Skip to Content
AnimalsAnimals
  • Review
  • Open Access

29 March 2022

Hepatic Enzyme Profile in Horses

,
,
and
1
Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary, CEU-Cardenal Herrera University, 46115 Valencia, Spain
2
Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary and Experimental Science, Catholic University of Valencia-San Vicente Mártir, 46001 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Hepatic Disease of Equids

Simple Summary

This review aims to highlight the importance of using enzyme profiles for the diagnosis of common liver disorders in the horse. This review also highlights the limitations and alternative explanations for isolated or collective abnormalities of the different liver enzymes. This review also provides information on the screening test(s) of choice, their interpretation, and the results to confirm the diagnosis. Similarly, documented liver cases in the equine clinic are reviewed, with emphasis on abnormal enzyme activity.

Abstract

For diagnostic purposes, liver enzymes are usually classified into hepatocellular and cholestatic. These two groups of equine liver-specific enzymes include sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH), glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). SDH and GLDH mostly reflect hepatocellular injury and cholestasis, while GGT expresses high values in biliary necrosis or hyperplasia. Likewise, AST, LDH, and ALP also reflect hepatocellular and biliary disease, but these enzymes are not liver specific. From the clinical point of view of the course of liver or biliary disease, AST and ALP are indicative of chronic disease, whereas SDH, GGT, and GLDH indicate an acute course. The patterns of enzymatic changes at the blood level are associated with different types of liver pathologies (infectious, inflammatory, metabolic, toxic, etc.). Increases in hepatocellular versus biliary enzyme activities are indicative of a particular process. There are different ways to diagnose alterations at the hepatic level. These include the evaluation of abnormalities in the predominant pattern of hepatocellular versus cholestatic enzyme abnormalities, the mild, moderate, or marked (5–10-fold or >10-fold) increase in enzyme abnormality concerning the upper limit of the reference range, the evolution over time (increase or decrease) and the course of the abnormality (acute or chronic).

1. Introduction

Within the concept of liver disease, we can include different pathologies that directly or indirectly affect liver function. In turn, these alterations in liver function may be temporary or may progress to complete and irreversible failure [1]. Although liver failure is rare in equines, different authors point out that the clinical manifestation occurs when more than 70% of the function of this organ is lost [1,2,3,4]. Liver disease and liver failure are two distinct and important concepts that must be differentiated. Among all liver functions, the reserve is extremely important. Therefore, a loss of at least 60–80% of the mass of this organ is required to show clear signs of liver failure. This clarification becomes important because some indicators of liver function, such as albumin or coagulation times, are affected when this organ is insufficient and are therefore not sensitive for detecting disease in early stages [2,3,5].
Several different etiological causes may be ascribed to the development of horse hepatic diseases [1]. Pre-existing sepsis, hypoxia, neoplasia, toxic or metabolic causes in both foals and adult horses can lead to liver damage [1,6,7,8]. The consumption of toxic plants (e.g., mugwort and clover) and mycotoxins (e.g., aflatoxin, zearalenone, and fumonisin) also can develop hepatic disease [9,10,11,12].
Infectious and non-infectious causes of liver and biliary tract inflammation have also been described. These include serum hepatitis or Theiler’s disease or viral hepatitis (caused by equine herpesvirus, hepatitis, equine hepacivirus, and equine parvovirus), parasitic hepatitis (caused by large strongyles and ascarids), Tyzzer’s disease (Clostridium piliforme), inflammatory diseases such as cholangiohepatitis (due to cholelithiasis or intestinal obstruction), displacement of the right dorsal colon with bile duct obstruction, cholelithiasis, hepatic torsion, portal vein thrombosis and hyperlipemia [8,13,14,15,16,17]. Other causes of liver disease are primary neoplasms such as hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, or hepatoblastoma. Additionally, metastatic dissemination of lymphomas or malignant melanomas to the liver from other primary locations [8,18]. The main analytes to evaluate in blood samples related to liver disease are serum enzymes and indicators of residual liver functional capacity [6]. In general terms, we can classify liver enzymes into two main groups. On the one hand, some are filtered from the cytoplasm of the damaged hepatocyte called hepatocellular, and on the other hand, those that increase their concentration in the blood due to an increased synthesis as a response to the decrease or absence of normal bile flow from the liver to the duodenum also called cholestasis. In hepatocellular or cholestatic forms of liver injury, these liver enzymes are released into the bloodstream and, therefore, increased serum levels are diagnostically useful [19]. Therefore, the so-called liver functionality tests measure the serum level of liver enzymes and thus reflect hepatocyte integrity or cholestasis rather than the liver function itself [3]. Thus, in horses with liver disease, serum enzyme levels are related to the concentration of the enzyme in the hepatocyte, the severity, and duration of the disease, and the half-life of the enzyme. In general, the duration of elevation of serum liver enzyme activity depends on molecular size, intracellular location, plasma elimination rate, enzyme inactivation, and increased hepatic production. [19]. This results in a measurable increase in enzyme activity in the serum of those animals with hepatocellular injury [8].

2. Types and Characteristics of Hepatic Enzymes in Horses

Standard biochemical indices of hepatocellular disease include sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH), glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) while indicators of hepatobiliary disease include γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) indicates both hepatocellular and biliary origin [3,20]. These enzymes can usually be found in the cytoplasm (AST and LDH), mitochondria (GLDH and AST), nucleus or membranes (ALP and GGT) of hepatocyte cells, where they catalyze specific reactions [20] (Table 1).
Table 1. Characteristics of hepatic enzymes in horses based on location and function.
Cytoplasmic enzymes are released at the beginning of cell degeneration, whereas mitochondrial enzymes are released after advanced cell necrosis [20]. Based on this, GLDH, AST, and LDH activity are increased in hepatocellular damage while GGT and ALP enzymes are increased in cholestatic liver disease in horses [4,21]. Based on their specificity, liver-specific enzymes include SDH, GLDH, and GGT, where, on the one hand, SDH and GLDH reflect hepatocellular damage and GGT, on the other hand, is indicative of biliary damage. Other enzymes such as AST and LDH also reflect hepatocellular disease while ALP indicates biliary damage. However, these last three enzymes are not specific to the equine liver [2,3] (Table 2).
Table 2. Reference value interval, half-life, sensitivity, specificity, and stability of the hepatobiliary enzymes in horses.
These parameters are estimated values based on a review of available reports [2,3,20,22,23].
SDH is a liver-specific enzyme in horses. The reference range of SDH in equines is 0–8 IU/L [24]. A drawback is the instability of this enzyme in serum or plasma, even when refrigerated or frozen. According to Fouche et al. [25], plasma SDH activity in refrigerated samples at 4 °C is suitable for analysis for 24 h. It is not recommended to store plasma for more than 4 h at room temperature or −20 °C. This enzyme has a half-life of 12 h, and after an acute event, baseline values can be observed 3–5 days later [8].
The GLDH enzyme is found in the mitochondria of hepatocytes, and horses with an acute hepatocellular disease and its blood levels are abnormally high. The range of reference plasma values for GLDH in the equine species is <3.5 IU/L [24]. GLDH is more stable compared to other enzymes and has a somewhat longer half-life than SDH and, because of its stability, is a recommended test for detecting acute hepatocellular disease [2,3,23]. However, this parameter should be interpreted with caution in foals, as GLDH levels are usually increased in young lactating foals without actual liver disease [19].
AST is present in the cytoplasm of liver cell mitochondria. The reference range of AST in equines is 150–270 IU/L [24]. Serum levels are usually increased in liver disease and reflect hepatocellular injury. However, since it is also found in the liver, heart, skeletal muscle, and kidney, elevated serum activity can only be interpreted in conjunction with other more specific liver enzymes to diagnose disease. It is also important to note that this enzyme can be increased by hemolysis, as it is present in erythrocytes, and by lipemia [5].
GGT is an enzyme widely distributed in various tissues. Other organs such as the lungs, kidneys, pancreas, and mammary glands also produce GGT. However, these amounts are small, so this enzyme is considered liver specific. However, the activity of this enzyme in serum or plasma originates almost exclusively from hepatocytes [19]. This fact confers to GGT a high specificity for diseases of the hepatobiliary system and its reference range in equines is 5–20 IU/L [24]. Increased GGT activity can be considered normal in foals, donkeys, and mules. In them, serum levels can increase up to 3 times the normal reference range for horses. In foals, during the first month of life, values were 1.5 to 3 times higher than the upper physiological reference values for healthy adult horses. In neonatal foals, serum levels increase during the first two weeks of life because GGT concentrations are higher in colostrum and milk [26].
ALP reflects biliary injury, but is not specific to the liver, as it is also produced in bone, intestine, and macrophages. Care must be taken with the interpretation of this enzyme in growing animals, where normal values are 2 to 3 times higher than reference values in adults due to increased bone turnover associated with physical growth [24]. The reference range of ALP in equines is 73–194 IU/L [24]. In equids, ALP activity is used as a test of liver excretory function. ALP increases after 48 h of liver damage and is usually higher in cholestasis than in hepatocellular damage [24].
LDH isoenzyme 5 (LDH-5) is a non-specific enzyme as it is abundant in the liver, although it is also present in kidneys, muscle, myocardium, and red blood cells [5]. The reference range of LDH in equines is 162–412 IU/L [24].
Based on the clinical point of view of the course of liver or biliary disease, AST and ALP are indicative of chronic disease, whereas SDH, GGT, and GLDH indicate an acute course [3]. The initial activity of an enzyme in plasma or serum is usually a reflection of the amount and turnover of the tissue containing this enzyme. Thus, serum concentrations of specific liver enzymes are usually higher in acute liver disease than in chronic liver disease. Increased activities of SDH, GLDH, and AST occur even with mild acute hepatocellular injury, and the magnitude of the enzyme increase may not correspond to the functional state of the liver [3]. However, in chronic liver diseases with severe fibrosis and a reduction in the number of functional hepatocytes, plasma/serum liver enzyme activities may be within normal limits [4,21].

3. Assessment of Liver Enzyme Abnormalities

The increase in one or more enzymes is usually expressed as increments of levels above the upper limit of the reference interval. Usually, a 2- to 3-fold increase above the reference range is considered mild, while a 4- to 5-fold increase is moderate, and when the value approaches or exceeds a 10-fold increase, it is considered marked (Table 3). The degree of the increase in hepatocellular-damage, enzyme activities may help stage disease severity [27].
Table 3. Assessment of liver enzyme abnormalities.
Relative increases in hepatocellular versus biliary enzyme activities may point the clinician to a particular process (Table 4). Thus, if GGT activity is greatly increased and GLDH, SDH, or AST activity is only moderately increased, a process involving the biliary system, such as cholangiohepatitis, is most likely to be suspected. Conversely, if hepatocyte enzyme activity is very high and GGT activity is slightly increased, then the disease predominantly involves hepatocytes, such as hepatitis [19,20]. Other causes of liver disease may result in a similar increase in hepatocellular and biliary enzyme activities, such as pyrrolizidine alkaloid toxicity and hepatic lipidosis. These processes are probably highly dependent on the duration of the disease. Thus, if serum enzyme activity decreases by 50% for 2–4 days, it suggests that damage has ceased. Conversely, if the activity remains constant over time or increases, it suggests that damage is continuing.
Table 4. Patters of alterations of hepatic enzymes.

5. Conclusions

The liver enzymes present in serum reflect, to different degrees, different pathologies such as obstruction, proliferation, inflammation, toxicity, or neoplasia of both the liver and the hepatobiliary duct system. Their use is oriented to two purposes. The first is to evaluate and establish the type and degree of injury and the second is to provide treatment and prognosis for diseases that alter liver function. Depending on the evaluation, any of the enzymes involved offers data that are important to know how to interpret to reach a proper diagnosis. In general, variations in enzyme profiles are associated with different types of liver pathologies. Thus, acute or severe and preferentially hepatocellular injury is primarily associated with elevated levels of SDH and GLDH enzymes and increased GGT values. However, persistent injury is associated with weak changes in hepatocellular and hepatobiliary enzymes and thus other diagnostics are required to define the cause of these consistent increases. Thus, persistent acute or chronic liver damage is likely to disrupt one or more liver function tests. Additionally, when GGT and ALP enzymes are increased, they have important diagnostic value in determining the presence of decreased or disrupted bile flow. Therefore, it is easy for clinicians to differentiate and correctly diagnose liver pathologies from other diseases by evaluating a single hepatobiliary enzyme. The correlation of the variation of several enzymes together with other biochemical markers allows increasing the sensitivity and specificity to identify liver diseases to obtain an adequate treatment and prognosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S., L.M.-P., D.C. and J.C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S., D.C. and J.C.G.; writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bergero, D.; Nery, J. Hepatic diseases in horses. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2008, 92, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. West, H.J. Clinical and pathological studies in horses with hepatic disease. Equine Vet. J. 1996, 28, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Divers, T.J. The equine liver in health and disease. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Convention of American Association of Equine Practitioners, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 5–9 December 2015; Volume 6, pp. 66–103. [Google Scholar]
  4. Durham, A.E.; Newton, J.R.; Smith, K.C.; Hillyer, M.H.; Millyer, L.L.; Smith, M.R.; Marr, C.M. Retrospective analysis of historical, clinical, ultrasonographic, serum biochemical and haematological data in prognostic evaluation of equine liver disease. Equine Vet. J. 2003, 35, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Durham, A. Liver disease. In Equine Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Reproduction, 2nd ed.; Munroe, G., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 875–901. [Google Scholar]
  6. Divers, T.J. Liver Failure and Hemolytic Anemia. In Equine Emergencies Treatment and Procedures, 3rd ed.; Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2008; pp. 237–258. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gather, T.; Walter, S.; Pfaender, S.; Todt, D.; Feige, K.; Steinmann, E.; Cavalleri, J.M.V. Acute and chronic infections with nonprimate hepacivirus in young horses. Vet. Res. 2016, 47, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Divers, T.J.; Barton, M.H. Disorders of the Liver. In Equine Internal Medicine, 4th ed.; Reed, S.M., Bayly, W.M., Sellon, D.C., Eds.; WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 843–881. [Google Scholar]
  9. Moore, M.E.; Knottenbelt, D.; Matthews, J.B.; Beynon, R.J.; Whitfield, P.D. Biomarkers for ragwort poisoning in horses: Identification of protein targets. BMC Vet. Res. 2008, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bandarra, P.M.; Pavinini, S.P.; Raymundo, D.L.; Correa, A.M.; Pedroso, P.M.; Driemeier, D. Trema micrantha toxicity in horses in Brazil. Equine Vet. J. 2010, 42, 456–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Caloni, F.; Cortinovis, C. Toxicological effects of aflatoxins in horses. Vet. J. 2011, 188, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oliveira-Filho, J.P.; Cagnin, D.Q.; Badial, P.R.; Pessoa, M.A.; Del Piero, F.; Borges, A.S. Hepatoencephalopathy syndrome due to Cassia occidentalis (leguminosae Caesalpinioideae) seed ingestion in horses. Equine Vet. J. 2013, 45, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ramsay, J.D.; Evanoff, R.; Wilkinson, T.E., Jr.; Divers, T.J.; Knowles, D.P.; Mealey, R.H. Experimental transmission of equine hepacivirus in horses as a model for hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 2015, 61, 1533–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Figueiredo, A.S.; de Moraes, M.V.D.S.; Soares, C.C.; Chalhoub, F.L.L.; de Filippis, A.M.B.; Dos Santos, D.R.L.; de Almeida, F.Q.; Godoi, T.L.O.S.; de Souza, A.M.; Burdman, T.R.; et al. First description of Theiler’s disease-associated virus infection and epidemiological investigation of equine pegivirus and equine hepacivirus coinfection in Brazil. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 1737–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ramsauer, A.S.; Badenhorst, M.; Cavalleri, J.V. Equine parvovirus hepatitis. Equine Vet. J. 2021, 53, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tomlinson, J.E.; Tennant, B.C.; Struzyna, A.; Mrad, D.; Browne, N.; Whelchel, D.; Johnson, P.J.; Jamieson, C.; Löhr, C.V.; Bildfell, R.; et al. Viral testing of 10 cases of Theiler’s disease and 37 in-contact horses in the absence of equine biologic product administration: A prospective study (2014–2018). J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tomlinson, J.E.; Jager, M.; Struzyna, A.; Laverack, M.; Fortier, L.A.; Dubovi, E.; Foil, L.D.; Burbelo, P.D.; Divers, T.J.; Van de Walle, G.R. Tropism, pathology, and transmission of equine parvovirus-hepatitis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 20, 651–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Beeler-Marfisi, J.; Arroyo, L.; Caswell, J.L.; Delay, J.; Bienzle, D. Equine primary liver tumors: A case series and review of the literature. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2010, 22, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hoffmann, W.E.; Solter, P.F. Diagnostic enzymology of domestic animals. In Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 6th ed.; Kaneko, J.J., Harvey, J.W., Bruss, M.L., Eds.; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 351–378. [Google Scholar]
  20. Durham, A. Management of horses with hepatic disorders. In The Equine Hospital Manual; Corley, K., Stephen, J., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 524–532. [Google Scholar]
  21. Satué, K.; Gardon, J.C.; Muñoz, A. Use of Laboratory Testing to Diagnose Liver and Biliary Dysfunction in the Horse. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Res. 2013, 2, 807–813. [Google Scholar]
  22. DeNotta, S.L.; Divers, T.J. Clinical Pathology in the Adult Sick Horse: The Gastrointestinal System and Liver. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2020, 36, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McGorum, B.C.; Murphy, D.; Love, S. Clinicopathological features of equine primary hepatic disease: A review of 50 cases. Vet. Rec. 1999, 145, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pearson, E.G. Liver disease in the mature horse. Equine Vet. Educ. 1999, 11, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fouche, S.; Oesch, V.; Gerber, H.; Richter, J.; Howard Peters, L.M. Pre-analytical stability of sorbitol dehydrogenase in equine heparinized plasma. Vet. J. 2021, 274, 105706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gardner, R.B.; Nydam, D.V.; Mohammed, H.O. Serum gamma glutamyl transferase activity in horses with right or left displacements of the large colon. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2005, 19, 761–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Webster, C.R.L.; Cooper, J.C. Diagnostic approach to hepatobiliary disease. In Kirk’s Current Veterinary Therapy, 15th ed.; Bonagura, J., Twedt, D., Eds.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2014; pp. 569–575. [Google Scholar]
  28. Boulton, E. Liver and Biliary System and Pancreas. In The Horse Disease and Clinical Management; Saunders Company: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1995; pp. 364–372. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ankringa, N.; Wijnberg, I.D.; Boerma, S.; Ijzer, J. Copperassociated hepatic cirrhosis in a Friesian horse. Tijdschr. Diergeneeskd. 2012, 137, 310–314. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Hoffmann, W.E.; Baker, G.; Rieser, S.; Dorner, J.L. Alterations in selected serum biochemical constituents in equids after induced hepatic disease. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1987, 48, 1343–1347. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Davis, J.L.; Blikslager, A.T.; Catto, K.; Jones, S.L. A retrospective analysis of hepatic injury in horses with proximal enteritis (1984–2002). J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2003, 17, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Haggett, E.F.; Magdesian, K.G.; Kass, P.H. Clinical implications of high liver enzyme activities in hospitalized neonatal foals. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2011, 239, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schedlbauer, C.; Blaue, D.; Gericke, M.; Blüher, M.; Starzonek, J.; Gittel, C.; Brehm, W.; Vervuert, I. Impact of body weight gain on hepatic metabolism and hepatic inflammatory cytokines in comparison of Shetland pony geldings and Warmblood horse geldings. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Köller, G.; Gieseler, T.; Schusser, G.F. Hämatologische und blutchemische Referenzbereiche bei Pferden unterschiedlicher Rasse und Altersgruppen basierend auf neuesten labordiagnostischen Methoden. Pferdeheilkunde 2014, 30, 381–393. (In German) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chameroy, K.A.; Frank, N.; Elliott, S.B.; Boston, R.C. Effects of a supplement containing chromium and magnesium on morphometric measurements, resting glucose, insulin concentrations and insulin sensitivity in laminitic obese horses. Equine Vet. J. 2011, 43, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ahn, H.R.; Shin, M.H.; Nam HSPark, K.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Jeong, S.K.; Choi, J.S.; Kweon, S.S. The association between liver enzymes and risk of type 2 diabetes: The Namwon study. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2014, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Durham, A.E.; Hughes, K.J.; Cottle, H.J.; Rendle, D.I.; Boston, R.C. Type 2 diabetes mellitus with pancreatic beta cell dysfunction in 3 horses confirmed with minimal model analysis. Equine Vet. J. 2009, 41, 924–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Frank, N.; Elliott, S.B.; Brandt, L.E.; Keisler, D.H. Physical characteristics, blood hormone concentrations, and plasma lipid concentrations in obese horses with insulin resistance. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2006, 228, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dunkel, B.; Wilford, S.A.; Parkinson, N.J.; Ward, C.; Smith, P.; Grahame, L.; Brazil, T.; Schott, H.C., 2nd. Severe hypertriglyceridaemia in horses and ponies with endocrine disorders. Equine Vet. J. 2014, 46, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mack, S.J.; Kirkby, K.; Malalana, F.; McGowan, C.M. Elevations in serum muscle enzyme activities in racehorses due to unaccustomed exercise and training. Vet. Rec. 2014, 174, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. McGowan, C. Clinical pathology in the racing horse: The role of clinical pathology in assessing fitness and performance in the racehorse. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2008, 24, 405–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ramsay, J.D.; Evanoff, R.; Mealey, R.H.; Simpson, E.L. The prevalence of elevated gamma-glutamyltransferase and sorbitol dehydrogenase activity in racing Thoroughbreds and their associations with viral infection. Equine Vet. J. 2019, 51, 738–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Boyd, J.W. The mechanisms relating to increases in plasma enzymes and isoenzymes in diseases of animals. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 1983, 12, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Snow, D.H.; Harris, P. Enzymes as markers of physical fitness and training of racing horses. Adv. Clin. Enzymol. 1988, 6, 251. [Google Scholar]
  45. Swerczek, T.W. Tyzzer’s disease in foals: Retrospective studies from 1969 to 2010. Can. Vet. J. 2013, 54, 876–880. [Google Scholar]
  46. Curran, J.M.; Sutherland, R.J.; Peet, R.L. A screening test for subclinical liver disease in horses affected by pyrrolizidine alkaloid toxicosis. Aust. Vet. J. 1996, 74, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. West, H.J. Observation on gamma glutamil transferaz 5′-nucleotidase and leucone aminopeptidase activities in the plasma of the horse. Res. Vet. Sci. 1989, 46, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marrs, J.; Small, J.; Milne, E.M.; John, H.A. Liver and biliary system pathology in equine dysautonomia (grass sickness). J. Vet. Med. A Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 2001, 48, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Durongphongtorn, S.; McDonell, W.N.; Kerr, C.L.; Neto, F.J.; Mirakhur, K.K. Comparison of hemodynamic, clinicopathologic, and gastrointestinal motility effects and recovery characteristics of anesthesia with isoflurane and halothane in horses undergoing arthroscopic surgery. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2006, 67, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vengust, M.; Jager, M.C.; Zalig, V.; Cociancich, V.; Laverack, M.; Renshaw, R.W.; Dubovi, E.; Tomlinson, J.E.; Van de Walle, G.R.; Divers, T.J. First report of equine parvovirus-hepatitis-associated Theiler’s disease in Europe. Equine Vet. J. 2020, 52, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lyons, S.; Kapoor, A.; Sharp, C.; Schneider, B.S.; Wolfe, N.D.; Culshaw, G.; Corcoran, B.; McGorum, B.C.; Simmonds, P. Nonprimate hepaciviruses in domestic horses, United Kingdom. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 1976–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peek, S.F. Cholangiohepatitis in the mature horse. Equine Vet. Educ. 2004, 16, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saulez, M.N.; Cebra, C.K.; Tornquist, S.J. The diagnostic and prognostic value of alkaline phosphatase activity in serum and peritoneal fluid from horses with acute colic. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2004, 18, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Underwood, C.; Southwood, L.L.; Walton, R.M.; Johnson, A.L. Hepatic and metabolic changes in surgical colic patients: A pilot study. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2010, 20, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ryu, S.H.; Bak, U.B.; Lee, C.W.; Lee, Y.L. Cholelithiasis associated with recurrent colic in a Thoroughbred mare. J. Vet. Sci. 2004, 5, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tennent-Brown, B.S.; Mudge, M.C.; Hardy, J.; Whelchel, D.D.; Freeman, D.E.; Fischer, A.T., Jr. Liver lobe torsion in six horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2012, 241, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mair, T.S.; Love, S. Gastroenterology 2. Hepatic and intestinal disorders. Equine Med. Surg. Reprod. 2012, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Peek, S.F.; Divers, T.J. Medical treatment of cholangiohepatitis and cholelithiasis in mature horses: 9 cases (1991–1998). Equine Vet. J. 2000, 32, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. van der Luer, R.J.; Kroneman, J. Biliary atresia in a foal. Equine Vet. J. 1982, 14, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Elfenbein, J.R.; House, A.M. Pasture-associated Liver Disease in Horses. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, San Antonio, TX, USA, 18–22 November 2011; pp. 206–209. [Google Scholar]
  61. Braga, A.; Almeida, F.; Silva, V.; Almeida, M.; Keller, K.; Diegues, V.; Thomes, F.; Rocha Rosa, C. Horses fed meal contaminated with mycotoxins performing short-term exercises. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2020, 40, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dänicke, S.; Saltzmann, J.; Liermann, W.; Glatter, M.; Hüther, L.; Kersten, S.; Zeyner, A.; Feige, K.; Warnken, T. Evaluation of Inner Exposure of Horses to Zearalenone (ZEN), Deoxynivalenol (DON) and Their Metabolites in Relation to Colic and Health-Related Clinical-Chemical Traits. Toxins 2021, 13, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Theelen, M.J.P.; Beukers, M.; Grinwis, G.C.M.; Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan, M.M. Chronic iron overload causing haemochromatosis and hepatopathy in 21 horses and one donkey. Equine Vet. J. 2019, 51, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Abdelkader, S.V.; Gudding, R.; Nordstoga, K. Clinical chemical constituents in relation to liver amyloidosis in serum-producing horses. J. Comp. Pathol. 1991, 105, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hablolvarid, M.H.; Eslampanah, M.; Akbari, A. Prognosis of hepatic amyloidosis status and insufficiency in snake antivenom producing horses. Arch. Razi Inst. 2017, 72, 115–124. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mcconnico, R.; Duckett, W.; Wood, P. Persistent Hyperammonemia in Two Related Morgan Weanlings. J. Vet. Inter. Med. 1997, 11, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Valberg, S.J.; Mickelson, J. Glycogen-Branching Enzyme Deficiency. In Proceedings of the 62th Annual Convention of American Association of Equine Practitioners, Orlando, FL, USA, 3–6 December 2006; pp. 351–353. [Google Scholar]
  68. Seifi, H.; Gray, H.; Mohri, M.; Badiee, A. Hyperlipidemia in Caspian miniature horses: Effects of undernutrition. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2002, 22, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dunkel, B.; McKenzie, H.C., 3rd. Severe hypertriglyceridaemia in clinically ill horses: Diagnosis, treatment and outcome. Equine Vet. J. 2003, 35, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Oikawa, S.; McGuirk, S.; Nishibe, K.; Higuchi, T.; Kurosawa, T.; Watanuki, M.; Satoh, H. Changes of blood biochemical values in ponies recovering from hyperlipemia in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2006, 68, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sellon, D.C.; Spaulding, K.; Breuhaus, B.A.; Katz, L.; Mealey, R. Hepatic abscesses in three horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2000, 15, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.