Next Article in Journal
Tellurite and Tellurate Reduction by the Aerobic Anoxygenic Phototroph Erythromonas ursincola, Strain KR99 Is Carried out by a Novel Membrane Associated Enzyme
Next Article in Special Issue
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy is Ineffective as an Adjuvant to Daptomycin with Rifampicin Treatment in a Murine Model of Staphylococcus aureus in Implant-Associated Osteomyelitis
Previous Article in Journal
High Prevalence of blaNDM-1, blaVIM, qacE, and qacEΔ1 Genes and Their Association with Decreased Susceptibility to Antibiotics and Common Hospital Biocides in Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii
Previous Article in Special Issue
Approaches to Dispersing Medical Biofilms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants

Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62702, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2017, 5(2), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019
Submission received: 24 February 2017 / Revised: 4 April 2017 / Accepted: 10 April 2017 / Published: 18 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Biofilms and Human Infections)

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction is prevalent among men and will continue to become more so with the aging population. Of the available treatment options, implantable prosthetic devices are typically thought of as a third line treatment even though they have the highest satisfaction rate and continually improving success rates. Infection and mechanical failure are the most common reasons for implant revision in the past. Since the development of more reliable devices, bacterial biofilms are coming to the forefront of discussion as causes of required revision. Biofilms are problematic as they are ubiquitous and exceedingly difficult to prevent or treat.
Keywords: prosthetic surgery; penile prosthesis; biofilm; infection prosthetic surgery; penile prosthesis; biofilm; infection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faller, M.; Kohler, T. The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019

AMA Style

Faller M, Kohler T. The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants. Microorganisms. 2017; 5(2):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faller, Matthew, and Tobias Kohler. 2017. "The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants" Microorganisms 5, no. 2: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019

APA Style

Faller, M., & Kohler, T. (2017). The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants. Microorganisms, 5(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop