Next Article in Journal
The Regulatory Role of Myomaker in the Muscle Growth of the Chinese Perch (Siniperca chuatsi)
Previous Article in Journal
LEP Gene Promotes Milk Fat Synthesis via the JAK2-STAT3 and mTOR Signaling Pathways in Buffalo Mammary Epithelial Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 14
Issue 16
10.3390/ani14162447
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Selection Signatures in Zaobei Beef Cattle

by
Liangyu Shi
1,†,
Pu Zhang
1,†,
Qing Liu
1,
Chenhui Liu
2,
Lei Cheng
2,
Bo Yu
1,* and
Hongbo Chen
1,*
1
Laboratory of Genetic Breeding, Reproduction and Precision Livestock Farming & Hubei Provincial Center of Technology Innovation for Domestic Animal Breeding, School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China
2
Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Wuhan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430208, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2024, 14(16), 2447; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162447 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 July 2024 / Revised: 17 August 2024 / Accepted: 21 August 2024 / Published: 22 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Positive natural selection increases the frequency of beneficial genetic variations, promoting an organism’s adaptability and survival in specific environments. In this study, we conducted whole-genome resequencing and population genetic structure analysis to investigate the genetic diversity of Zaobei cattle, local yellow cattle from China. By comparing Zaobei cattle with Simmental cattle, we identified several genomic regions exhibiting positive selection. Gene annotation of these regions revealed key traits of Zaobei cattle, such as heat tolerance, fertility, and superior meat quality. These findings not only help understand the characteristics of Zaobei cattle but also provide valuable genetic information for future breeding programs, thereby improving their production efficiency and economic value.

Abstract

This investigation provides a comprehensive analysis of genomic diversity and selection signatures in Zaobei beef cattle, an indigenous breed known for its adaptation to hot and humid climates and superior meat quality. Whole-genome resequencing was conducted on 23 Zaobei cattle, compared with 46 Simmental cattle to highlight genetic distinctions. Population structure analysis confirmed the genetic uniqueness of Zaobei cattle. Using methods such as DASDC v1.01, XPEHH, and θπ ratio, we identified 230, 232, and 221 genes through DASDC, including hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and linkage sweeps, respectively. Coincidentally, 109 genes were identified when using XPEHH and θπ ratio methods. Together, these analyses revealed eight positive selection genes (ARHGAP15, ZNF618, USH2A, PDZRN4, SPATA6, ROR2, KCNIP3, and VWA3B), which are linked to critical traits such as heat stress adaptation, fertility, and meat quality. Moreover, functional enrichment analyses showed pathways related to autophagy, immune response, energy metabolism, and muscle development. The comprehensive genomic insights gained from this study provide valuable knowledge for breeding programs aimed at enhancing the beneficial traits in Zaobei cattle.

1. Introduction

Cattle are one of the most important livestock species in the world. By providing milk and dairy products, labor, meat, leather, and other products, they have become indispensable to human society. Carcass quality, meat quality, and reproduction performance are widely recognized as critical economic traits influencing the production of beef cattle. Zaobei cattle (Figure 1), a local yellow cattle breed distributed in Hubei Province in China, are known for their muscular build, superior meat quality, and exceptional reproductive performance. These cattle are predominantly found in rolling hills, plains, and undulating terrain, with elevations ranging from 70 to 780 m above sea level and the highest temperature above 40 degrees Celsius in summer. The breeding area falls within a subtropical continental monsoon climate zone, influenced annually by the southeast monsoon, resulting in a humid and rainy climate. The geographical and climatic features of the region play a significant role in shaping the adaptability and phenotypic traits of Zaobei cattle. Unlike Zaobei cattle, Simmental cattle originated from middle Europe [1]. In terms of herd management, the traditional practice primarily involves extensive free-range grazing. This approach allows the cattle to forage naturally, which aligns with the local agricultural practices and contributes to their distinctive meat quality and overall health. Therefore, these cattle exhibit great heat tolerance and can adapt to hot and humid environments in Southern China. The meat of Zaobei cattle is prized for its flavor, with the back and hind leg areas exhibiting distinctive marbling due to fat deposition, where small and thin veins and plexus fatty layers resemble marble, known as “snowflake beef”, a typical representative of high-end raw meat. With the rising demand for high-quality beef recently, the economic value of Zaobei cattle is apparently increasing. Due to their heat tolerance and high-quality beef production, it is of great importance to conserve and utilize Zaobei cattle genetic resources to enhance their productivity and economic and social benefits.
Whole-genome sequence data provide the possibility for a precise analysis of complex traits across many breeds. Selection has significantly changed the phenotypic characteristics of livestock, enhancing their environmental adaptability, along with the yield and quality of animal products [2,3,4]. This process, through positive selection, has promoted the accumulation of beneficial mutations in the genome, leaving distinctive imprints called selection signatures [5]. Identifying traits influenced by selection has become a powerful tool for detecting selection signature [6], aiding in revealing the biological processes behind biological evolution [7,8], productivity [9,10,11], and functional characteristics [12,13,14]. Researchers have developed methods to study these selected traits, each varying in the indicators and statistical inference methods [15,16,17,18,19]. However, they are generally based on evaluating the differences in allele or haplotype frequencies between populations. By identifying hard sweeps and soft sweeps signals, we can assess the genomic regions and their associated genes controlling quantitative traits, thereby gaining an understanding of the biological mechanisms behind these traits
Although Zaobei cattle’s genetic diversity has been studied, it has mainly focused on the introgression and demographic history [20]. Existing research suggests that Chinese yellow cattle breeds have high genetic diversity, with genotypic differences existing among different breeds [21,22]. However, the knowledge on the genetic constitution for Zaobei cattle is still limited, particularly in research of genetic variations related to adaptability and economic traits. The present study enhances the comprehension of genetic mechanisms underlying economically significant traits in cattle through the application of whole-genome resequencing. Our aim is to characterize the genetic diversity of Zaobei cattle by assessing their diversity, adaptability, and traits associated with production efficiency. This knowledge provides valuable insights for efficient implementation of cattle breeding programs and contributes to designing more effective hybridization or making improvement plans for breeding.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Sequencing

To ensure that samples represent the genetic diversity of the entire population, we specifically selected 18 Zaobei cattle for our study, focusing on different families and geographical distributions within their native region. Genomic DNA was extracted from ear tissues. Two paired-end libraries were constructed and sequenced using the Huada MGI-T7 platform, with an average coverage depth of roughly ~20× per individual. For comparison purposes of the selection sweeps and genetic diversity, we used 5 Zaobei cattle and 46 Simmental cattle obtained from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive repository under the BioProject accession numbers PRJNA379859, PRJNA238491, and PRJNA343262.

2.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing Data Alignment and Variant Calling

The raw data from the two cattle breeds were initially processed using Trimomatic v0.39 [23] to remove adapter sequences and low-quality bases. Reads with an average quality below 15 in a 5-base window or leading/trailing bases below a score of 5 were discarded, retaining sequences exceeding 50 bases after trimming. Subsequent to cleaning, reads were aligned to the reference cattle genome ARS-UCD1.3 (GCA_002263795.3) using the BWA-MEM (version 0.7.17) [24] with default parameters. Samtools [25] was used to sort and index aligned sequences, and duplicate reads were identified and removed with the command MarkDuplicates from Picard v2.27.1 [26] “https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/ (1 May 2022)” to reduce redundancy and potential biases in subsequent analyses.
SNP identification was performed using GATK v4.2.6.1 [27]. Initially, individual BAM files, processed to remove duplicates and recalibrate base quality, were analyzed with “HaplotypeCaller” to generate GVCF files per sample. These GVCFs were merged into multi-sample VCF files using “CombineGVCFs”. Joint genotyping across all samples was then conducted with “GenotypeGVCFs”, followed by SNP selection using “SelectVariants”. SNP filtering criteria were applied using the “VariantFiltration” tool to minimize false positives. The employed filtration parameters included quality by depth (<2.0), mapping quality (<40), strand odds ratio (>3.0), and Fisher strand score (>60), phred-scaled quality scores (QUAL) below 30.0, as well as those demonstrating marked deviations in mapping quality rank sum tests (<−12.5) or read position rank sum tests (<−8.0). SNP imputation and phasing were performed using BEAGLE v5.4 [28,29], utilizing default parameters. Genetic variations were annotated using ANNOVAR v4.7 [30]. SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of greater than 0.05 were considered in this analysis.

2.3. Population Structure and Genetic Analysis

The distance matrix, derived from SNP data using PLINK v1.90 [31], was used to construct a phylogenetic tree with the neighbor-joining method. The Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL v6) [32] was employed to facilitate visualization. ADMIXTURE v1.3.0 software [33] was used to conduct an admixture analysis, utilized for the investigation of population substructure. Genetic clusters (K) were explored from 2 to 3. To further scrutinize the genome-wide linkage disequilibrium (LD) within each breed, we computed the average r2 values for pairwise markers with PopLDdecay [34] with default settings.

2.4. Detection of Selection Signatures

Previous studies have shown that artificial intelligence methods possess greater power in detecting selection signatures compared to traditional statistical approaches [35]. To identify the signatures of selection driven by artificial selection and genetic adaptation to the local environment, we employed Domain Adaptation Sweep Detection and Classification (DASDC v1.01) [36] for intra-population analyses to detect genomic selection signals in Zaobei cattle. Unlike other AI methods, DASDC explicitly considers the issue of simulation data quality, reducing its impact on model performance, and has proven effective in livestock populations where genetic parameters are difficult to infer accurately. Compared to traditional methods, it can identify more complex patterns and signals, including soft sweeps. Additionally, this model is capable of distinguishing between hard and soft sweeps, providing more nuanced evidence for understanding the evolutionary processes in organisms. Following previous research [37,38], we simulated five classes of 100k genomic fragments (population size of 100), including hard selective sweeps, soft selective sweeps, hard linkage sweeps, soft linkage sweeps, and neutral, with 3000 cases for each class (total 15,000 cases). The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. The model was trained using the training set and real genomic data, evaluated on the test set, and subsequently used for detecting and classifying genomic selection signatures in the Zaobei cattle genome.
To further delineate the positive selection signatures influenced by domestication or environmental adaptation in Zaobei cattle, we employed additional inter-population genetic differentiation methods. We performed XPEHH [39] using selscan v2.0.2 software [40,41]. All these calculations were assessed in 50 kb windows with 20 kb steps to identify significant genomic regions. Additionally, the average nucleotide diversity (π) and population genetic differentiation (FST) [42] were assessed using high-quality autosomal SNPs. These SNPs were examined within non-overlapping 50 kb windows with a step size of 20 kb across all bovine autosomes using VCFtools version v0.1.16 [43]. Moreover, the θπ ratios were calculated.

2.5. Functional Annotation of Selection Signatures and Enrichment Analysis

Significant genomic regions identified by the top 1% of results from DASDC and θπ ratio, and XPEHH > 2.58 [44], were annotated using the Ensembl BioMart tool [45]. Regions, defined by the overlap of signals from at least two methodologies, located candidate genes mapped to the ARS-UCD1.2 cattle reference genome [46]. To elucidate the biological implications of these genes, functional annotation was performed using the WebGestaltR R package [47,48], which facilitated Gene Ontology (GO) [49] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses [50]. A p-value threshold of 0.05 was used for these analyses, with the results visualized using the ggplot2 package [51] in R v4.2.3.

3. Results

3.1. Whole-Genome Resequence and SNP Identification

We conducted whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on the Zaobei, a geographically diverse breed in China, and the Simmental cattle breed. High-throughput sequencing generated 1 Tb. The data yielded from the 46 Simmental cows have an average sequencing depth of 7.73×. The analyses focused on biallelic SNPs identified, and the annotation result was shown in Supplementary Materials Table S1. After quality control, including the filtering based on minor allele frequency and call rate, 25,085,581 SNPs were identified and retained for further analysis. The sequencing reads were aligned to the reference genome, achieving an average alignment rate above 94%.

3.2. Population Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis

To elucidate the genetic structure and diversity within the population of Zaobei and Simmental cattle through comprehensive analyses, including principal component analysis (PCA), ADMIXTURE v1.3.0, π, and linkage disequilibrium (LD). PCA was performed to capture the main axes of genetic variation among the sampled individuals. The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) together explained 28.12% of the total genetic variance, indicating distinct genetic separations between Zaobei and Simmental cattle (Figure 2b). PC1, in particular, accounted for 25.28% of the variance, effectively delineating the two breeds. neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) trees were constructed to visualize the phylogenetic relationships among the sampled individuals (Figure 2a,d). These phylogenetic trees corroborated the PCA results, showing clear clusters corresponding to each breed, supporting the genetic distinctiveness of the populations studied.
LD analysis showed different patterns between two breeds. Zaobei cattle exhibited higher LD values compared to Simmental cattle, suggesting higher linkage within their genomes (Figure 2c). The decay of LD with physical distance was quantified, indicating a sharper decline in LD values for Simmental cattle at 0.7 kb compared to 3.1 kb for Zaobei cattle.
The assessment of genetic diversity and differentiation was carried out by calculating the nucleotide diversity (π) and pairwise fixation index (FST) values (Figure 3). Zaobei cattle exhibited higher π values, indicative of their extensive genetic base, compared to Simmental cattle. The average FST value is 0.247363, emphasizing the moderate to high genetic differentiation between two breeds.

3.3. Signature of Detection in the Zaobei Cattle and Gene Annotationn

We then utilized the Domain Adaptation Sweep Detection and Classification (DASDC) model for discerning selection signals within the genome of Zaobei cattle. The DASDC model effectively identified regions exhibiting hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and linkage sweeps. In detecting hard sweeps, 857 significant regions and 230 genes with strong selection signals were found, primarily on chromosomes 2 and 20 (Figure 4). The highest selection signal on chromosome 20 was annotated with the SPEF2 gene. The SPEF2 gene is a well-known gene in cattle because of its association with important traits, such as adaptation to heat stress [52], fertility [53,54], temperament [55], as well as milk production and composition [56]. This gene, SPEF2, was annotated in GO:0048702, GO:0048854, and GO:0069541, which are related to the embryonic neurocranium, brain morphogenesis, and respiratory system development. On chromosome 2, a significant selection signal was linked to the CMKLR2 gene, also known as GPR1, found to be expressed in the bovine ovary, thereby affecting fertilization. Genes annotated to significant regions were found to be largely enriched in autophagy (bta04140), human immunodeficiency virus 1 infection (bta05170), mitophagy, Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis (bta04666), and other related immune pathways (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2).
Regarding soft sweeps, 857 remarkable regions were identified, encompassing a total of 232 genes (Figure 5). A functional enrichment analysis concerning these genes situated in the selected regions of the Zaobei cattle genome was conducted. Subsequent Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses illuminated various pathways associated with fertilization, adaptability in severe environments, fat accumulation, and meat quality, such as the AMPK signaling pathway (bta04152), genitalia development (GO:0048806), and potassium ion transmembrane transport (GO:0071805) (Supplementary Figures S3 and S4).
In identifying soft linkage sweeps, regions showed significant selection signals due to linkage with directly selected regions. A total of 856 significant regions were identified, annotated with 221 genes (Figure 6). These genes include PIGK, MUC20, ATP6V1A, KCNU1, and GSE1, which are associated with fat deposition [57], fertility [58,59,60,61,62] and temperament [63]. The genes annotated within the significant regions of soft linkage sweeps link to the calcium signaling pathway (bta04020), primary immunodeficiency (bta05340), and T cell receptor signaling pathway (bta04660), possibly correlating with differentiation and metabolism of fat cells and reproduction (Supplementary Figures S5 and S6).

3.4. Selective Sweep and Enrichment Analysis between Breeds

In order to explore the selection signatures of the two breeds, selective sweep analyses were performed on each strain using a consistent identification method to detect the selected regions of Zaobei and Simmental.
The θπ method detected 1197 significant regions and annotated them to 474 genes, while the XPEHH method uncovered 632 significant regions and annotated them to 201 genes. Of these significant regions, 280 exist in multiple XPEHH and θπ genomic windows, predominantly on chromosome 16 (Figure 7). In these overlapping regions, the two methods together recognized 109 genes, identifying them as prospective candidate genes for Zaobei cattle. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses revealed that these genes enrich pathways associated with the regulation of the secretion of proteases, peptides, cytokines, and other secretions, energy metabolism, immunity, and selenium-related pathways, for example, positive regulation of protein secretion (GO:0050714), glycolysis process (GO:0006096), ATP generation from ADP (GO:0006757), and HIF-1 signaling pathway (bta04066) (Supplementary Figures S7 and S8). Notably, the ABI2 gene was annotated at the point of the maximum signal value, while the GPAT2 gene was annotated in a significant region on chromosome 11. The ABI2 gene is regulated during embryonic development, and its aberrant splicing isoforms may adversely affect early embryonic development and subsequent reproductive traits. This could include issues such as reduced embryo implantation rates, developmental delays, or fetal abnormalities [64]. Additionally, ABI2 is associated with muscle development [65].

4. Discussion

The characterization of genetic diversity and population structure is requisite to reveal the adaptive and productive ability of cattle populations, thereby having significant implications for future efforts in genetic enhancement and conservation. The principal component (PC) and admixture analyses differentiate Zaobei cattle from European taurine breeds. The Simmental breed is associated with the Eurasian taurine ancestral component, while the Zaobei breed is associated with Chinese indicine ancestral component [20]. Phylogenetic tree and population genetic analysis in this study further support the point that Zaobei and Simmental are different categories, revealing their clear genetic difference. This not only reflects their respective geographic origins and genetic history, but also may indicate their genetic variations under different environmental factors.
Under natural and artificial selection, cattle have formed various breeds and populations with different phenotypic characteristics and have adapted to a variety of local environments, including both hot and cold conditions. Positive selection is a form of natural selection that enhances the adaptability and survival ability of organisms in specific environments by increasing the frequency of beneficial genetic variations, helping us understand how specific genetic variations affect the adaptive traits of organisms [66]. This selection mechanism can be divided into several categories, mainly including hard sweeps and soft sweeps. Hard sweeps refer to the rapid spread and fixation of newly emerged beneficial mutations within populations, which quickly fix advantageous traits in livestock, such as disease resistance or increased productivity. Unlike hard sweeps, soft sweeps refer to the existing genetic variations that have become beneficial due to environmental changes and usually increase in frequency, but do not achieve fixation. The presence of soft sweeps suggests a more diverse genetic response to selective pressures, which can be beneficial for the long-term adaptability and resilience of livestock populations. This mode of selection allows for rapid adaptation and preserving genetic diversity. Zaobei cattle have excellent reproductive performance and high meat quality and can adapt well to hot and humid environments. In this study, we implemented three distinct methodologies: DASDC, which includes hard sweep, soft sweep, soft linkage sweep, θπ, and XPEHH. The purpose of using different methodologies was to identify selection patterns in Zaobei cattle and pinpoint genetic variations and potential genes linked with reproduction, meat quality, and thermal tolerance. Nonetheless, no candidate regions were identified simultaneously by various selection-type methods. This might be due to the statistical differences between the methods that allow them to reveal different types of selection signatures across different timescales [67]. To reduce the false-positive rate, studies suggest that positive selection regions in the genome should be identified by at least two statistical methods [68]. Therefore, we defined the regions shortlisted by at least two methods.
By utilizing three methods (hard sweep, θπ, and XPEHH), we detected ARHGAP15 and USH2A genes in the cattle genome. ARHGAP15 has been found to be related to physiological traits associated with tropical adaptability in multiple breeds of cattle [69]. As one of the regulatory proteins of the Rho GTPase family, ARHGAP15 is a Rho GTPase activating protein that participates in various biological processes such as dynamic changes in the cytoskeleton, cell polarity, movement, and proliferation. Therefore, it may play a key role in the tropical adaptability of cattle by influencing these cellular processes [70]. The USH2A gene affects cattle hair color, which may be linked with adaptive traits or survival advantages [71]. In addition, the ZNF618 and PDZRN4 genes were detected in both hard sweep and θπ. ZNF618 is a zinc finger protein; its expression in bovine leukocytes is downregulated due to Theileria annulata infection, which may involve the host’s response to the pathogen [72]. In the northwest, northeast, and north parts of China, this gene is associated with the prevalence of theileriosis; while Zaobei cattle are mostly spread in the central China region, positive selection analysis shows a significant signal for the ZNF618 gene, indicating its potential role in adaptive evolution. The PDZRN4 gene is highly expressed in human abdominal adipose tissue [73]. Moreover, this gene is considered an important functional candidate gene for intramuscular fat content in pigs [74,75].
The SPATA6 and ROR2 genes were detected by soft sweep and θπ. SPATA6, a gene noted for its evolutionary conservation and specific expression in the testis, encodes a protein integral to the formation of segmented columns and the capitulum. These structures play an essential role in the sperm connecting piece, related to the developing flagellum to the sperm head during the phase of spermiogenesis. Disruption of SPATA6 in mice induces the production of acephalic spermatozoa, resulting in male sterility [76]. Additionally, SPATA6 is an important functional molecule of spermatogenesis, regulating the proliferation, apoptosis, and testosterone biosynthesis of Hu sheep Leydig cells [77].
The genes KCNIP3 and VWA3B were identified using three methods: soft linkage sweep, θπ, and XPEHH. The KCNIP3 gene may be involved in melatonin-regulated inflammatory hyperalgesia and reduced morphine tolerance [78]. The KCNIP3 protein exhibits similarities with melatonin at multiple levels, including oscillatory responses to circadian rhythms in the pineal gland and retina, as well as interactions with key enzymes regulating melatonin synthesis. It have been shown that disruptions in maternal circadian rhythms influence fetal development and reproductive health through impacts on the maternal circadian clock and related melatonin rhythms [79]. VWA3B with milk glycosylated kappa-casein percentage and higher differentiation among breeds for deletions [80,81].
We recognize that our study does not include functional validation data, which limits our ability to conclusively link the identified selection signatures with specific phenotypic traits in Zaobei cattle. Future research will aim to incorporate detailed phenotypic data and functional validation to better understand the biological implications of these genetic markers.

5. Conclusions

This research reveals significant positive selection in Zaobei beef cattle, distinguishing them from Simmental cattle and enhancing their adaptation to hot and humid environments. Key genomic regions under positive selection were identified, namely ARHGAP15, ZNF618, USH2A, PDZRN4, SPATA6, ROR2, KCNIP3, and VWA3B. These genes are associated with essential traits like heat stress adaptation, fertility, and meat quality, indicating a shaped genetic landscape of Zaobei cattle under selective pressures. Functional enrichment analyses further highlighted pathways related to autophagy, immune response, energy metabolism, and muscle development, highlighting the biological significance of the identified selection signatures. These insights support breeding strategies to make full use of valuable traits of Zaobei cattle for environmental adaptability and high-quality beef production.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani14162447/s1: Figure S1: GO enrichment analysis of candidate genes from hard sweeps of DASDC. The red, green, and blue parts represent biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, respectively; Figure S2: Enrichment of the top 30 KEGG pathways in candidate genes derived from hard sweeps in DASDC; Figure S3: GO enrichment analysis of candidate genes from soft sweeps of DASDC. The red, green, and blue parts represent biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, respectively; Figure S4: Enrichment of the top 30 KEGG pathways in candidate genes derived from soft sweeps in DASDC; Figure S5: GO enrichment analysis of candidate genes from soft linkage sweeps of DASDC. The red, green, and blue parts represent biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, respectively; Figure S6: Enrichment of the top 30 KEGG pathways in candidate genes derived from soft linkage sweeps in DASDC; Figure S7: GO enrichment analysis of candidate genes from XPEHH and θπ. The red, green, and blue parts represent biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, respectively; Figure S8: Enrichment of the top 30 KEGG pathways in candidate genes derived from XPEHH and θπ. Table S1: Distribution of the identified biallelic SNPs in 69 cattle genomes within various genomic regions.

Author Contributions

Data curation, formal analysis, software, and visualization, L.S. and P.Z.; conceptualization, L.S., H.C. and L.C.; writing—original draft, L.S. and B.Y.; methodology, L.S. and C.L.; investigation, L.S., P.Z., Q.L. and H.C.; validation, Q.L.; resources, C.L., L.C. and H.C.; writing—review and editing, B.Y. and H.C.; funding acquisition, L.C. and H.C.; project administration and supervision, H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key R&D Project of the Department of Science and Technology of Hubei Province (2022BBA007 and 2023BEB032).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal procedures were performed according to Hubei Provincial Regulation on Administration of Laboratory Animals (1 October 2005). The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuhan Polytechnic University (protocol code: WPU202109002; date of approval: 15 September 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available to preserve the privacy of the data.

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to Hui Song and Yunlong Ma, the authors of the DASDC v1.01 software, for their invaluable assistance and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Averdunk, G. DAIRY ANIMALS|Minor and Dual-Purpose Bos taurus Breeds. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences; Roginski, H., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2002; pp. 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, F.; Xie, R.; Fang, L.; Xiang, R.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L. Analysis of 206 whole-genome resequencing reveals selection signatures associated with breed-specific traits in Hu sheep. Evol. Appl. 2024, 17, e13697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sarviaho, K.; Uimari, P.; Martikainen, K. Signatures of positive selection after the introduction of genomic selection in the Finnish Ayrshire population. J. Dairy Sci. 2024, 107, 4822–4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tong, X.; Chen, D.; Hu, J.; Lin, S.; Ling, Z.; Ai, H.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, L. Accurate haplotype construction and detection of selection signatures enabled by high quality pig genome sequences. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qanbari, S.; Simianer, H. Mapping signatures of positive selection in the genome of livestock. Livest. Sci. 2014, 166, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989, 123, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, H.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, Y.; Hao, D.; Shi, Y.; Niu, Y.; Song, T.; Li, Y.; Zhao, S.; et al. Recent positive selection signatures reveal phenotypic evolution in the Han Chinese population. Sci. Bull. 2023, 68, 2391–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zeng, J.; Xue, A.; Jiang, L.; Lloyd-Jones, L.R.; Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Zheng, Z.; Yengo, L.; Kemper, K.E.; Goddard, M.E.; et al. Widespread signatures of natural selection across human complex traits and functional genomic categories. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lukic, B.; Curik, I.; Drzaic, I.; Galic, V.; Shihabi, M.; Vostry, L.; Cubric-Curik, V. Genomic signatures of selection, local adaptation and production type characterisation of East Adriatic sheep breeds. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhou, Z.; Li, M.; Cheng, H.; Fan, W.; Yuan, Z.; Gao, Q.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, J.; et al. An intercross population study reveals genes associated with body size and plumage color in ducks. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chen, M.; Pan, D.; Ren, H.; Fu, J.; Li, J.; Su, G.; Wang, A.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.F. Identification of selective sweeps reveals divergent selection between Chinese Holstein and Simmental cattle populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2016, 48, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tan, X.; Liu, R.; Zhao, D.; He, Z.; Li, W.; Zheng, M.; Li, Q.; Wang, Q.; Liu, D.; Feng, F.; et al. Large-scale genomic and transcriptomic analyses elucidate the genetic basis of high meat yield in chickens. J. Adv. Res. 2024, 55, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xiang, R.; Berg, I.V.D.; MacLeod, I.M.; Hayes, B.J.; Prowse-Wilkins, C.P.; Wang, M.; Bolormaa, S.; Liu, Z.; Rochfort, S.J.; Reich, C.M.; et al. Quantifying the contribution of sequence variants with regulatory and evolutionary significance to 34 bovine complex traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 19398–19408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Na, W.; Yu, J.Q.; Xu, Z.C.; Zhang, X.Y.; Yang, L.L.; Cao, Z.P.; Li, H.; Zhang, H. Important candidate genes for abdominal fat content identified by linkage disequilibrium and fixation index information. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Voight, B.F.; Kudaravalli, S.; Wen, X.; Pritchard, J.K. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, e72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pavlidis, P.; Alachiotis, N. A survey of methods and tools to detect recent and strong positive selection. J. Biol. Res. 2017, 24, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nielsen, R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2005, 39, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McQuillan, R.; Leutenegger, A.L.; Abdel-Rahman, R.; Franklin, C.S.; Pericic, M.; Barac-Lauc, L.; Smolej-Narancic, N.; Janicijevic, B.; Polasek, O.; Tenesa, A.; et al. Runs of homozygosity in European populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 83, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sabeti, P.C.; Reich, D.E.; Higgins, J.M.; Levine, H.Z.; Richter, D.J.; Schaffner, S.F.; Gabriel, S.B.; Platko, J.V.; Patterson, N.J.; McDonald, G.J.; et al. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 2002, 419, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chen, N.; Cai, Y.; Chen, Q.; Li, R.; Wang, K.; Huang, Y.; Hu, S.; Huang, S.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, Z.; et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals world-wide ancestry and adaptive introgression events of domesticated cattle in East Asia. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yu, H.; Zhang, K.; Cheng, G.; Mei, C.; Wang, H.; Zan, L. Genome-wide analysis reveals genomic diversity and signatures of selection in Qinchuan beef cattle. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xia, X.; Zhang, F.; Li, S.; Luo, X.; Peng, L.; Dong, Z.; Pausch, H.; Leonard, A.S.; Crysnanto, D.; Wang, S.; et al. Structural variation and introgression from wild populations in East Asian cattle genomes confer adaptation to local environment. Genome Biol. 2023, 24, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1303.3997. [Google Scholar]
  25. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Davies, R.M.; et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 2021, 10, giab008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Picard Toolkit. Broad Institute, GitHub Repository 2019. Available online: https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/ (accessed on 19 July 2024).
  27. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Browning, B.L.; Tian, X.; Zhou, Y.; Browning, S.R. Fast two-stage phasing of large-scale sequence data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2021, 108, 1880–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Browning, B.L.; Zhou, Y.; Browning, S.R. A One-Penny Imputed Genome from Next-Generation Reference Panels. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018, 103, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, K.; Li, M.; Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W78–W82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alexander, D.H.; Novembre, J.; Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, C.; Dong, S.S.; Xu, J.Y.; He, W.M.; Yang, T.L. PopLDdecay: A fast and effective tool for linkage disequilibrium decay analysis based on variant call format files. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 1786–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schrider, D.R.; Kern, A.D. S/HIC: Robust Identification of Soft and Hard Sweeps Using Machine Learning. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, H.; Chu, J.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Fang, L.; Han, J.; Zhao, S.; Ma, Y. A Novel Approach Utilizing Domain Adversarial Neural Networks for the Detection and Classification of Selective Sweeps. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2304842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schrider, D.R.; Kern, A.D. Soft Sweeps Are the Dominant Mode of Adaptation in the Human Genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 1863–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mughal, M.R.; DeGiorgio, M. Localizing and Classifying Adaptive Targets with Trend Filtered Regression. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 252–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sabeti, P.C.; Varilly, P.; Fry, B.; Lohmueller, J.; Hostetter, E.; Cotsapas, C.; Xie, X.; Byrne, E.H.; McCarroll, S.A.; Gaudet, R.; et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature 2007, 449, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Szpiech, Z.A.; Hernandez, R.D. selscan: An efficient multithreaded program to perform EHH-based scans for positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31, 2824–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Szpiech, Z.A. selscan 2.0: Scanning for sweeps in unphased data. Bioinformatics 2024, 40, btae006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wright, S. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 1951, 15, 323–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Danecek, P.; Auton, A.; Abecasis, G.; Albers, C.A.; Banks, E.; DePristo, M.A.; Handsaker, R.E.; Lunter, G.; Marth, G.T.; Sherry, S.T.; et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2156–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhao, F.-P.; Wei, C.-H.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J.-S.; Wang, G.-K.; Zeng, T.; Du, L.-X. A genome scan of recent positive selection signatures in three sheep populations. J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kinsella, R.J.; Kahari, A.; Haider, S.; Zamora, J.; Proctor, G.; Spudich, G.; Almeida-King, J.; Staines, D.; Derwent, P.; Kerhornou, A.; et al. Ensembl BioMarts: A hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space. Database 2011, 2011, bar030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rosen, B.D.; Bickhart, D.M.; Schnabel, R.D.; Koren, S.; Elsik, C.G.; Tseng, E.; Rowan, T.N.; Low, W.Y.; Zimin, A.; Couldrey, C.; et al. De novo assembly of the cattle reference genome with single-molecule sequencing. Gigascience 2020, 9, giaa021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Elizarraras, J.M.; Liao, Y.; Shi, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Pico, A.R.; Zhang, B. WebGestalt 2024: Faster gene set analysis and new support for metabolomics and multi-omics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W415–W421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, B.; Kirov, S.; Snoddy, J. WebGestalt: An integrated system for exploring gene sets in various biological contexts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W741–W748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Kawashima, S.; Okuno, Y.; Hattori, M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, D277–D280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ginestet, C. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 2011, 174, 245–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huson, H.J.; Kim, E.S.; Godfrey, R.W.; Olson, T.A.; McClure, M.C.; Chase, C.C.; Rizzi, R.; O‘Brien, A.M.; Van Tassell, C.P.; Garcia, J.F.; et al. Genome-wide association study and ancestral origins of the slick-hair coat in tropically adapted cattle. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sweett, H.; Fonseca, P.A.S.; Suarez-Vega, A.; Livernois, A.; Miglior, F.; Canovas, A. Genome-wide association study to identify genomic regions and positional candidate genes associated with male fertility in beef cattle. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Guo, F.; Yang, B.; Ju, Z.H.; Wang, X.G.; Qi, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.F.; Liu, H.D.; Feng, M.Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Alternative splicing, promoter methylation, and functional SNPs of sperm flagella 2 gene in testis and mature spermatozoa of Holstein bulls. Reproduction 2014, 147, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Araujo, A.C.; Carneiro, P.L.S.; Alvarenga, A.B.; Oliveira, H.R.; Miller, S.P.; Retallick, K.; Brito, L.F. Haplotype-Based Single-Step GWAS for Yearling Temperament in American Angus Cattle. Genes 2021, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, C.; Sun, D.; Zhang, S.; Wang, S.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Qiao, L. Genome wide association study identifies 20 novel promising genes associated with milk fatty acid traits in Chinese Holstein. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, S.; Yang, C.; Pan, C.; Feng, X.; Lei, Z.; Huang, J.; Wei, X.; Li, F.; Ma, Y. Identification of key genes and functional enrichment pathways involved in fat deposition in Xinyang buffalo by WGCNA. Gene 2022, 818, 146225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Stepanjuk, A.; Koel, M.; Pook, M.; Saare, M.; Jaager, K.; Peters, M.; Krjutskov, K.; Ingerpuu, S.; Salumets, A. MUC20 expression marks the receptive phase of the human endometrium. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2019, 39, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Martins-de-Souza, D.; Gattaz, W.F.; Schmitt, A.; Novello, J.C.; Marangoni, S.; Turck, C.W.; Dias-Neto, E. Proteome analysis of schizophrenia patients Wernicke’s area reveals an energy metabolism dysregulation. BMC Psychiatry 2009, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hammond, E.R.; Stewart, B.; Peek, J.C.; Shelling, A.N.; Cree, L.M. Assessing embryo quality by combining non-invasive markers: Early time-lapse parameters reflect gene expression in associated cumulus cells. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 1850–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Melo, T.P.; Fortes, M.R.S.; Bresolin, T.; Mota, L.F.M.; Albuquerque, L.G.; Carvalheiro, R. Multitrait meta-analysis identified genomic regions associated with sexual precocity in tropical beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 4087–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hiver, S.; Shimizu-Mizuno, N.; Ikawa, Y.; Kajikawa, E.; Sai, X.; Nishimura, H.; Takaoka, K.; Nishimura, O.; Kuraku, S.; Tanaka, S.; et al. Gse1, a component of the CoREST complex, is required for placenta development in the mouse. Dev. Biol. 2023, 498, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Abo-Ismail, M.; Miller, S.; Sargolzaei, M.; Grossi, D.; Nayeri, S.; Moore, S.; Plastow, G.; Stothard, P.; Schenkel, F. Genome wide association analyses identify new loci for milking speed and temperament in North American Holsteins. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Volume Genetics of Trait Complexes: Lactation, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 17–22 August 2014; pp. 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  64. Cheng, R.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Liu, X.; Xu, W.; Wang, M.; Gao, Y.; Xing, X.; Zhou, C.; et al. Modification of alternative splicing in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos using engineered CRISPR-Cas13d. Sci. China Life Sci. 2022, 65, 2257–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ma, X.; Cheng, H.; Liu, Y.; Sun, L.; Chen, N.; Jiang, F.; You, W.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Song, E.; et al. Assessing Genomic Diversity and Selective Pressures in Bohai Black Cattle Using Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. Animals 2022, 12, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pritchard, J.K.; Pickrell, J.K.; Coop, G. The genetics of human adaptation: Hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, R208–R215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mastrangelo, S.; Ben Jemaa, S.; Ciani, E.; Sottile, G.; Moscarelli, A.; Boussaha, M.; Montedoro, M.; Pilla, F.; Cassandro, M. Genome-wide detection of signatures of selection in three Valdostana cattle populations. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2020, 137, 609–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Huang, M.; Tang, J.; Yang, L.; Yu, Z.; Li, D.; Li, G.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, Y.; et al. Whole-genome SNP markers reveal conservation status, signatures of selection, and introgression in Chinese Laiwu pigs. Evol. Appl. 2021, 14, 383–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Laodim, T.; Koonawootrittriron, S.; Elzo, M.A.; Suwanasopee, T.; Jattawa, D.; Sarakul, M. Genetic factors influencing milk and fat yields in tropically adapted dairy cattle: Insights from quantitative trait loci analysis and gene associations. Anim. Biosci. 2024, 37, 576–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Costa, C.; Germena, G.; Martin-Conte, E.L.; Molineris, I.; Bosco, E.; Marengo, S.; Azzolino, O.; Altruda, F.; Ranieri, V.M.; Hirsch, E. The RacGAP ArhGAP15 is a master negative regulator of neutrophil functions. Blood 2011, 118, 1099–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, S.; Raza, S.H.A.; Zhang, K.; Mei, C.; Alamoudi, M.O.; Aloufi, B.H.; Alshammari, A.M.; Zan, L. Selection signatures of Qinchuan cattle based on whole-genome sequences. Anim. Biotechnol. 2023, 34, 1483–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Elati, K.; Tajeri, S.; Obara, I.; Mhadhbi, M.; Zweygarth, E.; Darghouth, M.A.; Nijhof, A.M. Dual RNA-seq to catalogue host and parasite gene expression changes associated with virulence of T. annulata-transformed bovine leukocytes: Towards identification of attenuation biomarkers. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Passaro, A.; Miselli, M.A.; Sanz, J.M.; Dalla Nora, E.; Morieri, M.L.; Colonna, R.; Pisot, R.; Zuliani, G. Gene expression regional differences in human subcutaneous adipose tissue. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, B.B.; Hou, L.M.; Zhou, W.D.; Liu, H.; Tao, W.; Wu, W.J.; Niu, P.P.; Zhang, Z.P.; Zhou, J.; Li, Q.; et al. Genome-wide association study reveals a quantitative trait locus and two candidate genes on Sus scrofa chromosome 5 affecting intramuscular fat content in Suhuai pigs. Animal 2021, 15, 100341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhou, P.; Yin, C.; Wang, Y.; Yin, Z.; Liu, Y. Genomic Association Analysis of Growth and Backfat Traits in Large White Pigs. Genes 2023, 14, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yuan, S.; Stratton, C.J.; Bao, J.; Zheng, H.; Bhetwal, B.P.; Yanagimachi, R.; Yan, W. Spata6 is required for normal assembly of the sperm connecting piece and tight head-tail conjunction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E430–E439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Li, X.; Yao, X.; Xie, H.; Deng, M.; Gao, X.; Deng, K.; Bao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, F. Effects of SPATA6 on proliferation, apoptosis and steroidogenesis of Hu sheep Leydig cells in vitro. Theriogenology 2021, 166, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, I.J.; Yang, C.P.; Lin, S.H.; Lai, C.M.; Wong, C.S. The Circadian Hormone Melatonin Inhibits Morphine-Induced Tolerance and Inflammation via the Activation of Antioxidative Enzymes. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Reiter, R.J.; Tan, D.X.; Korkmaz, A.; Rosales-Corral, S.A. Melatonin and stable circadian rhythms optimize maternal, placental and fetal physiology. Hum. Reprod. Update 2014, 20, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Buitenhuis, B.; Poulsen, N.A.; Gebreyesus, G.; Larsen, L.B. Estimation of genetic parameters and detection of chromosomal regions affecting the major milk proteins and their post translational modifications in Danish Holstein and Danish Jersey cattle. BMC Genet. 2016, 17, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mesbah-Uddin, M.; Guldbrandtsen, B.; Iso-Touru, T.; Vilkki, J.; De Koning, D.J.; Boichard, D.; Lund, M.S.; Sahana, G. Genome-wide mapping of large deletions and their population-genetic properties in dairy cattle. DNA Res. 2018, 25, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 14 02447 g001
Figure 1. Photographs of Zaobei cattle: (a) bull; (b) cow.
Figure 1. Photographs of Zaobei cattle: (a) bull; (b) cow.
Animals 14 02447 g001
Animals 14 02447 g002
Figure 2. Population structure analysis: (a) neighbor-joining tree of the relationships in these populations; (b) principal component analysis; (c) decay of r2 with pair-wise SNP marker distances in Zaobei (ZB) and Simmental cattle; (d) ancestry component analysis of these cattle breeds using ADMIXTURE v1.3.0 with K = 2 and K = 3.
Figure 2. Population structure analysis: (a) neighbor-joining tree of the relationships in these populations; (b) principal component analysis; (c) decay of r2 with pair-wise SNP marker distances in Zaobei (ZB) and Simmental cattle; (d) ancestry component analysis of these cattle breeds using ADMIXTURE v1.3.0 with K = 2 and K = 3.
Animals 14 02447 g002
Animals 14 02447 g003
Figure 3. Nucleotide diversity and differentiation in Zaobei (ZB) (red) and Simmental Cattle (blue): (a) genome-wide distribution of nucleotide diversity for each breed; (b) identification of putatively selected genomic regions in cattle populations using both fixation index (FST) and π ratio methods.
Figure 3. Nucleotide diversity and differentiation in Zaobei (ZB) (red) and Simmental Cattle (blue): (a) genome-wide distribution of nucleotide diversity for each breed; (b) identification of putatively selected genomic regions in cattle populations using both fixation index (FST) and π ratio methods.
Animals 14 02447 g003
Animals 14 02447 g004
Figure 4. Manhattan diagram of the selective characteristics of hard sweep signatures.
Figure 4. Manhattan diagram of the selective characteristics of hard sweep signatures.
Animals 14 02447 g004
Animals 14 02447 g005
Figure 5. Manhattan diagram of the selective characteristics of soft sweep signatures.
Figure 5. Manhattan diagram of the selective characteristics of soft sweep signatures.
Animals 14 02447 g005
Animals 14 02447 g006
Figure 6. Manhattan diagram of the selective characteristics of soft linkage signatures.
Figure 6. Manhattan diagram of the selective characteristics of soft linkage signatures.
Animals 14 02447 g006
Animals 14 02447 g007
Figure 7. Select sweep analysis: (a) significant loci from θπ; (b) significant loci from XPEHH.
Figure 7. Select sweep analysis: (a) significant loci from θπ; (b) significant loci from XPEHH.
Animals 14 02447 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, L.; Zhang, P.; Liu, Q.; Liu, C.; Cheng, L.; Yu, B.; Chen, H. Genome-Wide Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Selection Signatures in Zaobei Beef Cattle. Animals 2024, 14, 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162447

AMA Style

Shi L, Zhang P, Liu Q, Liu C, Cheng L, Yu B, Chen H. Genome-Wide Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Selection Signatures in Zaobei Beef Cattle. Animals. 2024; 14(16):2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Liangyu, Pu Zhang, Qing Liu, Chenhui Liu, Lei Cheng, Bo Yu, and Hongbo Chen. 2024. "Genome-Wide Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Selection Signatures in Zaobei Beef Cattle" Animals 14, no. 16: 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop