Next Article in Journal
Physiological Changes in Chicken Embryos Inoculated with Drugs and Viruses Highlight the Need for More Standardization of this Animal Model
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Paratuberculosis Transmission in a Small Dairy Herd Typical of Slovenia Suggests That Different Models Should Be Used to Study Disease Spread in Herds of Different Sizes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Virulence Genes as Markers for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation in Dogs and Cats
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Integrated Basic Heart and Lung Ultrasound Examination for the Differentiation between Bacterial Pneumonia and Lung Neoplasm in Dogs—A New Diagnostic Algorithm

Animals 2022, 12(9), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091154
by Andrzej Łobaczewski 1, Michał Czopowicz 2, Agata Moroz 2, Marcin Mickiewicz 2, Rafał Sapierzyński 3, Sylwia Tarka 4, Tadeusz Frymus 5, Wojciech Mądry 6, Michał Buczyński 6 and Olga Szaluś-Jordanow 5,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Animals 2022, 12(9), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091154
Submission received: 26 March 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 27 April 2022 / Published: 29 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring the Mechanism of Animal Disease: New Diagnostic Methods)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript "Integrated basic heart and lung ultrasound examination for the differentiation between bacterial pneumonia and lung neoplasm in dogs – a new diagnostic algorithm" (Manuscript ID: animals-1676040) faces with a methodological approach two important pathologies of dogs, lung neoplasm and bacterial pneumonia. 

The manuscript is well structured and clear in all its parts. The only advice I would like to give to the authors is to dedicate a part of the Introduction to the description of the pathologies taken into consideration. In particular, please specify the etiological agents for bacterial pneumonia. 

Author Response

The manuscript "Integrated basic heart and lung ultrasound examination for the differentiation between bacterial pneumonia and lung neoplasm in dogs – a new diagnostic algorithm" (Manuscript ID: animals-1676040) faces with a methodological approach two important pathologies of dogs, lung neoplasm and bacterial pneumonia. 

Reviewer: The manuscript is well structured and clear in all its parts. The only advice I would like to give to the authors is to dedicate a part of the Introduction to the description of the pathologies taken into consideration.

Our answer: done

Reviewer: In particular, please specify the etiological agents for bacterial pneumonia.

Our answer: In our research, the initial diagnosis of pneumonia was based on a clinical examination, clinical interview combined with an ultrasound image, and the confirmation of the diagnosis was the disappearance of lesions after the applied broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and the animal's recovery to full health. Unfortunately, we have no confirmed etiological factors in our patients.

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript proposes a diagram to differentiate lung neoplasia to pneumonia. However, authors mixed primary and metastatic diseases. Therefore, could be interesting to shown some x-ray images of the disease diseases, to increase reader understanding.

Authors could provide more information in the manuscript to direct the manuscript regarding neoplastic disease to primary versus metastatic disease. In this reviewer understanding, metastatic disease could be challenging regarding the differentiation with pneumonia. Is that correct?

Later in results, authors described primary lung tumors as primary diagnosis. Why primary lung tumors could be challenging regarding its diagnosis?

Please, divide the introduction section in different paragraphs

Do not start the results section with the word “Finally”.

Author Response

Reviewer: This manuscript proposes a diagram to differentiate lung neoplasia to pneumonia. However, authors mixed primary and metastatic diseases. Therefore, could be interesting to shown some x-ray images of the disease diseases, to increase reader understanding.

Our answer: done

Reviewer: Authors could provide more information in the manuscript to direct the manuscript regarding neoplastic disease to primary versus metastatic disease. In this reviewer understanding, metastatic disease could be challenging regarding the differentiation with pneumonia. Is that correct?

Our answer:

A metastatic neoplasm was diagnosed when a primary tumor was found in clinical examination or ultrasonography of the abdominal cavity. We added this information in the Materials and Methods section, lines 211-212. Hopefully, it is clearer now. Unfortunately, it is not possible to distinguish between primary and metastatic lesions based on the ultrasound image, because primary lesions are often not a single solid tumor, but in the course of a primary lung neoplasm, we observe all described changes, such as B lines, thickening of the pleural border, consolidation, hepatization.

Reviewer: Later in results, authors described primary lung tumors as primary diagnosis. Why primary lung tumors could be challenging regarding its diagnosis?

Our answer:

As we mentioned above, primary lung cancer is not only single lung tumors, but also various lesions, covering a large part of the lung.

Reviewer: Please, divide the introduction section in different paragraphs

Our answer: Done.

Reviewer: Do not start the results section with the word “Finally”.

Our answer: done.

 

 

Back to TopTop