Association with Different Housing and Welfare Parameters on Results of a Novel Object Test in Laying Hen Flocks on Farm
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Husbandry
2.2. Novel Object Test
2.3. Feather and Integument Scoring Method
2.4. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Housing System
3.2. Age
3.3. Flock Size
3.4. Feather Damage and Cannibalism
3.5. Feather Color
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Raspa, F.; Tarantola, M.; Muca, E.; Bergero, D.; Soglia, D.; Cavallini, D.; Vervuert, I.; Bordin, C.; De Palo, P.; Valle, E. Does Feeding Management Make a Difference to Behavioural Activities and Welfare of Horses Reared for Meat Production? Animals 2022, 12, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giorgino, A.; Raspa, F.; Valle, E.; Bergero, D.; Cavallini, D.; Gariglio, M.; Bongiorno, V.; Bussone, G.; Bergagna, S.; Cimino, F.; et al. Effect of Dietary Organic Acids and Botanicals on Metabolic Status and Milk Parameters in Mid–Late Lactating Goats. Animals 2023, 13, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pollesel, M.; Tassinari, M.; Frabetti, A.; Fornasini, D.; Cavallini, D. Effect of does parity order on litter homogeneity parameters. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 19, 1188–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masebo, N.T.; Marliani, G.; Cavallini, D.; Accorsi, P.A.; Di Pietro, M.; Beltrame, A.; Gentile, A.; Jacinto, J.G.P. Health and welfare assessment of beef cattle during the adaptation period in a specialized commercial fattening unit. Res. Vet. Sci. 2023, 158, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spoolder, H. Fear of humans. In On Farm Monitoring of Pig Welfare; Velarde, A., Geers, R., Eds.; Wageningen Academic: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 35–39. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes, R.N. Intrinsic exploration in animals: Motives and measurement. Behav. Process. 1997, 41, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozempolska-Rucinska, I.; Kibala, L.; Prochniak, T.; Zieba, G.; Lukaszewicz, M. Genetics of the Novel Object Test outcome in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017, 193, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, S.B.; Geyer, M.A.; Gallagher, D.; Paulus, M.P. The balance between approach and avoidance behaviors in a novel object exploration paradigm in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2004, 152, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WelfareQuality®. Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Poultry (Broilers, Laying Hens); Welfare Quality Consortium: Lelystad, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, R.B. Fear and adaptability in poultry: Insights, implications and imperatives. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 1996, 52, 131–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, R.B.; Satterlee, D.G.; Marks, H.L. Fear-related behaviour in Japanese quail divergently selected for body weight. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 52, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vestergaard, K.S.; Kruijt, J.P.; Hogan, J.A. Feather pecking and chronic fear in groups of red junglefowl: Their relations to dustbathing, rearing environment and social status. Anim. Behav. 1993, 45, 1127–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Johnsen, P.F.; Vestergaard, K.S.; Nørgaard-Nielsen, G. Influence of early rearing conditions on the development of feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998, 60, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, R.B.; Blokhuis, H.J.; Beuving, G. Open-field and tonic immobility responses in domestic chicks of two genetic lines differing in their propensity to feather peck. Br. Poult. Sci. 1995, 36, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodenburg, T.B.; Buitenhuis, A.J.; Ask, B.; Uitdehaag, K.A.; Koene, P.; van der Poel, J.J.; van Arendonk, J.A.M.; Bovenhuis, H. Genetic and Phenotypic Correlations Between Feather Pecking and Open-Field Response in Laying Hens at Two Different Ages. Behav. Genet. 2004, 34, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uitdehaag, K.; Komen, H.; Rodenburg, T.B.; Kemp, B.; van Arendonk, J. The novel object test as predictor of feather damage in cage-housed Rhode Island Red and White Leghorn laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 109, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hocking, P.M.; Channing, C.E.; Waddington, D.; Jones, R.B. Age-related changes in fear, sociality and pecking behaviours in two strains of laying hen. Br. Poult. Sci. 2001, 42, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albentosa, M.J.; Kjaer, J.B.; Nicol, C.J. Strain and age differences in behaviour, fear response and pecking tendency in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003, 44, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicol, C.J.; Gregory, N.G.; Knowles, T.G.; Parkman, I.D.; Wilkins, L.J. Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 65, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilcík, B.; Keeling, L.J. Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 68, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilcik, B.; Keeling, L.J.; Newberry, R.C. Effect of group size on tonic immobility in laying hens. Behav. Process. 1998, 43, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forkman, B.; Boissy, A.; Meunier-Salaün, M.C.; Canali, E.; Jones, R.B. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 92, 340–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dalmau, A.; Mainau, E.; Velarde, A. Reliability of Fear Assessment in Growing Pigs Exposed to a Novel Object Test in Commercial Conditions. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2017, 20, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Directive, E.U. Council Directive 99/74/EC of 19 July 1999 Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Laying Hens. Off. J. Eur. Communities 1999, 203, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
- Tiersch, G. Tierschutzgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 18. Mai 2006 (BGBl. I S. 1206, 1313), das zuletzt durch Artikel 2 Absatz 20 des Gesetzes vom 20. Dezember 2022 (BGBl. I S. 2752) geändert worden ist. Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tierschg/BJNR012770972.html (accessed on 2 July 2023).
- TierSchNutztV. Verordnung zum Schutz landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere und anderer zur Erzeugung tierischer Produkte gehaltener Tiere bei ihrer Haltung. Tierschutz-Nutztierhaltungsverordnung in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 22. August 2006 (BGBl. I S. 2043), die zuletzt durch Artikel 1a der Verordnung vom 29. Januar 2021 (BGBl. I S. 146) geändert worden ist. Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tierschnutztv/BJNR275800001.html (accessed on 2 July 2023).
- Lohmann Management Guide, Hendrix Management Guide for Alternative Housing Systems, e.g., 06/21_V01-21. Available online: https://lohmann-breeders.com/e-guide/alternative-housing/ (accessed on 2 July 2023).
- European Commission. Council Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, 50, 33–79. [Google Scholar]
- Giersberg, M.F.; Spindler, B.; Kemper, N. Assessment of Plumage and Integument Condition in Dual-Purpose Breeds and Conventional Layers. Animals 2017, 7, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bilcik, B.; Keeling, L.J. Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 1999, 40, 444–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landis, J.R.; Koch, G.G. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 1977, 33, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hemsworth, P.H.; Coleman, G.J. Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity of Intensively Farmed Animals; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hemsworth, P.H.; Mellor, D.; Cronin, G.; Tilbrook, A. Scientific assessment of animal welfare. N. Z. Vet. J. 2015, 63, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uitdehaag, K.A.; Rodenburg, T.B.; Bolhuis, J.E.; Decuypere, E.; Komen, H. Mixed housing of different genetic lines of laying hens negatively affects feather pecking and fear related behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 116, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodenburg, T.B.; Van Krimpen, M.M.; De Jong, I.C.; De Haas, E.N.; Kops, M.S.; Riedstra, B.J.; Nordquist, R.E.; Wagenaar, J.P.; Bestman, M.; Nicol, C.J. The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: Identifying the underlying principles. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2013, 69, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fraisse, F.; Cockrem, J.F. Corticosterone and fear behaviour in white and brown caged laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2006, 47, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, L.E.; Lewis, K.; Kimpton, A.; Nicol, C.J. Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease. Vet. Rec. 2000, 147, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knierim, U. Animal welfare aspects of outdoor runs for laying hens: A review. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2006, 54, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sherwin, C.M.; Richards, G.J.; Nicol, C.J. Comparison of the welfare of layer hens in 4 housing systems in the UK. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010, 51, 488–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huber-Eicher, B.; Audige, L. Analysis of risk factors for the occurrence of feather pecking in laying hen growers. Br. Poult. Sci. 1999, 40, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nannoni, E.; Buonaiuto, G.; Martelli, G.; Lizzi, G.; Trevisani, G.; Garavini, G.; Sardi, L. Influence of Increased Freedom of Movement on Welfare and Egg Laying Pattern of Hens Kept in Aviaries. Animals 2022, 12, 2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameters | Number of Flocks | ||
---|---|---|---|
Housing System | Flock Size | White | Brown |
Barn | Extra small (<1500) | 1 | - |
Small (1500–5000) | - | 2 | |
Medium (5000–10,000) | 2 | 1 | |
Large (>10,000) | 1 | - | |
Free-range | Extra small (<1500) | - | 1 |
Small (1500–5000) | - | 3 | |
Medium (5000–10,000) | 1 | 1 | |
Large (>10,000) | - | - | |
Organic | Extra small (<1500) | - | 1 |
Small (1500–5000) | - | - | |
Medium (5000–10,000) | - | 1 | |
Large (>10,000) | - | 1 |
Krippendorff’s Alpha Coefficient for the Scored Body Region | Integument Damage | Plumage Damage |
---|---|---|
Head/neck | 1.0 | 0.61 |
Rump | 1.0 | 0.74 |
Wings | 1.0 | 0.41 |
Tail | 0.73 | 0.70 |
Belly | 0.40 | 0.73 |
Score | Feather Losses | Score | Skin Lesions |
---|---|---|---|
0 | No feather losses | 0 | No skin injuries |
1 | ≤25% feather loss (slight damage) | 1 | Injuries of <1 cm diameter |
2 | >25% to ≤50% feather loss (moderate damage) | 2 | Injuries > 1 cm–<2 cm diameter |
3 | >50% feather loss (severe damage) | 3 | Injuries > 2 cm diameter |
Flock-Category | Definition of Feather Damages | Flock-Category | Definition of Cannibalism |
---|---|---|---|
0 | No animal received the score 1 or worse | 0 | No scored hen received the score 1 or worse |
1 | >15% of the scored hens received score 1 and worse (slight feather damages) | 1 | >1 scored hen received score 2 and worse (slight cannibalism) |
2 | >50% of the scored hens received score 1 and worse (moderate feather damages) | 2 | >15% of the scored hens received score 2 and worse (severe cannibalism) |
3 | >80% of the scored hens received score 1 and worse (severe feather damages) | 3 | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hüttner, J.; Clauß, A.; Klambeck, L.; Andersson, R.; Kemper, N.; Spindler, B. Association with Different Housing and Welfare Parameters on Results of a Novel Object Test in Laying Hen Flocks on Farm. Animals 2023, 13, 2207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132207
Hüttner J, Clauß A, Klambeck L, Andersson R, Kemper N, Spindler B. Association with Different Housing and Welfare Parameters on Results of a Novel Object Test in Laying Hen Flocks on Farm. Animals. 2023; 13(13):2207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132207
Chicago/Turabian StyleHüttner, Jennifer, Annette Clauß, Lea Klambeck, Robby Andersson, Nicole Kemper, and Birgit Spindler. 2023. "Association with Different Housing and Welfare Parameters on Results of a Novel Object Test in Laying Hen Flocks on Farm" Animals 13, no. 13: 2207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132207