Next Article in Journal
Transposition of Insertion Sequences was Triggered by Oxidative Stress in Radiation-Resistant Bacterium Deinococcus geothermalis
Previous Article in Journal
A Diverse Repertoire of Exopolysaccharide Biosynthesis Gene Clusters in Lactobacillus Revealed by Comparative Analysis in 106 Sequenced Genomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ecophysiology of Chloromonas hindakii sp. nov. (Chlorophyceae), Causing Orange Snow Blooms at Different Light Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 7
Issue 10
10.3390/microorganisms7100445
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diversity, Distribution, and Ecology of Fungi in the Seasonal Snow of Antarctica

by
Graciéle C.A. de Menezes
1,
Soraya S. Amorim
1,
Vívian N. Gonçalves
1,
Valéria M. Godinho
1,
Jefferson C. Simões
2,
Carlos A. Rosa
1 and
Luiz H. Rosa
1,*
1
Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
2
Centro Polar e Climático, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91201-970, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2019, 7(10), 445; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100445
Submission received: 13 September 2019 / Revised: 4 October 2019 / Accepted: 8 October 2019 / Published: 12 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ice and Snow Microbiology)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We characterized the fungal community found in the winter seasonal snow of the Antarctic Peninsula. From the samples of snow, 234 fungal isolates were obtained and could be assigned to 51 taxa of 26 genera. Eleven yeast species displayed the highest densities; among them, Phenoliferia glacialis showed a broad distribution and was detected at all sites that were sampled. Fungi known to be opportunistic in humans were subjected to antifungal minimal inhibition concentration. Debaryomyces hansenii, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium sp. 3, and Penicillium sp. 4 displayed resistance against the antifungals benomyl and fluconazole. Among them, R. mucilaginosa isolates were able to grow at 37 °C. Our results show that the winter seasonal snow of the Antarctic Peninsula contains a diverse fungal community dominated by cosmopolitan ubiquitous fungal species previously found in tropical, temperate, and polar ecosystems. The high densities of these cosmopolitan fungi suggest that they could be present in the air that arrives at the Antarctic Peninsula by air masses from outside Antarctica. Additionally, we detected environmental fungal isolates that were resistant to agricultural and clinical antifungals and able to grow at 37 °C. Further studies will be needed to characterize the virulence potential of these fungi in humans and animals.
Keywords:
Antarctica; ecology; fungi; snow

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Antarctica is composed of special ecosystems that allow for the study of the taxonomy and ecology of resident life forms under extreme conditions [1]. Among the eukaryote organisms living in Antarctica, fungi have received special attention due their ability to colonize and survive in different Antarctic habitats/substrates. Most studies on fungi in Antarctica have focused on fungi living in terrestrial and marine environments, such as lakes [2,3], soils [4,5], historic woods [6], plants [7,8], and macroalgae [9,10]. In these Antarctic habitats, fungi are represented mostly by the taxa of the phyla Ascomycota and its anamorphs, followed by Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, and Chytridiomycota [11,12].
Snow habitats are ecosystems characterized by permanently low temperatures, low nutrient composition, and high levels of ultraviolet radiation at high altitudes [13]. Snow represents an important component of the cryosphere and occupies about 35% of the Earth’s surface during the Northern Hemisphere winter [14], covering over 99% of the 13.8 million km2 of the Antarctic continent. Antarctic seasonal snow, that is the snow deposited in the last winter season, can be considered a cryptic microhabitat for microorganisms directly related to the atmosphere, the precipitation of dust, and microbial cells, as well as other organic materials suspended in the air [14].
According to Kang et al. [15], falling snow greatly contributes to the deposition of airborne contaminants via the removal of atmospheric aerosols and the absorption of gas phase vapors. Industrial and agricultural activities have a great impact on these natural habitats due the dispersion of greenhouse gases, nitrogen compounds, and other synthetic chemicals, which, when released in high amounts, are dispersed in the atmosphere and transported by winds to remote areas of the planet, including the polar regions [16]. Previous studies have already demonstrated that several pesticides and semi-volatile organic compounds circulate and accumulate in remote ecosystems across the world, including high-elevation and high-latitude habitats [17,18,19]. Kang et al. [15] detected 22 persistent organic pollutants (POPs), identified as organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), in snow in Antarctica; among them, α-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), γ-HCH, and hexachlorobenzene (HCB) were frequently found in snow at different concentration ranges. The Antarctic Peninsula is close to South America, which is known for its intense agricultural and industrial activities and which employs the use of chemicals to combat plant and animal pests and diseases. These chemicals are then transported by winds to the Antarctic atmosphere to be then deposited in the snow by precipitation [16].
Though studies on the fungi found in snow in Antarctica are scarce, the presence of cold-tolerant cosmopolitan and psychrophilic endemic fungi living at the edge of life has been demonstrated [20,21,22,23,24], which are in contact with different compounds transported by the air and deposited in the snow, including pollutants with chemical structures similar to agricultural and clinical antifungal drugs. These pollutants may work as selective antimicrobial agents on Antarctic fungi living in snow. In this context, the present study aimed to characterize the fungal diversity present in the seasonal snow of the Antarctic Peninsula islands and investigate the possible resistance of species and strains against agricultural and clinical antifungal drugs.

2. Methods

2.1. Snow Sampling, Concentration, and Fungal Isolation

Seasonal snow samples (snow deposited during the last winter season) were collected in six different regions of the Antarctic Peninsula and in the South Shetland Islands between November and December 2015 (Table S1; Figure S1). Approximately 10 kg of snow from the top, middle, and base layers (10 cm above soil) were collected in triplicate using a sterile plastic scoop, and these were stored in sterilized 20 L plastic bags (Figure S2). The samples were thawed in a microbiology laboratory on board the Brazilian polar ship Admiral Maximiano over a period of 12 h. After snow thaw, a mix of 10 L of water were obtained, and the physicochemical properties of the melted snow sample were measured using the Hanna multi-parameter probe HI 9828 (manufacture Hanna instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA). A total of 1.5 L of melted snow was filtered through a membrane with a diameter of 47 mm (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) in triplicate experiments. The membranes were inoculated on a Sabouraud agar (Acumedia Lab, Lansing, MI, USA) and on a minimal Medium (6.98 g K2HPO4; 5.44 g KH2PO4; 1.0 g (NH4)2SO4; 1.1 g MgSO4 7H2O, 0.25 g peptone, 20 g agar per L, pH 6.8 ± 0.2), containing 200 µg mL−1 of chloramphenicol (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and these membranes were incubated at 10 °C for 30 days. The fungi were purified in fresh Petri dishes containing the Sabouraud agar and deposited in the Collection of Microorganisms and Cells of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil, under the code UFMGCB in cryotubes at −80 °C and in distilled sterilized water [25] at room temperature.

2.2. Fungal Identification

The protocol for the DNA extraction of the cultivable fungi was conducted according to that procedure of Rosa et al. [1]. For the filamentous fungi, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was amplified using ITS1 and ITS4 primers [26], which were amplified as described by Rosa et al. [1]. The amplification of the β-tubulin [27] and ribosomal polymerase II genes (RPB2) [28] were utilized for fungal taxa with low intraspecific variation according to protocols established by Gonçalves et al. [29]. The yeasts were identified according to methods proposed by Kurtzman et al. [30]. Yeast molecular identities were confirmed as described by Lachance et al. [31]. The fungal sequences were analyzed with the program MEGA7 [32]. All sequences were compared with type and/or annotated fungal sequences deposited in the GenBank database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) [33]. Representative consensus sequences of the fungal taxa were deposited into the GenBank database (Table 1). To achieve species-rank identification based on ITS, β-tubulin data, and ribosomal polymerase B2, the consensus sequence was aligned with all sequences from related species retrieved from the NCBI GenBank database using BLAST [34]. The information about fungal classification generally followed the databases of dictionary Kirk et al. [35], the website MycoBank (http://www.mycobank.org) [36], and the Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org) [37].

2.3. Morphological Characterization

After sequence analysis, Penicillium species with unknown taxonomic positions were characterized according to their macroscopic properties (colony color, texture, reverse color, border type, sporulation, and the production of yellow soluble pigments). The diameters of the colonies were observed on yeast extract agar (YES, yeast extract 3 g, peptone 5 g, agar 20 g per L) and Czapek yeast extract agar (CYA, Himedia, Mumbai, India) media at 25 and 30 °C, respectively, for 14 days [38]. The resulting colors were graded according to the specifications proposed by Kornerup and Wanscher [39].

2.4. Diversity, Richness, Dominance, and Distribution

The diversity, richness, and evenness indices of (i) Fisher’s α, (ii) Margalef’s, and (iii) Simpson’s, respectively, were calculated to estimate the fungal assembles diversity in Antarctic snow. In addition, the distribution among the fungal assemblages were determinates by Sorensen (QS) and Bray-Curtis (B) indices. All indices were calculated with 95% confidence and a bootstrap of 1.000 iterations using the program PAST, version 1.90 [40]. Additionally, a Venn diagram was produced according to the work of Bardou et al. [41] to illustrate the distribution of the fungal assemblages of the seasonal snow Antarctic.

2.5. Fungal Growth Responses to Temperature

Fungi known to be opportunistic in humans were grown on a Sabouraud agar at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 37 °C on Petri dishes to determine their growth profile at different temperatures. The filamentous fungi were inoculated by transferring blocks (4 mm2) from 10-day-old pre-cultures grown at 10 °C. Microtiter plates were incubated in triplicate for 7 days. Yeast was cultured on YM for 72 h at 10 °C. Then, 10 µL of cells with a turbidity of 0.5 on the MacFarland scale (1.5 × 106 cells mL−1 at 70% transmittance) were inoculated at the center of the Petri dishes containing Sabouraud media. All plates were incubated in triplicate for 14 days to detect the presence or absence of growth.

2.6. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Antifungal Drugs Benomyl, Fluconazole, and Amphotericin B

Fungi known to be opportunistic in humans were subjected to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination for the antifungal drugs benomyl (Sigma, Steinheim, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) and fluconazole (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Isolates with an MIC ≥ 64 µg/mL for fluconazole that also exhibited growth at 37 °C were subjected to MIC determination for the antifungal drug amphotericin B (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The MIC protocol was performed using a modified version of the method used for yeast [42] and filamentous fungi [43] in a Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640) medium (INLAB, Diadema, SP, Brazil) using 96-well microtiter plates. The yeast cells and fungal spores were treated with benomyl concentrations ranging from 0.078125 to 40 µg mL−1 [44], fluconazole from 0.062 to 64 µg mL−1, and amphotericin B from 0.007 to 8 µg mL−1. Microtiter plates containing spores and yeast cells were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h for benomyl and fluconazole and at 37 °C for 48 h for amphotericin B. All MIC assays were performed in duplicate.

3. Results

3.1. Snow Fungal Community

From the different snow samples, 234 fungal isolates were obtained and identified as 51 taxa of 26 genera (Table 1). Among the yeast species identified, Bannozyma yamatoana, Cystobasidium pallidum, Glaciozyma antarctica, Leucosporidium fragarium, Leucosporidium golubevii, Phenoliferia glacialis, Phenoliferia psychrophenolica, Phaeococcomyces sp., Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Hamamotoa singularis, and Vishniacozyma victoriae displayed the highest densities (≤300 CFU L−1). In contrast, filamentous fungi taxa showed the lowest density values. Twenty-nine fungi (56.8%) occurred in low densities (≤50 CFU L−1); these represented singletons and were considered rare taxa within the seasonal snow fungal community. Twenty-two taxa showed low molecular similarities or inconclusive taxonomic definitions when compared with the sequences of known fungi deposited in the GenBank database. Among them, Bionectriaceae sp., Cystobasidium sp., Genolevuria sp., Helotiales sp., Galactomyces sp., and Hyaloscyphaceae sp. showed the lowest query coverage and identity percentages, and these may represent new species.

3.2. Diversity and Distribution

The seasonal snow fungal community showed high values of diversity (Fisher α), richness (Margalef’s), and dominance (Simpson’s) (Table 2). The highest ecological indices were found in the snow of King George Island, followed by Snow Island, Trinity Island, Deception Island, Robert Island, and the Arctowski Peninsula. In addition, the similarities between the fungal assemblages of the different snow segments of each site showed that, except for those of King George Island, Segments 2 and 3 were more similar than Segment 1 (Figure S3). Eleven yeast species displayed the highest densities; among them, Phenoliferia glacialis showed a broad distribution and was detected at all sites that were sampled (Figure S4).

3.3. Opportunistic Virulence Potential

Five isolates of R. mucilaginosa, one of P. chrysogenum, Penicillium sp. 3, and Penicillium sp. 4 showed capacity for resistance to the clinical antifungal drug fluconazole at 25 °C. Two isolates of Debaryomyces hansenii were resistant to benomyl but susceptible to fluconazole (Table 3). In addition, isolates of R. mucilagina displayed MIC values of 0.03 and 0.125 µg mL−1 against amphotericin B at 37 °C (Table 3). However, we did not detect a clear correlation between the antifungal benomyl, used in agriculture, with the cross-resistance of fungi against fluconazole and amphotericin B, used in clinical therapy.

4. Discussion

4.1. Taxonomy, Diversity, and Distribution

In the winter seasonal snow of the Antarctic Peninsula, we detected a rich fungal community. Within this community, the yeasts B. yamatoana, C. pallidum, G. antarctica, L. fragarium, L. golubevii, P. glacialis, P. psychrophenolica, R. mucilaginosa, H. singularis, and V. victoriae, all of which are known to occur in tropical, temperate, and polar environments, were found at high densities. Generally, in extreme environments, fungal assemblages are dominated by Ascomycota.
Rhodotorula includes pigmented yeast species that are found worldwide and can abundantly grow in extreme environments [45,46]. Rhodotorula mucilaginosa is ubiquitous and is present in different habitats and substrates, including cold and extreme environments [47]. In Antarctica, R. mucilaginosa is commonly isolated from terrestrial and marine substrates [48,49]. Despite the extensive snow cover of the Antarctic continent, our study represents the first report on the high density of R. muscilagionsa in snow samples of different sites in Antarctica.
Of all 51 taxa found in the Antarctic snow, only Phenoliferia glacialis (a synonym of Rhodotorula glacialis) was isolated from all sites sampled in this work and with high densities. Phenoliferia glacialis is a psychrophilic yeast that exhibits high metabolic versatility, and together with P. psychrophenolica (Rhodotorula psychrophenolica), was originally obtained from the Etendard Glacier in France and the Stubaier Glacier and cryoconite in Austria [46]. Recently, Ferreira et al. [50] isolated P. glacialis and P. psychrophenolica from the leaves of Deschampsia antarctica, mosses, and different biofilms present in the Antarctic Peninsula. Cystobasidium pallidum (Rhodotorula pallida) was obtained from different cold environments, such as the rhizosphere in Russia [51] and the seawater of the Indian Ocean [52]. In Antarctica, C. pallidum was detected in snow, rocks, and the Ross Dependency in the Antarctic Peninsula [53,54].
Vishniacozyma victoriae (a synonym of Cryptococcus victoriae) was first described in Antarctica [55] but was subsequently detected in penguin guano, soil, sediment, freshwater samples, the rhizosphere of D. antarctica [48], macroalgae [10], lichens [56], and as endophytes of D. antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis [57]. In addition, V. victoriae was detected in environments outside of Antarctica, such as soil and rhizosphere soil in Korea [58], seawater in Portugal [59], the gut of the insect Chrysoperla rufilabris in the USA [60], an industrial malting area and indoor air in Finland [61,62], in glacial ice from the Arctic [63], in a dry meat processing factory in Norway [64], and in the Italian Alps [65,66]. Garcia et al. [67] proposed that V. victoriae represents a generalist species with the ability to tolerate different stressful environments. Antony et al. [22] previously reported V. victoriae in the snow of Victoria Land, Antarctica.
The Glaciozyma antarctica species represents a re-classification of Leucosporidium antarcticum, originally described by Turchetti et al. [68]. In Antarctica, G. antarctica was previously isolated from Antarctic marine waters [69], soils around to Lake Fletcher, Lichen and Taylor Valleys, and on dead sponge [68], seawater of the Weddell Sea near Joinville Island, in the soils of South Victoria Land and Lake Fletcher [66], and in the seawater of the Northern Antarctic Peninsula [70].
Leucosporidium fragarium was obtained from the melt water river of the Frias Glacier of Mount Tronador [71,72]. Leucosporidium golubevii was isolated from the river water in the north of Portugal [73] and as endophytic fungus present in leaves of C. quitensis [57]. Bannozyma yamatoana (Bensingtonia yamatoana) was reported in Antarctica, present in soil and ornithogenic soil [48], and associated with thalli of lichen Usnea antarctica [56].
Generally, in extreme environments fungal communities are dominated by Ascomycota filamentous fungi [74]. However, our results demonstrate that the basidiomycetous yeast assemblage was the dominant form in the winter seasonal snow of Antarctica. Similar results were obtained by de García et al. [71] from yeasts isolated from glacial melt water rivers originating from glaciers in the Argentinean Patagonia. Butinar et al. [62] detected viable yeasts in the ice layers of Arctic glaciers in the Svalbard Islands (Norway), and Turchetti et al. [65] detected viable yeasts in Alpine glaciers; however, in both studies, the yeasts occurred at low densities.

4.2. Resistance against Antifungal Drugs at 37 °C

We screened fungi previously reported as potential pathogenic taxa against the antifungal compounds benomyl (used as a pesticide in agriculture), fluconazole, and amphotericin B (used in medicine), which have structures composed of aromatic rings and which are similar to some POPs and OCPs previously found in snow [15]. Debaromyces hansenii, R. mucilaginosa, Penicillium chrysogenum, and Penicillium sp. 3 and sp. 4 showed resistance against the antifungal drugs tested.
Debaryomyces hansenii is considered a cosmopolitan yeast species that is able to occupy and colonize different ecological niches and ecosystems. In Antarctica, D. hansenni was previously recovered from the rhizosphere of D. antarctica and soil [48], as well as the soil and thalli of lichens [75], macroalgae [76], freshwater, and marine water [77]. However, D. hansenii (also reported as Candida famata, its anamorph) has been previously found to cause opportunistic human infections [78,79,80]. Moreover, there have been reports of higher MIC values of fluconazole for D. hansenii than for pathogenic yeasts species [81]. Though several isolates found in the snow show susceptibility to fluconazole and are unable to grow at 37 °C, D. hansenii is able to synthesize or tolerate several toxins and has been reported to show resistance against several environmental pesticides, among them benomyl [81]. Similarly, we found isolates of D. hansenii that were resistant to benomyl.
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa has recently emerged as an opportunistic fungal pathogen. Rhodotorula mucilaginosa is able to cause outbreaks of skin infections in chickens and lung infections in sheep [82,83], and it is able to worsen the condition of immunosuppressed patients [84]. Here, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa present in snow in Antarctica was found to be resistant to fluconazole and susceptible to amphotericin B. Similar results were reported by Spiliopoulou et al. [85], who found that opportunistic Rhodotorula species was resistant to fluconazole but susceptible to echinocandins and amphotericin B. Generally, opportunistic R. mucilaginosa has been reported to be able grow at 30 °C but not at 37 °C. However, R. mucilaginosa isolates found in the snow in Antarctica were resistant to fluconazole and able to grow at 37 °C.
Penicillium chrysogenum was previously reported as an opportunistic fungus in immunocompromised patients, resulting in otomycoses, endophthalmitis, keratitis, endocarditis, cutaneous infections, and systemic infection [86]; it was also able to cause bloodstream infection in immunocompromised patients [87] and cerebral disease in healthy individuals [88]. Penicillium taxa recovered from the ornithogenic soil samples and rocks of from continental and Antarctic Peninsula [89,90,91] displayed different pathogenic potential to human in vitro.
Kang et al. [15] detected organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) at different concentrations in the snow of East Antarctica and suggested that the air masses that arrive at the sampling sites mainly originate from the Indian and Atlantic Oceans which travel over the Antarctic continent, suggesting that the OCPs were subjected to long-range atmospheric transport and were deposited in surface snow. In recent years, several studies have focused on fungal cross-resistance between agricultural pesticides and clinical antifungal drugs [92,93,94]. Opportunistic fungi are also ubiquitous in the environment and can come into contact with pesticides and antifungal agents used in crops [94]. Since OCPs have chemical structures that are similar to those of antifungal azoles, their presence in the snow in Antarctica may explain the detection of D. hansenii, R. mucilacinosa, and P. chrysogenum resistant to agricultural and clinical antifungal drugs.

5. Conclusions

Our results show that the winter seasonal snow in the Antarctic Peninsula contains a diverse fungal community dominated by cosmopolitan ubiquitous basidiomycetous yeasts species previously found in tropical, temperate, and polar ecosystems. These species were found to display specific adaptations for their successful survival and colonization in the Antarctic snow microhabitat. The high densities of these cosmopolitan fungi suggest that they may be present in the air masses arriving at the Antarctic Peninsula from outside Antarctica, and these air masses are then pushed down by snow precipitation and compacted at high concentrations in the snow each year. Additionally, we detected environmental fungal isolates resistant to agricultural and clinical antifungals, some of which were able to grow at 37 °C. Further studies will be needed to characterize the innate virulence potential of these fungi against humans and animals.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/7/10/445/s1.

Author Contributions

G.C.A.d.M. and L.H.R. designer the project, fieldwork, fungal identification, and manuscript preparation. V.N.G., V.M.G. were involved with the fieldwork. S.S.A. assisted in MIC assays. J.C.S. and C.A.R. wrote and reviewed the manuscript. This manuscript contains part of the results from thesis the G.C.A.d.M. under the supervision L.H.R. of and co-supervision of C.A.R.

Funding

The financial support from PROANTAR CNPq (442258/2018-6), INCT Criosfera, FAPEMIG, CAPES (88887.136384/2017-00 and 88887.314457/2019-00), FNDCT, and PRPq-UFMG. GCA de Menezes scholarship was supported by CNPq (142341/2018-5) and FAPEMIG (418).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rosa, L.H.; Vaz, A.B.M.; Caligiorne, R.B. Endophytic fungi associated with the Antarctic Grass Deschampsia Antarct. Desv. (Poaceae). Polar Biol. 2009, 32, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ellis-Evans, J.C. Fungi from maritime Antarctic freshwater environments. Br. Antarct. Surv. Bull. 1985, 68, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tsuji, M.; Fujiu, S.; Xiao, N.; Hanada, Y.; Kudoh, S.; Kondo, H.; Tsuda, S.; Hoshino, T. Cold adaptation of fungi obtained from soil and lake sediment in the Skarvsnes ice-free area, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 346, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Fell, J.W.; Scorzetti, G.; Connell, L.; Craig, S. Biodiversity of micro-eukaryotes in Antarctic dry valley soils with <5% soil moisture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 3107–3119. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gomes, E.C.Q.; Godinho, V.M.; Silva, D.A.S.; De Paula, M.T.R.; Vitoreli, G.A.; Zani, C.L.; Alves, T.M.A.; Junior, P.A.S.; Murta, S.M.F.; Barbosa, E.C.; et al. Cultivable fungi present in Antarctic soils: taxonomy, phylogeny, diversity, and bioprospecting of antiparasitic and herbicidal metabolites. Extremophiles 2018, 22, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arenz, B.E.; Held, B.W.; Jurgens, J.A.; Farrell, R.L.; Blanchette, R.A. Fungal diversity in soils and historic wood from the Ross Sea Region of Antarctica. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 3057–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bradner, J.R.; Sidhu, R.K.; Yee, B.; Skotnicki, M.L.; Selkirk, P.M.; Nevalainen, K.M.H. A new microfungal isolate, Embellisia sp., associated with the Antarctic moss Bryum argenteum. Polar Biol. 2000, 23, 730–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, N.; Park, S.-Y.; Kim, J.; Park, C.-H.; Jeong, M.-H.; Oh, S.-O.; Hong, S.; Talavera, M.; Divakar, P.; Hur, J.-S. Endophytic and endolichenic fungal diversity in maritime Antarctica based on cultured material and their evolutionary position among Dikarya. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2018, 2, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Loque, C.P.; Medeiros, A.O.; Pellizzari, F.M.; Oliveira, E.C.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Fungal community associated with marine macroalgae from Antarctica. Polar Biol. 2010, 33, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Furbino, L.E.; Pellizzari, F.M.; Neto, P.C.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Isolation of fungi associated with macroalgae from maritime Antarctica and their production of agarolytic and carrageenolytic activities. Polar Biol. 2018, 41, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bridge, P.D.; Spooner, B.M. Non-lichenized Antarctic fungi: Transient visitors or members of a cryptic ecosystem? Fungal Ecol. 2012, 5, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rosa, L.H.; Zani, C.L.; Cantrell, C.L.; Duke, S.O.; Dijck, P.V.; Desideri, A.; Rosa, C.A. Fungi in Antarctica: Diversity, ecology, effects of climate change, and bioprospection for bioactive compounds. In Fungi of Antarctica, 1st ed.; Rosa, L.H., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  13. Miteva, V. Bacteria in snow and glacier ice. In Psychrophiles: From Biodiversity to Biotechnology, 1st ed.; Margesin, R., Schinner, F., Marx, J.-C., Gerday, C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 31–50. [Google Scholar]
  14. Margesin, R.; Miteva, V. Diversity and ecology of psychrophilic microorganisms. Res. Microbiol. 2011, 162, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kang, J.H.; Son, M.H.; Hur, S.D.; Hong, S.; Motoyama, H.; Fukui, K.; Chang, Y.S. Deposition of organochlorine pesticides into the surface snow of East Antarctica. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 433, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Segawa, T.; Takeuchi, N.; Rivera, A.; Yamada, A.; Uoshimura, Y.; Barcaza, G.; Shinbori, K.; Motoyama, H.; Kohshima, S.; Ushida, K. Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in glacier environments. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2013, 5, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Halsall, C.J. Investigating the occurrence of persistent organicpollutants (POPs) in the Arctic: Their atmospheric behaviourand interaction with the seasonal snow pack. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 128, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Daly, G.L.; Wania, F. Organic contaminants in mountains. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Muir, D.C.G.; Shearer, R.G.; Van Oostdam, J.; Donaldson, S.G.; Furgal, C. Contaminants in Canadian Arctic biota andimplications for human health: Conclusions and knowledgegaps. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 351, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thomas-Hall, S.R.; Watson, K. Cryptococcus nyarrowii sp. nov., a basidiomycetous yeast from Antarctica. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar]
  21. Thomas-Hall, S.R.; Turchetti, B.; Buzzini, P.; Branda, E.; Boekhout, T.; Theelen, B.; Watson, K. Cold-adapted yeasts from Antarctica and the Italian Alps-description of three novel species: Mrakia robertii sp. nov., Mrakia blollopis sp. nov. and Mrakiella niccombsii sp. nov. Extremophiles 2010, 14, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Antony, R.; Sanyal, A.; Kapse, N.; Dhakephalkar, P.K.; Thamban, M.; Nair, S. Microbial communities associated with Antarctic snow pack and their biogeochemical implications. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Menezes, G.C.A.; Godinho, V.M.; Porto, B.A.; Gonçalves, V.N.; Rosa, L.H. Antarctomyces pellizariae sp. nov., a new, endemic, blue, snow resident psychrophilic ascomycete fungus from Antarctica. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. De Menezes, G.C.A.; Porto, B.A.; Simões, J.C. Fungi in snow and glacial ice of Antarctica. In Fungi of Antarctica, 1st ed.; Rosa, L.H., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  25. Castellani, A. Maintenance and cultivation of common pathogenic fungi in distilled water. J. Trop. Med. Hygien. 1967, 42, 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  26. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.J.W.T.; Taylor, J.L. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  27. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Gonçalves, V.N.; Cantrell, C.L.; Wedge, D.E.; Ferreira, M.C.; Soares, M.A.; Jacob, M.R.; Oliveira, F.S.; Galante, D.; Rodrigues, F.; Alves, T.M.A.; et al. Fungi associated with rocks of the Atacama Desert: taxonomy, distribution, diversity, ecology and bioprospection for bioactive compounds. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 18, 232–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kurtzman, C.; Fell, J.W.; Boekhout, T. The Yeasts: A taxonomic study, 5th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; p. 2354. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lachance, M.A.; Bowles, J.M.; Starmer, W.T.; Barker, J.S.F. Kodamaea kakaduensis and Candida tolerans, two new yeast species from Australian Hibiscus flowers. Can. J. Microbiol. 1999, 45, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kirk, P.M.; Cannon, P.F.; Minter, D.W.; Stalpers, J.A. Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2008; p. 784. [Google Scholar]
  35. Crous, P.W.; Gams, W.; Stalpers, J.A.; Robert, V.; Stegehuis, G. MycoBank: An online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Stud. Mycol. 2004, 50, 19–22. Available online: http://www.mycobank.org (accessed on 15 July 2019).
  36. Index Fungorum Partnership. Checklist Dataset. Available online: http://www.indexfungorum.org (accessed on 2 August 2019).
  37. Houbraken, J.; Frisvad, J.; Seifert, K.; Overy, D.; Tuthill, D.; Valdez, J.; Samson, R. New penicillin-producing Penicillium species and an overview of section Chrysogena. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2012, 29, 78–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kornerup, A.; Wanscher, J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour, 3rd ed.; Eyre Methuen: London, UK, 1984; p. 252. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Paleontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bardou, P.; Mariette, J.; Escudié, F.; Djemiel, C.; Klopp, C. Jvenn: An interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinform. 2014, 15, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wayne, P.A. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 4th ed.; CLSI document M27-A3; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2008; p. 43. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wayne, P.A. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi; approved standard CLSI document M38-A2; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2008; p. 53. [Google Scholar]
  43. Truong, M.; Monahan, L.G.; Carter, D.A.; Charles, I.G. Repurposing drugs to fast-track therapeutic agents for the treatment of cryptococcosis. Peer J. 2018, 6, e4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sampaio, J.P. Diversity, phylogeny and classification of basidiomycetous yeasts. In Frontriers in Basidiomycete Mycology, 1st ed.; Agerer, R., Blanz, P., Piepenbring, M., Eds.; IHW-Verlag: Eching, Germany, 2004; pp. 49–80. [Google Scholar]
  45. Margesin, R.; Fonteyne, P.A.; Schinner, F.; Sampaio, J.P. Rhodotorula psychrophila sp. nov., Rhodotorula psychrophenolica sp. nov. and Rhodotorula glacialis sp. nov., novel psychrophilic basidiomycetous yeast species isolated from alpine environments. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 2179–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sampaio, J.P. Rhodotorula Harrison (1928). In The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 5th ed.; Kurtzman, C.P., Fell, J.W., Boekhout, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 1873–1927. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vaz, A.B.M.; Rosa, L.H.; Vieira, M.L.A.; Garcia, V.D.; Brandão, L.R.; Teixeira, L.C.; Moliné, M.; Libkind, D.; Van Broock, M.; Rosa, C.A.; et al. The diversity, extracellular enzymatic activities and photoprotective compounds of yeasts isolated in Antarctica. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011, 42, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Godinho, V.M.; Furbino, L.E.; Santiago, I.F.; Pellizzari, F.M.; Yokoya, N.S.; Pupo, D.; de Almeida Alves, T.M.; Junior, P.A.S.; Romanha, A.J.; Zani, C.L.; et al. Diversity and bioprospecting of fungal communities associated with endemic and cold-adapted macroalgae in Antarctica. ISME J. 2013, 7, 1434–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ferreira, E.M.S.; de Sousa, F.M.P.; Rosa, L.H.; Pimenta, R.S. Taxonomy and richness of yeasts associated with angiosperms, bryophytes, and meltwater biofilms collected in the Antarctic Peninsula. Extremophiles 2019, 23, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bab’eva, I.P.; Belianin, A.I. Yeast in the rhizosphere. Mikrobiologiia 1966, 35, 712–720. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fell, J.W. Distribution of yeasts in the Indian Ocean. Bull. Mar. Sci. 1967, 17, 454–470. [Google Scholar]
  52. Di Menna, M.E. Yeasts in Antarctic soils. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1966, 32, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rovati, J.I.; Pajot, H.F.; Ruberto, L.; Mac Cormack, W.; Figueroa, L.I. Polyphenolic substrates and dyes degradation by yeasts from 25 de Mayo/King George Island (Antarctica). Yeast 2013, 30, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vishniac, H.S. Yeast biodiversity in the Antarctic. In Biodiversity and Ecophysiology of Yeasts, 1st ed.; Rosa, C.A., Péter, G., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 419–440. [Google Scholar]
  55. Santiago, I.F.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Lichensphere: A protected natural microhabitat of the non-lichenised fungal communities living in extreme environments of Antarctica. Extremophiles 2015, 19, 1087–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Santiago, I.F.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Endophytic symbiont yeasts associated with the Antarctic angiosperms Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis. Polar Biol. 2017, 40, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hong, S.G.; Lee, K.H.; Bae, K.S. Diversity of yeasts associated with natural environments in Korea. J. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gadanho, M.; Almeida, J.M.F.; Sampaio, J.P. Assessment of yeast diversity in a marine environment in the south of Portugal by microsatellite-primed PCR. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2003, 84, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Woolfolk, S.W.; Inglis, G. Microorganisms associated with field-collected Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) adults with emphasis on yeast symbionts. Biol. Control. 2004, 29, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Laitila, A.; Wilhelmson, A.; Kotaviita, E.; Olkku, J.; Home, S.; Juvonen, R. Yeasts in an industrial malting ecosystem. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 33, 953–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pitkäranta, M.; Meklin, T.; Hyvärinen, M. Analysis of fungal flora in indoor dust by ribosomal DNA sequences analysis, quantitative PCR, and culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Butinar, L.; Spencer-Martins, I.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Yeasts in high Arctic glaciers: The discovery of a new habitat for eukaryotic microorganisms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2007, 91, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Asefa, D.T.; Gjerde, R.O.; Sidhu, M.S.; Langsrud, S.; Kure, C.F.; Nesbakken, T.; Skaar, I. Moulds contaminants on Norwegian dry-cured meat products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 128, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Turchetti, B.; Buzzini, P.; Goretti, M.; Branda, E.; Diolaiuti, G.; D’Agata, C.; Smiraglia, C.; Vaughan-Martini, A.; Vaughan-Martini, A. Psychrophilic yeasts in glacial environments of Alpine glaciers. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 63, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Branda, E.; Turchetti, B.; Diolaiuti, G.; Pecci, M.; Smiraglia, C.; Buzzini, P. Yeast and yeast-like diversity in the southernmost glacier of Europe (Calderone Glacier, Apennines, Italy). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 72, 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Garcia, V.; Zalar, P.; Brizzio, S.; Gunde-Cimerman, N.; Van Broock, M. Cryptococcus species (Tremellales) from glacial biomes in the southern (Patagonia) and northern (Svalbard) hemispheres. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 82, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Turchetti, B.; Hall, S.R.T.; Connell, L.B.; Branda, E.; Buzzini, P.; Theelen, B.; Müller, W.H.; Boekhout, T. Psychrophilic yeasts from Antarctica and European glaciers: Description of Glaciozyma gen nov, Glaciozyma martini sp. nov. and Glaciozyma watsonii sp. nov. Extremophiles 2011, 15, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fell, W.; Statzell, A.C.; Hunter, I.L.; Phaff, L. Leucosporidium gen. n., the heterobasidiomycetous stage of several yeasts of the genus Candida. Antonie Van Laeuwenhoek 1969, 35, 433–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gonçalves, V.N.; Vitoreli, G.A.; de Menezes, G.C.; Mendes, C.R.; Secchi, E.R.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Taxonomy, phylogeny and ecology of cultivable fungi present in seawater gradients across the Northern Antarctica Peninsula. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 1005–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. De Garcia, V.; Brizzio, S.; Libkind, D.; Buzzini, P.; Van Broock, M. Biodiversity of cold-adapted yeasts from glacial meltwater rivers in Patagonia, Argentina. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 59, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. De García, V.; Coelho, M.A.; Maia, T.M.; Rosa, L.H.; Vaz, A.M.; Rosa, C.A.; Sampaio, J.P.; Gonçalves, P.; Van Broock, M.; Libkind, D. Sex in the cold: taxonomic reorganization of psychrotolerant yeasts in the order Leucosporidiales. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sampaio, J.P.; Gadanho, M.; Bauer, R.; Weiß, M. Taxonomic studies in the Microbotryomycetidae: Leucosporidium golubevii sp. nov., Leucosporidiella gen. nov. and the new orders 73 Leucosporidiales and Sporidiobolales. Mycol. Prog. 2003, 2, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Connell, L.B.; Redman, R.; Craig, S.D.; Scorzetti, G.; Iszard, M.; Rodriguez, R. Diversity of soil yeasts isolated from South Victoria Land, Antarctica. Microb. Ecol. 2008, 56, 448–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Duarte, A.W.F.; Dayo-Owoyemi, I.; Nobre, F.S.; Pagnoca, F.C.; Chaud, L.C.S.; Pessoa, A.; Felipe, M.G.A.; Sette, L.D. Taxonomic assessment and enzymes production by yeasts isolated from marine and terrestrial Antarctic samples. Extremophiles 2013, 17, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Duarte, A.W.F.; Passarini, M.R.Z.; Delforno, T.P.; Pelizzari, F.M.; Cipro, C.V.Z.; Montene, R.C.; Petry, M.V.; Putzke, J.; Rosa, L.H.; Sette, L.D. Yeasts from macroalgae and lichens that inhabit the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Env. Microbiol. 2016, 8, 874–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Brandão, L.R.; Aline, B.M.; Vaz, A.B.M.; Lilia, C.; Santo, L.C.; Pimenta, R.S.; Morais, P.B.; Libkind, D.; Rosa, L.H.; Rosa, C.A. Diversity and biogeographical patterns of yeast communities in Antarctic, Patagonian and tropical lakes. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 28, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. St-Germain, G.; Laverdiere, M. Torulopsis candida, a new opportunistic pathogen. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1986, 24, 884–885. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wagner, D.; Sander, A.; Bertz, H.; Finke, J.; Kern, W.V. Breakthrough invasive infection due to Debaryomyces hansenii (teleomorph Candida famata) and Scopulariopsis brevicaulis in a stem cell transplant patient receiving liposomal amphotericin B and caspofungin for suspected aspergillosis. Infection 2005, 33, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gupta, A.; Mi, H.; Wroe, C.; Jaques, B.; Talbot, D. Fatal Candida famataperitonitis complicating sclerosing peritonitis in a peritoneal dialysis patient. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2006, 21, 2036–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Breuer, U.; Harms, H. Debaryomyces hansenii-an extremophilic yeast with biotechnological potential. Yeast 2006, 23, 415–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Aruo, S.K. Necrotizing cutaneous rhodotorulosis in chickens in Uganda. Avian Dis. 1980, 24, 1038–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Monga, D.P.; Garg, D.N. Ovine pulmonary infection caused by Rhodotorula rubra. Mykosen 1980, 23, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wirth, F.; Goldani, L.Z. Epidemiology of Rhodotorula: An emerging pathogen. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infec. Dis. 2012, 465717, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Spiliopoulou, A.; Anastassiou, E.D.; Christofidou, M. Rhodotorula fungemia in an intensive care unit patient and review of published cases. Mycopathologia 2012, 174, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. De Hoog, G.S.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Haase, G.; Fernandez-Zeppenfeldt, G.; Angelis, D.A.; Ende, A.H.G.G.V.D.; Matos, T.; Peltroche-Llacsahuanga, H.; Pizzirani-Kleiner, A.A.; Rainer, J.; et al. Black fungi: clinical and pathogenic approaches. Med. Mycol. 2000, 38, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Swoboda-Kopec, E.; Wroblewska, M.M.; Rokoz, A. Mixed bloodstream infection with Stahylococcus aureus and Penicillium chrysogenum in an immunocompromised patient: Case report and review of the literature. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2003, 9, 1116–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lyratzopoulos, G.; Ellis, M.; Nerringer, R.; Denning, D.W. Invasive Infection due to Penicillium species other than P. marneffei. J. Infect. 2002, 45, 184–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. De Sousa, J.R.P.; Gonçalves, V.N.; de Holanda, R.A.; Santos, D.A.; Bueloni, C.F.; Costa, A.O.; Petry, M.V.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Pathogenic potential of environmental resident fungi from ornithogenic soils of Antarctica. Fungal Biol. 2017, 12, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Gonçalves, V.N.; Vitoreli, G.A.; de Menezes, G.C.; Mendes, C.R.; Secchi, E.R.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Antarctic rocks from continental Antarctica as source of potential human opportunistic fungi. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Alves, I.M.; Gonçalves, V.N.; Oliveira, F.S.; Schaefer, C.E.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. The diversity, distribution, and pathogenic potential of cultivable fungi present in rocks from the South Shetlands archipelago, Maritime Antarctica. Extremophiles 2019, 23, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Snelders, E.; Camps, S.M.T.; Karawajczyk, A.; Schaftenaar, G.; Kema, G.H.J.; Van Der Lee, H.A.; Klaassen, C.H.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Verweij, P.E. Triazole fungicides can induce cross-resistance to medical triazoles in aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 31801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bastos, R.W.; Carneiro, H.C.S.; Oliveira, L.V.N. Environmental triazole induces cross-resistance to clinical drugs and affects morphophysiology and virulence of Cryptococcus gattii and C. neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01179-17. [Google Scholar]
  93. Carneiro, H.C.S.; Ribeiro, N.Q.; Bastos, R.W.; Santos, D.A. Effect of non-antifungal agrochemicals on the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus gattii. Med. Mycol. 2019, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hof, H. Critical annotations to the use of azole antifungals for plant protection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 5, 2987–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Fungi obtained from Antarctic snow segments and identified by sequence comparison with the BLASTn match with the NCBI GenBank database.
Table 1. Fungi obtained from Antarctic snow segments and identified by sequence comparison with the BLASTn match with the NCBI GenBank database.
RegionSnow SegmentDensity (CFU L−1)UFMGCB aTop BLAST Search Results (GenBank Accession Number)Query Cover (%)Identity (%)N° of bp AnalyzedProposed Taxa (GenBank acc. n°)
Deception Island (62° 58′ 55.6″ S; 60° 33′ 11.5″ W)1>30018371Leucosporidium fragarium (NG058330) e10099831Leucosporidium fragarium (MN0655470) j
36.6612598Penicillium cavernicola (MH862709) b100100466Penicillium sp. 1 (MK981319) g
1012377Mortierella elongatula (MH859811) b10096483Mortierella sp. (MK889363) g
3.318377Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MH636067) e10099495Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MN0655160) j
2>30018378Phenoliferia glacialis (LC203727) e100100815Phenoliferia glacialis (MN065548) j
9.912592Cladosporium phyllactiniicola (MH863929) b100100432Cladosporium sp. 1 (MK981325) g
612376Antarctomycespsychrotrophicus (MH874317) b100100432Antarctomycespsychrotrophicus (MK889356) g
412597Thelebolus balaustiformis (NR159056) b99100443Thelebolus balaustiformis (MK889369) g
212375Penicillium cavernicola (MH862709) b
Penicillium albocoremium (KU896812) c
Penicillium solitum (KU904363) d		100
99
100		100
97
100		430
405
689		Penicillium solitum (MK981306) g (MN017378) h (MN056972) i
3>30018368Leucosporidium golubevii (KY108283) e9998670Leucosporidium sp. (MN065549) j
41.312371Leohumicola minima (NR121307) b10091474Helotiales sp. 1 (MK889360) g
4.612428Thelebolus balaustiformis (NR159056) b100100487Thelebolus balaustiformis (MK889370) g
5.312741Penicillium cavernicola (MH862709) b10099468Penicillium sp. 1 (MK981334) g
412372Penicillium rubens (NR111815) b
Penicillium glycyrrhizacola (KF021538) c		100
99		100
98		464
398		Penicillium sp. 2 (MK981307) g (MN0173379) h
212380Penicillium tardochrysogenum (MH865983) b
Penicillium chrysogenum (AY495981) c		100
100		99
97		470
377		Penicilliumchrysogenum (MK981309) g (MN045349) h
112373Penicillium roqueforti (MH855127) b
Penicillium carneum (AY674386) c
Penicillium psychrosexualis (KU904362) d		100
96
100		100
97
99		463
321
554		Penicillium cf. psychrosexualis (MK981308) g (MN045348) h (MN379931) i
King George Island (62° 06′ 211″ S; 058° 27’ 627″ W)1>30018388Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e100100551Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065550) j
>30018404Phenoliferia glacialis (NG058369) e9499555Phenoliferia cf. glacialis (MN065514) j
>30018386Phaeococcomyces mexicanus (NG058078) e10098490Phaeococcomyces sp. (MN065551) j
>30018400Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (KY218728) e10099622Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MN065517) j
2.6612430Penicillium tardochrysogenum (MH865983) b100100476Penicillium sp. 3 (MK981320) g
2.6612388Thelebolus globosus (MH862951) b10099499Thelebolus globosus (MK889371) g
13.312391Alternaria multiformis (MH862776) b100100447Alternaria multiformis (MK889355) g
4.612395Penicillium rubens (NR111815) b
Penicillium chrysogenum (JF909937) d		98
98		99
99		469
936		Penicillium chrysogenum (MK981310) g (MN379932) i
3.512390Neomicrosphaeropsis italica (NR158247) b10098503Neomicrosphaeropsis cf. italica (MK889364) g
2.612397Penicilliumtardochrysogenum (MH865983) b
Penicillium chrysogenum (JF909937) d		100
100		99
100		467
920		Penicillium chrysogenum (MK981311) g(MN379933) i
3.312389Ijuhya vitelina (NR154100) b10088511Bionectriaceae sp. 1 (MK889358) g
1.312393Thelebolus balaustiformis (NR159056) b100100474Thelebolus balaustiformis (MK889374) g
1.318399Mrakia gelida (KY108585) e9899554Mrakia sp. (MN065528) j
2>30018387Hamamotoa singularis (KY107777) e10099435Hamamotoa singularis (MN065527) j
>30018483Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (KY218730) e100100673Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MN065518) j
>30018391Hamamotoa singularis (KY107777) e10097551Hamamotoa sp. (MN065526) j
>30018478Vishniacozyma victoriae (LC203739) e10099642Vishniacozyma victoriae (MN0655520) j
8818381Glaciozyma antarctica (NG057664) e100100553Glaciozyma antarctica (MN065525) j
7.312734Ijuhya vitelina (NR154100) b10087453Bionectriaceae sp. 1 (MK889359) g
612385Penicillium cavernicola (MH862709) b
Penicillium glandicola (KU896814) c		100
93		100
82		465
407		Penicillium sp. 1 (MK981312) g (MN045350) h
1.312594Cladosporium phyllactiniicola (MH863929) b100100465Cladosporium sp. 1 (MK981333) g
112384Neomicrosphaeropsis italica (NR158247) b10098482Neomicrosphaeropsis cf. italica (MK889365) g
3>30018395Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e100100565Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065553) j
>30018393Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MF927654) e10099546Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MN065519) j
>30018403Glaciozyma antarctica (LC202043) e100100501Glaciozyma antarctica (MN065524) j
>30018493Phenoliferia glacialis (LC203727) e100100590Phenoliferia glacialis (MN0655540) j
812386Penicillium cavernicola (MH862709) b
Penicillium albocoremium (KU896812) c		100
95		100
97		425
370		Penicillium sp. 1 (MK981313) g (MN045351) h
2.612735Penicillium caseifulvum (MH862722) b100100373Penicillium sp. 4 (MK981321) g
412387Penicillium commune (NR111143) b
Penicillium palitans (KU904360) d		100
100		100
100		466
577		Penicillium palitans (MK981314) g (MN379934) i
412582Cladosporiumasperulatum (MH863916) b100100475Cladosporium sp. 2 (MK981326) g
412740Leohumicola minima (NR121307) b10091482Helotiales sp. 1 (MK889361) g
Trinity Peninsula (63° 24’ 45.6″ S; 57° 00’ 164″ W)1>30018481Phenoliferia glacialis (LC203723) e10099678Phenoliferia glacialis (MN065531) j
>30018417Bannozymayamatoana (AF189896) e10099563Bannozymayamatoana (MN065523) j
>30018489Vishniacozyma victoriae (LC203739) e100100559Vishniacozyma victoriae (MN065555) j
>30018480Cystobasidium pallidum (NG059006) e10093529Cystobasidium sp. (MN065556) j
11018410Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e10099543Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065530) j
4612405Penicillium caseifulvum (MH862722) b
Penicillium longisporum (KJ834467) c		100
88		100
98		495
336		Penicillium sp. 4 (MK981316) g (MN075199) h
31.318408Dioszegia hungarica (KY107643) e10099488Dioszegia hungarica (MN065557) j
3418423Dioszegia crocea (KX096670) e100100448Dioszegia crocea (MN065520) j
12.618411Genolevuria bromeliarum (NG058291) e
Genolevuria bromeliarum (NG058291) b		98
61		94
95		542
860		Genolevuria sp. (MN065564) j (MN065510) g
612429Penicillium oregonense (MH865652) b
Penicillium glandicola (KU896814) c		100
93		96
82		419
407		Penicillium sp. 5 (MK981315) g (MN045352) h
212404Thelebolus balaustiformis (NR159056) b99100488Thelebolus balaustiformis (MK889373) g
2>30018413Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (KP223715) e100100596Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MN065512) j
>30018425Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e100100508Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065535) j
10612427Penicillium tardochrysogenum (NR1383081) b
Penicillium chrysogenum (JF909937) c
Penicillium chrysogenum (AY495981) d		100
100
100		99
100
100		504
651
342		Penicillium chrysogenum (MK981317) g (MN075200) h (MN379935) i
8.618426Debaryomyces hansenii (KX981201) e100100712Debaryomyces hansenii (MN065522) j
2.618416Leucosporidium muscorum (KY108280) e
Leucosporodium creatinivorum (KC455908) b		100
99		99
100		599
654		Leucosporidium sp. (MN121386) e (MN121387) g
1.318422Candida sake (KY102375) e100100656Candida sake (MN065558) j
3>30018414Phenoliferia glacialis (LC203723) e10099653Phenoliferia cf glacialis (MN0655320) j
>30018415Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e10099499Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065533) j
5.312402Penicillium tardochrysogenum (MH865983) b10099419Penicillium sp. 3 (MK981335) g
2.612732Cladosporium phyllactiniicola (MH863929) b100100428Cladosporium sp. 1 (MK981327) g
Arctowski Peninsula (64 45 ’0″S; 62 25’ 0″ W)1>30018430Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e100100533Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065534) j
12018428Genolevuria amylolytica (NG057728) e10099455Genolevuria amylolytica (MN065559) j
3.6512432Antarctomycespsychrotrophicus (MH874317) b100100435Antarctomycespsychrotrophicus (MK889357) g
212433Cladosporiumphaenocomae (MH865096) b
Cladosporium longisporum (KJ834467) c		100
94		100
97		435
355		Cladosporium sp. 3 (MK981324) g (MN075202) h
218436Debaryomyces hansenii (LC219506) e100100546Debaryomyces hansenii (MN065521) j
2>30018431Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e100100571Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065536) j
>30018477Phenoliferia glacialis (LC203727) e100100510Phenoliferia glacialis (MN065537) j
15.3312431Cladosporium phyllactiniicola (MH863929) b100100462Cladosporium sp. 1 (MK981330) g
7.312408Cladosporiumvariabile (MH863132) b100100481Cladosporium sp. 3 (MK981331) g
1.312587Penicillium caseifulvum (MH862722) b100100488Penicillium sp. 4 (MK981323) g
112407Thelebolusbalaustiformis (NR159056) b98100439Thelebolus cf. balaustiformis (MK889366) g
Snow Island (62° 46’ 300″ S; 06° 15’ 240″ W)1>30018455Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e100100527Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065538) j
157.318439Mrakia gelida (LC203698) e100100618Mrakia gelida (MN065529) j
19.9518441Phenoliferia glacialis (LC203727) e100100631Phenoliferia glacialis (MN065539) j
2818475Holtermanniella wattica (LC203693) e100100458Holtermanniella wattica (MN065560) j
6.318443Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (KY218730) e100100543Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MN065513) j
3.318491Genolevuria bromeliarum (NG058291) e9698542Genolevuria sp. (MN065563) j
1.318440Kabatiella bupleuri (JN886792) e
Kabatiella bupleuri (JN886792) b		98
100		98
98		420
577		Kabatiella cf. bupleuri (MN065565) j (MN655511) g
212590Clathrosphaerina zalewskii (MH856474) b10091423Hyaloscyphaceae sp. (MK889362) g
2>30018445Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e100100553Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065540) j
>30018484Phenoliferia glacialis (LC203727) e100100571Phenoliferia glacialis (MN065561) j
0.618448Vishniacozyma victoriae (LC203739) e10099599Vishniacozyma victoriae (MN065562) j
212434Cladosporiumtenuissimum (MH864840) b10099471Cladosporium sp. 4 (MK981332) g
212411Penicillium tardochrysogenum (NR1383081) b
Penicillium chrysogenum (AY4959811) c		100
100		100
99		523
416		Penicillium chrysogenum (MK981318) g (MN075201) h
3>30018437Phenoliferia glacialis (LC203727) e100100571Phenoliferia glacialis (MN065541) j
>30018456Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (FN550378) e10099514Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065542) j
6.6512739Pseudogymnoascus destructans (EU88492) b10099453Pseudogymnoascus destructans (MK889375) g
2.6612412Thelebolus globosus (KX576510) b10099410Thelebolus globosus (MK889367) g
2.612589Pseudogymnoascus verrucosus (KJ755525) b100100400Pseudogymnoascus verrucosus (MK889376) g
412588Pseudogymnoascus pannorum (MH861038) b9998414Pseudogymnoascus sp. (MK889378) g
Robert Island (62 °37’ 941″ S; 059° 70’ 400″ W)1>30018470Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (FN550378) e100100525Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065543) j
>30018461Phenoliferia glacialis (KX773532) e100100506Phenoliferia glacialis (MN065544) j
3.312420Cladosporium phyllactiniicola (MH863929)b98100430Cladosporium sp. 1 (MK981328) g
412419Thelebolusbalaustiformis (NR159056) b10099511Thelebolus cf. balaustiformis (MK889368) g
1.312423Pseudocamarosporium africanum (NR154294) b
Pseudocamarosporium africanum (JX496368) c		99
90		100
99		528
422		Pseudocamarosporium africanum (MK889379) g (MN075203) h
2>30018464Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e10099538Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065545) j
2.6612414Thelebolus balaustiformis (NR159056) b100100425Thelebolus balaustiformis (MK889372) g
1.3312413Cladosporium phyllactiniicola (MH863929) b100100469Cladosporium sp. 1 (MK981329) g
1.312733Penicillium rubens (NR111815) b98100434Penicillium sp. 2 (MK981322) g
3>30018472Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (KY108774) e100100528Phenoliferia psychrophenolica (MN065546) j
>30018490Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (KY218730) e100100605Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (MN065515) j
1412416Antarctomyces pellizariae (KX576510) b
(KX790790) c (KY100007) d		100100545Antarctomyces pellizariae (KX576510) g (KX790790) h (KY100007) i
112438Pseudogymnoascus verrucosus (KJ755525) b9899488Pseudogymnoascus cf. verrucosus (MK889377) g
a UFMGCB, Culture of Microorganisms and Cells from the Federal University of Minas Gerais. Taxa subjected to BLAST analysis based on the b ITS, c β-tubulin, d Polymerase II, and e D1/D2 regions for the elucidation of taxonomic positions. f Taxonomic position suggested. Sequences of g ITS, h β-tubulin and/or i Polymerase II and j D1/D2 sequences deposited in GenBank database.
Table
Table 2. Physicochemical parameters of melted snow sampled in different sites of Antarctic Peninsula and diversity indices fungal.
Table 2. Physicochemical parameters of melted snow sampled in different sites of Antarctic Peninsula and diversity indices fungal.
Parameters/Diversity Indices/DensitySites Sampled
Deception IslandKing George IslandTrinity PeninsulaArctowski PeninsulaSnow IslandRobert Island
Conductivity (µS cm−1)5017320285253
Resistivity (MΩ cm−1)0.0240.0060.0470.0230,0260.039
Total dissolved solids (ppm)2486111414.627
Oxidation Reduction Potential (mV)190.9310256.8255.9361.2230.2
pH6.766.36.746.246.16.5
Salinity (ppt)0.020.080.010.010.020.02
Number of taxa163121112014
Fisher α2.694.633.091.713.172.06
Margalef’s2.163.652.521.442.551.73
Simpson’s0.740.920.900.740.840.84
Table
Table 3. The minimal inhibitory concentration of benomyl, fluconazole, and amphotericin B against fungi isolated from seasonal snow of Antarctica.
Table 3. The minimal inhibitory concentration of benomyl, fluconazole, and amphotericin B against fungi isolated from seasonal snow of Antarctica.
FungiUFMGCB aMIC b at 25 °CMIC b at 37 °C d
BenomylFluconazoleAmphotericin B
Debaryomyces hansenii18426408−
D. hansenii18436404−
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa183770.3125640.03
R. mucilaginosa184000.3125640.03
R. mucilaginosa183930.3125640.03
R. mucilaginosa184130.3125640.03
R. mucilaginosa184430.3125640.125
Penicillium chrysogenum12380032−
P. chrysogenum12427064−
Penicillium sp. 3124302.564−
Penicillium sp. 2127332.51−
Penicillium sp. 4124052.564−
a UFMGCB, Culture of Microorganisms and Cells from the Federal University of Minas Gerais. b MIC, Minimal inhibitory concentration at µg mL−1. d for selected fungi with MIC ≥ 64 µg mL−1 that were able to grow at 37 °C. 0, Absence of growth. −, Fungi incapable to grow at 37 °C.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Menezes, G.C.A.; Amorim, S.S.; Gonçalves, V.N.; Godinho, V.M.; Simões, J.C.; Rosa, C.A.; Rosa, L.H. Diversity, Distribution, and Ecology of Fungi in the Seasonal Snow of Antarctica. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100445

AMA Style

de Menezes GCA, Amorim SS, Gonçalves VN, Godinho VM, Simões JC, Rosa CA, Rosa LH. Diversity, Distribution, and Ecology of Fungi in the Seasonal Snow of Antarctica. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(10):445. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100445

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Menezes, Graciéle C.A., Soraya S. Amorim, Vívian N. Gonçalves, Valéria M. Godinho, Jefferson C. Simões, Carlos A. Rosa, and Luiz H. Rosa. 2019. "Diversity, Distribution, and Ecology of Fungi in the Seasonal Snow of Antarctica" Microorganisms 7, no. 10: 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop