Body Condition in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco near the Northern Limit of Its Range: Effects of Individual Characteristics and Environmental Conditions
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population and Field Work
2.2. Characteristics of Breeding Birds
2.3. Extrinsic Factors
2.4. Statistics
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Blem, C.R. Avian Energy Storage. In Current Ornithology; Power, D.M., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; Volume 7, pp. 59–113. [Google Scholar]
- Schamber, J.L.; Esler, D.; Flint, P. Evaluating the validity of using unverified indices of body condition. J. Avian Biol. 2009, 40, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricklefs, R.E. Energetics of Reproduction in Birds. In Avian Energetics; Paynter, R.A., Jr., Ed.; Nuttall Ornithological Club: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974; pp. 152–292. [Google Scholar]
- Drent, R.H.; Daan, S. The Prudent Parent: Energetic Adjustments in Avian Breeding. Ardea 2002, 68, 225–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jönsson, K.I. Capital and Income Breeding as Alternative Tactics of Resource Use in Reproduction. Oikos 1997, 78, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirons, G.J.M. The importance of body reserves for successful reproduction in the Tawny owl (Strix aluco). J. Zool. 1985, 1, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korpimaki, E. Body Mass of Breeding Tengmalm’s Owls Aegolius funereus: Seasonal, Between-Year, Site and Age-Related Variation. Ornis Scand. 1990, 21, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersson, M.; Norberg, R.Å. Evolution of Reversed Sexual Size Dimorphism and Role Partitioning among Predatory Birds, with a Size Scaling of Flight Performance. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 1981, 15, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solonen, T. Factors Affecting Reproduction in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco in Southern Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2009, 46, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikkola, H. Owls of Europe; Poyser: Calton, UK, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Southern, H.N.; Cramp, S. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: The Birds of the Western Palearctic; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1985; Volume 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karell, P.; Ahola, K.; Karstinen, T.; Valkama, J.; Brommer, J. Climate change drives microevolution in a wild bird. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zuberogoitia, I. Weather Influence on Breeding Success of the Tawny Owl on the Southwest Limit of Eurosiberian Region. In Ecology and Conservation of European Forest-Dwelling Raptors; Zuberogoitia, I., Martínez, J.E., Eds.; Diputación Foral de Bizkaia: Bilbao, Spain, 2011; pp. 184–189. [Google Scholar]
- Millon, A.; Petty, S.J.; Little, B.; Gimenez, O.; Cornulier, T.; Lambin, X. Dampening prey cycle overrides the impact of climate change on predator population dynamics: A long-term demographic study on tawny owls. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 1770–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratajc, U.; Breskvar, M.; Džeroski, S.; Vrezec, A. Differential responses of coexisting owls to annual small mammal population fluctuations in temperate mixed forest. IBIS 2021, 164, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comay, O.; Ezov, E.; Yom-Tov, Y.; Dayan, T. In Its Southern Edge of Distribution, the Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) Is More Sensitive to Extreme Temperatures Than to Rural Development. Animals 2022, 12, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brito, P.H. The influence of Pleistocene glacial refugia on tawny owl genetic diversity and phylogeography in western Europe. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 3077–3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brito, P.H. Contrasting patterns of mitochondrial and microsatellite genetic structure among Western European populations of tawny owls (Strix aluco). Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 3423–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Linkola, P.; Myllymäki, A. Der Einfluss der Kleinsäugerfluktuationen auf das Brüten einiger Kleinsäugerfressender Vögel im Südlichen Häme, Mittelfinnland 1952–1966. Ornis Fenn. 1969, 46, 45–78. [Google Scholar]
- Solonen, T.; Karhunen, J. Effects of Variable Feeding Conditions on the Tawny Owl Strix aluco near the Northern Limit of Its Range. Ornis Fenn. 2002, 79, 121–131. [Google Scholar]
- Francis, C.M.; Saurola, P. Estimating Components of Variance in Demographic Parameters of Tawny Owls, Strix aluco. Anim. Biodiv. Conserv. 2004, 27, 489–502. [Google Scholar]
- Solonen, T. Breeding of the Tawny Owl Strix aluco in Finland: Responses of a Southern Colonist to the Highly Variable Environment of the North. Ornis Fenn. 2005, 82, 97–106. [Google Scholar]
- Karell, P.; Ahola, K.; Karstinen, T.; Zolei, A.; Brommer, J.E. Population dynamics in a cyclic environment: Consequences of cyclic food abundance on tawny owl reproduction and survival. J. Anim. Ecol. 2009, 78, 1050–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galeotti, P.; Rubolini, D.; Dunn, P.O.; Fasola, M. Colour polymorphism in birds: Causes and functions. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roulin, A.; Ducret, B.; Ravussin, P.-A.; Altwegg, R. Female colour polymorphism covaries with reproductive strategies in the tawny owl Strix aluco. J. Avian Biol. 2003, 34, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakarov, N.; Boerner, M.; Krüger, O. Biological Consequences of Plumage Polymorphism in Common Buzzard. In Ecology and Conservation of European Forest-Dwelling Raptors; Zuberogoitia, I., Martínez, J.E., Eds.; Diputación Foral de Bizkaia: Bilbao, Spain, 2011; pp. 234–241. [Google Scholar]
- Solonen, T. Does plumage colour signal fitness in the tawny owl Strix aluco? J. Avian Biol. 2021, 52, e02470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galeotti, P.; Cesaris, C. Rufous and Grey Colour Morphs in the Italian Tawny Owl: Geographical and Environmental Influences. J. Avian Biol. 1996, 27, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brommer, J.E.; Ahola, K.; Karstinen, T. The colour of fitness: Plumage coloration and lifetime reproductive success in the tawny owl. Proc. R. Soc. B Boil. Sci. 2005, 272, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solonen, T. Effects of Variable Food Supply on the Body Condition of Breeding Tawny Owls Strix aluco in Southern Finland. Int. Sch. Res. Net. Zool. 2011, 2011, 929460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kendeigh, S.C. Energy Responses of Birds to Their Thermal Environments. Wilson Bull. 1969, 81, 441–449. [Google Scholar]
- Solonen, T. Are Vole-eating Owls Affected by Mild Winters in Southern Finland? Ornis Fenn. 2004, 81, 65–74. [Google Scholar]
- Solonen, T.; Ahola, K.; Karstinen, T. Clutch size of a vole-eating bird of prey as an indicator of vole abundance. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Southern, H.N. The natural control of a population of Tawny owls (Strix aluco). J. Zool. 1970, 162, 197–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunde, P.; Bølstad, M.S.; Møller, J.D. Reversed sexual dimorphism in tawny owls, Strix aluco, correlates with duty division in breeding effort. Oikos 2003, 101, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Petty, S.J. A Guide to Age Determination of Tawny Owl Strix aluco. In The Ecology and Conservation of European Owls; Galbraicht, C.A., Taylor, I.R., Percival, S., Eds.; Joint Nature Conservation Committee: Peterborough, UK, 1992; pp. 89–91. [Google Scholar]
- Spencer, R. The Ringer’s Manual, 2nd ed.; BTO: Oxford, UK, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Finnish Meteorological Inst. Temperature and Precipitation Statistics from 1961 Onwards. 2019. Available online: https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/statistics-from-1961-onwards (accessed on 13 December 2019).
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022; Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 11 March 2022).
- Venables, W.N.; Smith, D.M.; The R Development Core Team. An Introduction to R. Version 3.1.1. The R Project for Statistical Computing. 2014. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 21 November 2014).
- Kouba, M.; Bartoš, L.; Bartošová, J.; Hongisto, K.; Korpimäki, E. Long-term trends in the body condition of parents and offspring of Tengmalm’s owls under fluctuating food conditions and climate change. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solonen, T. Overwinter Population Change of Small Mammals in Southern Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2006, 43, 295–302. [Google Scholar]
- Dijkstra, C.; Daan, S.; Tinbergen, J.M. Family Planning in the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): The Ultimate Control of Covariation of Laying Date and Clutch Size. Behaviour 1990, 114, 83–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietiäinen, H.; Kolunen, H. Female Body Condition and Breeding of the Ural Owl Strix uralensis. Funct. Ecol. 1993, 7, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Value | SE | df | t | p | Mean (95% CI) | AIC | Adj R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 4.7170 | 0.1535 | 300 | 30.7 | <0.001 | 3.81 (3.75–3.86) | ||
Winter temp. | 0.0555 | 0.0193 | 28 | 2.88 | 0.004 | −3.70 (−3.90–−3.49) | 500.6 | −0.002 |
Snow cover | 0.0073 | 0.0022 | 28 | 3.30 | 0.001 | 18.40 (16.67–20.12) | 498.1 | 0.006 |
Frost seesaw | −0.0516 | 0.0078 | 28 | −6.61 | <0.001 | 16.29 (15.90–16.68) | 467.9 | 0.092 |
Variable | Value | SE | df | t | p | Mean (95% CI) | AIC | Adj R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female condition | ||||||||
(Intercept) | 0.1274 | 0.0244 | 300 | 5.21 | <0.001 | 0.186 (0.178–0.194) | ||
Winter temp. | −0.0044 | 0.0031 | 28 | −1.45 | 0.148 | −3.70 (−3.90–−3.49) | −756.7 | −0.003 |
Snow cover | −0.0005 | 0.0004 | 28 | −1.42 | 0.155 | 18.40 (16.67–20.12) | −757.0 | −0.002 |
Frost seesaw | 0.0032 | 0.0012 | 28 | 2.54 | 0.012 | 16.29 (15.90–16.68) | −761.4 | 0.011 |
Male condition | ||||||||
(Intercept) | 0.1246 | 0.0181 | 300 | 6.87 | <0.001 | 0.153 (0.147–0.159) | ||
Winter temp. | −0.0007 | 0.0023 | 28 | −0.30 | 0.768 | −3.70 (−3.90–−3.49) | −958.6 | −0.003 |
Snow cover | 0.0000 | 0.0003 | 28 | 0.033 | 0.974 | 18.40 (16.67–20.12) | −958.7 | −0.003 |
Frost seesaw | 0.0016 | 0.0009 | 28 | 1.706 | 0.089 | 16.29 (15.90–16.68) | −961.5 | 0.006 |
Variable | Value | SE | df | t | p | Mean (95% CI) | AIC | Adj R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 0.2975 | 0.0677 | 294 | 4.39 | <0.001 | 0.186 (0.178–0.194) | ||
Female colour | 0.0193 | 0.0073 | 294 | 2.63 | 0.009 | 1.527 (1.473–1.581) | −761.3 | 0.011 |
Female age | 0.0036 | 0.0011 | 294 | 3.11 | 0.002 | 4.136 (3.780–4.491) | −768.4 | 0.032 |
Mate colour | 0.0200 | 0.0073 | 294 | 2.72 | 0.007 | 1.500 (1.446–1.554) | −761.0 | 0.010 |
Mate age | −0.0003 | 0.0015 | 294 | −0.20 | 0.842 | 3.831 (3.556–4.106) | −757.3 | −0.001 |
Mate condition | 0.2507 | 0.0669 | 294 | 3.75 | <0.001 | 0.153 (0.147–0.159) | −791.5 | 0.097 |
Julian date | −0.0018 | 0.0002 | 294 | −7.63 | <0.001 | 136.4 (134.5–138.4) | −822.3 | 0.177 |
Vole index | −0.0063 | 0.0083 | 27 | −0.76 | 0.450 | 3.806 (3.751–3.861) | −757.3 | −0.001 |
Winter temp. | −0.0052 | 0.0027 | 27 | −1.96 | 0.051 | −3.70 (−3.90–−3.49) | −756.7 | −0.003 |
Snow cover | −0.0001 | 0.0003 | 27 | −0.32 | 0.746 | 18.40 (16.67–20.12) | −757.0 | −0.002 |
Frost seesaw | 0.0015 | 0.0012 | 27 | 1.28 | 0.202 | 16.28 (15.90–16.68) | −761.4 | 0.011 |
Variable | Value | SE | df | t | p | Mean (95% CI) | AIC | Adj R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Intercept) | 0.2382 | 0.0546 | 295 | 4.36 | <0.001 | 0.153 (0.147–0.159) | ||
Male colour | 0.0087 | 0.0060 | 295 | 1.45 | 0.149 | 1.500 (1.446–1.554) | −960.1 | 0.001 |
Male age | 0.0026 | 0.0012 | 295 | 2.17 | 0.031 | 3.831 (3.556–4.106) | −965.6 | 0.018 |
Mate colour | 0.0107 | 0.0060 | 295 | 1.78 | 0.076 | 1.527 (1.473–1.581) | −960.7 | 0.003 |
Mate age | 0.0017 | 0.0009 | 295 | 1.86 | 0.063 | 4.136 (3.780–4.491) | −965.3 | 0.017 |
Julian date | −0.0010 | 0.0002 | 295 | −5.23 | <0.001 | 137.9 (136.0–139.8) | −984.8 | 0.073 |
Vole index | −0.0054 | 0.0068 | 27 | −0.80 | 0.426 | 3.806 (3.751–3.861) | −958.8 | −0.002 |
Winter temp. | −0.0016 | 0.0022 | 27 | −0.74 | 0.463 | −3.70 (−3.90–−3.49) | −958.6 | −0.003 |
Snow cover | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | 27 | 0.70 | 0.487 | 18.40 (16.67–20.12) | −958.7 | −0.003 |
Frost seesaw | 0.0009 | 0.0010 | 27 | 0.91 | 0.366 | 16.28 (15.90–16.68) | −961.5 | 0.006 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Solonen, T. Body Condition in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco near the Northern Limit of Its Range: Effects of Individual Characteristics and Environmental Conditions. Animals 2022, 12, 2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202843
Solonen T. Body Condition in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco near the Northern Limit of Its Range: Effects of Individual Characteristics and Environmental Conditions. Animals. 2022; 12(20):2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202843
Chicago/Turabian StyleSolonen, Tapio. 2022. "Body Condition in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco near the Northern Limit of Its Range: Effects of Individual Characteristics and Environmental Conditions" Animals 12, no. 20: 2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202843
APA StyleSolonen, T. (2022). Body Condition in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco near the Northern Limit of Its Range: Effects of Individual Characteristics and Environmental Conditions. Animals, 12(20), 2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202843