Next Article in Journal
Clostridial Neurotoxins: Structure, Function and Implications to Other Bacterial Toxins
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of Long-Read Sequencing Technologies in Infection Control: Horizontal Transfer of a blaCTX-M-27 Containing lncFII Plasmid in a Patient Screening Sample
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Phylogeny of the Genus Euplotes (Protozoa, Ciliophora) Revealed by the Mitochondrial CO1 and Nuclear Ribosomal Genes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial Resistance and Comparative Genome Analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains Isolated in Egypt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Comparison of Conjugative Plasmids from Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli Encoding Beta-Lactamases and Capable of Mobilizing Kanamycin Resistance Col-like Plasmids

1
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Bacterial Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, Athens, GA 30605, USA
2
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Molecular Characterization of Foodborne Pathogens Research Unit, Wyndmoor, PA 19038, USA
3
Institute of Biosecurity and Microbial Forensics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(11), 2205; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112205
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 20 October 2021 / Accepted: 21 October 2021 / Published: 23 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance and Genetic Elements in Bacteria)

Abstract

:
Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli are important human pathogens that frequently contain plasmids, both large and small, carrying antibiotic resistance genes. Large conjugative plasmids are known to mobilize small Col plasmids, but less is known about the specificity of mobilization. In the current study, six S. enterica and four E. coli strains containing large plasmids were tested for their ability to mobilize three different kanamycin resistance Col plasmids (KanR plasmids). Large conjugative plasmids from five isolates, four S. enterica and one E. coli, were able to mobilize KanR plasmids of various types. Plasmids capable of mobilizing the KanR plasmids were either IncI1 or IncX, while IncI1 and IncX plasmids with no evidence of conjugation had disrupted transfer regions. Conjugative plasmids of similar types mobilized similar KanR plasmids, but not all conjugative plasmid types were capable of mobilizing all of the KanR plasmids. These data describe some of the complexities and specificities of individual small plasmid mobilization.

1. Introduction

Both Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli are common causes of foodborne illness in the United States and globally [1]. Combined, Salmonella and Shiga-toxin producing E. coli were responsible for 23.4% of reported foodborne illnesses in 2019 at sites participating in FoodNet in the U.S. [2]. Unfortunately, an increasing number of these infections display resistance to antibiotics [3]. Many of the genes conferring these resistances are carried by plasmids, both large and small, which could increase the mobility of these genes and by extension increase the spread of antibiotic resistance [4]. For example, β-lactamase genes, blaCMY-2 in particular, have been shown to frequently be carried by large plasmids especially of types IncA/C and IncI1 in Salmonella [5].
While many large plasmids are able to transfer to new cells independently via conjugation, not all plasmids are self-transmissible. Mobilizable plasmids are those that cannot transfer via conjugation on their own, but require a “helper plasmid” possessing the necessary genes to encode the mate-pair structures which mobilizable plasmids can utilize to transfer to a new cell [6]. Mobilizable plasmids may utilize their own relaxase/nikase or those present on the conjugative helper plasmid [7,8]. Many large plasmids, such as types IncF, IncP, and IncI1, have proven capable of mobilizing small plasmids [9]. However, less attention has been given to the differences in mobilization capabilities of these large conjugative plasmids.
Previously, small ColE-like plasmids carrying kanamycin resistance aph(3′)-I genes were categorized based on their plasmid replication/maintenance region and mobilization gene(s) [10,11,12,13,14]. In order to investigate the specifics of mobilization of these KanR plasmids, we screened a collection of β-lactam resistant Salmonella and E. coli strains for large plasmids and the ability of those large plasmids to mobilize varying KanR plasmids in tri-parental mating experiments. For isolates producing transconjugants, whole genome sequencing and further comparison of the plasmid sequences were completed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains

To maximize potential for presence of large plasmids, β-lactam-resistant, KAN STR-susceptible Salmonella enterica (n = 6) and Escherichia coli (n = 4) isolates were selected from a collection of multidrug resistant isolates of animal origin (Table 1). Isolates were tested for their ability to convert E. coli NEB10β to AMP-resistant via conjugation overnight. The plasmid replicon types and the β-lactamases present in the original isolates and their transconjugants were characterized using a PCR-based plasmid replicon typing kit (PBRT; Diatheva, Cartoceto, Italy) and the ARM-D β-lactamases ID kit (Streck, La Vista, NE, USA), respectively. The transconjugants were screened for the absence of small plasmids by extracting DNA using QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), and clones without visible small plasmids were chosen for further testing (described below) for their ability to mobilize different ColE-like kanamycin resistance plasmids (KanR plasmids) [10,12,13]. Of those, three isolates were selected for sequencing (n = 2 S. enterica, n = 1 E. coli) and one isolate, strain five (CRJJGF_00030), was sequenced and characterized as a part of a previous study [15]. A transformant containing the I1 plasmid of isolate #2 and the transconjugants of isolates #3, #5, and #12 were also sequenced.

2.2. KanR Plasmid Mobilization Tests on Agar

The ability of the conjugative plasmids to mobilize different KanR plasmids (pU302S [10], pSN11/00Kan [12], and pSe-Kan [13]) was tested using tri-parental mating on agar for qualitative assessment. Cultures of donor (NEB5α carrying KanR plasmid; KANR), recipient CAG18483 (TETR; F-, fadL771:Tn10, obtained from Coli Genetic Stock Center, #7407), and helper (NEB10β carrying conjugative plasmid; AMPR) were adjusted to ~108 CFU/mL and mixed at the ratio of 1:5:1 (10 μL:50 μL:10 μL) on a LB agar plate, and incubated at 37 °C for six hours. Mating mixtures were then resuspended into LB broth and plated on LB agar supplemented with kanamycin A (50 mg/L) and tetracycline-HCl (2 mg/L) for selection. Plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C and the KanR plasmid mobilization was scored as positive or negative.

2.3. Sequencing

Strains were sequenced using Nextera XT library kits on an Illumina MiSeq. Raw reads were assembled with A5 [16]. Plasmid replicons were identified using PlasmidFinder (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/; accessed on 31 August 2020) and plasmid contigs were identified using BLAST in comparison to known plasmid sequences in the non-redundant database [17]. Plasmid sequences were annotated using RAST and gene assignments were confirmed using BLAST in comparison to the non-redundant protein database [18]. Antibiotic resistance genes were identified using ResFinder (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/; accessed on 31 August 2020) [19]. The oriT sequences were identified with oriTFinder [20]. For plasmids where oriTFinder could not identify an oriT sequence, the oriT was manually annotated based on the homology with the oriT of IncX1 plasmid pOLA52 (NC_010378.1) [21]. Plasmid maps were generated using SnapGene (https://www.snapgene.com/; version 4.0.8). The transfer regions of each plasmid were extracted and aligned with the transfer regions of plasmids of similar type within this study as well as the prototypical plasmid of their incompatibility group using Mauve [22]. Prototypical plasmids used were IncX2 plasmid R6K (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Plasmids/; accessed on 31 September 2020) and IncI1 plasmid R64 (AP005147.1) [23]. The transfer region for p3I1 could not be aligned because the sequence was discontinuous. Plasmids were compared with the matching transconjugant plasmid using BLAST. The Blast Ring Image Generator (BRIG) was used to generate ring comparison figures [24].

3. Results

A total of 10 isolates were investigated, each of which contained at least one large plasmid. All 10 strains also contained a detectable β-lactamase gene, blaCMY-2. Seven of these strains yielded transconjugants in the bi-parental mating: all S. enterica strains investigated, but only one E. coli strain. Only plasmids of replicon types I1, X1, and X4 showed evidence of conjugation. However, not all plasmids of these types yielded transconjugants. With the exception of one isolate (strain #3), blaCMY-2 was the β-lactamase gene transferred to the recipient cell (Table 1).
Seven strains were subjected to whole genome sequencing with an average of 252 contigs per sequence. Plasmid replicon genes and antibiotic resistance genes were identified in every sequence (Table 1). Plasmids identified in original strains were named for the isolate number and replicon type. Plasmids in transconjugants were given the same name with a TC designation (Table 2). In each isolate/transconjugant pair, only one large plasmid containing a β-lactamase gene transferred. However, three of four isolates contained an additional large plasmid that did not transfer (Table 1). Plasmids of IncI1 or IncX type were assembled regardless of whether they transferred or not (Table 2, Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). The transfer regions of both IncI1 plasmids that did not transfer were disrupted by transposons or other sequences (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). Isolates #2, #3, and LCp2 contained a ColVC plasmid approximately 2 kb in size; the ColVC is partial (~one kb) in TC5f (Table 1).
Plasmids from original isolates were compared to plasmids in transconjugant clones. Plasmids p3X1 and p3X1-TC contained identical sequence with no SNP differences. A 163 bp insertion in a non-coding region of p3X1-TC was determined to be an assembly artifact rather than sequence change; this sequence was also present in the whole genome sequence of the original isolate, but on a small contig that could not be joined to the plasmid. p5I1 and p5I1-TC were identical. p12X4-TC contained all the sequence within p12X4 but had two insertions not contained within the genomic sequence of the original isolate: a 112 bp insertion in a non-coding region and a 275 bp insertion overlapping a non-coding region and transposase gene. p2I1 and the retransformed p2I1-LC contained the same sequence, except for a 258 bp deletion between two genes in the transfer region of p2I1-LC and a 289 bp deletion between two genes outside of the transfer region. However, there were also minor rearrangements related to assembly artifacts and less than 10 mismatches.
Alignments were generated comparing the transfer region of each plasmid of similar Inc type to each other and to a prototypical plasmid of each type. Plasmids were also compared to the plasmid of similar type that did not transfer (Figure 1 and Figure 2; Supplementary Figures S3 and S4). IncX1 plasmids showed more similarity to each other than to the IncX4 plasmid or the prototypical IncX plasmid, which is IncX2 (Figure 1; Supplementary Figure S3). IncI1 plasmids showed homology in their transfer regions, except p12I1, which contained both an insertion and deletion (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure S4).
Conjugative plasmids from at least five of the 10 original isolates were capable of mobilizing small plasmids (Table 3), four of which were sequenced: p2I1, p3X1, p5I1, and p12X4 (and those in the corresponding transconjugant/transformant p2I1-LC, p3X1-TC, p5I1-TC, and p12X4-TC). These plasmids were able to mobilize the KanR plasmids investigated with varying success. Plasmids of the same Inc type were able to mobilize the same small plasmids. pSN11/00Kan, which carries the mobC-mobABD operon, can be mobilized by all conjugative plasmids tested (IncI1, X1, and X4). Neither IncX plasmid could mobilize plasmids pU302S (carries nikA) or pSe-Kan (does not carry known mob genes), which suggests the Col plasmid-borne mob genes are required for IncX assisted plasmid mobilization (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Plasmids and β-lactamase genes were identified in 10 isolates (n = 6 S. enterica and n = 4 E. coli). We then determined the ability of the large plasmids in each isolate to mobilize small KanR plasmids. In all but one case, only one large plasmid transferred via conjugation (selected for AMP resistance) in each isolate regardless of the number of large plasmids present in each isolate. KanR plasmids were mobilized with varying success, depending on plasmid type.
Here we showed that pU302S, which carried just oriT and a nikA accessory protein, can be mobilized by IncI1 (p2I1-LC and p5I1-TC). This provided the only other experimental evidence than that of NTP16 that this group of diverse plasmids which lacks a relaxase may be mobilized by the IncI family [25]. While mobilization of plasmids lacking a relaxase has been documented, the essential genes necessary for transfer, which are provided by a conjugative plasmid, have not been specified yet. IncI1 plasmids also mobilized pSN11/00Kan, the KanR plasmid carrying the mobC-mobABD mobilization region, as well as the pSe-Kan which possesses two different oriT regions but no other identifiable mobilization accessory protein.
Plasmids from original isolates were nearly identical to their transconjugants. While there were minor differences in the sequences of these plasmids, it is most likely that these differences are related to sequencing and/or assembly error, rather than genetic change. Sequencing and assembly can introduce errors into the final sequence, especially in repetitive elements [26]. Further, the insertions and deletions detected were present near the beginning and ends of contigs and less than the average length of a paired end read. Long-read sequences combined with the short reads collected here would help resolve these discrepancies.
Both IncI1 plasmids that did not transfer had disrupted transfer regions. In p12I1, the transfer region was disrupted by a partial blaCMY-2 gene, the insertion occurring where traG is located in the other IncI1 plasmids investigated. In p3I1, the transfer region was disrupted in several places by transposons: inserted between the traT and traU genes, between traM and traN, and inside the DNA primase. It was not possible to close the assembly of p3I1 because there was no overlap of contig ends, possibly because of insertion of these transposons and repetitive elements, which can be difficult to sequence. In contrast, the IncX1 plasmid that did not transfer (p2X1) had complete transfer regions similar to p3X1, which was conjugative. It is possible that this plasmid is conjugative but either did not transfer, or transconjugants containing this plasmid were not selected because the plasmid did not contain a β-lactamase gene.
Isolates #2 and #3 contained a 2-kb ColVC plasmid. The ColVC plasmids in the two isolates were identical and appeared to be transferrable. All the transconjugants derived from isolate #2 carried additional small plasmid(s), as well as the sequenced transformant, LCp2. While the isolate #5 sequence did not contain a ColVC plasmid, transconjugant clone TC5f did. Isolate #5 was sequenced as part of another study using a different sequencing technology several years prior to this investigation. It is possible that the plasmid was not detected because the conjugation experiments were not conducted with the same culture (different retrieval from frozen storage) or that the sequencing technology did not detect the plasmid at the time of sequencing. Considering that only those transconjugant clones without visible small plasmid bands were selected for further investigation, it was unexpected to find that some TC clones still possessed ColVC plasmids within their whole genome sequence. Possible explanations for this discrepancy between sequencing and wet lab results could be (1) the ColVC plasmid may be present in lower copy number than other small plasmids, resulting in more varied miniprep yield between different samples that sometimes failed to be visualized on the gel; (2) uncut, supercoiled plasmids tend to run as smears, not sharp bands, on agarose gel, and do not take up DNA intercalating dyes easily, thus further reducing detection sensitivity. None of the ColVC plasmids contained any antibiotic resistance genes but their presence and the ability to be co-transferred does highlight the relevance of Col plasmids in natural environments.
In conclusion, similar types of large conjugative plasmids were able to mobilize the same (sub)group of KanR plasmids. Plasmids with disrupted transfer regions were not able to conjugate. We were able to show that the nikA-carrying KanR plasmid can be mobilized by IncI1 plasmids but not the IncX plasmids. Further studies with additional replicon types are needed to understand the full range of large plasmids capable of mobilizing these and other Col plasmids and will be important in understanding the transfer risk of a given antibiotic resistance gene.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms9112205/s1, Figure S1: IncI1 plasmids investigated, Figure S2: IncX plasmids investigated, Figure S3: progressiveMauve alignment of the transfer regions of R6K, p2X1, p3X1-TC, and p12X4-TC, Figure S4: progressiveMauve alignment of the transfer regions of R64, p2I1, p5I1-TC, and p12I1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.M., C.-Y.C. and J.G.F.; methodology, E.A.M., L.-H.T.N., L.M.H., P.S. and C.-Y.C.; validation, E.A.M., L.-H.T.N., L.M.H., P.S. and C.-Y.C.; formal analysis, E.A.M., L.-H.T.N., L.M.H. and P.S.; investigation, E.A.M., L.-H.T.N., L.M.H., P.S. and C.-Y.C.; resources, C.R.J., J.G.F. and C.-Y.C.; data curation, E.A.M. and P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.M. and C.-Y.C.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, E.A.M.; supervision, C.R.J., J.G.F. and C.-Y.C.; project administration, C.R.J., J.G.F. and C.-Y.C.; funding acquisition, C.R.J., J.G.F. and C.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service internal project plans 8072-42000-091-000-D and 6040-32000-079-000-D. E.A.M. was supported by a USDA ARS Headquarters Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Sequences generated as a result of this study can be accessed via NCBI under BioProject number PRJNA756294.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to acknowledge Asseta Kagambega for technical assistance during isolate sequencing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

References

  1. Scallan, E.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Angulo, F.J.; Tauxe, R.V.; Widdowson, M.A.; Roy, S.L.; Jones, J.L.; Griffin, P.M. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tack, D.M.; Ray, L.; Griffin, P.M.; Cieslak, P.R.; Dunn, J.; Rissman, T.; Jervis, R.; Lathrop, S.; Muse, A.; Duwell, M.; et al. Preliminary incidence and trends of infections with pathogenes transmitted commonly through food—Foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U.S. sites, 2016–2019. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carattoli, A. Plasmids and the spread of resistance. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 303, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Folster, J.P.; Pecic, G.; McCullough, A.; Rickert, R.; Whichard, J.M. Characterization of bla(CMY)-encoding plasmids among Salmonella isolated in the United States in 2007. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 1289–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Loftie-Eaton, W.; Rawlings, D.E. Diversity, biology and evolution of IncQ-family plasmids. Plasmid 2012, 67, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zechner, E.L.; Moncalián, G.; de la Cruz, F. Relaxases and Plasmid Transfer in Gram-Negative Bacteria. In Type IV Secretion in Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria; Backert, S., Grohmann, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 93–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Francia, M.V.; Varsaki, A.; Garcillan-Barcia, M.P.; Latorre, A.; Drainas, C.; de la Cruz, F. A classification scheme for mobilization regions of bacterial plasmids. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 79–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Warren, G.J.; Saul, M.W.; Sherratt, D.J. ColE1 plasmid mobility: Essential and conditional functions. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1979, 170, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chen, C.Y.; Nace, G.W.; Solow, B.; Fratamico, P. Complete nucleotide sequences of 84.5- and 3.2-kb plasmids in the multi-antibiotic resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium U302 strain G8430. Plasmid 2007, 57, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, C.Y.; Lindsey, R.L.; Strobaugh, T.P., Jr.; Frye, J.G.; Meinersmann, R.J. Prevalence of ColE1-like plasmids and kanamycin resistance genes in Salmonella enterica serovars. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6707–6714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, C.Y.; Strobaugh, T.P., Jr.; Frye, J.G. Characterization of small ColE1-like plasmids conferring kanamycin resistance in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars Typhimurium and Newport. Plasmid 2010, 63, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, C.Y.; Strobaugh, T.P., Jr.; Lindsey, R.L.; Frye, J.G.; Uhlich, G. Sequence analysis of a group of low molecular-weight plasmids carrying multiple IS903 elements flanking a kanamycin resistance aph gene in Salmonella enterica serovars. Plasmid 2011, 65, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, C.-Y.; Strobaugh, T.P.; Nguyen, L.-H.T.; Abley, M.; Lindsey, R.L.; Jackson, C.R. Isolation and characterization of two novel groups of kanamycin-resistance ColE1-like plasmids in Salmonella enterica serotypes from food animals. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. McMillan, E.A.; Gupta, S.K.; Williams, L.E.; Jové, T.; Hiott, L.M.; Woodley, T.A.; Barrett, J.B.; Jackson, C.R.; Wasilenko, J.L.; Simmons, M.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance genes, cassettes, and plasmids present in Salmonella enterica associated with United States food animals. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tritt, A.; Eisen, J.A.; Facciotti, M.T.; Darling, A.E. An integrated pipeline for de novo assembly of microbial genomes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; Garcia- Fernandez, A.; Larsen, M.V.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Hasman, H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Overbeek, R.; Olson, R.; Pusch, G.D.; Olsen, G.J.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Parrello, B.; Shukla, M.; et al. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D206–D214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zankari, E.; Hasman, H.; Cosentino, S.; Vestergaard, M.; Rasmussen, S.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Larsen, M.V. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2640–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Liu, M.; Tai, C.; Sun, J.; Deng, Z.; Ou, H.-Y. oriTfinder: A web-based tool for the identification of the origin of transfers in DNA sequences ofbacterial mobile genetic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W229–W234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Norman, A.; Hansen, L.H.; She, Q.; Sorensen, S.J. Nucleotide sequence of pOLA52: A conjugative IncX1 plasmid from Escherichia coli which enables biofilm formation and multidrug efflux. Plasmid 2008, 60, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Darling, A.E.; Mau, B.; Perna, N.T. progressiveMauve: Multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sampei, G.; Furuya, N.; Tachibana, K.; Saitou, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Mizobuchi, K.; Komano, T. Complete genome sequence of the incompatibility group I1 plasmid R64. Plasmid 2010, 64, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alikhan, N.F.; Petty, N.K.; Ben Zakour, N.L.; Beatson, S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): Simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Moran, R.A.; Hall, R.M. Analysis of pCERC7, a small antibiotic resistance plasmid from a commensal ST131 Escherichia coli, defines a diverse group of plasmids that include various segments adjacent to a multimer resolution site and encode the same NikA relaxase accessory protein enabling mobilisation. Plasmid 2017, 89, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Torresen, O.K.; Star, B.; Mier, P.; Andrade-Navarro, M.A.; Bateman, A.; Jarnot, P.; Gruca, A.; Grynberg, M.; Kajava, A.V.; Promponas, V.J.; et al. Tandem repeats lead to sequence assembly errors and impose multi-level challenges for genome and protein databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 10994–11006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Blast comparison of the IncX plasmids.
Figure 1. Blast comparison of the IncX plasmids.
Microorganisms 09 02205 g001
Figure 2. Blast comparison of IncI1 plasmids.
Figure 2. Blast comparison of IncI1 plasmids.
Microorganisms 09 02205 g002
Table 1. Strain characterization: antibiogram, plasmid replicon typing, and β-lactamase gene.
Table 1. Strain characterization: antibiogram, plasmid replicon typing, and β-lactamase gene.
Original IsolateNeb10β Transconjugant
StrainOrganismIsolation SourceResistance Profile aReplicon Type (PBRT) b
[Sequencing]
bla Gene cNGS dClone ID eReplicon Type (PBRT)
[Sequencing]
bla Gene c
[Sequencing]
KanR Plasmid Mobilization f
1S. enterica
Infantis
CattleAMP AUG AXO CEP FOX TIOI1CMY-2 TC1dI1CMY-2N.D.
2S. enterica
Heidelberg
CattleAMP AUG AXO CEP FOX TIOI1, X1
[ColVC]
CMY-2LCp2 *I1
[ColVC]
CMY-2All
3S. enterica Typhimurium var. 5-CattleAMP AUG AXO CEP FOX TIOI1, FIB, X1
[FIC, ColVC]
CMY-2TC3cX1Unk [TEM-1]pSN11/00Kan
4S. enterica TyphimuriumCattleAMP AUG AXO CEP FOX TIOI1, FIISCMY-2 TC4dI1CMY-2All
5S. enterica
Infantis
ChickenAMP AUG AXO FOX TIOI1CMY-2TC5fI1
[ColVC]
CMY-2All
6S. enterica SaintpaulTurkeyAMP AUG AXO FOX TIOI1, X1CMY-2 TC6dI1, X1CMY-2N.D.
7E. coliChickenAMP AUG AXO COT FIS FOX GEN NAL TIOI1, FIB, I2, KCMY-2 N.A.
8E. coliChickenAMP AUG AXO FOX GEN TIOFIB, B/O, KCMY-2 N.A.
10E. coliChickenAMP AUG AXO FIS FOX GEN TIOI1, FIB, X1, B/O, KCMY-2 N.A.
12E. coliDogAMP AUG AXO CIP FOX GEN NAL TIOI1 [X4, FIA, FIB, FII, Col]CMY-2TC12dUnk [X4]CMY-2pSN11/00Kan
a Abbreviations: Ampicillin (AMP), Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AUG), Ceftriaxone (AXO), Cephalothin (CEP), Chloramphenicol (CHL), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (COT), Cefoxitin (FOX), Sulfisoxazole (FIS), Gentamicin (GEN), Nalidixic acid (NAL), Ceftiofur (TIO), Streptomycin (STR), Unknown (Unk). b Determined using PCR-Based Plasmid Replicon Typing kit (Diatheva). Unknown, not positive with any of the primers; additional replicons identified using sequence result shown between square brackets. c Identified using ARM-D β-lactamase ID kit (Streck). Unknown, not positive with any of the primers; sequence result shown between square brackets. d Strains (transconjugant clone and the corresponding original isolate) selected for sequencing are indicated by “√”. e N.A., transconjugant not available; *, all transconjugants showed the presence of 1 or 2 small plasmid(s); LCp2 was generated from transformation of the Large-construct plasmid prep (Qiagen) and screened for the lack of visible small plasmid band. f via tri-parental mating; N.D., not determined; All, pU302S, pSN11/00Kan, and pSe-Kan.
Table 2. Sequenced plasmids information.
Table 2. Sequenced plasmids information.
PlasmidReplicon TypeSize aAR GenesConjugated?
p2I1I1100kbblaCMY-2Yes
p2I1-LC bI1100kbblaCMY-2Yes c
p2X1X138kbN/ANo
p3X1X143kbblaTEM-1Yes
p3X1-TCX143kbblaTEM-1Yes (Transconjugant)
p3I1I1101kbblaCMY-2No
p5I1I199kbblaCMY-2Yes
p5I1-TCI199kbblaCMY-2Yes (Transconjugant)
p12X4X437kbblaCMY-2Yes
p12X4-TCX437kbblaCMY-2Yes (Transconjugant)
p12I1I194kbN/ANo
a Size is approximate to the nearest whole number. b LC = large construct. c Transformant was used for the sequencing and characterization.
Table 3. Qualitative assessment of KanR plasmid mobilization using tri-parental agar mating. + indicates donor plasmid was mobilized, − indicates donor plasmid was not mobilized.
Table 3. Qualitative assessment of KanR plasmid mobilization using tri-parental agar mating. + indicates donor plasmid was mobilized, − indicates donor plasmid was not mobilized.
Donor PlasmidMobilization GenesHelper Strain
LCp2TC3cTC4dTC5fTC12d
pU302SnikA+++
pSN11/00KanmobC-mobABD+++++
pSe-KanUnknown+++
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McMillan, E.A.; Nguyen, L.-H.T.; Hiott, L.M.; Sharma, P.; Jackson, C.R.; Frye, J.G.; Chen, C.-Y. Genomic Comparison of Conjugative Plasmids from Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli Encoding Beta-Lactamases and Capable of Mobilizing Kanamycin Resistance Col-like Plasmids. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112205

AMA Style

McMillan EA, Nguyen L-HT, Hiott LM, Sharma P, Jackson CR, Frye JG, Chen C-Y. Genomic Comparison of Conjugative Plasmids from Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli Encoding Beta-Lactamases and Capable of Mobilizing Kanamycin Resistance Col-like Plasmids. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(11):2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112205

Chicago/Turabian Style

McMillan, Elizabeth A., Ly-Huong T. Nguyen, Lari M. Hiott, Poonam Sharma, Charlene R. Jackson, Jonathan G. Frye, and Chin-Yi Chen. 2021. "Genomic Comparison of Conjugative Plasmids from Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli Encoding Beta-Lactamases and Capable of Mobilizing Kanamycin Resistance Col-like Plasmids" Microorganisms 9, no. 11: 2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112205

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop