Next Article in Journal
Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 Signaling Is Independent on Protein Kinase A Phosphorylation of Ankyrin-Rich Membrane Spanning Protein
Next Article in Special Issue
Melatonin as a Repurposed Drug for Melanoma Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Mental Health of Nurses Working in a Judicial Psychiatry Hospital during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: An Online Survey
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medical Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/medsci10040062
medsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

17β-estradiol Enhances 5-Fluorouracil Anti-Cancer Activities in Colon Cancer Cell Lines

by
Amani A. Mahbub
Laboratory Medicine Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, P.O. Box 715, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
Med. Sci. 2022, 10(4), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci10040062
Submission received: 8 October 2022 / Revised: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 27 October 2022 / Published: 28 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Repurposing in Cancer Treatment and Impacting the Efficacy of Therapeutic Agents)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) represents one of the major constituents of chemotherapy combination regimens in colon cancer (CRC) treatments; however, this regimen is linked with severe adverse effects and chemoresistance. Thus, developing more efficient approaches for CRC is urgently needed to overcome these problems and improve the patient survival rate. Currently, 17β-estradiol (E2) has gained greater attention in colon carcinogenesis, significantly lowering the incidence of CRC in females at reproductive age compared with age-matched males. Aims: This study measured the effects of E2 and/or 5-FU single/dual therapies on cell cycle progression and apoptosis against human HT-29 female and SW480 male primary CRC cells versus their impact on SW620 male metastatic CRC cells. Methods: The HT-29, SW480, and SW620 cells were treated with IC50 of E2 (10 nM) and 5-FU (50 μM), alone or combined (E+F), for 48 h before cell cycle and apoptosis analyses using flow cytometry. Results: The data here showed that E2 monotherapy has great potential to arrest the cell cycle and induce apoptosis in all the investigated colon cancer cells, with the most remarkable effects on metastatic cells (SW620). Most importantly, the dual therapy (E+F) has exerted anti-cancer activities in female (HT-29) and male (SW480) primary CRC cells by inducing apoptosis, which was preferentially provoked in the sub-G1 phase. However, the dual treatment showed the smallest effect in SW620 metastatic cells. Conclusion: this is the first study that demonstrated that the anti-cancer actions of 17β-estradiol and 5-Fluorouracil dual therapy were superior to the monotherapies in female and male primary CRC cells; it is proposed that this treatment strategy could be promising for the early stages of CRC. At the same time, 17β-estradiol monotherapy could be a better approach for treating the metastatic forms of the disease. Nevertheless, additional investigations are still required to determine their precise therapeutic values in CRC.

1. Introduction

Colon cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1,2]. Dysregulation of the cell cycle progression and apoptosis induction are critical features of cancer [3,4]. In this regard, colon carcinogenesis is commonly linked with abnormal cell cycle progression, in conjunction with the inhibition of apoptosis induction [5,6,7,8,9]. Thus, the development of new anti-cancer agents primarily focuses on regulating the cell cycle and the apoptosis process and their related molecular targets in cancer therapy [3,4].
Until now, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has represented one of the most common and effective used agents and the main constituent of chemotherapy combination regimens in CRC treatments [10]. Unfortunately, the 5-FU regimen is markedly associated with toxicity, severe side effects, and chemoresistance [10,11,12,13,14]. Combining 5-FU with other cytotoxic drugs, such as oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and others, can enhance the chemotherapy outcomes [15,16]. However, the efficacy of these agents is still limited as many CRC patients have been reported to have developed chemoresistance [15,16]. Recently, Moutabian et al. (2022) [14] have reported that identifying novel, effective, and safe therapeutic anti-cancer agents for their potential application when combined with 5-FU during CRC treatment is urgently required to improve patient survival and overcome the adverse effects.
Recently, the 17β-oestradiol (E2) in colon carcinogenesis has gained greater attention as many studies have seen a significantly lower incidence of CRC in females of reproductive age compared with age-matched males [17,18]. Worldwide, the incidence of CRC is lower in females than in males, suggesting a protective role of sex hormones in CRC development [1,2,19,20,21]. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the incidence of CRC is also classified as the first and the third among males and females, respectively [2,21,22,23,24]. Better survival rates and prognosis have also been detected in female CRC patients aged between 18 and 44 years than in male patients of the same age or females older than 50 years [1,19,25]. Concurrently, the development of CRC risk increased markedly by more than 20% in females after unilateral and bilateral oophorectomy [26,27]. In addition, the use of oral contraceptives (OC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) by postmenopausal females was linked with a remarkable reduction in the incidence of CRC compared with age-matched non-user females [17,18]. Under this theme, Labadie et al. (2020) [28] have also found a strong inverse association between HRT application and the overall CRC risk in postmenopausal females, suggesting efficient chemopreventive actions for HRT in the suppression of the adenoma–carcinoma in CRC. Most current meta-analyses, experimental studies, and reports also reveal anti-cancer activities for 17β-oestradiol against colon carcinogenesis, which could suppress cell growth and induce apoptosis [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38].
Thus, understanding the role of female sex steroids such as estrogen could be necessary to consider for the CRC treatment plan and to establish the screening, prevention, and/or treatment protocols to reduce mortality and improve the survival outcome and life quality of CRC patients. Although the ovaries are the main producers of estrogens, other peripheral tissues also express the enzymes that are required for estrogen synthesis [39,40]. The most biologically active estrogen isoform is 17β-estradiol (E2), which initiates its cellular signals by activating its nuclear receptors (ERα and ERβ), which mediate major genomic actions [41,42,43]. The E2 synthesising enzymes and ERβ are expressed in normal colonic mucosa in both genders, and CRC is mainly linked with pathological alterations in the expression of these molecules [34]. Moreover, the expression of ERβ is commonly downregulated, while ERα increases substantially in malignant colonic tissues, suggesting that E2 could induce its anti-cancer actions in the colon via ERβ [44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. In vitro studies showed that E2 therapy can inhibit the expression of ERα and activate the ERβ in colon cancer cells, which can also consequently prevent the activation of pro-oncogenic molecules [51,52].
Recently, Mahbub (2022) [53] reviewed the current pre-clinical experiments and concluded that E2 exogenous treatment and/or the reactivation of its beta receptor (ERβ) can reduce cell proliferation, promote cell cycle arrest, and induce apoptosis via the modulation of several molecular pathways. However, no studies have investigated the potential role of E2 in combination with 5-FU chemotherapy. Exploring the role of E2 with or without 5-FU could offer a more suitable alternative and/or better-targeted therapy against CRC. Thus, this research has aimed to measure the monotherapy and dual therapy effects of 17β-estradiol (E2) and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) on cell cycle progression (Sub-G1, G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases), live cells, and cell death (early apoptosis, late apoptosis, and dead cells) against HT-29 female and SW480 male primary CRC cells and SW620 male metastatic CRC cells, in vitro using flow cytometry analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Treatments and Reagents

The 17β-estradiol (E2) (E8875-5G) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy was sourced from Hospira Australia Ltd. (Melbourne, Australia). In addition, all the cell culture materials, including Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Media (DMEM) (#10566032), foetal bovine serum (FBS) (#A3160802), and antibiotic-antimycotic solution (#15240062), were provided from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).

2.2. Colon Cancer Cell Lines and Culture Conditions

Human female (HT-29) and male (SW480) primary colon cancer cell lines and metastatic male (SW620) colon cancer cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. More information about the features of these selected cells in correlation with their endogenous expression of estrogen receptors (ERα and/or ERβ) was represented in the previous paper [53].

2.3. Treatment Regimes

The colon cancer cells were first treated with a wide range of E2 and 5-FU concentrations for 72 h, and the IC50 was determined by applying the 3-(4,5- 176 Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) cytotoxicity assay (Figure S1). In particular, the IC50 values of the E2 were 11.7 µM for the HT-29 cells, 12 µM for the SW480 cells, and 12.5 µM for the SW620 cells; the IC50 values of the 5-FU were 50.7 µM for the HT-29 cells, 54.2 µM for the SW480 cells, and 66.9 µM for the SW620 cells (Figure S1). From the MTT data, it can be noted that the colon cancer cells have an almost similar dose response in the cell viability inhibition and IC50 values (Figure S1).
For the flow cytometry analysis, the cells were seeded at 2 × 105 per well in 6-well plates for 24 h to achieve 30%-50% confluency and then treated with the E2 at 10 nM and 5-FU at 50 µM, alone or combined for 48 h, for all the colon cancer cells. These doses and the time point were applied here to ensure that any effects of monotherapies and dual combination therapy could be precisely analysed by cell cycle and cell death, particularly the apoptosis type. The treatment groups were the untreated control (CT), the E2 and 5-FU monotherapies, and the dual combination therapy (E+F). Three independent experiments performed all treatments in triplicate (n = 3).

2.4. Cell Cycle Analysis Using PI Staining and Flow Cytometry

Following the treatment regimens, the HT-29, SW480, and SW620 cells were trypsinised and washed with PBS (500× g for 5 min), then fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol for 24 h at 4 °C. After that, the cells were treated with 20 µg/mL of RNase A (#12091021; Thermo Fisher) for 15 min and then stained with 2 µg/mL propidium iodide (PI) (#P1304MP; Thermo Fisher) for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. Consequently, the stained cells were analysed by applying the Acea Novocyte 3000 flow cytometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The cell numbers in the cell cycle phases: Sub-G1, G0/G1, S, and G2/M were demonstrated via the NovoExpress software cell cycle algorithm for 20,000 events. All the treatments were performed in triplicate (n = 3) in three independent experiments. The data represented the percentage of each cell cycle phase as the mean ± SD.

2.5. Cell Death Analysis Using Annexin V-FITC/PI Staining and Flow Cytometry

Cell death was assessed by an Annexin V-FITC/PI Assay Kit (#V13245; Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the kit’s protocol. Following the treatment regimens, the HT-29, SW480, and SW620 cells were collected and washed twice with ice-cold PBS and then re-suspended in 100 µL of 1× Annexin V (AV) binding buffer. After that, a mixture of AV-FITC (5 µL) and PI (1 µL) was added to each of the cell suspensions and incubated for 15 min in the dark at room temperature to allow the cells to be stained. Then, the AV binding buffer (400 µL) was added. The cells were located on the ice and directly analysed with the NovoCyte 3000 flow cytometry (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), measuring the fluorescence emissions at 530 nm.
In three independent experiments, all treatments were performed in triplicate (n = 3). The data represented the percentage of cells (mean ± SD) in the different cell death stages as follows: live (unstained), early apoptotic (AV+/PI−) and late apoptotic (AV+/PI+), and dead (AV−/PI+) cells. The dead cells are indicated for the very late stages of apoptosis and can be associated with secondary necrosis.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The cell cycle and apoptosis were analysed by determining the percentage of cells in each phase/stage. The data were expressed as mean and standard deviation (n = 3). As the data were non-parametric, a Kruskal–Wallis and a Conover–Inman post-hoc test were applied using Stats Direct software (Stats Direct Ltd., Altrincham, UK) to determine the statistical significance of the data. The data were represented in a bar chart; symbols such as a green asterisk (*) were used when there was a significant increase, while the red asterisk (*) was used when there was a significant decrease. The results were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05.

2.6.1. Analysis of Monotherapies Effect

The statistical significance of the individual drugs (E2 or 5-FU) was determined by comparison with the untreated control cells (CT).

2.6.2. Analysis of Dual Therapy Effect

The statistical significance of dual therapy (E+F) was determined by comparison with the CT and the monotherapies (E2 and 5-FU). The effectiveness of dual treatment on cell cycle/cell death in CRC cell lines was classified as interactive, non-interactive, or no effect, which are defined as follows:
Interactive effect: the dual therapy (E+F) was associated with a significant cell accumulation in any phase of the cell cycle/reduction in live cells/induction of cell death compared to the CT and the monotherapies (E2 and 5-FU).
Non-interactive effect: the dual therapy (E+F) was associated with a significant cell accumulation in any phase of the cell cycle/reduction in live cells/induction of cell death compared to the CT, and/or there was no significant different or it was significantly less compared to one or both treatments when applied alone.
No effect: the dual therapy (E+F) had no significant difference in cell accumulation in any phase of the cell cycle/reduction in live cells/induction of cell death compared to the CT, and/or it was significantly less when compared to the monotherapies.

3. Results

3.1. Cell Cycle Results

3.1.1. The Monotherapy Effect of 7β-estradiol

The E2 monotherapy significantly increased the cells’ accumulation in the sub-G1 phase (Figure 1 and Table 1) and decreased the cells’ accumulation in the G0/G1 phase when compared to untreated control cells (CT) in all three of the investigated colon cancer cell lines (HT-29, SW480, and SW620), p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 1). A differential effect of E2 was observed in the S phase which was dependent on the type of CRC cells and which did not cause any effect in the S phase on the HT-29 female CRC cells (Figure 1). At the same time, it significantly increased the cells’ accumulation in the S phase in the SW480 male CRC cells compared to the CT, p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 1 and Table 1). However, it significantly decreased the cell accumulation in the S phase in the SW620 male metastatic CRC cells compared to the CT, p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 1 and Table 1). The G2/M phase was not affected by E2 monotherapy in the HT-29 and SW480 cells, while the cells were significantly reduced in this phase in the SW620 metastatic cells compared to the CT, p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 1).

3.1.2. The Monotherapy Effect of 5-Fluorouracil

The monotherapy of 5-FU significantly increased the accumulation of the cells in the sub-G1 phase and decreased the cell accumulation in the G0/G1 and G2/M phases when compared to CT in all the investigated CRC cell lines (HT-29, SW480, and SW620), p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 1 and Table 1). In addition, the cells were also significantly accumulated at the S phase in the HT-29 female and SW480 male primary CRC cells compared to the CT, p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 1 and Table 1); meanwhile, no effect was seen in the S phase for the SW620 male metastatic CRC cells compared to the CT, p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 1 and Table 1).

3.1.3. The Dual Therapy Effect of 7β-estradiol and 5-Fluorouracil

In both the HT-29 female and the SW480 male primary CRC cells, the dual therapy (E+F) was shown to have an interactive effect, causing the significant accumulation of cells within the sub-G1 phase of the cell cycle compared to the CT and monotherapies (E2 and 5-FU) (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 1 and Table 1). In the SW620 male metastatic CRC cells, the dual therapy was associated with a non-interactive effect in the sub-G1 phase; there was a significant accumulation of cells in this phase compared to the CT and one of the monotherapies (in particular to 5-FU only) (p ≤ 0.05), with an almost similar effect to that of the E2 monotherapy (Figure 1 and Table 1).
At the same time, in all the investigated CRC cells (HT-29, SW480, and SW620), the dual therapy was shown to have a significant reduction in cell accumulation in the G0/G1 phase compared to the CT and monotherapies (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 1). Regarding the S phase, the E+F therapy caused a non-interactive effect in this phase which linked with a significant accumulation of cells in the HT-29 and SW480 cells; meanwhile, it caused a significant reduction in SW620 cell accumulation compared to one of the monotherapies and CT (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 1). Moreover, the dual therapy did not cause any effect in the G2/M phase in the HT-29 cells, while there was a significant reduction in cell accumulation at this phase in the SW480 and SW620 cells compared to the CT and monotherapies (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 1).
The significant arrest of the cell cycle phases by either monotherapies (E2 or 5-FU) or dual therapy (E+F) in human colon cancer cell lines is summarised and represented in Table 1, with their p values

3.2. Cell Death Results

3.2.1. The Monotherapy Effect of 7β-estradiol

In all the investigated CRC cell lines (HT-29, SW480, and SW620), the E2 monotherapy significantly reduced the live cells and induced apoptosis; in particular, there was the significant induction of late apoptosis seen in the HT-29 cells, the early apoptosis observed in the SW480 cells, and both the early and the late apoptosis in the SW620 cells when compared to the CT, p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 2, Table 2 and Table 3). No significant induction was seen on the dead cells in all the cell lines compared to the CT (Figure 2).

3.2.2. The Monotherapy Effect of 5-Fluorouracil

In all the investigated colon cancer cells (HT-29, SW480, and SW620), the 5-FU monotherapy significantly reduced the live cells and induced early apoptosis in the HT-29 and SW620 cells and both early and late apoptosis in the SW480 cells compared to the CT, p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 2, Table 2 and Table 3). No significant induction was observed on the dead cells in the HT-29 and SW480 primary CRC cells, whilst significant induction was seen in the SW620 metastatic CRC cells compared to the CT, p ≤ 0.05 (Figure 2).

3.2.3. The Dual Therapy Effect of 7β-estradiol and 5-Fluorouracil

In the HT-29 cells, the dual therapy (E+F) was shown to have an interactive effect, causing a significant reduction in live cells when compared to the CT and monotherapies (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 2 and Table 2), while in the remaining CRC cells (SW480 and SW620) the dual therapy was revealed to have had a non-interactive effect, which was associated with a significant reduction in live cells but, compared to the CT, with a significant differential effect against the monotherapies (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 2 and Table 2).
Interestingly, the treated HT-29 and SW480 primary CRC cells with the dual therapy were associated with an interactive effect on apoptosis induction, in which there was a significant induction of early or late apoptotic cells, respectively, compared to the CT and monotherapies (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 2, Table 2 and Table 3). However, the dual therapy did not cause any interactive effects on cell death induction in the SW620 metastatic CRC cells, which was associated with a differential effect against the monotherapies; meanwhile, there was a significant induction of early and late apoptosis compared to the CT, (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 2 and Table 3).
The significant reduction in live cells and the induction of cell death by the monotherapies (E2 or 5-FU) and dual therapy (E+F) in human colon cancer cells are summarised and represented in Table 2 and Table 3.

4. Discussion

The current study explored the anti-cancer activity of 17β-oestradiol (E2) as monotherapy and dual therapy with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in vitro against the female (HT-29) and male (SW480) primary CRC cells, as well as the male (SW620) metastatic CRC cells. This is the first study to explore the in vitro anti-cancer activity of combining E2 with 5-FU against CRC cells. The findings here showed that the E2 and 5-FU monotherapies significantly promoted the cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction in all the investigated CRC cell lines (HT-29, SW480, and SW620), suggesting that E2 monotherapy could be a promising therapeutic strategy for both primary and metastatic CRC types. However, the greatest anti-cancer actions were observed with dual therapy (E+F) against the female and male primary CRC cells (HT-29 and SW480), suggesting that E2 could enhance the activity of 5-FU chemotherapy and could be used as an alternative treatment combination strategy for the early stage of CRC, for both the female and the male genders.
Notably, the monotherapy of 5-FU (50 µM) at 48 h caused a significant increase in the accumulation of the cells in the sub-G1 and S phases in the HT-29 female and SW480 male primary CRC cells and in the sub-G1 phase only in the SW620 male metastatic CRC cells, with a significant reduction in live cell numbers and the induction of early apoptosis in all three of the investigated CRC cells when compared to the CT. In addition, 5-FU monotherapy induced late apoptotic cells in the SW480 cells. 5-FU produces its anti-cancer effects by suppressing thymidylate synthase (TS) and disrupting the intracellular deoxynucleotide pools needed for DNA replication [10]. Therefore, it can inhibit cellular proliferation by controlling the critical molecular pathway molecules that inhibit the DNA synthesis in the S phase and induce cell cycle arrest (G0/G1 or S phases), causing DNA damage [54]. Accordingly, 5-FU is thought to suppress cancer cell growth by inducing apoptosis and cell death [54]. Moreover, the cell cycle arrest induced by 5-FU involves the dysregulation of the critical intracellular signalling pathways and their related molecules, including activating cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (p21Waf1/Cip1 and p27Kip1), inhibiting the markers of proliferation, such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and survivin, and upregulating the expression of the activity of the apoptosis-related proteins, such as p53 and caspase-3 [55,56,57].
The data here also demonstrated that E2 monotherapy (10 nM) at 48 h effectively arrested the cell cycle at the sub-G1 phase, reduced the live cells, and induced early and/or late apoptosis in all the investigated CRC cell lines (HT-29, SW480, and SW620) that either derived from the primary or metastatic tumors. Accordingly, E2 monotherapy could be highly effective as an anti-cancer agent for treating both the early and advanced stages of colon cancer in both genders. Based on the significant values in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, E2 monotherapy greatly arrested the cells in the sub-G1 phase and induced both early and late apoptosis in metastatic CRC cells compared to its effect on primary CRC cells.
Taken together, the E2 and 5-FU monotherapies had an almost similar effect on the cell cycle by arresting mainly the sub-G1 phase (Table 1), reducing the living cells (Table 2), and inducing early and/or late apoptosis (Table 3) in all the investigated cell lines (HT-29, SW480, and SW620). Meanwhile, it is important to mention that there is some differential sensitivity in response to monotherapies on the cell cycle and apoptosis; this is normal and is due to the diversities in the cellular and molecular features of each of the CRC cell lines applied [53], which could have induced some different anticancer responses.
In agreement with these results, earlier studies found that DLD-1 primary male CRC cells, when treated with a single therapy of E2 at a 10 nM dose for 24, 30, and/or 48 hrs, caused an inhibition of the cell proliferation [58,59,60], the arrest the cell cycle in the sub-G1 phase [59], and apoptosis induction [59,60,61]. Mechanistically, the E2 anticancer activity has occurred through activating the caspase-3 induction and increasing the poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) cleavage [59,60,61]. In addition, most of the current studies have reported that the actions of E2 in CRC are receptor-dependent and have also shown that ERα is oncogenic, whereas ERβ exerts anti-cancer activities [44,62,63,64], which, consequently, can activate the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38/MAPK) pathway [65]. Several human CRC cell lines are endogenously overexpressed with ERβ receptors. For example, the HT-29, SW480, and DLD-1 primary cells were reported to express ERβ and lack ERα [44,58,61,63]. In contrast, the SW620 metastatic cells express ERα and ERβ [64].
Interestingly, additional studies found that the ERβ re-expression exogenously, along with E2 treatment at 10 nM for 24 h, could be a very effective therapeutic strategy to produce anti-cancer activity for the primary colon cancer cells (SW480 and HT-29) [35,66,67]. They showed that this treatment strategy caused cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase in female (HT-29) and male (SW480) colon cancer cells [35,66] by decreasing the expression of MYC [67,68], MYB, and the PROX1 [67] oncogenes and increasing the expression of the p21Waf1/Cip1 and p27Kip1 cell cycle inhibitors [35]. On the other hand, Edvardsson et al. (2013) [67] reported that E2 treatment following ERβ activation in the SW620 metastatic CRC cells showed no effects on the MYC expression. The metastatic CRC cells could respond to this treatment strategy if investigated for a long treatment period, such as 48 h rather than 24 h, as the E2 monotherapy here showed significant anti-cancer activity in this type of cells at 48 h.
Remarkably, the data here also revealed a significant accumulation of the cells at the sub-G1 phase and the induction of apoptosis in HT-29 female and SW480 male primary CRC cells when treated with dual combination therapy (E+F) compared to the action of the monotherapy (E2 and 5-FU) and the CT. Meanwhile, dual treatment has a lower effect in SW620 male metastatic CRC cells. These findings suggested that E2 can enhance the activity of 5-FU, and this combination regimen could be a promising therapeutic approach for the early stages of CRC for both genders. However, a lower concentration of E2 and 5-FU may be needed for a dual therapy strategy in treating the metastatic SW620 CRC cells to produce an interactive effect on the cell cycle progression and apoptosis because, when the percentage of cells in the sub-G1 phase is considered, the E2 monotherapy has caused maximum efficacy on the cell cycle in which 70% of the cells in the sub-G1 phase had accumulated; thus, using a lower dose, particularly for E2 when combined with 5-FU, could produce an interactive effect in SW620 cells.
The findings from the flow cytometric analysis in the current study demonstrated that all the treated CRC cells were arrested at the sub-G1 phase associated with apoptosis induction. The detection of most of the treated cells in the sub-G1 phase demonstrated strong evidence of apoptosis induction [69]. Apoptosis is subsequently linked with DNA damage induction, which leads to the arrest of the cell cycle progression [26]. The cell cycle includes a series of events within a cell divided into interphase (G1, S, and G2 phases) and mitosis (M phase), which leads to its division and duplication [3,4]. The G1 phase is a crucial part of the cell cycle as it provides the signal to the cell to permit it to enter the cell division stage [69]. Thus, regulating the cell cycle progression and apoptosis is a practical approach to controlling tumor growth [69].
This first study demonstrated that 17β-estradiol could enhance the anti-cancer activities of 5-Fluorouracil chemotherapy in treating the human female and male colon cancer cells; this was preferentially provoked in the sub-G, phase associated with the induction of apoptosis. Nevertheless, further studies are still needed to explore the genomic and non-genomic effects of E2 and 5-FU dual therapy for CRC to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying their anti-cancer actions in order to corroborate the observations here. Future studies should also investigate their anti-cancer activities in female and male experimental models (in vivo) to determine their precise therapeutic values in CRC.
The17β-estradiol can initiate its cellular signals by triggering and activating its nuclear receptors (ERα and ERβ), which mediate major genomic actions [41,42,43]. It is important to mention that female sex steroid can produce pro- or antitumorigenic effects, based on the origin of the cancer type, the expression pattern of the estrogen endogenous receptors in the tissue, and the malignancy stage [70,71]. In this context and in contrast to CRC, estrogens (either endogenous or exogenous) have been revealed to promote cell proliferation and tumor progression in the breast and uterus [72]. These pro-tumorigenic actions are mediated via the ERα, which is predominant in these tissues [72]. However, the activities of E2 in CRC are receptor-dependent; ERα produces oncogenic actions, while ERβ produces anticancer actions [64]. Thus, it is essential to consider the cancer types when using the therapeutic strategy, including the female sex steroid hormones.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the most responsive CRC cells to the dual therapy (E+F) regimen were the primary CRC cells (HT-29 and SW480), while the metastatic CRC cells (SW620) were the least responsive to this treatment strategy. Meanwhile, the SW620 cells were the most responsive CRC cell type to the E2 monotherapy compared to the primary CRC cells. The investigated E2 treatment strategies consistently arrested the cell cycle progression at the sub-G1 phase in conjunction with early and/or late apoptosis induction in CRC cells. These results suggested that E2 monotherapy could be more effective for the advanced stages of CRC and that the E+F dual therapy could be an alternative potential combination regimen for the early stages of CRC, and, interestingly, it could be for both genders. Meanwhile, additional studies are still required to explore those promising treatment strategies at the molecular levels, in vitro and in vivo.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/medsci10040062/s1, Figure S1: colon cancer cells (HT-29, SW480, and SW620) were treated with a wide range of concentrations of the 7β-estradiol (E2) and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 72h, and the IC50 for each demonstrated the use of the MTT cell viability assay.

Funding

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University; the grant code was 19-MED-1-03-0007, Makkah—Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University, which supported this work with grant code 19-MED-1-03-0007. The author would like to thank Bassem Refaat ([email protected]) for the supervision during the research work and paper preparation and Akhmed Aslam ([email protected]) for support during the research lab experiments at the Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences of Umm Al-Qura University.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Globocan. Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide 2020. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/%20data/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheets.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2022).
  2. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Filipits, M.; Pirker, R.; Dunant, A.; Lantuejoul, S.; Schmid, K.; Huynh, A.; Haddad, V.; Andre, F.; Stahel, R.; Pignon, J.-P.; et al. Cell Cycle Regulators and Outcome of Adjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Completely Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Biologic Program. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 2735–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brough, R.; Bajrami, I.; Vatcheva, R.; Natrajan, R.; Reis-Filho, J.S.; Lord, C.J.; Ashworth, A. APRIN is a cell cycle specific BRCA2-interacting protein required for genome integrity and a predictor of outcome after chemotherapy in breast cancer. EMBO J. 2012, 31, 1160–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Li, Y.; Wei, J.; Xu, C.; Zhao, Z.; You, T. Prognostic significance of cyclin D1 expression in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jakubowska, K.; Pryczynicz, A.; Dymicka-Piekarska, V.; Famulski, W.; Guzińska-Ustymowicz, K. Immunohistochemical expression and serum level of survivin protein in colorectal cancer patients. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 3591–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Al-Maghrabi, J.; Al-Ahwal, M.; Buhmeida, A.; Syrjänen, K.; Sibyani, A.; Emam, E.; Ghanim, A.; Al-Qahtani, M. Expression of Cell Cycle Regulators P21 and P27 as Predictors of Disease Outcome in Colorectal Carcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2011, 43, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Simpson, K.L.; Cawthorne, C.; Zhou, C.; Hodgkinson, C.L.; Walker, M.J.; Trapani, F.; Kadirvel, M.; Brown, G.; Dawson, M.J.; Macfarlane, M.; et al. A caspase-3 ‘death-switch’ in colorectal cancer cells for induced and synchronous tumor apoptosis in vitro and in vivo facilitates the development of minimally invasive cell death biomarkers. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Oh, H.J.; Bae, J.M.; Wen, X.; Jung, S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, K.J.; Cho, N.-Y.; Kim, J.H.; Han, S.-W.; Kim, T.-Y.; et al. p53 expression status is associated with cancer-specific survival in stage III and high-risk stage II colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vodenkova, S.; Buchler, T.; Cervena, K.; Veskrnova, V.; Vodicka, P.; Vymetalkova, V. 5-fluorouracil and other fluoropyrimidines in colorectal cancer: Past, present and future. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 206, 107447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Katona, C.; Kralovánszky, J.; Rosta, A.; Pandi, E.; Fónyad, G.; Tóth, K.; Jeney, A. Putative Role of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase in the Toxic Side Effect of 5-Fluorouracil in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Oncology 1998, 55, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abdel Latif, Y.; El-Bana, M.; Hussein, J.; El-Khayat, Z.; Farrag, A.R. Effects of resveratrol in combination with 5-fluorouracil on N-methylnitrosourea-induced colon cancer in rats. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2019, 28, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Blondy, S.; David, V.; Verdier, M.; Mathonnet, M.; Perraud, A.; Christou, N. 5-Fluorouracil resistance mechanisms in colorectal cancer: From classical pathways to promising processes. Cancer Sci. 2020, 111, 3142–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moutabian, H.; Majdaeen, M.; Ghahramani-Asl, R.; Yadollahi, M.; Gharepapagh, E.; Ataei, G.; Falahatpour, Z.; Bagheri, H.; Farhood, B. A systematic review of the therapeutic effects of resveratrol in combination with 5-fluorouracil during colorectal cancer treatment: With a special focus on the oxidant, apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory activities. Cancer Cell Int. 2022, 22, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, J.H. Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG 2015, 21, 5158–5166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yaffee, P.; Osipov, A.; Tan, C.; Tuli, R.; Hendifar, A. Review of systemic therapies for locally advanced and metastatic rectal cancer. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2015, 6, 185–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jang, Y.; Huang, H.; Leung, C.Y. Association of hormone replacement therapy with mortality in colorectal cancer survivor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schmuck, R.; Gerken, M.; Teegen, E.; Krebs, I.; Klinkhammer-Schalke, M.; Aigner, F.; Pratschke, J.; Rau, B.; Benz, S. Gender comparison of clinical, histopathological, therapeutic and outcome factors in 185,967 colon cancer patients. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2020, 405, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Abancens, M.; Bustos, V.; Harvey, H.; McBryan, J.; Harvey, B.J. Sexual Dimorphism in Colon Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 607909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maingi, J.W.; Tang, S.; Liu, S.; Ngenya, W.; Bao, E. Targeting estrogen receptors in colorectal cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 4087–4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Almatroudi, A. The Incidence Rate of Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia: An Observational Descriptive Epidemiological Analysis. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2020, 13, 977–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mosli, M.H.; Al-Ahwal, M.S. Colorectal Cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Need for Screening. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012, 13, 3809–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Al-Ahwal, M.S.; Shafik, Y.H.; Al-Ahwal, H.M. First national survival data for colorectal cancer among Saudis between 1994 and 2004: What’s next? BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Alsanea, N.; Abduljabbar, A.S.; Alhomoud, S.; Ashari, L.H.; Hibbert, D.; Bazarbashi, S. Colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia: Incidence, survival, demographics and implications for national policies. Ann. Saudi Med. 2015, 35, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, C.; Gong, X.; Yang, X.; Shang, X.; Du, Q.; Liao, Q.; Xie, R.; Chen, Y.; Xu, J. The roles of estrogen and estrogen receptors in gastrointestinal disease (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2019, 18, 5673–5680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Luo, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Guo, P.; Li, K. Risk of colorectal cancer with hysterectomy and oophorectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg. 2016, 34, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Koch, T.; Therming Jørgensen, J.; Christensen, J.; Duun-Henriksen, A.K.; Priskorn, L.; Kildevæld Simonsen, M.; Dehlendorff, C.; Andersen, Z.J.; Juul, A.; Bräuner, E.V.; et al. Bilateral oophorectomy and rate of colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study. Int. J. Cancer 2022, 150, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Labadie, J.D.; Harrison, T.A.; Banbury, B.; Amtay, E.L.; Bernd, S.; Brenner, H.; Buchanan, D.D.; Campbell, P.T.; Cao, Y.; Chan, A.T.; et al. Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Colorectal Cancer Risk by Molecularly Defined Subtypes and Tumor Location. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020, 4, pkaa042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grodstein, F.; Newcomb, P.A.; Stampfer, M.J. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of colorectal cancer: A review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Med. 1999, 106, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Prihartono, N.; Palmer, J.R.; Louik, C.; Shapiro, S.; Rosenberg, L. A Case-Control Study of Use of Postmenopausal Female Hormone Supplements in Relation to the Risk of Large Bowel Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2000, 9, 443–447. [Google Scholar]
  31. Woodson, K.; Lanza, E.; Tangrea, J.A.; Albert, P.S.; Slattery, M.; Pinsky, J.; Caan, B.; Paskett, E.; Iber, F.; Kikendall, J.W.; et al. Hormone Replacement Therapy and Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence Among Women in the Polyp Prevention Trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 1799–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Rossouw, J.E.; Anderson, G.L.; Prentice, R.L.; LaCroix, A.Z.; Kooperberg, C.; Stefanick, M.L.; Jackson, R.D.; Beresford, S.A.A.; Howard, B.V.; Johnson, K.C.; et al. Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results from the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2002, 288, 321–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anderson, G.L.; Limacher, M.; Assaf, A.R.; Bassford, T.; Beresford, S.A.A.; Black, H.; Bonds, D.; Brunner, R.; Brzyski, R.; Caan, B.; et al. Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Hysterectomy: The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2004, 291, 1701–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Newcomb, P.A.; Zheng, Y.; Chia, V.M.; Morimoto, L.M.; Doria-Rose, V.P.; Templeton, A.; Thibodeau, S.N.; Potter, J.D. Estrogen Plus Progestin Use, Microsatellite Instability, and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Women. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 7534–7539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hartman, J.; Edvardsson, K.; Lindberg, K.; Zhao, C.; Willimas, S.C.; Strom, A.; Gustafsson, J.A. Tumor Repressive Functions of Estrogen Receptor β in SW480 Colon Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6100–6106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wei, Y.; Huang, C.; Wu, H.; Huang, J. Estrogen Receptor Beta (ERβ) Mediated-CyclinD1 Degradation via Autophagy Plays an AntiProliferation Role in Colon Cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 15, 942–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Topi, G.; Satapathy, S.R.; Dash, P.; Fred Mehrabi, S.; Ehrnström, R.; Olsson, R.; Lydrup, M.-L.; Sjölander, A. Tumour-suppressive effect of oestrogen receptor β in colorectal cancer patients, colon cancer cells, and a zebrafish model. J. Pathol. 2020, 251, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fiocchetti, M.; Camilli, G.; Acconcia, F.; Leone, S.; Ascenzi, P.; Marino, M. ERβ-dependent neuroglobin up-regulation impairs 17β-estradiol-induced apoptosis in DLD-1 colon cancer cells upon oxidative stress injury. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 149, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Prough, R.A.; Clark, B.J.; Klinge, C.M. Novel mechanisms for DHEA action. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2016, 56, R139–R155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Escajadillo, T.; Wang, H.; Li, L.; Li, D.; Sewer, M.B. Oxysterol-related-binding-protein related Protein-2 (ORP2) regulates cortisol biosynthesis and cholesterol homeostasis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 427, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Slattery, M.L.; Sweeney, C.; Murtaugh, M.; Ma, K.N.; Wolff, R.K.; Potter, J.D.; Caan, B.J.; Samowitz, W. Associations between ERalpha, ERbeta, and AR genotypes and colon and rectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005, 14, 2936–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Check, J.H.; Dix, E.; Cohen, R.; Check, D.; Wilson, C. Efficacy of the Progesterone Receptor Antagonist Mifepristone for Palliative Therapy of Patients with a Variety of Advanced Cancer Types. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Gan, L.; He, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, G.; Chen, Y.; Pan, J.; Wang, J.-J.; Wang, X. Expression profile and prognostic role of sex hormone receptors in gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Campbell-Thompson, M.; Lynch, I.J.; Bhardwaj, B. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) subtypes and ERbeta isoforms in colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Di Leo, A.; Barone, M.; Maiorano, E.; Tanzi, S.; Piscitelli, D.; Marangi, S.; Lofano, K.; Ierardi, E.; Principi, M.; Francavilla, A. ER-β expression in large bowel adenomas: Implications in colon carcinogenesis. Dig. Liver Dis. 2007, 40, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Grivas, P.D.; Tzelepi, V.; Sotiropoulou-Bonikou, G.; Kefalopoulou, Z.; Papavassiliou, A.G.; Kalofonos, H. Expression of ERalpha, ERbeta and co-regulator PELP1/MNAR in colorectal cancer: Prognostic significance and clinicopathologic correlations. Cell. Oncol. 2009, 31, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tzelepi, V.; Grivas, P.; Kefalopoulou, Z.; Kalofonos, H.; Varakis, J.N.; Melachrinou, M.; Sotiropoulou-Bonikou, G. Estrogen signaling in colorectal carcinoma microenvironment: Expression of ERbeta1, AIB-1, and TIF-2 is upregulated in cancer-associated myofibroblasts and correlates with disease progression. Virchows Arch. Int. J. Pathol. 2009, 454, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Foley, E.F.; Jazaeri, A.A.; Shupnik, M.A.; Jazaeri, O.; Rice, L.W. Selective loss of estrogen receptor β in malignant human colon. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 245–248. [Google Scholar]
  49. Castiglione, F.; Taddei, A.; Degl’Innocenti, D.; Buccoliero, A.; Bechi, P.; Garbini, F.; Chiara, F.G.; Moncini, D.; Cavallina, G.; Marascio, L.; et al. Expression of Estrogen Receptor β in Colon Cancer Progression. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 2008, 17, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fang, Y.; Lu, Z.; Wang, F.; Wu, X.; Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Pan, Z.-Z.; Wan, D.-S. Prognostic impact of ERβ and MMP7 expression on overall survival in colon cancer. Tumor Biol. 2010, 31, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Koehler, K.F.; Helguero, L.A.; Haldosén, L.; Warner, M.; Gustafsson, J. Reflections on the Discovery and Significance of Estrogen Receptor β. Endocr. Rev. 2005, 26, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hsu, H.; Cheng, S.; Wu, C.; Chu, C.; Weng, Y.; Lin, C.; Lee, S.; Wu, H.; Huang, C.; Kuo, W. Apoptotic Effects of Over-Expressed Estrogen Receptor-β on LoVo Colon Cancer Cell is Mediated by p53 Signalings in a Ligand-Dependent Manner. Chin. J. Physiol. 2006, 49, 110–116. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mahbub, A.A. Therapeutic Strategies and Potential Actions of Female Sex Steroid Hormones and Their Receptors in Colon Cancer Based on Preclinical Studies. Life 2022, 12, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Filgueiras, M.d.C.; Morrot, A.; Soares, P.M.G.; Costa, M.L.; Mermelstein, C. Effects of 5-fluorouracil in nuclear and cellular morphology, proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, cytoskeletal and caveolar distribution in primary cultures of smooth muscle cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Borralho, P.M.; Moreira da Silva, I.B.; Aranha, M.M.; Albuquerque, C.; Nobre Leitão, C.; Steer, C.J.; Rodrigues, C.M. Inhibition of Fas expression by RNAi modulates 5-fluorouracil-induced apoptosis in HCT116 cells expressing wild-type p53. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Basis Dis. 2007, 1772, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Jung, Y.; Qian, Y.; Chen, X. Examination of the expanding pathways for the regulation of p21 expression and activity. Cell. Signal. 2010, 22, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Aslam, A.; Ahmad, J.; Baghdadi, M.A.; Idris, S.; Almaimani, R.; Alsaegh, A.; Alhadrami, M.; Refaat, B. Chemopreventive effects of vitamin D3 and its analogue, paricalcitol, in combination with 5-fluorouracil against colorectal cancer: The role of calcium signalling molecules. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Basis Dis. 2021, 1867, 166040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Fiorelli, G.; Picariello, L.; Martineti, V.; Tonelli, F.; Brandi, M.L. Functional Estrogen Receptor β in Colon Cancer Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 261, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Marino, M.; Galluzzo, P.; Leone, S.; Acconcia, F.; Ascenzi, P. Nitric oxide impairs the 17β-estradiol-induced apoptosis in human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2006, 13, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bolli, A.; Bulzomi, P.; Galluzzo, P.; Acconcia, F.; Marino, M. Bisphenol A impairs estradiol-induced protective effects against DLD-1 colon cancer cell growth. IUBMB Life 2010, 62, 684–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Galluzzo, P.; Caiazza, F.; Moreno, S.; Marino, M. Role of ERbeta palmitoylation in the inhibition of human colon cancer cell proliferation. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2007, 14, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Arai, N.; Ström, A.; Rafter, J.J.; Gustafsson, J. Estrogen Receptor β mRNA in Colon Cancer Cells: Growth Effects of Estrogen and Genistein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 270, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Qiu, Y.; Waters, C.; Lewis, A.; Langman, M.; Eggo, M. Oestrogen-induced apoptosis in colonocytes expressing oestrogen receptor beta. J. Endocrinol. 2002, 174, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Ditonno, I.; Losurdo, G.; Rendina, M.; Pricci, M.; Girardi, B.; Ierardi, E.; Di Leo, A. Estrogen Receptors in Colorectal Cancer: Facts, Novelties and Perspectives. Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28, 4256–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Caiazza, F.; Galluzzo, P.; Lorenzetti, S.; Marino, M. 17Beta-estradiol induces ERbeta up-regulation via p38/MAPK activation in colon cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 359, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Edvardsson, K.; Ström, A.; Jonsson, P.; Gustafsson, J.A.; Williams, C. Estrogen receptor β induced anti-inflammatory and antitumorogenic networks in colon cancer cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2011, 25, 969–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Edvardsson, K.; Nguyen-Vu, T.; Kalasekar, S.M.; Pontén, F.; Gustafsson, J.; Williams, C. Estrogen receptor β expression induces changes in the microRNA pool in human colon cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34, 1431–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zhang, Y.; Wen, X.; Guo, X.; Huang, S.; Wang, T.; Zhou, P.; Li, W.; Zhou, L.-F.; Hu, Y.-H. Progesterone suppresses the progression of colonic carcinoma by increasing the activity of the GADD45α/JNK/c-Jun signalling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2021, 45, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ngabire, D.; Seong, Y.A.; Patil, M.P.; Niyonizigiye, I.; Seo, Y.B.; Kim, G.D. Induction of apoptosis and G1 phase cell cycle arrest by Aste. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 2300–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Paterni, I.; Granchi, C.; Katzenellenbogen, J.A.; Minutolo, F. Estrogen receptors alpha (ERα) and beta (ERβ): Subtype-selective ligands and clinical potential. Steroids 2014, 90, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Rennert, G. Reproductive factors, hormones and colorectal cancer—Still unresolved. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 116, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Mohammed, H.; Russell, I.A.; Stark, R.; Rueda, O.M.; Hickey, T.E.; Tarulli, G.A.; Serandour, A.A.A.; Birrell, S.N.; Bruna, A.; Saadi, A.; et al. Progesterone receptor modulates ERα action in breast cancer. Nature 2015, 523, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medsci 10 00062 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage of cells (mean ± SD of three independent experiments in triplicate) in the cell cycle phases (sub-G1, G0/G1, S, G2/M) in untreated control cells (CT) and following treatments with 7β-estradiol (E2) at 10 nM and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) at 50 µM, alone and in combination (E+F), for 48 h in the: (a) HT-29 female and (b) SW480 male primary colon cancer cells and in the (c) SW620 male metastatic colon cancer cells, using the PI staining and flow cytometry analysis. Data were represented in the bar chart; symbols such as the green asterisk (*) were used when there was a significant increase, while the red asterisk (*) was used when there was a significant decrease. Results were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05; monotherapies were statistically compared to CT only, while dual therapy was statistically compared to CT and monotherapies (Section 2.6).
Figure 1. Percentage of cells (mean ± SD of three independent experiments in triplicate) in the cell cycle phases (sub-G1, G0/G1, S, G2/M) in untreated control cells (CT) and following treatments with 7β-estradiol (E2) at 10 nM and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) at 50 µM, alone and in combination (E+F), for 48 h in the: (a) HT-29 female and (b) SW480 male primary colon cancer cells and in the (c) SW620 male metastatic colon cancer cells, using the PI staining and flow cytometry analysis. Data were represented in the bar chart; symbols such as the green asterisk (*) were used when there was a significant increase, while the red asterisk (*) was used when there was a significant decrease. Results were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05; monotherapies were statistically compared to CT only, while dual therapy was statistically compared to CT and monotherapies (Section 2.6).
Medsci 10 00062 g001
Medsci 10 00062 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage of the live cells and early and late apoptotic cells alongside dead cells (mean ± SD of three independent experiments in triplicate) in untreated control cells (CT) and following treatments with 7β-estradiol (E2) at 10 nM and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) at 50 µM at µM alone and in combination (E+F) for 48 in the: (a) HT-29 female and (b) SW480 male primary colon cancer cells, and in the (c) SW620 male metastatic colon cancer cells, using the AV/PI staining and flow cytometry analysis. Data were represented in the bar chart; symbols such as the green asterisk (*) were used when there was a significant increase, while the red asterisk (*) was used when there was a significant decrease. Results were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05; monotherapies were statistically compared to CT only, while dual therapy was statistically compared to the monotherapies and CT (Section 2.6).
Figure 2. Percentage of the live cells and early and late apoptotic cells alongside dead cells (mean ± SD of three independent experiments in triplicate) in untreated control cells (CT) and following treatments with 7β-estradiol (E2) at 10 nM and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) at 50 µM at µM alone and in combination (E+F) for 48 in the: (a) HT-29 female and (b) SW480 male primary colon cancer cells, and in the (c) SW620 male metastatic colon cancer cells, using the AV/PI staining and flow cytometry analysis. Data were represented in the bar chart; symbols such as the green asterisk (*) were used when there was a significant increase, while the red asterisk (*) was used when there was a significant decrease. Results were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05; monotherapies were statistically compared to CT only, while dual therapy was statistically compared to the monotherapies and CT (Section 2.6).
Medsci 10 00062 g002
Table
Table 1. The summary of significant arrested cell cycle phases by monotherapies and dual therapy in human colon cancer cells (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 1. The summary of significant arrested cell cycle phases by monotherapies and dual therapy in human colon cancer cells (p ≤ 0.05).
Colon Cancer Cell LinesMonotherapies
Compared to CT Only		Dual Therapy
Compared to CT & Monotherapies
E25-FUE+F
HT-29 cells Sub-G1 phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p = 0.0007		Sub-G1 phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p = 0.0133
S phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p < 0.0001		Interactive effect at Sub-G1 phase
Significant arrest vs. CT, p < 0.0001
Significant arrest vs. E2, p = 0.0133
Significant arrest vs. 5-FU, p = 0.0007
SW480 cells Sub-G1 phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p = 0.0063
S phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p = 0.0166		Sub-G1 phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p = 0.0002
S phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p = 0.0001		Interactive effect at Sub-G1 phase
Significant arrest vs. CT, p < 0.0001
Significant arrest vs. E2, p < 0.0001
Significant arrest vs. 5-FU, p = 0.0063
SW620 cellsSub-G1 phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p < 0.0001		Sub-G1 phase
Significant arrest
vs. CT, p = 0.0063		Non-interactive effect at Sub-G1 phase
Significant arrest vs. CT, p < 0.0001
No significant arrest vs. E2, p = 0.2017
Significant arrest vs. 5-FU, p = 0.0063
The summary of the significant arrest of cell cycle phases by monotherapies: 7β-estradiol (E2) at 10 nM and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) at 50 µM and dual therapy (E+F) at 48 h in the HT-29 female and SW480 male primary CRC cells and in the SW620 male metastatic CRC cells. The treatment effects were statistically determined based on the data represented in Figure 1 using the statistical analysis methods of Section 2.6.
Table
Table 2. The summary of the significant reduction in living cells by monotherapies.
Table 2. The summary of the significant reduction in living cells by monotherapies.
Colon Cancer Cell LinesMonotherapies
Compared to CT Only		Dual Therapy
Compared to CT & Monotherapies
E25-FUE+F
HT-29 cells Significant reduction
vs. CT, p < 0.0001		Significant reduction
vs. CT, p = 0.0063		Interactive effect on live cells
Significant reduction vs. CT, p = 0.0063
Significant reduction vs. E2, p = 0.0063
Significant reduction vs. 5-FU, p < 0.0001
SW480 cells Significant reduction
vs. CT, p = 0.0063		Significant reduction
vs. CT, p < 0.0001		Non-interactive effect on live cells
Significant reduction vs. CT, p < 0.0001
Significant reduction vs. E2, p = 0.0063
Significant increase vs. 5-FU, p = 0.0063
SW620 cellsSignificant reduction
vs. CT, p < 0.0001		Significant reduction
vs. CT, p = 0.0063		Non-interactive effect on live cells
Significant reduction vs. CT, p < 0.0001
Significant increase vs. E2, p = 0.0063
Significant reduction vs. 5-FU, p = 0.0052
7β-estradiol (E2) at 10 nM and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) at 50 µM and dual therapy (E+F) at 48 h in the HT-29 female and SW480 male primary CRC cells and in the SW620 male metastatic CRC cells. The treatment effects were statistically determined based on the data represented in Figure 2, using the statistical analysis methods of Section 2.6.
Table
Table 3. The summary of significant induction of early/late apoptosis by monotherapies and dual therapy in human colon cancer cell lines, (p ≤ 0.05).
Table 3. The summary of significant induction of early/late apoptosis by monotherapies and dual therapy in human colon cancer cell lines, (p ≤ 0.05).
Colon Cancer Cell LinesMonotherapies
Compared to CT Only		Dual Therapy
Compared to CT & Monotherapies
E25-FUE+F
HT-29 cells Late apoptosis
Significant induction
vs. CT, p = 0.0372		Early apoptosis
Significant induction
vs. CT, p = 0.0063		Interactive effect on early apoptosis
Significant induction vs. CT, p < 0.0001
Significant induction vs. E2, p < 0.0001
Significant induction vs. 5-FU, p = 0.0063
SW480 cells Early apoptosis
Significant induction
vs. CT, p = 0.0047		Early apoptosis
Significant induction
vs. CT, p = 0.0001
Late apoptosis
Significant induction
vs. CT, p < 0.0001		Interactive effect on late apoptosis
Significant induction vs. CT, p < 0.0001
Significant induction vs. E2, p < 0.0001
Significant induction vs. 5-FU, p = 0.0064
SW620 cellsEarly apoptosis
Significant induction
vs. CT, p = 0.0007
Late apoptosis
Significant induction
vs. CT, p < 0.0001		Early apoptosis
Significant induction
vs. CT, p < 0.0001		Non-interactive effect on early apoptosis
Significant induction vs. CT only, p = 0.0133
No significant induction vs. E2, p = 0.0578
Significant reduction vs. 5-FU, p = 0.0007
Non-interactive effect on late apoptosis
Significant induction vs. CT, p = 0.0063
Significant induction vs. E2, p = 0.0063
Significant reduction vs. 5-FU, p < 0.0001
The summary of the significant induction of cell death (early apoptosis, late apoptosis, and/or dead cells) by monotherapies: 7β-estradiol (E2) at 10 nM and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) at 50 µM and dual therapy (E+F) at 48 h in the HT-29 female and SW480 male primary CRC cells and in the SW620 male metastatic CRC cells. The treatment effects were statistically determined based on the data represented in Figure 2, using the statistical analysis methods of Section 2.6.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahbub, A.A. 17β-estradiol Enhances 5-Fluorouracil Anti-Cancer Activities in Colon Cancer Cell Lines. Med. Sci. 2022, 10, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci10040062

AMA Style

Mahbub AA. 17β-estradiol Enhances 5-Fluorouracil Anti-Cancer Activities in Colon Cancer Cell Lines. Medical Sciences. 2022; 10(4):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci10040062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahbub, Amani A. 2022. "17β-estradiol Enhances 5-Fluorouracil Anti-Cancer Activities in Colon Cancer Cell Lines" Medical Sciences 10, no. 4: 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci10040062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop