Next Article in Journal
Meiotic Development of Canine Oocytes from Poly-Ovular and Mono-Ovular Follicles after In Vitro Maturation
Next Article in Special Issue
First Records of Picobiine Mites Associated with Birds-of-Paradise: Can Interspecific Sexual Behaviour of Hosts Play a Role in the Distribution of Quill Mite Parasites?
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of the Supplementation Using an Herbal Mixture as a Choline Source during Early Gestation in Rambouillet Ewes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of an Undescribed Babesia sp. in Capybaras and Amblyomma Ticks in Central-Western Brazil
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/ani13040647
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Species Discrimination of Stomoxys Flies S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens (Diptera: Muscidae) Using Wing Geometric Morphometrics

by
Tanasak Changbunjong
1,2,*,
Tanawat Chaiphongpachara
3 and
Thekhawet Weluwanarak
2
1
Department of Pre-Clinic and Applied Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
2
The Monitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals (MoZWE), Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
3
Department of Public Health and Health Promotion, College of Allied Health Sciences, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Samut Songkhram 75000, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(4), 647; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040647
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 9 February 2023 / Published: 13 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Parasitic Arthropods of Vertebrates)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Stomoxys flies (Diptera: Muscidae) are bloodsucking insects that feed on both animals and humans. They are a major vector of a variety of animal pathogens, including agents of trypanosomosis, anaplasmosis, bovine leucosis, African horse sickness, lumpy skin disease, etc. This study investigated the effectiveness of landmark-based geometric morphometrics of wings to discriminate among three morphologically similar species of Stomoxys in Thailand: Stomoxys bengalensis, Stomoxys calcitrans, and Stomoxys sitiens. Our study reveals that geometric morphometrics can accurately discriminate the three species of Stomoxys based on wing shape. Therefore, wing geometric morphometrics can be used in addition to traditional morphological methods to identify these flies as species.

Abstract

The flies of the genus Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762 (Diptera: Muscidae), are regarded as pests of veterinary and medical importance. In Thailand, Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) is the most abundant species and is widely distributed throughout the country. This Stomoxys species can coexist with two other morphologically similar species: Stomoxys bengalensis Picard, 1908, and Stomoxys sitiens Rondani, 1873. Hence, discriminating using morphological characteristics is difficult, especially if the specimen is damaged or loses its diagnostic characteristics. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the landmark-based geometric morphometric (GM) approach to discriminate among the three Stomoxys spp.: S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens. Left-wing images of S. bengalensis (n = 120), S. calcitrans (n = 150), and S. sitiens (n = 155) were used for the GM analyses. The results of the wing shape analyses revealed that the GM approach was highly effective for discriminating three Stomoxys, with high accuracy scores ranging from 93.75% to 100%. This study adds to the evidence that landmark-based GM is an excellent alternative approach for discriminating Stomoxys species.

1. Introduction

The genus Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762, of the family Muscidae, subfamily Stomoxyinae, contains at least 18 described species, most of which are found in Africa, with some species also found in the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia [1]. Stomoxys species are all hematophagous ectoparasites of domesticated and wild animals, and occasionally humans. They have a direct impact on animal health and can even result in economic losses due to their effects on cattle productivity [2,3]. Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758), the most well-known species with a global distribution, is an important vector of a variety of animal pathogens such as viruses, protozoa, bacteria, and helminths [2]. In Thailand, six Stomoxys species, namely, Stomoxys bengalensis Picard, 1908; S. calcitrans; Stomoxys indicus Picard, 1908; Stomoxys pullus Austen, 1909; Stomoxys sitiens Rondani, 1873; and Stomoxys uruma Shinonaga et Kano, 1966, as well as their distribution, have been recorded [4,5,6,7,8]. Among them, S. calcitrans was reported as the most predominant species [4,7], which was also involved in disease transmission, especially trypanosomosis or surra in horses, cattle, and buffaloes [9] and anaplasmosis in cattle and buffaloes [10]. Moreover, this species may be associated with epidemic outbreaks of lumpy skin disease in cattle throughout the country [11].
The precise species identification of Stomoxys is crucial for defining target vectors in the endemic area, which leads to the development of efficient vector control measures. However, the species identification of Stomoxys requires a thorough understanding of taxonomic characteristics. Traditionally, identification has been based primarily on morphological characteristics such as frons width, body color and pattern, wing cell proportion, curvature and setation of wing veins, color and hairs of legs, and genital structure [1]. Furthermore, the specimens must be clear and contain all relevant morphological features. Among the six Stomoxys spp. presented in Thailand, S. calcitrans is more similar to S. sitiens and S. bengalensis than to S. indicus, S. pullus, and S. uruma based on the spot pattern on the abdomen (Figure 1). According to Zumpt [1], S. calcitrans is distinguished from S. sitiens and S. bengalensis by the width of the frons (Figure 2), whereas S. sitiens and S. bengalensis are distinguished by the wing, with the apex of the media being slightly proximate to the apex of r4+5 in S. sitiens, which is almost directly under the apex of r4+5 in S. bengalensis (Figure 3). Moreover, the hind femur of male S. bengalensis has long ventral hairs that are not present in male S. sitiens (Figure 4). Therefore, if the important morphological features are damaged, it might be challenging to precisely identify them. To resolve problems associated with morphological-based identification of Stomoxys spp., alternative methods, such as the molecular method and geometric morphometrics, have gained popularity in the last decade [12,13,14].
Geometric morphometrics (GM) is a quantitative approach to insect species identification based on size and shape analyses [15,16,17]. It is a simple, rapid, and low-cost method compared with morphological and molecular identification methods, although it does require some laboratory environment and/or tools, and some taxonomic knowledge is needed to choose the best landmarks. In addition to being used for species identification, the GM method can be used to investigate intraspecific variation among insect populations and to determine sexual dimorphism [15]. In insects, the wing is usually used for GM analysis because wing veins provide well-defined landmarks or outlines appropriate for morphometrics [15,16]. Previously, Changbunjong et al. demonstrated the effectiveness of GM for the species identification of Stomoxys [14]. They revealed that both landmark and outline-based GM of the wing can discriminate among the three Stomoxys spp., namely, S. indicus, S. pullus, and S. uruma [14]. For other insects, GM has proved to be beneficial for species identification and/or discrimination of several important vectors, including blow flies [18], flesh flies [19], mosquitoes [20,21,22,23,24,25,26], sand flies [27,28], tsetse flies [29], horse flies [30], and triatomine bugs [31].
In this study, the landmark-based GM approach was used to evaluate its effectiveness in discriminating among the three Stomoxys spp., namely, S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens. The results of this study provide an alternative approach for identifying the species of these flies. Furthermore, our study material can be used as species reference data for morphometric identification of these species based on wing geometry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Statement

This research protocol was checked, reviewed, and approved by the Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University Animal Care and Use Committee (Ethics Approval Number: MUVS-2022-01-04).

2.2. Specimen Collection and Species Identification

Between May 2022 and November 2022, specimens of S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens were collected from animal farms in three central Thai provinces, namely, Nakhon Pathom, Pathum Thani, and Saraburi, using five Vavoua traps [32] (Figure 5, Table 1). These traps were randomly placed near the animal hosts and enclosures and were used for four consecutive days during the day (06:00–18:00). All captured specimens were euthanized in a freezer at −10 °C, deposited in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes separately, and delivered to the Vector-Borne Diseases Research Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Undamaged Stomoxys specimens with clearly morphological characteristics (“unambiguous specimens”) were used to identify species based on the descriptions and taxonomic keys of Zumpt [1] using a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ745; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Zumpt [1] divided the key used to identify Stomoxys into males and females. Therefore, specimens for GM analysis were analyzed separately as male and female of each species. The specimens were then safely stored in a freezer at −20 °C until further GM analysis.

2.3. Specimen Preparation

The left undamaged wings of male and female S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens were dissected from the thorax using a sterilized blade and mounted on microscope slides using Hoyer’s medium [14]. Each wing slide was then photographed using a digital camera attached to a stereomicroscope (Nikon AZ 100; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). On each wing image, a 1-mm scale bar was placed. A total of 425 wing images (Table 1), including 155 wings of S. sitiens, 150 wings of S. calcitrans, and 120 wings of S. bengalensis, were analyzed using the landmark-based GM approach in the next step (Tables S1 and S2).

2.4. Wing Geometric Morphometric Analyses

2.4.1. Landmark Digitization and Digitization Error

According to the previous study by Changbunjong et al. [14], the coordinates of ten wing landmarks at the intersections of wing veins and wing boundaries were digitized (Figure 6). The repeatability index, which was computed using the Procrustes analysis of variance (ANOVA) method, was used to evaluate the accuracy and error for repeatability of the landmark digitization [33]. To assess intra- and inter-user repeatability, ten wing images of each Stomoxys species were chosen at random and digitized twice by the same and different users. In this study, if the repeatability index of wing shape was less than 90%, all wing images were re-digitized to ensure the precision of the coordinates [30].

2.4.2. Wing Size Analyses

To estimate the wing size of male and female S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens, the centroid size (CS) was calculated by taking the square root of the sum of the squared distances between the centroid and each landmark [34]. Boxplots were constructed to illustrate the wing CS variation for each Stomoxys species. Moreover, the statistically significant difference in wing size between Stomoxys species was determined using a one-way ANOVA. The statistical significance was calculated using a non-parametric test (1000 permutations) with a Bonferroni correction at p-value of 0.05.

2.4.3. Wing Shape Analyses

After performing a Procrustes superimposition using the generalized Procrustes analysis [35], the wing shape variables were subsequently obtained. Their principal components (PCs) were used as the final shape variables in wing-shape studies. The superposition of the mean wing shape provided configurations for comparing shape changes among species and sexes visually. Following that, the final wing shape variables were used as data for multivariate discriminant analysis (DA) [15], as shown by the factor maps illustrating wing shape variation among Stomoxys species. After DA, Mahalanobis distances, distance shape metrics that measure distances between species, were calculated. The statistically significant difference in wing shape based on Mahalanobis distances was determined using a non-parametric permutation test (1000 permutations) with a Bonferroni correction at p-value of 0.05.

2.4.4. Validated Classification Based on Size and Shape

To determine the percentage of specimens correctly classified within their respective species, a cross-validated classification was performed. Each individual specimen was gradually removed from the total number of specimens and allocated to the most probable group based on the maximum likelihood approach for wing size investigation [36] and the closest group based on Mahalanobis distance for wing shape investigation [37].

2.4.5. Allometric Effect Analysis

The allometric effect, also known as the effect of size on shape variation, was estimated using linear regression between the CS (size variable) and the first PC of shape (shape variable), and then the determination coefficient (r2) was used to assess the influence.

2.4.6. Morphometric Software

The online software XYOM (XY Online Morphometrics) version 2 was used to digitize landmarks, investigate statistical size and shape, and generate graphics output [17]. This software is freely available at https://xom.io/, accessed on 1 January 2023.

3. Results

3.1. Intra-and Inter-User Repeatability

The two image sets of measurements performed by the same user and images showed a high degree of intra-user repeatability for shape (repeatability index score = 98.5%, measurement error = 1.5%), while the same images performed by different users demonstrated high inter-user repeatability for shape (repeatability index score = 97.5%, measurement error = 2.5%).

3.2. Wing Size Variation

The wing size (CS) variation of male and female S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens is illustrated by quantile boxes (Figure 7). In males, S. bengalensis (4.83 ± 0.17 mm) had the largest wing, followed by S. sitiens (4.32 ± 0.16 mm) and S. calcitrans (4.23 ± 0.22 mm). Conversely, in females, S. bengalensis (4.76 ± 0.19 mm) had the largest wing, followed by S. sitiens (4.36 ± 0.23 mm) and S. calcitrans (4.35 ± 0.20 mm). Table 2 shows the statistically significant differences in wing CS among the three Stomoxys spp. in both sexes (p < 0.05).

3.3. Wing Shape Variation

The visual comparisons of superposed configurations among the three Stomoxys spp. revealed landmark locations that differ greatly among species and are found in the upper, middle, and lower parts of the wing (landmarks 1, 5, 9, and 10) for males but only in the middle part of the wing for females (landmarks 5 and 7) (Figure 8).
The factor maps of the first two shape-derived discriminant factors (DFs) revealed that the male groups of S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens are clearly separated from each other. In contrast, female groups of S. calcitrans and S. sitiens exhibited considerable overlapping (Figure 9). Further, the pairwise Mahalanobis distances of wing shape were significantly different among the three Stomoxys spp. in both sexes (p < 0.05, Table 3).

3.4. Validated Classification

The overall accuracy scores of size- and shape-based cross-validated classification of male and female S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens were 58.35% (248/425) and 98.35% (418/425), respectively (Table 4). The accuracy scores of wing size-based classification using the maximum likelihood technique were relatively low in males (62.93%, ranging from 48.00% to 89.09%) and in females (54.10%, ranging from 13.33% to 86.15%, Table 4). However, the accuracy score of shape-based classification based on Mahalanobis distance was perfect in males (100%) and very high in females (96.82%, ranging from 93.75% to 100%).

3.5. Allometric Effect

The analysis of the effect of wing size on shape variation in male and female among the three Stomoxys spp. showed that wing size was significantly correlated with wing shape variation (r2 = 30.6% for male and r2 = 29.2% for female, p < 0.05). The linear regression prediction of the allometric effect revealed negative correlations in both sexes (Figure 10).

4. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that the landmark-based GM approach is efficient for discriminating among the three Stomoxys spp. in Thailand, namely, S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens. These Stomoxys flies are morphologically similar and can be difficult to discriminate based on morphology alone. Therefore, modern methods for identifying the correct species of S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens are required. Among those species, S. calcitrans is the most abundant species, which can coexist with S. bengalensis and S. sitiens [8,38]. Therefore, it can be seen that most specimens used in this study were collected from the same site. In terms of species distribution, S. calcitrans and S. sitiens have been recorded in various geographical regions of Thailand [4,7,38], while S. bengalensis has been recorded predominantly in the central part of the country, such as Bangkok, Nakhon Pathom, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, and Saraburi Provinces [6,8,38]. The presence of these three Stomoxys species in the same area makes species confirmation even more difficult due to the inability to make predictive decisions.
The application of GM to the discrimination of Stomoxys spp. was initiated by Changbunjong et al. [14]. Their results revealed that both landmark- and outline-based methods can discriminate among the three Stomoxys spp., namely, S. pullus, S. uruma, and S. indicus [13]. In the present study, we selected ten anatomical landmark positions according to the previous study [14]. These positions have been proven to be useful in discriminating among the three Stomoxys spp. and can be used to investigate the phenotypic variation [39]. Additionally, 15 landmarks were used to investigate the wing size and shape variations of S. calcitrans under the influence of larval densities and substrate types during the larvae stage [40].
The comparison of wing size variation using mean CS showed that the wing size of S. bengalensis was significantly larger than that of S. calcitrans and S. sitiens in both sexes. Our findings indicated that the wing size could help in discriminating S. bengalensis from S. calcitrans and S. sitiens. However, due to its relatively low classification accuracy in terms of validated classification scores, we do not recommend using wing size for discrimination. Furthermore, wing size is regarded as unsuitable for taxonomic purposes because it is often influenced by environmental factors [39,40]. For instance, Baleba et al. [40] revealed that larval density and substrate quality had a significant effect on the wing size variation of S. calcitrans. The previous study by Chaiphongpachara et al. [39] also indicated that the phenotypic variation of S. calcitrans populations in Thailand has evolved in response to local environmental pressures.
The DA of wing shape variables showed that all males are clearly separated into each species, whereas only females of S. calcitrans and S. sitiens showed partial overlap in the factor map. These findings could be related to males having more easily identifiable morphological characteristics than females. Zumpt [1] mentioned that male S. calcitrans is easy to distinguish from other species in the genus through the broad frons, while male S. bengalensis can be easily distinguished from male S. sitiens through the presence of long ventral hairs on the hind femur. In contrast, the width of the frons of female S. calcitrans is not much different from the other two species, making identification difficult. Furthermore, the abdominal and wing venation patterns of S. sitiens are quite similar to those of S. calcitrans (Figure 1 and Figure 3). Therefore, they are occasionally misidentified. The results of the validated classification based on wing shape supported the misidentification of S. calcitrans and S. sitiens, with two specimens (2.67%) of S. calcitrans classified as S. sitiens and five specimens (6.25%) of S. sitiens classified as S. calcitrans. It is not surprising that the geometry of the wing shape could recognize S. bengalensis perfectly (100%), as evidenced by its separation from other species in the factor map (Figure 9).
The assessment of the allometric effect revealed a correlation between wing size and wing shape among the three Stomoxys spp. The linear regression showed a negative correlation, which is consistent with the findings of Chaiphongpachara et al. [39]. They found a negative correlation between wing size and wing shape in both sexes of S. calcitrans populations in Thailand (r2 = 24.0% for males and r2 = 15.0% for females). The linear regression displayed a negative correlation (also known as an inverse correlation), which means that one variable tends to increase while the other tends to decrease, or vice versa. However, the allometric effect was not removed from our study because size variations were considered important for the species identification process [15,24,41].
Overall, the landmark-based GM approach is nearly 99% accurate in discriminating the three Stomoxys spp. (S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens) when compared with the same method used to discriminate other Stomoxys spp. (S. pullus, S. uruma, and S. indicus), with an accuracy of approximately 93% [14]. We also found that digitizing Stomoxys wings provided excellent precision, regardless of whether the user was the same (98.5% intra-user repeatability) or different (97.5% inter-user repeatability). Therefore, our study material (landmark coordinate data) can serve as reference data for morphometric identification of these species. Finally, we suggest that a landmark-based GM approach can be used as a complement to traditional morphology identification, especially for Stomoxys specimens with unclear diagnostic characteristics or those that have been damaged during specimen collection and handling in the field. Moreover, this method is inexpensive and fast and does not require an expert taxonomist for these flies.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the landmark-based GM approach to discriminate among the three Stomoxys spp., namely, S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens. Our results demonstrated that this method was highly effective in discriminating them based on their wing shape. As a result, when specimens have ambiguity or loss of diagnostic characteristics, the GM can be used as a supplement to morphological identification. In addition, our findings suggest that our study material can be used as reference data to assist in species identification. Therefore, we included the wing geometric morphometric data of S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens in the supplementary material for interested researchers to download and use. The use of the GM approach is important for accurate identification of Stomoxys species and may lead to more effective control measures for the flies in animal farms.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13040647/s1, Table S1: Raw coordinates of male wing landmarks of Stomoxys bengalensis (No. 1–55), S. calcitrans (No. 56–130), and S. sitiens (No. 131–205). Table S2: Raw coordinates of female wing landmarks of Stomoxys bengalensis (No. 1–65), S. calcitrans (No. 66–140), and S. sitiens (No. 141–220).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong) and T.C. (Tanawat Chaiphongpachara); methodology, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong) and T.C. (Tanawat Chaiphongpachara); validation, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong) and T.C. (Tanawat Chaiphongpachara); investigation, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong) and T.W.; resources, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong); data curation, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong); writing—original draft preparation, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong) and T.C. (Tanawat Chaiphongpachara); writing—review and editing, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong), T.C. (Tanawat Chaiphongpachara) and T.W.; project administration, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong); funding acquisition, T.C. (Tanasak Changbunjong). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Mahidol University (Specific League Funds), grant number 78.017/0398.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Faculty of Veterinary Science, Mahidol University Animal Care and Use Committee (Ref. MUVS-2022-01-04).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

This research paper is supported by Specific League Funds from Mahidol University. We would like to thank the authorities of the Monitoring and Surveillance Center for Zoonotic Diseases in Wildlife and Exotic Animals (MoZWE) for their kind cooperation and assistance in the study. Special thanks go to Emeritus Gerard Duvallet, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier for comments of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zumpt, F.Z. The Stomoxyine Biting Flies of the World; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 1973; pp. 97–137. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldacchino, F.; Muenworn, V.; Desquesnes, M.; Desoli, F.; Charoenviriyaphap, T.; Duvallet, G. Transmission of Pathogens by Stomoxys Flies (Diptera, Muscidae): A Review. Parasite 2013, 20, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taylor, D.B.; Moon, R.D.; Mark, D.R. Economic Impact of Stable Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) on Dairy and Beef Cattle Production. J. Med. Entomol. 2012, 49, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Changbunjong, T.; Weluwanarak, T.; Ratanakorn, P.; Maneeon, P.; Ganpanakngan, M.; Apiwathnasorn, C.; Sungvornyothin, S.; Sriwichai, P.; Sumruayphol, S.; Ruangsittichai, J. Distribution and Abundance of Stomoxyini flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2012, 43, 1400–1410. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Changbunjong, T.; Weluwanarak, T.; Sedwisai, P.; Chamsai, T. Stomoxyini Fly Fauna of the Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2013, 3, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tumrasvin, W.; Shinonaga, S. Studies on medically important flies in Thailand. V. On 32 Species belonging to the Subfamilies Muscinae and Stomoxyinae including the Taxonomic Keys (Diptera: Muscidae). Bull. Tokyo Med. Dent. Univ. 1978, 25, 201–227. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Muenworn, V.; Duvallet, G.; Tainchum, K.; Tuntakom, S.; Tanasilchayakul, S.; Prabaripai, A.; Akratanakul, P.; Sukonthabhirom, S.; Chareonviriyaphap, T. Geographic Distribution of Stomoxyine Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) and Diurnal Activity of Stomoxys calcitrans in Thailand. J. Med. Entomol. 2010, 47, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Masmeatathip, R.; Ketavan, C.; Duvallet, G. Morphological Studies of Stomoxys spp. (Diptera: Muscidae) in Central Thailand. Kasetsart J. 2006, 40, 872–881. [Google Scholar]
  9. Desquesnes, M.; Holzmuller, P.; Lai, D.H.; Dargantes, A.; Lun, Z.R.; Jittaplapong, S. Trypanosoma evansi and Surra: A review and Perspectives on Origin, History, Distribution, Taxonomy, Morphology, Hosts, and Pathogenic Effects. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 194176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Saetiew, N.; Stich, R.W.; Jittapalapong, S. Biodiversity of Blood Sucking Flies Associated with the Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale Infection in Dairy Farms in Ratchaburi Province. J. Mahanakorn Vet. Med. 2018, 13, 171–184. [Google Scholar]
  11. Arjkumpa, O.; Suwannaboon, M.; Boonrod, M.; Punyawan, I.; Liangchaisiri, S.; Laobannue, P.; Lapchareonwong, C.; Sansri, C.; Kuatako, N.; Panyasomboonying, P.; et al. The First Lumpy Skin Disease Outbreak in Thailand (2021): Epidemiological Features and Spatio-Temporal Analysis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 8, 799065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Changbunjong, T.; Weluwanarak, T.; Samung, Y.; Ruangsittichai, J. Molecular Identification and Genetic Variation of Stomoxyine flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in Thailand Based on COX1 Barcode. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sevidzem Silas, L.; Kong Anita, B.; Koumba Armel, A.; Zinga Koumba, C.; Mintsa-Nguema, R.; Mavoungou, J.F. Molecular Identification of Stomoxys and Musca (Diptera: Muscidae) of Veterinary Importance in the Pasture Area of Ngaoundere. Acta. Entomol. Zool. 2020, 1, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  14. Changbunjong, T.; Sumruayphol, S.; Weluwanarak, T.; Ruangsittichai, J.; Dujardin, J.P. Landmark and Outline-based Geometric Morphometrics Analysis of Three Stomoxys Flies (Diptera: Muscidae). Folia Parasitol. 2016, 63, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Dujardin, J.P. Morphometrics Applied to Medical Entomology. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2008, 8, 875–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dujardin, J.P.; Kaba, D.; Solano, P.; Dupraz, M.; McCoy, K.D.; Jaramillo, O.N. Outline-Based Morphometrics, an Overlooked Method in Arthropod Studies? Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 28, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dujardin, S.; Dujardin, J.P. Geometric Morphometrics in the Cloud. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 70, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sontigun, N.; Sukontason, K.L.; Zajac, B.K.; Zehner, R.; Sukontason, K.; Wannasan, A.; Amendt, J. Wing Morphometrics as a Tool in Species Identification of Forensically Important Blow Flies of Thailand. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sontigun, N.; Samerjai, C.; Sukontason, K.; Wannasan, A.; Amendt, J.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Sukontason, K.L. Wing Morphometric Analysis of Forensically Important Flesh Flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in Thailand. Acta Trop. 2019, 190, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lorenz, C.; Marques, T.C.; Sallum, M.A.; Suesdek, L. Morphometrical Diagnosis of the Malaria Vectors Anopheles cruzii, An. homunculus and An. bellator. Parasit. Vectors 2012, 5, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Martinet, J.-P.; Ferté, H.; Sientzoff, P.; Krupa, E.; Mathieu, B.; Depaquit, J. Wing Morphometrics of Aedes Mosquitoes from North-Eastern France. Insects 2021, 12, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. De Souza, A.L.D.S.; Multini, L.C.; Marrelli, M.T.; Wilke, A.B.B. Wing Geometric Morphometrics for Identification of Mosquito Species (Diptera: Culicidae) of Neglected Epidemiological Importance. Acta Trop. 2020, 211, 105593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chaiphongpachara, T.; Changbunjong, T.; Sumruayphol, S.; Laojun, S.; Suwandittakul, N.; Kuntawong, K. Geometric Morphometrics Versus DNA Barcoding for the Identification of Malaria Vectors Anopheles dirus and An. baimaii in the Thai-Cambodia border. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Simões, R.F.; Wilke, A.B.B.; Chagas, C.R.F.; Menezes, R.M.T.d.; Suesdek, L.; Multini, L.C.; Silva, F.S.; Grech, M.G.; Marrelli, M.T.; Kirchgatter, K. Wing Geometric Morphometrics as a Tool for the Identification of Culex Subgenus Mosquitoes of Culex (Diptera: Culicidae). Insects 2020, 11, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ruangsittichai, J.; Apiwathnasorn, C.; Dujardin, J.P. Interspecific and Sexual Shape Variation in the Filariasis Vectors Mansonia dives and Ma. bonneae. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11, 2089–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Laojun, S.; Changbunjong, T.; Chaiphongpachara, T. Evaluation of Modern Techniques for Species Identification of Lutzia Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand: Geometric Morphometrics and DNA Barcoding. Insects 2023, 14, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dujardin, J.P.; Le Pont, F.; Baylac, M. Geographical versus Interspecific Differentiation of Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae): A landmark Data Analysis. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2003, 93, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Giordani, B.F.; Andrade, A.J.; Galati, E.A.B.; Gurgel-Gonçalves, R. The Role of Wing Geometric Morphometrics in the Identification of Sand Flies within the Subgenus Lutzomyia. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2017, 31, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kaba, D.; Berté, D.; Ta, B.T.; Tellería, J.; Solano, P.; Dujardin, J.P. The Wing Venation Patterns to Identify Single Tsetse Flies. Infect.Genet. Evol. 2017, 47, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Changbunjong, T.; Prakaikowit, N.; Maneephan, P.; Kaewwiset, T.; Weluwanarak, T.; Chaiphongpachara, T.; Dujardin, J.P. Landmark Data to Distinguish and Identify Morphologically Close Tabanus spp. (Diptera: Tabanidae). Insects 2021, 12, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gumiel, M.; Catalá, S.; Noireau, F.; Rojas de Arias, A.; Garcia, A.; Dujardin, J. Wing geometry in Triatoma infestans (Klug) and T. melanosoma Martinez, Olmedo & Carcavallo (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Syst. Entomol. 2003, 28, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
  32. Laveissiere, C.; Grebaut, P. The Trapping of Tsetse Flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) Improvement of a Model: The Vavoua Trap. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1990, 41, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Klingenberg, C.P.; McIntyre, G.S. Geometric Morphometrics of Developmental Instability: Analyzing Patterns of Fluctuating Asymmetry with Procrustes Methods. Evolution 1998, 52, 1363–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bookstein, F.L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Geometry and Biology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rohlf, F.J. Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods. In Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop; University of Michigan Museum of Zoology: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1990; pp. 227–236. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dujardin, J.P.; Dujardin, S.; Kaba, D.; Santillán-Guayasamín, S.; Villacís, A.G.; Piyaselakul, S.; Sumruayphol, S.; Samung, Y.; Morales-Vargas, R. The Maximum Likelihood Identification Method Applied to Insect Morphometric Data. Zool. Syst. 2017, 42, 46–58. [Google Scholar]
  37. Manly, B.F.J. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer; Chapman Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  38. Phasuk, J.; Prabaripai, A.; Chareonviriyaphap, T. A Comparison of Attractants for Sampling Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) on Dairy Farms in Saraburi Province, Thailand. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 942–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chaiphongpachara, T.; Duvallet, G.; Changbunjong, T. Wing Phenotypic Variation among Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) Populations in Thailand. Insects 2022, 13, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Baleba, S.B.S.; Masiga, D.; Torto, B.; Weldon, C.W.; Getahun, M.N. Effect of Larval Density and Substrate Quality on the Wing Geometry of Stomoxys calcitrans L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sauer, F.G.; Jaworski, L.; Erdbeer, L.; Heitmann, A.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J.; Kiel, E.; Lühken, R. Geometric Morphometric Wing Analysis Represents a Robust Tool to Identify Female Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Germany. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 13 00647 g001 550
Figure 1. Male and female abdomens of Stomoxys bengalensis (A,D), S. calcitrans (B,E), and S. sitiens (C,F). The spot pattern (arrow) is used to distinguish among species. Photos are made by authors.
Figure 1. Male and female abdomens of Stomoxys bengalensis (A,D), S. calcitrans (B,E), and S. sitiens (C,F). The spot pattern (arrow) is used to distinguish among species. Photos are made by authors.
Animals 13 00647 g001
Animals 13 00647 g002 550
Figure 2. Male and female heads of Stomoxys bengalensis (A,D), S. calcitrans (B,E), and S. sitiens (C,F). The width of frons (arrow) is used to distinguish among species. Photos are made by authors.
Figure 2. Male and female heads of Stomoxys bengalensis (A,D), S. calcitrans (B,E), and S. sitiens (C,F). The width of frons (arrow) is used to distinguish among species. Photos are made by authors.
Animals 13 00647 g002
Animals 13 00647 g003 550
Figure 3. Wings of Stomoxys bengalensis (A), S. calcitrans (B), and S. sitiens (C). Stomoxys bengalensis is distinguished from S. calcitrans and S. sitiens by wing with the apex of media almost directly under the apex of r4+5 (arrow). Photos are made by authors.
Figure 3. Wings of Stomoxys bengalensis (A), S. calcitrans (B), and S. sitiens (C). Stomoxys bengalensis is distinguished from S. calcitrans and S. sitiens by wing with the apex of media almost directly under the apex of r4+5 (arrow). Photos are made by authors.
Animals 13 00647 g003
Animals 13 00647 g004 550
Figure 4. Male hind legs of Stomoxys bengalensis (A), S. calcitrans (B), and S. sitiens (C). Male S. bengalensis is distinguished from male S. sitiens by the hind femur with long ventral hairs (arrow). Photos are made by authors.
Figure 4. Male hind legs of Stomoxys bengalensis (A), S. calcitrans (B), and S. sitiens (C). Male S. bengalensis is distinguished from male S. sitiens by the hind femur with long ventral hairs (arrow). Photos are made by authors.
Animals 13 00647 g004
Animals 13 00647 g005 550
Figure 5. Geographic map of Stomoxys collection sites in this study: Nakhon Pathom (1), Pathum Thani (2), and Saraburi (3) (A); Vavoua trap used for fly collection and animal hosts at the collection sites (B,C). The map was created using the USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/, accessed on 8 February 2023.
Figure 5. Geographic map of Stomoxys collection sites in this study: Nakhon Pathom (1), Pathum Thani (2), and Saraburi (3) (A); Vavoua trap used for fly collection and animal hosts at the collection sites (B,C). The map was created using the USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/, accessed on 8 February 2023.
Animals 13 00647 g005
Animals 13 00647 g006 550
Figure 6. Ten anatomical landmarks (red dots and numbers from 1 to 10) digitized on the wing of Stomoxys flies for the landmark-based GM analysis.
Figure 6. Ten anatomical landmarks (red dots and numbers from 1 to 10) digitized on the wing of Stomoxys flies for the landmark-based GM analysis.
Animals 13 00647 g006
Animals 13 00647 g007 550
Figure 7. Boxplots of the centroid size variations of male (A) and female (B) Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens. The horizontal line that crosses each box represents the median, separating the 25th and 75th quartiles.
Figure 7. Boxplots of the centroid size variations of male (A) and female (B) Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens. The horizontal line that crosses each box represents the median, separating the 25th and 75th quartiles.
Animals 13 00647 g007
Animals 13 00647 g008 550
Figure 8. Superposition of the mean anatomical landmark positions of male (A) and female (B) Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens.
Figure 8. Superposition of the mean anatomical landmark positions of male (A) and female (B) Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens.
Animals 13 00647 g008
Animals 13 00647 g009 550
Figure 9. Factor maps of discriminant factors (DFs) showing wing shape variation in male (A) and female (B) Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens. For males, the two DFs represent 100% of the total discriminant space: 72% for DF1 and 28% for DF2. However, for females, the two DFs represent 100% of the total discriminant space: 74% for DF1 and 26% for DF2.
Figure 9. Factor maps of discriminant factors (DFs) showing wing shape variation in male (A) and female (B) Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens. For males, the two DFs represent 100% of the total discriminant space: 72% for DF1 and 28% for DF2. However, for females, the two DFs represent 100% of the total discriminant space: 74% for DF1 and 26% for DF2.
Animals 13 00647 g009
Animals 13 00647 g010 550
Figure 10. Linear regression between centroid size and first principal component (PC) of shape for the male (A) and female (B) Stomoxys species. Orange dotted line indicates linear regression prediction.
Figure 10. Linear regression between centroid size and first principal component (PC) of shape for the male (A) and female (B) Stomoxys species. Orange dotted line indicates linear regression prediction.
Animals 13 00647 g010
Table
Table 1. Collection sites, month, and number (n) of Stomoxys specimens used for the geometric morphometric analysis.
Table 1. Collection sites, month, and number (n) of Stomoxys specimens used for the geometric morphometric analysis.
SpeciesMonthDistrict/ProvinceRegionCollection Sitesn
S. bengalensisMayMueang, Nakhon Pathom
(N 14°01′10″, E 99°57′37″)		CentralCattle farm and horse farmMale 45,
Female 45
JulySam Khok, Pathum Thani
(N 14°04′46″, E 100°31′51″)		CentralCattle farmMale 10,
Female 20
S. calcitransMayMueang, Nakhon Pathom
(N 14°01′10″, E 99°57′37″)		CentralCattle farm and horse farmMale 25,
Female 25
JulySam Khok, Pathum Thani
(N 14°04′46″, E 100°31′51″)		CentralCattle farmMale 25,
Female 25
NovemberKaeng Khoi, Saraburi
(N 14°28′39″, E 101°05′33″)		CentralHorse farmMale 25,
Female 25
S. sitiensMayMueang, Nakhon Pathom
(N 14°01′10″, E 99°57′37″)		CentralCattle farm and horse farmMale 50,
Female 50
NovemberKaeng Khoi, Saraburi
(N 14°28′39″, E 101°05′33″)		CentralHorse farmMale 25,
Female 30
Total 425
Table
Table 2. Mean centroid size of male and female Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens and statistically significant differences.
Table 2. Mean centroid size of male and female Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens and statistically significant differences.
SpeciesnMean (mm)Min–MaxVarianceSD
Male
S. bengalensis554.83 a4.45–5.130.030.17
S. calcitrans754.23 b3.63–4.640.040.22
S. sitiens754.32 b3.91–4.690.030.16
Female
S. bengalensis654.76 a4.20–5.180.040.19
S. calcitrans754.35 b3.77–4.790.040.20
S. sitiens804.36 b3.72–4.830.050.23
Different letters after the mean value represent statistically significant differences in wing CS between male and female (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Mahalanobis distances (below diagonal) and p-values (above diagonal) in the wing shape of male and female Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens.
Table 3. Mahalanobis distances (below diagonal) and p-values (above diagonal) in the wing shape of male and female Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens.
SpeciesS. bengalensisS. calcitransS. sitiens
Male
S. bengalensis-<0.001<0.001
S. calcitrans7.33-<0.001
S. sitiens5.066.71-
Female
S. bengalensis-<0.001<0.001
S. calcitrans5.46-<0.001
S. sitiens5.713.42-
Table
Table 4. Cross-validated classification based on the wing sizes and wing shapes of male and female Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens.
Table 4. Cross-validated classification based on the wing sizes and wing shapes of male and female Stomoxys bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens.
SpeciesSizeShape
% AccuracyAssigned/Observed% AccuracyAssigned/Observed
Male
S. bengalensis89.0949/5510055/55
S. calcitrans58.6744/7510075/75
S. sitiens48.0036/7510075/75
Total62.93129/205100205/205
Female
S. bengalensis86.1556/6510065/65
S. calcitrans13.3310/7597.3373/75
S. sitiens66.2553/8093.7575/80
Total54.10119/22096.82213/220
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Changbunjong, T.; Chaiphongpachara, T.; Weluwanarak, T. Species Discrimination of Stomoxys Flies S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens (Diptera: Muscidae) Using Wing Geometric Morphometrics. Animals 2023, 13, 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040647

AMA Style

Changbunjong T, Chaiphongpachara T, Weluwanarak T. Species Discrimination of Stomoxys Flies S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens (Diptera: Muscidae) Using Wing Geometric Morphometrics. Animals. 2023; 13(4):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Changbunjong, Tanasak, Tanawat Chaiphongpachara, and Thekhawet Weluwanarak. 2023. "Species Discrimination of Stomoxys Flies S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens (Diptera: Muscidae) Using Wing Geometric Morphometrics" Animals 13, no. 4: 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040647

APA Style

Changbunjong, T., Chaiphongpachara, T., & Weluwanarak, T. (2023). Species Discrimination of Stomoxys Flies S. bengalensis, S. calcitrans, and S. sitiens (Diptera: Muscidae) Using Wing Geometric Morphometrics. Animals, 13(4), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop