Next Article in Journal
Molecular Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Cats in Europe and Associated Risk Factors
Previous Article in Journal
Full-Fat Soybean Meals as an Alternative Poultry Feed Ingredient—Feed Processing Methods and Utilization—Review and Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Infrared Thermography in Assessment of Facial Temperature of Racing Sighthound-Type Dogs in Different Environmental Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Environmental Enrichment in Rabbit Husbandry: Comparative Impacts on Performance and Welfare

1
Poultry Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21545, Egypt
2
Veterinary World, Wankaner, Star, Gulshan Park, Wankaner 363621, India
3
Poultry Production Department, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
4
Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21545, Egypt
5
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064 Bologna, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(16), 2367; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162367
Submission received: 14 July 2024 / Revised: 11 August 2024 / Accepted: 14 August 2024 / Published: 15 August 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Rabbit meat is consumed in both developing and developed countries. Intensive animal housing systems often subject animals to challenging environmental conditions, resulting in behavioral changes and the activation of stress responses at the neurological and hormonal levels, adversely affecting their health and productivity. Environmental enrichment strategies aim to mitigate these impacts by facilitating animals’ adaptation to their farming environment, thereby reducing stress. This review comprehensively examines the efficacy of various environmental enrichments, whether implemented individually or in combination, in enhancing the welfare and performance of rabbits within intensive farming settings. Furthermore, this review discusses future developments and the integration of precision rabbit farming approaches aimed at further improving animal welfare.

Abstract

Rabbits are highly susceptible to environmental stress. Such stress, stemming from conventional housing conditions, can negatively impact well-being and productivity. Some of these negative consequences are increased susceptibility to diseases and infections and reduced growth rates and reproductive performance, as well as increased behavioral issues such as aggression. Environmental enrichment is the modification of the environment in which a domesticated animal lives in order to meet the species’ behavioral needs. The objective of providing enrichment is to facilitate animals in expressing natural behaviors, thereby preventing behavioral frustration and negative affective states. Several inexpensive and safe materials can be used to enrich rabbit enclosures. This review emphasizes the significance of implementing diverse environmental enrichments to alleviate stress in rabbit farming. It summarizes their effects on animal performance and welfare while exploring potential future perspectives in this field.

1. Introduction

The global consumption of rabbit products is increasing due to their high nutritional value and affordable prices [1]. These meats offer essential proteins, vitamins, and minerals, and are generally lower in fat compared to red meats. As demand increases, the sector faces challenges in maintaining sustainable and ethical production practices. Over the past few years, consumers have expressed great interest in improving animal welfare and product quality [2]. Prioritizing animal welfare aligns with ethical principles, leading to increased consumer satisfaction and long-term benefits for both animals and consumers.
In modern intensive husbandry systems, animals can be exposed to challenging farming conditions resulting in stress responses, abnormal behavior, body lesions, or more severe consequences. The rabbit industry is not immune to this issue. Decades of genetic selection aimed at increasing productivity have resulted in rabbits with poor resilience to stress and a lower capability to cope with suboptimal farming conditions, negatively impacting their health, welfare, and productivity [3,4]. The negative consequences include an increased susceptibility to diseases and infections and reduced growth rates and reproductive performance, as well as increased behavioral issues such as aggression and stereotypies. Housing conditions are the most important factor influencing the welfare of raised rabbits. Thus, establishing better living conditions that align with animal welfare concerns is important [5]. Wire cages, overcrowding, a lack of space availability, poor ventilation, inadequate lighting, and limited opportunities to carry out natural behaviors are some of the most prominent stressors in conventional housing systems [5,6]. There are some strategies and tools that can help reduce environmental stress, creating a more enriched and comfortable environment for rabbits, and promoting better animal welfare and performance.
Environmental enrichment is a key aspect of animal welfare, particularly for small livestock like rabbits. It could be defined as the modification of the environment in which a domesticated animal lives in order to meet the species’ behavioral needs [7]. It involves adding physical and social stimuli to the living environment to enhance the animals’ mental and physical health [7,8]. Several inexpensive and safe objects and tools can be used to enrich rabbit environments, such as toys, mirrors, hiding places, and tunnels [7,9] (Figure 1). In some regions, such as Europe, the use of environmental enrichments is regulated by law for certain categories of livestock, like pigs [10] and rabbits [11]. On the other hand, some other countries have no regulations specifically addressing the protection and welfare of rabbits in farming according to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [5].
Increasing animals’ behavioral choices to promote abilities has a crucial effect on animal welfare as well as reducing stress and boredom [7,12]. Environmental enrichment can improve animal welfare, prevent abnormal behavior, and generate feelings of comfort, pleasure, interest, and a sense of control by allowing animals opportunities to engage in rewarding behaviors, which can include feeding, exploration, standing, foraging, resting, and social interactions [8,12]. Additionally, environmental enrichment has the potential to promote animals’ cognitive development, resource utilization, and adaptability [13,14]. These potential benefits are particularly relevant considerations in modern commercial rabbit production systems. Therefore, this review delineates the importance of using different environmental enrichment materials, either individually or in combination, to improve the performance and welfare of rabbits.
Additionally, this integrated review provides educational and practical synergy; farmers and researchers benefit from a broader understanding of enrichment techniques that can enhance the productivity and welfare of rabbits. This holistic perspective can lead to more informed decision-making and policy development. Finally, implementing enrichment strategies that are effective for multiple species can contribute to the economic and environmental sustainability of farming practices. By reducing costs and minimizing environmental impact, these practices support more sustainable agricultural systems.

2. Environmental Stress on Rabbits

Stress is an adaptive phenomenon in animals, occurring in response to environmental changes [15]. This process involves the organism’s reaction to a stimulus that activates the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical (HPA) axis and the sympathetic–adrenomedullary system [16]. Rabbits are sensitive social animals that are always raised in cages. Does (females), for example, are generally kept in individual cages [17]. It is important to note that this situation varies widely depending on farm management practices or specific legislation. Although rabbits are typically raised in conventional and/or enriched cages, they can also be raised in indoor parks and outdoor systems [5].
Environmental stressors pose serious threats to animal welfare and production [14,18]. The adverse effects of environmental stress on small livestock animals, such as rabbits, can manifest in poor overall performance, including a reduced feed intake, growth, and reproduction, as well as increased mortality rates. Additionally, stress profoundly impacts the genetic structure of animals, like rabbits, leading to detrimental effects on their DNA integrity [18,19,20,21,22]. Although the immediate consequences of stress on behavior and physiology are well documented, the long-term effects of stress on the genetic composition of animals, particularly rabbits, are often overlooked. This essay delves into the intricate relationship between stress and genetic structure, shedding light on how chronic stress can inflict damage at the molecular level. When animals encounter stressors, whether from environmental factors or social interactions, their bodies initiate a cascade of physiological responses to cope with the perceived threat [23,24,25,26]. The release of stress hormones, such as cortisol and adrenaline, triggers a series of adaptive changes aimed at enhancing survival [16]. However, prolonged exposure to stress disrupts this delicate balance, leading to dysregulation in various biological systems [27].
The profound impact of chronic stress on the genetic structure of animals has been well documented [20,26]. Previous studies have shown that stress can induce alterations in gene expression, affecting crucial biological processes, such as immune function, metabolism, and reproduction. Additionally, stress-induced changes in DNA methylation patterns have been linked to the increased susceptibility to diseases and reduced overall fitness of these animals [20,21]. One of the most alarming consequences of chronic stress is the DNA damage of animals [19,21]. Oxidative stress, a consequence of prolonged exposure to stress hormones, can cause DNA strand breaks and mutations, compromising the stability of the genome [22]. DNA damage not only accelerates aging but also increases the risk of developing genetic disorders and hereditary diseases. In conclusion, the complex interplay between stress and genetic structure highlights the need for a holistic approach to animal well-being. By understanding the genetic consequences of chronic stress on animals like rabbits, we can pave the way for innovative research and targeted interventions aimed at preserving genetic integrity and promoting resilience in the face of environmental challenges.

3. Environmental Enrichment for Rabbits

Given the prevalence of welfare issues in some rabbit farming systems, it is evident that enrichment plays a crucial role and should be implemented on a large commercial scale to help rabbits better adapt to their farming environment and offer them additional space to express their natural behaviors.
Table 1 depicts some of the most recent studies on the effects of environmental enrichment on rabbits.
Hansen and Berthelsen [28] studied the impact of keeping rabbits in enriched cages, with access to shelter and increased cage height, on their behavior and welfare. Rabbits raised in conventional cage systems exhibited excessive self-grooming, restlessness, bar-gnawing, and stress than rabbits raised in an enriched cage system. These results indicate that rabbits kept in an enriched cage system, particularly females, had better welfare than those kept in a conventional cage system due to access to shelter and improved opportunities to interact with their surroundings. Hansen and Berthelsen [28] reported that access to shelter and the presence of elevated platforms (or high shelves) should be considered environmental enrichment materials in rabbit cages. The results of this study support the concept that environmental enrichment can reduce abnormal activity and stress, particularly in female rabbits.
Trocino et al. [29] evaluated the use of two types of enrichment (an elevated plastic slatted platform and/or a plastic hiding tube) on the behavior and productive performance of growing rabbits housed in collective pens in large groups. According to their findings, using the platform allowed rabbits to move up and down, rest in a more comfortable position, and increase their exploratory behavior, while maintaining production performance. However, more injured rabbits were found at the end of the study in the pens with platforms. The inclusion of the tube did not change the behavior but reduced the growth performance. Hence, the elevated platforms acted as a useful structural enrichment for animal behavior, but negatively impacted injuries; therefore, the effectiveness of the tube was not confirmed [29].
Adding bedding material on the wire net of the cage floor for environmental enrichment may improve animal husbandry and welfare [30,31]. On the other hand, Feng et al. [32] examined the effects of using a willow stick, a rubber duck, and a can of beans on rabbit behavior and serum hormonal levels. They found that enrichment with a can of beans was the most suitable for rabbits’ behavior and health, among the three tested. Working with cardboard and rubber objects as potential environmental enrichment materials for rabbits, Da Silva et al. [45] reported no significant differences in behavior among the treatment groups. One possible reason for the lack of changes in rabbit behavior after receiving gnawing objects is that all the animals were provided with hay during the experiment. According to Berthelsen and Hansen [33], hay can be regarded as a source of enrichment for rabbits. Huang et al. [34] evaluated the effects of a scratching card, gnawing material, and a platform on female rabbit behavior. They reported that the does preferred plastic mesh flooring over wire mesh flooring. Furthermore, providing these enrichments stimulates specific behaviors, such as gnawing, scratching, and rearing up, which may enhance their welfare. Princz et al. [35] reported that growing rabbits prefer plastic net floors and cages provided with gnawing sticks. Additionally, the presence of gnawing sticks decreased the frequency of physical injuries. Rashed and El-Edel [36] assessed the effect of different floor types (plastic, wire, or combination) on the behavior, welfare, and productivity of growing rabbits. They found that a plastic floor, either alone or combined with wire, significantly increased exploration, walking, and body care behaviors compared to wire flooring. Feeding behavior was significantly higher in rabbits reared on a combination floor than in other groups, whereas drinking behavior was significantly higher in rabbits reared on a plastic floor than in other groups. Conversely, resting behavior was significantly higher in rabbits reared on wire flooring. The authors also observed that the rabbits showed a higher preference for plastic flooring over wire or combination flooring. Furthermore, the body weight and daily weight gain for the group reared on plastic floors were significantly higher than those on wire or combination floors. Rashed and El-Edel [36] concluded that the presence of a plastic net floor increased the productivity and welfare of rabbits. Similarly, Gharib et al. [46] noticed that placing plastic or rubber mats on the floor of a wire cage reduced aggressive and abnormal behavior, lowered cortisol levels, and improved the productivity and welfare of growing rabbits.
Enriching rabbit cages with toys or gnawing materials could provide a better farming condition for rabbits’ teeth health since these materials are more abrasive, thus preventing medical concerns that could jeopardize their well-being [7]. The presence of toys in cages has a substantial impact on rabbit behavior, as rabbits with toys spend significantly more time chewing than those without toys. Thus, objects, particularly rubber ones, can enrich rabbit cages and improve animals’ welfare. Furthermore, using different cage enrichments, such as rubber floors, plastic colored balls, and mirrors, has no adverse impact on the cecal bacteria counts of growing rabbits [9].
Mirrors have recently become a popular enrichment material for rabbit cages. These appear to mimic a situation where rabbits are permitted to make eye contact with other conspecifics, which increases natural activities, including olfactory investigation [30]. Mastellone et al. [37] found that the use of mirrors may represent a low-cost, efficient means to stimulate the expression of natural behaviors in rabbits bred in small groups in a free-range system. Rabbits raised in mirrored cages with visual and olfactory contact expressed much higher levels of natural activities, such as olfactory investigation and allo-grooming activity, than those in the other groups. Musco et al. [38] reported that mirrors can have positive effects on growth performance and carcass quality traits. They found that rabbits raised in cages enriched with mirrors showed the best feed conversion rate and dressing percentage. The use of mirrors can improve the rabbit’s growth performance and carcass traits by lowering the rabbit’s locomotion activity in comparison to the other tested systems. Additionally, Dalle Zotte et al. [39] showed that rabbits preferred the cage half-enriched with mirrors, which reduced marginally with age. However, the presence of conspecifics did not diminish this interest in mirrors at varying stocking densities. The findings of Dalle Zotte et al. [39] imply that the presence of mirrors provides benefits, may be connected to comfort and welfare, and thus might be used as environmental enrichment for fattening rabbits and, in particular, for rabbits housed individually for prolonged periods. Likewise, Edgar and Seaman [40] reported that when single housing cannot be avoided, mirrors might be appropriate to partially compensate for social contact in female rabbits. However, adding multiple mirrors in rabbit cages, particularly for a long time, without monitoring rabbit behavior and reactions, especially at young ages (prior to weaning), may result in abnormal behavioral effects, such as anxiety and fear [47].
According to the literature, sensory stimulation in the form of olfactory, auditory, and visual cues can be used as an environmental enrichment strategy for caged animals [48]. Environmental enrichment appears to be associated with an increased frequency of several natural behaviors, including allo-grooming, a social behavior involving mutual recognition and pheromonal olfactory stimulation. According to Luzi et al. [41], a lack of stimulation during rabbit fattening may result in welfare issues. They also reported that providing fattening rabbits raised in colony cages with environmental enrichments such as a wood stick hanging down from the cage ceiling could enhance their biological functioning, increase their growth rate without worsening their health status, allowing the animals to perform a broader range of specific behaviors and reducing the occurrence of stereotypic behaviors. Similarly, Zucca et al. [42] stated that engagement with an object, such as a wooden stick, allows the rabbit to carry out exploratory behavior, especially in small-sized groups. According to Buijs et al. [43], the addition of a wooden structure enhances welfare, reducing lateral lying and interactions with conspecifics. Despite social contact often being regarded as beneficial, rabbits could have used the structure as a visual or physical barrier to avoid undesired contact with conspecifics. Bozicovich et al. [44] investigated whether two eucalyptus sticks suspended from the cage ceiling affected the behavior and relative brain weight of growing rabbits. They found that whereas enrichment had no effect on growth performance, the males in enriched cages had heavier brains than those in non-enriched cages. Furthermore, the rabbits kept in enriched cages had fewer wounds on their skin, indicating lower aggression levels.
Finally, it is important to remember that any application of environmental enrichment undoubtedly impacts the economic sustainability of the farm and, consequently, the entire production sector, even though this consideration is not addressed in the previously cited studies. The primary limitation in adopting environmental enrichments and better technologies generally depends on the individual choices and preferences of rabbit farmers, primarily driven by economic benefits. As reported by Mondin et al. [49], rabbit farmers choose to adopt higher animal welfare standards if they gain advantages such as a higher market price often due to better meat quality, as noted by de Greef et al. [50], or reduced costs [51]. Like other sectors, rabbit farming is influenced by market dynamics, which generate high price volatility, followed by a decline in consumption in certain areas. These factors affect all farmers uniformly [52,53,54]. Therefore, the ability of farmers to adopt any innovation in animal welfare largely depends on the impact of such innovation on farm profitability.
However, it is important to note, as observed by Dockès and Kling-Eveillard [55], that sometimes farmers are also influenced by non-economic motivations, such as societal incentives, the social image of the profession, and belonging to a group of producers [56,57]. Health-related reasons can also influence farmers’ decisions, encouraging them to invest in infrastructure and adopt measures to improve the welfare of their animals, as reported by Le Bouquin et al. [58]. Nevertheless, regardless of the state of the economy or the societal structures in place, the well-being of animals must always be a priority and the welfare of captive animals, in particular, must be guaranteed.

4. Future Perspectives

In addition to environmental enrichment materials, enhancing the welfare of rabbits also involves optimizing the use of existing facilities. Although the application of precision livestock farming technologies has not yet achieved widespread success among rabbit breeders, the deployment of these technologies in animal husbandry—such as digital imaging systems, vocalization analysis, thermal/infrared analysis, and Raman spectroscopy—could play a crucial role [59]. These technologies enable efficient and continuous data collection from multiple sources to monitor animal behavior, health, and production. They can be instrumental in detecting behavioral changes, physiological issues, and illnesses in rabbit farms [60]. By analyzing environmental and animal-based data, these tools help farmers make informed management decisions and implement targeted interventions to address the identified issues. Sensors, for example, play a crucial role in collecting data on daily animal behavior and physiological parameters (e.g., feeding behavior, body weight, or activity) [61]. By tracking these metrics, farmers can gain valuable insights into the welfare of their animals and choose the best environmental enrichment approach. On the other hand, artificial intelligence (AI) technology can analyze vast amounts of data collected by monitoring systems to predict trends, identify patterns, and optimize farm operations [61]. AI algorithms can help breeders and producers make informed decisions regarding feed management, ventilation/lighting control, and disease prevention. By using AI, breeders can also enhance efficiency, minimize resource wastage, and improve overall farm performance. Moreover, data collected using these tools can also be utilized for the genetic improvement of livestock species, including rabbits. This contributes to the selection of better-performing animals that are better adapted to their farming environment, as reported by Negretti et al. [62].
To date, the most widespread technology used in small livestock farms are systems for monitoring air temperature, velocity, humidity, and levels of harmful gases, such as ammonia [59,63]. This prevalence is due to the significant impact of environmental conditions, particularly temperature and relative humidity, on both the physiological state and productivity of animals [64]. Rabbits, in particular, are sensitive to heat, having few sweat glands and difficulty dissipating body heat [65,66]. For this reason, several researchers have studied systems to monitor thermal stress conditions and general changes in body temperature. Changes in the body surface temperature, as a consequence of both acute and chronic stress, can be detected using infrared thermography (IRT) cameras for temperature measurement [67,68]. An infrared camera measures electromagnetic energy and detects different wave frequencies emitted by each temperature value (Stewart et al., 2005) [67]. The main strength of IRT is that it is a non-invasive and non-contact method for measuring the surface temperature of animals [69]. In rabbits, infrared thermography has been utilized in various studies (e.g., [68,70]). Ludwig et al. [71] and Luzi et al. [72] were the first to use this technology to monitor the temperature of specific body areas (eye bulb, periocular area, and ear skin) in rabbits subjected to thermal stress. Their work yielded promising results and paved the way for subsequent studies. Another example of this technology’s application is provided by researchers who utilized the same principles, reported by the authors of [71,72], to assess heat stress in does and bucks when temperatures exceeded the thermoneutral zone of rabbits reared under typical commercial conditions. These authors compared results obtained from different body areas of the rabbit (eyes, ears—both externally and internally—and nose), reporting that the ocular temperature exhibited a narrower range of variation compared to other body areas, and highlighting challenges in capturing clear images of the internal ear. They suggested that the minimum eye temperatures and maximum or minimum nose temperatures could be used to assess heat stress in rabbits. De Lima et al. [68] employed infrared thermography (IRT) to detect differences in the surface body temperature of breeding rabbits exposed to two distinct temperature conditions above their comfort zone. One condition involved temperatures below the combination of temperature and humidity considered severely stressful for rabbits, while the other condition involved several hours per day of exposure to temperatures ranging from severe to very severe stress. This study is particularly interesting as it investigates whether IRT can highlight if animals are subjected to more severe stress in one environment by detecting higher heat losses. A particularly interesting application of infrared thermography (IRT) is demonstrated by Vadlejch et al. [73], who used this technology to monitor changes in skin temperature in rabbits during coccidiosis infection. Their study illustrates how IRT can be employed not only to monitor stress but also to predict and detect diseases.
The continuous monitoring of these factors enables farmers to detect potential issues early and implement proactive measures to maintain optimal conditions for the animals. However, the potential of sensor technology in the sector is much broader, encompassing technologies such as ultra-wideband (UWB) tracking, computer vision (CV), accelerometers, radio frequency identification (RFID), and the use of artificial intelligence for data analysis [74,75].
As previously mentioned, precision livestock farming technologies are not widely used in rabbit farming. This is likely due to the fact that, unlike other sectors (such as dairy cattle or laying hens), rabbit farming is a “niche” sector with a lower turnover. Table 2 presents several studies on the application of various technologies in rabbit farming [4,68,70,71,72,73,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88]. In general, the most widespread technology in rabbit farms today concerns environmental monitoring. The characteristics of rabbit farms and the species’ sensitivity to respiratory problems make the monitoring of farming conditions—such as temperature, humidity, and air quality—particularly important. This monitoring is crucial for preventing health issues that can impact both production and animal welfare. An example of such an application is reported by Zhang and Qian [78], who designed a technology-based intelligent farm environment monitoring system. Their goal was to address the limitations of existing wired monitoring systems. Using rabbits as a case study, they investigated the main environmental factors affecting rabbit growth. The system monitors key environmental parameters, including temperature, humidity, light, and ammonia levels. An additional contribution is provided by Yingdong and Wenshen [80], who proposed a real-time environmental monitoring system for rabbit houses based on Narrowband Internet of Things (NB–IoT). Their system aimed to overcome the limitations of traditional wired networks, reducing network costs and circuit component expenses. An Arduino development board and the Quectel BC260Y–NB–IoT network module were used, along with the message queuing telemetry transport (MQTT) protocol for remote telemetry transmission, enabling network connectivity and communication with an IoT cloud platform. Multiple sensors, including SGP30, MQ137, and 5516 photoresistors, were integrated into the system to achieve the real-time monitoring of various environmental parameters within the rabbit house, such as sound decibels, light intensity, humidity, temperature, and gas concentrations [80]. The collected data were stored for further analysis and could be used to inform environmental regulation and monitoring in rabbit houses, both locally and in the cloud. Signal alerts based on circuit principles were triggered when thresholds were exceeded, creating an optimal living environment for the rabbits.
One particularly interesting technology that is relatively easy to deploy in small livestock farming is image processing technology [80]. This technology involves capturing the movement patterns in animals, allowing for the measurement of their activity and behavior, which can be used as an indicator of their welfare. Currently, there are no studies reporting the application of this technology to rabbit farming, likely due to the specific nature of this type of livestock. However, some studies have evaluated the use of infrared video technology to assess doe–kit contact [83]. This parameter is crucial as it directly influences both the kits’ quality of life and the breeder’s profitability [89]. Monitoring systems for the litter can provide precise reports to the breeder on the number of times the doe enters the nest to nurse the kits, allowing for timely intervention in case of issues. An additional development of this technology could involve directly monitoring the litter. In the first days of life, kits are particularly sensitive to temperature fluctuations [90]. Therefore, this technology could be used to monitor the nest temperature, helping to reduce kit mortality. In short, this technology offers advantages over conventional farming issue detection methods like visual inspection, because it allows for earlier treatment or corrective actions to prevent further spread of infection among the animals and reduce mortality.
Another promising precision livestock farming (PLF) technology that could be easily applied in the commercial rabbit sector is sound analysis. This method can recognize specific vocalizations and use them as indicators of both positive (e.g., social calls) or negative (e.g., coughing) conditions. However, no studies are currently available in the literature on this topic. Nevertheless, Ilès [91] observed changes in vocalizations in rabbit does exposed to bucks, which were related to their reproductive state (pregnant or not). The conclusions of this study suggest that analyzing vocalizations could be used as an indicator of pregnancy in domestic rabbits. Further research is desirable, as the current method for diagnosing pregnancy in does involves manual palpation by an operator. This practice can be very stressful for rabbits, as they may associate handling with a predation attempt.
Currently, the market offers various robotic systems, typically autonomous vehicles or devices that travel on tracks, such as those applied in some advanced poultry farms [92]. These robots contribute to improving the quality of bedding and air, and their movement encourages physical activity among the animals, positively impacting their health [61,93]. According to Jiang et al. [88], robotics can also be used in the distribution of feed, helping to reduce stress, particularly in species such as rabbits that are highly susceptible to loud noises. Additionally, these technologies can be employed in implementing precision feeding protocols [84,88,94]. Thus, the integration of monitoring systems, artificial intelligence, sensors, and environmental enrichment approaches is crucial for enhancing farming conditions in rabbit farms. By leveraging these technologies and practices, farmers can improve animal welfare, optimize farm productivity, and mitigate environmental impact. Furthermore, it is imperative for the rabbit industry to embrace further research and investigation, notably on diverse environmentally friendly enrichment tools, to ensure sustainability, animal well-being, and production efficiency.

5. Conclusions

The intensive nature of most rabbit farm practices can lead to environmental challenges and impact animal welfare. Enhancing rabbits’ quality of life is a crucial aspect, as it impacts welfare, health, and production. This review updates readers and farmers on different environmental enrichment strategies, such as using toys, mirrors, and tunnels for rabbits to improve their behavior and performance. Although some farmers remain hesitant to adopt these strategies on their farms, the well-being of animals must always be a priority, regardless of economic conditions or societal structures. These strategies can be applied separately or in combination and could be part of a farm management system provided with sensors for the early detection of potential problems and to take proactive measures to ensure that animals are kept in optimal conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.E.-S.; data curation, K.E.-S., S.A. (Sohail Ahmad), A.S., S.A. (Sarah Aggag), and G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, K.E.-S., D.C., E.N., and G.B.; writing—review and editing, K.E.-S., D.C., E.N., and G.B.; visualization, K.E.-S.; supervision, K.E.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The supplementary data can be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this manuscript are grateful to their respective universities for their technical assistance and valuable support in completing this review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abd El-Aziz, A.; Abo Ghanima, M.; Mota-Rojas, D.; Sherasiya, A.; Ciani, F.; El-Sabrout, K. Bee products for poultry and rabbits: Current challenges and perspectives. Animals 2023, 13, 3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. El-Sabrout, K.; Dantas, M.R.; Souza-Júnior, J.B. Herbal and bee products as nutraceuticals for improving poultry health and production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2023, 79, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Belz, E.E.; Kennell, J.S.; Czambel, R.K.; Rubin, R.T.; Rhodes, M.E. Environmental enrichment lowers stress-responsive hormones in singly housed male and female rats. Pharm. Biochem. Behav. 2003, 76, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jaén-Téllez, J.A.; Sánchez-Guerrero, M.J.; Valera, M.; González-Redondo, P. Influence of stress assessed through infrared thermography and environmental parameters on the performance of fattening rabbits. Animals 2021, 11, 1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saxmose Nielsen, S.; Alvarez, J.; Bicout, D.J.; Calistri, P.; Depner, K.; Drewe, J.A.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Gonzales Rojas, J.L.; Gortázar Schmidt, C.; et al.; EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems. EFSA J. Europ. Food Saf. Auth. 2020, 18, e05944. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nannoni, E.; Buonaiuto, G.; Martelli, G.; Lizzi, G.; Trevisani, G.; Garavini, G.; Sardi, L. Influence of increased freedom of movement on welfare and egg laying pattern of hens kept in aviaries. Animals 2022, 12, 2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Poggiagliolmi, S.; Crowell-Davis, S.L.; Alworth, L.C.; Harvey, S.B. Environmental enrichment of New Zealand White rabbits living in laboratory cages. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 2011, 6, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jacobs, L.; Blatchford, R.A.; de Jong, I.C.; Erasmus, M.A.; Levengood, M.; Newberry, R.C.; Regmi, P.; Riber, A.B.; Weimer, S.L. Enhancing their quality of life: Environmental enrichment for poultry. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elsayed, M.; Soliman, F.; Elghalid, O.; El-Sabrout, K. Using different cage enrichments to improve rabbits’ performance, behavior, and welfare. Animals 2024, 14, 2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Pigs. Off. J. L 47. 2009, pp. 5–13. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/120/oj (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  11. Baumans, V. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: Requirements of rodents, rabbits, and research. ILAR J. 2005, 46, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mellor, D.J. Updating animal welfare thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards a life worth living. Animals 2016, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zahoor, M.S.; Ahmad, S.; Usman, M.; Dawood, M.; El-Sabrout, K.; Hashmi, S.G.M.D.; Khan, E.U.; Hussain, M.; Maqsood, M.A.; Latif, H.R.A. Effects of mirror and coloured balls as environmental enrichment tools on performance, welfare and meat quality traits of commercial broiler. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022, 54, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morgado, J.N.; Lamonaca, E.; Santeramo, F.G.; Caroprese, M.; Albenzio, M.; Ciliberti, M.G. Effects of management strategies on animal welfare and productivity under heat stress: A synthesis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1145610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Veissier, I.; Boissy, A. Stress and welfare: Two complementary concepts that are intrinsically related to the animal’s point of view. Physiol. Behav. 2007, 92, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Möstl, E.; Palme, R. Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2002, 23, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Szendrő, Z.; Mcnitt, J.I. Housing of rabbit does: Group and individual systems: A review. Livest. Sci. 2012, 150, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liang, Z.L.; Chen, F.; Park, S.; Balasubramanian, B.; Liu, W.C. Impacts of heat stress on rabbit immune function, endocrine, blood biochemical changes, antioxidant capacity and production performance, and the potential mitigation strategies of nutritional intervention. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 906084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, B.; Manuja, A.; Aich, P. Stress and its impact on farm animals. Front. Biosci. (Elite Ed.) 2012, 4, 1759–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Terenina, E.E.; Cavigelli, S.; Mormede, P.; Zhao, W.; Parks, C.; Lu, L.; Jones, B.C.; Mulligan, M.K. Genetic factors mediate the impact of chronic stress and subsequent response to novel acute stress. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gormally, B.M.G.; Fuller, R.; McVey, M.; Romero, L.M. DNA damage as an indicator of chronic stress: Correlations with corticosterone and uric acid. Compar. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2019, 227, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Herbet, M.; Korga, A.; Gawrońska-Grzywacz, M.; Izdebska, M.; Piątkowska-Chmiel, I.; Poleszak, E.; Wróbel, A.; Matysiak, W.; Jodłowska-Jędrych, B.; Dudka, J. Chronic variable stress is responsible for lipid and DNA oxidative disorders and activation of oxidative stress response genes in the brain of rats. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 7313090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. El-Sabrout, K. Effect of rearing system and season on behaviour, productive performance and carcass quality of rabbit: A review. J. Anim. Behav. Biometeorol. 2018, 6, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iraqi, E.; Hady, A.A.; Elsayed, N.; Khalil, H.; El-Saadany, A.; El-Sabrout, K. Effect of thermal manipulation on embryonic development, hatching process, and chick quality under heat-stress conditions. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fares, W.A.; Ahmed, M.R.M.; Rizk, R.E.; Shahein, E.H.A.; Boutrous, N.G.; El-Sabrout, K. Influence of non-ventilating intervals during early incubation stage on egg hatching process. Vet. World 2023, 16, 1534–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Alexa, A.I.; Zamfir, C.L.; Bogdănici, C.M.; Oancea, A.; Maștaleru, A.; Abdulan, I.M.; Brănișteanu, D.C.; Ciobîcă, A.; Balmuș, M.; Stratulat-Alexa, T.; et al. The impact of chronic stress on behavior and body mass in new animal models. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chu, B.; Marwaha, K.; Sanvictores, T.; Ayers, D. Physiology, Stress Reaction. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541120/ (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  28. Hansen, L.T.; Berthelsen, H. The effect of environmental enrichment on the behavior of caged rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 68, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Trocino, A.; Zomeño, C.; Filiou, E.; Birolo, M.; White, P.; Xiccato, G. The use of environmental enrichments affects performance and behavior of growing rabbits housed in collective pens. Animals 2019, 9, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jekkel, G.; Milisits, G. Comparison of the behaviour of growing rabbits reared on wire net or combined floor at different stocking densities. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 8, 202–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Siloto, E.V.; Moura, A.S.A.M.T.; Zeferino, C.P.; Fernandes, S.; Sartori, J.R.; Siqueira, E.R. Temperatura e enriquecimento ambiental sobre o bem-estar decoelhos em crescimento. Ciênc. Rural 2008, 39, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, Y.; Fan, H.; Liang, X.; Wang, X.; Gao, G.; Gun, S. Environmental enrichment changes rabbits’ behavior, serum hormone level and further affects cecal microbiota. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Berthelsen, H.; Hansen, L.T. The effect of hay on the behaviour of caged rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Anim. Welf. 1999, 8, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, Y.; Breda, J.C.; Savietto, D.; Debrusse, A.; Bonnemère, J.M.; Gidenne, T.; Combes, S.; Fortun-Lamothe, L. Effect of housing enrichment and type of flooring on the performance and behaviour of female rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 2021, 29, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Princz, Z.; Dalle Zotte, A.; Radnai, I.; Bíró-Németh, E.; Matics, Z.; Gerencsér, Z.; Nagy, I.; Szendrő, Z. Behaviour of growing rabbits under various housing conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 111, 342–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rashed, R.R.; El-Edel, M.A. Behavior and performance of growing rabbit under various floor types. Glob. Vet. 2015, 14, 149–155. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mastellone, V.; Bovera, F.; Musco, N.; Panettieri, V.; Piccolo, G.; Scandurra, A.; Di Meo, C.; Attia, Y.; Lombardi, P. Mirrors improve rabbit natural behavior in a free-range breeding system. Animals 2019, 9, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Musco, N.; Lombardi, P.; Addeo, N.F.; Secci, G.; Parisi, G.; Pero, M.E.; Piccolo, G.; Nizza, A.; Bovera, F. Mirrors can affect growth rate, blood profile, carcass and meat traits and caecal microbial activity of rabbits reared in a “small group” free-range system. Animals 2019, 9, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dalle Zotte, A.; Princz, Z.; Matics, Z.; Gerencsér, Z.; Metzger, S.; Szendrő, Z. Rabbit preference for cages and pens with or without mirrors. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 116, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Edgar, J.L.; Seaman, S.C. The effect of mirrors on the behaviour of singly housed male and female laboratory rabbits. Anim. Welf. 2010, 19, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luzi, F.; Ferrante, V.; Heinzl, E.; Verga, M. Effect of environmental enrichment on productive performance and welfare aspects in fattening rabbits. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 2, 438–440. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zucca, D.; Marelli, S.P.; Redaelli, V.; Heinzl, E.U.; Cardile, H.; Ricci, C.; Verga, M.; Luzi, F. Effect of environmental enrichment and group size on behaviour and live weight in growing rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 2012, 20, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Buijs, S.; Keeling, L.J.; Tuyttens, F.A. Behaviour and use of space in fattening rabbits as influenced by cage size and enrichment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2011, 134, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bozicovich, T.F.; Moura, A.S.; Fernandes, S.; Oliveira, A.A.; Siqueira, E.R. Effect of environmental enrichment and composition of the social group on the behavior, welfare, and relative brain weight of growing rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016, 182, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Da Silva, K.G.; Stange, M.G.; Pergorara, M.; Sotomaior, C.S.; Weber, S.H.; Borges, T.D.; Costa, L.B. Cardboard and rubber objects as means of environmental enrichment for rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 2021, 29, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gharib, H.S.; Khattab, N.; Youssef, M.I.; Saleem, A.Y.; Mohammed, H.H. Effect of cage floor type on behaviour, performance and carcass traits of growing rabbits. Zagazig Vet. J. 2015, 43, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jones, S.; Phillips, C. The effects of mirrors on the welfare of caged rabbits. Anim. Welf. 2005, 14, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wells, D.L. Sensory stimulation as environmental enrichment for captive animals: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 118, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mondin, C.; Trestini, S.; Trocino, A.; Di Martino, G. The economics of rabbit farming: A pilot study on the impact of different housing systems. Animals 2021, 11, 3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. de Greef, K.H.; Rommers, J.M.; Lavrijsen, S. Market and society driven innovations in the Dutch rabbit production system. In Proceedings of the 11th World Rabbit Congress, Qingdao, China, 15–18 June 2016; Volume 1, pp. 953–956. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chiron, P.; Doré, A.; Lamothe, L.F. Factors affecting French rabbit farmers’ adoption of pro-welfare innovations. World Rabbit Sci. 2022, 30, 249–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mukaila, R. Measuring the economic performance of small-scale rabbit production agribusiness enterprises. World Rabbit Sci. 2023, 31, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Petracci, M.; Soglia, F.; Leroy, F. Rabbit meat in need of a hat-trick: From tradition to innovation (and back). Meat Sci. 2018, 146, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Siddiqui, S.A.; Adli, D.N.; Nugraha, W.S.; Yudhistira, B.; Lavrentev, F.V.; Shityakov, S.; Feng, X.; Nagdalian, A.; Ibrahim, S.A. Social, ethical, environmental, economic and technological aspects of rabbit meat production—A critical review. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dockès, A.C.; Kling-Eveillard, F. Farmers’ and advisers’ representations of animals and animal welfare. Livest. Sci. 2006, 103, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Michel-Guillou, E.; Weiss, K. Representations and behaviours of farmers with regard to sustainable development: A psycho-environmental approach. In Sustainable Development Research Advances; Larson, A.B., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 207–221. [Google Scholar]
  57. Borges, J.A.; Domingues, C.H.; Caldara, F.R.; Rosa, N.P.; Senger, I.; Guidolin, D.G. Identifying the factors impacting on farmers’ intention to adopt animal friendly practices. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019, 170, 104718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Le Bouquin, S.; Rouxel, G.; Mihoc, E.; Chauveau, V.; Terrade, F.; Chauvin, C. Human factors and antibiotic use in rabbit production: A study of some psychological determinants. In Proceedings of the 15e Journées de la Recherche Cunicole, Le Mans, France, 19–20 November 2013; Volume 1, pp. 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  59. Benhmad, T.; Ben Abdennour, A.; Darghouthi, A.; Belgacem Rhaimi, C. Remote control of environmental parameters in rabbitry based on IoT. Inter. Things Cyber-Phys. Sys. 2022, 2, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Huang, Y.; Gigou, M.; Goby, J.; Roinsard, A.; Savietto, D.; Gidenne, T. Digital breeding and assisted management in organic rabbit farming: The first results. In Proceedings of the 12th World Rabbit Congress, Nantes, France, 3–5 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
  61. Park, M.; Britton, D.; Daley, W.; McMurray, G.; Navaei, M.; Samoylov, A.; Usher, C.; Xu, J. Artificial intelligence, sensors, robots, and transportation systems drive an innovative future for poultry broiler and breeder management. Anim. Front. 2022, 12, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Negretti, P.; Bianconi, G.; Finzi, A. Visual image analysis to estimate morphological and weight measurements in rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 2007, 15, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lashari, M.H.; Karim, S.; Alhussein, M.; Hoshu, A.A.; Aurangzeb, K.; Anwar, M.S. Internet of things- based sustainable environment management for large indoor facilities. PeerJ Comp. Sci. 2023, 9, e1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ogunjimi, L.A.; Oseni, S.O.; Lasisi, F. Influence of temperature-humidity interaction on heat and moisture production in rabbit. In Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italy, 10–13 June 2008. [Google Scholar]
  65. Finzi, A.; Daader, A.; Yamani, K.; Soliman, A.; Askar, A. Influence of chronic high relative humidity on semen quality of hot stressed bucks. In Proceedings of the 7th World Rabbit Congress, Valencia, Spain, 4–7 July 2000; pp. 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  66. Marai, I.; Habeeb, A.A.; Gad, A. Rabbits’ productive, reproductive and physiological performance traits as affected by heat stress: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 78, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stewart, M.; Webster, J.; Schaefer, A.; Cook, N.; Scott, S. Infrared thermography as a non-invasive tool to study animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2005, 14, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. De Lima, V.; Piles, M.; Rafel, O.; López-Béjar, M.; Ramon, J.; Velarde, A.; Dalmau, A. Use of infrared thermography to assess the influence of high environmental temperature on rabbits. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 95, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. McCafferty, D.J. The value of infrared thermography for research on mammals: Previous applications and future directions. Mammal Rev. 2007, 37, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rafel, O.; De Lima, V.; Piles, M.; Velarde, A.; Ramón, J.; López-Béjar, M.; Dalmau, A. Use of infrared thermography to assess heat stress in rabbits. In Proceedings of the 10th World Rabbit Congress, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 3–6 September 2012; pp. 1081–1085. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ludwig, N.; Gargano, M.; Luzi, F.; Carenzi, C.; Verga, M. Technical note: Applicability of infrared thermography as a non invasive measurements of stress in rabbit. World Rabbit Sci. 2007, 15, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Luzi, F.; Ludwig, N.; Gargano, M.; Milazzo, M.C.; Carenzi, C.; Verga, M. Evaluation of skin temperature change as stress indicator in rabbit through infrared thermography. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 6, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vadlejch, J.; Knížková, I.; Makovcová, K.; Kunc, P.; Jankovská, I.; Janda, K.; Borkovcová, M.; Langrová, I. Thermal profile of rabbits infected with Eimeria intestinalis. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 171, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ye, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, S.; Sun, B.; Chen, Y. Design and implementation of production supervising system for large scale rabbit farm. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 229–234. [Google Scholar]
  75. Curti, P.F.; Selli, A.; Pinto, D.L.; Merlos-Ruiz, A.; Balieiro, J.C.C.; Ventura, R.V. Applications of livestock monitoring devices and machine learning algorithms in animal production and reproduction: An overview. Anim. Reprod. 2023, 20, e20230077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, Y.; Niimi, M.; Zhang, L.; Tang, X.; Lu, J.; Fan, J. A simple telemetry sensor system for monitoring body temperature in rabbits—A Brief Report. Animals 2023, 13, 1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Navarrete, E.; Díaz-Villaseñor, A.; Díaz, G.; Salazar, A.M.; Montúfar-Chaveznava, R.; Ostrosky-Wegman, P.; Caldelas, I. Misadjustment of diurnal expression of core temperature and locomotor activity in lactating rabbits associated with maternal over-nutrition before and during pregnancy. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, H.; Qian, S. Network architecture for intelligent identification of faults in rabbit farm environment monitoring based on a biological neural network model. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 6377043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Noor, M.Z.H.; Baharuddin, M.S.; Rahiman, M.H.F.; Taib, M.N.; Dom, M.S.M. Design and development of Automatic Rabbit Feeding System (ARFES) using PIC microcontroller. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications (ISIEA), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 28 September–1 October 2014; pp. 153–156. [Google Scholar]
  80. Yingdong, Q.; Wenshen, J. Real-Time monitoring system for rabbit house environment based on NB-IoT network. Smart Agric. 2023, 5, 155–165. [Google Scholar]
  81. Mora, M.; Riaboff, L.; David, I.; Sanchez, J.P.; Piles, M. Classifying active and inactive states of growing rabbits from accelerometer data using machine learning algorithms. J. Anim. Sci 2024, hal-04621966v2, In press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ma, Y.; Liang, F.; Wang, P.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Research on identifying different life states based on the changes of vital signs of rabbit under water and food deprivation by UWB radar measurement. In Proceedings of the 2019 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium—Fall (PIERS—Fall), Xiamen, China, 17–20 December 2019; pp. 397–403. [Google Scholar]
  83. Schuh, D.; St, H.; Selzer, D. Vocalization of rabbit pups in the mother-young relationship. In Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress, Puebla, Mexico, 7–10 September 2004; pp. 1266–1270. [Google Scholar]
  84. Sánchez, J.P.; Perucho, O.; Pascual, M.; Rafel, O.; Piles, M. Electronic feeder to record individual feed intake on rabbits raised in collective cages. In Proceedings of the 12th World Rabbit Congress, Nantes, France, 3–5 November 2021. Communication O-11, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
  85. Psiroukis, V.; Malounas, I.; Mylonas, N.; Grivakis, K.; Fountas, S.; Hadjigeorgiou, I. Monitoring of free-range rabbits using aerial thermal imaging. Smart Agric. Technol. 2021, 1, 100002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Adedeji, O.J.; Abayomi-Alli, A.; Arogundade, O.T.; Abayomi-Alli, O.; Omoyiola, B.O. Deep transfer learning for classification of rabbit behaviour using publicly available datasets. In Proceedings of the 2023 First International Conference on the Advancements of Artificial Intelligence in African Context (AAIAC), Arusha, Tanzania, 15–16 November 2023; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ipek, N.; Van Damme, L.G.W.; Tuyttens, F.A.M.; Verwaeren, J. Quantifying agonistic interactions between group-housed animals to derive social hierarchies using computer vision: A case study with commercially group-housed rabbits. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 14138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Jiang, W.; Hao, H.; Fan, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, H. Rabbit feeding robot: Autonomous navigation and precision feeding. Biosyst. Eng. 2024, 239, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Eiben, C.; Tobias, G.; Kustos, K.; Gódor-Surmann, K.; Kotány, S.; Gulyas, B.J.; Szira, G. The change of nursing for oestrus induction (Biostimulation): Effect of contact between rabbit doe and its young. Livest. Sci. 2007, 111, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Habibu, B.; Aliyu, A.; Idris, S.Y.; Buhari, H.U.; Galadanchi, F.A.; Abdulrahman, M.; Yaqub, L.S. Thermoregulation in periparturient rabbit does and their neonatal kits with different litter sizes during West African winter. Anim. Biotechnol. 2023, 34, 4357–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ilès, I. Vocalizations as an indicator of pregnancy in local domestic rabbit does: Preliminary study. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2018, 30, 84. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ren, G.; Lin, T.; Ying, Y.; Chowdhary, G.; Ting, K.C. Agricultural robotics research applicable to poultry production: A review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 169, 105216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Olejnik, K.; Popiela, E.; Opaliński, S. Emerging Precision Management Methods in Poultry Sector. Agriculture 2022, 12, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. El-Sabrout, K.; Khalifah, A.; Ciani, F. Current applications and trends in rabbit nutraceuticals. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Potential enrichment materials to improve rabbit health and productivity.
Figure 1. Potential enrichment materials to improve rabbit health and productivity.
Animals 14 02367 g001
Table 1. Main recent studies on environmental enrichment in rabbit farms.
Table 1. Main recent studies on environmental enrichment in rabbit farms.
Type of EnrichmentHousingReference
Shelter and raised heightGroup cageHansen and Berthelsen [28]
Platform and tubeCollective penTrocino et al. [29]
Wire net and straw litterCollective penJekkel and Milisits [30]
Straw litterGroup cageSiloto et al. [31]
Willow-stick, rubber duck, and bean canGroup cageFeng et al. [32]
Hay as gnawing materialGroup cageBerthelsen and Hansen [33]
Platforms and gnawing materialsGroup cageHuang et al. [34]
Gnawing sticksGroup cagePrincz et al. [35]
Gnawing sticksGroup cageRashed and El-Edel [36]
MirrorsGroup cageMastellone et al. [37]
MirrorsGroup cageMusco et al. [38]
MirrorsGroup cage and penDalle Zotte et al. [39]
MirrorsSingle cageEdgar and Seaman [40]
Wooden stickColony cageLuzi et al. [41]
Wooden stickGroup cageZucca et al. [42]
ShelterOpen-top wire cagesBuijs et al. [43]
Wooden stickGroup cageBozicovich et al. [44]
Plastic colored ballsGroup cageElsayed et al. [9]
Table 2. Some studies on the application of precision farming technologies in rabbit farms.
Table 2. Some studies on the application of precision farming technologies in rabbit farms.
Reference Type of TechnologyMeasured Output
Ludwig et al. [71]Infrared thermographyThermal stress condition
Luzi et al. [72]Infrared thermographySkin temperature changes
Rafael et al. [70]Infrared thermographySkin temperature changes
De Lima et al. [68]Infrared thermographyBody temperature and heat losses
Vadlejch et al. [73]Infrared thermographyParasite infection
Jaén-Téllez et al. [4]Infrared thermographyBody temperature
Chen et al. [76]TelemetryBody temperature
Navarrete et al. [77]TelemetryBody temperature, activity
Zhang and Qian [78]Wireless sensor networksEnvironmental monitoring
Noor et al. [79]PIC microcontrollerAutomatic feeding system
Yingdong and Wenshen [80]Internet of ThingsEnvironmental monitoring
Mora et al. [81]AccelerometerActivity
Ma et al. [82]Ultra-wideband radarRespiratory frequency
Schud et al. [83]Infrared video technologyDoe–kit contact
Sánchez et al. [84]Electronic feederFeeding behavior
Psiroukis et al. [85]Thermal imagingLocalization
Adedeji et al. [86]Deep learningBehavior
Ipek et al. [87]Computer visionBehavior
Jiang et al. [88]RoboticsAutomatic feeding
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Sabrout, K.; Sherasiya, A.; Ahmad, S.; Aggag, S.; Nannoni, E.; Cavallini, D.; Buonaiuto, G. Environmental Enrichment in Rabbit Husbandry: Comparative Impacts on Performance and Welfare. Animals 2024, 14, 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162367

AMA Style

El-Sabrout K, Sherasiya A, Ahmad S, Aggag S, Nannoni E, Cavallini D, Buonaiuto G. Environmental Enrichment in Rabbit Husbandry: Comparative Impacts on Performance and Welfare. Animals. 2024; 14(16):2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162367

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Sabrout, Karim, Anjum Sherasiya, Sohail Ahmad, Sarah Aggag, Eleonora Nannoni, Damiano Cavallini, and Giovanni Buonaiuto. 2024. "Environmental Enrichment in Rabbit Husbandry: Comparative Impacts on Performance and Welfare" Animals 14, no. 16: 2367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162367

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop