Next Article in Journal
A Subovulatory Dose of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) May Sustain Terminal Follicle Development and Reproductive Efficiency during Anestrus in Sheep
Previous Article in Journal
Insights to Study, Understand and Manage Extruded Dry Pet Food Palatability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Management of Grassland on Prey Availability and Physiological Condition of Nestling of Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio

1
Department of Botany and Evolutionary Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
2
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Łódzki 3, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(7), 1093; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071093
Submission received: 8 February 2024 / Revised: 28 March 2024 / Accepted: 29 March 2024 / Published: 3 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Birds)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The decline in biodiversity in agricultural areas in much of biological Europe is linked to agricultural intensification and land use changes. Bird species inhabiting natural and semi-natural grassland are among the most endangered ecological groups in Europe. This study aimed to determine the impact of grassland use on the availability of arthropods for red-backed shrike Lanius collurio and the condition of their chicks. A total of 133 pastures with different types of use were delineated: 1. extensively used meadows, 2. intensively used meadows fertilised with mineral fertilisers, and 3. intensively used meadows fertilised with manure. The analyses also took into account environmental factors that can affect food availability and condition parameters of chicks (distance to the forest, distance to the river, soil moisture, and proportion of shrubs and tree stands in the meadow border zone). The diversity of arthropods was greatest in extensively used meadows, and the average abundance and proportion of invertebrates over 1 cm in length was highest in intensively used meadows, especially those fertilised with manure. Coefficients characterising body condition parameters (resBCI) and glucose levels of nestlings associated with breeding birds foraging in extensively used meadows indicate good nutrition, but blood parameters suggest severe environmental stress, as is the case in the intensively used meadows fertilised with manure.

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the influence of grassland management on the potential food base of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio and the condition of chicks in the population inhabiting semi-natural grasslands in the Narew floodplain. The grassland area was divided into three groups: extensively used meadows, intensively used meadows fertilised with mineral fertilisers, and intensively used meadows fertilised with liquid manure, and selected environmental factors that may influence food availability were determined. Using Barber traps, 1825 samples containing 53,739 arthropods were collected, and the diversity, abundance, and proportion of large arthropods in the samples were analysed depending on the grassland use type. In the bird population, the condition of the chicks was characterised by the BCI (Body Condition Index) and haematological parameters (glucose level, haemoglobin level, haematocrit, and H:L ratio). The diversity of arthropods was highest in extensively used meadows. Still, the mean abundance and proportion of arthropods over 1 cm in length differed significantly for Orthoptera, Hymenoptera, Arachne, and Carabidae between grassland use types, with the highest proportion of large arthropods and the highest abundance recorded in manure-fertilised meadows. The highest Body Condition Indexes and blood glucose levels of nestlings indicating good nestling nutrition were recorded in nests of birds associated with extensive land use. The H:L ratio as an indicator of the physiological condition of nestlings was high on manure-fertilised and extensively managed meadows, indicating stress factors associated with these environments. This suggests that consideration should be given to the effects of chemicals, such as pesticides or drug residues, that may come from slurry poured onto fields on the fitness of red-backed shrike chicks.

1. Introduction

Biodiversity in agricultural areas in much of Europe has been under serious threat for years. Significant declines in the number of species or changes in the community structure of such habitats have been reported for plants, e.g., [1], insects (e.g., [2,3,4]), birds (e.g., [5,6]), and mammals [7]. Declines in biodiversity have been identified as a result of increased agricultural intensification (e.g., [8,9]) and land use changes [10,11,12]. Increased grazing pressure and intensive use of machinery have led to the degradation of soil structure and natural soil renewal processes, resulting in soils of low fertility and biodiversity [13]. Semi-natural grasslands found in temperate climate zones are among the areas with the highest biodiversity in the world [14,15,16]. Meadows of this type are distinguished from other ecosystems by the composition of their flora and fauna and are important habitats for many invertebrates and birds whose occurrence is closely linked to this ecosystem [17,18,19]. At the same time, bird species inhabiting wet meadows are among Europe’s most threatened ecological groups [20,21]. The decline in the number of species and their abundance in agricultural areas is linked to aspects manifested by the intensification of agriculture: the creation of large monocultures, row and field crops, denser and more uniform cropping structures, the loss of native pastures and other semi-natural habitats, an increase in the area of autumn sowings [22,23], or increased use of fertilisers and pesticides [24]. Bird diversity is also negatively affected by the frequency and timing of mowing [25,26].
Frequent mowing, homogeneity of vegetation, and excessive use of agrochemicals have contributed to the decline in many pollinators and the loss of habitat for many arthropods [20,27,28], which are the preferred dietary component of many birds [20,29,30,31,32,33]. In the EU, grassland management to halt declines in grassland birds is mainly limited to delaying mowing dates after the chicks have hatched to reduce mortality [34]. The timing of hay harvest is also an important consideration. Moderately late timing of hay harvest conducted simultaneously over large tracts of land is likely to negatively affect the abundance and diversity of the most common arthropods [17,35]. In turn, the cessation of land use leads to changes in species composition and impoverishment of plant communities [36,37], which consequently reduces the availability of invertebrates for birds [20,38]. The diversity, abundance, and availability of invertebrates for birds in restored wetlands are also modified by groundwater levels [39,40,41] and habitat moisture [26,39,42]. In forests and agricultural environments, the negative effects of drought and high temperatures on the abundance of soil fauna, e.g., Collembola, Diptera, and other arthropods, were recorded [43,44,45,46].
Food supplies are usually considered to be a natural and direct factor that can affect bird breeding densities by influencing the survival of full-grown birds or their production of young [47]. Usually, food supply is a critical factor after the young hatch, but food scarcity can also be a serious limiting factor prior to hatching, especially in species that commence breeding in early spring when invertebrate abundance is still low [48] or that have a nestling stage that depends on synchrony with insects’ density [49,50]. A shortage of food during the pre-breeding or egg-laying period can result in a lower proportion of pairs entering breeding [51,52]. In experimental studies with food supplementation, the authors found that the food limitation after the young hatch can also result in a low condition of chicks, high chick mortality, and decreased breeding success [53,54,55]. This may be especially true in anthropogenically modified landscapes [56,57,58]. The availability of food seems to be a key factor for the development of chicks affecting their condition, usually assessed as measurements of morphological traits (e.g., wing length, tarsus, and culmen), body weight, and BCIs (Body Condition Indexes [59,60]), fat score [59,61,62,63], and haematological [59,64,65,66], physiological [67], and biochemical [65,67] parameters.
The Body Condition Index (body weight divided by one of the body length parameters) is commonly used to assess the condition of birds (see [60,68,69]) and to determine body energy reserves [70,71,72] because the available data suggest that morphometric indices of body condition are often moderately to strongly correlated with fat content in birds [60,73]. Body condition indices have been proven to be a good indicator of the survival prospects of nestling birds [74,75] and to significantly influence their future life [76,77,78]. However, morphometric measurements cannot always effectively detect differences in the condition of birds inhabiting different habitats with consistent access to food [79] or belonging to different populations [80] and often do not reflect the values of other physiological parameters related to bird health or nutritional status [81,82,83]. Measurements based on physiological data, including haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit, haemogram, triglycerides, glucose, and ketone bodies, are commonly used to assess the health of birds [84,85], including in studies of wild birds (e.g., [86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]), and can be used to assess the condition of birds and the effects of environmental stress on their condition [83,95,96,97,98,99]. This is related to the modern view of the condition of the individual [100,101] linked to the influence of many factors shaping weight, metabolic functions, and individual quality. These are influenced by the quality of food (e.g., [102,103,104,105]), infections (e.g., [87,106]), the presence of parasites (e.g., [107,108]) or potentially pathogenic fungi (e.g., [109]), climate (e.g., [110]), genetic and environmental conditions shaping immune function (e.g., [111,112]), and the adaptation of body mass to prey–predator relationships or migration conditions (e.g., [79,113,114,115,116]). All of the above factors contribute to condition variation and influence the costs and benefits of fitness [116,117,118]. In addition to BCIs, measurements of various physiological parameters are therefore used in assessing bird fitness. Minias [98], in a review of more than 120 published studies, concludes that in most of the bird species studied, haemoglobin concentration was positively correlated with commonly used fitness indices such as body weight and fat content, as well as with diet quality. Diet quality is a factor that significantly affects the development of nestlings in the nest, and, as indicated by studies conducted on the Eurasian blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus and the great tit Parus major, haemoglobin concentration in nestlings is closely related to food quality and availability [64,119]. Haemoglobin concentration in chicks also reliably reflected the intensity of haematophagous ectoparasite invasion [see 98]. Furthermore, haemoglobin concentration correlates with such fitness-related traits as the timing of arrival at breeding grounds, the timing of breeding, egg size, developmental stability, and habitat quality, although these relationships were not always consistent [98].
Another reliable indicator of the impact of environmental stress on vertebrates is the H:L ratio, which changes in response to external stressors, including adverse climatic or weather conditions, environmental pollution, increased reproductive effort, or parasite invasion [99,120]. Baseline levels of the H:L ratio, measured under normal physiological conditions (without acute stress), are highly consistent across individuals over the long term [121], and, hence, the H:L ratio has been most commonly used in physio-ecological studies as a simple but robust measure of physiological stress [96]. Often, changes in the H:L ratio are linked to the response to nutritional conditions [122,123,124,125].
Other authors point to glucose and haematocrit as indicators of environmental stress related to both nutrition and pollution. Glucose concentrations may also indicate malnutrition in birds [126]. Haematocrit is one of the more commonly used haematological indices, since, as indicated by a study conducted on the blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus, haematocrit is influenced primarily by environmental conditions rather than genetic or maternal factors [127]. On the other hand, Kamiński et al., in studies conducted on white storks, observed the effect of heavy metal element interactions in a polluted environment on Hb (haemoglobin) content and values of red blood [128] and concluded that the use of only Hct (haematocrit) and Hb to assess the health and condition of birds is questionable and gives a positive correlation with various environmental stresses [129].
The present work is a continuation of the study of the floodplain of a large lowland central European river (Narew River) included in the Natura 2000 network on the influence of the type and intensity of use of grasslands and their fertilisation regime on the functioning of biodiversity. The Narew and Biebrza river valleys in north-east Poland are among the most valuable areas of biotic diversity in Europe [130]. The flooded river valleys are home to specific meadows that have been extensively used as hay and grazed meadows for many centuries. In Poland, the process of transformation of land use and the intensification of production accelerated significantly in the 1990s. The intensification of agricultural production in north-eastern Poland relates primarily to the increase in cattle numbers and the intensification of grassland management. The transformation of agriculture and the increase in the number of livestock also resulted in an increase in the use of manure and slurry as fertiliser applied to the soil. The intensification of fodder production, resulting in reduced areas of permanent pastures and meadows and more intensive management, may have lowered both the amount of food and its availability to birds. So far, we have shown that the mode of use, especially the frequency of mowing and the type of fertilisation, modified by environmental factors such as distance to the river, soil moisture, and the presence of shrubs affects the biotic diversity of invertebrates, amphibians, and birds [26]. The highest invertebrate diversity was recorded in extensively used meadows introduced in agro-environmental projects, while the strongest reduction in the number of species and their abundance was caused by intensive use of meadows with manure fertilisation [26].
The question has arisen as to whether declining invertebrate diversity leads to reduced breeding productivity of insectivorous birds and whether it reduces the condition of nestlings during development in the nest. Stanton et al. [131], in a review paper, report that previous studies have shown negative relationships between agricultural intensification and insect availability, reduced food availability, and lower bird survival and reproduction, but rarely have these two topics been linked. Moreover, the number of papers highlighting the impact of agricultural land use on the physiological aspects of birds is sparse. While the effects of agricultural resource management on bird diversity, species occurrence or abundance, and reproduction have been investigated (e.g., [20,26,29,132,133]), there are few reports on how such factors affect birds’ body or physiological condition during the nesting season (e.g., [134,135,136,137]).
As a model species, we chose for our study the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio, which is a breeding species in agricultural areas in Europe. In western European countries, there has been a significant decline in its population [138,139], which is listed as a species in need of conservation as listed in Annex I of the Birds Directive [Directive 2009/147/EC]. Karlsson, in a study in Finland, shows that a reduction in the heterogeneity and floristic diversity of the herbaceous vegetation (and thus a decrease in the density of invertebrates and their biomass) in intensively cultivated agricultural areas is detrimental to the red-backed shrike due to an increase in the costs necessary for breeding success [140]. Red-backed shrikes feed dependent nestlings mainly with ground-living arthropods (spiders, orthopterans, and beetles) [141,142]. The nestlings are fed food items of mainly medium and large size, and the largest invertebrates are torn apart by adult birds, which feed the chicks with their fragments [142].
This study aimed to analyse how the management of grassland affects the availability of potential food for shrikes and the condition of the chicks of this species. We used the assessment of residuals BCIs and several haematological indices as measures of condition. In addition, we have included in our analyses the influence of selected environmental factors that may shape food availability and chick condition parameters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area (Figure 1) is located in north-eastern Poland, in the valley of the Narew River, between the villages of Grądy-Woniecko, Bronowo, Kalinówka-Basie, and Lutostań (endpoints of the study area: EPSG 2180: 1. N: 53°08′23.40″, E: 22°22′54.85″; 2. N: 53°07′15.90″, E: 22°23′41.30″; 3. N: 53°07′42.35″, E: 22°19′02.33″; and 4. N: 53°06′14.14″, E: 22°19′27.93″). The study area had 13.2 km2 and was located on humid grasslands in agricultural use.
The study area was extensively reclaimed in the 1960s [143], and it is currently assigned to the Special Bird Protected Area “Wizna Marsh”. The land drainage investments of the entire Wizna peatland complex, followed by permanent hay-cutting, radically changed the original character of the meadow habitats. In the years 1962–1971, the entire surface of the peat bog was subjected to exhaustive drainage works, and for almost the next 50 years, the dominant areas of swamps, reeds, and shrublands have been replaced by multi-hay meadows with different levels of use. The treatments carried out allowed the clearing of scrub and shrub and a significant increase in the area of grassland used for agriculture [143,144]. The timing of the presence of river flooding during the year and ownership aspects have a key influence on how individual grasslands are managed. The CORINE Land Cover dataset (Copernicus Land Monitoring Service) was used to classify grassland according to one of two soil moisture types: permanently wet areas and temporarily wet areas. There were a total of 133 individual grasslands in the study area, which were of similar size (Figure 1) and for which the type of use (frequency of mowing and type and intensity of fertilisation) was determined. Based on our earlier study [26], three types of meadows were distinguished: extensively used meadows mown once a year (area of approx. 5.3 km2), intensively used meadows mown two to four times per year and fertilised with mineral fertiliser (area approx. 5.8 km2), and intensively used meadows mown more than twice with cattle slurry (area approx. 2.1 km2). In addition, the distance of the centre of each meadow to the riverbed (m) and the edge of the nearest forest (m) and the length of the boundary line of each meadow occupied by shrubs and trees (m) were measured. These variables were measured in “QGIS Desktop 3.4.13” [145] using a loaded orthophoto from “Geoportal 2” (https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/ accessed on 1 April 2023), as well as measurements taken in the field using a Leica 1600 rangefinder and a rangefinder integrated with Leica Geovid R 15 × 56 binoculars.

2.2. Methods: Arthropods—Field and Laboratory Works

Epigeic arthropods, i.e., the potential food source for the red-backed shrike, were sampled by using Barber pitfall traps. The traps were placed in 27 meadows, along two randomly chosen transects (II and III) across the Narew River valley (Figure 1). Six linearly arranged Barber pitfall traps were placed in each meadow. The traps were filled to about 1/3 of their height with ethylene glycol, using a modified method according to Huruk [146]. Trapping took place in the three growing seasons (May–August) of 2018, 2019, and 2020. Each year, we performed, 4 series of trapping, each one 7 days long, at regular intervals. Therefore, we carried out a total of 12 trapping series. At the end of each trapping series, trap contents were collected from 1944 set-up traps, of which 1825 contained invertebrates and 119 were empty or destroyed by agricultural activities.
In each sample, the identification of invertebrates to orders Arachne, Orthoptera, Hymenoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, and Coleoptera and, in the case of Coleoptera beetles imago, to families Carabidae, Curculionidae, and Elateridae and their abundances were determined. Large carrion beetles Silphidae were not included in the taxonomic composition of arthropods, as their abundance in the sample was dependent on the number and type of prey present (mainly small vertebrates that accidentally fell into the traps). The Coleoptera larvae also were identified in samples. The taxonomic diversity of arthropods was characterised by the Shannon index.
Arthropods from each sample were spread out on white boards and photographed. Based on the photographs taken, the size of individual specimens was measured to the nearest 1 mm using QGIS Desktop 3.4.13 [145]. A total of 53,739 organisms were measured. The average size of the taxa and the ratio of the number of arthropods over 1 cm in size to the sum of all measured organisms from each taxonomic group were calculated, as in [147,148,149].

2.3. Methods: Birds—Field and Laboratory Works

The number of shrike breeding pairs in each breeding season was determined based on detected nests [150]. Surveys were carried out annually between 2017 and 2020 in May–August, during which the territories of pairs of birds were determined using the mapping method [151] and nests were found. During the work, foraging adult birds’ locations were mapped, and data on nest locations and territories were entered into a GPS (Global Positioning System) space using the Garmin GPSmap76S and eTrex Vuista HGx. These data were used to calculate the distances between the closest neighbouring nests using QGis Desktop 3.4.13 software.
Based on the observations of nesting territories and foraging sites of birds, individual nesting territories were assigned to the two most frequently used grasslands. During the study period, we found 145 nests with brood. The average clutch size was 5.0 ± 1.16 eggs/nest and 4.3 ± 0.17 chicks/nest). In extensively used meadows, 32 nests were found (4.9 ± 1.01 eggs/nest; 4.0 ± 1.62 chicks/nest); in the vicinity of meadows fertilised with mineral fertilisers, 70 nests were found (4.9 ± 1.26 eggs/nest, 4.1 ± 1.59 chicks/nest); and in meadows fertilised with manure, 43 nests were found (5.1 ± 1.05 eggs/nest; 4.6 ± 1.14 chicks/nest). The chicks from which samples were taken were approximately 5–10 days old.
For 97 nests, information related to the body and physiological condition of the 337 chicks was obtained. In chicks, wing length was measured with an accuracy of 1 mm, tarsus length with an accuracy of 0.1 mm, and weight of birds with an accuracy of 0.5 g. Exponential regression models were fitted between body mass and tarsus length (y = −51.905 + exp(3.911+(0.016*x)) and between body mass and wing length (y = 6.927exp(0.074x)) [152,153]. The residuals from these models (resBC1 and resBCI2, respectively) were used to assess the body condition of chicks.
Haematological indices (haemoglobin level, haematocrit, and white blood cell indices) and glucose levels were used to assess the physiological condition of the chicks [154,155].
Blood was collected from the cutaneous ulnar vein, in haematocrit microcapillaries, and a blood smear was performed on a basal slide according to, e.g., [156,157]. Haemoglobin [g/dL] was measured using a HemoCue HB 201+ analyser and glucose [mg/dL] using a HemoCue Glucose 201+ analyser. Haematocrit capillaries were centrifuged using a Hettich Haematocrit 200 centrifuge. Haematocrit level (%) was determined from the ratio of the height of the morphotic elements to the height of the whole blood column, which was measured with a Measy electronic calliper to the nearest 0.01 mm. To determine the proportion of leucocyte types in the blood, the “Hemacolor” method was used (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The number of heterophils, eosinophils, basophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes was determined in the smears, and the H:L ratio was calculated from these data to assess the level of environmental stress in birds [96].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Relationships between arthropod abundance, arthropod diversity, and the ratio of large arthropods in samples and variation in environmental factors were examined using canonical simultaneous analysis based on three data matrices: the first consisted of the abundance of arthropods in Barber pitfall trap samples collected in individual meadows, the second consisted of the share of arthropods larger than 1 cm in the taxa sample, and the third consisted of environmental variables: distance to the forest boundary (m), distance to the river (m), the length of the meadow boundary line with shrubs and tree stands (m), soil moisture (ranks: 1–3), number of times mown (ranks: 0–4), percentage of mowing area (%), type of meadows use (protected meadows; intensive use, chemical fertilisation; and intensive use, liquid manure fertilisation), and intensity of fertilisation (ranks: 1. lack, 2. moderate fertilisation, 3. excessive fertilisation, and 4. intensive fertilisation). The relationship was analysed using constrained ordination and redundancy analysis—RDA [158]—with Canoco 5 software. The significance of the relation with explanatory variables and the effect of the whole constrained axis were tested using the Monte Carlo permutation test (number of permutations = 99,999). The contribution of individual environmental variables to the explanation of variance in the dependent variables was also tested using the same Monte Carlo permutation test, and probabilities of error of the first type were given for each variable, along with the correction as a result of testing the null hypothesis during multiple comparisons. Corrections were made using the false discovery rate method, a procedure designed to control for the expected proportion of “discoveries” (rejected null hypotheses) that are false. FDR-controlling procedures provide high testing power [159,160].
Both resBCI1 and resBCI2 were highly correlated with each other (0.689, p < 0.001; n = 337; Figure A1), so the PCA principal component resulting from both variables (factor loadings = 0.906) was used in further analyses to assess variation in chick body condition depending on environmental factors (hereafter, this new variable is called PCAresBCI1-2). The PCA model and estimation of eigenvalues of the vector were performed using Statistica 13.3 [161].
The relationship of body condition of nestlings and haematological indices (glucose, haemoglobin, haematocrit, and H:L ratio) on environmental variables: distance to the forest boundary (m), distance to the river (m), the length of the meadows boundary line with shrubs and tree stands (m), soil moisture (category: temporary and permanent), type of grassland use (category: 1. lack, protected meadows; 2. intensive, natural fertilisation; and 3. intensive, liquid manure), as well as the number of nestlings per nest and the distance to the nearest neighbouring nest (m), was tested in generalised linear mixed models—GLMMs [162,163]—using IBM SPSS 29 software. Three models were compared in the study. Model A (or initial model) contained only the environmental variables characterising the river valley grassland landscape: distance of the nest to the river, distance of the nest to the forest, soil moisture, length of the border of the meadow covered with shrubs/tree stands, and the number of chicks in the nest. This model was largely unaffected by the factors that characterise grasslands use. Model B (or full model) included all variables from Model A plus those variables characterising the intensity and type of grassland use in the study area and the distance between neighbouring nests. Finally, Model C (or selected model) included only statistically significant explanatory variables. The best-fitting models were selected using the method of introducing the most relevant variables or removing the least relevant in subsequent model-building steps [163,164]. GLMM contained parameters common to all (regression fixed effects and variance components) and cluster-specific parameters estimated from the population distribution. For the variables PCResBCI1-2, glucose level, and haemoglobin level, normal distributions with a link linear function (identity function) were used. For the haematocrit level and H:L ratio, the Gamma distribution and a logarithmic link function were assumed. To exclude some of the variability of the predicted variables (body condition and haematological indexes), the year of bird breeding and the nest ID were included as random variables.

3. Results

3.1. Diversity of the Potential Food Base of the Red-Backed Shrike

Differences in the composition of potential red-backed shrike prey between the grassland types studied were found for mean arthropod abundance, the proportion of arthropods larger than 1 cm, and arthropod diversity and were modified by several environmental variables linked to the nature of the river valley, which together formed a combination of a system of specific environments.
The environmental factors represented by the first two axes separated by the RDA methods explained 71.38% of the variance in the abundance and diversity of captured invertebrate taxa (Figure 2). The effect of variation in arthropod abundance and diversity variance by the environmental variables studied was statistically significant (pseudo F = 1.7, p = 0.045), with two variables playing the strongest role in the variation: distance to the river and number of performed mowing (Table 1). The distance to the river was inversely correlated with soil moisture and determined the more abundant presence of Hemiptera and Curculionidae, and meadows with this location in the space of the Narew valley were the most frequent areas introduced to agri-environmental programmes, extensively used and unfertilised (Figure 2). The diversity of arthropods showed an increase for meadows with extensive type of use (Figure 2). Fertilisation intensity and type of extensive use were the variables influencing the explanation of about 10% of the variance in arthropod diversity and abundance of each (Table 1). The intensively fertilised and mown meadows were characterised by a higher abundance of Elateridae and Orthoptera, partly also Arachne, which was also due to the lower humidity of these habitats located further away from the river (Figure 2).
Large arthropods (greater than 1 cm in length) were most abundant in liquid manure-fertilised meadows, localised at a high distance to the river, with temporary moisture of soil and were mainly large Carabidae, other Coleoptera, and Orthoptera (Figure 3). The proportion of large invertebrates in general was lowest in meadows with an extensive type of use, with large spiders having a higher proportion in this type of grassland (Figure 3). The occurrence of a high proportion of taxa larger than 1 cm was associated with total taxon abundance in the case of Orthoptera, Carabidae, and Curculionidae, whereas for the other studied taxa, especially Arachne, Diptera, Coleoptera larvae, a high proportion of large specimens was rather associated with a specific habitat type and was not associated with total taxa abundance (Figure 3). The factors most strongly influencing the variation in the proportion of large pondweed were the distance to the river, the extensive type of meadow management, the number of mowings per year, the intensity of fertilisation, the degree of soil moisture, and also the percentage of mown meadow area (Table 2).

3.2. Variation in Red-Backed Shrike Chick’s Condition between Meadow Types

The body condition of the chicks (PCAresBCI1-2) was higher in nests that were further away from the nests of neighbouring pairs of birds and also depended on the location of the nesting territory to the river and woodland (Table 3). Chick glucose levels were significantly positively related only to brood size (Table 4). Variables entered into the initial model testing the hypothesis of an effect of grassland use intensity on the physiological condition of red-backed shrike chicks were found to be unrelated to variation in their glucose levels (Table 4, Figure 4). Glucose levels were not correlated with indicators of chick body condition (Figure 5).
The level of haemoglobin in red-backed shrike chicks increased with increasing proximity of nests to the Narew River, as well as in the case of pairs of birds whose nesting territories were located on meadows with a low proportion of shrubs in the birch zone (Table 5). The initial models showed no correlation between haematocrit level and the determined variables (Table 6), while the H:L ratio, like haemoglobin level, increased with decreasing distance from the nest site (Table 7). The addition of variables characterising the intensity of use of the meadows into the A models tested made it possible to conclude that the type of fertilisation and the intensity of use influenced the parameters of the physiological condition of the chicks. The chicks of pairs of birds nutritionally associated with extensively used meadows, like those of birds from manure-fertilised meadows, had low haemoglobin levels compared to birds from territories located on meadows fertilised with mineral fertilisers (Table 5, Figure 4). Haemoglobin level was also strongly related to brood size, increasing significantly in broods with few chicks (Table 5).
Haematocrit levels depended mainly on the type of grassland use (Table 6, Figure 4); it was significantly higher in chicks associated with mineral-fertilised meadows compared to extensively managed meadows as well as grasslands fertilised with manure (Table 6). Similarly, the H:L ratio was lowest in mineral-fertilised meadows, and the ratio increased in extensively used and manure-fertilised meadows and decreased with increasing distance from the river and woodland (Table 7, Figure 4). Chicks with better body condition had lower H:L ratios (rs = −0.125, n = 282, p < 0.001), higher haemoglobin levels (rs = 0.217, n = 306, p = 0.0001), and higher haematocrit levels (rs = 0.152, n = 282, p = 0.010) (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

The transformation of agriculture and the intensification of agricultural production, including the intensification of livestock breeding, is leading to the replacement of extensively used grasslands and pastures with areas of high grass production, resulting in an increase in fertilisation and the use of plant protection products, which are reducing biodiversity. The more intensive management results in a decrease in invertebrate diversity, which is an important food source for many bird species. The red-backed shrike is a predominantly insectivorous species that feeds dependent nestlings mainly with ground-living arthropods (spiders, orthopterans, and beetles) [141,142], preferring large prey [140,141,165] that is not only more easily detectable but has also been shown in other species to have greater nutritional value [166,167].
Karlsson [140] lists Coleoptera (which accounted for 53% of the diet) and Orthoptera (8.3% of the diet) as among the three most common invertebrates found in red-backed shrike pellets. The dominance of beetles and Orthoptera (mainly grasshoppers) in the shrike’s diet is due, among other reasons, to the fact that they are captured by relatively inexpensive energetic methods, known as a ‘sit and wait’ strategy [148,168]. The importance of these two groups of invertebrates in the diet of shrikes is also highlighted by Paczuska et al. [169] who studied the Great Grey Shrike (Lanius excubitor) and reported that Coleoptera was found most abundantly in pellets, while Orthoptera dominated in larders. However, it is worth remembering that examining the composition of pellets has its limitations related to the rate of digestion of various groups of insects, which is why the number of identified soft-bodied arthropods is often lower, for example like flies or spider fragments [170]. Kuper et al. [171] indicated that the drastic decline in the abundance of this species in the Netherlands is due to a significant decrease in the number of large invertebrates. Therefore, following the work of Goławski and Goławska [149], we believe that the abundance and proportion of large invertebrates are good indicators of habitat importance for the shrike.
The highest diversity of arthropods playing a key role in the shrike’s diet throughout its European range [165] was found in extensively managed meadows. Extensively managed meadows had the highest number of Hymenoptera and the highest proportion of large spiders. In a study by Karlsson [140], Hymenoptera accounted for 30.9% of the prey found in pellets and was the second most popular diet source just after beetles. Similar results were reported by Nikolov [141]. On the other hand, soft and non-hard invertebrates such as spiders Araneae, caterpillars Lepidoptera, Opiliones, and Lumbricomorpha appeared two to three times more frequently in the diet of chicks than in that of adult birds [141]. As we have shown in the paper [26], Opiliones in the Narew River valley were strongly correlated in occurrence with soil moisture, which was higher in extensively used meadows close to the river, and their abundance decreased with the intensity of use and fertilisation.
Despite the high diversity of arthropods in extensive meadows, their abundance, which is important for the availability of food for chick-feeding birds, was significantly lower than in more intensively managed meadows. Also, the proportion of large arthropods (greater than 1 cm) was higher in fertilised and intensively managed grasslands than in those extensively managed. Plant biomass, vegetation species structure, and habitat heterogeneity are the main factors affecting the abundance and taxonomic diversity of meadow arthropods [172,173]. Nutrient availability is a major determinant of many ecosystem properties, including primary and secondary production and community structure [174,175]. It can be hypothesised that the higher habitat trophicity that was induced by fertilisation increased the abundance of some invertebrates, especially large insects, but reduced the overall diversity compared to the non-trophic biota. A similar result was obtained by Prather and Kaspari, who indicated in the Pigtail Alley Prairie (Oklahoma, USA) that simply increasing plant biomass through fertilisation increased the abundance, activity, and richness of arthropods [176]. Nutrient loading not only increases plant crop biomass but also plant litter production, which can increase the basal food resource for the detrital community, resulting in increased detritivore and epigeal predator abundances, as predicted by biodiversity and productivity theory, but not affecting species richness [177].
In addition, the use of meadows by mowing them simplifies the habitat structure and most often results in a reduction in arthropod diversity but an increase in arthropod activity, which could move more easily and faster and feed on previously mowed ground [176,177]. Meadows fertilised with mineral fertiliser and slurry were mown several times during the season, resulting in the maintenance of the shortest vegetation. Under short sward conditions, the availability of potential prey for the shrike can increase significantly [178,179]. The role of grasslands with low sward structure is greater than would be suggested by the abundance and biomass of animals in this habitat alone. Moskat [180] showed that longer grass increases the frequency of hunting in flight, which is associated with much higher energy expenditure, so the red-backed shrike prefers to collect prey from the ground when possible. Goławski and Meissner point out that mowing meadows during the breeding season also increases the number of damaged (injured) invertebrates [179]. Therefore, injured and readily available invertebrates are a frequent food of the shrike. The shrike’s use of animals killed during agricultural work in its diet is confirmed by the observations of Van Nieuwenhuyse and Vandekerkhove [181]. The Lesser grey shrike Lanius minor also shows a significant increase in foraging intensity in mown meadows compared to unmown meadows [182].
In our study, nestling body condition did not differ significantly between pairs of birds collecting food in extensively managed meadows and intensively managed meadows with different types of fertilisation. Overall, the factor values of the PCAresBCI1-2 component indicated that birds make good use of food for growth during the nesting period in different habitat types regardless of the variation in potential food. The only factor shaping the variation in body condition between nestlings was the aspect of competition, expressed by the influence of the distance of the nearest neighbouring pairs and modified by the distance to the river and forest. The condition of chicks was negatively related to the distance between neighbouring nests. The degree of nourishment of chicks was not associated with the expected negative effect of nesting pair density on chick condition as a result of competition for food resources and reduced food provisioning (e.g., [183,184,185]) and did not decrease with increasing distance between neighbouring nests. Such a result suggests that birds choose certain parts of the environment for the best quality environment for nestling rearing. Despite high body condition indices (BCI), chicks in the extensive meadows had haematological parameters indicative of high levels of environmental stress, as did chicks of pairs that collected food in slurry-fertilised meadows.
Birds maintain higher plasma glucose concentrations (P(Glu)) than other vertebrates of similar body weight and, in most cases, appear to store relatively little glucose intracellularly as glycogen, with glucose being used as a metabolic substrate [186]. In wild chicks of the Welcome swallow Hirundo neoxena and the Spotted dove Streptopelia chinensis, Lill et al. reported a developmental increase in BGlu—blood glucose—which probably reflected an increase in metabolic rate as the chicks gained weight and became more active [187]. Baseline glucose levels have also been shown to be an individual characteristic negatively associated with survival (e.g., [42,188]) and to increase as a result of adverse environmental conditions during nestling development [188,189]. Blood glucose and haemoglobin levels may therefore be part of the physiological processes linking environmental conditions to lifespan, a conclusion also drawn from research by Braun and Sweazea [186]. Also, the other two haematological indices studied (haematocrit and H:L ratio) indicate a similar effect of long-term exposure to some stressors on chicks. The effect of stressors that increase the proportion of heterophils and decrease the proportion of lymphocytes present in the blood has been extensively reported in the literature (e.g., [99,120,123,125,127]), and, in addition, birds with a high H:L ratio have been observed to exhibit higher intra-hatch mortality [124] or shortened lifespan and reduced annual survival [190]. Haematocrit, on the other hand, is an indicator of the capacity of the circulatory system to carry oxygen and is related to metabolic levels [191,192].
Many authors have indicated that a reduction in the average haemoglobin level in chicks is associated with limited access to food (e.g., [65,98,193,194]) or poor food quality (e.g., [64,119]). Also, high haematocrit values are correlated with environmental food abundance and the absence of infections and parasites [195,196]. In the case of the Siberian tit Poecile cinctus, it was shown that food availability was a stress factor affecting H:L index values [190]. Also, a study by Bańbura et al. [102] involving targeted feeding of Great Tits showed that fed birds have lower H:L index values, while Kaliński et al. [197] suggested that areas with lower food availability for birds may generate chronic environmental stress.
The results of our study indicate that it is not the availability of food but environmental pollution affecting food quality that may be a factor in the reduced physiological condition of shrike chicks. Environmental pollution with chemical compounds associated with intensive grassland use, particularly chemical compounds associated with liquid manure fertilisation, may trigger physiological responses to adverse factors, particularly under conditions of high metabolism in developing young birds. We believe that an important factor to be analysed in future studies may be the effect of chemicals, which, in the case of our study, may come specifically from the liquid manure poured on the fields. Haematological indices indicate the strongest stress in chicks of birds associated with grasslands of this type of management, but also chicks of birds of extensively managed grasslands included in agri-environmental schemes had similar values of indices indicative of environmental stress, which is an unexpected result. We predict that the surface water run-off in the Narew valley, carrying loads of chemical compounds associated with the use of pesticides and poured manure (e.g., nitrate, antibiotics, and other pharmaceutics), causes their concentration in the extensively managed meadows, as these were located closer to the river in areas that were permanently irrigated, making water-soluble compounds available to plants and subsequently the trophic network of this environment. Antibiotics are widespread and irrationally used in agriculture, medical treatment, and livestock breeding. Most antibiotics ingested by animals are not fully absorbed and metabolised but enter the environment through faeces or the frequent application of faecal or slurry manure, increasing the ecological risk of antibiotics in soil and groundwater. In studies carried out in NE Catalonia in natural springs in an agroecosystem environment with intensive livestock production, high concentrations of nitrate in groundwater, tetracycline residues, and sulphonamides were found, which were characterised by seasonal variations mainly related to hydrological factors and reactive transport processes [198]. Genes conferring resistance to those classes of antibiotics most commonly used in animal production were found in most sources [198].
Pharmaceutics can further be transformed into bioactive compounds, stable and mobile in the environment, with potentially higher toxicity and having a significant impact on living organisms and microbial communities [199]. The negative impact of antibiotic residues on the structure and function of microbial communities is often shown to have the effect of promoting resistance in primary bacteria in the environment, which can be transferred to species associated with infections [200]. It cannot be ruled out that such a risk problem leads to the observed physiological response in chicks. Heterophils are involved in non-specific immune responses; they proliferate into tissues, and their numbers increase in response to prolonged bacterial and fungal infections and abnormalities related to diet and stress [201,202]. The level of stress is not only manifested by an increasing number of heterophils [203,204] but also by a decrease in the number of lymphocytes [205]. It is also manifested by complex responses of the immune system and often compensatory interactions of various components attempting to stabilise the homeostasis of the organism.

5. Conclusions

High body condition indices of chicks of pairs of birds feeding on extensively farmed meadows included in agri-environmental programs and a diverse food base indicate favourable conditions for the development of the chicks, but haematological indices describing physiological condition suggest a strong environmental stressor on the chicks.
Presumably, a stressor could be environmental poisoning by nitrogen compounds and the ingress of pharmaceutical residues through intensive fertilisation of the grassland with slurry, which is reflected in the physiological functioning of the organism and haematological indices indicative of environmental stress.
As the long-term effects of such impacts on the environment cannot be underestimated, our results suggest that further work is required to clarify the condition of the red-backed shrike and other birds associated with this grassland area, particularly as the study area is a Natura 2000 site designated for bird protection and biodiversity. It is important to know if such a condition is widespread in grasslands located on river floodplains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation: J.J.N. and P.K.; methodology: J.J.N., P.K. and A.G.; validation: J.J.N., P.K. and B.D.; investigation—field study: J.J.N., P.K., A.M.S., B.D. and A.G.; laboratory study: P.K., J.J.N., A.M.S. and B.D.; formal analysis: J.J.N., P.K. and A.G.; statistical analysis: J.J.N. and P.K.; data curation: J.J.N. and P.K.; visualisation: P.K. and J.J.N.; writing—original draft preparation: J.J.N. and P.K.; writing—review and editing by all authors; supervision: J.J.N.; project administration: J.J.N.; funding acquisition: J.J.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Regional Directorate for Environmental Protection in Olsztyn (Decision WOPN-OOP.6401.42.2015.EK of 3 April 2015), the Regional Directorate for Environmental Protection in Białystok (Decision WPN.6401.81.2016.MD of 17 March 2016), and the local ethical committee for animal experiments in Olsztyn (Resolution No. 16/2015 of 25 March 2015, Resolution No. 33/2016 of 26 October 2016, and Resolution No. 7/2018 of 27 February 2018) regarding the possibility of taking biological samples (feathers and blood) from birds.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The primary data supporting the results of this study are available upon a reasonable request to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Oskar Gross and Krzysztof Lewandowski for their help with the fieldwork.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Relationship between resBCI1 and resBCI2 of red-backed shrike chicks.
Figure A1. Relationship between resBCI1 and resBCI2 of red-backed shrike chicks.
Animals 14 01093 g0a1

References

  1. Andreasen, C.; Stryhn, H.; Streibig, J.C. Decline of the Flora in Danish Arable Fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 1996, 33, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuussaari, M.; Heliölä, J.; Luoto, M.; Pöyry, J. Determinants of Local Species Richness of Diurnal Lepidoptera in Boreal Agricultural Landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 122, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Van Dyck, H.; Van Strien, A.J.; Maes, D.; Van Swaay, C.A.M. Declines in Common, Widespread Butterflies in a Landscape under Intense Human Use. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Raven, P.H.; Wagner, D.L. Agricultural Intensification and Climate Change Are Rapidly Decreasing Insect Biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2002548117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wretenberg, J.; Lindström, Å.; Svensson, S.; Pärt, T. Linking Agricultural Policies to Population Trends of Swedish Farmland Birds in Different Agricultural Regions. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007, 44, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rigal, S.; Dakos, V.; Alonso, H.; Auniņš, A.; Benkő, Z.; Brotons, L.; Chodkiewicz, T.; Chylarecki, P.; De Carli, E.; Del Moral, J.C.; et al. Farmland Practices Are Driving Bird Population Decline across Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2216573120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Heer, M.; Kapos, V.; Ten Brink, B.J.E. Biodiversity Trends in Europe: Development and Testing of a Species Trend Indicator for Evaluating Progress towards the 2010 Target. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2005, 360, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tscharntke, T.; Klein, A.M.; Kruess, A.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Thies, C. Landscape Perspectives on Agricultural Intensification and Biodiversity—Ecosystem Service Management. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 857–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Báldi, A.; Faragó, S. Long-Term Changes of Farmland Game Populations in a Post-Socialist Country (Hungary). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 118, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kuemmerle, T.; Hostert, P.; Radeloff, V.C.; Van Der Linden, S.; Perzanowski, K.; Kruhlov, I. Cross-Border Comparison of Post-Socialist Farmland Abandonment in the Carpathians. Ecosystems 2008, 11, 614–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bonari, G.; Fajmon, K.; Malenovský, I.; Zelený, D.; Holuša, J.; Jongepierová, I.; Kočárek, P.; Konvička, O.; Uřičář, J.; Chytrý, M. Management of Semi-Natural Grasslands Benefiting Both Plant and Insect Diversity: The Importance of Heterogeneity and Tradition. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 246, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Soulé, E.; Hawes, C.; Young, M.; Henckel, L.; Michel, N.; Michonneau, P.; Bockstaller, C.A. Predictive Indicator Assessing Effect of Cropping System and Surrounding Landscape on Biodiversity. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 151, 110289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. EASAC Secretariat. Opportunities for Soil Sustainability in Europe; EASAC policy report 36; Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina 2018; Schaefer Druck und Verlag GmbH: Teutschenthal, Germany, 2018; pp. 1–42. Available online: https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/EASAC_Soils_complete_Web-ready_210918.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  14. Küster, H.; Keenleyside, C. The origin and use of agricultural grasslands in Europe. In Grasslands in Europe of High Nature Value; Veen, P., Jefferson, R., de Smidt, J., van der Straaten, J., Eds.; KNNV Publishing: Zeist, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dengler, J.; Janišová, M.; Török, P.; Wellstein, C. Biodiversity of Palearctic Grasslands: A Synthesis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 182, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chytrý, M.; Dražil, T.; Hájek, M.; Kalníková, V.; Preislerová, Z.; Šibík, J.; Ujházy, K.; Axmanová, I.; Bernátová, D.; Blanár, D.; et al. The Most Species-Rich Plant Communities in the Czech Republic and Slovakia (with New World Records). Preslia 2015, 87, 217–278. Available online: https://www.preslia.cz/article/pdf?id=90 (accessed on 15 March 2023).
  17. Cizek, O.; Zamecnik, J.; Tropek, R.; Kocarek, P.; Konvicka, M. Diversification of Mowing Regime Increases Arthropods Diversity in Species-Poor Cultural Hay Meadows. J. Insect Conserv. 2012, 16, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pywell, R.F.; Heard, M.S.; Bradbury, R.B.; Hinsley, S.; Nowakowski, M.; Walker, K.J.; Bullock, J.M. Wildlife-Friendly Farming Benefits Rare Birds, Bees and Plants. Biol. Lett. 2012, 8, 772–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wehn, S.; Burton, R.; Riley, M.; Johansen, L.; Hovstad, K.A.; Rønningen, K. Adaptive Biodiversity Management of Semi-Natural Hay Meadows: The Case of West-Norway. Land Use Policy 2018, 72, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vickery, J.A.; Tallowin, J.R.; Feber, R.E.; Asteraki, E.J.; Atkinson, P.W.; Fuller, R.J.; Brown, V.K. The Management of Lowland Neutral Grasslands in Britain: Effects of Agricultural Practices on Birds and Their Food Resources: Impacts of Grassland Management on Birds. J. Appl. Ecol. 2001, 38, 647–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kulik, M.; Baryła, R.; Urban, D.; Grzywaczewski, G.; Bochniak, A.; Różycki, A.; Tokarz, E. Vegetation and Birds Species Changes in Meadow Habitats in Polesie National Park, Eastern Poland. Rocz. Ochr. Sr. 2017, 19, 211–229. [Google Scholar]
  22. Murphy, M.T. Avian Population Trends within the Evolving Agricultural Landscape of Eastern and Central United States. Auk 2003, 120, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Newton, I. The Recent Declines of Farmland Bird Populations in Britain: An Appraisal of Causal Factors and Conservation Actions: Recent Declines of Farmland Bird Populations in Britain. Ibis 2004, 146, 579–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McLaughlin, A.; Mineau, P. The Impact of Agricultural Practices on Biodiversity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1995, 55, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pedrini, P.; Rizzolli, F.; Rossi, F.; Brambilla, M. Population Trend and Breeding Density of Corncrake Crex crex (Aves: Rallidae) in the Alps: Monitoring and Conservation Implications of a 15-Year Survey in Trentino, Italy. Ital. J. Zool. 2012, 79, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Knozowski, P.; Nowakowski, J.J.; Stawicka, A.M.; Górski, A.; Dulisz, B. Effect of Nature Protection and Management of Grassland on Biodiversity—Case from Big Flooded River Valley (NE Poland). Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 898, 165280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Biesmeijer, J.C.; Roberts, S.P.M.; Reemer, M.; Ohlemüller, R.; Edwards, M.; Peeters, T.; Schaffers, A.P.; Potts, S.G.; Kleukers, R.; Thomas, C.D.; et al. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 2006, 313, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goulson, D.; Nicholls, E.; Botías, C.; Rotheray, E.L. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 2015, 347, 1255957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Britschgi, A.; Spaar, R.; Arlettaz, R. Impact of Grassland Farming Intensification on the Breeding Ecology of an Indicator Insectivorous Passerine, the Whinchat Saxicola rubetra: Lessons for Overall Alpine Meadowland Management. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 130, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schekkerman, H.; Beintema, A.J. Abundance of invertebrates and foraging success of Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa chicks in relation to agricultural grassland management. Ardea 2007, 95, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gilroy, J.J.; Anderson, G.Q.A.; Grice, P.V.; Vickery, J.A.; Bray, I.; Watts, N.P.; Sutherland, W.J. Could soil degradation contribute to farmland bird declines? Links between soil penetrability and the abundance of yellow wagtails Motacilla flava in arable fields. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 3116–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Felici, L.D.; Piersma, T.; Howison, R.A. Abundance of arthropods as food for meadow bird chicks in response to short- and long-term soil wetting in Dutch dairy grasslands. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Onrust, J.; Wymenga, E.; Piersma, T.; Olff, H. Earthworm activity and availability for meadow birds is restricted in intensively managed grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 56, 1333–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Broyer, J.; Sukhanova, O.; Mischenko, A. Mowing Management and Density Dependence in Meadow Passerine Hatching Success. Bird Study 2014, 61, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Konvicka, M.; Benes, J.; Cizek, O.; Kopecek, F.; Konvicka, O.; Vitaz, L. How Too Much Care Kills Species: Grassland Reserves, Agri-Environmental Schemes and Extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from Its Former Stronghold. J. Insect Conserv. 2008, 12, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Myśliwy, M.; Bosiacka, B. Disappearance of Molinio-Arrhenatheretea Meadows Diagnostic Species in the Upper Płonia River Valley (NW Poland). Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2009, 18, 513–519. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nekrošienė, R.; Skuodienė, R. Changes in Floristic Composition of Meadow Phytocenoses, as Landscape Stability Indicators, in Protected Areas in Western Lithuania. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 21, 703–711. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schaub, M.; Martinez, N.; Tagmann-Ioset, A.; Weisshaupt, N.; Maurer, M.L.; Reichlin, T.S.; Abadi, F.; Zbinden, N.; Jenni, L.; Arlettaz, R. Patches of Bare Ground as a Staple Commodity for Declining Ground-Foraging Insectivorous Farmland Birds. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Berg, Å. Habitat Selection by Monogamous and Polygamous Lapwings on Farmland. The Importance of Foraging Habitats and Suitable Nest Sites. Ardea 1993, 81, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  40. Verhulst, J.; Kleijn, D.; Berendse, F. Direct and Indirect Effects of the Most Widely Implemented Dutch Agri-Environment Schemes on Breeding Waders: Agri-Environment Schemes and Breeding Waders. J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 44, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Żmihorski, M.; Pärt, T.; Gustafson, T.; Berg, Å. Effects of Water Level and Grassland Management on Alpha and Beta Diversity of Birds in Restored Wetlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 53, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rodenhouse, N.L.; Holmes, R.T. Results of Experimental and Natural Food Reductions for Breeding Black-Throated Blue Warblers. Ecology 1992, 73, 357–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Frampton, G.K.; Van Den Brink, P.J.; Gould, P.J.L. Effects of spring drought and irrigation on farmland arthropods in southern Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 2000, 37, 865–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pflug, A.; Wolters, V. Influence of drought and litter age on Collembola communities. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2001, 37, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lindberg, N.; Engtsson, J.B.; Persson, T. Effects of experimental irrigation and drought on the composition and diversity of soil fauna in a coniferous stand. J. Appl. Ecol. 2002, 39, 924–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsiafouli, M.A.; Kallimanis, A.S.; Katana, E.; Stamou, G.P.; Sgardelis, S.P. Responses of soil microarthropods to experimental short-term manipulations of soil moisture. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2005, 29, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Newton, I. Population Limitation in Birds; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  48. Broyer, J.; Curtet, L.; Boissenin, M. Does Breeding Success Lead Meadow Passerines to Select Late Mown Fields? J. Ornithol. 2012, 153, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marshall, M.R.; Cooper, R.J. Territory size of a migratory songbird in response to caterpillar density and foliage structure. Ecology 2004, 85, 432–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Seress, G.; Hammer, T.; Bókony, V.; Vincze, E.; Preiszner, B.; Pipoly, I.; Sinkovics, C.; Evans, K.L.; Liker, A. Impact of urbanization on abundance and phenology of caterpillars and consequences for breeding in an insectivorous bird. Ecol. Appl. 2018, 28, 1143–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Derbyshire, R.; Strickland, D.; Norris, D.R. Experimental Evidence and 43 Years of Monitoring Data Show That Food Limits Reproduction in a Food-Caching Passerine. Ecology 2015, 96, 3005–3015. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24702426 (accessed on 15 March 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Elmegaard, N.; Andersen, P.N.; Odderskær, P.; Prang, A. Food supply and breeding activity of Skylarks in fields with different pesticide treatment. In Proceedings of the 22 International Ornithology Congress, Durban, South Africa, 16–22 August 1998; Adams, N.J., Slotow, R.H., Eds.; BirdLife: Johannesburg, South Africa, 1999; pp. 1058–1069. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ruffino, L.; Salo, P.; Koivisto, E.; Banks, B.P.; Korpimäki, E. Reproductive responses of birds to experimental food supplementation: A meta-analysis. Front. Zool. 2014, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Marshall, M.R.; Cooper, R.J.; DeCecco, J.A.; Strazanac, J.; Butler, L. Effects of experimentally reduced prey abundance on the breeding ecology of the red-eyed vireo. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12, 261–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Granbom, M.; Smith, H.G. Food Limitation During Breeding in a Heterogeneous Landscape. Auk 2006, 123, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Evans, B.A.; Gawlik, D.E. Urban food subsidies reduce natural food limitations and reproductive costs for a wetland bird. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Seress, G.; Sándor, K.; Evans, K.L.; Liker, A. Food availability limits avian reproduction in the city: An experimental study on great tits Parus Major. J. Anim. Ecol. 2020, 89, 1570–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Grabarczyk, E.E.; Gill, S.A.; Vonhof, M.J.; Alabady, M.S.; Wang, Z.; Schmidt, J.M. Diet composition and diversity does not explain fewer, smaller urban nestlings. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0264381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bleeker, M.; Kingma, S.A.; Szentirmai, I.; Székely, T.; Komdeur, J. Body condition and clutch desertion in penduline tit Remiz pendulinus. Behaviour 2005, 142, 1465–1478. [Google Scholar]
  60. Labocha, M.K.; Hayes, J.P. Morphometric Indices of Body Condition in Birds: A Review. J. Ornithol. 2012, 153, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ardia, D.R. Super size me: An experimental test of the factors affecting lipid content and the ability of residual body mass to predict lipid stores in nestling European starlings. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Anteau, M.J.; Afton, A.D. Using plasma-lipid metabolites to index changes in lipid reserves of free-living lesser scaup (Aythya affinis). Auk 2008, 125, 354–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bergstrom, B.J.; Sherry, T.W. Estimating lipid and lean body mass in small passerine birds using TOBEC, external morphology and subcutaneous fat-scoring. J. Avian Biol. 2008, 39, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bańbura, J.; Bańbura, M.; Kaliński, A.; Skwarska, J.; Słomczyński, R.; Wawrzyniak, J.; Zieliński, P. Habitat and Year-to-Year Variation in Haemoglobin Concentration in Nestling Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2007, 148, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Czech, A.; Merska, M.; Ognik, K. Blood Immunological and Biochemical Indicators in Turkey Hens Fed Diets With a Different Content of the Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2014, 14, 935–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Poliserpi, M.B.; Noya Abad, T.; De Gerónimo, E.; Aparicio, V.; Brodeur, J.C. Behavioral and Physiological Response of the Passerine Bird Agelaioides badius to Seeds Coated with Imidacloprid. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 80293–80310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Totzke, U.; Fenske, M.; Hüppop, O.; Raabe, H.; Schach, N. The Influence of Fasting on Blood and Plasma Composition of Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 1999, 72, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Johnson, D.H.; Krapu, G.L.; Reinecke, K.J.; Jorde, D.G. An evaluation of condition indices for birds. J. Wildl. Manag. 1985, 49, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Labocha, M.K.; Schutz, H.; Hayes, J.P. Which body condition index is best? Oikos 2014, 123, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Blem, C.R. Avian energy storage. Curr. Ornithol. 1990, 7, 59–133. [Google Scholar]
  71. Conway, C.J.; Eddleman, W.R.; Simpson, K.L. Evaluation of Lipid Indices of the Wood Thrush. Condor 1994, 96, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ardia, D.R. Glycated Hemoglobin and Albumin Reflect Nestling Growth and Condition in American Kestrels. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2006, 143, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wenker, E.S.; Kendrick, E.L.; Maslanka, M.; Power, M.L. Fat scoring in four sparrow species as an estimation of body condition: A validation study. J. Field Ornithol. 2022, 93, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Alatalo, R.V.; Gustafsson, L.; Lundberg, A. Phenotypic selection on heritable size traits: Environmental variance and genetic response. Am. Nat. 1990, 135, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Linden, M.; Gustafsson, L.; Part, T. Selection of fledging mass in the collared flycatcher and the great tit. Ecology 1992, 73, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Merila, J. Genetic Variation in Offspring Condition: An Experiment. Funct. Ecol. 1996, 10, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kogel, C.H.D. Long-Term Effects of Brood Size Manipulation on Morphological Development and Sex-Specific Mortality of Offspring. J. Anim. Ecol. 1997, 66, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Merilä, J.; Svensson, E. Are Fat Reserves in Migratory Birds Affected by Condition in Early Life? J. Avian Biol. 1997, 28, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jenni-Eiermann, S.; Jenni, L. What can plasma metabolites tell us about the metabolism, physiological state and condition of individual birds? An overview. Biol. E Conserv. Della Fauna 1998, 102, 312–319. [Google Scholar]
  80. Castro, G.; Myers, J.P. Validity of predictive equations for total body fat in Sanderlings in different nonbreeding areas. Condor 1990, 92, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Schamber, J.L.; Esler, D.; Flint, P.L. Evaluating the Validity of Using Unverified Indices of Body Condition. J. Avian Biol. 2009, 40, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pryke, S.R.; Astheimer, L.B.; Griffith, S.C.; Buttemer, W.A. Covariation in life-history traits: Differential effects of diet on condition, hormones, behavior, and reproduction in genetic finch morphs. Am. Nat. 2012, 179, 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. O’Dell, D.A.; Carlo, M.A.; Kimmitt, A.; Bikowski, E.; Morris, K.R.; Dolby, A.A. Comparison of Techniques Measuring Stress in Birds. Va. J. Sci. 2014, 65, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mitchell, E.B.; Johns, J. Avian hematology and related disorders. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2008, 11, 501–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jones, M.P. Avian Hematology. Clin. Lab. Med. 2015, 35, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Machado-Filho, R.A.N.; Balsamao, G.M.; Marini, M.A. Seasonal differences in immune profiles and body conditions of migratory and permanent resident neotropical flycatchers. Condor 2010, 112, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Saino, N.; Calza, S.; Møller, A.P. Effects of a Dipteran Ectoparasite on Immune Response and Growth Trade-Offs in Barn Swallow, Hirundo rustica, Nestlings. Oikos 1998, 81, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pavlak, M.; Vlahović, K.; Jerčić, J.; Dovč, A.; Župančić, Ž. Age, sexual and seasonal differences of haematological values and antibody status to Chlamydophila sp. in feral and racing pigeons (Columba livia forma domestica) from an urban environment (Zagreb, Croatia). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2005, 51, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mortimer, L.; Lill, A. Activity-related variation in blood parameters associated with oxygen transport and chronic stress in little penguins. Aust. J. Zool. 2007, 55, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Krams, I.A.; Suraka, V.; Rantala, M.J.; Sepp, T.; Mierauskas, P.; Vrublevska, J.; Krama, T. Acute infection of avian malaria impairs concentration of haemoglobin and survival in juvenile altricial birds. J. Zool. 2013, 291, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Norte, A.C.; Lobato, D.N.C.; Braga, E.M.; Antonini, Y.; Lacorte, G.; Gonçalves, M.; Lopes de Carvalho, I.; Gern, L.; Núncio, M.S.; Ramos, J.A. Do ticks and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. constitute a burden to birds? Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 1903–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Minias, P. High glucose concentrations are associated with symptoms of mild anaemia in Whiskered Terns: Consequences for assessing physiological quality in birds. J. Ornithol. 2014, 155, 1067–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Granthon, C.; Williams, D.A. Avian Malaria, Body Condition, and Blood Parameters In Four Species of Songbirds. Wilson J. Ornithol. 2017, 129, 492–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Muriel, J.; Garcia-Longoria, L.; Magallanes, S.; Ortiz, J.A.; Marzal, A. Avian malaria, haematocrit, and body condition in invasive wetland passerines settled in southwestern Spain. Avian Res. 2022, 14, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Andersson, M.S.; Gustafsson, L. Glycosylated Haemoglobin: A New Measure of Condition in Birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 1995, 260, 299–303. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/50190 (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  96. Davis, A.K.; Maney, D.L.; Maerz, J.C. The Use of Leukocyte Profiles to Measure Stress in Vertebrates: A Review for Ecologists. Funct. Ecol. 2008, 22, 760–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lobato, D.N.C.; Braga, E.M.; Belo, N.O.; Antonini, Y. Hematological and parasitological health conditions of the Pale-breasted Thrush (Turdus leucomelas) (Passeriformes: Turdidae) in southeastern Brazil. Zoologia 2011, 28, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Minias, P. The use of haemoglobin concentrations to assess physiological condition in birds: A review. Conserv. Physiol. 2015, 3, cov007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Skwarska, J. Variation of heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the Great Tit Parus major—A review. Acta Ornithol. 2018, 53, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wilson, A.J.; Nussey, D.H. What is individual quality? An evolutionary perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Milot, E.; Cohen, A.A.; Vézina, F.; Buehler, D.M.; Matson, K.D.; Piersma, T. A novel integrative method for measuring body condition in ecological studies based on physiological dysregulation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bańbura, J.; Bańbura, M.; Glądalski, M.; Kaliński, A.; Markowski, M.; Michalski, M.; Nadolski, J.; Skwarska, J.; Zieliński, P. Body condition parameters of nestling Great Tits Parus major in relation to experimental food supplementation. Acta Ornithol. 2011, 46, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Perrig, M.; Grüebler, M.U.; Keil, H.; Naef-Daenzer, B. Experimental Food Supplementation Affects the Physical Development, Behaviour and Survival of Little Owl Athene noctua Nestlings. Ibis 2014, 156, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Korpimäki, E.; Hongisto, K.; Masoero, G.; Laaksonen, T. The Difference between Generalist and Specialist: The Effects of Wide Fluctuations in Main Food Abundance on Numbers and Reproduction of Two Co-existing Predators. J. Avian Biol. 2020, 51, jav.02508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Dzielski, S.A.; Bailey, R.L.; Fernandez-Duque, F.; Bonter, D.N. Supplemental Feeding of Insect Larvae Increases Mass of Nestling Eastern Bluebirds, but Not Nestling Black-capped Chickadees. J. Field Ornithol. 2021, 92, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Arsnoe, D.M.; Ip, H.S.; Owen, J.C. Influence of body condition on influenza A virus infection in mallard ducks: Experimental infection data. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Szabo, K.; Szalmas, A.; Liker, A.; Barta, Z. Effects of haematophagous mites on nestling house sparrows (Passer Domest.). Acta Parasitol. 2002, 47, 318–322. [Google Scholar]
  108. Simon, A.; Thomas, D.; Blondel, J.; Perret, P.; Lambrechts, M.M. Physiological ecology of Mediterranean blue tits: Effects of ectoparasites (Protocalliphora spp.) and food abundance on metabolic capacity of nestlings. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2004, 77, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Dulisz, B.; Dynowska, M.; Nowakowski, J.J. Body condition and colonization by fungi of House Sparrows Passer domesticus in the urban and rural environment. Eur. Zool. J. 2021, 88, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Balbontín, J.; Møller, A.P.; Hermosell, I.G.; Marzal, A.; Reviriego, M.; De Lope, F. Lifetime individual plasticity in body condition of a migratory bird. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 105, 420–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kamiński, M.; Janiszewski, T.; Indykiewicz, P.; Nowakowski, J.J.; Kowalski, J.; Dulisz, B.; Minias, P. Density-dependence of nestling immune function and physiological condition in semi-precocial colonial bird: A cross-fostering experiment. Front. Zool. 2021, 18, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Minias, P.; Podlaszczuk, P.; Indykiewicz, P.; Ledwoń, M.; Nowakowski, J.J.; Chyb, A.; Janiszewski, T. Genetic variation at innate and adaptive immune genes—Contrasting patterns of differentiation and local adaptation in a wild gull. Heredity 2023, 131, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Liker, A.; Papp, Z.; Bókony, V.; Lendvai, Á.Z. Lean Birds in the City: Body Size and Condition of House Sparrows along the Urbanization Gradient. J. Anim. Ecol. 2008, 77, 789–795. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20143251 (accessed on 1 October 2023). [CrossRef]
  114. Dulisz, B.; Nowakowski, J.J.; Górnik, J. Differences in biometry and body condition of the House sparrow (Passer domesticus) in urban and rural populations during breeding season. Urban Ecosyst. 2016, 19, 1307–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Guglielmo, C.G. Obese super athletes: Fat-fueled migration in birds and bats. J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 221, jeb165753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Lorch, P.D.; Proulx, S.; Rowe, L.; Day, T. Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2003, 5, 867–881. [Google Scholar]
  117. Cotton, S.; Small, J.; Pomiankowski, A. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16, R755–R765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Kisdi, E.; Utz, M.; Gyllenberg, M. Evolution of condition-dependent dispersal. In Dispersal Ecology and Evolution; Clobert, J., Baguette, M., Benton, T.G., Bullock, J.M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 139–151. [Google Scholar]
  119. Kaliński, A.; Bańbura, M.; Glądalski, M.; Markowski, M.; Skwarska, J.; Wawrzyniak, J.; Zieliński, P.; Bańbura, J. Physiological condition of nestling great tits (Parus major) declines with the date of brood initiation: A long term study of first clutches. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Minias, P.; Włodarczyk, R.; Meissner, W. Leukocyte profiles are associated with longevity and survival, but not migratory effort: A comparative analysis of shorebirds. Funct. Ecol. 2018, 32, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hõrak, P.; Saks, L.; Ots, I.; Kollist, H. Repeatability of condition indices in captive greenfinches (Carduelis chloris). Can. J. Zool. 2002, 80, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hoi-Leitner, M.; Romero-Pujante, M.; Hoi, H.; Pavlowa, A. Food availability and immune capacity in serin (Serinus serinus) nestlings. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2001, 49, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ilmonen, P.; Hasselquist, D.; Langefors, Å.; Wiehn, J. Stress, immunocompetence and leucocyte profiles of pied flycatchers in relation to brood size manipulation. Oecologia 2003, 136, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Suorsa, P.; Helle, H.; Koivunen, V.; Huhta, E.; Nikula, A.; Hakkarainen, H. Effects of forest patch size on physiological stress and immunocompetence in an area-sensitive passerine, the Eurasian treecreeper (Certhia familiaris): An experiment. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Bańbura, J.; Skwarska, J.; Bańbura, M.; Glądalski, M.; Holysz, M.; Kaliński, A.; Markowski, M.; Wawrzyniak, J.; Zieliński, P. Spatial and temporal variation in heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratios of nestling passerine birds: Comparison of blue tits and great tits. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. García-Rodríguez, T.; Ferrer, M.; Carrillo, J.C.; Castroviejo, J. Metabolic Responses of Buteo buteo to Long-Term Fasting and Refeeding. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Physiol. 1987, 87, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Simon, A.; Thomas, D.W.; Bourgault, P.; Blondel, J.; Perret, P.; Lambrechts, M.M. Between-Population Differences in Nestling Size and Hematocrit Level in Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus): A Cross-Fostering Test for Genetic and Environmental Effects. Can. J. Zool. 2005, 83, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kamiński, P.; Kurhalyuk, N.; Kasprzak, M.; Szady-Grad, M.; Jerzak, L. Element–element interactions in the blood of white stork (Ciconia ciconia) chicks from polluted SW Poland environments. In The White Stork in Poland: Studies in Biology, Ecology and Conservation; Tryjanowski, P., Sparks, T.H., Jerzak, L., Eds.; Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Poznań, Poland, 2006; pp. 471–480. [Google Scholar]
  129. Kamiński, P.; Kurhalyuk, N.; Jerzak, L.; Kasprzak, M.; Tkachenko, H.; Klawe, J.J.; Szady-Grad, M.; Koim, B.; Wiśniewska, E. Ecophysiological determinations of antioxidant enzymes and lipoperoxidation in the blood of White Stork Ciconia ciconia from Poland. Environ. Res. 2008, 109, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bojsza, A.; Lićwinko, M.; Pińkowska, J. Preservation of Wetland Habitats in the Upper Biebrza Valley LIFE 11 NAT/PL/422; Biebrza National Park: Goniadz, Poland, 2019; Available online: https://www.gorna.biebrza.org.pl/plik,4710,raport-laika-wersja-angielska.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  131. Stanton, R.L.; Morrissey, C.A.; Clark, R.G. Analysis of trends and agricultural drivers of farmland bird declines in North America: A review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 254, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Stoate, C.; Báldi, A.; Beja, P.; Boatman, N.D.; Herzon, I.; van Doorn, A.; de Snoo, G.R.; Rakosy, L.; Ramwell, C. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe—A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 91, 22–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Martin, A.E.; Collins, S.J.; Crowe, S.; Girard, J.; Naujokaitis-Lewis, I.; Smith, A.C.; Lindsay, K.; Mitchell, S.; Fahrig, L. Effects of farmland heterogeneity on biodiversity are similar to—Or even larger than—The effects of farming practices. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 288, 106698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kentie, R.W.; Hooijmeijer, C.E.; Trimbos, K.B.; Groen, N.M.; Piersma, T. Intensified agricultural use of grasslands reduces growth and survival of precocial shorebird chicks. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Van Vliet, H.E.J.; Stutchbury, B.J.M.; Newman, A.E.M.; Norris, D.R. The impacts of agriculture on an obligate grassland bird of North America. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 287, 106696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kusack, J.W.; Mitchell, G.W.; Evans, D.R.; Cadman, M.D.; Hobson, K.A. Effects of agricultural intensification on nestling condition and number of young fledged of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 709, 136195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Moreau, J.; Monceau, K.; Gonnet, G.; Pfister, M.; Bretagnolle, V. Organic farming positively affects the vitality of passerine birds in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 336, 108034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yosef, R. Conservation Commentary: Evaluation of the Global Decline in the True Shrikes (Family Laniidae). Auk 1994, 111, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Keller, V.; Herrando, S.; Voříšek, P.; Franch, M.; Kipson, M.; Milanesi, P.; Martí, D.; Anton, M.; Klvaňová, A.; Kalyakin, M.V.; et al. European Breeding Bird Atlas 2: Distribution, Abundance and Change; European Bird Census Council & Lynx Edicions: Barcelona, Spain, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  140. Karlsson, S. Season-Dependent Diet Composition and Habitat Use of Red-Backed Shrikes Lanius collurio in SW Finland. Ornis Fenn. 2004, 81, 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  141. Nikolov, B.P. Diet of the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio in Bulgaria. Acrocephalus 2002, 23, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  142. Panov, E.N. The True Shrikes (Lanidae) of the World. Ecology, Behavior and Evolution; Pensoft Publishers: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  143. Sołowiej, P. Zagospodarowanie Obiektu Bagno Wizna. Wiadomości Melior. I Łąkarskie 1974, 17, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  144. Próchnicki, A.; Kołos, P. Zastosowanie Retrospektywnej Analizy Zdjęć Lotniczych w Projektowaniu Zabiegów Renaturalizacyjnych Na Torfowisku Wizna (Dolina Narwi). Teledetekcja Sr. 2004, 33, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  145. QGIS Project. QGIS User Guide. Release 3.4. 2020. Available online: https://qgis.org/pl/site/forusers/download.html (accessed on 1 April 2023).
  146. Huruk, S. Program pomiarowy: O1 Fauna epigeiczna. In Zintegrowany Monitoring Środowiska Przyrodniczego. Zasady organizacji, System Pomiarowy, Wybrane Metody Badań; Kostrzewski, A., Kruszyk, R., Kolander, R., Eds.; Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza: Poznań, Poland, 2006; pp. 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  147. Hernández, A. Dieta de Los Pollos de Tres Especies Simpátricas de Alcaudones (Lanius spp.): Variaciones Con La Edad, Estacionales e Interespecíficas. Acta Vertebr. 1993, 20, 145–163. [Google Scholar]
  148. Lefranc, N.; Worfolk, T. Shrikes: A Guide to the Shrikes of the World; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  149. Goławski, A.; Goławska, S. Habitat Preference in Territories of the Red-Backed Shrike Shrike Lanius collurio and Their Food Richness in an Extensive Agriculture Landscape. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 2008, 54, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  150. Tryjanowski, P.; Hromada, M.; Antczak, M.; Grzybek, J.; Kuźniak, S.; Lorek, G. Which Method Is Most Suitable for Censusing Breeding Populations of Red-Backed (Lanius collurio) and Great Grey (L. excubitor) Shrikes? Ornis Hung. 2003, 12–13, 223–228. [Google Scholar]
  151. Bibby, C.J.; Burgess, N.D.; Hill, D.A.; Mustoe, S.H. Bird Census Techniques; Academic Press: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  152. Green, A.J. Mass/length residuals: Measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 2001, 82, 1473–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Peig, J.; Green, A.J. New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: The scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 2009, 118, 1883–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Votýpka, J.; Šimek, J.; Tryjanowski, P. Blood Parasites, Reproduction and Sexual Selection in the Red-Backed Shrike (Lanius collurio). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2003, 40, 431–439. [Google Scholar]
  155. Gayathri, K.L.; Shenoy, K.B.; Hegde, S.N. Blood Profile of Pigeons (Columba livia) during Growth and Breeding. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2004, 138, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Owen, J.C. Collecting, Processing, and Storing Avian Blood: A Review: Avian Blood Collection Techniques. J. Field Ornithol. 2011, 82, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Campbell, T.W. Blood Sample Collection and Preparation in Birds. In Exotic Animal Hematology and Cytology; Campbell, T.W., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Šmilauer, P.; Lepš, J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using Canoco 5; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  159. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Benjamini, Y. Discovering the false discovery rate. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 2010, 72, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Statistica [Data Analysis Software Program]; Version 13TIBCO Software Inc.: Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2017; Available online: http://statistica.io (accessed on 2 February 2023).
  162. McCulloch, C.E.; Searle, S.R. Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  163. IBM SPSS Advanced Statistics 29; IBM Corporation: Armonk, NY, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/SSLVMB_29.0.0/pdf/IBM_SPSS_Advanced_Statistics.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  164. McCullagh, P.; Nelder, J.A. Generalized Linear Models; Chapman and Hall: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  165. Cramp, S. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Flycatchers to Shrikes; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  166. Brodmann, P.A.; Reyer, H.U. Nestling Provisioning in Water Pipits (Anthus spinoletta): Do Parents Go for Specific Nutrients or Profitable Prey? Oecologia 1999, 120, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Lepley, M.; Ranc, S.; Isenmann, P.; Bara, T.; Ponel, P.; Guillemain, M. Diet and gregarious breeding in Lesser Grey Shrike Lanius minor in Mediterranean France. Rev. D’écologie (La Terre Et La Vie) 2004, 59, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Van Nieuwenhuyse, D.; Nollet, F.; Evans, A. The ecology and conservation of the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio breeding in Europe. Aves 1999, 36, 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  169. Paczuska, M.; Jaskuła, R.; Goławski, A. Diet composition and prey choice by the Great Grey Shrike Lanius excubitor during the non-breeding period: Comparing two methods of diet analysis. Bird Study 2021, 68, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Tryjanowski, P.; Karg, M.K.; Karg, J. Food of the Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio: A Comparison of Three Methods of Diet Analysis. Acta Ornithol. 2003, 38, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Kuper, J.; Van Duinen, G.J.; Nijssen, M.; Geertsma, M.; Esselink, H. Is the Decline of the Red-Backed Shrike (Lanius collurio) in the Dutch Coastal Dune Area Caused by a Decrease in Insect Diversity? Ring 2000, 22, 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  172. Lassau, S.A.; Hochuli, D.F. Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 2004, 27, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Arnan, X.; Rodrigo, A.; Retana, J. Uncoupling the effects of shade and food resources of vegetation on Mediterranean ants: An experimental approach at the community level. Ecography 2007, 30, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Chapin III, F.S.; Vitousek, P.M.; Van Cleve, K. The Nature of Nutrient Limitation in Plant Communities. Am. Nat. 1985, 127, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Gruner, D.S.; Smith, J.E.; Seabloom, E.W.; Sandin, S.A.; Ngai, J.T.; Hillebrand, H.; Harpole, W.S.; Elser, J.J.; Cleland, E.E.; Bracken, M.E.; et al. A cross-system synthesis of consumer and nutrient resource control on producer biomass. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 740–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Prather, R.M.; Kaspari, M. Plants regulate grassland arthropod communities through biomass, quality, and habitat heterogeneity. Ecosphere 2019, 10, e02909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Patrick, L.B. Fertilization and Plant Litter Effects on the Plant and Epigeal Arthropod Communities. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA, OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, Columbus, OH, USA, 2009. Available online: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1259588844 (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  178. Brandl, R.; Lübcke, W.; Mann, W. Habitatwahl beim Neuntöter Lanius collurio. J. Ornithol. 1986, 127, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Goławski, A.; Meissner, W. The Influence of Territory Characteristics and Food Supply on the Breeding Performance of the Red-Backed Shrike (Lanius collurio) in an Extensively Farmed Region of Eastern Poland. Ecol. Res. 2008, 23, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Moskát, C. Changes in the frequency of hunting techniques in the Red-backed Shrike Lanius collurio during the breeding season. Ornis Hung. 2001, 11, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  181. Van Nieuwenhuyse, D.; Vandekerkhove, K. Caractéristiques et typologie des territoires de la Pie-grièche écorcheur (Lanius collurio) en Lorraine belge. Aves 1992, 29, 137–154. [Google Scholar]
  182. Wirtitsch, M.; Hoi, H.; Valera, F.; Krištín, A. Habitat composition and use in lesser grey shrike Lanius minor. Folia Zool. 2001, 50, 137–150. [Google Scholar]
  183. Alatalo, R.V.; Lundberg, A. Density-dependence in breeding success of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). J. Anim. Ecol. 1984, 53, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Both, C. Experimental evidence for density dependence of reproduction in Great Tits. J. Anim. Ecol. 1998, 67, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Sillett, T.S.; Rodenhouse, N.L.; Holmes, R.T. Experimentally reducing neighbor density affects reproduction and behavior of a migratory songbird. Ecology 2004, 85, 2467–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Braun, E.J.; Sweazea, K.L. Glucose regulation in birds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 151, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Lill, A. Sources of Variation in Blood Glucose Concentrations of Free-Living Birds. Avian Biol. Res. 2011, 4, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Montoya, B.; Briga, M.; Jimeno, B.; Moonen, S.; Verhulst, S. Baseline glucose level is an individual trait that is negatively associated with lifespan and increases due to adverse environmental conditions during development and adulthood. J. Comp. Physiology. B 2018, 188, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Kaliński, A.; Bańbura, M.; Glądalski, M.; Markowski, M.; Skwarska, J.; Wawrzyniak, J.; Zieliński, P.; Cyżewska, I.; Bańbura, J. Long-Term Variation in Hemoglobin Concentration in Nestling Great Tits Parus major. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2015, 185, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Krams, I.; Cīrule, D.; Krama, T.; Hukkanen, M.; Rytkönen, S.; Orell, M.; Iezhova, T.; Rantala, M.J.; Tummeleht, L. Effects of Forest Management on Haematological Parameters, Blood Parasites, and Reproductive Success of the Siberian Tit (Poecile cinctus) in Northern Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2010, 47, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Saino, N.; Cuervo, J.J.; Krivacek, M.; De Lope, F.; Møller, A.P. Experimental Manipulation of Tail Ornament Size Affects the Hematocrit of Male Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica). Oecologia 1997, 110, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Bech, C.; Klaassen, M. Blood Hemoglobin Content and Metabolic Performance of Arctic Tern Chicks Sterna paradisaea. J. Avian Biol. 1996, 27, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lidman, J.; Jonsson, M.; Berglund, Å.M.M. Availability of Specific Prey Types Impact Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) Nestling Health in a Moderately Lead Contaminated Environment in Northern Sweden. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 257, 113478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Zaremba, U.; Kasprzykowski, Z.; Kondera, E. The Influence of Biological Factors on Haematological Values in Wild Marsh Harrier (Circus aeruginosus) Nestlings. Animals 2021, 11, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Merino, S.; Potti, J. Growth, nutrition and blowfly parasitism in nestling pied flycatchers. Can. J. Zool. 1998, 76, 936–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Potti, J.; Moreno, J.; Merino, S.; Frıas, O.; Rodrıguez, R. Environmental and genetic variation in the haematocrit of fledgling pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Oecologia 1999, 120, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Kaliński, A.; Bańbura, M.; Glądalski, M.; Markowski, M.; Skwarska, J.; Wawrzyniak, J.; Zieliński, P.; Cyżewska, I.; Bańbura, J. Landscape patterns of variation in blood glucose concentration of nestling blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Gros, M.; Mas-Pla, J.; Sànchez-Melsió, A.; Čelić, M.; Castaño, M.; Rodríguez-Mozaz, S.; Borrego, C.M.; Balcázar, J.L.; Petrović, M. Antibiotics, antibiotic resistance and associated risk in natural springs from an agroecosystem environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Minden, V.; Deloy, A.; Volkert, A.M.; Leonhardt, S.D.; Pufal, G. Antibiotics impact plant traits, even at small concentrations. AoB Plants 2017, 9, plx010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Polianciuc, S.I.; Gurzău, A.E.; Kiss, B.; Ştefan, M.G.; Loghin, F. Antibiotics in the environment: Causes and consequences. Med. Pharm. Rep. 2020, 93, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Maxwell, M.H. Avian blood leucocyte responses to stress. World Poult. Sci. J. 1993, 49, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Maxwell, M.H.; Robertson, G.W. The avian heterophil leucocyte: A review. World Poult. Sci. J. 1998, 54, 155–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Campbell, T.W. (Ed.) Avian Hematology and Cytology; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  204. Harmon, B.G. Avian heterophils in inflammation and disease resistance. Poult. Sci. 1998, 77, 972–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Krams, I.; Cîrule, D.; Krama, T.; Vrublevska, J. Extremely low ambient temperature affects haematological parameters and body condition in wintering Great Tits Parus major. J. Ornithol. 2011, 152, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study area: (A)—location of the area in the Narew River valley (NE Poland), (B)—different types of meadows use: dark green—extensively used meadows, included in an agri-environmental program; light green—intensively used meadows fertilised with mineral fertiliser; brown—intensively used meadows fertilised with cattle liquid manure; and blue borders—meadows with Barber pitfall traps.
Figure 1. Study area: (A)—location of the area in the Narew River valley (NE Poland), (B)—different types of meadows use: dark green—extensively used meadows, included in an agri-environmental program; light green—intensively used meadows fertilised with mineral fertiliser; brown—intensively used meadows fertilised with cattle liquid manure; and blue borders—meadows with Barber pitfall traps.
Animals 14 01093 g001
Figure 2. The arthropod abundance—environmental variables (left) and arthropod diversity (Shannon index)—environmental variables (right) biplots of RDA (the first two axes) in the study area; the two axes explained 71.38% of the total variance.
Figure 2. The arthropod abundance—environmental variables (left) and arthropod diversity (Shannon index)—environmental variables (right) biplots of RDA (the first two axes) in the study area; the two axes explained 71.38% of the total variance.
Animals 14 01093 g002
Figure 3. The share of large arthropods—environmental variables (left) and taxon’s abundance—share of large arthropods (right) biplots of RDA (the first two axes) in the study area; the two axes explained 60.56% and 77.73% of the total variance, respectively.
Figure 3. The share of large arthropods—environmental variables (left) and taxon’s abundance—share of large arthropods (right) biplots of RDA (the first two axes) in the study area; the two axes explained 60.56% and 77.73% of the total variance, respectively.
Animals 14 01093 g003
Figure 4. Variation in haematological parameters of red-backed shrike chicks between grassland types. Box plot: line mean, box—95% C.I.; whiskers—min–max.
Figure 4. Variation in haematological parameters of red-backed shrike chicks between grassland types. Box plot: line mean, box—95% C.I.; whiskers—min–max.
Animals 14 01093 g004
Figure 5. Relationship between body condition and haematological parameters of red-backed shrike chicks; striped lines—95% predicted.
Figure 5. Relationship between body condition and haematological parameters of red-backed shrike chicks; striped lines—95% predicted.
Animals 14 01093 g005
Table 1. Effects of individual environmental variables on variation in arthropod abundance and diversity. Explains%—the percentage of variance explained; pseudo F—the value of permutation F-test; p—probability; and p(adj.)—probability adjusted for the number of variables compared.
Table 1. Effects of individual environmental variables on variation in arthropod abundance and diversity. Explains%—the percentage of variance explained; pseudo F—the value of permutation F-test; p—probability; and p(adj.)—probability adjusted for the number of variables compared.
EffectsExplains %Pseudo-Fpp(adj.)
Distance to river15.34.50.0060.034
Number of mowings15.04.40.0070.034
Intensity of fertilisation10.32.90.0360.115
Type of use: protected, extensive use9.32.60.0490.115
Soil humidity9.02.50.0570.115
Type of use: manure7.52.00.0980.164
Distance to forest4.81.30.2650.379
Percentage of mowing area3.30.90.4620.577
Type of use: chemical fertilisation, intensive use2.90.80.5290.588
Shrubs2.50.60.6880.688
Table 2. Effect of individual environmental variables on variation in the proportion of large arthropods. Explains%—the percentage of variance explained; pseudo F—the value of permutation F-test; p—probability; and p(adj.)—probability adjusted for the number of variables compared.
Table 2. Effect of individual environmental variables on variation in the proportion of large arthropods. Explains%—the percentage of variance explained; pseudo F—the value of permutation F-test; p—probability; and p(adj.)—probability adjusted for the number of variables compared.
EffectsExplains %Pseudo-Fpp(adj.)
Distance to river13.84.00.000070.0007
Type of use: protected, extensive use11.53.30.00110.004
Number of mowings11.03.10.00130.004
Intensity of fertilisation10.52.90.0020.006
Soil humidity9.62.70.0050.011
Percentage of mowing area8.12.20.0220.037
Distance to forest5.61.50.1510.216
Type of use: chemical fertilisation, intensive use4.71.20.2700.318
Type of use: manure4.61.20.2860.318
Shrubs4.41.20.3410.341
Table 3. Generalised linear mixed models explaining the dependence of the body condition of red-backed shrike chicks (PCAresBCI1-2) on environmental factors in the study area.
Table 3. Generalised linear mixed models explaining the dependence of the body condition of red-backed shrike chicks (PCAresBCI1-2) on environmental factors in the study area.
A—initial model: F = 0.627, p = 0.679; dependent: normal, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept −0.998−2.378–0.3831.4200.156
Number of chicks in nest −0.013−0.149–0.1230.1890.850
Distance to river 0.0003−0.0001–0.0011.4500.148
Distance to forest 0.0003−0.0002–0.0011.2940.196
Shrubs −0.0002−0.001–0.0010.6360.525
Soil humidityPermanently−0.085−0.429–0.2590.4830.629
Random effect (Year) 0.000
Random effect (Nest) 0.3910.297–0.515Z = 7.102<0.001
B—full model: F = 5.431, p < 0.001; dependent: normal, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept −219.224−361.043–−77.4043.0370.003
Distance to nearest nest −0.002−0.003–0.0015.745<0.001
Distance to river 0.00010.0002–0.00050.8830.377
Distance to forest 0.00030.0002–0.0011.2970.195
Soil humidityPermanently−0.175−0.468–0.1181.1740.241
Grassland use typeManure−0.141−0.475–0.1930.8290.408
Mineral fertiliser0.076−0.180–0.3310.5800.562
Number of chicks in nest −0.033−0.114–0.0480.8000.424
Shrubs −0.0002−0.001–0.0010.4530.651
Random effect (Year) 0.018
Random effect (Nest) 0.0570.033–0.097Z = 3.661<0.001
C—selected model: F = 3.080, p = 0.016; dependent: normal, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 593.807172.761–1014.8522.7710.006
Distance to nearest nest −0.003−0.005–−0.0012.6050.009
Distance to river 0.0010.0001–0.0022.2490.025
Distance to forest 0.0020.0004–0.0032.7320.007
Soil humidity Permanently−0.298−0.873–0.2771.0170.309
Random effect (Year) 0.0920.014–0.606Z = 1.0370.300
Random effect (Nest) 1.0320.657–1.622Z = 4.340<0.001
Table 4. Generalised linear mixed models explaining the dependence of the glucose level of red-backed shrike chicks on environmental factors in the study area.
Table 4. Generalised linear mixed models explaining the dependence of the glucose level of red-backed shrike chicks on environmental factors in the study area.
A—initial model: F = 1.804, p = 0.111; dependent: normal, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 48.39617.842–78.9493.1130.002
Number of chicks in nest 0.0310.009–0.0532.7950.005
Distance to river −0.00001−0.00008–0.00010.3520.725
Distance to forest −0.00002−0.0001–0.0010.5170.606
Shrubs 0.00002−0.0001–0.00010.5350.593
Soil humidityTemporary0.013−0.031–0.0570.5880.557
Random effect (Year) 0.0010.00002–0.012Z = 0.6250.532
Random effect (Nest) 0.0170.011–0.027Z = 4.227<0.001
B—full model: F = 1.030, p = 0.412; dependent: normal, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 9581.8872215.528–16948.2452.5560.011
Distance to nearest nest 0.003−0.015–0.0220.3450.730
Distance to river −0.002−0.019–0.0150.7850.377
Distance to forest −0.005−0.027–0.0170.4310.667
Soil humidityPermanently−3.103−14.054–7.8470.5570.578
Grassland use typeManure−1.128−15.168–12.9110.1580.875
Mineral fertiliser2.517−9.327–14.3620.4180.676
Number of chicks in nest 6.8091.471–12.1482.5070.013
Shrubs 0.005−0.013–0.0240.5890.556
Random effect (Year) 25.0021.000–624.801Z = 0.6090.543
Random effect (Nest) 969.863606.631–1550.587Z = 4.177<0.001
C—selected model: F = 4.239, p = 0.015; dependent: normal, link-function–log.
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 47.93917.848–78.0313.1310.002
Number of chicks in nest 0.0310.009–0.0532.8110.005
Shrubs 0.00002−0.00005–0.00010.4630.643
Random effect (Year) 0.0010.00002–0.012Z = 0.6260.531
Random effect (Nest) 0.0170.011–0.026Z = 4.240<0.001
Table 5. Generalised linear mixed models explaining the dependence of the haemoglobin level of red-backed shrike chicks on environmental factors in the study area.
Table 5. Generalised linear mixed models explaining the dependence of the haemoglobin level of red-backed shrike chicks on environmental factors in the study area.
A—initial model: F = 3.300, p = 0.006; dependent: normal, link-function–linear
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 581.668−916.524–2079.8600.7630.446
Number of chicks in nest −1.446−3.437–0.5461.4260.154
Distance to river −0.005−0.011–0.00021.8910.059
Distance to forest −0.004−0.012–0.0031.1500.251
Shrubs −0.009−0.015–0.0032.8560.004
Soil humidityPermanently1.506−2.291–5.3030.7790.436
Random effect (Year) 0.1930.000004–9279.117Z = 0.1820.856
Random effect (Nest) 172.522111.682–266.503Z = 4.507<0.001
B—full model: F = 2.354, p = 0.017; dependent: normal, link-function–linear
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 834.189−982.030–2650.4070.9030.367
Distance to nearest nest −0.002−0.009–0.0050.5280.597
Distance to river −0.006−0.013–−0.00022.0320.043
Distance to forest −0.006−0.014–0.0021.4460.149
Soil humidityPermanently1.335−2.497–5.1680.6850.494
Grassland use typeManure1.971−2.911–6.8530.7930.428
Mineral fertiliser−0.442−4.352–3.4670.2220.824
Number of chicks in nest −1.619−3.676–0.4371.5470.122
Shrubs −0.008−0.014–−0.0022.5630.011
Random effect (Year) 0.3300.0002–690.006Z = 0.2560.798
Random effect (Nest) 182.941117.514–284.797Z = 4.428<0.001
C—selected model: F = 7.240, p = <0.001; dependent: normal, link-function–linear
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 2187.001619.360–3754.6432.7410.006
Number of chicks in nest −1.328−2.521–−0.1352.1860.029
Grassland use typeManure−1.309−5.541–2.9220.6080.544
Mineral fertiliser4.9661.215–8.7182.6010.010
Random effect (Year) 1.2170.051–29.280Z = 0.6160.538
Table 6. Generalised linear mixed model explaining the dependence of the haematocrit level of red-backed shrike chicks on environmental factors in the study area.
Table 6. Generalised linear mixed model explaining the dependence of the haematocrit level of red-backed shrike chicks on environmental factors in the study area.
A—initial model: F = 0.685, p = 0.635; dependent: Gamma, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept −22.558−47.679–2.5631.7650.078
Number of chicks in nest −0.010−0.029–0.0091.0510.294
Distance to river −0.00001−0.0001–0.000050.2980.766
Distance to forest −0.00002−0.0001–0.00010.5470.585
Shrubs −0.0000−0.0001–0.000021.2370.217
Soil humidityPermanently0.014−0.028–0.0550.6560.512
Random effect (Year) 0.00020.00001–0.006Z = 0.5740.566
Random effect (Nest) 0.0110.007–0.017Z = 4.142<0.001
B—full model: F = 1.432, p = 0.181; dependent: Gamma, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept −24.661−42.093–−7.2282.7800.006
Distance to nearest nest 0.00004−0.00001–0.00011.4930.136
Distance to river 0.00002−0.00002–0.00010.8770.376
Distance to forest 0.00001−0.00005–0.00010.3370.736
Soil humidityPermanently0.009−0.033–0.0520.4400.660
Grassland use typeManure0.027−0.026–0.0801.0150.311
Mineral fertiliser0.0540.011–0.0962.4680.014
Number of chicks in nest 0.002−0.011–0.0150.2620.794
Shrubs −0.0001−0.0001–0.000011.7240.085
Random effect (Year) 0.00020.00001–0.005Z = 0.5190.798
C—selected model: F = 2.514, p = 0.058; dependent: Gamma, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept −24.382−41.462–−7.3022.8060.005
Distance to nearest nest 0.00003−0.00002–0.00011.3110.191
Grassland use typeManure0.034−0.013–0.0801.4140.158
Mineral fertiliser0.0510.010–0.0912.4550.014
Random effect (Year) 0.00020.00001–0.004Z = 0.6460.519
Table 7. Generalised linear mixed models explaining the dependence of the H:L ratio of red-backed shrike chicks on environmental factors in the study area.
Table 7. Generalised linear mixed models explaining the dependence of the H:L ratio of red-backed shrike chicks on environmental factors in the study area.
A—initial model: F = 1.280, p = 0.271; dependent: Gamma, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 135.55154.809–216.2933.2990.001
Number of chicks in nest 0.034−0.022–0.0891.1860.236
Distance to river −0.0002−0.0004–−0.000042.3760.018
Distance to forest −0.0002−0.0004–0.000021.7220.077
Shrubs 0.00001−0.0002–0.00020.0510.960
Soil humidityPermanently0.002−0.123–0.1260.0240.981
Random effect (Year) 0.0050.0002–0.101Z = 0.6460.518
Random effect (Nest) 0.0910.056–0.148Z = 4.025<0.001
B—full model: F = 3.714, p < 0.001; dependent: Gamma, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 180.928125.257–−236.6006.386<0.001
Distance to nearest nest −0.000001−0.0002–0.00020.0170.987
Distance to river −0.0002−0.0004–−0.00013.1320.002
Distance to forest −0.0003−0.0005–−0.00013.547<0.001
Soil humidityPermanently0.004−0.123–0.1300.0550.956
Grassland use typeManure−0.033−0.191–0.1260.4040.686
Mineral fertiliser−0.1980.328–−0.0693.0150.003
Number of chicks in nest 0.0410.001–0.0802.0280.043
Shrubs 0.00005−0.0002–0.00030.4260.671
Random effect (Year) 0.0080.0005–0.140Z = 0.6900.490
C—selected model: F = 3.619, p < 0.001; dependent: Gamma, link-function–log
EffectLevel of EffectParameter95% C.I. of Parametert Statisticp
Intercept 228.407160.305–296.5096.594<0.001
Number of chicks in nest 0.040−0.008–0.0881.6320.103
Distance to nearest nest 0.00004−0.0001–0.00020.4560.649
Grassland use typeManure−0.055−0.248–0.1370.5650.573
Mineral fertiliser−0.229−0.387–−0.0712.8430.005
Distance to river −0.0002−0.0004–−0.000042.4410.015
Distance to forest −0.0004−0.001–−0.00013.350<0.001
Soil humidityPermanently0.023−0.132–0.1770.2860.775
Random effect (Year) 0.0130.001–0.220Z = 0.6900.490
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Knozowski, P.; Nowakowski, J.J.; Stawicka, A.M.; Dulisz, B.; Górski, A. Effect of Management of Grassland on Prey Availability and Physiological Condition of Nestling of Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio. Animals 2024, 14, 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071093

AMA Style

Knozowski P, Nowakowski JJ, Stawicka AM, Dulisz B, Górski A. Effect of Management of Grassland on Prey Availability and Physiological Condition of Nestling of Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio. Animals. 2024; 14(7):1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Knozowski, Paweł, Jacek J. Nowakowski, Anna Maria Stawicka, Beata Dulisz, and Andrzej Górski. 2024. "Effect of Management of Grassland on Prey Availability and Physiological Condition of Nestling of Red-Backed Shrike Lanius collurio" Animals 14, no. 7: 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071093

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop