Next Article in Journal
An Insight into Practices Associated with the Control of Internal Parasites in the Dairy Goat Herds of Romania: A Questionnaire Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Exploration of Synergistic Regulation Mechanisms of Cerebral Ganglion and Muscle in Eriocheir sinensis Activated in Response to Alkalinity Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deciphering the Hearts: Geometric Morphometrics Reveals Shape Variation in Abatus Sea Urchins across Subantarctic and Antarctic Seas

1
Millennium Institute Biodiversity of Antarctic and Subantarctic Ecosystems (BASE), Santiago 7800003, Chile
2
Laboratorio de Ecología Molecular, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7800003, Chile
3
Laboratorio de Ecología y Morfometría Evolutiva, Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile
4
Programa de Doctorado en Salud Ecosistémica, Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile
5
Cape Horn International Center (CHIC), Centro Universitario Cabo de Hornos, Universidad de Magallanes, Puerto Williams 6350000, Chile
6
Instituto de Alta Investigación, Universidad de Tarapacá, Casilla 7D, Arica 1010069, Chile
7
Biogeosciences UMR 6282 CNRS, Université de Bourgogne, EPHE, 21078 Dijon, France
8
South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute, Falkland Islands, Port Stanley FIQQ 1ZZ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(16), 2376; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162376
Submission received: 1 July 2024 / Revised: 26 July 2024 / Accepted: 13 August 2024 / Published: 16 August 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Abatus is a genus of sea urchin that inhabits the Southern Ocean. Among the 11 described species, three shared morphological traits and live in intertidal zones in Patagonia (A. cavernosus), Kerguelen (A. cordatus), Antarctica, and Tierra del Fuego (A. agassizii). The relationships between Abatus species are complicated and have not been clarified yet. This study analyzed shape variation among these species. The shape of 72 individuals from four locations in the South Shetlands, Kerguelen, Patagonia, and Falklands/Malvinas, were evaluated. Differences in shape were found in all four locations. Especially, the Falklands/Malvinas group showed a marked difference in shape compared to other localities. The possibility that the Falklands/Malvinas group shows phenotypic plasticity or represents a distinct evolutionary unit is discussed. Finally, the methodology used in this study proved to be a powerful tool to differentiate these species, highlighting its utility in systematic studies.

Abstract

Abatus is a genus of irregular brooding sea urchins to the Southern Ocean. Among the 11 described species, three shared morphological traits and present an infaunal lifestyle in the infralittoral from the Subantarctic province; A. cavernosus in Patagonia, A. cordatus in Kerguelen, and A. agassizii in Tierra del Fuego and South Shetlands. The systematic of Abatus, based on morphological characters and incomplete phylogenies, is complex and largely unresolved. This study evaluates the shape variation among these species using geometric morphometrics analysis (GM). For this, 72 individuals from four locations; South Shetlands, Kerguelen, Patagonia, and Falklands/Malvinas were photographed, and 37 landmarks were digitized. To evaluate the shape differences among species, a principal component analysis and a Procrustes ANOVA were performed. Our results showed a marked difference between the Falklands/Malvinas and the other localities, characterized by a narrower and more elongated shape and a significant influence of location in shape but not sex. Additionally, the effect of allometry was evaluated using a permutation test and a regression between shape and size, showing significant shape changes during growth in all groups. The possibility that the Falklands/Malvinas group shows phenotypic plasticity or represents a distinct evolutionary unit is discussed. Finally, GM proved to be a powerful tool to differentiate these species, highlighting its utility in systematic studies.

1. Introduction

Abatus Troschel, 1851 is a genus of irregular sea urchin belonging to the order Spatangoida, family Schizasteridae, to which eleven extant species are currently attributed based on morphological characters; all of them are mainly distributed in the Southern Ocean [1]. Test shape in irregular sea urchins is characterized by both a bilateral and a radial symmetry that is overlaid on each other, spatangoids being commonly referred to as heart urchins given the typical outline of the test [2]. Species of Abatus are deposit feeders, inhabiting muddy and sandy environments at different water depths, from the shallow subtidal area down to 1000 m [1]. Species in the genus have a direct development, with no larval phase, the females brooding their young inside four aboral depressed petals (named marsupia) for several months before releasing the juveniles on the seafloor [3,4].
Four of the eleven species of Abatus are reported from the subantarctic province: Abatus agassizii Mortensen, 1910 off Tierra del Fuego, Abatus cavernosus Philippi, 1845 off the coasts of eastern Patagonia, Abatus cordatus Verrill, 1876 a species endemic to the Kerguelen Islands and plateau, and Abatus philippii Lovén, 1871 in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean as far north as Mar del Plata [5]. The remaining seven species are only distributed around the Antarctic continent: Abatus beatriceae Larrain, 1985, Abatus bidens Mortensen, 1910, Abatus curvidens Mortensen, 1936, Abatus elongatus Koehler, 1908, Abatus ingens Koehler, 1926, Abatus nimrodi Koehler, 1911, and Abatus shackletoni Koehler, 1911 [1]. Although A. agassizii has an Antarctic and subantarctic distribution, it is morphologically and genetically closely related to the subantarctic species A. cordatus and A. cavernosus, suggesting that its presence in the Antarctic region is likely the result of recent colonization from northern regions [6].
These three species show biological and ecological similarities. They have the same infaunal mode of life, form dense populations with patchy distributions in medium and fine-grained sediments in the infralittoral zone at very shallow depths, and feed on detritus and organic matter by ingesting surface sediments [4,7,8]. For these reasons, they are considered keystone species in benthic marine ecosystems by highly affecting sediment and water biochemical interactions, including carbon cycling, sediment oxygenation, and inorganic nutrient fluxes, maintaining microbial and infaunal diversity [8,9]. Furthermore, they have an annual reproductive cycle, releasing their young in the summer, probably to take advantage of the increase in primary productivity, unlike the Antarctic species, which have a continuous year-long reproductive cycle [10,11].
The systematics of the genus Abatus have been questioned in former studies [6,12,13]. Species identification and taxonomy only rely on discrete, categorical, and linear morphological characters, e.g., [14], such as the type of pedicellariae, relative length of petals, labrum size, number of gonopores and type of fascioles [1,15]. Traditional morphometrics has been used in former studies to differentiate between species of Abatus: Shinner and McClintock [16] compared the size of marsupia between A. nimrodi and A. shackletoni, David et al. [12] used traditional morphometrics to differentiate between two species, namely, A. cordatus and A. bidens. Additionally, Gil et al. [4,17] evaluated size frequency and relationships between size and reproductive traits in A. cordatus.
Geometric morphometrics (GM) is a tool that makes it possible to study the shape variation and its covariation due to other variables, capturing the morphological structure [18]. This approach uses the analysis of the geometric coordinates of anatomical homologous points (landmarks) located on individuals or samples, allowing for the visualization of differences, evaluation of asymmetry, or identification of allometry between complex shapes [19]. Through this tool, it is possible to evaluate biological patterns, evolutionary and developmental processes, and systematic studies, analyzing subtle morphological variation between closely related species, comparing morphological adaptations to different habitats and modes of life, or shaping variation during ontogeny, both in extant and extinct fossil species [20,21,22]. Using GM in echinoderm is not very common; however, Martín-Ledo et al. [23] used shape analyses to distinguish between genera within the Cassidulidae family by analyzing the cryptic morphology of plate shapes in Echinoidea. Hernández-Díaz et al. [22], on the other hand, combine GM techniques with a molecular approach using the ophiuroid species Ophiothrix angulate, the differentiation of dorsal and ventral arm plates, along with integrative species delimitation analyses, identifies one of these lineages as a confirmed candidate species. De-los-Palos-Peña et al. [24] utilized a combination of scanning electron microscopy and ontogenetic studies of the odontophore in Luidia superba to explore patterns of size and shape variation. In addition, GM has also been used to better understand the complex interplay between genetics, phenotypes, development, and environmental constraints [25,26].
Few studies have used GM to analyze shape variation in species of Abatus [27]. The use of GM has proved relevant to reveal morphological differences between populations and cryptic species of echinoderms [22]. Considering the complicated systematics of the genus Abatus and the high morphological similarity of species, the present work aims to analyze shape differences in test outlines using GM between the three closely related species A. agassizii, A. cordatus, and A. cavernosus, which show similar test morphologies and biological traits.

2. Materials and Methods

Seventy-two individuals belonging to three species of the genus Abatus were collected from four localities (Figure 1): the Kerguelen Islands (Port aux Français; 49.3510° S, 70.2107° E) (A. cordatus, 10 males and 10 females), the Magellan Strait (Possession Bay; 52.3353° S, 69.4782° W) in Patagonia (A. cavernosus, 10 males and 10 females), and King George Island (Fildes Bay; 62.2199° S, 58.9533° W) in Antarctica (A. agassizii, 11 males and 10 females). On the other hand, there are few studies on the genus Abatus in the Falkland/Malvinas Islands and discrepancies in the species that inhabit there [28]. Therefore, to include intraspecific variation, individuals from Falklands/Malvinas Islands (Canache Bay; 51.6963° S, 57.7851° W; sub-Antarctic province, 11 males), identified as A. cavernosus, were used in the analyses as the fourth location. Samples were collected during several field campaigns and preserved in 95% ethanol. To expose the test, individuals were submerged in a chlorine solution of 5% for one minute, and the spines were removed using a brush [27]. Species identification was performed following the most updated taxonomic key “Antarctic Echinoidea” “http://echinoidea-so.identificationkey.org/mkey.html accessed on 21 May 2024)”, where sea urchins were observed and species identified based on diagnostic morphological descriptors.
Each sample was photographed in aboral view using a Nikon d7500 digital camera. The files were converted to tps format using tpsUtil32 software v. 1.78 [29]. Following the methodological protocol of Benítez et al. [30], a curve with 37 points was defined along the test outline of individuals, beginning and ending at the ambulacrum III (counterclockwise), using the TPSdig2 v. 2.31 [31]. The curve was appended to landmarks using tpsUtil32 [29]. To estimate measurement error, landmark digitization was performed twice at different times. Landmark information was extracted through a Procrustes fit analysis on both measurements combined, which allowed for the standardization of the samples by eliminating the effect of size, position, and rotation [32]. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the shape covariance matrix of individuals to simulate the morphospace. To test for a significant effect of the localities (group) and sex of individuals in shape and size, a Procrustes ANOVA was realized using the Procrustes distances of the covariance matrix. Finally, to evaluate the shape differences, pairwise differences in shape between groups were computed using a permutation test with 10,000 rounds based on the Mahalanobis and Procrustes distances.
In order to evaluate the effect of allometry on shape variation among individuals, a multivariate regression was performed with shape as the dependent variable and the centroid size as the independent variable. The significance of allometry was computed using a permutation statistical test with 10,000 rounds [33]. All statistical analyses were realized using the software MorphoJ v 1.07a [34] and the package “geomorph” [35] of the R version 4.04 software.

3. Results

The PCA of shape variation between samples showed that 79.19% of the variance is explained by the first two components (PC1 = 68.57%; PC2 = 10.61%). The results showed a clear difference between A. agassizii, A. cordatus, and A. cavernosus from the Falklands/Malvinas, while the shape variation of A. cavernosus from Patagonia overlaps with A. agassizii and A. cordatus and is clearly separated to the A. cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (Figure 2). The shape varies in relative test length and width along the first PC; meanwhile, along the second axis, shape varies in the anterior part of the test, with individuals having a more or less pronounced anterior sulcus, either reinforcing or reducing the heart-shaped outline of specimens (Figure 3). The Procrustes ANOVA tested a significant effect of locality on test shape and size variation but showed no significant effect of sex (Table 1). Finally, the permutation test of groups evidenced significant pairwise differences in shape (Table 2 and Table 3), with A. cordatus and A. cavernosus (Patagonia) being the most similar, and A. agassizii and A. cavernosus (Falklands/Malvinas) the most different.
The influence of centroid size by allometry in four groups of Abatus was eliminated from analyses using the multivariate regression residual, correcting PCA analyses by size (Figure 4). In fact, the first and second PCs accumulated 80.11% of the variance (PC1 = 68.83%; PC2 = 11.27%). In addition, the effect of allometry was tested significantly in the four groups (9.8%; p-value: <0.0001) that showed a significant relationship between the shape and centroid size of individuals (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

The present study showed that geometric morphometrics is a powerful tool to evaluate shape variation in groups and species of Abatus from Antarctic and subantarctic provinces. The approach evidenced a clear distinction between species in test outlines supporting the current taxonomy based on the presence, or absence, of a frontal sulcus and on other morphological characters related to globiferous pedicellariae [1]. Interestingly, the results showed no effect of sex in outline shape. Although sexual dimorphism is not a very recurrent feature in echinoids, irregular species show noticeable differences, specifically in the depression of the marsupia (for brood their young) and in the gonopore size [4,16,17]. However, although these traits change the morphology of the female testa, they do not seem to generate an intersexual difference in the outline shape.
The computed morphospace revealed two morphological groups. The first one is composed of the three studied species, where A. agassizii and A. cordatus differentiate from each other in the development of the anterior sulcus along PC2. Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia is intermediate in shape between the two species. Abatus agassizii exhibits a more rounded test outline in aboral view, without the heart-shaped form that characterizes other species. In contrast, A. cordatus and A. cavernosus showed the presence of a deep frontal sulcus, in line with diagnostic characters used for the taxonomy of the three species [1].
Interestingly, a second morphological group corresponding to individuals from the Falklands/Malvinas (morphologically identified as A. cavernosus) present a shape markedly different from A. cavernosus from Patagonia, A. agassizii, and A. cordatus. The Falklands/Malvinas group is represented along PC1 by specimens with more elongated and narrower tests, which contrasts with the more rounded shape of the group. This clear difference in shape between A. cavernosus from the Falklands/Malvinas and the one from Patagonia can be explained by several factors [6,12]. The difference in shape could be attributed to phenotypic plasticity and peculiar local environmental conditions prevailing in the sampling areas. In burrowing marine invertebrates, factors such as the type and grain size of sediment can affect body shape [36]. Phenotypic plasticity had already been documented in A. cordatus and was associated with local environmental conditions [37]. In irregular sea urchins, Ferber and Lawrence [38] found that sediment grain size affects the burrowing capacity of individuals. Similarly, Saitoh and Kanazawa [39] evidenced morphological adaptations of spantagoid body shape and type of appendages, allowing for a more efficient streamline and stability in bottom currents flowing over the sediment surface. Therefore, different local environmental conditions between localities could cause an alteration in development, changing the adult phenotype of individuals [40]. By contrast, there may be other environmental factors such as stress, pollution, or ecological interactions with other species, which may cause instability in development, that is, a variation in the shape of individuals due to random fluctuations during ontogeny [24]. This could be evaluated in the future through an analysis of fluctuating asymmetry [30]. A second hypothesis is that the Falklands/Malvinas group could constitute a differentiated evolutionary unit (different evolutionary trajectory). It is commonly claimed that the Falklands/Malvinas share faunal assemblages with Patagonia. However, genetics and biogeographic studies have detected strong population differences, low gene flow, or even isolation between Patagonia and Falklands/Malvinas in several marine invertebrates with pelagic larvae, e.g., [41,42]. In Abatus, a direct developer without a pelagic larval phase, the low mobility of adults and the absence of a dispersal stage considerably limit gene flow between populations even between nearby patches [43]. Therefore, for such shallow coastal sea urchins, the distance between Falklands/Malvinas and eastern Patagonia may have promoted geographic isolation and genetic divergence, leading to the formation of two different genetic and evolutionary units such as previously reported in the brooding isopod Serolis paradoxa [44]. Further genetic studies should complement the GM approach and help clarify the identity of this group.
After being released to the sea floor, following the brooding period, juveniles grow constantly in a non-linear way, rather it appears to be a sigmoid curve [45], maintaining the size after a certain age. Mespoulhé [37] mentioned that juveniles present a different shape compared to adults, i.e., a not conservation of shape during development, which is consistent with our results. This evidence opens questions about the role of shape differences through development that could bring adaptive or survival advantages to younger individuals, for example, in locomotion, metabolic rate, or use of habitats [46,47], or due to architectural constraints of development [37].

5. Conclusions

This study showed that GM can be powerful in differentiating between the shapes of closely related Abatus species. The genomics approach could also help elucidate the intricate relationships between Abatus species. In the future, the combination of genomics and morphometrics approaches, together with ecological components, could be used to better understand the diversification and evolutionary relationships among species of Abatus across the Southern Ocean.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M., E.P. and H.A.B.; Samples processing & taking photographs, F.M. and J.H.; Methodology, F.M., E.P. and H.A.B.; Formal analysis, F.M., J.H. and M.J.S.; Visualization, F.M., J.H. and H.A.B.; samples identification, T.S. and P.B.; Supervision, T.S., P.B., E.P. and H.A.B.; Writing—original draft, F.M., E.P. and H.A.B.; Writing—review and editing, F.M., J.H., M.J.S., T.S., P.B., E.P. and H.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by ANID—Millennium Science Initiative Program–ICN2021_002 and FONDECYT Regular 1211672.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available by personal request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

F.M. thanks Millennium Institute BASE for funding his postgraduate studies. Also, thanks to program n°1044 Proteker from the French Polar Institute (IPEV) for access to samples from the Kerguelen Islands. Thanks to Léa Cabrol, Sebastián Rosenfeld, Julieta Orlando, Karin Gérard and Mélanie Delleuze for field assistance in collecting Abatus specimens.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. David, B.; Choné, T.; Mooi, R.; De Ridder, C. Antarctic echinoidea. In Synopses of the Antarctic Benthos; Koeltz Scientific Books: Königstein, Gemany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dell, R.K. Antarctic benthos. Adv. Mar. Biol. 1972, 10, 1–216. [Google Scholar]
  3. Schatt, P.; Féral, J.-P. The brooding cycle of Abatus cordatus (Echinodermata: Spatangoida) at Kerguelen islands. Polar Biol. 1991, 11, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gil, D.G.; Zaixso, H.E.; Tolosano, J.A. Brooding of the sub-Antarctic heart urchin, Abatus cavernosus (Spatangoida: Schizasteridae), in southern Patagonia. Mar. Biol. 2009, 156, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Flores, J.N.; Penchaszadeh, P.E.; Brogger, M.I. Heart urchins from the depths: Corparva lyrida gen. et sp. nov. (Palaeotropidae), and new records for the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2021, 69, 14–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Díaz, A.; González-Wevar, C.A.; Maturana, C.S.; Palma, A.T.; Poulin, E.; Gerard, K. Restricted geographic distribution and low genetic diversity of the brooding sea urchin Abatus agassizii (Spatangoidea: Schizasteridae) in the South Shetland Islands: A bridgehead population before the spread to the northern Antarctic Peninsula? Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2012, 85, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Poulin, E.; Féral, J.-P. Pattern of spatial distribution of a brood-protecting schizasterid echinoid, Abatus cordatus, endemic to the Kerguelen Islands. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1995, 118, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pascal, P.Y.; Reynaud, Y.; Poulin, E.; De Ridder, C.; Saucede, T. Feeding in spatangoids: The case of Abatus cordatus in the Kerguelen Islands (Southern Ocean). Polar Biol. 2021, 44, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lohrer, A.M.; Thrush, S.F.; Gibbs, M.M. Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions. Nature 2004, 431, 1092–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pearse, J.S.; McClintock, J.B. A comparison of reproduction by the brooding spatangoid echinoids Abatus shackletoni and A. nimrodi in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 1990, 17, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maturana, C.S. Estrategias de Reproducción en la Antártica: Estacionalidad Reproductiva y Patrón de Apareamiento en el Erizo Incubante, Abatus agassizii (Mortensen 1910). Master’s Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. David, B.; Saucède, T.; Chenuil, A.; Steimetz, E.; De Ridder, C. The taxonomic challenge posed by the Antarctic echinoids Abatus bidens and Abatus cavernosus (Schizasteridae, Echinoidea). Polar Biol. 2016, 39, 897–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guzzi, A.; Alvaro, M.C.; Cecchetto, M.; Schiaparelli, S. Echinoids and Crinoids from Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea) Based on a Reverse Taxonomy Approach. Divers 2023, 15, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mortensen, T. The Echinoidea of the Swedish South Polar Expedition. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903; Lithographisches Institut des Generalstabs: Stockholm, Sweden, 1910. [Google Scholar]
  15. David, B.; Choné, T.; Mooi, R.; De Ridder, C. Biodiversity of Antarctic echinoids: A comprehensive and interactive database. Sci. Mar. 2005, 69, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schinner, G.O.; McClintock, J.B. Form and function of brood pouches of the Antarctic heart urchins Abatus nimrodi and Abatus shackletoni. In Echinoderms through Time; David, B., Guille, A., Féral, J.-P., Roux, M., Eds.; A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; p. 872. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gil, D.G.; Zaixso, H.E.; Tolosano, J.A. Sex-specific differences in gonopore and gonadal growth trajectories in the brooding sea urchin, Abatus cavernosus (Spatangoida). Invertebr. Biol. 2020, 139, e12278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adams, D.C.; Rohlf, F.J.; Slice, D.E. Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital. J. Zool. 2004, 71, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zelditch, M.; Swiderski, D.L.; Sheets, H.D. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. Márquez-Borrás, F.; Solís-Marín, F.A.; Mejía-Ortiz, L.M. Troglomorphism in the brittle star Ophionereis commutabilis Bribiesca-Contreras et al., 2019 (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea, Ophionereididae). Subterr. Biol. 2020, 33, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Swisher, R.E. Convergent discoidal sand dollars from isolated regions: A geometric morphometric analyses of Dendraster and Arachnoides. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 2021, 32, 1117–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hernández-Díaz, Y.Q.; Solis, F.; Beltrán-López, R.G.; Benítez, H.A.; Díaz-Jaimes, P.; Paulay, G. Integrative species delimitation in the common ophiuroid Ophiothrix angulata (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea): Insights from COI, ITS2, arm coloration, and geometric morphometrics. PeerJ 2023, 11, e15655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Martín-Ledo, R.; Sands, C.J.; López-González, P.J. A new brooding species of brittle star (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from Antarctic waters. Polar Biol. 2013, 36, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De-los-Palos-Peña, M.; Solís-Marín, F.A.; Laguarda-Figueras, A.; Durán-González, A. Ontogenetic variation of the odontophore of Luidia superba (Asteroidea: Paxillosida) and its taxonomic implications. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2021, 69, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Klingenberg, C.P. Evolution and development of shape: Integrating quantitative approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 623–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barría, E.M.; Benítez, H.A.; Hernández, C.E. Evolvability in the cephalothoracic structural complexity of Aegla araucaniensis (Crustacea: Decapoda) determined by a developmental system with low covariational constraint. Biology 2022, 11, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stige, L.C.; David, B.; Alibert, P. On hidden heterogeneity in directional asymmetry–can systematic bias be avoided? J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. GBIF. GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. 2023. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/species/3249617 (accessed on 22 July 2024).
  29. Rohlf, F.J. The tps series of software. Hystrix 2015, 26, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Benítez, H.A.; Lemic, D.; Villalobos-Leiva, A.; Bažok, R.; Órdenes-Claveria, R.; Pajač Živković, I.; Mikac, K.M. Breaking symmetry: Fluctuating asymmetry and geometric morphometrics as tools for evaluating developmental instability under diverse agroecosystems. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rohlf, F.J. TpsDig; Version 2.31; Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rohlf, F.J.; Slice, D. Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Biol. 1990, 39, 40–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Drake, A.G.; Klingenberg, C.P. The pace of morphological change: Historical transformation of skull shape in St Bernard dogs. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2008, 275, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Klingenberg, C.P. MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Baken, E.K.; Collyer, M.L.; Kaliontzopoulou, A.; Adams, D.C. geomorph v4. 0 and gmShiny: Enhanced analytics and a new graphical interface for a comprehensive morphometric experience. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2021, 12, 2355–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Faulkes, Z. Morphological Adaptations for Digging and Burrowing. In Functional Morphology and Diversity; Watling, L., Thiel, M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 276–295. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mespoulhé, P. Morphologie d’un Echinide Irregulier Subantarctique de L’archipel des Kerguelen: Ontogenese, Dimorphisme Sexual et Variabilite. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ferber, I.; Lawrence, J.M. Distribution, substratum preference and burrowing behaviour of Lovenia elongata (Gray)(Echinoidea: Spatangoida) in the Gulf of Elat (‘Aqaba), Red Sea. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 1976, 22, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saitoh, M.; Kanazawa, K.I. Adaptative morphology for living in shallow water environments in spatangoid echinoids. Zoosymposia 2012, 7, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. West-Eberhard, M.J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  41. González-Wevar, C.A.; Segovia, N.I.; Rosenfeld, S.; Noll, D.; Maturana, C.S.; Hüne, M.; Naretto, J.; Gérard, K.; Díaz, A.; Spencer, H.G.; et al. Contrasting biogeographical patterns in Margarella (Gastropoda: Calliostomatidae: Margarellinae) across the Antarctic polar front. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2021, 156, 107039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. González-Wevar, C.A.; de Aranzamendi, M.C.; Segovia, N.I.; Rosenfeld, S.; Maturana, C.S.; Molina, C.R.; Brickle, P.; Gardenal, C.N.; Bastida, R.; Poulin, E. Genetic footprints of Quaternary glacial cycles over the patterns of population diversity and structure in three Nacella (Patellogastropoda: Nacellidae) species across the Magellan province in southern South America. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1154755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ledoux, J.B.; Tarnowska, K.; Gérard, K.; Lhuillier, E.; Jacquemin, B.; Weydmann, A.; Féral, J.-P.; Chenuil, A. Fine-scale spatial genetic structure in the brooding sea urchin Abatus cordatus suggests vulnerability of the Southern Ocean marine invertebrates facing global change. Polar Biol. 2012, 35, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Leese, F.; Kop, A.; Wägele, J.-W.; Held, C. Cryptic speciation in a benthic isopod from Patagonian and Falkland Island waters and the impact of glaciations on its population structure. Front. Zool. 2008, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mesphoulhé, P.; David, B. Stratégie de croissance d’un oursin subantarctique: Abatus cordatus des îles Kerguelen. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. III 1992, 314, 205–211. [Google Scholar]
  46. Glazier, D.S.; Hirst, A.G.; Atkinson, D. Shape shifting predicts ontogenetic changes in metabolic scaling in diverse aquatic invertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20142302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Smith, E.; Son, E. The role of animal morphology in adaptation and survival. J. Zool. Res. 2024, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Localities where specimens of Abatus were sampled for this study. Abatus cordatus from the Kerguelen Islands (green), Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), Abatus agassizii from King George Island (blue), and Abatus cavernosus from the Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Figure 1. Localities where specimens of Abatus were sampled for this study. Abatus cordatus from the Kerguelen Islands (green), Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), Abatus agassizii from King George Island (blue), and Abatus cavernosus from the Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Animals 14 02376 g001
Figure 2. Scatterplot of the first two PCs of the principal component analysis (PCA) of shape variation between Abatus groups: Abatus cordatus (green), Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), Abatus agassizii (blue), and Abatus cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Figure 2. Scatterplot of the first two PCs of the principal component analysis (PCA) of shape variation between Abatus groups: Abatus cordatus (green), Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), Abatus agassizii (blue), and Abatus cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Animals 14 02376 g002
Figure 3. Wireframe representation of groups’ average shape with the respective positioning of landmarks along the test outline, in aboral view: (A) Abatus cordatus (green), (B) Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), (C) Abatus agassizii (blue), and (D) Abatus cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Figure 3. Wireframe representation of groups’ average shape with the respective positioning of landmarks along the test outline, in aboral view: (A) Abatus cordatus (green), (B) Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), (C) Abatus agassizii (blue), and (D) Abatus cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Animals 14 02376 g003
Figure 4. Scatterplot of principal component analysis (PCA) for Abatus groups, which shapes the use of the residuals of the multivariate regression (corrected by size). Abatus cordatus (green), Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), Abatus agassizii (blue), and Abatus cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Figure 4. Scatterplot of principal component analysis (PCA) for Abatus groups, which shapes the use of the residuals of the multivariate regression (corrected by size). Abatus cordatus (green), Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), Abatus agassizii (blue), and Abatus cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Animals 14 02376 g004
Figure 5. Multivariate regression of the Abatus species for the different groups: Abatus cordatus (green), Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), Abatus agassizii (blue), and Abatus cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Figure 5. Multivariate regression of the Abatus species for the different groups: Abatus cordatus (green), Abatus cavernosus from Patagonia (orange), Abatus agassizii (blue), and Abatus cavernosus from Falklands/Malvinas (red).
Animals 14 02376 g005
Table 1. Result of the Procustes ANOVA assessing the effect of locality (group) and sex on test shape variation and centroid size. Significant p-values are highlighted in bold.
Table 1. Result of the Procustes ANOVA assessing the effect of locality (group) and sex on test shape variation and centroid size. Significant p-values are highlighted in bold.
Centroid Size
EffectSSMSdfFp
Localities238.21479.404681373.83<0.0001
Sex0.573260.5732610.530.4679
Individual72.0591.07550767
Shape
Localities0.038350.000365310546.39<0.0001
Sex0.000110.000003278350.420.999
Individual0.018470.00000787423452.77<0.0001
Table 2. Pairwise comparisons between the four groups of Abatus. Results are reported as Mahalanobis distance after 10,000 permutation rounds. Significant distances are shown by an asterisk.
Table 2. Pairwise comparisons between the four groups of Abatus. Results are reported as Mahalanobis distance after 10,000 permutation rounds. Significant distances are shown by an asterisk.
A. agassiziiA. cordatusA. cavernosus (F/M)
A. cordatus12.1293 *
A. cavernosus (F/M)13.4967 *9.5791 *
A. cavernosus (P)10.5548 *7.9832 *10.1073 *
Table 3. Pairwise comparison between the four groups of Abatus. Results are reported as Procrustes distances after 10,000 permutation rounds. Significant distances are shown by an asterisk.
Table 3. Pairwise comparison between the four groups of Abatus. Results are reported as Procrustes distances after 10,000 permutation rounds. Significant distances are shown by an asterisk.
A. agassiziiA. cordatusA. cavernosus (F/M)
A. cordatus0.0244 *
A. cavernosus (F/M)0.0657 *0.0537 *
A. cavernosus (P)0.0191 *0.0171 *0.0527 *
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moya, F.; Hernández, J.; Suazo, M.J.; Saucède, T.; Brickle, P.; Poulin, E.; Benítez, H.A. Deciphering the Hearts: Geometric Morphometrics Reveals Shape Variation in Abatus Sea Urchins across Subantarctic and Antarctic Seas. Animals 2024, 14, 2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162376

AMA Style

Moya F, Hernández J, Suazo MJ, Saucède T, Brickle P, Poulin E, Benítez HA. Deciphering the Hearts: Geometric Morphometrics Reveals Shape Variation in Abatus Sea Urchins across Subantarctic and Antarctic Seas. Animals. 2024; 14(16):2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moya, Fernando, Jordan Hernández, Manuel J. Suazo, Thomas Saucède, Paul Brickle, Elie Poulin, and Hugo A. Benítez. 2024. "Deciphering the Hearts: Geometric Morphometrics Reveals Shape Variation in Abatus Sea Urchins across Subantarctic and Antarctic Seas" Animals 14, no. 16: 2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162376

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop