Next Article in Journal
Nanopore Sequencing Allows Recovery of High-Quality Completely Closed Genomes of All Cronobacter Species from Powdered Infant Formula Overnight Enrichments
Previous Article in Journal
A Case Series Report on the Effect of Tofacitinib on Joint Inflammation and Gut Microbiota Composition in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Naive to Biologic Agents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Prevalence of Four Nematode Species (Mermithidae) in Adult Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): First Comments Since Infection/Parasitism in Fourth-Instar Larvae

by
Rafael Pérez-Pacheco
1,*,
Edward G. Platzer
2,
Carlos Granados-Echegoyen
3,*,
Sabino H. Martinez-Tomas
1,
Baldomero H. Zárate-Nicolás
1,
Beatriz Quiroz-González
1,
Henry Loeza-Concha
4,
Jorge Tucuch-Haas
5,
Alicia Fonseca-Muñoz
6 and
Fabián Arroyo-Balán
7
1
Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional (CIIDIR) Unidad Oaxaca, Santa Cruz Xoxocotlan 71230, Oaxaca, Mexico
2
University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
3
CONAHCYT-Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional (CIIDIR) Unidad Oaxaca, Santa Cruz Xoxocotlan 71230, Oaxaca, Mexico
4
Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Campeche, Champoton 24450, Campeche, Mexico
5
Instituto Nacional De Investigación Forestal, Agrícola y Pecuario, Mococha 97000, Yucatán, Mexico
6
Facultad de Sistemas Biológicos e Innovación Tecnológica, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, Oaxaca 68120, Oaxaca, Mexico
7
Centro de Estudios en Desarrollo Sustentable y Aprovechamiento de la Vida Silvestre (CEDESU), CONAHCYT-Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, San Francisco de Campeche 24079, Campeche, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2388; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122388
Submission received: 9 October 2024 / Revised: 7 November 2024 / Accepted: 13 November 2024 / Published: 21 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Public Health Microbiology)

Abstract

We examined the infective capacity of the mermithid nematodes, Romanomermis iyengari, Romanomermis culicivorax, Romanomermis wuchangensis, and Strelkovimermis spiculatus in fourth-instar mosquito larvae nearing pupation of Aedes aegypti, Aedes sierrensis, and Culex pipiens to determine their prevalence in the adults of these mosquitoes. We exposed 100 fourth-instar larvae to pre-parasitic nematodes (juvenile 2 stages) at a ratio of 10:1 (10 nematodes per mosquito larvae). Two days after the nematode applications, a sample of 20 pupae was taken and placed into transparent plastic cups with distilled water to observe the development and growth of pupae until they reached the adult phase with nematodes inside. The four species of nematodes showed the highest prevalence of infection on the Cx. pipiens mosquito, exceeding 55% parasitism, while R. wuchangensis and R. iyengari surpassed this value on Ae. sierrensis by 61.11% and 57.89%. Aedes aegypti was the least susceptible to nematodes, with parasitism values between 30% and 40%. In laboratory settings, we obtained high rates (26.32–77.78%) of parasitized adults when the three-mosquito species in fourth-instar larvae nearing pupation were exposed to infective nematodes. R. wuchangensis (1.86) and S. spiculatus (1.80) were infected Cx. pipiens with greater intensity and R. iyengari (1.33) and R. culicivorax (1.09) with less intensity. This evaluation offers valuable insights into the variability of nematode prevalence of infection and infectivity in fourth-instar larvae, which host mermithids capable of progressing through the pupal stage to adulthood.

1. Introduction

Mermithid nematodes have been identified in various mosquito species across the globe, with documented parasitism in at least 100 different species of mosquitoes [1].
There are many advantages to using mermithids for the biological control of mosquitoes, including host specificity, ease of application, and the lethality of a single nematode that successfully parasitizes an individual larva. Additionally, there is potential for recycling at long-term application sites, even in the extreme abiotic conditions found in certain tropical regions [2].
An alternative method for reducing mosquito populations is biological control, which involves the use of parasitic nematodes from the Mermithidae family. Several researchers have demonstrated the potential of Romanomermis iyengari (Welch, 1964) and Romanomermis culicivorax (Ross and Smith, 1976) (Nematoda: Mermithidae) nematodes for controlling mosquito larvae [3,4,5,6,7]. However, most studies focus on assessing the impact of nematodes on mosquito larvae during their first and second instar stages due to their susceptibility. The larvae parasitized by juvenile nematodes perish during the fourth mosquito larval stage when the adult nematode emerges to continue its biological cycle. Several studies have indicated that the third and fourth stages of mosquito larvae are less susceptible to nematode parasitism compared to the first and second instar stages [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Nonetheless, the third and fourth stages of mosquito larvae can still be parasitized, and nematode pre-parasites can continue their development into the pupal and adult stages. The emergence of Mermithidae nematodes invariably leads to the death of the mosquito, whether it is in the larval, pupal, or adult stage. This lethal effect on insects is crucial for public health due to the narrow host specificity, sparking significant interest in using mermithids for the biological control of mosquitoes.
Severe outbreaks occur because of the crucial role played by the Culex pipiens (Linnaeus, 1758) mosquito in transmitting diseases like St. Louis encephalitis and West Nile virus. Public health and prevention expenses spend millions of dollars to control these mosquitoes and manage the diseases they spread. Across different regions and outbreaks, the morbidity and mortality rates of Cx. pipiens can vary. For instance, the West Nile virus has a mortality rate of 1% in severe cases. In the United States, around 2000 cases of neuroinvasive disease were reported in 2018, with a mortality rate of 10% in severe cases [15,16]. Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) mosquito is the primary vector of viral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya. This mosquito causes between 96 and 390 million infections worldwide each year. In Mexico, dengue is one of the major diseases transmitted by Ae. aegypti, and its incidence has increased in recent decades. Between 2010 and 2015, the number of cases reported to the WHO rose from 2.2 million to 3.2 million. It is estimated that dengue poses a risk to almost half of the world’s population [17,18,19]. Aedes sierrensis (Ludlow, 1905) mosquito is less well-known and studied than other mosquitoes, but researchers have linked it to the transmission of diseases such as Sierra encephalitis virus, with no significant morbidity or mortality figures reported compared to more prominent vectors [20,21]. However, the possibility of symbiotic interactions between mosquitoes and mosquito viruses should not be ruled out [22].
The present study aims to assess the infective potential of four mosquito parasitic nematode species—R. iyengari, R. culicivorax, R. wuchangensis (BAO, 1985), and Strelkovimermis spiculatus (Poinar and Camino, 1986)—on fourth-instar larvae approaching the pupation of Ae. aegypti, Ae. sierrensis, and Cx. pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) to investigate the biological development of nematodes into the pupal and adult stages of the mosquito species in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Nematode Colony

The nematodes R. culicivorax, R. iyengari, R. wuchangensis, and S. spiculatus were reared using second instar larvae of the mosquito Culex pipiens, following the methods outlined by Petersen and Willis [23] and Pérez-Pacheco et al. [5] at the University of California, Riverside. Mosquito egg packets were placed in plastic trays measuring 47 × 35 × 12 cm, which contained 4 L of distilled water.
Pre-parasitic nematode larvae (L2 stage) were obtained from cultures that had been stored in the laboratory for six weeks. Distilled water was added to these cultures, and after 3 to 4 h, the water was decanted into an Erlenmeyer flask. The volume required for infestation was then calculated using a stereoscopic microscope and the volumetric dilution method.
L2 nematodes were applied at a ratio of 5:1 (five nematodes per mosquito larva) when the larvae reached the second instar; a 5:1 ratio was employed to maintain the nematode brood stock, which differs from the ratio utilized in the experimental process. After 3 to 6 days of exposure, the larvae reached the fourth instar, and dead larvae were observed floating on the surface of the water. These were then sieved to collect the adult nematodes emerging from the host larvae.
The emerged post-parasitic nematodes were placed in containers measuring 21 × 13.5 × 5.5 cm using curved-tip entomological needles. They were mixed with previously washed and sterilized river sand along with 50 mL of distilled water. This environment facilitated the colonization of the nematodes at the bottom of the container and promoted their mating and oviposition on the substrate. The water was subsequently decanted, and the containers were hermetically sealed to prevent desiccation of the culture. The cultures were labeled by species and planting date and stored at room temperature (27 ± 2 °C) for six weeks.

2.2. Mosquito Colony

Culex pipiens mosquitoes were bred at the University of California, Riverside. Aedes sierrensis eggs were collected using ovitraps in the Lake County Vector Control District, California. Aedes aegypti eggs were obtained from a colony maintained by Dr. Peter Atkinson in the Department of Entomology at UC Riverside. All mosquitoes were reared in the laboratory. The larvae were fed tilapia fish food (Api-tilapia-1®) until they reached the pupal stage, at which point they were transferred to containers measuring 47 cm × 35 cm × 12 cm filled with distilled water and placed in insect cages to develop into adults.
Adult mosquitoes were given ad libitum access to a 10% sugar solution. Every 12 h, a sedated rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) was provided as a blood meal for the female mosquitoes. To facilitate egg-laying, black plastic containers (30 × 20 × 6 cm) with Pellon® fabric attached to the walls were placed in the cages, allowing gravid females to lay their eggs. The collected egg-laying material, including egg rafts from the Culex mosquitoes (which typically contained 100 to 200 eggs), was dried for later use.
The breeding environment was maintained at 27 ± 2 °C, with a relative humidity of 60–70% and a 12 h light/dark photoperiod. The F1 generation of mosquitoes produced in this environment was utilized in a bioassay [24,25].

2.3. Adult Parasitism

One hundred late fourth-instar mosquito larvae were introduced into 500 mL of distilled water in polyethylene trays measuring 21 cm in length, 13.5 cm in width, and 5.5 cm in height at a parasite–host ratio of 10:1 (10 nematodes per larva) and replicated four times (n = 400). Two days after exposure to pre-parasitic nematodes, 20 larvae were randomly sampled from each replicate (n = 80) and transferred into clear plastic cups containing 150 mL of distilled water. The cups were covered with plastic plugs featuring 5 mm perforations to allow for adequate oxygen access. From this sample, we observed the daily development of mosquito larvae and removed deceased individuals for microscopic dissection to assess their parasitic status, using a Zeiss Stemi DV4, 8–32X stereo microscope (Jena, Germany). As some of the larvae matured into adults, we examined the adult mosquitoes for nematodes. The prevalence of infection (%) and the intensity of infection of four species of nematodes (the number of nematodes per adult mosquito) were determined by counting the number of parasitized mosquitoes and the number of nematodes that emerged from mosquitoes. The environmental conditions during the parasitism experiments were set to a temperature of 27 ± 2 °C, with relative humidity between 60% and 70%, and a 12 h light/dark cycle. A control group was included in which the mosquito larvae were not exposed to the nematode dosage but were subjected to the same environmental conditions.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The experiment was conducted using a completely randomized experimental design with four repetitions. Analysis of variance was employed to identify significant differences, and Tukey’s test was utilized to distinguish means at a significance level of p < 0.05. In the experiment, a sample of 20 individuals per 100 larvae was considered for each replicate because this population per replicate is not extremely heterogeneous (the 100 individuals are relatively homogeneous in terms of age, size, and health). In addition, random sampling (n = 20/replicate) ensured that each individual had the same probability of being selected, which increased the representativeness of the sample [26]. Furthermore, in populations of moderate size, such as 100 larvae per replicate, a sample of 20 individuals is usually sufficient to estimate the prevalence of a phenomenon (such as nematode infection) with an acceptable level of precision [27], as shown in previous studies [5,28].

3. Results and Discussion

Understanding whether nematodes can emerge from adult mosquitoes is essential for clarifying their life cycle. This knowledge is crucial for developing effective control and management strategies, as some nematode species may have additional life stages in adult mosquitoes that are not apparent when observing larvae alone. Overall, Cx. pipiens and Ae. sierrensis exhibited the highest levels of infection. Romanomermis wuchangensis caused the highest rates of parasitism in Cx. pipiens and Ae. sierrensis, resulting in parasitism percentages of 77.78% and 61.11%, respectively.
Similarly, R. iyengari caused parasitism percentages of 66.67% in Cx. pipiens and 57.89% in Ae. Sierrensis. The nematode S. spiculatus induced 40% parasitism in Ae. Aegypti, which was the least susceptible among the four mosquito species. High rates (26.32–77.78%) of parasitized adults were obtained in laboratory settings when the three-mosquito species in fourth-instar larvae nearing pupation were exposed to infective nematodes (Table 1).
Culex pipiens exhibited higher infection intensity when exposed to R. wuchangensis (1.86) and S. spiculatus (1.80), and lower intensity when infected by R. iyengari (1.33) and R. culicivorax (1.09). For Ae. sierrensis, the highest infection intensities were reported for R. iyengari (1.91) and S. spiculatus (1.60), and lower intensities with R. wuchangensis (1.27). R. culicivorax had an intensity of 1.14. Aedes aegypti showed lower levels of infection intensity, with no statistically significant difference observed in the infection caused by the four-nematode species (Table 2).
The mortality of adult mosquitoes that emerged from pupae parasitized during the fourth instar larvae stage was observed between the fourth and eighth day. This period marks the end of the parasitic phase of the nematodes, prompting their emergence to proceed with their life cycle. It was observed and verified that the evolution of the parasitic phase of the nematode normally occurs through the pupal and the adult phases of the mosquito, meaning when they are infested in the fourth instar. This implies that the life expectancy of the adult is drastically reduced, preventing it from becoming a vector of diseases (e.g., Ae. aegypti for Dengue Fever, Chikungunya, Zika Virus, Yellow Fever; Ae. sierrensis for Western Equine Encephalitis, California Encephalitis; and Cx. pipiens for West Nile Virus, St. Louis Encephalitis, and Japanese Encephalitis). The reason is that during this short lifespan of the pathogen, the disease cannot be incubated into the adult phase of the mosquito.
The outcome of parasitism by different nematode species in mosquito larvae is influenced by several major factors. These include the high chitin content of the mosquito larvae’s exoskeleton [29], the distinct movement patterns of the larvae of each nematode species [30], and the unique physiological characteristics of the mosquito larvae [31]. These factors are more prominent in fourth-instar mosquito larvae compared to first-instar mosquito larvae. Furthermore, late-fourth instar mosquito larvae, which are nearing the pupal stage, have reduced exposure to circulating nematodes as they progress more quickly to the pupal stage, decreasing the likelihood of parasitism. At this stage, larvae are more developed and exhibit faster movement compared to second-instar larvae, which are commonly identified as hosts of nematodes in mosquitoes. The insights from this study provide valuable information to enhance the effectiveness of using this biological control method for managing mosquitoes in natural conditions.
According to Allahverdipoura et al. [32], there is a correlation between the duration of parasite infection in fourth-instar larvae before transitioning to the pupal stage and the probability of detecting mermithids in adult mosquitoes. They also point out that exposure to early fourth-instar larvae does not result in parasitized adults. In contrast, Kurihara and Maeda [33] observed that exposure of three-day-old fourth instar larvae of Culex pipiens molestus to the nematode R. culicivorax did not produce parasitized adults. However, exposure to four-day-old fourth-instar larvae resulted in the parasitism of adults.
There is currently no recent information on the occurrence of parasitic nematodes in adult mosquitoes. This is also the first report of the nematode R. wuchangensis occurring and emerging from adult Cx. pipiens mosquitoes. However, parasitized adult mosquitoes could potentially serve as a way for mermithids to establish themselves in new host larval habitats. Mermithids need to locate an aquatic mosquito larva to complete their life cycle, as water is the only habitat for their free-living stages (Figure 1).

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the four species of mermithid nematodes (R. iyengari, R. culicivorax, R. wuchangensis, and S. spiculatus) can infect fourth instar larvae of Cx. pipiens, Ae. sierrensis, and Ae. aegypti, with some nematodes continuing their life cycle to the adult mosquito stage. The species R. wuchangensis and R. iyengari exhibited the highest prevalence levels of infection in Cx. pipiens and Ae. sierrensis, exceeding 65%. In contrast, Ae. aegypti was consistently less susceptible to infection by all evaluated nematode species.
Furthermore, in terms of infectivity, R. wuchangensis and S. spiculatus demonstrated the highest levels of infectivity in Cx. pipiens and Ae. sierrensis, surpassing the other nematode species in these two mosquito species. This evaluation provides valuable information about the variability in the infective capacity of nematodes in the fourth instar larvae stage, supporting the idea that mermithids can pass through the pupal stage to the adult stage. These results highlight the variability in susceptibility among different mosquito species to these nematodes and their potential in the implementation of biological control strategies. The high parasitism rates achieved under laboratory conditions suggest that these nematodes could serve as an effective tool for mosquito control in the field, contributing to the reduction in populations of disease vectors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.P.-P., E.G.P. and C.G.-E.; methodology, R.P.-P., E.G.P. and C.G.-E., software, S.H.M.-T., B.H.Z.-N., B.Q.-G. and J.T.-H.; validation, S.H.M.-T., B.H.Z.-N., B.Q.-G. and J.T.-H.; formal analysis, A.F.-M., H.L.-C. and F.A.-B.; investigation, A.F.-M. and F.A.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.P.-P., E.G.P., H.L.-C. and C.G.-E.; writing—review and editing, R.P.-P., E.G.P., C.G.-E., S.H.M.-T., B.H.Z.-N., B.Q.-G., J.T.-H., A.F.-M., H.L.-C. and F.A.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR-Oaxaca and UCMEXUS-CONAHCYT for funding this research work. Special thanks to Rafael Perez Martinez, a student in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University, for dedicating the time and effort required to review the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Becnel, J.J.; Johnson, M.A. Pathogenicity test on nine mosquito species and several non-target organisms with Strelkovimermis spiculatus (Nematoda: Mermithidae). J. Nematol. 1998, 30, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Kerry, B.R.; Hominick, W.M. The Biology of Nematodes. In Biological Control; Lee, D.L., Ed.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2002; pp. 483–509. [Google Scholar]
  3. Santamarina, M.A.; Pérez, P.R.; Tomas, M.S.H.; Cantón, L.E.; Flores, A.G. The Romanomermis iyengari parasite for Anopheles pseudopunctipennis supresión in natural habitats in Oaxaca State, México. Pan-Am. J. Public Health 1999, 5, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pérez, P.R.; Rodríguez, H.C.; Lara, R.J.; Montes, B.R.; Ramírez, V.G. Susceptibilidad de larvas de mosquitos Aedes aegypti y Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) al parasitismo del nematodo Romanomermis iyengari Welch. Folia Entomol. Mex. 2003, 42, 321–327. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pérez-Pacheco, R.; Rodríguez, H.C.; Lara, R.J.; Monte, B.; Ramírez, V.G.; Martínez, M.L. Parasitism of Romanomermis iyengari in larvae of three species of mosquito in the laboratory and in Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in the field. Agrociencia 2004, 38, 413–421. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pérez-Pacheco, R.; Rodríguez-Hernández, C.; Lara-Reyna, J.; Montes-Belmont, R.; Ruiz-Vega, J. Control of the mosquito Anopheles pseudopunctipennis (Diptera: Culicidae) with Romanomermis iyengari (Nematoda: Mermithidae) in Oaxaca, Mex. Biol. Control. 2005, 32, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pérez-Pacheco, R.; Platzer, E.G.; Woodward, D.; Hyman, B.C. Bioassays for comparative infectivity of mermithid nematodes (Romanomermis iyengari, Romanomermis culicivorax, and Strelkovimermis spiculatus) for culicine mosquito larvae. Biol. Control. 2015, 80, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gajanana, A.; Kazmin, S.J.; Bheema Rao, U.S.; Suguna, S.G.; Chandrahas, R.K. Studies on a nematode parasite (Romanomermis sp.: Mermithidae) of mosquito larvae isolated in pondicherry. Indian. J. Med. Res. 1978, 68, 242–247. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chandrahas, R.K.; Rajagopalan, P.K. Mosquito breeding and the natural parasitism of larvae by a fungus Coelomomyces and mermithid nematode Romanomermis in paddy Welds in Pondicherry. Indian. J. Med. Res. 1979, 69, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vladimirova, V.V.; Pridantseva, E.A.; Gafurov, A.K.; Muratova, M.E. A trial of Romanomermis iyengari and R. culicivorax mermithids as a means for controlling blood-sucking mosquitoes in the Tadznik. Medi. Parazitol. 1990, 3, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  11. Santamarina, M.A.; García, A.I.; González, B.R. Capacidad infestiva del nematodo parásito Romanomermis iyengari en larvas de mosquitos en condiciones naturales. Rev. Cubana Med. Trop. 1992, 49, 92–97. [Google Scholar]
  12. Santamarina, M.A.; Ruiz, M.G.; Rodríguez, E.A.; Bustamante, H.A.; Pérez, P.R. Effectiveness of Romanomermis culicivorax in Anopheles pseudopunctipennis and Culex quinquefasciatus in México. Misc. Zool. 1996, 19, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  13. Santamarina, M.A. Actividad parasitaria de Romanomermis iyengari Nematoda: Mermithidae en criaderos naturales de larvas de mosquitos. Misc. Zool. 1994, 17, 59–65. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pérez, P.R.; Santamarina, M.A.; Martínez, S.H.; Flores, A.G. Susceptibilidad de las larvas de Anopheles pseudopunctipennis al parasitismo del nematodo Romanomermis iyengari, estado de Oaxaca, México. Rev. Cubana Med. Trop. 1998, 50, 199–202. [Google Scholar]
  15. Retana-Salazar, A.P.; Rodríguez-Arrieta, A.; Barrientos-Segura, A. El virus de nilo occidental y sus vectores: Reseña histórica, biología y ecología de Aedes albopictus, Culex pipiens y Cx. quinquefasciatus. Rev. Costarricense Salud Pública 2017, 26, 99–141. [Google Scholar]
  16. McDonald, E.; Mathis, S.; Martin, S.W.; Staples, J.E.; Fischer, M.; Lindsey, N.P. Surveillance for West Nile Virus Disease—United States, 2009–2018. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 2021, 70, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, H.; Mehmood, K.; Chang, Y.F.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, W.; Chang, Z. Increase in cases of dengue in China, 2004–2016: A retrospective observational study. Travel Med. Infect. Di. 2020, 37, 101674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Näslund, J.; Ahlm, C.; Islam, K.; Evander, M.; Bucht, G.; Lwande, O.W. Emerging mosquito-borne viruses linked to Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: Global status and preventive strategies. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021, 21, 731–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ilic, I.; Ilic, M. Global Patterns of Trends in Incidence and Mortality of Dengue, 1990–2019: An Analysis Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study. Medicina 2024, 60, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eldridge, B.F. Biology and control of mosquitoes. In Vector-Borne Disease Section Center for Infectious Diseases; California Department of Public Health: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2008; p. 120. [Google Scholar]
  21. Thiemann, T.C.; Woodward, D.L.; Fang, Y.; Ryan, B.M.; Nelms, B.M.; Scott, J.J.; Reisen, W.K. Abundance and bloodfeeding patterns of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in an oak woodland on the eastern slope of the Northern Coast Range of California. J. Med. Entomol. 2017, 54, 1344–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Altinli, M.; Schnettler, E.; Sicard, M. Symbiotic interactions between mosquitoes and mosquito viruses. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 694020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Petersen, J.J.; Willis, O.R. Procedures for the mass rearing of a mermithid parasite of mosquitoes. Mosq. News 1972, 2, 226–230. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chaverri, L.G.; Dillenbeck, C.; Lewis, D.; Rivera, C.; Romero, L.M.; Chaves, L.F. Mosquito Species (Diptera: Culicidae) Diversity from Ovitraps in a Mesoamerican Tropical Rainforest. J. Med. Entomol. 2018, 55, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Viveros-Santos, V.; Hernández-Triana, L.M.; Ibáñez-Bernal, S.; Ortega-Morales, A.I.; Nikolova, N.I.; Pairot, P.; Torres-Estrada, J.L.; Cárdenas-Elizalde, M.R.; Hernández-Martínez, L.M.; Pérez-Vega, J.A. Integrated Approaches for the Identification of Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from the Volcanoes of Central America Physiographic Subprovince of the State of Chiapas, Mexico. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2022, 22, 120–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guest, G. Sampling and selecting participants in field research. In Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology; Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, MD, USA, 2014; Volume 2, pp. 215–250. [Google Scholar]
  27. Singh, A.S.; Masuku, M.B. Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag. 2014, 2, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  28. Abagli, A.Z.; Alavo, T.B.C.; Perez-Pacheco, R. Efficacy of the mermithid nematode, Romanomermis iyengari, for the biocontrol of Anopheles gambiae, the major malaria vector in sub-Saharan Africa. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, X.; Xu, Y.; Yin, Q.; Zhang, H.; Yin, H.; Sun, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhou, D.; Shen, B. Physiological characterization of chitin synthase A responsible for the biosynthesis of cuticle chitin in Culex pipiens pallens (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit. Vectors 2021, 14, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sanad, M.; Shamseldean, M.; Elgindi, A.; Gaugler, R. Host Penetration and Emergence Patterns of the Mosquito-Parasitic Mermithids Romanomermis iyengari and Strelkovimermis spiculatus (Nematoda: Mermithidae). J. Nematol. 2013, 45, 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  31. Valdez, M. Parasitoid-induced behavioral alterations of Aedes aegypti mosquito larvae infected with mermithid nematodes (Nematoda: Mermithidae). J. Vector Ecol. 2006, 31, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Allahverdipoura, H.H.; Talaei-Hassanlouic, R.; Karimid, J.; Wang, Y.; Rochlina, I.; Gauglera, R. Behavior manipulation of mosquitoes by a mermithid nematode. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2019, 168, 107273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kurihara, T.; Maeda, R. Observations on the development of the nematode parasite Romanomermis culicivorax in pupal and adult Culex pipiens molestus mosquitoes. Mosq. News 1980, 40, 643–645. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Culex pipiens adult mosquito with a distended, abdomen from emerging the parasitic mermithids nematode R. wuchangensis.
Figure 1. Culex pipiens adult mosquito with a distended, abdomen from emerging the parasitic mermithids nematode R. wuchangensis.
Microorganisms 12 02388 g001
Table 1. Prevalence of infection by four species of nematodes in adult mosquitoes (Cx. pipiens, Ae. Sierrensis, and Ae. Aegypti).
Table 1. Prevalence of infection by four species of nematodes in adult mosquitoes (Cx. pipiens, Ae. Sierrensis, and Ae. Aegypti).
NematodePrevalence of Infection (%)/Mosquito Speciesp-Value *
Culex pipiensAedes sierrensisAedes aegypti
R. wuchangensis77.78 A a61.11 A a30.00 A b<0.001
R. iyengari66.67 AB a57.89 A a31.58 A b0.005
R. culicivorax55.00 B a33.33 B b33.33 A b0.0217
S. spiculatus55.56 B a26.32 B b40.00 A ab0.0068
Control0.00 C c0.00 C c0.00 C c-
p-value **0.0348<0.00010.6751
* Chi-square test p-value between mosquitos. ** Chi-square test p-value between nematodes. Uppercase letters by columns denote a statistical difference between nematodes. Lowercase letters by rows denote a statistical difference between mosquitos’ species (n = 20 mosquitos/nematode species).
Table 2. Infection intensity of four species of nematodes in adult mosquitoes Cx. pipiens, Ae. sierrensis, and Ae. aegypti.
Table 2. Infection intensity of four species of nematodes in adult mosquitoes Cx. pipiens, Ae. sierrensis, and Ae. aegypti.
NematodeInfectivity/Mosquito Speciesp-Value *
Culex pipiensAedes sierrensisAedes aegypti
R. wuchangensis1.86 A a1.27 BC b1.33 A b0.0015
S. spiculatus1.80 A a1.60 AB a1.13 A b0.0012
R. iyengari1.33 B b1.91 A a1.17 A b0.0367
R. culicivorax1.09 B b1.14 C ab1.50 A a0.0008
p-value **<0.00010.00030.1251
* Chi-square test p-value between mosquitos. ** Chi-square test p-value between nematodes. Uppercase letters by columns denote a statistical difference between nematodes. Lowercase letters by rows denote a statistical difference between mosquitos’ species.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Pacheco, R.; Platzer, E.G.; Granados-Echegoyen, C.; Martinez-Tomas, S.H.; Zárate-Nicolás, B.H.; Quiroz-González, B.; Loeza-Concha, H.; Tucuch-Haas, J.; Fonseca-Muñoz, A.; Arroyo-Balán, F. Prevalence of Four Nematode Species (Mermithidae) in Adult Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): First Comments Since Infection/Parasitism in Fourth-Instar Larvae. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122388

AMA Style

Pérez-Pacheco R, Platzer EG, Granados-Echegoyen C, Martinez-Tomas SH, Zárate-Nicolás BH, Quiroz-González B, Loeza-Concha H, Tucuch-Haas J, Fonseca-Muñoz A, Arroyo-Balán F. Prevalence of Four Nematode Species (Mermithidae) in Adult Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): First Comments Since Infection/Parasitism in Fourth-Instar Larvae. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(12):2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Pacheco, Rafael, Edward G. Platzer, Carlos Granados-Echegoyen, Sabino H. Martinez-Tomas, Baldomero H. Zárate-Nicolás, Beatriz Quiroz-González, Henry Loeza-Concha, Jorge Tucuch-Haas, Alicia Fonseca-Muñoz, and Fabián Arroyo-Balán. 2024. "Prevalence of Four Nematode Species (Mermithidae) in Adult Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): First Comments Since Infection/Parasitism in Fourth-Instar Larvae" Microorganisms 12, no. 12: 2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122388

APA Style

Pérez-Pacheco, R., Platzer, E. G., Granados-Echegoyen, C., Martinez-Tomas, S. H., Zárate-Nicolás, B. H., Quiroz-González, B., Loeza-Concha, H., Tucuch-Haas, J., Fonseca-Muñoz, A., & Arroyo-Balán, F. (2024). Prevalence of Four Nematode Species (Mermithidae) in Adult Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): First Comments Since Infection/Parasitism in Fourth-Instar Larvae. Microorganisms, 12(12), 2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop