Next Article in Journal
Algorithm for Autonomous Management of a Poultry Farm by a Cyber-Physical System
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Supplementation with Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb) Benth Fruits to Fattening Rabbits
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Interactive Dairy Goat Image Segmentation for Precision Livestock Farming

Animals 2023, 13(20), 3250; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203250
by Lianyue Zhang 1, Gaoge Han 1, Yongliang Qiao 2, Liu Xu 1, Ling Chen 1 and Jinglei Tang 1,3,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Animals 2023, 13(20), 3250; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203250
Submission received: 23 June 2023 / Revised: 20 July 2023 / Accepted: 16 October 2023 / Published: 18 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Animal System and Management)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Aim of the manuscript is to improve the segmentation accuracy of an image annotation tool in dairy goat keeping which is a very important topic. What is missing from the manuscript is the farmers' point of view. As an animal breeder (and not an IT expert), the reviewer has to represent the animal keepers' aspect, as well. That's why the research design and circumstances have to be clearly identified. On the other hand, it is also needed to describe the benefits of the new model for researchers and farmers, as well.

Detailed comments and recommendations are in the attached document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

A few grammatic and stylistic errors have been found and indicated in the text. The specified sentences should be refined.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

1. An interactive segmentation network for interactive dairy goat image segmentation is proposed in this paper. Also, more phenotypical image data such as sheep images should be added to the dataset to increase the generalization of the interactive segmentation model. Please describe more clearly which parameters should be adjusted in the interactive segmentation model.

2. The abstract and conclusion sections would be improved with more quantitative data from results.

3. Table 5 shows segmentation performance of 5 interactive image segmentation models on the validation set. Please show the unit for the segmentation performance.

4. Are there any limits or requirements for hardware systems such as CPU and RAM, if the proposed method, an interactive segmentation network, is adopted for deep learning experiments?  

5. It is suggested that authors should combine qualitative and quantitative analysis to reflect the repeatability of the proposed method.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop