella, Enterococcus, Pediococcus, and Aerococcus. The most abundant yeast was Saccharomyces cerevisiae, followed by Candida humulis. Still, other present yeast species belonged to the genera of Kazachstania, Pichia, Wickerhamomyces, Rhodotorula, and Torulaspora. There are numerous benefits of these microorganisms for the properties of sourdough bread. They contribute to better rheological and sensory characteristics of bread and extended shelf life due to their metabolites, such as various organic acids, which also possess antimicrobial properties against the most deleterious food spoilage microorganisms, such as Penicillium, Mucor, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Monillia, etc. [8]. Understanding the fermentation patterns of LABs and yeasts allows us to select strains that can be used as commercial sourdough starter cultures with the desired and well-tailored properties. Petkova et al. [9] investigated LAB and yeast species from typical Bulgarian sourdoughs originating from various geographical locations in Bulgaria to select strains that can be used as commercial sourdough starter cultures. Based on their acid production capacity, amylolytic and proteolytic properties, and antimicrobial properties, strains such as Lb. brevis 01M22, Lb. brevis 07B198, Lb. plantarum 08B217, and P. pentosaceus 12R2192 were found to be the most promising for the development of new active starter cultures with good biopreservation capacities. Müller et al. [10] investigated 99 strains from the genus Leuconostoc isolated from 2 sourdough starters for their antimicrobial activity and potential to be used as non-conventional starter cultures in sourdough fermentation. For the investigation, four Lc. Citreum strains (DCM49, DCM65, MA079, and MA113) were selected for lab-scale sourdough fermentation. The results revealed that Lc. citreum possesses a high potential for being used as multiple techno-functional starter cultures in sourdough fermentations. In addition to the benefits related to the rheological quality and sensory characteristics of bread, these microorganisms give many benefits to human health, especially those related to the gastrointestinal system. The proteolytic activity of LAB and their potential to contribute to better bread digestibility and other bakery products are beneficial for patients suffering from non-celiac wheat sensitivity or irritable bowel syndrome. Fraberger et al. [11] investigated the degradation potential of eighty-seven LAB isolates obtained from traditional Austrian sourdoughs, the Belgian Coordination Collection of Microorganisms (LMG), and the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) towards immunogenic wheat proteins with a focus on amylase-trypsin inhibitors (ATIs) and gliadins. The research showed that investigated LAB isolates possess minor differences in their ATIs degradation potential, while gliadin degradation varied strongly. The highest capacity was exhibited by Lp. plantarum Lpl5, and Lpl7, as well as Lac. paracasei Lpl4 strains.
Dairy products are other consumables that are rich in LAB. The diversity of LAB species present in spontaneously fermented dairy products is significant and affected by the geographical origin and type of the fermented dairy product [12]. Petrova et al. [13] give an overview of LAB consortia in Bulgarian dairy products. Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus in symbiosis with Streptococcus thermophilus are usually used as starter cultures in all Bulgarian dairy products, except in koumiss. The accompanying microflora found in these products was highly diverse. The majority belongs to the genera Lactococcus and Leuconostoc followed by Entherococcus, Pediococcus, and Weissela. Kefir and koumiss also contain yeasts from Saccharomyces and Kazachtania species. The greatest diversity of microorganisms exists in kefir, followed by yogurt, cheese, koumiss, and katak, and less diversity was observed in kashkaval (a type of yellow cheese).
The antimicrobial properties of some LAB species such as Bacillus spp. against Gram-negative bacteria are well known and documented [14]. Usually, Bacillus spp. with such properties are isolated from soil, but this species may also be found in various environments, such as plant rhizosphere, human tracts, and foodstuffs [14]. Pajčin et al. [15] demonstrate that antimicrobial lipopeptides produced by Bacillus velezensis IP22 isolated from cheese possess antimicrobial properties against the plant pathogen Xanthomonas euvesicatoria.
LAB also play an essential role in beverage production and, when certain strains are added, may enhance beverage quality and properties. Zokaityte et al. [16] examined the quality of beverages derived from milk permeate (MP) with (AppMP) or without (MP) the addition of 8% (w/w) apple by-products when some LAB strains with antimicrobial properties were added. MP beverages fermented with strains Liquorilactobacillus uvarum LUHS245 and Lacticaseibacillus casei LUHS210 and AppMP fermented with Loigolactobacillus coryniformis LUHS71 showed the highest antimicrobial activity, inhibiting 13 out of 15 tested microbial pathogens. The content of galactooligosaccharide in fermented MP was found to depend significantly on the type of LAB strain, and Pediococcus acidilactici LUHS29 was found to be the dominant strain regarding this feature.
LAB from the genus Carnobacterium spp. are naturally present in the microflora of seafood, dairy products, and meat [17]. Some, such as Carnobacterium divergens and Carnobacterium maltaromaticum, may act as food spoilage bacteria when food is improperly stored. Bacteria from the genus Carnobacterium are also known as bacteriocins producers with the potential to be used as food antimicrobials. Bergem et al. [18] investigated the antimicrobial activity of 260 Carnobacterium spp. isolates from seafood products, including cod, smoked salmon, and shrimp, finding that C. maltaromaticum was the most abundant. Other strains belong to C. divergens, C. jeotgali, C. inhibens, C. funditum, and C. viridans. None were found to be effective against Candida albicans and Pseudomonas fluorescens. C. maltaromaticum was effective against Enterococcus faecalis, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Escherichia coli, Brochothrix thermosphacta, Carnobacterium divergens, Lactococcus garvieae, Vagococcus salmoninarum, Listeria monocytogenes, and Listeria innocua, but it was not effective against Gram-negative bacteria and Staphylococcus epidermidis. C. inhibens MIP2551 was the only strain effective against Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio harveyi, and Chromobacterium violaceum.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all the authors and reviewers for their excellent contributions to this Special Issue. Additional thanks to the Microorganisms Editorial Office for their professional assistance and continuous support. The authors of this editorial article would also like to acknowledge COST Action 18101 SOURDOMICS—Sourdough biotechnology network towards novel, healthier, and sustainable food and bioprocesses (https://sourdomics.com/; https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA18101/, accessed on 18 March 2023)—where authors B.K. and S.K.V. are members of the working groups 2, 6, and 8; author M.T. is member of the working groups 2 and 3 and author J.M.R. is the Chair and Grant Holder Scientific Representative and is supported by COST (European Co-operation in Science and Technology) (https://www.cost.eu/, accessed on 18 March 2023). COST is a funding agency for research and innovation networks. Author J.M.R. also acknowledges the Universidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina—Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Porto, Portugal, as well as the support made by LA/P/0045/2020 (ALiCE) and UIDB/00511/2020-UIDP/00511/2020 (LEPABE) funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC).

Conflicts of Interest

The editors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Lv, M.; Shao, Z.; Hungwe, M.; Wang, J.; Bai, X.; Xie, J.; Wang, Y.; Geng, W. Metabolism Characteristics of Lactic Acid Bacteria and the Expanding Applications in Food Industry. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 612285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lovitt, R.W.; Wright, C.J. Bacteria: The bacterial cell. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Batt, A.C., Pate, P., Eds.; Elsevier: Swansea, UK, 2014; pp. 151–159. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rosell, C.M. The Science of Doughs and Bread Quality. In Flour and Breads and Their Fortification in Health and Disease Prevention, 1st ed.; Preedy, R.V., Watson, R.R., Patel, B.V., Eds.; Elsevier-Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  4. Paul Ross, R.; Morgan, S.; Hill, C. Preservation and fermentation: Past, present and future. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 79, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Luzón-Quintana, L.M.; Castro, R.; Durán-Guerrero, E. Biotechnological Processes in Fruit Vinegar Production. Foods 2021, 10, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xu, Q.; Tao, W.; Ao, Z. Antioxidant activity of vinegar melanoidins. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chochevska, M.; Jančovska Seniceva, E.; Veličkovska, S.K.; Naumova-Leţia, G.; Mirčeski, V.; Rocha, J.M.F.; Esatbeyoglu, T. Electrochemical Determination of Antioxidant Capacity of Traditional Homemade Fruit Vinegars Produced with Double Spontaneous Fermentation. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lau, S.W.; Chong, A.Q.; Chin, N.L.; Talib, R.A.; Basha, R.K. Sourdough Microbiome Comparison and Benefits. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Petkova, M.; Stefanova, P.; Gotcheva, V.; Angelov, A. Isolation and Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeasts from Typical Bulgarian Sourdoughs. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Müller, D.C.; Mischler, S.; Schönlechner, R.; Miescher Schwenninger, S. Multiple Techno-Functional Characteristics of Leuconostoc and Their Potential in Sourdough Fermentations. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fraberger, V.; Ladurner, M.; Nemec, A.; Grunwald-Gruber, C.; Call, L.M.; Hochegger, R.; Domig, K.J.; D’Amico, S. Insights into the Potential of Sourdough-Related Lactic Acid Bacteria to Degrade Proteins in Wheat. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yu, Z.; Peng, C.; Kwok, L.Y.; Zhang, H. The Bacterial Diversity of Spontaneously Fermented Dairy Products Collected in Northeast Asia. Foods 2021, 10, 2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Petrova, P.; Ivanov, I.; Tsigoriyna, L.; Valcheva, N.; Vasileva, E.; Parvanova-Mancheva, T.; Arsov, A.; Petrov, K. Traditional Bulgarian Dairy Products: Ethnic Foods with Health Benefits. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Su, Y.; Liu, C.; Fang, H.; Zhang, D. Bacillus subtilis: A universal cell factory for industry, agriculture, biomaterials and medicine. Microb. Cell Factories 2020, 19, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pajčin, I.; Vlajkov, V.; Frohme, M.; Grebinyk, S.; Grahovac, M.; Mojićević, M.; Grahovac, J. Pepper Bacterial Spot Control by Bacillus velezensis: Bioprocess Solution. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zokaityte, E.; Cernauskas, D.; Klupsaite, D.; Lele, V.; Starkute, V.; Zavistanaviciute, P.; Ruzauskas, M.; Gruzauskas, R.; Juodeikiene, G.; Rocha, J.M.; et al. Bioconversion of Milk Permeate with Selected Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains and Apple By-Products into Beverages with Antimicrobial Properties and Enriched with Galactooligosaccharides. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lorenzo, J.M.; Munekata, P.E.; Dominguez, R.; Pateiro, M.; Saraiva, J.A.; Franco, D. Main Groups of Microorganisms of Relevance for Food Safety and Stability: General Aspects and Overall Description. In Innovative Technologies for Food Preservation; Barba, F.J., Sant’Ana, A.S., Orlien, V., Koubaa, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 53–107. [Google Scholar]
  18. Begrem, S.; Ivaniuk, F.; Gigout-Chevalier, F.; Kolypczuk, L.; Bonnetot, S.; Leroi, F.; Grovel, O.; Delbarre-Ladrat, C.; Passerini, D. New Insight into Antimicrobial Compounds from Food and Marine-Sourced Carnobacterium Species through Phenotype and Genome Analyses. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rocha, J.M.; Kovacevik, B.; Veličkovska, S.K.; Tamame, M.; Teixeira, J.A. Screening and Characterization of the Diversity of Food Microorganisms and Their Metabolites. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051235

AMA Style

Rocha JM, Kovacevik B, Veličkovska SK, Tamame M, Teixeira JA. Screening and Characterization of the Diversity of Food Microorganisms and Their Metabolites. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(5):1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051235

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rocha, João Miguel, Biljana Kovacevik, Sanja Kostadinović Veličkovska, Mercedes Tamame, and José António Teixeira. 2023. "Screening and Characterization of the Diversity of Food Microorganisms and Their Metabolites" Microorganisms 11, no. 5: 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051235

APA Style

Rocha, J. M., Kovacevik, B., Veličkovska, S. K., Tamame, M., & Teixeira, J. A. (2023). Screening and Characterization of the Diversity of Food Microorganisms and Their Metabolites. Microorganisms, 11(5), 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop