The Effect of Phytonutrients in Terminalia chebula Retz. on Rumen Fermentation Efficiency, Nitrogen Utilization, and Protozoal Population in Goats
by
, , , ,
Pongsatorn Gunun
1
,
Anusorn Cherdthong
2
,
Pichad Khejornsart
3,
Metha Wanapat
2,
Sineenart Polyorach
4,
Sungchhang Kang
5,
Walailuck Kaewwongsa
6 and
Nirawan Gunun
6,* 1
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Sakon Nakhon Campus, Phangkhon, Sakon Nakhon 47160, Thailand
2
Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
3
Agro-Bioresources, Faculty of Natural Resources and Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Chalermphakiat Sakon Nakhon Campus, Sakon Nakhon 47000, Thailand
4
Department of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand
5
National Institute of Education, Phnom Penh 268, Cambodia
6
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Technology, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Udon Thani 41000, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(16), 2022; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162022
Submission received: 14 July 2022
/
Revised: 3 August 2022
/
Accepted: 5 August 2022
/
Published: 10 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alternative Feeds and Feed Additives in Ruminants-Increasing Productivity and Reducing Environmental Pollution)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
The manipulation of ruminal ecology and fermentation to improve feed efficiency and reduce nitrogen excretion in ruminants is a pertinent goal for animal nutritionists. The fruits of Terminalia chebula Retz. are a rich source of phytonutrient compounds, which are attractive as rumen modifiers since these compounds are natural substances. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) supplementation on digestibility, rumen fermentation, nitrogen utilization, and protozoal population in goats. The findings indicated that the inclusion of TCM could improve rumen fermentation efficiency and N balance while reducing the protozoal population. As a result, TCM could be used as a plant source for the rumen enhancement of small ruminants.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) supplementation on digestibility, rumen fermentation, nitrogen utilization, and protozoal population in goats. Eight goats with an initial body weight (BW) of 13 ± 3.0 kg were randomly assigned according to a double 4 × 4 Latin square design to receive different levels of TCM supplementation at 0, 8, 16, and 24 g/kg of total dry matter (DM) intake, respectively. The goats were fed with concentrate diets at 13 g/kg BW, while rice straw was used as a roughage source, fed ad libitum. The results revealed that the feed intake and the apparent digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were similar among the treatments (p > 0.05). However, crude protein (CP) digestibility decreased significantly (p < 0.05) when supplemented with TCM at 24 g/kg of total DM intake (p < 0.05). The addition of TCM did not change the ruminal pH and blood urea nitrogen concentrations (p > 0.05), whereas the concentration of NH3-N at 4 h post feeding was reduced with the inclusion of TCM at 16 and 24 g/kg of total DM intake. The total numbers of bacteria were enhanced by the addition of TCM, while the protozoal population, in both entodiniomorph and holotrich, was reduced (p < 0.05). The supplementation of TCM did not change the concentration of total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), acetic acid, or butyric acid, while the propionic acid concentration at 4-h post feeding increased significantly, especially when supplemented at 16 g/kg of total DM intake (p < 0.05. In addition, urinary nitrogen (N) excretion decreased, while fecal N excretion, N absorption, N retention, and the proportion of N retention to N intake increased with the inclusion of TCM at all levels. In summary, the inclusion of TCM could improve rumen fermentation efficiency and N balance without having an adverse effect on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and rumen ecology; however, the protozoal population decreased. Therefore, this study suggests that TCM (16 g/kg of total DM intake) could be used as a plant source for rumen enhancement in goats fed a diet based on rice straw without having an adverse effect on feed intake or nutrient digestion. However, further studies on the production of types of meat and milk that have a long-term feeding trial should be carried out.
1. Introduction
Animal nutritionists have a direct interest in modifying ruminal ecology and fermentation to enhance feed efficiency and reduce nitrogen excretion in ruminants. Feed additives that alter rumen fermentation promote feed utilization efficiency while lowering nitrogen excretion and protozoal population [1,2]. These effects were shown with the addition of antibiotics and ionophores, the majority of which are currently out of favor due to global concerns about food safety [2]. Plant phytonutrients are particularly appealing as rumen modifiers since they are natural substances [3]. Tannins and saponins are a group of phytonutrient compounds that have been demonstrated to alter rumen ecology, enhance rumen fermentation, increase dietary N utilization efficiency, and reduce N losses in ruminant animals [4].
Terminalia chebula Retz. (Combretaceae family) is a plant native to India and Southeast Asia whose fruits are a rich source of secondary compounds such as condensed tannins (CT) and saponins (SP) [5,6,7]. Our earlier studies showed that adding Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) at 24 mg/g DM was shown to increase rumen fermentation and decrease protozoal population in vitro [6]. According to Patra et al. [8], supplementing 0.50 mL/g DM of TCM extract showed a reduction in the total protozoal population. In addition, Patra et al. [9] indicated that the addition of TCM at 10 g/kg of DM intake could increase fiber digestibility without adversely affecting DM intake and N utilization in sheep. Patra and Saxena [10], tannins, and saponins reduce the protozoa associated with fibrolytic bacteria [11]. Plant secondary metabolites have been shown to enhance ruminant feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation characteristics [12]. This outcome may be due to protozoa, which are able to digest bacterial and fungal cells; as a result, reducing these protozoa is anticipated to increase the density of the rumen microbial population [11], which can improve digestibility and rumen fermentation in ruminants. However, the utilization of CT and SP in TCM for goats has not yet been studied. Based on the research on TCM as a feed additive in ruminants, we hypothesized that TCM could enhance rumen fermentation and nitrogen utilization, while resulting in a reduction in protozoal numbers in goats.
Therefore, the aim of the current experiment was to investigate the effects of TCM supplementation on the digestibility of nutrients and on rumen fermentation, N utilization, and protozoal population in goats fed a rice straw–based diet.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals, Diets, and Experimental Design
Fresh Terminalia chebula fruits were taken in the provinces of Sakon Nakhon and Udon Thani, Thailand. The fruits were dried at 60 °C for approximately 2 days and ground to create TCM. Eight male crossbred (Anglo-Nubian x Thai native) goats with live weights of 13 ± 3 kg of BW were arranged in a four-by-four replicated Latin square design. The TCM was supplemented at 0, 8, 16, and 24 g/kg of total DM intake. The goats were fed the concentrate diets (Table 1) at 13 g/kg BW and free-choice feedings of rice straw at 07:00 and 16:00. Each goat was kept separately in ventilated pens with access to clean, fresh water and mineral blocks at all times. The research was conducted over four periods of 21 days each. The first 14 days were used to measure feed intake, and the final 7 days were used to collect urine and feces. The BW of each goat was measured at the first and last day of each period.
2.2. Data Collection and Chemical Analysis
During the last week of the collection period, samples of feed, feces, and urine were collected from each goat. The volumes of DM, ash, CP [13], NDF, and ADF [14] in the samples were measured. The modified vanillin-HCl technique based on Burns [15] was used to analyze the condensed tannin content in the TCM. The crude saponins were determined using methanol extraction as described by Kwon et al. [16] and as modified by Poungchompu et al. [17]. A plastic container treated with sulfuric acid (10%) to prevent N loss was used to collect all of the urine samples; then they were evaluated for total N [18].
On the last day of each period, blood samples were taken from the jugular vein at 0 and 4 h after feeding to analyze blood urea nitrogen (BUN) [19]. Rumen fluid (approximately 60 mL) was collected from all the animals along with blood samples using a stomach tube linked to a vacuum pump. Ruminal pH was immediately measured using a mobile pH meter (FiveGO; Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Greifensee, Switzerland). Rumen fluid samples were filtered through four layers of cheesecloth and subsampled for NH3-N measurement and microbial counts. The concentration of NH3-N was determined using a Kjeltech Auto 1030 Analyzer [18], and volatile fatty acids (VFA) were quantified using high-pressure liquid chromatography [20]. The total direct counts of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi were obtained using the Galyean method [21].
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Using the GLM model approach in the SAS program, all the data were submitted to variance analysis using a repeated 4 × 4 Latin square design [22]. Data were analyzed using the model Yijk = μ + Mi + Aj + Pk + εijk, where Yijk is the observation from treatment i, goat j, and period k; μ is the overall mean; Mi is the mean effect of the treatments (I = 1–4); Aj is the mean effect of the goats (j = 1–8); Pk is the mean effect of the periods (k = 1–4); and εijk is the residual error. To evaluate the impact of TCM supplementation, Tukey’s test was utilized and p < 0.05 was used to establish whether the influence was significant.
3. Results
3.1. Feed Intake and Nutrient Digestibility
The addition of TCM did not affect the roughage, concentrate, and total DM intake (p > 0.05) (Table 2). Similarly, the intakes of nutrients were similar among the groups (p > 0.05). However, goats receiving TCM at 24 g/kg of total DM intake had a lower apparent digestibility of CP as compared to other treatments (p < 0.05). The CP digestibility was reduced from 60.6 to 56.1% with the increasing level of TCM.
3.2. Rumen Ecology, Microorganisms, and Blood Metabolites
The supplementation of TCM did not change the ruminal pH and BUN concentrations (p > 0.05) (Table 3). On the other hand, ruminal NH3-N at 4-h post feeding decreased in goats receiving TCM at 16 and 24 g/kg of total DM intake (p < 0.05). The NH3-N concentration was reduced from 18.9 to 17.0 mg/dl with the increasing level of TCM. In contrast, the total bacteria counts at 4-h post feeding increased with the inclusion of TCM as compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Total protozoa, horotrich, and entodiniomorph were reduced when supplemented with TCM (p < 0.05), while fungal zoospore counts were similar among the treatments (p > 0.05).
3.3. Volatile Fatty Acid (VFA) Profiles
Total VFA, acetic acid, and butyric acid concentrations and acetic/propionic ratio were unaffected by the addition of TCM (p > 0.05; Table 4). However, there was the exception that after 4-h post feeding, the concentration of propionic acid was higher for goats receiving TCM at 16 g/kg of total DM intake than for goats in the other treatment groups (p < 0.05).
3.4. Nitrogen Utilization
The use of TCM for goats had no effect on N intake or total N excretion (p > 0.05) (Table 5). However, the amount of N excreted in the urine decreased (p < 0.05), while fecal N excretion increased with the TCM-supplemented groups. In addition, N absorption, N retention, and the ratio of N retention to N intake were enhanced (p < 0.05) in goats fed with TCM at 8 and 16 g/kg of total DM intake.
4. Discussion
4.1. Feed Intake and Nutrient Digestibility
The supplementation of plants containing CT and SP to ruminant diets at a high level (>50 g/kg DM) usually reduces feed intake due to a decrease in palatability, a decrease in digestion rate, and the development of conditioned aversion [23,24]. In contrast, low to moderate tannin supplementation (<50 g/kg DM) has positive effects such as reducing bloat, inhibiting parasite larvae, and protecting protein digestion in the rumen [25,26,27]. In the present study, TCM was an alternative animal feed that did not receive a negative response regarding its palatability, as there were no negative effects on feed intake and nutrient intake. Similarly, Gunun et al. [28] found that CT-containing seed meal from Antidesma thwaitesianum Muell. Arg. could be utilized as a feed additive without causing negative effects on dairy cow feed intake.
The CP digestibility was lower with TCM supplementation. A decrease in CP digestibility was also observed by Tseu et al. [29], who included tannins in Nellore cows’ diets. Patra et al. [9] also found that the addition of tannin sources from TCM decreased ruminal apparent digestibility. The reduction of CP digestibility may have resulted from protein tannin complex formation, which may have reduced protein solubility and may have contributed to the decrease in CP digestibility [29]. This action is regarded as a positive impact of tannin ingestion. When feed protein is not degraded to ammonia in the rumen, the feed protein flow in the small intestine will increase, so that high-quality protein from feed can be absorbed from the small intestine [30]. This is in agreement with Barry and Manley [26], who found that the CT from Lotus pedunculatus can improve the post-ruminal flow of nitrogen and amino acids, thus increasing the level of the rumen bypass protein.
4.2. Rumen Ecology, Microorganisms, and Blood Metabolites
The current experiment has shown that ruminal pH did not differ among treatments, and the values were in an optimal range for normal rumen fermentation, microbial growth, and microbial activity [31]. In addition, ruminal NH3-N concentration at 4-h post feeding significantly decreased (p < 0.05) with the increasing level of TCM supplementation. This may be a result of the CT forming a protein tannin complexation, which reduces the availability of feed protein breakdown in the rumen and NH3-N release [32]. Moreover, BUN is a marker for rumen protein breakdown [33]. Although CP digestibility was reduced by diet supplementation, BUN concentration was not affected by TCM supplementation. In the present study, BUN was in the normal range of 10 to 15 mg/dl [34].
The total protozoa, horotrich, and entodiniomorph populations were reduced when supplemented with TCM containing CT and SP. Wallace et al. [35] explained that SP might kill or damage protozoa by reacting with the cholesterol contained in the membrane of the protozoa. The membrane may degrade and eventually disintegrate. The growth or activities of methanogens and protozoa in the rumen may also be inhibited by tannins [36]. In the previous in vitro trial, adding TCM at 20 mg/0.5 g of DM reduced the protozoal count by 68% [6]. Likewise, Patra et al. [8] reported that total protozoa counts were reduced with the addition of TCM extract at 0.50 mL/g DM. Moreover, the total bacteria population increased when supplemented with TCM, possibly as a result of the suppression of protozoal populations. Meanwhile, the TCM did not affect the fungal zoospores.
4.3. Volatile Fatty Acid (VFA) Profiles
An increase in the proportion of propionic acid was observed. Patra and Saxena [37] suggest that SP may also induce a shift in the production of propionate from excess hydrogen. The expected shift in the VFA profile from the acetic to propionic acid ratio was correlated with a shift in excess hydrogen, which is particularly helpful for producing propionic acid [6]. As a result, the reducing power must be eliminated by an alternative metabolic pathway that uses an electron sink. The synthesis of propionic acid through the succinate propionic acid pathway is a possible means to achieve this [38]. Notably, when goats were fed TCM as a source of CT and SP, the proportion of propionic acid increased.
4.4. Nitrogen Utilization
High protein consumption and rapid ruminal digestion cause ammonia production to exceed microbial needs, which results in high urinary N. Extra ammonia can be converted to urea in the liver and recycled through the ruminal wall, salivary secretion, and urine excretion. In the present study, supplementation with TCM as a source of CT was shown to reduce NH3-N and urinary N excretion, whereas fecal N excretion increased as compared to the control group. These results can be explained by the fact that tannins may inhibit protein degradation, due to the formation of tannin protein complexes that inhibit protein breakdown and which may disrupt post-rumen enzymatic activity, leading to an increase in fecal N [39]. High-quality protein is more efficiently absorbed in the lower gut due to its condensed tannins and saponins [31]. The addition of TCM enhanced N absorption and retention and the proportion of N retention to N intake. This was possible because the animals retained protein to make up for natural protein losses, such as the enhanced secretion of salivary glycoproteins and digestive enzymes; greater epithelial cell regeneration; and higher mucus secretion in the gastrointestinal tract with the addition of tannins [39]. Similar findings were reported by Dawson et al. [40]: Adding Quebracho tannin extract at 5% to sheep promoted surface epithelial ulceration and enhanced mucosal histiocytes in the jejunum and ileum.
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
The TCM supplementation improved rumen fermentation and N balance without affecting feed intake and nutrient digestibility. The TCM supplementation could also reduce the protozoal population. This study recommends the dosed usage of TCM at 16 g/kg of total DM intake as a rumen modifier.
Author Contributions
Planning and design of the study, N.G. and P.G.; conducting and sampling, N.G. and P.G; sample analysis, N.G., P.G., W.K. and P.K.; statistical analysis, N.G. and P.G.; manuscript drafting, N.G. and P.G.; manuscript editing and finalizing, N.G., P.G., A.C., M.W., S.P. and S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
All the animal procedures were approved by the Animals Ethical Committee of the Rajamangala University of Technology Isan (approval number 20/2564).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their most sincere gratitude and appreciation to the Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Technology, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, and Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Sakon Nakhon campus for the use of the research facilities.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Bhatt, S.; Gething, P.W.; Brady, O.J.; Messina, J.P.; Farlow, A.W.; Moyes, C.L.; Drake, J.M.; Brownstein, J.S.; Hoen, A.G.; Sankoh, O.; et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 2013, 496, 504–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kobayashi, Y.; Oh, S.; Myint, H.; Koike, S. Use of Asian selected agricultural byproducts to molulate rumen microbes and fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wanapat, M.; Kang, S.; Phesatcha, K. Enhancing buffalo production efficiency through rumen manipulation and nutrition. Buffalo Bull. 2013, 32, 258–275. [Google Scholar]
- Gunun, P.; Wanapat, M.; Gunun, N.; Cherdthong, A.; Sirilaophaisan, S.; Kaewwongsa, W. Effects of condensed tannins in mao (Antidesma thwaitesianum Muell. Arg.) seed meal on rumen fermentation characteristics and nitrogen utilization in goats. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 1111–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Li, K.; Diao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, B.; Huang, S.; Yang, H. Tannins extracts from immature fruits of Terminalia chebula Fructus Retz. promote cutaneous wound healing in rats. BMC Complement Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anantasook, N.; Wanapat, M.; Gunun, P.; Cherdthong, A. Reducing methane production by supplementation of Terminalia chebula RETZ. containing tannins and saponins. Anim. Sci. J. 2016, 87, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnaveni, M.; Aishwarya, P.G.; Aparna, K.R. Comparative phytochemical analysis of Alpinia officinarum rhizome and Terminalia chebula fruit. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2017, 7, 32–39. [Google Scholar]
- Patra, A.K.; Kamra, D.N.; Agarwal, N. Effect of plant extracts on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 128, 276–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patra, A.K.; Kamra, D.N.; Bhar, R.; Kumar, R.; Agarwal, N. Effect of Terminalia chebula and Allium sativum on in vivo methane emission by sheep. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2011, 95, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patra, A.K.; Saxena, J. A new perspective on the use of plant secondary metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 1198–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanapat, M.; Kongmun, P.; Poungchompu, O.; Cherdthong, A.; Khejornsart, P.; Pilajun, R.; Kaenpakdee, S. Effects of plants containing secondary compounds and plant oils on rumen fermentation and ecology. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod. 2012, 44, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cherdthong, A.; Khonkhaeng, B.; Foiklang, S.; Wanapat, M.; Gunun, N.; Gunun, P.; Chanjula, P.; Polyorach, S. Effects of supplementation of Piper sarmentosum leaf powder on feed efficiency, rumen ecology and rumen protozoal concentration in Thai Native beef cattle. Animals 2019, 9, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 20th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burns, R.E. Method for estimation of tannin in the grain sorghum. Agronomy J. 1971, 163, 511–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, J.H.; Belanger, J.; Pare, M.R.; Yaylayan, V.A. Application of the microwave-assisted process (MAPTM) to the fast excretion of ginseng saponins. Food Res. Int. 2003, 36, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poungchompu, O.; Wanapat, M.; Wachirapakorn, C.; Wanapat, S.; Cherdthong, A. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation and methane production by dietary saponins and tannins from mangosteen peel and soapberry fruit. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2009, 63, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Crocker, C.L. Rapid determination of urea nitrogen in serum or plasma without deproteinization. Am. J. Med. Technol. 1967, 33, 361–365. [Google Scholar]
- Mathew, S.; Sagathevan, S.; Thomas, J.; Mathen, G. An HPLC method for estimation of volatile fatty acids in ruminal fluid. Indian. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 67, 805–807. [Google Scholar]
- Galyean, M. Laboratory Procedures in Animal Nutrition Research; Department of Animal and Range Science, New Mexico State University: Las Cruces, NM, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Statistical Analysis Systems. SAS/STAT User’s Guide: Version 6.12, 4th ed.; SAS Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Mueller-Harvey, I. Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 2010–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauchemin, K.A.; Kreuzer, M.; O’Mara, F.; McAllister, T.A. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barry, T.N.; Duncan, S.J. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep. 1. Voluntary intake. Brit. J. Nutr. 1984, 51, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Barry, T.N.; Manley, T.R. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep. 2. Quantitative digestion of carbohydrates and proteins. Brit. J. Nutr. 1984, 51, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Santosa, P.S.M. Impact of Tannins on Digestibility and Fecal Nitrogen Excretion in Goats. Master’s Thesis, University of Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany, 13 August 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunun, P.; Gunun, N.; Khejornsart, P.; Ouppamong, T.; Cherdthong, A.; Wanapat, M.; Sirilaophaisan, S.; Yuangklang, C.; Polyorach, S.; Kenchaiwong, W.; et al. Effects of Antidesma thwaitesianum Muell. Arg. pomace as a source of plant secondary compounds on digestibility, rumen environment, hematology, and milk production in dairy cows. Anim. Sci. J. 2019, 90, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tseu, R.J.; Junior, F.P.; Carvalho, R.F.; Sene, G.A.; Tropaldi, C.B.; Peres, A.H.; Rodrigues, P.H.M. Effect of tannins and monensin on feeding behaviour, feed intake, digestive parameters and microbial efficiency of Nellore cows. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 19, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beauchemin, K.A.; McGinn, S.M.; Martinez, T.F.; McAllister, T.A. Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 1990–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Supapong, C.; Cherdthong, A.; Seankamsorn, A.; Khonkhaeng, B.; Wanapat, M.; Gunun, N.; Gunun, P.; Chanjula, P.; Polyorach, S. Effect of Delonix regia seed meal supplementation in Thai native beef cattle on feed intake, rumen fermentation characteristics and methane production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 232, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makkar, H.P.S. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin rich feeds. Small Rumin. Res. 2003, 49, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathak, A.K.; Dutta, N.; Banerjee, P.S.; Pattanaik, A.K.; Sharma, K. Influence of dietary supplementation of condensed tannins through leaf meal mixture on intake, nutrient utilization and performance of Haemonchus contortus infected sheep. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26, 1446–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Byers, F.M.; Moxon, A.L. Protein and selenium levels for growing and finishing beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1980, 50, 1136–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallace, R.J.; McEwan, N.R.; McInotoch, F.M.; Teferedegne, B.; Newbold, C.J. Natural products as manipulators of rumen fermentation. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 10, 1458–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, H.Y.; Sieo, C.C.; Abdullah, N.; Liang, J.B.; Huang, X.D.; Ho, Y.W. Effects of condensed tannins from Leucaena on methane production, rumen fermentation and populations of methanogens and protozoa in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 169, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patra, A.K.; Saxena, J. A review of the effect and mode of action of saponins on microbial population and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2009, 22, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Newbold, C.J.; Lopez, S.; Nelson, N.; Ouda, J.O.; Wallace, R.J.; Moss, A.R. Propionate precursors and other metabolic intermediates as possible alternative electron acceptors to methanogenesis in ruminal fermentation in vitro. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 94, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ahnert, S.; Dickhoefer, U.; Schulz, F.; Susenbeth, A. Influence of ruminal Quebracho tannin extract infusion on apparent nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance, and urinary purine derivatives excretion in heifers. Livest. Sci. 2015, 177, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawson, J.M.; Buttery, P.J.; Jenkins, D.; Wood, C.D.; Gill, M. Effects of dietary quebracho tannin on nutrient utilization and tissue metabolism in sheep and rats. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 1423–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Ingredients and chemical compositions of concentrate, rice straw, and Terminalia chebula meal (TCM).
Table 1.
Ingredients and chemical compositions of concentrate, rice straw, and Terminalia chebula meal (TCM).
| Item | Concentrate | Rice Straw | TCM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredient, g/kg dry matter (DM) | |||
| Rice straw | 400 | ||
| Cassava chip | 300 | ||
| Rice bran | 100 | ||
| Soybean meal | 140 | ||
| Urea | 20 | ||
| Molasses | 20 | ||
| Minerals and vitamins | 10 | ||
| Pure sulfur | 5 | ||
| Salt | 5 | ||
| Chemical composition | |||
| Dry matter, g/kg | 890 | 910 | 944 |
| Organic matter, g/kg DM | 929 | 863 | 969 |
| Crude protein, g/kg DM | 140 | 33 | 38 |
| Neutral detergent fiber, g/kg DM | 356 | 697 | 327 |
| Acid detergent fiber, g/kg DM | 222 | 576 | 201 |
| Condensed tannin, g/kg DM | - | - | 81 |
| Crude saponin, g/kg DM | - | - | 94 |
Table 2.
Effect of Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) supplementation on feed intake and digestibility.
| Items | TCM (g/kg of Total DM Intake) | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8 | 16 | 24 | |||
| Roughage DM intake | ||||||
| g/d | 244.2 | 241.0 | 246.8 | 238.3 | 1.62 | 0.27 |
| g/kg BW | 14.2 | 14.3 | 14.0 | 13.9 | 0.03 | 0.20 |
| g/kg BW0.75 | 274.6 | 265.5 | 268.8 | 265.1 | 0.61 | 0.37 |
| Concentrate DM intake | ||||||
| g/d | 229.2 | 221.1 | 216.8 | 223.6 | 2.41 | 0.78 |
| g/kg BW | 13.0 | 13.1 | 13.0 | 13.1 | 0.16 | 0.21 |
| g/kg BW0.75 | 251.3 | 256.2 | 257.8 | 259.3 | 0.17 | 0.27 |
| Total DM intake | ||||||
| g/d | 473.3 | 462.1 | 463.7 | 461.8 | 2.64 | 0.85 |
| g/kg BW | 27.3 | 27.4 | 27.1 | 26.9 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
| g/kg BW0.75 | 525.9 | 511.0 | 512.2 | 523.8 | 1.16 | 0.23 |
| Nutrients intake, g/d | ||||||
| Dry matter | 473.3 | 462.1 | 463.6 | 461.8 | 2.94 | 0.73 |
| Organic matter | 391.9 | 391.3 | 378.7 | 379.1 | 2.94 | 0.60 |
| Crude protein | 40.2 | 40.4 | 39.9 | 40.7 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 244.1 | 241.24 | 242.88 | 241.4 | 2.47 | 0.34 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 184.0 | 181.1 | 181.7 | 181.3 | 1.66 | 0.97 |
| Apparent Digestibility, % | ||||||
| Dry matter | 61.0 | 64.9 | 61.7 | 61.1 | 1.51 | 0.78 |
| Organic matter | 62.8 | 67.5 | 63.3 | 63.2 | 1.95 | 0.72 |
| Crude protein | 60.6 a | 59.9 a | 58.7 ab | 56.1 b | 1.10 | 0.04 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 58.0 | 57.8 | 56.4 | 56.0 | 0.88 | 0.61 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 57.1 | 56.9 | 56.0 | 55.9 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
a,b Values on the same row with different superscripts differed (p < 0.05).
Table 3.
Effect of Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) supplementation on ruminal pH, NH3-N, BUN concentration, and microbial population.
Table 3.
Effect of Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) supplementation on ruminal pH, NH3-N, BUN concentration, and microbial population.
| Items | TCM (g/kg of Total DM Intake) | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8 | 16 | 24 | |||
| Ruminal pH | ||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 6.7 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 0.06 | 0.89 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 0.04 | 0.81 |
| mean | 6.6 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 0.02 | 0.40 |
| NH3-N concentration, mg/dL | ||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 14.6 | 15.2 | 14.2 | 14.9 | 0.61 | 0.44 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 18.8 a | 18.9 a | 17.0 b | 17.0 b | 0.31 | 0.04 |
| mean | 16.7 | 17.0 | 15.7 | 16.0 | 0.39 | 0.41 |
| Blood urea-N concentration, mg/dL | ||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 13.0 | 14.0 | 12.9 | 12.4 | 0.56 | 0.75 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 14.4 | 15.0 | 13.5 | 14.5 | 0.51 | 0.88 |
| mean | 13.7 | 14.5 | 13.2 | 13.4 | 0.55 | 0.65 |
| Direct count, (cell/mL) | ||||||
| Total bacteria, ×108 | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 0.30 | 0.26 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 4.1 b | 5.4 a | 5.5 a | 5.7 a | 0.21 | 0.02 |
| Mean | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 5.0 | 0.31 | 0.16 |
| Protozoa, ×105 | ||||||
| Entodiniomorph | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 5.3 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 0.43 | 0.22 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 6.1 a | 4.7 b | 4.4 b | 4.1 b | 0.51 | <0.01 |
| Mean | 6.0 a | 4.8 b | 4.4 b | 4.4 b | 0.34 | 0.03 |
| Holotrich | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 4.1 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 6.9 a | 4.2 b | 3.9 b | 3.7 b | 0.52 | <0.01 |
| Mean | 4.7 a | 3.7 b | 3.6 b | 3.7 b | 0.33 | 0.04 |
| Total Protozoa | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 9.4 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 0.64 | 0.51 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 13.0 a | 8.9 b | 8.3 b | 7.8 b | 0.78 | <0.01 |
| Mean | 10.7 a | 8.4 b | 8.0 b | 8.0 b | 0.61 | 0.03 |
| Fungi zoospore, ×104 | ||||||
| 0 h post feeding | 6.0 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 0.23 | 0.20 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 6.3 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 0.31 | 0.44 |
| Mean | 6.2 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 0.26 | 0.33 |
a,b Values on the same row with different superscripts differed (p < 0.05).
Table 4.
Effect of supplementing meals with Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) on ruminal volatile fatty acid profile.
Table 4.
Effect of supplementing meals with Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) on ruminal volatile fatty acid profile.
| Items | TCM (g/kg of Total DM Intake) | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8 | 16 | 24 | |||
| Total VFA, mmol/L | ||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 127.5 | 139.9 | 144.2 | 129.3 | 4.44 | 0.21 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 122.8 | 134.9 | 121.5 | 128.5 | 3.84 | 0.86 |
| Mean | 125.7 | 139.6 | 133.5 | 127.8 | 2.41 | 0.44 |
| VFA, mol/100 mol | ||||||
| Acetic acid | ||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 67.6 | 66.9 | 67.1 | 66.5 | 2.73 | 0.43 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 67.8 | 62.5 | 64.8 | 65.9 | 2.11 | 0.08 |
| Mean | 67.7 | 64.7 | 65.9 | 66.2 | 2.00 | 0.11 |
| Propionic acid | ||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 19.5 | 20.2 | 19.8 | 21.0 | 1.77 | 0.10 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 21.9 b | 24.5 ab | 26.1 a | 24.9 ab | 0.67 | 0.02 |
| Mean | 20.7 | 22.4 | 23.0 | 23.0 | 1.21 | 0.11 |
| Butyric acid | ||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 12.9 | 12.9 | 13.1 | 13.5 | 0.13 | 0.24 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 10.3 | 13.0 | 9.1 | 9.2 | 0.79 | 0.08 |
| Mean | 11.6 | 13.0 | 11.1 | 12.9 | 1.42 | 0.20 |
| Acetic/propionic acid ratio | ||||||
| 0 h-post feeding | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 0.59 | 0.21 |
| 4 h-post feeding | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 0.54 | 0.98 |
| Mean | 3.3 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 0.57 | 0.34 |
a,b Values on the same row with different superscripts differed (p < 0.05).
Table 5.
Effect of Terminalia chebula meal (TCM) meal supplementation on N utilization.
| Items | TCM (g/kg of Total DM Intake) | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8 | 16 | 24 | |||
| N utilization | ||||||
| N intake, g/d | ||||||
| Roughage | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.06 | 0.65 |
| Concentrate | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 0.05 | 0.70 |
| Total | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 0.06 | 0.45 |
| N excretion, g/d | ||||||
| Feces | 1.6 a | 2.2 b | 2.3 b | 2.2 b | 0.11 | 0.03 |
| Urine | 2.7 a | 1.6 b | 1.6 b | 1.7 b | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Total | 4.3 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 0.20 | 0.41 |
| Nitrogen balance g/d | ||||||
| N absorption | 4.1 b | 4.6 a | 4.5 a | 4.4 ab | 0.11 | 0.04 |
| N retention | 2.9 b | 3.6 a | 3.4 a | 2.9 b | 0.14 | 0.03 |
| N retention/ N intake | 49.9 c | 58.7 a | 57.4 a | 53.5 b | 0.19 | 0.04 |
a,b,c Values on the same row with different superscripts differed (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Gunun, P.; Cherdthong, A.; Khejornsart, P.; Wanapat, M.; Polyorach, S.; Kang, S.; Kaewwongsa, W.; Gunun, N. The Effect of Phytonutrients in Terminalia chebula Retz. on Rumen Fermentation Efficiency, Nitrogen Utilization, and Protozoal Population in Goats. Animals 2022, 12, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162022
AMA Style
Gunun P, Cherdthong A, Khejornsart P, Wanapat M, Polyorach S, Kang S, Kaewwongsa W, Gunun N. The Effect of Phytonutrients in Terminalia chebula Retz. on Rumen Fermentation Efficiency, Nitrogen Utilization, and Protozoal Population in Goats. Animals. 2022; 12(16):2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162022
Chicago/Turabian StyleGunun, Pongsatorn, Anusorn Cherdthong, Pichad Khejornsart, Metha Wanapat, Sineenart Polyorach, Sungchhang Kang, Walailuck Kaewwongsa, and Nirawan Gunun. 2022. "The Effect of Phytonutrients in Terminalia chebula Retz. on Rumen Fermentation Efficiency, Nitrogen Utilization, and Protozoal Population in Goats" Animals 12, no. 16: 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162022
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
