Next Article in Journal
One-Step In Vitro Generation of ETV2-Null Pig Embryos
Previous Article in Journal
Corynebacterium conjunctivae: A New Corynebacterium Species Isolated from the Ocular Surface of Healthy Horses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Dynamic Energy Budget Model for Kuruma Shrimp Penaeus japonicus: Parameterization and Application in Integrated Marine Pond Aquaculture

1
The Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao 266003, China
2
Function Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, 1 Wenhai Road, Qingdao 266003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(14), 1828; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141828
Submission received: 6 June 2022 / Revised: 15 July 2022 / Accepted: 15 July 2022 / Published: 18 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Physiology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Individual growth models of animals are the basis of ecosystem models, which are important tools for aquaculture management. The lack of mechanistic growth model studies of kuruma shrimp, an important integrated marine aquaculture species, has hindered ecosystem-level aquaculture management. In this study, an individual growth model of kuruma shrimp was constructed based on the dynamic energy budget theory, and the goodness of fit of both parameterization and application was high. The results showed that the model could reproduce the growth of kuruma shrimp in terms of total length and wet weight.

Abstract

Individual growth models can form the basis of population dynamics assessment and ecosystem model construction. In order to provide a basic module for an ecosystem model of an integrated marine aquaculture pond, an individual growth model was constructed for kuruma shrimp (Penaeus japonicus) based on dynamic energy budget (DEB) theory. The model was first parameterized based on a covariation method using the Add-my-Pet (AmP) procedure. The parametric estimation model underestimated the ultimate abdominal length for female shrimp, and the predicted values of other zero-variate parameters were generally consistent with observed values. The relative errors of the predicted and observed values of the univariate data set within three geographical regions showed acceptable goodness of fit. Parameter estimation achieved an overall goodness of fit with a mean relative error of 0.048 and a symmetric mean squared error of 0.066. A DEB model was constructed using the estimated parameters, and the goodness-of-fit indicators (R square, mean bias and absolute and relative root mean square error) showed that the model was able to reproduce the growth of kuruma shrimp in terms of total length and wet weight with high accuracy. The results provide data to support the subsequent development of integrated aquaculture management at the ecosystem level.

1. Introduction

As a typical integrated multitrophic aquaculture (IMTA) model, integrated marine pond aquaculture has the advantages of increased feed efficiency, high-quality product, high yield and low pollution emissions compared with extensive, semi-intensive and intensive aquaculture models [1]. In China, integrated marine pond aquaculture is dominated by shrimp and crab species, forming integrated aquaculture models, such as shrimp–crab, shrimp–crab–shellfish, shrimp–crab–fish and shrimp–crab–shellfish–fish [2]. Owing to their strong vitality, high quality meat and high commercial prices, kuruma shrimp (Penaeus japonicus) are popular among farmers, with an average annual production of more than 50,000 tons in China in the past decade, making kuruma shrimp an important integrated marine aquaculture species [3]. As an efficient aquaculture ecosystem, integrated marine pond aquaculture has been studied in depth in terms of economic benefits, disease prevention and control and water quality regulation [4,5], but further application and promotion requires theoretical research at the ecosystem level to support aquaculture planning and management [6].
The core of aquaculture management based on ecosystem models is to reproduce environmental dynamics through mathematical functions in order to simulate scenarios such as different species pairings and different aquaculture practices with the aim of maximizing economic and ecological benefits [7,8]. Individual growth models are key submodules of ecosystem models. Individual growth models of crustaceans mainly include two types of models: simple empirical growth models [9,10] and mechanism-based growth models [11].
Empirical growth models, in which empirical data are collected through experiments or surveys and statistically regressed, are more region-specific, and further applications are usually integrated into other empirical models [12]. Mechanism-based growth models describe the material or energy-partitioning processes of individuals through a set of complex differential equations that vary in time and/or space, and their simulation results can be validated with observations. Although the fit may be lower than that of empirical growth models, they can be incorporated into larger ecosystem models [13]. Currently, the most widely used mechanistic models of individual growth include the SFG model, which is based on the scope for growth concept [14], and the DEB model, which is based on dynamic energy budget theory [15].
Since the DEB theory was first proposed by S.A.L.M Kooijman [16], more than 1000 papers related to the DEB model have been published, including applications in various IMTA ecosystems [17,18,19,20]. The DEB model has achieved good results in studies on northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica), brown shrimp (Crangon crangon) and Chinese shrimp (Fenneropenaeus chinensis), providing information to support the assessment and management of fishery resources [21,22,23].
The accurate acquisition of DEB parameters, which reflect the differences in life history and energetics among species, is a prerequisite for model construction [24]. The traditional approach to DEB model parameterization is to obtain data sets based on factorial design experiments with controlled conditions, such as ingestion, oxygen consumption and starvation experiments [25,26]. However, the AmP (Add-my-Pet) project and the creation of the associated database and procedure have standardized and improved DEB parameter estimation methods [27]. The ability of the AmP procedure to extract DEB parameters from animals with less critical data has effectively facilitated the development and application of DEB models [28].
In this study, a kuruma shrimp DEB model was parameterized using the AmP procedure, and the growth of kuruma shrimp in a marine integrated aquaculture pond was simulated using the model. The model will provide the basic module and data support for subsequent construction of ecosystem models for integrated marine aquaculture ponds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. DEB Model

The DEB model used in this study is based on the κ rule to describe the absorption, reserve dynamics and utilization of energy by individuals [16]. The DEB model equations developed for kuruma shrimp are presented in Table 1. Simulation experiments and statistical analyses were performed in Python 3.7.
Within the model, individuals are described by four state variables: structure (V), reserve (E), reproduction (ER) and maturity (EH) (Figure 1). Energy from the environment is first incorporated into the reserve; then, part of it is used for growth and maintenance, and another part is used for maturity and reproduction [29].
Individuals may lose weight or die if reserves are not sufficient to sustain the consumption of normal activities. They obtain energy from food and, which is transferred to reserves through the assimilation process (PA). The reserve is subsequently metabolized (PC) to be used for growth (PG), maintenance (PM) and maturity/reproduction (PR). A constant fraction (κ) of the mobilized reserve is allocated to somatic tissue, which includes somatic maintenance and growth, whereas the remaining 1-κ fraction, after subtracting the costs associated with maturity maintenance (PJ), is used for maturity/reproduction.

2.2. Parameter Estimation

The parameters of the kuruma shrimp DEB model were estimated according to the Add-my-Pet (AmP) procedure, which is based on the improved version of the covariance method, i.e., the parameters are continuously adjusted by minimizing the loss function to achieve a reduction in the difference between the observations and predictions [27]. Loss function minimization is achieved by an automatic execution check of the Nelder–Mead simplex method [30]. The new procedure uses mean relative error (MRE) and symmetric mean squared error (SMSE) to assess the overall goodness of fit [28]. The data needed for parameterization include zero-variate data, univariate data and pseudo-data, among which zero-variate data and univariate data are extracted from existing studies and records [31]. The DEB parameters of kuruma shrimp were obtained by running the AmP procedure in Matlab R2016a.
Zero-variate data related to the biological features of kuruma shrimp were mainly obtained from the records of Song et al. [32]. Kuruma shrimp have a short life cycle and grow rapidly, with a maximum life span of 2 years. Kuruma shrimp is a subtropical species with strong adaptability to temperature, although changes in temperature still have a significant effect on its growth and developmental time. At water temperatures of 22–29 °C, fertilized eggs take 13 to 20 h to develop and hatch into the nauplius stage. After a further 36 h, the nauplius stage develops into the protozoa stage, and individuals start to feed. Sexual differentiation of the gonads is normally observed on approximately the 60th day after protozoa become juvenile shrimps [33]. The ultimate length of a male shrimp is approximately 17 cm, and that of female shrimp is approximately 27 cm, with an ultimate wet weight of 130 g [34]. The maximum annual egg production of kuruma shrimp is about 700,000, with an average of 500,000 to 600,000 [35,36].
Univariate data (growth curves in length and weight) were obtained from three geographic areas along the Chinese coast: two bays (Guzhenkou Bay and Laoshan Bay) [37,38] and one intensive aquaculture pond in Hainan Province, China [39]. Annual shrimp stock enhancement is carried out in late June and early July in the two bays. During the periods from August to October 2006 and 2007, surveys were conducted every half month in Guzhenkou Bay, with each survey measuring total body length and wet weight of female and male shrimp. Data from a total of 11 surveys over two years were combined in the AmP procedure. Seven semi-monthly surveys were also conducted in Laoshan Bay from August to October 2008. At least 30 shrimp were collected in each survey in the two bays (average water temperature: 22 °C). In the intensive aquaculture pond, the total length and wet weight of 30 shrimp were recorded every 10 days during a 100-day aquacultural experiment from August to December 2009 (average water temperature: 28 °C).
Growth, ingestion and metabolism of individuals are affected by temperature, and the response of physiological rates to temperature in the DEB model follows an Arrhenius relationship [29]. Arrhenius temperature (TA) is usually determined by measuring the effect of temperature on oxygen consumption or other physiological rates, and existing studies on the variation of oxygen consumption rate with temperature in kuruma shrimp have mainly focused on the juvenile stage [32,40,41].
In this study, parameters of similar species, such as northern krill, brown shrimp and Chinese shrimp [21,22,23], were combined, and TA was set at 6200 K. The remaining four parameters (TL, TH, TAL and TAH) used to describe the temperature tolerance range of enzyme activity were manually adjusted to provide the best fit [42].

2.3. Integrated Aquaculture Pond Experimental Setup

An integrated aquaculture experiment was conducted in a marine pond in Zhoushan City, Zhejiang Province, China (24°35′ N, 112°7′ E), containing swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus), kuruma shrimp (P. japonicus) and razor clam (Sinonovacula constricta). The pond area was 1.33 ha, with an average water depth of 1.2 m during the experimental period. Kuruma shrimp with total lengths of 1.02 ± 0.07 cm and an average wet weight of 8.7 × 10−3 g were stocked to a density of 22.5 × 104 ind·ha−1. The experimental period ran from June 2020 to November 2020—a total of 180 days.
Water temperature and food density are the forcing functions used to run the model. Water temperature was continuously recorded by a water temperature recorder (HOBO-MX2201, America) [43]. The nutrients required for shrimp and crab growth were provided by feeding with iced trash fish. Growth data, including total length and wet weight, were measured every 15 days. DEB theory describes individual feeding using a Holling type-II functional response; the rates of feeding and energy assimilation from the environment are proportional to food density (i.e., f = X/(XK + X), where X is the food density, and XK is the half-saturation constant, 0 ≤ f ≤ 1 [44]). In the absence of information on biological feeding parameters or food biomass, f can be obtained based on the model fit [45]. In DEB models for animals artificially fed feedstuff, f is usually set to a constant [46].

3. Results

3.1. Model Parameters

The completeness of the data used for parameter estimation was set at 4.2 according to the criteria developed by Lika et al. [31]. Zero-variate predictions of the kuruma shrimp DEB model were completed using the AmP procedure, and a comparison of predicted and observed values is presented in Table 2. The model underestimated the ultimate abdominal length for female shrimp, whereas the predicted values of other parameters were generally consistent with the observed values.
Univariate simulation results for the kuruma shrimp DEB model in the three environments from which the model parameters were derived are shown in Figure 2. For both bays, simulated values of total length were greater than those observed for male shrimp from day 60 to day 140. The initial simulated values of male and female shrimp were slightly overestimated in Guzhenkou Bay, with relative errors (RE) of 0.0297 and 0.0170 for simulated and observed values of female and male shrimp, respectively. In Laoshan Bay, the simulated values of female shrimp were all greater than the observed values, the simulated values of male shrimp were all less than the observed values, and the relative errors of simulated and observed values of female and male shrimp were 0.0279 and 0.0199, respectively. In the intensive aquaculture pond, the prediction and observation of total length and wet weight were close, and the relative errors of predicted and observed values were 0.0299 and 0.0735, respectively.
The goodness of fit for the zero and univariate parameter estimates was generally acceptable, with an MRE of 0.048 and a SMSE of 0.066. The estimated parameters of the kuruma shrimp DEB model are presented in Table 3.

3.2. Model Application

The observed and modelled growth of kuruma shrimp in the experimental integrated aquaculture pond from June to November 2020 are shown in Figure 3. The optimal fit of the model to the observation resulted in an f value of 0.62. According to the modelled values, in the first 2 months, kuruma shrimp grew rapidly, and the modelled values were slightly higher than the observed values. From August to October, the shrimp entered a slow growth period, as demonstrated by both simulated and observed values. After October, the growth rate of the shrimp picked up, and modelled and observed values matched more closely.
Statistical tests were performed using coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias (MB) for the goodness of fit of the model. Compared with the observed results, the RMSEs of total length (0.9342~11.4362 cm) and wet weight (0.0082~11.4216 g) were 0.6331 cm (6.03%) and 0.6345 g (5.56%), respectively, and the MBs were −0.1116 cm and −0.2666 g, respectively. The modelled values were in general agreement with the observed values, indicating that the model could simulate and reflect the changes of total length and wet weight.

4. Discussion

In this study, an individual growth model of kuruma shrimp in an experimental integrated marine aquaculture pond was constructed based on DEB theory, and the parameterization and simulation results all showed good fits. We hope that this will form the basis for an ecosystem model for integrated aquaculture ponds. DEB theory has been widely used for aquatic animals, such as fish, shellfish and crustaceans [23,48,49]. However, this is the first time this theory has been applied to kuruma shrimp.
In this study, iced trash fish was the common food for both the kuruma shrimp and the main feeder in the integrated experimental aquaculture system, P. trituberculatus. Although feeds were excessive, unlike the optimal food condition (f = 1) in a previous DEB model for P. trituberculatus [43], the modelled results for kuruma shrimp fit better with the observed results when f was 0.62, probably because feed palatability (composition, shape, size, etc.) was optimized for P. trituberculatus.
Animal species in DEB theory use the same model structure, and the differences in their life histories are reflected by the differences in their DEB parameter sets [50]. Currently, DEB model parameter estimates are mainly obtained through physiological experiments and the covariation method, which links the parameters to experimental and field observations. [51]. DEB parameterization experiments are laborious, and some parameters cannot be measured directly but still need to be obtained by “free fitting” [52]. AmPtool can be downloaded directly from https://www.bio.vu.nl/thb/deb/deblab/add_my_pet (accessed on 1 March 2009). The AmP method has a wide range of search parameters and good substitutability of the required parameters and has become a reliable method for estimating DEB model parameters after several optimizations [28,53]. The diversity of environmental conditions may produce individual differences, and artificial management (strain, feeds, oxygenation, water quality regulation, etc.) may increase such differences [54]. Despite the small differences in parameter values between individuals of the same species, biological data from certain long-established or characteristic strains were not selected from data collection in this study to reduce possible parameter errors [55].
The molting process in crustaceans leads to discontinuities in growth, which makes individual growth models difficult to apply to crustaceans. Two key components of crustacean molt dynamics (molt increment, MI and intermolt period (IP)) are necessary for the construction of discontinuous growth models [12]. Many simple empirical growth models have been developed to model crustacean discontinuous growth by statistically analyzing MI and IP data to relate the molting process to pre- and post-molt size [12,56]. Mechanism-based growth models for simulating discontinuous growth processes in crustaceans require suitable trait parameters as thresholds. Currently, the molting process is mostly ignored in the SFG and DEB growth models of shrimp [14,23]. In discontinuous growth models for crab based on DEB theory, single and multiple molts have been simulated by two parameters: carbon mass/wet mass and condition factor, respectively [11,43]. We applied these two parameters to the discontinuous growth model to simulate the molting behavior of kuruma shrimp, but they were not successful.
DEB models do not provide population dynamics directly but can provide detailed information on quantified physiological processes and bioenergetics, which can then be extended to populations using their dynamics resulting from interactions between individuals under dynamic environmental conditions [54]. Unlike bay and deep-sea aquaculture, the physical processes involved in pond aquaculture are relatively simple, which makes biological processes more critical in predictive models [57]. The kuruma shrimp DEB model developed here will provide an important component for ecological models that aim to simulate the population dynamics of integrated marine aquaculture ponds and provide assessments of their carrying capacity.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the parameters of the DEB model for kuruma shrimp were estimated using the AmP method, and zero-variate, univariate and overall goodness-of-fit analyses (RE, MRE and SMSE) showed the reasonableness of the estimated parameters. A DEB model for kuruma shrimp in an experimental integrated marine aquaculture pond was constructed using the estimated parameters. Statistical tests of simulated and observed values showed that the model could simulate the growth of total length and wet weight of kuruma shrimp. This study can be used not only for individual growth prediction but also coupled with ecosystem models to provide important information for carrying capacity and environmental pollution assessment at the ecosystem level in integrated aquacultural systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D. and F.W.; methodology, D.L.; validation, S.D. and F.W.; investigation, B.Z.; resources, L.Y. and H.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D.; writing—review and editing, F.W.; visualization, D.L.; supervision, F.W.; project administration, F.W.; funding acquisition, F.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFD0900402) and the Yellow River Delta Industry Leading Talents Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (Animal Research and Ethics Committees of Ocean University of China (http://www.ouc.edu.cn/2022/0413/c59a367443/pagem.psp) (accessed on 25 December 2020)). No shrimp were hurt in any procedures. After the experiment, remaining shrimp were supplied with a separated area, fed and returned to the aquaculture facility at the location of collection. No licenses or permits were required for this study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article. Further information is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our appreciation to the editor and the reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Biswas, G.; Kumar, P.; Ghoshal, T.K.; Kailasam, M.; De, D.; Bera, A.; Mandal, B.; Sukumaran, K.; Vijayan, K.K. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) Outperforms Conventional Polyculture with Respect to Environmental Remediation, Productivity and Economic Return in Brackishwater Ponds. Aquaculture 2020, 516, 734626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chang, Z.Q.; Neori, A.; He, Y.Y.; Li, J.T.; Qiao, L.; Preston, S.I.; Liu, P.; Li, J. Development and Current State of Seawater Shrimp Farming, with an Emphasis on Integrated Multi-Trophic Pond Aquaculture Farms, in China—A Review. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 2544–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries Bureau. China Fishery Statistics Yearbook; Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cunha, M.E.; Quental-Ferreira, H.; Parejo, A.; Gamito, S.; Ribeiro, L.; Moreira, M.; Monteiro, I.; Soares, F.; Pousão-Ferreira, P. Understanding the Individual Role of Fish, Oyster, Phytoplankton and Macroalgae in the Ecology of Integrated Production in Earthen Ponds. Aquaculture 2019, 512, 734297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Flickinger, D.L.; Costa, G.A.; Dantas, D.P.; Proença, D.C.; David, F.S.; Durborow, R.M.; Moraes-Valenti, P.; Valenti, W.C. The Budget of Carbon in the Farming of the Amazon River Prawn and Tambaqui Fish in Earthen Pond Monoculture and Integrated Multitrophic Systems. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 17, 100340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferreira, J.G.; Saurel, C.; Ferreira, J.M. Cultivation of Gilthead Bream in Monoculture and Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture. Analysis of Production and Environmental Effects by Means of the FARM Model. Aquaculture 2012, 358–359, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jamu, D.M.; Piedrahita, R.H. An Organic Matter and Nitrogen Dynamics Model for the Ecological Analysis of Integrated Aquaculture/Agriculture Systems: I. Model Development and Calibration. Environ. Model. Softw. 2002, 17, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nobre, A.M.; Robertson-Andersson, D.; Neori, A.; Sankar, K. Ecological-Economic Assessment of Aquaculture Options: Comparison between Abalone Monoculture and Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture of Abalone and Seaweeds. Aquaculture 2010, 306, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Montenegro, C.; Branco, M. Bayesian State-Space Approach to Biomass Dynamic Models with Skewed and Heavy-Tailed Error Distributions. Fish. Res. 2016, 181, 48–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lloyd-Jones, L.R.; Nguyen, H.D.; McLachlan, G.J.; Sumpton, W.; Wang, Y.G. Mixture of Time-Dependent Growth Models with an Application to Blue Swimmer Crab Length-Frequency Data. Biometrics 2016, 72, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Talbot, S.E.; Widdicombe, S.; Hauton, C.; Bruggeman, J. Adapting the Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Approach to Include Non-Continuous Growth (Moulting) and Provide Better Predictions of Biological Performance in Crustaceans. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2019, 76, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chang, Y.J.; Sun, C.L.; Chen, Y.; Yeh, S.Z. Modelling the Growth of Crustacean Species. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 2012, 22, 157–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Reid, G.K.; Lefebvre, S.; Filgueira, R.; Robinson, S.M.C.; Broch, O.J.; Dumas, A.; Chopin, T.B.R. Performance Measures and Models for Open-Water Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 47–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Franco, A.R.; Ferreira, J.G.; Nobre, A.M. Development of a Growth Model for Penaeid Shrimp. Aquaculture 2006, 259, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barillé, L.; Lerouxel, A.; Dutertre, M.; Haure, J.; Barillé, A.L.; Pouvreau, S.; Alunno-Bruscia, M. Growth of the Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in a High-Turbidity Environment: Comparison of Model Simulations Based on Scope for Growth and Dynamic Energy Budgets. J. Sea Res. 2011, 66, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kooijman, S.A.L.M. Population Dynamics on the Basis of Budgets. In The Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations; Metz, J.A.J., Diekmann, O., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1986; Volume 68, pp. 266–297. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ren, J.S.; Stenton-Dozey, J.; Plew, D.R.; Fang, J.; Gall, M. An Ecosystem Model for Optimising Production in Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture Systems. Ecol. Modell. 2012, 246, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sarà, G.; Reid, G.K.; Rinaldi, A.; Palmeri, V.; Troell, M.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M. Growth and Reproductive Simulation of Candidate Shellfish Species at Fish Cages in the Southern Mediterranean: Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Modelling for Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture. Aquaculture 2012, 324–325, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lamprianidou, F.; Telfer, T.; Ross, L.G. A Model for Optimization of the Productivity and Bioremediation Efficiency of Marine Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2015, 164, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Galasso, H.L.; Lefebvre, S.; Aliaume, C.; Sadoul, B.; Callier, M.D. Using the Dynamic Energy Budget Theory to Evaluate the Bioremediation Potential of the Polychaete Hediste Diversicolor in an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture System. Ecol. Modell. 2020, 437, 109296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Campos, J.; Van der Veer, H.W.; Freitas, V.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M. Contribution of Different Generations of the Brown Shrimp Crangon crangon (L.) in the Dutch Wadden Sea to Commercial Fisheries: A Dynamic Energy Budget Approach. J. Sea Res. 2009, 62, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jager, T.; Ravagnan, E. Modelling Growth of Northern Krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica) Using an Energy-Budget Approach. Ecol. Modell. 2016, 325, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, T.; Ren, J.S.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M.; Shan, X.; Gorfine, H. A Dynamic Energy Budget Model of Fenneropenaeus chinensis with Applications for Aquaculture and Stock Enhancement. Ecol. Modell. 2020, 431, 109186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Freitas, V.; Cardoso, J.F.M.F.; Lika, K.; Peck, M.A.; Campos, J.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M.; Van Der Veer, H.W. Temperature Tolerance and Energetics: A Dynamic Energy Budget-Based Comparison of North Atlantic Marine Species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365, 3553–3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ren, J.S.; Schiel, D.R. A Dynamic Energy Budget Model: Parameterisation and Application to the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas in New Zealand Waters. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 2008, 361, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rosland, R.; Strand; Alunno-Bruscia, M.; Bacher, C.; Strohmeier, T. Applying Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) Theory to Simulate Growth and Bio-Energetics of Blue Mussels under Low Seston Conditions. J. Sea Res. 2009, 62, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Marques, G.M.; Augustine, S.; Lika, K.; Pecquerie, L.; Domingos, T.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M. The AmP Project: Comparing Species on the Basis of Dynamic Energy Budget Parameters. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2018, 14, e1006100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Marques, G.M.; Lika, K.; Augustine, S.; Pecquerie, L.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M. Fitting Multiple Models to Multiple Data Sets. J. Sea Res. 2019, 143, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kooijman, S.A.L.M. Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lika, K.; Augustine, S.; Pecquerie, L.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M. The Bijection from Data to Parameter Space with the Standard DEB Model Quantifies the Supply-Demand Spectrum. J. Theor. Biol. 2014, 354, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lika, K.; Kearney, M.R.; Freitas, V.; van der Veer, H.W.; van der Meer, J.; Wijsman, J.W.M.; Pecquerie, L.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M. The “Covariation Method” for Estimating the Parameters of the Standard Dynamic Energy Budget Model I: Philosophy and Approach. J. Sea Res. 2011, 66, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Song, S.; Weng, X. Healthy Aquaculture Technology of Penaeus japonicus; China Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nakamura, K.; Matsuzaki, N.; Yonekura, K.Y. Organogenesis of Genital Organs and Androgenic Gland in the Kuruma Prawn [Penaeus japonicus]. Nippon. Suisan Gakkaishi 1992, 58, 2261–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wiki. Available online: https://En.Wikipedia.Org/Wiki/Marsupenaeus (accessed on 6 June 2022).
  35. Yan, Z.L.; Weng, J.H.; Zhu, Z.W.; Huang, J.F.; Ni, Z.Q. A Study on the Artificial Overwintering Acceleration of Maturity an the Techniques of the Larva Culture of Penaeus japonicus. Trans. Oceanol. Limnol. 1994, 4, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Q.W.; Kong, J.; Luan, S.; Liu, S.T.; Liu, L.C.; Wang, Y.W. The Primary Research on Controlled Breeding of Marsupenaeus japonicus as Broodstock). Mar. Fish. Res. 2005, 26, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, X.J. The Preliminary Research on the Releasing of Penaeus Japonicus in Guzhenkou Bay. Master Thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  38. Fan, Y. The Evalution on the Releasing of Penaeus japonicus in Laoshan Bay and Primary Research on Paralichthys olivaceus in Guzhenkou Bay. Master Thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sun, C.B.; Li, T.; Li, Y.J.; Wang, P.; Xu, A.M.; Sun, C.Z.; Li, Y. Growth Pattern of Kuruma Shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus Cultured in Intensive Ponds above Sea Level. J. Dalian Ocean. Univ. 2012, 26, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, J.C.; Lai, S.H. Effects of Temperature and Salinity on Oxygen Consumption and Ammonia-N Excretion of Juvenile Penaeus japonicus Bate. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 1993, 165, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, X.M.; Wu, L.S.; Ma, Z.Y.; Li, S.J. Primary Studies on Respiration and Excretion of Penaeus japonicus Post-Larvae. J. Oceanogr. Taiwan Strait 2001, 20, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  42. Arnall, S.G.; Mitchell, N.J.; Kuchling, G.; Durell, B.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M.; Kearney, M.R. Life in the Slow Lane? A Dynamic Energy Budget Model for the Western Swamp Turtle, Pseudemydura umbrina. J. Sea Res. 2019, 143, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dong, S.P.; Xu, X.; Lin, F.; Yu, L.Y.; Shan, H.W.; Wang, F. Model of Swimming Crab Portunus trituberculatus and Its Application in the Nutrient Dynamic Simulation in an Intensive Mariculture Pond. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kooijman, S.A.L.M. Dynamic Energy Budget Theory for Metabolic Organisation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  45. Haberle, I.; Marn, N.; Geček, S.; Klanjšček, T. Dynamic Energy Budget of Endemic and Critically Endangered Bivalve Pinna nobilis: A Mechanistic Model for Informed Conservation. Ecol. Modell. 2020, 434, 109207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ren, J.S.; Jin, X.; Yang, T.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M.; Shan, X. A Dynamic Energy Budget Model for Small Yellow Croaker Larimichthys polyactis: Parameterisation and Application in Its Main Geographic Distribution Waters. Ecol. Modell. 2020, 427, 109051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lin, Q.W.; Li, S.J.; Wang, G.Z.; Huang, J.Q.; Ai, C.X.; Chen, X.; Ye, H.H. Study on Reproductive Ecology of Shrimp and Crab Broodstock. J. Xiamen Univ. 2006, 45, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cheng, M.C.F.; Tan, A.L.S.; Rinaldi, A.; Giacoletti, A.; Sarà, G.; Williams, G.A. Predicting Effective Aquaculture in Subtropical Waters: A Dynamic Energy Budget Model for the Green Lipped Mussel, Perna viridis. Aquaculture 2018, 495, 749–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dambrine, C.; Huret, M.; Woillez, M.; Pecquerie, L.; Allal, F.; Servili, A.; de Pontual, H. Contribution of a Bioenergetics Model to Investigate the Growth and Survival of European Seabass in the Bay of Biscay—English Channel Area. Ecol. Modell. 2020, 423, 109007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kooijman, S.A.L.M. Quantitative Aspects of Metabolic Organization: A Discussion of Concepts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 356, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Kooijman, S.A.L.M.; Sousa, T.; Pecquerie, L.; Van Der Meer, J.; Jager, T. From Food-Dependent Statistics to Metabolic Parameters, a Practical Guide to the Use of Dynamic Energy Budget Theory. Biol. Rev. 2008, 83, 533–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ren, J.S.; Ross, A.H. A Dynamic Energy Budget Model of the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas. Ecol. Modell. 2001, 142, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lika, K.; Augustine, S.; Kooijman, S.A.L.M. The Use of Augmented Loss Functions for Estimating Dynamic Energy Budget Parameters. Ecol. Modell. 2020, 428, 109110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Serpa, D.; Pousão-Ferreira, P.; Caetano, M.; Cancela da Fonseca, L.; Dinis, M.T.; Duarte, P. A Coupled Biogeochemical-Dynamic Energy Budget Model as a Tool for Managing Fish Production Ponds. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 463–464, 861–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, Q.Y.; Zhong, S.P.; Wang, J.; Mao, Y. Growth Characteristics of Bred Marsupenaeus japonicus in Polyculture Pond Mixed with Bostrychus Sinensis. J. Xiamen Univ. 2015, 54, 335–339. [Google Scholar]
  56. Moksnes, P.O.; Mirera, D.O.; Björkvik, E.; Hamad, M.I.; Mahudi, H.M.; Nyqvist, D.; Jiddawi, N.; Troell, M. Stepwise Function of Natural Growth for Scylla serrata in East Africa: A Valuable Tool for Assessing Growth of Mud Crabs in Aquaculture. Aquac. Res. 2015, 46, 2938–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, T.W. The Model of Carbon Flux in Intensive Penaeid Shrimp Culture and Ecological Cultivation. Master Thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the parameters used to describe kuruma shrimp in a standard DEB model.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the parameters used to describe kuruma shrimp in a standard DEB model.
Animals 12 01828 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of model predictions and observations of total length and weight in Guzhenkou Bay (A), Laoshan Bay (B) and an intensive aquaculture pond Hainan Province, China (C,D). The lines indicate model predictions of growth. The circles and triangles indicate observations of total length and wet weight growth, respectively. In (A,B), solid lines and symbols are predictions for females, and dashed lines and open symbols are predictions for males. The observations reflect the mean growth of the species in each environment.
Figure 2. Comparison of model predictions and observations of total length and weight in Guzhenkou Bay (A), Laoshan Bay (B) and an intensive aquaculture pond Hainan Province, China (C,D). The lines indicate model predictions of growth. The circles and triangles indicate observations of total length and wet weight growth, respectively. In (A,B), solid lines and symbols are predictions for females, and dashed lines and open symbols are predictions for males. The observations reflect the mean growth of the species in each environment.
Animals 12 01828 g002
Figure 3. Modelled (lines) and observed (circles with bars for standard deviation) growth in terms of total length (A) and wet weight (C) for kuruma shrimp in an integrated marine aquaculture pond, and validation for total length (B) and wet weight (D) growth modeled with several goodness-of-fit indices.
Figure 3. Modelled (lines) and observed (circles with bars for standard deviation) growth in terms of total length (A) and wet weight (C) for kuruma shrimp in an integrated marine aquaculture pond, and validation for total length (B) and wet weight (D) growth modeled with several goodness-of-fit indices.
Animals 12 01828 g003
Table 1. Equations describing the energy fluxes in the standard DEB model for kuruma shrimp.
Table 1. Equations describing the energy fluxes in the standard DEB model for kuruma shrimp.
DefinitionEquation
Temperature dependence k T = k 0 exp T A T 0 T A T 1 + exp T AL T T AL T L + exp T AH T H T AH T 1
Assimilation rate P A =   k T · f · P Am · V 2 / 3
Catabolic rate P C = k T E V E G + κ · E V E G · P Am · V 2 3 E M + P M · V
Maintenance rate P M = k T · P M · V
Maturity maintenance rate P J = k T · min V , V P · P M · 1 κ κ
Reserve dynamics dE dt =   P A P C
Reproductive reserve dynamics dE R dt = 1 κ P c P J
Biovolume growth dV dt = κ   · P C P M E G
Volume V = E V E G
Total length L = V 1 / 3 δ m
Wet weight Ww = E μ E + κ R · E R μ E + V · ρ
Table 2. List of zero-variate data used to estimate parameters of the kuruma shrimp DEB model. References of observed data and relative error (RE) are specified. The average temperature at which parameters were measured is provided.
Table 2. List of zero-variate data used to estimate parameters of the kuruma shrimp DEB model. References of observed data and relative error (RE) are specified. The average temperature at which parameters were measured is provided.
SymbolUnitObservationPredictionParameterREReferences
abd2.002.05age at birth (27 °C)0.0277[32]
amd730728life span (22 °C)0.0018[32]
tpd70.0070.03time since birth at puberty (26 °C)0.0005[32,33]
Licm27.0019.83ultimate abdominal length for female shrimp0.2656[34]
Limcm17.0018.46ultimate length for male shrimp0.0861[34]
Wwig130.0135.9ultimate wet weight0.0457[34]
Ri#d−115071510ultimate reproduction rate (27 °C)0.0023[36,47]
Table 3. Parameter values of the DEB model for kuruma shrimp at a reference temperature of 20 °C.
Table 3. Parameter values of the DEB model for kuruma shrimp at a reference temperature of 20 °C.
SymbolValueUnitParameterSource
z0.76-zoom factor for female shrimpThis study
z m 0.71-zoom factor for male shrimpThis study
{Fm}6.5J·cm−2·d−1maximum specific searching rateThis study
ύ0.0336cm·d−1energy conductanceThis study
[EG]4439J·cm−3volume-specific costs for structureThis study
[EM]13,235J·cm−3maximum storage densityThis study
κ 0.98-fraction of catabolic flux to growth and maintenanceThis study
κ R 0.95-fraction of reproductive reservesThis study
δM0.1585-shape coefficientThis study
{PAm}1823J·cm−2·d−1maximum surface-area-specific assimilation rateThis study
[PM]569J·cm−3·d−1volume-specific maintenance rateThis study
T1293Kreference temperature[32]
TA6200KArrhenius temperature[21,22,23]
TH302Kupper boundary temperature of the tolerance range[32]
TL283Klower boundary temperature of the tolerance range[32]
TAH33,800KArrhenius temperature for the rate of decrease at upper boundary[32,40,41]
TAL13,300KArrhenius temperature for the rate of decrease at lower boundary[32,40,41]
ρ1g·cm−3volume-specific dry flesh weightThis study
E Hb 0.0013Jmaturity at birthThis study
E Hj 0.0966Jmaturity at metamorphosisThis study
E Hp 2349Jmaturity at pubertyThis study
h a 1.8 × 10−7JWeibull aging accelerationThis study
s G 0.0001-Gompertz stress coefficientThis study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, S.; Liu, D.; Zhu, B.; Yu, L.; Shan, H.; Wang, F. A Dynamic Energy Budget Model for Kuruma Shrimp Penaeus japonicus: Parameterization and Application in Integrated Marine Pond Aquaculture. Animals 2022, 12, 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141828

AMA Style

Dong S, Liu D, Zhu B, Yu L, Shan H, Wang F. A Dynamic Energy Budget Model for Kuruma Shrimp Penaeus japonicus: Parameterization and Application in Integrated Marine Pond Aquaculture. Animals. 2022; 12(14):1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141828

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Shipeng, Dapeng Liu, Boshan Zhu, Liye Yu, Hongwei Shan, and Fang Wang. 2022. "A Dynamic Energy Budget Model for Kuruma Shrimp Penaeus japonicus: Parameterization and Application in Integrated Marine Pond Aquaculture" Animals 12, no. 14: 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141828

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop