Next Article in Journal
Tracing the Dynamical Genetic Diversity Changes of Russian Livni Pigs during the Last 50 Years with the Museum, Old, and Modern Samples
Previous Article in Journal
The First Report of a Water Mite Unionicola (Trombidiformes: Unionicolidae) Infection in Filopaludina spp. (Gastropoda: Viviparidae) from Thailand with a Description of a New Species of Unionicola (Polyatax) kasetbangkhenensis sp. nov.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Levels of Extruded Coffee (Coffea arabica) Pulp Flour on the Productive Performance and Intestinal Morphometry of Cobb 500 Broiler Chickens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/ani14111628
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fermented Astragalus Powder, a New Potential Feed Additive for Broilers to Improve the Growth Performance and Health

by
Songwei Han
1,
Guowei Xu
1,
Kang Zhang
1,
Saad Ahmad
1,
Lei Wang
1,
Fubin Chen
1,
Jiahui Liu
1,
Xueyan Gu
1,
Jianxi Li
1 and
Jingyan Zhang
1,2,*
1
Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730050, China
2
Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(11), 1628; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14111628
Submission received: 19 April 2024 / Revised: 23 May 2024 / Accepted: 29 May 2024 / Published: 30 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Paradigm Shift—Precision Poultry Nutrition and Alternative Poultry Feed Ingredients Using Novel Feed Processing Methods)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Astragali Radix cell wall is composed of dense components, which greatly reduces the utilization rate of its active constituents and limits its application and promotion in animals. The application of microbial fermentation technology can effectively address this issue. We produced a mixed-bacterial-fermented Astragalus powder. In this study, we found that fermented Astragalus powder has the potential to enhance the growth performance, immune function, and antioxidant capacity of broilers to a certain degree. Additionally, it has shown promising effects in regulating the intestinal flora. Fermented Astragalus powder is expected to be a novel kind of feed additive.

Abstract

A total of 320 1-day-old broilers were randomly divided into five groups. The control group (CON) received a basal diet, while the FAP4, FAP2, and FAP1 groups were provided with the basal diet supplemented with 4%, 2%, and 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively. The unfermented Astragalus powder (UAP2) group was fed the basal diet supplemented with 2% UAP. Each group contained eight replicates of eight chicks each. The results revealed that the final BW and ADG in the FAP 1 and FAP2 were higher than those in the UAP2 and CON groups, while reducing F/G from day 14 to day 42. On day 42, the thymus index in the UAP and FAP groups as well as the bursa index in the FAP4 group showed significant increases compared to those in the CON group. Supplementation with 2% FAP elevated serum IgA levels in broilers on day 28 and day 42, and it also increased serum IgG levels on day 42. Furthermore, supplementation with 2% FAP elevated serum albumin (ALB) levels in broilers, while supplementation with 4% FAP increased serum (glucose) GLU levels in broilers on day 28. The serum biochemical parameters and pathological observation of the liver and kidney in the groups did not show any adverse effects on broilers’ health. In addition, the serum total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) level significantly increased in the FAP4 and FAP2 groups on day 28, and the malondialdehyde (MDA) level in both serum and liver tissue decreased in the FAP2 group on day 28 and day 42. Compared to the CON group, 2% FAP and 2% UAP supplementation reduced the relative abundance of Bacteroides and supplementation with 2% FAP increased the relative abundance of Alistipes on day 42. In conclusion, the dietary supplementation of FAP can enhance the growth performance, immune function, and antioxidant capacity and regulate microflora in broilers, of which 2% FAP is more effective. It indicates FAP exhibits significant application potential as a promising feed additive for broilers.

1. Introduction

The projected global population is anticipated to reach 9.6 billion by the year 2050 [1]. To meet the increasing demand for chicken meat, many intensive broiler farms have been established. However, this farming method contradicts the natural growth pattern of broilers, leading to slower growth rates [2]. Simultaneously, high-density breeding environments can cause immunity decline and oxidative stress of broilers [3]. As a result, antibiotic growth promoters are widely used, resulting in problems like intestinal flora imbalance [4], bacterial resistance [5], and antibiotic residues in chicken meat [6]. These issues have significant adverse effects on both poultry and human health. Consequently, the development of safe and effective “natural growth promoters” has become a focal point of current research.
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is expected to become a popular choice as “natural growth promoters“ due to its non-drug resistance and diverse prebiotic functions [7]. Astragalus is the dried root of Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge. var. mongholicus (Bge.) Hsiao or A. membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge. and is used as a traditional herb in China, USA, Japan, Korea, Iran, Russia, and some other European countries [8]. It contains polysaccharides [9], saponins [10], flavonoids [11], and other active ingredients. Astragalus has been widely used in poultry, with functions such as elevating immunity and antioxidation and regulating intestinal microflora [12]. However, there are a lot of lignin, cellulose, and pectin in Astragalus, which are closely bound with bioactive substances, and these substances inhibit the release of bioactive substances in Astragalus to the external environment [13]. Probiotic fermentation presents a potential solution to this issue. The process of microbial fermentation generates a complex enzymatic system that not only facilitates the release of active ingredients from Astragalus [14], but also catalyzes the degradation, modification, or transformation of these active ingredients into more potent bioactive compounds [15].
In our previous study, a fermentable strain of Streptococcus alactolyticus was isolated [16] from chicken cecum and evaluated for safety [17]. Further investigation showed that liquid fermentation of Astragalus using S. alactolyticus significantly increased the levels of polysaccharides and flavonoids [18,19]. Considering that the product of multi-strain mixed fermentation is richer in nutrients and active ingredients than that of single-strain fermentation and also being more conducive to animal growth and feed utilization [20,21,22], we established and optimized the liquid fermentation process of Astragalus fermentation with mixed bacteria (including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri, and S. alactolyticus). Currently, there has been no systematic appraisal of the application of Astragalus fermented by mixed bacteria as a feed additive for broilers. Therefore, this study focused on the effects of FAP on the growth performance, immune function, antioxidant capacity, and intestinal microbiota in broilers, providing evidence for the application of mixed-bacteria fermentation technology in Astragalus and promoting the use of FAP as new feed additives in broilers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fermentation Strains and Herbs

The fermentation strains were the mixture of L. acidophilus, L. reuteri, and S. alactolyticus with a ratio of 1:1:1, with a cell density of 1 × 108 CFU/mL. L. acidophilus and L. reuteri were provided by North Na Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Langfang City, Hebei Province, China). S. alactolyticus (GenBank accession No. JX435470; China Patent No. 20120141827.5) was derived from the chicken cecum, isolated, and preserved in the Veterinary Laboratory of Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences of CAAS. Astragalus Radix was purchased from Gansu Huanghe Pharmacy Market (Lanzhou, China) and identified by Agricultural Product Quality Inspection & Safety Test Center of Gansu Province (Lanzhou, China).

2.2. Preparation of Fermented Astragalus Powder

Fermented Astragalus powder (FAP) and unfermented Astragalus powder (UAP) were prepared by Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences of CAAS. The preparation of FAP involved adding 6% of the mixture of bacterial suspensions into an aseptic liquid fermentation medium containing Astragalus, glucose, and other materials. The mixture was evenly mixed and subjected to anaerobic fermentation at 37 °C for 42 h. Afterwards, corncob powder was added to the fermented Astragalus and mixed thoroughly. Subsequently, the mixture was dried at 70 °C. The dried fermented Astragalus was ground into <0.30 mm powder, to obtain FAP. The preparation of UAP followed a similar process to that of FAP, except that the mixture of bacterial suspensions was replaced with sterile MRS broth (bacterial culture medium). The main nutritional and active components of UAP and FAP were determined through laboratory testing (Table 1).

2.3. Animal Treatment and Experimental Design

Based on a single-factor completely randomized design, a total of 320 one-day-old male Sanhuang broilers from a local commercial farm (Lanzhou, Gansu, China) and broiler breeding trials were conducted at this commercial farm (Xigu Family Farm). After a 14-day adaptation period, all birds were randomly assigned into five groups, consisting of 8 replicates with 8 chickens per replicate, which were then denoted as CON group (basal diet), UAP2 group (basal diet supplemented with 2% unfermented Astragalus powder), FAP4, FAP2, and FAP1 groups (basal diet supplemented with 4%, 2%, and 1% fermented Astragalus powder). The additive and the base diet granules were blended together using a mixer before being fed. The basal diet used in this study was formulated in accordance with the National Research Council (NRC) guidelines to meet the recommended nutritional requirements of broilers (Table 2) and provided to broilers without any anticoccidial or antibacterial supplements. All birds are raised indoors in off-ground sheds, with free feeding and watering. The coop temperature was maintained at 33 °C from 1 to 4 days of age, followed by a weekly decrease of 3 °C. The temperature was maintained at 24 °C until the end of the experiment. Vaccination procedures were carried out as per standard protocols throughout the trial.

2.4. Growth Performance

The weekly feed consumption of broilers was recorded for each replicate. Weighing occurred 12 h after feeding cessation at 28 and 42 days of age. Subsequently, the average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), and feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) were calculated respectively.

2.5. Sample Collection

The treatment schedule and sampling protocol is shown in Figure 1. The methods for the sample collection are described below.
At 28 and 42 days of age, broilers were fasted for 12 h prior to individual weighing. Broilers with body weights close to the average of their respective replicates were selected and blood was collected from the wing veins. The serum was then separated and stored at −20 °C.
At 42 days of age, the blood collected broilers were euthanized by bleeding from the jugular vein. Afterwards, the liver, kidney, spleen, thymus, and bursa were removed, and the fat was stripped and weighed. Liver and kidney tissues from the same part of each broiler were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h.
The end of the cecum of collected broilers was cut with sterilized scissors, and the cecum content was collected in a sterile centrifuge tube, temporarily stored in liquid nitrogen, and then transferred to the refrigerator at −80 °C for storage.

2.6. Main Organ Indexes

The main organ indexes of the broilers in the groups were calculated according to the formula as follows:
Organ index = immune organ weight (g)/live body weight (kg).

2.7. Serum Biochemical Parameters and Immunoglobulin Levels

The levels of serum total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine (CREA), urea (UREA), and glucose (GLU) were analyzed by an automatic biochemistry analyzer (Erba XL-640, Mannheim, Germany). The concentrations of Immunoglobulin A (IgA) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) in serum were determined by ELISA kit (Beijing Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

2.8. Histological Analysis

The fixed liver and kidney tissues were dehydrated with varying concentrations of alcohol, paraffin-embedded, and sliced. Finally, the liver and kidney sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin solution (H&E). The pathological changes in the liver and kidney were observed under the optical microscope (BX43 + DP26, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.9. Antioxidant Capacity

The levels of total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), glutathione (GSH), and malondialdehyde (MDA) in both serum and liver samples were determined using colorimetric kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

2.10. Microflora of Cecum Analysis

Total genomic bacterial DNA was extracted from the cecal contents using the Fecal Genome DNA Extraction Kit (Tiagen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Subsequently, the full-length 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primers (27F: 5′-AGRGTTTGATYNTGGCTCAG 3; 1492R: 5′-TASGGHTACCTTGTTASGACTT-3). PCR products were sequenced on Sequel II after being quantified, repaired, and purified. The sequencing data were processed using SMRT Link (v 8.0) to obtain Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS). Lima (v 1.7.0) was employed for CCS filtering, and the Effective-CCS was derived by eliminating the Mosaic. Sequences with more than 97% similarity were considered the same operational taxonomic unit (OTU). The OTU sequences were subsequently annotated with reference to the SILVA database using classify-sklearn module in QIIME2 (v 2020.6). Based on the annotation results, differences in species composition were analyzed at the phylum and genus levels by relative abundance histogram. Next, QIIME2 (v 2020.6) was used to evaluate community diversity through α diversity analysis (including ACE, Chao1, Simpson, and Shannon indexes). β diversity was performed based on the weighted unifrac algorithm to compare the overall dissimilarity of cecal bacteria between three group samples and was visualized using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS). The above analyses were performed using BMKCloud (www.biocloud.net).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed by IBM SPSS statistical software (v 26.0). Multiple comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Statistical plots were generated by GraphPad Prism software (v 8.06). A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

The effect of FAP supplementation on the growth performance of broilers is shown in Table 3. From 14 to 42 days, the final BW and ADG were significantly higher in the groups FAP1, FAP2, and FAP4 compared to that in the CON group, with a notable reduction in F/G across all FAP (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in final BW, ADG, and F/G between the UAP2 group and the CON group during this period. Between days 14 and 28, as well as days 29 and 42, the ADG in the FAP1 and FAP2 groups was significantly higher than that in the CON group (p < 0.05). Additionally, the F/G in FAP1 and FAP2 groups was significantly lower than that in the CON group (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences observed in both ADG and F/G between the UAP2 group and the CON group (p > 0.05). Moreover, the addition of both FAP and UAP had no significant effect on feed intake (p > 0.05). The survival rate increased in UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, and FAP1 groups compared to that in the CON group; no significant difference was observed during the whole period (p > 0.05).

3.2. Main Organ Indexes

The results regarding the effect of FAP on main organ indexes of broilers are presented in Table 4. The thymus index of three FAP groups and UAP2 group was significantly higher than that of the CON group (p < 0.05). The thymus index of the FAP2 group was the highest, with a significant difference observed compared to that of the UAP2 group (p < 0.05). No significant difference in the spleen index was observed among all groups (p > 0.05). However, the bursa index of FAP4 group exhibited a significant increase compared to that of the CON group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in liver index and kidney index among the groups (p > 0.05).

3.3. Serum Biochemical Parameters and Immunoglobulin Levels

As shown in Table 5, supplementation with 2% FAP led to elevated serum ALB and IgA levels in broilers at 28 days (p < 0.05) compared to the CON group. Additionally, supplementation with 4% FAP increased serum GLU levels in broilers at 28 days (p < 0.05). Furthermore, supplementation with 2% FAP significantly increased serum IgA levels in broilers at 28 days (p < 0.05) and both IgA and IgG levels at 42 days (p < 0.05) compared to the CON group. However, supplementation with FAP and UAP did not have significant effects on other serum biochemical parameters of broilers.

3.4. Histological Observation and Organ Index of Liver and Kidney

The liver lobules of broilers in each group exhibited clear and intact structures, with liver cells arranged radially around the central vein, displaying normal morphology and structural integrity. Similarly, the renal structure of broilers in each group exhibited intact morphology, with clearly visible internal veins of lobules and normal surrounding cortical thin tissue (Figure 2).

3.5. Antioxidant Capacity

Compared to the CON group, both FAP2 and FAP4 groups significantly augmented serum T-AOC levels at 28 days (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant differences in serum GSH levels among all groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, the serum MDA levels in FAP2 group were significantly lower than those in the CON group, UAP2 group, and FAP4 group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, at 42 days, the serum MDA levels in FAP2 group were significantly lower than those in the CON group (p < 0.05). Conversely, UAP supplementation had no effect on the antioxidant capacity of broilers at 28 and 42 days (p > 0.05) (Table 6).

3.6. Microflora in Cecum

Based on the dilution curve (Figure 3A), it is evident that the curve gradually plateaued, suggesting that the sample sequence was adequate and that the species diversity would not undergo significant increase with further sequencing depth. A total of 214,059 effective CCSs were obtained from the 18 samples, resulting in the identification of 561 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a similarity threshold of 97%. The Venn diagram (Figure 3B) illustrated 458 OTUs shared among all the three groups, with the CON group exhibiting a higher count of 528 OTUs compared to the other groups. Moreover, the CON group exhibited 17 unique OTUs, while the UAP2 and FAP2 groups had 9 and 8 unique OTUs, respectively.
The relative abundance of three distinct microflora groups was analyzed at both the phylum and genus levels. At the phylum level (Figure 4A), Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla of all groups, collectively accounting for 90.10% of the total abundance. Additionally, Proteobacteria, Desulfobacterota, Campylobacterota, and Cyanobacteria were present in proportions exceeding 1%. Notably, no significant variation in bacterial abundance was observed among all groups (p > 0.05). The ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B), being an indicator of microbial imbalance [23], remained unaffected by treatments (Figure 4C). At the genus level (Figure 4D), three types of microflora exhibited relative abundances exceeding 5%, namely Bacteroides (11.36%), unclassified muribactaceae (8.99%), and Alistipes (7.53%). Compared with the CON group, supplementation with 2% FAP and 2% UAP resulted in a significant reduction in the relative abundance of Bacteroides (p < 0.05) (Figure 4E), while addition of 2% FAP led to an increased relative abundance of Alistipes (p < 0.05) (Figure 4E).
The α diversity (including ACE, Chao1, Simpson, and Shannon indexes) serves as a measure of the species richness and evenness within intestinal microflora. As illustrated in Figure 5, there is no significant difference in the impact of treatments on the Chao1, Ace, Shannon, and Simpson indexes. However, PCoA and NMDS revealed that the FAP2 and UAP2 groups had a different microbiota structure compared to the CON group (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

The fermentation of TCM involves a biological transformation process. Under the action of microorganisms, the original properties of the medicine are enhanced or new therapeutic effects are produced, which may be attributed to extracellular enzymes such as cellulase and pectinase produced by microorganisms breaking the cell wall of TCM and exposing the active ingredients [24]. Therefore, fermentation is one of the effective means to improve the utilization rate of TCM. Tang et al. fermented Lychee pulp with a combination of bacteria, significantly increasing the release of catechins and quercetin. Moreover, the fermented lychee phenolics were found to be more beneficial for the growth of gut microbiota [25]. Similarly, Wang et al. indicated that dietary supplementation with 3% fermented Artemisia argyi significantly enhanced the growth performance and meat quality of broilers [26]. Further, Liu et al. also showed that both fermented and unfermented Andrographis paniculata exerted positive impact on the growth performance, immune status, and intestinal morphology of ducks, with a more pronounced effect using fermented Andrographis paniculata [27].
In poultry farming, growth performance serves as a direct indicator for assessing animal health and the effectiveness of additives. There have been many reports on the study of TCM as growth promoters in broilers. In a study by Liu et al., the inclusion of 1000 mg/kg polyherbal mixtures in the diet of yellow-feathered broilers exhibited a significant enhancement in growth performance and immune status, improvised by improved antioxidant capacity and intestinal function [28]. The results from the study of Zhang et al. showed that Lasia spinosa Thw. exerts a discernible growth-promoting effect on broilers [29]. TCM is often characterized by poor taste, which can be improved through fermentation. This enhances its palatability and facilitates its utilization as a feed additive, thereby promoting the incorporation of TCM in animal production practices. Ding et al. discovered that fermented mulberry leaf powder supplementation enhances nutrient digestion and absorption of broilers, thereby promoting growth performance [30]. Wu et al. showed that fermentation had a beneficial effect on the chemical composition of rapeseed meal, leading to increased ADG and ADFI in broilers when fed with fermented rapeseed meal [31]. Building upon this, our study investigated the impact of dietary supplementation of FAP on the growth performance of broilers. From 14 to 28 days, supplementation with 1% FAP exhibited the most significant growth-promoting impact with the highest feed conversion rate. From 29 to 42 days, 2% FAP supplementation showed the best effect on broiler growth. These findings suggest that as broilers gets older, higher FAP dosages are needed to enhance growth. Additionally, the supplementation of UAP can moderately enhance the growth performance of broilers, though without statistical significance. The growth-promoting effects of FAP are likely attributed to increased levels of its active ingredients (Table 1). Young broilers fed diets containing Astragalus polysaccharides exhibited a significantly higher weight gain [32]. Flavonoids also can positively regulate the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, thereby promoting growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) [33]. From the perspective of economic benefits, although the addition of FAP will lead to an increase in feed costs, FAP promotes the growth of broilers, which makes up for this loss, and the use of FAP also improves the survival rate of broilers. Therefore, the supplementation of FAP in broiler diets can improve the economic efficiency of chicken farms. Therefore, Astragalus, particularly after probiotic fermentation, demonstrates significant potential as a growth promoter for broilers.
The immune organ index is crucial for assessing the development of animal immune organs, usually used to reflect the immune function and health status of animals [34]. In chickens, the primary immune organs include the thymus, spleen, and bursa, the latter being unique to avian species. These organs serve as crucial sites for the differentiation and maturation of T and B lymphocytes, playing a pivotal role in mounting an effective immune response within the organism [35]. This study unveiled that supplementation with 1% FAP, 2% FAP, 4% FAP, and 2% UAP led to significant increases in the thymus index of broilers compared to the CON group. Notably, the highest thymus index was observed in the FAP2 group. Dietary inclusion of 2% UAP and 2% FAP resulted in a remarkable increase in the broiler thymus index by 11.21% and 25.86%, respectively. Furthermore, the incorporation of 4% FAP exhibited a significant elevation of the bursa index by 26.06%, compared to the CON group. These results suggest that both FAP and UAP have the potential to improve the immune organ index of broilers, with FAP demonstrating more pronounced effects on these indexes. IgA and IgG, as primary immunoglobulins in serum, play vital roles in host defense against infections and are essential components of humoral immunity. Several studies explored the impact of Astragalus on immunoglobulin levels in animals. Hao et al. demonstrated that the inclusion of 15 g/kg Astragalus powder in the diet of fattening lambs significantly enhanced serum levels of IgA, IgG, and IgM [36]. Likewise, in a research by Xia et al. [37], dietary supplementation with Astragalus polysaccharide was found to stimulate the secretion of IgA and IgG in the serum of weaned rabbits. In the current study, only FAP2 group had significantly increased serum IgA and IgG levels in broilers at both 28 days and 42 days. In conclusion, compared to UAP, FAP exhibited a more significant positive impact on the immune function of broilers, indicating its potential as an effective immunomodulator for poultry.
Blood biochemical parameters serve as crucial indicators of the body’s nutrient function and metabolism [38]. Albumin (ALB), a crucial plasma protein, plays a pivotal role in maintaining the body’s nutritional status and regulating osmotic pressure [39]. Our results showed that ALB levels in the FAP2 group were significantly increased compared to the CON group at 28 d. ALT and AST are important indicators of liver function, with abnormal activity of these enzymes indicating liver injury [40]. However, in this study, there were no significant differences in ALT and AST levels among all groups. In addition, dietary supplementation with 4% FAP significantly increased the GLU levels of broilers at 28 days, which serves as a crucial monosaccharide for energy provision in animal blood. Within the normal range, there exists a positive correlation between sugar metabolism and GLU levels [41]. This suggests that dietary supplementation of 4% FAP enhances glucose metabolism in broilers. Meanwhile, this study revealed a significant impact on both ALB and GLU levels in young broilers, suggesting that FAP is more likely to affect serum parameters during the early stages of development. Creatinine (CREA) and urea (UREA) levels are commonly used to reflect the kidney function [42]. However, we found that supplemental feeding with FAP had no effect on serum CREA and UREA levels in broilers. Additionally, based on pathological observation of the liver and kidney, adding 1–4% FAP to the diet did not cause damage to these organs.
Oxidative stress is considered as an important factor influencing animal growth performance and predisposing animals to various diseases [43]. T-AOC represents the comprehensive capacity of a cell’s endogenous enzymatic and non-enzymatic systems to effectively eliminate free radicals [44]. GSH serves as the most important non-enzymatic antioxidant in the body, responsible for scavenging free radicals and preserving cell membrane integrity, making its content an important indicator of the body’s antioxidant capacity [45]. MDA is the main degradation product of lipid peroxidation, and its concentration can reflect the extent of oxidative damage [46]. The antioxidant properties attributed to Astragalus are mainly due to its active ingredients, such as polysaccharides, flavonoids, and saponins [47,48,49]. In our study, compared to the CON group, supplementation with 2% FAP significantly enhanced serum T-AOC levels and effectively reduced serum MDA levels in broilers at 28 d. Additionally, supplementation with 2% FAP resulted in a significant reduction in MDA levels in the serum at 42 d. However, supplementation with UAP did not show any effect on the antioxidant capacity of broilers at either 28 days or 42 days. These results suggest that 2% FAP exhibits better antioxidant activity than the same dose of UAP. A similar study was conducted by Lv et al. [50], who supplemented broiler diets with fermented Shenling Baizhu San and unfermented Shenling Baizhu San and noticed that the broilers fed with fermented Shenling Baizhu San showed greater antioxidant capacity. These results may be due to the fact that broilers absorb more of the active substance released during fermentation. Additionally, it is plausible that the fermentation process alters the structure of the active substance, thereby enhancing its antioxidant activity [15]. In summary, fermentation appears to promote the effectiveness of Astragalus application in broilers.
Intestinal microflora plays an important role in various physiological processes such as nutrient absorption, growth, immune regulation, and maintaining the biological barrier function of the host. Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of TCM in modulating the composition of intestinal microflora and promoting overall bodily health [51,52,53]. In this study, as the beneficial effects of FAP supplementation were mainly seen in the FAP2 group, we assessed the modulating effect of FAP and UAP on intestinal microflora in the CON, UAP2 and FAP2 groups. From the perspective of microflora structures, although the addition of UAP or FAP in the diet did not significantly affect the richness of cecum microflora, there was a tendency to increase the diversity of microflora, which was reflected by the increase in Shannon and Simpson indexes. Greater microbial diversity is associated with enhanced productivity, robust ecological communities, and heightened resistance to invasive species, thereby facilitating more efficient dietary utilization [54]. The results of β diversity in our study revealed significant differences in the microflora structures of the UAP and FAP groups compared to the CON group. It is possible that intensive farming weakens the influence of genetic factors on the intestinal microbial composition of broilers, making dietary and environmental factors more important [51]. In terms of intestinal microflora composition, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the two most dominant phyla in the cecum of broilers. Changes in Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes can disrupt host homeostasis by altering energy acquisition, lipid metabolism, endocrine function, and inflammatory responses [55]. Healthy animals often maintain a dynamic balance in their intestinal microflora to ensure homeostasis. This study showed that 2% UAP and 2% FAP did not significantly affect the F/B. However, at the genus level, 2% FAP led to an increase in the relative abundance of Alistipes. Previous studies reported that Alistipes is capable of producing short-chain fatty acids, mitigating intestinal inflammation, and potentially exerting protective effects against various diseases such as liver fibrosis, colitis, cancer immunotherapy, and cardiovascular diseases [56]. Additionally, Wang et al. verified that glucan can substantially enhance the abundance of Alistipes and facilitate intestinal nourishment and defense [57]. Furthermore, the addition of 2% FAP and 2% UAP resulted in a reduction in the relative abundance of Bacteroides. Greiner and Bäckhed have proposed that compared to lean individuals, obese individuals exhibit decreased levels of Bacteroides in their gut microbiota [58]. Meanwhile, Xiang et al. found that Bacteroides is closely related to abdominal fat deposition in chickens and is more abundant in lean meat chickens, suggesting that the abundance of Bacteroides is negatively correlated with growth performance [59]. Therefore, our results indicate that feeding broilers with 2% FAP could potentially affect growth performance and immune function by modulating the composition of intestinal microflora.

5. Conclusions

The dietary supplementation of FAP has demonstrated significant improvements in the growth performance, immune function, antioxidant capacity, and regulation of intestinal flora in broilers. Based on these findings, FAP holds promise as a high-efficiency feed additive for broilers. It is recommended to incorporate an appropriate dosage of 1% to 2% FAP into broiler diets, with gradual increments corresponding to their age.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and J.Z.; formal analysis, G.X.; project administration, K.Z.; resources, L.W.; methodology, S.H., F.C., J.L. (Jiahui Liu), and X.G.; investigation, S.H., F.C., J.L. (Jiahui Liu), and X.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H.; writing—review and editing, S.A. and J.Z.; supervision, J.L. (Jianxi Li); funding acquisition, J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFD1801104-4), International Cooperation Program of Gansu Province (No. 22YF7WA032), and technical innovation guidance plan of Gansu Province (No. 22CX8NA013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee of Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences of CAAS (the permission number: 2022-014).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Research data are available upon request to the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kalia, V.C.; Shim, W.Y.; Patel, S.K.S.; Gong, C.; Lee, J.-K. Recent Developments in Antimicrobial Growth Promoters in Chicken Health: Opportunities and Challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 834, 155300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Qaid, M.M.; Albatshan, H.A.; Hussein, E.O.S.; Al-Garadi, M.A. Effect of Housing System and Housing Density on Performance, Viability, and Gastrointestinal Tract Growth of Broiler Chicks during the First 2 Wk of Age. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Guo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Wu, J.; Han, J.; Yang, G.; Zhang, L. Oxidative Stress Mediated Immunosuppression Caused by Ammonia Gas via Antioxidant/Oxidant Imbalance in Broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 2023, 64, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mu, C.; Zhu, W. Antibiotic Effects on Gut Microbiota, Metabolism, and beyond. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 9277–9285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Catrin, E. Changes in Antibiotic Resistance in Animals. Science 2019, 365, 1251–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, J.; Ying, G.-G.; Deng, W.-J. Antibiotic Residues in Food: Extraction, Analysis, and Human Health Concerns. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7569–7586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Foroutankhah, M.; Toghyani, M.; Landy, N. Evaluation of Calendula officinalis L. (Marigold) Flower as a Natural Growth Promoter in Comparison with an Antibiotic Growth Promoter on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Humoral Immune Responses of Broilers. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 5, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, Z.; Liu, L.; Gao, C.; Chen, W.; Vong, C.T.; Yao, P.; Yang, Y.; Li, X.; Tang, X.; Wang, S.; et al. Astragali Radix (Huangqi): A Promising Edible Immunomodulatory Herbal Medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 258, 112895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, S.; Qin, Y.; Ma, X.; Luan, W.; Sun, P.; Ju, A.; Duan, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, D. Effects of in Ovo Injection of Astragalus Polysaccharide on the Intestinal Development and Mucosal Immunity in Broiler Chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 738816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, J.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Shen, P.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J. Research on the Interaction of Astragaloside IV and Calycosin in Astragalus membranaceus with HMGB1. Chin. Med. 2023, 18, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, M.; Guo, Z.; Zhou, H.; Ge, B.; Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, X. Study on the bi-directional regulation of anti-inflammatory immune response by total flavonoids of Astragalus in macrophages RAW264.7. Chin. J. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 42, 822–829. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Q.; Wang, X.F.; Xing, T.; Li, J.L.; Zhu, X.D.; Zhang, L.; Gao, F. The Combined Impact of Xylo-Oligosaccharides and Gamma-Irradiated Astragalus Polysaccharides on the Immune Response, Antioxidant Capacity, and Intestinal Microbiota Composition of Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, C.-Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, L.-J.; Hu, Z.-Y.; Wang, S.-P.; Mei, X.; Mi, W.; Zhang, J.-Y. Biotransformation and Bioaccessibility of Active Ingredients from Radix astragali by Poria cocos during Solid-State Fermentation and In Vitro Digestion and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, B.; Liu, Q.; Fan, J.; Zhao, X.; Jia, L.; Yang, W. Optimization of Conditions for Increasing the Contents of Astragalus Polysaccharide by Microbial Fermentation. Chin. J. Vet. Drug 2022, 56, 68–74. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee, J.Y.; Park, H.M.; Kang, C.-H. Antioxidant Effect via Bioconversion of Isoflavonoid in Astragalus membranaceus Fermented by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MG5276 In Vitro and In Vivo. Fermentation 2022, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, K.; Yue, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, J. The Safety and Potential Probiotic Properties Analysis of Streptococcus alactolyticus Strain FGM Isolated from the Chicken Cecum. Ann. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, K.; Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, J. Preliminary Safety Evaluation of the Fermented Astragalus Liquid by FGM Strain. Chin. J. Vet. Drug 2020, 54, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hao, G.J.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, J.Y.; Wang, X.R.; Qin, Z.; Wang, X.Z.; Wang, L.; Meng, J.R.; Yang, Z.Q.; Li, J.X. RT-qPCR Analysis of dexB and galE Gene Expression of Streptococcus alactolyticus in Astragalus membranaceus Fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6009–6018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Su, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, K.; Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Li, J. Study on Improving Active Ingredients of Astragalus Root, Stem and Leaf by Probiotic Fermentation. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2017, 44, 1877–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, X.; Liu, H.; Duan, C.; Yan, G. Effects of Mixed Starters of Plant- and Wine-Derived L. plantarum on Hawthorn Juice Fermentation: Physicochemical Properties, Phenolic and Volatile Profiles. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, L.; Wang, L.; Fan, W.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; Peng, W.; Wu, C. The Application of Fermentation Technology in Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Review. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2020, 48, 899–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qiao, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, S.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Kang, N.; Bian, C. Effeets of Fermented Eucommia ulmoides Leaves on Production Performance. Antioxidant Properties and Immune Related Gene Expression in Broilers. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2023, 50, 1845–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Qi, H.; Tang, W.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wei, X.; Kong, Z.; Jia, S.; et al. Probiotic Fermentation of Ganoderma lucidum Fruiting Body Extracts Promoted Its Immunostimulatory Activity in Mice with Dexamethasone-Induced Immunosuppression. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 141, 111909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wen, Y.-L.; Yan, L.-P.; Chen, C.-S. Effects of Fermentation Treatment on Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Four Common Chinese Herbal Medicinal Residues by Aspergillus oryzae. J. Food Drug Anal. 2013, 21, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tang, S.; Luo, N.; Zeng, Q.; Dong, L.; Zhang, R.; He, S.; Nag, A.; Huang, F.; Su, D. Lychee Pulp Phenolics Fermented by Mixed Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Promote the Metabolism of Human Gut Microbiota Fermentation In Vitro. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 7672–7681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Q.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Sun, M.; Li, P.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Gao, P.; Ma, J.; et al. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Fermented Artemisia argyi on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance, and Meat Quality in Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Z.; Lei, X.; Li, J.; Zhong, Y.; Tan, D.; Zhang, Q.; Kong, Z. Effects of Fermented Andrographis paniculata on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Immune Function, and Intestinal Health in Muscovy Ducks. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, M.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y.; Ding, Y.; Lian, J.; Dong, Q.; Qu, Q.; Lv, W.; Guo, S. Effects of Dietary Polyherbal Mixtures on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Function and Jejunal Health of Yellow-Feathered Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, L.; Hong, Y.; Liao, Y.; Tian, K.; Sun, H.; Liu, X.; Tang, Y.; Hassanin, A.A.; Abdelnour, S.A.; Suthikrai, W.; et al. Dietary Lasia spinosa Thw. Improves Growth Performance in Broilers. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 775223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, Y.; Jiang, X.; Yao, X.; Zhang, H.; Song, Z.; He, X.; Cao, R. Effects of Feeding Fermented Mulberry Leaf Powder on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance, and Meat Quality in Chicken Broilers. Animals 2021, 11, 3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, Z.; Chen, J.; Ahmed Pirzado, S.; Haile, T.H.; Cai, H.; Liu, G. The Effect of Fermented and Raw Rapeseed Meal on the Growth Performance, Immune Status and Intestinal Morphology of Broiler Chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 106, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, S. Effect of Dietary Astragalus membranaceus Polysaccharide on the Growth Performance and Immunity of Juvenile Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 3489–3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Muqier; Qi, S.; Wang, T.; Chen, R.; Wang, C.; Ao, C. Effects of Flavonoids from Allium mongolicum Regel on Growth Performance and Growth-Related Hormones in Meat Sheep. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 3, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Deng, J.; Zhang, J.; Chang, Y.; Wang, S.; Shi, M.; Miao, Z. Effects of Chinese yam Polysaccharides on the Immune Function and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Broilers. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 1013888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wu, Q.J.; Zheng, X.C.; Wang, T.; Zhang, T.Y. Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Oridonin on the Growth Performance, Relative Organ Weight, Lymphocyte Proliferation, and Cytokine Concentration in Broiler Chickens. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hao, X.; Wang, P.; Ren, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhang, J.; Leury, B.; Zhang, C. Effects of Astragalus membranaceus Roots Supplementation on Growth Performance, Serum Antioxidant and Immune Response in Finishing Lambs. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 33, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xia, M.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Li, S. Effect of sietary Astragalus polysaccharide on growth performance, apparent digestibility of nutrients serum biochemical indices and immune organs index of weaned rabbit. Feed Res. 2023, 46, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, J. Effects of Dietary Macleaya cordata Extract on Growth Performance, Biochemical Indices, and Intestinal Microbiota of Yellow-Feathered Broilers Subjected to Chronic Heat Stress. Animals 2022, 12, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Kong, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Lei, X. Effects of Earthworm Hydrolysate in Production Performance, Serum Biochemical Parameters, Antioxidant Capacity and Intestinal Function of Muscovy Ducks. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, R.; Ma, H.; Han, P.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Y.; Ni, A.; Zong, Y.; Bian, S.; et al. Effects of Feed Systems on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Organ Index, and Serum Biochemical Parameters of Pigeon. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 102224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, C.; Ma, J.; Hu, R.; Cao, G.; Dai, Q.; Wang, X.; Zou, H.; Xue, B.; Peng, Q.; Wang, L.; et al. Effects of Active Dry Yeast on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibilities, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Serum Biochemical and Antioxidant Indexes of Simmental Crossbred Cattle. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 33, 3925–3933. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ahmat, M.; Cheng, J.; Abbas, Z.; Cheng, Q.; Fan, Z.; Ahmad, B.; Hou, M.; Osman, G.; Guo, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LFB112 on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Immune, and Serum Biochemical Response in Broiler Chickens. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Balmus, I.M.; Ciobica, A.; Trifan, A.; Stanciu, C. The Implications of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Aspects and Animal Models. Saudi J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sun, D.; Jin, X.; Shi, B.; Su, J.; Tong, M.; Yan, S. Dietary Yucca schidigera Extract Improved Growth Performance and Liver Antioxidative Function in Broilers. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 16, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, X.; Cao, W.; Jia, G.; Zhao, H.; Chen, X.; Wu, C.; Tang, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, G. New Insights into the Role of Spermine in Enhancing the Antioxidant Capacity of Rat Spleen and Liver under Oxidative Stress. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 3, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Jin, Y.; Deng, J.; Shi, M.; Miao, Z. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Chinese Yam Polysaccharide on Carcass Composition, Meat Quality, and Antioxidant Capacity in Broilers. Animals 2023, 13, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, R.-Z.; Tan, L.; Jin, C.-G.; Lu, J.; Tian, L.; Chang, Q.-Q.; Wang, K. Extraction, Isolation, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Polysaccharides from Astragalus membranaceus. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 77, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sheng, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, B. UHPLC–MS/MS Analysis on Flavonoids Composition in Astragalus membranaceus and Their Antioxidant Activity. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Song, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Yu, J.; Li, Z.; Liang, K.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J. Study on the Biotransformation and Activities of Astragalosides from Astragali radix In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 17924–17946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lv, W.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Huang, J.; He, S.; Du, H.; Guo, S. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum Fermented Shenling Baizhu San on Gut Microbiota, Antioxidant Capacity, and Intestinal Barrier Function of Yellow-Plumed Broilers. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1103023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, J.; Yu, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Si, W.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, J. Dietary Epimedium Extract Supplementation Improves Intestinal Functions and Alters Gut Microbiota in Broilers. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zheng, J.; Liang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.; Li, Y.; Diao, J.; Dong, L.; Ni, H.; Yin, Y.; Ren, J.; et al. Effects of Compound Chinese Herbal Medicine Additive on Growth Performance and Gut Microbiota Diversity of Zi Goose. Animals 2022, 12, 2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Che, Q.; Luo, T.; Shi, J.; He, Y.; Xu, D.-L. Mechanisms by Which Traditional Chinese Medicines Influence the Intestinal Flora and Intestinal Barrier. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 863779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, X.; Huang, L.; Shi, Y.; Wang, X.; Luo, Y.; Wei, S.; Qin, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ju, Y.; et al. Ganoderma Lingzhi Culture Enhance Growth Performance via Improvement of Antioxidant Activity and Gut Probiotic Proliferation in Sanhuang Broilers. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1143649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shu, G.; Kong, F.; Xu, D.; Yin, L.; He, C.; Lin, J.; Fu, H.; Wang, K.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, X. Bamboo Leaf Flavone Changed the Community of Cecum Microbiota and Improved the Immune Function in Broilers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Parker, B.J.; Wearsch, P.A.; Veloo, A.C.M.; Rodriguez-Palacios, A. The Genus Alistipes: Gut Bacteria with Emerging Implications to Inflammation, Cancer, and Mental Health. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, J.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, J.; Xiao, Y.; Ji, X.; Zhang, Z.; He, H.; Ding, B.; Tang, B. Effect of β-1,3/1,6-Glucan on Gut Microbiota of Yellow-Feathered Broilers. AMB Express 2022, 12, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Greiner, T.; Bäckhed, F. Effects of the Gut Microbiota on Obesity and Glucose Homeostasis. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 22, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xiang, H.; Gan, J.; Zeng, D.; Li, J.; Yu, H.; Zhao, H.; Yang, Y.; Tan, S.; Li, G.; Luo, C.; et al. Specific Microbial Taxa and Functional Capacity Contribute to Chicken Abdominal Fat Deposition. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 643025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 14 01628 g001
Figure 1. The experimental design and sampling schedule. UAP: unfermented Astragalus powder; FAP: fermented Astragalus powder.
Figure 1. The experimental design and sampling schedule. UAP: unfermented Astragalus powder; FAP: fermented Astragalus powder.
Animals 14 01628 g001
Animals 14 01628 g002
Figure 2. Histopathological changes in liver and kidney in broilers (H&E staining, 200×). CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Figure 2. Histopathological changes in liver and kidney in broilers (H&E staining, 200×). CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Animals 14 01628 g002
Animals 14 01628 g003
Figure 3. Dilutive curve (A) and Venn diagram (B). CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Figure 3. Dilutive curve (A) and Venn diagram (B). CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Animals 14 01628 g003
Animals 14 01628 g004
Figure 4. Effects of fermented Astragalus powder on cecal microflora composition in broilers. (A) The cecal microflora composition and abundance of each group at phylum level. (B) Relative abundance of the five most predominant cecal microflora at phylum level. (C) The ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes. (D) The cecal microflora composition and abundance of each group at genus level. (E) Relative abundance of the five most predominant cecal microflora at the genus level. All data were evaluated as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05. CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Figure 4. Effects of fermented Astragalus powder on cecal microflora composition in broilers. (A) The cecal microflora composition and abundance of each group at phylum level. (B) Relative abundance of the five most predominant cecal microflora at phylum level. (C) The ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes. (D) The cecal microflora composition and abundance of each group at genus level. (E) Relative abundance of the five most predominant cecal microflora at the genus level. All data were evaluated as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05. CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Animals 14 01628 g004
Animals 14 01628 g005
Figure 5. Effect of fermented Astragalus powder on α diversity of cecal microflora in broilers. CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Figure 5. Effect of fermented Astragalus powder on α diversity of cecal microflora in broilers. CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Animals 14 01628 g005
Animals 14 01628 g006
Figure 6. Effect of fermented Astragalus powder on β diversity of cecal microflora in broilers. CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Figure 6. Effect of fermented Astragalus powder on β diversity of cecal microflora in broilers. CON: control. UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Animals 14 01628 g006
Table 1. The main nutritive and active components of FAP and UAP.
Table 1. The main nutritive and active components of FAP and UAP.
ItemNutritive Components (%)Active Components (%)
CPEECFCaPTPTFTS
FAP9.620.821.80.230.275.050.250.58
UAP8.870.726.40.260.33.660.160.48
FAP: fermented Astragalus powder; UAP: unfermented Astragalus powder; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; CF: crude fiber; Ca: calcium; P: phosphorus; TP: total polysaccharides; TF: total flavonoids; TS: total saponins.
Table 2. The ingredient and nutrient composition of the basal diet (% as fed basis).
Table 2. The ingredient and nutrient composition of the basal diet (% as fed basis).
Component1–21 Days22–42 Days
Ingredient (%)
Corn55.6055.20
Soybean meal 129.0024.00
Cottonseed meal2.503.00
Wheat flour4.004.00
Hydrolyzed feather meal1.501.50
Dicalcium phosphate0.900.80
Limestone powder1.501.50
Bentonite1.001.00
Soy oil2.007.00
Premix 22.002.00
Total100.00100.00
Calculation of nutrients 3
Metabolizable energy, kcal/kg28943212
Crude protein, %21.5019.51
Calcium, %0.960.84
Total phosphorus, %0.660.55
Lysine, %1.451.40
Methionine, %0.540.50
Threonine, %0.910.80
Note: 1 The crud protein content was 44%. 2 The premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: VA, 6000 IU;VD3, 2000 IU; VE, 30 mg; VK3, 2 mg; VB1, 3 mg; VB2, 5 mg; pantothenic acid, 800 mg; choline chloride 1500 mg; nicotinic acid, 30 mg; pyridoxine, 3 mg; folic acid, 500 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg; VBl2, 1 mg; Fe, 100 mg; Cu, 8 mg; Mn, 100 mg; Zn, 100 mg; I, 0.42 mg; Se, 0.3 mg. 3 The nutrient levels were calculated from date provided by Feed Database in China.
Table 3. Effect of dietary FAP supplementation on the growth performance in broilers.
Table 3. Effect of dietary FAP supplementation on the growth performance in broilers.
ItemsTreatmentsSEMp-Value
CONUAP2FAP4FAP2FAP1
Initial BW (g)242.89242.42242.88242.88242.803.5821.0
Final BW (g)1291.58 c1324.74 bc1337.85 ab1374.15 a1373.83 a13.092<0.001
14 to 42 days of age
ADFI (g)87.7087.9187.0087.5587.061.2470.941
ADG (g)37.45 c38.65 bc39.11 ab40.40 a40.39 a0.507<0.001
F/G2.34 a2.28 ab2.23 bc2.15 c2.16 c0.032<0.001
14 to 28 days of age
ADFI (g)63.9263.7763.1663.1163.230.9700.874
ADG (g)33.14 c34.33 bc34.34 bc35.25 ab36.17 a0.4460.001
F/G1.93 a1.86 ab1.84 abc1.79 bc1.75 c0.032<0.001
29 to 42 days of age
ADFI (g)111.27112.05110.83111.93110.892.1480.936
ADG (g)41.77 c42.98 bc43.87 abc45.56 a44.62 ab0.8200.001
F/G2.67 a2.61 ab2.53 abc2.46 c2.49 bc0.0480.001
Survival rate (%)93.7596.8896.8898.4498.443.1250.565
a–c Values with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05) (n = 8). CON: control; UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively. ADG: average daily gain; ADFI: average daily feed intake; F/G: feed to gain ratio.
Table 4. Effect of dietary FAP supplementation on the main organ indexes in broilers.
Table 4. Effect of dietary FAP supplementation on the main organ indexes in broilers.
ItemTreatmentsSEMp-Value
CONUAP2FAP4FAP2FAP1
Thymus index3.21 c3.57 b3.87 ab4.04 a3.97 ab0.156<0.001
Spleen index1.511.541.541.601.580.7100.724
Bursa index1.42 b1.69 ab1.79 a1.74 ab1.74 ab0.1200.029
Liver index21.2320.4521.3921.2520.170.4480.228
Kidney index5.956.256.646.486.140.2700.424
a–c Values with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05) (n = 8). CON: control; UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively.
Table 5. Effect of dietary FAP supplementation on the serum biochemical parameters in broilers.
Table 5. Effect of dietary FAP supplementation on the serum biochemical parameters in broilers.
ItemTreatmentsSEMp-Value
CONUAP2FAP4FAP2FAP1
28 days of age
TP (g/L)31.2431.5631.2534.1631.861.0560.046
ALB (g/L)11.54 b12.05 ab11.58 b12.71 a12.11 ab0.3230.006
ALT (U/L)4.064.294.844.184.440.6180.754
AST (U/L)186.75182.00184.50185.63193.6310.4360.843
GLU (mmol/L)8.60 b9.13 ab10.43 a9.56 ab9.58 ab0.4520.005
CREA (μmol/L)45.6846.3647.3845.9147.162.360.936
UREA (mmol/L)0.290.350.330.300.380.060.585
IgA (mg/mL)0.25 b0.26 ab0.28 ab0.32 a0.30 ab0.0100.020
IgG (mg/mL)2.162.292.272.542.510.1870.223
42 days of age
TP (g/L)33.3133.2534.0034.6934.091.1180.685
ALB (g/L)11.7612.1012.8912.9112.490.5430.174
ALT (U/L)4.794.864.644.884.560.7040.989
AST (U/L)190.00195.38199.13203.75201.259.7820.662
GLU (mmol/L)6.866.636.446.886.630.2530.398
CREA (μmol/L)44.6643.0045.6646.1945.142.370.714
UREA (mmol/L)0.280.310.380.300.310.060.428
IgA (mg/mL)0.30 b0.37 ab0.40 ab0.45 a0.36 ab0.4740.036
IgG (mg/mL)2.57 b2.89 ab3.17 ab3.44 a2.92 ab0.2830.051
a,b Values with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05) (n = 8). CON: control; UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively. TP: total protein; ALB: albumin; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CREA: areatinine; UREA: urea; GLU: glucose; IgA: Immunoglobulin A; IgG: Immunoglobulin G.
Table 6. Effect of dietary FAP supplementation on the antioxidant capacity in serum of broilers.
Table 6. Effect of dietary FAP supplementation on the antioxidant capacity in serum of broilers.
ItemsTreatmentsSEMp-Value
CONUAP2FAP4FAP2FAP1
28 days of age
T-AOC (mM)0.52 b0.57 ab0.63 a0.64 a0.60 ab0.0290.003
GSH (μmol/L)37.9439.2340.7741.4540.692.0870.464
MDA (nmol/mL)5.77 a5.58 ab5.44 ab4.95 c5.10 bc0.167<0.001
42 days of age
T-AOC (mM)0.460.490.510.530.480.0380.398
GSH (μmol/L)35.7336.5740.5441.3038.772.1880.064
MDA (nmol/mL)6.19 a5.95 ab5.80 ab5.55 b5.79 ab0.1610.007
a–c Values with different superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05) (n = 8). CON: control; UAP2, FAP4, FAP2, FAP1 represent that dietary supplementation of 2% unfermented Astragalus powder and 4%, 2%, 1% fermented Astragalus powder, respectively. T-AOC: total antioxidant capacity; GSH: glutathione; MDA: malondialdehyde.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, S.; Xu, G.; Zhang, K.; Ahmad, S.; Wang, L.; Chen, F.; Liu, J.; Gu, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, J. Fermented Astragalus Powder, a New Potential Feed Additive for Broilers to Improve the Growth Performance and Health. Animals 2024, 14, 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14111628

AMA Style

Han S, Xu G, Zhang K, Ahmad S, Wang L, Chen F, Liu J, Gu X, Li J, Zhang J. Fermented Astragalus Powder, a New Potential Feed Additive for Broilers to Improve the Growth Performance and Health. Animals. 2024; 14(11):1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14111628

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Songwei, Guowei Xu, Kang Zhang, Saad Ahmad, Lei Wang, Fubin Chen, Jiahui Liu, Xueyan Gu, Jianxi Li, and Jingyan Zhang. 2024. "Fermented Astragalus Powder, a New Potential Feed Additive for Broilers to Improve the Growth Performance and Health" Animals 14, no. 11: 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14111628

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop