Occurrence of Eimeria spp. and Intestinal Helminths in Free-Range Chickens from Northwest and Central Romania
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals, Samples, and Sample Analysis
2.2. PCR
2.3. Statistical Analysis
2.4. Ethical Statement
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Farrell, D. The role of poultry in human nutrition. In Poultry Development Review; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2013; pp. 2–9. [Google Scholar]
- Shifaw, A.; Feyera, T.; Walkden-Brown, S.W.; Sharpe, B.; Elliott, T.; Ruhnke, I. Global and regional prevalence of helminth infection in chickens over time: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Statista. Leading Poultry Producers in the European Union in 2022. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1407478/leading-poultry-meat-producers-in-the-eu/ (accessed on 24 November 2023).
- Eurostat. Agricultural Production—Livestock and Meat. 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?oldid=427096 (accessed on 25 November 2023).
- U.S. Department of Agriculture. Romania: Challenging Prospects for Romania’s Poultry Industry. 2020. Available online: https://fas.usda.gov/data/romania-challenging-prospects-romanias-poultry-industry (accessed on 24 November 2023).
- National Institute of Statistics. Efectivele de Animale şi Producţia Animală, în Anul 2022. 2023. Available online: https://insse.ro/cms/ro/content/efectivele-de-animale-%C5%9Fi-produc%C5%A3ia-animal%C4%83-%C3%AEn-anul-2022 (accessed on 24 November 2023).
- Statista. Eggs—Romania. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/food/dairy-products-eggs/eggs/romania (accessed on 24 November 2023).
- El Jeni, R.; Dittoe, D.K.; Olson, E.G.; Lourenco, J.; Seidel, D.S.; Ricke, S.C.; Callaway, T.R. An overview of health challenges in alternative poultry production systems. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Javaregowda, A.K.; Kavitha Rani, B.; Revanna, S.P.; Udupa, G. Prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites of backyard chickens (Gallus domesticus) in and around Shimoga. J. Parasit. Dis. 2016, 40, 986–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mujahid, T. Prevalence of Intestinal Helminth Parasites of Chicken (Gallus Gallus Domesticus Linnaeus, 1758) in Lalitpur District, Nepal. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Zoology, Institute of Science and Technology, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Gržinić, G.; Piotrowicz-Cieślak, A.; Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A.; Górny, R.L.; Ławniczek-Wałczyk, A.; Piechowicz, L.; Olkowska, E.; Potrykus, M.; Tankiewicz, M.; Krupka, M.; et al. Intensive poultry farming: A review of the impact on the environment and human health. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 160014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tomza-Marciniak, A.; Pilarczyk, B.; Tobiańska, B.; Tarasewicz, N. Gastrointestinal parasites of free-range chickens: A worldwide issue. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj-Napoca Vet. Med. 2019, 76, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blake, D.P.; Knox, J.; Dehaeck, B.; Huntington, B.; Rathinam, T.; Ravipati, V.; Ayoade, S.; Gilbert, W.; Adebambo, A.O.; Jatau, I.D.; et al. Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Vet. Res. 2020, 51, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McDonald, V.; Shirley, M.W. Past and future: Vaccination against Eimeria. Parasitology 2009, 136, 1477–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peek, H.W.; Landman, W.J.M. Coccidiosis in poultry: Anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. Vet. Q. 2011, 31, 143–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pop, L.M.; Varga, E.; Coroian, M.; Nedișan, M.E.; Mircean, V.; Dumitrache, M.O.; Farczádi, L.; Fülöp, I.; Croitoru, M.D.; Fazakas, M.; et al. Efficacy of a commercial herbal formula in chicken experimental coccidiosis. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coroian, M.; Pop, L.M.; Popa, V.; Friss, Z.; Oprea, O.; Kalmár, Z.; Pintea, A.; Borșan, S.D.; Mircean, V.; Lobonțiu, I.; et al. Efficacy of Artemisia annua against Coccidiosis in Broiler Chickens: A Field Trial. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaramillo-Ortiz, J.M.; Burrell, C.; Adeyemi, O.; Werling, D.; Blake, D.P. First detection and characterisation of Eimeria zaria in Europe. Vet. Parasitol. 2023, 324, 110068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blake, D.P.; Vrba, V.; Xia, D.; Jatau, I.D.; Spiro, S.; Nolan, M.J.; Underwood, G.; Tomley, F.M. Genetic and biological characterisation of three cryptic Eimeria operational taxonomic units that infect chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Int. J. Parasitol. 2021, 51, 621–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicholls, J.; Obendorf, D.L. Application of a composite faecal egg count procedure in diagnostic parasitology. Vet. Parasitol. 1994, 52, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Györke, A.; Pop, L.; Cozma, V. Prevalence and distribution of Eimeria species in broiler chicken farms of different capacities. Parasite 2013, 20, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schnitzler, B.E.; Thebo, P.L.; Mattsson, J.G.; Tomley, F.M.; Shirley, M.W. Development of a diagnostic PCR assay for the detection and discrimination of four pathogenic Eimeria species of the chicken. Avian Pathol. 1998, 27, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schnitzler, B.E.; Thebo, P.L.; Tomley, F.M.; Uggla, A.; Shirley, M.W. PCR identification of chicken Eimeria: A simplified read-out. Avian Pathol. 1999, 28, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haug, A.; Thebo, P.; Mattsson, J.G. A simplified protocol for molecular identification of Eimeria species in field samples. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 146, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blake, D.P.; Worthing, K.; Jenkins, M.C. Exploring Eimeria genomes to understand population biology: Recent progress and future opportunities. Genes 2020, 11, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feed&Additive. Global Poultry Industry and Trends. 2021. Available online: https://www.feedandadditive.com/global-poultry-industry-and-trends/ (accessed on 30 November 2023).
- Butcher, G.D.; Miles, R.D. Intestinal Parasites in Backyard Chicken Flocks; University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS: Gainesville, FK, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Tomza-Marciniak, A.; Pilarczyk, B.; Tobianska, B.; Tarasewicz, N. Gastrointestinal parasites of free-range chickens. Ann. Parasitol. 2014, 60, 305–308. [Google Scholar]
- McDougald, L.R. Internal Parasites. In Diseases of Poultry, 13th ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: New York City, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1117–1147. [Google Scholar]
- Afolabi, O.J.; Simon-Oke, I.A.; Olasunkanmi, A.O. Intestinal parasites of domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) in Akure, Nigeria. J. Biomed. 2016, 1, e9771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belete, A.; Addis, M.; Ayele, M. Review on major gastrointestinal parasites that affect chickens. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc. 2016, 6, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
- Mesa-Pineda, C.; Navarro-Ruíz, J.L.; López-Osorio, S.; Chaparro-Gutiérrez, J.J.; Gómez-Osorio, L.M. Chicken coccidiosis: From the parasite lifecycle to control of the disease. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 787653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Species | Primer Sequence 5′ 3′ | Annealing Temperature (°C) | Amplicon Size (bp) |
---|---|---|---|
E. acervulina | F 5′-GGGCTTGGATGATGTTTGCTG-3′ R 5′-GCAATGATGCTTGCACAGTCAGG-3′ | 65 | 145 |
E. brunetti | F 5′-CTGGGGCTGCAGCGACAGGG-3′ R 5′-ATCGATGGCCCCATCCCGCAT-3′ | 58 | 183 |
E. maxima | F 5′-GTGGGACTGTGGTGATGGGG-3′ R 5′-ACCAGCATGCGCTCACAACCC-3′ | 65 | 205 |
E. mitis | F 5′-GTTTATTTCCTGTCGTCGTCTCGC-3′ R 5′-GTATGCAAGAGAGAATCGGGATTCC-3′ | 65 | 330 |
E. necatrix | F 5′-AGTATGGGCGTGAGCATGGAG-3′ R 5′-GATCAGTCTCATCATAATTCTCGCG-3′ | 58 | 160 |
E. praecox | F 5′-CATCGGAATGGCTTTTTGAAAGCG-3′ R 5′-GCATGCGCTAACAACTCCCCTT-3′ | 65 | 215 |
E. tenella | F 5′-AATTTAGTCCATCGCAACCCTTG-3′ R 5′-CGAGCGCTCTGCATACGACA-3′ | 65 | 278 |
OTUx | Xf2 5′-GGGTAGAGCCAGGGGTAGAG-3′ Xr2 5′-CGTAGTCCCAAGTGCCAACT-3′ | 58 | 1018 |
OTUy | Yf1 5′-CAAGAAGTACACTACCACAGCATG-3′ Yr1 5′-ACTGATTTCAGGTCTAAAACGAAT-3′ | 56 | 346 |
OTUz | Zf1 5′-TATAGTTTCTTTTGCGCGTTGC-3′ Zr1 5′-CATATCTCTTTCATGAACGAAAGG-3′ | 58 | 147 |
Species | Frequency (n) | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eimeria spp. | 36 | 24.8 | 18.5–32.5 | 0.002 |
A. galli/H. gallinarum | 37 | 25.5 | 19.1–33.2 | |
Capillaria spp. | 34 | 23.5 | 17.3–31.0 | |
Strongyle egg | 12 | 8.3 | 4.8–13.9 | |
Single infection | 43 | 29.7 | 22.8–37.5 | 0.251 |
Mixed infection | 33 | 22.8 | 16.7–30.2 | |
Total | 77 | 53.1 | 45.0–61.0 |
Species | 12–23 Months (n = 69) | 24–36 Months (n = 76) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Eimeria spp. | 14 (9.7; 5.8–15.6) | 22 (15.2; 10.2–21.9) | 0.182 |
A. galli/H. gallinarum | 18 (12.4; 8.0–18.8) | 19 (13.1; 8.6–19.6) | 0.869 |
Capillaria spp. | 17 (11.7; 7.5–18.0) | 17 (11.7; 7.5–18.0) | 1 |
Strongyle eggs | 5 (3.5; 1.5–7.8) | 7 (4.8; 2.4–9.6) | 0.563 |
Single infection | 16 (11.0; 6.9–17.2) | 28 (19.3; 13.7–26.5) | 0.07 |
Mixed infection | 16 (11.0; 6.9–17.2) | 17 (11.7; 7.5–18.0) | 0.861 |
Total | 32 (22.1; 16.1–29.5) | 45 (31.0; 24.1–39.1) | 0.138 |
1–10 Chickens (n = 40) | 11–20 Chickens (n = 58) | 21–30 Chickens (n = 30) | 31–45 Chickens (n = 17) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eimeria spp. | 6 (4.1; 1.9–8.7) | 10 (6.9; 3.8–12.2) | 10 (6.9; 3.8–12.2) | 10 (6.9; 3.8–12.2) | 0.957 |
A. galli/H. gallinarum | 6 (4.1; 1.9–8.7) | 19 (13.1; 8.6–19.6) | 5 (3.5; 1.5–7.8) | 7 (4.8; 2.4–9.6) | 0.003 |
Capillaria spp. | 7 (4.8; 2.4–9.6) | 12 (8.3; 4.8–13.9) | 10 (6.9; 3.8–12.2) | 5 (3.5; 1.5–7.8) | 0.332 |
Strongyle egg | 2 (1.4; 0.4–4.9) | 5 (3.5; 1.5–7.8) | 4 (2.8; 1.1–6.9) | 1 (0.7; 0.1–3.8) | 0.343 |
Single infection | 13 (9.0; 5.3–14.7) | 13 (9.0; 5.3–14.7) | 9 (6.2; 3.3–11.4) | 9 (6.2; 3.3–11.4) | 0.692 |
Mixed infection | 3 (2.1; 0.7–5.9) | 16 (11.0; 6.9–17.2) | 8 (5.5; 2.8–10.5) | 6 (4.1; 1.9–8.7) | 0.010 |
Total | 16 (11.0; 6.9–17.2) | 29 (20.0; 14.3–27.3) | 17 (11.7; 7.5) | 15 (10.3; 6.4–16.4) | 0.08 |
Species | Winter (n = 66) | Spring (n = 79) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Eimeria spp. | 16 (11.0; 6.9–17.2) | 20 (13.8; 9.1–20.4) | 0.504 |
A. galli/H. gallinarum | 13 (9.0; 5.3–14.7) | 24 (16.6; 11.4–23.5) | 0.07 |
Capillaria spp. | 9 (6.2; 3.3–11.4) | 25 (17.2; 12.0–24.2) | 0.006 |
Strongyle egg | 4 (2.8; 1.1–6.9) | 8 (5.5; 2.8–10.5) | 0.248 |
Single infection | 17 (11.7; 7.5–18.0) | 26 (17.9; 12.5–25.0) | 0.169 |
Mixed infection | 11 (7.6; 4.3–13.1) | 22 (15.2; 10.2–21.9) | 0.05 |
Total | 29 (20.0; 14.3–27.3) | 48 (33.1; 26.0–41.1.) | 0.03 |
Frequency (n) | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Single infection | ||||
Eimeria spp. | 16 | 11.0 | 6.9–17.2 | 0.121 |
Ascaridia/Heterakis | 11 | 7.6 | 4.3–13.1 | |
Capillaria spp. | 10 | 6.9 | 3.8–12.2 | |
Strongyle | 5 | 3.5 | 1.5–7.8 | |
Mixed infection | ||||
E + A/H | 8 | 5.5 | 2.8–10.5 | 0.03 |
E + C | 3 | 2.1 | 0.7–5.9 | |
A/H + C | 10 | 6.9 | 3.8–12.2 | |
A/H + S | 2 | 1.4 | 0.4–4.9 | |
E + A/H + C | 5 | 3.5 | 1.5–7.8 | |
E + C + S | 4 | 2.8 | 1.1–6.9 | |
A/H + C + S | 1 | 0.7 | 0.1–3.8 |
Species | Frequency (n) | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
E. acervulina | 15 | 41.7 | 27.1–57.8 | 0.002 |
E. tenella | 10 | 27.8 | 15.9–44.0 | |
E. praecox | 6 | 16.7 | 7.9–31.9 | |
E. brunetti | 6 | 16.7 | 7.9–31.9 | |
OTUy | 3 | 8.3 | 2.9–21.8 | |
OTUz | 3 | 8.3 | 2.9–21.8 | |
E. mitis | 2 | 5.6 | 1.5–18.1 | |
A + P | 1 | 2.8 | 0.5–14.2 | 0.699 |
A + T | 3 | 8.3 | 2.9–21.8 | |
A + B | 3 | 8.3 | 2.9–21.8 | |
M + P | 1 | 2.8 | 0.5–14.2 | |
M + T | 1 | 2.8 | 0.5–14.2 | |
P + T | 3 | 8.3 | 2.9–21.8 | |
A + P + T | 2 | 5.6 | 1.5–18.1 | 0.818 |
A + M + P + T | 1 | 2.8 | 0.5–14.2 | |
A + P + T + B | 2 | 5.6 | 1.5–18.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Coroian, M.; Fábián-Ravasz, T.-Z.; Dobrin, P.R.; Györke, A. Occurrence of Eimeria spp. and Intestinal Helminths in Free-Range Chickens from Northwest and Central Romania. Animals 2024, 14, 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040563
Coroian M, Fábián-Ravasz T-Z, Dobrin PR, Györke A. Occurrence of Eimeria spp. and Intestinal Helminths in Free-Range Chickens from Northwest and Central Romania. Animals. 2024; 14(4):563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040563
Chicago/Turabian StyleCoroian, Mircea, Tünde-Zsuzsánna Fábián-Ravasz, Patricia Roxana Dobrin, and Adriana Györke. 2024. "Occurrence of Eimeria spp. and Intestinal Helminths in Free-Range Chickens from Northwest and Central Romania" Animals 14, no. 4: 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040563
APA StyleCoroian, M., Fábián-Ravasz, T. -Z., Dobrin, P. R., & Györke, A. (2024). Occurrence of Eimeria spp. and Intestinal Helminths in Free-Range Chickens from Northwest and Central Romania. Animals, 14(4), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040563