Next Article in Journal
Exploration of Synergistic Regulation Mechanisms of Cerebral Ganglion and Muscle in Eriocheir sinensis Activated in Response to Alkalinity Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Phenotypic and Genetic Analyses of Mastitis, Endometritis, and Ketosis on Milk Production and Reproduction Traits in Chinese Holstein Cattle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 14
Issue 16
10.3390/ani14162373
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Hemp Hay (Canapa sativa L.) in the Diets of Grazing Goats on Milk Production and Fatty Acid Profile

by
Piera Iommelli
1,
Fabio Zicarelli
1,
Ruggero Amato
1,
Nadia Musco
1,*,
Fiorella Sarubbi
2,
Lucia Bailoni
3,
Pietro Lombardi
1,
Federica Di Bennardo
1,
Federico Infascelli
1 and
Raffaella Tudisco
1
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Napoli Federico II, 80100 Napoli, NA, Italy
2
Institute for the Animal Production System in the Mediterranean Environment, National Research Council, 80055 Portici, NA, Italy
3
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science (BCA), University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(16), 2373; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162373
Submission received: 13 July 2024 / Revised: 3 August 2024 / Accepted: 13 August 2024 / Published: 16 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers of the XXIV Congress of the Italian Society of Sheep and Goat Pathology and Production (SIPAOC) “Sustainability of Sheep and Goat Farming”)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.), traditionally used for textile fiber, has gained interest as animal feed due to its nutritional properties. This study investigated the impact of supplementing goats’ diets with hemp hay on the milk yield, composition, and fatty acid profile of 20 dairy goats. The milk yield was higher in the hemp group, though the milk composition remained unchanged. The fatty acid profile of the hemp group’s milk showed lower levels of certain saturated fatty acids (C11:0, C12:0, C13:0, C14:0, C15:0, and C17:0) and higher levels of C16:0 and C18:0. Additionally, the hemp group’s milk had lower levels of some polyunsaturated fatty acids (C18:2 n6 and C20:4) but higher C20:5 n3 levels. Hemp hay may represent an advantageous alternative as feed supplementation in grazing goats’ diet. Also, in terms of eco-sustainability and the efficiency of agricultural production, the hemp hay is a by-product of the supply chain, which may represent an additional benefit of its use in ruminant nutrition.

Abstract

Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is a cosmopolitan annual herbaceous plant used in the past as a source of textile fiber. Currently, hemp is receiving great interest as animal feed due to its chemical and nutritional properties. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of supplementing goats’ diets with hemp hay on the milk yield, chemical composition, and fatty acid profile. Twenty multiparous goats, immediately after kidding, were divided into two homogenous groups (C: control vs. H: hemp); the goats had free access to the pasture, and both groups received a supplement of 500 g/head/day of a barley and corn meal mixture (50/50). In addition, group H was given 250 g/head/day of hemp hay while group C received the same amount of alfalfa hay. The milk yield was measured daily, and milk samples were collected monthly 4 times to evaluate the milk composition and fatty acid profile. The milk yield was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the experimental group, while no differences were found in the milk chemical composition. Concerning the fatty acid profile, the milk from group H was characterized by significantly lower concentrations of C11:0, C12:0, C13:0, C14:0, C15:0, and C17:0 and higher C16:0 and C18:0. Among the polyunsaturated FA, C18:2 n6 and C20:4 were significantly (p < 0.001) lower, and C20:5 n3 was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the milk from group H than that from group C. The n6/n3, LA/ALA and AA/EPA ratios were significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the milk from group H, while the CLAs were unaffected by the treatment.
Keywords:
goat; hemp; milk fatty acid; milk

1. Introduction

Cannabis sativa L., commonly known as hemp, is a cosmopolitan annual herbaceous plant historically cultivated as a source of textile fiber. In recent years, its seeds and oil have garnered especially great interest as animal feed due to their chemical and nutritional properties [1]. The high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), particularly the n6 series (linoleic acid) and the n3 series (linolenic acid), as well as the presence of aromatic compounds, makes it particularly suitable for improving the nutritional characteristics of animal-derived products [2]. The potential for enhancing the nutritional profile of animal-derived foods through dietary manipulation has already been demonstrated [3]. In particular, several authors [4,5,6] have investigated the impact of incorporating PUFA-rich additives into the diet of lactating ruminants. Their results indicate that an animal diet rich in n3- and n6 fatty acids (FA) can enhance the nutritional profile of milk by increasing its content of beneficial FA, including n3, n6 and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). It is evident that PUFA in ruminants undergo a biohydrogenation (BH) process, which results in their saturation. However, a considerable amount of PUFAs in the diet evade BH and are directly incorporated into the milk. Furthermore, intermediate compounds of BH serve as substrates for desaturation enzymatic activity in the mammary gland, which is responsible for the highest concentration of CLA in milk [7]. Cannabis sativa var. sativa has acquired significant interest due to its low tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content (<0.2–0.3%), a chemical compound responsible for psychoactive effects. This cultivar is suitable for legal cultivation in Europe for the production of hempseed and hempseed cake to be used as feed ingredients for all animal species [8]. Hemp has been extensively studied as a dietary supplement for ruminants given its fatty acid profile and the presence of bioactive compounds, including cannabidiol and polyphenols, which have been recognized for their beneficial physiological effects [9]. Other research has explored the implications for animal nutrition within the context of a circular economy. This includes investigations into the use of by-products from hemp processing, such as protein cakes [10] or the whole hemp plant after cannabinoid extraction (spent hemp) [11]. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of supplementing goats’ diets with hemp hay on the milk yield, chemical composition, and fatty acid profile. The hypothesis was that the beneficial compounds present in Cannabis sativa could improve milk’s nutritional characteristics, and that hemp hay could partially substitute alfalfa hay in goats’ diets. It should be specified that the milk yielded in this trial was used for research purposes only.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

This study was performed at the Azienda Zootecnica Antonio Amato located in Casaletto Spartano (SA, Italy; 832 m.s.l.; 40°09′ N, 15°37′ E; 30–68 mm of rainfall; temperature of 9.8–22 °C) according to the Animal Welfare and Good Clinical Practice (Directive 2010/63/EU) and was approved by the local animal ethics committee (protocol number: PG/2019/0070006). Twenty multiparous Murciana goats (body weight, BW: 49 ± 2 kg; 3rd parity; milk yield of 2250 ± 200 g/head/day) at 60 ± 7 days in milk were randomly allocated into two groups (C: control vs. H: hemp). All subjects had free access to water and to a spontaneous pasture (from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.; 12 Ha) comprising plants, shrubs, and trees. After grazing, the goats were individually housed in a 1 × 2 m box and fed 500 g/head/day of a barley and corn meal mixture (BCM, 50/50). In addition, group H was given 250 g/head/day of hemp hay, while group C received the same amount of alfalfa hay. Their BW was measured monthly, while the mixture and hay refusals were weighed daily. The animals were milked twice a day for 4 months (from April to July), and the individual milk yields were recorded daily.

2.2. Diet and Feed Analysis

The animals were accompanied in the pasture when grazing to identify the plants most commonly eaten. Pasture samples were collected weekly from four distinct areas of 2.5 m2 each and pooled monthly. Four representative samples (1 kg) of the same size, obtained the four different areas, were air-oven-dried at 65 °C. Samples of hays and mixture were collected monthly. All the feeds were milled through a 1 mm screen and analyzed in accordance with the AOAC [12] for dry matter (DM, ID 934.01), crude protein (CP, ID 984.13), ether extract (EE, ID 920.29), and ash (ID: 942.05). The fiber fractions were determined according to Van Soest et al. [13], and the nutritive value (UFL = 1700 kcal of net energy for lactation) was calculated as suggested by the INRA [14]. The determination of the fatty acid (FA) profile was conducted by extracting the milk fat using an ASE (accelerated solvent extractor) with petroleum ether as the solvent. The solvent was evaporated under a N2 stream (Genevac EZ-2, SP Industries, Warminster, PA, USA) at 60 °C. The residual samples (extracted lipids in vials) were weighed before adding 4 mL of 1% H2SO4 in methanol and held at 50° C overnight. Then, hexane (1 mL of hexane per 20 mg of extracted fat) and 4 mL of NaSO4 (0.47% in H2O) were added and vigorously agitated to transfer the methylated fatty acids in the organic phase. The organic phase was collected after centrifugation and analyzed by GC-FID with an Agilent 7820A Gas Chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Then, 1 μL was injected at a split ratio of 65:1. A Supelco OMEGAWAX-TM 250 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (internal diameter of 30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness of 0.25 μm) was used, with hydrogen as the carrier at 1.4 mL/min. The oven temperature was set to 50 °C, where it was held for 2 min, then raised to 220 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min, and held for 23 min. Both the injector and the detector temperatures were set to 250 °C. The individual FAs were identified by comparing the retention time of the standard FA methyl ester mixture (Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix, 47,885–U, Nu Check GLC 674). Individual FA methyl esters were expressed as percentages of the total area of eluted FA methyl esters.

2.3. Milk Sampling and Analysis

Individual milk samples were collected monthly (4 samplings), divided into two sterile Falcon test tubes, and stored at 4 °C. One aliquot was analyzed for protein, fat, and lactose using a Milko Scan FT+ (Foss, Hilleroed, Denmark), which is standardized for goat milk. The second aliquot was stored at −20 °C and then analyzed for the fatty acid profile, as suggested by Zicarelli et al. [15]. In brief, the total fat was extracted with hexanopropanol and isopropanol (3/2 v/v) [16] and trans-methylated according to Chouinard et al. [17]. The methyl esters were quantified by GC (ThermoQuest 8000TOP gas chromatograph, Thermo Electron Corporation, Rodano, Milan, Italy) with a flame ionization detector and capillary column (CP-SIL 88 fused silica capillary column, internal diameter of 100 m × 0.25 mm with a 0.2 μm film thickness; Varian, Inc. Walnut Creek, CA, USA) and the following temperature ramp: 70 °C for 4 min → 13 °C/min → 175 °C for 27 min → 3 °C/min → 215 °C for 38 min → 10 °C/min → 70 °C. The temperatures of the injector and detector were 250 °C and 260 °C, respectively. The gas flows were as follows: carrier gas (helium)—1 mL/min; hydrogen—30 mL/min; air—350 mL/min; make-up gas (helium)—45 mL/min. The FA peaks were identified by comparing them with a standard mixture of fatty acid methyl esters (Larodan Fine Chemicals, AB, Limhamnsgårdens Malmö, Sweden). CLA isomers were recognized by comparing the samples’ chromatograms with those of single purified isomers (CLA cis-9, trans-11; CLA trans-10, cis-12; CLA cis-9, trans-11; CLA trans-9, trans-11) (Larodan Fine Chemicals, AB, Limhamnsgårdens Malmö, Sweden).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, and the means were compared using the Tukey’s test (SAS, 2000). The milk data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA for repeated measures using JMP software (version 11, PROC GLM, SAS 2000), in accordance with the following model:
Yijk = μ + Di + Sj + (DS)ij + εijk
where y = the mean of the response variable, μ = the general mean, Di = effect of the dietary treatment (i = 2; C and H), Sj = the sampling effect (j milk = 4; I, II, III, IV), DS = interaction between the dietary treatment and sampling effect, and εijk = the residual error. The means were statistically compared using Tukey’s test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

In Table 1, the chemical compositions of the feeds are reported. The hemp (HH) and alfalfa hays (AH) showed similar crude protein contents, while HH was characterized by higher ether extract and lower NDF, ADF, and ADL than AH. Thus, its nutritive value was higher (UFL/kg DM 0.77 vs. 0.75, for HH and AH, respectively).
Concerning the feeds’ FA profiles (Table 2), the pasture showed significant differences among the months of collection. In particular, the highest levels of saturated (SFA) and monounsaturated (MUFA) fatty acids were detected in April, while polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) reached their highest levels in May, mainly for those of the n3 series. The BCM was characterized by a high content of PUFA, mainly represented by the n6 series. Hemp hay showed higher values of SFA and MUFA and lower values of PUFA than alfalfa hay. In addition, AH was characterized by higher contents of both n3 PUFA and n6 PUFA than HH.
No feed refusals were detected; moreover, no difference in body weight was found between the groups throughout the study. The milk yield was significantly higher in the experimental group (p < 0.05), while no differences were found in the milks’ chemical compositions (Table 3).
The mean values of the milks’ FAs are depicted in Table 4. Several significant differences were found between the groups. In particular, among the SFAs, C11:0 (undecanoic acid), C12:0 (lauric acid), C13:0 (tridecanoic acid), C14:0 (myristic acid), C15:0 (pentadecylic acid), and C17:0 (margaric acid) were significantly lower, and C16:0 (palmitic acid) and C18:0 (stearic acid) were significantly higher in the milk from group H than in that from group C; among the MUFAs, C14:1 (myristoleic acid) was significantly lower and C16:1 (palmitoleic acid), C17:1 (eptadecenoic acid), C18:1 cis 11, and C18:1 cis 12 (optadecenoic acids) were significantly higher in the milk from group H than in that from group C. Among the PUFAs, C18:2 n6 (linoleic acid, LA) and C20:4 n6 (arachidonic acid, AA) were significantly lower, and C20:5 n3 (EPA) was significantly higher in the milk from group H than that from group C.
The FA classes and the nutritional indices are reported in Table 5. The total PUFA and n6/n3, LA/ALA, and AA/EPA ratios were significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the milk from group H, while the CLAs were unaffected by the treatment. In both groups, the total CLA increased from April to May, decreased in June, and increased again in July, showing a similar trend to the pasture n3PUFA (Figure 1). The hypercholesterolemic saturated fatty acid (HSFA) and desirable fatty acid (DFA) indices were calculated according to Kumar et al. [18]. The DFAs were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the milk of the supplemented group, whereas no differences were detected for the HSFAs.

4. Discussion

The chemical composition of the pasture was similar to that reported by Tudisco et al. [19] in previous research performed in the same area. Concerning the pasture PUFAs, the n3 series showed fluctuating behavior over the months and was higher than the n6 series in all samples, excepted in June according to Lo Presti et al. [20]. In contrast, Meľuchová et al. [21] reported a progressive decrease in C18:3 from May to July and ascribed these differences among the sampling months to the different phenological phases, as suggested by Cabiddu et al. [22]. Hemp hay showed a remarkable chemical composition, with slightly lower crude protein and NDF contents in comparison to the findings of Ran et al. [23], and high content of n3 PUFA, making the plant suitable for animal feeding, as suggested by Bailoni et al. [1]. Indeed, n3 PUFAs in feed has the effect of increasing the levels of beneficial FAs in foods of animal origin, with favorable effects on human health [24,25].
The goats of both groups did not change their body weight throughout the trial. Indeed, according to Tudisco et al. [26], the energy requirements (ER) were satisfied as follows: the ER for maintenance was equal to 0.0365 UFL/kg of metabolic weight (MW/BW of 0.75), while the ER for milk production was equal to 0.41 UFL/kg of fat-corrected milk (FCM, 4% fat). Thus, the total ER was 1.52 UFL (0.67 UFL maintenance + 0.85 UFL milk production), and, considering that the average pasture DM intake in the internal areas of Southern Italy is 20 g/kg BW [27], the deficit of 0.76 UFL was compensated for by the concentrate and hays.
The milk yield was significantly higher in group H (1954 vs. 1731 g/head/day; p < 0.05), while no differences were observed in the fat, protein, or lactose. In contrast, other authors [28,29,30,31,32] have reported significant increases in milk fat and protein from using hemp seeds in animal feed.
Concerning SFAs, the milk from the goats of group H showed significantly lower percentages of lauric (C12:0) and myristic (C14:0) acids, both with atherogenic properties. Also, Rapetti et al. [2] found a decrease in lauric acid in the milk from goats fed hemp seed. Interestingly, other authors have observed, in vitro, several potentialities of lauric acid as an antidiabetic enhancing anti-insulin resistance [33,34]. The milk of group H also showed significantly lower percentages of pentadecylic (C15:0) and margaric (C17:0) acids, whose role in reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases and the incidence of diabetes type 2, as well as the inflammatory state, has been described [5]. Conversely, the percentages of palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) acids, the former potentially atherogenic and the latter possibly thrombogenic [26], were significantly higher in the milk of group H. The goats fed hemp hay yielded milk with significantly higher levels of lignoceric acid (C24:0), which is able to promote mitochondrial β-oxidation [35].
Hemp hay feed significantly lowered the milk PUFA and the n6/n3 ratio. It is the responsibility of animal nutritionists to implement feeding strategies that will reduce the ratio of animal-derived food in order to produce products with superior beneficial properties for consumers. A reduction in the dietary n6/n3 ratio has been demonstrated to attenuate the inflammatory response to high-fat meals and to suppress low-grade inflammation, which could contribute to the development of numerous chronic diseases [36]. In addition, in the present trial, this parameter fell within the range suggested as beneficial for human health [37] in both groups, reinforcing the notion that the milk from goats raised on pasture has excellent nutritional characteristics, as observed in previous studies [38]. Moreover, the CLAs, known for their anticarcinogenic effects [39], were remarkable in the milks of both groups. Other authors, using different sources of hemp, have found significant increases in milk’s alfa-linolenic acid and CLAs [2,30,31,32], while Cozma et al. [29] reported a significant increase in the total PUFA in goats fed hempseed oil, however, it did not influence the n3 PUFA content.
The milk of the supplemented group was also found to contain significantly higher levels of DFA, a result that aligns with the observations of Morais et al. [40] in the milk of goats that had been supplemented with Mauritia flexuosa. This index offers evidence of the quality of lipids, which is beneficial and has positive implications for consumer health.
Compared to the control group, the goats fed hemp hay showed significantly lower levels of arachidonic acid (AA, C20:4 n6) but significantly higher levels of EPA (C20:5 n3), as also observed by Mielita et al. [32]. Our findings are inconsistent with those of Rapetti et al. [2], who reported no significant differences in the fatty acid content between goats supplemented with hempseed and a control group. According to Tallima et al. [41], AA plays a fundamental role in promoting cell membrane fluidity and the activity of ion channels mainly in the brain, while EPA contributes to lowering the risk of cardiovascular disease and neuroinflammation, preserving mental health [42]. Nevertheless, despite the biological importance of DHA and ARA in human health, the recommendations regarding specific dietary requirements for these nutrients are inconsistent and, at times, controversial. There is an emerging body of evidence that links AA and its metabolites to the development of chronic diseases, as well as an increase in plasma phospholipids and cholesteryl esters, but only when exceeding the recommended doses [43].
Therefore, from a nutritional point of view, feeding goats hemp hay led to both an improvement and a deterioration of their milk’s fatty acid profile. According to Oh and Hristov [44], this could be affected by the composition of volatile and bioactive compounds, which modulate the rumen metabolism.
Furthermore, the potential use of cannabis sativa as a dietary supplement should be subjected to further investigation from an economic standpoint in animal farming. Indeed, numerous authors [45,46,47] have reported an enhancement of economic efficiency through the utilization of aromatic plants as a feed additive in ruminant diets. This has led to the suggestion that the increase in feed costs was largely offset by the improvement in animal health and performance, both of which increased farm profitability.

5. Conclusions

The aim of this research was to evaluate the influence of replacing alfalfa hay with hemp hay in the diets of goats raised on pasture on the milk yield, chemical composition, and fatty acid profile. The goats fed hemp hay showed a significantly higher milk yield without modifications in the chemical composition. Contrasting results from a nutritional point of view were observed for the milk’s FA profile. Indeed, among the atherogenic acids, the lauric and myristic acids decreased, while the palmitic acid increased in the experimental group. Accordingly, the CLAs were unaffected by the treatment, whereas the n6/n3 ratio decreased. This finding is of particular interest in the context of promoting an animal diet that could potentially reduce this ratio, which is of particular importance for human health in the prevention of chronic disease. Therefore, it follows that hemp hay could be a potential feed capable of enhancing milk production. Nevertheless, further research is required to ascertain its influence on milk quality with regard to bioactive and aromatic compounds and to determine the optimal quantity for administration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.I. and R.A.; methodology, F.Z.; software, N.M.; validation, P.L., R.T., and F.I.; formal analysis, F.S.; investigation, F.D.B.; resources, R.A.; data curation, L.B.; writing—original draft preparation, P.I.; writing—review and editing, N.M.; visualization, F.Z.; supervision, R.T.; project administration, P.L.; funding acquisition, F.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The trial was performed according to the Animal Welfare and Good Clinical Practice (Directive 2010/63/EU) and was approved by the local animal ethics committee (protocol number: PG/2019/0070006.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bailoni, L.; Bacchin, E.; Trocino, A.; Arango, S. Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Seed and Co-Products Inclusion in Diets for Dairy Ruminants: A Review. Animals 2021, 11, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rapetti, L.; Colombini, S.; Battelli, G.; Castiglioni, B.; Turri, F.; Galassi, G.; Battelli, M.; Crovetto, G.M. Effect of linseeds and hemp seeds on Milk production, energy and nitrogen balance, and methane emissions in the dairy goat. Animals 2021, 11, 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Butler, G. Manipulating dietary PUFA in animal feed: Implications for human health. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013, 73, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tudisco, R.; Calabrò, S.; Cutrignelli, M.I.; Grossi, M.; Musco, N.; Piccolo, V.; Infascelli, F. Extruded linseed in the diet of grazing goats: Effects on milk Conjugated Linoleic Acid. In Trends in Veterinary Sciences: Current Aspects in Veterinary Morphophysiology, Biochemistry, Animal Production, Food Hygiene and Clinical Sciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  5. Musco, N.; Tudisco, R.; Esposito, G.; Iommelli, P.; Totakul, P.; D’Aniello, B.; Lombardi, P.; Amato, R.; Wanapat, M.; Infascelli, F. Effects of Linseed Supplementation on Milk Production, Composition, Odd- and Branched-Chain Fatty Acids, and on Serum Biochemistry in Cilentana Grazing Goats. Animals 2022, 12, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kouba, M.; Mourot, J. A review of nutritional effects on fat composition of animal products with special emphasis on n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Biochimie 2011, 93, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chilliard, Y.; Glasser, F.; Ferlay, A.; Bernard, L.; Rouel, J.; Doreau, M. Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. Eur. J. Lip. Sci. Tech. 2007, 109, 828–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. EFSA. Scientific Opinion on the safety of hemp (Cannabis genus) for use as animal feed. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  9. Klir, Ž.; Novoselec, J.; Antunović, Z. An overview on the use of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in animal nutrition. Poljoprivreda 2019, 25, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Serrapica, F.; Masucci, F.; Raffrenato, E.; Sannino, M.; Vastolo, A.; Barone, C.M.A.; Di Francia, A. High fiber cakes from mediterranean multipurpose oilseeds as protein sources for ruminants. Animals 2019, 9, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Irawan, A.; Puerto-Hernandez, G.M.; Ford, H.R.; Busato, S.; Ates, S.; Cruickshank, J.; Ranches, J.; Estill, C.T.; Trevisi, E.; Bionaz, M. Feeding spent hemp biomass to lactating dairy cows: Effects on performance, milk components and quality, blood parameters, and nitrogen metabolism. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 107, 258–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. INRA; Noziere, P.; Sauvant, D.; Delaby, L. INRA Feeding System for Ruminants; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2018; 640p, ISBN 978-90-8686-292-4. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zicarelli, F.; Addi, L.; Tudisco, R.; Calabrò, S.; Lombardi, P.; Cutrignelli, M.I.; Moniello, G.; Grossi, M.; Tozzi, B.; Musco, N.; et al. The influence of diet supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Saccharomyces cerevisiae plus Aspergillus oryzae on milk yield of Cilentana grazing dairy goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2016, 135, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hara, A.; Radin, N.S. Lipid extraction of tissues with a low-toxicitysolvent. Anal. Biochem. 1978, 90, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chouinard, P.Y.; Corneau, L.; Barbano, D.M.; Metzger, L.E.; Bauman, D.E. Conjugated linoleic acids alter milk fatty acid composition and inhibit milk fat secretion in dairy cows. J. Nutr. 1999, 129, 1579–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kumar, S.; Banakar, P.S.; Tyagi, A.K.; Sharma, H. Intra-species variation in fatty acid profile and nutritional indices of cattle (Bos indicus), buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and goat (Capra hircus) ghee deciphered using GC-FID and FT-IR spectroscopy. Int. Dairy J. 2022, 129, 105342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tudisco, R.; Morittu, V.M.; Addi, L.; Moniello, G.; Grossi, M.; Musco, N.; Grazioli, R.; Mastellone, V.; Pero, M.E.; Lombardi, P.; et al. Influence of Pasture on Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase and miRNA 103 Expression in Goat Milk: Preliminary Results. Animals 2019, 9, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lo Presti, V.; Tudisco, R.; Di Rosa, A.R.; Musco, N.; Iommelli, P.; Infascelli, F.; Grossi, M.; Ferrara, M.; Chiofalo, B.; Lombardi, P.; et al. Influence of season on milk fatty acid profile and sensory characteristics of grazing goats in a Mediterranean environment: A sustainable agro-food system. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2023, 63, 689–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meľuchová, B.; Blaško, J.; Kubinec, R.; Górová, R.; Dubravská, J.; Margetín, M.; Soják, L. Seasonal variations in fatty acid composition of pasture forage plants and CLA content in ewe milk fat. Small Rum. Res. 2008, 78, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cabiddu, A.; Decandia, M.; Addis, M.; Piredda, G.; Pirisi, A.; Molle, G. Managing Mediterranean pastures in order to enhance the level of beneficial fatty acids in sheep milk. Small Rum. Res. 2005, 59, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ran, T.; Xu, Z.; Yang, W.; Liu, D.; Wu, D. Partially substituting alfalfa hay with hemp forage in the diet of goats improved feed efficiency, ruminal fermentation pattern and microbial profiles. Anim. Nutr. 2024, 17, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cavaliere, G.; Trinchese, G.; Musco, N.; Infascelli, F.; De Filippo, C.; Mastellone, V.; Morittu, V.M.; Lombardi, P.; Tudisco, R.; Grossi, M.; et al. Milk from cows fed a diet with a high forage: Concentrate ratio improves inflammatory state, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function in rats. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 1843–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Trinchese, G.; Cavaliere, G.; Penna, E.; De Filippo, C.; Cimmino, F.; Catapano, A.; Musco, N.; Tudisco, R.; Lombardi, P.; Infascelli, F.; et al. Milk from cow fed with high forage/concentrate ratio diet: Beneficial effect on rat skeletal muscle inflammatory state and oxidative stress through modulation of mitochondrial functions and AMPK activity. Front. Phys. 2019, 9, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tudisco, R.; Chiofalo, B.; Addi, L.; Lo Presti, V.; Rao, R.; Calabro’, S.; Musco, N.; Grossi, M.; Cutrignelli, M.I.; Mastellone, V.; et al. Effect of hydrogenated palm oil dietary supplementation on milk yield and composition, fatty acids profile and Stearoyl-CoA desaturase expression in goat milk. Small Rum. Res. 2015, 132, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Iommelli, P.; Infascelli, L.; Tudisco, R.; Capitanio, F. The Italian Cilentana goat breed: Productive performances and economic perspectives of goat farming in marginal areas. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022, 54, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Karlsson, L.; Finell, M.; Martinsson, K. Effects of increasing amounts of hempseed cake in the diet of dairy cows on the production and composition of milk. Animal 2010, 4, 1854–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cozma, A.; Andrei, S.; Pintea, A.; Miere, D.; Filip, L.; Loghin, F.; Ferlay, A. 2015. Effect of hemp seed oil supplementation on plasma lipid profile, liver function, milk fatty acid, 56 cholesterol, and vitamin A concentrations in Carpathian goats. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 60, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mierlita, D. Effects of diets containing hemp seeds or hemp cake on fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of sheep milk. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 48, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cremonesi, P.; Conte, G.; Severgnini, M.; Turri, F.; Capra, E.; Rapetti, L.; Colombini, S.; Chessa, S.; Batelli, G.; Alves, S.P.; et al. Evaluation of the effects of different diets on microbiome diversity and the fatty acid composition of rumen liquor in dairy goats. Animal 2018, 12, 1856–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mierlita, D.; Mierlita, S.; Struti, D.I.; Mintas, O.S. Effects of hemp seed on the production, fatty acid profile, and antioxidant capacity of milk from goats fed hay or a mixed shrubs–grass rangeland. Animals 2023, 13, 3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. DiNicolantonio, J.J.; O’Keefe, J.H. Good Fats versus Bad Fats: A Comparison of Fatty Acids in the Promotion of Insulin Resistance, Inflammation, and Obesity. Mo. Med. 2017, 114, 303–307. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tham, Y.Y.; Choo, Q.C.; Muhammad, T.S.T.; Chew, C.H. Lauric acid alleviates insulin resistance by improving mitochondrial biogenesis in THP-1 macrophages. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 9595–9607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sun, S.; Cao, X.; Gao, J. C24:0 avoids cold exposure-induced oxidative stress and fatty acid β-oxidation damage. iScience 2021, 24, 103409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. DiNicolantonio, J.J.; O’Keefe, J.H. Importance of maintaining a low omega–6/omega–3 ratio for reducing inflammation. Openheart 2018, 5, e000946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Simopoulos, A.P. The Healthiest Diet for You: Scientific Aspects; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 2, pp. 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tudisco, R.; Chiofalo, B.; Lo Presti, V.; Morittu, V.M.; Moniello, G.; Grossi, M.; Infascelli, F. Influence of feeding linseed on SCD activity in grazing goat mammary glands. Animals 2019, 9, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pipoyan, D.; Stepanyan, S.; Stepanyan, S.; Beglaryan, M.; Costantini, L.; Molinari, R.; Merendino, N. The Effect of Trans Fatty Acids on Human Health: Regulation and Consumption Patterns. Foods 2021, 10, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Morais, J.S.; Bezerra, L.R.; Silva, A.M.A.; Araújo, M.J.; Oliveira, R.L.; Edvan, R.L.; Lanna, D.P.D. Production, composition, fatty acid profile and sensory analysis of goat milk in goats fed buriti oil. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tallima, H.; El Ridi, R. Arachidonic acid: Physiological roles and potential health benefits—A review. J. Adv. Res. 2018, 11, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mollica, M.P.; Trinchese, G.; Cimmino, F.; Penna, E.; Cavaliere, G.; Tudisco, R.; Musco, N.; Manca, C.; Catapano, A.; Monda, M.; et al. Milk Fatty Acid Profiles in Different Animal Species: Focus on the Potential Effect of Selected PUFAs on Metabolism and Brain Functions. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Taber, L.; Chiu, C.H.; Whelan, J. Assessment of the arachidonic acid content in foods commonly consumed in the American diet. Lipids 1998, 33, 1151–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Oh, J.; Hristov, A.N. Effects of plant-derived bio-active compounds on rumen fermentation, nutrient utilization, immune response, and productivity of ruminant animals. In Medicinal and Aromatic Crops: Production, Phytochemistry, and Utilization; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; Volume 11, pp. 167–186. [Google Scholar]
  45. Allam, S.; El-Elaime, R. Impact of garlic, Lemongrass, Peppermint and Rosemary as feed additives on Performance of growing Barki lambs. Egypt. J. Nut. Feed. 2020, 23, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amany, A.; Khayyal, M.; El-Badawy, M.; Ashmawy, T.A.M. Effect of rosemary or laurel leaves as feed additives on performance of growing lambs. Egypt. J. Nut. Feed. 2021, 24, 343–356. [Google Scholar]
  47. Khattab, H.M.M.; Badr, A.M.; Abdelfarrag, M.M.; Singe, A.M. The Supplementary Effect of Some Medicinal Plant Mixtures on the Productive Performance of Saidi Lambs. Acta Sci. Vet. Sci. 2022, 4, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 14 02373 g001
Figure 1. Trends of milk CLAs (g/100 g of fat) throughout the trial.
Figure 1. Trends of milk CLAs (g/100 g of fat) throughout the trial.
Animals 14 02373 g001
Table 1. Chemical compositions (g/kg DM) and nutritive values (UFL/kg DM) of feeds.
Table 1. Chemical compositions (g/kg DM) and nutritive values (UFL/kg DM) of feeds.
PastureBarley/Corn MixHemp HayAlfalfa Hay
CP160.2 ± 1.3100.4 ± 0.9207.7 ± 2.7194.5 ± 2.6
EE22.6 ± 0.331.6 ± 2.621.2 ± 0.716.8 ± 0.8
NDF481.8 ± 5.1165.2 ± 1.3401.5 ± 2.4413.5 ± 2.3
ADF429.4 ± 2.5145.1 ± 1.7318.4 ± 5.2344.1 ± 4.9
ADL46.2 ± 2.95.3 ± 2.233.4 ± 6.051.7 ± 2.7
Ash72.5 ± 2.210.5 ± 1.5101.9 ± 1.499.5 ± 1.9
UFL/kg DM0.761.040.780.77
CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; NDF: neutered detergent fiber; ADF: acid detergent fiber; ADL: acid detergent lignin; UFL: feed unity for lactation; DM: dry matter.
Table 2. Fatty acid profiles (g/100 g fat) of pasture, barley/corn mixture (BCM), hemp hay (HH), and alfalfa hay (AH).
Table 2. Fatty acid profiles (g/100 g fat) of pasture, barley/corn mixture (BCM), hemp hay (HH), and alfalfa hay (AH).
PastureBCMHHAH
AprilMayJuneJuly
SFA39.2A22.3 D26.4C34.6B20.039.025.3
MUFA22.8A11.2C17.8B16.4B21.523.58.2
PUFA38.0D65.5A55.8B49.0C58.537.566.5
n6 PUFA16.2C24.1B29.9A10.31D55.48.317.1
n3 PUFA21.3D40.1A25.3C37.9B1.615.634.8
SFA: saturated fatty acids; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Table 3. Body weight (kg); mean milk yield (g/head/day), and chemical composition (%).
Table 3. Body weight (kg); mean milk yield (g/head/day), and chemical composition (%).
HCRMSE
Body weight49.149.26.3
Milk yield1954.0 a1731.0 b503.5
Protein3.263.160.20
Fat2.993.071.74
Lactose4.154.050.18
a, b: p < 0.05; RMSE: root mean square error.
Table 4. Milk fatty acid profile (g/100 g of fat).
Table 4. Milk fatty acid profile (g/100 g of fat).
Item Group EffectTime EffectG × TRMSE
Group HGroup Cppp
SFA
C4:03.0413.214NS***NS0.774
C6:01.7371.824NSNS***0.190
C8:02.4212.682NS******0.364
C10:010.8010.70NS******1.063
C11:00.0890.251*********0.066
C12:03.6874.658*******0.677
C13:00.0550.112*********0.022
C14:09.58510.995*********0.835
C15:00.6990.822*********0.109
C16:029.1727.93*NSNS2.299
C17:00.6500.860*********0.196
C18:013.2611.23*******2.085
C20:00.1860.197NS**NS0.042
C22:00.1030.124*******0.022
C24:00.0390.030*******0.009
MUFA
C14:10.1660.294*******0.074
C16:10.6170.471*********0.072
C17:10.0240.019**NSNS0.005
C18:1 CIS60.1180.113NS****0.023
C18:1 trans 90.2760.315NS***NS0.134
C18:1 trans 11 (TVA)1.4371.320NS**NS0.267
C18:1 CIS917.1316.89NS****1.155
C18:1 CIS100.3230.341NS****0.099
C18:1 CIS110.1990.143*********0.053
C18:1 CIS120.0830.069*****0.022
C22:10.0160.012NSNSNS0.009
C24:10.0210.027***NS0.008
PUFA
C18:2 TRANS n60.1160.135NS******0.046
C18:2 CIS n6 (LA)1.7261.980*********0.238
C18:3 n60.0310.026NS***NS0.014
C18:3 n3 (ALA)0.8080.792NS***NS0.149
CLA10.2390.333******NS0.064
CLA20.2190.161*********0.034
C20:2 n60.0220.037*********0.010
C20:3 n60.0190.019NS*NS0.020
C20:4 n6 (AA)0.1080.125******NS0.017
C22:2 n60.0170.017NS**NS0.007
C20:5 n3 (EPA)0.0530.044******0.013
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; SFA: saturated fatty acids; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids. RMSE: root mean square error. NS: not significant.
Table 5. Milk fatty acid classes (g/100 g of fat) and ratios.
Table 5. Milk fatty acid classes (g/100 g of fat) and ratios.
ItemGroup H Group C Group Effect Time Effect G × TRMSE
SFA75.5275.64NS****1.107
MUFA20.4220.04NS******1.105
PUFA3.383.67*********0.325
n62.052.34*********0.237
n30.8710.837NS***NS0.151
CLAs0.4590.494NS***NS0.073
PUFA/SFA0.0440.048********0.044
n6/n32.402.98********0.515
LA/ALA2.172.66*******0.523
AA/EPA2.313.19********0.837
DFA37.0636.01*****NS0.352
HSFA42.4343.01NSNSNS0.376
SFA: saturated fatty acids; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids; CLA: conjugated linoleic acids; LA: linoleic acid; ALA: alpha-linolenic acid; AA: arachidonic acid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; DFA: desirable fatty acid; HSFA: hypercholesterolemic saturated fatty acid. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. RMSE: root mean square error. NS: not significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iommelli, P.; Zicarelli, F.; Amato, R.; Musco, N.; Sarubbi, F.; Bailoni, L.; Lombardi, P.; Di Bennardo, F.; Infascelli, F.; Tudisco, R. The Effects of Hemp Hay (Canapa sativa L.) in the Diets of Grazing Goats on Milk Production and Fatty Acid Profile. Animals 2024, 14, 2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162373

AMA Style

Iommelli P, Zicarelli F, Amato R, Musco N, Sarubbi F, Bailoni L, Lombardi P, Di Bennardo F, Infascelli F, Tudisco R. The Effects of Hemp Hay (Canapa sativa L.) in the Diets of Grazing Goats on Milk Production and Fatty Acid Profile. Animals. 2024; 14(16):2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162373

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iommelli, Piera, Fabio Zicarelli, Ruggero Amato, Nadia Musco, Fiorella Sarubbi, Lucia Bailoni, Pietro Lombardi, Federica Di Bennardo, Federico Infascelli, and Raffaella Tudisco. 2024. "The Effects of Hemp Hay (Canapa sativa L.) in the Diets of Grazing Goats on Milk Production and Fatty Acid Profile" Animals 14, no. 16: 2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162373

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop