Next Article in Journal
Hybridization in Canids—A Case Study of Pampas Fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) and Domestic Dog (Canis lupus familiaris) Hybrid
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Microplastic Exposure Changes Gut Microbiota in Chickens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 15
10.3390/ani13152504
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Host Associations of Culicoides Biting Midges in Northeastern Kansas, USA

by
Bethany L. McGregor
1,* and
Aaron Lewis
2,†
1
Arthropod-Borne Animal Diseases Research Unit, Center for Grain and Animal Health Research, USDA-ARS, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA
2
College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Deceased.
Animals 2023, 13(15), 2504; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152504
Submission received: 29 June 2023 / Revised: 28 July 2023 / Accepted: 31 July 2023 / Published: 3 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vector-Borne Diseases and Vector Control Strategies in Animals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Culicoides biting midges are small biting flies that can spread diseases to livestock. Understanding which animal species midges feed on in nature is important for assessing the risk of disease spread. In this study, we used molecular methods to determine host associations for five midge species. Midges were found to feed heavily on either birds or mammals, with a small degree of crossover for all species. The size of the bloodmeal was found to make a bigger difference in successfully detecting the host than did the digestion stage. These results indicate that species that were found to feed heavily on birds are unlikely to be vectors of mammalian diseases and provide further evidence of the vector status of the mammalian-feeding midge species.

Abstract

Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are hematophagous flies that transmit several viruses of veterinary concern to livestock. Understanding blood feeding behaviors is integral towards identification of putative vector species and preventing the transmission of these pathogens. PCR-based blood meal analysis was conducted on 440 blood-engorged Culicoides midges collected in northeastern Kansas, with 316 (71.8%) returning non-human vertebrate identifications at the ≥95% identity match level. Broadly, Culicoides sonorensis, Culicoides stellifer, and Culicoides variipennis were found to feed heavily on mammalian hosts, while Culicoides crepuscularis and Culicoides haematopotus fed on avian hosts. The blood meals in all specimens were graded prior to DNA extraction to determine whether blood meal size or digestion status significantly impacted the likelihood of a quality host match. Size had a significant impact on the likelihood of a quality match at grades 3–5, whereas digestion only significantly impacted outcomes at the most extreme grade. These vector–host dynamics have not previously been studied in Culicoides collected in Kansas, which represents a unique tallgrass prairie biome within the United States that is heavily interspersed with livestock operations. Based on these data, the highly abundant species C. crepuscularis and C. haematopotus are unlikely to be major vectors of mammalian viruses.

1. Introduction

Biting midges in the genus Culicoides are small, blood-feeding Dipterans which can transmit numerous pathogens of veterinary importance. In the United States, the primary Culicoides-borne pathogens of interest include bluetongue virus (BTV), which primarily affects sheep and white-tailed deer; epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV), which affects white-tailed deer, mule deer, and pronghorn antelope; and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), which causes disease in horses, swine, and cattle [1]. While the host range for each of these viruses varies, they all primarily infect large hooved mammals, making these hosts particularly susceptible targets for blood feeding midges during outbreak periods.
The host associations of many North American Culicoides species are poorly understood, although there is evidence that midges can show varying degrees of association with different host groups. Class-level associations have been documented for several midge species, although strict mammalophilic or ornithophilic habits appear to be rare, based on these investigations [2,3]. In situations with well characterized host communities, host associations at the species level have been identified, indicating that some midge species may feed more preferentially on certain hosts when they are available [4]. Host associations and feeding habits are a vital part of understanding not only the ecology of vector insects but also the potential for disease transmission within a vector population.
Vectorial capacity (VC) is a measure of the efficiency of vector-borne disease transmission that takes into account both intrinsic factors, such as vector competence and the extrinsic incubation period, as well as extrinsic factors like vector density, the daily survival rate, and the daily blood feeding rate [5]. The inclusion of each of these variables ensures that the full breadth of factors contributing to transmission is considered in determining the likelihood of disease being spread from a vector to a host. For example, one study on Plasmodium yoelii infection in Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes found that increased temperature shortened the EIP, which should favor increased transmission. However, increased temperatures also had a nonlinear impact on vector competence, which ultimately reduced the VC at high temperatures [6]. The blood feeding rate in particular is an important part of the VC equation, as this variable is squared to represent the two feedings necessary for the transmission of a pathogen. First, the acquisition of the pathogen by a vector from an infected host, and then subsequent transmission to a naïve host. The inclusion of this squared variable underscores the importance of understanding host associations and blood feeding ecology. If there is a weak association between a vector and the susceptible hosts for a pathogen, the VC is reduced and the likelihood of transmission decreases.
Historically, host associations for biting arthropods were determined through the use of various non-specific serological assays that mainly differentiated at the family or order level [7] or through field studies employing tethered or caged hosts used as lures [8]. In both methods, the information gathered is limited only to the specific hosts that are actively being studied. Molecular blood meal analysis, which generates broad vertebrate matches by targeting mitochondrial genes such as 16s, cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI), and cytochrome oxidase B (CytB), is a modern method that provides a relatively unbiased determination of host blood meal source. Molecular blood meal analysis has been used for a variety of blood-feeding Dipteran taxa, including mosquitoes, sand flies, stable flies, tsetse flies, and biting midges [9,10,11,12,13,14].
While molecular blood meal analysis provides an unbiased view of host breadth, the limitations of this method have also been investigated in some taxa. In sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae), successful molecular identification of a host was linked to the digestion stage of the blood meal rather than the size of the blood meal present [9]. In mosquitoes, decreasing size in smaller mosquitoes was found to lead to decreased ability to identify hosts, compared with larger mosquitoes, especially when the smaller blood meal was partially digested [14]. In biting midges, time post-feed significantly impacted amplification success, although the authors found that long term storage of samples (up to 9 months) and storage temperature (ambient vs. −20 °C) did not significantly affect amplification success [15].
In the present study, molecular blood meal analysis was conducted on blood-engorged Culicoides biting midges collected in agricultural and sylvatic habitats in Northeastern Kansas, USA, to investigate broad host associations of particularly abundant midge species. All blood meals were characterized by blood meal size and digestion status to further investigate how these two metrics impacted blood meal amplification and successful host match.

2. Materials and Methods

Field collections were conducted at two sites in northeastern Kansas, USA between June 2020 and October 2021. The first site was the Konza Prairie Biological Station (KPBS), a 3487 ha expanse of native tallgrass prairie habitat that has watersheds dedicated to bison and cattle grazing as well as un-grazed areas. Twelve traps were operated at KPBS, including four in the un-grazed portion of the property, five in the cattle-grazed section, and four in the bison-grazed section. The second trapping location was the Animal Science and Industry teaching facilities at Kansas State University, located in Manhattan, KS. Ten traps were set at the KSU sites, including at the Sheep & Meat Goat Center (1), the Dairy Teaching and Research Center (4), the Beef Cattle Research Center (BCRC) (1), the Cow–Calf Unit (3), and the Beef Stocker Unit (1) (Figure 1). Midges were collected using CDC miniature light traps baited with UV LED arrays (BioQuip Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA). Traps were modified with a secondary mesh to exclude large insects and a cloth funnel to direct small insects into an attached conical tube containing 90% ethanol. Midges were sorted from bycatch using a stereomicroscope and identified to the species level using morphological characteristics [16,17,18]. Blood meals were then scored based on the level of digestion and the size of the blood meal (Figure 2). To control for observer bias, the same person scored all specimens. Following scoring, blood-engorged specimens were air-dried, transferred into individual 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes, and placed at −80 °C until further processing.
Blood-engorged midges were manually homogenized in 10 µL of 0.9% NaCl with a pestle using a pestle motor (Kimble, 749540-0000, DWK Life Sciences, Millville, NJ, USA). DNA was extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the included spin-column protocol. The first step of the standard protocol was modified by combining the homogenate with 20 µL of proteinase K and 200 µL of PBS. The remaining steps of the protocol were followed as written. Eluted DNA was stored in a −20 °C freezer.
Host DNA was amplified by PCR using two different primer sets. Samples were initially run with primers targeting cytochrome B (F: GGACAAATATCATTCTGAGG, R: GGGTGGAATGGGATTTTGTC) [13]. Any samples that failed to amplify using the cytochrome B primer set were subsequently run using primers targeting the mitochondrial 16s rRNA gene fragment (F: GCCTGTTTACCAAAAACATCAC, R: CTCCATAGGGTCTTCTCGTCTT) [13]. These primer sets were selected due to their successful use with blood meal analysis in previous studies. All PCR products were run on a 1% agarose gel with CyberSafe stain at 110 V for 20 min and visualized under blue light for the presence of bands. Samples that produced bands were sent for commercial Sanger sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Louisville, KY, USA). All PCR and electrophoresis assays were run with positive controls derived from horse blood samples and negative controls of molecular grade water. All chromatograms were checked for the presence of multiple peaks that would indicate the possibility of multiple blood meals, but none were detected.
Sequences were run against the GenBank database using BLASTn (NCBI, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) to determine host matches for each individual blood meal. Matches were considered good quality at ≥95% identity match and ≥75% query coverage. Matches to human hosts were removed from this analysis to rule out any potential contamination during processing. The influence of digestion and size of the blood meal on successful host identification was evaluated using logistic regression, in which the size and digestion score were assigned as factors and the outcomes were either a successful match following the criteria above or an unsuccessful match/no amplification. Blood meal size and degradation were evaluated independently using R Studio version 3.5.0 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria, 2018).

3. Results

A total of 440 blood-engorged Culicoides were collected and processed for blood meal analysis during the study period. The species for which blood meals were evaluated included C. arboricola Root and Hoffman (n = 2), C. bergi Cochrane (n = 1), C. crepuscularis Malloch (n = 45), C. haematopotus Malloch (n = 71), C. hinmani Khalaf (n = 2), C. nanus Root and Hoffman (n = 1), C. sonorensis Wirth and Jones (n = 72), C. stellifer Coquillett (n = 98), and C. variipennis Coquillett (n = 148). Out of 440 blood meals, 316 (71.8%) returned good quality, non-human matches for downstream analysis, and are described below.
Overall, blood meals by each species were mainly split by vertebrate class (Figure 3). Species feeding primarily on mammals included C. sonorensis (92.7%), C. stellifer (82.6%), and C. variipennis (97.6%), while C. crepuscularis (92%) and C. haematopotus (90%) mainly fed on avian hosts. While cows were the dominant species fed on by mammalian feeders, blood meals were also taken from horses, white-tailed deer, dogs, sheep, and elk. Wild turkeys constituted the largest single-species proportion of avian bloodmeals, although blood meals were also taken from numerous wild songbird species (Table 1). Culicoides arboricola (n = 2, Wild Turkey), C. bergi (n = 1, Northern Cardinal), and C. nanus (n = 1, Summer Tanager) fed on avians; however, there were too few blood meals to draw conclusions on the broad host associations of these species. Neither of the C. hinmani bloodmeals met the criteria for inclusion in the dataset.
The majority of blood-engorged midges collected for this study were found at the Beef Cattle Research Center, where the most common blood-engorged species collected were C. variipennis (n = 101) and C. sonorensis (n = 41). These species were not collected in this great of an abundance at any other site in the study. Despite their association with the Beef Cattle Research Center, very few C. sonorensis and C. variipennis blood feds were collected on other cattle-associated KSU units, and none were collected within the cattle units at Konza. Culicoides stellifer was the only species collected from all three grazing regimens present at Konza, and it was also collected in great abundance at the KSU Cow–Calf Unit and Beef Stocker Unit. Culicoides haematopotus and C. crepuscularis were most abundant at the KSU Beef Stocker Unit and Cow–Calf Unit, respectively (Table 2).
The most common grade for blood meal digestion was a 2, with the most common size grade being a 1 (Figure 4). Digestion status was only found to significantly impact host identification at the most-digested grade (5, p < 0.001). Size significantly impacted identification outcomes at grades 3–5 (p = 0.006 at grade 3, p < 0.001 at grades 4–5).

4. Discussion

Blood meal analysis provides an unbiased opportunity to investigate the host associations of blood-feeding arthropods. In this study, the host associations of five Culicoides species were determined. Species such as C. sonorensis, C. stellifer, and C. variipennis were found to feed heavily on mammalian hosts, especially cattle. This is in stark contrast to C. crepuscularis and C. haematopotus, which were found to feed primarily on avian hosts. Although class associations were discernable, there was some degree of crossover for all species tested, with mammalian feeders taking occasional avian blood meals and avian feeders also taking mammalian meals. Additionally, blood meal results were reported for C. arboricola, C. bergi, and C. nanus, documenting avian feeding behavior in these species, although the sample sizes for each were too low to draw any significant conclusions for these species.
While the observed heavy cattle feeding by the mammalian feeders was not surprising considering the presence of cattle at several of the study sites, blood meal did not always correspond with the dominant host present at the sites. Despite 12 blood-engorged midges coming from the Sheep and Meat Goat Center, only one of these (C. stellifer) was determined to have a sheep blood meal. Four of the blood meals from this site were taken from cattle, possibly taken from an adjacent beef cattle research facility which we did not sample from for this study. Midges can disperse across several kilometers [19], and blood-engorged midges have been found to disperse hundreds of meters despite the weight added by the blood meal [20,21]. The average digestion score for the midges collected at the Sheep and Meat Goat Center was 2.3, indicating that substantial egg development had not yet begun, and oviposition was not imminent for most of these midges. These midges may have been seeking a microclimate ideal for completing digestion of the blood meal.
Culicoides variipennis and C. sonorensis were primarily found to be associated with the Beef Cattle Research Center. This facility typically houses large numbers of beef cattle in pens at a relatively high density, which is likely generating a significant amount of attractive host volatiles that these midges are following. These two species are known to emerge from the wastewater ponds present at the Dairy Teaching and Research Center located across the street (McGregor, Unpublished Data). It is surprising that blood-engorged specimens of these two species were not collected in greater abundance from the traps located at the dairy, which also houses a large concentration of cattle and is closer to the probable larval habitat from which these species are emerging. It is unclear whether this could be due to differences in handling between the beef and dairy cattle, the density of animals present, or whether there could be differences in attractiveness between cattle bred for these different purposes.
Blood meal size was found to have a greater impact on the ability to identify blood meal source than did digestion status. This is in contrast to a study conducted on blood-engorged sand flies, which found that digestion was more important than blood meal size [9]. While the slightly smaller size of biting midges compared to sand flies could explain this difference, both groups are extremely small flies that take small blood meals, indicating that invertebrate size alone may not be resulting in this discrepancy. It is possible that digestion of midge bloodmeals does not degrade host DNA as quickly or efficiently as sand fly blood meal digestion. More research is needed to understand the comparative physiology of blood meal digestion in the Nematocera.
From a disease transmission standpoint, these data indicate that C. crepuscularis and C. haematopotus are unlikely vectors of mammalian pathogens. A previous study found BTV-positive pools of C. crepuscularis and C. haematopotus collected during a BTV outbreak in Louisiana [22]. Another study conducted in Louisiana detected EHDV in a pool of C. crepuscularis [23]. The positives detected in these studies were from individuals without observable blood in the gut, which would suggest that the detected viruses were present within the insects themselves. However, based on the present study, it seems unlikely that these species would have taken the two blood meals from susceptible mammalian hosts necessary to both pick up and spread these pathogens. There were no local reports of bluetongue virus or epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus transmission during the study period. There was local transmission of vesicular stomatitis virus in 2020 [24]. No effort was made to detect any mammalian viruses from the blood-engorged midges used for this study, since there is no way to determine whether the detected pathogen was actively infecting the insect or if it was just being carried in the bloodmeal.
While C. crepuscularis and C. haematopotus are unlikely mammalian vectors, their avian feeding habits could make these species particularly strong vector candidates for avian pathogens that can be carried by midges. One study conducted in Texas detected Onchocercidae and Haemoproteus DNA in C. crepuscularis [25], but more data are needed to determine the exact role this species and C. haematopotus may play in the transmission of any avian parasites in North America. Avian parasites have also been detected from field-collected Culicoides around the world, including Haemoproteus and Plasmodium species in Germany and Spain [26,27], Trypanosoma, Leucocytozoon, and Plasmodium species in Thailand [28,29], and Haemoproteus in Japan [30], amongst others.
Culicoides sonorensis, C. variipennis, and C. stellifer were all found to feed on mammalian hosts susceptible to midge-borne viruses. Culicoides sonorensis is a confirmed vector for all three North American Culicoides-borne pathogens, so this finding simply reinforces the significance of this vector within the transmission landscape. Culicoides variipennis and C. stellifer have been implicated as putative vectors for VSV and EHDV [24,31,32], and C. stellifer has further been implicated as a putative vector for BTV [32,33,34]. In the absence of laboratory transmission studies, field ecological data such as these can provide further support for the consideration of these species as putative vectors. However, without vector competence studies being conducted, neither species can be considered a fully confirmed vector for these pathogens.
One elk blood meal was detected from a C. stellifer individual collected at the western-most cow–calf site. There are small populations of elk present in eastern Kansas, but their population numbers are low compared to other farmed and sylvatic ungulates in the area. Considering the small population size, and the thought that the closest population had been further to the west near Fort Riley, this host match was surprising. This result emphasizes the utility of using blood meal analysis, not only as a method to make inferences about invertebrate ecology, but also as a tool for monitoring vertebrate populations. Other studies have evaluated the efficacy of using arthropod blood meals for conservation biology [35] and to study changes in vertebrate communities over time [36]. Blood meal analysis results can also be used to make inferences about avian breeding and migration ranges. In this study, we identified blood meals from summer tanagers (taken by C. crepuscularis and C. nanus) from both the KSU and KPBS sites. Riley County, KS, is outside of the typical northwestern boundary of the breeding range for summer tanagers, which is valuable information for monitoring this species.
Blood meal analysis has also been used to monitor how shifts in host communities are impacting disease transmission dynamics. Blood meal analysis conducted on Culex cedecei mosquitoes collected in the Florida Everglades and compared with historical blood meal data showed that host use patterns had shifted from non-rodent meso-mammals to rodents after the introduction of the invasive Burmese python [36]. This shift has the potential to impact transmission of Everglades virus, a member of the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus complex [37], an observation that was made possible due to historical blood meal data collection. In addition to changes due to introduced species, the changing climate is also anticipated to cause shifts in vector presence and abundance, disease incidence, and host ranges [38,39,40]. For these reasons, having benchmark data on host use for blood-feeding arthropods is extremely valuable in determining how the disease transmission landscape is changing over time.

5. Conclusions

Blood meal analysis provides researchers an opportunity to better understand host associations through an unbiased lens. These host associations can in turn be used to better understand disease transmission dynamics, make inferences about the vector status of blood-feeding arthropod species, and even to learn more about the host community that is present. The data can also be used in conjunction with other relevant data to calculate disease transmission metrics such as the vectorial capacity.
In this study, blood meal analysis data collected from northeastern Kansas, USA, revealed that C. crepuscularis and C. haematopotus are primarily feeding on birds, despite historical data indicating the presence of mammalian pathogens in field-collected individuals of these species. Based on their blood-feeding habits in this study, it is unlikely that they would take the two mammalian blood meals necessary for disease transmission to occur. However, their role as potential vectors of avian pathogens is still largely unexplored. Culicoides sonorensis, C. variipennis, and C. stellifer were all found to feed primarily on mammalian hosts. While C. sonorensis is a confirmed vector of all three North American Culicoides-borne viruses, C. variipennis and C. stellifer remain putative vectors that have not been fully confirmed. These data contribute to our understanding of their potential role in the transmission of mammalian viruses and further reinforce the prospect that they contribute to transmission in some capacity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L.M.; methodology, B.L.M.; validation, B.L.M. and A.L.; formal analysis, B.L.M.; investigation, B.L.M. and A.L.; resources, B.L.M.; data curation, B.L.M. and A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L.M.; writing—review and editing, A.L.; visualization, B.L.M.; supervision, B.L.M.; project administration, B.L.M. B.L.M. read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. A.L. read and agreed to the initial manuscript submission but passed away prior to the final published version.

Funding

This research was funded by USDA-ARS National Program 104 Project #3020-32000-018-00D.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on the Ag Data Commons following publication of this research and is also available from the authors by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Travis Davis and Theresa Markwardt for their assistance with collecting and sorting the collections, as well as Robert Pfannenstiel and Mark Ruder for their assistance in identifying the sites used in this study. The authors would also like to thank the managers of the Konza Prairie Biological Station and the Kansas State University Animal Science Units for permission to sample at those locations and the USDA-ARS Boehringer Ingelheim Veterinary Scholars Program for A. Lewis’ stipend funding. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. In memoriam of Aaron Lewis, who tragically passed away prior to publication of this manuscript. May he rest in peace.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McGregor, B.L.; Shults, P.T.; McDermott, E.G. A review of the vector status of North American Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) for bluetongue virus, epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus, and other arboviruses of concern. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2022, 9, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martinez-de la Puente, J.; Figuerola, J.; Soriguer, R. Fur or feather? Feeding preferences of species of Culicoides biting midges in Europe. Trends Parasitol. 2015, 31, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hopken, M.W.; Ryan, B.M.; Huyvaert, K.P.; Piaggio, A.J. Picky eaters are rare: DNA-based blood meal analysis of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) species from the United States. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. McGregor, B.L.; Stenn, T.; Sayler, K.A.; Blosser, E.M.; Blackburn, J.K.; Wisely, S.M.; Burkett-Cadena, N.D. Host use patterns of Culicoides spp. biting midges at a big game preserve in Florida, U.S.A., and implications for the transmission of orbiviruses. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2019, 33, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kramer, L.D.; Ciota, A.T. Dissecting vectorial capacity for mosquito-borne viruses. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2015, 15, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Paaijmans, K.P.; Blanford, S.; Chan, B.H.K.; Thomas, M.B. Warmer temperatures reduce the vectorial capacity of malaria mosquitoes. Biol. Lett. 2011, 8, 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tempelis, C. Host-feeding patterns of mosquitoes, with a review of advances in analysis of blood meals by serology. J. Med. Entomol. 1975, 11, 635–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wright, R.E.; DeFoliart, G.R. Associations of Wisconsin mosquitoes and woodland vertebrate hosts. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1970, 63, 777–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baum, M.; de Castro, E.A.; Pinto, M.C.; Goulart, T.M.; Baura, W.; Klisiowicz Ddo, R.; Vieira da Costa-Ribeiro, M.C. Molecular detection of the blood meal source of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a transmission area of American cutaneous leishmaniasis, Parana State, Brazil. Acta Trop. 2015, 143, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pitzer, J.B.; Kaufman, P.E.; Tenbroeck, S.H.; Maruniak, J.E. Host blood meal identification by multiplex polymerase chain reaction for dispersal evidence of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) between livestock facilities. J. Med. Entomol. 2011, 48, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gaithuma, A.; Yamagishi, J.; Hayashida, K.; Kawai, N.; Namangala, B.; Sugimoto, C. Blood meal sources and bacterial microbiome diversity in wild-caught tsetse flies. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sloyer, K.E.; Acevedo, C.; Wisely, S.M.; Burkett-Cadena, N.D. Host associations of biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides) at deer farms in Florida, USA. J. Med. Entomol. 2023, 60, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Blosser, E.M.; Stenn, T.; Acevedo, C.; Burkett-Cadena, N.D. Host use and seasonality of Culex (Melanoconion) iolambdis (Diptera: Culicidae) from eastern Florida, USA. Acta Trop. 2016, 164, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kent, R.J.; Norris, D.E. Identification of mammalian blood meals in mosquitoes by a multiplexed polymerase chain reaction targeting cytochrome B. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005, 73, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bellekom, B.; Bailey, A.; England, M.; Langlands, Z.; Lewis, O.T.; Hackett, T.D. Effects of storage conditions and digestion time on DNA amplification of biting midge (Culicoides) blood meals. Parasites Vectors 2023, 16, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Blanton, F.S.; Wirth, W.W. The Sand Flies (Culicoides) of Florida (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). In Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas; Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1979; Volume 10. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wirth, W.W.; Dyce, A.L.; Peterson, B.V. An atlas of wing photographs, with a summary of the numerical characters of the Nearctic species of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Contrib. Am. Entomol. Inst. 1985, 22, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wirth, W.W.; Blanton, F.S. The North American Culicoides of the Guttipennis Group (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Fla. Entomol. 1967, 50, 207–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanders, C.J.; Harrup, L.E.; Tugwell, L.A.; Brugman, V.A.; England, M.; Carpenter, S. Quantification of within- and between-farm dispersal of Culicoides biting midges using an immunomarking technique. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 54, 1429–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lassen, S.B.; Nielsen, S.A.; Skovgard, H.; Kristensen, M. Molecular identification of bloodmeals from biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides Latreille) in Denmark. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 108, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bartsch, S.; Bauer, B.; Wiemann, A.; Clausen, P.H.; Steuber, S. Feeding patterns of biting midges of the Culicoides obsoletus and Culicoides pulicaris groups on selected farms in Brandenburg, Germany. Parasitol. Res. 2009, 105, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Becker, M.E.; Reeves, W.K.; Dejean, S.K.; Emery, M.P.; Ostlund, E.N.; Foil, L.D. Detection of bluetongue virus RNA in field-collected Culicoides spp. (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) following the discovery of bluetongue virus serotype 1 in white-tailed deer and cattle in Louisiana. J. Med. Entomol. 2010, 47, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Becker, M.; Park, J.-S.; Gentry, G.; Husseneder, C.; Foil, L. Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. McGregor, B.L.; Rozo-Lopez, P.; Davis, T.M.; Drolet, B.S. Detection of vesicular stomatitis virus Indiana from insects collected during the 2020 outbreak in Kansas, USA. Pathogen 2021, 10, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Martin, E.; Chu, E.; Shults, P.; Golnar, A.; Swanson, D.A.; Benn, J.; Kim, D.; Schneider, P.; Pena, S.; Culver, C.; et al. Culicoides species community composition and infection status with parasites in an urban environment of east central Texas, USA. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Santiago-Alarcon, D.; Havelka, P.; Schaefer, H.M.; Segelbacher, G. Bloodmeal analysis reveals avian Plasmodium infections and broad host preferences of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) vectors. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ferraguti, M.; Martínez-de la Puente, J.; Ruiz, S.; Soriguer, R.; Figuerola, J. On the study of the transmisión networks of blood parasites from SW Spain: Diversity of avian haemosporidians in the biting midge Culicoides circumscriptus and wild birds. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sunantaraporn, S.; Hortiwakul, T.; Kraivichian, K.; Siriyasatien, P.; Brownell, N. Molecular identification of host blood meals and detection of blood parasites in Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) collected from Phatthalung Province, Southern Thailand. Insects 2022, 13, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sunantaraporn, S.; Thepparat, A.; Phumee, A.; Sor-Suwan, S.; Boonserm, R.; Bellis, G.; Siriyasatien, P. Culicoides Latrielle (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as potential vectors for Leishmania martiniquensis and Trypanosoma sp. in northern Thailand. PLoS Neg. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0010014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Inumaru, M.; Nakamura, K.; Odagawa, T.; Suzuki, M.; Murata, K.; Sato, Y. The first detection of avian haemosporidia from Culicoides biting midges in Japan, with notes on potential vector species and the transmission cycle. Vet. Parasitol. 2023, 39, 100840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McGregor, B.L.; Reister-Hendricks, L.M.; Nordmeyer, C.; Stapleton, S.; Davis, T.M.; Drolet, B.S. Using zoos as sentinels for re-emerging arboviruses: Vector surveillance during an outbreak of epizootic hemorrhagic disease at the Minnesota Zoo. Pathogen 2023, 12, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McGregor, B.L.; Sloyer, K.E.; Sayler, K.A.; Goodfriend, O.; Krauer, J.M.C.; Acevedo, C.; Zhang, X.; Mathias, D.; Wisely, S.M.; Burkett-Cadena, N.D. Field data implicating Culicoides stellifer and Culicoides venustus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as vectors of epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mullen, G.R.; Jones, R.H.; Braverman, Y.; Nusbaum, K.E. Laboratory infections of Culicoides debilipalpis and C. stellifer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) with bluetongue virus. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1985, 178, 239–243. [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith, K.E.; Stallknecht, D.E.; Sewell, C.T.; Rollor, E.A.; Mullen, G.R.; Anderson, R.R. Monitoring of Culicoides spp. at a site enzootic for hemorrhagic disease in white-tailed deer in Georgia, USA. J. Wildl. Dis. 1996, 32, 627–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Martinez-de la Puente, J.; Mendez, M.; Ruiz, S.; Godoy, J.A.; Soriguer, R.C.; Figuerola, J. Individual identification of endangered species using mosquito blood meals: A proof-of-concept study in Iberian lynx. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 1607–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Hoyer, I.J.; Blosser, E.M.; Acevedo, C.; Thompson, A.C.; Reeves, L.E.; Burkett-Cadena, N.D. Mammal decline, linked to invasive Burmese python, shifts host use of vector mosquito towards reservoir hosts of a zoonotic disease. Biol. Lett. 2017, 13, 20170353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Burkett-Cadena, N.D.; Blosser, E.M.; Loggins, A.A.; Valente, M.C.; Long, M.T.; Campbell, L.P.; Reeves, L.E.; Bargielowski, I.; McCleery, R.A. Invasive Burmese pythons alter host use and virus infection in the vector of a zoonotic virus. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wilson, A.; Mellor, P. Bluetongue in Europe: Vectors, epidemiology, and climate change. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gallana, M.; Ryser-Degiorgis, M.-P.; Wahli, T.; Segner, H. Climate change and infectious diseases of wildlife: Altered interactions between pathogens, vectors and hosts. Curr. Zool. 2013, 59, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tabachnick, W.J. Challenges in predicting climate and environmental effects on vector-borne disease episystems in a changing world. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213, 946–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Animals 13 02504 g001
Figure 1. Map of collection locations, including the Konza Prairie Biological Station and the Kansas State University Animal Science and Industry facilities. Inset shows the location of the map within the state of Kansas. Map generated using ArcGIS Pro 3.1 software and included basemaps.
Figure 1. Map of collection locations, including the Konza Prairie Biological Station and the Kansas State University Animal Science and Industry facilities. Inset shows the location of the map within the state of Kansas. Map generated using ArcGIS Pro 3.1 software and included basemaps.
Animals 13 02504 g001
Animals 13 02504 g002
Figure 2. Examples of sizes and digestion grades. These examples were chosen, since their size and digestion scores matched, to make visualization easier. Most samples did not have parallel size and digestion scores.
Figure 2. Examples of sizes and digestion grades. These examples were chosen, since their size and digestion scores matched, to make visualization easier. Most samples did not have parallel size and digestion scores.
Animals 13 02504 g002
Animals 13 02504 g003
Figure 3. Chord diagram depicting the association of each Culicoides species (at the bottom) with its hosts (on the top). The size of the chord corresponds to the proportional amount of feeding on each host.
Figure 3. Chord diagram depicting the association of each Culicoides species (at the bottom) with its hosts (on the top). The size of the chord corresponds to the proportional amount of feeding on each host.
Animals 13 02504 g003
Animals 13 02504 g004
Figure 4. Histogram depicting the frequency of the five size and digestion scores evaluated in the dataset.
Figure 4. Histogram depicting the frequency of the five size and digestion scores evaluated in the dataset.
Animals 13 02504 g004
Table 1. Blood meal hosts of the five most abundant Culicoides species collected at the Konza and KSU sites.
Table 1. Blood meal hosts of the five most abundant Culicoides species collected at the Konza and KSU sites.
SiteHost ClassHostcrepus.haemat.sonor.stell.varii.
KonzaAvianAmerican crow20000
Eastern bluebird10000
Orchard oriole10000
Summer tanager00000
Turkey vulture10000
Wild turkey02020
Yellow-billed cuckoo03010
MammalianCow010140
White-tailed deer00021
KSUAvianBarred owl05110
Blue jay11000
Brown-headed cowbird10000
Common grackle10000
Cooper’s hawk10000
Eastern bluebird03110
Eastern meadowlark10000
Great horned owl01000
House finch11010
Mourning dove40000
Northern cardinal01000
Orchard oriole10000
Summer tanager10000
Tufted titmouse12000
Wild turkey412241
Yellow-billed cuckoo15022
MammalianCow123928113
Dog10000
Elk00010
Horse01925
Sheep00010
White-tailed deer00391
Table 2. Locations and sites of the blood-engorged midges that resulted in successful matches.
Table 2. Locations and sites of the blood-engorged midges that resulted in successful matches.
LocationSitearbor.bergicrepus.haemat.nanussonor.stell.varii.
KonzaBison00150021
Cattle000000140
Ungrazed00411030
KSUBeef Stocker Unit2022701197
Dairy 002008113
BCRC01030413101
Cow–Calf Unit0013202231
Sheep/Meat Goat00320340
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McGregor, B.L.; Lewis, A. Host Associations of Culicoides Biting Midges in Northeastern Kansas, USA. Animals 2023, 13, 2504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152504

AMA Style

McGregor BL, Lewis A. Host Associations of Culicoides Biting Midges in Northeastern Kansas, USA. Animals. 2023; 13(15):2504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152504

Chicago/Turabian Style

McGregor, Bethany L., and Aaron Lewis. 2023. "Host Associations of Culicoides Biting Midges in Northeastern Kansas, USA" Animals 13, no. 15: 2504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop