Next Article in Journal
From Investigating a Case of Cellulitis to Exploring Nosocomial Infection Control of ST1 Legionella pneumophila Using Genomic Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Artificial Restoration of Alpine Grasslands in the Qilian Mountains on Vegetation, Soil Bacteria, and Soil Fungal Community Diversity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Trichinella spiralis Infecting Wild Boars in West, Southwest, and Northwest of Romania: Evidence of an Underrated Risk

1
Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I” from Timisoara, 300645 Timisoara, Romania
2
Department of Infectious Diseases, Center for Diagnosis and Study of Parasitic Diseases, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
3
Forestry Faculty, Transilvania University Brasov, Sirul Beethoven, 500123 Brasov, Romania
4
Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
5
Department of Surgery, Emergency Discipline, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(5), 856; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050856
Submission received: 29 March 2024 / Revised: 20 April 2024 / Accepted: 23 April 2024 / Published: 25 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Parasitology)

Abstract

:
The species of the genus Trichinella are etiological agents distributed all over the world and are able to infect mammals, birds, and reptiles. Trichinella spiralis is the species most adapted to domestic and wild pigs and is also the most important etiological agent of trichinellosis. The wild boar (Sus scrofa) is a nocturnal omnivorous mammal belonging to the Suidae family. S. scrofa has a great appetite and its diet includes a variety of small prey such as mice, rats, and other rodents, as well as carcasses of larger animals. The aim of this study was the identification and the molecular characterization of Trichinella larvae isolated from the muscle tissue of S. scrofa specimens collected in different counties of Romania. The muscle samples were examined by artificial digestion and the larvae identified at the species level by multiplex PCR. T. spiralis, a species that is able to infect a considerable number of different host species including humans, was identified. In Romania, S. scrofa is an important reservoir species for T. spiralis and plays an important role in linking the domestic and the wild cycle of Trichinella, with serious repercussions for human health.

1. Introduction

The Sus scrofa is an omnivorous ungulate species largely diffused in the hunting fauna of Romania [1]. Being a species with a high adaptability to various types of habitats, the S. scrofa represents, in the big game category, the subject of greatest interest for hunting activities [2]. The analysis of data, provided by the Ministry of Environment, Water, and Forests (MEWF) [3] for the 2014–2023 period, revealed an overpopulation of S. scrofa until the year 2020. However, after 2020, the population declined due to the African swine fever (ASF) epidemic that affected Romania.
The observed population value in the 2014–2020 period was more than 2.4 times higher than the optimal population value established for this species for the natural hunting habitat of Romania. Even if in recent years, the herds assessed for this species have considerably decreased under the effect of the African swine fever epidemic, they remain at a value of more than 1.4 times higher than the optimal herd value calculated according to natural conditions of habitat, as shown by the MEWF data [3]. This overpopulation was also probably the cause of the rapid expansion of the African swine fever, which, in turn, generated the decrease in the S. scrofa herd by more than 30% in just three years (2020–2023). Sus scrofa is a species with a very high natural birth rate (186%) [2], having the ability to restore their flocks in relatively short periods of time. The number of hunted animals fluctuated from 25,750 in 2015 to 50,857 in 2020 and then 13,608 in 2023 [3]. Because of this high hunting activity, a remarkable amount of S. scrofa meat and raw material was supplied to the Romanian food industry.
Due to the anatomical, behavioral, and feeding peculiarities, as well as hunting management measures, the S. scrofa is a perfect host for the transmission of various parasitic zoonoses, particularly the nematodes belonging to the Trichinella genus [4,5]. Trichinella spiralis is the species most adapted to domestic and wild pigs, and also to rats, having a cosmopolitan distribution. This species is also the most important etiological agent of human disease [6]. The sylvatic cycle of T. spiralis involves wild carnivores which can become an important route of transmission of the infection to the domestic cycle. Residues from pigs infected with T. spiralis are the main source of infection for synanthropic animals (rats, horses, stray cats, and dogs) [7,8,9]. Trichinella spiralis was identified in S. scrofa isolates in Germany, Spain, Poland, Finland, Austria, Bulgaria, France, Hungary, and Lithuania, with this wild animal being considered a reservoir host for the established species of the genus Trichinella [10]. The epidemiology of trichinellosis caused by T. spiralis is in transition in terms of incidence and sources of infection [11]. The consumption of raw or undercooked S. scrofa meat represents the source of infection with Trichinella spp. larvae, even when they are present in low numbers [12]. The first episode of trichinellosis in humans in the 2015–2016 period was reported in Serbia as a result of the consumption of S. scrofa meat [13]. In Portugal, infections of the hunters who consumed S. scrofa meat that were not controlled by trichinoscopy and artificial digestion have been reported [14]. In Romania, infection with the Trichinella spp. is still significantly present, affecting several species of domestic and wild animals, omnivores, and carnivores, with different prevalence rates over the years and thus maintaining a close epidemiological relationship between the domestic cycle and the sylvatic outbreak of the zoonotic nematode. In S. scrofa, in Romania, the species T. spiralis and T. britovi have been identified [15,16], with a higher prevalence of the latter [17]. The present study was conducted to assess the current epidemiological situation of the Trichinella spp. infection in S. scrofa in the western regions of Romania. Therefore, this research was aimed at the identification and molecular characterization of Trichinella larvae isolated from the muscles of S. scrofa from the west, southwest, and northwest of Romania.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Diagnostic Procedures

The research was conducted in the 2021–2022 period, on a total of 20 S. scrofa specimens (14 males and 6 females). The S. scrofa were shot based on the annual harvest quota approved by the Minister of Environment, Water and Forests. The hunting action by which these S. scrofa specimens were harvested was conducted in compliance with Law 407/2006 (on hunting and wildlife protection) [18]. These animals came from different hunting funds, including six counties in Romania (Mehedinți, Caraș-Severin, Timiș, Hunedoara, Satu Mare, and Mureș) (Figure 1).

2.1.1. Artificial Digestion

About 30 g of muscle from the diaphragm of each animal was tested for the presence of the Trichinella spp. larvae by the artificial digestion method, according to the Commission Regulation (EC) no. 1375/2015 [19]. After artificial digestion, larvae were collected, counted, stored in 96% ethanol, and sent to the European Reference Laboratory for Parasites (EURLP) (Rome, Italy) for species identification by multiplex PCR [20].

2.1.2. PCR Protocol

Briefly, the DNA was purified from single larvae using a DNA IQ System kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and a Tissue and Hair Extraction kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Five primer sets, targeting specific regions (expansion segment V, ITS1 and ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA repeats, were used in multiplex PCR to obtain a species-specific electrophoretic DNA banding pattern [21,22].

3. Results

Of the 20 specimens, 6 S. scrofa from the Mehedinți, Timiș, Hunedoara, and Satu Mare counties tested positive for the presence of Trichinella spp. larvae by the artificial digestion method (Figure 2).
Six Trichinella larvae have been individually evaluated by multiplex PCR and identified as T. spiralis (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

In Europe, expanding S. scrofa populations represent a potential risk of dissemination of zoonotic nematode infections due to their high susceptibility to infection [11]. Raw or undercooked S. scrofa meat and its products are one of the most important sources of human trichinellosis worldwide. In Europe, the following four species of the genus Trichinella have been isolated from the muscle of S. scrofa: T. spiralis, T. britovi, T. pseudospiralis, and T. nativa [23,24]. Although in Eastern Europe, most outbreaks of human trichinellosis are due to the consumption of native pork [25,26], especially those raised in the traditional system, with a substantial risk of infection, nowadays, outbreaks of trichinellosis episodes are associated with the consumption of game meat, especially S. scrofa [11].
The epidemiological situation that is registered in Romania is similar to those reported in other European countries, with the species identified in S. scrofa being T. spiralis and T. britovi [16]. The present study revealed a 30% prevalence of the Trichinella spp. in S. scrofa, in counties from the west, southwest, and northwest of Romania, with the only species identified and molecularly characterized being T. spiralis. In the Balkan countries, which are considered endemic for Trichinella nematodes in both domestic and wild animals, the prevalence of these zoonotic pathogens in animals is high [27,28]. The dietary habits of consuming raw meat and meat products have led to a remarkably high prevalence of trichinellosis in people living in this European region. Santrac et al. reported the presence of T. britovi in S. scrofa in Bosnia and Herzegovina [27], and Zivojinovic et al. [28] reported a prevalence of 53% of T. spiralis and 31% of T. britovi in Serbian wildlife. Hunting in Poland is a longstanding tradition and has become an even more popular phenomenon since 1990, with over 60,000 S. scrofa specimens being hunted annually. T. spiralis and T. britovi were the species isolated from the host muscle [29,30]. A Polish study conducted in 2017 revealed, for the first time, the presence of T. nativa (a frost-resistant species) in S. scrofa. This finding was not only one of the few cases of T. nativa infection in S. scrofa worldwide, but also one of the few cases of T. nativa detected so far beyond the known range of this species [31]. In Hungary, three species of the zoonotic nematode were identified in S. scrofa, namely T. britovi (64.7%), T. spiralis (29.4%) and T. pseudospiralis (5.9%) [32]. Two years later, Tolnai et al. [33] isolated T. spiralis and T. britovi from the S. scrofa muscle and argued that the distribution of T. spiralis in Hungarian wildlife was determined by transboundary transmission of the parasite from neighboring endemic countries. The long survival of T. britovi larvae was associated with climatic conditions (average annual temperature) that ensured a slower decomposition of wild animal carcasses. In the Iberian Peninsula, T. britovi is the representative species in wildlife [14,34], but mixed infection with T. spiralis and T. britovi was reported in a S. scrofa hunted in the province Caceres (Spain) [35]. A mixed infection T. spiralis/T. pseudospiralis in S. scrofa was also reported for the first time by Nockler et al. in Germany [36]. Langner et al. identified, for the first time, T. spiralis in raccoons [37].
An epidemiological study conducted in Italy revealed a stable prevalence of T. britovi in S. scrofa meat intended for human consumption, suggesting a risk of infection for consumers, especially hunters and users of local markets. The authors recommended that veterinary health education surveillance models be promoted to improve trichinellosis control and prevention in a One Health perspective [38]. The first description in Estonia of T. psedospiralis in S. scrofa and T. spiralis in S. scrofa and lynx was made by Karssin et al. [39]. Trichinella spiralis, T. britovi, T. pseudospiralis, and a mixed T. spiralis/T. britovi infection were reported in Croatia [40]. The presence of a Trichinella infection among wildlife populations suggests a sylvatic cycle of transmission in Argentina, which can serve as a reservoir for humans and domestic animals. The identification of T. spiralis species in S. scrofa and rats, with a high prevalence in the latter, allowed authors to emphasize the need to improve the pig management process in small individual farms without adequate technology, to improve feed quality, and to upgrade veterinary services to avoid Trichinella infection [41,42]. Infections with Trichinella spp. have been reported in Vietnam [43]. The predominant species that were isolated from the S. scrofa musculature in Israel were T. spiralis and T. britovi [44], while in Chile, it was T. spiralis [45].
The review by Gherman et al. [16] refers to the research carried out over the last 30 years on the presence of Trichinella infection in over 80% of Romania’s territory (33 counties). Infections of wild animals were reported in all the studied areas, with the prevalence of Trichinella spp. in wild canids and felids being at the top of the epidemiological pyramid, followed by bears, mustelids, and S. scrofa. A picture regarding the circulation of T. spiralis and T. britovi species in Romania was also provided by Nicorescu et al., who isolated T. britovi larvae from the muscles of S. scrofa and found that they were a higher percentage (57.33%) compared to T. spiralis (23.68%). The authors indicated the presence of T. britovi throughout the country, especially in areas with high altitudes (hill, mountain), favorable areas for the presence of wild carnivores, which are a reservoir of infection for S. scrofa. In the south of Romania, T. spiralis predominates in pigs and, implicitly, in the domestic cycle, compared to the north of the country, where the situation is in favor of T. britovi [17]. The results of the present study are in line with those previously reported by Blaga et al. [15] and Borza et al. [46]. Comparing to what has been previously observed, this study identified T. spiralis as the only species isolated from muscle of S. scrofa originating from geographical areas, both with low altitudes (counties Mehedinți, Timiş and Satu-Mare), as well as medium to high altitudes (Hunedoara County). The epidemiological surveillance carried out over a period of six years validated the presence of T. spiralis and T. britovi in domestic and game animals from the northeastern part of Romania. T. spiralis is the dominant species in pigs, horses, S. scrofa, and bears and occupies the entire northeastern area of Romania, while T. britovi is associated with S. scrofa and bears in the mountainous areas [47]. S. scrofa meat is a real source of infection with larvae of Trichinella spp. even when they are found in sparse numbers [12]. Moreover, the presence of the Trichinella nematode in host canid species located in the peripheral habitats of rural localities where traditional hunting activities are frequently encountered may represent a way of transmission of this zoonosis to species of wild fauna of hunting interest (S. scrofa) and through it, to the people [16,48,49]. The prevalence of human trichinellosis was described as reaching high percentages in northwestern Romania compared to other regions of the country [50,51]. According to the authors, this could be the result of poor veterinary sanitary control of pork raised in backyards and slaughtered at home, to which culinary habits are added. In this region, hunting practices are common, and pig scraps from backyards and home-slaughtered pigs are left by hunters to attract wild animals [50,51]. Human trichinellosis continues to represent a public health problem in western Romania. Recent studies conducted in this region have shown that the vast majority of trichinellosis cases were severe and patients required hospitalization [25,26]. It should be noted that the number of reported human trichinellosis cases does not illustrate the actual prevalence of the disease. In a seroepidemiological survey conducted in western Romania, anti-Trichinella antibodies were detected in healthy blood donors, who were not previously diagnosed with trichinellosis. The demonstration of Trichinella antibodies in this group of asymptomatic individuals suggests that in this region, the exposure to the nematode and the prevalence of infection are higher than the number of reported cases [52].

5. Conclusions

In the present study, we detected and molecularly identified T. spiralis larvae in muscle tissue of S. scrofa specimens collected in six different counties of Romania. The animals originated from hunting funds belonging to areas with different geographical features such as low altitudes (Mehedinți, Timiş, and Satu-Mare counties) and medium to high altitudes (Hunedoara County) zones. The S. scrofa represents, in Romania, an important reservoir host for T. spiralis and a link between the domestic and the sylvatic cycle of this parasite, with an important impact on human health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.-M.M., T.R.O. and N.M.; methodology, G.M. and D.-C.P.; software, D.-C.P. and D.P.; validation, A.-M.M., G.M. and N.M.; investigation, D.P. and D.-C.P.; resources, D.-C.P.; data curation, A.-M.M., S.M. and N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-M.M., D.P. and N.M.; writing—review and editing, T.R.O., G.M. and S.M.; visualization, A.-M.M., T.R.O. and N.M.; supervision, S.M. and N.M.; project administration, N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Micu, I.; Cotta, V.; Bodea, M. Vânatul României; Ceres: Pucioasa, Romania, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Șelaru, N. Mistrețul; Thalia: Braila, Romania, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ordinul Ministerului Mediului, Apelor și Pădurilor nr. 2847/24.11.2022 Studii de Evaluare a Speciilor De Faună Cinegetică în România. Available online: http://www.mmediu.ro/categorie/efective/292 (accessed on 3 November 2023).
  4. Brown, V.R.; Bowen, R.A.; Bosco-Lauth, A.M. Zoonotic pathogens from feral swine that pose a significant threat to public health. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M. Wild Boar: A Reservoir of Foodborne Zoonoses. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2019, 16, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pozio, E.; Kapel, C.M.O.; Gajadhar, A.A.; Boireau, P.; Dupouy-Camet, J.; Gamble, H.R. Trichinella in pork: Current knowledge on the suitability of freezing as a public health measure. Euro Surveill. 2006, 11, E061116.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dupouy-Camet, J.; Bruschi, F. Management and diagnosis of human trichinellosis. In FAO/WHO/OIE Guidelines for the Surveillance, Management, Prevention and Control of Trichinellosis; Dupouy-Camet, J., Murrell, K.D., Eds.; World Organisation for Animal Health Press: Paris, France, 2007; pp. 37–68. [Google Scholar]
  8. Oksanen, A.; Interisano, M.; Isomursu, M.; Heikkinen, P.; Tonanzi, D.; Oivanen, L.; Pozio, E. Trichinella spiralis prevalence among wildlife of a boreal region rapidly reduced in the absence of spillover from the domestic cycle. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 262, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pozio, E.; Marucci, G. Trichinella-infected pork products: A dangerous gift. Trends Parasitol. 2003, 19, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pozio, E.; Rinaldi, L.; Marucci, G.; Musella, V.; Galati, F.; Cringoli, G.; Boireau, P.; La Rosa, G. Hosts and habitats of Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi in Europe. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Murrell, K.D. The dynamics of Trichinella spiralis epidemiology: Out to pasture? Vet Parasitol. 2016, 15, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Boros, Z.; Vallee, I.; Panait, L.C.; Gherman, C.M.; Chevillot, A.; Boireau, P.; Cozma, V. Seroprevalance of Trichinella spp. in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from Bihor county, western Romania. Helminthologia 2020, 57, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pavic, S.; Andric, A.; Sofronic-Milosavljevic, L.J.; Gnjatovic, M.; Mitic, I.; Vasilev, S.; Sparic, R.; Pavic, A. Trichinella britovi outbreak: Epidemiological, clinical, and biological features. Med. Mal. Infect. 2020, 50, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vieira-Pinto, M.; Fernandes, A.R.G.; Santos, M.H.; Marucci, G. Trichinella britovi infection in wild boar in Portugal. Zoonoses Public Health 2021, 68, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blaga, R.; Gherman, C.; Cozma, V.; Zocevic, A.; Pozio, E.; Boireau, P. Trichinella species circulating among wild and domestic animals in Romania. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 159, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gherman, C.M.; Boros, Z.; Băieș, M.H.; Cozma-Petruț, A.; Cozma, V. A review of Trichinella species infection in wild animals in Romania. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022, 27, e00178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nicorescu, I.M.; Ioniță, M.; Ciupescu, L.; Buzatu, C.V.; Tănăsuică, R.; Mitrea, I.L. New insights into the molecular epidemiology of Trichinella infection in domestic pigs, wild boars, and bears in Romania. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ordinul Ministrului Mediului, Apelor și Pădurilor nr. 1571/07.06.2022 Privind Aprobarea Cotelor de Recoltă Pentru Unele Specii de Faună de Interes Cinegetic. Available online: https://mmediu.ro/articol/ordinul-ministrului-mediului-apelor-si-padurilor-nr-1571 (accessed on 2 November 2023).
  19. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1375 of 10 August 2015 Laying Down Specific Rules on Official Controls for Trichinella in Meat (Codification). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32015R1375 (accessed on 2 November 2023).
  20. Pozio, E.; Zarlenga, D.S. International Commission on Trichinellosis: Recommendations for genotyping Trichinella muscle stage larvae. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 15, e00033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pozio, E.; La Rosa, G. Trichinella. In Molecular Detection of Foodborne Pathogens; Liu, D., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor and Francis Group: London, UK, 2010; pp. 851–863. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zarlenga, D.S.; Chute, M.B.; Martin, A.; Kapel, C.M. A multiplex PCR for unequivocal differentiation of all encapsulated and non-encapsulated genotypes of Trichinella. Int. J. Parasitol. 1999, 29, 1859–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pozio, E.; Christensson, D.; Stéen, M.; Marucci, G.; La Rosa, G.; Bröjer, C.; Mörner, T.; Uhlhorn, H.; Agren, E.; Hall, M. Trichinella pseudospiralis foci in Sweden. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 125, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pozio, E.; Kapel, C.M.O. Trichinella nativa in sylvatic wild boars. J. Helminthol. 1999, 73, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lupu, M.A.; Pavel, R.; Lazureanu, V.E.; Popovici, E.D.; Olariu, T.R. Trichinellosis in hospitalized patients from Western Romania: A retrospective study. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pavel, R.; Ursoniu, S.; Lupu, M.A.; Olariu, T.R. Trichinellosis in Hospitalized Children and Adults from Western Romania: A 11-Year Retrospective Study. Life 2023, 13, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Santrac, V.; Nedic, D.N.; Maric, J.; Nikolic, S.; Stevanovic, O.; Vasilev, S.; Cvetkovic, J.; Sofronic-Milosavljevic, L. The first report of Trichinella pseudospiralis presence in domestic swine and T. britovi in wild boar in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Acta Parasitol. 2015, 60, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zivojinovic, M.; Sofronic-Milosavljevic, L.; Cvetkovic, J.; Pozio, E.; Interisano, M.; Plavsic, B.; Radojicic, S.; Kulisic, Z. Trichinella infections in different host species of an endemic district of Serbia. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 194, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bilska-Zając, E.; Różycki, M.; Chmurzyńska, E.; Marucci, G.; Cencek, T.; Karamon, J.; Bocian, L. Trichinella species circulating in wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations in Poland. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2013, 7, 211–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moskwa, B.; Cybulska, A.; Kornacka, A.; Cabaj, W.; Bień, J. Wild boars meat as a potential source of human trichinellosis in Poland: Current data. Acta Parasitol. 2015, 60, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bilska-Zając, E.; Różycki, M.; Chmurzyńska, E.; Antolak, E.; Próchniak, M.; Grądziel-Krukowska, K.; Karamon, J.; Sroka, J.; Zdybel, J.; Cencek, T. First case of Trichinella nativa infection in wild boar in Central Europe-molecular characterization of the parasite. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 1705–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Széll, Z.; Marucci, G.; Ludovisi, A.; Gómez-Morales, M.A.; Sréter, T.; Pozio, E. Spatial distribution of Trichinella britovi, T. spiralis and T. pseudospiralis of domestic pigs and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Hungary. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 183, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tolnai, Z.; Széll, Z.; Marucci, G.; Pozio, E.; Sréter, T. Environmental determinants of the spatial distribution of Trichinella britovi and Trichinella spiralis in Hungary. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 204, 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zamora, M.J.; Alvarez, M.; Olmedo, J.; Blanco, M.C.; Pozio, E. Trichinella pseudospiralis in the Iberian peninsula. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 210, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rodríguez, E.; Olmedo, J.; Ubeira, F.M.; Blanco, C.; Gárate, T. Mixed infection, Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi, in a wild boar hunted in the Province of Cáceres (Spain). Exp. Parasitol. 2008, 119, 430–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nöckler, K.; Reckinger, S.; Pozio, E. Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella pseudospiralis mixed infection in a wild boar (Sus scrofa) of Germany. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 137, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Langner, T.; Hamedy, A.; Wellner, H.; Johne, A.; Mayer-Scholl, A.; Birka, S. First detection of Trichinella spiralis in raccoon (Procyon lotor) in Germany. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2022, 36, 100800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sgroi, G.; D’Alessio, N.; Marucci, G.; Pacifico, L.; Buono, F.; Deak, G.; Anastasio, A.; Interisano, M.; Fraulo, P.; Pesce, A.; et al. Trichinella britovi in wild boar meat from Italy, 2015–2021: A citizen science approach to surveillance. One Health 2023, 16, 100480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kärssin, A.; Hakkinen, L.; Vilem, A.; Jokelainen, P.; Lassen, B. Trichinella spp. in wild boars (Sus scrofa), brown bears (Ursus arctos), eurasian lynxes (Lynx lynx) and badgers (Meles meles) in Estonia, 2007–2014. Animals 2021, 11, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Balić, D.; Marucci, G.; Agicic, M.; Benic, M.; Krovina, Z.; Miskic, T.; Aladic, K.; Skrivanko, M. Trichinella spp. in wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations in Croatia during an eight-year study (2010–2017). One Health 2020, 11, 100172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cohen, M.; Costantino, S.N.; Calcagno, M.A.; Blanco, G.A.; Pozio, E.; Venturiello, S.M. Trichinella infection in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from a protected area of Argentina and its relationship with the presence of humans. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ribicich, M.; Gamble, H.R.; Bolpe, J.; Scialfa, E.; Krivokapich, S.; Cardillo, N.; Betti, A.; Cambiaggi Holzmann, M.L.; Pasqualetti, M.; Fariña, F.; et al. Trichinella infection in wild animals from endemic regions of Argentina. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 107, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Thi, N.V.; Nguyen, V.D.; Praet, N.; Claes, L.; Gabriël, S.; Huyen, N.T.; Dorny, P. Trichinella infection in wild boars and synanthropic rats in northwest Vietnam. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 200, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Erster, O.; Roth, A.; King, R.; Markovics, A. Molecular characterization of Trichinella species from wild animals in Israel. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 231, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hidalgo, A.; Villanueva, J.; Becerra, V.; Soriano, C.; Melo, A.; Fonseca-Salamanca, F. Trichinella spiralis infecting wild boars in Southern Chile: Evidence of an underrated risk. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019, 19, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Borza, C.; Neghină, A.M.; Dumitrașcu, V.; Tirnea, L.; Calma, C.L.; Neghină, R. Epizootiology of trichinellosis in pigs and wild boars in western Romania, 1998–2011. Vect Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 712–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Iacob, O.; Chiruta, C.; Mares, M. Trichinella spiralis and T. britovi in North-Eastern Romania: A Six-Year Retrospective Multicentric Survey. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marin, A.M.; Dărăbuș, G.; Herman, V.; Morariu, S.; Olariu, T.R.; Dărăbuș, R.G.; Sîrbu, B.; Mederle, N. Study on the prevalence and larval burden of the nematode Trichinella spp. in red foxes from hunting grounds in Timis county. Rev. Rom. Med. Vet. 2021, 31, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  49. Moraru, M.M.F.; Herman, V.; Oprescu, I.; Fodor, J.T.; Morariu, S.; Ilie, M.; Marin, A.M.; Mederle, N. Wild boar—The source of human contamination with Trichinella spp. in Romania. Rev. Rom. Med. Vet. 2022, 32, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  50. Blaga, R.; Durand, B.; Antoniu, S.; Gherman, C.; Crețu, C.M.; Cozma, V.; Boireau, P. A dramatic increase in the incidence of human trichinellosis in Romania over the past 25 years: Impact of political changes and regional food habits. Am. J. Trop Med. Hyg. 2007, 76, 983–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Neghina, R.; Neghina, A.M.; Marincu, I.; Moldovan, R.; Iacobiciu, I. Evidence of Trichinella spiralis in Timis County, Romania: A Report of a Winter Trichinellosis Outbreak in 2008 Due to Consumption of Contaminated Pork. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010, 10, 931–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pavel, R.; Ursoniu, S.; Paduraru, A.A.; Lighezan, R.; Lupu, M.A.; Olariu, T.R. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Trichinella spiralis Infection in Blood Donors from Western Romania. Medicina 2022, 58, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map showing the geographical areas where the S. scrofa carcasses were collected; red triangles show the male-positive sites and the red squares show the female-positive sites.
Figure 1. Map showing the geographical areas where the S. scrofa carcasses were collected; red triangles show the male-positive sites and the red squares show the female-positive sites.
Microorganisms 12 00856 g001
Figure 2. The larvae of Trichinella spp. isolated from S. scrofa muscle.
Figure 2. The larvae of Trichinella spp. isolated from S. scrofa muscle.
Microorganisms 12 00856 g002
Figure 3. Capillary electrophoresis run of the multiplex PCR on Trichinella larvae collected from S. scrofa; A1 to A6 larvae isolated from S. scrofa; A7 T. spiralis positive control; A8 T. britovi positive control; A9 negative control; A10 size marker.
Figure 3. Capillary electrophoresis run of the multiplex PCR on Trichinella larvae collected from S. scrofa; A1 to A6 larvae isolated from S. scrofa; A7 T. spiralis positive control; A8 T. britovi positive control; A9 negative control; A10 size marker.
Microorganisms 12 00856 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marin, A.-M.; Olariu, T.R.; Popovici, D.-C.; Marucci, G.; Morariu, S.; Popa, D.; Mederle, N. Trichinella spiralis Infecting Wild Boars in West, Southwest, and Northwest of Romania: Evidence of an Underrated Risk. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050856

AMA Style

Marin A-M, Olariu TR, Popovici D-C, Marucci G, Morariu S, Popa D, Mederle N. Trichinella spiralis Infecting Wild Boars in West, Southwest, and Northwest of Romania: Evidence of an Underrated Risk. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(5):856. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050856

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marin, Ana-Maria, Tudor Rareș Olariu, Dan-Cornel Popovici, Gianluca Marucci, Sorin Morariu, Daian Popa, and Narcisa Mederle. 2024. "Trichinella spiralis Infecting Wild Boars in West, Southwest, and Northwest of Romania: Evidence of an Underrated Risk" Microorganisms 12, no. 5: 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050856

APA Style

Marin, A. -M., Olariu, T. R., Popovici, D. -C., Marucci, G., Morariu, S., Popa, D., & Mederle, N. (2024). Trichinella spiralis Infecting Wild Boars in West, Southwest, and Northwest of Romania: Evidence of an Underrated Risk. Microorganisms, 12(5), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050856

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop