Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Ambiguous Status of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci in the Biosafety of Fermented Meats: The Case of Antibacterial Activity Versus Biogenic Amine Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacterial, Gut Microbiome-Modifying Therapies to Defend against Multidrug Resistant Organisms
Previous Article in Journal
Mbov_0503 Encodes a Novel Cytoadhesin that Facilitates Mycoplasma bovis Interaction with Tight Junctions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Global Burden of Colistin-Resistant Bacteria: Mobilized Colistin Resistance Genes Study (1980–2018)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Incidence, Microbiology and Outcome of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

1
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Critical Care Center, F-59000 Lille, France
2
Medicine Faculty, University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
3
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St. James’s Hospital, St. James Street, Dublin 8, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland
4
Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Universidad de Barcelona, Ciberes, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
5
Nova Medical School, New University of Lisbon, 1099-085 Lisbon, Portugal
6
ICU, Hospital Universitari de Tarragona Joan XXIII, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
7
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, University of Lille, EA 2694—Santé Publique, Epidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Département de Biostatistiques, F-59000 Lille, France
8
Institute for Research and Education, D’Or, Rio de Janeiro 22281-100, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(2), 165; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020165
Submission received: 3 January 2020 / Accepted: 18 January 2020 / Published: 23 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens)

Abstract

:
Objectives: To determine the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on incidence, microbiology, and outcomes of ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTI). Methods: Planned ancillary analysis of TAVeM study, including 2960 consecutive adult patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) > 48 h. COPD patients (n = 494) were compared to non-COPD patients (n = 2466). The diagnosis of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was based on clinical, radiological and quantitative microbiological criteria. Results: No significant difference was found in VAP (12% versus 13%, p = 0.931), or VAT incidence (13% versus 10%, p = 0.093) between COPD and non-COPD patients. Among patients with VA-LRTI, Escherichia coli and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were significantly more frequent in COPD patients as compared with non-COPD patients. However, COPD had no significant impact on multidrug-resistant bacteria incidence. Appropriate antibiotic treatment was not significantly associated with progression from VAT to VAP among COPD patients who developed VAT, unlike non-COPD patients. Among COPD patients, patients who developed VAT or VAP had significantly longer MV duration (17 days (9–30) or 15 (8–27) versus 7 (4–12), p < 0.001) and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (24 (17–39) or 21 (14–40) versus 12 (8–19), p < 0.001) than patients without VA-LRTI. ICU mortality was also higher in COPD patients who developed VAP (44%), but not VAT(38%), as compared to no VA-LRTI (26%, p = 0.006). These worse outcomes associated with VA-LRTI were similar among non-COPD patients. Conclusions: COPD had no significant impact on incidence or outcomes of patients who developed VAP or VAT.

1. Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent airflow limitation, associated with an enhanced chronic inflammatory response in the airways and the lung to noxious particles or gases [1]. According to the WHO, over 65 million people have moderate to severe COPD worldwide. With an increasing prevalence, COPD is thought to become the third cause of death in the world by 2030 [2]. In a large Austrian cohort including 194,453 critically ill patients [3], COPD was present in 8.6% of all patients, including one third admitted for acute respiratory failure due to COPD and two thirds with only comorbid COPD. Although use of noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbations of COPD has substantially reduced the need for intubation, a large proportion of COPD patients still require invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). The largest prospective international cohorts of mechanically ventilated patients reported 10% of critically ill patients receiving MV because of acute exacerbation of COPD in 1998, and still 6% in 2010 [4].
Ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTI), including both ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), are the most common healthcare-associated infections among critically ill patients receiving MV. Approximately, one out of four patients intubated for more than 48 h develop VA-LRTI [5]. Intubated COPD patients may be at increased risk for VA-LRTI. Specific risk factors in this population include: (1) prolonged duration of invasive MV, linked with skeletal and diaphragmatic muscle weakness; (2) high incidence of microaspiration, due to gastro-esophageal reflux and altered interaction between breathing and deglutition, resulting in high tracheobronchial bacterial colonization, also favored by defective mucociliary clearance; and (3) altered general host defense mechanisms [6].
Several studies have identified COPD as independently associated to VAP occurrence [7,8], but more recent data suggest that COPD patients may not be at higher risk for VAP [9]. However, VAP is associated with prolonged MV and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and higher mortality among critically ill patients [5,10], including COPD population [9,11], although mortality attributable to VAP is still a matter for debate [12].
Further, VAT has been proposed as an intermediate stage between tracheobronchial colonization and VAP [13,14]. Several studies have already reported that VAT could progress to VAP, and was associated with longer duration of MV and ICU stay [15,16,17,18]. Recently, our group have confirmed that VAT was a separate entity, responsible itself for increased duration of MV and ICU stay in a large cohort of medical and surgical patients [5]. VAT was not associated with increased mortality rates, but transition from VAT to VAP was a risk factor for mortality and appropriate antibiotic treatment decreased both subsequent pneumonia rate and mortality.
However, to our knowledge, no study to date has specifically evaluated VAT among COPD population. One could hypothesize a higher incidence of VAT, as well as worse outcomes, in this particular population. Additionally, as previously mentioned, conflicting epidemiological data exist regarding the impact of COPD on the incidence of VAP. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine the impact of COPD on the incidence, microbiology, and outcomes of patients with VA-LRTI.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This study is a planned ancillary analysis of TAVeM study [5]. TAVeM is a large prospective multinational observational study conducted in 114 ICUs in Europe (Spain, France, Portugal) and South America (Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Bolivia and Colombia), which consecutively included, between September 2013 and July 2014, 2960 patients older than 18 years, who received invasive MV for more than 48 h, and prospectively collected data regarding VA-LRTI, defined as VAT and VAP. Readmitted patients and patients who had been previously tracheostomised were not included. Participating centers either received ethics approval from their institutions or ethics approval was waived (institutional review board number 2013515). Informed consent was waived because of the observational nature of the study.

2.2. Data Collection

Patients were prospectively followed up for VA-LRTI diagnosis and outcome data until death or discharge from hospital [5]. Patient demographic characteristics, severity scores, comorbidities, primary diagnoses, prior antibiotic exposure (during the three months preceding ICU admission) were recorded at baseline for all patients. Further, data about clinical, biological and radiological diagnostic criteria for VA-LRTI, microbiological diagnostic procedures, bacteriological findings, degree of severity on the onset of infection, antibiotic use and clinical outcomes were obtained.

2.3. Definitions

2.3.1. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Patients were considered as having COPD if exhibiting documented medical history, namely pulmonary function tests before admission, but also compatible clinical and/or radiological criteria, such as smoking exposure, history of acute exacerbations, hyperinflation or emphysema on chest X-ray, expiratory flow limitation during controlled MV [1].

2.3.2. Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

The diagnosis of VA-LRTI was based on the presence of at least two of the following criteria [5]: body temperature of more than 38.5 °C or less than 36.5 °C, leucocyte count greater than 12,000 cells per μL or less than 4000 cells per μL, and purulent secretions. Additionally, all episodes of infection needed microbiological confirmation, with the isolation in the endotracheal aspirate of at least 105 colony-forming units (CFU) per mL, or in bronchoalveolar lavage of at least 104 CFU per mL, to be included in the final analysis.
VAT was defined with the above-mentioned criteria with no radiographical signs of new pneumonia. VAP was defined by the presence of new or progressive infiltrates on chest radiograph.
Only first episodes of VAT and VAP were analyzed. VAP was defined as occurring subsequently to VAT if it was diagnosed in the 96 h period after diagnosis of VAT and if the same microorganism caused both infections.

2.3.3. Antibiotic Treatment and Microbiological Data

Antibiotic was considered appropriate if it matched the in vitro susceptibility of the pathogen causing VA-LRTI [19]. Microbiological identification and susceptibility tests were performed using standard methods. Multidrug resistant (MDR) isolates were defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [20].

2.4. Outcomes

The primary aim of our study was to determine the impact of COPD on the incidence of VA-LRTI, including VAT and VAP.
Our secondary objectives were to determine the impact of COPD on the microbiology and outcomes (duration of MV, length of stay in the ICU, in the hospital, and ICU mortality) of VA-LRTI. We also studied diagnostic data, antibiotic treatment data, and the effect of antibiotic treatment on progression from VAT to VAP in COPD as compared to non-COPD patients.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (percentages) and compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Normality of distribution of continuous variables was checked graphically and by using the Shapiro–Wilk test. As all continuous variables were skewed, they were presented as medians (interquartile ranges), and compared using Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test. Adjusted analyses on age and gender were performed using non-parametric analysis of covariance for continuous variables and logistic regression for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses to determine factors associated with ICU mortality in patients with ventilator associated lower respiratory tract infection were also performed. All variables with a p-value < 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in a logistic regression model using a stepwise backward elimination. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Statistics Department of Lille University Hospital performed all data analyses using SAS software package, release 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Patient Characteristics

Among the 2960 included patients, 494 (17%) had COPD. Age, percentage of men, percentage of patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, and alcohol abuse, were significantly higher in COPD patients compared with non-COPD patients. COPD patients were significantly more frequently admitted to the ICU for medical reasons, with a higher percentage of pneumonia as the main cause of admission, compared with non-COPD patients (Table 1).
Prior antibiotic use was significantly more frequent in COPD patients compared with non-COPD patients who developed VA-LRTI (95 of 121 (78.5%) versus 347 of 530 (65.5%), p = 0.0056).

3.2. Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

No significant difference was found in the incidence of VAP (12% versus 13%, p = 0.931), or VAT (13% versus 10%, p = 0.093) between COPD and non-COPD patients (Figure 1). No significant difference was found in the rate of transition from VAT to VAP (17% versus 11% of VAT episodes, p = 0.172) between COPD and non-COPD patients.

3.3. Characteristics of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

3.3.1. Diagnostic Data

On the day of VA-LRTI diagnosis, SOFA score and PCT were not significantly different in COPD patients who developed VAP as compared to patients who developed VAT, unlike in non-COPD patients (Table 2). However, clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) was significantly higher in VAP than in VAT patients, both in COPD and non-COPD population.
In both COPD and non-COPD patients, bronchoalveolar lavage was significantly more frequently used to diagnose VAP than VAT. Nevertheless, significantly higher proportion of COPD patients had invasive microbiological diagnostic tests, i.e., bronchoscopy or bronchoalveolar lavage, than did non-COPD patients, in both VAT and VAP groups (Table 2).

3.3.2. Microbiological Data

Among patients with VA-LRTI, Escherichia coli and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were significantly more frequent in COPD patients as compared with non-COPD patients (Table 3). The rate of MDR bacteria was not significantly different between COPD and non-COPD patients.

3.3.3. Impact of Antibiotic Treatment on Transition from VAT to VAP

In COPD patients, no significant difference was found in rate of antibiotic treatment, appropriate antibiotic treatment, or duration of antibiotic treatment between patients with transition from VAT to VAP, as compared with those with no transition from VAT to VAP (Table 4).

3.4. Outcomes of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

In COPD patients, MV, ICU and hospital length of stay were significantly different between patients with VAT, VAP, or no VA-LRTI, as in non-COPD patients. ICU mortality was also significantly different in these three groups of patients in both COPD and non-COPD populations: VAP was associated with a higher mortality compared to VAT and no-VALRTI among non-COPD patients, and only compared to no-VALRTI among COPD patients. COPD had no significant impact on duration of MV, length of ICU or hospital stay, or mortality in patients with VA-LRTI. In patients without VA-LRTI, COPD patients exhibited significantly lower ICU mortality, as compared to non-COPD patients (Table 5). Factors associated with ICU mortality in patients with VA-LRTI in univariate and multivariate analyses are shown in Table S1 (supplementary material).

4. Discussion

The main results of our study are as follows: (1) the incidence of VAP and VAT was not significantly different between COPD and non-COPD patients. (2) Among patients with VA-LRTI, E. coli and S. maltophilia were significantly more frequent in COPD patients as compared with non-COPD patients. The rate of MDR bacteria was not significantly different between the two groups. (3) Among COPD patients, those with VAT or VAP had significantly longer MV duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, as compared to patients without VA-LRTI. ICU mortality was also higher among COPD patients who developed VAP as compared to patients without VA-LRTI. These worse outcomes associated with VA-LRTI were similarly found among non-COPD patients. (4) Appropriate antibiotic treatment was not significantly associated with progression from VAT to VAP among COPD patients who developed VAT, unlike non-COPD patients.
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate the relationship between COPD and VA-LRTI, specifically including VAT. It benefits from several strengths of TAVeM study, which constitutes the largest prospective multicenter international cohort of VA-LRTI, with strict diagnostic criteria, obtaining data from consecutive patients, and generating robust and reproducible results [5].
Among intubated COPD patients, VAP incidence widely ranges, from 6 to 34% [7,8,9,11], possibly because of different VAP diagnostic criteria used in these studies. The relatively low rate of VAP among COPD patients, together with the lack of significant difference with non-COPD patients, may be due to the significantly higher previous exposure to antibiotics in COPD patients. Previous studies reported that antibiotic treatment could be protective against VAP [21]. However, antibiotic treatment is well-known risk factor for late-onset ICU-acquired infections, and MDR bacteria emergence [22]. Our results contradict several earlier studies that identified COPD as an independent risk factor for VAP [7,8], but are in line with data from a recent retrospective analysis of a large prospective observational study conducted in 27 European ICUs and including 2082 intubated patients, which reported a similar 20% incidence of VAP among COPD and non COPD patients [9].
In addition, differentiating VAT and VAP episodes in COPD patients can be challenging, as the interpretation of chest X-ray to identify new or progressive infiltrates, may be particularly tricky in this population with baseline abnormal radiographs. This might have resulted in a misclassification of VA-LRTI episodes. Using CT scan or lung ultrasound to diagnose pneumonia may be a future option to effectively differentiate VAT and VAP in COPD patients, as some authors have recently proposed for community-acquired pneumonia [23,24]. However, baseline CT would be needed, and indications should be carefully evaluated, as transport of critically ill patients to the radiology department was repeatedly reported to be associated with adverse events [25].
Little but consistent data are available on the microbiology of VAP in COPD patients [9,11,26]. Gram-negative bacilli are the most frequently isolated microorganisms in this population, with a high proportion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, around one third of responsible bacteria, followed by Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus. Koulenti et al. recently reported a higher prevalence of P. aeruginosa in VAP among COPD patients, as compared to non COPD patients (29 versus 19%, p = 0.04) [9]. The high proportion of MDR bacteria in COPD patients with VAP could be explained by the frequent antimicrobial treatments and hospitalizations in this population [27]. Our results showed significantly higher rates of S. maltophilia and E. coli in COPD patients as compared with non-COPD patients. However, no significant difference was found in MDR bacteria, or P. aeruginosa rates between COPD, and non-COPD patients. COPD has been previously reported as an independent risk factor for S. maltophilia ICU-acquired infections [28]. The absence of significant difference in MDR bacteria rate between COPD and non-COPD patients could be explained by high rates of MDR bacteria in both COPD and non-COPD population, and different local epidemiology.
Our results suggest that COPD itself is not associated with negative impact on outcome of VAP or VAT patients, as same worse outcomes were observed among COPD and non-COPD patients in our cohort, as compared to patients without VA-LRTI. Our results are in line with the recent large European cohort of intubated critically ill patients, including 397 COPD patients, which reported a 17% significant increase of ICU mortality in COPD patients who developed VAP, as compared to COPD patients without VAP, and identified the occurrence of VAP as an independent predictor of mortality among COPD patients (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval 1.35–3.87) [9]. However, a prospective observational study including 215 patients with VAP, observed a significantly higher ICU mortality in COPD patients compared with non COPD patients (60 versus 43%, p = 0.027) and identified COPD as an independent risk factor for ICU mortality in multivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.34–5) [26]. At least two potential explanations could be given for the absence of significant impact of COPD on outcomes of VAP patients in our study. First, our study might have been underpowered to detect such an effect. Second, the definition used for COPD was probably not specific, as lung function testing results were not available.
Besides, COPD has been considered a risk factor of death in ICU. A quite recent prospective study including 235 ventilated patients without evidence of respiratory infection showed that COPD was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio 2.1 [1.10–3.94]) [29]. Interestingly, our data suggest the opposite in the subgroup of patients without VA-LRTI, in which COPD was associated with significantly lower ICU mortality.
The rate of progression from VAT to VAP was similar in COPD and non-COPD patients in our study, suggesting that COPD is not a risk factor for progression from VAT to VAP. Antibiotic treatment, either appropriate or not, did not significantly reduce the progression from VAT to VAP among COPD patients. This result could be explained by the small number of COPD patients with transition from VAT to VAP.
Our study has several limitations. First, this was a planned analysis of a prospective database not initially designed to evaluate the relationship between COPD and VA-LRTI. The presence of COPD was recorded by the attending physician, based on pulmonary function tests before ICU admission, or compatible clinical and/or radiological criteria. Furthermore, data regarding the severity of COPD, such as GOLD stages, long term oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation at home or previous corticosteroid use were not recorded, and results might have been different if specific severity subgroups have been analyzed.

5. Conclusions

Our study suggests that COPD does not impact the incidence or the outcome of VA-LRTI. However, higher rates of S. maltophilia, and E. coli were found in COPD patients with VA-LRTI, as compared with non COPD patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/2/165/s1.

Author Contributions

A.R. (Anahita Rouzé), P.B. and S.N. designed the study. A.R. (Anahita Rouzé), P.B., I.M.-L., P.P., A.R. (Alejandro Rodriguez), N.R., J.S., M.H. and S.N. collected the data. A.R., P.B., and S.N. wrote the manuscript. All authors made substantial contribution. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

The TAVeM Study Group Included the Following Contributors

Ignacio Martín-Loeches, Alejandro Rodriguez, Daniel Curcio, Rubén Oscar Fernández, Jorge Arroyo, Maria Gabriela, Rodriguez Alvarez, Alex Tamayo Reyes, Christian Dellera, Francisco Molina, Daniel Molano Franco, Edwin Giovanny Chapeta Parada, Estuardo Salgado Yepez, Fernando Paredes Oña, Diego Morocho Tutillo, Diego Barahona, Francisco Alvarez Lerma, Ana Abella Álvarez, Jose Manuel Allegue Gallego, Francisco José Fuentes Morillas, Antonio Luis Ruiz Aguilar, María Lourdes Cordero Lorenzana, Rafael Sanchez Iniesta, Jordi Almirall, Antonio Albaya, Sergio Ruiz Santana, Carmen Fernandez, Miguel Angel Blasco Naval Potro, Pablo Vidal Cortes, Belen Jimenez, Rafael Sierra, Maria Del Valle Ortiz, Nieves Cruza, Pedro Maria Olaechea, Ana Carolina Caballero Zirena, Pilar Posada Gonzalez, Teresa Recio Gomez, Lorenzo Socias Crespi, Paula Ramírez Galleymore, Ricard Jordà Marcos, César Palazón, Bernardo Gil Rueda, Juan Carlos Ballesteros, Maria Pilar Gracia Arnilla, Antonia Socias, Joaquin Amador, Esperanza Molero Silvero, Laura Macaya Redín, Mónica Zamora Elson, Luis Cabré Pericas, Joaquín Álvarez Rodríguez, Mercedes Nieto, Antoni Torres, Elena Molinos, Ana Josefina, Nuno Catorze, Pedro Póvoa, Carlos Candeias, Luis Coelho, Paulo André, José Andrade Gomes, Elisa Vedes, Antero Fernandes, Miguel Ángel García, Catalina Sanchez Ramirez, Milagros Calizaya, Angel Estella, Adrià Albis, Gerardo Aguilar, Eva Torrents, Marta Gurpegui Puente, Angel Gabriel Sanchez, Thiago Lisboa, Pedro Azambuja, Marcos Freitas Knibel, Otavio Ranzani, Laura Darriba W. Camargo, Antonio Paulo Nassar Junior, Cesar Biselli Ferreira, Suzana Lobo, Ligia Rabello, Marcelo Park, Alexandre Guilherme Ribeiro de Carvalho, Mauricio Valencia, Alejandro Gonzalez Castro, Adoración Alcalá López, José María Castillo Caballero, Saad Nseir, Karim Jaffal, Erika Parmentier-Decrucq, Sébastien Préau, Chloé Rousselin, Caroline Blazejewski, Juliette Masse, Laurent Robriquet, Léa Satre-Buisson, Jean-Paul Mira, Nathalie Martin, Raphael Lepecq, Hervé Mentec, Christophe Girault, Antoine Marchalot, Jonathan Messika, Jean-Damien Ricard, Philppe Seguin, Bruno Mégarbane, Sandrine Valade, Elie Azoulay, Nicolas Boussekey, Olivier Leroy, Jean Reignier, Marc Clavel, Nicolas Pichon, Thomas Baudry, Laurent Argaud, Pascal Beuret, Ali Ait-Hssain, Martine Nyunga, Isabelle Alves, Florent Dewavrin, Guillaume Brunin, Stéphane Mérat, Pierre Pasquier, Frédéric Brun, Aurore Palud, Benoit Voisin, Romaric Grenot, Nicolas Van Grunderbeeck, Didier Thévenin, Benoit Misset, François Philippart, Jean-Pierre Frat, Rémi Coudroy, Philippe Cabaret, Marie Ledein, Fethi Zoheir Hadj Slimane, Romain Miguel-Montanes, Nicolas Weiss, Francis Bolgert, Bernard Just.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Participating centers either received ethics approval from their institutions or ethics approval was waived (institutional review board number 2013515). Informed consent was waived because of the observational nature of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

S.N.: MSD, Pfizer, Biomérieux, Gilead (lecture and advisory board). A.R.: MaatPharma (advisory board). Appendix A. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

COPDchronic obstructive pulmonary disease
VA-LRTIventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection
MVmechanical ventilation
VATventilator-associated tracheobronchitis
VAPventilator-associated pneumonia
ICUintensive care unit
CFU colony-forming units

References

  1. Vestbo, J.; Hurd, S.S.; Agustí, A.G.; Jones, P.W.; Vogelmeier, C.; Anzueto, A.; Barnes, P.J.; Fabbri, L.M.; Martinez, F.J.; Nishimura, M.; et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: GOLD Executive Summary. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 187, 347–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization Statistics 2008. Available online: https://www-who-int.gate2.inist.fr/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS08_Full.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 13 August 2019).
  3. Funk, G.C.; Bauer, P.; Burghuber, O.C.; Fazekas, A.; Hartl, S.; Hochrieser, H.; Schmutz, R.; Metnitz, P. Prevalence and prognosis of COPD in critically ill patients between 1998 and 2008. Eur. Respir. J. 2013, 41, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Esteban, A.; Frutos-Vivar, F.; Muriel, A.; Ferguson, N.D.; Peñuelas, O.; Abraira, V.; Raymondos, K.; Rios, F.; Nin, N.; Apezteguía, C.; et al. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 188, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Martin-Loeches, I.; Povoa, P.; Rodríguez, A.; Curcio, D.; Suarez, D.; Mira, J.P.; Cordero, M.L.; Lepecq, R.; Girault, C.; Candeias, C.; et al. Incidence and prognosis of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (TAVeM): A multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2015, 3, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rouzé, A.; Cottereau, A.; Nseir, S. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2014, 20, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Torres, A.; Aznar, R.; Gatell, J.M.; Jiménez, P.; González, J.; Ferrer, A.; Celis, R.; Rodriguez-Roisin, R. Incidence, Risk, and Prognosis Factors of Nosocomial Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1990, 142, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tejerina, E.; Frutos-Vivar, F.; Restrepo, M.I.; Anzueto, A.; Abroug, F.; Palizas, F.; González, M.; D’Empaire, G.; Apezteguía, C.; Esteban, A.; et al. Internacional Mechanical Ventilation Study Group. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia. J. Crit. Care 2006, 21, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Koulenti, D.; Blot, S.; Dulhunty, J.M.; Papazian, L.; Martin-Loeches, I.; Dimopoulos, G.; Brun-Buisson, C.; Nauwynck, M.; Putensen, C.; Sole-Violan, J.; et al. COPD patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: Implications for management. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 34, 2403–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Melsen, W.G.; Rovers, M.M.; Groenwold, R.H.; Bergmans, D.C.; Camus, C.; Bauer, T.T.; Hanisch, E.W.; Klarin, B.; Koeman, M.; Krueger, W.A.; et al. Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised prevention studies. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nseir, S.; Di Pompeo, C.; Soubrier, S.; Cavestri, B.; Jozefowicz, E.; Saulnier, F.; Durocher, A. Impact of ventilator-associated pneumonia on outcome in patients with COPD. Chest 2005, 128, 1650–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bekaert, M.; Timsit, J.F.; Vansteelandt, S.; Depuydt, P.; Vésin, A.; Garrouste-Orgeas, M.; Decruyenaere, J.; Clec’h, C.; Azoulay, E.; Benoit, D. Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A reappraisal using causal analysis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Rodríguez, A.; Póvoa, P.; Nseir, S.; Salluh, J.; Curcio, D.; Martín-Loeches, I. Incidence and diagnosis of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in the intensive care unit: An international online survey. Crit. Care 2014, 18, R32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Nseir, S.; Povoa, P.; Salluh, J.; Rodriguez, A.; Martin-Loeches, I. Is there a continuum between ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia? Intensive Care Med. 2016, 42, 1190–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dallas, J.; Skrupky, L.; Abebe, N.; Boyle, W.A., III; Kollef, M.H. Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in a mixed surgical and medical ICU population. Chest 2011, 139, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Craven, D.E.; Lei, Y.; Ruthazer, R.; Sarwar, A.; Hudcova, J. Incidence and outcomes of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and pneumonia. Am. J. Med. 2013, 126, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nseir, S.; Di Pompeo, C.; Pronnier, P.; Beague, S.; Onimus, T.; Saulnier, F.; Grandbastien, B.; Mathieu, D.; Delvallez-Roussel, M.; Durocher, A. Nosocomial tracheobronchitis in mechanically ventilated patients: Incidence, aetiology and outcome. Eur. Respir. J. 2002, 20, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Karvouniaris, M.; Makris, D.; Manoulakas, E.; Zygoulis, P.; Mantzarlis, K.; Triantaris, A.; Chatzi, M.; Zakynthinos, E. Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis increases the length of intensive care unit stay. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2013, 34, 800–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paul, M.; Shani, V.; Muchtar, E.; Kariv, G.; Robenshtok, E.; Leibovici, L. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Appropriate Empiric Antibiotic Therapy for Sepsis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 4851–4863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bouza, E.; Granda, M.J.P.; Hortal, J.; Barrio, J.M.; Cercenado, E.; Muñoz, P. Pre-emptive broad-spectrum treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia in high-risk patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39, 1547–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nair, G.B.; Niederman, M.S. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: Present understanding and ongoing debates. Intensive Care Med. 2014, 41, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Upchurch, C.P.; Grijalva, C.G.; Wunderink, R.G.; Williams, D.J.; Waterer, G.W.; Anderson, E.J.; Zhu, Y.; Hart, E.M.; Carroll, F.; Bramley, A.M.; et al. Community-acquired Pneumonia Visualized on Computed Tomography but Not Chest X-Ray: Pathogens, Severity, and Clinical Outcomes. Chest 2018, 153, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bouhemad, B.; Dransart-Rayé, O.; Mojoli, F.; Mongodi, S. Lung ultrasound for diagnosis and monitoring of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Ann. Transl. Med. 2018, 6, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Parmentier-Decrucq, E.; Poissy, J.; Favory, R.; Nseir, S.; Onimus, T.; Guerry, M.J.; Durocher, A.; Mathieu, D. Adverse events during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: Incidence and risk factors. Ann. Intensive Care 2013, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Makris, D.; Desrousseaux, B.; Zakynthinos, E.; Durocher, A.; Nseir, S. The impact of COPD on ICU mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Med. 2011, 105, 1022–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nseir, S.; Di Pompeo, C.; Cavestri, B.; Jozefowicz, E.; Nyunga, M.; Soubrier, S.; Roussel-Delvallez, M.; Saulnier, F.; Mathieu, D.; Durocher, A. Multiple-drug-resistant bacteria in patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Prevalence, risk factors, and outcome. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 34, 2959–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nseir, S.; Di Pompeo, C.; Brisson, H.; Dewavrin, F.; Tissier, S.; Diarra, M.; Boulo, M.; Durocher, A. Intensive care unit-acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Crit. Care 2006, 10, R143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rodríguez, A.; Lisboa, T.; Solé-Violán, J.; Gómez, F.; Roca, O.; Trefler, S.; Gea, J.; Masclans, J.R.; Rello, J. Impact of nonexacerbated COPD on mortality in critically ill patients. Chest 2011, 139, 1354–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study flowchart. Data are presented as number of patients. Only first episodes of VA-LRTI were taken into account. COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; VA-LRTI, ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia; VAT, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.
Figure 1. Study flowchart. Data are presented as number of patients. Only first episodes of VA-LRTI were taken into account. COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; VA-LRTI, ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia; VAT, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.
Microorganisms 08 00165 g001
Table 1. Patient characteristics at intensive care unit (ICU) admission in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-COPD patients.
Table 1. Patient characteristics at intensive care unit (ICU) admission in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-COPD patients.
COPD
n = 494
No COPD
n = 2466
p
Age, years68 (60–76)63 (49–74)<0.001
Male gender355 (72)1494 (61)<0.001
Severity scores
SAPS II50 (39–62)50 (37–63)0.27
SOFA score8 (5–10)8 (5–11)0.29
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus126 (26)442 (18)<0.001
Chronic respiratory failure187 (38)99 (4)<0.001
Chronic heart failure36 (7)176 (7)0.91
Chronic kidney disease76 (15)217 (9)<0.001
Cirrhosis 25 (5)152 (6)0.35
Immunosuppression113 (23)549 (22)0.77
Alcohol abuse84 (17)274 (11)<0.001
Intravenous drug abuse10 (2)43 (2)0.67
Category of admission <0.001
Medical392 (79)1496 (61)
Surgical68 (14)476 (19)
Trauma34 (7)494 (20)
Main causes for ICU admission
Shock33 (7)238 (10)0.037
Sepsis54 (11)284 (12)0.71
Acute respiratory distress syndrome23 (5)124 (5)0.73
Pneumonia110 (22)308 (12)<0.001
Aspiration5 (1)44 (2)0.22
Congestive heart failure20 (4)76 (3)0.27
Myocardial infarction12 (2)57 (2)0.87
Arrhythmia6 (1)28 (1)0.88
Coma 26 (5)248 (10)<0.001
Stroke6 (1)115 (5)<0.001
Seizure5 (1)66 (3)0.027
Brain aneurysm5 (1)37 (2)0.40
Traumatic brain injury6 (1)153 (6)<0.001
Acute renal failure9 (2)36 (1)0.55
Data are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICU, intensive care unit; SAPS, simplified acute physiology score; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment. Some patients had more than one cause for ICU admission.
Table 2. Biological criteria and microbiological diagnostic procedures used in ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis in COPD and non-COPD patients.
Table 2. Biological criteria and microbiological diagnostic procedures used in ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis in COPD and non-COPD patients.
COPD
n = 125
No COPD
N = 564
VAT
n = 64
VAP
n = 61
pVAT
n = 256
VAP
n = 308
p
CRP69 (9–201)129 (17–230)0.374126 (51–211)120 (30–239)0.78
PCT0.1 (0.0–1.7)0.8 (0.0–3.8)0.2190.1 (0.0–1.0)0.4 (0.0–5.0)<0.001
CPIS5 (3–6)6 (5–8)<0.0014 (3–6)7 (5–8)<0.001
Endotracheal aspirate52 (81)41 (67)0.072226 (88)212 (69)<0.001
Bronchoscopy7 (11) *15 (25) *0.04510 (4)41 (13)<0.001
Bronchoalveolar lavage6 (9) **15 (25) **0.0236 (2)44 (14)<0.001
Mini bronchoalveolar lavage5 (8)4 (7)0.78611 (4)41 (13)<0.001
Blind protected specimen brush8 (13)12 (20)0.27424 (9)39 (13)0.22
Data are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia; VAT, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; CPIS, clinical pulmonary infection score. p values are for comparison between VAT and VAP groups. * p = 0.008 and ** p = 0.005 versus patients with no COPD.
Table 3. Microbiological findings in COPD and non-COPD patients with ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections.
Table 3. Microbiological findings in COPD and non-COPD patients with ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections.
COPD
n = 125
No COPD
n = 564
p
Polymicrobial33 (26)132 (23)0.48
Multidrug-resistant isolates75 (60)346 (62)0.71
Gram-negative bacilli
Pseudomonas aeruginosa32 (26)136 (24)0.73
Escherichia coli23 (18)54 (10)0.005
Klebsiella pneumoniae15 (12)86 (15)0.35
Enterobacter spp.15 (12)66 (12)0.93
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia11 (9)20 (4)0.010
Haemophilus influenzae7 (6)50 (9)0.23
Proteus mirabilis7 (6)22 (4)0.39
Serratia marcescens5 (4)23 (4)0.97
Acinetobacter baumannii4 (3)37 (7)0.15
Citrobacter freundii3 (2)10 (2)0.71
Gram-positive cocci
MSSA21 (17)125 (22)0.18
MRSA4 (3)12 (2)0.51
Streptococcus pneumoniae8 (6)32 (6)0.75
Data are presented as number (%). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MRSA, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, meticillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.
Table 4. Antibiotic use in COPD and non-COPD patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.
Table 4. Antibiotic use in COPD and non-COPD patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.
COPD
n = 64
No COPD
n = 256
VAT to VAP Progression
n = 11
No VAT to VAP Progression
n = 53
pVAT to VAP Progression
n = 28
No VAT to VAP Progression
n = 228
p
Antibiotic treatment10 (91)50 (94)0.53921 (75)213 (93)0.005
Appropriate antibiotic treatment6 (55)42 (79)0.12413 (46)189 (83)<0.001
Length of antibiotic treatment, days7 (3–8)7 (4–10)0.5916 (4–10)7 (4–10)0.99
Data are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia; VAT, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. p values are for comparison between VAT to VAP and no VAT to VAP groups.
Table 5. Clinical outcomes of study patients.
Table 5. Clinical outcomes of study patients.
COPD
n = 494
No COPD
n = 2466
VAT
n = 64
VAP
n = 61
No VA-LRTI
n = 369
pVAT
n = 256
VAP
n = 308
No VA-LRTI
n = 1902
p
MV duration, days17(9–30)15(8–27)7(4–12)<0.00113(8–21)15(8–26)7(4–13)<0.001
ICU length of stay, days24(17–39)21(14–40)12(8–19)<0.00120(14–31)21(13–33)12(8–19)<0.001
Hospital length of stay, days42(22–59)30(18–56)23(14–38)<0.00136(21–54)31(20–54)23(14–41)<0.001
ICU mortality24 (38) $27 (44)95 (26) *0.00668 (27) £116 (38)565 (30)<0.001
Data are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range). P values are adjusted on age and gender using non-parametric analysis of covariance for continuous variables and logistic regression for categorical variables. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICU, intensive care unit; MV, mechanical ventilation; VA-LRTI, ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia; VAT, ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. P values are for comparisons between the three groups. $ p > 0.999 versus VAP, p = 0.150 versus no VA-LRTI, £ p = 0.002 versus VAP, p > 0.999 versus no VA-LRTI, * p =0.012 versus non-COPD patients with no VA-LRTI, p > 0.05 for all other comparisons between COPD and non COPD patients.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rouzé, A.; Boddaert, P.; Martin-Loeches, I.; Povoa, P.; Rodriguez, A.; Ramdane, N.; Salluh, J.; Houard, M.; Nseir, S. Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Incidence, Microbiology and Outcome of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020165

AMA Style

Rouzé A, Boddaert P, Martin-Loeches I, Povoa P, Rodriguez A, Ramdane N, Salluh J, Houard M, Nseir S. Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Incidence, Microbiology and Outcome of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2):165. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020165

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rouzé, Anahita, Pauline Boddaert, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Pedro Povoa, Alejandro Rodriguez, Nassima Ramdane, Jorge Salluh, Marion Houard, and Saad Nseir. 2020. "Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Incidence, Microbiology and Outcome of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections" Microorganisms 8, no. 2: 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020165

APA Style

Rouzé, A., Boddaert, P., Martin-Loeches, I., Povoa, P., Rodriguez, A., Ramdane, N., Salluh, J., Houard, M., & Nseir, S. (2020). Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Incidence, Microbiology and Outcome of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Microorganisms, 8(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020165

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop