Next Article in Journal
Modulation of OMV Production by the Lysis Module of the DLP12 Defective Prophage of Escherichia coli K12
Previous Article in Journal
Wild Boars Carry Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Special Issue
Decreased Expression of the High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) Gene in Peripheral Blood in Patients with Mild or Moderate Clostridioides difficile Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Special Issue: Clostridium difficile

by
Łukasz M. Grześkowiak
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 49, 14195 Berlin, Germany
Microorganisms 2021, 9(2), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020368
Submission received: 3 February 2021 / Revised: 9 February 2021 / Accepted: 12 February 2021 / Published: 12 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clostridium difficile)
Clostridium difficile (reclassified as Clostridioides difficile [1]), first described 85 years ago as a commensal microorganism in the feces of a newborn infant, has drawn further attention due to its involvement in intestinal infection that lead to high morbidity and mortality among individuals of different ages in healthcare and the community. It has also emerged as a zoonotic pathogen since highly genetically similar C. difficile isolates were characterized in humans, pets and farm animals [2,3]. Indeed, livestock can serve as a potential reservoir for C. difficile and pose a threat to humans since the spores facilitate the rapid spread of this bacterium in the environment. Although antimicrobial resistance is common among C. difficile [4], widespread antibiotic use in healthcare and animal husbandry has led to the development of multiresistant types, making the treatment of C. difficile infections (CDI) even more difficult [5]. Moreover, due to its anaerobic metabolism and relatively slow growth compared with other bacterial pathogens, research on C. difficile faces many challenges. However, in recent decades, significant advances in molecular methods has made possible a better understanding of the physiology and epidemiology of C. difficile in animals and humans [4,6,7].
C. difficile is one of the pioneer microbial colonizers in animals and humans. In farm animals such as pigs, an immature yet developing microbiota allows for the outgrowth of C. difficile, including toxigenic types, which may lead to infection [8,9]. It is noteworthy that concentrations of C. difficile and its toxins in neonatal piglets peak quickly during the first week and diminish from the second week onwards [9]. Therefore, a very short time window for C. difficile colonization, including toxin-producing types, can be observed. Such an observation is also true for infants. However, the lack of toxin-receptor expression or toxin-neutralizing antibodies at such early age has been suggested as a reason that infants are protected against CDI development [10]. On the other hand, in adult humans C. difficile outgrowth and infections have been associated with microbial dysbiosis in the gut caused by comorbidities, the use of antimicrobials or advanced age [11,12]. Recently, it has been suggested that a decreased expression of the High Mobility Group Box 1 HMGB1 cytokine in peripheral blood is involved in the diminished capability of elderly patients with CDI to fight the pathogen [7]. Indeed, reports show that microbial diversity is decreased in both C. difficile-colonized and CDI patients, and certain bacteria have been identified as playing a key role in colonization resistance against C. difficile and CDI development [13,14].
Lately, an in vitro study has demonstrated that sow colostrum, which contains antibodies against C. difficile toxins, may protect intestinal porcine cell lines from toxin-induced effects [15,16]. Moreover, the administration of antibodies against C. difficile toxins can protect all experimentally challenged piglets from developing systemic infection and minimize intestinal lesions [17]. Therefore, sufficient antibody titers against toxins transferred from mother to offspring through colostrum may be crucial in passive protection against gut intoxication and infection development once C. difficile colonization has been established in the piglet gut. In humans, clinical studies have identified protective antibodies against C. difficile toxins in the blood of patients who have suffered from CDI [18]. Further, a successful development of an antibody vaccine that neutralizes C. difficile toxin B has been demonstrated [19]. Finally, a recent study has identified a new immunoreactive surface protein isolated from C. difficile that is recognized by human blood and umbilical cord blood sera; therefore, it could serve a future use in preventive vaccine construction for humans [20].
The abovementioned studies demonstrate significant progress in the research on C. difficile. However, there are still many open questions regarding it, such as how healthy animal and human carriers of C. difficile and its toxins can remain free of symptoms or why there is a very short time window for colonization of C. difficile in certain farm animal species. Successful strategies to prevent and treat CDI in animals and humans while reducing the antimicrobial use are also needed.

Acknowledgments

Łukasz M. Grześkowiak was financially supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) grant GR 5107/2-1. I would like to thank all the authors who contributed significantly to the Special Issue on Clostridium difficile. My gratitude goes to the reviewers for their valuable help in improving the manuscripts before being published. I would also like to thank the Assistant Editors for their excellent technical support in this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lawson, P.A.; Citron, D.M.; Tyrrell, K.L.; Finegold, S.M. Reclassification of Clostridium difficile as Clostridioides difficile (Hall and O’Toole 1935) Prévot 1938. Anaerobe 2016, 40, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Knetsch, C.W.; Connor, T.R.; Mutreja, A.; van Dorp, S.M.; Sanders, I.M.; Browne, H.P.; Harris, D.; Lipman, L.; Keessen, E.C.; Corver, J.; et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals potential spread of Clostridium difficile between humans and farm animals in the Netherlands, 2002 to 2011. Eurosurveillance [Online] 2014, 19, 20954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bjöersdorff, O.G.; Lindberg, S.; Kiil, K.; Persson, S.; Guardabassi, L.; Damborg, P. Dogs are carriers of Clostridioides difficile lineages associated with human community-acquired infections. Anaerobe 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Masarikova, M.; Simkova, I.; Plesko, M.; Eretova, V.; Krutova, M.; Cizek, A. The colonisation of calves in czech large-scale dairy farms by clonally-related clostridioides difficile of the sequence type 11 represented by ribotypes 033 and 126. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Spigaglia, P.; Barbanti, F.; Mastrantonio, P.; Ackermann, G.; Balmelli, C.; Barbut, F.; Bouza, E.; Brazier, J.; Delmee, M.; Drudy, D.; et al. Multidrug resistance in European Clostridium difficile clinical isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 2227–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kachrimanidou, M.; Tzika, E.; Filioussis, G. Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in food-producing animals, horses and household pets: A comprehensive review. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Czepiel, J.; Biesiada, G.; Pitera, E.; Wołkow, P.P.; Michalak, M.; Garlicki, A. Decreased expression of the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) gene in peripheral blood in patients with mild or moderate Clostridioides difficile infection. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Grześkowiak, Ł.; Dadi, T.H.; Zentek, J.; Vahjen, W. Developing Gut Microbiota Exerts Colonisation Resistance to Clostridium (syn. Clostridioides) difficile in Piglets. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Grześkowiak, Ł.; Zentek, J.; Vahjen, W. Determination of the extent of Clostridium difficile colonisation and toxin accumulation in sows and neonatal piglets. Anaerobe 2016, 40, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jangi, S.; Lamont, J.T. Asymptomatic colonization by clostridium difficile in infants: Implications for disease in later life. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2010, 51, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jachowicz, E.; Wałaszek, M.; Sulimka, G.; Maciejczak, A.; Zieńczuk, W.; Kołodziej, D.; Karaś, J.; Pobiega, M.; Wojkowska-Mach, J. Long-term antibiotic prophylaxis in urology and high incidence of clostridioides difficile infections in surgical adult patients. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kachrimanidou, M.; Tsintarakis, E. Insights into the role of human gut microbiota in clostridioides difficile infection. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Crobach, M.J.T.; Ducarmon, Q.R.; Terveer, E.M.; Harmanus, C.; Sanders, I.M.J.G.; Verduin, K.M.; Kuijper, E.J.; Zwittink, R.D. The bacterial gut microbiota of adult patients infected, colonized or noncolonized by clostridioides difficile. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Buffie, C.G.; Bucci, V.; Stein, R.R.; McKenney, P.T.; Ling, L.; Gobourne, A.; No, D.; Liu, H.; Kinnebrew, M.; Viale, A.; et al. Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature 2015, 517, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Grześkowiak, Ł.; Pieper, R.; Kröger, S.; Martínez-Vallespín, B.; Hauser, A.E.; Niesner, R.; Vahjen, W.; Zentek, J. Porcine Colostrum Protects the IPEC-J2 Cells and Piglet Colon Epithelium against Clostridioides (syn. Clostridium) difficile Toxin-Induced Effects. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Grześkowiak, Ł.M.; Pieper, R.; Huynh, H.A.; Cutting, S.M.; Vahjen, W.; Zentek, J. Impact of early-life events on the susceptibility to Clostridium difficile colonisation and infection in the offspring of the pig. Gut Microbes 2019, 10, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Steele, J.; Mukherjee, J.; Parry, N.; Tzipori, S. Antibody against TcdB, but not TcdA, prevents development of gastrointestinal and systemic clostridium difficile disease. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 207, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Shakir, F.A.; Ali, T.; Bigham, A.C.; Ballard, J.D.; Miner, P.B.; Philpott, J.R. Determination of serum antibodies to Clostridium difficile toxin B in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (N. Y) 2012, 8, 313–317. [Google Scholar]
  19. Alonso, C.D.; Mahoney, M.V. Bezlotoxumab for the prevention of clostridium difficile infection: A review of current evidence and safety profile. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Razim, A.; Pacyga, K.; Martirosian, G.; Szuba, A.; Gamian, A.; Myc, A.; Górska, S. Mapping epitopes of a novel peptidoglycan cross-linking enzyme Cwp22 recognized by human sera obtained from patients with Clostridioides difficile infection and cord blood. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grześkowiak, Ł.M. Editorial for the Special Issue: Clostridium difficile. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020368

AMA Style

Grześkowiak ŁM. Editorial for the Special Issue: Clostridium difficile. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(2):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grześkowiak, Łukasz M. 2021. "Editorial for the Special Issue: Clostridium difficile" Microorganisms 9, no. 2: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop