Next Article in Journal
Comparative Morphology of Skeletal Development in Homo sapiens and Raja asterias: Divergent Stiffening Patterns Due to Different Matrix Calcification Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Strategies to Alleviate Stress and Improve Welfare in Dairy Ruminants
Previous Article in Special Issue
RNA-Seq Analysis of Glycolysis Regulation of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Replication
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Co-Infection of Chickens with Staphylococcus lentus and Staphylococcus aureus from an Outbreak of Arthritis, Synovitis, and Osteomyelitis Argues for Detailed Characterisation of Isolates

1
Clinic Unit for Poultry Medicine, Clinical Center for Population Medicine in Fish, Pigs, and Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
2
Tierarzt GmbH Dr. Mitsch, Hauffgasse 24, 1110 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(17), 2574; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172574
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 30 August 2024 / Accepted: 3 September 2024 / Published: 4 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Common Infectious Diseases in Poultry)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This manuscript reports on an outbreak of joint infections in an organic broiler breeder flock in Austria, associated with two types of bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus lentus. The clinical picture of the affected chickens included weakness, lethargy, and difficulty walking, with some birds succumbing to the infection. Detailed examinations revealed severe joint inflammation and damage. Laboratory analyses confirmed the presence of both bacteria, with tests showing resistance to many antibiotics. This study underscores the importance of recognising and understanding less common bacteria like S. lentus, which are not frequently reported but can seriously impact poultry health. The findings highlight the need for thorough bacterial identification in outbreaks to improve disease management and prevention strategies.

Abstract

Staphylococcus species are widespread in poultry environments and can cause various infections, often when the host’s defences are compromised. This manuscript reports on a co-infection of chickens with Staphylococcus lentus and Staphylococcus aureus associated with an outbreak of arthritis, synovitis, and osteomyelitis in an organic broiler breeder flock in Austria. Clinically, the affected flock showed weakness, lethargy, lameness, and increased mortality. Post-mortem examinations identified purulent arthritis and femoral head necrosis. Bacteriological analysis using MALDI-TOF MS identified both S. aureus and S. lentus in the affected joints. Antibiotic resistance testing revealed significant resistance, particularly in S. lentus. Histological analysis showed severe inflammation and bacterial colonies in the joints. While S. aureus is a common pathogen in poultry, S. lentus is less frequently reported. This study emphasises the need for detailed bacterial characterisation in outbreaks to better understand the role of less common pathogens like S. lentus. Further research is necessary to elucidate the impact of S. lentus on poultry health and its role in causing arthritis and synovitis, highlighting the importance of comprehensive investigation in such outbreaks.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus encompasses several species and subspecies, making it the most prominent genus in the Staphylococcaceae family [1]. These bacteria are Gram-positive, coccoid, and typically cluster together when grown on solid media. Under aerobic conditions, S. aureus forms circular, smooth, β-haemolytic colonies, measuring 1–3 mm in diameter, with pigmentation that often ranges from white to orange.
Staphylococcus species are widespread, commonly inhabiting the skin and mucous membranes, and are prevalent in environments where poultry are bred, raised, or processed. Various Staphylococcus species, including S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. xylosus, S. cohnii, S. lentus, S. saprophyticus, S. sciuri, and S. gallinarum, have been isolated from the skin and nasal passages of healthy poultry [2]. Infections often occur when the host’s natural defences are compromised, such as through skin injuries, mucous membrane inflammation, parasitic infections, immunosuppressive conditions, or unhealed navel infections in newly hatched chicks [2,3]. Clinically, these infections can result in yolk sac infections during the first week of life and osteomyelitis lesions in the bones of older birds. Osteomyelitis lesions consist of focal yellow areas of caseous exudate or lytic areas, making affected bones fragile. The proximal tibiotarsus and proximal femur are most frequently involved, with affected birds often experiencing disarticulation and/or fracture of the coxofemoral joint and femoral head necrosis. Arthritis, periarthritis, and synovitis are also common, with affected joints becoming swollen and filled with inflammatory exudate as osteomyelitis extends from nearby metaphyseal areas [4]. This report describes an outbreak of arthritis with synovitis and osteomyelitis in an organic broiler breeder flock in Austria associated with S. aureus and S. lentus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Description

In the federal state of Upper Austria, Austria, a 35-week-old organic broiler breeder flock of 5450 Hubbard hens and 550 cockerels, was housed in a barn system with deep litter bedding and adhered to a standardised vaccination regimen. The flock had a history of a colibacillosis outbreak at 26 weeks old, resulting in a mortality rate of 1.7%, which was initially stabilised with enrofloxacin treatment. However, in the subsequent weeks, the whole flock was affected, with enrofloxacin failing to yield therapeutic effects. The clinical presentation included weakness, lethargy, lameness, and occasionally cannibalism, culminating in heightened mortality rates. Over time, the clinical condition transitioned into a chronic state, marked by the daily loss of 1–2 birds and a lack of uniformity within the flock. Morbidity was estimated at approximately 5%. Despite these challenges, production data indicated an 85% laying rate, with 80% of eggs being fertilised and maintaining good egg quality.

2.2. Post-Mortem Investigation, Bacterial Isolation, and Identification

Three chickens were referred to the Clinic for Poultry Medicine at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria, for further examination. Necropsies were conducted according to standard procedures, and bacteriological investigation smears were obtained from the heart, liver, intestine, and hock joints. Specimens were directly plated onto Columbia agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood (COS; bioMerieux, Vienna, Austria), MacConkey agar (Scharlau, Vienna, Austria), and Schaedler agar containing 5% sheep blood (SCS; bioMerieux). COS and MacConkey agar plates were aerobically incubated at 37 °C, while SCS plates were anaerobically incubated (Genbox anaer; bioMerieux) at 37 °C for 24 h.
Identification of bacterial isolates was performed using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionisation–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Microflex LT instrument, Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) using the Bruker Daltonic reference library version 4.1.80, following the manufacturer’s guidelines. Sample preparation was conducted according to the manufacturer’s guidelines for the extraction method using formic acid and acetonitrile.

2.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

An antibiogram was generated using an agar diffusion test, following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines as outlined in the 5th edition of the Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals [5]. The evaluation of the agar diffusion test involved measuring the inhibition zone diameters in millimetres using a ruler. These measurements were then compared to the appropriate critical diameter table. The categorisation of the bacterial response to the antibiotics as “sensitive”, “intermediate”, or “resistant” was determined following the CLSI standards.

2.4. Histology

During necropsy, samples from the hock joints were taken, fixed in Formical-4™ Decalcifier (StatLab Medical Products, McKinney, TX, USA), and subsequently embedded in paraffin blocks. Tissue sections, measuring 4 µm in thickness, were cut using a microtome (Microm HM 360; Microm Laborgerate GmbH, Walldorf, Germany), affixed to glass slides, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).

3. Results

3.1. Necropsy, Bacterial Isolation, and Identification

The chickens subjected to post-mortem examination were exclusively female birds, with body weights of 1.1 kg, 1.2 kg, and 1.8 kg, respectively. Feathering around the pericloacal region was soiled with faecal matter, and two of the birds exhibited shortened tibiotarsi. Additionally, these individuals displayed purulent arthritis in the hock joints and necrosis of the femoral heads (Figure 1).
A substantial number of Staphylococcus spp. colonies were isolated from the hock joints in COS agar, with lower counts detected in samples from the heart and liver. Further characterisation through MALDI-TOF MS analysis revealed Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus lentus in the hock joints (Table 1). Detailed findings from the antimicrobial resistance testing are outlined in Table 2.

3.2. Histology

Joints showed massive accumulations of heterophilic granulocytes and necrotic material in the joint space. In addition, numerous colonies of coccoid bacteria could be seen in the lesions and the surrounding tendons (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Although various Staphylococcus spp. can be implicated in different pathological conditions in poultry, some are more frequently associated with specific infections. For instance, S. aureus is commonly linked to bumblefoot and gangrenous dermatitis, while S. hyicus is often found in cases of turkey stifle joint osteomyelitis, eye infections (such as blepharitis and conjunctivitis), and acantholytic dermatitis, and S. simulans and S. agnetis are typically associated with endocarditis [4]. Even though a wide range of Staphylococcus spp. have been isolated from cases of arthritis, S. aureus has been the most commonly identified and is thus considered to be the Staphylococcus of biggest health concern in poultry [4]. Nonetheless, when conducting differential diagnosis investigations for arthritis and synovitis in chickens, it is essential to consider other conditions that mimic staphylococcosis, such as infections caused by Escherichia coli, Pasteurella multocida, Salmonella gallinarum, Mycoplasma synoviae, reoviruses, and bone disorders resulting from mechanical trauma. In this report, both gross and histopathological examinations confirmed a bacterial nature of the outbreak. Further bacteriological analyses, including MALDI-TOF, identified two staphylococcal species associated with the condition: S. aureus and S. lentus. While S. aureus is coagulase-positive, most other staphylococci found in poultry, including S. lentus, are coagulase-negative [2]. Although biochemical panel tests can distinguish these bacteria, protein fingerprinting using MALDI-TOF is a powerful method for identifying and differentiating Staphylococcus species [6,7], including coagulase-negative staphylococci [8]. While coagulase-positive staphylococci, like S. aureus, are primary health concerns in poultry, infections by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), such as S. lentus, are also documented in cases of arthritis and synovitis, though less frequently [4,9]. S. lentus was the most prevalent CNS species in Belgian poultry farms in the 1970s [10] and recently ranked as the third most common Staphylococcus species in Western Poland’s poultry farms (13.9%), being the most prevalent in breeding hens (31.1%) [11]. Over 80% of isolated Staphylococci in the latter study were CNS. Comprehensive investigations indicate that CNS can cause persistent infections and produce various virulence factors, though the specific role of these factors in pathogenicity remains unclear [12,13]. It is crucial to conduct additional research to clarify the role of S. lentus in such outbreaks, investigating in which way, and if at all, it is a contributing cause of arthritis and synovitis in chickens.
Outbreaks of severe arthritis and synovitis in chickens caused by Staphylococcus infections can arise suddenly and pose significant health problems. These infections typically occur when the host’s natural defences are breached, often through skin wounds or inflamed mucous membranes, leading to osteomyelitis in the metaphyseal joints [2]. Joint and tendon sheath lesions are often linked to concurrent bone changes [14,15]. Thus, the affected flock’s prior colibacillosis infection weakened its immunity and increased its susceptibility to staphylococcosis. This condition resulted in reduced activity, decreased feed consumption, and higher mortality rates. Opportunistic Staphylococcus spp. exploited these vulnerabilities, further aggravated by stress and cannibalism within the flock, with chronically affected birds exhibiting swollen joints, reluctance to move, and debilitation. Severe issues with hock joint synovitis in breeder flocks have been observed across all ages, with a notable increase during the second half of the rearing period, post-transport, and at the onset of production, likely due to oestrogenic and immunosuppressive effects [16].
There is currently no effective vaccine for S. aureus, and staphylococcal bacterins have proven ineffective in preventing poultry infections [2,3]. Management relies on antibiotic therapy, but treating localised lesions is challenging due to poor antibiotic penetration [17], which is additionally discouraged in organic farming. Chronic infections are particularly difficult to treat as necrotic foci in bones hinder antibiotic effectiveness [17]. Sick birds often struggle to eat or drink, reducing drug intake. Additionally, antibiotic resistance is of extreme importance in isolated Staphylococcus strains; thus, sensitivity tests should always be performed. In the present study, S. lentus showed resistance to important therapeutic drugs such as tetracycline and spectinomycin. Similarly, resistance to tetracyclines, penicillins, and macrolides was a common resistance phenotype in isolated S. lentus from chickens and turkeys in Poland [18]. It has been suggested that CNS strains present higher resistance levels to antibiotics than S. aureus and that multi-resistant CNS are observed with increased frequency [11,18,19]. In general, in our investigation, S. aureus was more susceptible to the tested antibiotics, including enrofloxacin, which was previously used in the flock. More studies are necessary to determine the impact of commensal CNS strains, which can act as reservoirs and sources of antibiotic-resistant genes, on the health of poultry species.
Organic farming discourages antibiotic use, emphasising preventive measures [20]. Effective management includes practices that reduce damage to host defences, such as minimising wounds, stress, and other diseases. Preventing injuries is crucial since wounds are entry points for S. aureus. Implementing biosecurity measures and proper vaccination schemes are also essential for minimising leg problems.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this report presents a case of staphylococcal arthritis with synovitis and osteomyelitis in an organic broiler breeder flock, exacerbated by previous conditions. Bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF investigation revealed the presence of S. lentus, in addition to S. aureus, associated with the outbreak. S. aureus is recognised as a significant opportunistic pathogen in poultry and is the most frequently reported Staphylococcus spp. associated with clinical disease in the field. However, further research is necessary to elucidate the role of S. lentus as a causative agent of arthritis and synovitis in chickens.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, C.H. and M.H.; methodology, C.H. and D.L.; validation, M.M, C.H. and D.L.; formal analysis, M.M., C.H. and D.L.; investigation, M.M., C.H., P.M. and D.L.; resources, M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M., C.H., P.M., D.L. and M.H.; visualisation, M.M.; supervision, M.H.; project administration, C.H. and M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. Open Access Funding by the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the Austrian law on animals used for experimental purposes (Tierversuchsgesetz—TVG 2012) and in cooperation with veterinarians in charge of the respective farms, having obtained consent from farmers for the application of veterinary procedures.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article. The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Delfina Jandreski-Cvetkovic and Patricia Wernsdorf for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

Peter Mitsch was employed by the company Tierarzt GmbH Dr. Mitsch. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Parte, A.C.; Carbasse, J.S.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Reimer, L.C.; Göker, M. List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) Moves to the DSMZ. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5607–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Catherine, M.L.; Claire, B. Andreasen Other Bacterial Diseases. In Diseases of Poultry; Swayne, D.E., Boulianne, M., Logue, C.M., McDougald, L.R., Nair, V., Suarez, D.L., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 995–1085. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andreasan, J.R.; Andreasan, C.B.; Anwer, M.; Sonn, A.E. Heterophil Chemotaxis in Chickens with Natural Staphylococcal Infections. Avian Dis. 1993, 37, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Szafraniec, G.M.; Szeleszczuk, P.; Dolka, B. Review on Skeletal Disorders Caused by Staphylococcus Spp. in Poultry. Vet. Q. 2022, 42, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 5th ed.; Sweeney, M.T., Diaz-Campos, D.V., Bowden, R., Fritsche, T.R., Hayes, J., Langston, C., Lubbers, B.V., Martin-Jimenez, T., Miller, C., Pallotta, C., et al., Eds.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Elbehiry, A.; Al-Dubaib, M.; Marzouk, E.; Osman, S.; Edrees, H. Performance of MALDI Biotyper Compared with VitekTM 2 Compact System for Fast Identification and Discrimination of Staphylococcus Species Isolated from Bovine Mastitis. Microbiologyopen 2016, 5, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hess, C.; Alispahic, M.; Hess, M. Application of MALDI-TOF MS in Veterinary and Food Microbiology. In MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry in Microbiology; Kostrzewa, M., Schubert, S., Eds.; Caister Academic Press: Bremen & Munich, Germany, 2016; pp. 109–126. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cameron, M.; Barkema, H.W.; De Buck, J.; De Vliegher, S.; Chaffer, M.; Lewis, J.; Keefe, G.P. Identification of Bovine-Associated Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Using a Direct Transfer Protocol. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 2137–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Awan, M.; Matsumoto, M. Heterogeneity of Staphylococci and Other Bacteria Isolated from Six-Week-Old Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 1998, 77, 944–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Devriese, L.A.; Schleifer, K.H. Identification of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci from Farm Animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1985, 58, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Marek, A.; Stepień-Pyśniak, D.; Pyzik, E.; Adaszek, Ł.; Wilczyński, J.; Winiarczyk, S. Occurrence and Characterization of Staphylococcus Bacteria Isolated from Poultry in Western Poland. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 2016, 129, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Vanderhaeghen, W.; Piepers, S.; Leroy, F.; Van Coillie, E.; Haesebrouck, F.; De Vliegher, S. Invited Review: Effect, Persistence, and Virulence of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Species Associated with Ruminant Udder Health. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 5275–5293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Von Eiff, C.; Peters, G.; Heilmann, C. Pathogenesis of Infections Due to Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2002, 2, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alderson, M.; Speers, D.; Emslie, K.; Nade, S. Acute Haematogenous Osteomyelitis and Septic Arthritis--a Single Disease. An Hypothesis Based upon the Presence of Transphyseal Blood Vessels. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1986, 68-B, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nairn, M.E.; Watson, A.R.A. Leg Weakness of Poultry—A Clinical and Pathological Characterization. Aust. Vet. J. 1972, 48, 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sato, Y. Optimizing the Health of Poultry Layers. In Optimising Poultry Flock Health; de Wit, S., Ed.; Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2022; pp. 289–345. ISBN 9781786768872. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dowling, P. Antimicrobial Therapy of Selected Organ Systems. In Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine; Giguèra, S., Prescott, J.F., Dowling, P.M., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Ames, IA, USA, 2013; pp. 395–419. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pyzik, E.; Marek, A.; Stȩpień-Pyśniak, D.; Urban-Chmiel, R.; Jarosz, L.S.; Jagiełło-Podȩbska, I. Detection of Antibiotic Resistance and Classical Enterotoxin Genes in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Poultry in Poland. J. Vet. Res. 2019, 63, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Osman, K.; Badr, J.; Al-Maary, K.S.; Moussa, I.M.I.; Hessain, A.M.; Amin Girah, Z.M.S.; Abo-shama, U.H.; Orabi, A.; Saad, A. Prevalence of the Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Coagulase-Positive-and Negative-Staphylococcus in Chicken Meat Retailed to Consumers. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. European Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products and Repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. Off. J. Eur. Union 2018, L150, 1–92.
Figure 1. Main pathological findings observed during the necropsy: arthritis of the hock joints, characterised by swelling, and yellow exudate involving the tendon sheaths in the epiphysis of tibiotarsus and tarsometatarsus (tenosynovitis) (A); chondronecrosis and osteomyelitis of the proximal femur (B).
Figure 1. Main pathological findings observed during the necropsy: arthritis of the hock joints, characterised by swelling, and yellow exudate involving the tendon sheaths in the epiphysis of tibiotarsus and tarsometatarsus (tenosynovitis) (A); chondronecrosis and osteomyelitis of the proximal femur (B).
Animals 14 02574 g001
Figure 2. Histological investigation of the affected hock joints. (A) a tendon (*) showing severe fibrinoheterophilic inflammation (highlighted in B) associated with numerous colonies of bacteria of coccoid morphology (highlighted in C). Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Bar = 200 µm (A), 25 µm (B), 10 µm (C).
Figure 2. Histological investigation of the affected hock joints. (A) a tendon (*) showing severe fibrinoheterophilic inflammation (highlighted in B) associated with numerous colonies of bacteria of coccoid morphology (highlighted in C). Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Bar = 200 µm (A), 25 µm (B), 10 µm (C).
Animals 14 02574 g002
Table 1. Log (scores) of Staphylococcus isolates investigated by MALDI-TOF, based on the Bruker Daltonic database.
Table 1. Log (scores) of Staphylococcus isolates investigated by MALDI-TOF, based on the Bruker Daltonic database.
SampleMatched PatternLog (Score) a
PA18_25301 AStaphylococcus lentus LMG 19120 LMG_corr2.14
PA18_25301 BStaphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus DSM 799 DSM2.61
a A log(score) ranging from 1.7 to 2.0 indicates genus-level identification; a log(score) exceeding 2.0 corresponds to species-level identification. Any log(score) below 1.7 is considered unidentifiable by the software.
Table 2. Antibiogram results of the Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus lentus isolates identified by MALDI-TOF. R: resistant; I: intermediate; S: susceptible.
Table 2. Antibiogram results of the Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus lentus isolates identified by MALDI-TOF. R: resistant; I: intermediate; S: susceptible.
S. aureusS. lentus
Oxalic acid (2 µg)RR
Spectinomycin (100 µg)SR
Tilmycosin (15 µg)SI
Trimethropin/Sulfamethoxazol (1.25/23.7 µg) RI
Tylosin (15 µg) SI
Amoxicillin (10 µg)II
Ampicillin (10 µg)II
Colistin (10 µg)RR
Doxycycline (30 µg)IS
Enrofloxacin (5 µg)SI
Neomycin (30 µg)II
Tetracycline (30 µg)IR
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matos, M.; Mitsch, P.; Liebhart, D.; Hess, M.; Hess, C. Co-Infection of Chickens with Staphylococcus lentus and Staphylococcus aureus from an Outbreak of Arthritis, Synovitis, and Osteomyelitis Argues for Detailed Characterisation of Isolates. Animals 2024, 14, 2574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172574

AMA Style

Matos M, Mitsch P, Liebhart D, Hess M, Hess C. Co-Infection of Chickens with Staphylococcus lentus and Staphylococcus aureus from an Outbreak of Arthritis, Synovitis, and Osteomyelitis Argues for Detailed Characterisation of Isolates. Animals. 2024; 14(17):2574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matos, Miguel, Peter Mitsch, Dieter Liebhart, Michael Hess, and Claudia Hess. 2024. "Co-Infection of Chickens with Staphylococcus lentus and Staphylococcus aureus from an Outbreak of Arthritis, Synovitis, and Osteomyelitis Argues for Detailed Characterisation of Isolates" Animals 14, no. 17: 2574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172574

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop