Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from American Bison (Bison bison) Showed Uncommon Virulent Gene Patterns and Antimicrobial Multi-Resistance
by
, and
Jonathan J. López-Islas
1,
Daniel Martínez-Gómez
2,
Wendy E. Ortiz-López
2,
Tania Reyes-Cruz
2,
Andrés M. López-Pérez
3,
Carlos Eslava
4 and
Estela T. Méndez-Olvera
2,* 1
Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Calzada del Hueso 1100, Villa Quietud, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04960, Mexico
2
Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Calzada del Hueso 1100, Villa Quietud, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04960, Mexico
3
Red de Biología y Conservación de Vertebrados, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Carretera Antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Xalapa 91073, Mexico
4
Unidad Periférica Investigación Básica y Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM—Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Cuidad de Mexico 06720, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(7), 1367; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071367
Submission received: 7 June 2024
/
Revised: 20 June 2024
/
Accepted: 21 June 2024
/
Published: 3 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogen Infection in Wildlife 2.0)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Wildlife plays an important role in global health, especially considering that most emerging infectious diseases originate from these animals. The emergence of these diseases involves dynamic ecological interactions among wildlife, livestock, and human populations. During this process, non-pathogenic bacteria can acquire genes that encode virulence factors or antimicrobial resistance mechanisms through horizontal gene transfer. Since wild animals can serve as sentinels for new bacterial pathogens resulting from this process, analyzing microorganisms isolated from wildlife could help describe the molecular characteristics associated with virulence evolution. Escherichia coli is a Gram-negative commensal bacterium found in the intestinal tracts of almost all vertebrate species. However, several strains can cause diverse intestinal and extraintestinal diseases in animals, including humans. The results of this study show that American bison populations can harbor atypical virulence gene profiles (virotypes) of E. coli, indicating that natural environments can be crucial sites for studying virulence evolution.
Abstract
E. coli is considered one of the most important zoonotic pathogens worldwide. Highly virulent and antimicrobial-resistant strains of E. coli have been reported in recent years, making it essential to understand their ecological origins. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of E. coli strains present in the natural population of American bison (Bison bison) in Mexico. We sampled 123 individuals and determined the presence of E. coli using standard bacteriological methods. The isolated strains were characterized using molecular techniques based on PCR. To evaluate the diversity of E. coli strains in this population, we analyzed 108 suggestive colonies from each fecal sample. From a total of 13,284 suggestive colonies, we isolated 33 E. coli strains that contained at least one virulence gene. The virotypes of these strains were highly varied, including strains with atypical patterns or combinations compared to classical pathotypes, such as the presence of escV, eae, bfpB, and ial genes in E. coli strain LMA-26-6-6, or stx2, eae, and ial genes in E. coli strain LMA-16-1-32. Genotype analysis of these strains revealed a previously undescribed phylogenetic group. Serotyping of all strains showed that serogroups O26 and O22 were the most abundant. Interestingly, strains belonging to these groups exhibited different patterns of virulence genes. Finally, the isolated E. coli strains demonstrated broad resistance to antimicrobials, including various beta-lactam antibiotics.
1. Introduction
Escherichia coli is a Gram-negative bacterium abundant in the gastrointestinal tract of many animal species, including humans. This bacterium is typically a harmless commensal member of the microbiota and lives with its host in a mutualistic relationship; however, some strains have developed the capability to cause diverse intestinal and extraintestinal diseases [1]. The pathogenicity of these E. coli strains depends on a wide range of virulence factors (VF) that confer various abilities to the pathogen, such as adhesion to epithelia, tissue invasion, iron acquisition, motility, and toxigenicity, among others. The acquisition of genes encoding these factors has led to different levels of virulence and has enhanced our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms used by E. coli strains to infect various hosts. Pathogenic E. coli strains isolated from clinical cases in humans have been classified into (1) intestinal pathotypes: enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), and diffuse adherent E. coli (DAEC); and (2) extraintestinal pathotypes: uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and E. coli associated with meningoencephalitis (MNEC) [2]. Unfortunately, the origin, genetic structure, and virulence capabilities of E. coli strains recovered from free-range bison are unknown, and many questions about the biology of pathogenic variants remain unresolved. There are many reports about the presence of E. coli O157 in carcasses [3] and retail meat [4] but not in natural habitats. In retail beef, E. coli serotypes O121, O145, and O157 were identified, suggesting a possible risk of foodborne disease. Additionally, resistance to antimicrobial drugs has been reported in E. coli strains recovered from carcasses and fecal samples of Bisons [5,6].
In E. coli, conventionally, the phylogroup and serogroup have been associated with a specific virulence gene profile (virotype); for example, typical EPEC strains are distributed in two major phylogroups, B1 and B2, which further correspond to EPEC complexes 2 and 1, respectively. The eae gene type differentiates these two groups, the first group possessing the eae β type, while the second group has the eae α type. Atypical EPEC strains belong to phylogroup E and possess the eae γ gene. EHEC strains are distributed between groups A and B1, but the highest concentration of these pathovars is found in group E strains of serotype O157 [7]. This association is not clear in wildlife since virulence-associated genes seem to be independent of phylogroup and serotype [8]. An analysis of E. coli strains recovered from animals showed the presence of virulence genes in phylogroups A, B1, B2, C, D, E, and F, with a higher proportion in phylogroups A and B1, considered commensals [9]. Likewise, antimicrobial resistance in E. coli seems to change with host and habitat switching and does not depend on phylogroup and serogroup [10].
Although some characteristics of E. coli virotypes isolated from animals have been described using the ECOR collection (a set of reference strains of E. coli); unfortunately, this collection includes strains isolated principally from domestic and zoo animals, where possible cross-contamination with human strains could occur; also, this collection does not include E. coli strains recovered from Bison [7]. Isolation and characterization of E. coli strains recovered from wildlife are essential to understanding the diversity of this genus. A few studies have investigated pathogenic E. coli in wild bison despite evidence that they are asymptomatic carriers. A study conducted on farms and ranches in the Midwestern United States showed that the mean prevalence of E. coli O157 in bison was 47.4% [11]. Likewise, a study with wild ruminants showed that these animals represent significant reservoirs of E. coli containing the virulence-associated genes stx1 or stx2 (STEC). The frequency of STECs observed in wild ungulates was 19.4% (22.3% in elk and 15.3% in deer) [12]. Additionally, E. coli strains isolated from the feces of diarrheic and non-diarrheic water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) showed diverse virulence factors such as stx1, stx2, eae, and EAST-1. The E. coli pathovars identified in diarrheic feces were ETEC, STEC, EPEC, and EHEC [13,14]. In this study, E. coli strains isolated from a population of American bison held in an ecological reserve in northwest México were analyzed to describe the antigenic, genetic, virulence, and resistance characteristics of strains present in free-ranging bison.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
This study was conducted at the ecological reserve “Rancho el Uno,” an area dedicated to the conservation of American bison (Bison bison). The ecological reserve is located within the Janos Biosphere Reserve (RBJ) in Chihuahua, México, in the northwest of Chihuahua. It is situated between meridians 108°56′49″ and 108°56′22″ West and parallels 31°11′7″ and 30°11′27″ North. The reserve covers an area of 5264 km2, with an altitude ranging from 1200 to 2700 m above sea level.
2.2. Experimental Design and Animal Management
One hundred twenty-three fecal samples from bison were collected during the Ecological Ranch’s annual medical supervision. This supervision involves transferring animals to a defined area, followed by their introduction into a squeeze chute for clinical evaluation. For fecal analysis, samples were taken directly from the rectum of the animals while they were inside the squeeze chute. Only animals older than one year were included in the study. The samples were placed in plastic containers and kept on ice until analysis in the laboratory.
2.3. Isolation and Identification of E. coli from Feces
Two grams of each of the 123 fecal samples collected were inoculated into 9 mL of buffered peptone water and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Then, 0.1 mL of the suspension was inoculated onto eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar (Oxoid, Lenexa, KS, USA) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. One hundred and eight green metallic sheen-like colonies from each sample were picked and identified using standard microbiology laboratory techniques. Isolates that tested positive for the methyl red test (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), negative for the Voges-Proskauer test (MRVP broth, Oxoid, KS, USA), negative for the Simmons citrate test (citrate agar, Oxoid, KS, USA), negative for the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) test, positive for the indole test, positive for the motility test (SIM agar, Oxoid, KS, USA), negative for the urease production test (urea agar, Oxoid, KS, USA), and produced an acid-over-acid reaction in the Triple Sugar Iron (TSI) test (TSI agar, Oxoid, KS, USA) were subcultured on EMB agar (Oxoid, KS, USA) at 37 °C for 24 h and stored at 4 °C. This study used five E. coli strains provided by Dr. Carlos A. Eslava Campos from the Federico Gómez Children’s Hospital as controls. The five reference strains were as follows: EPEC O127, (E2348/69), EHEC O157, (EOL933), ETEC O78 (H10407), EAEC O42: NM, and EIEC O143: NM.
2.4. Virulence-Associated Genes Identification by PCR in E. coli Strains
All wildlife and control strains of E. coli were inoculated into 10 mL of Luria-Bertani broth and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The biomass was recovered via centrifugation at 1200× g for 15 min at 4 °C. For DNA extraction, the CTAB-NaCl method was used. The extracted DNA was then used for the amplification of seven virulence-associated genes by PCR (eae, escV, bfpB, stx1, stx2, st, and lt). A commercial kit (PCR Master Mix 2X, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was employed for the PCR assays, following the manufacturer’s protocol. Primer sequences and PCR conditions are provided in Supplementary Table S1. PCR products were analyzed via 1.8% agarose gel electrophoresis.
2.5. E. coli Serotyping and Genotyping
Strains identified as E. coli were serotyped using agglutination assays with 96-well microtiter plates and rabbit antisera against O1 to O187 somatic (O) antigens and 53 flagellar (H) antigens. The antisera were prepared in rabbits (SERUNAM, a registered trademark in México, with number 323158/2015) using a method previously reported [15]. Phylogenetic groups were determined via PCR multiplex using the primers described in Supplementary Table S1 and under conditions detailed in a previously reported method. The designation of the phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, F, and Escherichia cryptic clade I) was established by the presence or absence of chuA, yjaA, TspE4.C2, trpA and the arpA gene (Supplementary Table S1) [16].
2.6. Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation in E. coli Strains
Susceptibility testing was performed on all E. coli strains. Conditions for the diffusion agar assays included commercial discs for antimicrobial testing (Investigación Diagnóstica, México) and Mueller Hinton agar plates (BBL). A standard 0.5 McFarland saline suspension of E. coli strains was seeded onto Mueller Hinton agar using a cotton swab. Then, a commercial disc was placed on the agar surface. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C overnight. Subsequent inhibition zones were measured with a caliper, and results were interpreted as recommended by the manufacturer. Susceptibility testing included a panel of twelve different antimicrobial drugs: cephalothin (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), netilmicin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim (25 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), carbenicillin (100 μg), and gentamicin (10 μg). A quality control strain, E. coli ATCC 25922, was used to validate the susceptibility testing procedure.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive and comparative statistics were performed using R software (ver. 4.4.1.) E. coli frequencies were established according to individual, serotype, genotype, and each virulence gene.
3. Results
3.1. Isolation and Identification of E. coli from American Bison Feces
During 2015 and 2016, a total of 123 individuals were captured and examined, resulting in the collection of 123 fecal samples. From these, 13,284 suggestive colonies of E. coli were recovered, with 108 colonies isolated from each bison stool sample. All isolates were analyzed using standard procedures for bacterial identification and molecular techniques to identify virulence-associated genes (VAGs). E. coli strains carrying VAGs (E. coli-CVAGs) were found in only eight individuals (6.54%). From these animals, thirty-three distinct E. coli-CVAGs strains with at least one virulence gene were recovered from American bison (see Table 1). The frequency of virulence-associated genes showed that stx2 was the most common per individual (6 out of 8 bison) and overall (51.5%). The frequencies of the other virulence-associated genes were 33.3% for eae, 27.2% for ial, 18.1% for stx1 and escV, and 9.09% for bfpB (see Table 1). These strains were serotyped and genotyped using standard methods.
3.2. E. coli Serotypes and Genotypes
Genotyping of the 33 E. coli-CVAGs strains indicated that all belonged to unrecognized genogroup. For these strains, PCR assays showed positive results for arpA, yjaA, and TspE4.C2, which do not correspond to any pattern described by Clermont [16].
The serotyping of the E. coli-CVAGs strains showed that eight (24.2%) belonged to the O22 pathogenic serogroup, eight (24.2%) to the O26 pathogenic serogroup, three (9.0%) to the 112ab group, one (3.0%) to the O10 group, and six (18.1%) to both the O79 and O8 serogroups, respectively. Only one E. coli-CVAGs strain could not be typed.
The results for flagellar antigens showed that eight individuals (24.24%) were positive for the H14 antigen, seven (21.0%) for H8, four (12.12%) for H11, three (9.09%) for H2, and nine (27.27%) had negative results (see Table 1).
3.3. Antimicrobial Resistance in E. coli-CVAGs Strains
In agar diffusion assays, E. coli-CVAGs strains showed resistance to almost all antimicrobial drugs. The results indicated that all strains (100%) were resistant to chloramphenicol, netilmicin, nitrofurantoin, ampicillin, amikacin, carbenicillin, gentamicin, and cephalothin. Thirty-two strains (96%) were resistant to cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin, thirty-one (87.8%) to norfloxacin, and twenty-four (72.7%) to sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim (see Table 2). Some E. coli-CVAGs strains resistant to antimicrobial drugs showed slightly different growth inhibition zones, suggesting varying growth capabilities in the presence of antimicrobial drugs.
4. Discussion
Although E. coli is an essential member of the normal intestinal microbiota, some strains represent significant pathogens of global concern. Animal sources of this bacterium are crucial in transmission, and increasing attention has been directed at wildlife reservoirs [14]. Isolation and characterization of pathogenic E. coli strains from animal hosts are essential to understand the diversity of this genus. In this research, 123 individuals were sampled to identify E. coli-CVAGs strains; the results showed that 6.54% carried this type of E. coli. A study conducted with farm-raised bison showed frequencies of EHEC O157 ranging from 17 to 83% [6], suggesting that in wild bison, the presence of E. coli-CVAGs was lower in comparison with farm-raised bison. However, the frequency of 6.54% obtained in this study is similar to that reported for EHEC O157 in domestic bovines. An investigation of cattle feces showed that out of 589 fecal samples, only 44 (7.5%) were positive for pathogenic E. coli [17]. Additionally, another study with fecal samples of sheep and goats showed a frequency of 4.7–8.6% [18]. The frequency rate observed in our study closely aligns with those reported in investigations involving domestic ruminants. This suggests that factors such as contaminated pasture might contribute to the high frequency of virulent E. coli observed in farm-raised American bison. Additionally, our data indicate that the occurrence of virulent E. coli in wild American bison is infrequent. However, this does not imply it is a minor public health concern.
The analysis of virulent genes revealed that stx2 was the most prevalent virulent gene, detected in 51.5% of individual and isolated strains. A previous study indicated that the stx2 gene was the most prevalent Shiga toxin gene in E. coli strains isolated from ungulates in Portugal [19]. Other studies in Europe have similarly reported a higher prevalence of stx2 in E. coli strains isolated from wild ungulates [20]. These findings suggest widespread dissemination of the stx2 gene in E. coli strains from wild ungulates. This is noteworthy, considering that all E. coli strains isolated in these studies belonged to different serogroups and genotypes and were recovered from natural environments. Interestingly, a study involving 150 E. coli strains isolated from bison found that stx1 and eae were the most frequent genes, with frequencies of 27.3% and 17.7%, respectively [9]. However, in that study, the animals were in contact with domestic cattle, which might explain this difference.
The genetic characterization of E. coli-CVAGs via PCR revealed different combinations for each virulent gene evaluated in this study. The virotypes identified in this study in wild Bison could be classified as STEC, EPEC, EHEC, and EIEC. An analysis of E. coli strains isolated from the feces of both diarrheic and non-diarrheic water buffalo calves also demonstrated diverse virulence factors, such as stx1, stx2, eae, and EAST-1. The E. coli pathovars identified in diarrheic feces included ETEC, STEC, EPEC, and EHEC [21]. Similarly, a previous study found that the pathotypes of E. coli strains isolated from bison calves were STEC, EPEC, ETEC, and EAEC [9]. These results confirm that wild ruminants are reservoirs of STEC strains.
A study suggests that the coexistence of specific virulence-associated genes (such as eae and escV) offers an advantage for E. coli adaptation to the bovine intestinal environment. During these evolutionary processes, the presence of bacterivorous protozoa in the bovine intestine exerts selection pressure to maintain stx and other virulence-associated genes associated with anti-predation activities [22]. In our study, the most frequent virulent gene was stx2 (51.5%), followed by eae (33.3%), ial (27.2%), stx1 (18.1%), escV (18.1%), and bfpB (9.09%). Analysis of gene combinations showed that the stx2 gene often appeared alongside eae, stx1, and ial in E. coli-CVAGs.
In the present study, E. coli-CVAGs strains exhibited various serogroups associated with virulent strains, each containing at least one virulent gene. The most frequent serogroups were O26 and O22, both with a frequency of 24%. O26 strains are among the most reported non-O157 STEC strains associated with human infections worldwide [23]. Twelve serogroups have been described in EPEC: O26, O55, O86, O111, O114, O119, O125, O126, O127, O128, O142, and O158. These serogroups include both typical and atypical EPEC strains, as well as other diarrhoeagenic E. coli categories [1]. In this study, serogroup O26 was identified in E. coli isolates recovered from American bison. Interestingly, the serotypes O26:H- and H11 (isolated in this study) represent heterogeneous stx-producing serotypes that include different clones or genetic lineages. Some authors even classify them as EHEC or STEC. In this study, serogroup O26 displayed different virotypes and tested positive for eae, escV, ial, and bfpB but not for stx. This suggests that the patterns of virulence genes in strains isolated from wildlife are different from those described in domestic animals or humans [23,24].
Similar to findings in other studies on American bison [5,6,25], E. coli-CVAG strains isolated from free-ranging bison exhibited multiple resistances to antimicrobials. A potential factor contributing to the increased multidrug resistance (MDR) levels could be the high or increasing degree of environmental anthropization. There is also considerable evidence that agricultural and waste management practices are leading to clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance dissemination through ecological pathways. Over the past several decades, wildlife has shown promise for evaluating the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance within the environment [26]. In this study, all strains were resistant to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, amikacin, carbenicillin, gentamicin, and cephalothin, suggesting possible environmental contamination. However, the distribution of other animals in the area, such as carnivores, could explain the presence of multi-resistant strains. Previous research has indicated that carnivorous animals are more frequently carriers of resistant strains than omnivorous animals [27]. Additionally, it has been reported that antibiotic-resistant strains are more commonly found in carnivores than in herbivorous animals [28]. Resistance to tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole is among the most common types of resistance observed in strains derived from wildlife [29].
Furthermore, a study demonstrated that cattle from the northeastern regions of Mexico are reservoirs of multidrug-resistant E. coli. In this study, the most common pathotype identified was EHEC (stx2- and eae-positive strains), followed by EPEC (eae- and bfp-positive strains), ETEC (lt- and st-positive strains), and EIEC (ipaH- and virF-positive strains). Among the E. coli pathotype strains recovered in this study, there was significant resistance to erythromycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, and β-lactams [30]. Additionally, another study of the antimicrobial resistance profile of E. coli strains isolated from bovine feces and carcass samples from Tamaulipas, Mexico, showed that 83.0% were resistant to ampicillin, 76.0% to cephalothin, and 69.0% to tetracyclines. Notably, the virulence-associated genes eae and bfp were not detected in any strain [13].
The detection of “unknown” phylogroup E. coli strains in this study was not an unexpected result. Despite the advantages of the quadruplex method used in this study, a small fraction of strains still needs to be assigned correctly to the appropriate phylogroup. The reasons for these failures could include the presence of extremely rare phylogroups or the occurrence of large-scale recombination events where the donor and recipient originated from different phylogroups [24]. The existence of unknown phylogroup E. coli strains uncovers the highly variable gene content driven by the frequent gain and loss of genes within wildlife strains. Studies of E. coli phylogroups in water buffalo have shown that many strains cannot be assigned to a specific phylogroup due to large-scale recombination between different phylogroups or the highly variable genome content driven by gene gain and loss [31].
The evolution of pathogen virulence in nature is a scientific question of great medical and biological importance. Using molecular techniques to detect genes encoding virulence factors aids in studying the different E. coli virotypes present in wild animals [32]. The identification of atypical combinations of virulence-associated genes in E. coli strains provides valuable insights into the evolution of new pathotypes, which may be more pathogenic and capable of causing diseases in animals. In this research, relevant characteristics of E. coli strains isolated from free-living bison are reported, providing important information on the epidemiology and attributes of this pathogenic microorganism in natural environments.
5. Conclusions
The analysis of E. coli strains isolated from wild animals is crucial for understanding the various characteristics of this pathogen. In this study, a community of American bison (Bison bison) hosted in an ecological reserve in northwest Mexico was analyzed to describe the genetic and virulent characteristics of E. coli strains present in free-range ruminants. Thirty-three E. coli-CVAGs strains were recovered from clinically healthy American bison. The results indicate that American bison carry atypical E. coli virotypes, suggesting the presence of potential pathogens in natural environments. However, more research is needed to establish the zoonotic potential of E. coli-CVAGs. Moreover, animal sources of E. coli are significant in the transmission of infections, and increasing attention has been directed towards wildlife reservoirs in recent years. However, the genetic analysis of E. coli strains isolated from wild American bison highlights the need to develop or expand classification systems, as E. coli variants isolated from wild animals exhibit different characteristics from those described in human strains.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12071367/s1, Table S1, Primer sequences and sizes of PCR products.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.M.-G.; Data curation, A.M.L.-P.; Formal analysis, D.M.-G. and T.R.-C.; Funding acquisition, E.T.M.-O.; Investigation, J.J.L.-I.; Methodology, W.E.O.-L.; Supervision, C.E.; Writing—review and editing, E.T.M.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported, in part, by Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco, CONACyT (CONACYT-becario 747804), and Fundación para el Manejo y Conservación de la Vida Silvestre A.C.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The experiment was carried out in accordance with Official Mexican Norm (NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) guidelines for environmental protection—Mexican native species of wild flora and fauna. All procedures for trapping and handling carnivores were approved by the Mexican Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMANART-Permit FAUT-0250) and by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Comité Institucional para el cuidado y uso de los animales experimentales—CICUAE FMVZUNAM) (Permit FMED/CI/JMO/004/2012).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
We are grateful to A. Vigueras, A. Rubio, and K. Moreno for helping during field sampling. We thank E. Ponce, R. Sierra (Janos Grassland Biological Station, IE-UNAM), and A. Esquer (Rancho El Uno TNC) for logistical support in the field.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Kaper, J.; Nataro, J.; Mobley, H. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Croxen, M.A.; Finlay, B.B. Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rivera-Betancourt, M.; Shackelford, S.D.; Arthur, T.M.; Westmoreland, K.E.; Bellinger, G.; Rossman, M.; Reagan, J.O.; Koohmaraie, M. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella in two geographically distant commercial beef processing plants in the United States. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Magwedere, K.; Dang, H.A.; Mills, E.W.; Cutter, C.N.; Roberts, E.L.; DeBroy, C. Incidence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains in beef, pork, chicken, deer, boar, bison, and rabbit retail meat. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2013, 25, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Sherwood, J.S.; Logue, C.M. Characterization of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli isolated from processed bison carcasses. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 2361–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodbury, M.R.; Chirino-Trejo, M. A survey of the fecal bacteria of bison (Bison bison) for potential pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility of bison-origin E. coli. Can. Vet. J. 2011, 52, 414–418. [Google Scholar]
- Escobar-Páramo, P.; Clermont, O.; Blanc-Potard, A.B.; Bui, H.; Le Bouguénec, C.; Denamur, E. A specific genetic background is required for acquisition and expression of virulence factors in Escherichia coli. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21, 1085–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagerstrom, K.M.; Hadly, E.A. The under-investigated wild side of Escherichia coli: Genetic diversity, pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance in wild animals. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2021, 288, 20210399. [Google Scholar]
- Karakaya, E.; Aydin, F.; Kayman, T.; Abay, S. Escherichia coli in different animal feces: Phylotypes and virulence genes. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 39, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geurtsen, J.; de Been, M.; Weerdenburg, E.; Zomer, A.; McNally, A.; Poolman, J. Genomics and pathotypes of the many faces of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 46, fuac031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinstein, S.; Fox, J.T.; Shi, X.; Alam, M.J.; Nagaraja, T.G. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the American bison (Bison bison). J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 2555–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gilbreath, J.J.; Shields, M.S.; Smith, R.L.; Farrell, L.D.; Sheridan, P.P.; Spiegel, K.M. Shiga toxins, and the genes encoding them, in fecal samples from native Idaho ungulates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 862–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coura, F.M.; de Diniz, S.A.; Silva, M.X.; Oliveira, C.H.S.; Mussi, J.M.S.; Oliveira, C.S.F.; Lage, A.P.; Heinemann, M.B. Virulence factors and phylotyping of Escherichia coli isolated from non-diarrheic and diarrheic water buffalo calves. Ciencia Rural 2019, 49, e20180998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinosa, L.; Gray, A.; Duffy, G.; Fanning, S.; McMahon, B.J. A scoping review on the prevalence of Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli in wild animal species. Zoonoses Public Health 2018, 65, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orskov, F.; Orskov, I. Serotyping of Escherichia coli; Bergan, T., Ed.; Academic Press Ltd.: London, UK, 1984; pp. 43–112. [Google Scholar]
- Clermont, O.; Christenson, J.; Denamour, E.; Gordon, D. The Clermont Escherichia coli phylotyping method revisited: Improvement of specificity and detection of new phylogroups. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2013, 5, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mersha, G.; Asrat, D.; Zewde, B.M.; Kyule, M. Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in faeces, skin and carcasses from sheep and goats in Ethiopia. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 50, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jajarmi, M.; Askari Badouei, M.; Imani Fooladi, A.A.; Ghanbarpour, R.; Ahmadi, A. Pathogenic potential of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains of caprine origin: Virulence genes, Shiga toxin subtypes, phylogenetic background and clonal relatedness. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dias, D.; Caetano, T.; Torres, R.T.; Fonseca, C.; Mendo, S. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in wild ungulates. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eggert, M.; Stüber, E.; Heurich, M.; Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Burgos, Y.; Beutin, L.; Märtlbauer, E. Detection and characterization of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in faeces and lymphatic tissue of free-ranging deer. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012, 141, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awad, W.S.; El-Sayed, A.A.; Mohammed, F.F.; Bakry, N.M.; Abdou, N.M.I.; Kamel, M.S. Molecular characterization of pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from diarrheic and in-contact cattle and buffalo calves. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2020, 52, 3173–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seker, E.; Kuyucuoğlu, Y.; Sareyyüpoğlu, B.; Yardimci, H. PCR detection of Shiga toxins, enterohaemolysin and intimin virulence genes of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains isolated from faeces of Anatolian water buffaloes in Turkey. Zoonoses Public Health 2010, 57, e33–e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valilis, E.; Ramsey, A.; Sidiq, S.; DuPont, H.L. Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli-A poorly appreciated enteric pathogen: Systematic review. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 76, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arimizu, Y.; Kirino, Y.; Sato, M.P.; Uno, K.; Sato, T.; Gotoh, Y.; Auvray, F.; Brugere, H.; Oswald, E.; Mainil, J.G.; et al. Large-scale genome analysis of bovine commensal Escherichia coli reveals that bovine-adapted E. coli lineages are serving as evolutionary sources of the emergence of human intestinal pathogenic strains. Genome Res. 2019, 29, 1495–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Plaza-Rodríguez, C.; Alt, K.; Grobbel, M.; Hammerl, J.A.; Irrgang, A.; Szabo, I.; Stingl, K.; Schuh, E.; Wiehle, L.; Pfefferkorn, B.; et al. Wildlife as Sentinels of Antimicrobial Resistance in Germany. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramey, A.M. Antimicrobial resistance: Wildlife as indicators of anthropogenic environmental contamination across space and through time. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, R1385–R1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osińska, M.; Nowakiewicz, A.; Zięba, P.; Gnat, S.; Łagowski, D.; Trościańczyk, A. Wildlife Carnivorous Mammals as a Specific Mirror of Environmental Contamination with Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Strains in Poland. Microb. Drug Resist. 2020, 26, 1120–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nhung, N.T.; Cuong, N.V.; Campbell, J.; Hoa, N.T.; Bryant, J.E.; Truc, V.N.; Kiet, B.T.; Jombart, T.; Trung, N.V.; Hien, V.B.; et al. High levels of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from livestock farms and synanthropic rats and shrews in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 812–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, S.; Wang, J.; Fanning, S.; McMahon, B.J. Antimicrobial resistant bacteria in wild mammals and birds: A coincidence or cause for concern. Ir. Vet. J. 2014, 67, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortiz, Y.; Cerino, B.; Moreno, M.; Yañez, E.; Heredia, N.; Dávila-Aviña, J.; Quezada, T.; Calle, A.; García, S. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli with Multidrug Resistance in Cattle from Mexico. J. Food Prot. 2024, 87, 100257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trabulsi, L.R.; Keller, R.; Gomes, T.A. Typical and Atypical Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiethoelter, A.K.; Beltrán-Alcrudo, D.; Kock, R.; Mor, S.M. Global trends in infectious diseases at the wildlife-livestock interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9662–9667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Virotypes and serotypes of E. coli-CVAGs strains *.
| Individual | E. coli Virotypes | Serotype | Strain Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| B. bison—3 | E. coli (escV+) | O26 H11 | LMA-26-2-1 |
| E. coli (escV+, eae+, ial+) | O26 H11 | LMA-26-2-3 | |
| E. coli (escV+, ial+) | O26 H11 | LMA-26-6-22 | |
| E. coli (eae+, ial+) | O26 H11 | LMA-26-6-31 | |
| E. coli (ial+) | O26 H- | LMA-26-2-5 | |
| E. coli (escV+, bfpB+) | O26 H- | LMA-26-6-3 | |
| E. coli (escV+, eae+, bfpB+, ial+) | O26 H- | LMA-26-6-6 | |
| E. coli (escV+, bfpB+, ial+) | O26 H- | LMA-26-6-11 | |
| B. bison—17 | E. coli (stx1+) | 112ab H2 | LMA-31-2-1 |
| E. coli (stx1+, stx2+) | 112ab H2 | LMA-31-2-32 | |
| E. coli (stx2+) | 112ab H2 | LMA-31-2-34 | |
| E. coli (stx2+) | O8 H14 | LMA-31-2-4 | |
| E. coli (stx1+) | O8 H14 | LMA-31-2-8 | |
| E. coli (stx1+, eae+) | O8 H14 | LMA-31-2-16 | |
| E. coli (stx1+, stx2+) | O8 H14 | LMA-31-2-30 | |
| E. coli (eae+) | O8 H14 | LMA-31-3-24 | |
| B. bison—28 | E. coli (stx2+) | O22 H8 | LMA-3-6-1 |
| E. coli (stx2+, ial+) | O22 H8 | LMA-3-6-5 | |
| B. bison—46 | E. coli (stx2+) | O79 H14 | LMA-49-1-2 |
| E. coli (stx2+, eae+) | O79 H14 | LMA-49-1-7 | |
| E. coli (stx2+) | O79 H- | LMA-49-1-9 | |
| E. coli (stx2+, eae+) | O79 H- | LMA-49-1-28 | |
| E. coli (stx1+) | O79 H- | LMA-49-1-33 | |
| B. bison—60 | E. coli (eae+) | O8 H14 | LMA-7-1-15 |
| B. bison—63 | E. coli (stx2+) | O? H21 | LMA-15-3-3 |
| B. bison—64 | E. coli (stx2+, ial+) | O22 H8 | LMA-16-1-28 |
| E. coli (stx2+, eae+, ial+) | O22 H8 | LMA-16-1-32 | |
| E. coli (stx2+) | O22 H8 | LMA-16-3-18 | |
| E. coli (stx2+) | O22 H- | LMA-16-3-33 | |
| B. bison—66 | E. coli (stx2+) | O22 H8 | LMA-14-3-1 |
| E. coli (eae+) | O22 H8 | LMA-14-3–6 | |
| E. coli (eae+) | O79 H7 | LMA-14-3-9 | |
| E. coli (stx2+) | O10 H- | LMA-14-3-12 | |
| Total strains | 33 | ||
* Only animals with E. coli strains tested positive for virulence-associated genes evaluated in this study were reported; commensal E. coli were found in all animals. “O?” indicates an unknown serogroup.
Table 2.
Antimicrobial resistance of E. coli-CVAGs strains.
| Strain Name | Antimicrobial Resistance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cfx | net | cpf | nof | cl | stx | Nf | am | ak | cb | ge | cf | |
| LMA-26-2-1 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-26-2-3 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-26-2-5 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-26-6-3 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-26-6-6 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-26-6-11 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-26-6-22 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-26-6-31 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-31-2-1 | I | R | R | I | R | S | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-31-2-4 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-31-2-8 | R | R | R | R | R | I | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-31-2-16 | R | R | R | I | R | I | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-31-2-30 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-31-2-32 | R | R | I | R | R | I | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-31-2-34 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-31-3-24 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-3-6-1 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-3-6-5 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-49-1-2 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-49-1-7 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-49-1-9 | R | R | R | R | R | I | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-49-1-28 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-49-1-33 | R | R | R | R | R | I | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-7-1-15 | R | R | R | I | R | I | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-15-3-3 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-16-1-28 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-16-1-32 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-16-3-18 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-16-3-33 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-14-3-1 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-14-3–6 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-14-3-9 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| LMA-14-3-12 | R | R | R | I | R | I | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Abbreviations: cefotaxime, cfx; netilmicin, net; ciprofloxacin, cpf; norfloxacin, nof; chloramphenicol, cl; sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, stx; nitrofurantoin, nf; ampicillin, am; amikacin, ak; carbenicillin, cb; gentamicin, ge; cephalothin, cf; resistant, R; intermediate resistance, I; susceptible, S.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
López-Islas, J.J.; Martínez-Gómez, D.; Ortiz-López, W.E.; Reyes-Cruz, T.; López-Pérez, A.M.; Eslava, C.; Méndez-Olvera, E.T. Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from American Bison (Bison bison) Showed Uncommon Virulent Gene Patterns and Antimicrobial Multi-Resistance. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1367. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071367
AMA Style
López-Islas JJ, Martínez-Gómez D, Ortiz-López WE, Reyes-Cruz T, López-Pérez AM, Eslava C, Méndez-Olvera ET. Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from American Bison (Bison bison) Showed Uncommon Virulent Gene Patterns and Antimicrobial Multi-Resistance. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7):1367. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071367
Chicago/Turabian StyleLópez-Islas, Jonathan J., Daniel Martínez-Gómez, Wendy E. Ortiz-López, Tania Reyes-Cruz, Andrés M. López-Pérez, Carlos Eslava, and Estela T. Méndez-Olvera. 2024. "Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from American Bison (Bison bison) Showed Uncommon Virulent Gene Patterns and Antimicrobial Multi-Resistance" Microorganisms 12, no. 7: 1367. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071367
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
