Next Article in Journal
Molecular and Serological Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Dogs from Germany (2008–2020)
Next Article in Special Issue
Mortality Causes in Captive Cantabrian capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus cantabricus) in Spain
Previous Article in Journal
Ubiquitous Love or Not? Animal Welfare and Animal-Informed Consent in Giant Panda Tourism
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/ani13040719
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Establishment and Application of an Indirect ELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Porcine Streptococcus suis Based on a Recombinant GMD Protein

by
Nihua Dong
1,
Zhaofei Wang
2,
Qing Sun
1,
Xiaojun Chen
1,
Hailong Zhang
1,
Jiayang Zheng
1,
Xinya Zhang
1,
Yafeng Qiu
1,
Zongjie Li
1,
Beibei Li
1,
Ke Liu
1,
Donghua Shao
1,
Jianchao Wei
1,
Jianhe Sun
2,* and
Zhiyong Ma
1,*
1
Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 200241, China
2
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(4), 719; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040719
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 7 February 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacterial Diseases in Livestock and Poultry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study developed an indirect ELISA (GMD-ELISA) to detect the Streptococcus suis (S. suis) antibody. The antigen—antibody response was optimized using checkerboard titration. This method has strong specificity and can detect the main epidemic strains of S. suis in China—type 2, type 7, and type 9—compared with using the commercial Streptococcus suis ELISA type 2 kit. The GMD-ELISA method has high sensitivity and good repeatability. The novel GMD-ELISA method provides technical support for rapid diagnosis and epidemiological investigation.

Abstract

S. suis is an important zoonotic pathogen from sick and recessive carrier pigs that poses a serious threat to animal husbandry production and public health. It usually causes horizontal transmission among pigs. The morbidity and mortality of this disease are very high. Human infection is caused through direct or indirect contact with sick pigs. The two large-scale outbreaks in China were due to the outbreak of S. suis on pig farms, which spread to human infection; thus, detecting S. suis in pig herds is crucial. At present, the commercial S. suis ELISA type 2 kits on the market can only detect single serotypes, high probabilities of interaction reactions, and biosafety risks when using inactivated S. suis as an antigen. Phosphate-3-glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase (GAPDH), muramidase-released protein (MRP), and dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLDH) are important S. suis type 2, S. suis type 7, and S. suis type 9 protective antigens. This study purified the GMD protein (B-cell-dominant epitopes of GAPDH, MRP, and DLDH antigens) and used a diverse combination of dominant epitopes of the multiple different antigens as coated antigens, improving the sensitivity and safety of the indirect ELISA experiments. An indirect ELISA method (GMD-ELISA) was developed for detecting S. suis antibodies. The antigen—antibody response was optimized using checkerboard titration. The results of testing using ELISA for Salmonella enterica (S. enterica), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (SA), and Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) were all negative, indicating that this method had strong specificity. The results were still positive when the dilution ratio of S. suis-positive serum reached 1:6, 400, thus indicating that the method had high sensitivity. The results of the reproducibility assay for indirect ELISA showed that the intra-assay coefficient of variation and the inter-assay coefficient of variation were less than 10%, indicating that the method had good repeatability. We investigated the seroprevalence of S. suis in 167 serum samples collected in East China, and 33.5% of the samples were positive for antibodies against S. suis, indicating that the prevalence of S. suis is high in pig farms in Eastern China. The novel GMD-ELISA is a convenient, sensitive, and specific diagnostic method that provides technical support for rapid diagnosis and epidemiological investigation.

1. Introduction

S. suis is an encapsulated Gram-positive bacterium. According to the different capsular antigens, S. suis can be divided into 35 serotypes, of which serotypes 2, 7, and 9 are the main pathogenic bacterial groups in pigs [1,2,3]. It can cause disease in animals and humans and can be transmitted to humans through wounds and the digestive tract, causing clinical symptoms such as sepsis, pneumonia, endocarditis, arthritis, meningitis, and death [4,5,6,7]. Prior to 2005, over 200 cases were reported in European and Asian countries. Two large-scale outbreaks of human S. suis infection occurred in China in 1998 and July 2005, resulting in widespread fatalities [8,9,10]. Repeated outbreaks have raised worldwide concern about its potential as an emerging zoonotic pathogen.
Accurately and rapidly detecting S. suis is very important in the early diagnosis and treatment of infection. Traditional microbiological and biochemical analyses are laborious, time-consuming, and have low specificity or sensitivity [11]. Ju et al. (2010) developed a colloidal gold immunochromatography method for rapidly detecting S. suis type 2, but the sensitivity of this method was poor and it can only detect a positive result when the bacterial concentration is greater than 105 cfu/mL [12]. Therefore, developing a rapid detection method for S. suis for real-time studies and serological monitoring is necessary.
Over the past few decades, immunoassays have become routine methods for detecting pathogens. Indirect ELISA is a quick and simple method for detecting antibodies or antigens while screening many samples in a single experiment [13,14]. It can be used for rapidly evaluating a vaccine’s immune effect by detecting the antibody level and serum titer changes caused by vaccine immunization.
The enzyme phosphate-3-glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase (GAPDH) plays a significant role in the glycolytic pathway and is also a surface-related factor in the interaction of pathogenic Streptococci with host proteins and cells [15]. Muramidase-released protein (MRP) is an important virulence factor of S. suis and both GAPDH and MRP have been proven to be related to adhesion [16]. Moreover, FAD-dependent enzyme dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLDH) is one of the components of the pyruvate dehydrogenase system, which participates in cellular respiratory energy metabolism. In Neisseria pneumoniae (N.pneumoniae), DLDH is speculated to transport sugars and has been shown to have high immunogenicity [17].
Wang et al. found that the GMD protein showed effective immune protection against S. suis type 2, S. suis type 7, and S. suis type 9 in zebrafish. Immunizing mice and pigs with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) as an adjuvant of the TLR4 agonist induced a strong innate immune response and had a good protective effect for both mice and pigs [18]. In this paper, the GMD protein was purified, with the aim of developing an indirect ELISA test as a reliable technical method for serologically investigating the S. suis disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Serum Samples and Materials

S. suis type 2 (ZY05719 strain), S. suis type 7 (SH04815 strains), and S. suis type 9 (SH26 strain) and the corresponding reference antisera of serotypes 2, 7, and 9 (SS2, SS7, SS9) were obtained by Professor Sun Jianhe from Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
To establish the GMD-ELISA protocol, 30 antisera of S. suis serotypes 2, 7, and 9 (SS2-P1~SS2-P10, SS7-P1~SS7-P10, SS9-P1~SS9-P10) from naturally infected pigs and 34 negative sera (SS-N1~SS-N34), which were identified using the agglutination test described previously [19], were used (Supplementary Table S1). The positive sera for S. enterica, E. coli, SA, and S. pyogenes were provided by the laboratory of the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute. In the conformance rate experiment, 40 serum samples were collected from farms with disease outbreaks and 60 serum samples were collected from farms without disease outbreaks. One hundred and sixty-seven samples of pig serum from (Shandong, Hebei, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Guangdong) East China were stored by the Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute.

2.2. Expression and Purification of Recombinant GMD Protein

The recombinant plasmid containing the GMD gene was constructed by Wang Zhaofei of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. TMHMM, SignalP, ABCpred, Beppred 2.0, Sopma, and DNASTAR were used to predict the B-cell epitopes of GAPDH MRP and DLDH antigens; finally, 15 B-cell antigen-dominant epitopes were obtained. According to the predicted dominant B-cell epitopes of GAPDH, MRP, and DLDH proteins, all the epitopes were combined and spliced in sequence in the order of GAPDH–MRP–DLD and the epitopes were connected in a series using GGGG flexible fragments to construct the recombinant plasmid GMD-pET-28a [18]. The recombinant plasmid was transferred to E. coli BL21 to induce GMD protein expression. In this study, the GMD proteins were purified on a nickel column using a His-Bind Purification Kit (Bio-Rad, Berkeley, CA, USA) and confirmed using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

2.3. Optimizing ELISA Indirect Conditions

After optimization, the ELISA assay was performed in 96-well microtiter plates according to the method described in a previous study [14]. In order to establish the iELISA, checkerboard titration was performed to determine the optimal concentrations of the coating antigen, sera, and secondary antibodies. The recombinant GMD protein was serially diluted in a twofold series to 6.72, 3.36, 1.68, 0.84, 0.42, and 0.21 μg/mL. The standard positive serum for S. suis types 2 (SS2), S. suis 7 (SS7), and S. suis 9 (SS9) and the negative serum for S. suis were also diluted from 1:50 to 1:6400 in the same manner. The secondary antibody horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-swine IgG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was diluted to 1:5000, 1:10,000, 1:15,000, and 1:20,000. Briefly, the 96-well microtiter plates were coated with 100 μL of purified GMD protein at 4 °C overnight. The wells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST) and blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 2 h at 37 °C.
Next, the wells were washed three times and incubated with 100 μL of diluted sera at 37 °C for 1 h. The wells were then washed and incubated with 100 μL of diluted secondary antibody at 37 °C for 1 h. The wells were again washed three times using PBST and 200 μL of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) reaction solution was added. After 15 min of incubation in the dark at room temperature, the reactions were stopped by adding 50 μL of 2 M H2SO4. Then, the OD value was measured at 450 nm using a spectrophotometer. The optimal concentrations of the coating antigen, sera, and secondary antibody were selected as those that provided the highest ratio of OD450 values between the positive and the negative controls (P/N).

2.4. Determining the Critical Value

The optimized GMD-ELISA method was used to detect 34 S. suis-negative sera with a clear background, and the mean OD450 nm value (X) and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. When the mean OD450 nm value of the to-be-evaluated serum equaled or exceeded? X ¯ + 3SD, it was considered positive. When the mean OD450 nm value of the serum to be evaluated was less than? X ¯ + 3SD, it was considered negative.

2.5. Specificity Analysis

A total of 35 specific serum samples (the negative serum for S. suis, S. enterica, E. coli, SA, and S. pyogenes, Supplementary Table S1) were used to evaluate the specificity of the ELISA.

2.6. Sensitivity Analysis

The positive sera of S. suis serotypes 2, 7, and 9 (SS2-P1~SS2-P3, SS7-P1~SS7-P3, SS9-P1~SS9-P3) were diluted at 1:100, 1:200, 1:400, 1:800, 1:1600, 1:3200, 1:6400, 1:12,800, 1:25,600, and 1:51,200 and detected using the established GMD-ELISA method to determine the minimum detection amount. The sensitivity of the commercially available S. suis type 2 ELISA kit was also analyzed.

2.7. Reproducibility Assay for Indirect ELISA

The GMD-ELISA’s reproducibility was evaluated using six serum samples, which were chosen from the present primary tests. The coefficient of variation (CV) was used to evaluate the intra- and inter-assay variation. Each sample was evaluated on each of the three plates on separate occasions to determine the inter-assay CV, while three replicates within the same plate were used to calculate the intra-assay CV. The mean sample/positive control (S/P) ratios and standard deviations (SD) were also calculated.

2.8. Conformance Rate Experiment

To establish this experiment, antibodies from 100 clinical pig serum samples were simultaneously detected by using the commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit and the GMD-ELISA method. The S. suis-positive and -negative sera were used as positive and negative controls with two replicates.

2.9. Elimination of GMD Antibodies after S. suis Type 2 Challenge in Clinically Healthy Pigs

Three clinically healthy sows were selected and numbered as one, two, and three, and each was intravenously injected with the 5 × 106 CFU strain of S. suis type 2 ZY05719. They were each tracked and monitored for the extinction of the serum GMD antibodies.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All the results are presented as the means ± standard errors of the means (SE) of triplicate experiments. The data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software 8.0.1, San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The statistical significance was evaluated using a one-way ANOVA as an analysis of variance.

3. Results

3.1. Expression and Purification of the Recombinant GMD Protein

The GMD protein was purified by elution using an imidazole gradient. The SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the recombinant GMD protein had an approximate molecular mass of 43.3 kDa, as shown in Figure 1A, from lanes 2 to 11. The Western blot analysis using the S. suis type 2 positive serum (SS2), S. suis type 7 positive serum (SS7), S. suis type 9 positive serum (SS9), and anti-His antibody revealed that the shifted band is the recombinant GMD protein, as seen in Figure 1A–E.

3.2. ELISA Optimization Using Recombinant GMD Protein

The optimal working concentration of the antigen coating was shown to be 0.84 μg/mL and the appropriate dilutions of the sera were confirmed to be 1:100, which were determined using checkerboard assays with serial dilutions of antigens and sera. The best dilution of the secondary antibody was 1:5000. Using both Streptococcus suis-positive sera and negative sera in the ELISA assay, in the 4 °C condition for 12 h for the positive serum and in the negative serum antigen coating with the maximum P/N value, the GMD protein had the best antigen coating effect working conditions, including for the antigen coating under different optimized temperatures and time conditions. The cut-off value was determined by the sum of the mean OD450 nm value (X) and three standard deviations (SD) of the 34 negative sera. All 34 negative serum samples were further verified using the commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit and confirmed to be negative for anti-S. suis type 2 antibodies. These serum samples were therefore used to determine the cut-off value in Figure 2; they had an average absorbance of 0.323 and a standard deviation of 0.042. The ELISA threshold was 0.323 + 3 × 0.042 = 0.449. All the results were determined based on the principle that the OD450 ratio of the positive to the negative samples should be above 2.1.

3.3. Specificity Analysis of Indirect ELISA

The S. suis-positive sera (SS2-P1~SS2-P10, SS7-P1~SS7-P10, SS9-P1~SS9-P10), negative sera, and S. enterica, E. coli, SA, and S. pyogenes-positive sera were detected using the established GMD-ELISA method and the results showed good specificity, as seen in Figure 3A. The specificity of the commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit is shown in Figure 3B. The GMD-ELISA can detect S. suis types 2, 7, and 9, while the commercial S. suis type 2 kit can only detect S. suis type 2 (Figure 3C,D).

3.4. Sensitivity Analysis Test of Indirect ELISA

Different dilutions of S. suis-positive serum were evaluated. The detection results showed that the minimum detection amount of this method was 1:6400, as in Figure 4A. The sensitivity of the commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit was 1:3200, as in Figure 4B. The GMD-ELISA method showed higher sensitivity than the S. suis type 2 ELISA kit.

3.5. Reproducibility Assay for Indirect ELISA

Three S. suis-positive sera and three S. suis-negative sera with different antibody levels were used for intra-batch and inter-batch repeatability tests. The calculated results showed that the intra-assay coefficient of variation ranged from 2.42 to 7.07% and the inter-assay coefficient of variation ranged from 3.23 to 6.75%. All were less than 10%, as shown in Table 1, indicating that the method had good repeatability, high accuracy, and could be used for routine detection.

3.6. Results of the Conformance Rate Experiments

One hundred clinical swine serum samples were simultaneously detected using a commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit (Wuhan Keqian Biology, Wuhan, China). The results showed that the S. suis-positive sera were all positive, while the S. suis-negative sera and blank controls were all negative. The commercial S. suis ELISA kit showed that 29 positive sera were detected from 100 clinical serum samples, while 34 positive serum samples were detected using GMD-ELISA(GMD-ELISA was developed for detecting S. suis antibodies), as shown in Table 2; the total compliance rate was 95%.

3.7. Eliminating GMD Antibody in Clinical Healthy Pigs Infected with S. suis Type 2

Three clinically healthy pigs were infected with a 5 × 106 CFU dose of S. suis type 2 strain ZY05719. All three pigs showed clinical symptoms such as claudication, happy lying, and lethargy and the symptoms were gradually relieved after seven days. As can be seen from Figure 5, on the 25th day after infection, the serum GMD antibody levels of all the pigs peaked and there were individual differences between them.

3.8. Seroprevalence of S. suis in East China

The GMD-ELISA method was used to detect 167 clinical pig serum samples from pig farms in East China, which were kept by the Animal Health Testing Center of Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, with an S. suis-positive rate of 33.5%, as seen in Table 3.
The samples were collected from farms with known or unknown S. suis exposure. The GMD-ELISA evaluated 167 pig serum samples.

4. Discussion

The diseases caused by S. suis have wide transmission channels, with many inducing factors such as high morbidity and mortality that affect the pig industry’s sustainable development [20,21,22,23]. Antibiotics are the main tool to prevent and treat S. suis infections, but, with the emergence of drug-resistant strains, many have become ineffective or been banned, so the risk of antibiotic treatment is increased and S. suis infection prevention is a major challenge [24,25,26,27].
There are many serotypes of S. suis disease. Wei et al. found that the epidemic strains were not fixed but dynamic [28]. An important virulence factor of S. suis is MRP, which has good immunogenicity and can be used as a candidate protein of the S. suis subunit vaccine [29]. In addition, the MRP and GAPDH genes of different isolates were highly conserved [30]. The DLDH gene supposedly has a sugar transport function and high immunogenicity [31,32]. Good conservation of GAPDH, MRP, and DLDH is also important as they are protective antigens. The current diagnostic methods for S. suis infection include routine biochemical analysis, flight mass spectrometry, and polymerase chain reaction [33,34]. These methods are time-consuming, cumbersome, and require the use of sophisticated experimental equipment. Indirect ELISA was used to detect S. suis infection, but the specificity of whole bacterial antigens was poor, so this study established a GMD-ELISA based on the recombinant GMD protein, which could quickly detect S. suis with good specificity and sensitivity. This was confirmed in a reproducibility test showing that all cross-validation (CV) values for intra-assay and inter-assay were less than 10%. In addition, there was no cross-reactivity with antisera of S. enterica, E. coli, SA, and S. pyogenes. The GMD-ELISA method has high sensitivity compared to the commercial S. suis ELISA kit. The former can detect S. suis type 2, S. suis type 7, and S. suis type 9.
The inconsistency between the two tests’ results was because the antigens used in the commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit were inactivated Streptococci and some of the bacterial surface protein structures were destroyed during the inactivation. However, the serotype of the S. suis is complex, with more strains of S. suis emerging in recent years; the sensitivity of this method is not strong due to the single coating of the bacterial antigen. During the experiment, we selected a reference serum with good characteristics, but the other serotypes contaminating it was inevitable due to the large number of S. suis serotypes. This situation leads to differences between the two approaches. This aspect must be continuously improved.
In the elimination experiment of the GMD antibody of S. suis type 2 in clinical healthy pigs, the S. suis positivity could be clearly distinguished seven days after the initial infection; thus, it can achieve early diagnosis and prevention. At the same time, the S. suis positivity cannot be clearly judged in the first 5 days, so this detection method also has certain limitations.
Kataoka Y. used S. suis type 2 strain (NCTC 10234) as an antigen to establish an indirect ELISA method [35]; in the antibody elimination experiment, the titer of the ELISA slowly increased within 20 days and then significantly increased after 20 days. However, the ELISA titer of the GMD-ELISA increased significantly and maintained an elevated level after 10 days of challenge. The results showed that the GMD-ELISA method had high sensitivity.
The diseases caused by S. suis have caused great harm to the breeding industry and, as an emerging human pathogen, it poses a threat to public health. As a zoonotic disease, the early diagnosis and effective prevention of S. suis diseases would maintain public health security by reducing the transmission of large-scale diseases, the economic losses of pig farms, and, most importantly, the probability of human infection.
There are more than 30 serotypes of S. suis that cause S. suis diseases. Although commercial vaccines are widely used in China and some European countries, disease prevention and control still require development. Since the first human case of S. suis was reported in Denmark in 1968, more than 1000 cases have been reported in more than 30 countries with intensive pig production, especially in Southeast Asia [36]. In 2010, there was a serious outbreak of S. suis in Northern Thailand, involving 171 human cases [37]. In 2015, more than 500 cases were reported in research facilities in some national and provincial hospitals in Vietnam and 151 patients were found to be affected by S. suis [38]. In 1998, there was an outbreak of S. suis in Jiangsu Province, China, in which 25 people were infected, 14 died, and approximately 98,000 pigs were infected [35]. Studies of the prevalence of S. suis on pig farms in the three main European pig-producing countries—Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain—showed that 3.3 to 4.0% of pigs in infected farms had S. suis-related disease, with mortality rates of 0.5 to 0.9% [39]. In Spain, researchers found that 55.6% of patients worked in pig farms [40].

5. Conclusions

In this study, the GMD-ELISA test was used to analyze 167 sera from six provinces in East China from 2018 to 2021 and, of them, 34.1% were positive for anti-S. suis IgG antibodies. In East China, S. suis mostly occurs in summer and autumn, when the climate is hot and humid, which is conducive to bacterial growth.
These data indicated that the prevalence of S. suis was high in East China, which may be due to the climate of this region. The GMD-ELISA method established in this study can be used to rapidly detect and epidemiologically investigate S. suis disease in pigs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13040719/s1; Table S1: Identification of negative and positive serum for Streptococcus suis types 2, 7 and 9.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: N.D., J.W. and Z.M. Performed the experiments: N.D., Z.W., X.C. and X.Z. Analyzed the data: N.D., J.W. and Z.M. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: J.S., N.D., Q.S., H.Z., J.Z., Y.Q., Z.L., B.L., K.L. and D.S. Wrote the paper: N.D. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFE0101300, awarded to Z.M.) and the Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China (No. X2022-02-08-00-12-F01195 and No. X2021-02-08-00-12-F00770, awarded to J.W.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, China (IACUC No. SVRI-P-2020110802) and performed in compliance with the Guidelines on the Humane Treatment of Laboratory Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, Policy No. 2006 398).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated during this study are publicly available. However, the raw data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gottschalk, M.; Segura, M.; Xu, J. Streptococcus suis infections in humans: The Chinese experience and the situation in North America. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2007, 8, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Goyette-Desjardins, G.; Auger, J.P.; Xu, J.; Segura, M.; Gottschalk, M. Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent-an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2014, 3, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hatrongjit, R.; Kerdsin, A.; Gottschalk, M.; Takeuchi, D.; Hamada, S.; Oishi, K.; Akeda, Y. First human case report of sepsis due to infection with Streptococcus suis serotype 31 in Thailand. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Clifton-Hadley, F.A. Streptococcus suis type 2 infections. Br. Vet. J. 1983, 139, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Staats, J.J.; Feder, I.; Okwumabua, O.; Chengappa, M.M. Streptococcus suis: Past and present. Vet. Res. Commun. 1997, 21, 381–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Francois, B.; Gissot, V.; Ploy, M.C.; Vignon, P. Recurrent septic shock due to Streptococcus suis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gottschalk, M.; Segura, M. The pathogenesis of the meningitis caused by Streptococcus suis: The unresolved questions. Vet. Microbiol. 2000, 76, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, H.J.; Liu, X.C.; Wang, S.W.; Liu, L.G.; Zu, R.Q.; Zhong, W.J.; Zhu, X.P.; Xiang, N.J.; Yuan, H.; Meng, L.; et al. Matched case–control study for risk factors of human Streptococcus suis infection in Sichuan Province, China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2005, 26, 636–639. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tang, J.; Wang, C.; Feng, Y.; Yang, W.; Song, H.; Chen, Z.; Yu, H.; Pan, X.; Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome caused by Streptococcus suis serotype 2. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e151. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yu, H.; Jing, H.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, H.; Zhu, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, L.; Zu, R.; Luo, L.; et al. Human Streptococcus suis outbreak, Sichuan, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robertson, I.D.; Blackmore, D.K. Occupational exposure to Streptococcus suis type 2. Epidemiol. Infect. 1989, 103, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ju, Y.; Hao, H.J.; Xiong, G.H.; Geng, H.R.; Zheng, Y.L.; Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Y.H.; Cai, X.H.; Jiang, Y.Q. Development of colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic assay for rapid detection of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2010, 133, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Del Campo Sepúlveda, E.M.; Altman, E.; Kobisch, M.; D’allaire, S.; Gottschalk, M. Detection of antibodies against Streptococcus suis capsular type 2 using a purified capsular polysaccharide antigen-based indirect ELISA. Vet. Microbiol. 1996, 52, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xia, X.J.; Wang, L.; Shen, Z.Q.; Qin, W.; Hu, J.; Jiang, S.J.; Li, S.G. Development of an Indirect Dot-PPA-ELISA using glutamate dehydrogenase as a diagnostic antigen for the rapid and specific detection of Streptococcus suis and its application to clinical specimens. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dupas, D.; Vignon, M.; Géraut, C. Streptococcus suis meningitis. A severe noncompensated occupational disease. J. Occup. Med. 1992, 34, 1102–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vecht, U.; Wisselink, H.J.; Van Dijk, J.E.; Smith, H.E. Virulence of Streptococcus suis type 2 strains in newborn germfree pigs depends on phenotype. Infect. Immun. 1992, 60, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Expósito Raya, N.; Mestre Luaces, M.; Silva Rodriguez, R.; Nazábal Gálvez, C.; Peña Rivero, M.; Martínez De La Puente, N.; Font Batista, M.; Guillén Nieto, G. Preformulation study of the vaccine candidate P64k against Neisseria meningitidis. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 1999, 29, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, Z.; Guo, M.; Kong, L.; Gao, Y.; Ma, J.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Yan, Y.; Sun, J. TLR4 Agonist Combined with Trivalent Protein JointS of Streptococcus suis Provides Immunological Protection in Animals. Vaccines 2021, 9, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pan, Z.; Ma, J.; Dong, W.; Song, W.; Wang, K.; Lu, C.; Yao, H. Novel variant serotype of streptococcus suis isolated from piglets with meningitis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 976–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lun, Z.R.; Wang, Q.P.; Chen, X.G.; Li, A.X.; Zhu, X.Q. Streptococcus suis: An emerging zoonotic pathogen. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2007, 7, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Segura, M.; Fittipaldi, N.; Calzas, C.; Gottschalk, M. Critical Streptococcus suis Virulence Factors: Are They All Really Critical? Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Susilawathi, N.M.; Tarini, N.M.A.; Fatmawati, N.N.D.; Mayura, P.I.B.; Suryapraba, A.A.A.; Subrata, M.; Sudewi, A.A.R.; Mahardika, G.N. Streptococcus suis-Associated Meningitis, Bali, Indonesia, 2014–2017. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 2235–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Werinder, A.; Aspán, A.; Backhans, A.; Sjölund, M.; Guss, B.; Jacobson, M. Streptococcus suis in Swedish grower pigs: Occurrence, serotypes, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Acta Vet. Scand. 2020, 62, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stuart, J.G.; Zimmerer, E.J.; Maddux, R.L. Conjugation of antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus suis. Vet. Microbiol. 1992, 30, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cromwell, G.L. Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production. Anim. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 7–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Riley, M.A.; Wertz, J.E. Bacteriocins: Evolution, ecology, and application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002, 56, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bonifait, L.; Grignon, L.; Grenier, D. Fibrinogen induces biofilm formation by Streptococcus suis and enhances its antibiotic resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4969–4972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wei, Z.; Li, R.; Zhang, A.; He, H.; Hua, Y.; Xia, J.; Cai, X.; Chen, H.; Jin, M. Characterization of Streptococcus suis isolates from the diseased pigs in China between 2003 and 2007. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 137, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, J.; Ren, J.; Zhou, D.; Luo, Y.B.; Hu, M.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Rapid Detection of mrp, epf, and sly Genes by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification in Streptococcus suis. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2021, 18, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brassard, J.; Gottschalk, M.; Quessy, S. Cloning and purification of the Streptococcus suis serotype 2 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and its involvement as an adhesin. Vet. Microbiol. 2004, 102, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gottschalk, M.; Higgins, R.; Jacques, M.; Mittal, K.R.; Henrichsen, J. Description of 14 new capsular types of Streptococcus suis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1989, 27, 2633–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Liu, H.; Ye, C.; Fu, H.; Yue, M.; Li, X.; Fang, W. Stk and Stp1 participate in Streptococcus suis serotype 2 pathogenesis by regulating capsule thickness and translocation of certain virulence factors. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 152, 104607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ishida, S.; Tien Le, H.T.; Osawa, R.; Tohya, M.; Nomoto, R.; Kawamura, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Kikuchi, N.; Kikuchi, K.; Sekizaki, T. Development of an appropriate PCR system for the reclassification of Streptococcus suis. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 107, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chaiden, C.; Jaresitthikunchai, J.; Kerdsin, A.; Meekhanon, N.; Roytrakul, S.; Nuanualsuwan, S. Streptococcus suis serotyping by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kataoka, Y.; Yamashita, T.; Sunaga, S.; Imada, Y.; Ishikawa, H.; Kishima, M.; Nakazawa, M. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibody against Streptococcus suis type 2 in infected pigs. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1996, 58, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tan, C.; Zhang, A.; Chen, H.; Zhou, R. Recent Proceedings on Prevalence and Pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2019, 32, 473–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Thongkamkoon, P.; Kiatyingangsulee, T.; Gottschalk, M. Serotypes of Streptococcus suis isolated from healthy pigs in Phayao Province, Thailand. BMC Res. Notes 2017, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Mai, N.T.; Hoa, N.T.; Nga, T.V.; Linh Le, D.; Chau, T.T.; Sinh, D.X.; Phu, N.H.; Chuong, L.V.; Diep, T.S.; Campbell, J.; et al. Streptococcus suis meningitis in adults in Vietnam. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 659–667. [Google Scholar]
  39. Neila-Ibáñez, C.; Casal, J.; Hennig-Pauka, I.; Stockhofe-Zurwieden, N.; Gottschalk, M.; Migura-García, L.; Pailler-García, L.; Napp, S. Stochastic Assessment of the Economic Impact of Streptococcus suis-Associated Disease in German, Dutch and Spanish Swine Farms. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 676002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Díez De Los Ríos, J.; Reynaga, E.; García-Gonzàlez, M.; Càmara, J.; Ardanuy, C.; Cuquet, J.; Quesada, M.D.; Navarro, M.; Vilamala, A.; Párraga-Niño, N.; et al. Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Streptococcus suis Infections in Catalonia, Spain. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 792233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 13 00719 g001 550
Figure 1. Purification and validation of the recombinant GMD protein. Electrophoretic diagram of GMD protein purified using Ni column SDS-PAGE (A) and identified using Western blot with SS2 (B), SS7 (C), SS9 (D), and anti-His antibody (E). (A) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: flowing liquid; 2:20 mM imidazole eluant; 3:40 mM imidazole eluant; 4:60 mM imidazole eluant; 5–12: 200 mM imidazole eluant. (B) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: Purified GMD protein; 2: uninduced GMD protein. (C) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: Purified GMD protein; 2: uninduced GMD protein. (D) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: Purified GMD protein; 2: uninduced GMD protein. (E) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: Purified GMD protein; 2: uninduced GMD protein.
Figure 1. Purification and validation of the recombinant GMD protein. Electrophoretic diagram of GMD protein purified using Ni column SDS-PAGE (A) and identified using Western blot with SS2 (B), SS7 (C), SS9 (D), and anti-His antibody (E). (A) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: flowing liquid; 2:20 mM imidazole eluant; 3:40 mM imidazole eluant; 4:60 mM imidazole eluant; 5–12: 200 mM imidazole eluant. (B) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: Purified GMD protein; 2: uninduced GMD protein. (C) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: Purified GMD protein; 2: uninduced GMD protein. (D) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: Purified GMD protein; 2: uninduced GMD protein. (E) M: 180 kDa protein marker; 1: Purified GMD protein; 2: uninduced GMD protein.
Animals 13 00719 g001
Animals 13 00719 g002 550
Figure 2. Determination of cut-off value for GMD-ELISA. Cut-off values were evaluated by testing 34 negative control sera. Each value represented the mean absorbance at 450 nm obtained from three replicates of each evaluated serum sample. The cut-off value was defined as mean OD value of all tested negative control sera, plus three standard deviations. The cut-off value (0.449) is represented by dashed lines. Error bars indicate mean and SD.
Figure 2. Determination of cut-off value for GMD-ELISA. Cut-off values were evaluated by testing 34 negative control sera. Each value represented the mean absorbance at 450 nm obtained from three replicates of each evaluated serum sample. The cut-off value was defined as mean OD value of all tested negative control sera, plus three standard deviations. The cut-off value (0.449) is represented by dashed lines. Error bars indicate mean and SD.
Animals 13 00719 g002
Animals 13 00719 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) GMD-ELISA specificity analysis. The ELISA has cross-reactivity with serum of S. suis type 2, type 7, and type 9 and no reactivity with positive sera of other swine viruses, including S. enterica, E. coli, SA, and S. pyogenes. (B) Commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit specificity analysis. The ELISA has cross-reactivity with serum of S. suis type 2 and no reactivity with positive sera of other swine viruses, including S. enterica, E. coli, SA, and S. pyogenes. (C) The samples of S. suis type 2, S. suis type 7, and S. suis type 9 were serially diluted twofold from 1:100 to 1:12,800 and detected using the GMD-ELISA method. (D) The samples of S. suis type 2, S. suis type 7, and S. suis type 9 were serially diluted twofold from 1:100 to 1:12,800 and detected using the commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit.
Figure 3. (A) GMD-ELISA specificity analysis. The ELISA has cross-reactivity with serum of S. suis type 2, type 7, and type 9 and no reactivity with positive sera of other swine viruses, including S. enterica, E. coli, SA, and S. pyogenes. (B) Commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit specificity analysis. The ELISA has cross-reactivity with serum of S. suis type 2 and no reactivity with positive sera of other swine viruses, including S. enterica, E. coli, SA, and S. pyogenes. (C) The samples of S. suis type 2, S. suis type 7, and S. suis type 9 were serially diluted twofold from 1:100 to 1:12,800 and detected using the GMD-ELISA method. (D) The samples of S. suis type 2, S. suis type 7, and S. suis type 9 were serially diluted twofold from 1:100 to 1:12,800 and detected using the commercial S. suis type 2 ELISA kit.
Animals 13 00719 g003
Animals 13 00719 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Sensitivity analysis. S. suis-positive serum was serially diluted twofold from 1:100 to 1:12,800 and detected using the GMD-ELISA method. (B) Sensitivity analysis. S. suis-positive serum was serially diluted twofold from 1:100 to 1:12,800 and detected using the S. suis type 2 ELISA kit.
Figure 4. (A) Sensitivity analysis. S. suis-positive serum was serially diluted twofold from 1:100 to 1:12,800 and detected using the GMD-ELISA method. (B) Sensitivity analysis. S. suis-positive serum was serially diluted twofold from 1:100 to 1:12,800 and detected using the S. suis type 2 ELISA kit.
Animals 13 00719 g004
Animals 13 00719 g005 550
Figure 5. Kinetics of GMD antibody in serum of challenged pigs with S. suis type 2.
Figure 5. Kinetics of GMD antibody in serum of challenged pigs with S. suis type 2.
Animals 13 00719 g005
Table
Table 1. The results of repeating test.
Table 1. The results of repeating test.
Sample NumberInter-Assay CV (%)Intra-Assay CV (%)
X ± SDCV (%)X ± SDCV (%)
11.150 ± 0.0403.48%1.154 ± 0.0524.51%
21.302 ± 0.0423.23%1.364 ± 0.0332.42%
31.336 ± 0.0372.77%1.359 ± 0.0453.31%
40.285 ± 0.0165.61%0.297 ± 0.0206.73%
50.348 ± 0.0236.61%0.382 ± 0.0277.07%
60.415 ± 0.0286.75%0.432 ± 0.0266.02%
Table
Table 2. The results of the conformance test.
Table 2. The results of the conformance test.
Commercial Streptococcus suis Type 2 ELISA Kit
PositiveNegativeTotal
GMD-ELISAPositive29534
Negative06666
Total2971100
Positive coincidence rate93%
Negative coincidence rate100%
The total coincidence rate95%
Table
Table 3. Epidemiological investigation of S. suis in pig farms in Eastern China, 2018–2021.
Table 3. Epidemiological investigation of S. suis in pig farms in Eastern China, 2018–2021.
Sample TypeNo. SamplesNo. PositivePositive Rate
Total number of samples1675633.5%
Vaccinated pigs423583.3%
Unvaccinated pigs31619.4%
Unknow941516%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, N.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Qiu, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; et al. Establishment and Application of an Indirect ELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Porcine Streptococcus suis Based on a Recombinant GMD Protein. Animals 2023, 13, 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040719

AMA Style

Dong N, Wang Z, Sun Q, Chen X, Zhang H, Zheng J, Zhang X, Qiu Y, Li Z, Li B, et al. Establishment and Application of an Indirect ELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Porcine Streptococcus suis Based on a Recombinant GMD Protein. Animals. 2023; 13(4):719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Nihua, Zhaofei Wang, Qing Sun, Xiaojun Chen, Hailong Zhang, Jiayang Zheng, Xinya Zhang, Yafeng Qiu, Zongjie Li, Beibei Li, and et al. 2023. "Establishment and Application of an Indirect ELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Porcine Streptococcus suis Based on a Recombinant GMD Protein" Animals 13, no. 4: 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040719

APA Style

Dong, N., Wang, Z., Sun, Q., Chen, X., Zhang, H., Zheng, J., Zhang, X., Qiu, Y., Li, Z., Li, B., Liu, K., Shao, D., Wei, J., Sun, J., & Ma, Z. (2023). Establishment and Application of an Indirect ELISA for the Detection of Antibodies to Porcine Streptococcus suis Based on a Recombinant GMD Protein. Animals, 13(4), 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040719

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop