Next Article in Journal
A Holistic Approach to Evaluating Linear and Non-Linear Mixed Models to Predict Phosphorus Retention in Growing and Finishing Pigs
Next Article in Special Issue
Glycine Alleviated Intestinal Injury by Inhibiting Ferroptosis in Piglets Challenged with Diquat
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Housing System on Disease Prevalence and Productive Lifespan of Dairy Herds—A Case Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 13
10.3390/ani12131609
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Bacillus licheniformis on Growth Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Function, and Fecal Microflora in Weaned Piglets

by
Xiaorong Yu
1,†,
Zhenchuan Cui
1,†,
Songke Qin
1,
Ruiqiang Zhang
1,
Yanping Wu
2,
Jinsong Liu
3 and
Caimei Yang
1,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, College of Animal Medicine, Zhejiang Agriculture & Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2
Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University), Ministry of Education, Hangzhou 311300, China
3
Institute of Animal Health Products, Zhejiang Vegamax Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313306, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(13), 1609; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131609
Submission received: 13 May 2022 / Revised: 16 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 22 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-antibiotic Feed Additives: Implications for Pig Growth and Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Bacillus licheniformis has been shown to be safe as a green additive in food and feed. This experiment was conducted to investigate the value of Bacillus licheniformis in the diet of piglets. Our results suggested that dietary Bacillus licheniformis supplementation plays an important role in improving the average daily gain, alleviating diarrhea, improving antioxidant capacity, promoting immune function, and regulating the intestinal microflora of weaned piglets.

Abstract

Bacillus licheniformis (B. licheniformis) is a safe probiotic that can promote animal growth and inhibit pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to assess the effects of B. licheniformis, one green feed additive, on growth performance, diarrhea incidence, immune function, fecal volatile fatty acids, and microflora structure in weaned piglets. Weaned piglets (n = 180) were randomly divided into three treatment groups and fed a basal diet and a basal diet supplemented with 500 mg B. licheniformis per kg and 1000 mg B. licheniformis per kg, respectively. The dietary 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis inclusion improved the average daily gain, reduced diarrhea incidence, and strengthened antioxidant capacity. Piglets supplemented with B. licheniformis presented increased serum immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM) compared to the CON group. Meanwhile, the expression of anti-inflammation factors was increased, and the levels of pro-inflammation factors were reduced after B. licheniformis administration. Moreover, the levels of volatile fatty acids, including acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, isobutyric acid, and isovaleric acid, in the BL500 and BL1000 groups were increased compared with the CON group, and the concentration of valeric acid was higher in the BL500 group. Furthermore, piglets in the 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis addition group significantly altered fecal microbiota by increasing Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Oscillospira. In conclusion, dietary B. licheniformis relieved diarrhea, enhanced antioxidant capacity, immunity function, and fecal microflora structure in weaned pigs.

1. Introduction

Early weaning is a stress, and pigs commonly experience diarrhea and a reduced growth rate during postweaning [1]. Antibiotics are usually used to enhance the immune response and command the incidence of many diseases in weaned piglets [2]. However, in recent years, antibiotic resistance has become an important global issue and has received widespread concern in the livestock industry [3]. Antibiotic resistance has an undesirable effect on people other than the immediate consumer of the antibiotic [4]. Several research studies on promising alternatives to antibiotics are currently being developed in livestock, such as probiotics [5], acidifiers [6], plant extracts [7], and so on.
Several studies have demonstrated that probiotics are beneficial for improving growth performance and immune function in animals [8]. Among the prebiotics and probiotics commonly adopted, B. licheniformis is a spore-forming Gram-positive bacterium that has been used in animal feed for a long time [9]. B. licheniformis can produce bacitracin against pathogenic microorganisms [10]. In vivo experiments, B. licheniformis has the function of promoting growth and acting as a competitive repellent, stimulating appetite, promoting digestion, and increasing nutrient retention and absorption [11]. Research demonstrated that B. licheniformis repaired the imbalance of intestinal flora in deoxynivalenol-challenged mice [12]. B. licheniformis strain CK1 had probiotic characters, including acid resistance, adhesion ability, and resistance to pathogenicity [13]. Supplementation in the diet with B. licheniformis could increase digestibility and fecal Lactobacillus counts and reduce fecal toxic gas emissions in growing-finishing pigs [14]. Lin et al. [15] added 0.5 g/kg of a B. licheniformis-fermented feed additive, containing 5 × 1011 CFU/g B. licheniformis, to the basal diet in a weaned piglet experiment. Xu et al. [16] explored the role of B. licheniformis in broiler chickens, where the B. licheniformis group was fed a basal diet supplemented with 1.5 × 109 CFU/kg B. licheniformis. Based on previous studies, we set the dose of B. licheniformis for weaned piglets.
However, few studies have evaluated whether B. licheniformis was a promoter for weaned pig growth and health. The current study aimed to prove the hypothesis that the application of B. licheniformis in piglets’ diet could alleviate the diarrhea incidence, promote growth performance, antioxidant capacity, immune function, and alter the fecal microbial composition in weaned piglets. The combined analysis of these results may help to find specific microorganisms, as well as provide insights into the potential microbial mechanisms of piglets supplemented with B. licheniformis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Feedings

The current study was carried out according to the regulations by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Zhejiang A&F University (No. ZAFUAC2021026). A total of 180 four-week-old weaned Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire piglets were raised in Zhengxing Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China), and the piglets were randomly divided into three treatment groups (6 replicates, 10 piglets per pen) as follows: CON (basal diet), BL500 (basal diet supplemented with 500 mg B. licheniformis per kg of basal diet), and BL1000 (basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg B. licheniformis per kg of basal diet). The corresponding amounts of B. licheniformis were evenly mixed into the basic diet for feeding. The experiment lasted for 28 days. The Bacillus licheniformis product was used at a concentration of 1 × 109 CFU per gram of B. licheniformis. The strain has been saved in the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) and its collection number is HJ0135. The basal diet for piglets was designed to conform to the nutritional necessities of NRC (2002) without antibiotics (Table 1). Piglets were fed at a suitable temperature and water was provided ad libitum. The piglets were vaccinated according to the routine methods of the farm.

2.2. Sample Collection

On day 28, 18 piglets were chosen to collect blood samples from the front cavity vein, with body weight close to the average at Zhengxing Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). Blood samples were collected and centrifuged (3000× g for 15 min at 4 °C for serum separation. Furthermore, feces were also collected in a sterile tube to determine the composition of fecal microorganisms. Serum and fecal samples were stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

2.3. Growth Performance and Diarrhea Rate

Piglets from different groups were weighed individually at the start and the end of the experiment to monitor body weight and calculate the average daily gain (ADG). Feed intake was recorded each day in each pen. The average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed to gain ratio (F:G) were computed using the recorded data. The number of pigs with diarrhea was observed and recorded daily to evaluate the incidence of diarrhea. The diarrhea rate (%) = total number of diarrhea piglets/(total number of piglets × test days) × 100.

2.4. Serum Antioxidant Indexes

The serum antioxidant indexes, including glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA), were determined in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions using relevant diagnostic kits purchased from the Angle Gene Bioengineering Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). The Lot number of SOD was 202204011C, the Lot number of GSH-Px was 202204033C, the Lot number of MDA was 202204052D, and the Lot number of T-AOC was 202204024B.

2.5. Immune Indexes

Concentrations of immunoglobulin (IgG, IgA, IgM) and inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. The kits above were bought from Angle Gene Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). The specific test steps followed the manufacturer’s instructions. The Lot number of IgG was 202111062B, the Lot number of IgG was 202111051C, the Lot number of IgM was 202111032C, the Lot number of IL-1β was 202111063A, the Lot number of IL-10 was 202111041B, the Lot number of TNF-α was 202111063D, and the Lot number of IL-6 was 202111044A.

2.6. Fecal Volatile Fatty Acids (VFAs)

Fecal VFAs were assayed by a Gas Chromatography System (7890B, Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) according to previous studies [17]. In brief, the samples (0.5 g) were mixed with 1 mL of pre-cooled deionized water and centrifuged (12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C) to gain the supernatant. Then, the supernatant was mixed with 25% metaphosphoric acid (w/v) at a ratio of 5:1, and then centrifuged (12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C) to obtain the supernatant. After centrifugation, approximately 500 μL of the supernatant was filtered into sample bottles for further gas chromatography analysis

2.7. Fecal Flora Structure

The fecal samples from different piglets were used for the microbiome analysis. The genomic DNA of fecal microbial was extracted using the DNeasy Power Soil Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The specific primer sequences 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) were used for the analysis of V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene. The sequencing was conducted on the Illumina Miseq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the data were analyzed on the Majorbio Cloud Platform, an online platform provided by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The amplicon sequence variant (ASV) is a set composed of concerned species. These concerned species can be comprised of unique or common species information in different groups obtained through a Venn diagram. ASV can be used for composition analysis and correlation analysis of specific species. Alpha diversity analyses were used to describe the degree of fecal microflora diversity between each group.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All data were checked by the equality of variance with normality distribution, then analyzed with SPSS 25.0 software (SPSS Inc., New York, NY, USA) using a one-way ANOVA to analyze whether the species diversity was significant between three independent experiments with at least six replicates per independent experiments. The histograms were created using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Prism Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). 0.05 < p < 0.1 was considered a trend and p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance and Diarrhea Rate

The effects of B. licheniformis on growth performance in weaned piglets are indicated in Table 2. Compared with the control group, 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis supplementation significantly enhanced the ADG in piglets throughout the entire experimental period (p < 0.05). Dietary supplementation with 500 and 1000 mg/kg of B. licheniformis could significantly reduce the diarrhea rate of piglets (p < 0.05).

3.2. Serum Antioxidant Indexes

The effects of B. licheniformis on the serum antioxidant parameters in weaned piglets are shown in Figure 1. Compared to the CON group, dietary 500 and 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis significantly increased the serum GSH-Px activity and decreased the MDA level of serum in weaned piglets (p < 0.05). Moreover, the supplementation of 500 mg/kg of B. licheniformis significantly improved the serum levels of T-AOC and SOD (p < 0.05). In addition, dietary 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis markedly improved the serum GSH-Px activity and reduced the MDA level of serum in weaned piglets compared to the BL1000 group (p < 0.05).

3.3. Serum Immune Cytokine

As demonstrated in Figure 2, compared with the control piglets, 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis-treated piglets exhibited significantly higher serum IgA and IgM concentrations and lower serum IL-1β and IL-6 concentrations (p < 0.05). The level of serum anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 in the BL500 and BL1000 groups was higher than that in the CON groups (p < 0.05).

3.4. Concentrations of VFAs

The results of the VFA analysis are shown in Figure 3. The concentrations of acetic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric acid, butyric acid, isovaleric acid, and valeric acid dietary were significantly higher in the BL500 group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the levels of acetic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric acid, butyric acid, and isovaleric acid markedly increased in the BL1000 group compared to the CON group (p < 0.05). Compared with the BL1000 group, the contents of acetic acid, isobutyric acid, and isovaleric acid were significantly higher in the BL500 group (p < 0.05).

3.5. Microflora Structure in the Colonic Contents

The microbiota in the colonic content is summarized in Figure 4. A total of 725 ASVs were shared among the three treatment groups (Figure 4A). The control group piglets had 463 unique ASVs, BL500 group piglets had 388 ASVs, and the BL1000 group had 341 unique ASVs (Figure 4A). The Chao index represents the community richness of fecal samples, while the Simpson index reflects the community diversity of fecal samples. The addition of 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis gave lower Chao index and higher Simpson index readings for fecal microbiota in piglets and 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis addition showed a lower Chao index (p < 0.05, Figure 4B,C).
At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Spirochaetota were the three major phyla (Figure 4D). At the family level, Prevotellaceae, Clostridiaceae, and Lachnospiraceae were the dominant flora (Figure 4E). The addition of 500 mg/kg of B. licheniformis significantly increased the content of Clostridiaceae (p < 0.05, Figure 4F). At the genus level, Prevotella Norank-F-Muribaculaceae, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Prevotellacea-NK3B31-group, Lactobacillus, Terrisporobacter, unclassified_f__Lachnospiraceae, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, UCG-005, and Phascolarctobacterium were the top 10 genera in abundance values (Figure 4G). Compared with the CON group, adding 500 mg/kg of B. licheniformis could dramatically increase the contents of Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Oscillospira (p < 0.05, Figure 4H,I).

3.6. Spearman’s Correlation Analysis

The results of Spearman’s correlation analysis between fecal microbiota and serum immune cytokines are shown in Figure 5. The genera norank_f__Prevotellaceae and Coprococcus had a significant positive correlation with the pro-inflammatory factor IL-6, while Selenomonas and Megasphaera had a significant negative correlation with the anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 (p < 0.05). What is more, heatmaps of Spearman’s correlation analysis between fecal microbiota and volatile fatty acids are shown in Figure 6. The genera Oscillospira had an observable positive association with acetic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric acid, and isovaleric acid; meanwhile, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 was positively correlated with valeric acid (p < 0.05). However, Megasphaera and Selenomonas had significant negative relations with acetic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric acid, isovaleric acid, and valeric acid (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Pathogen invasion and environmental stress affected the incidence of diarrhea by changing the composition of intestinal flora [18]. Weaning stress, one of the environmental stresses, can easily cause diarrhea in piglets, which contributes to intestinal inflammation. Bacillus strains could improve infectious enteritis or diarrhea in weaned piglets [19]. Similarly, the present study results indicated that B. licheniformis significantly reduced the incidence of diarrhea. According to Lin et al. [15], a B. licheniformis-fermented feed additive not only reduced the incidence of diarrhea, but also tended to increase body weight and the average daily gain of weaned piglets. In this study, supplementation of the diet with 500 mg/kg of B. licheniformis markedly enhanced the ADG compared with the control group, while a diet with B. licheniformis could increase ADFI and reduce F:G but the effects were not significant. What is more, there was no significant difference in growth performance between the BL500 group and the BL1000 group. The improved growth performance of piglets fed B. licheniformis may be related to beneficial metabolites produced by B. licheniformis, such as extracellular digestive enzymes and lysozymes [20]. It is also possible that feeding B. licheniformis could improve the immunity of piglets [21]. B. licheniformis reduced the pathogens in the gut through competitive rejection, while increasing the uptake of nutrients in the intestine, as it was beneficial to improving the growth performance of animals [22]. The ADG of piglets in the BL500 group was significantly higher than the CON group, indicating that a lower dose of B. licheniformis was better for modulating the gut health of piglets, but the mechanism needs to be further explored. Piglets fed a diet with B. licheniformis showed reduced damage to the villus height and increased the villus height: crypt depth in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum [23]. Liu et al. [8] found that B. licheniformis had positive effects on controlling Salmonella Infantis infection via alleviating inflammation and maintaining the intestinal mucosal barrier integrity in pigs.
Researchers hypothesize that oxidative stress affects growth performance in animals [24]. The antioxidant capacity of the host was evaluated by measuring catalase, SOD, GSH-Px, and other related enzymes [25]. Oxidative stress can produce large amounts of MDA, which ultimately leads to tissue damage and the development of diseases. Xu et al. [26] showed that weaning induced oxidative stress characterized by increasing the contents of MDA and free radicals and impairing the antioxidant defense system of piglets. T-AOC refers to the total antioxidant level composed of various antioxidant substances and antioxidant enzymes [27]. GSH-Px is a significant part of the enzyme antioxidant defense system [28]. Peng et al. [29] found the supplementation of B. licheniformis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) increased the activities of SOD and GSH-Px. In this study, compared with the CON group, B. licheniformis improved the antioxidant capacities in the serum of piglets by increasing T-AOC, GSH-Px, and SOD activities and by decreasing MDA. Similarly, B. licheniformis enhanced muscle antioxidant capacity and improved meat quality in late-finishing pigs [30].
Serum immunoglobulins and inflammatory cytokines are typical parameters for estimating the immune status of livestock and poultry [31]. Excess pro-inflammatory cytokines may reduce feed intake and increase energy expenditure, thus reducing the performance of livestock [32]. In the present case, adding 500 mg/kg of B. licheniformis could elevate IgA, IgM, and IL-10 levels and reduce the contents of IL-6 and IL-1β compared with control piglets. The results indicated that the lower dose of B. licheniformis could be more beneficial to enhance immune function, possibly because it could better regulate the balance of intestinal flora in piglets, while the exact mechanism needs to be further studied. Kwak et al. [33] found the levels of IL-1β and IL-12 in the jejunum of growing-finishing pigs were down-regulated by multispecies probiotic formulation supplementation. Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed the genera norank_f__Prevotellaceae and Coprococcus had a significant positive association with IL-6, while Selenomonas and Megasphaera had a significant negative relationship with the anti-inflammatory factor IL-10. However, Huang et al. [34] showed Coprococcus was negatively correlated with IL-17A, suggesting that it may be involved in pemphigus vulgaris by regulating T cell differentiation and the related cytokines. Indeed, previous data showed that the Megasphaera sp. XA511 promoted the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, suggesting that the Megasphaera might enhance the immune response [35]. The active triple peptides reduced the expression of inflammatory cytokines, thereby reducing the abundance of Epsilonproteobacteria, Erysipelotrichales, Prevotellaceae, Flavobacteriaceae, and other pathogenic bacteria [36].
The intestinal VFAs play an active role in nutrient metabolism and immune function, while also regulating the intestinal microbiota at the same time [37], obtaining the fermentation of polysaccharides by intestinal anaerobic bacteria [38]. VFAs also create an acidic environment in the gut to inhibit some harmful bacteria [39]. Xu et al. [16] indicated that the levels of VFAs, including butyric acid, isobutyric acid, valeric acid, and isovaleric acid, in fecal content were improved by adding B. licheniformis. Adding probiotics to the diet resulted in a higher proportion of VFAs, mainly acetic acid, which may be beneficial to the intestinal environment and may reduce post-weaning diarrhea in piglets [40]. These findings were similar to this study, whereby the B. licheniformis supplementation induced an incremental increase in fecal VFAs. This result is consistent with the previous research where higher VFAs concentrations were reported because of B. licheniformis supplementation [41]. Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that Oscillospira was positively associated with acetic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric acid, and isovaleric acid, and Clostridium sensu stricto 1 was positively related to valeric acid. Yang et al. [42] found that Oscillospira could produce various VFAs, mainly butyric acid. Moreover, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_4 were responsible for the change in butyric and propionic acid contents in the colon of anemic animals [43].
Various research had interpreted a close link between fecal microbes, VFAs, and immune function [44,45]. Richards et al. [46] indicated that animal intestinal flora had nutritional and protective functions, activated the immune system, produced beneficial products in intestinal fermentation, and prevented pathogen colonization. Earlier studies had shown that Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the most dominant phyla in piglets [47]. In this case, Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the advantage of bacterial phyla. At the genus level, the current results revealed a high abundance of Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 in the BL500 group compared with the control group. Clostridium sensu stricto has been associated with necrotizing enterocolitis, growth performance, and inflammation in pig models [48]. Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_2 were two major groups in the Clostridium genus. Compared with healthy piglets, the content of Clostridium_sensu_stricto_2 was higher in piglets with diarrhea, whereas Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 exhibited contrary results, indicating B. licheniformis could reduce the diarrhea incidence by increasing the level of Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 [49]. In addition, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 was reported to produce VFAs using mucus-derived sugars as an energy source and promote intestinal mucus barrier adhesion to pathogens [50]. Moreover, Fu et al. [51] found the abundance of Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 significantly increased in the resveratrol group. Through correlation analysis, Zhou et al. [52] showed the elevated relative abundances of Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 in cecum contents were negatively correlated with the level of inflammatory factors IL-12, IL-6, and IFN-γ.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the supplementation of 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis in the diet of weaning piglets could increase the average daily gain, relieve diarrhea, enhance antioxidant capacity, improve immune function, and regulate the intestinal flora in weaned piglets. B. licheniformis may increase the genera Oscillospira and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 to promote growth performance. These findings provide novel insight into B. licheniformis enhancing beneficial effects in weaned piglets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y., Z.C. and C.Y.; methodology, S.Q. and J.L.; software, R.Z.; validation, Y.W. and J.L.; formal analysis, X.Y. and J.L.; investigation, R.Z. and Y.W.; resources, Z.C.; data curation, X.Y. and Z.C.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., R.Z. and C.Y.; visualization, S.Q. and J.L.; supervision, C.Y.; project administration, S.Q.; funding acquisition, Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program of China, grant number 2021C02008; the Zhejiang Provincial Leading Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team Project, grant number 2020R01015; the Key Research and development Program of “Leading Goose” of Zhejiang Province, grant number 2022C02059; and the Project of Key Agricultural Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, grant number 2021Y30004.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Animal Management Rules of the Ministry of Health of People’s Republic of China and approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University, Hangzhou, China (No. ZAFUAC2021026).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dunsford, B.R.; Knabe, D.A.; Haensly, W.E. Effect of dietary soybean meal on the microscopic anatomy of the small intestine in the early-weaned pig. J. Anim. Sci. 1989, 67, 1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kong, X.; Yin, Y.; Wu, G.; Liu, H.; Yin, F.; Li, T.; Huang, R.; Ruan, Z.; Xiong, H.; Deng, Z. Dietary supplementation with Acanthopanax senticosus extract modulates cellular and humoral immunity in weaned piglets. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 20, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Levy, S. Reduced antibiotic use in livestock: How Denmark tackled resistance. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, A160–A165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ahmad, M.; Khan, A.U. Global economic impact of antibiotic resistance: A review. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 19, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Simon, O. An interdisciplinary study on the mode of action of probiotics in pigs. J. Anim. Feed. Sci. 2010, 19, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gao, C.; Shi, H.; Xie, W.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, J.; Ji, C.; Ma, Q. Dietary supplementation with acidifiers improves the growth performance, meat quality and intestinal health of broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, H.; Tong, J.; Zhou, D. Utilization of Chinese herbal feed additives in animal production. Agric. Sci. China 2011, 10, 1262–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, X.; Xia, B.; He, T.; Li, D.; Su, J.; Guo, L.; Wang, F.; Zhu, Y. Oral Administration of a Select Mixture of Lactobacillus and Bacillus alleviates inflammation and maintains mucosal barrier integrity in the ileum of pigs challenged with salmonella infantis. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhao, Y.; Zeng, D.; Wang, H.; Qing, X.; Sun, N.; Xin, J.; Luo., M.; Khalique., A.; Pan., K.; Shu, G. Dietary probiotic Bacillus licheniformis H2 enhanced growth performance, morphology of small intestine and liver, and antioxidant capacity of broiler chickens against Clostridium perfringens-induced subclinical necrotic enteritis. Probiotic Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kayalvizhi, N.; Gunasekaran, P. Production and characterization of a low-molecular-weight bacteriocin from Bacillus licheniformis MKU3. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 47, 600–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lei, K.; Li, Y.; Yu, D.; Rajput, I.; Li, W. Influence of dietary inclusion of Bacillus licheniformis on laying performance, egg quality, antioxidant enzyme activities, and intestinal barrier function of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 2389–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, S.; Hou, Q.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Wei, H.; Shen, L. Isolation and characterization of a deoxynivalenol-degrading bacterium Bacillus licheniformis YB9 with the capability of modulating intestinal microbial flora of mice. Toxins 2020, 12, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hsu, T.C.; Yi, P.J.; Lee, T.Y.; Liu, J.R. Probiotic characteristics and zearalenone-removal ability of a Bacillus licheniformis strain. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lan, R.; Kim, I.H. Effects of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis complex on growth performance and faecal noxious gas emissions in growing-finishing pigs. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 2019, 99, 1554–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, K.H.; Yu, Y.H. Evaluation of Bacillus licheniformis-fermented feed additive as an antibiotic substitute: Effect on the growth performance, diarrhea incidence, and cecal microbiota in weaning piglets. Sensors 2020, 10, 1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Xu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Li, Q.; Lan, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Cao, G.; Yang, C. Effects of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance, immunity, short chain fatty acid production, antioxidant capacity, and cecal microflora in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, C.M.; Zhang, L.L.; Cao, G.T.; Feng, J.; Yue, M.; Xu, Y.; Dai, B.; Han, Q.; Guo, X. Effects of dietary supplementation with essential oils and organic acids on the growth performance, immune system, fecal volatile fatty acids, and microflora community in weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gresse, R.; Chaucheyras, D.F.; Fleury, M.A.; Van, W.T.; Forano, E.; Blanquet, D.S. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in postweaning piglets: Understanding the keys to health. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 851–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, D.; Zhu, Y.H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, M.L.; Fan, W.Y.; Song, D.; Yang, G.Y.; Jensen, B.B.; Wang, J.F. Oral administration of a select mixture of Bacillus probiotics generates Tr1 cells in weaned F4ab/acR- pigs challenged with an F4+ ETEC/VTEC/EPEC strain. Vet. Res. 2015, 46, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sahu, M.K.; Swarnakumar, N.S.; Sivakumar, K.; Thangaradjou, T.; Kannan, L. Probiotics in aquaculture: Importance and future perspectives. Indian J. Microbiol. 2008, 48, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ren, C.; Zhou, Q.; Guan, W.; Lin, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, H.; Zhang, Y. Immune response of piglets receiving mixture of formic and propionic acid alone or with either capric acid or Bacillus licheniformis after escherichia coli challenge. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, e6416187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Xu, S.; Lin, Y.; Zeng, D.; Zhou, M.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, H.; Pan, K.; Jing, B.; et al. Bacillus licheniformis normalize the ileum microbiota of chickens infected with necrotic enteritis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zong, X.; Wang, T.H.; Lu, Z.Q.; Song, D.G.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.Z. Effects of Clostridium Butyricum or in combination with Bacillus Licheniformis on the growth performance, blood indexes, and intestinal barrier function of weanling piglets. Livest. Sci. 2019, 220, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iqbal, M.; Pumfor, N.R.; Tang, Z.X.; Lassiter, K.; Ojano, D.C.; Wing, T.; Cooper, M.; Bottje, W. Compromised liver mitochondrial function and complex activity in low feed efficient broilers are associated with higher oxidative stress and differential protein expression1. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fu, R.; Chen, D.; Tian, G.; Zheng, P.; Mao, X.; Yu, J.; He, J.; Huang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Yu, B. Effect of dietary supplementation of Bacillus coagulans or yeast hydrolysates on growth performance, antioxidant activity, cytokines and intestinal microflora of growing-finishing pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 5, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, J.; Xu, C.; Chen, X.; Cai, X.; Yang, S.; Sheng, Y.; Wang, T. Regulation of an antioxidant blend on intestinal redox status and major microbiota in early weaned piglets. Nutrition 2014, 30, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Duan, X.; Feng, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, P.; Ding, M.; Wang, W.; Zhou, X.; Yao, W. The interaction effects of coke oven emissions exposure and metabolic enzyme Gene variants on total antioxidant capacity of workers. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 70, 103197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, S.; Wu, Z.; Heng, J.; Song, H.; Tian, M.; Chen, F.; Guan, W. Combined yeast culture and organic selenium supplementation during late gestation and lactation improve preweaning piglet performance by enhancing the antioxidant capacity and milk content in nutrient-restricted sows. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 6, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jia, P.; Cui, K.; Ma, T.; Wan, F.; Wang, W.; Yang, D.; Wang, Y.; Guo, B.; Zhao, L.; Diao, Q. Influence of dietary supplementation with Bacillus licheniformis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as alternatives to monensin on growth performance, antioxidant, immunity, ruminal fermentation and microbial diversity of fattening lambs. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cheng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Du, M.; Wen, C.; Zhou, Y. Evaluation of dietary synbiotic supplementation on growth performance, muscle antioxidant ability and mineral accumulations, and meat quality in late-finishing pigs. Kafkas. Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2018, 24, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cerami, A. Inflammatory cytokines. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1992, 62, S3–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kc, K. Nutritional aspects of leukocytic cytokines. J. Nutr. 1988, 118, 1436–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kwak, M.J.; Tan, P.L.; Oh, J.K.; Chae, K.S.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.H.; Eun, J.S.; Chee, S.W.; Kang, D.K.; Kim, S.H. The effects of multispecies probiotic formulations on growth performance, hepatic metabolism, intestinal integrity and fecal microbiota in growing-finishing pigs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2021, 274, 114833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, S.; Mao, J.; Zhou, L.; Xiong, X.; Deng, Y. The imbalance of gut microbiota and its correlation with plasma inflammatory cytokines in pemphigus vulgaris patients. Scand. J. Immunol. 2019, 90, e12799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Huang, Y.; Zhu, N.; Zheng, X.; Liu, Y.; Lu, H.; Yin, X.; Hao, H.; Tan, Y.; Wang, D.; Hu, H. Intratumor microbiome analysis identifies positive association between Megasphaera and survival of Chinese patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 785422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, N.; Zhou, L.; Fang, J.; Jiang, H.; Liu, G. Effects of IQW and IRW on inflammation and gut microbiota in etec-induced diarrhea. Mediators. Inflamm. 2021, 2021, e2752265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chambers, E.S.; Viardot, A.; Psichas, A.; Morrison, D.J.; Murphy, K.G.; Zac-Varghese, S.; MacDougall, K.; Preston, T.; Tedford, C.; Finlayson, G.S. Effects of targeted delivery of propionate to the human colon on appetite regulation, body weight maintenance and adiposity in overweight adults. Gut 2015, 64, 1744–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Xu, X.; Xu, P.; Ma, C.; Tang, J.; Zhang, X. Gut microbiota, host health, and polysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 318–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Long, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Mahfuz, S.; Piao, X. Natural capsicum extract replacing chlortetracycline enhances performance via improving digestive enzyme activities, antioxidant capacity, anti-inflammatory function, and gut health in weaned pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. García, K.E.; Souza, T.; Landín, G.M.; Barreyro, A.; Santos, M.; Soto, J. Microbial fermentation patterns, diarrhea incidence, and performance in weaned piglets fed a low protein diet supplemented with probiotics. Food. Nutr. Sci. 2014, 5, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cao, G.; Tao, F.; Hu, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, B.; Zhan, X. Positive effects of a Clostridium butyricum-based compound probiotic on growth performance, immune responses, intestinal morphology, hypothalamic neurotransmitters, and colonic microbiota in weaned piglets. Food. Funct. 2019, 10, 2926–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Wen, Z.; Liu, W.; Meng, L.; Huang, H. Oscillospira—A candidate for the next-generation probiotics. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1987783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Soriano, A.; García, M.; Alférez, M.; Pérez, V.; Sanchez, V.; Linde, Á.; Ortiz, M.; Soriano, M.; García, J.A.; López, I. Gut microbiome–short-chain fatty acids interplay in the context of iron deficiency anaemia. Eur. J. Nutr. 2022, 61, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wu, Y.; Pan, L.; Shang, Q.; Ma, X.; Long, S.; Xu, Y.; Piao, X. Effects of isomalto-oligosaccharides as potential prebiotics on performance, immune function and gut microbiota in weaned pigs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2017, 230, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Raabis, S.; Li, W.; Cersosimo, L. Effects and immune responses of probiotic treatment in ruminants. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2019, 208, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Richards, J.; Gong, J.; Lange, C. The gastrointestinal microbiota and its role in monogastric nutrition and health with an emphasis on pigs: Current understanding, possible modulations, and new technologies for ecological studies. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 85, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zeng, Z.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P.; Zhao, P.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Piao, X. Effects of essential oil supplementation of a low-energy diet on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora, immune properties and antioxidant activities in weaned pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2015, 86, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, Y.; Han, H.; Yin, J.; He, X.; Tang, Z.; Li, T.; Yao, K.; Yin, Y. D- and L-Aspartate regulates growth performance, inflammation and intestinal microbial community in young pigs. Food. Funct. 2019, 10, 1028–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Forssten, S.; Sindelar, C.; Ouwehand. A. Probiotics from an industrial perspective. Anaerobe 2011, 17, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wlodarska, M.; Willing, B.; Bravo, D.; Finlay, B. Phytonutrient diet supplementation promotes beneficial Clostridia species and intestinal mucus secretion resulting in protection against enteric infection. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fu, Q.; Tan, Z.; Shi, L.; Xun, W. Resveratrol attenuates diquat-induced oxidative stress by regulating gut microbiota and metabolome characteristics in piglets. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 695155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, J.; Luo, J.; Yang, S.; Xiao, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Shi, D. Different responses of microbiota across intestinal tract to enterococcus faecium hdrsef1 and their correlation with inflammation in weaned piglets. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 12 01609 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of B. licheniformis on serum antioxidant parameters of weaned piglets. CON represents the control piglets; BL500 represents the piglets supplemented with 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis; BL1000 represents the piglets supplemented with 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis. a,b,c Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05). Note: T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; SOD, superoxide dis-mutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde. n = 6.
Figure 1. Effects of B. licheniformis on serum antioxidant parameters of weaned piglets. CON represents the control piglets; BL500 represents the piglets supplemented with 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis; BL1000 represents the piglets supplemented with 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis. a,b,c Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05). Note: T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; SOD, superoxide dis-mutase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde. n = 6.
Animals 12 01609 g001
Animals 12 01609 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of B. licheniformis on serum immune cytokine of weaned piglets. CON represents the control piglets; BL500 represents the piglets supplemented with 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis; BL1000 represents the piglets supplemented with 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis. a,b Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05). Note: IgG, immunoglobulin G. IgA, immunoglobulin A. IgM, immunoglobulin M. IL-6, interleukin-6. IL-1β, interleukin-1β. IL-10, interleukin-10. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α. n = 6.
Figure 2. Effects of B. licheniformis on serum immune cytokine of weaned piglets. CON represents the control piglets; BL500 represents the piglets supplemented with 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis; BL1000 represents the piglets supplemented with 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis. a,b Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05). Note: IgG, immunoglobulin G. IgA, immunoglobulin A. IgM, immunoglobulin M. IL-6, interleukin-6. IL-1β, interleukin-1β. IL-10, interleukin-10. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α. n = 6.
Animals 12 01609 g002
Animals 12 01609 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of B. licheniformis on the colonic concentrations of VFAs in weaned piglets. CON represents the control piglets; BL500 represents the piglets supplemented with 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis; BL1000 represents the piglets supplemented with 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis. a,b,c Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05). n = 6.
Figure 3. Effects of B. licheniformis on the colonic concentrations of VFAs in weaned piglets. CON represents the control piglets; BL500 represents the piglets supplemented with 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis; BL1000 represents the piglets supplemented with 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis. a,b,c Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05). n = 6.
Animals 12 01609 g003
Animals 12 01609 g004 550
Figure 4. Summary of the microbial community composition in the fecal contents of weaned piglets. (A) Venn diagram summarizing the numbers of common and unique ASVs in the microflora community in the fecal in piglets. (B) Chao index. (C) Simpson index. (D) The microbiota composition on phylum level. (E,F) The microbiota composition on family level. (G–I) The microbiota composition on genus level. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. n = 6.
Figure 4. Summary of the microbial community composition in the fecal contents of weaned piglets. (A) Venn diagram summarizing the numbers of common and unique ASVs in the microflora community in the fecal in piglets. (B) Chao index. (C) Simpson index. (D) The microbiota composition on phylum level. (E,F) The microbiota composition on family level. (G–I) The microbiota composition on genus level. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. n = 6.
Animals 12 01609 g004
Animals 12 01609 g005 550
Figure 5. Heatmaps of Spearman’s correlation analysis between fecal microbiota and serum immune cytokines ((A): Phylum; (B): Genus. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Heatmaps of Spearman’s correlation analysis between fecal microbiota and serum immune cytokines ((A): Phylum; (B): Genus. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Animals 12 01609 g005
Animals 12 01609 g006 550
Figure 6. Heatmaps of Spearman’s correlation analysis between fecal microbiota and volatile fatty acids ((A): Phylum; (B): Genus. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 6. Heatmaps of Spearman’s correlation analysis between fecal microbiota and volatile fatty acids ((A): Phylum; (B): Genus. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Animals 12 01609 g006
Table
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet (air-dry basis).
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet (air-dry basis).
IngredientsContent, %Nutrient LevelContent
Corn55.00DE, MJ/kg14.17
Wheat midding3.50CP, %20.35
Phospholipid2.00Lys, %1.34
Whey powder 5.00Met+Cys, %0.77
Extruded soybean7.30Thr, %0.80
Soybean meal18.50Ca, %0.95
Fish meal5.00TP, %0.65
Dicalcium phosphate1.00AP, %0.48
Limestone1.10
NaCl0.10
L-Lysine HCl0.35
DL- methionine0.15
Vitamin-mineral premix 11.00
Total100
1 Supplied the following per kg of diet: Vitamin A, 10,000 IU; vitamin D3, 400 IU; vitamin E, 10 mg; pantothenic acid, 15 mg; vitamin B6, 2 mg; biotin, 0.3 mg; folic acid, 3 mg; vitamin B12, 0.009 mg; ascorbic acid, 40 mg; Fe, 150 mg; Cu, 130 mg; Mn, 60 mg; Zn, 120 mg; I, 0.3 mg; and Se, 0.25 mg.
Table
Table 2. Effects of B. licheniformis on growth performance and diarrhea rate in piglets.
Table 2. Effects of B. licheniformis on growth performance and diarrhea rate in piglets.
Item 1DietSEMp-Value
CONBL500BL1000
Initial BW, kg8.9389.4288.70500.3270.714
Final BW, kg16.48219.04517.5210.6130.251
ADG, kg0.269 b0.343 a0.315 ab0.0130.023
ADFI, kg0.4750.5690.5240.0180.079
F:G1.7651.6561.6640.0280.216
Diarrhea rate, %9.52 a7.54 b5.56 b0.0060.014
Note: a,b Means with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05). 1 CON, control. BL, Bacillus licheniformis. BW, body weight. ADG, average daily gain. ADFI, average daily feed intake; F:G, feed/gain ratio. BL500, dietary supplement with 500 mg/kg B. licheniformis, BL1000, dietary supplement with 1000 mg/kg B. licheniformis. n = 6.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, X.; Cui, Z.; Qin, S.; Zhang, R.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, C. Effects of Bacillus licheniformis on Growth Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Function, and Fecal Microflora in Weaned Piglets. Animals 2022, 12, 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131609

AMA Style

Yu X, Cui Z, Qin S, Zhang R, Wu Y, Liu J, Yang C. Effects of Bacillus licheniformis on Growth Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Function, and Fecal Microflora in Weaned Piglets. Animals. 2022; 12(13):1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131609

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Xiaorong, Zhenchuan Cui, Songke Qin, Ruiqiang Zhang, Yanping Wu, Jinsong Liu, and Caimei Yang. 2022. "Effects of Bacillus licheniformis on Growth Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Function, and Fecal Microflora in Weaned Piglets" Animals 12, no. 13: 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131609

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop