Study on Adult Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Preferences for Cages of Different Sizes
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cage Blocks with Different Floor Areas
2.1.1. Height of the Cage Block: 0.4 m
2.1.2. Height of the Cage Block: 1.0 m
2.2. Preference for Cages with Different Heights
2.2.1. Floor Area: 0.25 m2
2.2.2. Floor Area: 0.5 m2
2.3. Cages with Different Floor Areas and Heights
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Preference for Cages with Different Floor Areas
3.1.1. Height of the Cage Block: 0.4 m
3.1.2. Height of the Cage Block: 1.0 m
3.2. Preference for Cages with Different Heights
3.2.1. Floor Area: 0.25 m2
3.2.2. Floor Area: 0.5 m2
3.3. Cages with Different Floor Area and Height
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Spotorno, A.E.; Zuleta, C.A.; Valladares, J.P.; Deane, A.L.; Jimenez, J.E. Chinchilla laniger in Mammalian species. ASM 2004, 758, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Valladares, P.; Zuleta, C.; Spotorno, A. Chinchilla lanigera (Molina 1782) and C. chinchilla (Lichtenstein 1830): Review of their distribution and new findings. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 2014, 37, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roach, N.; Kennerley, R. Chinchilla lanigera (errata version published in 2017). In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2016; p. e.T4652A117975205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bidlingmaier, T.C. Notes on the genus Chinchilla. J. Mammal. 1937, 18, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez, J.E. The extirpation and current status of wild chinchillas Chinchilla lanigera and C. brevicaudata. Biol. Conserv. 1996, 77, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, W.D. Modern Chinchilla Farming; Borden Publishing Co.: Alhambra, CA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Heffer, R.S.; Heffer, H.E. Behavioral hearing range of the chinchilla. Hear. Res. 1991, 52, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimoyama, M.; Smith, J.; De Pons, J.; Tutaj, M.; Khampang, P.; Hong, W.; Erbe, C.; Ehrlich, G.; Bakaletz, L.; Kerschner, J. The chinchilla research resource database: Resource for an otolaryngology disease model. Database 2016, baw073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dzierżanowska-Góryń, D.; Kaleta, T.; Kowalczyk, M. The behaviour and an activity of chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) kept under laboratory conditions. In XIIth International Congress in Animal Hygiene (ISAH); Warsaw Agricultural University: Warszawa, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Łapiński, S.; Niedbała, P.; Markowska, K.; Rutkowska, A.; Lis, M.W. The effects of age, size, and cage complexity on the behaviour of farmed female chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- CoE Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes (T-AP). Recommendation Concerning Fur Animals, Adopted by the Standing Committee; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Łapiński, S.; Lis, M.W.; Wójcik, A.; Migdał, Ł.; Guja, I. Analysis of factors increasing the probability of fur chewing in chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) raised under farm conditions. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2014, 14, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łapiński, S.; Orel, J.; Niedbała, P.; Kucharska, W.; Jakubowska, M.; Lisowska-Lis, A.; Tombarkiewicz, B.; Lis, M.W. Infrared Thermography as an Indicator of Heat Loss in Fur-Chewing Chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera). J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2020, 23, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolb, H.H. Circadian activity in the wild Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Mammal Rev. 1986, 16, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cowan, D.P. Group living in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): Mutual benefit or resource localization? J. Anim. Ecol. 1987, 56, 779–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myers, K.; Parer, I.; Richardson, B.J. 45. Leporidae. In Fauna of Australia—Volume 1b Mammalia; Walton, D.W., Richardson, B.J., Eds.; AGPS: Canberra, Australia, 1989; p. 31. [Google Scholar]
- Palomares, F. Warren building by European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in relation to cover availability in a sandy area. J. Zool. Lond. 2003, 259, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szendrő, Z.S.; Dalle Zotte, A. Effect of housing conditions on production and behaviour of growing meat rabbits: A review. Livest. Sci. 2011, 137, 269–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szendrő, Z.S.; Trocino, A.; Hoy, S.T.; Xiccato, G.; Villagrá, A.; Maertens, L. A review of recent research outcomes on the housing of farmed domestic rabbits: Reproducing does. World Rabbit Sci. 2019, 27, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikó, A.; Szendrő, Z.S.; Matics, Z.S.; Radnai, I.; Odermatt, M.; Nagy, I.; Gerencsér, Z.S. Location preference of rabbit does between common sized and double sized cages. Acta Argic. Slov. 2012, 100 (Suppl. 3), 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matics, Z.S.; Szendrő, Z.S.; Bessei, W.; Radnai, I.; Biró-Németh, E.; Orova, Z.; Gyovai, M. The free choice of rabbits among identically and differently sized cages. In Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress, Puebla, Mexico, 7–10 September 2004; pp. 1251–1256. [Google Scholar]
- National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Sharp, J.; Azar, T.; Lawson, D. Does cage size affect heart rate and blood pressure of male rats at rest or after procedures that induce stress-like responses? Contemp. Top. 2003, 42, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
- Barker, T.H.; George, R.P.; Howarth, G.S.; Whittaker, A.L. Assessment of housing density, space allocation and social hierarchy of laboratory rats on behavioural measures of welfare. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailoo, J.D.; Murphy, E.; Varholick, J.A.; Novak, J.; Palme, R.; Würbel, H. Evaluation of the effects of space allowance on measures of animal welfare in laboratory mice. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaskill, B.N.; Pritchett-Corning, K.R. The effect of cage surface on behavior and reproduction in Crl:CD1(Icr) and C57BL/6NCrl laboratory mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Princz, Z.; Radnai, I.; Biróné Németh, E.; Matics, Z.S.; Gerencsér, Z.S.; Nagy, I.; Szendrő, Z.S. Effect of cage height on the welfare of growing rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 114, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szendrő, Z.S.; Matics, Z.S.; Odermatt, M.; Gerencsér, Z.S.; Nagy, I.; Szendrő, K.; Dalle Zotte, A. Use of different areas of pen by growing rabbits depending on the elevated platforms’ floor-type. Animal 2011, 6, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rommers, J.M.; Meijerhof, R. La dimensions de la cage influence-t-elle la productivitè et la bien-èntre des lapins. Cuniculture 1998, 25, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
- Mirabito, L.; Galliot, P.; Souchet, C.; Dumont, F.; Thomeret, F. Logement collectif des lapines reproductrices: Conséquences zootechniques. In Proceedings of the 11èmes Journées de la Recherche Cunicole, Paris, France, 29–30 November 2005; pp. 53–56. [Google Scholar]
- Bignon, L.; Bouchier, M.; Coutelet, G.; Galliot, P.; Souchet, C.; Fortun-Lamothe, L. Individual housing of young does in different sized cages: Impact on welfare, economic costs and productive data. In Proceedings of the 10th World Rabbit Congress, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 3–6 September 2012; pp. 1045–1049. [Google Scholar]
- Prola, L.; Cornale, P.; Renna, M.; Macchi, E.; Perona, G.; Mimosi, A. Effect of breed, cage type, and reproductive phase on fecal corticosterone levels in doe rabbits. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2013, 16, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szendrő, Z.S.; McNitt, I.J.; Matics, Z.S.; Mikó, A.; Gerencsér, Z.S. Alternative and enriched housing systems for breeding does: A review. World Rabbit Sci. 2016, 24, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumans, V. Science-based assessment of animal welfare: Laboratory animals. Rev. Sci. Tech. OIE 2005, 24, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Szendrő, Z.; Łapiński, S.; Matics, Z.; Gerencsér, Z. Study on Adult Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Preferences for Cages of Different Sizes. Animals 2024, 14, 3368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14233368
Szendrő Z, Łapiński S, Matics Z, Gerencsér Z. Study on Adult Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Preferences for Cages of Different Sizes. Animals. 2024; 14(23):3368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14233368
Chicago/Turabian StyleSzendrő, Zsolt, Stanisław Łapiński, Zsolt Matics, and Zsolt Gerencsér. 2024. "Study on Adult Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Preferences for Cages of Different Sizes" Animals 14, no. 23: 3368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14233368
APA StyleSzendrő, Z., Łapiński, S., Matics, Z., & Gerencsér, Z. (2024). Study on Adult Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Preferences for Cages of Different Sizes. Animals, 14(23), 3368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14233368