Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Susceptibility to Miltefosine of Leishmania infantum (syn. L. chagasi) Isolates from Different Geographical Areas in Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevotella melaninogenica, a Sentinel Species of Antibiotic Resistance in Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Niche?
Previous Article in Journal
Regulation of the Pseudomonas syringae Type III Secretion System by Host Environment Signals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diversity of Methanogens in Animals’ Gut
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Look at the Genus Solobacterium: A Retrospective Analysis of Twenty-Seven Cases of Infection Involving S. moorei and a Review of Sequence Databases and the Literature

1
Laboratoire SIMPA Stress Immunité Pathogènes EA 7300, Université de Lorraine, & Service de Microbiologie, CHRU de Nancy, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
2
HydroSciences Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Université de Montpellier, 34093 Montpellier, France
3
Service de Microbiologie, CHRU de Nancy, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
4
Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU de Nîmes, 30029 Nîmes, France
5
VBIC, INSERM U1047, Université de Montpellier, Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Nîmes, 30029 Nîmes, France
6
HydroSciences Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Université de Montpellier, Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU de Nîmes, 30029 Nîmes, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(6), 1229; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061229
Submission received: 12 May 2021 / Revised: 31 May 2021 / Accepted: 2 June 2021 / Published: 5 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinically Relevant Anaerobes and Facultative Anaerobes)

Abstract

:
Solobacterium moorei is an anaerobic Gram-positive bacillus present within the oral and the intestinal microbiota that has rarely been described in human infections. Besides its role in halitosis and oral infections, S. moorei is considered to be an opportunistic pathogen causing mainly bloodstream and surgical wound infections. We performed a retrospective study of 27 cases of infections involving S. moorei in two French university hospitals between 2006 and 2021 with the aim of increasing our knowledge of this unrecognized opportunistic pathogen. We also reviewed all the data available in the literature and in genetic and metagenomic sequence databases. In addition to previously reported infections, S. moorei had been isolated from various sites and involved in intra-abdominal, osteoarticular, and cerebral infections more rarely or not previously reported. Although mostly involved in polymicrobial infections, in seven cases, it was the only pathogen recovered. Not included in all mass spectrometry databases, its identification can require 16S rRNA gene sequencing. High susceptibility to antibiotics (apart from rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and clindamycin; 91.3%, 11.8%, and 4.3% of resistant strains, respectively) has been noted. Our global search strategy revealed S. moorei to be human-associated, widely distributed in the human microbiota, including the vaginal and skin microbiota, which may be other sources for infection in addition to the oral and gut microbiota.

1. Introduction

The genus Solobacterium was created in 2000 to classify anaerobic, non-sporulated Gram-positive bacilli isolated from human feces that were phylogenetically distant from the genera Eubacterium, Holdemania, and Erysipelothrix. The nomenclature of the genus referred to a lone bacterial species (solus for sole, bakterion for small rod). Nowadays, the genus is classified in the family Erysipelotrichaceae within the phylum Firmicutes and, 20 years after its description, still comprises a unique validated species, Solobacterium moorei [1], for which the name Bulleidia moorei had also been proposed but not validated.
Three years after its characterization, S. moorei was found to be part of the tongue microbiota species and phylotypes that were significantly associated with halitosis [2], a finding that was later confirmed by Haraszthy et al. [3,4]. The fact that the presence of S. moorei was found to be significantly correlated with organoleptic scores of halitosis, volatile sulfur compound (hydrogen sulfide) levels, and beta-galactosidase activities was further consistent with the hypothesis that this species could be a source of malodorous oral compounds [4]. S. moorei has also been increasingly reported as being associated with other various oral diseases, including different periodontal and endodontic diseases [5,6,7,8]. Apart from being a microorganism present within the oral microbiota, S. moorei has mostly been described as a member of the intestinal microbiota. It has been suggested, based on a metagenomic analysis of the fecal microbiome—which revealed a significant association of several anaerobes, including S. moorei, with colorectal cancer—that this species might be involved in colorectal carcinogenesis [9]. Besides its role in oral infections, S. moorei is considered to be an opportunistic pathogen causing mainly bloodstream and surgical wound infections [10]. However, reported cases of S. moorei infections are still relatively rare, as evidenced by a recent review on this subject by Barrack et al. [10]. Considering the endogenous origin of S. moorei infections, the source of infection is often assumed to be the oral cavity or the intestinal tract. However, this seems not always relevant, suggesting that S. moorei may be present in other endogenous microbiota.
The scarcity of data concerning the involvement of S. moorei in human infections led us to carry out a retrospective analysis of 27 cases of infection involving S. moorei and observed in two geographically distant French university hospital centers. To broaden the knowledge on the endogenous reservoirs of S. moorei and the implications of this microorganism for human infections, we also carried out a review of the sequences available in the GenBank database and in metagenomic databases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Analysis

We conducted a retrospective case analysis of infections involving S. moorei among patients hospitalized between 2006 and 2021 in two large regional university hospitals located in the East (University Hospital Center of Nancy) and South (University Hospital Center of Nîmes) of France. All patients for whom cultures from any biological sample yielded S. moorei were included. The isolates had been identified in both laboratories using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, which provided accurate identification of the species under consideration. Taxonomic affiliation to the species S. moorei was performed using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria [11]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the recommendations of the antibiogram committee of the French Society for Microbiology (CA-SFM)/European Committee for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) in force at the time of isolation [12]. For each patient included, demographic (age, sex), clinical (type of infection, medical history, treatment, and outcome), and microbiological data (associated cultured bacteria if any, antimicrobial susceptibility profile) were collected.
The Institutional Review Board of the University Hospital of Nîmes approved the study (IRB number 21.03.03).

2.2. Review of S. moorei in the Literature and Databases

A PubMed search with the terms “Solobacterium” or “Solobacterium moorei” or “Bulleidia moorei” was conducted on 9 March 2021. We then reviewed all articles published in the English language and involving humans.
The NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database was searched on the same date, for the sequences of S. moorei using two approaches that were crossed to ascertain representativeness of the selection. On one hand, we reviewed all the sequences available in the nucleotide database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/, accessed on 9 March 2021) with the same search terms, and on the other hand, we performed a BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the S. moorei type strain JCM 10645T (GenBank accession number NR_115130) with selection of the sequences with the highest sequence identity. These latter were analyzed with Blast2GO software available at http://www.blast2go.de (accessed on 9 March 2021) [13] and sequences ≥98.65% identical to the sequence of S. moorei were selected. This percentage corresponds to the current threshold delineating a species as established by Kim et al. on the basis of Average Nucleotide Index and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities comparison [14]. Finally, metagenomic databases were searched using the Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing (IGMNGS) platform, a comprehensive open source tool for processing 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies (https://www.imngs.org/, accessed on 16 March 2021) [15]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the S. moorei type strain was used at the 99% similarity threshold level proposed to represent the species for the search. To determine the host or type of metagenome range of colonization without consideration of relative sequence abundances, the “report.0.tab” file was used (report of positive samples per sample category, e.g., human gut metagenome, human lung metagenome, pig gut metagenome, etc., for which a single hit is sufficient for a sample to be considered as positive). To determine the levels of relative abundance, the reports “report.0.1.tab” excluding rare (>0.1% threshold) and “report.0.01.tab” including only abundant (>1%) sequences were, respectively, used. These three exported spreadsheet files with the number of samples that were positive for the presence of the queried taxonomy for each sample category were manually curated by the removal of all samples that did not include “metagenome” in their designation and of those with no or ambiguous host information.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. S. moorei Isolation Characteristics and Antimicrobial Susceptibility

From 2006 to 2021, a total of 27 S. moorei isolates had been detected in clinical specimens obtained from 27 patients in both centers. Isolates were Gram-positive, obligatorily anaerobic, non-sporulated bacilli that grew on Brucella blood agar supplemented with hemin and vitamin K1 after 2–5 days of incubation. Anaerobic Gram-positive bacilli are a heterogeneous group of bacteria, difficult to identify in clinical microbiology laboratories before the era of mass spectrometry. The development of MALDI-TOF technologies has increased the performance in identifying anaerobes but may still be unsuccessful at identifying certain species. Indeed, major differences still exist between databases of currently available mass spectrometry systems, particularly regarding anaerobes. S. moorei is one example of this, being included in the Bruker MS system database (Bruker) [16], whereas it is absent from that of the VITEK® MS system (bioMérieux) used in our two laboratories. Consequently, all 27 isolates in this study were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, revealing that all of them belonged to the species S. moorei (>99% of sequence identity only with that of S. moorei type strain). S. moorei was identified in 17 male and 10 female patients, with a mean age of 59.5 years (range: 25–93 years). This species was mainly identified in mixed aerobic–anaerobic cultures, as observed for numerous cases of infections involving anaerobes (Table 1). Indeed, these infections are mostly endogenous and favored by damaged mucosal/cutaneous barriers, which allow the penetration of anaerobic species into normally sterile tissues, often together with aerobic/facultative anaerobic bacteria [17]. This results in infections involving a more or less complex association of various bacterial species, in which deciphering the pathogenic role of each species remains challenging. Isolation of S. moorei as the sole bacterium within a human clinical sample was rarer, representing seven cases in our study, with 6 of the 11 cases of bacteremia (54.5%) and one subcutaneous infection of the ear representing 6.25% of the infections other than bacteremia in our study.
Antibiotic susceptibility data were available for 24 of the 27 S. moorei isolates (Figure 1). Resistance to β-lactams and metronidazole was not observed. Resistance to clindamycin (1 of the 23 isolates tested, 4.3%) and to moxifloxacin (2 of the 17 isolates tested, 11.8%) was rarely observed, while 21 of the 23 isolates tested (91.3%) were resistant to rifampicin. With regard to beta-lactams and metronidazole, our data are in agreement with those found in the literature [18,19,20,21,22]. Resistance of S. moorei to fluoroquinolones or clindamycin has not yet been reported, whereas resistance to rifampicin has only been reported by Haraszthy et al. in 2008 for oral isolates [4]. It is noteworthy that isolates that were resistant to moxifloxacin, as well as to rifampicin, were responsible for osteoarticular infections for which fluoroquinolones and rifampicin can be used for treatment.

3.2. Analysis of S. moorei Infection Cases Revealed a Larger Spectrum of Human Infections Than Currently Described

S. moorei was identified during various infectious processes encompassing bacteremia (n = 11), skin and soft tissue (n = 7), osteoarticular (n = 6), central nervous system (n = 2), and intra-abdominal (n = 1) infections. All of them are presented hereafter successively in comparison with the current literature, with a more detailed description (medical history and treatment) of extremely rare cases or those not described before. Regarding cases not detailed hereafter, most patients had a complex medical history and their clinical conditions required medical and surgical therapy. Medical management most often included broad-spectrum empirical antibiotic treatments subsequently adjusted to the different species identified and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. These treatments were mostly active on S. moorei regarding the overall susceptibility of the species.

3.2.1. Bacteremia

Bloodstream infection is one of the most frequently reported infections due to S. moorei, with 14 cases described so far [10,18,19,22,23]. In our series, S. moorei was identified during bacteremia in 11 of the 27 reported cases. This relatively high occurrence might, at least in part, be related to the fact that special consideration is given to isolates obtained from blood in contrast to those that are part of a polymicrobial anaerobic culture obtained from other clinical samples. The first cases of bacteremia due to S. moorei were reported in 2006 in patients with multiple myeloma and acute proctitis complicating radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma, respectively [18,19]. These two cases underlined the potential diversity of sources for invasive infections due to S. moorei. Indeed, an oral source was suspected based on multiple dentoalveolar abscesses presented by the first patient, whereas, for the second patient, the authors incriminated translocation through the inflamed intestinal mucosa based on the patient’s clinical signs and the initial description of S. moorei in human feces. Since then, bacteremia has been reported in 12 additional patients, 10 of whom were recently reviewed [10,22,23]. Common characteristics were that patients had underlying diseases or risk factors (colon cancer, abdominal surgery, diabetes mellitus, etc.) and the most commonly incriminated portals of entry were oral (poor oral condition, dentoalveolar abscess, etc.) or digestive, despite remaining unknown in some cases as not related to any oral or digestive comorbidity [10,22,23]. In our study, an extensive chart review could only be performed for eight patients. For these patients, the portal of entry was likely to be the oral tract (n = 1), the gastrointestinal tract (n = 3), or the skin (n = 2), while remaining unknown for two patients. Comorbidities such as diabetes and/or digestive cancer were also identified in five patients (Table 1).

3.2.2. Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) involving S. moorei have been reported in two previous case series [20,22]. Zheng et al. reported nine cases of various SSTIs, including two thigh abscesses, an abdominal wound abscess, an axillary furuncle, two perirectal abscesses, and two pilonidal infections. Although the intestinal origin of the bacterium appeared obvious in some cases, the source of infection remained unknown for others, as in the two cases of thigh abscess and the axilla case furuncle. Whether the bacterium was part of the skin microbiome is still unknown and a potential cutaneous source of infection was not evaluated or discussed. The second study identified S. moorei in various samples related to SSTIs of oral origin: a pus sample from hidradenitis suppurativa of the gluteal region, a purulent discharge from the middle ear, an abscess in the mandibular region, and a total laryngectomy wound [22]. For all these cases, S. moorei was identified as a member of polymicrobial cultures. Two of the cases reported in our study (Table 1) are remarkable compared with the currently available literature: (i) a case of monomicrobial subcutaneous ear collection in a 22-year-old woman presenting a highly painful abscess of the helix, cartilage damage, and ear pavilion chondritis (case no. 14 in Table 1) and (ii) a breast abscess in a 50-year-old woman with no underlying disease or risk factors (case no. 15 in Table 1).

3.2.3. Osteoarticular Infections

In our study, six patients with bone infection involving S. moorei were found (Table 1). The diagnosis of bone infection was made on the basis of clinical, radiological, and microbiological evidence. For all of these patients, S. moorei was identified from samples (bone biopsies, n = 5; deep collection, n = 1) collected under aseptic surgical conditions. For five of these patients, three of whom had diabetes, these infections resulted mainly from the extension of adjacent SSTI, while, for the remaining patient, who presented a mandibular bone infection, the portal of entry was either the oral cavity or the skin. In this case, infection was favored by sequelae (mucosal lesions, cutaneous fistula, and osteonecrosis) of breast cancer treatment (case no. 19 in Table 1).
In the literature, only two case reports of S. moorei isolation associated with a bone infection were found: (i) a case of chronic fistulized osteomyelitis of the tibia for which S. moorei was isolated among a polymicrobial aerobic–anaerobic culture from serous fluid obtained from the fistula, and (ii) a case of a submandibular abscess for which S. moorei was cultured in association with Fusobacterium necrophorum from the abscess pus in a patient with suspected chronic osteomyelitis based on CT scan images [22]. However, in both cases, the implication of S. moorei in the osteomyelitis remained uncertain regarding the sampling conditions and the absence of bone biopsy analysis [22].

3.2.4. Central Nervous System Infections

To the best of our knowledge, the involvement of S. moorei in central nervous system (CNS) infections has so far not been reported, despite the common oral source of these infections and the presence of S. moorei in the oral cavity during health and diseases. In our case series, two cases of intracranial abscesses caused in part by S. moorei have been observed and have been detailed hereafter, as they represent the first description of the involvement of this species in CNS infections (Table 1).
The first case occurred in a 39-year-old man with a chronic breach of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus resulting from a previous ballistic trauma which had received prophylactic treatment including ofloxacin and rifampicin (case no. 25 in Table 1). The patient presented headaches, epileptic seizures, and sepsis. The computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a collection in the frontal area. Microbiological analysis of the abscess pus showed a mixed anaerobic culture, including an S. moorei isolate which was resistant to ofloxacin and rifampicin. The antimicrobial therapy was switched to intravenous cefotaxime, clindamycin, and metronidazole, with a favorable evolution after revision surgery.
S. moorei was also identified in a brain tissue sample obtained from a 72-year-old man with headaches, epileptic seizures, and sepsis (case no. 26 in Table 1). The patient had a history of meningioma exeresis with a persistent bone flap infection after craniotomy. CT scanning and magnetic resonance imaging revealed both an intracranial epidural abscess and a frontal brain abscess. Patient management included surgery and meropenem due to associated bacteria, including an extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. A favorable outcome was noted for this patient.

3.2.5. Intra-Abdominal Infections

Intra-abdominal infections may represent a possible source of bacteremia, as may be the case for Lee et al.’s case of S. moorei bacteremia associated with acute cholangitis [23]. However, it is noteworthy that, until today, no case of intra-abdominal infection in which S. moorei has been isolated from intra-abdominal samples has been published. Here, we report a case in which S. moorei was directly identified from a necrotic pancreatic collection in a 47-year-old male patient with severe, acute, lithiasic, necrotizing pancreatitis associated with a metabolic disorder (hypertriglyceridemia) (case no. 27 in Table 1). S. moorei was co-isolated with Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus, and Staphylococcus aureus; the patient died despite being treated with piperacillin-tazobactam in addition to surgical debridement (Table 1).

3.3. Exploring the Genetic and Metagenomic Sequence Databases for a Complete Spectrum of S. moorei Ecology

3.3.1. Lessons from the Analysis of the GenBank Database

Because sequences deposited in the GenBank database may or may not be associated with published studies, and because sequences originating from metagenomic studies may be associated with published studies not retrieved by using the bacterial name as a keyword for the search unless associated with the main results of the study, we reviewed the sequences present in the database with the aim of obtaining sufficient information about sources of recovery for S. moorei. On 9 March 2021, 938 entries corresponded to the search for “Solobacterium moorei” and 1151 to the search for “Solobacterium” in the NCBI nucleotide database. Most entries corresponded to Whole Genome Sequences, either as scaffold or contig sequences—for example, for strain F024 from the human oral microbiome [24] and strain DSM 22971T (=JCM10645T = RCA59-74T), the type strain of S. moorei isolated from human feces [1]. After excluding these entries, a comparison with the BLAST search results allowed us to check the completeness of our search and also to exclude sequences which had been erroneously affiliated to Solobacterium sp. despite being distantly related to this genus.
A total of 356 sequences sizing from 155 to 1499 nt and corresponding to strains or uncultured clones affiliated to S. moorei on the basis of sequences displaying ≥98.65% to 100% identity with that of the type strain were analyzed (Supplementary Table S1). An analysis of isolation sources is presented in Figure 2 and shows that 94% of the sequences originated from human sources (n = 336), suggesting that the species is human-associated.
  • Digestive tract-related sequences
Sequences related to the digestive tract represented 33% (n = 110) of the human sequences and originated either from the esophagus (n = 16) or gut/feces (n = 94). Human gut sequences were identified from stool and mucosal biopsy specimens (duodenal, colon, cecum) in both healthy [25] and diseased subjects with inflammatory bowel diseases, including Crohn’s disease [26,27,28,29] (Supplementary Table S1). Sequences were identified in adults and children and one sequence corresponded to an uncultured Solobacterium sp. clone (clone OTU124/accession number KJ527533) from the stools of preterm infants with extremely low birthweights. The analysis suggested an early implantation of the species in the human gut.
  • Oral cavity-related sequences
Around a quarter of the human sequences originated from the oral cavity (26%, n = 87) (saliva, subgingival plaque), being part of the human oral microbiome in healthy subjects [24,30,31] but also identified in the presence of tooth decay, gingivitis, and periodontitis, including aggressive forms in line with the known implication of S. moorei in oral pathologies [32] (Supplementary Table S1).
  • Respiratory tract-related sequences
Probably in relation to the aforementioned presence in the oral cavity, S. moorei sequences were also identified in the respiratory tract (n = 27). This included uncultured clones from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, human lungs, the biofilm of extubated endotracheal tube of ICU patients [33], sputum from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients (S. moorei strain C1107/JF803577) [34], sputum samples of patients suffering from hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infection (Solobacterium sp. uncultured clone V3 DCM-SHRJH/GU737675), and pneumonia patients with pulmonary emphysema (uncultured bacterium clones KY51_PHKY51_B01_003 and KY51_PHKY51_D05_007 with accession numbers LC260797.1 and LC260830.1, respectively) (Supplementary Table S1). Nevertheless, a pathogenic role of S. moorei in respiratory infection is not currently suspected, although its presence in pathologies well-known for their polymicrobial nature involving pathogenic communities such as CF questions the role of this species in the associated dysbiotic community.
  • Vaginal tract-related sequences
S. moorei was also identified in the vaginal microbiome (Solobacterium sp. S4-A19/JX104033) including the vaginal microbiota of HIV-infected African women (13 uncultured clones) [35], as well as in vaginal fluid from subjects with bacterial vaginosis (S. moorei strain DNF00973/KU726691) (Supplementary Table S1).
  • Skin-related sequences
Likewise, uncultured clones of S. moorei were identified from skin at various locations, including the occiput, antecubital and popliteal fossa, volar forearm, external auditory canal, and nostrils [36,37], as well as from human head and neck tissue samples [38], suggesting that the species may also be part of the human skin microbiota (Supplementary Table S1). Finally, six sequences corresponded to strains involved in wound infections described by Zheng et al. [20].
  • Blood-related sequences
Only two sequences corresponded to S. moorei strains isolated from blood [18,39] (Supplementary Table S1), confirming that not all sequences are deposited in databases, even for published case reports including 16SrRNA gene sequencing for strain identification.
  • Non-human-related sequences
Besides human-associated sequences, only nine sequences corresponded to uncultured clones that may be more or less distantly related to other mammals, including the following origins: milk from cows with mastitis, mouse skin [40], a dairy pasteurizer, and an anaerobic digestion reactor (grey cells in Supplementary Table S1). Other unusual miscellaneous sequences were found in the hemolymph of Crassostrea gigas oysters, ticks, and in fermenting enset (Ensete ventricosum), a kind of banana (orange cells in Supplementary Table S1).
Finally, 10 entries corresponded to uncultured S. moorei clones from environmental samples associated with the following sources: soil, soil or post-volcanic pyroclastic surface, volcanic ash at Eyjafjallajökull (Island) deposited in 2010, coal seam environments, Holocene marine sediment, river and river biofilms, mangrove leaves, a jet propulsion laboratory (clean rooms where spacecraft are assembled), and indoor air (green cells in Supplementary Table S1).
Although our search strategy was limited by the information included in the deposit form associated with the sequence, for which the patient’s designation and clinical status are not systematically specified or cannot be systematically found when published (particularly for large metagenomic studies with huge datasets), it brought new insight into the diversity of sources in which S. moorei can be identified. The analysis particularly revealed its presence in human vaginal and skin samples and showed us that the species was mainly human-associated.

3.3.2. Lessons from the Metagenomic Database Screening

The presence of 16S rRNA gene sequences displaying close identity to that of the S. moorei type strain was found in 55 types of metagenomes for which associated information was available, albeit imprecise for some of them. The analysis was split into human-associated metagenomes (based on “human” or “Homo sapiens” in the designation of the metagenome) and non-human-associated metagenomes. The presence of S. moorei-related sequences was overwhelmingly observed in human-associated metagenomes, confirming observations drawn from the analysis of individual NCBI sequences.
Regarding anatomical sites, metagenomes that most often contained S. moorei sequences were of tracheal and oral origin, with 17.3% and 16.4% of positive samples, respectively (Figure 3). Together with S. moorei detection in nasal/pharyngeal metagenomes, this makes the upper digestive and respiratory tracts by far the sites most commonly inhabited by S. moorei. By comparison, the presence of S. moorei is at least three times less frequently observed in gut metagenomes (5.2% of positive samples) whereas skin metagenomes more often hosted S. moorei (7.5% of positive samples) than gut metagenomes. Finally, vaginal and human reproductive system metagenomes also contain S. moorei but more rarely than other human metagenomes.
Altogether, S. moorei was found to be present in a wider panel of human metagenomes than initially thought from its original description in feces samples and well-known presence in the oral cavity.
Regarding the relative abundance of S. moorei sequences in human metagenomes, S. moorei hits mostly represented rare sequences below 0.1% of the total sequences in 68.8% of positive samples. An abundance of over 1% of total sequences was observed in 3.7% of samples and an intermediate abundance (0.1–1%) in 27.5% of samples (Figure 4). However, variability was observed according to the metagenome considered, with an overall higher abundance of S. moorei sequences in samples from the upper digestive and respiratory tracts and the lung (Figure 4).
The type of human metagenome is indicated, followed by, in brackets, the number of sequence read archive (SRA)-derived samples considered in the analysis. Color coding indicates the relative abundance of S. moorei-related sequences.
These different observations may support the frequent identification of an oral source or the implication of a digestive source for infection in patients with infectious processes involving S. moorei, as detailed in Section 3.1, but also confirm that other human microbiota may also be suspected in certain cases unrelated to any oral or digestive comorbidity. Skin and the reproductive tract are shown to represent alternate portals of entry for S. moorei that may have been considered in previous cases of S. moorei infection in patients with intravenous drug abuse [21,41] or cervical cancer [19]. In our study, S. moorei may have originated from the skin microbiota in at least two cases (subcutaneous ear collection and bacteremia in a 52-year-old patient with diabetes and a recent toe amputation).
In contrast to human metagenomes, S. moorei was occasionally identified in various non-human metagenomes, of either animal, environmental, or other origin (Table 2).
This low representation of S. moorei-related sequences in non-human metagenomes ties in with the rare, non-human sequences demonstrated in the first part of sequence database analysis of this study and previously shown in Figure 2 with a roughly similar, non-human source distribution (animal, environment, others).
However, although all previous results suggested that S. moorei was a human-associated species, atypical observations were made during the metagenome database analysis for pig gut and invertebrate gut metagenomes. These results were therefore more thoroughly analyzed, showing that they should be considered with caution as they probably result from the following biases: invertebrate gut metagenome data originated from very few samples (n = 32) resulting from a single study of gut metagenomes in the leech, Hirudo nipponica, revealing three S. moorei-positive samples. Similarly, 322 of the 325 positive samples from the pig gut metagenome (sequence read archive accession numbers comprised between ERR2739626 and ERR2740414) originated from a single study performing a longitudinal assessment of the gut microbiome in piglets from birth up to weaning. Considering that positive samples originated from single studies and, probably, from non-independent samples in both cases, these potentially biased results are not considered further and S. moorei is still considered a human-associated species.

4. Conclusions

Taking S. moorei as an example, lessons from the GenBank and metagenome databases’ screening are in favor of their usefulness for complementing commonly performed reviews of the literature. Indeed, published data only poorly reflect the growing amount of data available from cultivation-independent studies and sequences deposited in databases. In addition, it is highly probable that most microbiologists did not report the S. moorei strains and corresponding cases identified in their institutions as our ‘only’ bicentric, retrospective study doubled the number of cases currently reported in the literature. Our combined strategy, analyzing data from the routine practice of medical microbiology and different databases, allows us to increase the current knowledge on S. moorei, an anaerobic opportunistic pathogen in humans. We showed the species to be human-associated and widely present—but not a major representative—in a wider diversity of human metagenomes than previously thought. While mostly present in the oral, lung, and gut microbiota, its distribution among the human microbiota also includes the vaginal and skin microbiota, which may be other sources of infection. As it comes from various microbiota, S. moorei is mainly involved in polymicrobial infections where its pathogenic role often remains to be established and where the species is thought to interact with other bacteria. However, these interactions have yet to be characterized. Similarly, the role of S. moorei in dysbiotic microbiota associated with gut or lung diseases has yet to be clarified.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms9061229/s1, Table S1: Data associated with the 16S rRNA gene sequences (n = 356) displaying ≥98.65% identity with that of the type strain of S. moorei (accession NR_115130).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.; methodology, C.A., F.A., H.M.; formal analysis, C.A., F.A., C.E., H.M.; investigation, C.A., F.A., C.E., S.B.B., C.D., H.M.; data curation, C.A., F.A., C.E., H.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.; writing—review and editing, C.A., F.A., C.E., A.L., J.-P.L., H.M.; supervision, H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University Hospital of Nîmes (IRB number 21.03.03; date of approval: 11 March 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived for this observational study that fell into the category of routine practice with non-additional diagnostic and monitoring procedures applied to the patient and retrospective analysis of primary data derived from routine clinical care of patients who can not be identified in the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Teresa Sawyers, English medical writer at Nîmes University Hospital, for editing this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Kageyama, A.; Benno, Y. Phylogenic and phenotypic characterization of some Eubacterium-like isolates from human feces: Description of Solobacterium moorei Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov. Microbiol. Immunol. 2000, 44, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kazor, C.E.; Mitchell, P.M.; Lee, A.M.; Stokes, L.N.; Loesche, W.J.; Dewhirst, F.E.; Paster, B.J. Diversity of bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with halitosis and healthy patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Haraszthy, V.I.; Zambon, J.J.; Sreenivasan, P.K.; Zambon, M.M.; Gerber, D.; Rego, R.; Parker, C. Identification of oral bacterial species associated with halitosis. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2007, 138, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Haraszthy, V.I.; Gerber, D.; Clark, B.; Moses, P.; Parker, C.; Sreenivasan, P.K.; Zambon, J.J. Characterization and prevalence of Solobacterium moorei associated with oral halitosis. J. Breath Res. 2008, 2, 017002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rolph, H.J.; Lennon, A.; Riggio, M.P.; Saunders, W.P.; MacKenzie, D.; Coldero, L.; Bagg, J. Molecular identification of microorganisms from endodontic infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 3282–3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Schirrmeister, J.F.; Liebenow, A.L.; Pelz, K.; Wittmer, A.; Serr, A.; Hellwig, E.; Al-Ahmad, A. New bacterial compositions in root-filled teeth with periradicular lesions. J. Endod. 2009, 35, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Colombo, A.P.; Boches, S.K.; Cotton, S.L.; Goodson, J.M.; Kent, R.; Haffajee, A.D.; Socransky, S.S.; Hasturk, H.; Van Dyke, T.E.; Dewhirst, F.; et al. Comparisons of subgingival microbial profiles of refractory periodontitis, severe periodontitis, and periodontal health using the human oral microbe identification microarray. J. Periodontol. 2009, 80, 1421–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Koyanagi, T.; Sakamoto, M.; Takeuchi, Y.; Ohkuma, M.; Izumi, Y. Analysis of microbiota associated with peri-implantitis using 16S rRNA gene clone library. J. Oral Microbiol. 2010, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yu, J.; Feng, Q.; Wong, S.H.; Zhang, D.; Liang, Q.Y.; Qin, Y.; Tang, L.; Zhao, H.; Stenvang, J.; Li, Y.; et al. Metagenomic analysis of faecal microbiome as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Gut 2017, 66, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Barrak, I.; Stájer, A.; Gajdács, M.; Urbán, E. Small, but smelly: The importance of Solobacterium moorei in halitosis and other human infections. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. CLSI. Interpretive Criteria for Identification of Bacteria and Fungi by Targeted DNA Sequencing, 2nd ed.; CLSI Guideline MM18; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. Société Française de Microbiologie. Recommandations du Comité de l’Antibiogramme. Available online: https://www.sfm-microbiologie.org (accessed on 9 March 2021).
  13. Conesa, A.; Götz, S.; García-Gómez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Talón, M.; Robles, M. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3674–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kim, M.; Oh, H.S.; Park, S.C.; Chun, J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lagkouvardos, I.; Joseph, D.; Kapfhammer, M.; Giritli, S.; Horn, M.; Haller, D.; Clavel, T. IMNGS: A comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Genderini, F.G.; Martiny, D.; Ponthieux, F.; Argudín, M.A.; Gomez Galdon, M.; Zaarour, A.; Garcia, C.; Libois, A.; Gérard, M.; Dauby, N. First case of Campylobacter rectus and Solobacterium moorei mixed bacteraemia successfully identified by MALDI TOF-MS. New Microbes New Infect. 2019, 31, 100587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nagy, E.; Boyanova, L.; Justesen, U.S. ESCMID Study Group of Anaerobic Infections. How to isolate, identify and determine antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in routine laboratories. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 1139–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Detry, G.; Pierard, D.; Vandoorslaer, K.; Wauters, G.; Avesani, V.; Glupczynski, Y. Septicemia due to Solobacterium moorei in a patient with multiple myeloma. Anaerobe 2006, 12, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lau, S.K.; Teng, J.L.; Leung, K.W.; Li, N.K.; Ng, K.H.; Chau, K.Y.; Que, T.L.; Woo, P.C.; Yuen, K.Y. Bacteremia caused by Solobacterium moorei in a patient with acute proctitis and carcinoma of the cervix. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 3031–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zheng, G.; Summanen, P.H.; Talan, D.; Bennion, R.; Rowlinson, M.C.; Finegold, S.M. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Solobacterium moorei isolates from patients with wound infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 873–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pedersen, R.M.; Holt, H.M.; Justesen, U.S. Solobacterium moorei bacteremia: Identification, antimicrobial susceptibility, and clinical characteristics. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2766–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sárvári, K.P.; Sántha, D.; Kovács, R.; Körmöndi, S.; Pető, Z.; Vereb, T.; Sztanó, B. Six cases of Solobacterium moorei isolated alone or in mixed culture in Hungary and comparison with previously published cases. Anaerobe 2020, 65, 102241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Park, D.H.; Kim, M.N.; Jung, J. First case report of Solobacterium moorei bacteremia due to acute cholangitis in South Korea. Anaerobe 2020, 66, 102278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dewhirst, F.E.; Chen, T.; Izard, J.; Paster, B.J.; Tanner, A.C.; Yu, W.H.; Lakshmanan, A.; Wade, W.G. The human oral microbiome. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 5002–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Tap, J.; Mondot, S.; Levenez, F.; Pelletier, E.; Caron, C.; Furet, J.P.; Ugarte, E.; Munoz-Tamayo, R.; Paslier, D.L.; Nalin, R.; et al. Towards the human intestinal microbiota phylogenetic core. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 2574–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baumgart, M.; Dogan, B.; Rishniw, M.; Weitzman, G.; Bosworth, B.; Yantiss, R.; Orsi, R.H.; Wiedmann, M.; McDonough, P.; Kim, S.G.; et al. Culture independent analysis of ileal mucosa reveals a selective increase in invasive Escherichia coli of novel phylogeny relative to depletion of Clostridiales in Crohn’s disease involving the ileum. ISME J. 2007, 1, 403–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Frank, D.N.; St Amand, A.L.; Feldman, R.A.; Boedeker, E.C.; Harpaz, N.; Pace, N.R. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13780–13785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Walker, A.W.; Sanderson, J.D.; Churcher, C.; Parkes, G.C.; Hudspith, B.N.; Rayment, N.; Brostoff, J.; Parkhill, J.; Dougan, G.; Petrovska, L. High-throughput clone library analysis of the mucosa-associated microbiota reveals dysbiosis and differences between inflamed and non-inflamed regions of the intestine in inflammatory bowel disease. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, E.; Hamm, C.M.; Gulati, A.S.; Sartor, R.B.; Chen, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, T.; Rohlf, F.J.; Zhu, W.; Gu, C.; et al. Inflammatory bowel diseases phenotype, C. difficile and NOD2 genotype are associated with shifts in human ileum associated microbial composition. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e26284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nasidze, I.; Li, J.; Quinque, D.; Tang, K.; Stoneking, M. Global diversity in the human salivary microbiome. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bik, E.M.; Long, C.D.; Armitage, G.C.; Loomer, P.; Emerson, J.; Mongodin, E.F.; Nelson, K.E.; Gill, S.R.; Fraser-Liggett, C.M.; Relman, D.A. Bacterial diversity in the oral cavity of 10 healthy individuals. ISME J. 2010, 4, 962–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rylev, M.; Bek-Thomsen, M.; Reinholdt, J.; Ennibi, O.K.; Kilian, M. Microbiological and immunological characteristics of young Moroccan patients with aggressive periodontitis with and without detectable Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans JP2 infection. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2011, 26, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Perkins, S.D.; Woeltje, K.F.; Angenent, L.T. Endotracheal tube biofilm inoculation of oral flora and subsequent colonization of opportunistic pathogens. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 300, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guss, A.M.; Roeselers, G.; Newton, I.L.; Young, C.R.; Klepac-Ceraj, V.; Lory, S.; Cavanaugh, C.M. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of bacteria associated with cystic fibrosis. ISME J. 2011, 5, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Frank, D.N.; Manigart, O.; Leroy, V.; Meda, N.; Valéa, D.; Zhang, W.; Dabis, F.; Pace, N.R.; Van de Perre, P.; Janoff, E.N. Altered vaginal microbiota are associated with perinatal mother-to-child transmission of HIV in African women from Burkina Faso. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2012, 60, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oh, J.; Conlan, S.; Polley, E.C.; Segre, J.A.; Kong, H.H. Shifts in human skin and nares microbiota of healthy children and adults. Genome Med. 2012, 4, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kong, H.H.; Oh, J.; Deming, C.; Conlan, S.; Grice, E.A.; Beatson, M.A.; Nomicos, E.; Polley, E.C.; Komarow, H.D.; Murray, P.R.; et al. NISC Comparative Sequence Program. Temporal shifts in the skin microbiome associated with disease flares and treatment in children with atopic dermatitis. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, H.; Funchain, P.; Bebek, G.; Altemus, J.; Zhang, H.; Niazi, F.; Peterson, C.; Lee, W.T.; Burkey, B.B.; Eng, C. Microbiomic differences in tumor and paired-normal tissue in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Genome Med. 2017, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Liu, W.J.; Xiao, M.; Yi, J.; Li, Y.; Kudinha, T.; Xu, Y.C. First case report of bacteremia caused by Solobacterium moorei in China, and literature review. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Chehoud, C.; Rafail, S.; Tyldsley, A.S.; Seykora, J.T.; Lambris, J.D.; Grice, E.A. Complement modulates the cutaneous microbiome and inflammatory milieu. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 15061–15066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Martin, C.A.; Wijesurendra, R.S.; Borland, C.D.; Karas, J.A. Femoral vein thrombophlebitis and septic pulmonary embolism due to a mixed anaerobic infection including Solobacterium moorei: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2007, 1, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Solobacterium moorei isolates. The antibiotic molecule is indicated on the left side of the figure, followed by, in brackets, the number of strains with available susceptibility data. * Data for ofloxacin were not included in Figure 1 as they were available for 8 S. moorei strains only: 3 susceptible strains (37.5%), 3 resistant strains (37.5%), and 2 strains with intermediate susceptibility (25%).
Figure 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Solobacterium moorei isolates. The antibiotic molecule is indicated on the left side of the figure, followed by, in brackets, the number of strains with available susceptibility data. * Data for ofloxacin were not included in Figure 1 as they were available for 8 S. moorei strains only: 3 susceptible strains (37.5%), 3 resistant strains (37.5%), and 2 strains with intermediate susceptibility (25%).
Microorganisms 09 01229 g001
Figure 2. Relative distribution of 16S rRNA gene sequences corresponding to S. moorei (≥98.65% of sequence identity with the type strain) in the NCBI database (n = 356) according to origin. Sequences in the “Blood” (n = 2) and “Other” (n = 2) categories each represent 0.56% of the 356 sequences.
Figure 2. Relative distribution of 16S rRNA gene sequences corresponding to S. moorei (≥98.65% of sequence identity with the type strain) in the NCBI database (n = 356) according to origin. Sequences in the “Blood” (n = 2) and “Other” (n = 2) categories each represent 0.56% of the 356 sequences.
Microorganisms 09 01229 g002
Figure 3. S. moorei detection in different human metagenomes.
Figure 3. S. moorei detection in different human metagenomes.
Microorganisms 09 01229 g003
Figure 4. Relative abundance of S. moorei sequences in human metagenomes. The type of human metagenome is indicated on the left side of the figure, followed by, in brackets, the number of samples considered in the analysis for each type of metagenome. SRA: sequence read archive.
Figure 4. Relative abundance of S. moorei sequences in human metagenomes. The type of human metagenome is indicated on the left side of the figure, followed by, in brackets, the number of samples considered in the analysis for each type of metagenome. SRA: sequence read archive.
Microorganisms 09 01229 g004
Table 1. Data for the 27 Solobacterium moorei cases with available data included in this study.
Table 1. Data for the 27 Solobacterium moorei cases with available data included in this study.
CaseType of InfectionAge (Sex)Medical HistorySpecimenCo-Isolated Species
Bacteremia
1 76(M)Diabetes, sepsis, and peritonitis after hemicolectomy for colon cancerBlood cultureBacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Escherichia coli
2 85(M)Not availableBlood cultureStreptococcus constellatus
3 65(M)Diabetes, diabetic foot infectionBlood cultureGemella sp.
4 52(M)Diabetes, diabetic foot infectionBlood culturePeptoniphilus asaccharolyticus (in other vials), Staphylococcus aureus
5 37(M)Peritonsillar phlegmonBlood culturePrevotella sp.
6 93(M)Severe sepsis and diarrheaBlood cultureNone
7 42(F)Decompensated chronic alcoholic cirrhosis with ascitesBlood cultureNone
8 88(F)Not availableBlood cultureNone
9 70(M)Not availableBlood cultureNone
10 36(M)Not availableBlood cultureNot available
11 75 (F)Bowel obstruction and appendicular peritonitisBlood cultureNone
Skin and soft tissue infection
12Deep neck abscess53(M)Oropharyngeal cancerPusStreptoccus anginosus, polymicrobial anaerobic culture
13Paratracheal abscess69(M)Diabetes, lung cancer with thyroid metastasisPusAnaerococcus murdochii, Eikenella corrodens, Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. constellatus
14Auricular chondritis and abscess22(F)Preauricular fistulaPusNone
15Breast abscess50(F)NonePusFusobacterium nucleatum, unidentified Clostridiales
16Infected pressure ulcer35(M)Traumatic paraplegiaBiopsyBacteroides fragilis, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae
17Infected pressure ulcer60(M)Traumatic paraplegiaBiopsyE. coli
18Stump infection43(F)Below-knee amputation for tibial tumorBiopsyP. asaccharolyticus
Osteo-articular infection
19Mandibular bone infection84(F)Breast cancer, mandibular bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis, submandibular cutaneous fistula, oral lesionsBiopsyEnterobacter cloacae complex
20Sternal osteitis77(F)Diabetes, thoracic injuries after radiation for breast cancerCollectionActinomyces radingae, Capnocytophaga gingivalis, Klebsiella oxytoca, Morganella morganii
21Ulnar osteitis49(F)Self-injurious behavior, chronic forearm injuryBiopsyPeptostreptococcus anaerobius, S. aureus, S. anginosus, Streptococcus mitis/oralis
22Diabetic foot osteitis71(M)DiabetesBiopsyStreptococcus agalactiae
23Pressure ulcer-related pelvic osteomyelitis60(F)Diabetes, ischemic paraplegiaBiopsyActinomyces turicensis, B. fragilis, Clostridium ramosum, Finegoldia magna, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus
24Pressure ulcer-related femoral osteitis31(M)Traumatic tetraplegiaBiopsyS. aureus, S. mitis/oralis
Central nervous system infection
25Brain abscess39(M)Craniofacial traumaPusActinomyces odontolyticus, F. magna
26Intracranial epidural abscess and brain abscess72(M)Meningioma resectionIntracranial tissueA. odontolyticus, Atopobium parvulum, Bacteroides uniformis, E. coli,
S. anginosus
Intra-abdominal infection
27Necrotizing pancreatitis47(M)Obesity, severe hypertriglyceridemia, biliary lithiasisCollectionS. aureus, S. agalactiae, S. anginosus
Table 2. Non-human metagenomes containing S. moorei sequences.
Table 2. Non-human metagenomes containing S. moorei sequences.
Type of MetagenomeSamples (n)Positive Samples (n)
All Abundances (%)Excluding Rare Abundance <0.1%Abundance >1% Only
Host-associated metagenomes
pig gut metagenome3556325 (9.14%)581
pig metagenome11625 (0.04%)1-
plant metagenome1210113 (0.11%)1-
bovine gut metagenome990811 (0.11%)8-
bovine metagenome11014 (0.36%)1-
fish metagenome7067 (0.99%)2-
mouse gut metagenome197036 (0.03%)--
mouse skin metagenome6856 (0.88%)1-
mouse metagenome15413 (0.19%)--
coral metagenome27954 (0.14%)2-
insect metagenome15443 (0.19%)--
invertebrate gut metagenome323 (9.38%)--
beetle metagenome3272 (0.61%)--
rat gut metagenome14222 (0.14%)--
fungus metagenome3952 (0.50%)--
canine metagenome2281 (0.44%)--
nematode metagenome1491 (0.67%)--
fish gut metagenome10001 (0.10%)--
primate metagenome2221 (0.45%)--
Environmental source metagenomes
dust metagenome101845 (4.42%)--
soil metagenome6779021 (0.03%)1-
marine metagenome3743818 (0.05%)1-
freshwater metagenome1459315 (0.10%)--
aquatic metagenome104938 (0.80%)1-
indoor metagenome7198 (1.11%)4-
air metagenome10477 (0.67%)--
groundwater metagenome7452 (0.27%)--
freshwater sediment metagenome14941 (0.07%)--
hydrothermal vent metagenome2851 (0.35%)--
phyllosphere metagenome10611 (0.09%)--
rhizosphere metagenome141551 (0.01%)--
sand metagenome871 (1.15%)--
sludge metagenome19241 (0.05%)--
terrestrial metagenome8871 (0.11%)--
Other metagenomes
wastewater metagenome273859 (2.15%)--
activated sludge metagenome284629 (1.02%)--
bioreactor metagenome23768 (0.34%)--
anaerobic digester metagenome13791 (0.07%)11
bioreactor sludge metagenome5421 (0.18%)--
floral nectar metagenome4871 (0.20%)--
food production metagenome3761 (0.27%)--
food metagenome21191 (0.05%)--
A sample corresponds to an SRA (sequence read archive)-derived sample; a positive sample corresponds to a sample in which at least one sequence corresponding to S. moorei (sequence identity threshold: 99%) was detected (all abundances). The numbers of samples with relative abundance of S. moorei-related sequences >0.1% and >1% are given according to the type of metagenome. -: no sample in this category. Bold type indicates atypical, biased observations further discussed in the text.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alauzet, C.; Aujoulat, F.; Lozniewski, A.; Ben Brahim, S.; Domenjod, C.; Enault, C.; Lavigne, J.-P.; Marchandin, H. A New Look at the Genus Solobacterium: A Retrospective Analysis of Twenty-Seven Cases of Infection Involving S. moorei and a Review of Sequence Databases and the Literature. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061229

AMA Style

Alauzet C, Aujoulat F, Lozniewski A, Ben Brahim S, Domenjod C, Enault C, Lavigne J-P, Marchandin H. A New Look at the Genus Solobacterium: A Retrospective Analysis of Twenty-Seven Cases of Infection Involving S. moorei and a Review of Sequence Databases and the Literature. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(6):1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061229

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alauzet, Corentine, Fabien Aujoulat, Alain Lozniewski, Safa Ben Brahim, Chloé Domenjod, Cécilia Enault, Jean-Philippe Lavigne, and Hélène Marchandin. 2021. "A New Look at the Genus Solobacterium: A Retrospective Analysis of Twenty-Seven Cases of Infection Involving S. moorei and a Review of Sequence Databases and the Literature" Microorganisms 9, no. 6: 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061229

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop