Next Article in Journal
The Uprise of Human Leishmaniasis in Tuscany, Central Italy: Clinical and Epidemiological Data from a Multicenter Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Performance Evaluation of NovaplexTM Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Streptococcus agalactiae Serotypes
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Sharma et al. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1614
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis Using an Intelligent Microscopy Scanner and Image Recognition Model for Improved Acid-Fast Bacilli Detection in Smears
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

First Case of Candida Auris Sepsis in Southern Italy: Antifungal Susceptibility and Genomic Characterisation of a Difficult-to-Treat Emerging Yeast

by
Stefania Stolfa
1,†,
Giuseppina Caggiano
2,3,†,
Luigi Ronga
1,
Lidia Dalfino
4,
Francesca Centrone
3,
Anna Sallustio
3,
Davide Sacco
2,
Adriana Mosca
1,
Monica Stufano
4,
Annalisa Saracino
5,
Nicolo’ De Gennaro
5,
Daniele Casulli
3,
Nicola Netti
3,
Savino Soldano
6,
Maria Faggiano
7,
Daniela Loconsole
2,3,
Silvio Tafuri
2,3,
Salvatore Grasso
4 and
Maria Chironna
1,2,3,*
1
Microbiology and Virology Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari “A. Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
2
Hygiene Section, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari “A. Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
3
Hygiene Unit, Bari Policlinico University Hospital, 70124 Bari, Italy
4
Intensive Care Unit II, Department of Precision Medicine, Ionic Area, University of Bari “A. Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
5
Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari “A. Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
6
Policlinico Hospital Sanitary Direction, Bari Policlinico University Hospital, 70124 Bari, Italy
7
Pharmacy Unit, Bari Policlinico University Hospital, 70124 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(10), 1962; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12101962
Submission received: 2 August 2024 / Revised: 6 September 2024 / Accepted: 26 September 2024 / Published: 27 September 2024

Abstract

:
Candida auris is an emerging yeast considered a serious threat to global health. We report the first case of C. auris candidemia in Southern Italy, characterized using whole genome sequencing (WGS), and compared with a second strain isolated from a patient who presented as C. auris-colonized following screening. The C. auris strain was isolated from clinical samples, identified via MALDI-TOF, and subjected to WGS. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using commercial broth microdilution plates, and resistance protein sequences were evaluated with TBLASTN-2.15.0. Following the initial C. auris isolation from patient A, active surveillance and environmental investigations were implemented for all ICU patients. Of the 26 ICU surfaces sampled, 46.1% tested positive for C. auris via real-time PCR. Screening identified a second patient (patient B) as C. auris-colonized. The phylogenetic characterization of strains from patients A and B, based on the D1/D2 region of the 28s rDNA and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, showed high similarity with strains from Lebanon. SNP analysis revealed high clonality, assigning both strains to clade I, indicating a significant similarity with Lebanese strains. This case confirms the alarming spread of C. auris infections and highlights the need for stringent infection control measures to manage outbreaks.

1. Introduction

Candida auris is a multidrug-resistant (MDR) yeast of public health concern. Hospital-acquired infections (HAI) across five continents have been reported [1]. C. auris causes invasive infections particularly in immunocompromised patients, with high mortality rates mainly attributed to laboratory misidentification and MDR profiles. Furthermore, hospital outbreaks have been reported, probably due to its ability to create biofilms, making it resistant to antiseptics and persistent on environmental surfaces [2]. In 2019–2021, a large outbreak was reported in northern Italy with at least 277 cases [3] and a case fatality rate of 40.4% [4].
Six distinct clades of C auris have recently been reported [5]. These clades were distinguished on the basis of the analyses of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variation. Furthermore, these clades diverged in terms of antifungal susceptibility profiles, epidemic potential, and clinical manifestations [5].
We report the first case of C. auris candidemia in a critically ill patient admitted to a Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of southern Italy. The patient had not travelled abroad or had any other recent hospitalizations.
In April 2024, a critically ill patient was admitted to the ICU of the University Hospital Policlinico of Bari (patient A). One week later, he developed a bloodstream infection by New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and, despite prompt active antimicrobial treatment, refractory septic shock ensued. Daptomycin and caspofungin were empirically added but, unfortunately, the patient died within 48 h. Two days later, C. auris was isolated from their blood cultures.
Immediately, active surveillance of patients and ICU environmental surfaces was started, and infection control measures were strongly implemented. One of the sixteen screened patients (patient B) turned out to be colonized by C. auris in endotracheal aspirate, skin, and rectal swabs. He was admitted 2 weeks before patient A from an Albanian ICU and remained in good clinical condition until his last clinical evaluation in June 2024.

2. Materials and Methods

Blood cultures from patient A were performed as part of standard procedure for patients with sepsis. C. auris strain was isolated from blood culture after incubation on Sabouraud Dextrose agar (Biomerieux Inc., Lyon, France) for 48 h at 37 °C. Skin surveillance swabs (particularly of the axilla and groin) were collected by vigorously rubbing the tip of the swab over the indicated site at least 3–5 times. Skin, rectal swabs, and tracheobronchial aspirate (TBA) were inoculated on Sabouraud dextrose agar and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h. The identification of C. auris was performed through MALDI-TOF. Isolates of C. auris from patient A and patient B were subjected to WGS (whole genome sequencing) using the MiniSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). DNA was extracted and purified with QIAamp DNA Mini kit, according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. Purified DNA was measured with a Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen by ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA; USA) using the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Nextera XT paired-end sequencing with a paired-end run of 2 × 150 bp was performed for library preparation. FastQC V0.12.1 software was used to perform quality control checks on the raw sequence data [6,7].
Read data were aligned against the reference genome of C. auris B8441 (GenBank assembly accession GCA_002759435.2) using BWA-MEM [8]. The consensus was generated using Samtools (version 1.20) and consensus was generated from BAM file based on the contents of the alignment records. The consensus was written as FASTA file [9]. BLAST was used to retrieve sequences with >90% identity from NCBI database, which were then added to the background genomic dataset after manual curation. The alignment of the core genome, the detection of recombination events, and the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were performed using Parsnp v1.2 [10]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using RaxML8 and the TVM evolutionary model [11]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using Mega 11.0.13 software with the neighbor-joining algorithm and annotated in iTOL [12].
Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using commercial broth microdilution plates (Sensititre YeastOne, ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. As there are currently no established C. auris-specific susceptibility breakpoints, tentative breakpoints proposed by the CDC [13] were selected to define the clinical category of susceptibility.
A total of 26 surfaces in the ICU were sampled. Specifically, high-touch patient-area surfaces (multi-parameter touch screen monitors, assisted ventilation touch screen monitors, bed rails, infusion pumps, bed keypad, drug preparation shelf) and common ward surfaces (computer keyboards, ultrasound probes, telephone) were evaluated. The surfaces were sampled using sterile swabs soaked in distilled water. All swabs were transported to the laboratory in refrigerated containers at a temperature of +4 °C and were analyzed immediately upon arrival.

3. Results

C. auris strains from patient A (BA02) and patient B (BA03) were phylogenetically characterized on the basis of the D1/D2 region of the 28s rDNA and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
The analysis showed a high degree of similarity of BA02 and BA03 with strains isolated in Lebanon (Bioproject PRJNA736600). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis showed that BA02 and BA03 had a high degree of clonality showing only 125 SNPs and were assigned to clade I, confirming a high rate of similarity with the strains collected in Lebanon (Figure 3). The difference in the number of SNPs between the BA03 strain of the present study and the Lebanon strain GCA019039495 was 381.
The sequences of the original clinical specimens described here have been deposited in the Genebank sequence database (accession number: SAMN41379019, SAMN41379020).
The isolates were both resistant to fluconazole and amphotericin B and susceptible to caspofungin, anidulafungin and, micafungin.
The evaluation of resistance protein sequences was performed using TBLASTN-2.15.0 [14]. Compared with the reference genome, the isolates BA02 and BA03 harbored Y132F azole resistance-associated mutation in ERG11 and mutations M192I in ERG4, K74E in CIS2, K52N in SNQ2, and S70R in FCY1. Finally, A583S in TAC1b and K719N in STE6 were detected (Table 1). Both isolates also expressed flucytosine resistance harboring, a single mutation in the FCY1 gene [14].
The detection of C. auris from surfaces was performed by the commercial Auris ID detection real-time PCR kit according to the instructions for use (Olm Diagnostics, Braintree, UK, distributed by LionDx, Pordenone, Italy). Samples were considered positive when they showed a ct value ≤ 40. Of the 26 environmental samples, 12 (46.1%) were positive for C. auris, in particular, swabs from multi-parameter monitors, infusion pumps, bed rails, and telephones.

4. Discussion

C. auris infections represent a major challenge due to its unfavorable antifungal resistance profile, with more than 40% expressing combined resistance to two or more classes of antifungals, severely limiting therapeutic options [15]. This characteristic may complicate the management of invasive C. auris infections such as candidemia, potentially contributing to high mortality and transmissibility. C. auris candidemia usually follows colonization; therefore, the early identification of colonized patients is critical to prevent invasive infection through interventions on modifiable predictors.
To our knowledge, this is the first isolation of C. auris in the whole of southern Italy. Similar cases of C. auris importation into Italy have been described previously [16], but this result confirms its alarming spread, especially in hospital settings worldwide. The cases of C. auris importation are united by prolonged hospitalization in countries with a high rate of multi-resistant organisms and the need for invasive medical procedures (central venous catheter, urinary catheter recent surgical procedure, mechanical ventilation).
The high rate of similarity of the two analyzed strains, showing only 125 SNPS, clearly suggests an epidemiological link between patient A and patient B. On the other hand, it was not possible to establish an epidemiological link between the strains of the present study and the Lebanese strains, with which the strains of the present study showed a high degree of similarity, nor to identify the source of patient B colonization. In fact, the spread of C. auris in Albania is not known, nor are the sequences of the strains isolated in that country available. It also remains undefined through which routes strains of Lebanese origin may have caused the fatal case and the colonization of the patient admitted from the Albanian ICU. It is of note that Y132F in the Erg11 gene was detected in both isolates, reflecting the resistance to azoles. Y132F is commonly detected among South Asian isolates, particularly Indian, Pakistani, and Chinese, and it is considered a clade-I-specific marker of resistance against fluconazole as well as in other Candida species, such as C. parapsilosis strains, which have the same Y132F mutation in the ERG 11 gene [15,17,18].
The mutations in ERG4 may be linked to reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B in C. auris, although their impact on structural changes and gene expression has not been investigated [14].
K74E was reported in all susceptible and resistant isolates, suggesting this may represent a polymorphism not connected with resistance and may not be under selective pressure from antifungals. TAC1b is a transcription factor controlling CDR1 expression in Candida species. Mutations in TAC1b were associated with increased azole resistance [19,20]. Finally, STE6 is an a-pheromone ABC family transporter that showed antimycotic responses [21].
Antifungal susceptibility testing confirmed resistance to fluconazole and amphotericin B, as well as susceptibility to echinocandins, which are still the first choice of treatment. This demonstrates that the combination of molecular characterization and antimycotic susceptibility testing represents the best possible strategy to address the challenge of diagnosis and the treatment of both symptomatic infections and asymptomatic colonization.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our data suggest the hypothesis of a strain imported from Albania/Lebanon. It is notable that the strain has different characteristics from the Greek one collected by Rimoldi et al. since the common mutations detected are S70R on gene FCY1 and Y132F on gene ERG11 [16]. This suggests the likely different origins and dynamics of the strains. The high transmissibility, the ability of C. auris to cause outbreaks, and the high frequency of antifungal resistance among clinical isolates highlight the need for the early identification and implementation of global surveillance programs. Monitoring resistance, coordinating local and international antifungal surveillance protocols, and developing novel diagnostic tests and antifungal drugs may play a crucial role in improving the clinical outcome of ICU patients. After the first C. auris isolation, immediate and accurate environmental investigation and disinfection, in combination with timely clinical surveillance and updated HAI prevention bundles, controlled the spread of C. auris and quickly extinguished the epidemic outbreak.

Author Contributions

S.S. (Stefania Stolfa), L.R., F.C. and M.C. conceptualized, defined the aims and wrote the first draft of the article. S.S. (Stefania Stolfa), L.R. and A.M. isolated C. auris and analyzed and interpreted patient’s primary cultures and antifungal susceptibility. G.C. performed all environmental analysis and contributed to drafting the manuscript. L.D., M.S., A.S. (Annalisa Saracino), N.D.G. and S.G. were responsible for the clinical aspects of the work as the physicians responsible for the patients and the administration of antimicrobial and antifungal therapy and also contributed to the drafting and revising of the manuscript. A.S. (Anna Sallustio) and D.S. coordinated and performed genomic analysis. D.C. and N.N. collected the samples, analyzed the data, and critically discussed the results. D.L., S.S. (Savino Soldano) and S.T. conducted the epidemiological investigation and infection control interventions and analyzed and critically discussed the results and the final version of the paper. M.F. contributed to the study and the selection of disinfectants for infection control. M.C., S.T. and S.G. coordinated the study and analyzed and critically discussed the results and the final version of the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by EU funding within the NextGenerationEU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available upon reasonable request by e-mail to Maria Chironna ([email protected]).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kohlenberg, A.; Monnet, D.L.; Plachouras, D.; Candida auris survey collaborative group. Candida auris survey collaborative group includes the following national experts. Increasing number of cases and outbreaks caused by Candida auris in the EU/EEA, 2020 to 2021. Eurosurveillance 2022, 27, 2200846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Welsh, R.M.; Bentz, M.L.; Shams, A.; Houston, H.; Lyons, A.; Rose, L.J.; Litvintseva, A.P. Survival, Persistence, and Isolation of the Emerging Multidrug-Resistant Pathogenic Yeast Candida auris on a Plastic Health Care Surface. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 2996–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Candida Auris Outbreak in Healthcare Facilities in Northern Italy, 2019–2021. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/RRA-candida-auris-Feb2022.pdf (accessed on 30 May 2024).
  4. Sticchi, C.; Raso, R.; Ferrara, L.; Vecchi, E.; Ferrero, L.; Filippi, D.; Finotto, G.; Frassinelli, E.; Silvestre, C.; Zozzoli, S. Increasing Number of Cases Due to Candida auris in North Italy, July 2019–December 2022. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  5. Suphavilai, C.; Ko, K.K.K.; Lim, K.M.; Tan, M.G.; Boonsimma, P.; Chu, J.J.K.; Goh, S.S.; Rajandran, P.; Lee, L.C.; Tan, K.Y.; et al. Detection and characterisation of a sixth Candida auris clade in Singapore: A genomic and phenotypic study. Lancet Microbe 2024, 5, 100878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schoch, C.L.; Seifert, K.A.; Huhndorf, S.; Robert, V.; Spouge, J.L.; Levesque, C.A.; Chen, W.; Consortium, F.B. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6241–6246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Černáková, L.; Roudbary, M.; Brás, S.; Tafaj, S.; Rodrigues, C.F. Candida auris: A Quick Review on Identification, Current Treatments, and Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Davies, R.M.; et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 2021, 10, giab008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Treangen, T.J.; Ondov, B.D.; Koren, S.; Phillippy, A.M. The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  12. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W78–W82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. C. auris Screening: Patient Swab Collection. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/candida-auris/hcp/screening-hcp/c-auris-screening-patient-swab-collection-1.html (accessed on 30 May 2024).
  14. Ben Abid, F.; Salah, H.; Sundararaju, S.; Dalil, L.; Abdelwahab, A.H.; Salameh, S.; Ibrahim, E.B.; Almaslmani, M.A.; Tang, P.; Perez-Lopez, A.; et al. Molecular characterization of Candida auris outbreak isolates in Qatar from patients with COVID-19 reveals the emergence of isolates resistant to three classes of antifungal drugs. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2023, 29, 1083.e1–1083.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lockhart, S.R.; Etienne, K.A.; Vallabhaneni, S.; Farooqi, J.; Chowdhary, A.; Govender, N.P.; Colombo, A.L.; Calvo, B.; Cuomo, C.A.; Desjardins, C.A.; et al. Simultaneous Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris on 3 Continents Confirmed by Whole-Genome Sequencing and Epidemiological Analyses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 134–140, Erratum in Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 67, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  16. Rimoldi, S.G.; Nodari, R.; Rizzo, A.; Tamoni, A.; Longobardi, C.; Pagani, C.; Grosso, S.; Salari, F.; Galimberti, L.; Olivieri, P.; et al. First imported case of Candida auris infection in Milan, Italy: Genomic characterisation. Infection 2024, 52, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, X.F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, L.L.; Guo, L.N.; Liu, W.J.; Liu, Y.L.; Li, D.-D.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, R.-Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of in vivo-evolved Candida auris reveals multidrug-resistance mechanisms. Mycopathologia 2024, 189, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Caggiano, G.; Fioriti, S.; Morroni, G.; Apollonio, F.; Triggiano, F.; D’Achille, G.; Stefanizzi, P.; Dalfino, L.; Ronga, L.; Mosca, A.; et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream isolates: Health Care Associated Infections in a teaching Hospital in Italy. J. Infect. Public Health 2024, 17, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rybak, J.M.; Muñoz, J.F.; Barker, K.S.; Parker, J.E.; Esquivel, B.D.; Berkow, E.L.; Lockhart, S.R.; Gade, L.; Palmer, G.E.; White, T.C.; et al. Mutations in TAC1B: A Novel Genetic Determinant of Clinical Fluconazole Resistance in Candida auris. mBio 2020, 11, e00365-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Li, J.; Coste, A.T.; Liechti, M.; Bachmann, D.; Sanglard, D.; Lamoth, F. Novel ERG11 and TAC1b mutations associated with azole resistance in Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023, 65, e02663-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Yadav, A.; Singh, A.; Wang, Y.; Haren, M.H.V.; Singh, A.; de Groot, T.; Meis, J.F.; Xu, J.; Chowdhary, A. Colonisation and Transmission Dynamics of Candida auris among Chronic Respiratory Diseases Patients Hospitalised in a Chest Hospital, Delhi, India: A Comparative Analysis of Whole Genome Sequencing and Microsatellite Typing. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree (max. seq. difference 0.75) on the partial D1/D2 large subunit (LSU) rDNA sequence of C. auris was constructed using 101 sequences. Sequences BA02 (from patient A) and BA03 (from patient B) are shown in red.
Figure 1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree (max. seq. difference 0.75) on the partial D1/D2 large subunit (LSU) rDNA sequence of C. auris was constructed using 101 sequences. Sequences BA02 (from patient A) and BA03 (from patient B) are shown in red.
Microorganisms 12 01962 g001
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree (max. seq. difference 0.75) on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence of C. auris was constructed using 101 sequences. Sequences BA02 (from patient A) and BA03 (from patient B) are shown in red.
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree (max. seq. difference 0.75) on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence of C. auris was constructed using 101 sequences. Sequences BA02 (from patient A) and BA03 (from patient B) are shown in red.
Microorganisms 12 01962 g002
Figure 3. Six-clade population structure of C. auris using 139 genomes represented in the phylogenetic tree. The tree was generated by the maximum-likelihood method and annotated in iTOL. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values (only values >80 are shown). The strains of the present study are indicated in red.
Figure 3. Six-clade population structure of C. auris using 139 genomes represented in the phylogenetic tree. The tree was generated by the maximum-likelihood method and annotated in iTOL. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values (only values >80 are shown). The strains of the present study are indicated in red.
Microorganisms 12 01962 g003
Table 1. Antifungal susceptibility testing of the two C. auris isolates (upper part) and the mutations detected (lower part). * N/A: data not available.
Table 1. Antifungal susceptibility testing of the two C. auris isolates (upper part) and the mutations detected (lower part). * N/A: data not available.
MICPatient APatient BCDC’s Tentative MIC
Breakpoints
Amphotericin B2R4R ≥2
Anidulafungin0.12S0.12S≥4
Caspofungin0.12S0.12S≥2
Fluconazole128R256R≥32
Isavuconazole 0.06N/A *0.12N/AN/A
Itraconazole 0.12N/A0.25N/AN/A
Micafungin0.12S0.12S≥4
Posaconazole0.06N/A0.06N/AN/A
Voriconazole 0.5N/A0.5N/AN/A
Mutations
GeneGene IDSubstitution
CIS2B9J08_01093K74E
ERG4B9J08_00711M192I
SNQ2B9J08_03375K52N
STE6B9J08_05399K719N
ERG11B9J08_03698Y132F+
TAC1BB9J08_04780A583S
FCY1PIS48695.1S70R+
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stolfa, S.; Caggiano, G.; Ronga, L.; Dalfino, L.; Centrone, F.; Sallustio, A.; Sacco, D.; Mosca, A.; Stufano, M.; Saracino, A.; et al. First Case of Candida Auris Sepsis in Southern Italy: Antifungal Susceptibility and Genomic Characterisation of a Difficult-to-Treat Emerging Yeast. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12101962

AMA Style

Stolfa S, Caggiano G, Ronga L, Dalfino L, Centrone F, Sallustio A, Sacco D, Mosca A, Stufano M, Saracino A, et al. First Case of Candida Auris Sepsis in Southern Italy: Antifungal Susceptibility and Genomic Characterisation of a Difficult-to-Treat Emerging Yeast. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(10):1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12101962

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stolfa, Stefania, Giuseppina Caggiano, Luigi Ronga, Lidia Dalfino, Francesca Centrone, Anna Sallustio, Davide Sacco, Adriana Mosca, Monica Stufano, Annalisa Saracino, and et al. 2024. "First Case of Candida Auris Sepsis in Southern Italy: Antifungal Susceptibility and Genomic Characterisation of a Difficult-to-Treat Emerging Yeast" Microorganisms 12, no. 10: 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12101962

APA Style

Stolfa, S., Caggiano, G., Ronga, L., Dalfino, L., Centrone, F., Sallustio, A., Sacco, D., Mosca, A., Stufano, M., Saracino, A., De Gennaro, N., Casulli, D., Netti, N., Soldano, S., Faggiano, M., Loconsole, D., Tafuri, S., Grasso, S., & Chironna, M. (2024). First Case of Candida Auris Sepsis in Southern Italy: Antifungal Susceptibility and Genomic Characterisation of a Difficult-to-Treat Emerging Yeast. Microorganisms, 12(10), 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12101962

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop