Next Article in Journal
Metataxonomic Analysis Demonstrates a Shift in Duodenal Microbiota in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice
Next Article in Special Issue
Infectious Agents Induce Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway Deregulation in Primary Liver Cancers
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Influence of pH on the Dynamics of Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol Fermentation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Helicobacter pylori and Its Role in Gastric Cancer
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

The Immune Response Generated against HPV Infection in Men and Its Implications in the Diagnosis of Cancer

Microorganisms 2023, 11(6), 1609; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061609
by Lilia Chihu-Amparan, Adolfo Pedroza-Saavedra *,† and Lourdes Gutierrez-Xicotencatl *,†
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2023, 11(6), 1609; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061609
Submission received: 2 June 2023 / Revised: 15 June 2023 / Accepted: 16 June 2023 / Published: 18 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oncogenic Role of Viruses and Bacteria)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors should be congratulated for the topic. HPV represents a major health concern both for men and for women. While the knowledge of women's pathogenesis and tumorigenesis is deeply understood, men are still shadowed. The manuscript is comprehensive of the main evidence of current literature, it consolidates every aspect of the pathology, of the virus transmission, and of the evolution. Maybe, the fertility field is treated in a scant way and it will be improved (PMID 36576473). However, the manuscript is easily readable and well-written.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment." 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The abstract was not very clear. I had to read it twice to understand what type of study this was. Rewriting the abstract in a clear, concise manner would help.

It is helpful to explain the methodology of the articles included and excluded in this study. Which search tools were used? Which years? What was the inclusion/ exclusion criteria? A flowchart could illustrate the methodology well.

Otherwise, it was a thorough and well-written review.

Quality of English in this paper was good.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment." 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop