Next Article in Journal
Metaproteomics—An Advantageous Option in Studies of Host-Microbiota Interaction
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Survey and Genetic Diversity of Bartonella spp. in Small Indian Mongooses (Urva auropunctata) and Their Fleas on Saint Kitts, West Indies
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Endophyte Diversity of Rheum palmatum from Different Production Areas in Gansu Province of China and the Association with Secondary Metabolite
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Case of Atypical Bartonellosis in a 4-Year-Old Immunocompetent Child
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Serological and Molecular Evidence of Bartonella henselae in Stray Cats from Southern Italy

1
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia “Adelmo Mirri”, via G. Marinuzzi 3, 90129 Palermo, Italy
2
Dipartimento Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche, Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Viale delle Scienze, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
3
U.O. Igiene Urbana ASP Palermo Presso Canile Municipale, Piazza Tiro a Segno 5, 90141 Palermo, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(5), 979; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050979
Submission received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 26 April 2021 / Accepted: 30 April 2021 / Published: 30 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bartonella Infections in Humans and Animals)

Abstract

:
Bartonella henselae is a slow growing and facultative intracellular pathogen mainly transmitted by arthropod vectors adapted to domestic and wild mammalian reservoir hosts. Since cats are the major source of the B. henselae infection, this study aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence and the DNA presence in randomly sampled stray cats. Blood samples of 429 cats were collected from shelter of Palermo (Southern Italy) and sera and whole blood were analyzed for the presence of antibodies against B. henselae by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively. Two hundred and three sera (47.3%) were positive to IFA and 148 blood samples (34.5%) to real-time PCR. Based on serological results, the evaluation of the potential risk factors (sex, age, coat color) was carried out. The multivariate analysis indicated that cats more than 12 months old were more likely to be seropositive to B. henselae than cats <12 months. These data will add useful information to the understanding of the spread of B. henselae in stray cats in Southern Italy.

1. Introduction

Bartonella species are fastidious, slow growing and facultative intracellular pathogens mainly transmitted by arthropod vectors that are highly adapted to a wide range of domestic and wild mammalian reservoir hosts [1,2]. Domestic cats (Felis catus) are the primary reservoir of B. henselae, the main causative agent of the cat scratch disease (CSD). The CSD is a common zoonosis with a worldwide distribution, a benign lymphadenopathy characterized by local forms affecting the skin and the loco-regional lymph nodes [3,4]. The infection is usually benign and self-limiting, but sometimes, can evolve in systemic granulomatous forms, which acquire severity in immunocompromised hosts. The most frequent route of transmission to humans is via cat bites or scratches [5].
Bartonella infection in most cats is not usually characterized by clinical manifestations, but sometimes, diseased cats show self-limiting febrile illness, lymphadenopathy, transient anemia and neurological dysfunction [6]. Infected cats can remain bacteremic for long periods, even more than a year. Persistent bacteremia in asymptomatic cats represents the most important factor that facilitates the spread of the microorganism [7].
B. henselae is transmitted among cats mainly by the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis), and this vector is essential for maintaining the infection within the cat population. B. henselae can multiply in the digestive system of the cat flea and survive at least 3 days in the flea feces. Therefore, the source of infections appears to be the flea feces that are inoculated by contaminated cat claws [7].
Previous epidemiological studies worldwide have shown a high level of variability of B. heanselae seroprevalence among cat populations in different geographic regions, and among individuals living in the same geographic area [7]. Seroprevalence of 1–8% in Germany and in Switzerland [8,9,10], 41% in France [11], 56% in Netherlands [12], 81% in California were reported [13]. Bacteremic prevalence rate often approach 50–75% in feral cat populations worldwide [14]. The differences in serological and bacteremic prevalence are related to different climatic conditions increasing from cold climate to warm humid climates. Some factors such as age, animal status (pet or stray) as well as geographic and environmental conditions might influence the risk of B. henselae infection. Stray cats roam freely and often form colonies that live and feed in close proximity to humans, so stray cats are potential sentinels, mainly in urbanized areas, for both human and pet health [15,16,17,18].
Regarding Bartonella seroprevalence in cats in terms of sex, there are contradictory results. According to some authors, no significant differences have been detected between the sexes [19,20,21]. However, some researchers [12,22] have reported that male cats had higher infection rates having more opportunities to be scratched or bitten by other cats while protecting their territories, whereas Sander et al. found that female cats had a higher prevalence [23]. Moreover, as occurs in other vector-borne diseases, a correlation between seroprevalence for Bartonella and coat color could be hypothesized. It is more difficult to detect parasites in dark hair than in animals with fair hair color, and this may delay anti-parasite interventions. This would allow more time for the pathogen to move from the parasites to the host and infect it [24].
Since vector-borne diseases can have an impact in both animal and human health, it is relevant for infectious disease control and mitigation strategies to identify the pathogen circulation in a certain geographic area. Moreover, since cats are the major source of the B. henselae infection, this study aims to evaluate the epidemiology of this bacterium by both molecular and serological approaches in stray cats living in Palermo (Sicily, Southern Italy). We hypothesized that the seropositivity to Bartonella henselae in urban free-ranging cats could be influenced by possible risk factors as age, sex and coat color.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Specimens

During the period January–September 2018, 429 blood samples were collected into serum and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes from censused stray European race cats belonging to registered colonies of Palermo (Sicily, Italy). The sample size was determined using Winepi software considering an expected prevalence of 50%, with 5% precision at the 95% confidence level (as no other epidemiological data were available). According to Winepi, the minimum number of required samples was 270 animals. The cats were randomly chosen among those that arrived at the shelter to be spayed or neutered and then released into the environment and reintroduced in their colony. Veterinarians reported no overt symptoms of bartonellosis in the cats that were considered clinically healthy.

2.2. Serological Test

About of 1 mL of blood were collected into a 3 mL tube containing no anticoagulant, stored in a refrigerated bag and conferred to the laboratories of the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Sicily.
All samples were centrifuged at 1500× g for 15 min and then serum was separated from the clot and the sera were collected and immediately tested or stored at −20 °C. Antibodies to B. henselae were detected by the commercial test MegaFLUO® BARTONELLA henselae IFA IgG (MEGACOR Diagnostik GmbH, Horbranz, Austria) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All sera were diluted 1:50 and 1:100 with PBS as suggested by the manufactures. The results were visualized using standard fluorescence microscopy, where a positive reaction was seen as sharply defined yellow-green fluorescent inside infected cells. A negative reaction was seen as the absence of sharply defined proteobacteria, like that seen in the negative control well. Positive and negative controls were supplied in the kit. All sera with titers ≥1:50 were considered positive [25].

2.3. DNA Extraction and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Whole blood into an EDTA tube was collected and used to extract DNA. The DNA was extracted using the commercial kitMagMAX CORE (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Monza, Italy), following the manufacturer’s protocol, and stored at −20 °C. DNA samples had an average concentration between 9 and 32 ng/µL and an A260/280 ratio between 1.8 and 2. A screening on blood samples was carried out by real-time PCR in order to check for the presence of B. henselae DNA. The real-time PCR protocol proposed by Alamán Valtierra in 2016 was used [26], but a qualitative rather than a quantitative approach was carried out. Real-time PCR was performed using the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), amplifying a 183-base pair product of the specific 16S-23S intergenic region of B. henselae ribosomal RNA [26]. DNA was added to a reaction mix containing 1× of SSo advanced Universal Sybr Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and 0.5 µL of each primer (10 µM) (Table 1) up to a final volume of 25 µL. The instrument program consisted of an initial denaturation of 3 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of amplification, which included a denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 s and an annealing/extension step at 60 °C for 30 s. The final step consisted in 0.5 °C increment from 65 to 95 °C for 2 s/step to analyze the melting curve. All runs included a field sample positive to B. henselae and a negative (DNAase/RNAase free water) control.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed by multiple logistic regression models. The significant variables were identified using the maximum likelihood estimates. To assess the risk factors, corresponding p-values and odds ratios (OR) for the examined variables were evaluated, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The mathematical modelling was performed using the SAS/STAT software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
The cats were compared with respect to age (kitten ≤12 months and adult >12 months), sex (male or female) and coat color (uniform or mixed color). The cut off points were selected considering average characteristics of the analyzed cats.

2.5. Ethical Statement

The study did not involve any animal experiment. Only sample collection from naturally infected cats was carried out consisting of a single blood draw per cat. This was needed for the laboratory analyses and did not involve any suffering of the sampled animals. This study was conducted as part of the IZS SI 11/16 RC research project entitled “Indagine sulla diffusione di Borreliosi e Bartonellosi in canili del territorio regionale e potenziali rischi zoonosici correlati” approved by the Italian Ministry of Health on 9 August 2017.

3. Results

3.1. Animal Demographics

A total of 429 stray cats were sampled (166 male and 263 female). The cats were divided into two groups based on age 215 kittens (<12 months) and 214 adults (>12 months). In relation to the coat color, 297 cats had a mixed color coat and 132 a uniform color coat.

3.2. Serological Tests

Out of 429 sera samples, 203 had antibodies against B. henselae, 24 with a titer of 1:50, 179 with titer of 1:100 (Table 2). The overall seroprevalence was 47.3%.

3.3. Risk Factors Analysis

The results obtained were examined by the multivariate analysis in order to determine the correlation, if any, between IFA results and three different variables: age, sex and coat color (Table 3). The multivariate analysis showed that only age variable was significantly related to B. henselae seropositivity (χ2 = 4.7004; p < 0.0302). Adult cats were about one and a half times more likely to be seropositive compared to kittens. In fact, the seroprevalence in adult cats was 53.3% while in kittens it was 41.4%. No correlation was found for other variables.

3.4. Molecular Analysis

The real-time PCRs mean values of efficiency = 95.6 ± 2.6, slope = −3.4328 ± 0.07, R2 = 0.998 ± 0.003, and y-intercept = 34.049 ± 0.31 were evaluated. Real-time PCR carried out in the whole blood of all the 429 cats revealed that 148 cats (34.5%) contained B. henselae DNA. The positive control corresponded to a Tm of 81, while positive samples corresponded to a mean tm of 79.66 ± 0.83.
The real-time PCR and serological results are reported in Table 4.

4. Discussion

Bartonella henselae infection is common in stray and domestic cats and it is known that cats remain a reservoir of the zoonotic bacteria. Cats are ubiquitous and often in intimate contact with potential susceptible humans. Since infected cats usually remain asymptomatic, close contact with stray and wild cats may present a risk of acquiring Bartonella infection for humans and animals. Transmission from cats to humans occurs via a scratch or bite and is due to the presence of the bacterium on claws and in the oral cavity. Flea-infested cats tend to have higher grooming activity than non-infested cats. These circumstances would make a bacteremic cat a major risk for humans [27].
In this study the presence of anti-B. henselae antibodies and the DNA of B. henselae, in blood sample of stray cats from Palermo (Southern Italy) was assessed, in order to evaluate the prevalence of this pathogen. Cats captured from January to September 2018 were free-roaming and inhabiting urban streets, they did not belong to a specific household and most of them were untamed. Cats harboured fleas at the time of blood collection. As they probably did not receive any preventive flea treatment they were significantly more likely to be infected, suggesting that vector-control programs are crucial to avoid Bartonella infection. Anti B. henselae antibodies were detected in 203 (47.3%) of 429 sera examined. Our results are in agreement with data reported for Northern Italy (45.9%) [28] and for Southern Italy (45.7%) [29].
The statistical analysis conducted on the serological data of cats has shown that age has proved to be a risk factor, showing that animals older than one year of life are more likely to become infected with Bartonella henselae than younger cats as previously reported by Fabbi et al. [27]. No associations between seropositivity, sex, and coat color was found. This study corroborates the findings of previous studies conducted in the same geographical area which have shown that the seroprevalence of B. henselae in cats is generally high [30,31]. Moreover, Mansueto et al. demonstrated the correlation between humans and stray cats seroprevalence, rather than pet cats in the study area, probably due to the lower environmental exposure to Bartonella and the better health state and medical surveillance of pet cats, compared to stray cats [30].
On all whole blood samples, the DNA of B. henselae was searched by real-time PCR. Given the large number of samples, the real-time PCR proposed by Alamán Valtierra in 2016 [26] was converted into a qualitative PCR. In this way it was possible to carry out a rather rapid screening using Sybr green real-time PCR reducing costs compared to a Taqman probe-based real-time PCR.
B. henselae DNA was detected in 148 (34.5%) of 429 cats. B. henselae DNA was previously detected in the 27.1% and in the 20.9% of stray cats blood sample in Northern Italy and in Southern Italy respectively [28,29]. Other studies report finding B. henselae DNA in 56.9% of blood samples from 51 wild cats from Alabama and Florida [32] and in 41.8% of blood samples from 150 wild cats in Korea [33].
These studies reveal the variability of the results in the different geographical regions depending on the origin of the cats.
Out of 203 cats serologically positive for B. henselae, 117 were negative for the presence of pathogen DNA in the blood. These subjects were probably no longer in the phase of bacteremia and it can be assumed that the sample was sampled in a time distant from the infection. Moreover, 20 of the 117 cats have an antibody titer of 1:50 (low titer) and 97 cats had an antibody titer ≥1:100 (high titer). Most likely, the antibody titer of 1:50 corresponds to a remission stage of B. henselae infection, more distant from infection than in cats with an antibody titer ≥1:100.
Maggi and colleagues [34] developed a culture medium (Bartonella/alpha-Proteobacteria growth media, BAPGM) to support the growth of at least seven Bartonella species and to facilitate the isolation of B. henselae from blood and fluids. The molecular diagnosis of B. henselae was reported to be improved by pre-enrichment in BAPGM [35]. The lack of this enrichment phase in our study could be the basis of the discrepancy between negative real-time PCR samples from seropositive cats, although it is unlikely to account for all cases. Additionally, treatment histories were unknown, and previous antibiotic treatment may have adversely affected PCR DNA detection in Bartonella seropositive cats.
Among the positives for the presence of Bartonella DNA in the blood, 62 were seronegative and 86 seropositive for B. henselae.
The antibody response to B. henselae has been demonstrated to occur 2 weeks after infectious challenge [36]. As cats can remain bacteremic for up to 32 weeks [37], the presence of both bacteremia and elevated antibody titers is a common feature. This result indicates that the 62 cats were in the early or acute phase of infection and therefore IgM rather than IgG antibodies may have been present. Therefore, these cats could be carriers of the pathogen and so they could be contagious.
Determination of the absence of bacteremia is crucial in assessing actual risk of transmission for the cat; however, a non-bacteremic cat with positive serology results should be re-evaluated for possible recurrent bacteremia [27].
This work takes interest in animal and human health. The infected cats in this study did not show clinical changes although it is possible that they had transient anemia associated with bacteremia that just was not detected during this study cause blood tests were not performed. Since animals included in this study were stray and animals that may be adopted from both urban and rural areas, routine procedures of detection in shelters should be carried out, as well as effective vector control, in order to reduce the spread of the pathogens and avoid health problems in both pets and their owners. Furthermore, we emphasize the importance of managing flea control in the adopted cats and the environment and avoiding scratches and cat bites due to the potential risk that Bartonella infection represents mainly in immunosuppressed people.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.G. and F.G.; methodology, F.A., P.G., V.B.; software, S.S.; resources, F.S., D.V.; data curation, P.G., S.D.B. and V.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D.B. and P.G.; writing—review and editing, F.G., A.T.; supervision, A.T.; project administration, F.G.; funding acquisition, F.G., A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by Italian Health Ministry grant number IZS SI 11/16 RC.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia “Adelmo Mirri” (protocol code I/0013910/17, date of approval 16th October 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dvm, E.B.B.; Maggi, R.G.; Chomel, B.B.; Lappin, M.R. Bartonellosis: An emerging infectious disease of zoonotic importance to animals and human beings. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2010, 20, 8–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chomel, B.B.; Kasten, R.W.; Sykes, J.E.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Clinical Impact of Persistent Bartonella Bacteremia in Humans and Animals. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 990, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chomel, B.B.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Maruyama, S.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Bartonella spp. in Pets and Effect on Human Health. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lamps, L.W.; Scott, M.A. Cat-Scratch Disease. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004, 121, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Álvarez-Fernández, A.; Breitschwerdt, E.B.; Solano-Gallego, L. Bartonella infections in cats and dogs including zoonotic aspects. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Breitschwerdt, E.B. Feline bartonellosis and cat scratch disease. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2008, 123, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chomel, B.B.; Kasten, R.W.; Henn, J.B.; Molia, S. Bartonella Infection in Domestic Cats and Wild Felids. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1078, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arvand, M.; Klose, A.J.; Schwartz-Porsche, D.; Hahn, H.; Wendt, C. Genetic Variability and Prevalence of Bartonella henselae in Cats in Berlin, Germany, and Analysis of Its Genetic Relatedness to a Strain from Berlin That Is Pathogenic for Humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 743–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Haimerl, M.; Tenter, A.M.; Simon, K.; Rommel, M.; Hilger, J.; Autenrieth, I.B. Seroprevalence of Bartonella henselae in cats in Germany. J. Med. Microbiol. 1999, 48, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Glaus, T.; Hofmann-Lehmann, R.; Greene, C.; Glaus, B.; Wolfensberger, C.; Lutz, H. Seroprevalence of Bartonella henselae infection and correlation with disease status in cats in Switzerland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 2883–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gurfield, A.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Chomel, B.; Kasten, R.; Heller, R.; Bouillin, C.; Gandoin, C.; Thibault, D.; Chang, C.-C.; Barrat, F.; et al. Epidemiology of Bartonella infection in domestic cats in France. Veter Microbiol. 2001, 80, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bergmans, A.M.; de Jong, C.M.; van Amerongen, G.; Schot, C.S.; Schouls, L.M. Prevalence of Bartonella species in domestic cats in The Netherlands. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 2256–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Chomel, B.B.; Abbott, R.C.; Kasten, R.W.; Floyd-Hawkins, K.; Kass, P.H.; Glaser, C.; Pedersen, N.C.; Koehler, J. Bartonella henselae prevalence in domestic cats in California: Risk factors and association between bacteremia and antibody titers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995, 33, 2445–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chomel, B.; Kasten, R. Bartonellosis, an increasingly recognized zoonosis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guptill, L.; Wu, C.-C.; HogenEsch, H.; Slater, L.N.; Glickman, N.; Dunham, A.; Syme, H. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Genetic Diversity of Bartonella henselae Infections in Pet Cats in Four Regions of the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bergh, K.; Bevanger, L.; Hanssen, I.; Loseth, K. Low prevalence of Bartonella henselae infections in Norwegian domestic and feral cats. APMIS 2002, 110, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chomel, B.B.; Kasten, R.W.; Pajares, C.M.; Carlos, R.S.; Abenes, M.V.; Yamamoto, K.; Chang, C.C.; Carlos, E.T. Bartonella henselae and Bartonella clarridgeiae infection in domestic cats from The Philippines. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1999, 60, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Lappin, M.R.; Griffin, B.; Brunt, J.; Riley, A.; Burney, D.; Hawley, J.; Brewer, M.M.; Jensen, W.A. Prevalence of Bartonella species, haemoplasma species, Ehrlichia species, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Neorickettsia risticii DNA in the blood of cats and their fleas in the United States. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2006, 8, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Majali, A.M. Seroprevalence of and risk factors for Bartonella henselae and Bartonella quintana infections among pet cats in Jordan. Prev. Veter Med. 2004, 64, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Maruyama, S.; Kabeya, H.; Nakao, R.; Tanaka, S.; Sakai, T.; Xuan, X.; Katsube, Y.; Mikami, T. Seroprevalence of Bartonella henselae, Toxoplasma gondii, FIV and FeLV Infections in Domestic Cats in Japan. Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 47, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pinna Parpaglia, M.L.; Masu, G.; Masala, G.; Porcu, R.; Zobba, R.; Pintori, G.; Cocco, R. Seroprevalence of Bartonella henselae in dogs and cats in Sassari. Vet Res Commun. 2007, 31, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Inoue, K.; Maruyama, S.; Kabeya, H.; Kawanami, K.; Yanai, K.; Jitchum, S.; Jittaparapong, S. Prevalence of Bartonella infection in cats and dogs in a metropolitan area, Thailand. Epidemiol. Infect. 2009, 137, 1568–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sander, A.; Bühler, C.; Pelz, K.; Von Cramm, E.; Bredt, W. Detection and identification of two Bartonella henselae variants in domestic cats in Germany. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 584–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Gerber, B.; Eichenberger, S.; Wittenbrink, M.M.; E Reusch, C. Increased prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi infections in Bernese Mountain Dogs: A possible breed predisposition. BMC Vet. Res. 2007, 3, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Alves, A.; Milhano, N.; Santos-Silva, M.; Santos, A.; Vilhena, M.; de Sousa, R. Evidence of Bartonella spp., Rickettsia spp. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in domestic, shelter and stray cat blood and fleas, Portugal. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Alamán Valtierra, M.; Simón Valencia, C.; Fuertes Negro, H.; Unzuet Galarza, A.; Flores Somarriba, B.; Halaihel Kassab, N. Epidemiología molecular de Bartonella henselae en gatos callejeros y de albergue en Zaragoza, España. Rev. Esp. Salud. Publica. 2016, 90, e40010. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fabbi, M.; De Giuli, L.; Tranquillo, M.; Bragoni, R.; Casiraghi, M.; Genchi, C.; Sarantuya, J.; Nishi, J.; Wakimoto, N.; Erdene, S.; et al. Prevalence of Bartonella henselae in Italian Stray Cats: Evaluation of Serology to Assess the Risk of Transmission of Bartonella to Humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ebani, V.V.; Guardone, L.; Marra, F.; Altomonte, I.; Nardoni, S.; Mancianti, F. Arthropod-Borne Pathogens in Stray Cats from Northern Italy: A Serological and Molecular Survey. Animals 2020, 10, 2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Persichetti, M.F.; Pennisi, M.G.; Vullo, A.; Masucci, M.; Migliazzo, A.; Solano-Gallego, L. Clinical evaluation of outdoor cats exposed to ectoparasites and associated risk for vector-borne infections in southern Italy. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mansueto, P.; Pepe, I.; Cillari, E.; Arcoleo, F.; Micalizzi, A.; Bonura, F.; Seidita, A.; Palillo, L.; Di Gregorio, M.F.; Affronti, M.; et al. Prevalence of Antibodies Anti-Bartonella henselae in Western Sicily: Children, Blood Donors, and Cats. J. Immunoass. Immunochem. 2012, 33, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grippi, F.; Galluzzo, P.; Arnone, M.; Gargano, V.; Lombardo, S.; Santangelo, F.; Villari, S.; Chiarenza, G. Leptospirosis and bartonellosis seroprevalence in stay cats circulating in Palermo (Sicily, Italy). Lucr. Stiintifice Med. Vet. 2017, 50, 42–44. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lappin, M.R.; Hawley, J. Presence of Bartonella species and Rickettsia species DNA in the blood, oral cavity, skin and claw beds of cats in the United States. Veter Dermatol. 2009, 20, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, Y.-S.; Seo, K.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; Choi, E.-W.; Lee, H.-W.; Hwang, C.-Y.; Shin, N.-S.; Youn, H.-J.; Youn, H.Y. Prevalence of Bartonella henselae and Bartonella clarridgeiae in cats and dogs in Korea. J. Veter Sci. 2009, 10, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Maggi, R.G.; Duncan, A.W.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. Novel Chemically Modified Liquid Medium That Will Support the Growth of Seven Bartonella Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 2651–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Duncan, A.W.; Maggi, R.G.; Breitschwerdt, E.B. A combined approach for the enhanced detection and isolation of Bartonella species in dog blood samples: Pre-enrichment liquid culture followed by PCR and subculture onto agar plates. J. Microbiol. Methods 2007, 69, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Greene, C.E.; McDermott, M.; Jameson, P.H.; Atkins, C.L.; Marks, A.M. Bartonella henselae infection in cats; evaluation during primary infection, treatment, and rechallenge infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996, 34, 1682–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Guptill, L.; Slater, L.; Wu, C.-C.; Lin, T.-L.; Glickman, L.; Welch, D.; Tobolski, J.; HogenEsch, H. Evidence of reproductive failure and lack of perinatal transmission of Bartonella henselae in experimentally infected cats. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1998, 65, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Nucleotide sequence of primers used to reveal B. henselae DNA by real-time PCR assay.
Table 1. Nucleotide sequence of primers used to reveal B. henselae DNA by real-time PCR assay.
NameSequences 5′-3′GeneAmpliconsReference
B_hen FTGTCATCAGAAAGGGCTATT16S-23S183 bp[26]
B_hen RCAAAACAAAGTGCAAAACAA
Table 2. Distribution of Bartonella henselae different seropositivity (1:50 and 1:100).
Table 2. Distribution of Bartonella henselae different seropositivity (1:50 and 1:100).
FactorsTiter 1:50Titer 1:100
Age
<12 months1673
>12 months8106
Sex
Female14108
Male1071
Coat color
Mixed color16131
Uniform color848
Table 3. Bartonella henselae seropositivity according to characteristics of cats: percentage of positive, number of positive, odds ratio related 95% confidence intervals (95% CI); reference (Ref.).
Table 3. Bartonella henselae seropositivity according to characteristics of cats: percentage of positive, number of positive, odds ratio related 95% confidence intervals (95% CI); reference (Ref.).
Factors% posN° pos/AllOR (95% CI)
Age
<12 months41.489/215Ref.
>12 months53.3114/2141.593 (1.046–2.426)
Sex
Female46.4122/263Ref.
Male48.881/1661.045 (0.679–1.608)
Coat color
Mixed color49.4147/297Ref.
Uniform color42.456/1320.736 (0.466–1.161)
Table 4. Real-time PCR and seropositivity results in 429 cats.
Table 4. Real-time PCR and seropositivity results in 429 cats.
Status of CatReal-Time PCR Results
Positive (%)Negative (%)Total (%)
Seropositive86 (20)117 (27.3)203 (47.3)
Seronegative62 (14.5)164 (38.2)226 (52.7)
Total148 (34.5)281 (65.5)429
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grippi, F.; Galluzzo, P.; Guercio, A.; Blanda, V.; Santangelo, F.; Sciortino, S.; Vicari, D.; Arcuri, F.; Di Bella, S.; Torina, A. Serological and Molecular Evidence of Bartonella henselae in Stray Cats from Southern Italy. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050979

AMA Style

Grippi F, Galluzzo P, Guercio A, Blanda V, Santangelo F, Sciortino S, Vicari D, Arcuri F, Di Bella S, Torina A. Serological and Molecular Evidence of Bartonella henselae in Stray Cats from Southern Italy. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(5):979. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050979

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grippi, Francesca, Paola Galluzzo, Annalisa Guercio, Valeria Blanda, Francesco Santangelo, Sonia Sciortino, Domenico Vicari, Francesca Arcuri, Santina Di Bella, and Alessandra Torina. 2021. "Serological and Molecular Evidence of Bartonella henselae in Stray Cats from Southern Italy" Microorganisms 9, no. 5: 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050979

APA Style

Grippi, F., Galluzzo, P., Guercio, A., Blanda, V., Santangelo, F., Sciortino, S., Vicari, D., Arcuri, F., Di Bella, S., & Torina, A. (2021). Serological and Molecular Evidence of Bartonella henselae in Stray Cats from Southern Italy. Microorganisms, 9(5), 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050979

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop