Next Article in Journal
The Laetiporus sulphureus Fermented Product Enhances the Antioxidant Status, Intestinal Tight Junction, and Morphology of Broiler Chickens
Next Article in Special Issue
Inducing Ovulation with hCG Improves Fertility Outcomes of Co-Dominant Follicle Drainage to Avoid Twin Pregnancy in Dairy Cows
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Deoxynivalenol-Contaminated Diets on Metabolic and Immunological Parameters in Broiler Chickens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Twin Pregnancies in Dairy Cattle: Observations in a Large Herd of Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Benefits and Risks of Preventing Twin Pregnancies

by
Irina Garcia-Ispierto
1,2 and
Fernando López-Gatius
1,3,*
1
Agrotecnio Centre, 25198 Lleida, Spain
2
Department of Animal Science, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
3
Transfer in Bovine Reproduction SLu, 22300 Barbastro, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(1), 148; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010148
Submission received: 18 December 2020 / Revised: 6 January 2021 / Accepted: 8 January 2021 / Published: 11 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutics of Twin Pregnancies in Dairy Cattle)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

While cows usually give birth to singletons, the incidence of twin births has increased considerably during the past few decades alongside milk production. In most cases, multiple pregnancies arise from the simultaneous formation of two or more ovulatory follicles in either the same ovary or both ovaries. Twin pregnancies have devastating effects on cow welfare and the economy of dairy herds. To prevent them, strategies proposed have been the transfer of a single female beef cow embryo produced in vitro to a cow that is not suitable for producing replacements, or the drainage of co-dominant follicles at insemination to prevent twin pregnancies in cows with genetic merit. Developing strategies to reduce the incidence of multiple ovulations and twin pregnancies should be a main focus of clinicians responsible for reproduction in dairy herds. The two procedures mentioned could be components of a weekly reproductive control program and applied to synchronized cows. As a result, embryo survival should improve, avoiding economic losses associated with twin pregnancies, and beef output from the herd will accordingly increase. Last but not least, if twin pregnancies are prevented, the cow’s general health and welfare state will certainly improve.

Abstract

Clinical problems associated with twin pregnancies have been well established, and twin births are now considered undesirable or even disastrous for the dairy cattle industry and the individual cow. The high incidence of early fetal loss, abortion during the mid-lactation period, dystocia, stillbirth, and placenta retention should be considered a preventable consequence of management, as these disorders greatly compromise the welfare and productive lifespan of a cow carrying or delivering twins. The use of sexed semen generates herd replacements and additional heifers, so a proposed strategy for twin pregnancy prevention is the transfer of a single in vitro-produced female beef cow embryo to cows not suitable for producing replacements. Another proposed strategy is drainage at insemination of co-dominant follicles to prevent twin pregnancies in cows with genetic merit. As a result, embryo survival should improve, economic losses associated with twin pregnancies will be prevented, beef output from the herd will be increased, and the health and welfare of the cow will certainly benefit. In this review, the clinical prospects of preventing or avoiding twin pregnancies using both procedures are discussed.

1. Introduction

Twin pregnancies and subsequent twinning are considered highly undesirable in the dairy cattle industry and also from the perspective of the cow. The high incidence of early fetal loss [1,2], abortion during the middle period of lactation [3,4], dystocia, stillbirth, and placenta retention [5,6,7,8] could be considered a preventable consequence of management, as these disorders greatly compromise the welfare and productive lifespan of a cow carrying or delivering twins [8,9]. In some herds, the twinning rate may exceed 12% [10], and 10% of cows deliver twins at least once during their life [8]. An example of the economic impact of twin pregnancies is an annual cost estimate in the United States of 96 million USD [11]. Although hormone treatment or induced twin reduction at pregnancy diagnosis may mitigate the negative effects of twin pregnancies [2,12], the adage “prevent is better than cure” [13] is entirely appropriate for this problem.
Over the past three decades, multiple ovulation rates and thus the incidence of twin pregnancies and twinning have increased together with milk production [2]. The incidence of multiple ovulations increases with age and with genetic, nutrition, and management improvements related to increased milk production [2,8]. In addition, this is because of synchronization protocols for fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI), which have become an essential component of the management of dairy cow reproduction. Some of these FTAI protocols increase the twin pregnancy rate [14]. Therefore, a goal of such protocols should be to avoid or prevent multiple ovulations. For example, it has been shown that by shortening the time of treatment [15,16] and increasing progesterone before FTAI [17,18], twin pregnancies can be significantly reduced. However, although these results are encouraging for the development of protocols to reduce twins, the causal mechanisms of multiple ovulations are not well understood [19]. Recently, two strategies, the transfer of a single embryo produced in vitro and follicular drainage of co-dominant follicles at insemination, have been proposed to prevent twin pregnancies [20,21]. In this review, the clinical prospects and weaknesses of both procedures along with possible improvements are discussed.

2. Transferring a Single In Vitro Produced Embryo

The global use of in vitro-produced embryos (IVP) has increased over the past decades, surpassing the number of in vivo-produced embryos since 2016 [20,22]. While the main interest of IVP embryos lies in genetic gain, their lower costs and an increased efficiency of procedures means they are the most effective method to improve fertility during periods of heat stress [23,24,25] and for repeat-breeder cows following AI [26,27,28,29]. In effect, a single developing blastocyst transferred into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum (CL) does away with the risk of the in vivo fertilization of two or more oocytes following insemination, particularly in older cows. Twin pregnancies are more frequent in multiparous cows and may account for 25% of all pregnancies during the early fetal period in cows in their third lactation or more [3]. Many technicians are skilled at embryo transfer procedures and could in some circumstances replace AI with the transfer of an IVP embryo.

2.1. Benefits

As the use of sexed semen in heifers offers the benefit of herd replacements and additional heifers [29], embryo transfer of a single beef cow embryo to cows not appropriate for replacements should increase herd profitability. Sexed semen is also used in IVP procedures [30,31] so that by transferring a female beef cow embryo, the incidence of male calf-related dystocia will be reduced, and milk production increased. Indeed, the birth of a female calf has been associated with a milk production increase [32,33]. A further benefit of transferring beef cow IVP embryos should be increased beef output from dairy herds, making land use more efficient than when rearing beef cow herds with the consequence of reducing greenhouse gas emissions [34]. However, the efficiency of the in vitro production of embryos leaves much scope for improvement. Only 27% of cattle receiving IVP embryos produce a live calf [35] and these calves are more susceptible to experiencing large offspring syndrome compared with in vivo-generated newborns [36,37,38,39]. Fetal overgrowth syndrome induced by assisted reproduction has also been described in humans [39]. Further, a series of abnormalities such as reduced preimplantation energy metabolism [40] and chromosome aberrations [41,42] and embryo development defects, or young fetuses and placentas [43,44,45] can explain both individually and collectively the extremely high risk of such pregnancies [46,47]. Failure of a pregnancy with an IVP embryo ranges from 59% to 85% and seems to increase using sexed semen [35]. While the literature regarding the use of sexed semen in IVP is limited [22], a high pregnancy loss rate would be expected using sexed IVP embryos, as this has been described in heifers after AI with sexed semen [48]. In a recent study on 1562 heifers receiving a fresh embryo in vitro produced using conventional semen, GnRH treatment on Day five post-estrus (one to three days before embryo transfer) increased the formation of additional corpora lutea and reduced the pregnancy loss rate recorded on day 60 of gestation [49].

2.2. Risks

Regardless of the production of high genetic index calves, a main target of the IVP embryo industry is the use of IVP embryos under heat stress conditions [23,24,25] or in repeat-breeder cows [26,27,28,29]. In this context, preventing twin pregnancies through the transfer of a single embryo could be an important therapeutic approach. However, specific studies have yet to be carried out. After the transfer of an in-vivo-produced bovine embryo, the occurrence of monozygotic twins has been described [50,51], with an incidence of 1.6% after the transfer of a single in vitro-produced equine embryo [52], and extensive reports existing in humans. Assisted reproductive technologies have increased the incidence of multiple pregnancies in women, with rates of 1.4% to 13.2% reported for monozygotic twins [53,54,55], and of 0.04% to 0.3% for triplets [56,57]. Even a monozygotic quadruplet has been observed [57]. The first issues that need to be investigated are the incidence of twins after the transfer of a single IVP embryo and possible risk factors related to monozygotic twins.

3. Puncture and Drainage of the Smaller Co-Dominant Follicles

Most twin pregnancies derive from multiple ovulations which result from the simultaneous formation of two or more co-dominant follicles either in one or both ovaries [58,59]. The incidence of multiple ovulations in high producers at insemination may exceed 20% [60,61,62,63] and the rate of having two or more co-dominant follicles at the time of AI may be over 50% in cows subjected to a FTAI protocol [64]. Therefore, emptying of all follicles of pre-ovulatory size except the largest should prevent twin pregnancies. In effect, there is already evidence that transvaginal puncture and drainage of the smaller follicle at the time of insemination in cows with two co-dominant (ovulatory) follicles eliminates the risk of twin pregnancy without reducing fertility [65,66,67,68]. Drainage of follicles may be either ultrasound-guided [65,66], or hand-guided using a steel cannula designed for follicular cyst puncture [67,68]. This instrument makes the procedure quick and easy for an experienced technician after the detection of follicles of pre-ovulatory size by rectal palpation (Figure 1).

3.1. Benefits

Ablation or removal of the dominant follicle by ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicle aspiration has been extensively used to enhance the super-ovulatory response in embryo transfer programs in cattle and buffalo [69,70,71,72]. The follicular drainage procedure referred to here avoids suction of the antral fluid. Drainage with no aspiration leaves a sufficiently large number of granulosa cells in the follicle for the subsequent formation of luteal tissue [66]. All drained follicles develop as a CL seven days post-drainage [65,66,67,68]. GnRH treatment at this point, seven days post-estrus, reinforces the function of these induced luteal structures (Figure 2) so that drainage-induced CL and fellow CL are similar in terms of size and vascularization as determined through Doppler ultrasonography [66]. The drainage-induced additional CL has been shown to favor embryo survival [67] in a similar way to an additional CL following spontaneous ovulation, and this has proved to be a very strong factor reducing the risk of pregnancy loss during the late embryonic/early fetal period [73].

3.2. Risks

It should be noted that the follicular drainage procedure has an important shortcoming that needs improving. Although fertility is similar in drained and non-drained cows, a high percentage of non-drained follicles fail to ovulate. Based on data compiled from our four latest studies [65,66,67,68], in 23.3% (70/300) of follicle-drained cows, the non-drained follicle never reached the stage of ovulation. Pregnancy was not detected in these cows, whereas the pregnancy rate was similar for all drained (29.7%: 89/300) and non-drained (31.5: 95/302) cows. Hence, the compromised fertility of the whole sample of drained cows was offset by a high pregnancy rate of ovulating drained cows (38.7%: 89/230). The incidence of ovulation failure of the non-drained follicles and the subsequent high pregnancy rate of the ovulating ones need to be clarified. Treatment at drainage with a strong inducer of ovulation such as human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) could probably improve the ovulation rate of the non-drained follicles. However, caution is needed with this type of treatment. Follicles smaller than 10 mm, that is, of pre-ovulatory size [74], are able to respond to hCG treatment [75] and this may reverse the capacity of follicular drainage to prevent multiple pregnancies.

4. Conclusions

Follicular puncture and drainage with no aspiration and single embryo transfer may eliminate the risk of a twin pregnancy with the consequence of improved cow health and welfare. Following GnRH treatment, five to seven days post-estrus, both procedures promote the formation of an additional corpus luteum, and so reducing the risk of subsequent pregnancy loss. As older cows are the main population at risk of multiple ovulations, cows in their third lactation or more with no genetic merit could receive a single beef cow female embryo, whereas cows with a high genetic index could be inseminated with sexed semen following follicular puncture of co-dominant follicles. This strategy should increase herd profitability. Major concerns that still need to be addressed are the possible risks of the transfer of embryos produced in vitro using sexed semen and the low ovulation rate of non-drained follicles following follicular drainage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation, F.L.-G.; validation, writing—review and editing, I.G.-I. Funding acquisition, I.G.-I. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project “01.02.01 de Transferència Tecnològica del Programa de desenvolupament rural de Catalunya 2014-2020”, procedure numbers 19005 and N20016.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ana Burton for editorial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. López-Gatius, F.; García-Ispierto, I. Ultrasound and endocrine findings that help to assess the risk of late embryo/early foetal loss by non-infectious cause in dairy cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45 (Suppl. 3), 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. López-Gatius, F.; Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Mur-Novales, R.; Cabrera, V.E.; Hunter, R.H.F. The dilemma of twin pregnancies in dairy cattle. A review of practical prospects. Live Sci. 2017, 197, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. Abortion in dairy cattle with advanced twin pregnancies: Incidence and timing. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019, 54 (Suppl. 4), 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. López-Gatius, F.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Hunter, R.H.F. Twin Pregnancies in Dairy Cattle: Observations in a Large Herd of Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows. Animals 2020, 10, 2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nielen, M.; Schukken, Y.H.; Scholl, D.T.; Wilbrink, H.J.; Brand, A. Twinning in dairy cattle: A study of risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 1989, 32, 845–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mee, J.F. Factors affecting the spontaneous twinning rate and the effect of twinning on calving problems in nine Irish dairy herds. Ir. Vet. J. 1991, 44, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  7. Echternkamp, S.E.; Gregory, K.E. Effects of twinning on gestation length, retained placenta, and dystocia. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Ganau, S.; Fricke, P.M.; López-Gatius, F. Effects of twinning on the subsequent reproductive performance and productive lifespan of high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2012, 78, 2061–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bogado Pascottini, O.; Probo, M.; LeBlanc, S.J.; Opsomer, G.; Hostens, M. Assessment of associations between transition diseases and reproductive performance of dairy cows using survival analysis and decision tree algorithms. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 176, 104908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Silva del Rio, N.; Stewart, S.; Rapnicki, P.; Chang, Y.M.; Fricke, P.M. An observational analysis of twin births, calf sex ratio, and calf mortality in Holstein dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 1255–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mur-Novales, R.; López-Gatius, F.; Fricke, P.M.; Cabrera, V.E. An economic evaluation of management strategies to mitigate the negative effect of twinning in dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 8335–8349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. López-Gatius, F. Twins in dairy herds. Is it better to maintain or reduce a pregnancy? Animals 2020, 10, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Borysiewicz, L. Prevention is better than cure. Clin. Med. 2009, 9, 572–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. Photoperiod length and the estrus synchronization protocol used before AI affect the twin pregnancy rate in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2012, 78, 1209–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. A three-day PGF plus eCG-based fixed-time AI protocol improves fertility compared with spontaneous estrus in dairy cows with silent ovulation. J. Reprod. Dev. 2013, 59, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Roselló, M.A.; De Rensis, F.; López-Gatius, F. A five-day progesterone plus eCG-based fixed-time AI protocol improves fertility over spontaneous estrus in high-producing dairy cows under heat stress. J. Reprod. Dev. 2013, 59, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Martins, J.P.N.; Wang, D.; Mu, N.; Rossi, G.F.; Martini, A.P.; Martins, V.R.; Pursley, J.R. Level of circulating concentrations of progesterone during ovulatory follicle development affects timing of pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 10505–10525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Carvalho, P.D.; Santos, V.G.; Fricke, H.P.; Hernandez, L.L.; Fricke, P.M. Effect of manipulating progesterone before timed artificial insemination on reproductive and endocrine outcomes in high-producing multiparous Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 7509–7521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Macmillan, K.; Kastelic, J.P.; Colazo, M.G. Update on multiple ovulations in dairy cattle. Animals 2018, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. López-Gatius, F.; Hunter, R.H.F. Preventing twin pregnancies in dairy cattle, turning the odds into reality. Live Sci. 2019, 229, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. López-Gatius, F.; Garcia-Ispierto, I. Transfer of a single embryo versus drainage of subordinate follicles to prevent twin pregnancies in dairy cows. Why not both? J. Reprod. Dev. 2020, 66, 287–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ferré, L.; Kjelland, M.; Strøbech, L.; Hyttel, P.; Mermillod, P.; Ross, P. Review: Recent advances in bovine in vitro embryo production: Reproductive biotechnology history and methods. Animal 2020, 14, 991–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ealy, A.D.; Drost, M.; Hansen, P.J. Developmental changes in embryonic resistance to adverse effects of maternal heat stress in cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 2899–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hansen, P.J. Reproductive physiology of the heat-stressed dairy cow: Implications for fertility and assisted reproduction. Anim. Reprod. 2019, 16, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Baruselli, P.S.; Ferreira, R.M.; Vieira, L.M.; Souza, A.H.; Bó, G.A.; Rodrigues, C.A. Use of embryo transfer to alleviate infertility caused by heat stress. Theriogenology 2020, 155, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dochi, O.; Takahashi, K.; Hirai, T.; Hayakawa, H.; Tanisawa, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Koyama, H. The use of embryo transfer to produce pregnancies in repeat-breeding dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2008, 69, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Canu, S.; Boland, M.; Lloyd, G.M.; Newman, M.; Christie, M.F.; May, P.J.; Christley, R.M.; Smith, R.F.; Dobson, H. Predisposition to repeat breeding in UK cattle and success of artificial insemination alone or in combination with embryo transfer. Vet. Rec. 2010, 167, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yaginuma, H.; Funeshima, N.; Tanikawa, N.; Miyamura, M.; Tsuchiya, H.; Noguchi, T.; Iwata, H.; Kuwayam, T.; Shirasuna, K.; Hamano, S. Improvement of fertility in repeat breeder dairy cattle by embryo transfer following artificial insemination: Possibility of interferon tau replenishment effect. J. Reprod. Dev. 2019, 65, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Holden, S.A.; Butler, S.T. Review: Applications and benefits of sexed semen in dairy and beef herds. Animal 2018, 12 (Suppl. 1), s97–s103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, K.H.; Cran, D.G.; Seidel, G.E., Jr. In vitro fertilization with flow-cytometrically-sorted bovine sperm. Theriogenology 1999, 52, 1393–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hamano, K.; Li, X.; Qian, X.; Funauchi, K.; Furdate, M.; Minato, Y. Gender preselection in cattle with intracytoplasmically injected, flow cytometrically sorted sperm heads. Biol. Reprod. 1999, 60, 1194–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hinde, K.; Carpenter, A.J.; Clay, J.S.; Bradford, B.J. Holsteins favor heifers, not bulls: Biased milk production programmed during pregnancy as a function of fetal sex. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Hess, M.K.; Hess, A.S.; Garrick, D.J. The effect of calf gender on milk production in seasonal calving cows and its impact on genetic evaluations. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Selm, B.; Boer, I.J.M.; Ledgard, S.F.; Middelaar, C.E. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of New Zealand beef through better integration of dairy and beef production. Agric. Syst. 2021, 186, 102936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ealy, A.D.; Wooldridge, L.K.; McCoski, S.R. Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 2555–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Behboodi, E.; Anderson, G.B.; BonDurant, R.H.; Cargill, S.L.; Kreuscher, B.R.; Medrano, J.F.; Murray, J.D. Birth of large calves that developed from in vitro-derived bovine embryos. Theriogenology 1995, 44, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Young, L.E.; Sinclair, K.D.; Wilmut, I. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev. Reprod. 1998, 3, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bertolini, M.; Mason, J.B.; Beam, S.W.; Carneiro, G.F.; Sween, M.L.; Kominek, D.J.; Moyer, A.L.; Famula, T.R.; Sainz, R.D.; Anderson, G.B. Morphology and morphometry of in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine concepti from early pregnancy to term and association with high birth weights. Theriogenology 2002, 58, 973–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, Z.; Hagen, D.E.; Elsik, C.G.; Ji, T.; Morris, C.J.; Moon, L.M.; Rivera, R.M. Characterization of global loss of imprinting in fetal overgrowth syndrome induced by assisted reproduction. PNAS 2015, 112, 4618–4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Khurana, N.K.; Niemann, H. Energy metabolism in preimplantation bovine embryos derived in vitro or in vivo. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Viuff, D.; Greve, T.; Avery, B.; Hyttel, P.; Brockhoff, P.B.; Thomsen, P.D. Chromosome aberrations in in vitro-produced bovine embryos at days 2–5 post-insemination. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 63, 1143–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Lonergan, P.; Rizos, D.; Gutierrez-Adan, A.; Moreira, P.M.; Pintado, B.; De La Fuente, J.; Boland, M.P. Temporal divergence in the pattern of messenger RNA expression in bovine embryos cultured from the zygote to blastocyst stage in vitro or in vivo. Biol. Reprod. 2003, 69, 1424–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miles, J.R.; Farin, C.E.; Rodriguez, K.F.; Alexander, J.E.; Farin, P.W. Effects of embryo culture on angiogenesis and morphometry of bovine placentas during early gestation. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 73, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Farin, P.W.; Piedrahita, J.A.; Farin, C.E. Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2006, 65, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Barnwell, C.V.; Farin, P.W.; Whisnant, C.S.; Alexander, J.E.; Farin, C.E. Maternal serum progesterone concentration and early conceptus development of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2015, 52, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Taverne, M.A.M.; Breukelman, S.P.; Perényi, Z.; Dieleman, S.J.; Vosa, P.L.A.M.; Jonker, H.H.; de Ruigh, L.; Van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw, J.M.; Beckers, J.-F. The monitoring of bovine pregnancies derived from transfer of in vitro produced embryos. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2002, 42, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sirard, M.A. 40 years of bovine IVF in the new genomic selection context. Reproduction 2018, 156, R1–R7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Underwood, S.L.; Bathgate, R.; Ebsworth, M.; Maxwell, W.M.; Evans, G. Pregnancy loss in heifers after artificial insemination with frozen-thawed, sex-sorted, re-frozen-thawed dairy bull sperm. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 118, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. García-Guerra, A.; Sala, R.V.; Carrenho-Sala, L.; Baez, G.M.; Motta, J.C.L.; Fosado, M.; Moreno, J.F.; Wiltbank, M.C. Postovulatory treatment with GnRH on Day 5 reduces pregnancy loss in recipients receiving an in vitro produced expanded blastocyst. Theriogenology 2020, 141, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moyaert, I.; Bouters, R.; Bouquet, Y. Birth of a monozygotic cattle twin following non surgical transfer of a single 7 day old embryo. Theriogenology 1982, 18, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kraay, G.J.; Menard, D.P.; Bedoya, M. Monozygous cattle twins as a result of transfer of a single embryo. Can. Vet. J. 1983, 24, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Dijkstra, A.; Cuervo-Arango, J.; Stout, T.A.E.; Claes, A. Monozygotic multiple pregnancies after transfer of single in vitro produced equine embryos. Equine Vet. J. 2020, 52, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Chen, W.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y. Identifying risk factors related to monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technologies. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 230, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hviid, K.V.R.; Malchau, S.S.; Pinborg, A.; Nielsen, H.S. Determinants of monozygotic twinning in ART: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2018, 24, 468–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Busnelli, A.; Dallagiovanna, C.; Reschini, M.; Paffoni, A.; Fedele, L.; Somigliana, E. Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 111, 302–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Sundaram, V.; Ribeiro, S.; Noel, M. Multi-chorionic pregnancies following single embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage: A case series and review of the literature. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018, 35, 2109–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yamashita, S.; Ikemoto, Y.; Ochiai, A.; Yamada, S.; Kato, K.; Ohno, M.; Segawa, T.; Nakaoka, Y.; Toya, M.; Kawachiya, S.; et al. Analysis of 122 triplet and one quadruplet pregnancies after single embryo transfer in Japan. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2020, 40, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Echternkamp, S.E. Fetal development in cattle with multiple ovulations. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70, 2309–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Echternkamp, S.E.; Roberts, A.J.; Lunstra, D.D.; Wise, T.; Spicer, L.J. Ovarian follicular development in cattle selected for twin ovulations and births. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fricke, P.M.; Wiltbank, M.C. Effect of milk production on the incidence of double ovulation in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1999, 52, 1133–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lopez, H.; Caraviello, D.Z.; Satter, L.D.; Fricke, P.M.; Wiltbank, M.C. Relationship between level of milk production and multiple ovulations in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 2783–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. López-Gatius, F.; López-Béjar, M.; Fenech, M.; Hunter, R.H.F. Ovulation failure and double ovulation in dairy cattle: Risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kusaka, H.; Miura, H.; Kikuchi, M.; Sakaguchi, M. Incidence of double ovulation during the early postpartum period in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2017, 91, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. López-Gatius, F.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Serrano-Pérez, B.; Hunter, R.H.F. The presence of two ovulatory follicles at timed artificial insemination influences the ovulatory response to GnRH in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2018, 120, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. López-Gatius, F.; Hunter, R.H.F. Puncture and drainage of the subordinate follicles at timed artificial insemination prevents the risk of twin pregnancy in dairy cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2018, 53, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. López-Gatius, F.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Serrano-Pérez, B.; Balogh, O.G.; Gábor, G.; Hunter, R.H.F. Luteal activity following follicular drainage of subordinate follicles for twin pregnancy prevention in bi-ovular dairy cows. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 124, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. Improved embryo survival following follicular drainage of subordinate follicles for twin pregnancy prevention in biovular dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 2020, 63, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. Effects of twin pregnancy prevention strategies such as GnRH dose and drainage of the smaller follicle on ovulation in dairy cows with two follicles of pre-ovulatory size in the same ovary. J. Reprod. Dev. 2020, 66, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bergfelt, D.R.; Bo, G.A.; Mapletoft, R.J.; Adams, G.P. Superovulatory response following ablation-induced follicular wave emergence at random stages of the oestrous cycle in cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1997, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  70. Baracaldo, M.I.; Martinez, M.F.; Adams, G.P.; Mapletoft, R.J. Superovulatory response following transvaginal follicle ablation in cattle. Theriogenology 2000, 53, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lima, W.M.; Vieira, A.D.; Thaller Neto, A.; Mezzalira, A.; Matos, R.C.; Gregory, R.M. Improved superovulatory response in beef cattle following ovarian follicular ablation using a simplified transvaginal device. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2007, 100, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Honparkhe, M.; Gandotra, V.K.; Matharoo, J.S.; Ghuman, S.P.; Dadarwal, D.; Singh, J. Synchronization of follicular wave emergence following ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicle ablation or estradiol-17β administration in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 146, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. López-Gatius, F. Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review. Theriogenology 2012, 77, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sartori, R.; Fricke, P.M.; Ferreira, J.C.P.; Ginther, O.J.; Wiltbank, M.C. Follicular deviation and acquisition of ovulatory capacity in bovine follicles. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 65, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. De Rensis, F.; López-Gatius, F.; García-Ispierto, I.; Techakumpu, M. Clinical use of human chorionic gonadotropin in dairy cows: An update. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Follicular puncture and drainage with no aspiration of the smaller co-dominant (ovulatory) follicle using a transvaginal hand-guided metallic cannula in a cow with a follicle of pre-ovulatory size (blue) in each ovary. Drawing by López-Gatius. The color artwork is courtesy of Cris Segú Mora.
Figure 1. Follicular puncture and drainage with no aspiration of the smaller co-dominant (ovulatory) follicle using a transvaginal hand-guided metallic cannula in a cow with a follicle of pre-ovulatory size (blue) in each ovary. Drawing by López-Gatius. The color artwork is courtesy of Cris Segú Mora.
Animals 11 00148 g001
Figure 2. Puncture and drainage of the smaller co-dominant follicle at the time of insemination in cows with a follicle of pre-ovulatory size in each ovary (A). GnRH treatment is given seven days post-drainage to reinforce luteal activity of the drainage-induced luteal tissue (B). Luteal activity determinations are made 21 days post-drainage (C). Both corpora lutea are not distinguishable at this time point [65]. F: follicles; CL: corpora lutea; O: ovaries; U: uterus.
Figure 2. Puncture and drainage of the smaller co-dominant follicle at the time of insemination in cows with a follicle of pre-ovulatory size in each ovary (A). GnRH treatment is given seven days post-drainage to reinforce luteal activity of the drainage-induced luteal tissue (B). Luteal activity determinations are made 21 days post-drainage (C). Both corpora lutea are not distinguishable at this time point [65]. F: follicles; CL: corpora lutea; O: ovaries; U: uterus.
Animals 11 00148 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. Benefits and Risks of Preventing Twin Pregnancies. Animals 2021, 11, 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010148

AMA Style

Garcia-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F. Benefits and Risks of Preventing Twin Pregnancies. Animals. 2021; 11(1):148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010148

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garcia-Ispierto, Irina, and Fernando López-Gatius. 2021. "Benefits and Risks of Preventing Twin Pregnancies" Animals 11, no. 1: 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010148

APA Style

Garcia-Ispierto, I., & López-Gatius, F. (2021). Benefits and Risks of Preventing Twin Pregnancies. Animals, 11(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010148

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop