Next Article in Journal
Oral and Topical Probiotics and Postbiotics in Skincare and Dermatological Therapy: A Concise Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Sessile Lifestyle Offers Protection against Copper Stress in Saccharolobus solfataricus
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19 Outcomes and Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
RNase Y Autoregulates Its Synthesis in Bacillus subtilis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/microorganisms11061417
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Relationship between Human Papillomavirus Status and the Cervicovaginal Microbiome in Cervical Cancer

by
Hong Duc Thi Nguyen
1,2,
Tan Minh Le
1,2,
Eunmi Lee
1,2,
Donghyeon Lee
1,2,
Yeseul Choi
1,2,
Junghwan Cho
3,
Nora Jee-Young Park
2,3,4,5,
Gun Oh Chong
2,3,6,7,
Incheol Seo
8,* and
Hyung Soo Han
1,2,3,9,*
1
Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
2
BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
3
Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Republic of Korea
6
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
7
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Republic of Korea
8
Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
9
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(6), 1417; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061417
Submission received: 31 March 2023 / Revised: 5 May 2023 / Accepted: 25 May 2023 / Published: 27 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Microorganisms: Past, Present and Future)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Uterine cervical cancer (CC) is a complex, multistep disease primarily linked to persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). However, it is widely acknowledged that HR-HPV infection alone cannot account for the formation and progression of CC. Emerging evidence suggests that the cervicovaginal microbiome (CVM) also plays a significant role in HPV-related CC. Certain bacteria, such as Fusobacterium spp., Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Campylobacter, are currently being considered as potential microbiomarkers for HPV-positive CC. However, the composition of the CVM in CC is inconsistent; thus, further studies are needed. This review comprehensively discusses the complex interplay between HPV and the CVM in cervical carcinogenesis. It is postulated that the dynamic interaction between HPV and the CVM creates an imbalanced cervicovaginal microenvironment that triggers dysbiosis, enhances HPV persistence, and promotes cervical carcinogenesis. Moreover, this review aims to provide updated evidence on the potential role of bacteriotherapy, particularly probiotics, in the treatment of CC.

1. Introduction

Uterine cervical cancer (CC) remains a major public health problem, with a significant number of new cases and deaths annually [1]. Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, particularly high-risk genotypes (HR-HPV), is the most common cause of CC [2]. It is undeniable that HR-HPV infection is essential for CC formation and progression, but not sufficient alone. Moreover, drivers of the transition state between HPV acquisition, spacing, and persistence are poorly understood [3].
The cervicovaginal microbiome (CVM) has been considered essential to the female vaginal flora [4]. In most healthy women, the CVM is dominated by Lactobacillus spp., which benefits the host through symbiotic relationships [5,6]. Lactobacillus spp. depletion can lead to CVM dysbiosis, which may enhance tumor development through several mechanisms, such as promoting chronic inflammation, dysregulating the immune system, and producing genotoxins [7].
Recently, mounting evidence has suggested an interaction between HPV, the CVM, and CC progression [8]. On the one hand, HPV infection can induce changes in the cervicovaginal microenvironment [9]. Consequently, this can lead to CVM dysbiosis and cancer. On the other hand, abnormalities in the cervicovaginal flora may change vaginal pH, release bacteriocin, and disrupt the mucosal layer. As a result, dysbiosis may contribute to HPV-related CC by interfering with HPV infection, binding, internalization, integration, gene expression, and telomerase activation [10]. Several studies have reported that women with HPV infection and CVM dysbiosis show high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) or cancer [11,12], which may require closer follow-up and advanced treatment.
Bacteriotherapy, especially probiotics, has attracted enormous interest in CC prevention and treatment due to their antitumor activities [13,14,15,16]. Probiotics may become the best choice for controlling the complex interaction between the CVM, HPV, and cervical carcinogenesis.
To understand the complex role of microorganisms in cancer, this review aimed to comprehensively discuss the relationship between the CVM and HPV infection in CC carcinogenesis and update current research on bacteriotherapy in CC.

2. Human Papillomavirus

2.1. Structure and Genome

HPV is the most common cause of sexually transmitted infections in women. This virus belongs to a group of nonenveloped and double-stranded DNA viruses [17]. The HPV genome is circular DNA containing eight open reading frames and divided into three encoded regions: an early region encoding a nonstructural protein (E1, E2, and E4–E7) for replication, a late region encoding viral capsid proteins (L1 and L2) for viral assembly, and a long control region (LCR) or upstream regulatory region [18].
There are >200 types of HPV, and ~40 genotypes infect the mucosal epithelium in the anogenital tract. Based on the association between these types and carcinogenicity, they are categorized into low-risk HPVs (HPV6, 11, 40, 42–44, and 54) and HR-HPVs (HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59) [19]. For example, HPV6 and HPV11, low-risk HPVs, are related to benign warts. In contrast, HPV16 and HPV18, HR-HPVs, can represent intraepithelial neoplasia with the potential for malignant progression [20].

2.2. Life Cycle of HPV

The most common HPV infections are caused by sexual intercourse when the vaginal and cervical epithelia are exposed to HPV through a microwound [21]. After entering basal keratinocytes, the viral genome moves to the nucleus and is maintained as episome DNA with a low copy number (50–100 copies per cell) [22].
In the early region, E2 is considered a regulator factor, whereas E6 and E7 are critical in inhibiting host tumor suppressor genes and oncogenic transformation [23]. Notably, the formation of an E1-E2 complex is required for the stable binding of the E1 helicase to the LCR ori site and controls the transcriptional levels of E6 and E7 viral oncogenes [24]. After integrating the HPV genome into the host DNA, the connection between E1 and E2 breaks, and E2 expression is lost. As a result, E6 and E7 expression is upregulated, which leads to the inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb, respectively. This condition will promote malignant transformation in the cervix [25,26,27,28,29].
Until keratinocyte differentiation, the productive stage of the viral life cycle occurs by activating the late promoter (L1 and L2) and late viral gene expression (E4 and E5). Moreover, E1 and E2 expression increases HPV DNA amplification between 100 and 1000 episomal copies per cell [30,31]. Viral particles were then released from the uppermost layers of the stratified epithelium. There are ~3 weeks from infection to the release of the virus in which the virus can evade the immune system, and the appearance of lesions can occur after weeks to months [32].

2.3. HPV and Host Immune Responses

The host immune system, including the innate and adaptive immune systems, plays a vital role in clearing or controlling the infection and eliminating HPV-induced lesions.

2.3.1. HPV and Innate Immune Response

The essential step of the innate immune response is to detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by receptors located on the surface of sensor cells. During the early stages of HPV infection, pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) can recognize HPV and activate a cascade of antiviral signaling pathways to defend against its invasion. These pathogen sensors can detect DNA (known as DNA sensors: absent in melanoma 2 [33], interferon (IFN)-γ inducible protein 16 [34,35], Toll-like receptor 9 [36], and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase [37,38]) or RNA (known as RNA sensors: Toll-like receptor 3 [36], retinoic acid-inducible gene I [39], and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 [40]) in the cytoplasm or nucleus. One of the most important downstream reactions is the induction of IFN signaling, including types I and III IFNs, which stimulates the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) signaling cascade, enhances IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) expression, and results in HPV clearance [41,42,43,44].
Several types of immune sentinels (sensor cells) exist in the innate system, such as dendritic cells, Langerhans cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and keratinocytes. Among them, keratinocytes target cells of HPV in early infection and play an essential role in response to the recognition between PRRs and PAMPs. Keratinocytes can detect various HPV-related patterns and secrete various cytokines and chemokines. These cytokines and chemokines promote immune responses and recruit more immune cells to the HPV-related microenvironment [17,45].

2.3.2. HPV and the Adaptive Immune Response

The adaptive immune system includes cell-mediated immune responses and antibody-mediated humoral immunity. The cell-mediated system is vital for destroying virus-infected cells, and the antibody-mediated system is responsible for clearing free pathogen particles from body fluids [46]. During HPV invasion, CD4+ T helper 1 (Th1) cells can detect HPV E6, E7, and E2 and induce cytotoxicity by activating CD8+ T cells and releasing interleukin (IL)-2 and IFN-γ [47]. It is agreed that whereas innate responses play a role in early HPV clearance, adaptive responses are essential to determining and eliminating HPV-induced lesions, particularly effector T cells [46].
A meta-analysis by Litwin et al. [48] supported the important role of T-cell populations in the outcome of cervical HPV infections. According to this study, helper and killer T cells are found at lower levels in low- and high-grade cervical lesions than in normal tissue, suggesting that the virus evades immune detection in patients with persistent lesions. Moreover, Foxp3+ and CD25+ regulatory T-cell (Treg) infiltration was high in precancerous HPV-related lesions, and longitudinal data showed improved outcomes with lower Treg levels.

2.3.3. HPV and Immune Suppression

Even if the immune reaction seems perfect and can clear most HPV infections, HPV has several immune evasion mechanisms and can facilitate cancer progression (Figure 1). First, most HPVs in the intraepithelial layer provide almost no viremia, release few proteins, induce less inflammation, and cause few host cell deaths [47,49]. Therefore, HPV can often prevent itself from being recognized by sensors.
Second, HPV can alter host gene, transcript factor, or protein expression to evade the immune response. For example, HPV blocks IFN signaling by inhibiting the activity of the IFN regulatory factors, interfering with the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, and downregulating the IFN-κ and ISG expressions. Moreover, HPV deregulates the activity of transcription factors, particularly nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), to repress proinflammatory cytokine production. NF-κB is one of the members of the NF-κB family responsible for controlling cell proliferation and apoptosis through the NF-κB/IFN signaling pathway. HR-HPV can eradicate the inhibitory effect of the immune system and lead to persistent infection by decreasing NF-κB activation [50,51].
Third, the HPV-related microenvironment can inhibit the infiltration of helper and cytotoxic T cells while recruiting more immunosuppressive cells, such as M2 macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and Tregs [48,52]. Tregs are related to downregulated responses to exogenous antigens. When Tregs are recruited to a tumor, they suppress the adaptive immune response and promote HPV-related lesion formation. M2 macrophages and MDSCs can enhance HPV-associated tumor progression by inhibiting CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, attracting Tregs, and producing immunosuppressive factors such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) [53].

3. Cervicovaginal Microbiome

3.1. Cervicovaginal Microbiome in Healthy Women

Lactobacillus plays a critical role in cervicovaginal health in women [54]. They protect the vagina from bacterial invasion by maintaining an acidic environment and promoting the integrity of the epithelial cell barrier and intercellular junctional proteins [5,55,56].
Based on next-generation sequencing, many human microbiota studies have identified complex microbial communities in healthy women [54,57,58]. Ravel et al. [4] utilized 16S rRNA sequencing on 396 asymptomatic women of different ethnicities and investigated five community state types (CSTs). CSTs I to III and V present low diversity and are dominant with Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus iners, and Lactobacillus jensenii, respectively. In contrast, CST IV is characterized by reduced lactobacilli abundance and high diversity with a significant quantity of vaginosis bacteria, such as Gardnerella vaginalis, Megasphaera, Sneathia, and Prevotella spp.
The CVM is dynamic; one CST can transform into another in the same healthy woman. For example, an L. crispatus-dominated community often changes to dominant L. iners or mixed lactobacilli, and the L. iners-dominated one likely transforms into a bacterial vaginosis (BV)-associated community (CST IV) [59].
The CVM composition is influenced by numerous factors, such as ethnicity, hormonal status, sexual activity, age, menstrual cycle, or menopause [5,60,61]. Women of different ethnic groups are associated with different CVMs. For example, L. iners and L. crispatus were the most abundant cervicovaginal microbial communities in healthy Asian women [62], whereas L. iners and CST IV were dominant microbial communities in Black and Hispanic women [4].
In reproductive-aged women, the cyclic secretion of hormones determines significance, especially during the menstrual phase. In Cheng et al.’s study on Chinese women’s vaginal microbiota at childbearing age [63], L. iners and Lactobacillus helveticus are the most abundant species in both follicular and luteal phases [64]. Furthermore, low estrogen and progesterone levels and existing menstrual blood in the female vagina are related to the decrease in some microorganisms and the enrichment of others. Accordingly, during menses, reproductive-aged women may have a low amount of Lactobacillus spp. and a high abundance of other species, such as G. vaginalis, Streptococcus spp., and Anaerococcus spp. [65]. The reason is that the high iron level in menstrual blood may enhance the growth of bacteria such as G. vaginalis [66].
To understand the association between the CVM and several female conditions (pregnancy history, marriage, number of vaginal deliveries, age at first instance of vaginal sex, and breastfeeding), Jie et al. [57] utilized metagenomic shotgun sequencing on cervical samples from 516 women and recorded their life histories through questionnaires. They revealed that the cervicovaginal microbiota might reflect female physical status. For instance, L. crispatus was significantly higher in women with fewer pregnancies and overrepresented in menstruation. However, its abundance was depleted during breastfeeding or postmenopause.

3.2. Cervicovaginal Microbiome, Host Response, and Cervical Cancer

The CVM with predominant Lactobacillus protects the female genital tract against bacterial pathogens [5]. When lactobacilli are depleted, invading microorganisms can easily penetrate epithelial cell layers. Hence, a CVM with nondominant Lactobacillus and increased pathogenic microbial diversity, such as G. vaginalis, Atopobium, Prevotella, Sneathia, and Megasphaera, is commonly seen in BV or dysbiosis [67,68,69,70,71]. BV can damage the mucus and cytoskeleton structures, increase cell death, change antimicrobial peptides [62], and promote proinflammatory cytokine production [72,73,74,75].
Anahtar et al. [76] investigated a group of asymptomatic women in South Africa and found that most women had low Lactobacillus abundance and a high diversity of bacterial communities. Sneathia sanguinigens, Sneathia amnii, Mobiluncus mulieris, and Prevotella amnii in high-diversity communities are related to the presence of genital proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-8. Furthermore, the bacterial lipopolysaccharide in the CVM can be sensed by antigen-presenting cells on epithelial cells, triggering NF-κB pathways and Toll-like receptors and the recruitment of lymphocytes through chemokine secretion. Laniewski et al. [77] found similar results in 3D epithelial cervical cell models co-cultured with Lactobacillus crispatus and BV-associated bacteria Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, Prevotella bivia, and Sneathia amnii. Specifically, Lactobacillus crispatus enhanced protection of the cervical microenvironment through antimicrobial metabolites, including decreasing glucose and the production of phenyllactate and N-acetylated amino acids in 3D cervical models. In contrast, Atopobium vaginae and Sneathia amnii induced the greatest proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNFα, etc.), iNOS, and oxidative stress, while Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella bivia, and Sneathia amnii altered the epithelial barrier by decreasing protein and metabolite levels, such as mucins, sialic acid, and polyamines [77].
These alterations in the inflammatory cytokine profile present in a CVM environment may result in chronic inflammation, a risk factor for cervical carcinogenesis [73].
In addition, Fan et al. [78] reported the relationship between CVM dysbiosis and mucosal epithelial cell fucosylation, which is a protective component of vaginal epithelial cells [78]. Knocking out the core fucosyltransferase gene can promote CC cell proliferation and invasion. L. iners metabolites can increase core fucosylation levels by activating the Wnt pathway and inhibiting CC proliferation and migration. Hence, CVM imbalance and a low abundance of L. iners may result in abnormal fucosylation, which promotes the development of CC.

4. HPV Infection, Cervicovaginal Microbiome, and Cervical Carcinogenesis

The interaction between the host and microorganisms in cancer, particularly CC, is complex and poorly understood. Nevertheless, recent studies have provided critical evidence and insights into this vital field [79].

4.1. HPV Infection and Cervicovaginal Microbiome

HPV infection status is closely related to cervicovaginal dysbiosis (Figure 1) [9,70]. Di Paola et al. [80] collected cervicovaginal samples from 55 HPV-positive women in Italy to identify the CST related to persistent HPV [80]. To fulfill their purpose, they followed up with the candidates and checked the clearance or persistence of HPV after 12 months. More than 40% of persistent HPV-positive women presented in the CST IV subgroup with Gardnerella, Prevotella, Atopobium, and Megasphaera. Significantly, Gardnerella may contribute to the ongoing HPV status by secreting the sialidase enzyme involved in biofilm formation [80,81]. The association between biofilm formation in the CVM and HPV infection was confirmed by Donmez et al. [82]. In line with these results, Qingqing et al. [83] identified a high abundance of anaerobes, including Prevotella, Sphingomonas, and Anaerococcus, related to persistent HPV and a higher presence of Tregs, MDSCs, IL-6, and TNF-α in cervical secretions.
In addition, many studies have reported the association between the CVM and HR-HPV infection [3,84,85,86]. Most revealed a decrease in Lactobacillus spp. and an increase in CVM diversity in HR-HPV-positive women than in HR-HPV-negative women. For instance, Brotman et al. [87] identified that most HR-HPV-positive groups had a four-fold lower abundance of Lactobacillus spp., including L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri, compared to HPV-negative groups. In particular, Lee et al. [88] compared the differences in the CVM between HR-HPV-negative and HR-HPV-positive women in a Korean twin cohort. They proved that the HPV-positive group had higher species diversity and a lower abundance of Lactobacillus than their uninfected twins. Furthermore, they suggested that Sneathnia spp. could be identified as a microbiological marker of an HR-HPV infection. Also, Lebeau et al. [9] followed up on >6000 patients regarding their HPV infection and BV status for >8 years. By applying multiple analyses from patients, cell line cultures, and transgenic mouse samples, they discovered that the downregulation of NF-κB and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways due to persistent HPV infection can lead to the inhibition of most antimicrobial peptides, such as S100A7, SLPI, Elafin, HD6, HβD2, and HD5, and impair TNF-α/LPS. Because several antimicrobial peptides are the amino acid source for Lactobacillus survival, the Lactobacillus concentration was significantly decreased. In other words, the escape of HPV from the immune response results in an imbalance of microbiota in the female vaginal flora.

4.2. Cervical Carcinogenesis in the Relationship between HPV Infection and the Cervicovaginal Microbiome

HPV-persistent infection can interfere with the cervical microenvironment, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tissue differentiation. Any changes in regulatory factors in these processes may cause cervical neoplasia. However, HPV infection alone does not explain the development of CC. Indeed, some aspects, such as the milieu of mucosal secretion, epithelial surface integrity, immune regulation, and local microbiota, may influence HPV carcinogenesis [47]. Notably, increasing CVM diversity has been investigated to be associated with CIN progression and may be involved in regulating persistent HPV infection (Table 1) [89,90,91]. Guo et al. [11] identified differential microbial communities among 149 women with different HPV and SIL statuses. A non-Lactobacillus CVM was predominant in SIL women compared to HPV-negative and HPV-positive non-SILs. S. oralis and unclassified OTU265 differed between HPV-positive and HPV-positive LSILs. Also, this study revealed several unclassified OTUs, such as OTU880, OTU893, and OTU883, predominant in the HPV-positive HSIL group. In a longitudinal study, Usyk et al. [92] evaluated the CVM of 273 HR-HPV-infected women and tumor progression after two visits. They clustered the CVM into four CSTs: two CSTs related to L. iners and L. crispatus, one cluster containing high levels of G. vaginalis, and other CSTs without a significant group. L. iners were associated with HPV clearance, whereas G. vaginalis correlated with CIN2 progression after the first visit. Prevotella amnii and Anaerococcus prevotii, two common causative agents of BV, were linked to disease progression on the second visit. L. iners may have two opposite functions in the cervicovaginal microenvironment: one can promote health, and the other is associated with dysbiosis and CIN susceptibility [93]. For example, Oh et al. [94] identified a high abundance of L. crispatus in low-risk CIN, whereas L. iners was dominant in medium-risk CIN.
Concerning ICC, evidence about the relationship between the microbial community and ICC was also observed in several studies (Table 1). Audirac-Chalifour et al. [85] discussed the dynamics of the CVM depending on HPV status and cervical neoplasia lesions. The CVM with dominant L. crispatus changed into L. iners after HPV infection in the normal cervical microenvironment. When epithelial lesions became SILs, Sneathia and other Fusobacterium spp. were the most abundant. Fusobacterium necrophorum was highly represented in HPV-positive ICC cases and associated with increasing anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4 and TGF-β1. The authors concluded that Fusobacterium spp. might play a role in shifting Th1 immunity to Th2 or by having a direct effect on the E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling pathway in cervical HPV-transformed cells. However, this finding differed from Wu et al. [95], who found that Fusobacterium was not an excellent prognostic marker for CC, although the abundance of this bacteria was the highest among the groups. The potential marker genera for CC in this study were Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Campylobacter. Together, the CVM composition in CC differed from case-to-case; therefore, a large and well-designed study on the microbiome in CC with different HPV statuses is necessary for clinical applications.
Recently, multiomics has become an increasingly important area in cancer research. Several multiomics studies were carried out and contributed various insights into the underlying mechanism of the complex interaction between CC and its microorganisms. IIhan et al. [96] evaluated the CVM metabolomic and metagenomic profiling of 78 women in Arizona. Amino acid and nucleotide metabolism disruptions were identified in non-Lactobacillus-dominant communities and in high-grade dysplasia. 3-hydroxybutyrate, eicosenoate, and oleate/vaccinate are the metabolic features of CC [96]. Another multiomics study also highlighted that pipecolate and deoxycarnitine were significantly related to vaginal dysbiosis with HPV infection. Particularly, 3-hydroxybutyrate was strongly associated with a high abundance of Streptococcus, Prevotella, Megasphaera, Atopobium, and Sneathia [97].

5. Bacteriotherapy in Cervical Cancer Treatment

5.1. Probiotic Bacteriotherapy in Cervical Cancer Treatment

In the early stages of CC, there are multiple choices for treatment, such as surgery (e.g., fertility preservation surgery), radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the locally advanced stage, chemoradiation is the best approach. However, 30–40% of the patients do not respond entirely, and some patients face side effects from this therapy [98]. Therefore, it is necessary to find a more effective and nontoxic or less toxic treatment [99].
Recently, bacteriotherapy has emerged as a promising platform for cancer treatment. One of the most common representatives of bacteriotherapy is probiotics. Probiotics contain a number of live microorganisms that provide several benefits to their host. There are many sources of probiotics in the human diet, such as fermented milk products (yogurt, cheese, and beer) and mainly vegetables (cabbage and cucumber) [100,101]. The most common genera of probiotics in the human diet are Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus. Also, some strains belonging to Bacillus and Saccharomyces are utilized nowadays [102].
The past decade has seen the rapid development of probiotics for CC [10,14,103]. Researchers believed that probiotics could promote cancer cell apoptosis and inhibit tumor cell proliferation and metastasis [99]. As a result, probiotics can be used as an additional agent for enhancing or modulating other diagnostic and therapeutic methods. Moreover, probiotics can enhance HPV clearance through three hypotheses. First, an increased number of probiotic strains in the vagina may be able to prevent and reduce HPV infections by competing for space or nutrition and releasing several inhibitory factors, such as lactic acid, bacteriocins, biosurfactants, and aggregation molecules. An acidic environment can defend against pathogen invasion and growth [10]. Second, promoting an immune response is the principal mechanism against viral infections [104]. Last, the direct elimination of viruses occurs through the secretion of specific metabolites [105].
Various studies have assessed the efficacy of probiotics on CC cell lines. For instance, on the effect of L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri on CaSki cells, Wang et al. [106] reported that these subgenera of Lactobacillus could inhibit CC cell proliferation through the regulation of HPV oncogenes and cell cycle-related genes. Another study showed that L. gasseri could promote apoptosis in HeLa cells through its exopolysaccharides. Also, L. gasseri could affect the anti-inflammation of HeLa cells by reducing TNF-α and increasing the cytokine IL-10 [107]. Moreover, lactobacilli and their metabolites are essential in CC prevention and treatment. Pawar et al. [108] found that cell-free culture supernatants of 12 Lactobacillus spp. from different microenvironments resembled inhibitors of HPV 16 and 18 by restoring E-cadherin and suppressing MMP9. Another strain, Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005-A, has potential antiactivity by inhibiting E6 and E7 oncogene expression in SiHa cells [103].
There are also reports on the special role of probiotics in HPV infection and CC in human trials (Table 2). In 2013, a prospective controlled pilot study in women with HPV infection and LSILs who took an oral probiotic product (Lactobacillus casei) for six months had higher HPV clearance than the control group; however, the difference was not significant [14]. In a well-designed study by Out et al. [109], 121 HPV-positive women were given oral-specific strains of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus reuteri daily. Although the trial effects did not influence HPV clearance, they significantly decreased the rates of mildly abnormal and unsatisfactory cervical smears. Likewise, Dellino et al. [105] found that HPV-positive women who took the long-term oral probiotic L. crispatus M247 had reduced HPV-related cytological anomalies compared to the control group. However, HPV clearance was not significantly different between the probiotic group and the group without probiotics. In contrast, Pierro et al. [15] reported an increase in HPV clearance after 90 days of taking L. crispatus M247; furthermore, in some cases, the CVM shifted the CST status to CST I.

5.2. Novel Approaches Using Bacteria in Cervical Cancer Treatment

5.2.1. Vaginal Suppositories

In addition to oral probiotics, vaginal suppositories containing Lactobacillus have been studied and developed to prevent vaginal dysbiosis, such as BV or vulvovaginal candidiasis (Table 3) [110,111]. In a clinical trial, Tomusiak et al. [111] revealed that vaginal medicinal therapy (containing Lactobacillus fermentum 57A, Lactobacillus plantarum 57B, and L. gasseri 57C) is safe and can promote an increased abundance of Lactobacillus and decreased pH and Nugent score in women with symptomatic BV after four visits. Until now, there have been limited studies using probiotic vaginal administration in CC treatment, but some vaginal suppositories have reported high efficacy in HPV-positive women. A vaginal L. rhamnosus BMX therapy was implemented in 117 women with HPV and BV or vaginitis concomitantly after using an antibiotic (metronidazole) or antifungal (fluconazole) long-term. The study revealed that vaginal L. rhamnosus BMX could change abnormal cervical lesions and increase HPV clearance after long-term therapy [112].
Also, lacidophilin, a bacteriocin produced by lactic acid bacteria, has been considered a promising therapy. Lacidophilin can be an antibacterial factor by generating lactic acid and destroying the bacterial membrane [113]. The combination of lacidophilin and antitumor IFN-α2b was investigated for treating HPV-infected patients, with significant results in recovering vaginal microecology and inhibiting inflammatory factors [114].
The combination of probiotics and chemotherapy is currently being reported as a new approach to cervical cancer (CC) treatment. Previous studies have shown that using probiotic supplements can reduce the side effects or toxicity of chemotherapy [115]. For instance, cisplatin is a common therapy for CC; however, its toxicity affects normal cells and tissues. Negi et al. [116] combined cisplatin with probiotic-loaded pessaries (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) in a vaginal mouse model. They found a better outcome with fewer side effects of cisplatin and a reduced tumor volume in the treated group.

5.2.2. Probiotic Injection

A recent study reported the combination of a heat-killed preparation of L. casei and α-GalCer (an anticancer and NK T-cell stimulator) subcutaneous injections in a mouse model of CC. They found that splenocyte proliferation, lactate dehydrogenase, nitric oxide, and IFN-γ levels increased more in the combination therapy group than in the control group. Compared to Gardasil injection in the mouse model, the heat-killed preparation of L. casei and α-GalCer had a similar effect. These results could promise a new therapy for CC management [117].

5.2.3. Probiotics and Modulating the Gastrointestinal Problem of Cervical Cancer

Diarrhea is the most common side effect of radiotherapy in treating cervical cancer (CC) patients [118]. Previous studies have suggested that the supplementation of probiotics may prevent this gastrointestinal problem. For instance, Linn et al. [119] investigated the efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in 57 CC patients with diarrhea after radiotherapy. The study found that diarrhea symptoms in the mild-to-moderate group and the severe group were significantly reduced after three weeks of using probiotics.

5.2.4. Vaginal Microbiota Transplantation (VMT)

VMT may improve CVM imbalance when transplanting vaginal fluid from a healthy person with high Lactobacillus abundance [120]. Lev-Sagie et al. [121] reported applying VMT to intractable and recurrent BV treatment. Five patients used VMT, and four had remissions with symptom improvement and no side effects after 5–21 months of transplantation. Although the number of patients was too small, this study could improve CVM dysbiosis and CC management in the future.
Overall, these findings suggest a significant role for probiotics in fighting CC. Nevertheless, further studies are required to understand the function of bacteriotherapy and its underlying mechanisms, particularly during CC treatment.
Table
Table 3. Novel approaches using bacteria for HPV in cervical cancer treatment.
Table 3. Novel approaches using bacteria for HPV in cervical cancer treatment.
StudiesParticipateProbioticsAdministrationResults
Sun et al. (2022) [114]200 HPV-infected women (90 control group, 110 research group)Lacidophilin + rhIFN-α2bVaginal capsulesHPV-positive decreased, and the vaginal microecology recovered higher in the research group than using rhIFN-α2b alone.
Palma et al. (2018) [112]117 women (BV or vaginitis with concomitant HPV infections)L. rhamnosus BMX 54 (after treatment with metronidazole for 7 days or fluconazole for 2 consecutive days)Vaginal tablets, short-term (3 months) and long-term (6 months), follow-up for 9–30 monthsHPV-related cytological abnormalities decreased in the long-term vaginal probiotic group. HPV clearance increased after using vaginal probiotics.
Negi D. et al. (2020) [116]Mouse model of CCL. rhamnosus + cisplastin -loaded pessariesVaginal pessariesReduced the tumor volume in mice with CC and has a low side effect of cisplatin.
Haghighi et al. (2022) [117]Mouse model of CC with TC1 cellsL. casei combined to α-GalCerHeat-killed extracts of L. casei and α-GalCer (subcutaneous injections)Increasing splenocyte proliferation and cell death and decreasing IL-4 and TGF-β. The combination can be efficacious in the CC treatment model.
Linn et al. (2019) [119]57 CC patients with diarrhea after radiotherapyLactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12Oral capsule
(Biogurt®)		The diarrhea symptoms were significantly reduced.
Le-Sagie et al. (2019) [121]5 patients with intractable and recurrent BVVaginal microbiota transplantationVaginal health fluid from donorsFour patients improved their symptoms, the Amsel score normalized, and microscopic vaginal fluid appeared.

6. Conclusions

This review suggests a strong association between HPV infection and CVM status in cervical diseases. Accordingly, the dynamic interaction can cause an imbalanced cervicovaginal microenvironment, such as depletion of Lactobacillus and changes in the immune system and metabolism, which induce dysbiosis, enhance HPV persistence, and promote cervical carcinogenesis. However, this research is only beginning to understand the role of microorganisms in carcinogenesis. Further studies combining new molecular tools, or multiomics, should be considered to identify underlying mechanisms and provide insights into the interaction of microorganisms with immune and metabolic responses. Notwithstanding the relatively limited evidence, probiotics offer new opportunities for future therapy that could change the response to cancer treatment. Hence, continuing well-designed studies about the antitumor function of probiotics in managing CC patients is necessary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.D.T.N., I.S. and H.S.H.; Writing–original draft, H.D.T.N. and I.S.; Preparing figures T.M.L., H.D.T.N. and I.S.; Editing and revising the article, I.S., T.M.L., D.L., E.L., Y.C., J.C., N.J.-Y.P., H.S.H. and G.O.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, D.; Vignat, J.; Lorenzoni, V.; Eslahi, M.; Ginsburg, O.; Lauby-Secretan, B.; Arbyn, M.; Basu, P.; Bray, F.; Vaccarella, S. Global Estimates of Incidence and Mortality of Cervical Cancer in 2020: A Baseline Analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative. Lancet Glob. Health 2023, 11, e197–e206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Della Fera, A.N.; Warburton, A.; Coursey, T.L.; Khurana, S.; McBride, A.A. Persistent Human Papillomavirus Infection. Viruses 2021, 13, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mitra, A.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Marchesi, J.R.; Lee, Y.S.; Bennett, P.R.; Kyrgiou, M. The Vaginal Microbiota, Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: What Do We Know and Where Are We Going Next? Microbiome 2016, 4, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ravel, J.; Gajer, P.; Abdo, Z.; Schneider, G.M.; Koenig, S.S.K.; McCulle, S.L.; Karlebach, S.; Gorle, R.; Russell, J.; Tacket, C.O.; et al. Vaginal Microbiome of Reproductive-Age Women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4680–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chee, W.J.Y.; Chew, S.Y.; Than, L.T.L. Vaginal Microbiota and the Potential of Lactobacillus Derivatives in Maintaining Vaginal Health. Microb. Cell Fact. 2020, 19, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pino, A.; Bartolo, E.; Caggia, C.; Cianci, A.; Randazzo, C.L. Detection of Vaginal Lactobacilli as Probiotic Candidates. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. D’Antonio, D.L.; Marchetti, S.; Pignatelli, P.; Piattelli, A.; Curia, M.C. The Oncobiome in Gastroenteric and Genitourinary Cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, Z.; Hou, Y.; Qing, W.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, R.; Ou, J.; Zhou, H.; Chen, M. The Association of HPV Infection and Vaginal Microbiota of Reproductive Women in China: A Multicenter Cohort Study Protocol. Med. Microecol. 2023, 15, 100072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lebeau, A.; Bruyere, D.; Roncarati, P.; Peixoto, P.; Hervouet, E.; Cobraiville, G.; Taminiau, B.; Masson, M.; Gallego, C.; Mazzucchelli, G.; et al. HPV Infection Alters Vaginal Microbiome through Down-Regulating Host Mucosal Innate Peptides Used by Lactobacilli as Amino Acid Sources. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pourmollaei, S.; Barzegari, A.; Farshbaf-Khalili, A.; Nouri, M.; Fattahi, A.; Shahnazi, M.; Dittrich, R. Anticancer Effect of Bacteria on Cervical Cancer: Molecular Aspects and Therapeutic Implications. Life Sci. 2020, 246, 117413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, C.; Dai, W.; Zhou, Q.; Gui, L.; Cai, H.; Wu, D.; Hou, J.; Li, C.; Li, S.; Du, H.; et al. Cervicovaginal Microbiota Significantly Changed for HPV-Positive Women with High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 973875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kang, G.U.; Jung, D.R.; Lee, Y.H.; Jeon, S.Y.; Han, H.S.; Chong, G.O.; Shin, J.H. Potential Association between Vaginal Microbiota and Cervical Carcinogenesis in Korean Women: A Cohort Study. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dellino, M.; Cascardi, E.; Laganà, A.S.; Di Vagno, G.; Malvasi, A.; Zaccaro, R.; Maggipinto, K.; Cazzato, G.; Scacco, S.; Tinelli, R.; et al. Lactobacillus Crispatus M247 Oral Administration: Is It Really an Effective Strategy in the Management of Papillomavirus-Infected Women? Infect. Agent. Cancer 2022, 17, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Verhoeven, V.; Renard, N.; Makar, A.; Van Royen, P.; Bogers, J.P.; Lardon, F.; Peeters, M.; Baay, M. Probiotics Enhance the Clearance of Human Papillomavirus-Related Cervical Lesions: A Prospective Controlled Pilot Study. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2013, 22, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pierro, F.; Criscuolo, A.A.; Giudici, A.D.; Senatori, R.; Sesti, F.; Ciotti, M.; Piccione, E. Oral Administration of Lactobacillus Crispatus M247 to Papillomavirus-Infected Women: Results of a Preliminary, Uncontrolled, Open Trial Francesco. Minerva Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 73, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Valenti, P.; Rosa, L.; Capobianco, D.; Lepanto, M.S.; Schiavi, E.; Cutone, A.; Paesano, R.; Mastromarino, P. Role of Lactobacilli and Lactoferrin in the Mucosal Cervicovaginal Defense. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McBride, A.A. Human Papillomaviruses: Diversity, Infection and Host Interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 20, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shanmugasundaram, S.; You, J. Targeting Persistent Human Papillomavirus Infection. Viruses 2017, 9, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bzhalava, D.; Eklund, C.; Dillner, J. International Standardization and Classification of Human Papillomavirus Types. Virology 2015, 476, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McLaughlin-Daurbin, M.E.; Münger, K. Oncogenic Activities of Human Papillomaviruses Margaret. Virus Res. 2009, 143, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alizon, S.; Murall, C.L.; Bravo, I.G. Why Human Papillomavirus Acute Infections Matter. Viruses 2017, 9, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Graham, S.V. The Human Papillomavirus Replication Cycle, and Its Links to Cancer Progression: A Comprehensive Review. Clin. Sci. 2017, 131, 2201–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Haręża, D.A.; Wilczyński, J.R.; Paradowska, E. Human Papillomaviruses as Infectious Agents in Gynecological Cancers. Oncogenic Properties of Viral Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bhattacharjee, R.; Das, S.S.; Biswal, S.S.; Nath, A.; Das, D.; Basu, A.; Malik, S.; Kumar, L.; Kar, S.; Singh, S.K.; et al. Mechanistic Role of HPV-Associated Early Proteins in Cervical Cancer: Molecular Pathways and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2022, 174, 103675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Squarzanti, D.F.; Sorrentino, R.; Landini, M.M.; Chiesa, A.; Pinato, S.; Rocchio, F.; Mattii, M.; Penengo, L.; Azzimonti, B. Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6 and E7 Oncoproteins Interact with the Nuclear P53-Binding Protein 1 in an in Vitro Reconstructed 3D Epithelium: New Insights for the Virus-Induced DNA Damage Response. Virol. J. 2018, 15, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fischer, M.; Uxa, S.; Stanko, C.; Magin, T.M.; Engeland, K. Human Papilloma Virus E7 Oncoprotein Abrogates the P53-P21-DREAM Pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Giarrè, M.; Caldeira, S.; Malanchi, I.; Ciccolini, F.; Leão, M.J.; Tommasino, M. Induction of PRb Degradation by the Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7 Protein Is Essential To Efficiently Overcome P16 INK4a -Imposed G 1 Cell Cycle Arrest. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 4705–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Racle, J.; de Jonge, K.; Baumgaertner, P.; Speiser, D.E.; Gfeller, D. Simultaneous Enumeration of Cancer and Immune Cell Types from Bulk Tumor Gene Expression Data. eLife 2017, 6, e26476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jeon, S.; Allen-Hoffmann, B.L.; Lambert, P.F. Integration of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 into the Human Genome Correlates with a Selective Growth Advantage of Cells. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 2989–2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amador-Molina, A.; Hernández-Valencia, J.F.; Lamoyi, E.; Contreras-Paredes, A.; Lizano, M. Role of Innate Immunity against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infections and Effect of Adjuvants in Promoting Specific Immune Response. Viruses 2013, 5, 2624–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bienkowska-Haba, M.; Zwolinska, K.; Keiffer, T.; Scott, R.S.; Sapp, M. Human Papillomavirus Genome Copy Number Is Maintained by S-Phase Amplification, Genome Loss to the Cytosol during Mitosis, and Degradation in G1 Phase. J. Virol. 2023, 97, e01879-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wakabayashi, R.; Nakahama, Y.; Nguyen, V.; Espinoza, J.L. The Host-Microbe Interplay in Human Papillomavirus-Induced Carcinogenesis. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hornung, V.; Ablasser, A.; Charrel-Dennis, M.; Bauernfeind, F.; Horvath, G.; Caffrey, D.R.; Latz, E.; Fitzgerald, K.A. AIM2 Recognizes Cytosolic DsDNA and Forms a Caspase-1-Activating Inflammasome with ASC. Nature 2009, 458, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Scott, M.L.; Woodby, B.L.; Ulicny, J.; Raikhy, G.; Orr, A.W.; Songock, W.K. Human Papillomavirus 16 E5 Inhibits Interferon Signaling and Supports Episomal Viral Maintenance. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e01582-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cai, H.; Yan, L.; Liu, N.; Xu, M.; Cai, H. IFI16 Promotes Cervical Cancer Progression by Upregulating PD-L1 in Immunomicroenvironment through STING-TBK1-NF-KB Pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 123, 109790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Li, C. The Role of TLRs in Cervical Cancer with HPV Infection: A Review. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, H.; Sun, H.; You, F.; Sun, W.; Zhou, X.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Guan, Y.; et al. Activation of STAT6 by STING Is Critical for Antiviral Innate Immunity. Cell 2011, 147, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cheng, Z.; Dai, T.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, F.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, F. The Interactions between CGAS-STING Pathway and Pathogens. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Matsumiya, T.; Prescott, S.M.; Stafforini, D.M. IFN-ε Mediates TNF-α-Induced STAT1 Phosphorylation and Induction of Retinoic Acid-Inducible Gene-I in Human Cervical Cancer Cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 4542–4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rattay, S.; Hufbauer, M.; Hagen, C.; Putschli, B.; Coch, C.; Akgül, B.; Hartmann, G. Human Beta Papillomavirus Type 8 E1 and E2 Proteins Suppress the Activation of the RIG-I-like Receptor MDA5. Viruses 2022, 14, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kotenko, S.V.; Gallagher, G.; Baurin, V.V.; Lewis-Antes, A.; Shen, M.; Shah, N.K.; Langer, J.A.; Sheikh, F.; Dickensheets, H.; Donnelly, R.P. IFN-Λs Mediate Antiviral Protection through a Distinct Class II Cytokine Receptor Complex. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cannella, F.; Scagnolari, C.; Selvaggi, C.; Stentella, P.; Recine, N.; Antonelli, G.; Pierangeli, A. Interferon Lambda 1 Expression in Cervical Cells Differs between Low-Risk and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Positive Women. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014, 203, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Reiser, J.; Hurst, J.; Voges, M.; Krauss, P.; Münch, P.; Iftner, T.; Stubenrauch, F. High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses Repress Constitutive Kappa Interferon Transcription via E6 To Prevent Pathogen Recognition Receptor and Antiviral-Gene Expression. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 11372–11380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lazear, H.M.; Schoggins, J.W.; Diamond, M.S. Shared and Distinct Functions of Type I and Type III Interferons. Immunity 2019, 50, 907–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Richards, K.H.; Wasson, C.W.; Watherston, O.; Doble, R.; Eric Blair, G.; Wittmann, M.; Macdonald, A. The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) E7 Protein Antagonises an Imiquimod-Induced Inflammatory Pathway in Primary Human Keratinocytes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vanguri, V.K. The Adaptive Immune System. In Pathobiology of Human Disease: A Dynamic Encyclopedia of Disease Mechanisms; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 1–4. ISBN 9780123864567. [Google Scholar]
  47. Schiffman, M.; Doorbar, J.; Wentzensen, N.; De Sanjosé, S.; Fakhry, C.; Monk, B.J.; Stanley, M.A.; Franceschi, S. Carcinogenic Human Papillomavirus Infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016, 2, 16086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Litwin, T.R.; Irvin, S.R.; Chornock, R.L.; Sahasrabuddhe, V.V.; Stanley, M.; Wentzensen, N. Infiltrating T-Cell Markers in Cervical Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 124, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stanley, M.A. Epithelial Cell Responses to Infection with Human Papillomavirus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nakahara, T.; Kiyono, T. Interplay between NF-ΚB/Interferon Signaling and the Genome Replication of HPV. Future Virol. 2016, 11, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tilborghs, S.; Corthouts, J.; Verhoeven, Y.; Arias, D.; Rolfo, C.; Trinh, X.B.; van Dam, P.A. The Role of Nuclear Factor-Kappa B Signaling in Human Cervical Cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2017, 120, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Horta, B.; Pereira, T.; Medeiros, R.; Cerqueira, F. Cervical Cancer Outcome and Tumor-Associated Macrophages: Research Evidence. Immuno 2022, 2, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kobayashi, A.; Weinberg, V.; Darragh, T.; Smith-McCune, K. Evolving Immunosuppressive Microenvironment during Human Cervical Carcinogenesis. Mucosal Immunol. 2008, 1, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kroon, S.J.; Ravel, J.; Huston, W.M. Cervicovaginal Microbiota, Women’s Health, and Reproductive Outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 110, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Borgdorff, H.; Tsivtsivadze, E.; Verhelst, R.; Marzorati, M.; Jurriaans, S.; Ndayisaba, G.F.; Schuren, F.H.; Van De Wijgert, J.H.H.M. Lactobacillus-Dominated Cervicovaginal Microbiota Associated with Reduced HIV/STI Prevalence and Genital HIV Viral Load in African Women. ISME J. 2014, 8, 1781–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Delgado-Diaz, D.J.; Jesaveluk, B.; Hayward, J.A.; Tyssen, D.; Alisoltani, A.; Potgieter, M.; Bell, L.; Ross, E.; Iranzadeh, A.; Allali, I.; et al. Lactic Acid from Vaginal Microbiota Enhances Cervicovaginal Epithelial Barrier Integrity by Promoting Tight Junction Protein Expression. Microbiome 2022, 10, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jie, Z.; Chen, C.; Hao, L.; Li, F.; Song, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, J.; Tian, L.; Tong, X.; Cai, K.; et al. Life History Recorded in the Vagino-Cervical Microbiome Along with Multi-Omes. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2022, 20, 304–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oliver, A.; Lamere, B.; Weihe, C.; Wandro, S.; Lindsay, K.L.; Wadhwa, P.D.; Mills, D.A.; Pride, D.T.; Fiehn, O.; Northen, T.; et al. Cervicovaginal Microbiome Composition Is Associated with Metabolic Profiles in Healthy Pregnancy. mBio 2020, 11, e01851-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gajer, P.; Brotman, R.M.; Bai, G.; Sakamoto, J.; Schütte, U.M.E.; Zhong, X.; Koenig, S.S.K.; Fu, L.; Ma, Z.; Zhou, X.; et al. Temporal Dynamics of the Human Vaginal Microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 132ra52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vodstrcil, L.A.; Twin, J.; Garland, S.M.; Fairley, C.K.; Hocking, J.S.; Law, M.G.; Plummer, E.L.; Fethers, K.A.; Chow, E.P.F.; Tabrizi, S.N.; et al. The Influence of Sexual Activity on the Vaginal Microbiota and Gardnerella Vaginalis Clade Diversity in Young Women. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zapata, H.J.; Quagliarello, V.J. The Microbiota and Microbiome in Aging: Potential Implications in Health and Age-Related Diseases. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2015, 63, 776–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sun, N.; Ding, H.; Yu, H.; Ji, Y.; Xifang, X.; Pang, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, W. Comprehensive Characterization of Microbial Community in the Female Genital Tract of Reproductive-Aged Women in China. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 649067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Clarke, M.A.; Rodriguez, A.C.; Gage, J.C.; Herrero, R.; Hildesheim, A.; Wacholder, S.; Burk, R.; Schiffman, M. A Large, Population-Based Study of Age-Related Associations between Vaginal PH and Human Papillomavirus Infection. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cheng, L.; Gao, Y.; Xia, Q.; Wang, H.; Xie, X.; Liu, Y.; Shang, H.; Diao, Y. Reproductive Tract Microbiota of Women in Childbearing Age Shifts upon Gynecological Infections and Menstrual Cycle. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Song, S.D.; Acharya, K.D.; Zhu, J.E.; Deveney, C.M.; Walther-Antonio, M.R.; Tetel, M.J.; Chia, N. Daily Vaginal Microbiota Fluctuations Associated with Natural Hormonal Cycle, Contraceptives, Diet, and Exercise. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2020, 5, e00593-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Weinberg, E.D. Iron Availability and Infection. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2009, 1790, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kaelin, E.A.; Skidmore, P.T.; Łaniewski, P.; Holland, L.A.; Chase, D.M.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M.; Lim, E.S. Cervicovaginal DNA Virome Alterations Are Associated with Genital Inflammation and Microbiota Composition. mSystems 2022, 7, e00064-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sodhani, P.; Gupta, S.; Gupta, R.; Mehrotra, R. Bacterial Vaginosis and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Is There an Association or Is Co-Existence Incidental? Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2017, 18, 1289–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lin, S.; Zhang, B.; Lin, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zuo, X. Dysbiosis of Cervical and Vaginal Microbiota Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 767693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, L.; Shi, X.; Min, M.; Xiong, L.; Pan, J.; Liu, P.; Wu, G.; Gao, G. A Cross-Sectional Analysis about Bacterial Vaginosis, High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection, and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Chinese Women. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Onderdonk, A.B.; Delaney, M.L.; Fichorova, R.N. The Human Microbiome during Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 29, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Torcia, M.G. Interplay among Vaginal Microbiome, Immune Response and Sexually Transmitted Viral Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Łaniewski, P.; Barnes, D.; Goulder, A.; Cui, H.; Roe, D.J.; Chase, D.M.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Linking Cervicovaginal Immune Signatures, HPV and Microbiota Composition in Cervical Carcinogenesis in Non-Hispanic and Hispanic Women. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mitchell, C.; Marrazzo, J. Bacterial Vaginosis and the Cervicovaginal Immune Response. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 71, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Borgdorff, H.; Gautam, R.; Armstrong, S.D.; Xia, D.; Ndayisaba, G.F.; Van Teijlingen, N.H.; Geijtenbeek, T.B.H.; Wastling, J.M.; Van De Wijgert, J.H.H.M. Cervicovaginal Microbiome Dysbiosis Is Associated with Proteome Changes Related to Alterations of the Cervicovaginal Mucosal Barrier. Mucosal Immunol. 2016, 9, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Anahtar, M.N.; Byrne, E.H.; Doherty, K.E.; Bowman, B.A.; Yamamoto, H.S.; Soumillon, M.; Padavattan, N.; Ismail, N.; Moodley, A.; Sabatini, M.E.; et al. Cervicovaginal Bacteria Are a Major Modulator of Host Inflammatory Responses in the Female Genital Tract. Immunity 2015, 42, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Łaniewski, P.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Bacterial Vaginosis and Health-Associated Bacteria Modulate the Immunometabolic Landscape in 3D Model of Human Cervix. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2021, 7, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fan, Q.; Wu, Y.; Li, M.; An, F.; Yao, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.; Yuan, J.; Jiang, K.; Li, W.; et al. Lactobacillus Spp. Create a Protective Micro-Ecological Environment through Regulating the Core Fucosylation of Vaginal Epithelial Cells against Cervical Cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Brusselaers, N.; Shrestha, S.; van de Wijgert, J.; Verstraelen, H. Vaginal Dysbiosis and the Risk of Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 221, 9–18.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Di Paola, M.; Sani, C.; Clemente, A.M.; Iossa, A.; Perissi, E.; Castronovo, G.; Tanturli, M.; Rivero, D.; Cozzolino, F.; Cavalieri, D.; et al. Characterization of Cervico-Vaginal Microbiota in Women Developing Persistent High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lin, W.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Dong, B.; Xue, H.; Lei, H.; Lu, Y.; Wei, X.; Sun, P. Changes of the Vaginal Microbiota in HPV Infection and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Donmez, H.G.; Sahal, G.; Akgor, U.; Cagan, M.; Ozgul, N.; Beksac, M.S. The Relationship between the Presence of HPV Infection and Biofilm Formation in Cervicovaginal Smears. Infection 2020, 48, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Qingqing, B.; Jie, Z.; Songben, Q.; Juan, C.; Lei, Z.; Mu, X. Cervicovaginal Microbiota Dysbiosis Correlates with HPV Persistent Infection. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 152, 104617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. So, K.A.; Yang, E.J.; Kim, N.R.; Hong, S.R.; Lee, J.H.; Hwang, C.S.; Shim, S.H.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, T.J. Changes of Vaginal Microbiota during Cervical Carcinogenesis in Women with Human Papillomavirus Infection. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Audirac-Chalifour, A.; Torres-Poveda, K.; Bahena-Román, M.; Téllez-Sosa, J.; Martínez-Barnetche, J.; Cortina-Ceballos, B.; López-Estrada, G.; Delgado-Romero, K.; Burguete-García, A.I.; Cantú, D.; et al. Cervical Microbiome and Cytokine Profile at Various Stages of Cervical Cancer: A Pilot Study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gao, W.; Weng, J.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X. Comparison of the Vaginal Microbiota Diversity of Women with and without Human Papillomavirus Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 271–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Brotman, R.M.; Shardell, M.D.; Gajer, P.; Tracy, J.K.; Zenilman, J.M.; Ravel, J.; Gravitt, P.E. Interplay between the Temporal Dynamics of the Vaginal Microbiota and Human Papillomavirus Detection. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 210, 1723–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lee, J.E.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.; Song, Y.M.; Lee, K.; Han, M.J.; Sung, J.; Ko, G.P. Association of the Vaginal Microbiota with Human Papillomavirus Infection in a Korean Twin Cohort. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e0063514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kwasniewski, W.; Wolun-Cholewa, M.; Kotarski, J.; Warchol, W.; Kuzma, D.; Kwasniewska, A.; Gozdzicka-Jozefiak, A. Microbiota Dysbiosis Is Associated with HPV-Induced Cervical Carcinogenesis. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 7035–7047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Teka, B.; Yoshida-Court, K.; Firdawoke, E.; Chanyalew, Z.; Gizaw, M.; Addissie, A.; Mihret, A.; Colbert, L.E.; Napravnik, T.C.; El Alam, M.B.; et al. Cervicovaginal Microbiota Profiles in Precancerous Lesions and Cervical Cancer among Ethiopian Women. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mitra, A.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Lee, Y.S.; Smith, A.; Marchesi, J.R.; Lehne, B.; Bhatia, R.; Lyons, D.; Paraskevaidis, E.; Li, J.V.; et al. Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Disease Progression Is Associated with Increased Vaginal Microbiome Diversity. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Usyk, M.; Zolnik, C.P.; Castle, P.E.; Porras, C.; Herrero, R.; Gradissimo, A.; Gonzalez, P.; Safaeian, M.; Schiffman, M.; Burk, R.D. Cervicovaginal Microbiome and Natural History of HPV in a Longitudinal Study. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Jakobsson, T.; Forsum, U. Lactobacillus Iners: A Marker of Changes in the Vaginal Flora? J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Oh, H.Y.; Kim, B.S.; Seo, S.S.; Kong, J.S.; Lee, J.K.; Park, S.Y.; Hong, K.M.; Kim, H.K.; Kim, M.K. The Association of Uterine Cervical Microbiota with an Increased Risk for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Korea. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 674.e1–674.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wu, S.; Ding, X.; Kong, Y.; Acharya, S.; Wu, H.; Huang, C.; Liang, Y.; Nong, X.; Chen, H. The Feature of Cervical Microbiota Associated with the Progression of Cervical Cancer among Reproductive Females. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 163, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ilhan, Z.E.; Łaniewski, P.; Thomas, N.; Roe, D.J.; Chase, D.M.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Deciphering the Complex Interplay between Microbiota, HPV, Inflammation and Cancer through Cervicovaginal Metabolic Profiling. EBioMedicine 2019, 44, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bokulich, N.A.; Laniewski, P.; Adamov, A.; Chase, D.M.; Gregory Caporaso, J.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Multi-Omics Data Integration Reveals Metabolome as the Top Predictor of the Cervicovaginal Microenvironment. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2022, 18, e1009876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kumar, L.; Harish, P.; Malik, P.S.; Khurana, S. Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy in the Management of Cervical Cancer. Curr. Probl. Cancer 2018, 42, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jahanshahi, M.; Maleki Dana, P.; Badehnoosh, B.; Asemi, Z.; Hallajzadeh, J.; Mansournia, M.A.; Yousefi, B.; Yousefi, B.; Moazzami, B.; Chaichian, S. Anti-Tumor Activities of Probiotics in Cervical Cancer. J. Ovarian Res. 2020, 13, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kechagia, M.; Basoulis, D.; Konstantopoulou, S.; Dimitriadi, D.; Gyftopoulou, K.; Skarmoutsou, N.; Fakiri, E.M. Health Benefits of Probiotics: A Review. ISRN Nutr. 2013, 2013, 481651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ozen, M.; Dinleyici, E.C. The History of Probiotics: The Untold Story. Benef. Microbes 2015, 6, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Markowiak, P.; Ślizewska, K. Effects of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics on Human Health. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cha, M.; Lee, D.; An, H.; Lee, S.; Shin, S.; Kwon, J.; Kim, K.; Ha, N. Antiviral Activity of Bifidobacterium Adolescentis SPM1005-A on Human Papillomavirus Type 16. BMC Med. 2012, 10, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Azad, M.A.K.; Sarker, M.; Wan, D. Immunomodulatory Effects of Probiotics on Cytokine Profiles. Biomed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 8063647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Van Baarlen, P.; Troost, F.; Van Der Meer, C.; Hooiveld, G.; Boekschoten, M.; Brummer, R.J.M.; Kleerebezem, M. Human Mucosal in Vivo Transcriptome Responses to Three Lactobacilli Indicate How Probiotics May Modulate Human Cellular Pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4562–4569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, K.D.; Xu, D.J.; Wang, B.Y.; Yan, D.H.; Lv, Z.; Su, J.R. Inhibitory Effect of Vaginal Lactobacillus Supernatants on Cervical Cancer Cells. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2018, 10, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Sungur, T.; Aslim, B.; Karaaslan, C.; Aktas, B. Impact of Exopolysaccharides (EPSs) of Lactobacillus Gasseri Strains Isolated from Human Vagina on Cervical Tumor Cells (HeLa). Anaerobe 2017, 47, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Pawar, K.; Aranha, C. Lactobacilli Metabolites Restore E-Cadherin and Suppress MMP9 in Cervical Cancer Cells. Curr. Res. Toxicol. 2022, 3, 100088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ou, Y.C.; Fu, H.C.; Tseng, C.W.; Wu, C.H.; Tsai, C.C.; Lin, H. The Influence of Probiotics on Genital High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus Clearance and Quality of Cervical Smear: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. BMC Women’s Health 2019, 19, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. van de Wijgert, J.H.H.M.; Verwijs, M.C. Lactobacilli-Containing Vaginal Probiotics to Cure or Prevent Bacterial or Fungal Vaginal Dysbiosis: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Trial Designs. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020, 127, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tomusiak, A.; Strus, M.; Heczko, P.B.; Adamski, P.; Stefański, G.; Mikołajczyk-Cichońska, A.; Suda-Szczurek, M. Efficacy and Safety of a Vaginal Medicinal Product Containing Three Strains of Probiotic Bacteria: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Trial. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 5345–5354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Palma, E.; Recine, N.; Domenici, L.; Giorgini, M.; Pierangeli, A.; Panici, P.B. Long-Term Lactobacillus Rhamnosus BMX 54 Application to Restore a Balanced Vaginal Ecosystem: A Promising Solution against HPV-Infection. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhu, Y.; Zhang, S. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Lacidophilin From Lactobacillus Pentosus Against Staphylococcus Aureus and Escherichia Coli. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 582349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Sun, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhou, H.; You, L.; Zhu, Y. Influence of Lacidophilin Vaginal Capsules plus Rh-IFN- α 2b on Efficacy, Vaginal Microecology, and Safety of Patients with HPV Infection. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 3632053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rodriguez-Arrastia, M.; Martinez-Ortigosa, A.; Rueda-Ruzafa, L.; Ayora, A.F.; Ropero-Padilla, C. Probiotic Supplements on Oncology Patients’ Treatment-Related Side Effects: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Negi, D.; Singh, A.; Joshi, N.; Mishra, N. Cisplatin and Probiotic Biomass Loaded Pessaries for the Management of Cervical Cancer. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2019, 20, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Haghighi, D.; Yazdani, S.; Farzanehpour, M.; Esmaeili Gouvarchinghaleh, H. Combined Extract of Heated TC1, a Heat-Killed Preparation of Lactobacillus Casei and Alpha-Galactosyl Ceramide in a Mouse Model of Cervical Cancer. Infect. Agent. Cancer 2022, 17, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Andreyev, J. Gastrointestinal Complications of Pelvic Radiotherapy: Are They of Any Importance? Gut 2005, 54, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Linn, Y.H.; Thu, K.K.; Win, N.H.H. Effect of Probiotics for the Prevention of Acute Radiation-Induced Diarrhoea Among Cervical Cancer Patients: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yockey, L.J.; Hussain, F.A.; Bergerat, A.; Reissis, A.; Worrall, D.; Xu, J.; Gomez, I.; Bloom, S.M.; Mafunda, N.A.; Kelly, J.; et al. Screening and Characterization of Vaginal Fluid Donations for Vaginal Microbiota Transplantation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lev-Sagie, A.; Goldman-Wohl, D.; Cohen, Y.; Dori-Bachash, M.; Leshem, A.; Mor, U.; Strahilevitz, J.; Moses, A.E.; Shapiro, H.; Yagel, S.; et al. Vaginal Microbiome Transplantation in Women with Intractable Bacterial Vaginosis. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1500–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 11 01417 g001 550
Figure 1. Complex association between HPV infection, the CVM, and cancer formation in the cervicovaginal microenvironment. CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 30 March 2023).
Figure 1. Complex association between HPV infection, the CVM, and cancer formation in the cervicovaginal microenvironment. CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 30 March 2023).
Microorganisms 11 01417 g001
Table
Table 1. Association between the cervicovaginal microbiome and HPV in cervical neoplastic lesions.
Table 1. Association between the cervicovaginal microbiome and HPV in cervical neoplastic lesions.
AuthorParticipantsSample TypesMicrobial Analysis* Healthy* CIN1 or LSIL- HPV(+)* CIN2/3 or HSIL- HPV(+)* ICC
Audirac-Chalifour et al. (2016) [85]32 Mexican womenCervical epithelial scraping swabs, fresh biopsyV3-V4 regions of
16S rRNA		L. crispatus,
L. iners		Sneathia spp., Megasphaera elsdenii, Shuttleworhia satellesSneathia spp., M. elsdenii, S. satellesFusobacterium spp.
Kwasniewski et al. (2018) [89]250 Polish womenCervical swabsV4 region of 16S rRNAL. crispatus,
L. iners, L. taiwanensis		L. acidophilus,
L. iners		G. vaginalis,
L. acidophilus
Laniewski et al. (2018) [73]100 Hispanic women (USA)Cervical (swabs, lavage)V4 region of 16S rRNALactobacillus spp.L. inersL. inersSneathia spp.
Kang et al. (2021) [12]23 Korean womenCervicovaginal swabsV3 region of
16S rRNA		Lactobacillus spp. Gardnerella,
Prevotella		Streptococcus spp.
Wu et al. (2021) [95]94 Chinese womenCervical mucus dischargeV4 region of 16S rRNALactobacillus spp.Lactobacillus, Xanthobacter, Thermus, FlavisolibacterSphingopyxis, Sediminibacterium, GeobacillusSneathia, Gardnerella,
Megasphera		Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Campylobacter
Teka B. et al.
(2023) [90]		120 Ethiopian womenCervical (swabs, brush)V4 region of 16S rRNALactobacillus spp.L. inersL.inersPorphyromonas somerae, Prevotella timonensis, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica
LSIL: low squamous intraepithelial lesions; ICC: invasive CC; * key bacterial communities.
Table
Table 2. Treatment effects of Lactobacillus spp. on HPV and cervical cancer in clinical trials.
Table 2. Treatment effects of Lactobacillus spp. on HPV and cervical cancer in clinical trials.
StudiesNCT NumberParticipantsStrainTreatmentResults in CCHPV Clearance
Veronique et al. (2013) [14]NCT0109735654 women with HPV-positive LSILsL. casei strain Sheroni (Yakult)Oral daily for 6 monthsProbiotics significantly contributed to the resolution of cytological abnormalitiesHPV clearance was higher in probiotic takers than in the control group, but not statistically significant
Out et al. (2019) [109]NCT01599416121 women
62 HR-HPV(+), 59 control		L. rhamnosus GR-1
L. reuteri RC-14		Oral daily
until HPV-		Decreased, mildly abnormal, and unsatisfactory cervical smears in group probiotic takersNoninfluence HR-HPV
Pierro et al. (2021) [15]Not specified35 HPV-positive womenL. crispatus M247Oral, 90 daysChange in CST status to CST I after using probioticsIncreased HPV clearance in group probiotic takers
Dellino et al. (2022) [13]Not specified80 women with HPV infection and 80 controlL. crispatus M247Oral, follow-up 12 monthsReducing HPV-related cytological anomalies in long-term oral probiotic usersThe proportion of HPV-negative women was not significantly different
LSIL: low squamous intraepithelial lesions; HR-HPV: high-risk HPV.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, H.D.T.; Le, T.M.; Lee, E.; Lee, D.; Choi, Y.; Cho, J.; Park, N.J.-Y.; Chong, G.O.; Seo, I.; Han, H.S. Relationship between Human Papillomavirus Status and the Cervicovaginal Microbiome in Cervical Cancer. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061417

AMA Style

Nguyen HDT, Le TM, Lee E, Lee D, Choi Y, Cho J, Park NJ-Y, Chong GO, Seo I, Han HS. Relationship between Human Papillomavirus Status and the Cervicovaginal Microbiome in Cervical Cancer. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(6):1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Hong Duc Thi, Tan Minh Le, Eunmi Lee, Donghyeon Lee, Yeseul Choi, Junghwan Cho, Nora Jee-Young Park, Gun Oh Chong, Incheol Seo, and Hyung Soo Han. 2023. "Relationship between Human Papillomavirus Status and the Cervicovaginal Microbiome in Cervical Cancer" Microorganisms 11, no. 6: 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061417

APA Style

Nguyen, H. D. T., Le, T. M., Lee, E., Lee, D., Choi, Y., Cho, J., Park, N. J. -Y., Chong, G. O., Seo, I., & Han, H. S. (2023). Relationship between Human Papillomavirus Status and the Cervicovaginal Microbiome in Cervical Cancer. Microorganisms, 11(6), 1417. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop