Next Article in Journal
Techniques, Databases and Software Used for Studying Polar Metabolites and Lipids of Gastrointestinal Parasites
Previous Article in Journal
Information of Growth Traits Is Helpful for Genetic Evaluation of Litter Size in Pigs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of a Combined Chinese Herbal Medicine on Growth Performance, Intestinal Barrier Function, Immune Response, and Cecal Microflora in Broilers Infected with Salmonella enteritidis

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2
Guangrao County Livestock Development Service Center, Dongying 257000, China
3
Pingdu Yunshan Animal Health and Product Quality Supervision Station, Qingdao 266700, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(18), 2670; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182670
Submission received: 9 August 2024 / Revised: 3 September 2024 / Accepted: 11 September 2024 / Published: 13 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Poultry)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Bacterial enteritis caused by Salmonella enteritidis infection can reduce the growth performance and increase the mortality of broilers. Antibiotics were the mainstay of treatment for intestinal injury caused by Salmonella enteritidis, but the overuse of antibiotics has resulted in severe drug residues and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Chinese herbs contain natural compounds with high safety and medicinal value, making them good substitutes for antibiotics. Compared with use of a single Chinese herb, the rational combination of multiple herbs could produce synergistic effects to enhance therapeutic outcomes. In this study, the specific compound Chinese herbal medicine (CCHM) consisted of Pulsatilla, Coptis chinensis, Fraxini cortex, Cortex phellodendri, Folium isatidis, Raddix paeoniae alba, Schisandra chinensis, and Fructus mume in a ratio of 15:6:6:6:6:6:6:5. Our results showed that CCHM improved the growth performance, intestinal barrier function, immune response, and cecal microflora of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of CCHM in drinking water on broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis. One-day-old male Cobb 500 broilers (n = 300) were randomly assigned to five groups: a control (NC) group, a Salmonella enteritidis challenge (SE) group, an antibiotic (AB) group, a low dose of CCHM (CL) group, and a high dose of CCHM (CH) group. Each group had six replicate cages with ten broilers per cage. The broilers in the NC and SE groups were given normal drinking water. From days 12 to 18, the AB group received water treated with ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L), while the CL and CH groups received water containing CCHM at doses of 5 mL/L and 10 mL/L, respectively. Broilers in all groups except the NC group were orally given Salmonella enteritidis daily from days 9 to 11. The experimental period was 28 days. The results showed that, compared with the SE group, the CL and CH groups showed improved growth performance; increased immune organ indices, expressions of ileal occludin and ZO-1 proteins, jejunal and ileal villus heights (except at day 19), and cecal Lactobacillus counts on days 19 and 28 (p < 0.05); and decreased jejunal and ileal lesion scores, ileal interleukin 1β (IL-1β) (except at day 19), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin 6 (IL-6) (except at day 19), secretory immunoglobulin A (slgA) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (except at day 19) levels, serum D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase (DAO) (except at day 19) contents, jejunal and ileal crypt depths (except at day 19), and cecal Salmonella and Escherichia coli counts on days 19 and 28 (p < 0.05). On day 28, except for the levels of ileal interleukin 10 (IL-10), TNF-α, slgA, and serum D-lactic acid content, there were no differences among the NC, AB, and CL groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, drinking water supplemented with CCHM alleviated the intestinal damage caused by Salmonella enteritidis infection and improved growth performance and cecal microbiota in broilers. The optimal addition rate of CCHM was 5 mL/L.

1. Introduction

Salmonella enteritidis is one of the most common pathogens in broilers, typically leading to severe intestinal diseases [1]. Salmonella enteritidis infection alters the gut microbiota and damages the intestinal barrier, which results in decreased growth performance, diarrhea, and increased mortality in broilers [2,3]. Antibiotics are the primary agents for the prevention and treatment of Salmonella enteritidis infection [4]. However, extensive antibiotic use causes the emergence of resistant bacteria and drug residues [5]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel treatment approaches to combat these resistant strains and residues.
Traditional Chinese herbs are considered as substitutes for antibiotics due to their lower toxicity and fewer side effects, as well as their ability to reduce residues in the body and their lower risk of inducing drug resistance [6,7]. The bioactivities of herbs are attributed to their chemical constituents, including organic acid, polysaccharides, flavonoids, alkaloids, and so on [8,9]. Many studies have shown the anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties of these compounds, which contribute to immune modulation, enhancement of intestinal barrier function, and maintenance of intestinal microbiota balance [10,11]. The specific compound Chinese herbal medicine (CCHM) in this study consisted of Pulsatilla, Coptis chinensis, Fraxini cortex, Cortex phellodendri, Folium isatidis, Raddix paeoniae alba, Schisandra chinensis, and Fructus mume in a ratio of 15:6:6:6:6:6:6:5. Pulsatilla is a primary constituent of CCHM, known for its antioxidant and immune-modulating properties [12]. A study showed that Pulsatilla modulated immune responses and altered the composition of intestinal microbiota in Hungarian geese [13]. Berberine, the major active constituent in Coptis chinensis and Cortex phellodendri, is an isoquinoline derivative alkaloid with the ability to modulate intestinal microbiota and improve the growth performance of broilers [14,15,16]. Previous studies have shown that esculin, an active constituent of Fraxini cortex, exhibits inhibitory effects against Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium in vitro [17]. Radix paeoniae alba was reported to improve the intestinal flora in broilers with enteritis due to the antibacterial properties of its main bioactive constituents, such as Radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide [18]. Citric acid in Folium isatidis, Schisandra chinensis, and Fructus mume has an antibacterial effect and has been used to reduce Escherichia coli counts and promote intestinal villus growth in broilers [19,20,21,22]. Compared with the use of single Chinese herbs, the intricate composition of traditional Chinese herbal formulations facilitates synergistic interactions among their various constituents, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy [23,24]. Our previous research found that CCHM has an inhibitory effect on Salmonella enteritidis and protects intestinal epithelial cells against Salmonella enteritidis in vitro (unpublished data). However, the impact of CCHM on the growth performance and intestinal health of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis required further study. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of CCHM on the growth performance, intestinal barrier function, immune response, and cecal microflora of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Ethical Approval

All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Qingdao Agricultural University (DKY20231011).

2.2. Materials

The ciprofloxacin lactate injection was purchased from Luoyang Huizhong Animal Medicine Co., Ltd., Luoyang, China.
The Salmonella enteritidis serotype CVCC3379 was purchased from the China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control (Beijing, China). Salmonella enteritidis pre-culture was transferred to xylose lysine desoxycholate agar (XLD) medium (Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) at 37 °C under aerobic conditions for 24 h, and colonies with optimal growth were selected for further purification.
A total of 100 g of herbs was used to prepare CCHM according to the ratio of 15:6:6:6:6:6:6:5, which was then boiled twice with water (3–4 times the weight of the herbs each time). Firstly, the mixture was brought to a vigorous boil and then kept at a gentle boil. The first decoction was boiled for 1 h and filtered through gauze. The second decoction was simmered on low heat for 40 min and filtered through gauze. The combined decoctions were further reduced until 100 mL of liquid medicine remained, achieving a concentration of 1 g/mL. After autoclaving, the solution was filtered through a 0.22-micron filter and stored at cold temperatures for later use.

2.3. Identification of the Chemical Constituents in CCHM

A volume of 100 µL of CCHM was extracted and thoroughly mixed with 400 µL of methanol using a vortex mixer for 10 min. Subsequently, the mixture was centrifuged at 8000× g for another 10 min to separate the supernatant. This clarified solution was then subjected to machine analysis. Sample solutions were analyzed using an UltiMate 3000 RS system coupled with a Q Exactive quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Shier Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). High-resolution liquid chromatography data were initially processed using Compound Discoverer 3.3 (CD 3.3, Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by database retrieval and comparison in mzCloud [25].

2.4. Experimental Procedure

A total of 300 one-day-old male Cobb 500 broilers, each weighing 44.16 ± 0.97 g, were used in a completely randomized design experiment. The broilers were divided into five groups: a normal control (NC) group, a Salmonella enteritidis challenge (SE) group, an antibiotic (AB) group, a low dose of CCHM (CL) group, and a high dose of CCHM (CH) group. Each group consisted of six replicate cages, with ten broilers per cage. The broilers in the NC and SE groups were given normal drinking water. From days 12 to 18, the AB group received water treated with ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L), while the CL and CH groups were provided water containing CCHM at doses of 5 mL/L and 10 mL/L, respectively. The experimental period was 28 days. The Salmonella enteritidis used in the bacterial enteritis model was obtained following the method described by Zhen et al. [26]. From days 9 to 11, broilers in all groups except the NC group were orally gavaged with 1 mL of 1 × 109 CFU Salmonella enteritidis; the NC group was orally gavaged with normal sterile medium in equivalent amounts (Table 1). The basal diet was formulated according to the Cobb Broiler Management Guide [27] (Table 2). All broilers had free access to feed and water. The dimensions of the cages used were 80 cm × 65 cm × 55 cm (length × width × height). The temperature in the chicken coop was 33 °C–35 °C for the first week and then gradually decreased by 2 °C each week until it reached 25 °C. The lighting program provided 23 h of light and 1 h of darkness during the experiment.

2.5. Growth Performance Measurement

Daily feed intake was measured on a replicate basis. After a 12 h fast, body weight was recorded on days 0, 9, 19, and 28 to calculate the average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed:gain (F:G) ratio on a replicate basis. Daily mortality was observed and recorded.

2.6. Sample Collection

One broiler per cage was randomly selected for blood sampling and individual weighing on days 19 and 28. Blood samples were obtained from the jugular vein and transferred into centrifuge tubes. Serum was then obtained by centrifuging the samples at 3000× g for 10 min at 4 °C; afterward, samples were stored at −20 °C. Subsequently, selected broilers were euthanized using the cervical dislocation method. Post-euthanasia, the thymus was harvested from the ventral neck dissection, while the bursa of Fabricius and the spleen were collected following abdominal incision. All organs were then weighed. For histological analysis, ileum and jejunum sections were preserved in 4% buffered formaldehyde. Additionally, cecal contents and ileum mucosa were harvested for subsequent investigation.

2.7. Intestinal Lesion Scores

On days 19 and 28, lesion scores ranging from 0 to 6 were assigned to the jejunum and ileum using the Chiu/Park scoring method, where higher scores indicated greater degrees of damage [28].

2.8. Relative Immune Organ Weight

The weights of the bursa of Fabricius, thymus, and spleen were determined, and the immune organ indices were calculated using the following equation: immune organ weight (g)/body weight (kg) [29].

2.9. Analysis of Biochemical Indices

Serum concentrations of D-lactic acid and DAO were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Beijing FreeMore Bioscience Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). A 0.1 g sample of ileum mucosa was taken from ileum samples and homogenized with 0.9 mL normal saline. The concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and sIgA were then measured using ELISA kits (Beijing FreeMore Bioscience Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and the protein concentration was measured using a BCA protein quantification kit (ACRO Biosystems Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), with results expressed per milligram of protein.

2.10. Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression in Ileal Mucosa

Total protein was extracted from ileal mucosa samples using RIPA lysate (Servicebio Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) supplemented with 1% phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes using SDS-PAGE; then, the membranes were blocked with a protein-free rapid blocking buffer (Epizyme Biomedicine Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for 10 min. After washing 3–5 times, the membranes were incubated with diluted primary antibodies against β-actin, occluding, and ZO-1 (all from Servicebio Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) for 12 h at 4 °C. Following another 3–5 washes with PBST, the membranes were incubated with anti-rabbit IgG (Servicebio Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) for 1 h. Blots were scanned using a CanoScan LiDE 100 scanner (Canon, Tokyo, Japan), and quantification was performed with Image J software (version 1.8.0.112).

2.11. Assessment of Intestinal Histomorphology

Ileal and jejunal samples preserved in 4% buffered formaldehyde were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin; then, the crypt depth and villus height were observed and measured using a microscope (Eclipse 80i, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and the villus height to crypt depth ratio (V/C) was calculated [30].

2.12. Cultivation and Enumeration of Bacteria in Cecum

On a sterile operating table, cecal contents were finely fragmented, and 1 g was homogenized with 9 mL of phosphate-buffered saline. The mixture was then diluted to different gradient concentrations. A volume of 100 μL from each gradient concentration was plated onto the corresponding agar plates: total plate counts on plate count agar (PCA) (Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China), Lactobacillus on MRS agar (Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China), Escherichia coli on eosin TBX agar (Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China), and Salmonella on xylose lysine desoxycholate agar (XLD) (Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China). The MRS agar plates were plated under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 48 h, while the other agar plates were plated under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24 h. The microbial populations were quantified by plate counting and expressed as log10 CFU per gram of cecal content.

2.13. Data Collection and Statistical Analysis

Data management was performed using Excel (MS Excel 2021), and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted with SPSS Statistics 26.0 (SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA). The intestinal lesion scores and mortality were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The remaining indices were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Differences among treatments were evaluated using Duncan’s multiple range test, with results expressed as means. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. The Chemical Constituents in CCHM

A total of 421 chemical constituents were identified in CCHM. Among these, berberine accounted for 33.11%, citric acid for 6.44%, 6-acetylcodeine for 5.58%, fraxetin for 1.44%, esculin for 1.33%, ethylmorphine for 1.31%, methoxyphenamine for 1.27%, D- (+)-pyroglutamic acid for 1.26%, D- (+)-malic acid for 1.19%, L-isoleucine for 0.98%, and other compound classes for 46.09% (Table 3, Figure S1).

3.2. Growth Performance

Broilers in the CL and CH groups had a lower ADG (p = 0.002; Table 4) and ADFI (p = 0.045) than those in the NC group, but were no differences compared to the AB and SE groups. The F:G ratio showed no differences among all groups from days 10 to 19 (p > 0.05). Broilers in the CL and CH groups had higher ADG and ADFI and a lower F:G ratio than those in the SE group from days 20 to 28 and days 0 to 28 (p < 0.05), but no differences were observed in the CL and CH groups compared to the AB and NC groups (p > 0.05).

3.3. Intestinal Lesion Scores

On days 19 and 28, the CL and CH groups had lower jejunal and ileal lesion scores compared to the SE group (p < 0.001, Figure 1, Table 5), but no differences were observed among the CL, CH, and AB groups (p > 0.05).

3.4. Immune Organ Indices

On days 19 and 28, the indices of the bursa of Fabricius and thymus in the CL and CH groups were higher than those in the SE group (p ≤ 0.001, Table 6), but no differences were observed among the CL, CH, and NC groups on day 28 (p > 0.05). The spleen index in the CL and CH groups was lower than that in the SE group on day 19 (p < 0.05), but no differences were observed among all groups on day 28 (p > 0.05).

3.5. Ileal Immune Function

On day 19, the levels of TNF-α (p < 0.001, Figure 2), IFN-γ (p < 0.001), IL-1β (p < 0.001), IL-6 (p < 0.001), IL-10 (p = 0.016), and sIgA (p < 0.001) were higher in the SE group compared to the NC group, but there were no differences in the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 among the CL, CH, and SE groups (p > 0.05). On day 28, the levels of IL-1β (p < 0.001), IL-6 (p < 0.001), TNF-α (p < 0.001), and IFN-γ (p < 0.001) were lower in the CL and CH groups compared to the SE group (Figure 3). There were no differences in the levels of IL-1β, sIgA, TNF-α, and IL-6 among the CL, CH, and AB groups (p > 0.05), while the levels of IL-1β and IL-6 showed no differences among the CL, CH, AB, and NC groups on day 28 (p > 0.05).

3.6. Intestinal Permeability

On days 19 and 28, the levels of serum D-lactic acid in the CL and CH groups were lower than in the SE group (p < 0.001, Figure 4). However, no differences were observed among NC, AB, and CL groups on day 19 (p > 0.05), and there were no differences among the CL, CH, and AB groups on day 28 (p > 0.05). The level of serum DAO (p < 0.001) in the CL group was lower than that in the SE group, but no differences were observed among the NC, AB, and CL groups on day 19 or 28 (p > 0.05). The ileal protein expressions of ZO-1 (p < 0.001) and occludin (p < 0.001) in the CL and CH groups were higher than those in the SE group, but no differences were observed among AB and CL groups on days 19 and 28 (p > 0.05, Figure 5).

3.7. Morphological Measurements of the Jejunum and Ileum

On day 19, the villus height and V/C value of the ileum and jejunum in the CL group were higher compared to those in the SE group and were lower compared to those in the NC group (p < 0.001, Figure 5 and Table 7), but there were no differences observed in the villus height of the jejunum and ileum and jejunal V/C value between the SE and CH groups (p > 0.05). The crypt depths of the ileum in the CL and CH groups were lower than those in the SE groups (p < 0.001), but no differences were found in the crypt depths of the jejunum between the CL, CH, and SE groups on day 19 (p > 0.05). On day 28, the villus height and V/C value of the ileum and jejunum in the CL and CH groups were higher compared to those in the SE group (p < 0.05), but there were no differences among the NC, AB, and CL groups (p > 0.05). The crypt depths of the jejunum and ileum in the CL and CH groups were lower compared to those in the SE group on day 28 (p < 0.001), but no differences were observed among the NC, AB, and CH groups (p > 0.05).

3.8. Cecal Microbial Analysis

On days 19 and 28, the CL and CH groups exhibited lower counts of Salmonella and Escherichia coli compared to the SE group (p < 0.001, Table 8). However, no differences in Salmonella and Escherichia coli counts were observed among the NC, AB, CL, and CH groups on day 28 (p > 0.05). Additionally, the Lactobacillus count was lower in the SE group on days 19 and 28 (p < 0.001), with no differences between the AB and CL groups on day 28 (p > 0.05). The total plate count showed no differences between any groups on days 19 and 28 (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

In the present study, the studied CCHM contained alkaloids (berberine), organic acids (citric acid), glycosides (esculin), and other active components. Berberine, citric acid, and esculin have been demonstrated to possess antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and growth-promoting properties [17,31,32]. Therefore, the improvements in growth performance, intestinal inflammation, and microbiota in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis and treated with CCHM may be related to its active constituents.
In this study, broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis showed higher mortality rates and increased intestinal lesion scores, along with a decrease in both ADG and ADFI. These findings suggested that intestinal injury caused by Salmonella enteritidis infection negatively impacted growth performance. However, the harmful effects were alleviated by CCHM, which was in line with the results reported by Stringfellow et al. [33], who found that citric acid reduced both intestinal lesions and mortality and improved growth performance upon the induction of necrotic enteritis in broilers via a Clostridium perfringens challenge. Previous studies showed that dietary supplementation with berberine and citric acid increased the ADG and ADFI to alleviate LPS-induced growth performance impairment in broilers [34,35].
The weight of immune organs serves as an indicator of the immune status of broilers, with higher immune organ indices correlating with enhanced immune function and reduced illness susceptibility [36]. In the present study, Salmonella enteritidis infection reduced the indices of the bursa of Fabricius, thymus, and spleen in broilers, which was consistent with findings reported by Sadeghi et al. [29]. However, supplementing CCHM into drinking water improved these indices, suggesting that CCHM promoted the growth of immune organs and enhanced the immunity of broilers. This effect may be attributed to the active constituents contained in CCHM, which promoted the development of the intestinal tract, thereby enhancing nutrient absorption and subsequently improving the organ index in broilers. A previous study showed that dietary supplementation with citric acid-rich Schisandra chinensis increased the ileal crude protein digestibility and indices of the spleen and thymus in broilers [37]. Furthermore, dietary supplementation with berberine in broilers increased the weights of the bursa of Fabricius, spleen, and thymus [38].
The morphology of the intestinal mucosa is a crucial indicator for assessing gut health, with shorter villi or deeper crypts being related to tissue damage caused by invasive pathogens [39]. Salmonella enteritidis infection could destroy the intestinal morphology of broilers, as evidenced by increased crypt depth and decreased villus height [40]. In this study, supplementing CCHM into drinking water improved the crypt depth, villus height, and V/C value of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis, indicating that CCHM alleviated the damage to intestinal villi induced by Salmonella enteritidis. According to a previous study, dietary supplementation with berberine decreased the crypt depth and increased the villus height and V/C ratio in broilers [41]. Similar results were observed with dietary supplementation of citric acid, which increased the intestinal villus height and V/C value in broilers [42].
Tight junction proteins are essential for maintaining intestinal barrier homeostasis, and their regulation is crucial for epithelial barrier repair after injury [43]. Compromise of the intestinal barrier causes the release of D-lactic acid and DAO into the bloodstream, making the measurement of their serum levels useful for assessing the degree of intestinal damage or recovery [44,45]. Our study showed that Salmonella enteritidis infection reduced ileal protein expressions of ZO-1 and occludin and increased levels of serum D-lactic acid and DAO. However, supplementing CCHM into drinking water alleviated these adverse effects, indicating that CCHM improved the intestinal barrier function. Yuan et al. [46] observed that berberine reduced the protein expressions of claudin-1 and occludin in the jejunum upon the induction of necrotic enteritis in broilers via a Clostridium perfringens challenge. Additionally, Bialkowski et al. [47] found that citric acid decreased the levels of serum D-lactic acid and DAO in broilers.
Once a pathogen enters the colon and damages tissue, the intestinal epithelium releases pro-inflammatory mediators, which are closely associated with the intestinal inflammatory response [40]. The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 reduces the transcription and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in monocytes and macrophages [48]. In this study, Salmonella enteritidis infection led to increases in TNF-α, sIgA, IL-1β, IL-6, and IFN-γ levels in ileum. Supplementing CCHM into drinking water could reduce the release of these pro-inflammatory factors and increase the level of IL-10, indicating that CCHM could regulate immune factors to inhibit inflammation. Bialkowski et al. [47] discovered that citric acid supplementation reduced the mRNA expressions of TNF-α, IL-6, sIgA, and IFN-γ in broilers. Moreover, Shen et al. [49] reported that berberine reduced increases in pro-inflammatory markers such as IL-2, IL-12 and IFN-β induced by LPS injection in broilers.
The intestinal flora forms a multi-layered microbial barrier in the intestine, playing crucial roles in nutrition absorption, intestinal defense, and regulation of immune function [50,51]. In this study, Salmonella enteritidis infection increased the counts of Salmonella and Escherichia coli while decreasing the Lactobacillus count of broilers, indicating a disruption of the cecal microbiota. Supplementing CCHM into drinking water could increase the count of Lactobacillus and reduce the proliferation of harmful bacteria. Melaku et al. [52] found that dietary supplementation with citric acid promoted the proliferation of Lactobacillus in the caecum of broilers due to the decrease in intestinal pH. Several in vitro studies found that citric acid or esculin exhibited inhibitory effects against Escherichia coli and Salmonella [17,53]. Additionally, Yuan et al. [46] observed that berberine increased Lactobacillus counts and decreased the counts of Gram-negative bacteria such as Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli in broilers with Clostridium perfringens infection.

5. Conclusions

Supplementing CCHM into drinking water can improve the growth performance, intestinal barrier function, immune response, and cecal microflora of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis. In conclusion, CCHM can be used as a substitute for antibiotics to alleviate Salmonella enteritidis infection in broiler production. Under the presented experimental conditions, the optimal concentration of CCHM was 5 mL/L.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani14182670/s1, Figure S1: Total ion current spectrum of CCHM natural product identification; Figure S2: Western blots raw data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and C.Z.; Methodology, H.L., S.L. and X.Z.; Validation and Investigation, C.Z. and X.X.; Formal Analysis, C.Z.; Resources, H.L. and J.Z.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, C.Z.; Writing—Review, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, and Editing, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Qingdao Science and Technology Program (23-2-8-xdny-8-nsh); the Postgraduate Education Reform Project of Shandong Province (SDYJSJGC2023061); and the Postgraduate Innovation Program of Qingdao Agricultural University (QNYCX23003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Qingdao Agricultural University (DKY20231011).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data sets collected and analyzed in this study are available at the request of the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Du, M.; Li, J.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, E.; Kang, F.; Tu, C. Rapid detection of trace Salmonella in milk using an effective pretreatment combined with droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 251, 126838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gan, L.; Fan, H.; Mahmood, T.; Guo, Y. Dietary supplementation with vitamin C ameliorates the adverse effects of Salmonella enteritidis—Challenge in broilers by shaping intestinal microbiota. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 3663–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sarrami, Z.; Sedghi, M.; Mohammadi, I.; Bedford, M.; Miranzadeh, H.; Ghasemi, R. Effects of bacteriophage on Salmonella enteritidis infection in broilers. Sci. Rep. 2023, 27, 12198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kosznik-Kwaśnicka, K.; Podlacha, M.; Grabowski, Ł.; Stasiłojć, M.; Nowak-Zaleska, A.; Ciemińska, K.; Cyske, Z.; Dydecka, A.; Gaffke, L.; Mantej, J.; et al. Biological aspects of phage therapy versus antibiotics against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection of chickens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 4, 941867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Stępień-Pyśniak, D.; Hauschild, T.; Dec, M.; Marek, A.; Brzeski, M.; Kosikowska, U. Antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Enterococcus faecalis from yolk sac infections in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Abdallah, A.; Zhang, P.; Zhong, Q.; Sun, Z. Application of traditional Chinese herbal medicine by-products as dietary feed supplements and antibiotic replacements in animal production. Curr. Drug. Metab. 2019, 20, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, J.; Wang, R.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.; Cai, W. Effects of novel microecologics combined with traditional Chinese medicine and probiotics on growth performance and health of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saini, R.; Dhiman, N.K. Natural anti-inflammatory and anti-allergy agents: Herbs and botanical ingredients. Antiinflamm. Antiallergy. Agents. Med. Chem. 2022, 21, 90–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.S.; Shen, C.Y.; Jiang, J.G. Antidepressant active ingredients from herbs and nutraceuticals used in TCM: Pharmacological mechanisms and prospects for drug discovery. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 150, 104520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ding, Z.; Lian, F. Traditional Chinese medical herbs staged therapy in infertile women with endometriosis: A clinical study. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 14085–14089. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, F.X.; Sun, S.; Cui, Z.Z. Analysis of immunological enhancement of immunosuppressed chickens by Chinese herbal extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhong, J.; Tan, L.; Chen, M.; He, C. Pharmacological activities and molecular mechanisms of Pulsatilla saponins. Chin. Med. 2022, 23, 17–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fu, G.; Zhou, Y.; Song, Y.; Liu, C.; Hu, M.; Xie, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Chen, S.; et al. The effect of combined dietary supplementation of herbal additives on carcass traits, meat quality, immunity and cecal microbiota composition in Hungarian white geese. PeerJ 2023, 11, e15316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lan, Y.; Wang, H.; Wu, J.; Meng, X. Cytokine storm-calming property of the isoquinoline alkaloids in Coptis chinensis Franch. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 973587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhu, C.; Huang, K.; Bai, Y.; Feng, X.; Gong, L.; Wei, C.; Huang, H.; Zhang, H. Dietary supplementation with berberine improves growth performance and modulates the composition and function of cecal microbiota in yellow-feathered broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 1034–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, L.; Gu, P.; Shen, H. Protective effects of berberine hydrochloride on DSS-induced ulcerative colitis in rats. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 68, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cai, T.; Cai, B. Pharmacological activities of esculin and esculetin: A review. Medicine 2023, 102, e35306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, A.; Ding, J.; Shen, T.; Liang, Y.; Wei, F.; Wu, Y.; Iqbal, M.; Kulyar, M.F.; Li, K.; Wei, K. Radix paeoniae alba polysaccharide attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal injury by regulating gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1064657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, G.; Qi, Z.; Wang, A.; Jia, J. Effects of deacidification on composition of Schisandra chinensis ethanolic extract and studies on acute toxicity in mice. Molecules 2020, 25, 6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, L.; Lu, Y.; Jin, J.; Dong, L.; Xu, F.; Chen, S.; Wang, Z.; Liang, G.; Shan, X. n-Butanol extract from Folium isatidis inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory cytokine production in macrophages and protects mice against lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxic shock. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 5601–5609. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xing, H.; Zhang, L.; Ma, J.; Liu, Z.; Song, C.; Liu, Y. Fructus mume extracts alleviate diarrhea in breast cancer patients receiving the combination therapy of lapatinib and capecitabine. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Roofchaei, A.; Rezaeipour, V.; Vatandour, S.; Zaefarian, F. Influence of dietary carbohydrases, individually or in combination with phytase or an acidifier, on performance, gut morphology and microbial population in broiler chickens fed a wheat-based diet. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 5, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, C.; Huang, B.; Zhang, Y.W. Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of depression: Effects on the neuroendocrine-immune network. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 14–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, H.T.; Huang, M.X.; Liu, X.; Zheng, X.C.; Li, X.H.; Chen, G.Q.; Xia, J.Y.; Hong, Z.S. Evaluation of the adjuvant efficacy of natural herbal medicine on COVID-19: A retrospective matched case-control study. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2020, 48, 779–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, Y.; Li, F.; Yan, M.; Chen, S.; Cai, D.; Liu, X.; Han, N.; Yuan, Z.; Lu, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Revealing the toxicity-enhancing essence of glycyrrhiza on genkwa flos based on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry and self-assembled supramolecular technology. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 740952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhen, W.; Shao, Y.; Gong, X.; Wu, Y.; Geng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Y. Effect of dietary Bacillus coagulans supplementation on growth performance and immune responses of broiler chickens challenged by Salmonella enteritidis. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 2654–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cobb-Vantress. Cobb Broiler Management Guide. 2021. Available online: https://www.cobbgenetics.com/assets/Cobb-Files/Cobb500-Slow-Feather-Breeder-Management-Supplement.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2023).
  28. Santos, R.R.; van Eerden, E. Impaired performance of broiler chickens fed diets naturally contaminated with moderate levels of deoxynivalenol. Toxins 2021, 13, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sadeghi, A.A.; Shawrang, P.; Shakorzadeh, S. Immune response of Salmonella challenged broiler chickens fed diets containing gallipro, a bacillus subtilis probiotic. Probiotics Antimicrob. 2015, 7, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Divani, A.; Bagherzadeh-Kasmani, F.; Mehri, M. Plantago ovata in broiler chicken nutrition: Performance, carcass criteria, intestinal morphology, immunity, and intestinal bacterial population. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 102, e353–e363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, Z.; Liu, L.; Guo, F.; Huang, J.; Qiao, J.; Bi, R.; Huang, J.; Zhang, K.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z. Dietary supplemental coated essential oils and organic acids mixture improves growth performance and gut health along with reduces Salmonella load of broiler chickens infected with Salmonella enteritidis. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kikusato, M.; Xue, G.; Pastor, A.; Niewold, T.A.; Toyomizu, M. Effects of plant-derived isoquinoline alkaloids on growth performance and intestinal function of broiler chickens under heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Stringfellow, K.; McReynolds, J.; Lee, J.; Byrd, J.; Nisbet, D.; Farnell, M. Effect of bismuth citrate, lactose, and organic acid on necrotic enteritis in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 2280–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Islam, K.M.; Schaeublin, H.; Wenk, C.; Wanner, M.; Liesegang, A. Effect of dietary citric acid on the performance and mineral metabolism of broiler. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012, 96, 808–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, L.; Liu, G.; Liang, X.; Wang, M.; Zhu, X.; Luo, Y.; Shang, Y.; Yang, J.Q.; Zhou, P.; Gu, X.L. Effects of berberine on the growth performance, antioxidative capacity and immune response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in broilers. Anim. Sci. J. 2019, 90, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, X.; Tao, L.; Liu, H.; Yang, G. Effects of fermented feed on growth performance, immune organ indices, serum biochemical parameters, cecal odorous compound production, and the microbiota community in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, T.; Zhou, D.; Wang, X.; Xiao, T.; Wu, L.; Tang, Q.; Lu, Y. Effects of Kadsura coccinea L. fruit extract on growth performance, meat quality, immunity, antioxidant, intestinal morphology and flora of white-feathered broilers. Animals 2022, 13, 93–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, H.Y.; Piao, X.S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P.; Yi, J.Q.; Liu, J.D.; Li, Q.Y.; Wang, G.Q. The effects of Forsythia suspensa extract and berberine on growth performance, immunity, antioxidant activities, and intestinal microbiota in broilers under high stocking density. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 1981–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nabuurs, M.J.; Hoogendoorn, A.; van der Molen, E.J.; van Osta, A.L. Villus height and crypt depth in weaned and unweaned pigs, reared under various circumstances in The Netherlands. Res. Vet. Sci. 1993, 55, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shang, Y.; Regassa, A.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, W.K. The effect of dietary fructooligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and immune responses in broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella enteritidis lipopolysaccharides. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 2887–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dehau, T.; Cherlet, M.; Croubels, S.; van Immerseel, F.; Goossens, E. A high dose of dietary brberine improves gut wall morphology, despite an expansion of enterobacteriaceae and a reduction in beneficial microbiota in broiler chickens. mSystems 2023, 8, e0123922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nourmohammadi, R.; Afzali, N. Effect of citric acid and microbial phytase on small intestinal morphology in broiler chicken. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 12, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Slifer, Z.M.; Blikslager, A.T. The integral role of tight junction proteins in the repair of injured intestinal epithelium. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jiang, J.; Qi, L.; Lv, Z.; Jin, S.; Wei, X.; Shi, F. Dietary stevioside supplementation alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal mucosal damage through anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in broiler chickens. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.P.; Yang, M.X.; Zhang, L.L.; Lu, Z.X.; Zhou, Y.M.; Wang, T. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens supplementation alleviates immunological stress in lipopolysaccharide-challenged broilers at early age. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1504–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yuan, L.; Li, M.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, H.; Cui, L.; Wang, M. The impact of berberine on intestinal morphology, microbes, and immune function of broilers in response to necrotic enteritis challenge. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 1877075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bialkowski, S.; Toschi, A.; Yu, L.E.; Schlitzkus, L.; Mann, P.; Grilli, E.; Li, Y. Effects of microencapsulated blend of organic acids and botanicals on growth performance, intestinal barrier function, inflammatory cytokines, and endocannabinoid system gene expression in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schreiber, S.; Heinig, T.; Thiele, H.G.; Raedler, A. Immunoregulatory role of interleukin 10 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1995, 108, 1434–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shen, Y.B.; Piao, X.S.; Kim, S.W.; Wang, L.; Liu, P. The effects of berberine on the magnitude of the acute inflammatory response induced by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. de Vos, W.M.; Tilg, H.; Van Hul, M.; Cani, P.D. Gut microbiome and health: Mechanistic insights. Gut 2022, 71, 1020–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Erttmann, S.F.; Swacha, P.; Aung, K.M.; Brindefalk, B.; Jiang, H.; Härtlova, A.; Uhlin, B.E.; Wai, S.N.; Gekara, N.O. The gut microbiota prime systemic antiviral immunity via the cGAS-STING-IFN-I axis. Immunity 2022, 55, 847–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Melaku, M.; Zhong, R.; Han, H.; Wan, F.; Yi, B.; Zhang, H. Butyric and Citric Acids and Their Salts in Poultry Nutrition: Effects on Gut Health and Intestinal Microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 27, 10392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kumarasamy, D.; Purushothaman, M.R.; Vasanthakumar, P.; Sivakumar, K. Butyric acid as an antibiotic substitute for broiler chicken–A review. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2018, 6, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of CCHM on the immune-related indices of the ileal mucosa of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis on day 19 (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Figure 1. Effect of CCHM on the immune-related indices of the ileal mucosa of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis on day 19 (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Animals 14 02670 g001aAnimals 14 02670 g001b
Figure 2. Effect of CCHM on the immune-related indices of the ileal mucosa of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis on day 28. (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Figure 2. Effect of CCHM on the immune-related indices of the ileal mucosa of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis on day 28. (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Animals 14 02670 g002aAnimals 14 02670 g002b
Figure 3. Effect of CCHM on D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Figure 3. Effect of CCHM on D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Animals 14 02670 g003
Figure 4. Effect of CCHM on the tight junction protein expressions of the ileal mucosa of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,c,d Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge (Figure S2).
Figure 4. Effect of CCHM on the tight junction protein expressions of the ileal mucosa of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group). a,b,c,d Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge (Figure S2).
Animals 14 02670 g004
Figure 5. Effect of CCHM on intestinal morphology in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group). (A,B) Jejunum and ileum tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin on days 19 and 28 (scale bar: 200 μm). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge. Villus height: black line; Crypt depth: blue line. Images of the transverse section were photographed under 50× magnification.
Figure 5. Effect of CCHM on intestinal morphology in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group). (A,B) Jejunum and ileum tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin on days 19 and 28 (scale bar: 200 μm). NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge. Villus height: black line; Crypt depth: blue line. Images of the transverse section were photographed under 50× magnification.
Animals 14 02670 g005
Table 1. The timetable of the experimental design.
Table 1. The timetable of the experimental design.
GroupsNCSEABCLCH
Day of the start of the experiment00000
Number of broilers per group6060606060
Days of challenge with Salmonella enteritidis-9–119–119–119–11
Days of treatment with ciprofloxacin--12–18--
Days of treatment with CCHM---12–1812–18
Day of the end of the experiment2828282828
Number of evaluated broilers per group66666
Table 2. Ingredients and nutrient levels in the basal diet (air-dried basis) %.
Table 2. Ingredients and nutrient levels in the basal diet (air-dried basis) %.
ItemContents
0–14 Days of Age15–28 Days of Age
Ingredients
Corn54.7260.25
Soybean meal34.5929.69
Fish meal3.583.00
Soybean oil3.733.80
Limestone1.281.25
CaHPO40.430.30
NaCl0.300.30
DL-Methionine0.220.22
L-lysine0.150.19
Premix 11.001.00
Total100.00100.00
Total nutrient levels 2
Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg)12.5612.78
Crude protein, %21.9019.91
Calcium, %0.920.82
Available phosphorus, %0.610.46
Lysine, %1.291.18
Methionine, %0.580.55
Threonine, %0.920.83
1 Provided per kilogram of diet: Cu (as copper sulfate) 15 mg; Mn (as manganese sulfate) 100 mg; Zn (as zinc sulfate) 100 mg; Se (as sodium selenite) 0.35 mg; Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 40 mg; I (as potassium iodide) 1.0 mg; vitamin A (trans-retinyl acetate) 10,000 IU; vitamin B1 (thiamin) 3.0 mg; vitamin B2 (riboflavin) 9.0 mg; vitamin B6 (pyridoxine HCl) 4.0 mg; vitamin B12 (cobalamin) 0.02 mg; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 5000 IU; vitamin E (all-rac-α-tocopherol acetate) 80 IU; vitamin K3 (menadione) 3.0 mg; nicotinic acid 60 mg; calcium pantothenate 15 mg; folic acid 2.0 mg; biotin 0.15 mg. 2 The nutrient levels were calculated values.
Table 3. The chemical constituents in CCHM.
Table 3. The chemical constituents in CCHM.
NoCompoundsFormulaContent (%)
1BerberineC20H17NO433.11
2Citric acidC6H8O76.44
36-AcetylcodeineC20H23NO45.58
4FraxetinC10H8O51.44
5EsculinC15H16O91.33
6EthylmorphineC19H23NO31.31
7MethoxyphenamineC11H17NO1.27
8D- (+)-Pyroglutamic acidC5H7NO31.26
9D- (+)-Malic acidC4H6O51.19
10L-IsoleucineC6H13NO20.98
11Others 46.09
Table 4. Effect of CCHM on growth performance in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis from days 0 to 28 (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 4. Effect of CCHM on growth performance in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis from days 0 to 28 (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCSEABCLCHp-Value
Day 0–9
Average daily gain (g)10.31 ± 0.4810.53 ± 0.2310.32 ± 0.2210.59 ± 0.3610.75 ± 0.190.918
Average daily feed
intake (g)
16.32 ± 1.2316.41 ± 1.8715.78 ± 1.3915.83 ± 1.9615.81 ± 2.340.854
Feed/gain ratio1.58 ± 0.031.53 ± 0.031.52 ± 0.031.49 ± 0.021.51 ± 0.030.727
Day 10–19
Average daily gain (g)42.59 ± 0.97 a37.51 ± 1.03 b38.97 ± 0.91 b37.67 ± 0.36 b37.85 ± 1.20 b0.002
Average daily feed
intake (g)
70.70 ± 2.13 a66.62 ± 1.71 b65.88 ± 0.36 b66.50 ± 0.72 b66.26 ± 0.56 b0.045
Feed/gain ratio1.66 ± 0.021.78 ± 0.031.70 ± 0.041.77 ± 0.021.76 ± 0.050.077
Day 20–28
Average daily gain (g)50.02 ± 1.45 a42.54 ± 1.25 b50.58 ± 1.64 a51.16 ± 1.40 a49.84 ± 2.15 a<0.001
Average daily feed
intake (g)
87.03 ± 0.67 a78.27 ± 0.38 b88.52 ± 1.63 a88.51 ± 1.08 a88.22 ± 0.76 a<0.001
Feed/gain ratio1.74 ± 0.01 b1.84 ± 0.01 a1.75 ± 0.01 b1.73 ± 0.02 b1.77 ± 0.02 b0.001
Day 0–28
Average daily gain (g)34.60 ± 0.22 a30.38 ± 0.27 c33.34 ± 0.12 b33.02 ± 0.27 b32.90 ± 0.42 b<0.001
Average daily feed
intake (g)
58.13 ± 0.7 1a53.78 ± 0.0.37 b56.67 ± 0.36 a56.80 ± 0.52 a56.92 ± 0.24 a<0.001
Feed/gain ratio1.68 ± 0.01 b1.77 ± 0.01 a1.70 ± 0.02 b1.72 ± 0.01 b1.73 ± 0.02 ab0.006
Mortality (%)0.00 ± 0.00 b5.50 ± 0.22 a0.17 ± 0.17 b0.33 ± 0.21 b0.50 ± 0.22 b0.043
a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Table 5. Effect of CCHM on intestinal lesion scores in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 5. Effect of CCHM on intestinal lesion scores in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCSEABCLCHp-Value
Day 19
Jejunum lesion score 20.00 ± 0.00 c4.83 ± 0.31 a1.00 ± 0.37 b1.16 ± 0.31 b1.67 ± 0.21 b<0.001
Ileum lesion score 20.00 ± 0.00 c4.67 ± 0.21 a0.83 ± 0.31 b1.16 ± 0.31 b1.50 ± 0.22 b<0.001
Day 28
Jejunum lesion score 20.00 ± 0.00 c5.17 ± 0.31 a0.50 ± 0.22 bc0.83 ± 0.31 b1.00 ± 0.26 b<0.001
Ileum lesion score 20.00 ± 0.00 c4.67 ± 0.21 a0.50 ± 0.22 bc0.67 ± 0.21 b0.67 ± 0.21 b<0.001
a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge. 2 The higher the score, the more villus damage.
Table 6. Effect of CCHM on the values for immune organ indices in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 6. Effect of CCHM on the values for immune organ indices in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCSEABCLCHp-Value
Day 19
Thymus index (g/kg)1.73 ± 0.05 a1.28 ± 0.08 c1.75 ± 0.06 a1.67 ± 0.05 ab1.55 ± 0.04 b<0.001
Spleen index (g/kg)2.90 ± 0.05 a2.40 ± 0.09 c2.94 ± 0.07 a2.83 ± 0.06 a2.59 ± 0.02 b<0.001
Bursa of Fabricius
index (g/kg)
1.36 ± 0.03 ab1.07 ± 0.06 c1.48 ± 0.05 a1.37 ± 0.03 a1.23 ± 0.06 b<0.001
Day 28
Thymus index (g/kg)1.36 ± 0.02 ab1.05 ± 0.05 c1.42 ± 0.06 a1.36 ± 0.03 ab1.29 ± 0.03 b<0.001
Spleen index (g/kg)4.01 ± 0.083.54 ± 0.074.05 ± 0.103.90 ± 0.093.93 ± 0.170.068
Bursa of Fabricius
index (g/kg)
1.15 ± 0.05 a0.77 ± 0.08 b1.16 ± 0.05 a1.16 ± 0.10 a1.03 ± 0.05 a0.001
a,b,c Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Table 7. Effect of CCHM on intestinal morphology in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 7. Effect of CCHM on intestinal morphology in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCSEABCLCHp-Value
Day 19
Jejunum
Villus height (µm)1110.51 ± 17.36 a837.58 ± 33.49 c1043.6 ± 31.20 ab976.29 ± 43.85b868.44 ± 31.29 c<0.001
Crypt depth (µm)167.49 ± 9.86 c264.80 ± 11.26 a199.87 ± 2.37 b244.50 ± 11.01a253.71 ± 7.02 a<0.001
Villus height/crypt
depth value
6.70 ± 0.29 a3.16 ± 0.03 d5.22 ± 0.17 b4.01 ± 0.18c3.44 ± 0.22 cd<0.001
Ileum
Villus height (µm)909.25 ± 14.53 a727.22 ± 14.14 b875.30 ± 19.62 a763.25 ± 21.62 b754.87 ± 25.36 b<0.001
Crypt depth (µm)150.40 ± 3.57 c235.99 ± 13.18 a182.55 ± 6.85 b205.80 ± 9.41 b208.94 ± 9.35 b<0.001
Villus height/crypt
depth value
6.06 ± 0.16 a3.13 ± 0.21 d4.81 ± 0.08 b3.72 ± 0.09 c3.62 ± 0.09 c<0.001
Day 28
Jejunum
Villus height (µm)1266.70 ± 46.70 a914.54 ± 38.28 c1182.03 ± 63.13 ab1232.96 ± 44.87 ab1120.78 ± 17.17 b<0.001
Crypt depth (µm)199.08 ± 8.49 c297.28 ± 9.43 a210.71 ± 3.56 c199.38 ± 8.53 c234.10 ± 4.45 b<0.001
Villus height/crypt
depth value
6.44 ± 0.48 a3.08 ± 0.10 c5.64 ± 0.32 ab6.22 ± 0.31 a4.79 ± 0.06 b<0.001
Ileum
Villus height (µm)1003.22 ± 49.47 a784.07 ± 20.65 b1010.25 ± 33.77 a993.18 ± 47.92 a934.44 ± 16.17 a0.001
Crypt depth (µm)196.19 ± 5.56 b246.11 ± 3.90 a196.36 ± 2.63 b200.17 ± 3.83 b210.66 ± 8.61 b<0.001
Villus height/crypt
depth value
5.11 ± 0.18 a3.19 ± 0.08 c5.15 ± 0.16 a4.95 ± 0.16 a4.45 ± 0.11 b<0.001
a,b,c,d Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Table 8. Effect of CCHM on bacterial counts in the cecum of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Table 8. Effect of CCHM on bacterial counts in the cecum of broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis (n = 6 per experimental group).
Items 1NCSEABCLCHp-Value
Day 19
Total plate count
(log10 CFU/g)
10.83 ± 0.0510.85 ± 0.0410.79 ± 0.0410.83 ± 0.0610.85 ± 0.030.952
Lactobacillus
(log10 CFU/g)
9.90 ± 0.01 a9.35 ± 0.02 d9.51 ± 0.02 c9.61 ± 0.02 b9.59 ± 0.01 b<0.001
Salmonella
(log10 CFU/g)
4.77 ± 0.01 b5.97 ± 0.01 a4.49 ± 0.02 c4.53 ± 0.02 c4.51 ± 0.01 c<0.001
Escherichia coli
(log10 CFU/g)
4.10 ± 0.06 c5.95 ± 0.01 a4.61 ± 0.03 b4.60 ± 0.02 b4.61 ± 0.01 b<0.001
Day 28
Total plate count
(log10 CFU/g)
10.99 ± 0.0611.04 ± 0.0411.02 ± 0.0310.97 ± 0.0610.99 ± 0.040.590
Lactobacillus
(log10 CFU/g)
10.34 ± 0.02 a9.81 ± 0.01 d10.13 ± 0.05 b10.07 ± 0.02 b9.97 ± 0.01 c<0.001
Salmonella
(log10 CFU/g)
5.44 ± 0.01 b7.85 ± 0.21 a5.46 ± 0.01 b5.46 ± 0.04 b5.55 ± 0.01 b<0.001
Escherichia coli
(log10 CFU/g)
4.36 ± 0.02 b6.11 ± 0.04 a4.45 ± 0.02 b4.42 ± 0.04 b4.44 ± 0.03 b<0.001
a,b,c,d Different letters indicate differences (p < 0.05). 1 NC, normal drinking water; SE, normal drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; AB, ciprofloxacin lactate injection (1 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CL, CCHM (5 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge; CH, CCHM (10 mL/L)-treated drinking water + Salmonella enteritidis challenge.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, C.; Xing, X.; Li, S.; Zheng, X.; Zhao, J.; Liu, H. Effects of a Combined Chinese Herbal Medicine on Growth Performance, Intestinal Barrier Function, Immune Response, and Cecal Microflora in Broilers Infected with Salmonella enteritidis. Animals 2024, 14, 2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182670

AMA Style

Zou C, Xing X, Li S, Zheng X, Zhao J, Liu H. Effects of a Combined Chinese Herbal Medicine on Growth Performance, Intestinal Barrier Function, Immune Response, and Cecal Microflora in Broilers Infected with Salmonella enteritidis. Animals. 2024; 14(18):2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182670

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Changzhi, Xin Xing, Shunxi Li, Xuelong Zheng, Jinshan Zhao, and Huawei Liu. 2024. "Effects of a Combined Chinese Herbal Medicine on Growth Performance, Intestinal Barrier Function, Immune Response, and Cecal Microflora in Broilers Infected with Salmonella enteritidis" Animals 14, no. 18: 2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182670

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop