Next Article in Journal
Canine Leishmaniasis: Serological Results in Private and Kennel Dogs Tested over a Six-Year Period (2009–2014) in Abruzzo and Molise Regions, Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Contrasting Environmental Drivers Determine Biodiversity Patterns in Epiphytic Lichen Communities along a European Gradient
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/microorganisms8121914
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Genome Evolution in SCRaMbLEd Synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains

by
Elizabeth L. I. Wightman
1,†,
Heinrich Kroukamp
1,2,*,†,
Isak S. Pretorius
3,
Ian T. Paulsen
1,2 and
Helena K. M. Nevalainen
1,2
1
Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
2
Biomolecular Discovery and Design Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
3
Chancellery, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Contributed equally.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(12), 1914; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121914
Submission received: 5 November 2020 / Revised: 28 November 2020 / Accepted: 30 November 2020 / Published: 1 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Biotechnology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Genome-scale engineering and custom synthetic genomes are reshaping the next generation of industrial yeast strains. The Cre-recombinase-mediated chromosomal rearrangement mechanism of designer synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes, known as SCRaMbLE, is a powerful tool which allows rapid genome evolution upon command. This system is able to generate millions of novel genomes with potential valuable phenotypes, but the excessive loss of essential genes often results in poor growth or even the death of cells with useful phenotypes. In this study we expanded the versatility of SCRaMbLE to industrial strains, and evaluated different control measures to optimize genomic rearrangement, whilst limiting cell death. To achieve this, we have developed RED (rapid evolution detection), a simple colorimetric plate-assay procedure to rapidly quantify the degree of genomic rearrangements within a post-SCRaMbLE yeast population. RED-enabled semi-synthetic strains were mated with the haploid progeny of industrial yeast strains to produce stress-tolerant heterozygous diploid strains. Analysis of these heterozygous strains with the RED-assay, genome sequencing and custom bioinformatics scripts demonstrated a correlation between RED-assay frequencies and physical genomic rearrangements. Here we show that RED is a fast and effective method to evaluate the optimal SCRaMbLE induction times of different Cre-recombinase expression systems for the development of industrial strains.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Specialized strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are harnessed by industry for the production of food and beverages, pharmaceuticals, chemical building blocks and fuel. While past strategies such as ALE (adaptive laboratory evolution), random mutagenesis and rational design approaches have produced a myriad of improved strains, the field of genetic engineering now benefits from whole-genome reengineering approaches and the synthesis of custom designer genomes [1]. SCRaMbLE (synthetic chromosome rearrangement and modification by LoxPSym-mediated evolution) is a genome rearrangement system developed for use in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2.0 (Sc2.0) synthetic genome, facilitating large-scale genomic rearrangements [2]. The system allows gene deletions, insertions, inversion and translocations genome-wide to generate large libraries of unique strains that can be screened for desired phenotypes.
Valuable industrial characteristics, such as inhibitor tolerance and high protein secretion, often have complex and/or unknown genetic determinants [3,4,5]. Utilizing the genome-scale randomization of SCRaMbLE, improvements of complex phenotypes have already been accomplished [6,7,8,9]. An example of the capability for genome rearrangement was the rapid generation of semi-synthetic heterozygous diploid strains containing a single copy of the synthetic chromosomes synV and synX, with significantly improved thermotolerance at 42 °C after a single round of SCRaMbLE [9], whereas a similar increase in thermotolerance using ALE took over 300 generations [10]. SCRaMbLE was also used to optimize the biosynthetic pathway for improved violacein yields, demonstrating that this strategy could potentially be applied to optimize the production of any metabolite [7]. These SCRaMbLEd strains contained only one synthetic chromosome in a haploid genome context; therefore, it is conceivable that strains harboring more synthetic DNA, with more loxP recombinase recognition sites, could produce greater genomic diversity with associated novel phenotypes of interest. Thus far, SCRaMbLE has also been explored for a variety of fundamental and applied applications, including genome minimization [2], biosynthetic pathway assembly [8,11] and for the optimization of hydrolytic enzyme ratios for biofuel applications [12].
SCRaMbLE has been successfully employed to develop yeast strains with novel phenotypes; however, this is accompanied by the rapid loss of essential genes, especially in haploid cell populations. This often leads to retarded cell growth and high lethality rates, characteristics frequently used to estimate the degree of SCRaMbLE that has occurred in haploid cells [2,13]. In addition to the loss of cell viability, other non-lethal deleterious effects could mask the effects of desirable phenotypes generated through genomic rearrangement, while growth-impaired mutant cells are vulnerable to being outcompeted by healthier, less-SCRaMbLEd cells. It is thus imperative to maintain a balance between the degree of genomic rearrangement and cell viability so as to maximize the discovery of useful phenotypes.
Considering that industrial strains are generally diploid and that the 2n gene copy-number could serve as a viability buffer in the event of essential gene loss, SCRaMbLE holds tremendous potential to augment commercial strain development and improvement [9]. It has previously been shown that the survival of SCRaMbLEd diploids is significantly higher than that of haploids, with a viability over 70% compared to less than 30% in haploid strains under the same treatment conditions [9]. Although SCRaMbLEing in diploid cells overcomes some of the limitations associated with rapid haploid cell death, it abolishes the use of viability as a simple output to gauge the degree of genome scrambling in the population. Simultaneously, it increases the complexity of the bioinformatic analysis of these genomes due to the high sequence similarity between equivalent synthetic and non-synthetic genomic regions. As such, there is a need for new methods which overcome these limitations.
In this study, we have developed RED (rapid evolution detection), a simple colorimetric plate-assay procedure to determine the degree of genomic rearrangements within SCRaMbLEd diploid yeast populations. RED-capable semi-synthetic laboratory strains were combined with haploids from four different industrial strains. The frequency of red-pigmented colonies was quantified and compared to the relative degree of gene loss within randomly selected colonies in the population. We subsequently used the RED system to monitor the leakiness and SCRaMbLE induction profile of several previously reported Cre-recombinase expression vectors. As proof of concept, we have showed that RED could be generally applied to semi-synthetic industrial strains to rapidly evaluate the frequency of genomic rearrangements in a SCRaMbLEd population, which allows the fine-tuning and selection of optimal SCRaMbLE conditions for strain library generation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Culturing Media

Chemicals used in this study were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Australia and used as recommended by the supplier, unless stated otherwise. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains were routinely cultivated in YPD (10 g L−1 w/v yeast extract, 20 g L−1 w/v peptone, 20 g L−1 w/v glucose) at 30 °C and were shaken at 200 rpm for liquid cultures. Escherichia coli DH5α cultures were used for plasmid propagation and were cultivated at 37 °C in Luria Bertani broth or agar (10 g L−1 tryptone, 5 g L−1 yeast extract, 10 g L−1 sodium chloride, 20 g L−1 bacteriological agar) supplemented with 100 μg mL−1 ampicillin for plasmid selection.
YP-gal agar (10 g L−1 yeast extract, 20 g L−1 peptone, 20 g L−1 galactose), supplemented with 400 μg mL−1 hygromycin B (InvivoGen, USA), was used to select HO-deleted heterozygous diploid industrial strains and the subsequent haploid progeny. Sporulation agar plates contained 1 g L−1 yeast extract, 10 g L−1 potassium acetate and 20 g L−1 bacteriological agar.
S. cerevisiae strains containing Cre-plasmids were selected and maintained using SC-ura medium (20 g L−1 glucose, 1.92 g L−1 yeast synthetic drop-out medium supplements without uracil, 0.68 g L−1 yeast nitrogen base without amino acids). SC-ade agar (20 g L−1 glucose, 0.68 g L−1 yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 20 mg L−1 uracil, 20 mg L−1 L-methionine, 60 mg L−1 L-leucine, 20 mg L−1 L-histidine, 20 g L−1 bacteriological agar) was used to select for ADE2-positive transformants.

2.2. Construction of Cre Plasmids

All DNA manipulations were performed using reagents supplied by New England Biolabs, Australia according to the manufacturer’s recommendation, unless otherwise stated. All PCR primer sequences are provided in Table A1.
Four plasmids, each containing different native yeast promoters to allow the differential expression of the Cre-recombinase gene, were used in this study (Table 1). The pLM160 plasmid, containing the CLB2 promoter, has previously been constructed [9,14,15]. To construct pEW_SCW11p, the SCW11p Cre-EBD cassette was liberated from the pLM006 plasmid by SacI and EcoRI restriction enzyme digestion, and ligated directionally into the corresponding sites of the SacI and EcoRI digested pLM160 plasmid. The GAL1 promoter from pHK300-HO was isolated by digestion with EcoRI and PacI. The Cre-EBD cassette and the backbone plasmid from pLM160 were PCR-amplified using primers Cre-F+PacI and Cre-CassetteR (Table A1), which added a PacI restriction enzyme recognition site. The PCR amplicon was digested with PacI and EcoRI, and the digested GAL1 promoter was subsequently ligated into the Cre-EBD containing plasmid backbone, to yield pEW_GAL1p (Table 1).

2.3. Industrial Haploid Strain Generation

To generate stable haploid progeny of the industrial strains, ho-deletion cassette PCR fragments were generated from the pHK300-HO plasmid (Table 1), using the HO_ampl-F/R primer set (Table A1) and transformed into Y-11878, Y-582, YB-428 and MH-1000 (Table 2) using the LiOAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG transformation method [16], and recovered for 4 h in YP-gal broth before plating onto YP-gal agar, supplemented with 400 μg mL−1 G418–sulfate. The galactose-dependent expression of the geneticin resistance gene ensured the minimal influence of its protein product during strain evaluation on glucose-containing media. Putative transformants were selected and the disruption of at least one HO allele was confirmed with PCR using the HO_conf-F/R primer set (Table A1). Y-11878, Y-582, YB-428 and MH-1000 strains heterozygous for a functional HO gene were grown to the stationary phase in YPD medium. A thick cell suspension of each culture was spread on sporulation agar plates and incubated at ambient temperature until sufficient asci formation was observed (after 3–6 days). Random spore isolation was performed as previously described [5] and spore suspensions were plated on YP-gal agar, supplemented with 400 μg mL−1 hygromycin B to select for HO-disrupted haploid progeny. The HO gene encodes an endonuclease which allows yeast to convert between mating types, thus facilitating spontaneous diploid formation. The colonies were selected form the MH-1000, Y-11878, YB-428 and Y-582 backgrounds and were designated HK01, HK02, HK03 and HK04, respectively. The mating type selection was performed by multiplex PCR using the MatLocus, MatA and MatAlpha primers (Table A1), as previously described [17].

2.4. RED-Capable Strain Preparation

Strain preparation is summarized in Figure 1. To introduce RED capability into the strains intended for SCRaMbLE library generation, the native ADE2 on chromosome XV of the haploid strains HK01–HK04 and yZY175 was replaced with a kanMX4 marker, conferring resistance to geneticin. The ade2::kanMX4 locus, along with ~200 bp flanking sequences, was PCR amplified from genomic DNA (extracted using the SDS/LiOAc genomic DNA extraction procedure [18]) obtained from the BY4741 ade2Δ strain [19] (Table 2). The kanMX4-containing fragment was transformed into all five haploid strains to replace and disrupt the native ADE2 gene using the LiOAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method [16]. Transformants (red colonies) were selected on YPD agar supplemented with 200 μg mL−1 G418-sulfate (Roche) and to reflect a lack of ADE2 were designated HK01-a, HK02-a, HK03-a and HK04-a, based on the corresponding isogenic strain used.
A functional copy of ADE2 was reintroduced into a synthetic chromosome of strain yZY175 ade2Δ to complement the ade2 deletion from native Chr XV, producing white-colored colonies. The ADE2 CDS (with ~500 bp upstream and downstream flanking sequences) was amplified from S. cerevisiae BY4741 using forward and reverse primers ‘ADE2 + YFL019C’ using the same PCR conditions as above (Table A1). The primers added 40 bp of flanking sequences homologous to the YFL019C locus on Chr VI. The ADE2-containing PCR fragment was then transformed into synthetic Chr VI of the yZY175 ade2Δ, disrupting the nonessential gene YFL019C, thus generating a loxPsym-flanked ADE2. White colonies were selected on adenine-deficient (SC-ade) agar and the selected isolate was named EW00.
To allow the use of the Cre-recombinase expression plasmids containing URA3 as a selectable marker, the native URA3 was deleted from the HK01-a, HK02-a, HK03-a and HK04-a strains. The ura3Δ0 locus of the S. cerevisiae BY4742 strain was amplified using forward and reverse ‘Ura3′ primers that annealed approximately 250 bp upstream and downstream of the native CDS (Table A1). The fragment was transformed into the four strains and transformants were selected on YPD agar supplemented with 1 g L−1 Thermo Scientific™ 5-FOA (Fluoroorotic acid). The absence of a functional URA3 was subsequently confirmed by the absence of growth on media lacking uracil (SC-ura agar); these strains were identified using the following convention: HK0x-au.
Heterozygous diploid strains EW01, EW02, EW03 and EW04 were generated by mating each of the HK01-au, HK02-au, HK03-au and HK04-au with the semi-synthetic EW00. Individual strains were grown overnight in YPD broth, inoculated into fresh YPD broth to OD600 0.125 and incubated for 3 h. Cultures were then diluted to OD600 0.5 and co-cultured overnight in equal proportions in YPD broth at an ambient temperature to allow mating. Cell suspensions were plated on SC-ade to limit the growth of the industrial haploid colonies. Diploid colonies were identified by mating-type PCR, as described earlier.
To study the dynamics of previously reported SCRaMbLE induction systems, facilitated by different native yeast promoters driving Cre-recombinase expression, EW01 was transformed with either pLM160, pEW_GAL1p or pEW_SCW11p and putative transformants selected on SC-ura agar plates, to produce strains EW01-CLB, EW01-GAL and EW01-SCW, respectively.
Table
Table 2. Summary of relevant S. cerevisiae strains used in this study.
Table 2. Summary of relevant S. cerevisiae strains used in this study.
Strain DescriptionGenotypeReference
yZY175Contains synthetic chromosomes III, VI and IX-R MATα [20]
MH-1000Industrial distillery yeastMATa/MATα[21]
Y-11878Isolated from Jamaican cane juiceMATa/MATα[22]
YB-428Isolated from rum fermentationMATa/MATα[22]
Y-582Isolated from dry claret wineMATa/MATα[22]
HK01Progeny derived from MH1000MATa ho::GAL1p—kanMX4This study
HK02Progeny derived from Y-11878 MATa ho::GAL1p—kanMX4This study
HK03Progeny derived from Y-582MATa ho::GAL1p—kanMX4This study
HK04Progeny derived from YB-428MATa ho::GAL1p—kanMX4This study
HK01-auUracil / adenine auxotrophic HK01MATa ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4This study
HK02-auUracil / adenine auxotrophic HK02MATa ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4This study
HK03-auUracil / adenine auxotrophic HK03MATa ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4This study
HK04-auUracil / adenine auxotrophic HK04MATa ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4This study
EW00RED-enabled yZY175 (haploid)MATα ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4 yfl019c::ADE2This study
EW01RED-enabled HK01-au X EW00MATa/MATα ura3Δ/ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4/ ade2Δ::kanMX4 YFL019C/yfl019c::ADE2This study
EW02RED-enabled HK02-au X EW00MATa/MATα ura3Δ/ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4/ade2Δ::kanMX4 YFL019C/yfl019c::ADE2This study
EW03RED-enabled HK03-au X EW00MATa/MATα ura3Δ/ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4/ade2Δ::kanMX4 YFL019C/yfl019c::ADE2This study
EW04RED-enabled HK04-au X EW00MATa/MATα ura3Δ/ura3Δ ade2Δ::kanMX4/ade2Δ::kanMX4 YFL019C/yfl019c::ADE2This study
EW01-CLBEW01 with plasmid pLM160 yfl019c::ADE2 CLB2p Cre_EBDThis study
EW01-GALEW01 with plasmid pEW_GAL1yfl019c::ADE2 GAL1p Cre_EBDThis study
EW01-SCWEW01 with plasmid pEW_SCW11yfl019c::ADE2 SCW11p Cre_EBDThis study

2.5. Spot Assays for Fitness Evaluation

Industrial diploid strains, their haploid progeny (HK01–HK04) and RED-enabled diploid strains (EW01–EW04) were cultivated overnight in YPD after which they were inoculated into fresh YPD medium to a final optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.125 and grown for 3–4 h. Cultures were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline. Cells were diluted to an OD600 of 0.5 and a 10× dilution series spotted on YPD agar plates containing either 10% v/v ethanol, 12% v/v ethanol, 1.5 M sorbitol or 25 mM dithiothreitol (DTT).

2.6. Ethanol Production Determination

Cultures of heterozygous strains EW01–04 and industrial diploids MH-1000, Y-11878, YB-428 and Y-582 were grown overnight in YPD. The cultures were then inoculated into 40 mL of fresh YPD with high glucose concentration (200 g L−1 glucose) in 50 mL falcon tubes to an OD600 of 0.2. A rubber stopper with S-bend airlocks filled with ~2 mL of sterile water was attached to the top of the Falcon tubes to allow for CO2 escape. The cultures were incubated at ambient temperature for 120 h to allow the fermentation to finish. The final ethanol concentration in culture supernatant was measured using the Megazyme ethanol assay kit (K-ETOH, Megazyme, Ireland) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7. SCRaMbLE

The RED-assay workflow is shown in Figure 2. Strain EW01-GAL was cultivated overnight at 30 °C in YPD broth, then inoculated into fresh YPD to an OD600 of 0.2 and cultivated for 3–4 h. To induce SCRaMbLE, cells were washed twice with ddH2O and inoculated into fresh YP galactose broth (20 g L−1 galactose) supplemented with 1 µM β-estradiol at an OD600 of 0.2. In addition to this, EW01-GAL cultures were also prepared in YP galactose without β-estradiol and YPD with and without β-estradiol. Cells were incubated with 200 rpm shaking at 30 °C and samples were taken at 0, 2, 4 and 6 h, washed twice with ddH2O and plated on YPD agar. Plates were incubated for 2–3 days at 30 °C before colony numbers and colors (red or white) were recorded. A random selection of eight red and eight white colonies from each time point was analyzed by PCR to indicate the presence or absence of chromosome arms. One pair of primers was used for each chromosome arm of the native and synthetic Chr III and VI (Table A1).

2.8. Genome Sequencing

Twelve white post-SCRaMbLE EW01-GAL colonies from each time point were randomly selected from the cultures that had been plated onto YPD agar after 2, 4 and 6 h of induction. In addition, two red colonies from each time point were selected. Each selected colony was grown overnight in YPD broth and genomic DNA was extracted from each culture using the Thermo Scientific™ Yeast DNA Extraction Kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Paired-end whole genome sequencing was carried out at the Beijing Genome Institute (BGI), Beijing, China using the Illumina sequencing technology BGISEQ PE100 at 30× coverage. The length of each sequencing read after adapter trimming was 100 bp.

2.9. Detection of SCRaMbLE Events

HK01, EW00, EW01 and 48 SCRaMbLEd S. cerevisiae strains were sequenced. The determination of SCRaMbLE events in heterozygous diploid strains such as EW01 is technically challenging given the high sequence similarity between corresponding synthetic and ‘native’ DNA. As such, it was important to remove reads originating from ‘native’ DNA from the read pool as they cannot be SCRaMbLEd and could skew the interpretation of the results. A custom bioinformatics pipeline was therefore developed to remove these sequencing. Briefly, the script (supplementary material) used Bowtie 2 [23] to map all reads to two reference sequences—Syn III and VI of the semi-synthetic strain EW00, and Chr III and VI of the MH-1000-derived HK01. Using filtering strategies, reads were isolated that satisfied two requirements—firstly, they mapped with 100% similarity to Syn III or VI of EW00, and secondly, they did not map with 100% similarity to Chr III and VI of HK01. For unpaired reads recovered this way in the read pool, their read partner was recovered as well. These reads therefore contained sequences exclusively generated from the synthetic chromosomes and were used to infer subsequent deletion events. For convenience in subsequent analyses, the scripts were designed to generate a standardized FASTA formatted file. The bioinformatics procedure is visually represented in Figure A4. For quality control, an additional output of the script is a log file containing information from each step of the script, including, for example, the total number of reads and how many mapped to each reference (with and without 100% similarity). The filtered read pool was imported into Geneious Prime 2020.0.4 (https://www.geneious.com) and mapped to a consensus sequence of Syn Chr III and VI. The missing CDS annotations from each strain were compiled, enumerated and visualized in a heat map using GraphPad Prism version 8.01 for Windows, La Jolla California USA, www.graphpad.com.

3. Results

3.1. Heterozygous Diploid S. cerevisiae for Rapid Evolution Detection SCRaMbLE

To enable RED in S. cerevisiae strains, at least one functional copy of ADE2 should be present in the genome, flanked by loxP-recombination sites. This was achieved by the introduction of an ADE2 gene cassette into the loxP-flanked YFL019C locus of the semi-synthetic yZY175 ade2Δ strain. This RED-facilitator strain enabled the generation of four semi-synthetic strains through a simple mating procedure with industrially relevant, ADE2-deficient yeast strains. All four RED-enabled heterozygous diploid strains (EW01–EW04) had consistent white-cream colored colonies on YPD agar plates, with no spontaneous red colored colonies or sectoring detected at any stage. The presence of unique, locus-specific PCR-tags (a feature of the synthetic chromosomes [2]) implied the presence of the native and synthetic chromosomes III and VI, in all four RED-enabled heterozygous diploids. Illumina genome sequencing confirmed the presence of intact synthetic chromosomes III and VI, in addition to its native counterparts. No aberrant gene or chromosomal copy-numbers were detected.

3.2. General Stress-Resistance and Ethanol Production of Heterozygous Diploid Strains

In general, the semi-synthetic heterozygous diploids shared the combined properties of both synthetic and industrial yeast backgrounds. In addition to the ability to undergo rapid genome evolution, facilitated by the presence of many loxP sites on the synthetic chromosomes III and VI, the fitness of these heterologous diploids was similar to that of their respective parental diploid strains under various stress conditions. The novel diploid strains displayed high tolerance to osmotic stress (up to 1.5 M sorbitol), reducing conditions (up to 25 mM DTT) and presence of alcohol to up to 12% (v/v) ethanol, respectively (Figure 3). It is noted that the growth of the haploid industrial parent strains HK03 and HK04 was inhibited under ethanol and reducing conditions; however, the tolerance phenotypes were recovered in their corresponding heterozygous diploid strains.
In addition to the general stress tolerance of yeast strains, ethanol production is an important trait for many industrial S. cerevisiae strains; as such, the end-point ethanol production of the generated diploids was assessed. The semi-synthetic nature of the EW03 and EW04 strains did not affect their final ethanol yields compared to their corresponding diploid industrial parent strains (Figure 4). EW01 produced significantly less ethanol than its industrial diploid parent (p < 0.02), at just under 6% v/v, compared with the ~8.5% v/v achieved by the MH1000 strain under our culturing conditions. Interestingly, the heterozygous EW02 on average produced up to 1% v/v more ethanol than its corresponding industrial diploid parent, Y-11878.

3.3. SCRaMbLE Induction and Rapid Evolution Detection

The RED-enabled strains developed in this study provide a viability-independent visual output which reflects the scale of genome rearrangement within a post-SCRaMbLE yeast population. Based on the visibly red colonies produced by ade2 mutants (due to the accumulation of red-pigment [24]), our RED assay generates a visual estimation of the frequency of Cre-induced recombination, and the subsequent gene loss of the loxP-flanked ADE2 cassette (Figure A1).
Using the RED-assay, we compared the SCRaMbLE induction dynamics of three promoters, previously used for Cre_EBD expression. The promoters used to drive Cre_EBD expression were the M/G1 cell-cycle phase-activated CLB2 promoter [25,26], the daughter cell-specific activated SCW11 promoter [27] and the galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter [28]. In addition to the promoter-dependent expression patterns of the recombinase, estradiol is required for SCRaMbLE induction to allow the nuclear-localization of the estradiol binding domain-linked Cre-recombinase [6]. As unintended genome rearrangement can lead to preemptive genome instability, the basal recombination rate of the EW01 strains, harboring either the pEW_CLB, pEW_SCW11 or the pEW_GAL plasmid, were evaluated with RED (Figure 5). In the absence of estradiol, no red colonies were detected at any evaluated time point for the strains harboring the pEW_CLB or pEW_GAL plasmids when galactose was absent (Figure 5). Surprisingly, red colonies were observed in the EW01 strain containing the pEW_SCW plasmid, where the number of red colonies remained below 5% of the population when no estradiol was present (Figure 5). In the presence of galactose, but no estradiol, the EW01_GAL strain showed a continuous increase in red colonies over time, reaching significantly higher red colony formation frequencies compared to glucose-grown cells at 4 h and 6 h of growth (Figure 5). Up to a quarter of the population was red after 6 h of galactose growth.
With the exception of the glucose-grown EW01-GAL strain, the rapid generation of red colonies was observed after 2 h of estradiol addition (Figure 5), with more than 65% of the post-SCRaMbLE population being red in the EW01-GAL (grown in galactose) strain after 4 h of estradiol exposure (Figure 5). There was a gradual increase in red colony frequencies for all strains up to the 4 h time point, after which the EW01-SCW and EW01-GAL (grown in galactose) strains had reductions in the ratio of red colonies at 6 h after estradiol addition.

3.4. Quantitation of SCRaMbLE Events

The impact of SCRaMbLE on a genomic level was subsequently investigated using the EW01-GAL strain, since it had the greatest versatility for Cre-induction options and demonstrated the effective suppression of SCRaMbLE in glucose-containing media. Twelve white colonies and two red colonies were randomly selected from each time point after estradiol addition (2, 4 and 6 h) in the galactose–grown EW01-GAL strain (Figure 5). At each time point, the total number of colonies obtained was 63, 141 and 200, respectively. The genome of each colony was sequenced and the synthetic portion analyzed with custom scripts (developed in this study) to evaluate the level of SCRaMbLE that occurred. The degree of genome rearrangement was based on the number of genes lost per genome in each SCRaMbLEd colony.
The analysis of sequencing data from red-pigmented colonies revealed that, in general, large amounts of genetic material were lost on both synthetic chromosomes. At least 50%, and up to 78%, of all CDSs had been deleted in all analyzed red strains (data not shown). This phenomenon of large amounts of DNA loss in red colonies was supported by the absence of synthetic chromosome-specific PCR products obtained from a larger set of 24 red and 24 white colonies (Figure A2). The absence of PCR amplification products from targets on both chromosome arms might suggest a high frequency of complete loss of synthetic chromosomes in red colonies. Interestingly, red colonies obtained after two hours of SCRaMbLE displayed extensive gene loss, similar to those analyzed at the 4 and 6 h time points.
With the exclusion of two outlier strains, which had lost the majority of synthetic chromosome VI, a significant variation in gene-loss frequencies was observed between the white colonies evaluated at each time point, with 7–60 gene deletions per strain (Figure 6). On average, strains had 26 deletions after 2 h of induction, which increased to 33 at 4 h of estradiol introduction. In accordance with the RED assay, the average number of gene deletions decreased to 19 per strain for the 6 h time point. A genomic heat map (Figure A3), showing the frequency of gene loss across synthetic chromosomes III and VI, revealed a non-random distribution of gene deletion events over the length of both synthetic chromosomes.

4. Discussion

SCRaMbLE is a novel genome evolution system associated with the synthetic Sc2.0 strains, allowing the combinatorial deletion, duplication and translocation of multiple genes at a time. Not only is SCRaMbLE a valuable tool for studying epistatic interactions between genes, it has also been demonstrated as a useful approach to generate large libraries of novel strains with improved industrial phenotypes [7,12,15,29]. However, this indiscriminatory rearrangement of functional genomic units frequently results in inviable or unfit phenotypes due to the loss of essential genes or the disruption of fitness-related metabolic pathways. To harness SCRaMbLE for the development of next generation industrial strains, precise control is required to limit the loss of promising strains due to excessive gene loss. Currently, strategies to indicate the degree of genomic SCRaMbLEing are based on the evaluation of cell viability and time-consuming whole genome sequencing analysis [8], though both approaches are of limited use in industrial yeast strains, which are predominantly diploid. Here, a simple method called rapid evolution detection (RED) was developed for use in semi-synthetic heterozygous yeast strains. RED allows the qualitative detection of the genomic rearrangements that occurred within a SCRaMbLEd population through the generation of visually distinct red-pigmented yeast colonies.
SCRaMbLE-mediated genomic rearrangements occur exclusively in synthetic DNA at the gene-flanking loxP sites. Here, a RED-enabled semi-synthetic haploid strain (EW00) was constructed and used as a modular add-on to generate semi-synthetic heterozygous yeast strains with industrial backgrounds. Similar to other strain-breeding reports [30], the four semi-synthetic diploid strains generated here displayed a minimal loss of beneficial phenotypes (and even heterosis). Although a limited number of phenotypes were evaluated here, our results suggest that the heterozygous synthetic DNA had a low impact on the general fitness of the resulting strains, and that it is possible to introduce SCRaMbLE-capability into any industrial S. cerevisiae strain.
To restrict excessive genome rearrangement, SCRaMbLE was originally designed with an inducible control mechanism, whereby Cre-recombinase would only be expressed in newly formed daughter cells and only activated in the presence of estradiol [2]. This was achieved by fusing the Cre-recombinase to the murine estradiol-binding domain (EBD), which sequesters Cre-recombinase in the cytosol. The controlled addition of estradiol to the culture medium facilitates the movement of Cre-EBD into the nucleus, where Cre recombinase is able to act upon the loxP sequences of the synthetic genome [2]. However, reports from our group and other Yeast 2.0 consortium members have suggested that SCRaMbLE might occur even in the absence of estradiol. RED revealed low, but detectable, ADE2 deletion events for strains harboring CLB2p and SCW11p Cre-EBD expression plasmids in the absence of estradiol. Even at a low frequency, this could lead to unintended gene loss or even the loss of whole chromosomes without Cre-induction [6,15], and could affect the long-term stability of strains. Additional evidence of this leakiness was observed in RED-enabled strains grown on agar plates (in the absence of estradiol), with the infrequent appearance of the red sectoring (Figure A1) of otherwise white colonies—a strong indicator of genome instability [31]. The unintended SCRaMbLE initiation in the absence of estradiol is likely to be Cre-EBD concentration-dependent, as the strong induction of the recombinase expression from the GAL1 promoter surpassed the cytosolic sequestering ability of the estrogen-binding domain. This observation shows the versatility of the GAL1p expression system for Cre-induction, by providing options for a stepwise adjustment in SCRaMbLE strength, in addition to the effective suppression of SCRaMbLE in glucose-containing media.
The custom bioinformatic pipeline developed in this study was able to effectively differentiate short DNA reads originating from the synthetic portion of heterozygous S. cerevisiae strains, allowing the enumeration of gene deletion events after SCRaMbLE. The genome sequencing data supported the visual RED assay results. Using this simple method to visually report on the frequency of genomic rearrangements in a post-SCRaMbLE population, we were able to detect the leakiness of several Cre-expression systems and establish the induction timeframes for optimal SCRaMbLEing rates. Our results also demonstrated the importance of selecting appropriate sampling times, as prolonged SCRaMbLE induction could ultimately reduce the frequency of genomic rearrangement within the population. One reason for this observation could be linked to the loss of cell viability due to the increased chance of essential gene loss and/or the excessive disruption of cellular metabolism over extended periods of SCRaMbLE. It is thus conceivable that cells with fewer rearrangements or those which have escaped the influence of Cre-recombination (due to plasmid loss or mutations) would have a competitive advantage over cells with rapidly changing genomes.
Assuming an equal chance of recombination at any given loxP site, SCRaMbLEd synthetic haploid strains would have lost on average seven to eight genes, upon reaching 90% cell lethality due to essential gene loss. This value was in alignment with previous reports for SCRaMbLEd haploid strains that had up to eight gene deletions per strain [6]. In the heterozygous strains evaluated in this study, SCRaMbLEd populations were generated with, on average, 33 gene deletions per strain. Considering that some strains had up to 60 gene deletions, the opportunity to obtain highly modified genomes is significantly enhanced by the higher viability of these strains. SCRaMbLEing in heterozygous diploid strains has been established as a powerful tool to generate novel phenotypes (including in interspecies diploids [9]), but whether this increased genomic diversity of SCRaMbLEd heterozygous strains outweighs the potential masking effects of the native chromosome remains to be determined.
In conclusion, RED was developed as a modular system to monitor and report on the occurrence and level of SCRaMbLEing in a population that provides information visually without the need to sequence strains. Heterozygous diploids were developed by combining industrially relevant haploids with a RED-enabled strain containing synthetic DNA, and were shown to be generally as fit as their industrial parent. Through the breeding strategy used here, or protoplast fusions, synthetic chromosomes can be introduced to any industrial S. cerevisiae strain and be RED-enabled. Furthermore, RED proved a valuable resource to rapidly evaluate various SCRaMbLE induction systems and induction optimizations. In future studies, RED could be harnessed to determine the effects of different growth conditions or strain backgrounds on the magnitude of SCRaMbLE in a population, or assist in future genome minimization efforts [2].

Supplementary Materials

The shell scripts that was used to separate Synthetic Yeast Illumina DNA reads from a heterologous diploid strains can be accessed at https://github.com/HeinrichKroukamp/Wightman-et-al-2020-script.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.L.I.W. and H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, E.L.I.W. and H.K; writing—review and editing, E.L.I.W., H.K., I.S.P., I.T.P. and H.K.M.N.; visualization, E.L.I.W., H.K. and I.S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Liam Elsborne for helpful discussions and for providing access to the HPC. Plasmid pLM160_pCLB2_cre was a gift from Leslie Mitchell (NYU, Sc2.0 collaborator).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Microorganisms 08 01914 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Heterozygous diploid S. cerevisiae EW01-GAL colonies after SCRaMbLE. A clear difference between red and white colonies is observed.
Figure A1. Heterozygous diploid S. cerevisiae EW01-GAL colonies after SCRaMbLE. A clear difference between red and white colonies is observed.
Microorganisms 08 01914 g0a1
Microorganisms 08 01914 g0a2 550
Figure A2. Detection of PCR markers on the native and synthetic chromosomes of SCRaMbLEd EW01-GAL strains. Red colonies displayed a high frequency of synthetic chromosome loss, while maintaining native chromosome integrity.
Figure A2. Detection of PCR markers on the native and synthetic chromosomes of SCRaMbLEd EW01-GAL strains. Red colonies displayed a high frequency of synthetic chromosome loss, while maintaining native chromosome integrity.
Microorganisms 08 01914 g0a2
Microorganisms 08 01914 g0a3 550
Figure A3. Heat maps of gene loss frequencies in three sets of randomly selected white SCRaMbLEd EW01-GAL. Each segment represents a coding DNA sequence (CDS) on synthetic chromosomes III and VI, while the color depicts the total number of CDS lost by SCRaMbLEing; blue segments depict sites of minimal deletion while red represents the most frequent deletion sites.
Figure A3. Heat maps of gene loss frequencies in three sets of randomly selected white SCRaMbLEd EW01-GAL. Each segment represents a coding DNA sequence (CDS) on synthetic chromosomes III and VI, while the color depicts the total number of CDS lost by SCRaMbLEing; blue segments depict sites of minimal deletion while red represents the most frequent deletion sites.
Microorganisms 08 01914 g0a3
Microorganisms 08 01914 g0a4 550
Figure A4. Summary of bioinformatics pipeline to filter sequencing reads of SCRaMbLEd heterozygous diploid S. cerevisiae. Reads are mapped to reference sequences from both parental chromosomes (a) and are filtered by reads that were a 100% match to the reference (b). Pools of reads are compared and reads that uniquely match to the synthetic reference are separated (c). The final read pool is converted into FASTQ for convenient direct use in other software (d).
Figure A4. Summary of bioinformatics pipeline to filter sequencing reads of SCRaMbLEd heterozygous diploid S. cerevisiae. Reads are mapped to reference sequences from both parental chromosomes (a) and are filtered by reads that were a 100% match to the reference (b). Pools of reads are compared and reads that uniquely match to the synthetic reference are separated (c). The final read pool is converted into FASTQ for convenient direct use in other software (d).
Microorganisms 08 01914 g0a4
Table
Table A1. Primers used in this study.
Table A1. Primers used in this study.
Primer NameForward
HO_ampl-FTCACGGCTAACTCTTACGTTATG
HO_ampl-RGTATGTACCAGAAGCACGTGAAG
HO_conf-FATGCTTTCTGAAAACACGACTATTC
HO_conf-RACAGCATCAAACTGTAAGATTCCG
Cre-F+PacICTACTTAATTAAATGTCCAATTTACTGACC
Cre-CassetteRGAATTCGATATCAAGCTTATCGA
ADE2 FAAGCCGAGAATTTTGTAACACC
ADE2 RTCCTCGGTTCTGCATTGAGC
ADE2 + YFL019C FCTTTGCTCTATATTCGAGTCAGGCTCCACCAGTCATTTCGTCGCCCAATGTGTCCATCTG
ADE2 + YFL019C RATCATAAAAACCTTACGCCATCTGTGGGACTCGTCATAGGACGAGCCGTTGATGAGGTTA
Ura3 FGCGAGGCATATTTATGGTGAAG
Ura3 RTGGAACTCTTGTTGTTCTTTGG
MatA-FACTCCACTTCAAGTAAGAGTTTG
MatAlpha-FGCACGGAATATGGGACTACTTCG
MatLocus-R AGTCACATCAAGATCGTTTATGG
NatIII left FTTAGGGACGCATCTGTGAACTC
NatIII & SYNIII left RGTTTGGAGACTTTGGATCATCC
NatIII right FCTCTTCGGGGTACTCTTTACCT
NatIII & SYNIII right RGTTGAAGTCACATCGTCACAGT
NatVI left FCAGGATGTACTGATAGGACGTT
NatVI left RGTAGCATACGCACTCCGAAC
NatVI Right FCCTTGCTAGCATCCAAACTTTC
NatVI Right RGATGGACTGGTGACGCAAG
SynIII left FTCCGAGATGCTAGCGTTAATAG
SynIII right FAGCAGCGGTTATAGCTTGCCA
SynVI rightCAAGACTGGGTGAACGCTCAA
SynVI rightGCTTTGGCCTCTATTCAAACCT

References

  1. Pretorius, I.S.; Boeke, J.D. Yeast 2.0—Connecting the dots in the construction of the world’s first functional synthetic eukaryotic genome. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018, 18, foy032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dymond, J.S.; Boeke, J.D. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SCRaMbLE system and genome minimization. Bioengineered 2012, 3, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Almeida, J.R.; Modig, T.; Petersson, A.; Hähn-Hägerdal, B.; Lidén, G.; Gorwa-Grauslund, M.F. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kroukamp, H.; den Haan, R.; la Grange, D.C.; Sibanda, N.; Foulquié-Moreno, M.R.; Thevelein, J.M.; van Zyl, W.H. Strain breeding enhanced heterologous cellobiohydrolase secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a protein specific manner. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12, 1700346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. De Witt, R.N.; Kroukamp, H.; Van Zyl, W.H.; Paulsen, I.T.; Volschenk, H. QTL analysis of natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates reveals unique alleles involved in lignocellulosic inhibitor tolerance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019, 19, foz047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shen, Y.; Stracquadanio, G.; Wang, Y.; Yang, K.; Mitchell, L.A.; Xue, Y.; Cai, Y.; Chen, T.; Dymond, J.S.; Kang, K.; et al. SCRaMbLE generates designed combinatorial stochastic diversity in synthetic chromosomes. Genome Res. 2016, 26, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Blount, B.; Gowers, H.J.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Jovicevic, D.; McKiernan, R.M.; Xie, Z.X.; Li, Y.J.; Yuan, Y.J.; Ellis, T. Rapid host strain improvement by in vivo rearrangement of a synthetic yeast chromosome. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jia, B.; Wu, Y.; Li, B.; Mitchell, L.A.; Liu, H.; Pan, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Jia, N.; Li, B.; et al. Precise control of SCRaMbLE in synthetic haploid and diploid yeast. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shen, M.J.; Wu, Y.; Yang, K.; Li, Y.; Xu, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, B.; Li, X.; Xiao, W.; Zhou, X.; et al. Heterozygous diploid and interspecies SCRaMbLEing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Caspeta, L.; Chen, Y.; Ghiaci, P.; Feizi, A.; Buskov, S.; Hallström, B.M.; Petranovic, D.; Nielsen, J. Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant. Science 2014, 346, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hochrein, L.; Mitchell, L.A.; Schulz, K.; Messerschmidt, K.; Mueller-Roeber, B. L-SCRaMbLE as a tool for light-controlled Cre-mediated recombination in yeast. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wightman, E.L.I.; Kroukamp, H.; Pretorius, I.S.; Paulsen, I.T.; Nevalainen, H.K.M. Rapid optimisation of cellulolytic enzymes ratios in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using in vitro SCRaMbLE. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dymond, J.S.; Richardson, S.M.; Coombes, C.E.; Babatz, T.; Muller, H.; Annaluru, N.; Blake, W.J.; Schwerzmann, J.W.; Dai, J.; Lindstrom, D.L.; et al. Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. Nature 2011, 477, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. De Witt, R.N.; Kroukamp, H.; Volschenk, H. Proteome response of two natural strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with divergent lignocellulosic inhibitor stress tolerance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019, 19, foy116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ma, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Ding, M.; Wu, Y.; Yuan, Y. SCRaMbLE generates evolved yeasts with increased alkali tolerance. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gietz, R.D.; Schiestl, R.H. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Van Wyk, N.; Kroukamp, H.; Espinosa, M.I.; von Wallbrunn, C.; Wendland, J.; Pretorius, I.S. Blending wine yeast phenotypes with the aid of CRISPR DNA editing technologies. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 324, 108615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lõoke, M.; Kristjuhan, K.; Kristjuhan, A. Extraction of genomic DNA from yeasts for PCR-based applications. Biotechniques 2011, 50, 325–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Winzeler, E.A.; Shoemaker, D.D.; Astromoff, A.; Liang, H.; Anderson, K.; Andre, B.; Bangham, R.; Benito, R.; Boeke, J.D.; Bussey, H.; et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 1999, 285, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mitchell, L.A.; Wang, A.; Stracquadanio, G.; Kuang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yang, K.; Richardson, S.; Martin, J.A.; Zhao, Y.; Walker, R.; et al. Synthesis, debugging, and effects of synthetic chromosome consolidation: synVI and beyond. Science 2017, 355, eaaf4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Favaro, L.; Basaglia, M.; van Zyl, W.H.; Casella, S. Using an efficient fermenting yeast enhances ethanol production from unfiltered wheat bran hydrolysates. Appl. Energy 2013, 102, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Swezey, J. Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection (NRRL-Northern Regional Research Laboratory) Database; USDA/ARS, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research: Peoria, IL, USA, 2016. [CrossRef]
  23. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Jones, E.; Fink, G. Regulation of Amino Acid and Nucleotide Biosynthesis in Yeast. In The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces; Metabolism and Gene Expression, 2nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor: Long Island, NY, USA, 1982; p. 181. [Google Scholar]
  25. Althoefer, H.; Schleiffer, A.; Wassmann, K.; Nordheim, A.; Ammerer, G. Mcm1 is required to coordinate G2-specific transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 5917–5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Maher, M.; Cong, F.; Kindelberger, D.; Nasmyth, K.; Dalton, S. Cell cycle-regulated transcription of the CLB2 gene is dependent on Mcm1 and a ternary complex factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 3129–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Lindstrom, D.L.; Gottschling, D.E. The Mother Enrichment Program: A Genetic System for Facile Replicative Life Span Analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2009, 183, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Johnston, M.; Davis, R. Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1984, 4, 1440–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Luo, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Guo, Y.; Shen, Y.; Jiang, L.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Cai, Y.; et al. Identifying and characterizing SCRaMbLEd synthetic yeast using ReSCuES. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Benjaphokee, S.; Hasegawa, D.; Yokota, D.; Asvarak, T.; Auesukaree, C.; Sugiyama, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Boonchird, C.; Harashima, S. Highly efficient bioethanol production by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with multiple stress tolerance to high temperature, acid and ethanol. New Biotechnol. 2012, 29, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Strome, E.D.; Wu, X.; Kimmel, M.; Plon, S.E. Heterozygous screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies dosage-sensitive genes that affect chromosome stability. Genetics 2008, 178, 1193–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 01914 g001 550
Figure 1. Strategy to generate RED-enabled heterozygous diploid S. cerevisiae strains. Native ade2 and ura3 were removed from industrially derived HK01–HK04 haploid strains. Native ade2 was also deleted from Chr XV in the semi-synthetic yZY175 strain, and functional ADE2 was re-introduced into Syn Chr VI replacing the non-essential YFL019C gene. In this locus, ADE2 is flanked by the existing loxPsym sequences. Mating of the two modified parental haploids generated RED-enabled EW01–EW04 containing native (non-synthetic) chromosomes from HK01–HK04 (MATa) and synthetic chromosomes from yZY175 (MATα). Colors of yeast strains shown in this figure are representative of the color of strains following each genetic manipulation.
Figure 1. Strategy to generate RED-enabled heterozygous diploid S. cerevisiae strains. Native ade2 and ura3 were removed from industrially derived HK01–HK04 haploid strains. Native ade2 was also deleted from Chr XV in the semi-synthetic yZY175 strain, and functional ADE2 was re-introduced into Syn Chr VI replacing the non-essential YFL019C gene. In this locus, ADE2 is flanked by the existing loxPsym sequences. Mating of the two modified parental haploids generated RED-enabled EW01–EW04 containing native (non-synthetic) chromosomes from HK01–HK04 (MATa) and synthetic chromosomes from yZY175 (MATα). Colors of yeast strains shown in this figure are representative of the color of strains following each genetic manipulation.
Microorganisms 08 01914 g001
Microorganisms 08 01914 g002 550
Figure 2. Flow diagram of the RED assay experimental procedure. RED-enabled semi-synthetic heterozygous diploid cells, containing a synthetic copy of chr III and VI, were engineered to turn red due to loxP-mediated loss of ADE2 (a). Cre-recombinase expression was induced for 2, 4 and 6 h to allow increased genomic rearrangement through SCRaMbLE (b). The frequency of ADE2 loss was determined based on the appearance of yeast colonies with red pigment (c). Randomly selected colonies were sequenced using short-read NGS technology. Custom scripts were developed to filter out all reads not originating from the synthetic genomes (d). SCRaMbLEd chromosomes were assembled and assessed for gene loss (e).
Figure 2. Flow diagram of the RED assay experimental procedure. RED-enabled semi-synthetic heterozygous diploid cells, containing a synthetic copy of chr III and VI, were engineered to turn red due to loxP-mediated loss of ADE2 (a). Cre-recombinase expression was induced for 2, 4 and 6 h to allow increased genomic rearrangement through SCRaMbLE (b). The frequency of ADE2 loss was determined based on the appearance of yeast colonies with red pigment (c). Randomly selected colonies were sequenced using short-read NGS technology. Custom scripts were developed to filter out all reads not originating from the synthetic genomes (d). SCRaMbLEd chromosomes were assembled and assessed for gene loss (e).
Microorganisms 08 01914 g002
Microorganisms 08 01914 g003 550
Figure 3. Fitness assays of generated heterologous diploid strains EW01-04, their parental haploids (HK01–04 and yZY175) and the corresponding diploid strains (industrial diploids). Spot assays were performed on YPD containing 10–12% (v/v) ethanol, 25 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 1.5 M sorbitol incubated for 72 h.
Figure 3. Fitness assays of generated heterologous diploid strains EW01-04, their parental haploids (HK01–04 and yZY175) and the corresponding diploid strains (industrial diploids). Spot assays were performed on YPD containing 10–12% (v/v) ethanol, 25 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 1.5 M sorbitol incubated for 72 h.
Microorganisms 08 01914 g003
Microorganisms 08 01914 g004 550
Figure 4. Ethanol production of S. cerevisiae industrially relevant diploids (MH1000, Y-11878, Y-582 and YB-428) and semi-synthetic heterozygous diploids (EW01-EW04). Ethanol concentration was measured after cultivation in YPD with high glucose concentration (20 g L–l glucose) at 30 °C for 120 h. There was no difference in ethanol production from semi-synthetic strains compared to the corresponding industrial diploids, except for the EW01 strain, compared to the parental MH1000 strain.
Figure 4. Ethanol production of S. cerevisiae industrially relevant diploids (MH1000, Y-11878, Y-582 and YB-428) and semi-synthetic heterozygous diploids (EW01-EW04). Ethanol concentration was measured after cultivation in YPD with high glucose concentration (20 g L–l glucose) at 30 °C for 120 h. There was no difference in ethanol production from semi-synthetic strains compared to the corresponding industrial diploids, except for the EW01 strain, compared to the parental MH1000 strain.
Microorganisms 08 01914 g004
Microorganisms 08 01914 g005 550
Figure 5. Red:white ratio of S. cerevisiae heterozygous diploid EW01 colonies following SCRaMbLE for up to six hours. Three strains were evaluated (EW01-CLB, EW01-SCW and EW01-GAL) that contained Cre expression plasmids with CRE under the transcriptional control of promoters CLB2p, SCW11p and GAL1p, respectively. Cultures were supplemented with 1 μM estradiol to induce SCRaMbLEing, while the control cultures received no estradiol. EW01-GAL was cultivated in both inducing (galactose in the absence of glucose) or non-inducing (glucose-containing) conditions. At two-hour time points from 0 h, samples of cells were taken, washed and plated onto YPD agar. The color of colonies was recorded after 72 h.
Figure 5. Red:white ratio of S. cerevisiae heterozygous diploid EW01 colonies following SCRaMbLE for up to six hours. Three strains were evaluated (EW01-CLB, EW01-SCW and EW01-GAL) that contained Cre expression plasmids with CRE under the transcriptional control of promoters CLB2p, SCW11p and GAL1p, respectively. Cultures were supplemented with 1 μM estradiol to induce SCRaMbLEing, while the control cultures received no estradiol. EW01-GAL was cultivated in both inducing (galactose in the absence of glucose) or non-inducing (glucose-containing) conditions. At two-hour time points from 0 h, samples of cells were taken, washed and plated onto YPD agar. The color of colonies was recorded after 72 h.
Microorganisms 08 01914 g005
Microorganisms 08 01914 g006 550
Figure 6. The number of deleted genes in white EW01_GAL colonies obtained after two, four or six hours of estradiol exposure. Each black dot represents an individually sequenced SCRaMbLEd EW01_GAL colony.
Figure 6. The number of deleted genes in white EW01_GAL colonies obtained after two, four or six hours of estradiol exposure. Each black dot represents an individually sequenced SCRaMbLEd EW01_GAL colony.
Microorganisms 08 01914 g006
Table
Table 1. Cre-recombinase expression plasmids.
Table 1. Cre-recombinase expression plasmids.
Plasmid NameRelevant GenotypeReferences
pHK300-HOho::GAL1p –kanMX4[14]
pLM006HIS3,CEN6, SCW11p Cre_EBD [9,15]
pEW_CLBURA3, CEN6, CLB2p Cre_EBD aka pLM160 [9,15]
pEW_GALURA3, CEN6, GAL1p Cre_EBDThis study
pEW_SCWURA3,CEN6, SCW11p Cre_EBDThis study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wightman, E.L.I.; Kroukamp, H.; Pretorius, I.S.; Paulsen, I.T.; Nevalainen, H.K.M. Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Genome Evolution in SCRaMbLEd Synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121914

AMA Style

Wightman ELI, Kroukamp H, Pretorius IS, Paulsen IT, Nevalainen HKM. Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Genome Evolution in SCRaMbLEd Synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(12):1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121914

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wightman, Elizabeth L. I., Heinrich Kroukamp, Isak S. Pretorius, Ian T. Paulsen, and Helena K. M. Nevalainen. 2020. "Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Genome Evolution in SCRaMbLEd Synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains" Microorganisms 8, no. 12: 1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121914

APA Style

Wightman, E. L. I., Kroukamp, H., Pretorius, I. S., Paulsen, I. T., & Nevalainen, H. K. M. (2020). Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Genome Evolution in SCRaMbLEd Synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains. Microorganisms, 8(12), 1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121914

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop