Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Numerical, Real-Time Ultrasound Imaging Model for the Prediction of Litter Size in Pregnant Sows, with Machine Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Wild Birds from a Wildlife Rescue Centre
Previous Article in Journal
Screening of Microbial Fermentation Products for Anti-M. tuberculosis Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Infection of a Free-Living Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) with a Bacterium from the Mycobacterium kansasii Complex
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 15
10.3390/ani12151949
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Giardia duodenalis Zoonotic Assemblages AI and BIV in Pet Prairie Dogs (Cynomys ludovicanus) in Bangkok, Thailand

by
Ketsarin Kamyingkird
1,†,
Pornkamol Phoosangwalthong
1,†,
Nutsuda Klinkaew
1,
Alisara Leelanupat
1,
Chanya Kengradomkij
1,
Wissanuwat Chimnoi
1,
Teerapat Rungnirundorn
2,
Burin Nimsuphan
1,* and
Tawin Inpankaew
1,*
1
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Lad Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
2
Exotic Clinic, Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(15), 1949; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151949
Submission received: 1 July 2022 / Revised: 26 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 31 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zoonoses and Wildlife - One Health Approach)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Prairie dogs are native to the United States, Canada, and Mexico. They have been brought to Thailand and become popular as exotic pets and providing humans with exotic pets in close-contact environments. Prairie dogs have been known to carry several waterborne protozoan pathogens. One of those pathogens is known as Giardia, a flagellate protozoan parasite which can cause gastrointestinal illness in humans and other animals. This study has identified the Giardia parasite in the feces of prairie dogs. There were 13% of prairie dogs pets in Bangkok, Thailand that carried the Giardia parasite. We also found that the parasite was categorized as a human parasite. Therefore, there was potential risk that prairie dogs could contract a Giardia infection from humans as a source, and that humans could receive the parasite from their exotic pets via the fecal-oral route in shared environments. We suggest that exotic pet owners should pay more attention to effective sanitation and provide clean food and water for their exotic pets. Owners should bring their exotic pets for veterinary services and screening of zoonotic pathogens using fecal examination regularly. Treatment can successfully cure the infected pets as well as prevent the spreading of pathogen to the environment.

Abstract

Giardia is a flagellate protozoa that can be transmitted via direct contact and by consuming contaminated water. It is pathogenic in humans and various other animals, including exotic pets. Pet prairie dogs are popular in Thailand, but they have not been investigated regarding giardiasis. Giardia infection was measured, and genetic characterization was performed to investigate the zoonotic potential of Giardia carried by pet prairie dogs. In total, 79 fecal samples were examined from prairie dogs visiting the Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital during 2017–2021. Simple floatation was conducted. Two Giardia-positive samples were submitted for DNA extraction, PCR targeting the Giardia ssu rRNA, tpi and gdh genes was performed, and genetic characterization using sequencing analysis was conducted. Risk factors associated with Giardia infection were analyzed. Giardia infection was found in 11 out of the 79 pet prairie dogs (13.9%). Giardia infection was significantly higher in male prairie dogs (p = 0.0345). Coccidia cysts (12.7%), the eggs of nematodes (6.3%), and amoeba cysts (2.5%) were also detected. Genetic characterization of the two Giardia-positive samples revealed that they were G. duodenalis assemblage A, sub-genotypes AI and assemblage B, and sub-genotype BIV, the zoonotic assemblages. This was the first report of Giardia infection in pet prairie dogs in Bangkok, Thailand. The results revealed that these pet prairie dogs in Thailand were infected with zoonotic assemblages of G. duodenalis sub-genotype AI, which might have been derived from animal contaminants, whereas sub-genotype BIV might have been derived from human contaminants. Owners of prairie dogs might be at risk of giardiasis or be the source of infection to their exotic pets.

1. Introduction

Herbivorous-burrowing rodents in the genus Cynomys, known as prairie dogs, are native to the United States, Canada, and Mexico [1]. Five species of prairie dogs have been documented: Cynomys ludovicanus, the black-tailed prairie dog; C. pardivens, the Utah prairies dog; C. mexicanus, the Mexican prairie dog; C. leucurus, the white-tailed prairie dog; and C. gunnisoni, Gunnison’s prairie dog [2]. In nature, intestinal parasitic diseases in prairie dogs are common [3]. The black-tailed prairie dog is the most common species kept in captivity in zoos as well as in private homes as an exotic pet [1]. In the current decade, prairie dogs have become popular as exotic pets in Thailand. Prairie dogs eat plants and insects and belong to the squirrel family (Sciuridae) of rodents (order Rodentia); they are at risk of contracting protozoan pathogens via the consumption of contaminated food and water. This may lead to gastrointestinal parasites and protozoan infection in prairie dogs.
Giardiasis is caused by an intestinal flagellate enteric protozoan parasite in the genus Giardia that infects humans and animals. The Giardia life cycle involves two stages, the first as a trophozoite and then as a cyst [4]. The Giardia cyst is responsible for disease transmission through the ingestion of contaminated water and food [5,6]. Giardia caused weight loss, loose stools, and diarrhea in a laboratory colony of prairie dogs [7]. Giardia duodenalis (synonym G. intestinalis and G. lamblia) [8], G. muris, and G. microti have been reported in animals related to prairie dogs, such as rodents [9]. Giardia duodenalis is a broad host-range parasite that can infect domestic and wild mammals, including humans [10,11,12,13]. Therefore, the infection of G. duodenalis in prairie dogs may indicate that they are a possible wildlife reservoir or the victims of pathogen spill-over [7]. Giardia parasites can be identified by their trophozoites and/or cysts via microscopic examination from fecal or intestinal contents. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were also developed for more sensitive and specific identification of Giardia species. Genetical differentiation using several genetic markers, including β-giardin (bg), triose phosphate isomerase (tpi), the small subunit ribosomal RNA (ssu rRNA), and glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh), has helped to identify at least eight assemblages (A–H) of G. duodenalis, with G. duodenalis assemblage G identified from rodents [9,14].
In Thailand, giardiasis has been reported in humans [15,16,17,18] and in many animals, including dogs [19,20], cats [21] and long-tailed macaques [22]. However, information on the prevalence of Giardia infection in captive prairie dogs in Thailand is still limited. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to determine Giardia infection in prairie dogs in Thailand and to genetically characterize pet prairie dogs infected with Giardia to reveal the risk of zoonotic parasites among exotic pets and their owners.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Origin of Samples and Screening of Giardia

This study was conducted based on 79 fecal samples collected from pet prairie dogs visiting the Exotic Clinic, Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital during 2017–2021. Fecal samples were collected during the clinical examination then submitted to the Department of Parasitology for screening of Giardia and other intestinal parasites using simple floatation. Giardia-positive samples were selected for molecular diagnosis.

2.2. Identification of Giardia Using Molecular Diagnosis

2.2.1. Genetic Characterization of Giardia

Giardia-positive fecal samples were tested for DNA extraction using a stool DNA extraction kit (Flavorgen, Pingtung, Taiwan), then stored at −20 °C until use. Identification of Giardia was conducted using nested PCR methods. Three sets of primers were used—the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (ssu rRNA), the triose phosphate isomerase gene (tpi), and the glutamate dehydrogenase gene (gdh), as shown in Table 1.

2.2.2. Detection of Giardia ssu rRNA Gene

The amplification of the ssu rRNA gene was performed using a nested PCR as previously described [23,24]. Briefly, PCR reactions were prepared in total volumes of 25 µL, consisting of 10× PCR buffer 2.5 µL, 25 mM MgSO4 1.5 µL, 10 mM dNTPs 0.5 µL, 10 pmol of primers 1 µL, 0.5 unit of Taq DNA polymerase 0.5 µL (ABM Good, Richmond, Canada), 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) 1 µL (DMSO, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), and 2 µL of template genomic DNA. Sterile distilled water was used as a negative control and a positive control was extracted from a G. duodenalis trophozoite-positive fecal sample. A Mastercycler nexus PCR thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) was used for PCR amplification. The first PCR amplification consisted of initial degeneration at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of degeneration at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 58 °C for 45 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension for 1 cycle at 72 °C for 3 min. The nested PCR conditions were same as the first conditions.

2.2.3. Detection of G. duodenalis tpi Gene

The amplification of the tpi gene (530 bp) was conducted using a nested PCR as previously described [25]. The nested PCR was prepared in a total volume of 25 µL as mentioned above. The first PCR amplification consisted of initial degeneration at 96 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of degeneration at 96 °C for 45 s, annealing at 50 for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 45 s, with a final extension for 1 cycle at 72 °C for 7 min. The nested PCR conditions were as mentioned above except that the annealing temperature was 55 °C.

2.2.4. Detection of G. duodenalis gdh Gene

The amplification of the gdh gene (530 bp) was performed using a nested PCR as previously described [26] in a total volume of 25 µL PCR reaction, as mentioned earlier. The primary and secondary amplification consisted of initial degeneration at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of degeneration at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension for 1 cycle at 72 °C for 7 min [26]. Gel electrophoresis was performed to visualize the PCR product size from each PCR product, using 1.5% agarose gel and 100 V for 40 min and UV transluminescence.
Table
Table 1. List of primers used for genetic characterization of Giardia in prairie dog fecal samples.
Table 1. List of primers used for genetic characterization of Giardia in prairie dog fecal samples.
Primer Name (Sequences)Target GeneProduct SizeReference
TPI-F3: 5′-AAATIATGCCTGCTCGTCG-3′tpi835 bp[25]
TPI-R3: 5′-CAAACCTTITCCGCAAACC-3
TPI-F4: 5′-CCCTTCATCGGIGGTAACTT-3′530 bp
TPI-R2: 5′-GTGGCCACCACICCCGTGCC-3′
RH1 1 5′-CATCCGGTCGATCCTGCC-3′ssu rRNA140 bp[23]
RH4 5′-AGTCGAACCCTGATTCTCCGCCAGG-3′
Giar-F 5′-GACGCTCTCCCCAAGGAC-3′292 bp[24]
Giar-R 5′-CTGCGTCACGCTGCTCG-3′
Gdh1 5′-TTCCGTRTYCAGTACAACTC-3′gdh754 bp
530 bp		[26]
Gdh2 5′-ACCTCGTTCTGRGTGGCGCA-3′
Gdh3 5′-ATGACYGAGCTYCAGAGGCACGT-3′
Gdh4 5′-GTGGCGCARGGCATGATGCA-3′

2.3. DNA Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis

The PCR products of the ssu rRNA, tpi, and gdh genes were purified using a gel extraction kit (Flavorgen, Pingtung, Taiwan). The purified PCR products were submitted to MACROGEN, South Korea for DNA sequencing. The purity of the DNA sequences was qualified by visualization using Unipro UGENE software (V.41.0.), as previously documented [27], and compared with the GenBank database in the National Center for Biotechnology Institute (NCBI) using Basic Local Alignment Search Tools (BLAST).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Sex and age from clinical record were evaluated in terms of its association with Giardia positivity in pet prairie dogs using Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was tested at p > 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Occurrence of Giardia and Other Intestinal Parasites in Pet Prairie Dogs

Giardia infection in pet prairie dogs was 13.9% (11/79) based on simple floatation. Giardia infection was significantly dominant (p = 0.0345) in males (22.9%, 8/35) compared to females (6.8%, 3/44) (Table 2). Among the positive samples of Giardia spp., only the cyst stage was found with an average size of approximately 8.7 × 12 µm, with an oval shape and a smooth, thin wall. Cysts filled with a larva of protozoa that consisted of an axostyle and four nuclei were visualized and indicated as immature Giardia cysts based on microscopic examination (Figure 1). The number of immature Giardia cysts varied among the positive samples (from low to adequate cyst numbers). Two positive fecal samples based on microscopic examination with adequate numbers of Giardia cysts (approximately 3–5 cysts/viewed at 10× magnification) were selected for molecular diagnosis and genetic characterization.
In addition, the eggs of nematodes and cysts of amoeba were detected in the fecal samples of the pet prairie dogs (Table 2). The intestinal parasites infection was 31.6% (25/79). Intestinal parasites were found in male and female prairie dogs (31.4% (11/35) and 31.8% (14/44), respectively). The intestinal parasite infections were 35.9% (14/39) in young and 20.0% (8/40) in adult prairie dogs. There were 12.7% (10/79) coccidia, 6.3% (4/79) nematodes, and 6.3% (4/79) amoeba infections (Table 2). Two prairie dogs had mixed infections of Giardia with nematodes and coccidia with nematodes. Interestingly, coccidia infection in the pet prairie dogs was dominant among young prairie dogs (23.1%, 9/39) compared to adults (2.5%, 1/40).

3.2. Molecular and Genetic Characterization of Giardia in Pet Prairie Dogs

The nested PCR and sequencing analysis of the ssu rRNA gene confirmed that the Giardia found in two pet prairie dogs were G. duodenalis with 99.21–100% identity. Amplification of the tpi gene using a nested PCR confirmed that one prairie dog was infected with G. duodenalis assemblage A, sub-genotype AI (100% similarity) and another prairie dog was infected with G. duodenalis assemblage B, sub-genotype BIV (98.77% similarity). Sequencing of the gdh gene in each sample also confirmed the same assemblages with 99.20–100% similarity. All the ssu rRNA, tpi and gdh partial sequences derived from the two samples in this study were submitted to GenBank with accession numbers ON025978, ON025979, ON037509, ON037510, ON037511, and ON037512, respectively (Table 3). The bioinformatic analysis results indicated that G. duodenalis sub-genotype AI might have derived from animal contaminants, whereas sub-genotype BIV might have derived from human contaminants.

4. Discussion

Giardiasis is distributed worldwide. The surveillance of giardiasis in the USA between 2009 and 2010 revealed almost 20,000 cases annually, especially in children aged 1–9 years [28]. Laboratory identification of Giardia can be primarily detected using microscopic examination, rapid diagnostic assays, fluorescent microscopy, and molecular-based assays, with high sensitivity and specificity [5]. In addition, giardiasis in humans has been associated with major outbreaks in domestic animals, household pets, and farm animals [5]. Wild prairie dogs are common in urban landscapes of the USA and Canada; however, they have been introduced by humans into tropical countries, contributing to increasing concern of the potential dispersal of pathogens from exotic pets to humans and other livestock animals [29]. Prairie dogs have been known to carry several water-borne protozoan pathogens [30], including Giardia. In recent times, prairie dogs have been brought to Thailand as exotic pets.
The prevalence of Giardia in humans was reported to vary in the range 0–73.4% in the Southeast Asia, and the Far East [16]. In Thailand, the prevalence levels of G. duodenalis infection in humans varies in different provinces: 1.25% in Ayudthaya and Suphanburi [31], 2.21% in Chiang Mai [32], 2.2% in Surin, 6.5% in Samut Sakhon [33], 13.6–23.3% in Kanchanaburi [34], 17.6% in Bangkok [35], and 37.7% in Pathum Thani [15]. Similarly, the prevalence levels of G. duodenalis in animals in Thailand varies: 3.0–25.2% in dogs [20,36], 27.3% in cats [36], 1.6% in water buffaloes [37], and 7.0% in long-tailed macaques [22]. However, epidemiological study of Giardia infection in captive prairie dogs is very rare. The current results revealed that Giardia infection was predominant in pet prairie dogs followed by coccidia, nematode parasites, and amoeba, respectively. Giardia infection in pet prairie dogs in the current study was similar to the studies of [34,35] in humans and in dogs [36]. However, to compare the prevalence of Giardia in pet prairie dogs with such other studies is difficult due to the limited research conducted.
Pet prairie dogs have adapted from the wild, where they live in colonies under sociable conditions. Being kept as a solitary house-pets may lead to high stress and increased susceptibility to diseases, especially in young animals that have been separated from their mother, or in male prairie dogs that normally need to be surrounded by several females in the colony [38]. In the current study, the prevalence of Giardia was significantly higher in young, male pet prairie dogs, which might relate to the reasons described above. The rate was also similar to those in other reports that indicated significantly higher levels of Giardia infection in young, poor, and immunodeficient humans, especially in urban areas [16].
The current study used microscopic examination, which is the gold standard technique, in combination with molecular assays to achieve high sensitivity and specificity, as recommended [6]. A nested PCR targeting the tpi and gdh gene targets was useful and helped to confirm issues in the the pet prairie dogs in the current study, such as infection with zoonotic species of G. duodenalis, assemblage A and B. G. duodenalis assemblages A and B have been most frequently reported in humans as well as in cattle, dogs, and cats from different parts of the world [5]. In addition, G. duodenalis assemblages A and B have been found in prairie dogs captured from field sites [7,38]. Giardia duodenalis assemblage A consists of two distinct clusters, AI and AII, whereas assemblage B consists of sub-genotypes BIII and BIV [39]. In Thailand, G. duodenalis sub-genotypes AI, AII, BIII, and BIV have been reported [35]. However, AII was the most dominant sub-genotype in Thailand, [35]. The current study identified the sub-genotypes AI and BIV in pet prairie dogs, similar to other reports. In addition, G. duodenalis infection in humans causes gastrointestinal clinical manifestations, including diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and general malaise [5]. Clinical symptoms of diarrhea were recorded in some prairie dogs with Giardia infection [7]; however, most of the prairie dogs in our study had no specific clinical signs.
Giardia duodenalis assemblage A and B have been identified in non-human primates [22,40], which are closely related to humans. This is possibly the source of Giardia infection for other animals that share the same habitat and environment. Prairie dogs could be potential wildlife reservoirs, or the victims of pathogen spill-over as has been reported [7]. However, G. muris and G. microti seem to be the predominant species of Giardia in wild rodents, not G. duodenalis [9]. Some studies in China and Russia identified intestinal parasites in house-kept pets, and house-kept and zoo animals, based on genotyping analysis that indicated there was the possibility of pets, and house-kept and zoo animals receiving human-derived G. duodenalis isolates [30,41]. Thus, it might be that prairie dogs might contract G. duodenalis infection through the consumption of contaminated water and food supplied by humans. Therefore, food and water sanitization must be practiced by the pet owners to prevent giardiasis. A limitation of the current study was the small prairie dog population sample used to perform molecular identification. This was due to the low number of fecal samples received from the Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. To better understand the diversity of Giardia species infection in prairie dogs, a larger prairie dog population should be examined based on the surveillance of food and water-borne zoonotic protozoa in pet prairie dogs or from exotic animal farms. The origin of G. duodenalis infection in prairie dogs in Thailand is still not clear regarding whether the pathogen is transmitted from human sources or comes from animal sources. More Giardia isolates from prairie dogs should be used for further studies of genetic characterization. In addition, future study should involve the evaluation of food and water management and the detection of Giardia in both human owners and their exotic pets, which would help to identify the source of G. duodenalis transmission between humans and exotic pets.

5. Conclusions

This study was the first retrospective study on Giardia infections in prairie dog pets in Bangkok, Thailand. Genetic characterization of two Giardia-positive samples revealed that they were G. duodenalis assemblage A, sub-genotypes AI and assemblage B and sub-genotype BIV, the zoonotic assemblages. Prairie dogs might have become infected with G. duodenalis through the consumption of contaminated water and food supplied via human resources. Therefore, improved food and water sanitization must be a priority for the owners of pet prairie dogs to prevent giardiasis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.K. and B.N.; methodology, P.P., W.C., N.K., C.K. and A.L.; validation, K.K., B.N. and T.I.; formal analysis, K.K. and P.P.; investigation, P.P.; resources, T.R. and T.I.; data curation, P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, K.K. and P.P.; writing—review and editing, K.K.; visualization, K.K., B.N. and T.I.; supervision, B.N. and T.I.; project administration, K.K.; funding acquisition, K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University Start Up Funding, grant number 60/SRF04. The APC was funded by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the study being performed using data and records provided under veterinary services. The use of the leftover fecal specimens was approved through ethical committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The Exotic Clinic, Kasetsart University Teaching Animal Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand collected the fecal samples and information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hoogland, J.L.; James, D.A.; Watson, L. Nutrition, care, and behavior of captive prairie dogs. Vet. Clin. Exot. Anim. 2009, 12, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mulhern, D.W.; Knowles, C.J. Black-Tailed Prairie Dog Status and Future Conservation Planning; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; pp. 19–29.
  3. Leticia, M. Prairie Dogs as Pets. 2010. Available online: https://be.chewy.com/prairie-dogs-as-pets/ (accessed on 17 March 2022).
  4. Huang, D.B.; White, C. An updated review on Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2006, 35, 291–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cama, V.A.; Mathison, B. Infections by intestinal Coccidia and Giardia duodenalis. Clin. Lab. Med. 2015, 35, 423–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Soares, R.; Tasca, T. Giardiasis: An update review on sensitivity and specificity of methods for laboratorial diagnosis. J. Microbiol. Methods 2016, 129, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Roelling, D.M.; Salzer, J.S.; Carroll, D.S.; Ritter, J.M.; Drew, C.; Gallardo-Romero, N.; Keckler, M.S.; Langham, G.; Hutson, C.L.; Karem, K.L.; et al. Identification of Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bienusi in an epizoological investigation of a laboratory colony of prairie dogs, Cynomys ludovicianus. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 210, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Thompson, R.C.A.; Monis, P.T. Variation in Giardia: Implication for taxonomy and epidemiology. Adv. Parasitol. 2004, 58, 69–137. [Google Scholar]
  9. Helmy, Y.A.; Spiering, N.G.; Schmid, S.; Rosenfeld, U.M.; Reil, D.; Imholt, C.; Jacob, J.; Ulrich, R.G.; Aebischer, T.; Klotz, C. Occurence and distribution of Giardia species in wild rodents in Germany. Parasit. Vec. 2018, 11, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Monis, P.T.; Cacciò, S.M.; Thompson, R.C. Variation in Giardia. towards a taxonomic revision of the genus. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sprong, H.; Cacciò, S.M.; van der Giessen, J.W.B. Identification of zoonotic genotypes of Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009, 3, e558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Thompson, R.C.A.; Monis, P.T. Giardia—From genome to proteome. Adv. Parasitol. 2012, 78, 57–95. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Horton, B.; Bridle, H.; Alexander, C.L.; Katzer, F. Giardia duodenalis in the UK: Current knowledge of risk factors and public health implications. Parasitology 2018, 146, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Heyworth, M.F. Giardia duodenalis genetic assemblages and hosts. Parasite 2016, 23, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Saksirisampant, W.; Nuchprayoon, S.; Wiwanitkit, V.; Yenthakam, S.; Ampavasiri, A. Intestinal parasitic infestations among children in an orphanage in Pathum Thani province. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2003, 86, 263–270. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dib, H.H.; Lu, S.Q.; Wen, S.F. Prevalence of Giardia lamblia with or without diarrhea in South East, South East Asia and the Far East. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tungtrongchitr, A.; Sookrung, N.; Indrawattana, N.; Kwangsi, S.; Ongrotchanakun, J.; Chaicumpa, W. Giardia intestinalis in Thailand: Identification of genotypes. J. Health Pop. Nutr. 2010, 28, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kitvatanachai, S.; Jantrapanukorn, B.; Supcharoengoon, U.; Atasilp, C. Enteropathogenic bacterial and intestinal parasitic infections among asymptomatic food handlers in Rangsit University canteens, Central Thailand. J. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 10, 5565014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tangtrongsup, S.; Scorza, A.V.; Reif, J.S.; Ballweber, L.R.; Lappin, M.R.; Salman, M.D. Prevalence and multilocus genotyping analysis of Cryptosporidium and Giardia isolates from dogs in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Vet. Sci. 2017, 4, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khine, N.O.; Chimnoi, W.; Kamyingkird, K.; Kengradomkij, C.; Saetiew, N.; Simking, P.; Saengow, S.; Jittapalapong, S.; Inpankaew, T. Molecular detection of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. from stray dogs residing in monasteries in Bangkok, Thailand. Parasitol. Int. 2021, 8, 102337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jitsamai, W.; Khrutkham, N.; Hunprasit, V.; Chandrashekar, R.; Bowman, D.; Sukhumavasi, W. Prevalence of endoparasitic and viral infections in client-owned cats in metropolitan Bangkok, Thailand, and the risk factors associated with feline hookworm infections. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2021, 25, 100584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sricharern, W.; Inpankaew, T.; Keawmongkol, S.; Supanam, J.; Stich, R.W.; Jittapalapong, S. Molecular detection and prevalence of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. among long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in Thailand. Infect. Gen. Evol. 2016, 40, 310–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hopkins, R.M.; Meloni, B.P.; Groth, D.M.; Wetherall, J.D.; Reynoldson, J.A.; Thompson, R.C.A. Ribosomal RNA sequencing reveals differences between the genotypes of Giardia isolates recovered from humans and dogs living in the same locality. J. Parasitol. 1997, 83, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Read, C.; Walters, J.; Robertson, I.D.; Thompson, R.C. Correlation between genotype of Giardia duodenalis and diarrhoea. Int. J. Parasitol. 2002, 32, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sulaiman, I.M.; Fayer, R.; Bern, C.; Gilman, R.H.; Trout, J.M.; Schantz, P.M.; Das, P.; Lal, A.A.; Xiao, L. Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 1444–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cacciò, S.M.; Ryan, U. Molecular epidemiology of giardiasis. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2008, 160, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Okonechnikov, K.; Golosova, O.; Fursov, M. Unipro UGENE: A unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1166–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Yoder, J.S.; Gargano, J.W.; Wallace, R.M.; Beach, M.J. Giardiasis surveillance-United States, 2009–2010. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 2012, 61, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  29. Guo, Y.; Li, N.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Zoonotic parasites in farmed exotic animals in China: Implication to public health. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasit. Wild. 2021, 14, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, H.; Shen, Y.; Liu, A.; Yin, J.; Yuan, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Cao, J. Occurence and multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in pets and zoo animals in Shanghai, China. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2017, 11, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saksirisampant, W.; Prownebon, J.; Kulkumthorn, M.; Yenthakam, S.; Janpla, S.; Nuchprayoon, S. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among school children in the central region of Thailand. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2006, 89, 1928–1933. [Google Scholar]
  32. Saksirisampant, W.; Prownebon, J.; Kanmarnee, P.; Thaisom, S.; Yenthakam, S.; Nuchprayoon, S. Prevalence of parasitism among students of the Karen hill-tribe in Mae Chame district, Chiang Mai province, Thailand. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2004, 87, 278–283. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wongjindanon, N.; Suksrichavalit, T.; Subsutti, W.; Sarachart, T.; Worapisuttiwong, U.; Norramatha, P. Current infection rate of Giardia lamblia in two provinces of Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2005, 36, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Wongsatitwilairoong, B.; Srijan, A.; Serichantalergs, O.; Fukuda, C.D.; McDaniel, P.; Bodhidatta, L.; Mason, C.J. Intestinal parasitic infections among pre-school children in Sangkhlaburi, Thailand. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2007, 76, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Pipatsatitpong, D.; Aunpad, R. Prevalence and genotype of Giardia duodenalis of asymptomatic individual in a child care center, Bangkok, Thailand. Sci. Tech. Asia 2018, 23, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tangtrongsub, S.; Valeria Scorza, A.; Reif, J.S.; Ballweber, L.R.; Lappin, M.R.; Salman, M.D. Seasonal distributions and other risk factors for Giardia duodenalis and Crypotosporidium spp., infections in dogs and cats in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 174, 104820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Khurajog, B.; Masakul, A.; Inpankaew, T.; Kamyingkird, K.; Wongpanit, K.; Jittapalapong, S. Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis and factors associated with its infection in water buffaloes in Northeast Thailand. J. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2014, 37, 35–41. [Google Scholar]
  38. Appellbee, A.J.; Andrew Thompson, R.C.; Olson, M.E. Giardia and Cryptosporidium in mammalian wildlife—current status and future needs. Trend Parasitol. 2005, 21, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Monis, P.T.; Andrews, R.H.; Mayrhofer, G.; Ey, P.L. Genetic diversity within the morphological species Giardia intestinalis and its relationship to host origin. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2003, 3, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shu, F.; Song, S.; Wei, Y.; Guo, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L.; Li, N. High zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in wild nonhuman primates from Yunnan province, China. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kurnosova, O.P.; Arisov, M.V.; Odoyevskaya, I.M. Intestinal parasites of pets and other house-kept animals in Moscow. Helminthologia 2019, 56, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Animals 12 01949 g001 550
Figure 1. Cyst of Giardia duodenalis in prairie dog fecal sample.
Figure 1. Cyst of Giardia duodenalis in prairie dog fecal sample.
Animals 12 01949 g001
Table
Table 2. Giardia and other intestinal parasites infections in pet prairie dogs based on microscopic examination.
Table 2. Giardia and other intestinal parasites infections in pet prairie dogs based on microscopic examination.
FactorTotal NumberPositive Number
Total Intestinal Parasites (%)Giardia spp. (%)Coccidia (%)Nematodes (%)Amoeba
(%)
GenderFemale4414 (31.8%)3 (6.8%)5 (11.4%)1 (2.3%)1 (2.3%)
Male3511 (31.4%)8 (22.9%) *5 (14.3%)3 (8.6%)1 (2.9%)
Age<6 months3914 (35.9%)5 (12.8%)9 (23.1%)4 (10.3%)1 (2.6%)
>6 months408 (20.0%)6 (20.0%)1 (2.5%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.6%)
Total7925 (31.6%)11 (13.9%)10 (12.7%)4 (5.1%)2 (2.5%)
* p-value < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Genetic characterization of G. duodenalis in pet prairie dogs.
Table 3. Genetic characterization of G. duodenalis in pet prairie dogs.
Gene TargetsPrairie Dog 1 (Isolate: PS61-623)
Identified Species
(Assemblage, Sub-Genotype)		Similarity (%)Submitted to GenBank with Accession No.
ssu rRNAG. duodenalis (NA)100%ON025978
tpiG. duodenalis (assemblage B, BIV)98.77%ON037509
gdhG. duodenalis (assemblage B, BIV)99.20%ON037511
Gene TargetsPrairie Dog 2 (Isolate: PS61-629)
ssu rRNAG. duodenalis (NA)99.21%ON025979
tpiG. duodenalis (assemblage A, AI) 100%ON037510
gdhG. duodenalis (assemblage A, AI) 100%ON037512
NA = Not Available.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamyingkird, K.; Phoosangwalthong, P.; Klinkaew, N.; Leelanupat, A.; Kengradomkij, C.; Chimnoi, W.; Rungnirundorn, T.; Nimsuphan, B.; Inpankaew, T. Detection of Giardia duodenalis Zoonotic Assemblages AI and BIV in Pet Prairie Dogs (Cynomys ludovicanus) in Bangkok, Thailand. Animals 2022, 12, 1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151949

AMA Style

Kamyingkird K, Phoosangwalthong P, Klinkaew N, Leelanupat A, Kengradomkij C, Chimnoi W, Rungnirundorn T, Nimsuphan B, Inpankaew T. Detection of Giardia duodenalis Zoonotic Assemblages AI and BIV in Pet Prairie Dogs (Cynomys ludovicanus) in Bangkok, Thailand. Animals. 2022; 12(15):1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151949

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamyingkird, Ketsarin, Pornkamol Phoosangwalthong, Nutsuda Klinkaew, Alisara Leelanupat, Chanya Kengradomkij, Wissanuwat Chimnoi, Teerapat Rungnirundorn, Burin Nimsuphan, and Tawin Inpankaew. 2022. "Detection of Giardia duodenalis Zoonotic Assemblages AI and BIV in Pet Prairie Dogs (Cynomys ludovicanus) in Bangkok, Thailand" Animals 12, no. 15: 1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151949

APA Style

Kamyingkird, K., Phoosangwalthong, P., Klinkaew, N., Leelanupat, A., Kengradomkij, C., Chimnoi, W., Rungnirundorn, T., Nimsuphan, B., & Inpankaew, T. (2022). Detection of Giardia duodenalis Zoonotic Assemblages AI and BIV in Pet Prairie Dogs (Cynomys ludovicanus) in Bangkok, Thailand. Animals, 12(15), 1949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151949

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop