Next Article in Journal
Effects of Supplementation of Branches and Leaves Trimmed from Tea Plant on Growth Performance, Rumen Fermentation and Meat Composition of Nanjiang Yellow Goats
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Incremental Urea Supplementation on Rumen Fermentation, Nutrient Digestion, Plasma Metabolites, and Growth Performance in Fattening Lambs
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Brassica Vegetables as Potential Feed for Ruminants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lactational Responses of Heat-Stressed Dairy Goats to Dietary L-Carnitine Supplementation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Diet and Type of Pregnancy on Transcriptional Expression of Selected Genes in Sheep Mammary Gland

1
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, PO Box 567, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
2
Centro FONDAP, Interdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research (INCAR), Valdivia 5090000, Chile
3
Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santa Rosa 11735, Santiago 8320000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2019, 9(9), 589; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090589
Submission received: 12 May 2019 / Revised: 24 June 2019 / Accepted: 26 June 2019 / Published: 21 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Small Ruminant Nutrition and Metabolism)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

An experiment was designed to determine the effect of diet and type of pregnancy on the mammary gland development, measured by the transcriptional expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis. To that end, twin and single-bearing ewes were fed naturalized pasture or red clover from day −45 pre-partum until day +60 post-partum, taking samples of mammary tissue at day −10, +30 and +60 post-partum. The results showed that the group of twin-bearing ewes fed red clover was the best combination to increase the expression of genes associated to angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis in the mammary gland.

Abstract

These trials were carried out to determine firstly the effect of diet and type of pregnancy on the transcriptional expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis inside the sheep mammary gland from late gestation to late lactation. Eighteen Ile de France sheep, 8 twin- and 10 single-bearing ewes were alloted into two groups according to their diet, either based on ad libitum naturalized pasture or red clover hay plus lupine from day −45 pre-partum until day +60 post-partum. Samples from diets and mammary glands were collected at day −10 pre partum (time 1), day +30 (time 2) and day +60 post-partum (time 3) and analyzed by qRT-PCR. Additionally, samples from longissimus dorsi muscle were taken from lambs twice, at weaning and 45 days later, to determine the effect of the maternal treatment with regard to diet and type of pregnancy, on the mRNA expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism. The data was processed using the lme4 package for R, and SPSS Statistics 23.0 for Windows®. The results showed that the group of twin-bearing ewes fed red clover showed a higher expression of genes involved in angiogenesis before lambing and in cell turnover/lactogenesis during late lactation, explained by a lamb survival mechanism to delay apoptosis as a way to keep a secretory cells population and boosted by the diet quality, assuring a longer milk production potential during late lactation. Regarding lambs, apparently the maternal diet would influence the transcriptional expression of lipogenic enzymes in the longissimus dorsi muscle after weaning, but further studies are necessary to validate these results. In summary, Twin-bearing ewes fed red clover performed best at increasing the expression of genes associated with angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis in the mammary gland.

1. Introduction

Sheep production is mainly based on pastures and faces serious problems regarding lamb survival and growth from birth until weaning, especially in twin-bearing ewes [1], which is in accordance with the physiological negative energy balance present in peripartum [2,3]. It is known that milk production and its persistence are influenced by the metabolic status of the animals [4].
With regard to the synthesis of milk, the microcirculation in the mammary gland provides the necessary nutrients and oxygen for the lactotrophic mammary cells and also allows for the removal of metabolites [5]. However, there are precedents upon which to state that the processes of angiogenesis and cell proliferation normally occurring in the mamary gland during each lactantion are outdated in time. The mammary parenchyma regulates its own vascularization, which takes place during early lactation [6], unlike that seen in other organs where it occurs in response to an injury [5]. Thus, it is possible to recognize as angiogenic factors certain proteins like VEGF and their receptors VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 (which promote proliferation, survival, migration and differentiation of endothelial cells), ANGPT1 and ANGPT2 (the antagonist protein of ANGPT1, being able to induce endothelial cell apoptosis), and RTK [7]. In addition, some proteins associated to cell turnover/lactogenesis are BAX, BCL2, CCND1, IGF1 and its receptor IGF1R, plus the binding proteins IGFBP3 and IGFBP5, TGFB1 and their receptors TGFB1R1 and TGFB1R2, and LPTR [8].
In the search of forage-based nutritional strategies for peripartum, the lipid supplementation consisting of ω3-polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) turns out to be a good alternative to reduce fat mobilization since it can inhibit the de novo synthesis occurring in the mammary gland [9,10,11], and it can also increase the levels of C18:3 ω3, C20:5 ω3, and C22:6 ω3 in the ruminant milk and plasma [12,13,14] with proven benefits for the gestation length and lactation latency [15]. At this point, the 3-year red clover (Trifolium pratense, RC), a forage resource resistant to low temperatures and with a high content of 18:3 ω3 PUFA [16], shows some protection against ruminal biohydrogenation [17], by increasing ω3 PUFA content in animal products [18].
Studies on milk production and persistency have determined the effect of parity number on transcriptional expression of ruminant mammary gland; however, there is no data on the effect of type of pregnancy on transcriptional expression mammary gland in ewes. Furthermore, it has been reported that maternal nutrition during pregnancy can predispose to permanent structural, physiological and metabolic changes [19,20]; however, the effect of post-weaning maternal diet on the fetal programming of the offspring is unclear. Therefore, our hypothesis is that both diet and type of pregnancy influence the mRNA expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis in the mammary gland, specifically in ewes fed red clover from late gestation to late lactation. Thus, the objectives of this study were to determine the effect of diet and type of pregnancy on the transcriptional expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis in the mammary gland of twin- and single-bearing ewes fed two diets, and also to report (as descriptive data) the effects on the transcriptional expression of genes involved in the lipid metabolism of lamb muscle after weaning.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioethics

The methodology used in this study was approved by the Committee for the Ethical Use of Animals in Experiments of the Universidad Austral de Chile (Nº241/2015).

2.2. Location

The experiment was conducted in a farm located 12 km southeast of Villarrica city, IX Region, Chile (39°16′0″ S, 72°13′0″ E), from July 2016 to January 2017.

2.3. Animals and Sampling

A random selection of 18 animals was made from a large, free-ranging Ile de France, third-birth sheep flock of similar BCS (3.0), consisting of eight twin- and ten single-bearing ewes, grazing on a naturalized pasture, a successional pasture post cultivation, planted in previous years that germinates spontaneously when the conditions of temperature and humidity are appropriate. This pasture type is dominated by species such as Agrostis tenuis, Holcus lanatus and Trifolium repens [16]. The selected ewes were allocated in two groups according to their diet, either based on ad libitum naturalized pasture (NPH, 85.20 ± 1.93% dry matter (DM), 8.80 ± 0.45% crude protein (CP), 2.13 ± 0.07 Mcal kg−1 metabolizable energy (ME), 64.77 ± 2.39% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and 5.26 ± 0.14% total ashes (TA)) or red clover hay (RCH, 83.12 ± 1.62% DM, 10.62 ± 0.12% CP, 2.31 ± 0.04 Mcal kg−1 ME, 54.35 ± 0.13% NDF, and 5.23 ± 0.08% TA), supplemented lupine (88.90% DM, 17.17% CP, 3.08 Mcal kg−1 ME, 52.72% NDF, and 3.37% TA), according to their requirements [21]. All animals were segregated in four groups, according to the following dietary plan: twin-bearing ewes fed NPH (TP, n = 4) or RCH (TC, n = 4), and single-bearing ewes fed NPH (SP, n = 5) or RCH (SC, n = 5). The treatment took place from day from day −45 pre-partum to day +60 post-partum. Samples of mammary gland tissue were obtained at day −10 pre-partum (time 1), day +30 (time 2) and day +60 post-partum (time 3) and analyzed for gene expression by qRT-PCR to obtain DDCT. The biopsy procedure of the mammary gland was according the protocol described by Nielsen et al. [22]. Hence, a pilot study starting at weaning, was conducted taking into account the four above-mentioned maternal groups, where half of lambs of each group was allocated to graze NP and the other half was allocated to graze RC (the twins were assigned to different diets), thus forming 8 groups of lambs. Biopsy samples from Longissimus dorsi muscle were taken at weaning and after 45 days of grazing NP and RC, according to the protocol described by Gallardo et al. [16]. Samples for RNA extraction were kept in RNA Safer Stabilizer Reagent (E.Z.N.A.) −80 °C until further analysis at the Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Universidad Austral de Chile.

2.4. qRT-PCR Analysis

qRT-PCR analyses for this study were performed with a Lightcycler Mx3005P (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). The RNA extraction was made from 50 mg of mammary gland and muscle tissue samples was carried out using TRIzol™ Reagent (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA), following the procedure indicated by the manufacturer. The final RNA elution was carried out with nuclease-free water. Subsequently, the RNA was quantified by spectrophotometry (maestronano, maestrogen), obtaining the concentration data, in addition the 260/280 and 260/230 ratios were reviewed. Finally, the cDNA preparation was carried out by reverse transcription using 2 ul of RNA in each case. The reverse transcription was carried out using the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Subsequent qRT-PCR analyses were performed 5 μL of Brilliant II SYBR® Green Master Mix (Agilent Technologies), 0.5 μL forward/reverse (which were designed using Primer-BLAST and further analyzed by Amplifix tool) primer solution (0.2 μmol/L), and 1 μL cDNA template (1:5 dilution ratio) to a thermo cycling program for 10 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, and 45 s at 70 °C (45 cycles). Specific oligonucleotides for mammary gland transcripts were designed (Table 1). They were selected from other studies performed in the mammary gland of ruminants during different periods [6,22]. The nucleotides designed for lipid metabolism, such as ACCA (NM_001009256.1), FASN (XM_004013447.1), SCD1 (NM_001009254.1), SREBP1c (XM_004013336.1), and actin (NM_001009784.1) are detailed in Gallardo et al. [23].
Relative mRNA expression was calculated with the comparative efficiency-corrected ΔΔCT method [24]. β-Actin gene was stably expressed and served as a reference gene for gene expression normalization in these experiments.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The effects of maternal diet and type of pregnancy on the expression of eight genes related to angiogenesis (CAIV, VEGF, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, ANGPT1, ANGPT2, MKI67, and TBXAS1) and 13 genes related to cellular turnover/lactogenesis (LALBA, BAX, BCL2, CCND1, IGF1, IGF1R, IGFBP3, IGFBP5, LPT, LPTR, LTF, TGFB1, and TGFB1R1) in the mammary gland of ewes were determined by means of a linear model. This study employed fixed factors: a. Diet (to evaluate the effect of diet), b. Type of pregnancy (to determine if the intercepts are different, for diet changes in each type of pregnancy), and c. Diet * Type of Pregnancy interaction (to assess the combined response of diet and pregnancy). The effect of group and measuring time was determined through factorial ANOVA for repeated measures means through SPSS Statistics 23.0 for Windows (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), and the differences between means were analyzed by the Bonferroni test (p < 0.05). The statistical model employed in the analyses consisted of the folllowing: yijk = μ + Ti + Ej + TEij + eijk, where yijk = observation ij; μ = the overall mean; Ti = the effect of diet type i; Ej = the effect of type of pregnancy j; TEij interaction between diet type (i) and type of pregnancy (j), and eijk = random error. p-values were estimated with the fold change data.

3. Results

3.1. Effect on Angiogenesis

The effect of group and measuring time on the transcriptional expression of genes associated to angiogenesis in the mammary gland is shown in Table 2.
In time 1, group TC showed a higher transcriptional expression for genes VEGFR2 (together with SP and SC), ANGPT1, ANGPT2, and MK167, when compared to the other groups (p < 0.01). In time 2, group TP showed a higher expression level for CAIV than group SC (p = 0.014). In time 3, higher mRNA expression levels for genes VEGFR1 and ANGPT1 (p = 0.01) were found in group TC in contrast to the other groups. Regarding time, group SP exhibited a decreased expression for gene MK167, and group SC showed decreased levels of ANGPT2 expression (p = 0.04) as the season progressed.

3.2. Effect on Cell Turnover/Lactogenesis

The effect of group and measuring time related to the transcriptional expression of genes associated to cell turnover/lactogenesis in the mammary gland is shown in Table 3. In time 1, group TC showed higher expression levels of BCL2 (p = 0.0002), IGF1 (p = 0.0001), and IGFBP3 (than group TP, p = 0.01) as opposed to the other groups. Group SP showed a higher mRNA expression of TGFB1 than groups TP and TC (p = 0.02). In time 2, a higher expression level of gene LALBA (p = 0.021) was found in groups TP, TC, and SP; group TP showed higher expression levels for genes BCL2 (p = 0.0001), CCND1 (p = 0.007), IGFBP5 (p = 0.008) (together with TC), IGF1 (p = 0.005), and LPT (p = 0.0002) in contrast to the other groups. During time 3, group TC showed a higher transcriptional expression level for genes LALBA (p = 0.036), BAX (p = 0.0001), BCL2 (p < 0.0001), IGF1 (p = 0.0001), IGFBP3 (p = 0.0004), and IGFBP5 (p < 0.0001) when compared with the other groups, together with a higher mRNA expression of gene CCND1 (p = 0.0008) and IGF1R (p = 0.0001) than that observed in groups SP and SC. Group TP showed a higher expression of TGFB1 than the other groups (p = 0.0002). Regarding time, although group TP displayed an increased expression of IGF1 (p = 0.009) and TGFB1 (p = 0.006) as the season progressed, this group had an increased transcriptional expression of genes IGFBP3, IGFBP5 (p = 0.02), and LPT (p = 0.009) in time 2, which nonetheless showed a decrease in the last measurement. Although group TC showed a higher mRNA expression of LALBA (p = 0.023) in times 2 and 3, compared to time 1, and of IGF1 in times 1 and 3 compared to time 2 (p = 0.011), this group had a decreased mRNA expression of BCL2 (p = 0.0017), CCND1 (p = 0.04), IGF1R (p = 0.027), and IGFBP5 (p = 0.005) in time 2, but increased in time 3. A decrease in the expression of TGFB1 and CCND1 was observed in groups SP and SC, respectively, from time 1 to 3.
The effect of maternal diet on the transcriptional expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism of the longissimus dorsi muscle of lambs from weaning to 45 days post-weaning (descriptive data, included in the Appendix A Table A1), showed that the post-weaning maternal diet in grazing lambs would lead to an overexpression of genes encoding for lipogenic enzymes in the longissimus dorsi muscle, especially in twins.

4. Discussion

The present study was designed to determine the effect of diet and type of pregnancy on the transcriptional expression of genes associated to angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis in the mammary gland of twin- or single-bearing ewes from late gestation to late lactation. The study also reported descriptive data related to the effect of maternal diet on genes encoding lipid metabolism enzymes present in the intramuscular adipose tissue of lambs born from these ewes, from weaning to 45 days post-weaning.
Unlike to that reported for dairy goats and cows [25,26], the mammary gland development in sheep is mainly completed at lambing with scarce mammary growth during early lactation [27]. Then, cellular metabolic activity and nutrient transport are increased to provide substrates for the synthesis of milk components during early lactation [28], processes mediated by important changes in the transcriptional expression of the mammary gland [29,30]. Also, Colitti and Farinacci [31] reported structural and morphometrical changes associated to cell turnover and transcriptional expression of related genes in sheep mammary glands prior to involution, showing that control of balance between cell growth and death influences the mammary gland development, being very important for a successful lactation.
It is widely known that parity number affects angiogenesis, cell turnover, and survival of cells in the mammary gland during lactation. Safayi et al. [8] reported higher mRNA expression levels of genes involved in angiogenesis, such as ANGP1, ANGPT2, and VEGFR2, and a greater mammary epithelial cell proliferation during early lactation in ≥2 first-parity goats, since the onset of lactation is associated to the udder development and growth during early lactation, processes which are more prolonged in primiparous than in multiparous animals. In the present study, higher mRNA expression levels of genes involved in angiogenesis, such as ANGPT1, ANGPT2, VEGFR2, and MKi67 (a marker of proliferation) were observed in late pregnancy, especially in twin-bearing ewes fed RCH (p < 0.05), with a decreasing expression during lactation (p < 0.05). The higher expression of angiogenic factors in twin-bearing ewes fed RCH point out to the provision of these factors by the epithelial cells [32], which should follow the same developmental pattern observed in the above-mentioned cells [8], where a greater expression of angiogenic factors should manifest in the group with a lower expression of apoptotic factors; however, it is unknown why this effect, observed in twin-bearing ewes, was not reported in single-bearing ewes.
Regarding cell turnover and lactogenesis, its occurrence has been reported in late lactation [33,34], similar to that seen in the present study, where mRNAs of IGF1, IGF1R, IGFBP3, and IGFBP5, plus BAX, BCL2, and CCND1 were overexpressed during late lactancy, especially in twin-bearing ewes fed RCH. However, both maternal diets were based on hay in our study; therefore, from these data alone it is difficult to support an explanation to elucidate why the mRNA expression changed in time in both angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis as a consequence of the diet offered. Thus, the diet becomes relevant when comparing between treatments [35]. Faulconnier et al. [36] determined the effect of extruded linseed alone or in combination with fish oil on the mammary expression of 14 lipogenic genes, five lipogenic enzyme activities, and transcriptomic profiles after slaughtering at day 28. They reported that although extruded linseed alone or combined with fish oil had a significant effect on milk fat content and fatty acid composition, there were no effects on the mRNA expression levels of lipogenic genes; however, at the transcriptome level, they showed more effects on mRNA linked to protein and transport pathways than on lipid metabolism, probably affecting the functional remodeling of the mammary gland, a feature consistent with the findings of Castro-Carrera et al. [37], who fed lactating Assaf ewes with sunflower oil. The animals, slaughtered at day 49, showed that although sunflower oil modified milk fatty acid composition, it had no significant effects on the performance or mRNA expression of lipogenic genes in the mammary tissue, neither on the subcutaneous adipose tissue, suggesting that the effect of diet on the lipid metabolism should be mediated by a post-transcriptional process or by other genes not analyzed by the authors.
In ruminants, although the onset of lactancy is associated to prolactin regulation in the lactotrophic cells of the mammary secretory alveoli, the secretion of milk is related to the expression of LALBA [38], which increases in early lactation since this whey protein forms a key part of the regulatory subunit of the lactose synthase heterodimer, and the beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase constitutes the catalytic component, allowing the enzyme to produce lactose by transfering galactose moieties to glucose during lactancy. Tsiplaukou et al. [39] reported a LALBA under/overexpression following a 70% under or 130% overfeeding of the same diet in lactating dairy sheep, confirming its relationship with both milk protein yield and volume. In the present study, LALBA was overexpressed in twin-bearing ewes, especially those fed RCH, however, more studies including milk production measurements are necessary to validate the results.
It has been reported that suckling induced IGF1 release in rats during lactation [40]. However, a higher IGF1 overexpression in twin-bearing ewes as a consequence of double suckling was not observed during the present study.
Thus, the reason why the treatment only affected the expression of twin-bearing ewes fed RCH, but not that of single-bearing ewes fed the same diet can be explained by the lamb survival mechanism that delays apoptosis as a way to preserve a population of secretory cells to ensure a longer milk production potential in ewes feeding two lambs. At this point, although the pro-apoptotic factors IGFBP5 and BAX were overexpressed in twin-bearing ewes fed RCH, the anti-apoptotic factor BCL2, together with the overexpression of CCND1 (a proliferation-associated protein important in cell cycle regulation) [41], plus IGF1, a mammary mitogen and cell-survival factor [27] and its receptor IGF1R were also overexpressed in the mammary tissue of twin-bearing ewes, especially those fed RC, being able to support the explanation.
It is necessary to mention that in the present study we have included reports on goats and cows to facilitate the analyses of our results, although there are some inter-species differences at the transcriptional level [42], no functionally expressed genes that show antagonistic expression between sheep, goats and cows have been described, suggesting that breastfeeding in ruminants is a conservative process being suitable for comparison purposes [43].
Regarding the transcriptional expression of genes related to lipid metabolism in Longissimus dorsi muscle of lambs, it has been determined that a pre-partum maternal diet high in fiber, protein and fat changes the mRNA expression of fetal subcutaneous and perirenal adipose tissues [44]. Gallardo et al. [23] feeding weaned lambs with two different diets, i.e., calafatal and naturalized pasture, reported a higher mRNA expression of ACCA, FAS, and SREBF1 in subcutaneous fat of lambs fed calafatal, although the protein expression was not affected by the type of diet. In the present study, the results (analyzed as descriptive data) suggest that the maternal diet influences the transcriptional expression of lipogenic genes in the longissimus dorsi muscle after weaning, especially in twin lambs, but further studies are necessary to validate these results.

5. Conclusions

Twin-bearing ewes fed red clover hay showed higher expression levels of genes participating in angiogenesis during the dry period and of those genes involved in cell turnover/lactogenesis during late lactation, exhibiting the best combination between diet and type of pregnancy to increase transcriptional expression of genes associated to angiogenesis and cell turnover/lactogenesis in the mammary gland of ewes, thus providing a useful tool to increase profitability of sheep producers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G; methodology, M.G.; software, C.A.; validation, formal analysis, C.A.; investigation, M.G.; resources, J.G.C. and M.G.; data curation, L.A.-D.; writing—Original draft preparation, M.G.; writing—Review and editing, M.G.; supervision, J.C.; project administration, M.G.; funding acquisition, J.G.C.

Funding

This study was financed by Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica (FONDECYT) grants 3160059, 1150934 and Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (FONDAP) 15110027.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Pamela Williams and Rodrigo Allende for their scientific guidance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

The chemical composition of the pastures 45 days after weaning was 14.97% DM, 22.38% CP, 2.67 Mcal kg−1 ME, 29.21% NDF, and 9.66% TA, for NP and 17.79% DM, 31.17% CP, 3.01 Mcal kg−1 ME, 29.40% NDF, and 8.71% TA, for RC.
Table A1. Final effect of the lamb diet on the transcriptional expression of ACC, FAS, SCD1 and SREBP1c in Longissimus dorsi muscle in lambs at weaning (60 d) and 45 days after weaning (LSM ± SEM).
Table A1. Final effect of the lamb diet on the transcriptional expression of ACC, FAS, SCD1 and SREBP1c in Longissimus dorsi muscle in lambs at weaning (60 d) and 45 days after weaning (LSM ± SEM).
Lamb Ewe-DietTimeACCFASSCD1SREBP1c
TP-NPWeaning2.42 ± 0.382.05 ± 0.141.45 ± 0.030.67 ± 0.31
After weaning1.67 ± 0.311.84 ± 0.281.77 ± 0.372.40 ± 0.46
TP-RCWeaning3.29 ± 0.181.47 ± 1.081.92 ± 0.031.59 ± 0.41
After weaning0.52 ± 0.290.51 ± 0.070.64 ± 0.212.48 ± 0.24
TC-NPWeaning1.06 ± 0.281.00 ± 0.121.88 ± 0.730.66 ± 0.47
After weaning1.39 ± 0.361.13 ± 0.660.83 ± 0.020.45 ± 0.33
TC-RCWeaning0.70 ± 0.100.48 ± 0.300.31 ± 0.122.86 ± 2.61
After weaning2.93 ± 0.682.06 ± 0.012.37 ± 0.240.46 ± 0.19
SP-NPWeaning1.49 ± 0.291.19 ± 0.141.34 ± 0.182.68 ± 0.12
After weaning1.72 ± 0.091.76 ± 0.511.26 ± 0.441.49 ± 0.35
SP-RCWeaning1.06 ± 0.360.66 ± 0.123.82 ± 0.220.51 ± 0.35
After weaning0.66 ± 0.250.36 ± 0.210.54 ± 0.341.15 ± 0.57
SC-NPWeaning1.62 ± 0.871.52 ± 0.660.48 ± 0.642.15 ± 1.06
After weaning0.26 ± 0.050.43 ± 0.100.37 ± 0.132.77 ± 2.13
SC-RCWeaning1.31 ± 0.900.77 ± 0.070.67 ± 0.051.17 ± 0.18
After weaning1.73 ± 0.021.05 ± 0.661.26 ± 0.990.29 ± 0.19
1 ACC: acetyl-CoA carboxylase; 2 FAS: fatty acid synthase; 3 SCD1: stearoyl CoA desaturase 1; 4 SREBP1c: sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1c; 5 TP-NP: lambs from TP group and fed NP at weaning; 6 TP-RC: lambs from TP group and fed RC at weaning; 7 TC-NP: lambs from TC group and fed NP at weaning; 8 TC-RC: lambs from TC group and fed RC at weaning; 9 SP-NP: lambs from SP group and fed NP at weaning; 10 SP-RC: lambs from SP group and fed RC at weaning; 11 SC-NP: lambs from SC group and fed NP at weaning; 12 SC-RC: lambs from SC group and fed RC at weaning.

References

  1. Danso, A.S.; Morel, P.C.H.; Kenyon, P.R.; Blair, H.T. Relationships between prenatal ewe traits, milk production, and preweaning performance of twin lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 3527–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dillon, P.; Berry, D.; Evans, R.; Buckley, F.; Horan, B. Consequences of genetic selection for increased milk production in European seasonal pasture based systems of milk production. Livest. Sci. 2006, 99, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rukkwamsuk, T. A field study on negative energy balance in periparturient dairy cows kept in small- holder farms. Effect on milk production and reproduction. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 5, 3157–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hamann, H.; Horstick, A.; Wessels, A.; Disti, O. Estimation of genetic parameters for test day milk production, somatic cell score and litter size at birth in East Friesian ewes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 87, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Djonov, V.; Andres, A.C.; Ziemiecki, A. Vascular remodelling during the normal and malignant life cycle of the mammary gland. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2001, 52, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Agenäs, S.; Nielsen, M.O.; Safayi, S.; Knight, C. Timming of mammary angiogénesis: A posible explanation for post partum apoptosis in the bovine udder? Lactation Research in mammals and humans: The mammary gland in health and disease. In Proceedings of the from a Symposium, Uppsala, Sweden, 7–8 December 2010. [Google Scholar]
  7. Thurston, G. Role of angiopoietins and Tie receptor tyrosine kinases in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2003, 314, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Safayi, S.; Theil, P.K.; Elbrønd, L.; Hou, V.S.; Engbæk, M.; Nørgaard, J.V.; Sejrsen, K.; Nielsen, M.O. Mammary remodeling in primiparous and multiparous dairy goats during lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 1478–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Castañeda-Gutierrez, E.; Overton, T.; Butler, W.; Bauman, D. Dietary suplements of two doses of calcium salts of conjugated linoleic acid during the transition period and early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 1078–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Odens, L.; Burgos, R.; Innocenti, M.; Van Baale, M.J.; Baumgard, L.H. Effects of varying doses of suplemental conjugated linoleic acido n production and energetic variables during the transition period. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thatcher, W.; Santos, J.; Silvestre, F.; Kim, I.; Staples, C. Perspective on physiological/endocrine and nutritional factors influencing fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Caroprese, M.; Marzano, A.; Marino, R.; Gliatta, G.; Muscio, A.; Sevi, A. Flaxseed supplementation improves fatty acid profile of cow milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 2580–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Or-Rashid, M.M.; Fisher, R.; Karrow, N.; AlZahal, O.; McBride, B.W. Fatty acid profile of colostrum and milk of ewes supplemented with fish meal and the subsequent plasma fatty acid status of their lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 2092–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zachut, M.; Arieli, A.; Lehrer, H.; Livshitz, L.; Yakoby, S.; Moallem, U. Effects of increased supplementation of n-3 fatty acids to transition dairy cows on performance and fatty acid profile in plasma, adipose tissue and milk fat. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 5877–5889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Capper, J.L.; Wilkinson, R.G.; Mackenzie, A.M.; Sinclair, L.A. Polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation during pregnancy alters neonatal behavior in sheep. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gallardo, M.A.; Pulido, R.; Gallo, C. Fatty acid composition of Longissimus dorsi muscle of Suffolk Down lambs fed on different dryland forages. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 71, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, M.R.F.; Winters, A.L.; Scollan, N.D.; Dewhurst, R.J.; Theodorou, M.K.; Minchin, F.R. Plant-mediated lipolysis and proteolysis in red clover with different polyphenol oxidase activities. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dewhurst, R.J.; Delaby, L.; Moloney, A.; Boland, T.; Lewis, E. Nutritive value of forage legumes used for grazing and silage. Ir. J. Agric. Food Res. 2009, 48, 167–187. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, G.Y.; Bazer, F.W.; Cudd, T.A.; Meininger, C.J.; Spencer, T.E. Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 2169–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Symonds, M.E.; Stephenson, T.; Gardner, D.S.; Budge, H. Long-term effects of nutritional programming of the embryo and fetus: Mechanisms and critical windows. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2007, 19, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cárcamo, J.G.; Arias-Darraz, L.; Alvear, C.; Williams, P.; Gallardo, M.A. Effect of the diet and type of pregnancy on plasma metabolic response in sheep and its further effect on the lamb performance. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nielsen, M.; Cvek, K.; Dahlborn, K. Evolution of the mammary capillary network and carbonic anhydrase activity throughout lactation and during somatotropin treatment in goats. J. Dairy Res. 2010, 77, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gallardo, M.A.; Cárcamo, J.G.; Hiller, B.; Nuernberg, G.; Nuernberg, K.; Dannenberger, D. Expression of lipid metabolism related genes in subcutaneous adipose tissue from Chilota lambs grazing on two different pasture types. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2015, 17, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆CT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Knight, C.H. The importance of cell division in udder development and lactation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2000, 66, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Boutinaud, M.; Guinard-Flament, J.; Jammes, H. The number and activity of mammary epithelial cells, determining factors for milk production. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2004, 44, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anderson, R.R. Mammary-gland growth in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 1975, 41, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Capuco, A.V.; Ellis, S.E.; Hale, S.A.; Long, E.; Erdman, RA.; Zhao, X.; Paape, M.J. Lactation persistency: Insights from mammary cell proliferation studies. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hennighausen, L.; Robinson, G.W. Information networks in the mammary gland. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paten, A.M.; Duncan, E.J.; Pain, S.J.; Peterson, S.W.; Kenyon, P.R.; Blair, H.T.; Dearden, P.K. Functional development of the adult ovine mammary gland insights from gene expression Profiling. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, e748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Colitti, M.; Farinacci, M. Cell turnover and gene activities in sheep mammary glands prior to lambing to involution. Tissue Cell 2009, 41, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pepper, M.S.; Baetens, D.; Mandriota, S.J.; Di Sanza, C.; Oikemus, S.; Lane, T.F.; Soriano, J.V.; Montesano, R. Regulation of VEGF and VEGF receptor expression in the rodent mammary gland during pregnancy, lactation, and involution. Dev. Dyn. 2000, 218, 507–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Norgaard, J.V.; Nielsen, M.O.; Theil, P.K.; Sorensen, M.T.; Safayi, S.; Sejrsen, K. Development of mammary glands of fat sheep submitted to restricted feeding during late pregnancy. Small Rumin. Res. 2008, 76, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Caja, G.; Salama, A.A.K.; Such, X. Omitting the dry-off period negatively affects colostrum and milk yield in dairy goats. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 4220–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dai, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, F.; Liu, J.; Liu, H. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms of milk production using integrative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses: Improving inefficient utilization of crop by- products as forage in dairy industry. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, e403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Faulconnier, Y.; Bernard, L.; Boby, C.; Domagalski, J.; Chilliard, Y.; Leroux, C. Extruded linseed alone or in combination with fish oil modifies mammary gene expression profiles in lactating goats. Animal 2018, 12, 1564–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Castro-Carrera, T.; Frutos, P.; Leroux, C.; Chilliard, Y.; Hervás, G.; Belenguer, A.; Bernard, L.; Toral, P.G. Dietary sunflower oil modulates milk fatty acid composition without major changes in adipose and mammary tissue fatty acid profile or related gene mRNA abundance in sheep. Animal 2014, 9, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zidi, A.; Casas, E.; Amills, M.; Jordana, J.; Carrizosa, J.; Urrutia, B.; Serradilla, J.M. Genetic variation at the caprine lactalbumin, alpha (LALBA) gene and its association with milk lactose concentration. Anim. Genet. 2014, 45, 609–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsiplakou, E.; Flemetakis, E.; Kouri, E.D.; Karalias, G.; Sotirakoglou, K.; Zervas, G. The effect of long term under- and over-feeding on the expression of six major milk protein genes in the mammary tissue of sheep. J. Dairy Res. 2015, 82, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lékó, A.H.; Cservenák, M.; Dobolyi, Á. Suckling induced insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) release in mother rats. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2017, 37, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ahlin, C.; Lundgren, C.; Embretsén-Varo, E.; Jirstrom, K.; Blomqvist, C.; Fjallskog, M. High expression of cyclin D1 is associated to high proliferation rate and increased risk of mortality in women with ER-positive but not in ER-negative breast cancers. Breast Cancer Treat. 2017, 164, 667–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsiplakou, E.; Flemetakis, E.; Kalloniati, C.; Papadomichelakis, G.; Katinakis, P.; Zervas, G. Sheep and goats differences in CLA and fatty acids milk fat content in relation with mRNA stearoyl-CoA desaturase and lipogenic genes expression in their mammary gland. J. Dairy Res. 2009, 76, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Singh, M.; Thomson, P.C.; Sheehy, P.A.; Raadsma, H.W. Comparative transcriptome analyses reveal conserved and distinct mechanisms in ovine and bovine lactation. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2013, 13, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Peñagaricano, F.; Wang, X.; Rosa, G.J.M.; Radunz, A.E.; Khatib, H. Maternal nutrition induces gene expression changes in fetal muscle and adipose tissues in sheep. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, e1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Primer specifications.
Table 1. Primer specifications.
GeneAccessionForward Primer SequenceAmplicon
AngiogenesisReverse Primer Sequence
CAIVXM_012186664.1F: AGCGCTTTGCCATGGAGATACA148
R: AGGGGCTGGAAGTTCACATTCTTG
VEGFNM_001025110.1F: TGCTCTACCTTCACCATGCCAA101
R: GCGCTGGTAGACATCCATGAACTT
VEGFR1 (FTL1)XM_015098156.1F: AGGTGACCTGCTTCAAGCCAAT106
R: GAAGGCAGGTGTCGAGTACGTAAA
VEGFR2 (KDR)NM_001278565.1F: AAGACGCTGACTTGCTTTGGGA150
R: AAATGGGAAGAGCACGCAACCT
ANGPT1XM_004011787.3F: GCACCCTCATGCATTCTTGTCA140
R: ACCCTTTCCTCTACCCTATCTGCT
ANGPT2XM_004021671.3F: GAGACCTGCTCCCAAAGCAGTAAA145
R: TCACTGAGTGATGCGGGTTCAA
MKI67XM_015103501.1F: TGCAGACTTTGGCACAAACGAC143
R: AGTTTTAGCAGGACGCCTGGAA
TBXAS1XM_012177234.2F: CATCTTCCTCATTGCTGGCTACGA143
R: AGTACTCAGGGGCTGGATGTTTCT
Cell turnover
LALBANM_001009797.1F: TGCCACCCAGGCTGAACAATTA106
R: AAATGCGGTACAGACCCATTCAGG
BAXXM_015100639.1F: CTAAGACCTGGTGTAGCCAAGCAA103
R: TCGAACCCATGTTCCCTGCATT
BCL2XM_012103831.2F: ATGCGGCCCCTGTTTGATTTCT112
R: GTGGACTTCACTTATGGCCCAGAT
CCND1XM_015102997.1F: ACGACTTCATCGAGCACTTCCTCT127
R: GGTGGGTTGGAAATGAACTTCACG
IGF1XM_012159642.2F: CCAGACTTTGCACTTCAGAAGC106
R: GATGTGACTGGCATCTTCACCT
IGF1RXM_012098367.2F: CGAGATCCTGTACATTCGCACCAA100
R: GTTCCACTTCACGATCAGCTGAGA
IGFBP1NM_001145177.1F: CAGCGATGAGGCCACAGATACAAA117
R: CTGGACTCGGTCATCAAGTGGAAA
IGFBP3NM_001159276.1F: AGGTTGACTACGAGTCTCAGAGCA122
R: CAGGAACTTGAGGTCGTTCAGTGT
IGFBP5NM_001129733.1F: TGCGTGGACAAGTATGGGATGAAG103
R: AGGGGACGCATCACTCAACATT
LPTXM_004008038.3F: ATCCCACTCACCAGCATGCAAA145
R: CTACCAAGTGCAAGCACAGTTAGC
LPTRNM_001009763.1F: TTGGATGGCCTAGGAATCTGGAGT105
R: GTTAGACCCAACCGCTGTCAGAAT
LTFNM_001024862.1F: GGTTATTCTGGTGCCTTCAAGTGC119
R: AGAAGCTCATACTGGTCCCTGTCA
CYP19ANM_001123000.1F: AACACGTCCACATAGCCCAAGT80
R: ACCATCTGTGCTGATTCCATCACC
TGFB1NM_001009400.1F: GCACGTGGAGCTGTACCAGAAATA116
R: GCACAACTCCAGTGACGTCAAA
TGFB1R1XM_012120354.2F: CCAAGGAAAACCAGCCATAGCTCA118
R: TGTGGCCGAATCATGCCTTACT
TGFB1R2XM_012099307.2F: CCTTACAAAGCATGTGGGCTTGAC132
R: CCTGCACTGTAGGCGGATTCTTTA
ACTINNM_001009784.1F: TGAAGTGTGACGTGGACATCCGTA108
R: AGGTGATCTCCTTCTGCATCCTGT
CAIV, carbonic anhydrase IV; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor A; VEGFR1 (FTL1), fms-related tyrosine kinase 1; VEGFR2 (KDR), kinase insert domain receptor; ANGPT1, angiopoietin 1; ANGPT2, angiopoietin 2; MKI67, marker of proliferation Ki-67; TBXAS1, thromboxane A synthase 1; LALBA, lactalbumin alpha; BAX, BCL2-associated X protein; BCL2: B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2; CCND1, cyclin D1; IGF1, insulin like growth factor 1; IGF1R, insulin like growth factor 1 receptor; IGFBP1, insulin like growth factor binding protein 1; IGFBP3, insulin like growth factor binding protein 3; IGFBP5, insulin like growth factor binding protein 5; LPT, leptin; LPTR, leptin receptor; LTF, lactotransferrin; TGFB1, transforming growth factor beta 1; TGFB1R1, transforming growth factor, beta receptor 1; TGFB1R2, transforming growth factor, beta receptor 2; actin, β-actin.
Table 2. Effect of group and measuring time (late pregnancy, early and late lactation) related to the transcriptional expression of selected genes (fold changes) associated to angiogenesis in the mammary gland (LSM ± SEM).
Table 2. Effect of group and measuring time (late pregnancy, early and late lactation) related to the transcriptional expression of selected genes (fold changes) associated to angiogenesis in the mammary gland (LSM ± SEM).
Experimental Treatment 1CAIVVEGFVEGFR1VEGFR2ANGPT1ANGPT2MK167TBXAS1
Time 1
TP1.33 ± 0.350.58 ± 0.070.41 ± 0.060.43 b ± 0.050.31 b± 0.050.40 b ± 0.110.36 b ± 0.120.48 ± 0.09
TC4.81 ± 2.241.69 ± 0.632.00 ± 0.351.89 a ± 0.184.05 a ± 1.252.35 a ± 0.102.11 a ± 0.282.56 ± 0.76
SP1.56 ± 0.911.45 ± 0.231.83 ± 0.791.39 a ± 0.171.48 a,b ± 0.470.90 b ± 0.271.12 a,b ± 0.38 A1.01 ± 0.35
SC1.77 ± 1.321.03 ± 0.181.34 ± 0.521.15 a ± 0.301.08 b ± 0.381.51 a,b ± 0.36 A1.61 a ± 0.291.38 ± 0.40
p groups 20.330.170.140.0040.010.0010.0040.06
Time 2
TP1.73 a ± 0.281.43 ± 0.391.58 ± 0.881.03 ± 0.321.19 ± 0.481.31 ± 0.531.02 ± 0.421.38 ± 0.45
TC1.01 a,b ± 0.201.40 ± 0.131.37 ± 0.301.05 ± 0.041.48 ± 0.261.34 ± 0.141.59 ± 0.491.75 ± 0.66
SP1.52 a,b ± 0.281.20 ± 0.031.16 ± 0.131.74 ± 0.241.98 ± 0.571.51 ± 0.271.55 ± 0.32 A1.29 ± 0.21
SC0.66 b ± 0.130.74 ± 0.170.99 ± 0.260.85 ± 0.160.63 ± 0.130.69 ± 0.12 B2.95 ± 2.130.64 ± 0.07
p groups0.0140.140.830.070.100.250.760.27
Time 3
TP1.44 ± 0.451.31 ± 0.371.04 a,b ± 0.121.00 ± 0.220.90 b ± 0.230.96 ± 0.172.61 ± 1.041.24 ± 0.45
TC2.28 ± 0.671.99 ± 0.592.21 a ± 0.441.84 ± 0.372.01 a ± 0.252.45 ± 0.693.91 ± 1.813.13 ± 0.74
SP0.94 ± 0.150.94 ± 0.500.78 b ± 0.240.94 ± 0.190.89 b ± 0.441.40 ± 0.960.22 ± 0.06 B2.66 ± 2.40
SC0.80 ± 0.430.81 ± 0.080.88 b ± 0.200.84 ± 0.180.94 b ± 0.150.71 ± 0.11 B0.94 ± 0.250.78 ± 0.25
p groups0.180.190.010.060.010.100.120.28
P times 3
TP0.730.170.320.160.180.190.090.23
TC0.180.720.230.060.080.150.330.43
SP0.680.560.360.080.360.750.040.69
SC0.580.380.640.550.430.040.530.17
1 TP: twin-bearing ewes fed NP; TC: twin-bearing ewes fed RC; SP: single-bearing ewes fed NP; SC: single-bearing ewes fed RC; TP-TC (n =4); SP-SC (n = 5); 2 Different small letters (a,b) denote significant differences between groups within each measuring time at p ≤ 0.05; 3 Different capital letters (A,B) denote significant differences of each group according to time p ≤ 0.05.
Table 3. Effect of group and measuring time (late pregnancy, early and late lactation) related to the transcriptional expression of selected genes (fold changes) associated to cell turnover /lactogenesis in the mammary gland (LSM ± SEM).
Table 3. Effect of group and measuring time (late pregnancy, early and late lactation) related to the transcriptional expression of selected genes (fold changes) associated to cell turnover /lactogenesis in the mammary gland (LSM ± SEM).
Exp. Treat 1LALBABAXBCL2CCND1IGF1IGF1RIGFBP3IGFBP5LPTLPTRLTFTGFB1TGFB1R1
Time 1
TP2.74 ± 1.961.18 ± 0.300.91 b ± 0.23 B1.01 ± 0.180.71 b ± 0.12 B1.24 ± 0.140.63 b ± 0.15 B1.11 ± 0.07 AB1.02 ± 0.38 B1.56 ± 0.551.72 ± 1.031.04 a,b ± 0.07 B1.53 a ± 0.21
TC1.18 ± 0.27 B3.14 ± 0.992.43 a ± 0.11 A1.38 ± 0.07 B2.69 a ± 0.28 AB1.33 ± 0.56 B3.11 a ± 1.042.03 ± 0.38 B2.61 ± 1.041.36 ± 0.451.74 ± 0.110.73 b ± 0.070.97 a, b ± 0.04
SP0.40 ± 0.210.92 ± 0.420.73 b ± 0.090.66 ± 0.100.85 b ± 0.261.06 ± 0.390.81 a,b ± 0.120.71 ± 0.152.19 ± 1.381.05 ± 0.270.62 ± 0.171.47 a ± 0.14 A1.02 a,b ± 0.12
SC2.38 ± 0.940.90 ± 0.460.89 b ± 0.231.15 ± 0.21 A0.85 b ± 0.181.02 ± 0.330.86 a,b ± 0.120.87 ± 0.331.48 ± 0.921.09 ± 0.282.39 ± 1.671.07 a,b ± 0.100.81 b ± 0.08
p Groups 20.530.060.00020.080.00010.920.010.060.630.800.790.0020.008
Time 2
TP1.82 a ± 0.281.35 ± 0.191.61 a ± 0.13 A1.71 a ± 0.101.88 a ± 0.35 A2.02 a ± 0.241.50 a,b ± 0.33 A1.94 a ± 0.38 A5.86 a ± 1.10 A1.72 ± 0.543.02 ± 2.071.29 ± 0.09 AB1.51 ± 0.27
TC1.51 a ± 0.19 AB1.37 ± 0.231.38 a ± 0.11 B1.42 a ± 0.31 B1.28 a,b ± 0.16 B1.36 a,b ± 0.23 B2.00 a ± 0.431.39 a ± 0.28 B0.53 b ± 0.181.10 ± 0.172.93 ± 1.270.97 ± 0.051.05 ± 0.07
SP1.70 a ± 0.250.53 ± 0.140.80 b ± 0.130.63 b ± 0.060.73 b ± 0.150.66 b ± 0.050.85 b ± 0.220.87 b ± 0.131.31 b ± 0.420.84 ± 0.121.46 ± 1.020.89 ± 0.06 B0.76 ± 0.21
SC0.77 b ± 0.201.23 ± 0.300.66 b ± 0.090.82 b ± 0.16 AB0.72 b ± 0.100.82 b ± 0.240.70 b ± 0.210.57 b ± 0.081.41 b ± 0.381.07 ± 0.301.63 ± 0.770.97 ± 0.151.05 ± 0.26
p Groups0.0210.140.00010.0070.0050.0050.030.0080.00020.380.770.100.23
Time 3
TP1.09 b ± 0.261.70 b ± 0.341.26 b ± 0.13 AB1.40 a,b ± 0.271.89 b ± 0.19 A1.93 a,b ± 0.440.65 b ± 0.09 B0.85 b ± 0.12 B2.61 ± 0.93 AB1.33 ± 0.361.44 ± 0.381.75 a ± 0.17 A1.24 ± 0.35
TC2.36 a ± 0.28 A2.89 a ± 0.373.02 a ± 0.35 A2.64 a ± 0.50 A3.23 a ± 0.54 A3.45 a ± 0.66 A4.91 a ± 1.164.82 a ± 0.88 A1.41 ± 0.351.17 ± 0.191.47 ± 0.480.90 b ± 0.091.03 ± 0.16
SP1.05 b ± 0.520.66 b,c ± 0.190.82 b ± 0.360.61 b ± 0.070.57 b,c ± 0.150.49 b ± 0.190.60 b ± 0.040.52 b ± 0.052.41 ± 1.260.76 ± 0.181.63 ± 0.740.97 b ± 0.13 B1.11 ± 0.34
SC1.17 b ± 0.260.48 c ± 0.070.46 b ± 0.040.54 b ± 0.06 B0.41 c ± 0.060.45 b ± 0.060.64 b ± 0.110.53 b ± 0.060.84 ± 0.151.29 ± 0.331.06 ± 0.520.77 b ± 0.080.97 ± 0.05
p Groups0.0360.0001<0.00010.00080.00010.00050.0004<0.00010.230.600.870.00020.83
P times 3
TP0.620.450.0480.090.0090.180.020.020.0090.850.680.0060.73
TC0.0230.140.00170.040.0110.0270.130.0050.120.830.410.110.87
SP0.100.610.960.920.610.310.470.180.750.580.590.020.58
SC0.160.280.140.0490.060.260.580.430.730.840.690.220.56
1 TP: twin-bearing ewes fed NP; TC: twin-bearing ewes fed RC; SP: single-bearing ewes fed NP; SC: single-bearing ewes fed RC; TP-TC (n =4); SP-SC (n = 5); 2 Different small letters (a,b) denote significant differences between groups within each measuring time at p ≤ 0.05; 3 Different capital letters (A,B) denote significant differences of each group according to time p ≤ 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gallardo, M.; Cárcamo, J.G.; Arias-Darraz, L.; Alvear, C. Effect of Diet and Type of Pregnancy on Transcriptional Expression of Selected Genes in Sheep Mammary Gland. Animals 2019, 9, 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090589

AMA Style

Gallardo M, Cárcamo JG, Arias-Darraz L, Alvear C. Effect of Diet and Type of Pregnancy on Transcriptional Expression of Selected Genes in Sheep Mammary Gland. Animals. 2019; 9(9):589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090589

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gallardo, María, Juan G. Cárcamo, Luis Arias-Darraz, and Carlos Alvear. 2019. "Effect of Diet and Type of Pregnancy on Transcriptional Expression of Selected Genes in Sheep Mammary Gland" Animals 9, no. 9: 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090589

APA Style

Gallardo, M., Cárcamo, J. G., Arias-Darraz, L., & Alvear, C. (2019). Effect of Diet and Type of Pregnancy on Transcriptional Expression of Selected Genes in Sheep Mammary Gland. Animals, 9(9), 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090589

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop