Next Article in Journal
Lesion Localization and Pathological Diagnosis of Ovine Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Based on MASK R-CNN
Previous Article in Journal
Performance, Carcass Traits, and Meat Fatty Acid Profile of Post-Weaning and Finishing Zebu Steers on Tropical Pasture with Three Low-Intake Supplementation Strategies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae) Infecting the Gills of Chanodichthys dabryi, Bleeker, 1871 (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in Hunan Province, China †

1
Hunan Engineering Research Center for Utilization of Characteristics of Aquatic Resources, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
2
School of Marine Science and Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Disease Control and Healthy Culture, Zhanjiang 524000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B6D1B6C-18CC-4DCE-AB53-4B7211D5C68B.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2024, 14(17), 2487; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172487
Submission received: 24 July 2024 / Revised: 11 August 2024 / Accepted: 20 August 2024 / Published: 27 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Aquatic Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Myxozoa is an important metazoan parasite, with approximately 2600 species reported around the world. However, their diversity is still largely underestimated, particularly for those of the Culters, where only 15 species have been previously reported in China. Thus, an investigation into the diversity of myxozoans in Culters was conducted, and a new species belonging to Myxobolus was found. Through comprehensive morphological comparisons and molecular analyses with closely related species, we designated it a new Myxobolus species and named it Myxobolus darbryi n. sp.

Abstract

Culters are a popular and economically important carnivorous freshwater fish, widely distributed in rivers, lakes, and reservoirs in China. An investigation of Myxozoa was conducted to enhance the understanding of Myxozoan diversity in Culters in China, as only 15 Myxosporean species have been previously reported in 6 Culters species. A new species with typical Myxobolus characteristics was discovered exclusively in the gills of Chanodichthys dabryi, Bleeker, 1871, and no other species were found in other Culters fish or organs. The new species elicited whitish plasmodia in the serosa layer of the gill arch, with no distinct inflammatory reaction observed. This species is morphologically different from all reported Myxobolus spp. from Culters, differing in plasmodium and spore size, as well as the coils of polar filaments. Molecular analysis further supports that it does not match any sequences available in GenBank. Therefore, we identified it as a new species and named it Myxobolus dabryi n. sp.

1. Introduction

Myxozoa are an important metazoan parasite in aquaculture, with approximately 2600 species reported from various organs or tissues of different hosts (mainly fish) [1,2,3]. Among them, more than 700 species have been described in China [4,5]. Most of them were asymptomatic and harmless to their host; however, a few species can cause serious myxosporidiosis, leading to significant economic losses. Notable examples include the pharyngeal myxosporidiosis caused by Myxobolus honghuensis Liu, Whipps, Gu, Zeng & Huang, 2012 from Carassius auratus gibelio Bloch, 1782, liver myxosporidiosis caused by Myxobolus wulii Lansberg & Lom, 1991 also from C. auratus gibelio, skin myxosporidiosis caused by Thelohanellus wuhanensis Xiao & Chen, 1993 again from C. auratus gibelio, and intestinal giant-cystic disease caused by Thelohanellus kitauei Egusa & Nakajima, 1981 from scattered mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) [4,6,7,8,9].
Chanodichthys dabryi Bleeker, 1871 (Cyprinidae: Xenocypridinae) is an important carnivorous fish [10]. They are renowned for their delicious meat, strong resistance to disease, and high economic value, and are widely distributed in rivers (such as the Yangtze River), lakes (such as the Lake Poyang), and reservoirs (such as Danjiangkou reservoir) in China [10]. Currently, only seven myxosporean species have been previously documented in C. dabryi. These include four celozoic species (gallbladder-infecting): Myxidium polymorphum Nie & Li, 1973, Chloromyxum sinensis Nie & Li, 1992, Chloromyxum ellipticum Li & Nie, 1973, and Chloromyxum hupehensis Li & Nie, 1973, as well as three histozoic species (gill-infecting): Myxobolus chengkiangensis Ma, 1998, Myxobolus erythroculteri Nie & Li, 1992, and Myxobolus chuhsienensis Chen & Ma, 1998. No species of Thelohanellus Kudo, 1933 or Henneguya Thélohan, 1892 have been previously documented in this host, although they are frequently found in freshwater fish in China [4]. Due to historical and technological limitations, these seven species were described based solely on morphological characteristics, which are not compatible with the current taxonomic methods for Myxozoa that integrate morphological, ecological (host specificity and tissue tropism), and molecular characteristics [1,4,11,12]. Thus, to elucidate the diversity of Myxozoa of C. dabryi in China, an investigation was conducted, resulting in the discovery and identification of a new species, Myxobolus dabryi n. sp., based on morphological, histopathological, and molecular characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Examination

Ten specimens of C. dabryi, ranging from 25.7 to 27.2 cm in body length, were randomly collected in March 2023 from Lake Datong, Hunan Province, China. The fish were placed alive in a 5 L simple tank and immediately transported to the laboratory. Initially, the fish were euthanized using an overdose of tricaine methane sulfonate (MS-222). A comprehensive inspection of various organs including the gills, skin, fins, liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen, and intestine, was conducted to identify suspected plasmodia (generally whitish cysts) visible to the naked eyes or a Motic SMZ161 dissecting microscope (Motic, Beijing, China). Once found, the plasmodia were used to prepare microscope slides for further examination under an Olympus BX53 microscope (Olympus, Nagano, Japan) at 400× magnification. These slides were also used to capture photos of fresh spores with the Olympus BX53 microscope, equipped with an MSX 11 digital camera (Mingmei, Guangzhou, China), at 400× magnification. The morphological features of the spores and plasmodia were obtained from the digital images according to the guidelines described by Lom and Arthur [13]. All measurements are recorded in μm as means ± standard error (range) (n = 50). Schematic drawings of spores were created using CorelDraw X6 software (Corel, Ottawa, ON, Canada) based on the photos taken above.

2.2. Histopathological Examination

After fixing in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h, the infected gills were dehydrated in a series of ethanol, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at 5–6 μm, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and finally observed and photographed under light microscopy.

2.3. Molecular Characterization

2.3.1. DNA Isolation and Sequencing

One sample of four isolated plasmodia preserved in 70% ethanol was randomly selected and subjected to DNA extraction using a Qiagen DNeasy Blood&Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described previously by Liu et al. [11]. The partial nuclear 18S rDNA gene sequences were amplified using the MyxospecF [14] and 18R [15] primer pair, with an expected length of approximately 1800 base pairs. PCR were performed in a 25 µL reaction mixture that contained 100 ng of extracted template DNA, 1 × PCR mixture (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China), and 10 pmol of each primer. The thermocycler parameters comprised an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 46 °C for 50 s, and 65 °C for 90 s; with a final extension at 65 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified using a DNA Gel Extraction kit (CWBiotech, Taizhou, China). The purified DNA template was cloned into the PMD–18T vector (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) according to the manufacture’s recommended instructions and transformed into Escherichia coli (E. coli) DH5α competent cell. Three positive recombinant clones were selected and subjected to sequence on both sides on an ABI PRISM 3100 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Beijing, China).

2.3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

The sequences were aligned in BioEdit [16] and ambiguous bases were clarified with the corresponding ABI chromatograms. The consensus sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number OP359407 and verified as myxozoan based on the BLAST search. To explore the phylogenetic relationships of the novel species with related myxobolids, 40 myxosporean sequences (Table 1), including those most similar based on the BLASTN result and others of interest, were retrieved from GenBank and aligned using the Clustal X 1.8 program with the default setting [17]. The alignment was corrected manually using the alignment editor within MEGA 11.0.13 software [18]. Phylogenetic analyses were inferred using Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML), which were carried out by PhyML 3.0 and Mr. Bayes, respectively [19,20]. The optimal evolutionary model for ML and BI was GTR + F + I + G4, as determined by jModelTest 3.0 using the Akaike information criteria (AIC) [21]. Nucleotide frequencies were estimated from the data (A = 0.267, C = 0.196, G = 0.282, T = 0.255); nucleotide substitution rates were calculated as AC = 0.9490, AG = 2.9064, AT = 1.2381, CG = 0.7829, CT = 4.5860, GT = 1.0000. The proportion of the invariable site was 0.268 and the alpha value of the gamma distribution parameter was 0.380. Myxidium finnmarchicum Mackenzie, Collins, Kalavati & Hemmingsen, 2010 (GQ890673) was used as the outgroup. A total of 2 independent runs with 4 chains were conducted for 5 million generations for BI, with a sample frequency of 100, discarding the first 25% of trees as burn-in. Bootstrap supports were calculated from 1000 repetitions for ML. The generated phylogenetic tree was visualized using FigTree v1.4.2 [22], edited and annotated with Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results

During sampling, 10 C. dabryi were dissected to investigate myxosporean infections, and plasmodia were exclusively found in the gill arch (Figure 1). The prevalence of M. dabryi n. sp. was 20% (2/10). The plasmodia (n = 10) were ellipsoidal and measured 0.63–0.68 mm long and 0.31–0.36 mm wide. No plasmodium or mature spores were found in other organs such as the intestine, kidney, spleen, skin, or liver.

Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5, Table 2)

Morphological description: Fresh spores (n = 50) were ellipsoidal in the frontal view and fusiform in the sutural view, measuring 9.2 ± 0.4 (8.3–9.9) μm long, 7.4 ± 0.3 (6.9–8.0) μm wide and 5.2 ± 0.2 (4.8–5.5) μm thick. The surface of the spore was smooth, and the valves of the spore were symmetric. Two equal polar capsules were pyriform, averaging 3.5 ± 0.1 (3.3–3.7) μm long and 2.1 ± 0.1 (2.0–2.4) μm wide. The polar filaments were coiled with four to five turns, occupying about half the length of the spore. The mucous envelope, iodinophilous vacuoles, intercapsular appendix, Henneguya-like spores, and posterior folds were not observed in the present study (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Histological analysis (n = 8) showed that the M. dabryi n. sp. plasmodia resided in the serosa layer of the gill arches (Figure 4). The plasmodium was surrounded by a layer of connective tissues, with mature spores accumulated in the periphery and immature spores located centrally (Figure 4). No distinct inflammatory reaction was observed in the infection focus.
Figure 2. Fresh spores of Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. infecting the gills of Chanodichthys dabryi. (a) Fresh spores, scale bar = 20 µm; (b) four fresh spores in the frontal view, scale bar = 10 µm; (c) fresh spores in the sutural view, scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 2. Fresh spores of Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. infecting the gills of Chanodichthys dabryi. (a) Fresh spores, scale bar = 20 µm; (b) four fresh spores in the frontal view, scale bar = 10 µm; (c) fresh spores in the sutural view, scale bar = 10 µm.
Animals 14 02487 g002
Figure 3. Schematic drawings of M. dabryi n. sp. from Chanodichthys dabryi, spore in the frontal view (a) and in the sutural view (b), scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 3. Schematic drawings of M. dabryi n. sp. from Chanodichthys dabryi, spore in the frontal view (a) and in the sutural view (b), scale bar = 10 µm.
Animals 14 02487 g003
Figure 4. Histopathological analysis of the gills of Chanodichthys dabryi infected with M. dabryi n. sp. (a) The plasmodium (P) located in the serosa layer of the gill arch (GR), scale bar = 200 µm; (b) the magnification of the plasmodium in (a), indicating the plasmodium surrounded by connective tissues (CN) with mature spores (MS) located centrally and immature spores (IMS) peripherally, scale bar = 50 µm; (c) the magnification of the periphery of the plasmodium in (b), showing the plasmodium compressed slightly to adjacent connective tissues (arrow), scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 4. Histopathological analysis of the gills of Chanodichthys dabryi infected with M. dabryi n. sp. (a) The plasmodium (P) located in the serosa layer of the gill arch (GR), scale bar = 200 µm; (b) the magnification of the plasmodium in (a), indicating the plasmodium surrounded by connective tissues (CN) with mature spores (MS) located centrally and immature spores (IMS) peripherally, scale bar = 50 µm; (c) the magnification of the periphery of the plasmodium in (b), showing the plasmodium compressed slightly to adjacent connective tissues (arrow), scale bar = 10 µm.
Animals 14 02487 g004
Molecular characterization: The SSU rDNA gene sequence of M. dabryi n. sp. was 1728 bp and contained 50.06% GC bases. BLASTn demonstrated that it did not match any sequences available in GenBank but was most closely related to Myxobolus abitus Li & Nie, 1973 (92.17% over 1736 bp, MG520367) infecting the gills of silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix Valenciennes, 1844. Other similar sequences included Myxobolus tauricus Miroshnichenko, 1979 (91% over 1424 bp, JQ388896) infecting the fins of the common barbel Barbus barbus Linnaeus, 1758, Myxobolus kiuchowensis Chen, 1998 (91.12% over 1734 bp, MG520366) from the intestine of bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis Richardson, 1845, Myxobolus pavlovskii Akhmerov, 1954 (90.98% over 1741 bp, MG520369) from the gills of H. molitrix and Myxobolus mucosus Liu, Voronin, Dudin & Zhang, 2015 (90.49% over 1746 bp, KP751908) from the gills of Rultilus rutilus Linnaeus, 1758 and Leuciscus leuciscus Linnaeus, 1758. The pairwise distances and similarities calculated using Kimura 2-parameter model among the present species and those with high sequence similarity ranged from 0.100/90.0% to 0.066/93.4% (Table 2). ML and BI analysis produced a similar topological tree, although with somewhat different support values at some evolutionary nodes. Therefore, only the Bayesian tree was presented here, along with the bootstrap values of ML analysis. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out based on a final edited alignment of 1109 characters, which indicated that the present species initially clustered with M. tauricus and then formed a sister group to the aforementioned species with high sequence similarity within the group of Xenocypridinae-infecting Myxobolus Bütschli, 1882 species with moderate supported values (Figure 5).
Table 2. Comparison of sequence similarities (above diagonal) and genetic distances (below diagonal) of Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. with other genetically related Myxobolus spp. based on the partial 18S rDNA.
Table 2. Comparison of sequence similarities (above diagonal) and genetic distances (below diagonal) of Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. with other genetically related Myxobolus spp. based on the partial 18S rDNA.
Species12345678910111213
1 M. dabryi n. sp. OP359407 93.493.392.191.491.391.391.291.191.190.990.990.0
2 M. tauricus JQ3888960.066 95.494.891.991.291.192.391.591.291.591.790.0
3 M. abitus MG5203670.0670.046 96.090.892.892.892.092.591.492.691.590.5
4 M. drjagini MW5774550.0790.0520.040 91.391.391.392.192.090.292.091.090.2
5 M. erythrophthalmi KF5157280.0860.0810.0920.087 92.592.695.793.790.593.692.491.5
6 M. scardinii KJ5623620.0870.0880.0720.0870.075 99.693.593.490.593.30.9190.914
7 M. bliccae HM1387700.0870.0890.0720.0870.0740.004 93.593.490.893.392.091.5
8 M. zaikae MT1411240.0880.0770.0800.0790.0430.0650.065 94.190.593.892.991.6
9 M. polati MH3923180.0890.0850.0750.0800.0630.0660.0660.059 91.699.595.694.5
10 M. chakravartyi MZ2303770.0890.0880.0860.0980.0950.0950.0920.0950.084 91.390.389.5
11 M. diversicapsularis GU9681990.0910.0850.0740.0800.0640.0670.0670.0620.0050.087 95.894.9
12 M. impressus AF5079700.0910.0830.0850.0900.0760.0810.0800.0710.0440.0970.042 96.1
13 M. lamellobasis KF3148240.1000.1000.0950.0980.0850.0860.0850.0840.0550.1050.0510.039
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of M. dabryi n. sp. and its relatives based on the SSU rDNA sequences, rooted at M. finnmarchicum. Support values on the branch nodes are indicated as BI posterior probabilities/ML support values; asterisks represent support values > 0.95 or 95% and dashes demonstrate support values < 0.50 or 50%; abbreviations: B: brain; F: fins; G: gills; I: intestine; K: kidney; P: pin bones; S: scales; SB: swim bladder; T: throat; --: unknown.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of M. dabryi n. sp. and its relatives based on the SSU rDNA sequences, rooted at M. finnmarchicum. Support values on the branch nodes are indicated as BI posterior probabilities/ML support values; asterisks represent support values > 0.95 or 95% and dashes demonstrate support values < 0.50 or 50%; abbreviations: B: brain; F: fins; G: gills; I: intestine; K: kidney; P: pin bones; S: scales; SB: swim bladder; T: throat; --: unknown.
Animals 14 02487 g005
Taxonomic Summary
Species: Myxobolus dabryi n. sp.
Type host: Chanodichthys dabryi (Bleeker, 1871) (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae).
Type locality: Lake Datong, Hunan province, China (29°20′37″ N, 112°50′77″ E).
Site of infection: Gills.
Prevalence: 20% (2/10).
Type material: Syntype specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and 95% ethanol, H & E-stained tissue section, and their digitized photos were deposited in the Fishes Diseases Laboratory, College of Fisheries, Hunan Agricultural University (accession number MTR2023031901-MTR2023031906).
Etymology: The species is named after the species name of the host.
ZoonBank number: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B6D1B6C-18CC-4DCE-AB53-4B7211D5C68B.

4. Discussion

In China, six Culters species have previously been found in different rivers or lakes, including Culter alburnus Basilewsky, 1855, Chanodichthys dabryi Bleeker, 1871, Chanodichthys erythropterus Basilewsky, 1855, Chanodichthys mongolicus Basilewsky, 1855, Chanodichthys oxycephalus Bleeker, 1871, and Culter oxycephaloides Kreyenberg & Pappenheim, 1908 [10]. Additionally, only 15 myxosporean species have been reported, including 7 Myxobolus spp., 4 Chloromyxum spp., 1 Myxidium sp., 1 Henneguya sp., 1 Sphaerospora sp., and 1 Podospora sp. [4]. Among them, five Myxobolus species were most morphologically similar to M. dabryi n. sp., which included three C. dabryi gill-infecting Myxobolus spp. (M. chuhsienensis, Myxobolus erthroculteri Nie & Li, 1992, and Myxobolus changjiangensis Ma, 1993),along with Myxobolus lussi Akhmerov, 1960 from the gills of C. mongolicus, and Myxobolus dermatobia Ishii, 1915 infecting the kidney of C. alburnus [4]. M. dabryi n. sp. could be easily differentiated from all of them by difference in spore shapes, infection sites, spore sizes, etc. M. chuhsienensis is distinguished from the present species by its smaller cysts (0.21–0.25 mm × 0.12–0.17 mm vs. 0.63–0.68 mm × 0.31–0.36 mm), as well as shorter spore length (7.2–8.7 μm vs. 8.3–9.9 μm) and width (6.7–7.0 μm vs. 6.9–8.0 μm). Furthermore, three to four folds could be observed in the posterior of M. chuhsienensis, which are absent in the present species. The spores of M. erthroculteri and M. changjiangensis are pyriform, differing from the ellipsoidal spores of M. dabryi n. sp. Additionally, M. erthroculteri has a larger spore length (12.5–14.0 μm vs. 8.3–9.9 μm), thicker spore thickness (6.0–7.5 μm vs. 4.8–5.5 μm), and two larger polar capsules. M. changjiangensis is differentiated from M. dabyri n. sp. by its larger spores (26.5–28.0 × 21.0–22.0 × 15.0 μm vs. 8.3–9.9 × 6.9–8.0 × 4.8–5.5 μm) and polar capsules (12.0–14.0 × 6.0–7.0 μm vs. 3.3–3.7 × 2.0–2.4 μm). M. lussi and M. dermatobia resemble M. dabryi n. sp. in having an ellipsoidal spore shape. However, M. lussi can be differentiated from M. dabryi n. sp. by its larger whitish cysts (1.5–2 mm vs. 0.63–0.68 × 0.31–0.36 mm), apparent intercapsule appendix, longer spore length (10.6–12.0 μm vs. 8.3–9.9 μm), and more turns of polar filaments (6–7 vs. 4–5). M. dermatobia is distinguished from M. dabryi n. sp. by differing sites of infection (kidney vs. gills), slightly shorter spore length (7.4–8.4 μm vs. 8.3–9.9 μm), and narrower spore width (6.0–7.2 μm vs. 6.9–8.0 μm) (Table 3).
The gills located on both sides of the fish head are vital to fish due to their various physiological functions, including respiration (the major function), ammonia nitrogen excretion, filter feeding, etc. [23]. Myxobolus Bütschli, 1882 is the speciose genus within Myxozoa, with more than 1000 species reported worldwide. Almost half of them inhabit different portions of the gills, including the gill filaments, gill lamellae, gill arch, and gill rakers [5,13,24,25,26]. Gill myxosporidiosis mainly occurs in species dwelling in the gill filaments or gill lamellae (such as Myxobolus koi Kudo, 1920 from C. carpio and Myxobolus ampullicapsulatus Zhao, Sun, Kent, Deng & Whipps, 2008 from C. auratus gibelio) [27,28]. No distinct damage has been found in Myxobolus spp. infecting the gill arch. Currently, the Myxobolus species described in the gill arch can be divided into three categories: those dwelling in the epithelial tissues or connective tissues (most of them), those in the cartilaginous substances, and those in blood vessels [26,29,30]. The plasmodium of M. dabryi n. sp. is similar to Myxobolus niger Mathews, Maiab & Adriano, 2016, which is located in the serosa layer of the gill arch and is surrounded by a layer of connective tissues. This plasmodium causes slight compression to the adjacent tissues, but no distinct inflammatory reaction has been observed.
Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the selected species were clustered together mainly according to geographical distribution (Asia group and Europe group) and host subfamily (Xenocypridinae group, Labeoninae group, and Leuciscinae group) with few exceptions. Currently, numerous studies have been conducted to assess the impact of host affinity, tissue tropism, and spore shapes on the evolutionary routes of Myxozoa, but little attention has been paid to the role of geographic distribution [31]. This may be due to the difficulties in evaluating its influence, especially concerning species of invasive fish. For example, M. pavlovskii infecting the gills of silver carp H. molitrix and bighead carp H. nobilis and Thelohanellus nikolskii Achmerov, 1955 infecting the fins of common carp C. carpio L., have been reported in both China (Asia) and Hungary (Europe) [31,32,33,34,35]. Several myxosporean species have also been discovered in invasive fish in China, such as Cirrhinus mrigala Hamilton, 1822, Labeo rohita Hamilton, 1822, and Luciobarbus brachycephalus Kessler, 1872 [36,37]. It is difficult to determine whether these species are endemic to the importing country or whether they were introduced alongside other fish. Furthermore, some natural water bodies, such as the Amur River, are distributed across three countries, China (Asia), Mongolia (Asia) and Russia (Europe), leading to the presence of many species found in both Asia (China and Mongolia) and Europe (Russia) [4]. This complicates the evaluation of the role of geographic distribution in the evolution of myxozoa.
The infection site is an important taxonomic feature of Myxozoa; different species infect specific sites or several different sites [25]. The present species did not cluster with gill-infecting Myxobolus species, but clustered with M. tauricus infecting the fin and pin bones of Barbus barbus within the Xenocypridinae group. This group included species that infect various organs, including the gills, brain, intestine, and throat. This finding does not agree with previous research indicating that Myxobolus species primarily group with each other based on infection site tropism [31,38]. Shin et al. [31] demonstrated that the infection site tropism could be divided into specific infection-site tropism (infecting the gills or muscles) and non-specific infection-site tropism (affecting almost all organs). The case of M. dabryi n. sp. resembles those species with non-specific infection site tropism, while the species in the Europe group species exhibit specific infection-site tropism. Host specificity, site tropism, and spore shapes are important features for the taxonomy of Myxozoa and are correlated with the phylogeny of the group. Zhang et al. [12] indicated that host species possess a stronger evolutionary signal than spore morphology and site tropism, which aligns with the findings herein and other previously reported studies [36,38]. Therefore, we speculate that the host may be the primary selective pressure, followed by site infections and spore morphology. The diversity of spore morphology in Myxozoa may result from the long-term co-evolution of interactions between hosts (including different host and different site infections) and parasites. However, further research is needed to verify this hypothesis.

5. Conclusions

In summary, a new species, M. dabryi n. sp. infecting the gill arch of C. dabryi, has been comprehensively described using morphological, ecological, and molecular data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L. and J.Z.; methodology, X.Z. and Q.Y.; validation, D.L. and J.X.; formal analysis, J.Y., Q.W. and Q.Y.; investigation, Q.Y. and Q.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z. and Q.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.C. and X.L.; funding acquisition, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences Foundation of China (32100364), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Disease Control and Healthy Culture (PBEA2022ZD05), the earmarked fund for HARS-Aquaculture (HARS-06), Natural Sciences Foundation of Hunan (2024JJ6241), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFD2400900), the Startup Foundation for Advanced Scholars award to Xinhua Liu, Hunan Agricultural University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lisnerová, M.; Martinek, I.N.; Alama-Bermejo, G.; Bouberlová, K.; Schaeffner, B.C.; Nkabi, N.; Holzer, A.S.; Bartošová-Sojková, P. An ancient alliance: Matching evolutionary patterns of cartilaginous fishes (Elasmobranchii) and chloromyxid parasites (Myxozoa). Infect. Genet. Evol. 2022, 103, 105346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lom, J.; Dyková, I. Myxozoan genera: Definition and notes on taxonomy, life-cycle terminology and pathogenic species. Folia. Parasitol. 2006, 53, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fiala, I.; Bartošová-Sojková, P.; Whipps, C.M. Classification and phylogenetics of Myxozoa. In Myxozoan Evolution, Ecology and Development; Okumura, B., Gruhl, A., Bartholomew, J.L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2015; pp. 85–105. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Q.L.; Ma, C.L. Fauna Sinica, Myxozoa: Myxosporea, 1st ed.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  5. Eiras, J.C.; Cruz, C.F.; Saraiva, A.; Adriano, E.A. Synopsis of the species of Myxobolus (Cnidaria, Myxozoa, Myxosporea) described between 2014 and 2020. Folia. Parasitol. 2021, 68, 012–030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, Y.J.; Li, N.N.; Tang, F.H.; Dong, J. Remarks on the validity of Myxobolus ampullicapsulatus and Myxobolus honghuensis (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) based on SSU rDNA sequences. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 3817–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.Y.; Yokoyama, H.; Wang, J.G.; Li, A.H.; Gong, X.N.; Ryu-Hasegawa, A.; Iwashita, M.; Ogawa, K. Utilization of tissue habitats by Myxobolus wulii Landsberg & Lom, 1991 in different carp hosts and disease resistance in allogynogenetic gibel carp: Redescription of M. wulii from China and Japan. J. Fish. Dis. 2010, 33, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Yuan, J.; Jia, L.; Huang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Gu, Z. Supplemental description of Thelohanellus wuhanensis Xiao & Chen, 1993 (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) infecting the skin of Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch): Ultrastructural and histological data. Parasitol. Int. 2014, 63, 489–491. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, T.; Wei, W.Y.; Wang, K.Y.; Yang, Q.; Wang, E.L. Pathological and immunological analyses of Thelohanellus kitauei (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) infection in the scattered mirror carp, Cyprinus carpio. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, X.G. Comparative Studies on Morphology and Growth of Four Culters in Lake Poyang. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, X.H.; Weng, M.Q.; Song, R.; Zhao, Y.L.; Li, A.L.; Zhang, J.Y. Redescription and phylogenetic analysis of Myxobolus tricostatus (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae). J. Fish. China 2021, 45, 1340–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, J.Y.; Wang, M.M.; Tan, L.Q.; Zhao, Y.J. Myxobolus xiushanensis n. sp. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae) infecting the gill arches of Yellowhead Catfish Tachysurus fulvidraco from China. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2023, 35, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lom, J.; Arthur, J.R. 1989: A guideline for the preparation of species descriptions in Myxosporea. J. Fish. Dis. 1989, 12, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fiala, I. The phylogeny of Myxosporea (Myxozoa) based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene analysis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2006, 36, 1521–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Whipps, C.M.; Adlard, R.D.; Bryant, M.S.; Lester, R.J.; Findlay, V.; Kent, M.L. First report of three Kudoa species from eastern Australia: Kudoa thyrsites from mahi mahi (Coryphaena hippurus), Kudoa amamiensis and Kudoa minithyrsites n. sp. from sweeper (Pempheris ypsilychnus). J. Eukaryot Microbiol 2003, 50, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic. Acids. Sym. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  17. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Jeanmougin, F.; Higgins, D.G. The CLUSTAL_X Windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by Quality Analysis Tools. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and high-performance computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. FigTree v1.4.3. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 16 May 2024).
  23. Chen, X.Y.; Liu, S.B.; Ding, Q.W.; Teame, T.; Yang, Y.L.; Ran, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Z.G. Research advances in the structure, function, and regulation of the gill barrier in teleost fish. Water Biol. Secur. 2023, 2, 100139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eiras, J.C.; Molnár, K.; Lu, Y.S. Synopsis of the species of Myxobolus bütschli, 1882 (Myxozoa: Myxosporea: Myxobolidae). Syst. Parasitol. 2005, 61, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vieira, D.H.M.D.; Agostinho, B.N.; Negrelli, D.C.; Silva, R.J.; Azevedo, R.K.; Abdallah, V.D. Taxonomy and Systematics of Two New Species of Myxobolus (Cnidaria: Myxobolidae) Parasitizing the Gills of Mugil curema (Mugilidae) from the Brazilian Coast. Acta Parasitol 2022, 67, 1206–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Molnár, K. Site preference of fish myxosporeans in the gill. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2002, 48, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yokoyama, H.; Inoue, D.; Kumamaru, A.; Wakabayashi, H. Myxobolus koi (Myxozoa: Myxosporea) forms large-and small-type ‘cysts’ in the gills of common carp. Fish. Pathol. 1997, 32, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, X.Y.; Yao, X.; Zhou, F.; Yang, C.Z.; Liu, Y. Identification of Thelohanellus pseudonikolskii n. sp. and Myxobolus koi Kudo, 1920 from goldfish Carassius auratus. Aqua. Rep. 2022, 24, 101167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Molnár, K. Myxobolus intrachondrealis sp. n. (Myxosporea: Myxobolidae), a parasite of the gill cartilage of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Folia. Parasitol. 2000, 47, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mathews, P.D.; Maia, A.A.M.; Adriano, E.A. Morphological and ultrastructural aspects of Myxobolus niger n. sp. (Myxozoa) gill parasite of Corydoras melini (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae) from Brazilian Amazon. Acta. Trop. 2016, 158, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shin, S.P.; Nguyen, V.G.; Jeong, J.M.; Jun, J.W.; Kim, J.H.; Han, J.E.; Baeck, G.W.; Park, S.C. The phylogenetic study on Thelohanellus species (Myxosporea) in relation to host specificity and infection site tropism. Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 2014, 72, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Molnár, K. Myxobolus pavlovskii (Achmerov, 1954) (Myxosporidia) infection in the silver carp and bighead. Acta Vet. Acad. Sci. Hung 1979, 27, 207–216. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, B.; Gu, Z.M.; Liu, Y. Morphological, histological and molecular characterization of three Myxobolus species (Cnidaria: Myxosporea) from silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix Valenciennes and bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis Richardson in China. Parasitol. Int. 2018, 67, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Borzák, R.; Borkhanuddin, M.H.; Cech, G.; Molnár, K.; Hallett, S.L.; Székely, C. New data on Thelohanellus nikolskii Achmerov, 1955 (Myxosporea, Myxobolidae) a parasite of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio, L.): The actinospore stage, intrapiscine tissue preference and molecular sequence. Int. J. Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2021, 15, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Suo, D.; Zhao, Y.J. Morphological redescription of Thelohanellus nikolskii Achmerov, 1955 (Myxozoa, Bivalvulida) and phylogenetic analysis of Thelohanellus nikolskii inferred from 18S rDNA. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin. 2010, 35, 90–95. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, B.; Tu, X.; Gu, Z.M. Myxobolus shuifuensis sp. n. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae) infecting the exotic mrigal Cirrhinus mrigala feral in China. Parasitol. Int. 2023, 94, 102732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, X.H.; Wei, Q.; Zhao, X.J. The preliminary investigation of myxosporean diversity of invasive fish in China. 2024; manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
  38. Batueva, M.D.; Vlasenko, P.; Solovyev, M.M.; Abasheev, R.Y. Myxobolus nekrasovae n. sp. (Cnidaria, Myxozoa) is a new species parasitizing the gills of the gibel carp, Carassius auratus gibelio. Microb. Pathog. 2023, 185, 106454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Light microscopic observation of M. dabryi n. sp. of Chanodichthys dabryi. (a) A plasmodium dwelled (arrow) in the gill arches, scale bar = 500 µm; (b) two macroscopically visible whitish plasmodia (arrow) in the gill arches, scale bar = 500 µm.
Figure 1. Light microscopic observation of M. dabryi n. sp. of Chanodichthys dabryi. (a) A plasmodium dwelled (arrow) in the gill arches, scale bar = 500 µm; (b) two macroscopically visible whitish plasmodia (arrow) in the gill arches, scale bar = 500 µm.
Animals 14 02487 g001
Table 1. The details of the selected sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis.
Table 1. The details of the selected sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis.
Species NameAccession NumberHostInfected TissueSource
Myxobolus dabryi n. sp.OP359407Chanodichthys dabryiGillsPresent study
Myxobolus abitusMG520367Hypophthalmichthys molitrixGillsGenBank
Myxobolus allotypicaKJ725075Hypophthalmichthys molitrixGillsGenBank
Myxobolus arcasiiMK053784Achondrostoma arcasiiKidneyGenBank
Myxobolus arrabonensisMH375073Chondrostoma angorenseGillsGenBank
Myxobolus auratusKX399851Carassius auratus auratusUnknownGenBank
Myxobolus bjoerknaeKF314823Blicca bjoerknaGillsGenBank
Myxobolus bliccaeHM138770Blicca bjoerknaGillsGenBank
Myxobolus carnaticusKF796620Cirrhinus mrigalaGillsGenBank
Myxobolus caudatusJQ388889Barbus barbusFinsGenBank
Myxobolus chakravartyiMZ230377Labeo catlaFinsGenBank
Myxobolus cuttackiKF465682Labeo bataGillsGenBank
Myxobolus cycloidesDQ439810Squalius cephalusSwim bladderGenBank
Myxobolus dermiscalisMZ230378Labeo rohitaScalesGenBank
Myxobolus diversicapsularisMK100345Rutilus rutilusGillsGenBank
Myxobolus drjaginiMH119078Hypophthalmichys molitrixBrainGenBank
Myxobolus ellipsoidesDQ439813Squalius cephalusFinsGenBank
Myxobolus erythrophthalmiKF515727Scardinius erythrophthalmusUnknownGenBank
Myxobolus feistiJN252487Rutilus rutilusGillsGenBank
Myxobolus fundamentalisKF515725Rutilus rutilusGillsGenBank
Myxobolus gutturocolaMF543859Hypophthalmichthys molitrixThroatGenBank
Myxobolus impressusAF507970Abramis bramaGillsGenBank
Myxobolus kiuchowensisMG520366Hypophthalmichthys nobilisIntestineGenBank
Myxobolus macrocapsularisAF507969Abramis bramaGillsGenBank
Myxobolus mucosusKP751908Leuciscus leuciscusGillsGenBank
Myxobolus muelleriAY325284Squalius cephalusGillsGenBank
Myxobolus muellericusDQ439807Squalius cephalusGillsGenBank
Myxobolus paksensisKP025687Chondrostoma nasusSwim bladderGenBank
Myxobolus paratypicusMH119080Hypophthalmichys molitrixGillsGenBank
Myxobolus pavlovskiiMG520369Hypophthalmichthys nobilisGillsGenBank
Myxobolus polatiMH392318Chondrostoma angorenseGillsGenBank
Myxobolus rewensisMZ230381Cirrhinus mrigalaFinsGenBank
Myxobolus scardiniiKJ562362Scardinius erythrophthalmusGillsGenBank
Myxobolus sp.ON310964UnknownUnknownGenBank
Myxobolus tauricusJQ388896Barbus barbusFinsGenBank
Thelohanellus caudatusKM252684Labeo rohitaFinsGenBank
Thelohanellus habibpuriKM252683Labeo rohitaFinsGenBank
Thelohanellus sp.KR819273Labeo catlaGillsGenBank
Thelohanellus sp.KX881785UnknownUnknownGenBank
Thelohanellus sp.KY131789UnknownUnknownGenBank
Myxidium finnmarchicumGQ890673Gadus morhuagall bladderGenBank
Table 3. Morphological comparisons of Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. with its similar species from Culters (all measurements present in micrometer).
Table 3. Morphological comparisons of Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. with its similar species from Culters (all measurements present in micrometer).
SpeciesIS HSLSWSTSLPCWPCCPFRef
M. dabryi n. sp.GillsC. dabryiEllipsoide 9.2 ± 0.4 a7.4 ± 0.35.2 ± 0.23.5 ± 0.12.1 ± 0.14–5Present study
(8.3–9.9) b(6.9–8.0)(4.8–5.5)(3.3–3.7)(2.0–2.4)
M. chuhsienensisGillsC. dabryiEllipsoide8.2 c7.05.33.52.3?[4]
(7.2–8.7)(6.7–7.0)(5.0–5.6)(3.5–3.7)(2.1–2.5)
M. erythroculteriGillsC. dabryiPyriform12.5–14.0 7.4–9.06.0–7.56.0–7.52.4–3.0?[4]
M. changjiangensisGills C. dabryiPyriform26.5–28.021.0–22.015.012.0–14.06.0–7.04–5[4]
M. lussiGillsC. mongolicusRound11.48.15.84.93.16–7[4]
(10.6–12.0)(7.4–8.4)(4.8–6.2)(4.6–5.2)(2.8–3.6)
M. dermatobiaKidneyC. erythropeterusEllipsoide8.16.84.93.62.3?[4]
(7.4–8.4)(6.0–7.2)(4.8–5.0)(3.5–3.8)(2.0–2.4)
IS: site of infection, H: host, S: shape, LS: length of the spore, WS: width of the spore, TS: thickness of the spore, LPC: length of the polar capsule, WPC: width of the polar capsule, CPF: coils of the polar filaments, Ref: Reference. a Mean ± SD; b Minimum–maximum; c Mean; ? Data not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Yin, Q.; Cai, J.; Wei, Q.; Li, D.; Yu, J.; Xiang, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X. Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae) Infecting the Gills of Chanodichthys dabryi, Bleeker, 1871 (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in Hunan Province, China. Animals 2024, 14, 2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172487

AMA Style

Zhao X, Yin Q, Cai J, Wei Q, Li D, Yu J, Xiang J, Zhang J, Liu X. Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae) Infecting the Gills of Chanodichthys dabryi, Bleeker, 1871 (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in Hunan Province, China. Animals. 2024; 14(17):2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xiaojing, Qi Yin, Jia Cai, Qiang Wei, Deliang Li, Jianbo Yu, Jianguo Xiang, Jinyong Zhang, and Xinhua Liu. 2024. "Myxobolus dabryi n. sp. (Myxozoa: Myxobolidae) Infecting the Gills of Chanodichthys dabryi, Bleeker, 1871 (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in Hunan Province, China" Animals 14, no. 17: 2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop