Next Article in Journal
Use of 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Imaging Surgery in the Treatment of a Gastric Tumor in a Dog
Previous Article in Journal
Urolithiasis as a Husbandry Risk to Yaks in the Swiss Alps
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sargassum mcclurei Mitigating Methane Emissions and Affecting Rumen Microbial Community in In Vitro Rumen Fermentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Effects of Active Dry Yeast Supplementation in In Vitro and In Vivo Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community

1
State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
2
College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
3
Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Lanzhou 730020, China
4
Animal Husbandry Work Station of Ningxia, Yingchuan 750002, China
5
Centro Regional de Investigación Carillanca, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Vilcún 4880000, Chile
6
Aksu Tycoon Feed Co., Ltd., Aksu 843000, China
7
Tecon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(19), 2916; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192916
Submission received: 13 September 2024 / Revised: 7 October 2024 / Accepted: 8 October 2024 / Published: 9 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nutritional Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation)

Simple Summary

This study evaluated the influence of four active dry yeasts (ADYs) on nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation in lambs through in vitro and in vivo experiments. Notably, Vistacell (Vis) and Procreatin7 (Pro) showed enhanced total gas production and pH levels in vitro. Vis improved in vivo propionate molar proportion, NDF digestibility, and total VFA concentration, suggesting it is the most suitable for lamb growth. However, the study highlighted discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo outcomes, cautioning against directly translating batch culture results to live animal effects.

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of active dry yeast(ADY) on nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation, using both in vitro and in vivo experiments with lambs. In vitro, ADYs were incubated with rumen fluid and a substrate mixture to assess gas production, pH, volatile fatty acid(VFA) profiles, and lactate concentration. In vivo, Hu lambs were randomly assigned to five dietary treatments: a control group and four groups receiving one of two dosages of either Vistacell or Procreatin7. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation parameters, and bacterial community composition were measured. Pro enhanced the propionate molar proportion while it decreased the n-butyrate molar proportion. Vis reduced the lactate concentration in vitro. In the in vivo experiment, Vis increased the propionate molar proportion and the Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 abundance while it decreased the n-butyrate molar proportion and the Lachnospiraceae_ND3007 abundance. Additionally, Vis showed a greater impact on improving the NDF digestibility and total VFA concentration in vivo compared to Pro. Overall, the effects of ADYs on rumen fermentation were found to vary depending on the specific ADY used, with Vis being the most suitable for lamb growth. It was observed that Vis promoted propionate fermentation and Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001 abundance at the expense of reduced n-butyrate fermentation and Lachnospiraceae_ND3007 abundance. Importantly, differences were noted between the outcomes of the in vitro and in vivo experiments concerning the effects of ADYs on rumen fermentation, highlighting the need for caution when generalizing batch culture results to the in vivo effects of ADYs.
Keywords: active dry yeast; digestibility; fermentation; rumen active dry yeast; digestibility; fermentation; rumen

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.; Li, F.; Ma, Z.; Ma, M.; Ungerfeld, E.; Zhang, Z.; Weng, X.; Liu, B.; Deng, X.; Guo, L. Effects of Active Dry Yeast Supplementation in In Vitro and In Vivo Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community. Animals 2024, 14, 2916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192916

AMA Style

Liu H, Li F, Ma Z, Ma M, Ungerfeld E, Zhang Z, Weng X, Liu B, Deng X, Guo L. Effects of Active Dry Yeast Supplementation in In Vitro and In Vivo Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community. Animals. 2024; 14(19):2916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192916

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Haitao, Fei Li, Zhiyuan Ma, Miaomiao Ma, Emilio Ungerfeld, Zhian Zhang, Xiuxiu Weng, Baocang Liu, Xiaoyu Deng, and Liqing Guo. 2024. "Effects of Active Dry Yeast Supplementation in In Vitro and In Vivo Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community" Animals 14, no. 19: 2916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192916

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop