Next Article in Journal
A Case of Atypical Bartonellosis in a 4-Year-Old Immunocompetent Child
Next Article in Special Issue
Intra-Colonial Viral Infections in Western Honey Bees (Apis Mellifera)
Previous Article in Journal
Thermophilic Chloroflexi Dominate in the Microbial Community Associated with Coal-Fire Gas Vents in the Kuznetsk Coal Basin, Russia
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Gut Microbiota Can Provide Viral Tolerance in the Honey Bee
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Meals from Brassica nigra and Eruca sativa Control Artificial Nosema ceranae Infections in Apis mellifera

1
Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, Via di Saliceto 80, 40128 Bologna, Italy
2
Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, Via di Corticella 133, 40128 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors equally contributed to this work.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(5), 949; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050949
Submission received: 1 April 2021 / Revised: 23 April 2021 / Accepted: 24 April 2021 / Published: 28 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microorganisms in Pollinators: Interactions with Other Factors)

Abstract

:
Nosema ceranae is a widespread parasite responsible for nosemosis Type C in Apis mellifera honey bees, reducing colony survival. The antibiotic fumagillin is the only commercial treatment available, but concerns are emerging about its persistence, safety, and pathogen resistance. The use of natural substances from Brassicaceae defatted seed meals (DSMs) with known antimicrobial and antioxidant properties was explored. Artificially infected bees were fed for 8 days with candies enriched with two concentrations, 2% and 4%, of two DSMs from Brassica nigra and Eruca sativa, containing a known amount of different glucosinolates (GSLs). The food palatability, GSL intake, bee survival, and treatment effects on N. ceranae spore counts were evaluated. Food consumption was higher for the two 2% DSM patties, for both B. nigra and E. sativa, but the GSL intake did not increase by increasing DSM to 4%, due to the resulting lower palatability. The 2% B. nigra patty decreased the bee mortality, while the higher concentration had a toxic effect. The N. ceranae control was significant for all formulates with respect to the untreated control (312,192.6 +/− 14,443.4 s.e.), and was higher for 4% B. nigra (120,366.3 +/− 13,307.1 s.e.). GSL hydrolysis products, the isothiocyanates, were detected and quantified in bee gut tissues. Brassicaceae DSMs showed promising results for their nutraceutical and protective effects on bees artificially infected with N. ceranae spores at the laboratory level. Trials in the field should confirm these results.

1. Introduction

Nosema ceranae is a honey bee pathogen that belongs to the Microsporidia class [1]. Like other microsporidia, the N. ceranae is an obligate intracellular parasite able to colonize the midgut epithelium of Apis spp. [1,2]. The parasite is generally considered associated with the Asian honey bee Apis ceranae [3], but in the early 2000s, N. ceranae rapidly spread in the western honey bee Apis mellifera, causing nosemosis Type C [4,5,6]. The N. ceranae infection causes damage at the individual and colony level due to its increased energetic stress, reducing the lifespan, downregulating the genes involved in intestinal health and the absorption of nutritional compounds, inducing lethargic behavior with poor honey and pollen harvest, and suppressing the immune response, downregulating the expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. All of these factors are involved in the decline and collapse of honey bee colonies [7,14]. The only effective medicament against nosemosis is fumagillin, an antibiotic mycotoxin isolated from Aspergillus fumigatus, used for over 60 years in the beekeeping industry [15,16]. Although fumagillin may reduce the N. ceranae infection, its use is not legal in several countries as it may build residues in the bee products and result in antibiotic resistance; thus, promoting parasite proliferation [17]. Recently, natural and synthetic compounds were tested as a treatment against nosemosis Type C [18,19,20,21,22,23]. A commercial dietary supplement based on herbs (garlic and cinnamon) and vitamins, the ApiHerb® (Chemicals Laif S.p.A., Padua, Italy) showed a significant effect against N. ceranae infections [17,24,25] on the microbial profile of the honey bee midgut [26,27]. Moreover, the oxalic acid, which is generally administered to the colonies as a means to control Varroa destructor infestations, likewise showed efficacy against N. ceranae infections [17,28,29]. Moreover, sugars and protein administrated in sucrose syrup were effective to reduce N. ceranae infection in bees [30]. In detail, chitosan and peptidoglycan significantly reduced the nosemosis infection level in infected bees, and significantly increased their survivorship [30]. Even prebiotic and probiotic administration could be useful to reduce N. ceranae [31,32]. The administration of two probiotics, Protexin Concentrate single-strain (Enterococcus faecium) and Protexin Concentrate multi-strain (Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, L. delbrueckii, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus salivarius, and E. faecium) significantly reduce the number of spores in infected bees without affecting their surviving [31]. Moreover, the probiotic effect of two bee gut bacteria (Parasaccharibacter apium and Bacillus sp.) and two commercial probiotics (Bactocell® and Levucell SB®) increase the survival in N. ceranae infected honey bees [32].
Among the plants known to contain bioactive compounds with antimicrobial and antioxidant activity, the Brassicaceae family includes species that historically belong to the human diet, and are widely cultivated as important oilseed crops. Vegetable oils, in particular those from Brassica oilseeds, are well known for their potential applications in green chemistry, including their use as hydraulic fluids, biolubricants, and cosmetics [33]. Biomolecules produced from Brassica oilseed co-products, namely defatted seed meals (DSMs), can be applied in food and feed industries and as sustainable tools for agriculture, thus representing an innovative solution for the agricultural and processing phases [34,35,36,37]. Brassicaceae are characterized by the presence of the endogenous defense mechanism against pathogen attacks, the glucosinolate–myrosinase (GSL–MYR) system [38,39]. GSLs are plant secondary metabolites structured by a common hydrophilic β-d-glucopyranose residue linked via a sulfur atom to a (Z)-N-hydroximinosulfate ester, plus a variable hydrophobic aglycone side chain (R-group) derived from amino acids (Figure 1).
More than 130 GSL structures have been discovered and validated to date, and they may be classified in aliphatic, aryl aliphatic, or indolic GSLs in function of the variable side chain structure [40,41]. A single GSL is often dominant in brassica plants and their GSL quali–quantitative composition largely depends on the plant genotype, growth stage, the cultivation conditions, and the plant organ, even if GSLs are often particularly concentrated in seeds [42]. GSLs consistently occur in plants, in conjunction with the hydrolytic enzyme ¦Â-thioglucosidase, MYR, (E.C. 3.2.1.147). Upon biotic or abiotic lesions and physical disruption of the plant cell, GSL and MYR come into contact, triggering, in the presence of water, the hydrolysis reaction that releases a broad range of degradation compounds [43]. The isothiocyanates (ITCs) are the main products formed at neutral pH, but other compounds could form in function of several factors as substrate structure, reaction conditions, and the presence of specifier proteins (Figure 1).
ITCs are bioactive compounds largely known for their broad-spectrum biological activity against pests and soil/food-borne fungi and bacteria [44,45,46,47,48,49]. They are also studied for their beneficial effects in human health, chemo-protective, and antioxidant activities, assayed in vitro, in vivo, in human and in epidemiological studies [50]. Sulforaphane, mainly present in broccoli and black kale sprouts, is the most frequently studied ITC for its preventive activity against a variety of cancers, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative diseases, and diabetes [51], but also showed inhibitory activity against bacteria and fungi through in vitro trials [52]. Moreover, ITCs exert their health effect through antimicrobic activity against common human pathogens, such as Helicobacter pylori [53,54]. More recently, broths of lactic acid bacteria fermented with Eruca sativa seed extracts showed promising results in preventing Escherichia coli-induced intestinal inflammation and barrier dysfunction in Caco-2 cell in vitro assays [55]. Furthermore, Brassicaceae vegetables are a rich source of other health-promoting nutrients and phytochemicals, apart from GSL, such as vitamins (ascorbic acid, carotenoids), minerals, fibers, soluble sugars, amino acids, indole phytoalexins, terpenes, phytosteroids, and phenolic compounds, which contribute to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory protective effects [56]. Although GSL derives product activity against plant pathogens and pests, and its beneficial effects on human health are well documented and still under study, its potential protective role against animals, in particular insects and infections, has been less studied.
The present work aimed to explore the use of brassica DSMs in beekeeping to control N. ceranae infection. Artificially infected A. mellifera workers were reared and fed with different B. nigra and E. sativa GSL-containing diets to measure: (i) palatability and GLS intake; (ii) honey bee survival; (iii) development of the N. ceranae infection; and (iv) GSL conversion into ITCs in the honey bee intestines.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Source of Honey Bees

The experiments were conducted in the summer of 2018 on worker bees from an A. mellifera ligustica colony, selected from an apiary of CREA-AA located in Bologna, Italy (44°31′27.1″ N 11°21′03.6″ E); it was in appropriate conditions of development, and missing clinical symptoms of the disease. Combs with mature broods were taken from the nest and stored in an incubator at 34 °C. Hatching bees were collected daily in batches, incubated at 33 °C, fed ad libitum with sugar water (1:1 w/w), and supplied with water until the moment of the inoculation with N. ceranae spores.

2.2. Nosema ceranae Spore Extraction

An apiary with A. mellifera ligustica colonies was selected from the same area to provide N. ceranae spores. This was known as an infected apiary based on previous observations. Foragers were collected from the flight entrance of colonies showing signs of dwindling and kept at 33 °C under ad libitum feeding with sugar water until the extraction of the N. ceranae spores. The day before, or the same day, of each artificial infection session, 100–200 foragers were taken from the incubator and sacrificed. After dissection, their abdomens were smashed in a stomacher with a small amount of distilled water. The resulting material was filtered with a nylon mesh, washed with water to obtain approximately 20 mL suspension, and split into four aliquots. Each aliquot was gently overlaid onto a column of 40 mL 95% isotonic Percoll® (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in a 50 mL centrifuge tube. After repeated centrifugation and washing with PBS 1×, a pellet of purified spores was obtained and resolved in 250 µL PBS 1. The suspension was kept at room temperature until its use.

2.3. Brassicaceae DSMs

Brassica nigra (L.) W.D.J. Koch and Eruca sativa Mill. seeds were available in the seed collection of Brassicaceae of CREA-CI (Bologna) [57]. The two crops were cultivated at the experimental station of CREA-CI located at Anzola (Bologna), at open field level adopting low input techniques for both energy and fertilizers, whilst no pesticides were applied. Seeds were harvested, cleaned, and defatted using a small continuous seed crusher machine (Company model Elle.Gi type 0.90, Bracco, Milan, Italy) in a temperature-controlled procedure during which temperature was maintained at a maximum of 70 °C [58]. Obtained pellets were subsequently milled in a coffee grinder and the two defatted seed meals (DSMs) were treated in an autoclave, at 120 °C for 20 min for MYR enzyme deactivation. Finally, B. nigra and E. sativa deactivated DSMs were ground again by an ultra-centrifugal mill ZM200 (Retsch GMBH, Haan, Germany) and sieved at 80 μm to obtain a homogenous fine powder that was stored at room temperature in sealed vials until use. MYR deactivation was verified by suspending DSMs with 50 mM K phosphate buffer, pH 6.5 (1:10 w/v) for 20 min and 24 h, under agitation at room temperature, and verifying the DSM residual GSL content (GSL analysis described below). Obtained DSMs were characterized for moisture, nitrogen, and residual oil content according to [59]. The oil content was determined by the standard automated continuous extraction, following the Twisselmann principle, by using an E-816 ECE (Economic Continuous Extraction) extraction unit (BÜCHI Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland), and hexane as solvent. Nitrogen content was determined by using the Elemental analyzer LECO CHN TruSpec (St. Joseph, MI, USA) and the protein content was calculated from nitrogen using the conventional factor of 6.25. Oil and nitrogen content were expressed as a percentage on dry matter (DM). Oil fatty acid composition was analyzed by trans-methylation in 2N KOH methanol solution and fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were evaluated by a gas chromatography-FID detector (HRGC 5300 MEGA SERIES Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) by a capillary column Restek RT × 2330 (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.2 µm). Total GSL content and profile were determined by HPLC analysis of desulfo-GSLs following the ISO 9167-1 method [60], with some minor modifications [61], by using a Hewlett-Packard 1100 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a diode array detector and an Inertsil 5 ODS 3 column (250 × 3 mm). The desulfo-GSLs were detected monitoring their absorbance at 229 nm and identified by UV spectra and HPLC retention times according to a purified standard library. Their amount was estimated using sinigrin (2-propenyl GSL–SIN) and epi-progoitrin ((R)-2-hydroxybut-3-enyl GSL–EPI) as internal standards. The response factors used for desulfated glucoerucin (4-methylthiobutyl GSL–GER) and glucoraphanin (4-methylsulfinylbutyl GSL–GRA) determination in E. sativa were chosen according to [62], while for the desulfated SIN in B. nigra, the response factor was experimentally determined as 0.92. SIN and EPI standards were isolated from Brassica juncea and Crambe abyssinica Hochst. ex R. E. Fries seeds, respectively, according to [63], with a purity of 98.7% for SIN and 92% for EPI, as indicated by HPLC–UV chromatograms, and >96% on a weight basis for both GSLs. Glucoerucin (4-methylthiobutyl GSL–GER) and GRA reference standards were purified from E. sativa Mill and Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala sabellica, respectively, yielding for both GSLs, 99% purity based on the HPLC peak area value and 96% purity on weight-based. Total phenolic content was determined by ultrasound-assisted extraction of the DSM with acidified aqueous methanolic solutions and the Folin–Ciocalteu method using an Infinite M200 PRO microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) according to [48]. Gallic acid was used as standard, and the results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g of DSM.

2.4. Feed Formulation

Deactivated DSMs of B. nigra and E. sativa were mixed at two different concentrations, 2% and 4% (w/w), with sugar candy ApiCandy (Chemicals Laif, Padua, Italy) and 1% of water by an electric mixer. The sugar candy was composed of water at 3%; pH 5.5; carbohydrates at 97% (fructose 7.5%, glucose 8%, and sucrose >60%). The components were mixed until homogeneity, divided in aliquots of about 9 g per treatment cage, placed in empty plastic syringes (5 mL), and weighted. Syringes were previously cut at the edge to facilitate bee feeding during trials. GSL content stability of DSM patties, stored at 33 °C in ended-cut syringes, was verified at the beginning and the end of trials, after hot ethanol-water (70%) extraction and GSL analysis performed as described above (Section 2.3). A candy added with water 1% was prepared following the same protocol (negative control, CTRL−).

2.5. Experimental Design

2.5.1. Artificial Infections and Uninfected Groups

Before bee infection, the N. ceranae spore concentration of the isolated suspension was assessed with a Burker hemocytometer, then an aliquot was mixed with sugar water to the final concentration of 75,000 spores/µL. Five-day-old bees taken from the incubator were starved for approximately 2 h and gently transferred into Petri dishes in batches of five. The bee manipulation was eased by mild narcotization with a mixture of air and CO2 (40/60%, in volume). The bees were individually inoculated by feeding 2.5 µL purified spore suspension with a micropipette, corresponding to 187,500 spores/bee. The distribution of the experimental errors between the groups was accomplished by introducing the five inoculated bees of each batch randomly into hoarding cages (polystyrene, approximately 10 × 11 × 5.5 cm, with transparent walls and holed roof to supply food and water) until the needed number (N = 25). Two syringes filled respectively with sugar water and water were introduced from the holed roof into each cage for ad libitum feeding and watering. The cages were kept in an incubator at 33 °C for one day, to let the bees recover from the manipulation stress before the treatment.
The procedure described above was used also to arrange cages with uninfected five-day-old bees, which were administered 2.5 µL sugar water per os with a micropipette and kept in a separate incubator at 33 °C to prevent cross infections. The treatments were made after ad libitum administration of sugar water and water, for one day, as described for infected bees.

2.5.2. Bee Treatment Feeding Trials

The experiment on infected bees aimed to measure the effect on bee palatability, tolerability, and N. ceranae infection of DSM patties from B. nigra (N) and E. sativa (R), prepared as described above (Section 2.4). Treatments started one-day post-infection (dpi) and included four treated groups fed with DSM patties enriched with two doses of Brassicaceae DSM, 2 and 4%, both for B. nigra and for E. sativa (N2, N4, R2, R4), and two controls each receiving unadded candy (CTRL−) or sugar water added with 25 µg/mL fumagillin (CTRL+). The six cages containing the infected bees (N = 25) were randomly assigned to the groups and incubated at 33 °C throughout the trial. Three replicates were made for each treatment. Solid and liquid feeds were supplied ad libitum and integrated with fresh food on the need. Unlimited water availability was secured by a syringe until the end of the trial.
DSM patty palatability was performed at a 1–3-day interval after inoculation by weighting the feeders and calculating the food consumption by the difference of weight. The calculated amount was divided by the number of days to obtain the daily consumption, and by the number of bees that were present in the cage at the beginning of the interval, to calculate the average individual daily intake. This amount, calculated a daily basis for each cage, was summed up for the first seven days of the treatments (8 dpi) to calculate the weekly cumulative individual ingestion. Multiplying the food ingestion data by the respective GSL concentration allowed calculating the average individual GSL intake that occurred in each cage. Ingestion data of the CTRL+ were not reported as this group received syrup instead of solid food.
The cages were inspected at 1–3-day intervals to determine even bee survival, by counting the dead bees. After counting, the dead bees were removed from the cages.
Living bees were sampled from each cage the 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15 dpi, and frozen at −20 °C until the molecular analysis was performed (Section 2.6). Whenever possible, five bees were collected per cage, even if the bee mortality prevented a complete sampling plan in all groups.
During the inspections, three and five bees escaped, respectively, from the cages with infected and uninfected groups. Those individuals were removed from the dataset and further ignored.

2.6. N. ceranae Infection Quantification: DNA Extraction and qPCR

Before DNA extraction, 1ml of DNA-free water was added to the individual bee samples. Homogenates were obtained by a Tissue Lyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) running at 30 Hz for 3 min, as previously described [46]. The total DNA was extracted from each resulting homogenate with a Quick DNA Microprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) following the modified protocol for solid tissues [17]. The Real-Time qPCR to quantify the number of genomic copies of N. ceranae was performed using primers and probes designed on sequences of the Hsp70 gene [64]. A total reaction volume of 15 µL was prepared with 2× QuantiTect Probe PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), forward and reverse primers (2 µM), probe (500 nM), and 3 µL DNA extract. A standard curve was obtained by amplifying the N. ceranae-specific DNA fragment diluted serially from 1 × 100 to 1 × 109 copies as previously described [17].
The Real-Time qPCR assays were performed on a Rotor-Gene Corbett 6000 (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia) following the amplification and quantitation protocols for the gene sequence [64]. All the analyses were conducted on two technical replicates.

2.7. Bee GSL Metabolism Investigation

2.7.1. Bee Treatment and Gut Extraction

Cages with uninfected bees were prepared as described above for a study on the release within the honey bee intestines of hydrolysis products from the GSLs present in the DSM patties. The trial consisted of three replicates starting the same days as the previous experiment. Each of them included two groups treated with DSM patties N2 and R2 and one CTRL− receiving unadded candy. In this case, the groups were randomly assigned to the treatments and received ad libitum feeding and water supply from one dpi. On day 7 post-treatment, the surviving bees were sacrificed and dissected. On a Petri dish placed on an ice block, their midgut and hindgut were separated and grouped (N = 5) into different 1.5 mL tubes, which were promptly deep-frozen by immersion into liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until analysis. By this, depending on the number of surviving bees, it was possible to obtain 3–5 technical replicates from each cage.

2.7.2. Total ITC Gut Analysis

Sample guts were extracted two times with 300 μL and 250 μL of cold pure methanol using a Tissue-Lyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (30 Hz, 5 × 30 s), and subsequently centrifuged at 31,500× g for 20 min at 4 °C. A combination of the extracts (500 μL) was used for the cyclocondensation assay with 1,2-benzenedithiol to quantify the total ITCs as described in [48]. The cyclocondensation product, the 1,3-benzodithiole-2-thione, was analyzed using a Hewlett-Packard chromatograph 1100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), equipped with a diode array detector and an Eclipse XDB-C8 HPLC column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Hewlett Packard), thermostated at 30 °C. An external calibration curve was generated using methanolic solutions of pure allyl-ITC, AITC (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and 4-methylthiobutyl ITC, erucin, to obtain the cyclocondensation product for ITC quantification in gut deriving from bees fed on N2 and R2, respectively. Results were expressed as pmol/mg of ITC in gut tissues. Erucin standard was produced and purified from the GER–GSL as described in [63] with a purity >98% (w/w).

2.8. Calculations and Statistics

The weekly cumulative food ingestion of the individual bees belonging to the treated groups and the CTRL were normally distributed and they were statistically analyzed by a principal effect ANOVA, using the kind of food (CTRL−, R, N) and the concentration (0, 2, 4%) as categorical predictors. After the F test, significant differences between the factor levels were investigated by a pairwise Newman–Keuls post-hoc test. The cumulative GSL intake at 8 dpi was statistically analyzed by the same procedure. However, in this case, the CTRL−group was excluded from the analysis.
The survival of infected bees was analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier product limit estimator. The individuals sampled from the cages to assess the infection level were considered as right-censored observations. The sampling activity implied an increasing number of censored cases, which limited the time available for the survival estimate. A log-rank/Mantel–Cox post-hoc test was conducted for pairwise comparison of the survival distribution between the six groups, under the null hypothesis of equality.
The instantaneous risk of death was calculated with the Cox proportional hazard regression model and reported as the exponential function of the regression coefficients (hazard ratio: HR). In this analysis, the CTRL− acted as the reference group and a Wald test was conducted to spot significant differences between the reference and each of the other groups.
The N. ceranae abundance of each sampled bee was determined as the average number of copies detected in the two technical replicates. A general linear model (GLM) was used to analyze this dependent variable against ‘treatment’ and ‘dpi’, respectively, as a categorical and continuous predictor. Sigma-restricted parametrization was used for the categorical predictor, and a between-group design in which the treatment levels were tested versus the CTRL+ was used. Thereafter, a Newman–Keuls pairwise post-hoc test allowed to evaluate the significance of the differences between the treatment levels.
GSL stability in DSM patties and gut ITC analysis results were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance employing the least significant difference (LSD) test to assess significant differences between the analyzed samples.
A protection level against the statistical type I error of p α = 0.05 was set for all tests.

3. Results

3.1. DSM Characterization

Oil seed meal extraction was performed by a mechanical food-grade process, avoided high temperature, and use of solvents, which could impair the bee safety and the DSM quality too. E. Sativa and B. nigra DSM chemical characterization results are shown in Table 1.
E. sativa and B. nigra DSMs had a relatively high protein content, 35% and 43.8%, respectively, calculated from the DSM nitrogen quantification. A low percentage of residual oil was also present, higher for E. sativa than B. nigra, as a consequence of the defatting process. Both DSM oils were mainly composed of the long-chain erucic acid (22:1), 46% and 38%, respectively, plus around 10% of oleic acid (18:1) and 8% of gadoleic acid (20:1). A relatively high percentage, between 10% and 15%, of poly-unsaturated fatty acid, linoleic (18:2—omega-6) and linolenic acid (18:3—omega-3), were also present, higher in B. nigra than in E. sativa DSM.
The quali-quantitative GSL content of DSMs was also evaluated. The main GSLs in E. sativa belong to the class of aliphatic thio-functionalized GSLs, with a 4-carbon chain length, containing a sulfur atom at different oxidation states in the two GSL, with a total GSL content of 92.2 ¦μmol/g. The prevalent form is the GER, representing the 82% of total GSL, while the oxidized form GRA was present in a lower percentage. On the other hand, B. nigra DSM contains one prevalent GSL (>95%), the aliphatic short side chain SIN. GSLs are hydrolyzed by MYR at neutral pH to the corresponding ITCs, which maintain the side chain (R) structure of native GSL linked to the ITC (S=C=N-) moiety (Figure 1). Erucin and sulforaphane ITCs are the hydrolysis products of GER and GRA, respectively, and AITC of SIN. The total phenolic content was also quantified as DSM phytonutrient with antioxidant properties and no significant difference was found between the two DSMs.

3.2. DSM Formulation and GSL Stability in the DSM Patties

DSM patties were formulated for the treatment trials considering two DSM concentrations (2% and 4%) chosen based on preliminary trials evaluating palatability and tolerability (results not reported). GSL stability in the 4% DSM patties (N4 and R4) stored for 10 days at the same experimental conditions as in bee treatment feeding trials—that is, in syringes with a cut end, at 33 °C, was established. GSL patty content was determined at the beginning and the end of trials to observe the GSL stability over time; results are presented in Table 2.
SIN concentration in N4 was stable and no significant differences in its content were found in the residual patty before and after storage. Otherwise, the GER and GRA content showed small but significant changes, as the final GER concentration was 5.5% lower, while GRA was 7.6% higher than starting values.

3.3. Bee Treatment Feeding Trials

Bees were inoculated with isolated N. ceranae spores and treatment with DSM patties (N2, N4, R2, R4) started one dpi. Palatability, tolerability of DSM patties and their effect on N. ceranae infection were determined during trials and results are reported as follows.

3.3.1. Palatability of DSM Patties and GSL Intake

Bee food consumption was established for the treatment groups N2, N4, R2, R4 patties and the CTRL− and calculated as cumulative individual daily consumption at 8 dpi. The cumulative DSM patty individual consumption was then converted into GSL individual consumption based on the DSM patties GSL content. For R groups the E. sativa DSM total GSL content, as the sum of GRE and GRA, was considered. The average cumulative intake was 74.6 +/− 5.2 s.e. (SD = 20.0, 95% CI = 63.5, 85.6) mg/bee corresponding to 0.213 +/− 0.018 s.e. (SD = 0.061, 95% CI = 0.174, 0.252) GSL µmol/bee. Figure 2 shows the food consumption and relative GSL intake that occurred in the three replicates of each group.
The kind of food did not significantly influence the individual food consumption (F (1, 11) = 0.010, p = 0.922), which instead significantly varied with the DSM concentration (F (1, 11) = 10.377, p = 0.008). Indeed, a post-hoc test showed a significantly higher average consumption of food added with 2% DSM compared to 4% and the CTRL−.
The individual GSL intake at 8 dpi did not significantly change with the kind of food (F (1, 9) = 0.772, p = 0.402) and the DSM patty concentration (F (1, 9) = 5.031, p = 0.051).

3.3.2. Effect of DSM Patties on Bee Survival

On average, the infected bees (N = 447, including 306 censored cases) survived 11.682 +/− 0.209 (s.e.) dpi. Figure 3 and Table 3 report, respectively, the Kaplan–Meier curves and the mean survival for the individual groups.
The pairwise log-rank/Mantel–Cox test did not show a significant difference between CTRL− and CTRL+ (¦χ2 = 1.018, p = 0.313).
Bees in group N2 lived significantly longer than both CTRL− (¦χ2 = 11.870, p = 0.001) and CTRL+ (¦χ2 = 6.335, p = 0.012), and the treated bees of group R4 (¦χ2 = 5.540, p = 0.019). Bees receiving N4 survived significantly less than any other group: CTRL− (¦χ2 = 8.418, p = 0.004) and CTRL+ (¦χ2 = 14.721, p = 0.000), N2 (χ2 = 33.371, p = 0.000), R2 (χ2 = 21.353, p = 0.000) and R4 (χ2 = 18.044, p = 0.000). Therefore, results of N feeding effect on bee survival are strongly affected by the DSM concentration, with the high and low concentration having opposite consequence on bee. The same did not occur with R, as no significant difference was recorded between the two tested concentrations (χ2 = 0.121, p = 0.728). Moreover, they indicate lower compatibility with the bees of patties formulated with N4 vs. R4. However, the bee survival was not significantly affected by the lower DSM concentration in N2 and R2 groups (χ2 = 3.182, p = 0.074).
The Cox proportional hazard regression model (Figure 4) indicates the kind of food as a significant predictor of bee survival (χ2 = 40.472, p = 0.000).
Significant HR = 0.322 (χ2 = 10.698, p = 0.001) and HR = 2.000 (χ2 = 7.468, p = 0.006) were calculated, respectively, for the groups N2 and N4.

3.3.3. Effect of DSM Patties on N. ceranae

Figure 5 shows the number of N. ceranae copies detected with the RT-PCR in the different groups during the experiment.
The GLM approach including ‘N. ceranae abundance’ as the univariate dependent variable and ‘treatment’ and ‘dpi’ as independent predictors resulted in a significant model (R2 = 0.529, F (6, 299) = 56.082, p = 0.000). The relatively low coefficient of determination accounts for both the individual data variability and the non-linear component, which is rather evident in some of the groups. Within this model, highly significant predictors were both the independent continuous (dpi: F (1, 299) = 19.267, p = 0.000) and categorical (treatment: F (5, 299) = 62.880, p = 0.000) variable.
A significant model intercept was calculated, with a value (216,340.0) reasonably close to the spore dose (187,500) that was used to artificially infect the bees (Table 4).
The average infection level of individual bees belonging to the different groups is reported in Figure 6.
The number of N. ceranae copies was significantly higher in CTRL−, with a remarkably higher average (312,192.6 +/− 14,443.4 s.e.) than the spore dose that was inoculated at the beginning of the experiment. CTRL+ (83,777.8 +/− 13,735.9 s.e.) and N4 (105,885.7 +/− 7294.3 s.e.) resulted as the significantly least infected groups. The N. ceranae abundance in the groups N4, R4 (120,366.3 +/− 13,307.1 s.e.) and N2 (137,388.9 +/− 3367.0 s.e.) was not significantly different among them. Similarly, no significantly different number of N. ceranae genomic copies was found between the bees fed with the least concentrated DSM patties, N2 and R2 (159,921.4 +/− 4152.3 s.e.).

3.4. Total ITC Gut Analysis

To investigate the fate of GSL after bee N2 and R2 intake the search of ITC presence in the gut of uninfected bees was pursued. Gut tissues were sampled at 8 dpi and analyzed for total ITC content by the quantification of the derivatization product 1,3-benzodithiole-2-thione. The latter was obtained from different ITCs, as AITC from B. nigra and erucin plus sulforaphane from E. sativa DSM. Results are shown in Table 5.
The analysis revealed the presence of ITCs in tissues extracted from bees fed on 2% DSM patties, while no ITCs were detected in the CTRL− sample, represented by bees fed on candy alone. Different quantities were found depending on gut tissues and DSM used. In particular, the quantity of total ITCs found in samples of midgut were significantly lower than total ITCs in the hindgut, both for bee fed on R2 or N2 patties. Besides, the quantity of ITC derived from R2, mainly erucin, was higher than ITC formed from N2, represented by AITC, both for samples of midgut and hindgut.
Based on the DSM consumption registered in the last 24 h before bee gut sampling, and the related GSL intake, the GSL–ITC conversion rate, calculated for the whole gut, considering a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio, was 38.8% and 11.5% for R and N, respectively.
A random sampling of bee gut tissues was also performed on infected bees from bee treatment feeding trials described above; ITCs were found in treated bees while CTRL− were free of ITC adducts (results not shown).

4. Discussion

This experiment aimed to contribute to the alleviation of the N. ceranae impact on the beekeeping industry. Despite a quasi-global distribution and severe effects as a driver of colony losses, we still miss conclusive control measures against this pathogen [65]. Artificially infected worker honey bees were reared in hoarding cages and fed different GSL-containing diets to measure: (i) palatability and GLS intake; (ii) honey bee survival; (iii) development of the N. ceranae infection; and (iv) GSL conversion into ITCs in the honey bee intestines. The feedings were prepared with DSMs from B. nigra and E. sativa, which were added in the proportion of 2% and 4% to commercial candy.
Both tested plants belong to the botanical family of Brassicaceae and contain bioactive compounds, mainly GSLs, which can be obtained with low-impact cultures. DSMs are by-products of the seed oil extraction that, in the specific case of the chosen plant species are particularly rich in GSLs. The hydrolysis of GSLs in E. sativa (GER and GRA) and B. nigra (SIN) DSMs produce, respectively, the ITCs erucin, sulforaphane and allyl isothiocyanate, all of which have been studied for their beneficial effects on humans [63,66,67,68,69]. However, DSMs contain other substances (proteins, residual oils, and phenolic compounds), which normally the bee assumes by feeding on the pollen with positive effects on health, learning and other cognitive functions and that may contribute to the global effect of the formulation [70,71,72]. In the case of E. sativa and B. nigra DSMs, the protein component is rich in sulfur-containing amino acids while the erucic acid, a compound recognized as toxic for the humans [73,74,75], but of unknown effects on the bees, is the most represented fatty acid in the residual oil. Nevertheless, oils from E. sativa and B. nigra showed respectively antifungal and antibacterial activity [76,77], which may complete the ITC effect. Moreover, E. sativa and B. nigra DSMs total phenolic content is in line with other DSMs from plants of the same family [37,59], albeit their composition could be highly diverse depending on agri-environmental factors [78]. Their known antioxidant properties could also enhance the nutritive and protective effect of selected DSMs on bees.
Patties added with DSMs from the two plants at the concentration of 4% showed substantial steadiness in their GSL composition within the 10-day time interval of the stability experiment. SIN concentration did not change significantly during the storage, whereas GER and GRA showed slight but significant variations. In detail, GER lost 5.5% of its initial concentration, while GRA increased it of 7.6%. This behavior is not surprising as GER could have partly undergone oxidation to GRA, anyway this partial conversion should not be considered worrisome for the final biological activity of the formulates. The deriving bioactive compounds, erucin and sulforaphane, could probably exert a similar biological activity considering they were reversible biotransformed one in the other, in the human body [79]. On the other hand, GSLs stability in formulated patties indicated that they were not hydrolyzed by MYR enzyme; thus, demonstrating a successful enzyme deactivation in DSMs. Preliminary studies showed that the presence of DSM–MYR activity led to GSL hydrolysis to ITC in patties and highly affected patties palatability (not shown).
Regarding the treatment feeding trial results, the analysis of bee cumulative individual food consumption data showed no statistical differences between B. nigra and E. sativa DSM patties. Two-per cent added feedings resulted in significantly more consumed compared to 4% DSM patties and unadded candy, allowing the hypothesis of a stimulating effect of moderate additions to a plain sugar medium. The higher consumption may have compensated to some extent the lower concentration, as no clear difference in GSL intake was detected among the treated groups. However, it should be noted that this effect is associated with a probability coefficient (p = 0.051) only slightly above the conventional threshold adopted to protect against Type I errors.
No significant difference in bee survival was detected between untreated and treated controls. This result is compatible with low acute fumagillin toxicity at the concentration that was used and may indicate that, within the observation period, uncontrolled infections did not reach levels affecting the honey bee survival [15,16]. Feeding 2% B. nigra DSM significantly increased the survival compared to both controls and 4% E. sativa patties. Food added with 4% B. nigra DSM was somewhat opposite to that, as it corresponded to a significant survival decrease compared to any other group. The hazard ratio analysis showed this concentration effect on bee survival even more clearly, as the patties added with 2 and 4% B. nigra DSM concentrations corresponded, respectively, to significantly longer and shorter expected time to the event of death compared to the untreated controls.
All treatments significantly reduced the development of the N. ceranae infections compared to the untreated controls. Fumagillin and 4% B. nigra DSM feeding showed ex aequo the highest inhibiting effect. Two per cent E. sativa DSM patties resulted the significantly least effective treatment, whereas the other DSM-containing formulations represented an intermediate statistically homogeneous group.
The results of DSM palatability, bee survival, and efficacy against N. ceranae highlighted that B. nigra DSM at the lowest dose of 2% was the best and promising treatment. Indeed, this formulation did not show a significant difference of activity against the microsporidia, but it resulted more palatable, providing the same GSL intake, and it increased beneficially the bee tolerability and survival, halving the hazard ratio respect to the higher concentration.
The analysis of gut tissues from treated bees revealed the presence of ITCs, in the form of free or adduct compounds. The cyclocondensation assay enables the quantitative detection of total ITCs, in the free form, but also as ITC-adducts (namely dithiocarbamates) possibly deriving by ITC reaction with amino acids or proteins in the medium, avoiding underestimation [80]. Since DSMs were preliminarily treated in order to deactivate MYR activity and once verified the GSL stability in the candy during trials, it can be inferred that GSL hydrolysis to ITCs occurred after DSM ingestion and derived from bee metabolism, probably by an endogenous MYR-like enzyme, normally involved in carbohydrate metabolism [81,82]. Otherwise, bee intestinal bacterial MYR-like enzymes could have contributed to GSL hydrolysis [83]. The latter hypothesis, if confirmed, could explain the higher quantity of ITCs found in the hindgut, known to host a large microbial community [84], rather than in the midgut. Instead, the higher quantity of E. sativa DSM derived ITCs detected in gut tissues and their apparent higher GSL-ITC conversion rate respect to AITC from B. nigra DSM, could be due to a higher affinity for the enzyme-substrate. Moreover, other mechanisms could be involved as a more rapid bee detoxifying strategy for AITC, or simply minor stability of AITC in the gut respect to E. sativa ITCs. AITC is a volatile molecule known to be very unstable in buffer or aqueous media [62]. Furthermore, preliminary investigations showed that ITCs were the major hydrolysis products (results not shown), however, it cannot be excluded that other degradation products, such as nitriles, could be formed, in the function of the medium conditions and hydrolytic enzyme biochemistry.
To the best of our knowledge, the only study reporting the use of ITCs to control honey bee disease was performed by Borges et al. against N. ceranae [23]. In that work, the authors demonstrated that D,L-sulforaphane, administered to bees at pure concentration dissolved in a water/sugar syrup, reduced the N. ceranae spore counts, but also increased the bee mortality, indicating high toxicity at higher doses in relation to high ITC concentration. In detail, a 100% N. ceranae spore reduction was observed after D,L-sulforaphane administration of 1.25 mg/mL in the syrup for 16 days, but 100% of bee mortality was recorded. Moreover, the real ITC intake, calculated from the cumulative feed intake reported and reformulated for 8 days (about 113 mg syrup/bee and 0.7 ¦μmol sulforaphane/bee, considering syrup density of 1.2 g/mL), seemed to be much higher respect to the GSL intake evaluated in our experiments. Instead, at the lower dose of D,L-sulforaphane (0.1667 mg/mL), which resulted in an ITC intake closer to that of GSL intake demonstrated in our assay (about 0. 16 ¦μmol sulforaphane/bee calculated for 8 days), determined a 64% reduction in the spore counts, but bee survival was again negatively affected respect to untreated control (bee mortality 23%). Nevertheless, in our study, bees were not fed with pure ITC, but with DSMs, and ITCs were evaluated as GSL metabolites in the bee gut. Furthermore, the observed DSM protective effect on bees and the control on N. ceranae could be linked to the ITC presence in the bee gut and their direct potential antimicrobial and/or antioxidant activities, even if other DSM components could contribute to diet beneficial effect. The ITC or GSL effects on the microsporidia spore’s reduction could be linked to their antioxidant gene promoting activities [85]. During the infection, N. ceranae increases the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and decreases the expression of antioxidant properties [13], causing higher oxidative stress that linked to the epithelial damages, allow the microsporidia to spread in new cells [11]. The ITC action, upregulating the antioxidant genes, could prevent the N. ceranae spreads, blocking their infection routes, even if the high expression of these genes can cause cell damage and alter the cell repair process [86].
The same correlation verified for the positive effect of ITCs could be associated with negative or toxic effect showed by B. nigra administration at the highest dose. Indeed, ITC antimicrobial activity is not selective to pathogens, but it could inhibit the growth of beneficial microbes too [52]. The decrease and/or alterations of gut microbes could contribute to an increase the bee mortality [23,26,27]. The ITC could induce the apoptosis of bee cells [23,52,87] and it might cause intestinal function damages, which increase bee mortality and food intake. Moreover, high ITC concentrations could have a toxic effect on bees because they down-regulate the kinases involved in the Wnt signaling pathways, reducing cell repairing, and proliferation [86]. Moreover, N. ceranae downregulated the gene involved in the Wnt pathway [11], and the synergic downregulation in bees treated with ITC or GSL diets could reduce the gut epithelium and their functions, increasing mortality.

5. Conclusions

This research shows promising results in the potential use of Brassicaceae DSMs as an integration of the bee diet. Their administration has an interesting effect on the inhibition of N. ceranae, and potential nutraceutical benefits involved in the bee lifespan if given at low doses. Trials in the field, at colony level, are needed to confirm the results obtained under laboratory conditions, where DSM/GSL doses should be resettled. This is the first time that ITCs were detected in honey bee gut tissues after brassica product intake. Further research is necessary to investigate the presence of MYR activity in the bee and to understand bee GSL metabolism.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N., L.U., E.P., and L.L.; methodology, A.N., L.U., G.C., E.P.; formal analysis, L.U., G.C., L.M., I.C.; investigation, A.N., L.U., G.C., E.P., L.L., and I.C.; data curation, A.N., L.U., G.C., E.P., L.L., I.C., R.M., and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N., L.U., and G.C.; writing—review and editing, A.N., L.U., G.C., E.P., L.L., I.C., R.M., and L.L.; supervision, A.N. and L.L.; project administration, A.N.; funding acquisition, A.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food, and Forestry Policies, through the National Beekeeping Plan 2017–2019, year 2018, within the frame of the Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

MDPI Research Data Policies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fries, I.; Martín, R.; Meana, A.; García-Palencia, P.; Higes, M. Natural infections of Nosema ceranae in European honey bees. J. Apic. Res. 2006, 45, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Higes, M.; García-Palencia, P.; Urbieta, A.; Nanetti, A.; Martín-Hernández, R. Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae tissue tropism in worker honey bees (Apis mellifera). Vet. Pathol. 2020, 57, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fries, I.; Feng, F.; da Silva, A.; Slemenda, S.B.; Pieniazek, N.J. Nosema ceranae n. sp. (Microspora, Nosematidae), morphological and molecular characterization of a microsporidian parasite of the Asian honey bee Apis cerana (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Eur. J. Protistol. 1996, 32, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Higes, M.; Martín, R.; Meana, A. Nosema ceranae, a new microsporidian parasite in honeybees in Europe. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2006, 92, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Klee, J.; Besana, A.M.; Genersch, E.; Gisder, S.; Nanetti, A.; Tam, D.Q.; Chinh, T.X.; Puerta, F.; Ruz, J.M.; Kryger, P.; et al. Widespread dispersal of the microsporidian Nosema ceranae, an emergent pathogen of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2007, 96, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fries, I.; Chauzat, M.-P.; Chen, Y.-P.; Doublet, V.; Genersch, E.; Gisder, S.; Higes, M.; McMahon, D.P.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Natsopoulou, M.; et al. Standard methods for Nosema research. J. Apic. Res. 2013, 52, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Higes, M.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Botías, C.; Bailón, E.G.; González-Porto, A.V.; Barrios, L.; Del Nozal, M.J.; Bernal, J.L.; Jiménez, J.J.; Palencia, P.G.; et al. How natural infection by Nosema ceranae causes honeybee colony collapse. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 2659–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eiri, D.M.; Suwannapong, G.; Endler, M.; Nieh, J.C. Nosema ceranae can infect honey bee larvae and reduces subsequent adult longevity. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Higes, M.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Garrido-Bailón, E.; González-Porto, A.V.; García-Palencia, P.; Meana, A.; del Nozal, M.J.; Mayo, R.; Bernal, J.L.; Kamer, Y.; et al. Honeybee colony collapse due to Nosema ceranae in professional apiaries. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2009, 1, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Antúnez, K.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Prieto, L.; Meana, A.; Zunino, P.; Higes, M. Immune suppression in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) following infection by Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia). Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 2284–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dussaubat, C.; Brunet, J.-L.; Higes, M.; Colbourne, J.K.; Lopez, J.; Choi, J.-H.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Botías, C.; Cousin, M.; McDonnell, C.; et al. Gut pathology and responses to the microsporidium Nosema ceranae in the honey bee Apis mellifera. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Di Pasquale, G.; Salignon, M.; Le Conte, Y.; Belzunces, L.P.; Decourtye, A.; Kretzschmar, A.; Suchail, S.; Brunet, J.-L.; Alaux, C. Influence of pollen nutrition on honey bee health: Do Pollen Quality and Diversity Matter? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Aufauvre, J.; Misme-Aucouturier, B.; Viguès, B.; Texier, C.; Delbac, F.; Blot, N. Transcriptome analyses of the honeybee response to Nosema ceranae and insecticides. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cox-Foster, D.L.; Conlan, S.; Holmes, E.C.; Palacios, G.; Evans, J.D.; Moran, N.A.; Quan, P.-L.; Briese, T.; Hornig, M.; Geiser, D.M.; et al. A metagenomic survey of microbes in honey bee colony collapse disorder. Science 2007, 318, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Williams, G.R.; Sampson, M.A.; Shutler, D.; Rogers, R.E.L. Does fumagillin control the recently detected invasive parasite Nosema ceranae in western honey bees (Apis mellifera)? J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2008, 99, 342–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Higes, M.; Nozal, M.J.; Alvaro, A.; Barrios, L.; Meana, A.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Bernal, J.L.; Bernal, J. The stability and effectiveness of fumagillin in controlling Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia) infection in honey bees (Apis mellifera) under laboratory and field conditions. Apidologie 2011, 42, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Cilia, G.; Garrido, C.; Bonetto, M.; Tesoriero, D.; Nanetti, A. Effect of Api-Bioxal® and ApiHerb® treatments against Nosema ceranae infection in Apis mellifera investigated by two qPCR methods. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Botías, C.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Meana, A.; Higes, M. Screening alternative therapies to control Nosemosis type C in honey bee (Apis mellifera iberiensis) colonies. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 95, 1041–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maistrello, L.; Lodesani, M.; Costa, C.; Leonardi, F.; Marani, G.; Caldon, M.; Mutinelli, F.; Granato, A. Screening of natural compounds for the control of Nosema disease in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 2008, 39, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bravo, J.; Carbonell, V.; Sepúlveda, B.; Delporte, C.; Valdovinos, C.E.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Higes, M. Antifungal activity of the essential oil obtained from Cryptocarya alba against infection in honey bees by Nosema ceranae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2017, 149, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Porrini, M.P.; Garrido, P.M.; Umpiérrez, M.L.; Porrini, L.P.; Cuniolo, A.; Davyt, B.; González, A.; Eguaras, M.J.; Rossini, C. Effects of synthetic acaricides and Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) on molecules associated with chemical communication and recognition in honey bees. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Burnham, A.J. Scientific advances in controlling Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia) infections in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Borges, D.; Guzman-Novoa, E.; Goodwin, P.H. Control of the microsporidian parasite Nosema ceranae in honey bees (Apis mellifera) using nutraceutical and immuno-stimulatory compounds. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Michalczyk, M.; Sokół, R.; Koziatek, S. Evaluation of the effectiveness of selected treatments of Nosema spp. infection by the hemocytometric method and duplex PCR. Acta Vet. 2016, 66, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Michalczyk, M.; Sokół, R. Estimation of the influence of selected products on co-infection with N. apis/N. ceranae in Apis mellifera using real-time PCR. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 2018, 62, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cilia, G.; Fratini, F.; Tafi, E.; Turchi, B.; Mancini, S.; Sagona, S.; Nanetti, A.; Cerri, D.; Felicioli, A. Microbial profile of the ventriculum of honey bee (Apis mellifera ligustica Spinola, 1806) fed with veterinary drugs, dietary supplements and non-protein amino acids. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cilia, G.; Fratini, F.; Tafi, E.; Mancini, S.; Turchi, B.; Sagona, S.; Cerri, D.; Felicioli, A.; Nanetti, A. Changes of Western honey bee Apis mellifera ligustica (Spinola, 1806) ventriculus microbial profile related to their in-hive tasks. J. Apic. Res. 2020, 60, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nanetti, A.; Rodriguez-García, C.; Meana, A.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Higes, M. Effect of oxalic acid on Nosema ceranae infection. Res. Vet. Sci. 2015, 102, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Porrini, M.P.; Garrido, P.M.; Silva, J.; Cuniolo, A.; Román, S.; Iaconis, D.; Eguaras, M. Ácido oxálico: Potencial antiparasitario frente a Nosema ceranae por administración oral y exposición total. In Proceedings of the I Workshop Latinoamericano en Sanidad Apicola, Mar de Plata, Argentina, 25–26 October 2018; p. 64. [Google Scholar]
  30. Valizadeh, P.; Guzman-Novoa, E.; Goodwin, P.H. Effect of immune inducers on Nosema ceranae multiplication and their Impact on Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Survivorship and Behaviors. Insects 2020, 11, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Borges, D.; Guzman-Novoa, E.; Goodwin, P.H. Effects of prebiotics and probiotics on honey bees (Apis mellifera) infected with the microsporidian parasite Nosema ceranae. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El Khoury, S.; Rousseau, A.; Lecoeur, A.; Cheaib, B.; Bouslama, S.; Mercier, P.L.; Demey, V.; Castex, M.; Giovenazzo, P.; Derome, N. Deleterious interaction between honeybees (Apis mellifera) and its microsporidian intracellular parasite Nosema ceranae was mitigated by administrating either endogenous or allochthonous gut microbiota strains. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 6, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Fanigliulo, R.; Pochi, D.; Bondioli, P.; Grilli, R.; Fornaciari, L.; Folegatti, L.; Malaguti, L.; Matteo, R.; Ugolini, L.; Lazzeri, L. Semi-refined Crambe abyssinica (Hochst. EX R.E.Fr.) oil as a biobased hydraulic fluid for agricultural applications. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lazzeri, L.; Riva, G.; D’Avino, L.; Pedretti, E.F. Short introduction to the VALSO and EXTRAVALORE project activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 75, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Franco, P.; Spinozzi, S.; Pagnotta, E.; Lazzeri, L.; Ugolini, L.; Camborata, C.; Roda, A. Development of a liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous analysis of intact glucosinolates and isothiocyanates in Brassicaceae seeds and functional foods. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1428, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Canistro, D.; Vivarelli, F.; Ugolini, L.; Pinna, C.; Grandi, M.; Antonazzo, I.C.; Cirillo, S.; Sapone, A.; Cinti, S.; Lazzeri, L.; et al. Digestibility, toxicity and metabolic effects of rapeseed and sunflower protein hydrolysates in mice. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 16, 462–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lucarini, E.; Pagnotta, E.; Micheli, L.; Parisio, C.; Testai, L.; Martelli, A.; Calderone, V.; Matteo, R.; Lazzeri, L.; Mannelli, C. Eruca sativa meal against diabetic neuropathic pain: An H2S-mediated effect of glucoerucin. Molecules 2019, 24, 3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bones, A.; Rossiter, J. The enzymic and chemically induced decomposition of glucosinolates. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1053–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fenwick, G.R.; Heaney, R.K.; Mullin, W.J.; VanEtten, C.H. Glucosinolates and their breakdown products in food and food plants. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1983, 18, 123–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Agerbirk, N.; Olsen, C.E. Glucosinolate structures in evolution. Phytochemistry 2012, 77, 16–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Blažević, I.; Montaut, S.; Burčul, F.; Olsen, C.E.; Burow, M.; Rollin, P.; Agerbirk, N. Glucosinolate structural diversity, identification, chemical synthesis and metabolism in plants. Phytochemistry 2020, 169, 112100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Björkman, M.; Klingen, I.; Birch, A.N.E.; Bones, A.M.; Bruce, T.J.A.; Johansen, T.J.; Meadow, R.; Mølmann, J.; Seljåsen, R.; Smart, L.E.; et al. Phytochemicals of Brassicaceae in plant protection and human health—Influences of climate, environment and agronomic practice. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 538–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hanschen, F.S.; Lamy, E.; Schreiner, M.; Rohn, S. Reactivity and stability of glucosinolates and their breakdown products in foods. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11430–11450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Matthiessen, J.N.; Kirkegaard, J.A. Biofumigation and enhanced biodegradation: Opportunity and challenge in soilborne pest and disease management. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2006, 25, 235–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lazzeri, L.; Curto, G.; Dallavalle, E.; D’Avino, L.; Malaguti, L.; Santi, R.; Patalano, G. Nematicidal efficacy of biofumigation by defatted brassicaceae meal for control of Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid et White) Chitw. on a full field zucchini Crop. J. Sustain. Agric. 2009, 33, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cilia, G.; Sagona, S.; Giusti, M.; Jarmela dos Santos, P.E.; Nanetti, A.; Felicioli, A. Nosema ceranae infection in honeybee samples from Tuscanian Archipelago (Central Italy) investigated by two qPCR methods. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1553–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dufour, V.; Stahl, M.; Baysse, C. The antibacterial properties of isothiocyanates. Microbiology 2015, 161, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ugolini, L.; Pagnotta, E.; Matteo, R.; Malaguti, L.; Di Francesco, A.; Lazzeri, L. Brassica meal-derived allyl-isothiocyanate postharvest application: Influence on strawberry nutraceutical and biochemical parameters. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4235–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ugolini, L.; Martini, C.; Lazzeri, L.; D’Avino, L.; Mari, M. Control of postharvest grey mould (Botrytis cinerea Per.: Fr.) on strawberries by glucosinolate-derived allyl-isothiocyanate treatments. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 90, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Herr, I.; Büchler, M.W. Dietary constituents of broccoli and other cruciferous vegetables: Implications for prevention and therapy of cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2010, 36, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, L.; Palliyaguru, D.L.; Kensler, T.W. Frugal chemoprevention: Targeting Nrf2 with foods rich in sulforaphane. Semin. Oncol. 2016, 43, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Johansson, N.; Pavia, C.; Chiao, J. Growth inhibition of a spectrum of bacterial and fungal pathogens by sulforaphane, an isothiocyanate product found in broccoli and other cruciferous vegetables. Planta Med. 2008, 74, 747–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fahey, J.W.; Stephenson, K.K.; Wade, K.L.; Talalay, P. Urease from Helicobacter pylori is inactivated by sulforaphane and other isothiocyanates. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 435, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kurepina, N.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Mustaev, A. Growth-inhibitory activity of natural and synthetic isothiocyanates against representative human microbial pathogens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 115, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Bonvicini, F.; Pagnotta, E.; Punzo, A.; Calabria, D.; Simoni, P.; Mirasoli, M.; Passerini, N.; Bertoni, S.; Ugolini, L.; Lazzeri, L.; et al. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus fermented broths enriched with Eruca sativa seed extracts on intestinal barrier and inflammation in a co-culture system of an enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli and human intestinal cells. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ramirez, D.; Abellán-Victorio, A.; Beretta, V.; Camargo, A.; Moreno, D.A. Functional ingredients from Brassicaceae species: Overview and perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lazzeri, L.; Malaguti, L.; Cinti, S.; Ugolini, L.; De Nicola, G.R.; Bagatta, M.; Casadei, N.; D’Avino, L.; Matteo, R.; Patalano, G. The Brassicaceae biofumigation system for plant cultivation and defence. An Italian twenty-year experience of study and application. Acta Hortic. 2013, 1005, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lazzeri, L.; Leoni, O.; Manici, L.M.; Palmieri, S.; Patalano, G. Use of Seed Flour as Soilpesticide. U.S. Patent 7749549, 6 July 2010. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pagnotta, E.; Ugolini, L.; Matteo, R.; Lazzeri, L.; Foschi, L.; Angelini, L.G.; Tavarini, S. Exploring the Camelina sativa value chain: A new opportunity for bio-based products and overall crop sustainability. Riv. Ital. Delle Sostanze Grasse 2019, 96, 259–268. [Google Scholar]
  60. ISO 9167-1:1992/Amd 1:2013. Graines de Colza—Dosage des Glucosinolates—Partie 1: Methode par Chromatographie Liquide à Haute Performance. 1992. Available online: https://www.iso.org/fr/standard/72207.html (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  61. Pagnotta, E.; Agerbirk, N.; Olsen, C.E.; Ugolini, L.; Cinti, S.; Lazzeri, L. Hydroxyl and methoxyl derivatives of benzylglucosinolate in Lepidium densiflorum with hydrolysis to isothiocyanates and non-isothiocyanate products: Substitution governs product type and mass spectral fragmentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3167–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Whatelet, J.-P.; Iori, R.; Leoni, O.; Quinsac, A.; Palmieri, S. Guidelines for glucosinolate analysis in green tissues used for biofumigation. Agroindustria 2004, 3, 257–266. [Google Scholar]
  63. Citi, V.; Piragine, E.; Pagnotta, E.; Ugolini, L.; Di Cesare Mannelli, L.; Testai, L.; Ghelardini, C.; Lazzeri, L.; Calderone, V.; Martelli, A. Anticancer properties of erucin, an H 2 S-releasing isothiocyanate, on human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells (AsPC-1). Phyther. Res. 2019, 33, 845–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Cilia, G.; Cabbri, R.; Maiorana, G.; Cardaio, I.; Dall’Olio, R.; Nanetti, A. A novel TaqMan® assay for Nosema ceranae quantification in honey bee, based on the protein coding gene Hsp70. Eur. J. Protistol. 2018, 63, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Teixeira, E.W.; dos Santos, L.G.; Sattler, A.; Message, D.; Alves, M.L.T.M.F.; Martins, M.F.; Grassi-Sella, M.L.; Francoy, T.M. Nosema ceranae has been present in Brazil for more than three decades infecting Africanized honey bees. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2013, 114, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fuentes, F.; Paredes-Gonzalez, X.; Kong, A.-N.T. Dietary glucosinolates sulforaphane, phenethyl isothiocyanate, indole-3-carbinol/3,3′-diindolylmethane: Antioxidative stress/inflammation, Nrf2, epigenetics/epigenomics and in vivo cancer chemopreventive efficacy. Curr. Pharmacol. Reports 2015, 1, 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Boddupalli, S.; Mein, J.R.; Lakkanna, S.; James, D.R. Induction of Phase 2 Antioxidant enzymes by broccoli sulforaphane: Perspectives in maintaining the antioxidant activity of vitamins A, C, and E. Front. Genet. 2012, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Heiss, E.; Herhaus, C.; Klimo, K.; Bartsch, H.; Gerhäuser, C. Nuclear Factor κB Is a Molecular Target for sulforaphane-mediated anti-inflammatory mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 32008–32015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bhattacharya, A.; Li, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced inhibition of urinary bladder cancer growth and muscle invasion by allyl isothiocyanate and celecoxib in combination. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34, 2593–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Muth, F.; Breslow, P.R.; Masek, P.; Leonard, A.S. A pollen fatty acid enhances learning and survival in bumblebees. Behav. Ecol. 2018, 29, 1371–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Arien, Y.; Dag, A.; Shafir, S. Omega-6:3 Ratio more than absolute lipid level in diet affects associative learning in honey bees. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Rzepecka-Stojko, A.; Stojko, J.; Kurek-Górecka, A.; Górecki, M.; Kabała-Dzik, A.; Kubina, R.; Moździerz, A.; Buszman, E. Polyphenols from bee pollen: Structure, absorption, metabolism and biological Activity. Molecules 2015, 20, 21732–21749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Das, S.; Tyagi, A.; Singhal, K.K. Chemical composition including amino acid, fatty acid and glucosinolate profile of taramira (Eruca sativa) oilseed. Indian, J. Agric. Sci. 2001, 71, 613–615. [Google Scholar]
  74. Danlami, U. Phytochemical, Nutritional and antimicrobial evaluations of the aqueous extract of Brassica Nigra (Brassicaceae) Seeds. Am. J. Appl. Chem. 2016, 4, 161–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Knutsen, H.K.; Alexander, J.; Barregård, L.; Bignami, M.; Brüschweiler, B.; Ceccatelli, S.; Dinovi, M.; Edler, L.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; et al. Erucic acid in feed and food. EFSA J. 2016, 14, e04593. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ali, A.; Bashir, U.; Haiden, M. Bio-control effect of Eruca sativa Mill. oil against the hazardous food borne pathogens. Pak. J. Phytopathol. 2014, 26, 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  77. Aiyaa, S.J. Antibacterial activity of oil extracted of Brassica nigra seeds on some bacteria isolated from plaque and healthy teeth in children (1–5) years. Basrah J. Sci. 2012, 30, 105–119. [Google Scholar]
  78. Cartea, M.E.; Francisco, M.; Soengas, P.; Velasco, P. Phenolic compounds in Brassica vegetables. Molecules 2010, 16, 251–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Melchini, A.; Traka, M. Biological profile of erucin: A new promising anticancer agent from cruciferous vegetables. Toxins 2010, 2, 593–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zhang, Y. The 1,2-benzenedithiole-based cyclocondensation assay: A valuable tool for the measurement of chemopreventive isothiocyanates. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Pontoh, J.; Low, N. Purification and characterization of β-glucosidase from honey bees (Apis mellifera). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 32, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Beran, F.; Pauchet, Y.; Kunert, G.; Reichelt, M.; Wielsch, N.; Vogel, H.; Reinecke, A.; Svato, A.; Mewis, I.; Schmid, D.; et al. Phyllotreta striolata flea beetles use host plant defense compounds to create their own glucosinolate-myrosinase system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 7349–7354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Albaser, A.; Kazana, E.; Bennett, M.H.; Cebeci, F.; Luang-In, V.; Spanu, P.D.; Rossiter, J.T. Discovery of a bacterial glycoside hydrolase family 3 (GH3) β-glucosidase with myrosinase activity from a Citrobacter strain isolated from Soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 1520–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Ricigliano, V.A.; Fitz, W.; Copeland, D.C.; Mott, B.M.; Maes, P.; Floyd, A.S.; Dockstader, A.; Anderson, K.E. The impact of pollen consumption on honey bee (Apis mellifera) digestive physiology and carbohydrate metabolism. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2017, 96, e21406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mentor, S.; Fisher, D. Aggressive antioxidant reductive stress impairs brain endothelial cell angiogenesis and blood brain barrier function. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 2016, 14, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hu, R.; Khor, T.O.; Shen, G.; Jeong, W.S.; Hebbar, V.; Chen, C.; Xu, C.; Reddy, B.; Chada, K.; Kong, A.N.T. Cancer chemoprevention of intestinal polyposis in ApcMin/+ mice by sulforaphane, a natural product derived from cruciferous vegetable. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 2038–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Inês Amaro, M.; Rocha, J.; Vila-Real, H.; Eduardo-Figueira, M.; Mota-Filipe, H.; Sepodes, B.; Ribeiro, M.H. Anti-inflammatory activity of naringin and the biosynthesised naringenin by naringinase immobilized in microstructured materials in a model of DSS-induced colitis in mice. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 1010–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General pathway of myrosinase (MYR)-catalyzed hydrolysis of glucosinolates (GSLs). TFP, thiocyanate-forming protein; ESP, epithiospecifier protein; NSP, nitrile-specifier protein; DSM defatted seed meal.
Figure 1. General pathway of myrosinase (MYR)-catalyzed hydrolysis of glucosinolates (GSLs). TFP, thiocyanate-forming protein; ESP, epithiospecifier protein; NSP, nitrile-specifier protein; DSM defatted seed meal.
Microorganisms 09 00949 g001
Figure 2. Cumulative individual food daily consumption of N. ceranae-infected treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4) and CTRL−, expressed as mg/bee (dots—left y-axis), and relative cumulative individual GSL intake, expressed as ¦μmol/bees (columns–right y-axis), at 8 days post-infection. Vertical bars indicate the standard deviation.
Figure 2. Cumulative individual food daily consumption of N. ceranae-infected treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4) and CTRL−, expressed as mg/bee (dots—left y-axis), and relative cumulative individual GSL intake, expressed as ¦μmol/bees (columns–right y-axis), at 8 days post-infection. Vertical bars indicate the standard deviation.
Microorganisms 09 00949 g002
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survivorship curves for the N. ceranae-infected treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4), CTRL+ and CTRL−. Crosses indicate right-censored observations (cens.).
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survivorship curves for the N. ceranae-infected treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4), CTRL+ and CTRL−. Crosses indicate right-censored observations (cens.).
Microorganisms 09 00949 g003
Figure 4. Hazard ratios represented along with the respective confidence interval for each experimental N. ceranae-infected treated group (R2, R4, N2, N4) and CTRL+. The CTRL− served as the reference group. The dotted line indicates HR = 1. Significantly lower, higher, and non-significant HR values are, respectively, indicated by a black circle, white circle, and diamonds.
Figure 4. Hazard ratios represented along with the respective confidence interval for each experimental N. ceranae-infected treated group (R2, R4, N2, N4) and CTRL+. The CTRL− served as the reference group. The dotted line indicates HR = 1. Significantly lower, higher, and non-significant HR values are, respectively, indicated by a black circle, white circle, and diamonds.
Microorganisms 09 00949 g004
Figure 5. Variation in the N. ceranae copies across the timeline in the different treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4), CTRL+ and CTRL−.
Figure 5. Variation in the N. ceranae copies across the timeline in the different treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4), CTRL+ and CTRL−.
Microorganisms 09 00949 g005
Figure 6. Average N. ceranae abundance copies calculated for the different levels of the factor ‘treatment’, for treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4), CTRL+ and CTRL−. Standard deviations are shown as vertical bars. Same letters indicate no significant differences (Newman-Keuls post-hoc test; p = 0.05).
Figure 6. Average N. ceranae abundance copies calculated for the different levels of the factor ‘treatment’, for treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4), CTRL+ and CTRL−. Standard deviations are shown as vertical bars. Same letters indicate no significant differences (Newman-Keuls post-hoc test; p = 0.05).
Microorganisms 09 00949 g006
Table 1. Chemical characterization of E. sativa and B. nigra DSMs. Nitrogen and oil content are expressed as % w/w (based on dry weight). GSL content is expressed in μmol/g and total phenolic content in mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g of DSM. Mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3) are shown. GSL common variable side chain (R) chemical structure is also indicated where X represents the GSL S-glucopyranosyl thiohydroximate moiety. GER, GRA, and SIN indicate the GSL glucoerucin, glucoraphanin, and sinigrin respectively.
Table 1. Chemical characterization of E. sativa and B. nigra DSMs. Nitrogen and oil content are expressed as % w/w (based on dry weight). GSL content is expressed in μmol/g and total phenolic content in mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g of DSM. Mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3) are shown. GSL common variable side chain (R) chemical structure is also indicated where X represents the GSL S-glucopyranosyl thiohydroximate moiety. GER, GRA, and SIN indicate the GSL glucoerucin, glucoraphanin, and sinigrin respectively.
E. sativa DSMB. nigra DSM
Moisture (%)5.9 ± 0.17.6 ± 0.1
Nitrogen (%)5.6 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.1
Oil (%)17.9 ± 0.28.9 ± 0.1
GSL1 (¦μmol/g)
side chain (R1)
GSL2 (¦μmol/g)
side chain (R2)
GER 72.5 ± 1.8
Microorganisms 09 00949 i001
SIN 101.8 ± 2.5
Microorganisms 09 00949 i002
GRA 19.7 ± 0.2
Microorganisms 09 00949 i003
Phenols (mg GAE/g)8.6 ± 0.48.6 ± 0.2
Table 2. GSL content of DSM patties N4 and R4 at the beginning (T0), and the end of the trial (T10), after 10 days of storage at 33 °C. Mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3) are shown. GSL is expressed as ¦μmol/g of patty (±SD). Statistical differences between GSL content means are indicated by different superscript letters (p < 0.05, LSD test). SIN indicate the sinigrin content in N4, GER, and GRA indicate the glucoerucin and the glucoraphanin respectively content in R4.
Table 2. GSL content of DSM patties N4 and R4 at the beginning (T0), and the end of the trial (T10), after 10 days of storage at 33 °C. Mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3) are shown. GSL is expressed as ¦μmol/g of patty (±SD). Statistical differences between GSL content means are indicated by different superscript letters (p < 0.05, LSD test). SIN indicate the sinigrin content in N4, GER, and GRA indicate the glucoerucin and the glucoraphanin respectively content in R4.
DSM PattyGSLT0T10
N4SIN4.07 ± 0.014.00 ± 0.07
R4GER2.90 ± 0.05 a2.74 ± 0.14 b
GRA0.79 ± 0.03 b0.85 ± 0.08 a
Table 3. Censored and total observation, and mean survival +/− s.e. in the treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4), the CTRL− and CTRL+.
Table 3. Censored and total observation, and mean survival +/− s.e. in the treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4), the CTRL− and CTRL+.
GroupCensured ObservationsTotal ObservationsSurvival (Days)0.95 C.I.
CTRL−477511.125 +/− 0.51110.124–12.127
R2567512.677 +/− 0.43411.827–13.527
R4527311.886 +/− 0.41511.073–12.699
N2637513.384 +/− 0.41712.568–14.201
N435748.798 +/− 0.5087.801–9.794
CTRL+537511.385 +/− 0.39410.613–12.157
Table 4. Between-group effects of continuous and categorical predictors included in the GLM analysis of N. ceranae abundance data for treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4) and CTRL−.
Table 4. Between-group effects of continuous and categorical predictors included in the GLM analysis of N. ceranae abundance data for treated groups (R2, R4, N2, N4) and CTRL−.
EffectParameter +/− s.e.tp
Intercept216,340.0 +/− 14,952.014.4690.000
dpi−7204.6 +/− 1641.4−4.3890.000
CTRL−157,167.9 +/− 9409.316.7030.000
R28551.0 +/− 8779.90.9740.331
R4−33,488.0 +/− 9029.3−3.7090.000
N2−10,336.3 +/− 8475.6−1.2190.224
N4−52,406.2 +/− 10,684.5−4.9050.000
Table 5. Total ITC content of midgut and hindgut tissues of uninfected bees fed on R2 and N2 for 8 days. ITC content is expressed as pmol/mg of gut tissue. Mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3) are shown. Statistical differences between ITC content means are indicated by different superscript letters (p < 0.05, LSD test).
Table 5. Total ITC content of midgut and hindgut tissues of uninfected bees fed on R2 and N2 for 8 days. ITC content is expressed as pmol/mg of gut tissue. Mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3) are shown. Statistical differences between ITC content means are indicated by different superscript letters (p < 0.05, LSD test).
DSM PattyITC Content (pmol/mg)
MidgutHindgut
R2347.83 b788.90 a
N221.95 c285.57 b
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nanetti, A.; Ugolini, L.; Cilia, G.; Pagnotta, E.; Malaguti, L.; Cardaio, I.; Matteo, R.; Lazzeri, L. Seed Meals from Brassica nigra and Eruca sativa Control Artificial Nosema ceranae Infections in Apis mellifera. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050949

AMA Style

Nanetti A, Ugolini L, Cilia G, Pagnotta E, Malaguti L, Cardaio I, Matteo R, Lazzeri L. Seed Meals from Brassica nigra and Eruca sativa Control Artificial Nosema ceranae Infections in Apis mellifera. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(5):949. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050949

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nanetti, Antonio, Luisa Ugolini, Giovanni Cilia, Eleonora Pagnotta, Lorena Malaguti, Ilaria Cardaio, Roberto Matteo, and Luca Lazzeri. 2021. "Seed Meals from Brassica nigra and Eruca sativa Control Artificial Nosema ceranae Infections in Apis mellifera" Microorganisms 9, no. 5: 949. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050949

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop